TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Lolocraft1 Archive

View 4 posts and 1,184 comments by Lolocraft1 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
169

False AccusationLolocraft1/r/MensRights29/01/24 01:47 PM
124

GeneralLolocraft1/r/MensRights06/06/23 01:53 AM
30

Activism/SupportLolocraft1/r/MensRights14/02/25 04:18 PM
15

False AccusationLolocraft1/r/MensRights28/01/23 03:00 AM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,184 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
44

"Men dies, women most affected" moments. Men cannot suffer of anything, it always gotta be about women
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/07/26 09:45 PM
145

And of course the girl will face absolutely not criminal repercussions, and best thing the family can do is go through months, if not years of legal procedures to get monetary compensation, which will be a delusionaly low amount for making someone kill himself This is why we need laws against false allegations. But no of course, believe all women, you’re just a salty incel
/r/MensRights13/07/26 09:43 PM
0

>There’s over 22 millions women who will be raped, versus 7 millions men raped and FtP I literally wrote and aknowledged that very same number in my comment. If you do include sexual coercion, it’s 15.5 millions more women, versus 6.8 millions more men. Yet again, there’s more female victims than male victims. Yes male victim go underreported, so does women. In one of the first sources I’ve listed, it shows only 1 in 5 report from women is taken seriously by the authorities I don’t know why you …
/r/MensRights10/07/26 05:28 PM
0

The American laws doesn’t label this as a definition of rape. The other guy asked me for a definition of rape before talking about it, which I did. You’re only looking at the last of a chain of comment and wonder why you don’t understand. "To force someone to have sex with" also include FtP because it’s forced non-consensual sex From your own source, they say that in a lifetime, there’s over 22 millions women who will be raped, versus 7 millions men raped and FtP. I can’t explain why the numbers…
/r/MensRights10/07/26 12:33 PM
-6

… I literally brought up three sources in my first comment… what the hell are you talking about Definition of rape, according to the Cambridge dictionary: to force someone to have sex when they are unwilling, using violence or threatening behaviour: As for rape specifically: 91% of victim are women, 99% of perpretator are men. This means for sexual crime of any kind, men and women are victims at similar rate, but women are drastically more victim of rape than men. In either case, the majority of…
/r/MensRights09/07/26 07:41 PM
-3

Yes, as I literally said. The first one does, the second was to show that 1/4 men will suffer from sexual assault in their life, therefore close to the 1/3 for women Granted, it talk about sexual assault in general, but I don’t think it’s worth the nitpicking. The point is even though women have it rough and most perpretators are men, men also have it rough, just slightly less, and in the end male rapist are barely 1% of men I just added them as extras, because it also go against the rhetoric th…
/r/MensRights09/07/26 01:38 PM
-7

It’s because it is. It’s aknowledged by governmental studies. That being said, it’s 95-99% of rapist, not men. Also, the victim percentage by gender is similar, the amount of false report range from 2 to 10% and the majority of sexual assault of any kind comes from people the victim knew beforehand, not total strangers https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/11-627-m/11-627-m2024051-eng.htm https://www.nsvrc.org/statistics/ https://www.humboldt.edu/supporting-survivors/educational-resources/statisti…
/r/MensRights09/07/26 11:01 AM
2

Cis just mean cisgender, AKA when your gender align with the one you were assigned to at birth. That’s a definition people may apply to in gender sociology By your logic trans is also a slur
/r/MensRights30/06/26 11:38 AM
1

Same logic. Laws are there to protect people from harm. We can debate what cause harm and what don’t, but the purpose of the justice system, like its name suggest, is to give people people justice The debate here is if banning abortion bring justice to an infant, or does it remove justice to people who want to have a choice to be parents or not
/r/MensRights11/06/26 12:40 PM
0

If you want to be specific, let’s say abortion should be legal for the time being where a fetus develops a functional nervous system, unless a medical emergency that ensure to safety of the mother have to be done
/r/MensRights11/06/26 12:38 PM
0

I agree that where the line is is debatable, however this means there’s a line, therefore abortion can st least be partially legal, not outright banned
/r/MensRights10/06/26 08:48 PM
1

Well, that grounds to how American fundamentally function politically. It’s a confederation, which means States have a lot of right compare to the federal government. You would need to change the constitution to make Roe v. Wade immune to any change of legislation. From this point on, if Americans want to protect their rights, they gave to vote less dumb, and Republicans made sure to vote as stupid as possible
/r/MensRights10/06/26 08:47 PM
0

The government doesn’t make us pay taxes because it’s greedy and want money, it’s to finance public services. Or at least it’s supposed to be like this. In Canada, we pay more taxes to pay for an universal healthcare You can argue what should we spend taxes on, but the point remains that it’s to spend on something collective
/r/MensRights10/06/26 08:44 PM
1

You think one’s body is comparable to taxes? As for the draft, well yeah it sucks… which is exactly why men’s advocates want it gone.
/r/MensRights10/06/26 11:58 AM
1

Yet it stood since 1973. Nearly half a century. And it failed not because of the bill itself, but because a group of highly rightwing-biaised judge overturned it
/r/MensRights10/06/26 11:57 AM
1

A fetus isn’t alive until the last few months of pregnancy. Abortion aren’t killing babies. Therefore, the government shouldn’t ban people from using it. Especially when there are several cases when it become even more justifiable, such as childbirth, other medical condition which could harm or kill the mother, or just birthing a child in an unhealthy place due to negligent parents who were never ready to be ones in the first place
/r/MensRights10/06/26 11:54 AM
1

And my point is that you can’t make assumptions about my knowledge of American politics, and if you truly think I’m saying something wrong, then you are free to correct me. If you can’t, or don’t want to, I have no reason to believe I am far off. Either you provide counter-arguments, or your point has no value You don’t want to discuss abortion because "you’re not interested in it". Not only is that odd because the topic of abortion has been a controversial debate for the past years, but I also …
/r/MensRights10/06/26 11:51 AM
1

So you just come here, say I don't know what I'm talking about, and when asked to elaborate, removes yourself from any burden of explanation? Yeah no, I'm not gonna listen to you if you won't give justification to your claim. Again, using that very same logic, any non-British complaining about men not being legally considered as victim of rape do not know the context of such laws, nor is it likely that they have a full understanding of them. I may not know from the bottom of my heart the current…
/r/MensRights09/06/26 04:59 PM
1

Then you are free to elaborate how Trump electing republican judge at the supreme court, which then overturned Roe v Wade, which allowed abortion to be made a state right and this penalized in more than 10 states, is actually not Republicans’ fault
/r/MensRights09/06/26 12:26 PM
1

Your body my choice!! -Actual statement made by republican after Trump’s election The lack of self-awareness hurt both me and our cause
/r/MensRights09/06/26 02:20 AM
-3

Never said it wasn’t a problem, on the contrary. I want both gender to have a form of abortion. In fact, you being anti-female abortion is hypocritical if you want to complain about the absence of male paper abortion Do you know what Republican says to women? "Your body my choice". That’s vile.
/r/MensRights09/06/26 02:18 AM
0

Except that we can, as there are specific times where the fetus develop a brain, a nervous system, etc. By your logic that we consider human life as soon as there is a living entity which compose it, sperm is alive and therefore masturbation is murder. After all, sperm and ovules have human DNA as well Beside, there are case where abortion is necessary, such as stillbirth and other complications. Finally, kinda hypocritical when one of MRAs main request are male paper abortion
/r/MensRights08/06/26 06:59 PM
3

I ain’t British? Besides, you don’t need to be from one country to understand its politics. By this logic most users here talking about british rape laws would be in the wrong
/r/MensRights08/06/26 06:54 PM
-8

Republicans made abortion illegal in half the country, to the point where it can be punished with the death sentence. Wtf are you on about
/r/MensRights08/06/26 03:02 PM
1

Not only it’s not forced unto you because there is both a main female and male character, but even if you were forced to play as a woman, so what? It’s a game about gangster robbing, assaulting and killing for money. Men or women, we don’t give a damn, the game would still be the same and the city will still be as dystopian Hell, if you think because the MC is a woman the game will therefore be less masculine, literally in the trailer we see urban car race, a strip club and a woman twerking on a…
/r/MensRights23/05/26 04:46 PM
5

A feminists being an hypocrite? Shockers… But considering Hasan’s a communist I’m sorry but he (quite literally) had all the red flag that he’s an idiot. Don’t give too much credit to an extremist
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/05/26 04:02 PM
1

Some women don’t know what they wants. That being said, that explanation is dumb. It’s literally a fallacy.
/r/MensRights14/04/26 03:23 AM
7

"I agree. Let’s also teach girls not to virgin-shame, not body-shame and falsely accuse boys" What happen next is either they force themselves to agree, or they protest in which you show his own hypocrisy right to his face" It’s not fundamentally a bad thing to focus a problem on the demographic group that perpetuate it more, but in the case of men usually it’s a misandrist hypocrite who would be outrage at the idea of doing the same thing to women. Hell, if the context allow it you can even dro…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/04/26 04:11 AM
2

Patriarchy means men are in charge. That imply being expected to go to war, be the breadwinner and the worker. If men are forced to be drafted because they’re men and "it’s their duty", this is how patriarchy can be misandrist
/r/MensRights13/03/26 12:14 PM
12

Because like I said numerous times, your "temporary change" end up being sexist against men. Replacing a form of discrimination by another form of discrimination is stupid and contradictory Should we make white people only store as a temporary solution for the majority of shoplifting being done by black people?
/r/MensRights01/03/26 11:03 PM
66

Exactly. So instead of making discriminatory train car, we should focus on actually fixing the problem. Congratulation, you’ve just explained why this entire thing is worthy of a circus It’s not whataboutism when you specifically said we should stop all rape. Besides, even if you didn’t, it’s still true that women rape other women, and that train car by sex is discrimination just like white train car were
/r/MensRights01/03/26 06:33 PM
76

You realize a woman can also rape someone, including other women right? If it was truly about "stopping all rape" each cabin would be individual. This is just pseudo-equality that in the end is just discrimination. Literally the same thing was done with black and white people, with "white only" train car. We went so far left we ended up on the right
/r/MensRights01/03/26 06:15 PM
12

I’m touch starved and I approve this.
/r/MensRights09/02/26 12:17 AM
1

Yes, even if someone is rich, if he need help, then he deserve some help. Rich or poor, if you forgot your wallet and can’t eat for a whole day, your stomach’s empty, regardless of your economical status So again, appeal to normality. What’s happening is irrelevant to decide what should be happening. This is the fundamental point of ethics, and if you can’t understand that, it means it’s pointless to argue with you and you shouldn’t be voicing your opinion on the Internet, or anywhere whatsoever
/r/MensRights08/02/26 05:16 PM
1

Then your take about men being stronger is totally irrelevant, yet you felt the need to add it to the topic. Maybe you just put random informations under posts and this particular one was poorly received, but by best guess is you purposely wrote this to push the idea that we shouldn’t intervene when the victim is a man, or that they deserve it.
/r/MensRights08/02/26 02:46 AM
2

Appeal to normality. Just because it has been normalized doesn’t mean it’s good. Regardless of the strength of someone, attacking them is wrong and people should step in to help, unless the person is specifically asking not to. That’s called equality It’s also because physical strength ≠ mental strength. Some very strong people have weaker mental health that can prevent them from defending themselves, believing they deserve it or aren’t that strong. It’s a tool abusers use constantly. Comparing …
/r/MensRights07/02/26 10:24 PM
19

This is literally what you said: Men have the potential to do much more damage even if we didn't mean to. It's because we are stronger. It's a fact of life. If you’re not implying that men should feel violence because we’re stronger, nobody have any idea what you’re trying to say
/r/MensRights07/02/26 01:50 AM
33

So what you're saying is that you, a commenter using a username on an internet forum are the true feminist, and the feminists actually responsible for changing the laws, writing the academic theory, teaching the courses, influencing the public policies, and the massive, well-funded feminist organizations with thousands and thousands of members all of whom call themselves feminists... they are not "real feminists". That's not just "no true Scotsman". That's delusional self deception. Listen, if y…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/01/26 12:35 PM
3

I think it’s more that they’re hypocrite. Many times they will justify it with "well men weren’t oppressed" as if it was true and if it was even a justification to oppress them
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/26 07:11 PM
34

Then call it for what he is: A fascist. If it’s that easy to yell at them, you don’t need to insults him on things that everyone, regardless of their stance about ICE, can feel insecure and attacked about. Yes you attack MAGA rightist, but at the same time you make collateral damage on short leftist who have to hear those insults as well. They don’t magically become deaf just because they agree with you That’s literally a reason why people who originally agree would turn against you. It’s border…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/01/26 10:37 PM
4

Because even though this specific example is outdated, the problem remains. In many countries gays are much less tolerated than lesbians, both legally and socially Also because why shouldn’t we dunk on Nazis? It’s not a bad thing to talk about the atrocities this regime did
/r/MensRights12/01/26 12:50 PM
57

To me the worst one is the proportion of rapist. When they’re told that male rapist represent less than 1% of men, they claim it is justifiable to hate men and be afraid of us because "you wouldn’t eat from a bag of candy if you knew one of them is filled with cyanide" Because not only is it dehumanizing to compare people to food, it’s also that if anyone were to use the same rhetoric toward black people, gay, trans, women or anyone else, they would witch hunt the guy. They understand this logic…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/01/26 11:14 PM
1

Too many people on this sub have a doomer mentality where instead of trying to defend men, they believe it is futile and thus prefer to push down women instead This is why I consider leaving this. The only reason I’m staying is they allow freedom of opinions and allow post directly denouncing misandry and criticizing (not hating, criticize) feminism
/r/MensRights28/12/25 05:10 PM
1

Progressism for women, conservatism for men. That’s how the world have evolved
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/12/25 03:42 PM
16

There’s a difference between not being a virgin and having participated in intense sexual activities like orgies and porn I don’t consider myself redpill and wouldn’t care about the past relationship of my girlfriend, but I do would mind about her having banged 10 dudes in a single night or have her as an actress in adult movies
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 06:52 PM
0

For crying out loud I’m just gonna repeat what I wrote when I saw this meme on MemesOPdidnotlike, it is not the point of feminism What feminism want is for women to have the choice to choose between both those lives, instead of being coerced into one of them. They have nothing against women who hold more traditional values as long as they’re choose it and that they’re free to change their lifestyle if they want to. Same for the opposite, feminists would be concerned if a woman was forced to go a…
/r/MensRights12/12/25 01:58 AM
4

What does this have to do with my point?? If you’re going to be a condescending prick, at least be clear enough to be understood
/r/MensRights01/12/25 08:35 PM
11

I’m not sure I understand the link with the picture… the only thing I get from it is black women blaming white women for Trump’s elections. At best it’s anti-white racist but not misandrist
/r/MensRights01/12/25 04:50 AM
40

That’s not misandry. And if it is it’s not that bad. And if it’s bad the women have it worse. And women have it easy then men deserved it. Mentality I’ve seen way too many times when pointing out this behaviour
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/11/25 04:22 PM
2

Less children in more developped countries has always been a mystery to me. Shouldn’t it be the other way around? When you’re dirt poor you don’t wanna have too many mouths to feed, so the number of baby should be lowered in poor countries
/r/MensRights18/11/25 03:41 PM
3

Denmark being actually progressive to the point where "progressists" are getting mad about progressism
/r/MensRights18/11/25 02:40 AM
-4

Ehhh… I mean if my girlfriend give me oral, I find myself obligated to do the same to her It sound so unfair doing something less pleasant for you than it is to your partner, then him/her refusing to do extra effort for you as well
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/11/25 01:24 AM
9

The whole "punching up" thing is hypocritical. "We wanna achieve equality but only we are allowed to make fun of you. Now root for us or you’re a misogynist you pig"
/r/MensRights20/10/25 07:55 PM
7

That’s a great explanation! Now, let’s apply this to feminism.
/r/MensRights09/10/25 01:18 AM
57

"Why don’t you make effort to look attractive to women? Just be confident!" "Where are all the good men?"
/r/MensRights07/10/25 04:01 PM
0

Then again, you are free to explain the punchline of your joke, as well as elaborate on your overall point The other guy also asked you this, and you keep avoiding his request, just falling back into "it’s a joke! It’s just a joke!" and condescending insults. If we’re truly that oblivious, it shouldn’t be hard for you to explain it correctly. As the other guy said, you avoiding it tells more than any of your comment
/r/MensRights01/10/25 02:48 PM
0

Nope, I’m pointing out you "joke" that these cosplayers are cosplaying the red women and not the grey cast, but then double down saying none of these women got hurt because it’s fiction, meaning nobody of the grey cast got hurt either. That make your "joke" pointless, if we can ever call it a joke because again, I seriously doubt you were genuinely joking If it wasn’t about my point, then what were you trying to say exactly? Why bother mentionning my comment history in the first place You wrote,…
/r/MensRights01/10/25 02:25 PM
0

In that case, since it’s fiction none of these women choose to be sex slaves to a man either. But of course it’s a problem only when it dit your narrative. Hypocrite My posting history is irrelevant to my point, and I ain’t no alt account or some Keyboard warrior helping people loosing arguments. I’m counter-arguing you because I think you’re wrong and an idiot. That’s a shitload of assumptions. It’s not even true anyway, I’ve been commenting regularly here for years Your first comment is a proo…
/r/MensRights01/10/25 01:46 PM
0

Same goes for that article, yet here you are. I suggest you cut immediately with the condescending part. I’m highly doubting you even meant it as a joke in the first place Regardless of what word is used, the point is the women in the book aren’t free of choice. They didn’t choose to be used as sex slaves. The book is all about a distopia where women and men are forced into their strict gender role. Cosplaying as them is as much of a message than cosplaying as the grey cast (and as the other use…
/r/MensRights30/09/25 09:38 PM
25

It’s a men’s issue because vigilantism isn’t the way, and now someone was murdered, and considering the circumstances, people will defend her. And as it turns out, he wasn’t even convicted, so at best there wasn’t enough proof to legitimately consider him guilty, at worse he was innocent.
/r/MensRights15/09/25 11:45 PM
1

the Darwin Awards commemorate individuals who protect our gene pool by making the ultimate sacrifice of their own live https://darwinawards.com/rules/ Darwin award is for stupid people who had a stupid death Kirk defended guns and died by guns. That’s dumb
/r/MensRights11/09/25 01:07 PM
3

I know what Darwin award are. People who died doing dumb things Kirk defended guns his whole life and called victim of gun violent unfortunate, but necessary. And he became a victim of gun violence himself. I’ll argue that’s ironic enough
/r/MensRights11/09/25 10:50 AM
-32

Kirk’s just dumb because of his opinion on guns, and his death ironically show he was wrong from A to Z regarding this Plus, he literally stated that gun-related deaths were merely "unfortunate accident that are necessary to keep our 2nd Amendment". He became victim of his own choice of words Did he deserved to die? No, nobody deserve to be shot. Was he all dark? Probably not, as OP stated. But is he a Darwin award candidate? Absolutely
/r/MensRights11/09/25 03:10 AM
20

Because the UN recognize the Men’s mental Health month Edit: Nevermind, it’s not recognized either
/r/MensRights27/08/25 05:09 PM
15

Depend if she did it because she believe he shouldn’t date anyone else (IE she’s a femcel) / because she hate men, or if she’s just clinically insane But I’ll say a jealous male ex murdering his ex-wife out of jealousy is pretty mysoginist
/r/MensRights30/07/25 07:46 PM
5

Extremely rare mod W. Need to be said Also the fact they don’t agree and there’s even a comment saying it’s in women’s rights to complain freely about men tells a lot about what’s the actual goal of these individuals
/r/MensRights24/07/25 10:18 PM
9

It’s about men because it’s men who are being forced to draft. Systematically, in every country, at every war These soldiers being men is irrelevant. You can be a man and be misandrist
/r/MensRights01/07/25 10:19 PM
0

How is this sub even active yet?? The most upvoted post from the past month are straight up transphobic. Even for Reddit’s standards it should’ve been banned long ago
/r/MensRights29/06/25 10:41 PM
2

Considering LGBT+ are also a demographic group victim of a significantly higher suicide rate than average, it’s like if a straight tiktoker made jokes about the 41% saying "it’s all trans molesting children" But I doubt those hypothetical tiktoker would be allowed ever again to post anything on social medias, on the contrary to the misandrist ones
/r/MensRights14/06/25 03:48 PM
1

It’s not just about the laws, it’s about who’s getting raped more. And whether we like it or more, women get raped at a far higher rate than men
/r/MensRights08/06/25 01:19 AM
1

We aren’t talking about America only, there was no specification of that anywhere. Unless you’re telling me you’re gatekeeping Reddit to American content only?? I hope it’s not the case, or else you’re really a clown Besides, some of theses issues do apply to America. The US literally just passed a law so that women who have a miscarriage get condemned for "accidental abortion"… how is that not a problem for women
/r/MensRights07/06/25 12:14 AM
0

What does more father wanting to stay at home have anything to do here? Whataboutism again! Provide sources for your claims that somehow scientists are being silenced about this, and valid one. And another attempt at blatant whataboutism and I end the discussion.
/r/MensRights06/06/25 06:29 PM
0

Strange, because https://www.canada.ca/en/women-gender-equality/gender-based-violence/intimate-partner-violence.html https://www.newarab.com/news/hundreds-pakistani-girls-sold-brides-china?amp Meanwhile your videos based their source on the Google AI, which is among the least reliable sources I ain’t saying it’s a competition either, I’m saying women suffer from sexism, just not on the same topic as men. Male virgin shaming and female slut shaming aren’t incompatible. Stop with the whataboutism
/r/MensRights06/06/25 01:28 PM
1

Bull. Shit. There are some places in the wor’d where it’s legal to marry 8 years old girl, but where the age of consent for joys is higher. Some where women are still not paid the same wage as men for the same efforts on the same fields. There are some places which lack a lot regarding rape laws, even though worldwide sexual crime victims are mostly women The simple fact you think women struggle absolutely nowhere is a giveaway that you are far from being egalitarian.
/r/MensRights06/06/25 02:15 AM
1

Higher rape rate? Stereotypes? Domestic violence? Traditional expectations? Slut shaming? Some countries where underage girls are used as sex slaves or sold as wife and it’s perfectly legal? Yeah no, cut the crap.
/r/MensRights06/06/25 02:13 AM
0

Again, how does that make MRM anymore egalitarianism? You guys don’t talk about women’s issues, that make you by definition not egalitarianism. Stop pretending to be something you ain’t and stop being hypocrites, blaming feminists for something you are doing yourselves
/r/MensRights06/06/25 02:10 AM
-5

Men’s rights Activists are egalitarian… sure. I never saw anything related to defending women’s rights in any MRA spaces. Stop with the hypocrisy
/r/MensRights05/06/25 04:30 PM
-5

"A movement focused on one gender must be destroyed so that equality be done by a movement focused on one gender" …
/r/MensRights05/06/25 12:01 PM
14

And we don’t like it because she’s saying men are more violent than men when herself, a woman, was violent to a man It’s more about the irony of the situation and hypocrisy of that user than just "we don’t like it" Take any other situation, and it would be the same. A male user saying "Not all men are rapist! You’re just lying! Rape doesn’t happen!" and when you scroll down his post history you realize he made a thread about how he was sentenced to rape, would be as ironic and hypocritical as
/r/MensRights29/05/25 11:27 AM
-1

The post doesn’t show anything. It’s a question and we’re here to answer it And beside toxic feminism, one reason for men to mock other men is the patriarchal expectation of "men can’t be weak". They expect gender roles from men and bully the ones who doesn’t fit to it
/r/MensRights20/05/25 04:25 PM
-5

Feminists are against patriarchy. Men who hold patriarchal beliefs defend it, because they think men can’t cry, be raped or in general be in a position of weakness, hence why they mock male victims
/r/MensRights20/05/25 04:16 PM
2

You can be a man and misandrist, especially when you hold patriarchal beliefs
/r/MensRights20/05/25 03:08 PM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/9Kg9RbVK0c Nothing of what you assumed is true, except defending the existence of patriarchy, but as something that harm both men and women, and not something that is caused by men in general I didn’t mentionned these "examples" because they’re either anecdotal or false. Provide sources that show it happen AND that several feminists organizations have defended I’m not denying it never happen, but I’m denying it is systematic and rooted in feminism But most i…
/r/MensRights16/05/25 01:02 AM
0

Go tell that to the echo-chamber. The second you defend feminism you get downvoted to oblivion. There’s that other post of a feminists who was written a couple of days ago, and yet people still refused to believe any feminists could be pro-men And if it’s not the scapegoating, then it’s the abusive generalization of taking a couple of example of misandrist feminists and applying it to the whole organization.
/r/MensRights15/05/25 12:49 PM
0

Yep, instead they call you slurs, bury their heads in the sand when faced with evidence that they’re wrong, especially if it’s pro-feminism, and will get offensive really quickly when they feel like it Seriously I’ve been called the R word more than once here, for being pro-abortion And while I’m talking about that, rightwing echo-chamber isn’t very welcoming as well
/r/MensRights14/05/25 08:52 PM
-2

That doesn’t change the fact you do exactly the same. If you were the one in power you would be shitting on women and women’s rights and apply your oppressive ideologies Considering I see a lot of anti-abortion people around here, I’m kinda afraid of that outcome
/r/MensRights14/05/25 07:33 PM
-1

And MRAs do the same here by scapegoating them for literally everything. Every single thing that a man suffer through is Feminism’s fault. Of course they ain’t gonna engage with you guys with that mentality
/r/MensRights14/05/25 05:57 PM
19

Because commenting on this subreddit get you permanently banned from like 30 different subs, including feminists one And because of the anti-feminists circlejerk. If we don’t make it an environnment propice and welcoming, of course they won’t even bother
/r/MensRights14/05/25 02:59 PM
1

As OP said, you can be egalitarian while focusing on only one gender. Feminism is egalitarian while focusing on women’s rights, and MRA do the same with men. I never saw anything about protecting any women’s rights in this sub in 4 years And no, the majority of feminists do not believe the system is solely rigged against women. That’s the point OP is trying to make you all understand
/r/MensRights13/05/25 06:25 PM
0

Yes it is. But yeah, I could phrase it as "MANY feminists says the system hurt both men and women"
/r/MensRights13/05/25 06:22 PM
-1

https://allin.tulane.edu/content/timeline-history-sexual-violence-us The American colonies defined rape in common law as “carnal knowledge of a woman 10 years or older, forcibly and against her will.” This conception of rape excluded male survivors and normalized acts that would now be considered statutory rape Not only was the system rigged against women, it was also not even labelling it as rape for men. Another proof that patriarchy harm both Now your turn, show me proof of legal obligation t…
/r/MensRights13/05/25 06:21 PM
0

It is absolutely fallacious to say every single feminists believe exactly the same. Guess what? We can do exactly the same for MRAs: They’re all virgin incels angry at women for not dating them. How do you like that? That and the whataboutism of mentionning UK men when I’m talking about the USA If you can’t even make a point without making fallacious arguments, then there is no point in continuing further this conversation
/r/MensRights13/05/25 06:18 PM
1

I dont’ understand your question Feminists says the system hurt both men and women.
/r/MensRights13/05/25 05:18 PM
0

Yes, at a time where men got the paycheck of their spouse, were allowed to vote while women couldn’t, where the age of consent was at 10 for women and where rape was so predominant and where the laws was really light on it I dare you to say black people weren’t dominated by white people back then. The only difference was they didn’t had any privilege or rights at all
/r/MensRights13/05/25 05:16 PM
-1

I didn’t said you were abusive. An abusive generalisation is a fallacy where you generalize an entire demographic group over the action of a part of it. It’s a fallacy because it shift the blame of a minority toward the majority by basing it on a characteristic that isn’t inherent with the issue. Patriarchy mean men are in charge. But it doesn’t mean men have all the rights and privileges. It just means men are put in charge of everything, they must be the breadwinners, they must be the strong d…
/r/MensRights13/05/25 05:11 PM
-2

An abusive generalization backed up by a comment you made and doesn’t contain any actual source isn’t a valid argument
/r/MensRights13/05/25 04:30 PM
-1

Because you can’t control what every single self-identifying member of a community say or do. And that’s the same for this community I’ve been in this sub for years, and among all the shit I saw, there was anti-abortion apology, anti-immigration apology, racism, labeling women as "females", the hard N word, and MAGA support This one is no better than the feminist subreddit. An incel echo-chamber full of hypocrites who ask for rights while trying to remove women’s. The only difference is they don…
/r/MensRights13/05/25 04:29 PM
1

Except that no, it isn’t based on any kind of superiority, if not equality for all. That along is something this sub needs to understand
/r/MensRights13/05/25 04:25 PM
-18

Bad comparison. Feminism was based on fighting for women’s rights. KKK’s fundamentally discriminatory because their whole belief is that b’ack people are inferior Look, that’s feminists trying to not be toxic and misandrist. Let’s give them a chance. Because if we just bury our heads in the sand and keep hating on them despite them doing effort, this pointless war will just continue forever Better late than never
/r/MensRights13/05/25 03:24 AM
-15

OP ask question about times where something was used You answer with personal experience Downvotes because it’s not trashing feminists Anti-feminists circlejerk strike again
/r/MensRights10/05/25 02:20 AM
2

Biology student here. Mammals tend to be more polygamous and primates more promiscuous. However, those are far from being absolutes both inter (between species) and intraspecific (within the same species). That’s one thing we need to understand when talking about behaviour ecology/sociobiology. It’s extremely rare that there is only one reproductive method. It usually differs according to fitness (Capacity to survive and reproduce), environnment, competition level, etc. So yes humans may have be…
/r/MensRights07/05/25 11:47 PM
0

I would stop saying it’s only 5 angry women if you provide sources for your fucking claims Funny how you constantly evade each request to prove your claims.
/r/MensRights07/05/25 01:46 PM
0

Again, I downvote because I disagree. That’s what everybody’s does. You’re upset about these thing but dare to talk about coping… You say all of that for feminism, but doesn’t even elaborate on your point. You don’t even show the source for a stat you presented, as I requested. That make me think you’re just taking everything out of your ass. Either provide me with source, or I end the discussion
/r/MensRights07/05/25 01:43 PM
0

Because downvoting = disagreeing. If you don’t like when people disagree with you to the point of being upset about fake Internet point, don’t start any conversation on Reddit If my other source is more valuable than wikipedia and is still pushing that "agenda", then maybe it’s because it’s not an agenda and is just the truth?? Did it really never occured to you that you might be wrong? https://incels.wiki/w/Blackpill There, that’s a link to the blackpill page of the literal incel wiki, and gues…
/r/MensRights07/05/25 01:35 PM
1

You seeing 5 angry women online doesn’t mean all feminists. It baffle me how an MRA, who constantly yap about "Not all men! Not all men!" immediately do the same with things he doesn’t like Either you stop being an hypocrite, or I end this discussion
/r/MensRights07/05/25 01:29 PM
0

Good thing I also added an additional source. But of course you ignore it, as you only look at what go with your way
/r/MensRights07/05/25 01:28 PM
0

Source for that stat? Feminism isn’t based on hating men, it’s based on defending women’s rights You’re the one who sound lime he’s coping. I don’t know who hurt you, but you sound like a blackpill incel
/r/MensRights07/05/25 01:27 PM
1

Feminism ≠ women. I thought I was in a gender equality sub. And even so, not all feminists, just like not all men.
/r/MensRights06/05/25 04:59 PM
1

The "blackpill" (sometimes written as "black pill") generally refers to a set of beliefs mostly held by incel communities, which include biological determinism, fatalism, and defeatism for unattractive people https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incel#%22Blackpill%22 The term black pill, first popularized in the 2010s on the incel blog Omega Virgin Revolt, refers to accepting the futility of fighting against a feminist system. Blackpilled incels are encouraged to either commit suicide or “go ER”/be a…
/r/MensRights06/05/25 04:59 PM
2

Not that I heard of. The most I’ve seen of the pill jargon is the blue and redpill, as well as purplepilldebate
/r/MensRights05/05/25 09:10 PM
1

Whitepill is kinda like blackpill. They believe there is no way to be successful in dating, as women inherently have no interest in 99% of men, and their standards are something which are unrealistic and unachieveable The difference is blackpills use this rhetoric as an excuse to hate women, because if there’s no way of be appealing to them, there’s no point in even respecting them. Majorities of loud incels are blackpills Meanwhile whitepill use it as an excuse to completely separate themselves…
/r/MensRights05/05/25 08:06 PM
3

Still consider myself purplepill and whitepill, but honestly this sub made realize the injustices, such as circumcision, that I was faced with. Wasn’t circumcized gladly, but I didn’t knew how messed up it was It was also when I tried to talk about these issues in feminists subreddits and received severe backlashes and bans for it
/r/MensRights05/05/25 04:57 PM
1

