Londinium433 Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	There’s nothing misogynistic about men preferring a virgin women over a non-virgin. She would be a hypocrite - but the basis of her hypocrisy is not about genitals & freedom to do what you want with them whereas controlling women’s sexuality very much is about that… therefore it’s discrimination based on sex = misogyny	/r/MensRights	26/08/22 06:31 PM
1	There’s nothing misogynistic about men preferring a virgin women over a non-virgin. You can’t really analogise something that’s clearly more true for one gender? Men are far more likely to be over 6 ft than women. A fairer analogy would be someone with poor hygiene saying they will only date someone with excellent hygiene. It’s not respecting the other person’s attributes and you cannot demand something you don’t practise yourself (well you can, but it’s called hypocrisy). If a virgin man wants a virgin woman then I don’t see anything wrong with that. It’s the men who think it’…	/r/MensRights	26/08/22 06:19 AM
2	There’s nothing misogynistic about men preferring a virgin women over a non-virgin. Not only the ‘top men’ have sex that is ridiculous. Everyday, normal people, short or tall, ugly or attractive, thin or fat, achieve relationships and sex. Contrary to what’s on the internet - genuine, kind people are the ones who are most successful in relationships.	/r/MensRights	26/08/22 06:15 AM
2	There’s nothing misogynistic about men preferring a virgin women over a non-virgin. But this issue is about sex which as we know the sexuality of women has been oppressed for thousands of years. It’s about control, a belief that ‘I am allowed to practise a basic function of the human body but you are not’.	/r/MensRights	26/08/22 06:11 AM
2	There’s nothing misogynistic about men preferring a virgin women over a non-virgin. It’s hard to use sex as an example though, because sex is a primal instinct for both genders. We’re programmed to want it, and it also has many health benefits including your mental health. The fact that some men expect women to be deprived of all that just because it’s a ‘preference’ is a double standard, because they (mostly) do not practise that themselves.	/r/MensRights	26/08/22 06:08 AM
6	There’s nothing misogynistic about men preferring a virgin women over a non-virgin. Which is ridiculous because who are men supposed to sleep with if all the women should be virgins? They literally talk themselves out of getting laid	/r/MensRights	25/08/22 08:47 PM
3	There’s nothing misogynistic about men preferring a virgin women over a non-virgin. It’s not misogynistic to have preferences, what’s misogynistic is when you expect something from a woman that you don’t abide by yourself. Women are frustrated by the preferences for virgins because there isn’t the same precedent for men, and also there is a lot of myths spread around like non virgins have bigger vaginas or the cum stays in and mixes with your cum - it seems that people just believe what they wanna believe.	/r/MensRights	25/08/22 08:06 PM
4	I find myself disgusted by "sex work" and wonder how, in a world it's respected, men by and large can be any more than financial slaves or loners That could equally describe any porn star…	/r/MensRights	30/07/22 06:57 PM
2	I find myself disgusted by "sex work" and wonder how, in a world it's respected, men by and large can be any more than financial slaves or loners But the actors are paid in the free porn you watch? Thus you’re creating a supply and demand for women to be paid to have sex?	/r/MensRights	30/07/22 06:54 PM
2	I find myself disgusted by "sex work" and wonder how, in a world it's respected, men by and large can be any more than financial slaves or loners So you don’t have an issue with women being paid for sex, as long as you’re not the payer? OP seems to dislike the idea that women can so easily make money from sex, I’m just curious why that only applies to sex work and not porn.	/r/MensRights	30/07/22 06:45 PM
3	I find myself disgusted by "sex work" and wonder how, in a world it's respected, men by and large can be any more than financial slaves or loners Where’s the logic in saying women shouldn’t be paid for sex but they can if it’s for porn?	/r/MensRights	30/07/22 04:31 PM
1	What do you think of the term ‘incel’? We shouldn’t be blaming the other gender for our problems if they genuinely aren’t due to them.	/r/MensRights	18/07/22 01:41 PM
2	What do you think of the term ‘incel’? I don’t know what their situations are but abusive people can be very manipulative at getting someone to stay in a relationship or go back. Are you suggesting women like to be abused?	/r/MensRights	18/07/22 12:01 PM