And how am I a bigot, exactly?
/r/MensRights20/04/25 07:35 PM
0

Definition of bigotry, according to the Cambridge dictionnary: The fact of having and expressing strong, unreasonable beliefs and disliking other people who have different beliefs or a different way of life If the only thing you have to say as counterargument to a point is to "keep my insanity to myself", then you are by definition a bigot Either provide me with an actual argument, or keep that attitude, showing me you’re just another delusional rightwing asshole who will never mentally mature r…
/r/MensRights20/04/25 02:22 PM
0

Flour can develop into bread if in the right condition, that still doesn’t make it bread Same for a seed, which can grow into a tree and eventually fruit, but doesn’t make it a fruit nor a tree Just because it can develop into something doesn’t mean it is that thing. Hell, it’s even contradictory as you’re saying it exist and doesn’t exist at the same time
/r/MensRights20/04/25 02:16 PM
22

Really? How does german grammar work?
/r/MensRights16/04/25 07:21 PM
133

It is the other way around. When you say "men" you are talking about all men. You have to specify which type of men to not have your say concern all men
/r/MensRights16/04/25 06:02 PM
1

Stretched my ass. Like I said, it could be a coincidence if it was one or two occurence. It’s not. Maybe he didn’t participated in its writing, be he is sure as hell at least applying it
/r/MensRights16/04/25 11:39 AM
1

Project 2025 is based on conservative ideas Project 2025 was made by the MAGA republicans Trump is a MAGA conservative and applied/plan to apply many of the idea in project 2025 No no actually Trump have nothing to do with Project 2025 How many calories did you burned doing all the mental gymnastics to arrive at this conclusion? If someone apply several politics which are correlated with a roadmap made by his party member, when the concept of a president is to represent said party member, that a…
/r/MensRights15/04/25 09:50 PM
3

It’s not a question of who have it worse or not, it’s a question of who’s getting opressed on a specific subject You saying men don’t get oppressed because women are, when it is literally LEGAL to cut non-consenting newborns penis, is ignorant and misandrist, and a fallacy known as whataboutism Men and women get discriminated and oppressed, just not on the same things. Hell, sometimes they do and it’s just a question of at which scales
/r/MensRights15/04/25 08:41 PM
1

Bullshit. There are things that were on Project 2025 that are some of the decisions he did or plan to do Project 2025 talk about strong reinforcement of immigration laws, Trump reinforce them and even mass deport immigrants, including some which are already citizens Project 2025 talk about reforms in the FDA, Trump defund the FDA Project 2025 talk about overturning climate changes and environmental reforms, Trump remove himself from climate changes conventions and become more close with Oil lobb…
/r/MensRights15/04/25 08:38 PM
1

A foetus isn’t a living being biologically speaking. It isn’t biologically independant and barely feel any stimulis depending on the week. Hell, the brain’s barely developped. It’s organic mass, not an organism
/r/MensRights15/04/25 02:55 PM
1

He elected the highly conservatives judges that overturned Roe v. Wade, and plan to extend the abortion ban on all 50 states according to Project 2025 He already did a lot, and plan to do even more
/r/MensRights15/04/25 02:53 PM
1

Then your sister is an hypocrite, but that doesn’t make abortion less of a problem
/r/MensRights15/04/25 02:51 PM
4

I agree with you, but let's not make this into a war of who's having it worse, especially when women don't have access to abortion in half the states, and because of Trump the other half may lose it too. That's what drive outsiders out of the issue But yes, circumcision on underage boys should be illegal. Don't give a shit about your damn religion. And those mods are power-tripping assholes
/r/MensRights14/04/25 11:32 PM
1

And I find no problem in that. As another user pointed out, unequal pay is illegal in the UK. That mean they were legally in the wrong for doing so, and feminists/female workers had every rights to sue for discrimination If a company went bankrupt after being told to pay their employees fairly, in no way it is feminists fault for asking for women to be paid equally to men
/r/MensRights13/04/25 09:55 PM
0

And blaming feminists for a wage cut after they asked for equal pay would be like blaming MRM for a higher count of single mom parenting because so many dad abused the system to run away after banging without a condom, for asking for equal abortion rights Again, that’s unhinged to blame the one who asked for equality instead of the person who decided to push down men instead of pushing up women
/r/MensRights13/04/25 12:15 PM
0

If a company is bankrupt, then regardless of equal pay or not, wages would have been cut anyway This is scapegoating feminism for literally asking same wage between men and women… Sorry not sorry but there’s no mental gymnastic out of this one, just say you are a mysoginist
/r/MensRights13/04/25 04:50 AM
1

The city (because from what I see on Google, the bin company is part of the city) is so poor they need to cut wages instead to have equal pay… bullshit
/r/MensRights13/04/25 04:47 AM
0

Except that it’s not what happened? The lady isn’t in another restaurant? Just like the women working for that garbage company? They asked for the same pay as men and instead of highing up their pay, they decide to lower men’s one… That’s just wrong on many levels, and feminism isn’t to blame for asking the same pay
/r/MensRights13/04/25 04:45 AM
-6

Be angry at the guy who decided to make it equal by affecting negatively men instead of pushing up women Blaming feminists for this is like being mad at someone who complain she didn’t had a chair to sit on, and the waiter answered by removing your chair saying "there, now both of you are equals"
/r/MensRights12/04/25 05:38 PM
0

And instead of blaming the company for reducing the pay of men instead of making women’s pay higher, it’s feminists to blame for asking equal pay? You’re going against the wrong persons
/r/MensRights12/04/25 05:35 PM
1

That’s the name of the drawing google does for special occasions Now that Trump is elected, there are no google doodle for women’s day, black history month, pride month, etc. Instead of pushing men upward, now everyone else has been pushed downward
/r/MensRights10/04/25 11:10 PM
-20

Well now we resolved the problem. Trump is elected, so no more google doodle for anyone.
/r/MensRights10/04/25 05:55 PM
18

Blaming another man for it on top of thay
/r/MensRights10/04/25 03:26 PM
1

Because not only are the majority of men, just like the majority of women, aren’t participating in casual sexism, but most importantly, even for the ones who are, you can’t know until you have proof of these specific person being casually sexist That "horde of men" are being punished for something they didn’t, because 99% of the time discrimination is de-individualized, meaning the culprit isn’t being considered as a single person, but as a representative of whatever demographic group it is part…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 02:42 AM
9

You are 100% correct, but at the same time if they actually were agreeing with the fundamental message, they would have said so, while commenting how he shouldn’t be quick to judge women about how they actually hate this double standards also That’s not what any of them did, in fact they didn’t even adressed the point. They immediatly went for ad Hominems, attacking the person instead of the opinion. That alone is enough to be considered a fool
/r/MensRights08/04/25 12:29 PM
2

It is is absolutely the same. Man is a social construct. A biological female but who appear and identify as a man will be treated as such Hell, if there are any difference, trans men suffer both from transphobia and misandry
/r/MensRights06/04/25 09:49 PM
-2

I mean, trans men exists. And hell they’re among the best to tell how men and women are treated differently considering they’ve been both during their life There was a FtM trans guy who said in a video how lonely it was to be a man and how nobody give a damn once she became an he
/r/MensRights06/04/25 06:43 PM
1

Doesn’t necessarily kill, but I’ll say getting circumcised without your consent as an infant is far from being just "annoying". Same for the absence of male paper abortion, lack of male homeless shelter in proportion to female ones, legal definition of rape which make it nearly impossible, legally speaking, for a woman to be charged of rape, and thus not charged in many country (Ex. UK), and the social acceptable of female pedophile predating boys compared to the opposite
/r/MensRights25/03/25 05:55 PM
-11

The serie is about a boy being falsely accused of murder. How is this male hating? A serie talking about false accusation sound like a really good idea
/r/MensRights24/03/25 04:45 AM
12

Well can you at least get a restraining order? There has to be some sort of procedure so that she isn’t allowed near you
/r/MensRights16/03/25 05:40 PM
18

Get a restraining order. Pretty sure it can be justified considering what happen. Also consider to talk with a therapist for your nightmares and trauma
/r/MensRights16/03/25 03:34 PM
10

OOP also used the term "moids", a pejorative term which is the contraction of "men" and humanoid, to dehumanize men, mostly used by femcels (and shitposters, but that’s another case) This is the type of people who would probably go apeshit at the mere mention of men’s advocates
/r/MensRights15/03/25 02:40 AM
1

Menfluencers, tate-like and incels have beliefs way different from men’s advocates, as they are more focused on hating women than defending men Media bashing men and mysogynistic movement aren’t incompatible. Both are assholes
/r/MensRights12/03/25 04:31 PM
0

Being against international women’s day but being for international men’s day is by definition misogynist
/r/MensRights09/03/25 04:27 PM
-1

Lot’s of incels and other misogynist undercover here. Anything positive about women is mentionned, don’t know what to reply because they know damn well they would present themselves as hypocrites for speaking against it, so they just downvote and move on
/r/MensRights09/03/25 05:00 AM
2

International women’s day is bad and gynocentrist, but international men’s day isn’t problematic? Beside that blatant hypocrisy, both those days aren’t just to celebrate penises and vaginas. They are to celebrate men and women’s success through history, celebrate what they are currently doing for society, and talk about the on-going struggle each have to face
/r/MensRights08/03/25 07:17 PM
4

This is the thing the left does pooree than the rights. The right also hate some class of people, but at least (and at worse for everyone else), they are aware of the consequences, being they won’t get the vote of those demographic groups. But here’s the thing: They don’t care about those votes, because they don’t care about those voters The left hate men and white people, and afterward complain that men and white people aren’t voting for them. They are hypocrites, and until they realize it, the…
/r/MensRights04/03/25 11:45 PM
4

What is the Wall? Never heard about this before
/r/MensRights02/03/25 04:03 PM
1

I could try, but I don’t know if I want children or not, so I’ll have to consider it
/r/MensRights02/03/25 02:25 PM
2

I link this https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/SCS2VCJ75H And I add that downplaying misandry as just an annoyance is not only misandrist itself, it’s also a threat to the the security of men who could be faced with dangerous act of misandry, as well as being a huge disrespect toward the victims of misandrist atrocities
/r/MensRights28/02/25 04:06 PM
1

Well, according to my source, no. Do you have any sources that come from better sites or journals, or that are younger than the one I provided?
/r/MensRights27/02/25 09:00 PM
1

Because it wasn’t until 1974 that a bill was passed to prohibit credit discrimination based on gender In reality, in was more in the 60s that women gained their right to have their own bank account https://www.oneadvisorypartners.com/blog/the-history-of-women-and-money-in-the-united-states-in-honor-of-womens-history-month?format=amp So, not exactly correct, but not that wrong either. But nonetheless, that’s just blatant whataboutism to use women’s struggles as an argument to say men’s struggle d…
/r/MensRights27/02/25 05:41 PM
1

Because that’s an abusive generalisation, an argumental fallacy. And because it isn’t fair for women who did nothing wrong and for the one who support men
/r/MensRights27/02/25 12:24 PM
0

And because misandrist does it, we should do it? TBF I’ll understand why you would say yes, because it sucks to be considered as such. However, you cannot deny the whataboutism of this take. Nobody should generalize hate I am sorry for what happened to you, but understand that by your logic, a woman who got groped by a male family member have every right to hate men as a whole
/r/MensRights26/02/25 11:05 PM
0

If it’s not about all women, then we have to precise which one we are talking about. Not individualising people is one of the root cause of discrimination Not doing it doesn’t make us any better than misandrists ranting about "men" being a problem
/r/MensRights26/02/25 07:47 PM
-4

My brother in Christ. I saw on this sub MRAs - Defending pro-life - "Men and female" - Defending incels - Abusive generalisation of women over any kind of topics More than once. And you can add to that the use of the Hard N-word and MAGAs defending Trump Not to say there’s no misandrist feminists, but it’s a wild take to say there’s no misoginy among MRAs
/r/MensRights26/02/25 06:17 PM
13

Not necessarily misandry. GenZ have realised a romantic relationship isn’t an end goal and you shouldn’t spend your life searching for it
/r/MensRights26/02/25 01:12 PM
3

FragileMaleRedditor What is supposed to be a place where we laugh at men actually being fragile about gender issues, has turned into a misandrist circlejerk Last post I saw was about how Womenareviolentoo, a subreddit ce tered around women being violent and especially against a man, was a "sub full of fragile male redditor" Argued that denouncing violent women doesn’t make you fragile (Hell, aren’t feminists praising the courage of a woman denouncing violent men abusing them?), and after an argu…
/r/MensRights24/02/25 06:30 PM
2

Only found something about the Hart building, and from the images, they were like a dozen with some signs, with one guy arrested for climbing on a sculpture. It was hundreds of people yelling, climbing by force, looting, and even more, that protest wasn’t asked by the president himself by lying about the election being rigged
/r/MensRights23/02/25 03:24 PM
5

So? Where are your sources that they were let in
/r/MensRights22/02/25 06:58 PM
7

That is not true at all https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2022/01/04/politics/fact-check-capitol-insurrection-january-6-lies […] about 140 police officers were assaulted while trying to stop the mob from breaching the Capitol. There were hours-long battles between police and rioters near some entrances Why were policemen assaulted and in such high number if they were "let in"?
/r/MensRights22/02/25 06:57 PM
4

Because if they started shooting, you would have started complaining about how the left shoot at anyone disagreeing with them My brother in christ, they forced themselves in the capitol, they LOOTED stuff and bragged about on social medias And excluding the blatant whataboutism of justifying an attack because another one happened, point to me when democrats invaded the capitol
/r/MensRights22/02/25 06:46 PM
24

I have to frequently use it because each time I talk about men’s issues there’s at least one person who call me an incel or a misogynist. Because in their mind anything that involves talking about men in a positive way is seen as an attack on women
/r/MensRights21/02/25 09:26 PM
1

You know what we say about broken clocks. They’re right twice a day, doesn’t remove the fact they need to be changed
/r/MensRights20/02/25 09:02 PM
41

And I’m pretty sure if a female stripper did the same thing, there wouldn’t be so much outrage either, if not maybe by a different group of people
/r/MensRights16/02/25 11:19 PM
2

It’s not an argument of authority if the authority in question is an authority in the topic’s field of knowledge. A biologist using is authority to explain how evolution work isn’t an argument of authority. That same biologist doing the same thing to explain how a nuclear reactor work is one, as he have no authority in physics. The UN are the biggest worldwide entity that study and watch over the world in its globality. I am pretty sure they would know if women have it bad somewhere And no, the …
/r/MensRights16/02/25 04:59 PM
9

You do not, because except for reproductive rights and gender quotas, what that green user said is true. And he/she provided sources that are coming from serious organization. I don’t see how you can debunk a source coming from the United Nations Where he/she is actually wrong however, is that because women have it bad on some topics, that invalidate every topic where men have it bad. That’s just wrong, it’s a fallacy known as whataboutism. So in the end, the other user is saying the truth for t…
/r/MensRights16/02/25 03:10 PM
0

I can guarantee you a lot of black people care about the Black history month, same for LGBT and women for their respective event as well If not there wouldn’t be protest about it
/r/MensRights15/02/25 02:35 PM
0

That’s true, I give you that. Though I’ll say the difference is veterans aren’t exclusive to men even if they compose the majority of them, and fathers is specific on dad struggles and not men’s in general
/r/MensRights14/02/25 06:45 PM
0

How can we make people care about "something real" when they aren’t even bothered by a doodle?
/r/MensRights14/02/25 06:44 PM
3

Like I said, personally I’m all for rememberance of oppressed groups. Even if it’s probably true they only do this for profit, at least it actually push towards tolerance, if done correctly What I despite is the hypocrisy of men being left out despite being objectively oppressed as well
/r/MensRights14/02/25 06:43 PM
0

It’s true that maybe months is too much, but at the same time a single day doesn’t feel enough either I’ll say we cut in the middle and make them into weeks. That way we have 52 of them, that seem more than enough
/r/MensRights14/02/25 06:41 PM
42

Radical feminism (and other leftist ideologies) is one of the reason why Trump managed to be elected again How are American men supposed to vote for the party that not doesn’t care about you, but also downright hate you?
/r/MensRights13/02/25 12:27 PM
6

I just got permaban from FragileMaleRedditors because there was a post saying that the members of the Womenareviolenttoo sub were fragile male. I pointed out that it’s not fragile to denounce violence, especially when it’s men denouncing violence done against them, and got permaban The mod in question literally wrote "Misandry don’t exist". I checked her bio and she describe herself as a "Feminist killjoy" Not only is misandry real, but the one who are supposed to be for gender equality are sayi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/02/25 09:07 PM
12

Bigotry and hate come in every gender. It’s pointless to make men and women solely and as a whole accountable for anything
/r/MensRights12/02/25 02:19 PM
3

That it’s a fallacy known as an appeal to nature, and she who live in a glass house shouldn’t be throwing stones
/r/MensRights02/02/25 04:43 PM
2

How so? Bring humble and admit your wrongdoings is bad now? OP messed up, attacked a group for the actions of one, said he was being kind and polite while he was making abusive generalisation. I think they deserve at least an apology as bare minimum
/r/MensRights31/01/25 05:06 AM
-8

Honestly the best you can do right now is go apologize to the mod team of actual lesbian, possibly make a proper comment in that post on AmItheDevil (even if it’s totally understandable if you won’t), and go find support in one of the subreddit I’ve mentionned
/r/MensRights30/01/25 09:14 PM
7

You looked for closure in the wrong subreddit. Or at least didn’t formulated it correctly for the place you were seeking it If you had a problem with lesbians before, you should have talked about those specific lesbians while keeping in mind that they didn’t bullied your friend because they were lesbians, they bullied him because they’re assholes. Being an asshole doesn’t have a gender orientation
/r/MensRights30/01/25 09:10 PM
1

Hence why I say they should have kept your post up. But damn, if you’re this self-aware, why didn’t you just posted on a subreddit like venting, or suicide watch, or malementalhealth? Why did you go and attack lesbians who did nothing wrong in their own safe space??
/r/MensRights30/01/25 08:55 PM
-9

You made a post containing abusive generalization toward lesbians asking "why they hate men so much" As much as I can understand your grief and agree a permaban without warning is too much, what point were you trying to make exactly? Imagine if a woman posted here asking why men/MRAs hate women so much
/r/MensRights30/01/25 08:44 PM
0

I don’t need anything, thank you. Just please be aware that gender-neutral words and sentence changes nothing to our lives, but make the whole difference for the one impacted. It’s just a change of a single word, so I think yes, everything will be alright
/r/MensRights21/01/25 01:33 PM
0

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328317436_Reducing_a_Male_Bias_in_Language_Establishing_the_Efficiency_of_Three_Different_Gender-Fair_Language_Strategies#:~:text=In%20both%20experiments%2C%20results%20indicated,words%20contained%20a%20male%20bias Here’s one about it can impact non-binary people (yes it’s not women, but the logic is the same) https://psycnet.apa.org/buy/2024-82371-001 Here are some additionnal, but not verified, sources: https://broodcare.com/gender-neutral-terms-take-aw…
/r/MensRights21/01/25 01:31 PM
0

I was told that it come from Old English and that it was indeed referring to humans in general, and even an ancient word was also used to describe specifically men today (virrman) But I made the point that it was an ancient form of english not used today, and therefore since its meaning evolved through time, using etymology is biaised. Therefore, the word "man" as it exist today describes men, not humans in general Because by using this logic half of the sentences we use daily would make no sens…
/r/MensRights21/01/25 01:16 PM
1

Which part? The part about how man can include women, or the part where I explain it doesn’t matter anyway because it shouldn’t be like that?
/r/MensRights21/01/25 01:03 PM
1

And why is that, exactly?
/r/MensRights21/01/25 01:02 PM
1

Aaaaaand other attacks, because it seems simpletons are a plague in this thread! At least you provided an argument. It’s useless and bad-faith, but hey at least it’s one It’s bad-faith and useless because we are having an ethical argument, which therefore mean that we talk about how things should be, not what they are. It is also an useless argument because the "Ok then why don’t you do it" rhetoric provide nothing to the argument By this same logic, why don’t any of you MRAs stop bitching about…
/r/MensRights21/01/25 12:46 PM
-2

Learn about damn fallacies.
/r/MensRights21/01/25 02:30 AM
-2

Yep, so since womankind imply both women and men, then I guess by your logic and the logic of everyone who disagree with me say, we should therefore say "womankind"?
/r/MensRights21/01/25 02:23 AM
-5

Appeal to tradition. Just because the word had a different meaning doesn’t make my point wrong. In every language, at every time, words evolves. Sticking to a 500 years-old definition is bad-faith argumentation. Maybe you ahould save your "schooling" to understand this, which we learn in the first grades of school. Regardless of if it’s women or men being erased of existence, using gender-neutral terms such as human make it even for both sex, which make it ideal to avoid this kind of problem
/r/MensRights21/01/25 02:21 AM
1

Words change their meaning over time, and that is a fact for every language that exist. Saying that it isn’t offensive because of the old meaning of a word is an appeal to tradition, a fallacy. And yes, it does disminish women. If you think it’s bad for male SA victim to be labeled as women, imagine that but for humanity’s achievement (or even failures) Hell, it can also be offensive to men. Imagine if we said, when talking about for example a female serial killer, that it is "the worst of manki…
/r/MensRights21/01/25 02:14 AM
1

Of course. You find nothing to reply, so you fall in Ad Hominem attack. Just say you are a simpleton who hate being faced with different opinion and be gone
/r/MensRights21/01/25 02:10 AM
-3

I am not talking about how it should be introduced, more that it should, period. And it’s not just a small incovenience, it’s disminising women who are part of humanity Like I said, it’s how the British law wasn’t changed to include men and boys in "sexual violence comitted against women and girls" because "it’s mostly women who are victim of it". How do you think male victim of sexual crime feel when hearing this? Do you think we shouldn’t be offended by it because it’s "gendered language, whic…
/r/MensRights21/01/25 01:27 AM
0

It’s not the same at all. By this logic, we should call it womankind
/r/MensRights21/01/25 01:22 AM
-10

That’s not misandrist to say human instead of man? What are you on about?? Because it seems like it’s quite the opposite, it’s a gender NEUTRAL form If you feel offended because we should use a gender neutral term over a male-only one to refer to every human that exist, and if it is that much of a difficulty for you to adapt to it, then the problem is on you. English isn’t even my first language and I’ve been saying humankind for years
/r/MensRights20/01/25 11:17 PM
-2

English does have a gender neutral form for this specific case, because we are literally talking about genders: Man and woman. Therefore, "human" seems more appropriate to talk about things humanity did I am not complaining that chairs don’t have a gender, my point is that human does, and saying mankind erase every other gender from the sentence, and I feel unless we are specifically talking about men in the topic, and no other women, then we shouldn’t mind saying humankind instead I refer you t…
/r/MensRights20/01/25 11:14 PM
-26

We can also use humankind, which propose a gender-neutral word with the exact same meaning
/r/MensRights20/01/25 09:06 PM
-12

Good. It can. Now, read about the second part of my comment
/r/MensRights20/01/25 09:05 PM
-69

How does "man" include women?? And even if it does, that little girl have a point, it’s not a good thing that half the population get hidden being a meaning which put the emphasis on one It’s like British male SA victims being labeled under the term "violence against women and girls"
/r/MensRights20/01/25 07:29 PM
21

What
/r/MensRights19/01/25 02:36 AM
21

I just discovered this, and the awful numbers with it. How in the flying hell didn’t I learned about this earlier!? WHY ARE PEOPLE NOT TALKING ABOUT THIS
/r/MensRights19/01/25 02:32 AM
8

Since patriarchy is about putting gender into specific moles, it make no sense for it to end up being entirely misogynistic because both men and women suffer from it. Isn’t it what many feminists says? That patriarchy hurt everyone? If so, then misandry is pretty much real and all the example he can come up with, regard’ess of being due to patriarchy or not, is misandry Because in the end, whatever the hell you think patriarchy is, or if it’s real or not, misandry keep the same definition: The h…
/r/MensRights11/01/25 11:00 PM
2

This wouldn’t work just like a woman only city would not. Just the mere fact that even wanting a non-gay relationship mean you must go will transform it into a ghost town after 2 weeks. It would need to have constant immigration of habitants, which by correlation would come from cities that allow women to live in, so basically impossible to be self-sustainable
/r/MensRights05/01/25 02:59 AM
1

I supposed it would be more acceptable, but nontheless, we’re talking about HIS/HER money, the other spouse only had business with it when they were married. Divorce shouldn’t be some kind of easy money maker To me, marriage mean being with your love one, your other-half, for the rest of his/her life. To me, it’s an engagement of love. It’s not some kind of economical partnership. And a divorce mean who you thaught was your other half is in fact not, and prefer to go your separate way to find yo…
/r/MensRights04/01/25 10:32 PM
1

What’s wrong is Jolie’s taking 80 millions that she doesn’t need. Just as you said, it is supposed to be calculated based on each other’s need… what needs does Jolie have to fulfill for her to receives 80 millions when she is already, as you stated, a multi-millionnaire? And how can’t she live correctly post-divorce without that 80 millions? She have a career just like Brad Pitt, and a very lucrative one. She isn’t some kind of hobo with nothing in her hand. She is a goddamn celebrity! What’s un…
/r/MensRights04/01/25 06:46 PM
4

Then explain this specific case, because I don’t see how there should be any money given to any of them considering their already huge economic status
/r/MensRights04/01/25 03:33 PM
2

Except that it’s not what an incel is about. An incel is a man who not just don’t get laid, but also blame women for it, with a pinch or racism and homophobia You are still a virgin at 30? That’s fine. You say the reason is because women only want the "Chads" and "Tyrones"? You’re an incel
/r/MensRights02/01/25 02:52 AM
13

"Why does it matter? Love goes beyond frontiers" "The "slave" also choose to be with me, you realize that?" "So you’re saying [Country inhabitabts] are less educated than us? That sound kinda racist" Or one that work for all: "Sound more like you aren’t tolerant toward race-mixing. Begone you bigot"
/r/MensRights31/12/24 04:24 AM
155

As it should. 25 years is a proper sentence for a rapist IMO
/r/MensRights21/12/24 03:35 PM
22

One of the commenter have a name written in hindi… There is no ethnicity better than another. In all you will see misandrist piece of shit of like this
/r/MensRights20/12/24 10:47 PM
11

No no you see there is a reason she did it. Maybe the father was violent and she didn’t fell safe giving him the child /s
/r/MensRights19/12/24 06:24 PM
26

I hate it when cheaters justify themselves by saying there was something wrong with the relationship/lover How is that even an excuse? If you aren’t satisfied with your relationship, then you break things off first before going after someone else. Because the other person is still trying to be loyal toward you and cheating instead of telling him/her the truth is a breach of trust
/r/MensRights16/12/24 03:54 AM
1

How did you determined that one or other behaviour is an exceptions?
/r/MensRights15/12/24 10:48 PM
26

Complete bullshit. Both men and women can cheat by fucking around and by seeking romantically for another partner. There are dozens of cheating post here where the woman cheat with another man out of sexual frustrations
/r/MensRights15/12/24 10:42 PM
5

She abandonned a child. That’s absolutely a crime and she need to be punished. It was already immoral to not talk about it with the father, but she didn’t even sent it to a proper orphanage establishment, that make it legally abandonment You’re saying I’m looking way to far in your character, yet you assumed a lot about the dad that we know nothing about. Hypocrite. If you can’t understand how awful this situation is, then yes, maybe you should leave. You are literally glad that a woman gave up …
/r/MensRights15/12/24 05:15 PM
6

Because innocence until guilt is proven. That’s how it work, how it always worked and how it should work. Why do YOU automatically believe it’s a man’s fault when a woman act criminally? You don’t know him, you don’t even know his name, he’a barely even talked about in the article, yet you are saying that she did because the dad is certainly 1. A wife beater, 2. A non-provider and 3. A child-neglecting parent… It sounds like you have way too many stigmas about men and you should honestly stop. T…
/r/MensRights15/12/24 02:50 PM
7

Except that we’re not talking about banning abortion or forcing a woman to get pregnant. We’re talking about a mother abandoning a living baby without the dad’s consent Again, what is your point here?? How is any of your point even relevant to this post??
/r/MensRights15/12/24 02:58 AM
-7

Because this sub have a pretry big anti-abortion echo-chamber… yet they complain about wanting a male paper abortion Typical reddit hypocrisy
/r/MensRights14/12/24 07:03 PM
21

Consenting to sex ≠ Consenting to parenthood. This is exactly why we have female abortion. And how is this even relevant here? We’re talking about a parent abandonning his baby without the other parent’s knowledge
/r/MensRights14/12/24 07:00 PM
59

Being able to cheat in a job application resolving around saving lives is a dystopia becoming reality
/r/MensRights12/12/24 12:37 PM
2

It depend on which definition of patriarchy you’re using The Cambridge dictionnary have two official definition: A society where men are the leaders A society where men control women and where they use their power in their advantages https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/patriarchy The nuance here is that while controlling women and use everything for our own advantages imply that men are superior in every way, in contrast being a leader also include some burden that are complement…
/r/MensRights30/11/24 05:17 PM
9

She mentionned that the victim is a British male, and in the British legal system, a man can’t be a victim of rape by a woman because the definition of rape is a penis forcefully inserting itself in a person’s hole. Therefore, a woman who force herself to be penetrated can’t be criminally punished by rape So yes, victims of any crime need to take action to receive justice. But what do you do when the justice system doesn’t even see you as a victim?
/r/MensRights23/11/24 05:02 PM
2

That would mean blood loss from periods is indeed different from peeing, thank you for clearing the situation Now to see if this will pierce through the minds of the other commenters…
/r/MensRights23/11/24 01:52 PM
0

The cramps aren’t systematic with the bleeding?
/r/MensRights23/11/24 01:25 AM
14

OP’s point is that in both cases, it’s bodily fluids which can be willingly stopped (Putting a pad and, well not peeing), unless like you say with a case of medical issue Not the same, but same logic
/r/MensRights22/11/24 11:13 PM
0

Having the control of society ≠ Having the dominance Male navajo didn’t have political control, but they were seen as dominant nonetheless, hence why they were still seen as the breadwinner Meanwhile, according to the Amazons mythology, women were seen as the dominant, so they are the one fighting and hunting
/r/MensRights19/11/24 09:40 PM
0

Difference is what are considered as matriarchal societies aren’t matriarchal in the sense that they’re the opposing of patriarchal societies like ours. Navajos are called matriarchal because women hold primary powers, meanwhile patriarchal societies mean it revolve around male dominance I personally hate this because it’s basically two different definition for words that are fundamentally opposite to each other, and it’s really confusing when you want to discuss on the topic But for now, I’ll j…
/r/MensRights19/11/24 04:12 AM
2

Which matriarchal societies?
/r/MensRights18/11/24 09:48 PM
1

Pretty sure it was way more than just the 1%. In fact that was the opposite: The 1% of women could escape their gender roles and be rich, influential and even powerful. But for the 99% more, qomen were stay-at-home and that’s it. Hell, in some place they couldn’t even have their own salary (it was under their husband’s name), if they could ever get a job at all, where they were paid significantly less than men. They didn’t had the right to divorce (even if men in some place couldn’t do it either…
/r/MensRights16/11/24 01:46 PM
-6

And how so, exactly? It seems you are believing that because from a point of view where the reality was patriarchal, a matriarchal society wouldn’t be different when the whole point of men being sent to war and be expendable is because they are labeled as the leader who need to take care of things. If the gender were reverse, where it was now women who had to be the one in charge of things, then they would be logically the one sent to war and be expandable
/r/MensRights15/11/24 07:04 PM
-9

"Put" in charge in the sense of being in charge. Man get money and protect, woman do chores and nurse offsprings. Two gender with each their respective roles. And both men and women don’t have the choice but to abide to these roles Hence why patriarchy also hurt men since even being in charge can be a bad thing, especially when people get toxic expectation
/r/MensRights15/11/24 07:01 PM
-10

Eh… yeah? Matriarchy would be as bad and patriarchy, but since it’s about women having to be in charge, they’ll be the one being sent to war and considered as expendable workmeat, meanwhile men would be told to stay at home and do nothing with their life other than taking care of kids Patriarchy is a system where men are put in charge, and since the burden of charge is also a problem, this is why we say patriarchy hurt men too. It’s all about men and women being forced into molds
/r/MensRights15/11/24 04:30 PM
1

..what are you fighting for? im sorry, but you haven’t been oppressed for thousands of years :/ it’s only now that you’re being discriminated against; and just a little bit. This is your first comment in the chain Was this supposed to be some kind of sarcasm that nobody got? I don’t even see anywhere where feminism is even mentionned
/r/MensRights15/11/24 12:29 PM
10

So how can you say men aren’t being oppressed, or at least discriminated, when you just listed five example of how men need to defend their rights? Like, why can’t we do something on International Men’s Day about male vulnerability, sexual assault and other patriarchal standards that you’ve listed? Because the fact that we weren’t oppressed as much as women is just plain whataboutism
/r/MensRights14/11/24 05:32 PM
9

My mother telling me men hate independant women and women who don’t let their voice not be heard No I don’t mom, can you please not put me and my brother in the same basket as whoever misogynist is at your workplace?
/r/MensRights14/11/24 04:41 PM
6

Meh, let them have their body autonomy. You can’t force anyone to have a child (And yes I know about men not being to abort, that’s not the point), or marry, or be in a relationship Either we learn to be happy without women (MGTOW), either we find a woman who actually appreciate us and will not deny the need of a healthy relationship. If those women aren’t aromantic and asexual, then they will lose regardless of the outcome
/r/MensRights09/11/24 02:25 PM
-2

Already happened, Trump won
/r/MensRights08/11/24 08:07 PM
35

The party who is supposively inclusive and respectful of every demographic group suddenly blaming a specific ethnicity for losing the election The irony
/r/MensRights07/11/24 11:46 PM
1

This is exactly why the Two-Party sustem is a joke You only have two choices who are the complete opposite of each other. No place for middle ground, barely any place for nuances, no differenciation on the topic of one’s belief. It’s you or them. You are rightist on economy but want to support trans rights and abortion? Fuck you. Either you give up on your economical belief, or you your social one And it create a barrier of ideology between the two, inherently placing you in situations where you…
/r/MensRights07/11/24 04:54 AM
1

Which therefore mean some people care. What did the Men’s Rights Group did to support women during the overturn of Roe v. Wade?
/r/MensRights06/11/24 09:02 PM
0

Because it’s a myth that nothing is done for men in return https://nnomy.org/index.php/en/content_page/item/931-feminists-against-the-draft.html#:~:text=Feminists%20Against%20the%20Draft%20is,of%20abolition%20of%20the%20draft And because you will never get any kind of support if you never support anyone in the first place
/r/MensRights06/11/24 05:24 PM
0

It’s understandable for people to be upset. Not only retaking rights take a lot of time and struggles, especially when half the population is against it, but also in the meantime people are affected by it Yes women could get back their rights for abortion after Trump, but how many years will it take? The conservatives judges who overturned it will be here until they literally die. That could take more than a decade. And in the meantime, more and more women will continue to die, and many more wom…
/r/MensRights06/11/24 04:33 PM
5

And they’re left leaning… even when you agree with them, you will be blamed
/r/MensRights06/11/24 01:25 PM
1

Pretty sure he meant he doesn’t shame anyone, just by looking at the rest of his post Beside, if he indeed meant that Trump has no shame, how is this appealing to people, exactly? Why would anyone vote for someone who can’t be sorry about his wrongdoing?
/r/MensRights04/11/24 12:46 PM
1

When has any immigrant ever ate a dog/cat? And if it did happened, was it one or two anecdotic, isolated case or is there really some kind of immigrant network about the consuming of house pets? I won’t argue over Harris saying there are no laws giving the government the decision to decide the fate of a man’s body when there is a male draft
/r/MensRights03/11/24 10:50 PM
1

Elaborate.
/r/MensRights03/11/24 10:47 PM
3

Explain how I misunderstood then
/r/MensRights03/11/24 07:53 PM
8

Trump have no shame Meanwhile Trump wanting to pass Trans people as pedophiles, and literally saying in an official debate that immigrants are eating pets He absolutely shame, but instead of shaming men, he shame minorities, immigrants and religions other than protestants
/r/MensRights03/11/24 07:39 PM
5

"Yeah sorry we can’t be friends, I’d rather slit my wrist in a bathhub than go near a black person again. Thank you for respecting my boundaries"
/r/MensRights02/11/24 12:50 PM
-2

Understanding ≠ Justification
/r/MensRights01/11/24 02:09 PM
81

That’s a good start, but only three years for pedophilia… yikes
/r/MensRights26/10/24 09:53 PM
6

Which brigading are they even talking about anyway? As far as I know you can’t even comment some subreddit name here precisely to avoid brigading Not only are they doing one of the stupidest and abusive thing a mod can do, they’re also making shit up to excuse it
/r/MensRights03/10/24 11:41 AM
148

It’s easy to say women are better than men at art when you exclude men from the exhibit
/r/MensRights27/09/24 08:26 PM
122

Others have already said it, but it can’t be said enough: Screenshot everything this person sent to you and go file a complaint to the police. There are high chances it’s all bluff, but those are still death and mutilation threats and it need to be taken seriously Hell, even print them as well in case something happen to your phone
/r/MensRights27/09/24 04:06 PM
1

I do believe sex to be necessary in a relationship, but there are nuances to it First one is yes, it has to be a good relationship. You need sex to have a healthy relationship, but you relationship need the will to be healthy to have sex Second is time. You don’t automatically start fucking someone you’ve just entered a relationship with. And if the two partner are young, it’s also normal to consider more about having sex. But that time can be spend into building a healthy relationship, which is…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/24 11:38 AM
5

It’s easy to see yourself as the victim of everything when you ignore everybody else’s problem
/r/MensRights21/09/24 12:50 PM
3

Pretty sure the majority of woman fuck/make love to the one they are attracted to Same logic apply here: You’re saying that somehow, women will go "Mmh this dude is insufferable, is verbally abusive and yell at me all the time… God this make me horny". That doesn’t work like that, unless it’s consented kinks and still that is different
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 01:29 PM
6

That’s just not true. Answer’s gonna maybe vary depending on your definition of Bad Boy, but this whole "Nice guys finish last" and "Women like bad boys" gotta stop Just think about it: Women like abusers?? You’re telling me women, in general, are like "This guy hit me, yell at me all the time and verbally degrade me every time he can… he’s so hot!" Nah bullshit Women like someone who make them feel like they’re your most precious thing they have, and vice-versa. And that translate to listening …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 12:16 PM
-3

Hollywood is not a media, it’s an entertainment industry. Yes, you could count Secondary Education as "media", but in the end what are your claim that they are in control of it? As a Canadian, I’m pretty sure I haven’t seen trace of feminism outside of my history class in primary school and secondary 3 and 4. And maybe the reason Feminism is involved in Hollywood is due to the countless of evidence that countless of women are treated like subhumans in the industry? Ever heard of Weinstein and Po…
/r/MensRights17/09/24 01:52 AM
-5

There are so many things which doesn’t make sense here that I don’t even know where to start Ok first of all, how is Feminism even in control of the media? Especially when there are medias like X and Fox News What does the birthrate of women during the Great Depression has to do with this? Birthrate in general has decreased over the last decades, not exactly because nobody is attracted to each other anymore, but because now women aren’t expected to be baby-making machines and also because the nu…
/r/MensRights17/09/24 01:27 AM
2

Internet usage has widespread anti-feminist propaganda and at the same time widespread radicalist feminists to come out of the shadow and show themselves for who they truly are
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 01:19 AM
3

Make it 1 million per year + jailing
/r/MensRights13/09/24 03:28 PM
2

Yeah ok that’s fair
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/24 01:40 PM
4

Well this is what I don’t understand. Why would you let other people desire your husband when you can have him all for yourself? And like I said, I don’t understand the appeal of having with other women while being already in a relationship with someone else either. Because why would you be in a relationship with someone if you’re not going to have sex with her (Outside of being too young to have sex and excluding the time to decide you’re with the right person)?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/24 11:13 AM
2

If a cuck isn’t aroused by a partner having sex with other people, then what the hell is a cuck?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/24 02:00 AM
5

Why would their partner even stay in the relationship if they’re going to have sex with other people in the first place? Why "burdening" yourself with a cuck? Sex is a key part of a healthy relationship, and cucking straight remove it for both partner, and only one of them ever get pleasure from it: The cuck. There is literally no point for a hotpartner to be a hot partner, because he/she can just be with someone else.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/24 01:57 AM
7

Because the concept of being a cuckqueen/cuckold is to be sexually aroused by having your partner having sex with other people. By definition, it mean if you are the one having sex with others, your cuck partner doesn’t have sex with you, because he/she is not aroused by it Hence why I say a cuck doesn’t actually lust over you, they lust over you having sex with others Beside, even if it wasn’t how it work, when I enter a relationship with someone, I want to have sex with this specific person, n…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/24 12:00 AM
15

No. Immediate Redflag. 100% chance of ending the relationship right now. I want a partner which have dignity and self-respect, and who actually desire me enough to have sex with me instead of having to fulfill my needs with fuckfriends
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/24 08:55 PM
0

Do you seriously think anyone would actually pay someone to spend his time writing "Propaganda" on Reddit? You’re delusionnal
/r/MensRights09/09/24 02:36 AM
6

I don’t believe so. Some women are extremely bigoted, some men are too Stupidity is universal
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/24 12:45 AM
2

As much as I agree with the complaining part, by experience of being in that sub for many years, they don’t complain about women specifically, they complain about Feminist and Feminism as a whole… it ain’t that better but it’s not a misogynistic movement And considering the amount of post linking to newspaper, posts, videos, etc. everyday about women doing absolutely awful things, I can guarantee you they aren’t complaining about "nonexistent" women
/r/MensRights07/09/24 12:42 PM
0

And when have feminists as a whole or a majority of feminists, across the world, have ever said that a woman can not rape a male minor? When have they ever said boys failing as school pretended it wasn’t an issue? And keep in mind that not adressing something ≠ saying it doesn’t exist Yes, some feminist branch did make some controversial choice and belief such as TERFs, or Indian feminists who refused to allow a gender-neutral law to be passed in India. But then again, they are not the same femi…
/r/MensRights07/09/24 03:07 AM
1

Ajortion is absolutely a right. It’s part of the bigger right of body autonomy. To say it’s a privilege to have control over your own body isn’t just delusional, it’s an incel take. So yes, "killing" fetuses is absolutely a female right The rest of your comment is just plain whataboutism about how men have problem as if it negate the problems women had to go through. My point is simply that yes, women were also victim of oppression, nothing more.
/r/MensRights07/09/24 02:52 AM
0

You ask me to check my fact without citing any sources. And then you wonder why I talk about Feminism scapegoating and circlejerking… Beside, this would not bring anything to the topic, as my point isn’t that everything is due to men, my point was that yes, a majority of men have tried in the past to dictate what a woman should have the right to have and what she shouldn’t, as the comment I was responding was very ignorant about women’s fight for human rights, against an elite which was for the …
/r/MensRights07/09/24 12:28 AM
0

It is scapegoating when under every single post, the top comments constantly end up being blaming Feminism for the issue the post is bringing up regardless of what the topic is and without any further elaboration, with some exception Boy getting raped by a woman? Feminist are to blame! Boy failing at school? Feminism is the cause! Male mental health? Those damn feminists! Feminist feminist feminist feminist feminist feminist feminist feminist. Over and over again. Point out feminist is the cause…
/r/MensRights07/09/24 12:23 AM
-2

Not only is this a wrong definition of patriarchy, as patriarchy is a system where men are put in charge and not a system where they are in control of everything which are made to benefit men, but even if this was the case, where did I ever talked about patriarchy?? Stop the strawman
/r/MensRights06/09/24 11:29 PM
0

Ever heard of Roe v. Wade? You know, the law providing universal abortion to American women which was overturned by a group of six over-conservative men out in position of authority by another man, which was himself chosen to represent his party by deputees which were men for the majority, and is now menacing democracy as a whole for pretty much everyone in the US? …Yeah. Beside, even if it was indeed the case (which is not), like I said, abusive generalisation is an argument fallacy, and use it…
/r/MensRights06/09/24 11:26 PM
2

I didn’t because I myself have been told by big feminist subreddit that feminism was about equality But feminists are welcomed to tell me what are the stances of Feminism on male spaces and the place of men’s issues in Feminism
/r/MensRights06/09/24 07:34 PM
-1

I mean… the echo chamber and circlejerk of this sub is all about scapegoating feminism for everything that happen to men and generalise feminists as a whole. And even if it was actually the case, do you really think anyone will openly greet you and your idea when they are shitting on you and your movement? No wonder many feminist sub don’t really want to engage with MRM subs, or at least this one
/r/MensRights06/09/24 07:18 PM
-1

The feminists I’ve talked to about men having their own spaces seemed to be fine about men having their own spaces, they just disagree with Men’s Rights as a valid one
/r/MensRights06/09/24 12:33 PM
9

Some feminists openly agree with this. Feminism was made by women (for the most part), for women, and they believe it should remain that way. Some feminist subreddit are centered around that view. And honestly, I’m find with it The real question is if feminists are okay with men having their own movement, now that Feminism is considered not for us. And that’s the part where hypocrites come out of the shadow and whine that "Feminism is already about equality! We don’t need Men’s Liberation and Me…
/r/MensRights06/09/24 12:12 PM
0

That’s literally a copy-paste of my last comment, since it look like it wasn’t evident enough for you. How is this moving the goalpost?
/r/MensRights29/08/24 01:07 AM
0

How can you say something was taken seriously if even the LAW didn’t said it was bad or not? Sure, isolated events happened, but then again, EXCEPTIONS DOESN’T MAKE THE RULES
/r/MensRights28/08/24 11:44 PM
1

I didn’t. How can you say something was taken seriously if even the Law didn’t said it was bad or not? Sure, isolated events happened, but then again, exceptions doesn’t make the rule
/r/MensRights28/08/24 11:19 PM
1

As your source state, those were communities action, not legal repercussions, as assault, sexual or not and discrimination against women laws were very laxist https://ualr.edu/socialchange/2018/04/15/reflection-history-sexual-assault-laws-united-states/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9136376/ https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suicide_of_Rehtaeh_Parsons And maybe those mob justice occured because the law wasn’t protecting women enough
/r/MensRights28/08/24 09:56 PM
-2

What do you mean fake? All of my examples are historical realities that you can easily check with a quick google search. Women got their voting rights in the 20s, to divorce in the 40s, to open a bank account in the 60s, 74’ without the husband’s signature, and the first female shelter opened in 1974, all thanks to feminists and women’s advocate
/r/MensRights28/08/24 06:24 PM
2

I don’t see how tradcons advocate for what I wrote in my first section when they believe a woman’s role is to nurture and be a housewife. Conservatives have been for decades against women’s rights in the 20th century. It’s way less that in today’s age, but it was certainly not liberals and progressists who were manifesting against feminists
/r/MensRights28/08/24 06:20 PM
-4

Disagree. Feminism was created to fight for women’s rights at a time where they couldn’t vote, have a salary, open a bank account under their name instead of their husband’s, divorce, or have rape, abuse, and discrimination taken seriously. A lot of young women are acting like all men are evil because they were poisoned by abusive generalisation and stereotype, which modern feminism is more or less at fault depending on which feminist group and ideologies you’re talking about. Nevertheless, thes…
/r/MensRights28/08/24 04:06 PM
8

I know that, but how does that refutate our point? This is exactly why more and more people become anti-feminists Even worse, those echo-chamber also affect moderators, and now you get banned for having a different opinion. How is that suppose to make people interested in the feminist cause?
/r/MensRights27/08/24 12:58 PM
19

https://www.reddit.com/r/NoahGetTheBoat/s/le9lHT10il https://www.newindianexpress.com/amp/story/cities/bengaluru/2024/Jul/22/not-for-gender-neutral-sexual-offence-laws-womens-federation-of-india https://medium.com/@alexandermoreaudelyon/erin-pizzey-the-story-of-the-feminist-who-was-threatened-for-acknowledging-male-victims-a5a810964857 And there are plenty of others. Feminism absolutely deserve to be at least criticized, and it is foolish to think it’s only a "few"
/r/MensRights27/08/24 12:00 AM
0

This is absolutely nitpicking because regardless of how you fucking call them, men are accepted by feminists! This discussion is over. I will not waste my time with someone either trolling or just being a dumbass who believe he have the high ground of a debate by Ctrl+C Ctrl+V the same sentence over and over again when I clearly stated that it doesn’t matter. Fuck off.
/r/MensRights21/08/24 05:05 PM
0

Feminist or ally, it goes back to the same Again, stop with the definition nitpicking, or I’m ending the discussion.
/r/MensRights21/08/24 02:35 PM
-1

Regardless, ally or male feminist both are welcomed in Feminism, and I’m pretty sure you also understood it. Therefore, if it’s not a strawman, it’s nitpicking You have a great day too.
/r/MensRights21/08/24 12:45 AM
-1

Strawman. My point was that feminist accept men in their organisations, that’s all. I don’t know how much time you wasted writing this, but it’s totally irrelevant to my point
/r/MensRights20/08/24 11:03 PM
0

Allies are people who don’t call themselves feminists, but support feminists ideologies. But feminist or ally, it go back to the same Please stop with the definition Nitpicking
/r/MensRights20/08/24 11:02 PM
-2

The No True Scotsman fallacy imply that official and influencial people of a movement or organisation didn’t specified themselves what is and what isn’t a characteristic of their members, and in that case, Feminists are indeed officially saying that men can be feminists
/r/MensRights20/08/24 04:33 AM
-6

Literally just go ask on Askfeminist and they’ll all tell you, or they’ll remove your comment for asking something which was already asked countless of times
/r/MensRights20/08/24 02:54 AM
-5

The majority of feminist would absolutely like to have men as feminist "ally", and overall not having more people to your cause sound like shooting yourself in the foot, hence why even feminism would disagree with the author’s stances
/r/MensRights20/08/24 02:54 AM
41

That would be asking a mod to actually do some effort, which seems too hard for people who sit their ass on a computer all day monitoring people’s opinions and call it a job
/r/MensRights20/08/24 12:37 AM
3

Even feminists would call that article out and his author on their bullshit
/r/MensRights20/08/24 12:33 AM
4

As a r/Rolereversal enjoyer, yes
/r/MensRights19/08/24 10:35 PM
1

I agree with the body count, don’t really care, it’s more about why she have a high body count, disagree with the rest, which is just abusive generalisation, infantilisation and No True Scotsman fallacy
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 04:49 AM
6

That’s not even sexism at this point, this is just racist
/r/MensRights17/08/24 03:06 PM
5

It’s not even that ear piercing is comparable to circumcision, it’s simply that… forcing a minor to have his/her ear pierced is also not okay either. What happened to consent? Shapiro is saying bringing your child to pierce their ear regardless of their will is morally correct
/r/MensRights16/08/24 06:18 PM
239

You want me to prove it’s not all men? Ok. I’m a man, I don’t subjugate any woman to violence. Hell, I was the bullied one in school Case closed.
/r/MensRights15/08/24 02:09 AM
0

It define the American government, which force men to be eligible for the draft https://www.sss.gov If a definition of the dictionary if one of the top world’s University isn’t correct, then I wonder what is My question is about if it is the system which is the cause for all your point, or just a general tendency decided by men themselves
/r/MensRights14/08/24 08:11 PM
-1

That’s not the full definition of patriarchy. To be more precise, not the only one. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/patriarchy?q=Patriarchy#google_vignette a society in which the oldest male is the leader of the family, or a society controlled by men in which they use their power to their own advantage So maybe patriarchy still exist not as a system created by men who solely advantage men, but as a system where men are in charge, because clearly men don’t have all the advanta…
/r/MensRights14/08/24 06:09 PM
-6

The patriarchy mean men are in charges of the household and to make the society running. This is why men are mostly the ones doing physical labor, why men are being told to shut off their emotions, and why things such as "be a man" exist What explanation would you give to all of those examples if it isn’t caused by patriarchy?
/r/MensRights14/08/24 04:55 PM
0

I believe it’s both or can be both. Even if the way you will be perceived depends a lot on others around you, meaning you can be found unnattractive to a lot of people even with confidence, but there absolutely is a part that yourself can play in this by being more confident And it’s because confidence is something a lot of people, maybe women more than men, find attractive, hence the rhetoric. Even if it wouldn’t personally be the case for me, between a woman proud of her achievements, not afra…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 03:01 AM
1

Do we already have protection against police negligence?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 02:48 AM
3

Bro… do I really need to ask this question for that "friend" of yours 😂
/r/MensRights13/08/24 08:17 PM
12

The key is balance. Don’t be ashamed to watch porn, but don’t watch it to the much to the point of having an addiction
/r/MensRights13/08/24 04:55 PM
-15

Patriarchy mean men are in charge of the household. That mean the woman is seen as only good for housechores and taking care of the kid, but also mean men are seen as the breadwinner, and additionally without emotions Patriarchy isn’t a theory, it’s literally the functioning of the occidental culture since their creation, or at least so until the second half of the 20th century when feminists and male advocates started to request more rights for their respective gender
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/08/24 12:09 PM
21

You missed his point. Just because you’re "white" doesn’t mean you’re privileged. Just look at albinos in Africa, or Slavs, and the clichés of pretty much every European country I’m sorry that you had a bad experience with a moderator, but I don’t even see how is that relevant to this situation, and even if it is, you can’t just say we don’t know how to talk about race discourse over one person Rednecks don’t just have an anti-education culture, they live in poverty. It’s like saying blacks have…
/r/MensRights07/08/24 12:43 PM
21

Impressive work as always!
/r/MensRights06/08/24 12:46 PM
1

Unfortunately, except blocking the autoban bots that I’ve mentionned, there’s nothing we can do. Admins don’t give a damn about their own rule. Hell, even when they apply it, it’s so inconsistent that no real logic can be determined The very best we can do is openly talk about this, and criticize it. But considering that the only consistent thing is that any subreddit talking about admin/mod abuse and censorship get systematically banned, we’re in for a long journey
/r/MensRights01/08/24 05:25 PM
4

They can contribue with house chores, or taking care of the bills, the children, or hell, both parents can work and share other chores My point is doing all of that doesn’t give you a pussy pass Hence why, if you’re in a relationship with a woman who doesn’t want to have sex with, then leave her and find someone else. Don’t waste your time with someone who doesn’t want to satisfy your libido and get intimate with you
/r/MensRights01/08/24 05:20 PM
6

The first one isn’t wrong though. You can’t just force someone to have sex with you. But nothing stop you from leaving her for someone who actually like to be intimate with you
/r/MensRights01/08/24 03:28 PM
29

Fun fact: Banning someone for participating in another subreddit is against the moderator’s code of conduct, but since Reddit is either too lazy or hypocritical to apply it correctly, commenting or posting in this sub ban you automatically from maybe 10 different communities One way to prevent this from happening is to block the safebot and safestbot, but it wasn’t confirmed it this work
/r/MensRights01/08/24 02:30 PM
2

I believe that we should be ab’e to laugh about anything, however if some topic must not be made fun of, then it have to be even with everyone If hitting a man in the balls is allowed, then hitting a woman in her crotch, her tits or going further with the pain comedy, making fun of women giving birth should also be allowed
/r/MensRights31/07/24 09:03 PM
49

80 years ago, Rosa Park was being arrested for refusing to let a white man sit in her seat, at a time where people of colour were prohibited to sit in the same places as white people in bus, baseball game, plane, and couldn’t even use the same water fountain. And now here we are, doing the exact same thing with men. We evolved so much in march for "equality" that we went back to the starting point
/r/MensRights31/07/24 01:53 PM
17

I condemn cheating and believe that if you really want it to be over, you explain it to your partner instead of lying, but if that’s her reaction for something which is in the end not a threat to no one, then no wonder he went for other women
/r/MensRights30/07/24 07:20 PM
41

Even if this could legally count as parental negligence, how is that fair for the husband if he was geniusly unaware of the situation? Some people abuse their child for years and even CPS struggle to notice, so it wouldn’t surprised me even a parent don’t see it
/r/MensRights30/07/24 03:35 PM
-1

He indeed doesn’t abort, but he still provide financially and being a parent is also hard mentally speaking. A man should have the right to be linked to a child financially and psychologically for a minimum of 18 years. I hope this help when it is phrased like that
/r/MensRights29/07/24 01:47 AM
1

Pro-Choice all the way because a fetus isn’t a human being and because we should have the right for body autonomy What we fight for is for men to also have their right of financial autonomy and we shouldn’t have to be forced to pay for a child we didn’t asked for
/r/MensRights29/07/24 01:45 AM
1

Good point, lemme fix it Even if it’s true that 56% of parents who leave their family were men, that also mean 44% of them were women, so the difference isn’t that big Now that this simple mathematical error which remove nothing to my initial point has been fixed, would you care to explain now why you disagree with me so much that you just had to make personal attack directed to me? Don’t tell me you just went of your way to make a literal 🤓 meme out of yourself and replied for the sole reason o…
/r/MensRights28/07/24 03:06 AM
5

If he was really talking about suicide in a bad way, the mods would have banned him based on those specific comments. That’s not what happened, he was banned for saying the gender suicide gap must be fixed. I don’t care if he called out for a female extermination in another comment, if the ban was done because he said he likes cheeseburgers then the moderator in charge is an incompetent idiot and do not deserve to be in a position of authority of any subreddit
/r/MensRights27/07/24 04:14 AM
7

His comment simply state to fix the gender suicide gap. It doesn’t necessarily promote suicide, nor hate. It’s a cry of help for men who die by suicide three times more than women If asking for a gender imbalance to be fixed is worthy of a permaban, then Reddit does have an anti-male agenda indeed
/r/MensRights27/07/24 04:05 AM
-1

Sex is a key to a get relationship (except for asexuals), and it’s important to find someone with a similar sex drive to not be in a dead bed relationship Also, having sex isn’t just the key, the sex have to be good, and I’m not talking about genital size. Yes, lesbians have sex less often than heterosexuals, but they have a way higher orgasm rate. And honestly I prefer less sex than being blueballed from more sex where I can’t reach orgasm
/r/MensRights26/07/24 04:54 PM
12

This would have been a great idea if it wasn’t on the same documents that want to criminalize abortion and contraception in the whole country, as well as removing LGBT+ rights, making trans legally labeled as pedophiles, deport immigrants and other kind of messed up shit which will destroy the country as we know it
/r/MensRights26/07/24 05:51 AM
24

Anti-feminist circlejerking happened. As well as conservative circlejerking
/r/MensRights26/07/24 05:47 AM
5

My point isn’t that father leaving their child isn’t a problem, my problem is that it can’t the reason, or at least the only reason men are denied their parental right to see their kids, because women also do it as nearly as often Women leaving because of men leaving not only doesn’t make sense, but also doesn’t redirect the blame solely to the men either. Just like the man, the woman leaving made her own choice. I never talked about child support nor abortion in this discussion? What kind of St…
/r/MensRights24/07/24 03:00 PM
2

What do you mean there are no stats? It literally state in the first sentence that 1/4 children live without a dad. Therefore, 3/4 children have a father figure in their life How does the father being "in the picture" or not have any relevance to mother leaving? By this logic, we should also ask ourselves if dads are leaving because moms are also leaving, and we’re back to the start. Beside, it doesn’t matter, the point is that father and mother leave at nearly the same rate. So saying father do…
/r/MensRights24/07/24 02:15 PM
10

Not only stats from 5 years ago can still be relevant, but also the second one date from 2023. Also how does responsibility matter here? I’m saying it’s not a majority and that women leave their family nearly as much as men. How is it fair for men to get their rights denied because another men left? Also, how about you provide some sources before criticizing mine? You haven’t provided any kind of source even though you are the one which is supposed to have the burden of proof, you hypocrite http…
/r/MensRights24/07/24 01:58 PM
9

It’s true that 56% of parents who leave their family were men, but that also mean 44% of them were women, so the difference isn’t that big, and also that doesn’t mean it’s "most men". It’s actually closer to 25%. Even if that number is scarily high, it’s far away from a majority. https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol40/20/40-20.pdf https://www.fatherhood.org/father-absence-statistic Beside, it’s true that many father are forced to pay child support while being denied the right to see …
/r/MensRights24/07/24 01:46 PM
0

Hence why I said it also depends on the type of weapon they have. Read my comments entirely before talking nonsense Beside, there are other way beside fighting to help other. You realise de-escalating a situation is also part of helping, right? So the fact you go directly for the worst case scenario and constantly fall into the slippery slope fallacy say more about me than you. And finally, I never said men should help women, I say humans should help any other humans, and nothing is disgusting a…
/r/MensRights24/07/24 04:09 AM
-1

Whataboutism. Female abortion being criminalized is bad, male abortion being criminalized is also bad. Same for every other male issues you mentionned. I knew all of them already, I know they are bad, that doesn’t make women issue less bad nor mean women are considered better This is why I’m saying men and women are both being fucked over by the government
/r/MensRights21/07/24 07:47 PM
-3

Workplace discrimination in domains considered more masculine, sexual crimes being not taken as seriously as they should be, female human trafficking being way higher than male human trafficking. Tubal ligation can be denied by the doctor regardless of the reason, while some states still have law which can force sterilization on someone And even if yes, men never had any rights to abortion, that doesn’t make women having it removed a good thing, that’s just whataboutism. And that’s why I said we…
/r/MensRights21/07/24 07:45 PM
-5

Debattable. I would say we’re all more or less screwed by the system. But Project 2025 will surely fuck up pretty much anyone who isn’t a Cis straight white man (Hell, I say that yet Trump want to ban contraception, so no sex right for anyone)
/r/MensRights21/07/24 04:43 PM
-6

I mean the first comment have some legit part. I can’t see how the future can be female when Trump already won the election and if he apply his Project 2025. Women don’t even have the right for abortion in half of the country. I hate the sentence, but those two comments are right Also OP, where is the misandry disapproval and what female supremacy are you talking about?
/r/MensRights21/07/24 03:16 PM
0

No because women NEVER HELP men in distress […] Never helping other human being mean lacking of any moral compass, which make them vile. Also, if they don’t help people, then they are unhelpful. I hope I don’t have to explain this last sentence So again, there is no strawman, and I can’t believe you saw both comments and the response yet still think I answered the wrong argument
/r/MensRights20/07/24 12:10 AM
0

No because women never help men in distress while they expect to be saved at every inconvenience, no matter how minor. […] should convince men to never help a stranger woman out of any sense of moral obligation Either you’re purposely lying, or you have a goldfish’s memory. In both cases, you are just plain wrong
/r/MensRights19/07/24 06:40 PM
1

Not only it is false, because that would mean any of the countless social organisation and social care wouldn’t exist, and even if it was, nothing is stopping us from trying to make it a little bit better, step by step.
/r/MensRights18/07/24 10:32 PM
-2

Depend on how many robbers there are, their size, which type of weapon do they have, if they’re under the influence of some substance, etc. So no, helping someone getting beaten up by someone else while you’re with three of you guys isn’t putting your life at risk
/r/MensRights18/07/24 02:02 PM
-2

The law indeed need to be fixed. In Canada for example, we have the good Samaritan law, which obligates people to help others in need and protect them from jail or civil legal action when helping people. This should be implemented in the US
/r/MensRights18/07/24 02:00 PM
0

That’s still a pretty big number to consider 1 out of 2 women to pick the bear, especially when you take out that statistic out of your ass without any sources to back him up
/r/MensRights18/07/24 01:56 PM
-1

I don’t understand what you mean… how is helping someone in need of help somehow harvesting what you sow? You phrase it like it’s somehow a bad thing
/r/MensRights18/07/24 02:26 AM
-1

A couple of hundred millions is like more than every women on the west. The are like 200 millions women just in the US. Do you seriously think every single one of them will see you as a dangerous person just for being a man? The answer is no, so stop the generalisation
/r/MensRights18/07/24 02:15 AM
-2

And where are the strawman, exactly? She say that women will never help a man, I respond by saying not all women are selfish who will never help a man. Another say you shouldn’t help a woman because she could be man hating, I say not all women think like that The only fallacy here are you who generalise women but afterward will probably complain that a woman generalize men My point is simply that you should put a little but more trust in strangers, especially when their life could be on the line
/r/MensRights18/07/24 02:14 AM
-1

You didn’t say it straight up, however you imply that a female stranger can automatically be a "banshee" or a "man vs bear apologist", hence why the "not all women" Give a chance to people, especially when they’re in need of help
/r/MensRights18/07/24 02:11 AM
-4

Not all women. For an MRA to generalise a couple hundred of women on the billions that exist, that’s very hypocritical of you
/r/MensRights17/07/24 11:03 PM
-13

If that was the case I would have died 18 years ago, as well as around 13 years ago. I don’t know where you get that idea that women are vile, unhelpful creatures, but that narrative gotta stop
/r/MensRights17/07/24 08:55 PM
-7