1	What do you think of the term ‘incel’? It’s really easy though to find only women who are saying that online if you go looking for it. Women who say that need to open their minds slightly, however I don’t think there’s anything wrong with preferring a certain height or weight (and women who say weight is different to height are hypocrites).	/r/MensRights	18/07/22 08:06 AM
2	What do you think of the term ‘incel’? Ah ok he didn’t make clear that he was talking about non incels getting called incels.	/r/MensRights	17/07/22 05:47 PM
2	What do you think of the term ‘incel’? Yeah, I would be upset too. But there seems to be a collective belief among incels that their problems are due to women and that blame easily morphs into hate. Calling someone an incel if not self labelled is absolutely wrong.	/r/MensRights	17/07/22 05:17 PM
-4	What do you think of the term ‘incel’? I’m pretty sure women don’t like misogyny no matter who it comes from? It’s just incels are easier to notice because they label themselves.	/r/MensRights	17/07/22 05:12 PM
-15	What do you think of the term ‘incel’? It’s gotten progressively worse though, it’s no longer harmless. I’ve seen plenty of self professed incels posting really misogynistic content - they don’t help themselves.	/r/MensRights	17/07/22 01:22 PM
-30	What do you think of the term ‘incel’? Don’t incels call themselves incels? I thought it was a word created to describe themselves, women only call them that because they’ve decided that’s what they’re called?	/r/MensRights	17/07/22 10:06 AM
1	Name single right men have that women don't? Maybe, but isn’t that due to the lines generally being longer for the women’s bathroom? Try to understand what I’m saying. Men get more facilities. They also get pop up urinals dotted about the city, women don’t get anything like that. It takes women longer to go, and we’re also on our periods 20% of the time. And you think that creating equal facilities based on time and need is, what unfair? So it’s fair for men to have more facilities?	/r/MensRights	06/07/22 06:06 PM
1	Name single right men have that women don't? Women don’t enjoy greater privilege when it comes to bathrooms. Look up potty parity. Ever wondered why there’s always a longer line for the women’s bathroom? It takes women longer to go, and you can fit more urinals in the same space as toilets. So it means men’s bathrooms have more facilities in them. If it was truly equal, the women’s bathroom would be ever so slightly bigger which would create equal wait times for both bathrooms.	/r/MensRights	06/07/22 04:28 PM
2	Would you like to see more female construction workers? Yes I think careers which have a gender imbalance perpetuates itself by not showing role models for that gender so it becomes less and less likely that they consider it. It would be great if there were more female construction workers. Unfortunately cat calling from building sites is so damn common and I think if they had women among them they’d be less likely to harass walkers by.	/r/MensRights	02/07/22 11:33 AM
0	Men, let’s hang out our balls. And dare you to watch. It’s not allowed to like secondary genitals. I guess but why does sexually stimulating = must hide? Many people get turned on my having their ears bitten, neck kissed, foot stuff etc etc. but we don’t hide those. Men also frequently get their penises out (public urination) and in general they are not harassed when they do this. I’ve lived in big cities for a while now and you literally can’t go on a night out without seeing it it’s that common.	/r/MensRights	24/05/22 07:43 AM
-5	Men, let’s hang out our balls. And dare you to watch. It’s not allowed to like secondary genitals. That’s NOT the kind of boobs you want to see. Maybe we’ve cracked how to get them out and not be harassed	/r/MensRights	23/05/22 08:37 PM
-17	Men, let’s hang out our balls. And dare you to watch. It’s not allowed to like secondary genitals. But the difference is that in general men don’t get harassed when they show their nipples. Women do. And that’s where the double standard comes.	/r/MensRights	23/05/22 07:29 PM
-1	Why does society favor women? I wouldn’t exactly call staying at home doing housework being ‘favoured’. They weren’t allowed to have their own work life, money or independence. Yes, I’m sure many men did gruelling jobs. They also worked as carpenters, blacksmiths, doctors, barbers etc. I know I would rather work a job, gruelling or not, than have minimal rights and no independence.	/r/MensRights	22/03/22 08:57 AM
3	Why does society favor women? Only men could buy property, own a bank account and vote even just 120 years ago.	/r/MensRights	21/03/22 09:01 PM