Hence why I said that I also disagree with the comments saying it’s a man’s duty and not a human duty
/r/MensRights17/07/24 08:52 PM
-16

Of course women will never held that standard if we don’t held it too. I understand double standards may be frustrating, but we’ll never achieve anything if both sides just wait for the other one to do something
/r/MensRights17/07/24 08:43 PM
-31

Disagree with the comments in OP’s post and OP himself. We should be able to help people in needs (as long as we don’t put our own life at risk), however it’s not because we’re men, it’s because we are humans. Therefore, we should expect the same treatment from women
/r/MensRights17/07/24 07:09 PM
1

https://youtu.be/CxJUn21QBz0?si=w2W_uy22WkVitCOP https://youtu.be/xq1ZlHHWnzE?si=XPqr2GMajcMBLrXS
/r/MensRights16/07/24 04:22 AM
10

There are some country where some crimes committed by a woman aren’t legally punishable or are barely taken seriously by the authorities. So no fucking wonder most perpretators stats say men are the majority
/r/MensRights15/07/24 10:43 PM
1

How about explaining to me how I am not making any sense instead of being such an ass about it? But no, of course, double down and make yourself look like even more of a fool who don’t even know what she’s talking about And good, you have a vagina, that doesn’t explain your point for you. I have a penis and I believe you’re an idiot, I guess that make it true?
/r/MensRights15/07/24 10:38 PM
0

Disagree. That’s a meme like any other. It wouldn’t had made any kind of drama, except for some radicalist taking it for an attack against women I can’t prove it further than that because we’re talking about an hypothetical scenario, but think about the number of instance on the Internet or in movies/series/animes where a female character is being jokingly attacked by a male character, and none of them are being seen as a problem…
/r/MensRights15/07/24 10:36 PM
0

You can use any texto slang you want, I still have no idea what is the relevance between what you said and the topic. Hell, the fact you respond with a totally unnecessary comment only depicting your emotions make me wonder if you have any explanation in the first place
/r/MensRights15/07/24 08:03 PM
-6

And how does that make anything different? Are you saying the title is openly clickbait?
/r/MensRights15/07/24 07:15 PM
-1

Whataboutism. What does this even have to do with this post? Beside, I already said under another comment that it was my fault because I misread OP’s title
/r/MensRights15/07/24 07:15 PM
1

Fair enough. I didn’t saw the "should" in the title, making me think OP was saying women don’t lift their fingers
/r/MensRights15/07/24 07:14 PM
-5

Not in the title
/r/MensRights15/07/24 07:10 PM
1

The humor isn’t even towarded men. The joke isn’t even about men, it’s about kicking someone off the stairs because that person is a show off You could replace that character with a woman or any other sentient being ever and it would be the same joke
/r/MensRights15/07/24 06:23 PM
-34

You wrote "women", not "some women"
/r/MensRights15/07/24 06:20 PM
0

Strawman. I’m talking about social gender roles, I never said anything about biology. Biology isn’t necessarily a barrier anymore. Just look at abortion and how MRAs ask for paper abortion. If society take roots from past society, and the past society wasn’t patriarchal, but the reason we have modern gender issue is because men are encouraged to do certain things while women are encouraged to do other… then what is it?
/r/MensRights20/06/24 06:58 PM
-5

Patriarchy never says anything about legal rights. It’s about forcing roles into genders. Yes, both men and women can legally work the ladder, but men are socially more encouraged and seen better doing do than women, at least for the past few decades. Times are changing now, but the current gender stats of rich/influential people, as well as the current male and female issues, take some roots in the patriarchal cultures
/r/MensRights20/06/24 02:34 PM
-15

Naturally men socially are encouraged to work the ladder more than women both positively and negatively That’s… the definition of patriarchy. You just explained how patriarchy work and it how it can also affect negatively men I agree with everything the article says, except for the fact they’re saying patriarchy doesn’t exist. Patriarchy is "men are in charge". Men are supposed to the breadwinner, because of patriarchal belief As much as we can debate about the world being controlled by rich peo…
/r/MensRights20/06/24 03:41 AM
12

"It sounds like men only want a nice woman" Then WTF you want us to like?? I though liking women for their chest size wasn’t a good thing
/r/MensRights09/06/24 11:36 PM
3

I agree with feminists on that one. No girl owe us anything… just like we owe nothing to girls
/r/MensRights09/06/24 11:24 PM
3

Women have statistically more chance of getting raped, roofied and sexually assaulted and molested as children Women are seen more often as a sexual object in some part of the world, as well as their only purpose being making babies In some other part of the world, sometimes in the same country, women’s sex rights are violated Abortion is illegal in many countries, including developped ones like the US, or passible of jail time in some others In many culture, a woman’s place is under her husband…
/r/MensRights06/06/24 07:30 PM
1

Someone who still have the decency to not go into insults the second someone disagree with him. Beside, I’m not the only one who thought the same, there maybe 10 different person here who thought the same When you poorly make your title, don’t expect people to understand, and especially don’t go around insulting people who don’t understand. Not only it make you an asshole, it also give the impression that you can’t actually defend yourself properly and thus need to hide behind insults to keep yo…
/r/MensRights06/06/24 03:14 PM
2

Not just me, many comments from many different redditors When only one doesn’t understand, it’s a lack of comprehension skills, but when it’s 10 on a thread with like 40 redditors on it (at least commenting) the post is just poorly made
/r/MensRights06/06/24 03:09 PM
2

Except that common symptom of the disease can be identified just by what OOP’s been saying about his wife, and comments were sharing personal experiences By your logic, you would need to wait for a doctor to actually diagnose a cardiac arrest before trying to make a cardiac massage I have comprehensions skills, thank you. Show some respect, we’re having a civil conversation. Hell, maybe the reason I didn’t understood is because you leave important details, such as saying that you aren’t implying…
/r/MensRights06/06/24 02:48 PM
0

Then why are you making a post about people asking a husband to take measures to take care of his sick wife instead of shaming her?
/r/MensRights06/06/24 01:07 PM
0

My point wasn’t to make an exact comparison, my point was that we can also compare human beings to other animals without any difficulties I used this example because sharing feelings as a man is extremely difficult, the same way it is for a woman who need to deal with higher rape chances
/r/MensRights04/06/24 07:06 PM
4

The way I see it is I firstly try to have a valid and civil discussion about weither or not it’s a good thing to compare men to bears, but if I clearly see that I’m faced with a bigoted idiot, I’ll just use this exact logic as a last ditch effort to make those people realize what they’re doing I believe the best way to convince someone of their wrongdoing is to go down at their level and beat them at their own game
/r/MensRights04/06/24 03:05 PM
192

My own version of it is: To all men, would you prefer to share your feelings to a woman or a dog? I’ll choose the dog because at least he won’t use it against me later in life Same exact logic, reversed gender. If those "Man vs Bear" trend fanatic are going to discriminate men and compare them to wild animal, nothing stop us from shaming women for not listening to men
/r/MensRights04/06/24 12:00 PM
1

I would very much like to see her sources and argument to such a weird claim
/r/MensRights30/05/24 12:28 AM
5

I wish I knew that before getting banned, thanks for the info for everyone else though
/r/MensRights28/05/24 03:35 PM
3

Well I just got the same message, so it’s on me I guess
/r/MensRights26/05/24 01:04 PM
8

Kinda strange since I never had this kind of message coming from that subreddit
/r/MensRights26/05/24 12:23 PM
8

Number of black bear: 600 000 Number of grizzly bears: 1000 + 30 000 + 16 000 = 47 000 Number of Pandas: 1864 + 600 = 2464 Number of Polar bears: Between 22 000 and 31 000. Let’s take the middle and say 26 500 Total: 675 964 (40 / 675 964) x 100 = 0,0059% of bears killed a human being Number of men: 4 000 000 000 (89 000 / 4 000 000 000) x 100 = 0,0023% of men killed a woman. By years yes, but I didn’t count the number of humans who travel into the woods to meet bears compared to the number of m…
/r/MensRights22/05/24 11:07 PM
4

The art of shooting yourself in the foot
/r/MensRights18/05/24 03:59 PM
-2

Great post as usual, but I’m bugged by the graphic on page 2. How can google search be 100% about male suicide for a whole year?
/r/MensRights13/05/24 03:39 PM
12

I mean this could also be a good thing to clear the child custody bias against men too, who are forced to hand over their child to an abusive ex simply because they’re women. Now will that be applied to both sex is another story
/r/MensRights12/05/24 12:31 PM
17

The series is literally about a woman stalking a man, what are you on about with "men have have ruled the roost the earth"? What does it have to do with this? It’s not that what you said is necessarily incorrect, it’s that it is pure whataboutism Also, yes women are also partly at fault. Not all women, but there is a significant portion saying a man can’t be a victim of abuse, or abusers themselves
/r/MensRights10/05/24 12:17 PM
7

Like I said, biology isn’t the absolute decision of human behaviour
/r/MensRights09/05/24 06:37 PM
60

Biologist here. In nature, all you care about is what we call the "fitness", which is basically your chance of survival and reproduction. The higher your fitness is, the higher your survival chance and reproductive rate are That mean that even in species which are generally monogamous, like birds or humans, cheating can be the norm if it means a higher reproduction rate, and thus a higher fitness We have observed female bird "cheating" on their male counterparts to have better babies (thanks to …
/r/MensRights09/05/24 05:56 PM
1

If Redpills is about the rise of Men’s Rights, AKA the rise of movements centered around male issues, then it will depend on the woman. Some may find it reasonable because they also see the issues men face, others will turn a b’ind eye on them and call Redpillers incels But to properly answer the question, we should firstly define correctly what are Redpill ideology and philosophy, since I feel like it’s a word that is thrown at anything which disagree with "liberal" or feminist views
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 03:48 PM
3

I would like to add that the whole point about men being more dangerous than a bear is flawed because it doesn’t take into consideration which bear species nor which human culture. Also, of course women have less chance to be killed by a bear than a man… since men are everywhere while bears lives in the forest, where we humans don’t go everyday TheTinMen made a good point about this. A more honest question would be "would you swap all men on the planet for bears?". And now not only would these w…
/r/MensRights08/05/24 04:29 PM
2

Fair enough then. Like I said, at least the choice is given to the prisoner, which is way more ethical than forcing it
/r/MensRights02/05/24 05:57 PM
1

Debattable, but at least it leave the choice to the prisoner
/r/MensRights02/05/24 05:13 PM
4

I never did. I am an MRA because I care about male issues just like feminist care about female issues
/r/MensRights01/05/24 12:18 AM
1

How, exactly? Or maybe you just do ad Hominem attacks because you know I am right, or you have simply no arguments, and you don’t want to admit it out of pride Elaborate or fuck off
/r/MensRights29/04/24 03:57 PM
4

The amount of whataboutism, good lord Basically his point is men don’t suffer because women suffer more? Yet stating this imply that men also suffer, just less? Misandrist moron But how can you assume he’s a feminist? Whataboutism is bad, but scapegoating isn’t really better
/r/MensRights29/04/24 04:47 AM
3

I know damn well the chance he’s actually innocent is closed to zero. However, labeling something as inhumane mean there is no exceptions, even for cases proven beyond reasonable doubt Castration is fine in this perticular case, but the day we’re gonna realise one of those convicted was actually innocent all along, what are we gonna say? We castrated an innocent. We treated an innocent civilian like a farm animal. We stole a man from one of his crucial attrait of his masculinity. We will probabl…
/r/MensRights28/04/24 11:42 PM
12

Generally reversible, with irreversible side effects
/r/MensRights28/04/24 02:33 PM
13

Because we also care about the falsely accused And in case you didn’t knew, castration isn’t reversible. It’s the same logic as the death sentence, the risk isn’t worth it
/r/MensRights28/04/24 01:06 PM
1

I don’t know if this is a possible choice in the US, but can you "cancel" your vote?
/r/MensRights25/04/24 12:05 PM
2

It’s not even that at this point, did they consider the concept of p-value in their study? You know… the thing that we used to conclude if there is an actual statistical signification
/r/MensRights24/04/24 03:33 AM
0

They are supposed to represent the typical dystopian American family, which is mostly a fat, idiotic dad, a smarter mom, a pet smarter than what we think (that part isn’t really typical, but many cartoons have this trend), and two or more children, a girl trying to fit with her peers and a dumb son having a love-hate relationship with his dad You also forgot to mention that usually, the mom isn’t just smart, she’s mentally unstable and abusive toward her husband. That’s not a very good image of …
/r/MensRights22/04/24 12:05 PM
12

Also love. Love make people blind.
/r/MensRights18/04/24 04:33 PM
0

Alright, fair enough Now here comes the next question, how is this a bad thing, EiNsTeIn?
/r/MensRights18/04/24 11:43 AM
2

Interesting, but if narcissism is associated with social activism in general, that’ll also make us narcissists. So I’ll take that with a grain of salt, because that’s basically shooting ourselves in the foot
/r/MensRights18/04/24 01:51 AM
4

Both are required to make a child, but men are usually the only one who have to bring protection, make sure everything’s okay, and the only one to blame when accidents happen This is what we call double standards
/r/MensRights17/04/24 07:30 PM
6

Never said the issue is easily solvable, I’m disproving OP’s point stating that making a drawing or a photoshop of someone in a sexual way isn’t the same as a trained AI
/r/MensRights17/04/24 12:17 AM
19

It’s not the same because a drawing and a photoshop are way less realistic than a deepfake AI will reproduce to the identical (or nearly identical) a photo or even video of the person in an explicit position. A photoshop montage can be busted way more easily (depending on the skills of the person doing), and a drawing even more Also, I would like to add that AI can also fake evidences of a crimes, make you say thing which you never said using your voice, like admitting a crime you never did. Ai …
/r/MensRights16/04/24 06:43 PM
28

How could he have known the existence of those sextapes when to even know they existed was for her to admit it during that particular conversation? Sounds like he just discovered it as well Stop the victim blaming
/r/MensRights16/04/24 11:54 AM
15

That’s another debate, but it’s useless for this case anyway because in both scenarios they openly admitted what they were keeping
/r/MensRights16/04/24 11:07 AM
88

I initially disagreed with the post because yeah it’s kinda weird to keep things like texts from your exes, but then I just saw the Exhibit B and my blood started to boil. Keeping literall sextapes of you getting fucked by your ex!? Talking red flag
/r/MensRights16/04/24 05:09 AM
7

It’s even more hypocritical considering the patriarchy is also supported by a lot of women who consider themselves as Trad Plus the fact that it blame today’s men for something which was implemented centuries ago
/r/MensRights15/04/24 08:46 PM
1

What does it have to do with the conversation? Again, stop the Strawman. Twice in a row. I am done talking to you
/r/MensRights15/04/24 08:44 PM
2

Isn’t there r/FeMRADebates? Good idea though
/r/MensRights15/04/24 08:43 PM
1

What the hell are you talking about? Not only is science not even sure if circumcision have health benefits or not, even if there was, science never said anything about doing it on non-consenting boys Stop the strawman
/r/MensRights15/04/24 08:41 PM
1

So?
/r/MensRights15/04/24 08:39 PM
0

The hivemind of this sub think any think midly pro-feminist is inherently bad. You are absolutely right to say men’s rights shouldn’t have to always going the opposite way of women’s rights, but the anti-feminist circlejerk see feminism as a world wide terrorist organization with the only goal of eradicating men This is why sometimes I’m truly wondering if it’s a good thing for me to stay on that sub
/r/MensRights15/04/24 12:34 PM
2

That’s not my point. My point is that Wikipedia isn’t a valuable source to say this claim, or any claim that exist
/r/MensRights15/04/24 11:45 AM
-1

Euh… no it did not? I’m literally saying that if there ever is a pro-feminism bias in scientific institutions, it’s maybe because MRAs thinks any random person know better than a graduate professional ruled by an institution I’m not talking about politicians, I am talking about scientific institutions. Strawman
/r/MensRights15/04/24 11:44 AM
-1

Beside the fact that you’re making a claim and therefore the burden of proof rely on you, there is no proof of feminist bias in science. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/faculty-issues/diversity-equity/2023/04/27/research-finds-no-gender-bias-academic-science Hell, it’s even the opposite, where there is a small anti-woman bias in science https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1510649112 Now your turn. Show me your proof, if you have any
/r/MensRights15/04/24 11:40 AM
-1

Reviewing by the peers isn’t one of the step of the scientific method. The scientific method existed since the 17th century, but it wasn’t truly implemented until up to the mid-20th century and peers reviewing until early 19th century (even if it did existed around the same time period). Before that anyone could pretty much say whatever the hell they wanted and be as biaised as they wanted to. And it’s only after WW2 that peer reviewing was seen as necessary for any scientific research But as of…
/r/MensRights15/04/24 12:55 AM
2

Fair enough, we all make mistakes Now it’s me who made a mistake, I meant "if MRA’s give more importance to some random person saying something over an institution with rules and graduated professional, then no wonder science is biaised toward feminism"
/r/MensRights14/04/24 07:46 PM
0

I like this opinion even if I don’t entirely agree with it, but my point is simply that Wikipedia is the worst source of information there is Regardless of which gender you think is victimised more or why they are, if you have to use fucking Wikipedia as a claim, then you have no claim
/r/MensRights14/04/24 06:36 PM
-3

What kind of ad hominem attack is this!? That’s not even the point of the discussion! Also, it look a lot like something you pulled out of your ass. What a way to prove my point! I never said MRAs were redneck, used this word to describe how, if MRAs prefer to believe what any random person say without anything to back them up, instead of organized and ruled institutions which dedicate their life to science, then no wonder those institution are biaised against Feminism This exact same logic is u…
/r/MensRights14/04/24 06:33 PM
1

Strawman. I am not talking about what the law say or how it is biaised, I am saying the scientific institutions and science isn’t Feminist doing stats like this is pseudoscience, which scientific institutions already reject and denounce I would also very like to see the proof and source that it was actually feminist who pushed the government to change the definition of rape
/r/MensRights14/04/24 05:52 PM
-2

The sources aren’t necessarily verified by the peers, meaning they could be biaised in the reasoning or in the experiment itself. Every study, for every science field, must be reviewed by the peers to have the point of view of the rest of the scientific community and make sure it respect the code of a scientific study The users being reviewed isn’t enough, because they aren’t scientist themselves. They only provide the sources, and the source can be biaised itself, which is overlooked for the mo…
/r/MensRights14/04/24 05:50 PM
-9

I am not saying it is necessarily a lie, I am saying that Wikipedia, by its concept of letting anyone change it with any unverified sources, if they provide any source at all, is not a valuable way to find information to make a claim My point is that regardless of what you say or think and regardless of the number of actual sources who prove your point, if the only source you provide is a Wikipedia page, then you lost your entire credibility
/r/MensRights14/04/24 04:59 PM
-1

If MRAs truly think random people know better about their world and the gender problem there is, then this is a problem. Anyone can create a fake stat taken out of their asses and call it a valuable point by this logic Again, show me the proof that scientific institutions are biaised toward feminism, or hell, show me the proof about how feminism is biaised. Maybe the reason institution are biaised toward feminism (if they ever are), then maybe that’s because feminism know better about gender iss…
/r/MensRights14/04/24 04:33 PM
-2

Bullshit. Scientific institution aren’t controlled by any political party. It is science, the objective truth. If an experiment or a statistical survey is done a population (in that case, for example, the number of received call to the police regarding physical assault by gender), then it is the truth, all they did is transform it into mathematical word Also, where has science ever said that men were inherently evil, or that they’re all bad, that men can’t be victims or that women are pure creat…
/r/MensRights14/04/24 04:30 PM
-13

So are scientific institutions. You are completely free to make a new research to counter a first research, as long as it respect the rules of a scientific experiment. The difference is that it is done by scientific who have the knowledge to do the expriment, and is not biaised by the will of sensationalism like the news nor it is biaised by the users who can propose any kind of sources, valid or not
/r/MensRights14/04/24 03:47 PM
-20

You’re joking right? You literally said it yourself: Something which can be modified by anyone regardless of their backround, personal bias, or knowledge, versus multiple serious studies made by professional with the appropriate education and with strict rules to avoid bias Maybe the reason those studies say women are the gender which have the most chances to be victimized is because it’s the truth. If you’re at the point of believing Wikipedia, then you completely lost it
/r/MensRights14/04/24 03:10 PM
0

The percentage of pregnancy related to rape is 5% of all rape, around 32 000 pregnancy a year (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8765248/). I look at them because leaving them out of the question out on them the burden of being unfairly treated by the law, which make it very hypocritical for a Men’s Rights Activist to be say we should overlook it when one of our main fight point is the legal bias against men I don’t just look at rape to say abortion is fine, I say it is fine because it’s part of s…
/r/MensRights14/04/24 04:00 AM
0

It’s not a Strawman argument. His comment imply, in this context, that fetuses are babies, which they are not Contraception exist, but not only it is not 100% effective depending on the type and the quality of the contraceptive item, but most importantly, it’s also about rape cases, and rapist don’t always use condoms, because they’re rapist If you want to make this about fallacies, what you are doing right now is a Nirvana fallacy. You think abortion shouldn’t exist because there are alternativ…
/r/MensRights13/04/24 09:38 PM
1

So because there are worse things than cheating and because cheating always existed mean it’s not a cruel thing to do to someone? Appeal to tradition and gatekeeping, plus the nitpicking of according way too much importance on one fucking word instead of the main point if my comment Cheating is vile and can mess up with someone permanently, and anyone doing it should be shamed for more than just "yah you were wrong and it’s bad"
/r/MensRights11/04/24 02:35 AM
-1

Cheating is absolutely cruel. You took an oath to always be loyal to your lover and you made a decision which is the most treacherous act there is for this I never said castration was a justification for cheating either. I meant cheating is far worse than not doing the laundry
/r/MensRights11/04/24 02:20 AM
45

Over housework on International women’s day. Not even for something cruel like cheating or molesting their child. She castrated a man over doing the laundry. And you have people openly laughing about it on television. Yet there are people saying misandry doesn’t exist
/r/MensRights10/04/24 10:31 PM
1

Because you can’t compare those things and are now at the same scale, at least for guns
/r/MensRights10/04/24 07:01 PM
2

It’s gonna depend on the choice of your family, just like abortion is gonna be the choice of the woman. Besides, you’re comparing a fetus which no one knew before and that is literally attached to someone and an adult which people knew and who already had the right to live beforehand
/r/MensRights10/04/24 07:00 PM
2

That’s not derailing the conversation, that’s using your own logic to make a point It is indeed irrelevant, hence why I said many, not the majority
/r/MensRights10/04/24 06:57 PM
3

I wasn’t going to derogate it to a "clump of cells", I don’t like that term. But it’s still closer to organic matter than a living organism There are many criteria to be considered as living, not just heartbeat. For example, capacity to react to stimulis, independant growth and the ability to reproduce. A fetus can’t do that. If you cut the ombilical cord, it will decompose
/r/MensRights10/04/24 03:48 PM
1

Ironically enough, most highly upvoted comments are pro-choice Seems like the hivemind can’t decide who they agree with
/r/MensRights10/04/24 03:45 PM
2

Appeal to nature. Just because it has a natural purpose doesn’t mean it can’t be extended for something else By that logic choosing not to have sex with someone is against nature since you’re actively choosing not to procreate
/r/MensRights10/04/24 03:44 PM
1

In that case, rework the justice system so that those option are less biaised or restricted, and we’ll be good. Pretty sure abandonning a child is illegal for everybody If the mother put the baby on adoption, maybe we could legally ask the father if he want the child But anyway, it’s about men having the right to abort. So putting the child for adoption or abandonning them is another debate
/r/MensRights10/04/24 03:42 PM
2

Counter-bullshit. If there was no sense of mutual help, we wouldn’t even be arguing on Reddit now because Reddit, Internet, Wi-Fi and our phone wouldn’t exist, as they were created more or less with the help, directly or indirectly, of other humans. I would also like to see a source about how "women naturally don’t keep the end of a bargain". And even if it was the case, it’s an appeal to nature It’s true that many women will not agree with paper abortion, due to hypocrisy, ignorance or other ca…
/r/MensRights10/04/24 03:40 PM
2

It’s not a baby because it’s not living, it’s organic matter (until a certain amount of time). To be considered as living, you need to have specific requirements, such as reacting to stimulis, adaptation, reproductive ability, growth, regulation, etc A fetus doesn’t react to stimulis, can’t adapt itself to its environment and can’t reproduce. It can grow and regulate itself, but only because he’s attached to its mother, he can’t do it on its own
/r/MensRights10/04/24 03:36 PM
1

I know that’s what the State think, I’m saying that it’s still wrong If the parents are in no position of being parents, then it is better for the child’s sake to not be born. No life is better than a life full of misery
/r/MensRights10/04/24 03:31 PM
6

What troll? And we should give women the chance to hear our view. Not being open about who can be in our movement is Gatekeeping and shooting ourselves in the foot
/r/MensRights10/04/24 12:04 PM
2

Men can also do that though…
/r/MensRights10/04/24 11:54 AM
4

I don’t think it had to be that way. You don’t win a right by removing someone else’s right. Plus, do you really expect women to help us gain more rights if we just stay still and laugh when one of their most fundamental right get revoked? That create an endless circle. One doesn’t want to help the other get a right, so the other don’t help them get back their right, which make the first one not want to help even more, etc. Men have women have to stop fighting each other. It’s not men vs women, …
/r/MensRights10/04/24 11:53 AM
-2

*so then OP and his girlfriend could have access to a way of not fucking their life over if the condom broke, the pills doesn’t work either, or just don’t have the ressources to take care of a baby and instead prefer to abort rather than birthing a child that will have a miserable life in poverty and shitty parents Fixed it for you
/r/MensRights10/04/24 11:49 AM
3

Oh well, fair enough. But then bare the question: Is it really that much of a bad thing to for women to have better access to abortion?
/r/MensRights10/04/24 11:46 AM
6

Maybe because it’s an argument which has nothing to do with men’s rights? Besides, a fetus isn’t a living organism properly speaking until the 15th week, minimal. So abortion before the third month of pregnancy doesn’t kill babies. And even if it was, you realize some women need to have an abortion for their health because the birth could kill her? And what about rape and incest? Or just if the couple doesn’t have the time, the energy nor the money to take care of a child? You would prefer it to…
/r/MensRights10/04/24 11:45 AM
6

Good. Fetus aren’t babies. Therefore we should have legalized abortion. Case closed then.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 11:41 AM
1

"Consent to sex isn’t consent to parenthood", both an argument for abortion and parental surrendering
/r/MensRights10/04/24 11:39 AM
7

Pretty much like any anti-abortion take And to think anti-abortionnist aren’t that uncommon in this sub… I remember getting downvoted to oblivion more than once for defending abortion
/r/MensRights10/04/24 04:29 AM
-1

When the mother and father’s sake are at risk, an unborn child’s interest is closed to total irrelevance
/r/MensRights10/04/24 04:25 AM
3

What the hell are you talking about. You can’t "order" an abortion lol
/r/MensRights10/04/24 02:58 AM
224

Except that now, if you impregnate your girlfriend, you are absolutely sure to have the burden of parenthood since your girlfriend cannot go to the clinic for an abortion. I agree that men deserve more parental right including paper abortion, however women only having abortion at least meant she could abort it if it’s her choice. Now you are 100% sure if she’s pregnant, you’re screwed. No, both of you are screwed. Instead of pushing for both sex to have no right, we should be pushing so both sex…
/r/MensRights09/04/24 11:57 PM
18

I read all of it, and I am sorry for you, you deserve way better. Student being assholes is a thing, but teachers and your own mother is next level bullshit. Spread the word, talk to the one who trust you. You probably won’t want to do it, but the best is to point out the issue, to shame the ones who were biaised against you
/r/MensRights08/04/24 06:51 PM
15

Hypocrisy at its finest indeed
/r/MensRights27/03/24 05:33 PM
143

There was an experiment conducted in Australia where the Government, in order to prove that corporations were biaised against women, decided the remove the name and gender on every job application Ironically, this resulted in more men getting hired, as the only thing which was available for HR were the skills and education of the applicant Just this, prove that there is a bias against men in big companies, where they would prefer to reject a perfectly skilled man for the job and choose a woman n…
/r/MensRights27/03/24 12:18 PM
2

Good, they deserve a reality check And if that one succeed, every single one of those group are at risk of getting sued. That will send a message
/r/MensRights25/03/24 12:14 PM
21

They’re doing blatant whataboutism because you talked about one group’s issue and they’re mad you didn’t talked about the one they like Ignore them, but be prepared for more backlash in the future. You aren’t wrong for standing up to men
/r/MensRights24/03/24 05:35 PM
3

That’s why we already do, but it’s still idiotic nonetheless Beside, the point of MRAs is to debate on male issues, and being constant’y labeled as incels is one of them, so it’s legitimate for us to complain that nobody’s willing to have a proper conversation
/r/MensRights24/03/24 03:55 PM
14

Except that it goes beyond Reddit, and even Internet in general. Just because you never saw someone using it outside of Reddit doesn’t mean it doesn’t happen. Like common man that’s one of the most basic fallacies And even if it doesn’t come out of the Internet, does it matter? It’s still an insult which has lost all meaning because it is constantly used as a Joker card when someone is in a debate about relationships or men/women and doesn’t have any argument
/r/MensRights24/03/24 02:01 PM
27

This is why we, men, need to disconnect from that need to be in a relationship and find our own happiness, with ourselves and with other men If women don’t want us, then so be it, let them be alone
/r/MensRights24/03/24 01:53 PM
18

Reverse the gender and the guy would have been lynched
/r/MensRights23/03/24 05:04 PM
0

Banned from that same Conservative club. Again, nothing to do with feminism
/r/MensRights22/03/24 02:28 PM
1

Fair enough, that one’s on me
/r/MensRights22/03/24 11:30 AM
0

Well… yes? What proof do you have that it’s the University who put pressure on those conservatives?
/r/MensRights22/03/24 11:30 AM
1

It is written nowhere in the article…
/r/MensRights21/03/24 10:41 PM
1

And how is this an argument in favor of scapegoatism?
/r/MensRights21/03/24 09:07 PM
-1

My brother in Christ the conservatives banned abortion in every state where they were in charge, and they were ab’e to do that because a majority of conservative judge overturned Roe v. Wade What are you talking about??
/r/MensRights21/03/24 09:07 PM
-1

And what does it have to do with conservatives? Because feminists aren’t conservative
/r/MensRights21/03/24 11:34 AM
-2

And if that was truly the case, you wouldn’t have to scapegoat them by blaming then for something irrelevant to point them out. Yet, this is exactly what’s going on with this post. It looks like like people have no real argument and just want to hate on feminists
/r/MensRights21/03/24 11:32 AM
-19

Regardless of what you think of feminism, blaming them for something they didn’t even participated for is idiotic. Plus, you’re giving them free ammo to bash you
/r/MensRights21/03/24 03:39 AM
-30

True, but we shouldn’t scapegoat feminist over something they didn’t do. Pretty sure conservatives don’t like feminist either
/r/MensRights21/03/24 02:08 AM
-52

That was an invitation to a conservative club, nothing to do with feminism…
/r/MensRights21/03/24 12:25 AM
6

Boysarequirky rapidly grew and quickly became an anti-male femcel subreddit to the point where I saw a +1000 upvoted post saying misandry isn’t real… that’s not even the point of the sub in the first place
/r/MensRights20/03/24 11:51 AM
6

Sometimes crying is the best to cure overwhelming stress, men or women. It doesn’t make you less masculine just because you find life hard at the moment
/r/MensRights19/03/24 09:27 PM
-4

It’s not me who hijacked the term, that’s the definition of what an incel is (except for the Andrew Tate part, that’s on me) https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/incel#
/r/MensRights14/03/24 05:17 PM
-13

Incel mean being a mysogynist, radicalist, blackpilled asshole who blame everything on women. If you’re a virgin, celibate and it’s not your choice because you just fail to find a partner, you’re not an incel even if you’re an "incel" ethymologically speaking Hell, being a virgin or without a partner isn’t even a requirement for being an incel. Andrew Tates got laid, but he blame men’s problem on women and think any man not being rich and full of "females" is a failure
/r/MensRights14/03/24 01:52 PM
1

Because what he said was inappropriate and in front of other people, which can be compatible with the truth Do you know what else is the truth? Telling a grieving person that there is no God and no paradise, that we’re just bone and flesh. That’s the objective truth, yet do you seriously think it was the right place and time? No it was not, and someone doing that is an asshole It’s the same here. Like I said numerous time (yet it seems you always eclipsed that hence why you don’t understand my p…
/r/MensRights14/03/24 01:25 PM
1

Well, there was cameras in my middle and high school. They weren’t using them, but that’s another discussion I wasn’t meaning that he would have done something, more that he could protect himself from her false accusation, even if this goes both ways Female teacher also do that? That’s as bad as if a male on do it! Why are you trying to justify a bad behaviour with blatant whataboutism?
/r/MensRights14/03/24 02:34 AM
3

That’s what I have been saying, yes
/r/MensRights13/03/24 12:38 PM
-1

And you never thought it could be formulated in another way? Or to simply pull her out apart to tell it to her (while still be in a place with camera to have an alibi)? Like I said, there’s a way to respond to question, and what that teacher did was the wrong way. Would you have liked it if it was a female teacher saying to a male student that "Wear bigger shorts, everyone can see your dick"or some shit like that? My guess is no
/r/MensRights13/03/24 12:00 PM
-9

Saying out loud, as an adult, in front of teenagers, that you can see a student’s panty isn’t being a snowflakes. There’s a time, way and place to say that type of thing, and teenagers are vile Again, it doesn’t mean she was sexually assaulted, but it is weird as hell
/r/MensRights13/03/24 12:08 AM
-18

Honestly that "people could see your panties" comment look out of place, especially if it’s said in front of other people, but that’s not even closed as to what sexual harrassment is
/r/MensRights12/03/24 08:29 PM
55

They’re not saying what she did is morally correct nor that the situation is, they are giving him the best advice there is: Be prepared to be a dad or pay, because men unfortunately have barely any parental rights
/r/MensRights11/03/24 01:01 PM
7

Damned if you do, damned if you don’t
/r/MensRights07/03/24 02:41 PM
-1

Like I said, those studies are not only stating they aren’t sure, but they are also older than the one I provided. Therefore, it is safe to say that embryos aren’t truly living until around 24 weeks Again, you have not "destroyed my arguments". I have newer sources which are more certain of their take Beside, there are many other criteria to consider something living, such as the ability to reproduce or grow on its own, which an embryon can’t do
/r/MensRights06/03/24 12:37 AM
-2

Well, according to this definition, embryos aren’t living because they do both reproduce and don’t have functional activity (unless you consider kicking as a functional activity, but that’s near the end of pregnancy). They do grow and have continual change preceding death, but it’s because they are attached to the mother, it’s the mom’s metabolism who tale care of making a fetus grow and change I see embryos as limbs. Your arm does grow and change, but it’s because it’s attached and taken care o…
/r/MensRights06/03/24 12:34 AM
0

Plants do feel stimulis. They feel the change of temperature, light, CO2 concentration, transpiration rate (yes, plants also sweat), etc. An embryo on the other hand doesn’t feel anything. It’s like a cut limb: It may be organic and look alive, but it’s not because it doesn’t react to for example burning
/r/MensRights05/03/24 09:48 PM
1

The first article is just a statistic on the number of American who think they know when life begins. It doesn’t provide any scientifical arguments The second one say the early neural system develop at 12 weeks, three months. Therefore, early abortion aren’t murder https://www.webmd.com/baby/when-can-a-fetus-feel-pain-in-the-womb Majority of doctor and medical association say a fetus can’t fully feel pain until the 24th week You didn’t debunked any of my arguments, but you can still try if you w…
/r/MensRights05/03/24 08:50 PM
-3

I am a biology student and what you say is complete and utter nonsense. Life is defined by conscience and self-developpment. An embryo is not conscient for it have no neural connection nor does it feel any kind of stimulis, and can’t substain by itself as he need to be constantly fed and protected by the mother’s metabolism Science is not leftist nor it rightist. All it care about is the Truth, the Objective Reality. And the reality here is that no, abortion isn’t murder because embryos aren’t l…
/r/MensRights05/03/24 08:18 PM
8

I am not against abortion being a protected right, because we see what is happening right now in the US. However, the discussion here is that while women have now the constitutionnal right to have abortion access (which is a good thing), men can’t even take a paternity test to just know if they are raising their own child, let along being able to choose whether or not they want to be a parent or not Also, the argument that men have no say because they do not carry the baby is bullshit. Men are t…
/r/MensRights05/03/24 08:15 PM
1

Really funny. Anyway mistake corrected
/r/MensRights29/02/24 09:27 PM
8

That’s double standards indeed
/r/MensRights29/02/24 03:28 PM
-32

Well, she’s saying we should have a mental health institute regardless of gender. I don’t see how that’s a problem, because male mental health issue will be aknowledged regardless. But that includes dismantling any female mental health institute in favor of those bigger, general health institute
/r/MensRights29/02/24 02:46 PM
8

Even if it was patriarchy, according to the logic that patriarchy hurt men too, this mean men would still need a men association
/r/MensRights29/02/24 02:28 PM
20

If there are women association, I don’t see how there shouldn’t have men association
/r/MensRights29/02/24 01:30 PM
0

I… never said anything about darwinism being good or bad. You just wrote a 9 paragraph long Strawman when all I did was calling out a fallacy You are indeed right that it depends on on what natural concept we’re talking about, but that’s the whole point of the appeal to nature fallacy: Your argument can’t just be resumed by "it’s natural". Drinking water is good not because it’s natural, but because to keep a healthy body, you need to stay properly hydrated
/r/MensRights26/02/24 11:52 PM
2

Just because something is natural doesn’t mean it’s necessarily good and just because it’s unnatural or derive from nature doesn’t mean it’s necessarily bad. That’s what we call an appeal to nature, and that’s a fallacy regardless of your belief Changing nature, if done correctly, can be for the greater good. We changed nature so we could have vaccine, abortion and balanced food for example
/r/MensRights26/02/24 03:38 PM
5

From what I understood, some were said they were given something, either testosterone or a placebo, while other were given a placebo but were told they got testosterone. The one who were lied to tend to behavior more aggressively despite having a placebo, which mean people act aggressively because of social conception, and those women only behaved aggressively because they thought they were given "aggressive" hormone
/r/MensRights26/02/24 02:18 PM
11

Behaviour has indeed biological roots, and that can diverge depending on the sex of the individual. However, behaviour is also greatly influenced by parental education and the change from a natural state to a civilisation state, which means that society is also a factor in the divergence of behavior Therefore, we should be careful when discussing the genetical and psychological factors of the human behaviour and take either each one case-by-case, or approach it with the two factors in mind In th…
/r/MensRights26/02/24 01:12 PM
1

Keep the insults coming without providing any argument for your crap, surely that’ll make you look more intelligent
/r/MensRights26/02/24 12:42 PM
1

No only does strengh difference between a man and a woman barely matter with proper training, but even so, with all the technologies of modern warfare, physical strengh is secondary now. Soldiers aren’t fighting with swords and bows anymore, and regardless of who you are, a bullet result in the same fate for everyone. And considering the average men and women in society right now, I’ll say there’s a LOT of men who would absolutely be unapt to serve if it was for physical quality How about you st…
/r/MensRights26/02/24 03:32 AM
1

How about not make any distinction of of sex, and send the most physically apt citizen to the front and the others in the factory, regardless of men or women? You dare call me a "80 years-old grandpa" when you’re the one who’s defending double standards and the traditionalist vision of gender roles? Hypocrite
/r/MensRights26/02/24 12:25 AM
28

Women are equal to men, therefore they should also be sent to war. More soldier and gender equality
/r/MensRights25/02/24 04:21 PM
1

I don’t see the problem. Many men take classes to be attractive to women and there’s no problem with that either
/r/MensRights21/02/24 01:33 PM
0

Ok, so basically it’s all about "passing down your genes" It’s so unhinged, what the hell dude
/r/MensRights20/02/24 12:30 PM
5

I show them the statistic which clearly proove women can be perpretators, and conclude by saying that if she’s going to fall into fallacies such as abusive generalisation, then her opinions become irrelevant
/r/MensRights19/02/24 08:47 PM
1

It was an example to illustrate how stupid it is to compare cheating by gender. They are both bad, and it’s messed up to try and scale them At least donors aren’t a form of cheatinf
/r/MensRights19/02/24 07:26 PM
1

Male or female, realizing you’ve been cheated on a decade ago, they are both equally bad
/r/MensRights19/02/24 07:24 PM
1

Biology student here. I can’t say a lot about our biology, but one thing’s sure: Males were probably the one competing against other male for food, territory, and females, like the other species near ours like chimps and bonobos. That’s what we call competition in ecology However, I always say we have to be cautious when applying biology to our society, because many attitude and instinct from our natural state as a species become less relevant in a civilisation state like we are right now. So ev…
/r/MensRights19/02/24 04:17 PM
2

Therefore, any form of cheating is equally bad! I can’t believe I’m actually arguing over cheating. Is it really that hard to understand that there’s no better cheating in terms of genders!? Why are people even arguing over this!?
/r/MensRights19/02/24 03:50 PM
2

No? What does it have to do with cheating?
/r/MensRights19/02/24 03:48 PM
-2

Because I was making a comparison of how, men or women, it doesn’t matter, cheating is the same and equal’y awful, and trying to scale it based on gender is stupid I bring the example of how a father can ruin lives around him, and you replied with modern women being at fault. It’s the fault of women that a man cheat? That sound like a strawman
/r/MensRights19/02/24 04:32 AM
-7

What does it have to do with the discussion!?
/r/MensRights19/02/24 02:58 AM
-12

And not having any father figure is also morally, emotionally and psychologically bad. What’s your point? The unreasonable person here is you trying to argue one being cheated on is worse than the other way around. Hell, I’ll say it’s hypocritical because you’re doing exactly what we’re condemning here
/r/MensRights19/02/24 01:34 AM
-10

Wrong. A cheating man may impregnate another woman and thus birth a child without a potential father figure It’s weird to compare cheating, period. You’re doing exactly what the people in the survey did
/r/MensRights18/02/24 11:08 PM
1

Well damn… doesn’t give them a lot of credibility I have to say
/r/MensRights18/02/24 02:09 PM
1

Was it actually a feminist who said this?
/r/MensRights18/02/24 03:57 AM
1

What are your arguments? Like I said, yes there is a correlation between trauma and actions, and feminists do understand it. However, they still condemn those men because as much as a shitty life you had, in the end, if you rape someone, you’re a criminal and shouldn’t expect empathy. Hell, even worse, it’s a sexual crime, even less excusable than other type of crime such as theft or even murder
/r/MensRights18/02/24 01:22 AM
0

And how does calling out the other side for doing something we fight against’s gonna make any positive difference? On the contrary, it’ll give the public opinion even more arguments to discredite us Fighting for something doesn’t mean fighting so that everybody else doesn’t have it
/r/MensRights18/02/24 12:19 AM
-3

The last comment speaks the truth. As much as trauma can mess you up, if you radicalize yourself and start to hate women in general, you are at fault Feminists don’t ignore the possible bad experience, they just dislike the fact that those men project the bad experience to every women, and become misogynistic because of that one bad experience We MRA do the same thing everytime someone generalize men as a whole when there is a crime against a woman happening, we hate it because we’re being label…
/r/MensRights17/02/24 04:47 PM
0

The discussion was first about what did we though about the Barbie movie. Some people argued with me about it, and it went into the topic of oppression (don’t ask me how, I don’t remember that part). To which I replied that women didn’t had a secured access to protection in half of America Maybe next time, ask for context instead of trying to jump to conclusion by linking two totally unrelated comments. And stop stalking other people’s account you weirdo, if you need to do this to win an "argume…
/r/MensRights15/02/24 10:45 PM
-21

Why should we care? What does it have to do with Men’s Rights??
/r/MensRights15/02/24 04:29 PM
-1

Well damn if the mere fact that contradicting a point by providing a personal exemple is enough to make you give up, there is nothing to say anymore All that just because I said that there’s a portion of MRA who are radicalists…
/r/MensRights14/02/24 01:50 PM
0

I didn’t said men weren’t oppressed either, I simply said that women are I don’t know why everyone just whataboutise what I say when it have nothing hostile toward men
/r/MensRights14/02/24 12:52 PM
-1

Again, what explanation there was to say? Roe v. Wade was overturned, half the American States banned it. Oppression is when the government or authority figure inequally treat a group compared to the rest of the population. By definition, it is oppression No, I ain’t the one being ignorant here. I’m well aware of the parental surrender idea for men, and I approve it. However, trying to remove abortion isn’t the way to protect men from the burden of parenthood. You don’t fix a problem by creating…
/r/MensRights14/02/24 12:14 PM
0

I wouldn’t make such a shortcut considering there is many aspect of conservatism other than the household structure, and at different degrees
/r/MensRights14/02/24 12:10 PM
1

Saying that the whole confept of patriarchy is "a concoction of those women least able to empathize with the male condition" sound very conspirationnist
/r/MensRights14/02/24 03:23 AM
-1

The definition of patriarchy is "a system of society or government in which the father or eldest male is head of the family and descent is traced through the male line" It is not gendered. It is a system where men are the leaders, while women follow orders. A patriarchy is an ideology which try to target specific task to a specific gender, and it concern both men and women
/r/MensRights13/02/24 10:18 PM
2

Fair enough then: I proposed two way where we could prove or disprove the patriarchy: Law backround check, and a survey. There, you have your way to disprove it. Patriarchy therefore is a valid hypothesis Now your turn: Show me a way to disprove the hypothesis that gender inequalities are due to the socioeconomic organization we live in.
/r/MensRights13/02/24 10:16 PM
0

What does conservatism has to do with the discussion?
/r/MensRights13/02/24 08:24 PM
0

?
/r/MensRights13/02/24 08:21 PM
1

A scientific hypothesis must be falsifiable to be valid so that we avoid arguments such as "because God said so". However, it doesn’t mean that it have to have arguments which negate it You’re basically asking that to prove the existence of patriarchy, I have to find arguments or observation proving it doesn’t If you really want to have proof, we could check the law to see if there is anything specific for one gender, or we could make a survey one people’s opinion on what are the place of men an…
/r/MensRights13/02/24 07:48 PM
1

Women can absolutely enforce patriarchy because not being in charge have advantages of its own, like not having to work, not having to care about finances. Not having to always be strong, be able to show emotions, etc It’s not a rule of men, patriarchy mean men are in charge. Women can absolutely decide if they want men to be in charge of certain things or not
/r/MensRights13/02/24 07:43 PM
0

I agree that some feminists can be hypocritical and spurt patriarchal beliefs on men, but not only it is not all of them, but there is also a portion of men who also think like this. Patriarchal beliefs aren’t specific to a gender
/r/MensRights13/02/24 04:36 PM
1

Culture isn’t natural in the sense that it isn’t binded by Mathematical, Physical, Chemical, Geological, Astronomical, or Biological laws. Because technically, everything is natural Besides, it being natural or not doesn’t change the morality of it. Thinking it being natural means it is a good thing is an appeal to nature. So, for the moment, I’ll simply focus on the cultural aspect of the patriarchy I think it come many factors, the first being Christianity, which contain a lot of patriarchal b…
/r/MensRights13/02/24 04:33 PM
1

Then I don’t see this as a non-protected right. What I’m talking about is how, like you say, it is banned in some American states regardless of any nuances, and that’s a problem And my original point was that yes, there is a part of the MRM who are actually misogynist who don’t think women should have any rights. By ignoring the problem, we’re no better than those close-minded feminists blatantly ignoring the misandry present in the feminists groups
/r/MensRights13/02/24 03:16 PM
1

Well feminists are wrong. Patriarchy is about putting the man of the household (or company, state, etc.) as the head of it. It can be linked to economy, since being the head mean bringing money to the household, but capitalism has nothing to do either patriarchy. Pretty sure the USSR was also very patriarchal All I did was take the first definition I found on Google. Hell, I just verified on the literal Cambridge dictionary and it’s the same definition: The oldest man is the leader. Strangely th…
/r/MensRights13/02/24 02:59 PM
0

Rape is about empowering and taking control of the other. It’s all psychological. I don’t see the link with masculinity though, since a woman can absolutely rape a man
/r/MensRights13/02/24 01:21 PM
1

Is it illegal only in some part of Germany and legal in other area, or did the whole country banned free access to abortion?
/r/MensRights13/02/24 01:12 PM
-1

What are your arguments? Sound like a very big accusation to think there’s a female conspiracy which created the whole concept just to get rid of men…
/r/MensRights13/02/24 01:11 PM
0

Patriarchy can be at a household, school, classroom, etc. Doesn’t have to necessary be at the scale of a country Men face poor social prospect if they aren’t rich and powerful because of patriarchal ideologies, that’s my point. The selective pressure come from patriarchy, who say that men without wealth are failure That’s not natural, it come from our culture
/r/MensRights13/02/24 01:10 PM
0

No, I live in Canada, and no, I do not believe in the patriarchal system. I just corrected someone misunderstanding what patriarchy mean and how it’s actually legit to say it can hurt men too
/r/MensRights13/02/24 01:07 PM
0

Being in charge doesn’t necessarely mean governing a state or at a company level. If the head of the household is the father, it’s patriarchy Beside, I never said it was the case, I said that’s the definition of patriarchy. Stop the strawmanning
/r/MensRights13/02/24 01:06 PM
-2

Patriarchy doesn’t have a specific gender, it’s an ideology. Man or woman, you can absolutely be patriarchal, since not being at charge has its advantage If you’re going to insult someone, at least verify that what you say make sense, dumbass
/r/MensRights13/02/24 01:04 PM
-19

Being in charge ≠ being rich. Underpaid and overworked men can still be in charge, they’re the one working and bringing money to the household while the woman stay at home and obey the man Regardless, my point wasn’t that we’re living in a patriarchy, just that no, "patriarchy also hurt men" isn’t being hypocritical nor is contradicting
/r/MensRights13/02/24 12:09 AM
-17

What does it have to do with our conversation?
/r/MensRights12/02/24 11:26 PM
-29

Patriarchy doesn’t favor men, it put them at charge, which is as much of a burden as being put under charge This is why things like "men don’t cry", "men can’t be weak", "Men not earning money is a failure" are patriarchal take, because since men are supposed to be in charge, they must be stoic, always be on the top and always be strong
/r/MensRights12/02/24 10:43 PM
1

If something is deemed legal in some state and illegal in others, then it is not a protected right. Everywhere else in the world, it is protected as a federal law. A protected right mean the different subdivision of a country have no say in the question and can’t deny the said right to its citizens
/r/MensRights12/02/24 04:26 AM
0

Wdym they do? Who’s they in that sentence?
/r/MensRights12/02/24 01:00 AM
-10

I got downvoted to oblivion on this sub and called slurs for saying women’s rights were taken away when they overturned Roe v Wade, because now they don’t have a protected access to abortion And this sub went on a brigade streak on many subs, including one about rape victim where they were harassing them, telling them they were lying, to the point of 30-40 subs having an automatic ban bot for anyone commenting or posting on this sub It’s true that we can’t generalize, but let’s not bury our head…
/r/MensRights11/02/24 03:54 PM
1

Except that it’s not the guy himself who choose, it sound like it’s the parent who does it for him. That’s a huge problem of consent
/r/MensRights11/02/24 01:47 PM
2

Yeah, pretty much
/r/MensRights11/02/24 01:46 PM
4

What concern me is that it’s the mom who book it for their "clueless, virgin sons" I don’t think a parent taking an appointment to un-virgin their son sound consentual
/r/MensRights10/02/24 09:41 PM
-1

She was a great figure of women’s rights, but also a racist. Both those things aren’t i compatible, but that doesn’t mean feminists are racists. Pretty sure a lot of non-feminist and anti-feminist were also white supremacist at this time
/r/MensRights10/02/24 07:52 PM
9

Oh don’t worry, I got banned too with the same copy-pasted comment. They didn’t even wanted to give me a proper respond when I asked which comment were they referring about A place about hating a group of people becoming an echo-chamber where you can get banned over a yes or a no!? Who would have thought!
/r/MensRights09/02/24 01:32 PM
2

Yeah I was going to mention this. How can you be legally charged for "being with your buddies" if it’s now criminal to not let him do it But any-hoo, this law is definitly weird (how does an adress change cause alarm or distress!?), but I don’t see how it affect relationships that badly
/r/MensRights08/02/24 11:59 PM
1

Fair enough then. I see nothing wrong with prostitution objectively, even if I personally think it’s throwing away your dignity for money, but in the end you do you
/r/MensRights05/02/24 04:32 PM
0

Yet as I said, people aren’t just fucking in front of your face to show you what you don’t have. That’s the thing I don’t understand with your analogy. It’s not like happy couples were much of a bother However, if said happy couple is just laughing because you aren’t in a relationship, screw them
/r/MensRights05/02/24 04:30 PM
-1

If you actually read what I said, you would have understood that there’s alternative ways. If you really want to make this about testosterone, sports and not constantly masturbating are both very effective ways to high up your testosterone level
/r/MensRights05/02/24 04:26 PM
2

Food is considered as a human right by the declaration of human rights, among with housing, medical care, clothing, etc. But not only is sex not considered a human right, it’s not a need either, because again, you can perfectly live with other type of social interaction and with a healthy mental state by doing other activities But arguing over this is pointless anyway, because as I said, considering sex as a right imply morally questionnable problem reguarding body autonomy
/r/MensRights05/02/24 03:47 PM
-3

Just because it’s natural doesn’t mean it’s a good thing or that it should be enforced. This is known as an appeal to nature Also, if it is indeed comparable and important for a civil state of a species like humans, pretty sure women would too feel those urges and consider it comparable, because they too have a biological fertility clock and sexual hormones
/r/MensRights05/02/24 03:44 PM
-7

Not only is there other way without implying other humans to better out your mental health, first coming to mind being exercise, but can also be hobbies, self-accomplishment, artistic project, etc, but beside romantical, there are other type of relationship one can have: Friends and family Because putting sex as comparable to food is like saying sex should be provided as a basic human right, which imply itself a lot of morally questionnable issues
/r/MensRights05/02/24 03:28 PM
-15

Difference is you can’t live more than two weeks without food when you can survive your whole life without sex And no, people aren’t just fucking on the street. If simply seeing a happy couple is enough to make you angry just because you think they do it in front of your face, it’s you the problem I condemn the virgin-shaming though
/r/MensRights05/02/24 12:38 PM
1

You said that if the discussion was about workers, then he was right to comment what he commented. I reply that even if the topic was about workers, he still shouldn’t have commented what he commented because it wasn’t centered around female worker issue. To which you aggressively respond by calling me idiot while saying you agree with me, when I’m just specifying something You’re being upset and an asshole over nothing
/r/MensRights03/02/24 05:19 PM
21

At least the comment isn’t downvoted to oblivion and there’s people agreeing with him
/r/MensRights03/02/24 04:41 PM
1

Even so in the sense of even if the post was about the worst place for workers, he commented in a discussion about female issue trying to talk about male issue You don’t to be aggressive when you don’t understand something
/r/MensRights03/02/24 04:36 PM
1

Even so, he was commenting under a comment chain talking about female issue. He should have done a first comment talking about male issue instead of trying to shove a new topic in an already existing conversation
/r/MensRights03/02/24 03:55 PM
2

What he should have done is MAKE A FIRST COMMENT OF ITS OWN or make another totally different post talking about men in South Korea. That’s not what he did, and that’s why he’s being rightfully downvoted
/r/MensRights03/02/24 03:54 PM
0

It’s not how it work. Whataboutism is an argument fallacy and he straight up started his comment with "how about men?" then follow with a comment saying "yeah women problem but look at men!" If you truly want to defend a fallacy argument, then this discussion is pointless
/r/MensRights03/02/24 03:52 PM
1

That’s absolutely whataboutism. Whataboutism is responding to an accusation or in this case, an issue by raising another issue, as if because this other issue exist, the first issue is less relevant What he should have done is make a first comment on its own or make another totally different post talking about men in South Korea. That’s not what he did, and that’s why he’s being rightfully downvoted Like I said, he’s not wrong, but it wasn’t the right place to say so
/r/MensRights03/02/24 03:34 PM
14

No, they’re right You hop in a discussion about women’s issue in South Korea by doing the most blatant whataboutism comment by saying "yeah but how about men" Not that male issue aren’t a problem, but it wasn’t the point of the discussion. They are not downvoting you because they don’t care about men, they are downvoting you because it wasn’t the subject of the conversation. And after you just continue with more male issue when it’s not the goddamn point The guy who commented on the second image…
/r/MensRights03/02/24 02:39 PM
-2

I disagree with the concept of male-only gym because I disagree with the one-gender-only place/time concept in its whole, but you’re not inherently a pedo nor a rapist for suggesting this I don’t even see where is the child or the rape victim here
/r/MensRights03/02/24 01:37 PM
1

That’s not what I said. I said that you can focus on a group’s rights and still be about equality. By defending a group’s right, you also defend its equality in comparison to other groups In the end, everyone should be egalitarian, but I don’t see any problem with being a feminist or a MRA
/r/MensRights02/02/24 02:25 PM
0

Equality: Status of being equal; Socially: Status of two or many group being equal If many groups have issues, you can absolutely focus on one group of people by defending their rights Let’s not pretend MRM care about female issues
/r/MensRights02/02/24 01:50 PM
-3

This is why it’s our job to defend our rights too
/r/MensRights02/02/24 12:44 PM
-4

Oh and don’t mind the downvotes, the anti-feminist circlejerking hivemind isn’t worth it
/r/MensRights02/02/24 03:38 AM
-30

You can be pro-equality while focusing on one or the other gender Usually people who have knowledge about a topic are usually expert and working on one aspect of this topic
/r/MensRights01/02/24 11:00 PM
-20

I salute your actions, it’s rare for people to actually want to listen to both sides
/r/MensRights01/02/24 10:52 PM
-27

Feminism is a movement for women’s rights, so of course they will focus on women, the same way MRAs is about men’s rights, so we will focus on men
/r/MensRights01/02/24 10:52 PM
-1

Then how about you enlighten me instead? Something said more than a decade and a half ago may have been disproven today. What were you trying to say then?
/r/MensRights01/02/24 02:31 PM
-3

Yes. That’s called science. Something deemed true 10 years ago can be disputed by a newer research and is thus accepted as the new truth
/r/MensRights01/02/24 02:01 PM
-2

Even so, OP is right. It’s all about not generalizing, which is what we fight against. Let’s not be hypocritical ourselves
/r/MensRights30/01/24 09:54 PM
-9

Online feminist is shit because it’s online feminist. If OP went and said this to a feminist organisation, they would be agreeing for the most part And even so, OP is right. Feminist mods are shit, but that doesn’t mean the subbers are, and if they are shit too, that doesn’t mean IRL feminists are. It’s all about not generalizing, which is what we fight against. Let’s not be hypocritical ourselves
/r/MensRights30/01/24 12:39 PM
5

Oh yeah I watch those AI president from time to time, it’s funny as hell But that’s all fun and giggle until some political opponent actually use it to say controversial remark or false self-incrimination
/r/MensRights29/01/24 04:55 PM
2

She is right, you shouldn’t judge someone for his/her past. However, if she stopped only 10 days before you started her relationship with her and if she still have unblocked user to which she used to send them erotic stuff, I can see this as a red flag But regardless of what is right, one thing’s for sure: Those type of situations are a the best ingredients for insecurities, and it’s normal, you shouldn’t be ashamed of it. Yet, instead of accepting it and try to find a solution for both of you, …
/r/MensRights28/01/24 06:22 PM
2

In that case, throw her in jail for doing drugs And pretty sure that isolated case or not, killing someone mean you’re dangerous to society. It happened once, we won’t wait until it happened again
/r/MensRights26/01/24 12:32 PM
2

I know how mental illness are, it’s just that even for this, 100 hours of community service isn’t enough. Throw her in a mental hospital, she is too dangerous to get her freedom that easily
/r/MensRights26/01/24 12:29 PM
9

Yet this whole post is about a woman who was released after 100 hours of community service… unless I read it wrong?
/r/MensRights26/01/24 02:17 AM
21

You are right regarding the psychotic episode (And the "downvote-and-forget" too), but not only those psychotics episodes seemed to be caused by drugs, which is illegal by itself, but also, someone who can literally murder another human being during a psychotic episode deserve worse than just community service time. She killed someone, and if jail isn’t the solution, the mental hospital is. And not just that case, but any case of psychotic murder too Also, it’s kinda a male issue if when a woman…
/r/MensRights26/01/24 12:11 AM
2

Well, I could see how this could help, but I can also see how it can be severely abused
/r/MensRights25/01/24 09:13 PM
2

Oh, my mistake. I thought it said they wanted to remove parental alienation in court
/r/MensRights25/01/24 03:29 PM
-12

Parental alienation is straight up gaslighting where one parent tell the children that he would be better without the other. I don’t see how it’s such a bad thing, unless they specifically say only father are banned from doing this while mother can
/r/MensRights25/01/24 02:25 PM
16

Oppenheimer is a Biopic about the US military during WW2. Do I have to explain that there wasn’t a lot of women in the military at this time, let along in the Manhattan project? Can’t really say about the nudity. Still, Oppenheimer cheated, so they’ll add it to the story I guess
/r/MensRights24/01/24 12:36 PM
-31

Awful story but where is it written that she’s a feminist?
/r/MensRights23/01/24 04:27 PM
3

Another comment dropped it
/r/MensRights21/01/24 06:06 PM
53

Thetinmen did a great post disproving this bullshit, but I can’t find it
/r/MensRights21/01/24 02:50 PM
18

On one hand, I want to help people in danger. On the other hand, it’ll probably put two people in danger
/r/MensRights21/01/24 03:22 AM
2

People have a love bias, for anyone and anything. If you love someone or something, there’s high chance you will by-pass their mistakes/defaults, or in this case, think of them as more worthy than the others in their "group" I call this hypocrisy, but like we all know, love make you blind
/r/MensRights20/01/24 03:41 PM
7

No, just a bunch of country not talking to each other /s Joke aside, this is such a braindead take
/r/MensRights19/01/24 06:44 PM
5

What happened?
/r/MensRights19/01/24 04:14 AM
-1

I never said she was right, I just repeated t’what she said to make a point about using the word oppression. This discussion is completely meaningless, it’s all strawman fallacy. Let’s stop this here
/r/MensRights18/01/24 01:26 PM
-4

She say that Systemic misandry doesn’t exist, not that misandry doesn’t exist…
/r/MensRights18/01/24 01:05 PM
-3

It’s not oppression because, by its definition, the man isn’t a government and the government isn’t reinforcing men beating and dominating their wives. If the woman go to the police, his ass would be sent directly to jail. Even if he is clearly a crazy misogynist, he is doing something illegal, which is the key-word That doesn’t mean misogyny or misandry can’t exist without oppression. Discrimination can happen socially, not just legally. Even if it’s not reinforced by the state or straight up i…
/r/MensRights18/01/24 03:11 AM
-6

My comment’s purpose wasn’t to say there is no male oppression, just that the example the other guy said wasn’t an example of oppression Dunno why I’m getting downvoted for correcting a definition coming from the goddamn dictionnary
/r/MensRights18/01/24 03:07 AM
1

?
/r/MensRights18/01/24 02:06 AM
-13

Precisely, because the government in place isn’t implementing laws which make those situations happens. No laws said Epstein could rape those kids, no laws said Epstein could or couldn’t commit suicide, and no laws said that those african people could kidnap and force children into anything. The government doing the same thing is oppression, because it’s the figure of authority of the country. It’s the one making the ultimate decisions, and if those decision is directed negatively toward a speci…
/r/MensRights17/01/24 09:37 PM
-28

Except that she’s not saying misandry doesn’t exist, just that it’s not general oppression. A minority victim of racism being racist toward the majority is equally as bad as the other way around, but it’s not oppression. According to the Cambridge Dictionary, oppression mean "a situation in which people are governed in an unfair and cruel way and prevented from having opportunities and freedom". That mean to be oppressed, it has to be the government who persecute you and treat you in an unfair w…
/r/MensRights17/01/24 07:29 PM
1

Oh sorry, I’m not American, I though it was the first. But isn’t there an Amendment saying every American citizen are born equally and treated equally? I see the 14th and 28th on Google, but isn’t there 27 Amendment anyway? I’m confused…
/r/MensRights17/01/24 12:44 PM
2

I’m maybe going too far, but doesn’t that go against the First Amendment? That everyone is equal and treated equally?
/r/MensRights17/01/24 05:50 AM
11

The same way she is willing to put your dick which has gone into another girl’s vagina, so she can please you? The fact you judge women and plain refuse to give oral pleasure for having past relationship make you an awful person
/r/MensRights17/01/24 05:46 AM
3

They put homeless shelters where homeless people are. Seems kinda pointless to not only put it in a part of the city where homelessness isn’t a problem, but also letting the homeless directly interact with children
/r/MensRights17/01/24 01:50 AM
29

If false accusers faced jail time, they would consider it before falsely accuse someone
/r/MensRights15/01/24 02:07 PM
2