1	Male Genital Mutilation continues to be ignored while Female Mutilation continues to be considered a “Major Problem”. Jeez you’re stubborn	/r/MensRights	07/02/22 10:06 PM
1	Male Genital Mutilation continues to be ignored while Female Mutilation continues to be considered a “Major Problem”. It does say ‘adverse’, but sure, it’s conflicting for both.	/r/MensRights	07/02/22 10:04 PM
0	Male Genital Mutilation continues to be ignored while Female Mutilation continues to be considered a “Major Problem”. Literally the first articles that come up are supporting that so no I’m not going searching to affirm my views. I could say the same back, we can post articles back and forth all day and always find something to confirm our point. Even the first link you just sent, at the top of the suggested articles at the bottom was (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19028385/) so there you go.	/r/MensRights	07/02/22 10:01 PM
0	Male Genital Mutilation continues to be ignored while Female Mutilation continues to be considered a “Major Problem”. Because there’s conflicting information on MGM and there are studies concluding that there’s no difference in performance between circumcised/non circumcised whereas the research of FGM is more absolute. I’m being bombarded with comments now and can’t answer them all but what I will say is I’ve had conversations with circumcised men who having only spoken highly of it and listed off the benefits. I’m from Europe so am not used to it so when a man is, it’s generally a topic of conversation. So th…	/r/MensRights	07/02/22 09:39 PM
-2	Male Genital Mutilation continues to be ignored while Female Mutilation continues to be considered a “Major Problem”. Of course they are both a problem but the OP is badly worded ‘people are discussing FGM as if it’s an issue’. The only reason I’m highlighting it’s more harmful is because generally more harmful = more recognition so that’s why there’s a huge conversation around FGM and not MGM.	/r/MensRights	07/02/22 07:26 PM
-1	Male Genital Mutilation continues to be ignored while Female Mutilation continues to be considered a “Major Problem”. Ok, so clearly there’s lots of conflicting evidence on whether or not it affects sexual pleasure. I can accept that maybe it reduces pleasure, however FGM clearly has a higher prevalence of painful sex and reduced pleasure. Ok, most of what’s in the media is about the more extreme types which are less common. But still a huge problem. At the very least types 1 and 2 cause keloid scars/cysts/UTIs/painful sex/higher risk of complications during childbirth/PTSDs. It’s also estimated that complicati…	/r/MensRights	07/02/22 07:13 PM
-5	Male Genital Mutilation continues to be ignored while Female Mutilation continues to be considered a “Major Problem”. I agree with everything you’ve said, it is a violation of bodily autonomy. And your stats and links have shown that the benefits are only minor? Doesn’t this still prove that while tiny it still (on the whole) benefits rather than hinders? I still believe that FGM is a bigger burden on a person as it clearly carries heftier long term consequences. You have to compare the two in complications, pain, mental trauma and quality of life etc I think it’s a pretty hard argument to suggest circumcised m…	/r/MensRights	07/02/22 05:41 PM
-2	Male Genital Mutilation continues to be ignored while Female Mutilation continues to be considered a “Major Problem”. Ok, what’s the research that it reduces sexual pleasure? It seems that there’s many studies to show that there isn’t really a difference. Maybe the odd study concludes there’s a tiny decrease but that the margin is so small that it bears little significance. It seems there’s a few complications that can happen; bleeding, infection, swelling etc. However this is rare and not guaranteed whereas in FGM the pain is guaranteed and life long. I KNOW ITS WRONG AND I’M NOT SAYING MGM ISN’T TRAUMATIC FOR…	/r/MensRights	07/02/22 04:22 PM
-7	Male Genital Mutilation continues to be ignored while Female Mutilation continues to be considered a “Major Problem”. MGM shouldn’t be done without their consent. However, you can’t really compare the two when FGM is so much more life changing. FGM: - the procedure is usually done without anaesthetic or sterile conditions therefore is extremely painful and unsanitary. - it removes the clitoris meaning she will never experience sexual pleasure. - the labia is part/fully removed meaning giving birth is incredibly more difficult. - the procedure leaves life-lasting physical and psychological trauma - it has no hea…	/r/MensRights	07/02/22 02:14 PM