An ecosexual is someone attracted to nature, or plants more specifically. Where I’m from, there is a case right now of a woman marrying a tree
/r/MensRights15/01/24 01:14 PM
3

Basically their point is that it’s too close from a school I mean… do they prefer those "ill single men" to be left out in the street to "harm" those children instead of having a dedicated place? Such a bullshit petition
/r/MensRights14/01/24 11:55 PM
3

Homer is more or less that. Yes he’s a dumbass who literally sniffed a crayon in his brain, but there’s many scene where he is seen as a determinated father figure ready to sacrifice everything for his family. The best example is the episode about Maggie’s birth, where he gave up on his dream job at the bowling to go back to his office job at the nuclear central because he wasn’t paid enough for Maggie Same for Peter (Way less, but he had his moment), The guy from American Dad, Hank Hill, honest…
/r/MensRights12/01/24 06:10 PM
-10

As I said on another sub where this was posted, they’re both crazy and do not deserve to interact with other. Throwing a smoke grenade and throwing boiling water at someone are both very dangerous, and probably illegal
/r/MensRights08/01/24 05:50 PM
1

I do not make this a gendered issue, I specifically said that it is the parent with the job which give money to the stay-at-home parent. Removing child support will just make the parent struggle even more, which will go back to the kid which will grow up with a parent living in poverty If the one giving child support is questionning where the money go, ask for CPS to be involved. There are many sign visible that the money isn’t going to the kid, like dirty clothing, hunger, etc.
/r/MensRights08/01/24 03:59 AM
1

Yes it can be better. Instead of it being a percentage, calculate it on the average amount of money needed to raise a child in the State/the US. If the person who provide the child support can’t pay this amount, now you calculate it on percentage so that he can still be able to survive. Make it stop when the person entitled to child support get a new source of income, either by jobs or a new relationship, or when the child turn 18. If the person who provide the child support suffer an economic p…
/r/MensRights07/01/24 11:41 PM
1

Disagree, child support are a good thing if the ex can’t afford to pay and take care of the child. The parent which quitted his job to be a stay-at-home parent restart his life nearly from zero. He can’t just be tasked to do it all by himself I agree that the system is way too severe and flawed, but we still need it. Let’s better it instead of throwing it under the bus
/r/MensRights07/01/24 09:10 PM
0

It may not be equivalent to actual rape, but it’s still at least a very gross form of cyberbullying and it should be taken seriously
/r/MensRights04/01/24 01:42 PM
1

Everything?
/r/MensRights03/01/24 02:33 AM
0

No? What the hell are you talking about?
/r/MensRights03/01/24 02:08 AM
1

What?
/r/MensRights03/01/24 01:58 AM
4

More of a trans thing thing than a gender right thing. It’s because some male identify as women and some female identify as men
/r/MensRights03/01/24 12:49 AM
2

There’s a difference between watching porn and being addicted to it. And you’re not gonna resolve the problem by shaming him for being lonely Kinda ironic for you to call yourself a MRA yet shame a man for not having a girlfriend
/r/MensRights02/01/24 01:11 AM
-3

Are you really comparing Feminism to the fucking Nazis!? Nazism had barely anything good at all, while Feminism has been fighting for women’s rights for centuries. You are doing the same as those misandrists "feminists" who compare men to the devil incarnate. You became the very thing you swore to fight against, and this is why people don’t take us seriously, and want the MRAs to be burnt to the ground, because it house to many anti-feminists like you Being against Feminism also mean being again…
/r/MensRights02/01/24 01:07 AM
-2

It is undeniable that Feminism wasn’t, and isn’t perfect, but it’s foolish to think it’s all about misandry I am not denying Feminism has its flaws, but if defending Feminism or simply comparing something bad we’re doing with something bad similar that Feminism did end up in a permanent ban, I am not gonna waste my time with that sub. Screw circlejerking
/r/MensRights01/01/24 10:56 PM
-2

My first reaction: "Look interesting" See "Feminists are misandrists, don’t try to defend it or you’ll get banned, we’re pro-censorship My brother in Christ, why do you have to be an anti-feminist circlejerk…
/r/MensRights01/01/24 09:42 PM
1

It’s a great video, but what does it have to do with Nice Guys?
/r/MensRights01/01/24 09:08 PM
0

Go check r/NiceGuys, I can guarantee you they do, in fact, exist
/r/MensRights31/12/23 10:54 PM
-5

That’s literally the definition of a Nice Guy…
/r/MensRights31/12/23 10:48 PM
1

A Nice Guy is a man who think women are entitled to love and sex with him because he is being nice and respectful, in other words doing basic human interactions. It’s not that women prefer assholes who insult them, it’s just that no one is entitled to nothing because you giving him/her basic respect. Hell, even if you save someone’s life, this person isn’t obligated to love or have sex with you There is a difference between a "Nice" guy (A man being actually a good person out of good will), and …
/r/MensRights31/12/23 06:35 PM
4

What a disgusting woman
/r/MensRights30/12/23 03:19 PM
4

I feel obligated to protect anyone as a person, because helping each other during an emergency is the duty of any citizen
/r/MensRights30/12/23 12:48 AM
3

We’re not being weird, we’re disagreeing, and the main argument being that until proven the contrary, you haven’t studied at all feminism from a sociological and philosophical context You’re just spurting that feminist us by fact anti-male and anyone who is pro-feminist is anti-male. That’s an argument fallacy which we are taught to avoid in our first years in school. If we want to extend it further, you call yourself an MRA, and one of the main we try to defend are the generalization of men in …
/r/MensRights29/12/23 02:00 PM
1

Maybe, but in theory, according to the literal constitution, every human are equal
/r/MensRights28/12/23 12:26 PM
2

Hence why I said Pratically
/r/MensRights28/12/23 03:53 AM
19

Theorically: As much as a woman. Pratically: Unconditionnal love come from close family, and respect is determined by how much respect he have for other. But unfortunately, a big part of a man’s worth is determined by how much he can provide. A man without degree or wealth is worth significantly less than someone who have those things
/r/MensRights27/12/23 03:28 PM
8

Someone who start a conversation with "You can trust me, I’m [Insert movement], I’m a good person", is most of the time a red flag
/r/MensRights27/12/23 01:35 PM
3

Except that’s it’s true. Not all feminists are misandrists
/r/MensRights26/12/23 12:55 PM
19

A movie doesn’t necessarily put a character on a bright light. Let’s wait for the movie to cone out or at least heard the producer’s view before judging it
/r/MensRights23/12/23 04:35 PM
2

Double standards and going out of your way just to shit on me? A d I’m the one oversensitive and weak? Hypocrite And yes, I was a little mad, I was mad by you belittling me as if I’m some sort of idiot. All I did was not responding to your comment. I even upvoted it to show my approval. You were right, I had nothing to say, that’s all. You’re taking this way too far over someone not commenting back So like I said, fuck off you clown
/r/MensRights20/12/23 02:51 AM
0

Bitch, I upvoted your comment with the video link. I didn’t replied because there was nothing to reply. What the hell do you want me to do at this point!? Fuck off with that attitude What agenda are you even talking about?
/r/MensRights20/12/23 02:18 AM
1

I didn’t saw the video, I saw the article of the Guardian talking about out the story Do you have a link to the video in question?
/r/MensRights19/12/23 09:12 PM
1

Yep, but so can it be even if it’s your phone
/r/MensRights19/12/23 09:11 PM
-1

Oh… yeah… didn’t though of that. I’m stoopid Still, don’t try to retrieve it by force, because you can and will be sued or prosecuted
/r/MensRights19/12/23 06:34 PM
0

This one "Jabbari testified in court that things turned physical after she noticed romantic texts on Majors’s phone. When Jabbari grabbed the device from his hands, Majors twisted her arm in a position that caused her “excruciating pain”"
/r/MensRights19/12/23 06:28 PM
-2

He twisted her arm to get back his phone I admit there’s some weird thing regarding this case, but pushing away ≠ twisting a whole freaking limb Next time someone steal your phone, call the cops
/r/MensRights19/12/23 04:18 PM
6

It’s overused The whole point of toxic masculinity (and feminity) is when you try to push on others or when it impact others negatively in general, yet many consider even the smallest, most innocent masculine traits as toxic
/r/MensRights19/12/23 02:44 AM
7

Ok, let’s divorce Ain’t gonna waste my life with someone who do this type of threat. It’s one of the biggest red flag to exist
/r/MensRights18/12/23 01:44 AM
-4

Incels are the mysoginist online dwellers who blame their problems on women. I’m not talking about literal incels. Stop nitpicking
/r/MensRights15/12/23 09:29 PM
9

If they are embryonic homologues, then why would they have different purposes?
/r/MensRights15/12/23 09:10 PM
9

Homologous is a form of convergent evolution which is even more similar because it come from a common ancestor or from the same species. You literally just proved my point They are anatomically different, but they do have the same function. Like I said, Plant cells and Animal cells are anatomically very different, but have the same function. If you want another example more suited, gland and clitoris themselves are very anatomically different, but both share the same function: Stimulate the sex …
/r/MensRights15/12/23 08:56 PM
3

It’s undeniable that MRAs are important and valid as a movement, but it’s also true that there are a lot of incels, anti-feminists and mysoginists in our movement, including this subreddit. I was downvoted to oblivion for saying abortion was a female right. We need to defend ourselves, but we can’t turn a blind eye on the blatant portion of far-right or even blackpilled members of the MRM. Calling out the extreme is part of defending our movement
/r/MensRights15/12/23 08:52 PM
8

Just because two things have evolved differently or don’t have the same morphology doesn’t mean they can’t have similar function. That’s what we call evolutive convergence A plant’s chloroplast and an animal’s mitochondria are really different, yet have the same function: Create energy for the organism to survive. Totally different organism, totally different thing, same function
/r/MensRights15/12/23 08:45 PM
15

Bull. Shit. The clitoris hood and the foreskin have the same function: Protect the gland/clitoris, lubrication, sexual stimulation. They are not 100% comparable, nothing is, but they’re pretty similar Anesthesia or not, it is done without any consent, and the child will feel the pain for days after the surgery It is mutilation, by definition. You want to drag in other comments in our conversation? Ok. Someone else gave you the definition of mutilation coming from three different english dictionn…
/r/MensRights15/12/23 08:27 PM
9

Circumcision means cutting a part of flesh full of nerves, without any anesthesia nor consent from the baby It may not be as worse as a full excision or penis castration, but just like female circumcision, which is cutting the clitoris foreskin, it is mutilation and will be called as such
/r/MensRights15/12/23 08:18 PM
1

Hold on, was she really trans or is this a joke I missed
/r/MensRights15/12/23 03:22 PM
1

I know that, all I’m saying is if you truly want to tell anecdotes about how you meet someone who liked to be considered trash, fine but it ain’t a counter-argument Also, there’s a difference between talking to someone about their problem and bully them for being "freaks"
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/23 02:26 PM
1

Well, people with kinks are the exception, and as much as I hate it and think it’s weird, you do you
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/23 01:13 PM
42

It’s always men Audrey Hale, happened this year. The tragedy was literally used to prove that "mass shooting are not exclusive to men" Ignorance and hate aren’t a good mix
/r/MensRights15/12/23 04:31 AM
1

I’m not sure what you mean… I do think there should be a limit of week before having an abortion, because there’s a moment where it’s actually closer to a baby than a fetus and because it gives plenty of time to the mother to choose, I just don’t like the idea of solely allowing abortion just for medical emergencies
/r/MensRights15/12/23 04:28 AM
-2

Still, let women choose to be mothers or not
/r/MensRights15/12/23 04:05 AM
0

Because that now mean abortion isn't a protected right in every States, which mean now there are some place where women can't get an abortion, where doctor can lose their medical licence for aborting someone and even some suggesting the death penalty for it (See the irony here: They're so pro-life they are willing to kill a woman who want to abort a baby) ​ They have a pretty good reason to freak out. It's like the whole circumcision debate, let people do what they want to their body
/r/MensRights15/12/23 03:11 AM
5

Would you please GTFO you troll?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/23 08:35 PM
2

Because regardless of who do it to who, it’s a disgusting behaviour Imagine if your boyfriend told you you were just a back-up plan for someone else, I dare you to tell me you would have took it well. My guess is that no, you would have you heart shatter You’re supposed to love one person at a time, using people as if they’re replaceable love pokemon is awful
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/23 08:27 PM
0

My point was that the only way for this analogy to work was for this economic connection and if it was made by feminists group. If misandrists aren’t paid, are only isolated case or if they’re paid but by someone totally unrelated to feminism, then we can’t blame feminism for misandry So again, that’s a really great analogy of how someone can hide their actual belief, but applied to feminism we would beed actual proof of this existing connection
/r/MensRights14/12/23 01:30 AM
1

Alright, I misunderstood the first part, my bad However, don’t you dare to say I’m the one aggressive here when it’s you who literally started by telling me to go fuck myself, and your comment right now is starting by an insult, again Don’t ask for respect when you don’t give it in the first place. So either you mature up and apologize or just drop the conversation, either you keep insulting me, showing me how much of an hypocrite piece of shit you are, while giving me certitude of it because to…
/r/MensRights13/12/23 11:27 PM
1

Did they all went to the same clinic/met the same doctor?
/r/MensRights13/12/23 08:23 PM
1

You sent your mother, aunt, and grandmother to pass a testosterone level test?
/r/MensRights13/12/23 07:48 PM
-1

Your story, not arguing it’s fabricated, go on total contradiction with the other comment saying that endocrinologist specifically are ignorant about the adequate testosterone level My conclusion is that doctors in general know what they’re talking about, but there are unfortunately frauds which end up giving wrong diagnosis and treatment. I am sorry you met one of them, but that doesn’t make doctors all irresponsible
/r/MensRights13/12/23 04:04 PM
-1

Of course, they study the matter for years, yet they don’t know their shits. A google search has more value and credibility than a literal doctor Do you know how you sound like? Like those flat earther, anti-5G, climate change skepticism and antivax conspirationnist which despite having all the evidence that they are wrong, still believe that everything is just a big hoax So why don’t you fuck off, "my man"? If you can’t even trust a goddamn doctor regarding your health, then you’re a lost cause…
/r/MensRights13/12/23 03:53 PM
-1

What do you think is the best source? Your doctor which have studied the subjects for years, went through expensive and intense education and have since then done his job for more years before you entered his office, or a 30 second Google search?
/r/MensRights13/12/23 02:16 PM
-3

That would be a great analogy if it wasn’t for "paiy stubs" part. How the hell do we actually know feminists are paying people to act as misandrist? I feel like this entire analogy is only supported by this, because if misandrists act coming from self-identified feminists are done solely out of self-act and without any economical link or whatnot, then you can’t apply this analogy to feminism
/r/MensRights13/12/23 12:56 PM
8

Except that it’s hard being successful if you keep getting near-failing grade out of injustice I suggest OP to ask another teacher teaching the same class to grade your assignment him/herself, and to be as objective as possible after explaining why you feel your work was unfairly graded. If he/she give you something way different than your actual teacher, then there’s something fishy
/r/MensRights13/12/23 04:49 AM
-1

You’re ironically proving his point. He can’t even say he had a bad experience as a gay man without someone like you telling him shit "Shoving your lifestyle in all our faces" my sister in Christ WTF
/r/MensRights12/12/23 01:01 PM
5

I am sorry you had a bad experience with the MRM. Just understand that we’re not all like that. I won’t force you to agree with me
/r/MensRights12/12/23 01:00 PM
39

TBH the Heard v Depp trial was a good step forward. It was the first time a false accusation and its consequences was publicly shown at such a big scale. It definitely had an impact on
/r/MensRights12/12/23 02:37 AM
31

I just wonder what will be THE event which will broke the camel’s back and finally give credibility to the MRM in society, where it will be considered as important as feminism, BLM or LGBT+
/r/MensRights12/12/23 02:00 AM
1

Meh, as a virgin, I want my first time and sex in general with someone I love. Just doing it for the pleasure feel empty I prefer to stay a virgin than to have sex with someone I’ll never see again
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/23 07:22 PM
2

I am not saying Will is 100% free of guilt, I’m saying he would have never done it if it wasn’t for that manipulative woman
/r/MensRights11/12/23 04:27 PM
8

Bloody hell someone take this Witch away from Will
/r/MensRights10/12/23 02:23 PM
3

This is literally the Joker meme "You get what you fucking deserve"
/r/MensRights09/12/23 03:41 PM
1

Insult again. Such a good way to express your point This discussion is over. You’re a lost cause
/r/MensRights09/12/23 03:06 PM
1

You literally called me a slur as an argument. Fuck off
/r/MensRights09/12/23 04:28 AM
1

Or maybe there’s more to it, and even if it didn’t, It’s not a reason to further bash her Keep making Ad hominem attack, surely that’ll make your point more valid /s
/r/MensRights09/12/23 01:01 AM
0

"Suddently it’s an issue when women kill themselves" It’s fucked up. It doesn’t have any ounce of empathy, and the comment are worse
/r/MensRights08/12/23 08:44 PM
0

Because we’re talking about that woman!? The simple fact of talking about a female suicide is enough for you to say we don’t talk enough about male suicide?
/r/MensRights08/12/23 08:43 PM
1

It’s true that male suicide is often overviewed, but it’s not an excuse to rip on a female suicide
/r/MensRights08/12/23 06:12 PM
1

"A woman killed herself" "But what about male suicide!?" It is whataboutism
/r/MensRights08/12/23 06:11 PM
0

And what does it have to do with a female suicide? Again, whataboutism. If any sort of attention made to a female victim of suicide is a proof that society doesn’t care about men, you have a problem
/r/MensRights08/12/23 03:48 PM
1

And that deserve suicide? Frightening lack of empathy
/r/MensRights08/12/23 03:41 PM
0

The title is berating her work as if that excuse suicide, and if it’s a sub about male issue, why are things like this posted, when it has nothing to do with male issues? Why is this sub whataboutising on a poor woman who killed herself? Beside, just because it’s not a grief sub doesn’t mean we can’t have a minimum of empathy. A teacher killed herself for Christ’s sake
/r/MensRights08/12/23 03:40 PM
0

Yeah, this post is so weird. A head teacher end her life and this posts is just turning it up as a way to shit on her FFS this is the type of post which make us look like a bunch of incels
/r/MensRights08/12/23 03:35 AM
4

Don’t have well paying job because they choose not to have one. It’s 2023, there’a no laws restricting women from becoming lawyers or doctors. They choose not to be one, the same way my mom choose to be a lawyer like my dad So no, they don’t deserve support for choosing to be mothers, for choosing not to have a high-paying career. No the man isn’t as involved because he have NO say in the final decision of keeping the baby or not. How can you be so dense!? Choosing to talk about it isn’t an impa…
/r/MensRights07/12/23 04:47 PM
3

If the father isn’t involved, he’s entitled to 21 years of child support. That’s pretty much my point and show the hypocrisy of the way parenthood is seen this day: Women are strong and independant, and can make decisions on their own, yet expect money from a man who didn’t have the choice The mother shouldn’t be forced to carry a child for a man either, it’s her body My last paragraph was regarding your "He nutted inside her". Like bro what? The woman choose to agree to sex, choose to trust him…
/r/MensRights07/12/23 01:27 PM
2

Except that he doesn’t want to be a father, so why should he not have a say in this if, like you said, it’s also his potential child? Especially when the woman does have the right to be a mom or not? If it’s both their responsibilities, that mean both have a say in if they want to be parents or not, both of them. Yet only women get to decide and men are expected to suck it up You’re talking as if women were objects which can’t make decision on their own, she also decided to not get an abortion (…
/r/MensRights07/12/23 01:03 PM
9

Condoms can broke or even willingly damaged. So until they’re literally 100% effective and until we live in a perfect, honest world, let’s give men the choice to be fathers the same way we give women the choice to be mothers It is unfair that for a decision which impact both parent on a 21 year long timelapse, that only one of them get to decide wheither it happen or not
/r/MensRights07/12/23 04:17 AM
34

We should have abortion, but we should also give men the legal right to opt out of parenthood Women have the choice to keep their kids, men have the choice to keep their wallet
/r/MensRights06/12/23 09:01 PM
8

Both of you are in the wrong. What she did was shitty in some sense, but you can’t fully blame her, let alone stop trusting women The biggest mistakes you made was 1. Be in a long-distance relationship where she don’t even care about meeting you 2. Buy her an expensive material good as if that’s gonna save your relationship when it was this short 3. The worst: Open the relationship The best advice I have is to move on, try to request the 50% again, and file a complain for menace against the poss…
/r/MensRights05/12/23 02:38 PM
5

Like I said, I wouldn’t care if the backlash from "men bad" was as intense as "women bad" Someone say men are trash and you’ll get 2-3 people saying it doesn’t make sense, but if someone say women are trash his account would be reported, suspended and the dude cancelled before he even got to close twitter
/r/MensRights05/12/23 02:24 PM
1

My point wasn’t directed specifically to feminism at all. I don’t see what does feminism have to do with this
/r/MensRights05/12/23 12:56 PM
39

I do, because if you reverse the gender, it would be an immense shitstorm I wouldn’t gave a damn about Twitter being twitter if at least they weren’t hypocrites
/r/MensRights05/12/23 04:49 AM
9

That could be a great idea. That would also be a way to see if mentalities have changed compared to the controversy the first documentary had
/r/MensRights03/12/23 06:01 AM
4

Differenciate the artist from the art. You can enjoy someone’s music without approving of them. Although that mean it’s understandable not to go to their concert anymore
/r/MensRights01/12/23 04:25 PM
1

I didn’t said that to hurt you, I said that because it’s the truth
/r/MensRights01/12/23 01:02 AM
1

Bitch you sound like the troll here. We give a source and you’re just bitching it saying it’s not valid, but can’t come up with something better Why don’t you buzz off you hoser?
/r/MensRights30/11/23 08:13 PM
2

I’m mitigated about this Changing terms was stupid in the first place, but as long as the opposite terms of those words (Homicide become the term for male murder, Violence against men, Child and Father sabotage) exist, then it come back to the same, except that it can be different organisation to deal with each gender It’s stupid in the first place because both male and female issue are important, but if those organisation just want to focus on female issue, so be it, as long as we have an equal…
/r/MensRights30/11/23 07:26 PM
1

We made our point with a source. Now you come here and say our proof is wrong. The burden now fall on you because you claim the stats are different, which mean you need to provide a proof You can’t just say every sources are wrong and then say you don’t need to provide one
/r/MensRights30/11/23 12:31 PM
1

Do you have a better proof then?
/r/MensRights30/11/23 01:19 AM
-7

I don’t see how this can happen, but that’s something you can fight in court
/r/MensRights29/11/23 11:40 PM
-9

I don’t mind as long as it’s done with enough valid proof, like video or texts, and if misandry is also labeled ad a hate crime
/r/MensRights29/11/23 07:59 PM
0

I geniusly have no idea who
/r/MensRights29/11/23 07:57 PM
0

It says that 50% of women and 30% if men have experienced sexual violence, so assault and rape
/r/MensRights29/11/23 05:31 PM
5

Downvoted for answering with a source. Reddit moment
/r/MensRights29/11/23 04:32 PM
2

"Take some reading comprehension course" You insult me over a misunderstanding, yet here you are forgetting your own comments and not being ab’e to understand what misunderstanding mean Hypocrites
/r/MensRights29/11/23 02:16 PM
1

Like I said, I read it as her being judged as an 19 year-old You are being an ass, insulting me over a misunderstanding. Buzz off
/r/MensRights29/11/23 01:58 PM
-7

Oh I see there, nevermind then But you don’t have to be such an ass about it. I though was being judged when she was 19 for something she did when she was 15
/r/MensRights29/11/23 01:46 PM
-6

Well from what I read she was 15 during the event and he was 35. Again, she should still be jailed for what she did, but the dude wasn’t being free of guilt either
/r/MensRights29/11/23 01:09 PM
-5

Woah woah wait… did he agree to date a 15 years-old as a 35 year-old!? Not that she should go scott-free, but that’s still some messed up thing to do
/r/MensRights29/11/23 12:52 PM
12

Soooo… that mean the actual naturally-aggressive and dangerous gender are women? Which mean I am the one who’s supposed to be protected from the female oppression? Joke aside, I don’t get why we try to resolve social issue using natural statements. Whether male or female were better at hunting, that doesn’t indicate anything toward how socially men and women should be treated
/r/MensRights28/11/23 08:53 PM
19

The problem isn’t the number of false accusation, it’s that a man have everything to lose from this, because he is automatically considered guilty compared to other types of crime. HE will be the one who have to defend himself despite the burden of proof being on the accuser, HE would be the one look down upon by society, by the jury and maybe even the judge, and even if he’s declared innocent beyond any doubts, HE will still be the one losing everything because "nobody want to be associated wit…
/r/MensRights24/11/23 03:56 PM
9

"Just because it’s a group on same group problem doesn’t make it less of an issue" If they keep arguing, simply tell them that by their logic, black people shouldn’t get support against violence because it’s black people killing black people. That usually either shit them off and make them mad, in both outcome they lose their credibility
/r/MensRights23/11/23 09:42 PM
1

Except that we’re not talking about getting used or not, the guy straight up denied warcrimes. He jump into a highly taboo debate as a figure of authority of an institution and suffered the consequences The same thing could have happened to any organisation, to any gender. Replace this college with Google, Amazon of EA and replace the man by a woman and it would have been the same
/r/MensRights21/11/23 02:32 AM
3

I don’t see the connection between anti-male propaganda and someone denying warcrimes
/r/MensRights21/11/23 12:34 AM
9

I love his end point: Don’t judge a whole group based on one person’s actions and how an action from one side end up ruining the reputation of both That could be applied to both Misandrist feminist and Antifeminist MRAs
/r/MensRights20/11/23 02:42 PM
-3

I think those boundaries are fine. If you have nothing to hide, I don’t see the problem It’s not that you don’t trust each other, it’s that you have no real way of knowing what the other is doing, but your own words
/r/MensRights18/11/23 06:23 PM
1

Whataboutism is one of the favourite tolls used by people who don’t want to have a serious conversation about something. They prefer hiding their heads in the sand rather than openly discuss about it
/r/MensRights18/11/23 05:13 PM
-5

Because they’re focusing on women’s issue. That’s our job to talk about men’s issues
/r/MensRights17/11/23 04:55 PM
2

Because it’s not women nor feminism, it’s misandrist who sometimes happen to be women and feminist Right now you’re doing exactly like those who are saying shit like "why are men not helping us? Why aren’t we marching against masculinity? Why aren’t they all put on a watchlist?". That and the fact you’ll always have people opposing you, including simps and white knights
/r/MensRights17/11/23 01:14 PM
4

I disagree. Even if only a small percentage come, it is better than nothing, and we would actually be whiney looser if we gave up the second it doesn’t go as plan If attention is drawn on us and people get violent, we stay as calm as possible and call the police. But I get what you mean, this is why we should have cameras and people streaming it, to make sure to have proof to show Remember that the suffragette also struggled at the beginning and were even arrested, but they kept going. If we do …
/r/MensRights16/11/23 09:14 PM
0

Basing sociological standards on biology is stupid
/r/MensRights16/11/23 07:31 PM
1

You did like the other dude and stated me an example of Feminism of another country. I get that some feminist movement were batshit insane, but not only it ain’t in the UK where the story take place, you’re also talking of something in the past Show me a British example of present pushing against a change in the law
/r/MensRights16/11/23 12:26 PM
0

Yes, precisely! How about not thinking of a group as one big homogenous echo-chamber, huh? Did that really never passed through your mind? Mentalities change between cultures, and hell not a single person on Earth has the same mentality as someone else, even if they can share similarities. If you think it’s not true, you are the one delusional here Isn’t that one of the main thing we also try to defend as MRA? When people see us as a mere bunch of incels who aren’t worth anyone’s time? I get it,…
/r/MensRights16/11/23 04:56 AM
-2

Ok, I get that it happen in India and Israel. Does it happen in the UK, where the story come from?
/r/MensRights16/11/23 04:38 AM
13

If the definition of a patriarchy is a system where men hold the power, then a matriarchy is a system where women hold the power They questionned it, then proceed to give example of matriarchy So unless the definition of patriarchy and matriarchy has changed, then those societies were matriarchies
/r/MensRights16/11/23 04:32 AM
0

They don’t though?? Where does that come from?
/r/MensRights16/11/23 04:29 AM
12

Dude, all it take is a Google research. I took them from Wikipedia, and I know it’s not the most valuable source, but hell do the Google research yourself if it’s not enough Here’s a link https://www.brides.com/matriarchal-societies-throughout-history-5112024 You have the proof in front of your eyes, if that’s bot enough, then nothing will be, and that discussion has therefore no point
/r/MensRights16/11/23 03:37 AM
19

Dude, they are or were matriarchies. I am not making this up. Matriarchies, just like patriarchies, did in fact existed and yes, any society can be matriarchies, just like they can be patriarchies. Where are you going with this?
/r/MensRights16/11/23 02:18 AM
15

Cucuteni-Trypillia, Kihnu island, Padaungs, Kayaw, Minangbakau, Hopi, Iroquois… Should I continue?
/r/MensRights16/11/23 01:29 AM
28

It strongly depend on which culture you’re talking about at which time of our history. Matriarchal and patriarchal societies have existed, and many culture just had gender role which discriminate both sex. But regardless, this debate is as useless as it is stupid. Gender equality isn’t a competition, we’re not at the Olympic
/r/MensRights15/11/23 11:41 PM
-3

What does it have to do with Feminism…
/r/MensRights15/11/23 11:29 PM
9

It’s the UK. Legally speaking, rape mean forced penetration, which mean having a penis. It doesn’t consider a hole forcefully penetrating itself with someone’s penis as rape News are saying she had sex because she legally didn’t raped him
/r/MensRights15/11/23 03:21 PM
2

Bruh, that’s just bullshit What’s the definition of gender equality again?
/r/MensRights14/11/23 01:19 PM
15

Hold on, is this for women, or pregnant women?
/r/MensRights13/11/23 11:58 PM
1

I do not deny that, I’m saying the reason that sperm ended up in a sperm bank is because a man also decided entirely on his own to make a sperm donation But regardless, it has nothing to do with the debate. The debate here is to argue about if it’s right to draft pregnant women. And my point is that’s its wrong. Even if you don’t think of pregnancy as only a choice to be respected, drafting someone which is handicapped both physically and mentally is not only a danger to him/herself, but also a …
/r/MensRights12/11/23 11:50 PM
1

I’m not blaming anyone, I’m saying that saying a woman deliberately choose to get pregnant just to avoid draft or that simply saying it’s her own fault and shouldn’t gotten pregnant is absurd, because that’s not just her choice Why do YOU want to find a woman to blame?
/r/MensRights12/11/23 11:26 PM
2

Sperm which was donated by who?
/r/MensRights12/11/23 06:17 PM
3

Oh come on we’re talking about carrying a freaking baby. Also, for a woman to get pregnant you also need a man who also choose to make her pregnant
/r/MensRights12/11/23 06:07 PM
0

They’re still on the battlefield, sometimes even the frontline, so it’s still not the right place at all to be pregnant
/r/MensRights12/11/23 05:20 PM
37

Except that’s she’s Pregnant. I’m all for women to be drafted just like men, but not if you’re pregnant. Your body is already weakened and your metabolism fucked up because you’re carrying a fetus. Trenches ain’t the place for someone pregnant
/r/MensRights12/11/23 12:46 PM
3

I am not saying that, I’m asking you where it was ever mentionned that 1. Those women were paid more and 2. If they were saying they were as equally qualified as men Because neither of those things are in the article, and y’all are just turning an article about a bad athlete into a gender issue about gender pay equality. Find something more relevant if you want to be taken seriously
/r/MensRights10/11/23 03:13 PM
4

Lot of Anti-feminism circlejerking
/r/MensRights10/11/23 03:10 PM
-3

Where is it said in the article they want equal pay?
/r/MensRights10/11/23 01:03 PM
-4

Where, in the article, is it said those teens are paid the same amount as that professionnal? Are they even paid? Was it a friendly competition?
/r/MensRights10/11/23 12:57 PM
-3

What does it have to do with Men’s Rights? It’s just a professionnal athlete getting humiliated by a teen
/r/MensRights10/11/23 03:49 AM
1

Not saying there’s no monkeys in society, but we are for the most part a civil species, meaning we can take a distance from nature’s laws at some extend
/r/MensRights10/11/23 01:25 AM
0

Among the first few thing, there’s "If you aren’t white, you have less chance of dating a woman" Like I get it, racist exist, but they exist on both side and you really think it’s relevant biologically? Nah, the only exception would be absolute extreme, for example micropenis syndrome or having an elephant trunk, and then again…
/r/MensRights09/11/23 06:35 PM
6

Oh, I see. Yeah I do understand them. "Cute" is used when you’re already in a relationship with someone, but calling short men cute can be seemed as offensive because it’s like belittling them, like they were children. But looking at your comment, it’s clear you didn’t meant harm On the other side, you use "cute" when you’re attracted to someone. You find short men cute, I find muscular women cute, not that I find them childish, but because I love someone who could ki- ahem anyway Conclusion: It…
/r/MensRights09/11/23 06:26 PM
1

IDK… I’m not American, but in my head calling someone cute is also use when you’re attracted to someone. You find your boyfriend/girlfriend cute
/r/MensRights09/11/23 06:21 PM
1

Except there’s a difference with humans: We are a civil species. Nature isn’t the only controlling thing and it’s even a fallacy to think so. Not that I agree with obesity being accepted, but if we had to base our relationship standards on pure biology, that mean penis/breast/hips size, or simply size, and many other thing you can’t change, will become relevant to your love choice
/r/MensRights09/11/23 06:20 PM
2

If you count attracting females to reproduce, then yeah
/r/MensRights09/11/23 06:17 PM
45

The ironic part is, the reason male birds often have colourful feathers is because they are the one who have to parade and be pretty so attracts females… which is one of the thing women fought against for decades: Having to be pretty for men In other word, this article is saying male bird doing the exact same thing as women is somehow sexist towards women Men are always at fault
/r/MensRights09/11/23 04:09 PM
5

It depend on the context and to who you’re talking to. If it’s someone you don’t know/appreciate and she call you that to belittle you like a dog, then that’s not okay But if it’s your girlfriend or in a romantic context like flirting, then yes it is acceptable if you’re into praising I would like it too if I got called good boy
/r/MensRights09/11/23 01:18 PM
4

Damn, I would like being called cute. Was it in a specific context? Because I don’t understand where’s the problem…
/r/MensRights09/11/23 01:12 PM
2

No, not ALL women. Some are though, that’s for sure As horrible as it is to encounter the smae type of people doing the same type of crappy thing, you can’t say [group] are all [Something] until you actually checked every single one of them
/r/MensRights08/11/23 09:00 PM
4

Manipulative women do exist
/r/MensRights08/11/23 08:59 PM
15

Difference is you can hold your pee and poo in, while period blood just come out whenever it want. They barely have any control over it It’s the same for erection though. Men can have a boner for no reason than just standing up
/r/MensRights08/11/23 02:26 PM
1

Take screenshot of conversation and record as much as you can if you decide to have a relationship with a woman if it’s a one-night stand, a new woman or if your present relationship turn sour If she ever show a single symptom of someone who drank too much, leave the room and don’t try to engage a conversation
/r/MensRights07/11/23 05:43 PM
0

This is not something a normal mother would do. Your mother suck, but she’s not representative Also, you say women don’t get the same pay as men because they do not make as much effort as men and don’t work jobs as dangerous, yet right after that rant about how your mom is victim blaming men because she say men get longer sentence because they are more dangerous? Was the male danger also debunked? Because that sound kinda hypocrite
/r/MensRights06/11/23 10:02 PM
6

You shouldn’t be scared of every possible bad outcome to happen, or you’ll live a miserable life However, in this case, it’s difficult when there’s not an actual, legal protection against it
/r/MensRights03/11/23 12:47 AM
-6

I said it in another comment, but those bomb treath and arson were condemned by feminist themselves. Just because you do something in the name of a movement doesn’t make you an actual valid and trustful member of that said movement, nor does it mean the whole movement is like that That would mean considering the entire Muslim world as terrorist because of 20 maniac committing 9/11
/r/MensRights20/10/23 07:56 PM
-5

Were they though? Yes, there was some cases of bombing in the name of suffragette, but even British Feminists condemned those actions. Just because a small group of people does something in the name of a bigger group doesn’t make the whole group bad. Because this logic, MRM is a hate, incel movement because a portion of MRAs are Andrew Tate fan and harass women online. Muslim = Terrorists because some nutjobs highjackeds four planes in the name of Islam Show me what exactly Feminism did which ma…
/r/MensRights20/10/23 02:42 PM
0

So you have nuance only for people who aren’t part of an activist group, yet you’re here commenting on a Men’s Rights subreddit, where their member are MRAs, for Men’s Rights ACTIVISTS… You say you’re libertarian yet consider anyone who doesn’t express his freedom of speech for the same ideas as you terrorists… The hypocrisy
/r/MensRights20/10/23 02:27 PM
4

That’s unhinged. People have different opinions, and as long as they’re coherent with it and properly explain how they think it’s right, than those opinion are valids. To think anyone who doesn’t go with your beliefs is a terrorist is wrong on many level, including removing the chance of any nuances/grey area, and closer to an authoritarian dystopia than an actual working society You’re doing the exact same thing as those extremists feminists, or any extremists in general who think anyone agains…
/r/MensRights20/10/23 01:16 PM
-2

Are you really comparing feminism to freaking TERRORISTS!? Yes, feminism has its flaws, but not only it doesn’t make it right to generalize the whole movement, especially if it’s based on Internet feminism, which like everything else on Internet, is the most biased crap there is, that also doesn’t make it right to only protect the ones whom you agree with. Seriously, MensRights is important, but the constant anti-feminism circlejerk is what make us look like incels and prevent further discussion…
/r/MensRights20/10/23 01:04 PM
5

Are you seriously saying you don’t mind someone with a different opinion than yours getting killed, even your own family member..?
/r/MensRights20/10/23 12:47 PM
-1

Everyone should protect anyone, especially people at risk like very young and very old people, handicapped, mentally challenged, but not women, who are our equal. It’s our duty as citizen, regardless of gender, to protect people from a source of danger, but not while putting our own life to an obvious end (Not necessarely risk, as it take risk in emergency situation)
/r/MensRights20/10/23 12:37 PM
2

It’s true, but at this point its their problem
/r/MensRights20/10/23 11:13 AM
1

That's because, and that's entirely on them, uncircumsized men do not tend to wash underneath the foreskin, which is very important to prevent STDs and other things you really don't wanna have. Circumsized men don't have that problem since, well, the gland is already unprotected, thus it get washed with the rest ​ If you're uncircumsized, learn proper hygiene and you'll be fine.
/r/MensRights20/10/23 05:17 AM
1

I see. Depending on where you leave, there are laws regarding this, but everywhere, you need a good lawyer
/r/MensRights19/10/23 08:37 PM
21

The dude was lied in the face by an underage girl telling him she was an adult, when she wasn’t. And HE had to be registered as a sex offender for 7 years The man being prosecuted because the WOMAN lied about her age sounds a lot like a male issue TBH
/r/MensRights19/10/23 02:28 AM
-2

What do you mean by "tricked into having a child"?
/r/MensRights18/10/23 09:36 PM
37

Many actually just don’t care that it happened to them, and that’s okay. However, the fact it was probably done on them when they were unsolliciting infants is what bug many people. They do not care about the issue in its whole because it happened to them and they turned out fine, ignoring the number of men where it didn’t turned out fine, or are simply uncomfortable with the idea of having a part of their body removed without their consent If society truly want to ignore the scientific evidence…
/r/MensRights18/10/23 09:26 PM
2

What does it have to do with MensRights?
/r/MensRights16/10/23 11:36 AM
1

I define love as an unique feeling for each relationship, which all have the same base: How you feel when that person isn’t there. If your wife isn’t there anymore, either because she died, divorced you or is simply out for the day, are you missing her because you want money to buy a new Xbox, because you get overly insecure and incapable of controlling your emotions by yourself, or because you just want to spend quality time together? That is the difference. A wife/husband isn’t a piggy bank no…
/r/MensRights13/10/23 12:15 PM
1

Yeah, the worst part is the hypocrisy of him to say women only listen to natural desires and will inevitably go back to them, yet after take two whole paragraphs to explain how he can control them, and how he doesn’t want sex despite it being the natural desire to reproduce He’s both saying everything’s about natural urges and saying it’s actually not in the same comment I don’t care about what you think, you can open up and discuss it. But you lose any respect when you show sign of hypocrisy, b…
/r/MensRights13/10/23 03:29 AM
1

Yes, I do think there are right and wrong reason to start a relationship, and money is one of them. Relationship is for love, you shouldn’t start a relationship for anything else, which also include only emotionnal stability. If you go out with someone just to have a shoulder to fry on, it’s also problematic. You can however financially and emotionally support a spouse, just that you can’t have them as base of a relationship, or it’s probably doomed from the start. That’s the nuance Stay at home…
/r/MensRights12/10/23 11:25 PM
2

Faking love and having a relationship with someone with the main goal of getting money seems pretty malicious. And no, it’s not a majority of women. They’re human and seek love just like us Yes, temptation do exist, but it is not an excuse to be controlled and directed by them. That’s what a rapist is, someone who can’t control his/her natural sex urges? I am not saying the two next points are bad, I used them to show this dude’s hypocrisy, because he state women inevitably follow their carnal d…
/r/MensRights12/10/23 06:45 PM
2

It’s awful that they’re cheating, but again, how many women do you know? 20? 30? You may think it’s a lot, but there’s four billions of them. That’s not even 1% of 1% I don’t know if it’s because they’re trad or things like that, but even so, it’s probably not all trad women either I’m wondering though why wouldn’t you tell them it’s wrong and most importantly, talk to their husband about their infidelity. I mean if you know it and have proof don’t keep it to yourself
/r/MensRights12/10/23 03:37 PM
2

Then good, at least you make up for it and not generalize all of them, but you’re still generalizing married women, and that’s also wrong It’s your choice if you don’t want to get married, like I said I don’t believe in marriage either, but you can’t say wives will all eventually turn against you I’m not white knight, I’m just not generalizing
/r/MensRights12/10/23 03:34 PM
-4

Dude. You literally said, and I quote: "You can't change the way a gender carnally works. Women were always like this." Without any distinction of SOME women. No, you generalized women. That what is the most wrong about your take. And worse, you said "women" only respond to "carnal desire" like natural behaviour had anything to do with how a civil human work That and other hypocrite things like saying women obey to their carnal desire, but you can control them, and how you actually don’t want se…
/r/MensRights12/10/23 03:23 PM
5

Yep, Canadian here. Positive discrimination is a thing, and it’s royally fucked up how it accepted. Positive discrimination = discrimination Always ironically sad when you remember the Australian government did made a study where they hide the name and gender of someone to prove that female discrimination is real, and it turn out that actually, employers were now choosing more white men to do the job, and the government just stopped the experiment because they "didn’t got the result expected"
/r/MensRights12/10/23 03:18 PM
-1

You’re saying women are gold digger infidel whore. That’s a pretty incel take Point to me what exactly in my take make me a white knight, and I’ll shut up about it
/r/MensRights12/10/23 03:13 PM
-6

Good, we don’t need incels here either. We’re suppose to fight for our rights, not be an anti-feminist/anti-female circlejerk
/r/MensRights12/10/23 03:10 PM
-2

An incel isn’t just an involuntary celibate, it’s someone who blame every problem on women. You’re literally saying women only want money and make you a cuck. That’s pretty incel, or Neckbeard. You pick your poison at this point I may need to grow a pair, but you seriously need to grow a brain, learn nuance, and stop saying everybody who disagree with you is a cuck nor a white knight If not generalizing women make me a white night, there’s something wrong with you
/r/MensRights12/10/23 03:09 PM
-14

Dear incel, For starters, if you think MensRights is about considering women as inferior and only thinking of them as a huge group of whores who don’t love anything and only listen to their selfish desire, you’re on the wrong sub and movement. YOU should get the fuck out Coming to my points: What does fertility and kids have to do with? This question if both for you and the comment above yours Yes, women are applauded for following their desires, but not only that doesn’t mean it’s because their…
/r/MensRights12/10/23 02:55 PM
1

That is true, but why would you care about what some morons may think of you?
/r/MensRights10/10/23 06:56 PM
-1

It’s not what I mean, what I mean is that legally speaking, nobody’s forcing the mother to not extend her maternity leave, but nothing force the father to take extra work hours either Both put themselves at financial risk, but none are being "forced". Honestly, if my wife wouldn’t understand that her not going back to work will seriously put both of us in trouble, I wouldn’t do more effort just to satisfy her ass So you can call me naive all you want, there’s actually nothing who forced neither …
/r/MensRights10/10/23 12:33 PM
15

Please stop the whataboutism. Rape is bad, murder is bad, regardless of gender
/r/MensRights10/10/23 03:51 AM
-6

And if she wanted to keep a stable house life and a happy husband, she should have gone back to work instead of taking extra maternity leave. She still did it because she wasn’t legally forced, the same way you weren’t legally forced to work more, but choose to so you could keep both her and the house Seriously, if she can’t understand the fact it would put even more burden on your shoulders to not go back to work, she’s terrible. But nothing forced you to do what you did neither. The peak reddi…
/r/MensRights10/10/23 12:00 AM
-9

What/who forced you to work more and be away from the house, legally speaking?
/r/MensRights09/10/23 06:28 PM
-3

The only post of that type is one calling out the anti-feminist circlejerking of this sub, and regardless of what you think of feminism, it’s true that many comments tend to always blame feminists and feminism. I saw this morning upvoted comments compared feminism with goddamn NAZIS. How can you be more biased than that!? OP is doing it right now. What’s wrong with feminist trying to understand our view and discuss over gender topic? You prefer them to stay in their sub, further growing an echo-…
/r/MensRights08/10/23 04:57 PM
1

Are you sure about that? Both kill, both are equally wrong, both have their load of insane and inhuman shit
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/23 02:10 AM
11

You can apply that to every group of people Replace men in the analogy with women, white, b’ack, muslim, christian, jew, rich, poor, homeless, asian, handiccapped, mentally ill, healthy, orange juice lover. What’s the difference? None. So by that logic, we should all avoid each other altogether The analogy doesn’t work because it imply it’s the strawberries of a single bowl, not all strawberries of the world. She say it herself, she should avoid this particular strawberry bowl. She can’t take a …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/23 02:07 AM
3

Every place about a certain topic get harassed by bots and the ones which are against this topic. All it take is the topic to have people against it The only place I never saw get brigaded is meme place, and still, if a meme about another community get posted, you can be damn sure there’s gonna be haters shitting on it
/r/MensRights06/10/23 01:51 AM
44

AI are often very flawed because they get fed on what other user has told him and on the first results of an Internet research, which are also pretty biased (Try both those message on Google to check) I wouldn’t take ChatGPT too seriously, but it still suck how the beat technologies can be so misandrist
/r/MensRights04/10/23 03:57 AM
25

Send women to the front: 😡 Send older and older men which already did enough for their country: Hell yeah
/r/MensRights02/10/23 03:11 PM
1

That is a fact, and a problem. But my point still stand: Feminism is for women, Men’s Rights is for men
/r/MensRights02/10/23 03:05 PM
1

Isn’t that normal? It’s FEMinism. They advocate for women’s rights, the same way MEN’s Rights advocate for, well, men’s rights We shouldn’t expect feminist to talk about male issue the same way they shouldn’t expect us to talk about female issue
/r/MensRights02/10/23 02:07 PM
2

According to the scientific knowledge we have now, there is no biological evidence that physical health is linked to a frequency of sexual intercourse. At the extreme limit, not ejaculating enough make you more prone to prostate cancer It have a psychological impact though, like anxiety and depression, but not only is it controllable, it’s also same allele (DRD(2)) and hormone (Dopamine) shared with other type of pleasure, like eating your favourite food, doing fun activities, etc. It isn’t nece…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/23 09:23 PM
-10

How is a woman beating up a man in a movie a men issue? It could be for a thousand reason different, the main one being the person getting beaten up just happened to be a man and the person doing the best up happened to be a woman
/r/MensRights30/09/23 01:48 AM
6

That’s the two problems: There are countless of reason, wrong and valid, to still be a virgin after the mid-20s, and the definition of an introvert make it nearly impossible for two to meet. Well, maybe with the democratization of online dating app, it can help a little, but still I’m 20 year old, and never kissed a girl (Preschool crushes doesn’t count), because I always have a hard time to go further in a relationship, even if it’s just to make a friend, due to past trauma. I can st least now …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/23 01:05 AM
3

I do that too, but since I’m also a joker, I like to play my flaws and insecurities as jokes to cool down the atmosphere, as I think it’s better to laugh about it rather than constantly being upset about it, while still being aware of the change I can do to improve Yet I think of me as an hypocrite, because I do that, yet still complain to myself and wonder why can’t I find love. It sucks to be aware of your problems, but be scared to do anything about it, fearing the change and other’s reaction…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/23 12:56 AM
15

This is kinda ironic. Women don’t like men without experience and are insecure, but the reason they are like that is because women don’t give them a chance Being virgin for obvious reason, insecurities because it create an endless circle of insecure -> women don’t like that -> even more insecure etc. It is true it can be cured or at least easily deal with with therapy, but nevetheless, the more an i secure man get rejected, the more insecure it will be And this go for both gender, maybe st the d…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/23 12:35 AM
–

Redpill is more centered around MRM, male freedom, MGTOW, etc. I don’t see the point of talking about biology for gender related and social issue. The biological selection, whether natural or sexual, is rarely relevant for any gender-related debate. Because not only are those "biological preference" disputed in the scientific community, but also that we are over nature, being a civilized specie. So even if men liked thinner women and women liked taller men in nature, we are not in a natural stat…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/23 09:20 PM
2

An addiction can’t just disappear like that. You need years of therapy, with still a chance of falling back into it I don’t think sex worker truly are evil people which will do anything to take your money, but they won’t stop you from spending it even if it look obvious you shouldn’t, look awful because of it and feel terrible about it It’s like casinos. It’s not a "bad thing" in general, but nobody’s gonna force you to go home if you start to spiral into an endless cycle of addiction and money …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/23 10:59 PM
11

I’m a straight man, if I had the choice, I’ll become a straight man. Never be ashamed of what you are, including men, straight and cis people Although maybe, out of curiosity, I would try being interested in other men
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/23 02:20 AM
1

There is a difference between confidence and pride. Having confidence is being aware of his own capacity without overlooking your defaults, whereas pride is exaggerating what you are and what you can do just to look superior Confidence is necessary for an healthy relationship. Even if you don’t have personnal accomplishment, as long as you’re confident in what you can do and take action for it, you are a good person. But if you fake your whole personnality and plain lie about your capacities, in…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/23 02:16 AM
14

There is a big part of women (not the majority, but still very big), especially in online dating, which have ridiculously high standards, or simply standards which can’t really be changed, such as height However, we can say the same for a lot of men, although statistically speaking, it seems women have higher standards than men in general
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/23 02:11 AM
2

That’s not really true. First of all, evolution isn’t on the base of gender, but on the base of a population. A population in its whole evolve, which include male and female, which evolve in the same environment, with the same selective pressure The reason men are taller, stronger, faster, etc. is because males are biologically in a competition for the females, either directly with physical fights, or by again, evolution which give more chance of survival and reproduction to the more adapted ind…
/r/MensRights24/09/23 06:55 PM
11

Well no shit? She believe in his innocence until a trial, with a JUDGE, found him guilty. She did exactly what she should have done: Innocent until proven guilty. Being charged for rape is a good reason to divorce someone
/r/MensRights20/09/23 03:54 PM
-3

Just because it’s used by the wrong people doesn’t change its value. Blame the one using it wrongly
/r/MensRights19/09/23 04:31 PM
-6

OP, remember people like Andrew Tate exist. If that guy is not the definition of toxic masculinity, nothing is Masculinity in general is a good thing, but to deny the existence of radicalized men is foolish. And just because hypocrites blame everything on toxic masculinity while protecting "Ingrained mysoginy" doesn’t deny the existence of both toxic masculinity and toxic feminity
/r/MensRights19/09/23 12:04 PM
-3

Like I said, we overcome our primal instinct every day of our life. When was the last time you had the urge to go hunting a prey? To go and look for a temporary shelter? To find a viable source of water? To make selfish decision for the strict reason of surviving? You probably didn’t, so why would you have the urge to breed a woman? Men have urge, that’s true, but if it’s at the point of needing to castrate yourself, there’s a problem, because no, that’s not the norm, nor it is supposed to
/r/MensRights17/09/23 01:37 PM
-9

I don’t know why, but it feels wrong to justify incel behaviour with the "biological drive" argument. Civil humans are over natural behaviour and other primal instinct. If we don’t have the need of hunting, being afraid of the unknown, selfish survival act (Until a certain point) or overall "survive", why should the need to reproduce be any different? Don’t get me wrong, I don’t think constantly shitting on incels are going to solve the problem, but we shouldn’t justify someone hating women and …
/r/MensRights16/09/23 11:15 PM
22

I mean, it’s better to divorce than to live with someone doesn’t/ you don’t love anymore It sucks, but love doesn’t always last forever. They could try marriage counseling, but if it still doesn’t work afterward, better to split up
/r/MensRights15/09/23 07:31 PM
5

Based. Never lose that mindset
/r/MensRights15/09/23 04:22 AM
2

I always found female kinda cringe when using it as a noun. You refer to males and females in a biological context, not to sociologically describe women
/r/MensRights14/09/23 05:14 PM
6

All stereotype have an explanation, but no justification. Even if there are actual incels and Andrew Tate fan in that sub, it doesn’t justify blaming the majority nor does it justify a permaban when you never had any bad interaction with the sub directly I don’t like to do whataboutism, but there is also a double standard regarding gender-related sub, because you can see things as dumb and shitty as here in women-related sub, yet none of them get you instantly banned for participating in those c…
/r/MensRights14/09/23 03:36 PM
10

I’m a member of this sub since early 2021. Since when did you start looking into this sub? It doesn’t matter, because the second you’ll make another comment/post, you’ll get instantly re-banned. It’s an autobot doing this I already tried that and asked a mod of r/r ape, and yes, she agreed to unban me, but warned me that it’ll get re-banned automatically the next time I comment, which did happened. A bot doesn’t determine nor understand context. And it’s not fair that me, who haven’t participate…
/r/MensRights14/09/23 03:02 PM
21

This sub tend to blame feminism rather than women, and even if I don’t really agree with that, there’s a difference. MRAs women are welcomed and when a woman post to ask what must she do to be better, we respond with respect Banning someone for participating in a sub is foolish in the first place, because not only everyone’s not a perfect copy of the sub’s hivemind (Like I said, I don’t really agree with all of the anti-feminist circlejerk), but it could also simply be someone stumbling on one o…
/r/MensRights14/09/23 02:28 PM
1

They are men, I don’t care. They deserve the same treatment and respect as everyone else The one thing I want is to make a clear difference, if an injustice happen to a Trans man for example, between if the thing happened because he is trans or because he’s a man Men and Trans people face different challenge, and it’s important to sort each case in one or another. Not that issues trans people in general face are less important, just that we’re a men’s Right subreddit/movement, not a trans/LGBT+ …
/r/MensRights14/09/23 01:12 PM
6

Charged for her crime? Actually used the word "rape" in the title? That’s progress!
/r/MensRights13/09/23 02:01 AM
4

Because dumbasses will only judge you for what you prefer rather than what you’re saying It happened to me too. I don’t care how much you hate a specific sub, if you have to stalk someone’s account and insult him based on what he’s subbing in instead of finding a valid counter-argument, you’re an idiot and unworthy of being listened to
/r/MensRights12/09/23 01:03 AM
-1

How is abortion a privilege? Abortion is a medical procedure which can save the woman’s life in case of complication. Also, if the parents don’t have the financial stability nor the time to take care of a child, it’s better to abort than give birth to what will end up as a burden, and the child won’t have to live in poverty with distant parent How is it a competition? If women have basic rights, you’re losing the gender race? How about both resolving female and male issue instead of having a gen…
/r/MensRights01/09/23 07:51 PM
0

I never said men shouldn’t have the right to opt out of a baby’s life if he isn’t ready to be one. My point is simply that women should have access to it. Stop with the whataboutism
/r/MensRights01/09/23 01:43 PM
15

"A march for your rights is useless, and you are a fascist for suggesting it!" "Why are you whining about father issues? Why don’t your organize your own campaign of sensibilisation? Fix your issues by yourself"
/r/MensRights01/09/23 02:34 AM
-2

And where exactly did I said male issues were less of a problem, you absolute moron? Women should have their right for abortion protected, the same way men should have the right to decide if they want to be circumsized or not. Stop with the whataboutism. YOU are the fucking idiot for thinking it’s a competition
/r/MensRights01/09/23 02:01 AM
-2

Abortion is a right according to common sense. Women should have the right to be mothers or not I have no idea what the hell does that biotechnology come from The right to be saved is also a right. Yet in the states where abortion is illegal, it is illegal for everyone, regardless of a personnal choice or a medical necessity It’s not a right for men because man can’t get fucking pregnant? Unless you’re talking gender vs sex If you’re talking about the right to have a voice to rise about an abort…
/r/MensRights01/09/23 01:53 AM
-1

Sometimes, due to complication, you abort the baby to not kill the mother. There is also the case of death infant still inside the womb. Or even, maybe the mother don’t want to be one because the child is diagnosed with a genetic illness, or because despite using protection, she still ended up pregnant, and doesn’t have the money nor the time to take care of a child A fetus isn’t alive, it’s closer to a lump of flesh. It barely have any nerve and no functionnable brain If we force pregnancy on w…
/r/MensRights01/09/23 12:05 AM
-8

That’s not the point!?? Abortion is supposed to be a protected right for women, or biologically human female, and in all time it should be a choice, especially since sometimes, due to complications, an abortion is needed to save the woman’s life Are you seriously saying women shouldn’t have this right protected because it doesn’t include men!?
/r/MensRights01/09/23 12:01 AM
1

Gender problem are kinda like a relationship fight. It’s not boyfriend vs girlfriend, it’s love vs problem
/r/MensRights31/08/23 09:38 PM
-12

My brother in Christ, women don’t even have a certified protection of their abortion right, half the states not only ban it, but also have laws to punish women if they go get an abortion in another state
/r/MensRights31/08/23 09:36 PM
3

Kens weren’t hurt either? They were fed, happy, could enjoy life, but didn’t had jobs, and were only toys for the Barbies. In both Barbie and Kenland, they were conditionned into thinking that’s the best they are for, and learned to enjoy it
/r/MensRights31/08/23 08:10 PM
-6

The same way, in our modern society, some people think women shouldn’t have rights. If only a single Barbie think like that, then you can’t say they in general think like that Beside, like I said, just like in our society, the Kens start at the bottom with the possibility of rising up, just like in the assembly chamber. They start as a smaller group than Barbies, but over the year, they will grow more in number and power
/r/MensRights31/08/23 05:29 PM
-3

It is fair. The movie started with a matriarchal world where Ken are only a tool for Barbie, to the point where Barbies barely recognize him as an equal to her, never spending time with who is suppose to be her boyfriend Then, Kens, after years of being treated like sub-humans, rebel and make their own land, where yes, they are now the boss, but the main reason being they wanted attention from their Barbies, which they actually get. It’s still not a perfect world though, because Barbies are now …
/r/MensRights31/08/23 04:14 PM
6

NGL the title was kinda misleading, but I totally agree! Both in a relationship should take some days to spoil their partner, or both of then spoiling themselves on a day-off work
/r/MensRights29/08/23 12:04 AM
-1

The same reason why women are expected to be shorter, know how to cook and clean, or being weaker and strictly feminine: Double standards and stereotypes
/r/MensRights27/08/23 04:46 PM
1

Maybe because, like you said, she was submitted to her husband? I don’t if you made a poor choice of word or if you geniusly think a wife whould be submissive toward her husband, but if I were to bet submitted to someone, you can be damn sure I’ll try to regain independance for the next couple of year Nobody should be "dominating" in a marriage, unless it’s some kind of sexual thing. It’s abuse
/r/MensRights25/08/23 09:12 PM
18

Isn’t there at least one male shelter. I remember reading about that one Also, pretty sure not all Iranian execution were men
/r/MensRights24/08/23 03:31 PM
6

If this is psychological damage, what is false rape accusation then?
/r/MensRights23/08/23 02:01 PM
0

Why would you be working for free in the first place? Instead of blaming men, ask to be paid for your extra hour, or simply stop working extra UNPAID hour if you want to work less
/r/MensRights23/08/23 05:00 AM
2

New domestic shelters aren’t being build because, again, both society and government don’t give a shit. It’s not a politically correct issue. And there’s one thing that didn’t exist in early feminist time: Internet. And it changed how bullying and backlash work. You just have to post a pic and make up something about someone and he’s doomed. It may not be worse than suffragette arrestation, but it surely does way more psychological damage, especially on the long run. How is that even an argument…
/r/MensRights22/08/23 01:18 AM
3

It wasn’t just two guys, but those are the best known examples You think feminists never had to deal with social backlash? Didn’t stop them, did it? Nobody said feminists "didn’t" faced backlash. It might be time you listen to your own logic and see what happens. It doesn’t matter anyway, because 1. It didn’t stop us, but it bought someone to suicide 2. It’s not a victim war, it’s about fighting for equality. Both backlash from feminist and MRM only slow down the process. Government and society …
/r/MensRights21/08/23 11:42 PM
4

The issue here is that you place all men in the same big basket, which doesn’t make any sense. 4 billions people aren’t one big hivemind, the same way for everyone and every movement. Simply "placing more women in power" won’t resolve the problem, because one gender isn’t better than the other, it’s all about the person itself Beside, yes, men did make some changes. There was that one guy in Ottawa who created the first Canadian male shelter. And de Santis abolished permanent alimony in Florida …
/r/MensRights20/08/23 06:57 PM
23

The "Be a man" treatment, false accusation, testicle pain, or family/divorce court bias
/r/MensRights20/08/23 03:14 PM
19

That one is kinda light-Heart and funny compared to other comments. You made me chuckle, have my upvote
/r/MensRights20/08/23 03:11 PM
24

In that case why are they shitting over us? Why are they complaining about MRM? Why, each time you talk about it, they always tell you the same damn thing: "Feminism already care about male issues"!? Being only centered around female issue isn’t a problem, but being a complete hypocrite and says something only so it can suit your argument is one.
/r/MensRights19/08/23 08:06 PM
136

I got banned from Feminism for this. I didn’t even talked about male issues, I simply said there are males issues to be adressed. And I was banned because "comment must have a feminist view" So not only are they admitting they want to create the perfect echo-chamber and ban anyone who dare disagree, they also admitted feminism isn’t for men Strangely, when I talk about MRM, feminist always tell me "but feminism is already for men! Men’s Rights is hateful and useless!" Pure hypocrites
/r/MensRights19/08/23 03:38 PM
4

As stupid as the opposite sound like The difference is, the opposite would cause a riot
/r/MensRights19/08/23 03:17 PM
1

Considering you see something wrong with women having jobs, I don’t think so. So you can call me stupid all you want, I am not going to be impressed by a mysoginist who don’t want women to work. Please fuck off Also, if you can’t provide a logical argument, that mean you have no one. Someone who result in insults only show he has nothing to back up his claim. I’m really wondering who’s the actual stupid one between us two
/r/MensRights07/08/23 03:19 PM
1

And your point is?
/r/MensRights07/08/23 01:43 PM
5

Did you tried to make a complaint to the direction, or tell it to your parents? What an awful teacher
/r/MensRights06/08/23 12:22 PM
2

I disagree. Maybe it’s because HR was something that was created at the same time of the suffragette and other early feminist movements, in the early 1900s, but nevertheless, what’s stopping a man from being an HR employee? The same way a woman can be an employee of all the other department. Maybe if we look if which department is dominated by one gender, we can conclude something like this, but then again, the solution would still be to sensibilise men into going into those female-dominated dep…
/r/MensRights05/08/23 12:27 PM
1

What does that even have to do with the post? It’s just about how women are now 50% of worker. It has nothing to do with male or female only society (on the contrary, since 50/50 mean half of both for each domain), but most importantly, it doesn’t affect our rights as men
/r/MensRights05/08/23 04:26 AM
-2

What do you mean?
/r/MensRights05/08/23 02:40 AM
2

What does it have to do with men’s rights? Good for women if they manage to achieve work equality
/r/MensRights04/08/23 10:17 PM
5

Taking care of your partner during difficult times and financially helping them is a form if love though. There’s a difference between being someone’s cashcow and giving him/her money he/she’s having difficult times (debt, health money, ect.). The key is for it to be reciprocate I saw a post on AITA about how a man was upset that her wife, which was making like 400k per year and bough a lot of luxuries and vacation, didn’t want to pay for his father’s cancer treatment, because he didn’t have the…
/r/MensRights02/08/23 06:29 PM
3

I suggest you go on r/Malementalhealth. This subs and its member are very helpful, you’ll surely find support here
/r/MensRights02/08/23 12:12 AM
3

Wait, I saw this one before. Weren’t there a post on air feminism with the same thing for feminism and woman-hater? I think the message is great in both cases
/r/MensRights01/08/23 06:41 PM
1

Being simple doesn’t mean it’s done. I can assure you many uncircumsized don’t think about it, or don’t do it well
/r/MensRights30/07/23 05:20 PM
1

Again, never said Feminism was and is perfect. I can assure you I hate feminist generalizing men too.
/r/MensRights26/07/23 11:58 PM
0

I have to agree on this one, that there’s not enough effort to call out the extremist feminist. However, I still think it doesn’t justify making feminism the main source of modern gender-related problem. Because not only, again, even if there’s a lot of feminism not caring enough for extremism, there’s also a lot of feminist thinking the KAM portion is not even feminism at all and is more of an incel community, but also because extremism is a problem in all movement, including MRM. I saw comment…
/r/MensRights26/07/23 11:57 PM
2

That is one example of extremism that I don’t agree on, yes. What I don’t like is you generalizing it to the whole movement, which is millions of people, all around the globe So fine, I’ll change my take. Feminism has inevitably done crappy thing that should be denouced, but it is foolish to take away all the credibility of that movement because of it. No movement nor anyone’s a perfect Saint, this is why is is important to find nuances when talking about something with complexity
/r/MensRights26/07/23 09:38 PM
-1

TwoXchromosome is different, because it’s not a feminist sub by itself, it’s a women sub. And yes, it is known that there’s a hell of an echo chamber in that sub, but so is for every single sub to ever exist. Men’s rights has one hell of an echo chamber too. And maybe you have the impression that feminism is misandrist because being on reddit, you are faced with basement dwellers in an echo chamber that won’t respect your opinion, but it’s because they’re basement dwellers, behind a screen, an a…
/r/MensRights26/07/23 06:48 PM
1

The bias is kinda "normal" and isn’t just a feminism problem. Many people, identifying as member of a groupe, will likely have a positive bias toward their group and a negative one against other group. It’s a huge problem when wanting to have civil discussion, but it apply to every type or group, not just gender-related one, and I see as much male bias on men’s rights sub that I see female bias on feminism sub, for example I’m getting downvoted because, like you said, there’s also an echo chambe…
/r/MensRights26/07/23 06:18 PM
0

They don’t do that though? Not all of them are like that. I am not saying there’s no extremist, and yes, they may not want to talk about men’s right because they’re focusing on women’s rights, but they don’t try to shut down men’s rights or male rights discussion I am on askfeminist, and feminism, and while I don’t agree with everything, they do agree that false accusation are awful, and male mental health need more assistance from the system and soviety
/r/MensRights26/07/23 06:11 PM
-8

No, it is not. Sorry to burst your bubble, but seeing a woman with a KAM shirt isn’t enough to discreditate a multi-million member organisation
/r/MensRights26/07/23 06:09 PM
-17

No it is not… It advocate for women’s rights. Just because a misandrist is feminist doesn’t mean the whole movement is misandrist
/r/MensRights26/07/23 03:38 PM
-18

Patriarchy hurt everyone, so patriarchy is also misandrist. I don’t know what’s the deal with the other guy
/r/MensRights26/07/23 02:16 PM
13

The delivery driver was at the wrong time though. You don’t flirt during worktime But that comment is ridiculous
/r/MensRights26/07/23 12:53 AM
1

It’s not the lifebot that were closed to the first class, it’s the opposite: The first class were located closer to the lifeboats, because they were valued more important. There was still the "women and children first" mentality, but it was also clearly showing they priorised rich people over the others I fail to understand your point about self-preservation, priorising women because they’re "the bottleneck of reproduction" (which I think is false and irrevelant in an emergency situation anyway)…
/r/MensRights25/07/23 04:51 AM
1

You responded to it yourself then. At the time of the Titanic, it was the mentality of "who should we save". This is why the majority of the victims were third class, which were at the bottom of the ship, because we valued their lived based on their income Today, we do not do that anymore. We want to save everyone, and thus, since there are natural inequalities, we should priorise first the naturally weak people, which are the disabled, olds, young, pregnant women, etc. My point is, since the st…
/r/MensRights25/07/23 03:47 AM
1

It’s not a question of "who should we save", it’s a question of "How can we proceed so we can save everyone"
/r/MensRights25/07/23 02:40 AM
1

Women are biologically weaker than men, but for that type of situation, the difference for the same age are close to zero, to the point if irrevelance. Elderies, however, have a way more fragile body, and often need assistance during emergencies. So you can’t really compare them It’s not really a question about "who need to be saved", but more about "how can we save everybody". This is why old and very young people, people with disabilities and pregnant women are prioritized over the rest, who a…
/r/MensRights24/07/23 07:57 PM
0

Both gender are equal, therefore women shouldn’t have priorities over men However, children and eldery people do need priorities, because they are actually weaker and more at risk against a danger
/r/MensRights24/07/23 07:13 PM
9

It doesn’t matter if your opinion stems from this particular story or many stories of the same type, you’re putting in the same basket 4 billions women because of some nutjobs. Isn’t it one of the thing we’re fighting for in this sub? Don’t we call out people blaming all men and patriarchy for every women’s problem? By doing the same thing, not only that make you an hypocrite, it also remove all credibility to our takes and their arguments. And do you seriously think there’s no MRA women? That t…
/r/MensRights22/07/23 06:46 AM
25

Blaming all women because of one nutjob, ask someone to be aggressive at the risk of being kicked out of the place, call him a weak men for simply ignoring her and enjoy the rest of the movie, says its his fault he got yelled at Yeah, I think YOU need to shut the fuck up
/r/MensRights22/07/23 06:05 AM
3

What’s wrong with this post? It’s truly cute and wholesome that her husband is spending a lot of effort for the one he love. And the reason it’s on r/mademesmile is because she truly appreciate him and want to show it to reddit. How can we judge from that post that SHE isn’t doing anything for him?
/r/MensRights21/07/23 05:44 PM
4

For the same reason we wouldn’t do it to other crime, like rape or murder. Because it si no better than what he did and because of false accusation (in general, not this one) Get him a trial and let him rot in his cell for the next 20 year
/r/MensRights21/07/23 02:40 PM
9

"And I saw a male approach me" r/womenandmales
/r/MensRights21/07/23 03:30 AM
3

Men’s issues aren’t just worth fighting for the US, and the thing about "signing a draft" mean in case of an actual war, with intense conflict, which would menace your country directly, you will be drafted at age 18 Good for you if you were enjoying life at 18, but the day the US enter in a war, the next thing that’s going to happen is a military officer banging at your door, saying you’ll go serve your country. And yes, women from the same age aren’t conscripted, it will remain voluntary servic…
/r/MensRights20/07/23 03:21 PM
4

Yes? Unless you’re paraplegic or have a medical condition which prevent you to go to war, as soon as you’re 18, you get drafted And if you don’t want to, they do not care
/r/MensRights20/07/23 03:12 PM
7

I though mentalities would have changed a minimum after the Depp v. Heard saga, but either society has a goldfish memory, or just don’t care at all about sentencing, legally and socially, an innocent
/r/MensRights18/07/23 07:05 PM
3

It’s kinda the same of "protect your daughter» when you think about it. It imply that women can’t defend themselves and need protection from others Any message which generalize a group is idiotic. It may not be hate speech, but it generalize targeted group, and generalisation always stop progress toward equality
/r/MensRights15/07/23 09:24 PM
-2

Some MRA do the same. Not all Feminist are extremist.
/r/MensRights15/07/23 07:47 PM
-3

Well, men’s right is like Feminism. We advocate for MEN’s Rights. We are not egalitarian either, we rise OUR rights to be equal to women. MRM and Feminism is the two side of the same coin. And in both movements there is a sexist, extremist portion who hate the other gender and/or movement, and will call anyone who disagree with them a woman/man hater
/r/MensRights15/07/23 06:48 PM
19

I’m a man, stumbled upon this sub by hasard, stayed
/r/MensRights15/07/23 04:07 AM
2

It’s an indirect cause It’s because many men do not think about washing their genitals properly, which high up the chance of STDs. However, since circumcised men are, well, circumcised, water and soap go de facto underneath the skin, because they’re no skin. While an uncircumcised man need to actually know about this, stretch the prepuce and wash Conclusion: Wash correctly and you’ll be fine. If you’re a parent, TEACH your kids how to properly wash themselves, instead of cutting part of their sk…
/r/MensRights13/07/23 08:48 PM
1

If you mean "Is there specific clothe for specific gender", then I am against them. Wear a dress regardless of what gender you identify to. No one should be restrained from wearing what he/she like because of his/her gender If you mean "Is there specific clothe for specific occasion", then yes. Unlike cultural gender-based dress code, occasion-based dress code is still an element of culture without being offensive to anyone. So I’ll wear a suit at a wedding, a cow-boy outfit at a rodeo, and a sw…
/r/MensRights13/07/23 02:12 PM
7

He should be cleaning your room, and maybe even more, for everything you’re doing for him. But do you seriously think an argument as a couple really deserve to end a relationship? EVERY couple fight (verbally) during their relationship, it’s normal to have disagreements. It is not a red flag case, it’s an argument where he is in the wrong, simply
/r/MensRights12/07/23 04:49 PM
5

Anyone using the insult card over actual counter-argument prove that he/she doesn’t have the mental capabilities nor the maturity to have a proper discussion. It sucks, but the best way is to keep being mature about it, keep proposing arguments and asking how does what you say make you [Insert said insults] while in the same time saying an insult doesn’t make a point. It’ll only make them even more of a fool of themselves and they’ll keep crumbling over their own biases
/r/MensRights12/07/23 03:36 PM
1

I just did and what I saw were common post without any reference nor related to a gender. The first post was about a guy who asked his abusive father for a fistfight, and even in the comments, there weren’t highly upvoted misandrist one…
/r/MensRights10/07/23 11:41 PM
1

Can we have the link to the post please?
/r/MensRights10/07/23 06:11 PM
11

In which sub did you see it? Can we have a link to it?
/r/MensRights09/07/23 09:37 PM
51

That’s literally what he did. He set up a boundary saying he doesn’t like it when she or himself post picture of a near-naked ass on social media, he RESPECTFULLY told her she can do what she want, he just didn’t want to be in a relationship with someone who does it. Like you said, boundaries are for yourself, therefore you won’t be in a relationship with someone who do that
/r/MensRights09/07/23 09:00 PM
-5

Both are morons. He said out of the blue that she said women are better, and fighting war isn’t really a good thing (unless strict defense of course and no, you can’t reproduce without men. Yes, women can do that too, but men can also do what women are the majority in too
/r/MensRights09/07/23 11:38 AM
2

None of them are being replaced by wokeness. The closest you have is in Hawkeye and Loki and it’s simply another main character along with the original. There’s a difference. Captain America is being "replaced" by Captain Falcon, which is a recurring character in the comic, and Batman isn’t being replaced at all And they do have a very interesting personnality, especially Sylvie form Loki, but that’s subjective at this point
/r/MensRights09/07/23 02:46 AM
12

Either that, or ask myself the same question to women who want to be included into male only event, or say I’m geniusly interested in those event
/r/MensRights08/07/23 05:38 PM
81

I’ll accept it if men get to be included in women only organization
/r/MensRights08/07/23 04:41 PM
1

The same way many sphere of feminism are toxic to the point of wishing a male genocide, should we generalize all feminist saying they’re all incompatible due to some being misandrist? How about not generalizing an ENTIRE group based on some individuals? If we had to judge a whole group based on the worst one, then every group, regardless of what they are, are awful groups
/r/MensRights07/07/23 07:16 PM
2

Look at this post, which link to the same question, but reversed, on both MensRights and AskFeminist. I see a clear distinction between this sub who, despite having a bad opinion of feminist, could still agree with them, whereas the top comment on the feminist sub are things like "being an MRA and being friendly aren’t compatible". Hell, OP even stated that he was BANNED from AskFeminist because of it. What isn’t more hostile toward an opinion than banning someone for ASKING it? I am not going t…
/r/MensRights07/07/23 05:58 PM
-2

This is a brilliant respond, but she call herself a feminist just like you and I call ourselves MRAs, yet we are associated with misogynist incels. And guess what? Feminists who say this also tell us we should be egalitarian, so it’s only a subjective point of view at this point. Feminists and MRAs should all be egalitarian and work together in the first place, but instead we keep throwing rocks at each other, although I admit from a post I saw on a feminist sub, that they seems more hostile tow…
/r/MensRights07/07/23 02:19 PM
44

For saying male mental health wasn’t as aknowledged as it should, or at least what I think is should Positive note though, many people supported me and told the other guy he was angry over nothing
/r/MensRights06/07/23 11:26 PM
23

Someone having a killallmen shirt is criticism? Getting labeled as an incel because, like you say, you disagree with someone, is also criticism? Getting considered as a moneymaker and expected to be the bread winner, and if you don’t you’re a failure, is criticism? I witnessed many of those. I myself was called an incel for saying that male mental health wasn’t taken as seriously as it should And yes, we do have documented misandry in history. Hell, we have evidence of MATRIARCHAL society. And n…
/r/MensRights05/07/23 07:14 PM
39

And misogyny was only a word in the mid 17th century. So I guess hate on woman wasn’t a thing until then? And rape was only a word in the 14th century, so rape didn’t existed beforehand? Transphobia wasn’t a word until the 90s, so my guess is trans people weren’t oppressed before that, mmh? Isn’t that a funny coincidence? It’s like a word was created to describe something that already existed, so society could talk about it more properly, instead of having apologist like yourself saying it doesn…
/r/MensRights05/07/23 06:50 PM
1

You can’t equalize something like prison gender, that doesn’t make any sense. Like what? We give more chances to men? We bail them out? BS, even if there’s more men in prison than women, as long as they’re here for a good reason, then there’s no problem in that
/r/MensRights05/07/23 01:31 PM
3

What does it have to do with men’s rights? Anyone smoke weed, and people in prison for being dealers isn’t entitled to mens Discussing about the legalization of cannabis is an interesting topic, but it’s irrevelant to males issues
/r/MensRights05/07/23 05:30 AM
-5

Pretty sure if a mentally stable feminist see a KAM post, they’ll be among the first one to say it doesn’t make any sense Hell, I’m ready to make the experiment, go on askfeminist right now and see what they think Edit: Ok apparently in the FAQ someone already asked this question, and… the answer were in variety
/r/MensRights04/07/23 06:27 PM
1

Ah that explain. Still, blackpilling isn’t a feminist only issue
/r/MensRights04/07/23 06:26 PM
5

I was called a racist because I explained that history from a place/a nation start with the arrival of writing. Apparently, it’s a White supremacist concept My conclusion is anyone who can’t have a rational debate once they are faced with something they don’t like will automatically play an "Oppressive" card as a Joker for any kind of situation. You say history start with writing? Racist card! You say women can be abuser too? Sexist card! You call a transgender an asshole because he don’t know j…
/r/MensRights04/07/23 03:34 PM
-21

I am not doubting what you’re saying, but pretty sure feminist in their whole don’t want to kill men either. Blackpill incels, both in the Feminist Movement and MRM, exist and are a minority Also, what the hell does "join the rates" mean?
/r/MensRights04/07/23 02:25 PM
6

But now that everything was proven to be false under the legal system, they’ll be able to be foster parents right? I mean they’re not guilty, so there’s no reason for them to not get trusted? RIGHT?
/r/MensRights27/06/23 01:16 PM
3

I think it’s a negative consequence of the feminist and post-religious era we lived in for a shitload of time. For many years, women were treated with disrespect and considered inferior to men. So today, society make sure it doesn’t happen. But by doing so, nourished by a lack of critical thinking, many people think de facto that a woman is always a victim of oppression, and that a man is always a "loser who deserve it" This is a common thing that happens with eve et movement involving discrimin…
/r/MensRights25/06/23 07:54 PM
7

A matriarchy would be as bad as a patriarchy for society. Both think there is a specific natural role for each gender, one getting dominated and the other one entitled as the bread winner, and that if you dare try to be something outside of those social borders, you aren’t considered as a real woman or a real man I do not wish for none of both
/r/MensRights22/06/23 04:40 AM
2

What did she/he said?
/r/MensRights21/06/23 01:44 PM
209

The hypocrisy of not only leaving your dying husband but also be offended because no one called you to inform you about his death is at a whole new level
/r/MensRights20/06/23 09:05 PM
3

Idiots are defending anything they believe in like it’s a religion and thus refuse to collaborate, regardless of which movement. The rare time I got the chance to talk to a feminist (and by that mean someone actively engaging on feminist groupe), she was very opened to discussion and criticism, since like any sane person there is, someone can be part of a movement and still party agree/disagree with what’s being said. It’s exactly like in politics, weither you’re Liberal or Conservative, you don…
/r/MensRights17/06/23 01:21 PM
0

Yeah, sadly some do thing like that. Nevertheless, pretty sure that article isn’t talking about that
/r/MensRights12/06/23 01:38 AM
-4

I’m gonna go over the debate of if the survey is valid or just gaslighting bullshit, I still think there’s a lot of factor missing here, like the context of hitting a woman. There’s a huge difference between hitting as abuse and hitting as self-defense, for example. But since the survey also say those men said things like hitting their lovers in the past, dislike of public homosexuality and dislike of a woman having partners before then, I doubt they agree to hit women for the good reason
/r/MensRights12/06/23 12:23 AM
3

ANY type of discrimination toward ANY kind of groupe can be dangerous for said group Hate isn’t male, it’s human, and it’s known that hate lead to violence, regardless of who’s discriminated Misandry can kill as much as misogyny can, because mentally ill people can and will cause harm toward the ones they hate
/r/MensRights11/06/23 04:29 PM
24

That they have a point about women not getting nobel prizes, but it has nothing to do with men getting one. If you’re going to whataboutism when all I did was praising a man who dedicated his life to a science/art/peace, making the world a better place, because all you want is make it about you, then you have a problem
/r/MensRights09/06/23 04:10 PM
2

r/Malementalhealth And I don’t see how r/Askmen is "woke"
/r/MensRights07/06/23 08:52 PM
3

Staring is weird in general. The issues here is that he was BLIND and was kicked out for STARING. It’s a certified r/Facepalm moment Often, it’s not a case of staring, it’s a case of overreaction. Some paranoid people think a 1/10 second eye contact is staring
/r/MensRights07/06/23 08:45 PM
-1

r/Menandfemales
/r/MensRights07/06/23 02:08 PM
0

She’s technically right about the suicide paradox. Although it has nothing to do with MALE mental health anyway. Regardless of which gender have it worse, it’s important to aknowledge both, and June (or November?) is for men, the same as March is for women Happy Male Mental Health month guys
/r/MensRights07/06/23 05:44 AM
2

Exactly. Here, we talk about women and feminist when the topic of the post is related to women and feminist. And tes, we try, or at least I try as much as I can to have critical thinking and think about them too
/r/MensRights04/06/23 05:59 PM
0

What?
/r/MensRights30/05/23 11:41 PM
1

That’s another debate though. If society have that mentality of "all men are the same", then it have to change
/r/MensRights30/05/23 06:52 PM
1

Exactly! This is the nuance a lot of people don’t understand: Our goverment isn’t patriarchal, but society or even people with a common mindset can be. If I think women are weak creature which belong to the kitchen and that men should go to work and be tough, I have a patriarchal mindset, but it doesn’t make my country a patriarchy, simply because, for example, any woman can become a lawyer, a police member, a firefighter, etc. or any man can become a professionnal cooker in a restaurant, an art…
/r/MensRights30/05/23 05:33 PM
1

This is why I specified that even if patriarchal ideology is one of the reason, it’s not everything either. Some people are just misandrist scums. Not all women think about patriarchy nor are all misandrist. That’s the tricky part, you have to go for the right woman, no, the right person if you want to talk about personnal issue. This is why we have this sub, or r/Malementalhealth, for example
/r/MensRights30/05/23 05:25 PM
-7

Regardless of if you think Patriarchy as a government is present in your country, it’s a reality that a lot of people, including many men, have patriarcal ideologies, such as "men can’t cry", or "men must be the strong". Does it mean all of men’s problem are due to those people with those ideologies? Absolutely not. Many just don’t care about men, and many are "simply" misandrist It’s important to remember patriarchy isn’t just "Mysoginy, fuck women, men have everything". It’s an IDEOLOGY, a way…
/r/MensRights30/05/23 04:14 PM
-3

Yes, because feminism and misandrism, on the contrary to many people’s belief on this sub, aren’t linked at all. If a woman is misandrist, it’s not because she’s a feminist, it’s because she’s a cunt without respect. The same way a BLM member isn’t racist toward white people because he’s part of a BLM movement, it’s because he’s a piece of shit I like this sub and agree with many thing, but the "feminism = misandry" mentality has to change Also, OP, it’s a great thing you asked the exact same qu…
/r/MensRights30/05/23 04:02 PM
2

That’s kinda a paradox. People don’t want to date virgins, so people want to date other people who had sex. But if no one date virgins, they’ll keep being virgin. The less you date virgin, the more virgin you’ll meet Beside, the reason they want to go on a date with you is because they don’t want to be lonely virgin anymore. You’re literally shaming them for trying to get out of the situation you hate. It’s like shaming a fat guy for going at the gym
/r/MensRights29/05/23 01:19 PM
1

The Eternals, one if the super heroes is a dad, and he’s wholesome
/r/MensRights29/05/23 01:43 AM
1

Fair enough. I still think it’s stupid to put all women in the same basket, but yeah, those stats are scary
/r/MensRights28/05/23 03:12 PM
1

"And has DERIVED as a sub-culture of sexist sociopath" Are YOU feeling alright? Or should I add that ethymolical "incel" aren’t necessarely incels
/r/MensRights28/05/23 02:31 PM
1

Yes. Yes I am. So? What does it have to do with anything? And guess what? Not only am I a young man, but I’m fat and ugly. I’m not attractive for jackshit. I may be tall, but I have a beer tummy and I’m pretty sure I’m not that rich either. But I do have rich parents. And I’m not in a relationship. By this logic, I would just have to ask my dad 20 000 and I’ll end up with a girlfriend, which is totally false I have female friends, and they like me because I’m funny and nice. I do not consider my…
/r/MensRights28/05/23 01:54 PM
1

I agree to that, but it doesn’t answer my question. There’s too many variable that we’re not taking into consideration to just say "women prefer rich, tall guys"
/r/MensRights28/05/23 01:49 PM
1

Incel is blaming the other gender for a lack of sexual activity. It come from involutionary celibate, and has derived as a sub-culture of sexist sociopath He’s saying women only go for rich, tall guys. How is this not incel?
/r/MensRights28/05/23 01:48 PM
-7

That’s the point, I want to know why. Is it because women are actually more selective than before? For which reason? Is it the same towards women, what is the percentage of single young women? Which proportion of those men are single because they chose to not be in a relationship? There’s way more parameter to take into account than just "60% of young men aren’t in a relationship" I’m not disagreeing that women (and people in general) are too selective, many for the wrong reason. But to only dir…
/r/MensRights28/05/23 05:05 AM
-20

I’m not sure what that’s supposed to mean…
/r/MensRights28/05/23 04:41 AM
-47

Bro wtf? Not only it’s false, but that’s mysoginist Not all women aren’t only attracted to rich and tall, and the one who do are usually considered as dumbasses by women themselves I admit porn is often used as a copium mecanism when a man (or even a woman) feel low, but you can’t just blame your lack of sex and love by blaming an entire gender. Sorry to break it to you, but that’s literally the definition of an incel. I’m not saying you’re one, but Jesus that’s one hell of a bad take
/r/MensRights28/05/23 04:13 AM
3

Morally and by the definition? It’s rape, plain and simply Legally? You should look at the Swedish criminal code, because it vary A LOT depending on the country
/r/MensRights27/05/23 10:39 PM
6

I think the study they tell in those video should be made with a comparison as to the percentage of men who get insulted while playing online If they see a clear difference between men and women, then we can affirm there’s a potential gender bias toward women (but it can also prove there’s a gender bias toward men) We could also study which type of insult they’re getting, because "kill yourself" is a basic slur which apply to everyone, but if those women get told more often things like "Go back …
/r/MensRights26/05/23 05:01 PM
2

You have to talk to your father about this. If she only see him as a locked door for money, and only care about him dying so she can get his money, he have to divorce her and get the hell out of her life, and you too I would try to reason your sisters a little at least. It’s not their fault if they’re being brainwashed by your mother
/r/MensRights25/05/23 02:25 PM
-1

I honestly don’t know what to think of this I think it can be biaised, as even if it was true, the numbers of opportunities to boost libido are high, like counseling, therapist or roleplaying
/r/MensRights21/05/23 07:58 PM
1

But did your friend actually sexually abused that woman, or is it all made up by her?
/r/MensRights19/05/23 01:24 PM
19

Your father is megabased. He totally deserve a second chance. Hell, he’s even ready to pay a portion for recovery. Not a lot of people admit their mistake, even if it’s not regarding mutilation
/r/MensRights18/05/23 08:53 PM
1

That’s… exactly what I said. Circumcision and STDs are a false correlation because of that
/r/MensRights17/05/23 01:06 PM
-1

Yes, I know it’s basic hygiene. But we’re talking about humans. People are dumbs, and the result is people forgetting basic shit like this. Some probably never heard of soap
/r/MensRights17/05/23 01:52 AM
-7

Correlation, simply. Knowing human nature, and it’s pretty easy to forget about it Beside, that’s still not an argument for circumcision. Just stretch and wash underneath
/r/MensRights16/05/23 11:16 PM
-21

The real advantage is less chance of getting STDs, but that’s a false correlation, since most uncircumcised men don’t think about washing underneath the skin. It’s not the circumcision itself, it’s simply because the gland get washed by itself with the rest Therefore, as long as you teach him how to properly wash himself, he’ll be fine
/r/MensRights16/05/23 06:32 PM
18

"Patrick Brown, 49, was sentenced to life without parole in December 1994 after he was accused of raping his six-year-old stepdaughter. But for over 20 years, the victim had told authorities that her stepfather was innocent and implicated another family member, who had bragged about it around the time of the crime, according to filings and prosecutors notes from the time." Even the VICTIM herself said he was innocent, and the court didn’t listened. How does that even work!?
/r/MensRights09/05/23 07:00 PM
1

And we gotta admit ugly women didn’t got it easy neither. Best example are classic Disneys. The pretty fragile woman as the protagonist and the ugly old woman as the villain (I’m looking at you, Snow-White and The Little Mermaid)
/r/MensRights04/05/23 02:00 PM
3

"The only unconditionnal love a man get from a woman is from his mother"
/r/MensRights01/05/23 01:13 PM
10

r/awfuleverything
/r/MensRights01/05/23 01:11 PM
2

Meh. It’s worth the try
/r/MensRights30/04/23 07:36 PM
-11

I wonder if it would be possible to try and have some diplomatic discussion with the rest or Reddit, question of maybe getting a second chance at not being considered as assholes, especially since the scandal is 10 year old But yeah, I get why we often get hated and I understand the automatic ban from subreddit for commenting or posting here
/r/MensRights30/04/23 05:03 PM
4

WHAT THE FUCK!? This… this is simply not ok! It has to be fake right?
/r/MensRights27/04/23 08:38 PM
23

I’m not sure I understand what you’re trying to say. Basically, in 97.3% of rape case where a woman was a victim, the perpetrator was a man But what does it have to do with anything? It still mean in 57% of rape case, a man was the victim, and in the huge majority, the rapist was a woman And even so, it still is a near 50/50, so a proof that being a rapist isn’t attributed to one gender
/r/MensRights27/04/23 08:36 PM
1

Some people place culture over everything else. It’s biaised, of course, but they exist, simply because they grew up in that culture. And some culture can be very biaised toward gender equality and medecine because of belief Hence why I said the cultural advantage isn’t worth it
/r/MensRights21/04/23 07:21 PM
4

Advantage: Cultural reason, so to perpetrate a culture from generation to generation Disadvantage: He can’t consent, it’s extremely painful (we’re talking about cutting skin from a place more sensible than the rest of the body), it reduce skin sensitivity, so less pleasure in sexual activity when he will be older, and contrary to popular belief, it doesn’t have any medical advantage, as you can stretch it to wash underneath IMO don’t do it. He should be able to have the choice (even though I thi…
/r/MensRights21/04/23 04:54 PM
-3

There’s biological and social advantage of being a man, such as not having to deal with pregnancy, periods, and we aren’t the sex impacted by gender pay gap nor the percentage of rape. But so is for being born a woman, such as being literally able to create life (with a man of course, but still), and they aren’t being affected by prison time bias, false accusation percentage and women criminal are often taken less of an issue Biological disadvantage can be countered by social acceptation such as…
/r/MensRights21/04/23 11:31 AM
7

And the kid is now an orphan
/r/MensRights20/04/23 11:31 AM
2

Damn, it suck
/r/MensRights19/04/23 04:16 PM
2

Still would be isolated case instead of a core hate of the movement IMO. Anti-trans don’t hate trans because they’re feminist, it’s because they’re intolerant idiots
/r/MensRights19/04/23 04:15 PM
7

Were they isolated cases? Because I don’t know how you can link feminist and hate against femboys Ain’t saying it never happened, but I don’t think it’s because of feminism, more because of intolerant assholes
/r/MensRights19/04/23 02:28 PM
10

Honestly haven’t saw that much femboy hate outside of far-right conservatives morons
/r/MensRights19/04/23 01:26 PM
1

Yeah, that’s why we should have critical thinking about it. I know they was a drama caused by our sub many years ago, maybe it come from here. But if it date from many year, it should be irrevelant to keep the autoban up to now. I’m not saying we should "beg" for access. I’m saying both our communities, along with other who banned us/that we banned, start to get along more. It could be done with "diplomatic" discussion between mods, so we could come to an agreement
/r/MensRights19/04/23 03:44 AM
1

I think more than 30 subreddits have an autoban bot to anyone who comment or post on r/MensRights I talked with a mod of r rape, which have that autoban, and she told me it’s because many user of our sub started harassing them, to the point of needing an autoban Since I don’t know what originally happened, I suggest to take that explanation with critical thinking, but I will also admit the eventuality of a hate incel mob speaking on behalf of our sub and movement to harass rape victim If there’s…
/r/MensRights19/04/23 03:25 AM
1

Really? That doesn’t help AT ALL
/r/MensRights19/04/23 03:24 AM
64

One week under medical assistance, and permanent physical damage, with possible permanent mental trauma And she walk free? I understand the pussy pass concept, but bloody hell there’s a goddamn limit!
/r/PussyPass15/04/23 02:04 PM
4

We aren’t entitled to double standards and there’s some inqualities men face. It has destroyed my vision that women were always the victim and that men could also be treated inequally And that’s totally okay, assholes are everywhere in all form
/r/MensRights15/04/23 12:43 PM
3

Yeah, like I said, the movie plot is a really great idea, and the message is strong. Is there any male main character ehich aren’t depicted as bad?
/r/MensRights14/04/23 10:32 PM
4

Because misandrist people are idiots. To say misogyny is pure profond-hatred, but misandry is because you got called a slut in third grade by another idiot is a clear indicator you have bubbles instead of grey matter Both misogyny and misandry are social issues that can take enormous proportion, but isn’t natural
/r/MensRights14/04/23 02:27 PM
3

The message is strong, but I don’t see how a work strike has anything to do with your rights to do what you want with your body
/r/MensRights12/04/23 10:07 PM
6

We shouldn’t rely solely on someone’s testimony to sent someone to jail, that’s the problem The main reason why "Don’t punish false accusator because other won’t tell the truth" is literally saying "we have nothing else beside this guy’s speech" OP said it, it isn’t the 1920s anymore. We have the technologies to actually prove it or not, but the bias in court and in social opinion is what send an innocent to jail. We must have valid proof that someone did something, and you can’t just only rely …
/r/MensRights09/04/23 12:04 PM
19

We aren’t "grasping at anything possible to say I’m a victim", when we’re talking about men getting longer prison sentence than women on average, we ARE victim of discrimination. This is a sub to talk about men’s issues, what do you expect to find in it? Beside, you creating a troll account really doesn’t help if you want to share your opinion
/r/MensRights08/04/23 11:53 PM
2

That’s because of the evolution of cultures, simply. You’re talking of a time where it was still traditional family, and being seen other than a housewife was considered bad Hell, there was a time where women wearing jeans was offensive. Today, it’s perfectly normal. Does that mean I was brainwashed by feminist? Not at all, it was because of conservative mentality I would be kinda offended if I was called a male, especially if the one talking is referring women as "women" You can’t just say ever…
/r/MensRights05/04/23 09:08 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter