TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Lonemango Archive

View 0 posts and 245 comments by Lonemango on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

This is also why I think the argument often used to mitigate the stigma of an adult woman with a teenager “What teenage boy would say no to sex with her.” is so terrible. If a boy could or would not say no, that means he can’t really consent doesn’t it? A teenager will not consider the possible consequences of sex. Pregnancy and children which he would be financially responsible for, std’s, the husband finding out and kicking his ass , all negative consequences that a teenager wouldn’t really co…
/r/MensRights20/09/19 06:05 PM
2

I’m a vet, so obviously I don’t like animal abuse. And while this lady was obviously upset with her dog nothing about that dogs behavior to me says it felt abused. A dog like that could take a full force blow from that woman and not feel a thing. The dog probably thought she was playing. But don’t think I am defending her, she tried to humiliate and hurt her dog, she literally spat on it. The fact that she failed shouldn’t really be taken into account. It may be that this is a pattern for her wh…
/r/MensRights08/08/19 05:41 PM
3

I’m pretty sure if a woman said she doesn’t want to be alone with men ,or a particular man, because she fears for her safety, almost everyone would accommodate. And anyone who spoke against it would be seen as uncaring.
/r/MensRights13/06/19 03:54 PM
8

This isn’t meant to be a competition thing. Most people are aware how common, and deadly, breast cancer is, but are not as aware of the mortality rate of prostate cancer. This is meant to educate people and motivate them to get tested.
/r/MensRights13/04/19 12:32 PM
1

The comic is “Hark! a vagrant “ number 341. Edit: No link because I’m on my phone and I don’t know how to do that.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 12:24 PM
43

That’s exactly right, women earn less because they can afford to. No one on their deathbed wishes they had worked more, or spent less time with their family. This is why the earrings gap is always presented as making less for doing the same job, a blatant falsehood. Statistically Women are happier, and live longer than men*. Those two facts alone are enough to prove women are not oppressed. Edit: *This may not be true in all parts of the world or cultures.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 02:10 AM
2

Anyone who pays attention to this sub understands why lesbians earn more. Lesbians dont have a man that will help support them, so they make likely make life choices that will earn them a greater income. The interesting bit in this article is that it goes out of its way to explain that the wage gap for lesbians is very complicated, not do to positive discrimination, there are other factors etc. Which is true. Then it says gay men make less, because of discrimination, simple as that. That's when …
/r/MensRights20/02/16 01:14 PM
0

Inciting violence is not protected in the U.S. either, however while I think this sort of behavior is distasteful, I don't think it should be illegal until it becomes a credible threat.
/r/MensRights06/10/15 04:42 PM
11

None of us here know you or your GF, and obviously we don't know her reasoning. What I do know is that you are uncomfortable with the arrangement and that will only lead to resentment. You have every right to come up with your own counter proposal, or simply not move in with her. Don't let her or anyone on the internet guilt trip you into doing something you are uncomfortable with. Explain to her how it makes you feel, get her input. If she refuses to compromise, or give a satisfactory reason, t…
/r/MensRights18/09/15 12:20 PM
2

Good point, I did not consider that.
/r/MensRights02/09/15 11:57 PM
2

We don't know what percent of the staff are women, if its seventy percent then it makes perfect sense that managers would be seventy percent. There may be other factors as well, Its quite likely that women stay at the company longer than men. The first time a young man gets scoffed at by a girl because he still works at McDonald's he will look for other employment. Most fast food places I go to are staffed by mostly by adult women, young (teenage or just post-teen men), and the occasional adult …
/r/MensRights02/09/15 11:27 PM
6

Scenerio: Pat and Terry get drunk and have sex. Question: who was raped? SJW: I need more information. Neither were black out drunk. SJW: I need more information Pat is male. SJW: Aha! Terry was raped! Terry is also male SJW: um, I need more information Throughout the course of intercourse they both received anal sex. SJW: They were both raped! Stinking rapists raping each other.
/r/MensRights31/08/15 12:24 PM
5

That article is behind a subscription wall, this one by Forbes is not. This drug increases libidos in only 10% of women that take it. These women went from 2.7 sexually satisfying sexual experience per month to 4.5,compared to 3.7 for placebo. For that extra 0.8 sexy times a month you can never have alcohol, as you may get dangerously low blood pressure, along with all the other side effects. It also takes eight weeks for it to take full effect, if you are one of the lucky 10%. I think it's fair…
/r/MensRights24/08/15 05:25 PM
9

Its a macguffin. A way to motivate the character. Also makes it so he has a likable reason to have to continue to rob, sorry, burgle. Hopefully though people see it and realize it's not fair to hold his kid as ransom in that way. I don't think this was showing how child support should be, but how unfair it could be. He was trying to do everything right and all he wanted was to see his daughter, and this unfair situation was what forced him back to crime. I think you are being a bit like the peop…
/r/MensRights06/08/15 04:52 PM
7

Interesting way to see it. Imagine you could marry your best male friend (and now you can). As long as you stay friends all your assets are tied, you get tax benefits, and you can even adopt. But if you ever decided to not be friends, your assets are divided with the same bias in favor of your friend that women receive, and he gets custody of your adopted children and child support at the same as women typically do. Would you view this arrangement favorably. I doubt anyone would.
/r/MensRights02/08/15 12:40 AM
1

This is a textbook example of "moving the goal posts" We hear from feminists women make 23 % less than men for the exact same job. Then we show them that the more variables we control for the less the gap becomes, then they say well you can't explain the 5% that's left, so therefore women make less than men for doing the same job. This is exactly the same as creationists that say we don't have the missing link between man and other apes then when we show them for example Australopithecus. they s…
/r/MensRights29/07/15 12:58 AM
11

The myth isn't that women earn less, that is a fact. The myth is that they earn less because of discrimination, or they get paid less for doing the same work. From the same statistics we can see hispanic men earn less than women. Damn we must really hate Hispanics to pay their men less than even women for doing the same job. We also see Asians make more than whites. This is obviously because we love Asians so much we give them a bit extra even though they do the same job. Interestingly you never…
/r/MensRights28/07/15 01:31 AM
6

The user base of Facebook skews heavily towards women. It's not surprising or offensive that they would want a logo that appeals more to their user base. At least that's what I thought, but then I read this by the designer of the new logo. 'As a woman, educated at a women’s college, it was hard not to read into the symbolism of the current icon, the woman was quite literally in the shadow of the man, she was not in a position to lean in,' Ms Winner added. It's infuriating. The "slight" to women …
/r/MensRights08/07/15 04:31 PM
16

If a pre-sex contract like this were introduced three things would happen. First, any man that tries to have a women sign would be accused of being distrustful and a mysoginist. Second, any man who did not have a contract signed would be presumed a rapist. Third, any man that did have the contract signed would find it of no help at all when a women still accuses him as rape as she could have changed her mind after signing. These contracts are solely a way to shift burden of proof to the accused …
/r/MensRights05/07/15 05:40 PM
23

I think most here don't care so much that men are objectified, but the hypocrisy of many that say its wrong to objectify women, but then go watch magic mike. Nothing wrong or shameful about enjoying looking at attractive people.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 05:04 PM
8

She seems to be implying that Women have intrinsic value, whereas men only have instrumental value.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 04:45 PM
2

What's interesting is that people who justify this double standard would say "What teenage boy would say no to that?" And to me that is the whole point. If someone would not say " no", can they be considered to give consent. A teenage male would agree to sex without even considering the possible negative consequences of their actions: STD's,pregnancy, child support, etc. That is why boys need protection, not because they don't want it, but because they can't not want it.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 12:15 PM
1

I am fat, based on BMI I am obese, and what you say is bullshit. I am fat because I love to eat, I hate exercising, and I lack self discipline. I am fat because of the mistakes I made, and continue to make. I developed bad habits because I chose too. I chose not to exercise, and I still choose not to exercise. And yeah depression helps, but you know what helps with depression? Exercise! I choose to be lazy in this decade and do the other things, not because they are hard, but because they are ea…
/r/MensRights29/05/15 12:26 PM
1

You need to fight archaic religious beliefs with archaic religious beliefs. By Jewish law the religion of children is the religion of the mother. Your children will not be jewish , so circumcision does not apply to them. And you get to decide. On a personal note, my uncircumcised brother is in the reverse situation.His wife if Jewish, again not religious, and wanted their son circumcised. So he got circumcised. Not sure if he cared though, never talked to them about it because it upsets me.
/r/MensRights23/05/15 01:58 AM
1

Interesting, but I think their conclusion about boys is backwards. Makes more biological sense to say that a girl who forces a male to have sex is more likely to get pregnant.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 02:22 AM
10

So umm what does BBW stand for? Please don't kick me out of reddit.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 07:43 PM
1

Go to the source of those statistics. Show them that Asians make more than white people, then ask them if Asians are getting paid more for doing the same job. Compare white women to black men. Compare hispanic men to white women. Ask them if hispanic men are paid less than white women for doing the same.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 03:44 PM
5

She was sent for violating the dress code, the school never said it was because it was too revealing, that was just the assumption of the article. This in fact shows just how wrong they are, she was sent home not for distracting boys,(who would be distracted by that outfit?) but for violating the rules.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 11:59 AM
7

Why do they always say 70% of young men aren't married, but never show the equivalent statistic for women? Are women at 70% too or are they marrying older men? Maybe women don't want to marry either. I don't get why they only show half the picture.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 11:50 AM
11

This is why.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 04:55 PM
8

Because they can. Would they ask this question if it was male guards were having consensual sex with female prisoners? ( Assuming a prisoner could ever truly give consent.) Articles like this betray their inherent sexism against women. Women are not weak willed perpetual victims that have no control over their own lives or actions. I don't get why feminist don't see that.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 05:40 PM
1

I am going to try to answer your question. I have found that there are two major types of MRA's. Those who think the way feminists think is completely wrong. Let's call these type 1. These are MRA's that try to think more logically. They always saw feminism as bullshit. They may think gender roles are not neccesarily oppressive, unless taken to extremes. Then there are those that think more emotionally, like feminists, just skewed towards men. Call these type 2. Type 2's may be former feminists …
/r/MensRights12/01/15 01:22 PM
2

Basically you are saying you need to be willing to walk away from any negotiations. While this is generally true, I don't know how effective it will be in the courts. There is no incentive for the court compromise. Edit: I suppose the equivalent is to hire a lawyer and let the lawyer make whatever deal is financially to your best interest even if means less time with your children. That is tough to do.
/r/MensRights05/01/15 01:23 PM
0

Note, I would recommend seeing a psychologist/ psychiatrist before taking medical advice from any subreddit. That said, frequent masterbating lowers sex drive. Many many medications have lowered sex drive as a side effect, but I wouldn't recommend taking anything just to lower your labido. Perhaps there is a mgtow subreddit that will be better help to you. And for what its worth, I don't think one bad experience should completely turn you off to women, you are giving her way too much power over …
/r/MensRights22/12/14 06:50 PM
0

Caring, nurturing, loving, giving, sensitive, sympathetic. " feminine" traits with positive connotation. Aloof, stern, rough, aggressive. "masculine" traits with negative connotation. Men who show the first group of traits are not typically criticized for them, and men who show the second group are often criticized. The statement "feminine traits are seen as negative" is demonstrably false.
/r/MensRights23/11/14 05:39 PM
6

It's generally not men who care what women wear. I remember a coworker of mine was wearing something inappropriate to work, (very short shorts) and it didn't even notice it until my female coworkers noted it. That women didn't notice this guy wore the same thing for a year is because women notice what women wear more than what they notice what men wear. Tldr
/r/MensRights16/11/14 11:03 PM
1

Doesn't make sense to pay someone for what they are already doing. Pay the promiscuous people to stop having sex.
/r/MensRights09/10/14 03:20 AM
3

Let's assume that this app could be used as proof of consent in the kangaroo courts that colleges set up to try men. Men who tried to use this app would be shamed for being a paranoid misogynist. Not to mention that anyone could change their mind after agreeing on the app, and rightly so. Which means anyone can claim the withdrew consent after agreeing on the app. Which makes the app itself pointless.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 12:50 AM
1

You mean when it's a woman's word against two men's conviction of the men is not guaranteed? Very disturbing news indeed.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 06:32 PM
3

You make a very important point. Everyone is susceptible to group think and bias towards outsiders. Especially when an ideology is involved. We tend to dismiss the bad qualities of others who identify as being in our group, and dismiss the good qualities of those in the out group. We need to be aware that we are equally susceptible to this, and try to fight this ourselves. In truth, it's not feminism itself that is dangerous, it's the people who force their beliefs on others. Just like with reli…
/r/MensRights26/09/14 06:23 PM
4

You are not alone. No one cares that women express their sexuality, i.e. "look slutty", they care that they look low class. If a guy wears his trousers under their butt so everyone can sees his underwear, I don't think," That man is expressing his sexuality, how dare he", I think " What a douchbag." Granted he has every right to dress like that, but I have the right to criticize his attire. And if he showed up at work like that, his boss has the right to reprimand him. I don't understand why fem…
/r/MensRights05/08/14 05:22 PM
3

You have just been accused of rape. How do you prove you didn't do it? What would you want the standard of proof to be in your case? Before you ask, if I were raped, what would I want the standard of proof to be? The same as if I were robbed, or mugged, or assaulted or murdered.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 12:58 AM
1

4) Typically I would welcome it, but I admit that is just me. I appreciate hearing other people's points of view. Just as I appreciated hearing yours, thank you very much for taking the time to answer my questions.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 12:59 AM
2

Men are taught not to rape. Just like people are taught not to murder or steal. Some people do it anyway.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 12:28 AM
1

Thank you again, but if I may rebut. 1) in what way are women held responsible for their rape or assault? Rapists are held accountable for rape frequently. While I admit Women are raped by men way more often than the other way around, compare the accountability a female rapist receives compared to a male rapist. Surely you are not suggesting a female rapist is held to a greater accountability, or a male rape victim receives less blame, regardless of the gender of the assailant. That not all rapi…
/r/MensRights27/05/14 12:27 AM
2

It's actually looked down upon if a woman chooses not to make herself a sexual object. Looked down upon by whom? I think you are interpreting this incorrectly. Women choose to wear revealing clothing because they wish to be sexual subjects, not objects. By wearing attractive clothing they are hoping they will gain the attention of an attractive man, they are then free to choose whether or not to pursue the relationship. Is a man that wear tight shirts, or whatnot, objectifying himself? Of course…
/r/MensRights27/05/14 12:07 AM
1

Firstly, Thank you for answering my questions. Its hard to go into hostile territory and open yourself up to possible criticism. 1) In what ways do you feel men are seen socially superior to women? You mention this several times i other posts, but I wish you to be specific. 2) what do you feel is the defining characteristic of a feminist?
/r/MensRights26/05/14 11:56 PM
7

I wanted to test to see if they would do something similar for women. I figured the word " prostitute" would be a good test, as they are typically women, but can refer to men as well. Turns out it does say "typically a women", so there you go.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 02:42 AM
1

Then I suppose I agree with your analogy, just not your conclusions. However, I do agree that these arguments from analogy are not particularly effective.
/r/MensRights10/05/14 11:05 AM
1

I disagree. Lets say there were things prisoners could do to reduce the risk of rape. Obviously I have no idea what those would be, but for the sake of argument assume things exist. Then yes, you should teach prisoners those things. Especially if it can actually reduce the chance of being raped. I don't care if "soap on a rope" is stupid" if it were to reduce the odds of me being raped in prison please let me know. If simple things like that could reduce the chance of being raped, teaching priso…
/r/MensRights09/05/14 06:12 PM
0

It's okay for one sex to out perform another given the same opportunities. Sexual dimorphism in humans is real. It would not be surprising in the least if one sex is statistically better at literacy skills, or math skills or communication skills, what have you. The danger comes if we assume that one sex outperforming another means there is a bias against the under-performing sex.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 01:17 AM
3

Thank you, have an up vote.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 11:32 AM
1

My biggest complaint with this comic is that it was neither funny nor interesting. Back to the subject at hand he is correct, the first amendment only pertains to the legality of speech. That said shunning people from a community or firing them from a job based on an opinion is shit. It's why cults have such a powerful effect on the individual. It's why the Amish have remained isolated. There is of course a big difference between harassing people because of your opinion, and expressing an object…
/r/MensRights19/04/14 11:23 AM
5

Do you have links to these articles? I highly doubt anyone has ever pledged to set all rapists free, and searching for " mistake rape " showed no results in r/femra
/r/MensRights19/04/14 11:10 AM
23

Why do they keep saying MRA's are rape apologists? Has anyone here seen rape apology anywhere? I suppose, I have seen statutory rape apologists here on reddit (not much in this sub), but I see many more apologists of that in defense of female rapists. I have never seen a comment defending a man who knowingly had sex with a woman he knew did not want to sleep with him. I.E. rape. Presumption of innocence is not rape apology. Denying women can be rapists because all males want sex all the time, is…
/r/MensRights19/04/14 03:31 AM
2

Don't know, but this study was on people who were repeat victims. I suspect that those people who got PTSD and became hyper vigilant would have been excluded as they likely not be victimized again.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 12:14 AM
1

Exactly right, which came first the initial attack, or the reduced sense of boundaries? I don't think that question was within the scope of the study.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 12:11 AM
36

My brother did a study about people who were victims of multiple sexual assaults, it was pretty interesting. They would play an audio tape of a fictitious scenerio involving a man and a woman, with the man being the aggressor. He would become increasingly more pushy and aggressive leading eventually to rape. The subject was meant to stop the tape when they felt the situation was out of hand. Victims of assault would consistently stop the tape later than the controls. The hypothesis being that th…
/r/MensRights07/04/14 05:46 PM
6

I think I agree with you OP. Assuming I am interpreting your opinion correctly. The truth is he is not the father, the husband is. The husband assumed the role and the courts will force that role on the husband. who donated the DNA is largely irrelevant at this point. He should not get a paternity test, and resist any attempts to force one upon him. The only thing he can gain, assuming that he doesn't want to be part of the child's life, is a financial responsibility due to complete chance. Obvi…
/r/MensRights05/04/14 01:39 AM
-1

I think you are looking for r/shitredditsays.
/r/MensRights27/03/14 01:28 AM
2

Interestingly the notion of privilege, as used by most people I have seen, is inherently part of the oppression Olympics. By definition, If you are in the "privileged classes" you are inherently less oppressed, regardless of your level of income or education or anything else. Reading many social justice warrior types, it seems obvious they all think oppression Olympics is bad, as long as you realize that white cis men have it better than everyone else no matter what. That is absurd. I for one th…
/r/MensRights12/03/14 06:10 PM
5

What does an MRA do after masturbating? Flush his sock down the toilet.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 12:41 PM
1

Lets see... Men’s rights activists do not care about men. They are a reactionary hate group that sits around and complains about women and “manginas”. They are the gender equivalent of white rights activists. MRA's care about men I don't see why they think they don't. Reactionary, yeah probably, hate group, no. We mostly complain about feminism , and then only certain feminists, and I haven't heard the term "mangina" in these forums, but there are a lot of complaints about "white knights". But n…
/r/MensRights05/03/14 01:19 AM
4

I guess the most simple reason is because trans women are not men. Therefor, their issues are not ours. To address the concerns by the OP the question of revealing yourself. I guess the real reason this matters is because of societies notions of masculinity. Men are very sensitive to anything that may make them feel like less of a man, and having sex with someone that once had a penis, is a huge threat. Which is why trans men generally don't have this problem with the women they date. Some MRA s…
/r/MensRights14/02/14 01:56 AM
0

Please name one right that MRA men want for themselves, but do not want for women. We can then discuss MRA hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 12:58 AM
2

If that statistic has any truth to it, it is because of the chance of a huge asteroid impact that wipes out the entirety of the human race. That possibility inflates the odds of dying from an asteroid impact. Even so, it is very misleading.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 01:40 PM
-1

He really surprised me, especially after reading "speaker for the dead".
/r/MensRights27/01/14 06:49 PM
8

Yes, also you better be attracted to transmen or else your transphobic.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 01:23 PM
47

I have enjoyed his comic for sometime, and therefore I am not surprised at all by this. There are several comics I enjoy that I suspect would share his opinion, like Zach Wienersmith from SMBC, but I will still enjoy their work. I refuse to be like some feminists who blackball people just because they don't share every single opinion with them.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 01:20 PM
1

I understand the point you're trying to make, but lets say the man poisons the mother to be such that she has a miscarriage, that would be considered murder in every state, not just Texas. The original could also read "this women decided she could not be a mother, so gave the child up for adoption, she made a tough decision." And the double standard would hold true.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 01:44 AM
19

She is right, in a way. If you have seen girlrightswhat?! Then you know that feminism is simply an extension of the same system that has always been in place. Women thought to be weaker, frailer, more emotional, and therefore need special protection. Feminism does not fight this, they only claim that they do. Where as the "patriarchy" they claim to fight against uses these notions to keep women from achieving their goals, feminism uses these same notions to benefit women, and then claim that whe…
/r/MensRights14/01/14 01:50 PM
2

Ah I see, thank you for explaining.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 02:21 AM
1

Right, the premise they affirm without proof is that women are always treated unfairly. I thought I was using the term correctly, but I may have been mistaken.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 01:22 AM
15

I am surprised this author is still a self proclaimed feminist, but she is correct, and far more honest than many other feminist authors. ( at least in this one article) Her graph is spot on in my opinion, as is her notion that people shouldn't call themselves feminist if they don't make it down the graph. Why she still sees that being a feminist is something to be praised , as indicated by the "congratulations", is something she needs to explain.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 07:02 PM
12

A portmanteau of man and explaining. Used to outright dismiss any concerns males have about any topic concerning gender. I want to use this opportunity to coin the term femsplaining which is a portmanteau of feminist and complaining, because feminists can't actually explain anything.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 06:47 PM
10

"Only a Sith with deals in absolutes." Obi-wan kenobi I think the reason women are obsessed with this fallacy, is because it forces people to accept the premise that women are inherently treated unequally. Imagine a similarly phrased poster you either "support black people or you are a racist." Even though black people have it far worse in the states than women do, it would be obvious that this isn't a universal truth. You can be indifferent towards black people and not be racist. And in places …
/r/MensRights09/01/14 06:10 PM
6

Reading your post reminded me a lot of myself. I too am slow to become attracted to someone. I need around a month of daily interaction before I find myself attracted to someone, and only if she has qualities I find attractive. I have been freeing zoned once, and have friend zoned several women who I was not interested in. I think the reason men are considered to be friend zoned is because their is the notion that women are men's to lose. We have to win a woman's heart, etc. were as if a man isn…
/r/MensRights08/01/14 06:46 PM
2

No, don't you see. He-man represents male power fantasies because boys want to be strong and powerful. While little girls are only tricked into liking princesses. They don't actually want to be pretty, or be pampered and powerful like a princess. Feminist know that little girls have no ability to decide what they want, while little boys are the epitome of self determination
/r/MensRights04/01/14 06:52 PM
19

I am convinced that radfemmes have absolutely no respect for women. It seems to me that they think women are completely incapable of anything. No agency, no ability to overcome hardship. I think that is my greatest beef with feminism. I am in one of the few professional fields that is dominated by women, veterinary medicine. I know they can do whatever they want. I know they can be tough and lift huge ass dogs, or get bitten and not complain. I have seen it countless times. I know they can excel…
/r/MensRights03/01/14 04:31 AM
2

What a feminist would say " Men have all the power, when they abuse it for their own benefit its sexist. When they are trying to be magnanimous and benefit women its "benevolent sexism" Since women have no power, or say in societal norms and culture, they can't possibly be sexist, so nothing can actually be sexist towards men" Feminists believe that nonsense.
/r/MensRights03/01/14 04:00 AM
3

The title of this article makes the reader leap to the exact opposite conclusion as the article itself. You assume that the husband showing benevolent sexism leads to an unsatisfied wife. But, if i read it correctly, the studies show that women who expect to be treated with benevolent sexism become less satisfied when they aren't. Well no shit. therefore, its the expectation of benevolent sexism that hurts relationships, make that the title of the article you dipshit Scientific American author o…
/r/MensRights03/01/14 03:45 AM
4

Post hoc ergo propter hoc. As much as i dislike gender quotas, I hate logical fallacies more. I need more evidence of there being a link between these two events.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 06:42 PM
15

I gave up on rational wiki when I read their page on thunderf00t. Basically they call him a racist and a sexist and basically say " if you think we should adopt a neutral tone, tough shit." And this was before he did his antifeminism videos. Thunderf00t is a youtube atheist that has done great videos on creationism and evolution, and some Videos on the dangers of radical Islam. He definitely doesn't deserve that sort of animosity from rational wiki. But he got on the atheism plus and the P.C. Me…
/r/MensRights18/12/13 07:42 PM
1

Well, at the very least a man portrays the bungling idiot, but I do get your point, and you are right to point out that bias in me. I suppose, I feel men are involved because the statistical likelyhood that only women were responsible for those commercials to be insignificant.
/r/MensRights23/10/13 06:32 PM
27

Why would they say "having sex" and not "raping"? Hell, she was even charged with rape. The implication that an infant can "have sex" is mind boggling.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 01:59 AM
1

I don't get that either. I wonder if its a way to try to insult rapists. Sort of like " you are so weak you need to exert dominance by raping" maybe it makes them feel better. Either that or perhaps its a way to vilify men in general for the actions of one person.because then it's not just that that one guy wanted sex, its that men need to exert dominance over women.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 12:37 PM
2

If rape was defined as violent rape, then I think one might argue that its not just "about sex". Not having the mentality of a rapist I obviously don't know, but with the way many feminists define rape, then its obviously about sex. Having sex with a drunk woman ( which many people would say is rape) is not about exerting power or dominance, its about sex. What I don't get is why it really matters? So what if rape is about sex or power, its still wrong.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 12:31 PM
0

I can't help but feel that this law will result with five different guys paying child support to one women, for one child, because they each had a fatherly role in that child's life. Since courts always do " what's best for the child", I am almost sure this will be bad for men in general.
/r/MensRights05/10/13 06:23 PM
1

Right, I was agreeing with the notion that a member of a gender can contribute to negative views toward that gender, and therefore women can contribute to sexist views towards women.
/r/MensRights05/10/13 06:19 PM
1

It isn't of course. But I presume the site is called "Move over Bro", because they think men take up too much space at the expense of women.
/r/MensRights21/09/13 01:12 AM
11

I would be more understanding of their ire if there were a woman next to him, or if the man next to him looked even remotely bothered by his posture.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 05:07 PM
6

I have met a few open lesbians in my life, some super butch, and they have all been awesome. I have never met a stereotypical, man hating radfem lesbian. I suspect that the subset of lesbians that do hate men tend to be the more outspoken, and therefore visible ones. So, dislike the radfem philosophy, but try not to prejudice yourself against lesbians. This has been a public service announcement by brought to you by Lonemango.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 11:34 PM
2

Define "feminism".
/r/MensRights12/09/13 02:40 AM
2

It could be a men's issue if the law is selectively enforced. That said, this kid seemed to have sent pics to a bunch of classmates,as opposed to just his significant other, and likely that is why he would be charged.
/r/MensRights12/09/13 02:37 AM
1

Well, I was trying to explain how the MRA's may feel, not any objective truth. Also I dont think PUA's and MRA's are mutually exclusive. As for "the system" I guess I mean the established notion that males are supposed to be "alpha", macho , stoic etc... MRA's tend to not want to be "alpha" and are trying to change the notion that men have to be that way. Meanwhile PUA's try to exude alphaness to attract the opposite sex. (If my understanding of PUA's is correct.)
/r/MensRights08/09/13 05:48 PM
7

There is only one reason people silence critique, and it's because their ideology wouldn't stand up to scrutiny.
/r/MensRights06/09/13 12:53 AM
1

Now that you say it, I agree. I get a little annoyed when I see commercials where the dad is a bungling idiot, when that is "just marketing" to women.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 03:01 PM
1

But the differences are there.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 04:53 AM
1

The difference just one of degree, not of kind, and I used it to highlight the absurdity of the rule. Do you think if interest in women's tennis suddenly waned to the levels of the wnba that they would reverse their decision and pay them less? If the wnba drew in more than the nba, do you think they would be subsidizing the nba? And like I said in response to the previous poster, if men and women's tennis had different associations that could only pay the purses based on their own revenue, the w…
/r/MensRights04/09/13 04:52 AM
1

I don't know exactly how much men's tennis brings in when compared to women's, and I am no tennis fan, but here is a good article written by someone who presumably knows the sport. Lets say that each sex had their own association, and each association could only use the revenue they generated to pay for their prizes. Women would bring in much less. According to a previous post a ticket for the women's final was 66% of the men's final. And apparently because their matches are short they can also …
/r/MensRights04/09/13 04:38 AM
224

I would not allow any reporters into the locker room.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 07:48 PM
57

Or the notion that people can rape their spouses.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 07:46 PM
9

The point is that they are getting paid the same for less work, and less revenue brought to the sport, simply because they are women. Would you see the reverse as a women's rights issue? I would. Imagine if The wnba had to pay their athletes the same as the nba, and by taking the needed revenue from the nba. This is as absurd.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 07:44 PM
7

I just want to make sure people realize that this is a satirical article. As to the content, there are only two reasons to buy that product. One is as a harmless prank, the other is for extortion/manipulation. Besides the obvious issue of extortion, this will also cause problems when men begin to question every pregnancy test for fear of being exploited.(and rightly so)
/r/MensRights03/09/13 07:03 PM
2

It's okay, I only eat the bulls. I also make sure that the eggs I eat are fertilized with a male chick. As for milk, the cows I get milk from are all anti-feminist special snowflakes.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 06:05 AM
2

I am a lot like this author in that I am a white (mostly white anyway) hispanic (Cuban), also raised in Miami. Here are my issues with this lady. First, she found her whiteness unsettling. What? Why should anyone find who they are unsettling? How can she not see how wrong her movement is if she is made to find her whiteness unsettling? She basically admits that to her whiteness is bad. Secondly, at Brown she started introducing her self as her a full hispanic because she gained attention and "le…
/r/MensRights01/09/13 06:01 AM
3

I would tend to agree with you that the name "men's rights" is a bit of an exaggeration. While there may be a few rights women have that men do not,(depending on your country) I think a better name may be men's issues or something along those lines. However, that doesn't invalidate the concerns that this subreddit has. Men do face challenges because they are men. You may not think they are as difficult as the challenges women face, but they are distinct and should be addressed. May I ask why you…
/r/MensRights31/08/13 06:45 AM
15

Missed that part. Absurd. In other words, Women are seen as better, that's why they're discriminated against. Yep,makes perfect sense.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 01:11 PM
1

This is so obviously horrible that no one needs to be made aware of that fact. Another possibility is that this is more of a humans right's issue than a women's rights issue, so they are not too interested in it. But I wonder, why do you think they are quiet over this issue? What are you implying (if anything) with your post? That they are more lenient when other cultures commit crimes against women? This is true, but we knew that already.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 01:07 PM
2

Okay. I think it will be difficult for you. You likely will be accused of being homophobic,(assuming you are not gay) and the company will likely be scared of having a similar accusation. I think you will have a tougher time than a woman would in your situation. I would like to hear what others think about a recording device. I think I would talk to hr, not just your boss(like you are doing). Find a lawyer, maybe one with experience in sexual harassment cases, and ask their advice. They may try …
/r/MensRights30/08/13 01:12 AM
1

Are you really asking? I don't think any of us have any idea what your company's policies are. However, it must be illegal solicit someone for prostitution. I think you may want to talk to the police. As to what I think will happen, it depends, if you are male likely nothing. If you are female, also likely nothing, but if you make a big enough stink out of it something might be done. Either way good on you for going to your boss, this behavior should not be tolerated. Also I would carry a record…
/r/MensRights30/08/13 12:59 AM
1

I didn't really see comic 4 as an big attack on PUA, more like a joke at its expense. Especially as comic number 5 very bleak view of monogamous relationships. As to why MRA's see PUA as an enemy, it's because they see a broken system, and instead of wanting it fixed, they want to take advantage of it. I don't blame them for this, but I definitely could not do it. I would feel way too guilty. Of course the truth is that the only difference between PUA'S and men who are naturally good at picking …
/r/MensRights29/08/13 04:15 AM
2

You are right, but that just shows how much the justice system sucks. A guilty man and an innocent man acting in their best interest would behave the same. I am beginning to think plea deals should not be allowed. And definitely not to this degree. If the prosecution had so much doubt they were willing to give such a good deal to this guy, then they shouldn't have charged him at all.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 05:39 PM
2

Ethically yes, legally no. I agree that people who sleep with their students, regardless of age, are scum.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 05:31 PM
1

Why not? Obviously two parents are better than one, but one is better than none, right? I don't know if a single person is more likely to abuse than a couple, but I suppose that's your objection to single people adopting. Is that a correct assumption? If so, Are you also opposed to single women getting invitro fertilization? Or do you think that not having the same DNA makes the likely hood of abuse greater? I am not trying to argue, I am just curious. On a separate note, as a single male I woul…
/r/MensRights28/08/13 05:28 PM
3

What's interesting with these sorts of articles is the implication that its men that demand women wear these types of hair-dos, or fashion or whatnot. But when have you ever seen a fashion article in a men's magazine(except the occasional men's fashion). Generally men don't care about women's fashion, its women who place this expectation on women. Admittedly nice makeup, hair and clothes can make a woman look prettier, but the same is true for men. Also, this is a cultural thing. A few centuries…
/r/MensRights24/08/13 07:07 PM
2

Wow, that somehow makes it so much worse. I don't even know how to respond. Thank you for sharing your story.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 03:12 AM
4

Call a female friend to come beat her up? I think that's what I would do. If I had a woman corroborate my story, maybe the cops would be more likely to listen. Ugh. Men need to distribute those 12 things that determine who is the "aggressor" and try to game the system. If I need to act hysterical to be listened to, so be it. I will cry like a little girl, I will hide under the bed and wet my pants. It sucks that is what men would have to resort to.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 12:46 AM
66

While I don't agree with what the magazine did, I think context is important. In Australia the censorship laws are such that depictions of female genitalia cannot have labia and must show only "discreet genital detail" whatever that means. And therefore are often airbrushed to be acceptable. So this article is a reaction to that. Imagine if porn could only show circumcised males, uncircumsiced males would have horrible complexes. Apperantly this sort of complex happens to women in Australia wher…
/r/MensRights22/08/13 02:43 PM
5

A reasonable viewpoint. However, I would at least make it so that a male rape victim wouldn't be financially responsible for his rape baby.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 06:28 PM
8

For those who don't want to read the article, the author is using the #solidarityisforwhitewomen ironically. She is claiming that only white women get to be feminists, and feminism sees minorities as merely the poor people that these magnanimous white women are fighting for. I think it is a very valid critique of feminism. My favorite is the tweet of Raina Kalek. We hear about the women wage gap all the time, but no one ever talks about how white women make more than black men.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 02:02 PM
1

This is really important. And it's why I try to stay away from hero worship. Even paragons of reason like Dawkins, aronRa or even Aristotle ( or myself) are/were not immune to the effects of emotional bias. We are animals that have an emotional override over our ability to reason. This is why open discussion and debate is so important for the skeptic movement. And open discussion is something atheism plus actively tries to prevent. Nothing should be taboo. "It is the mark of an educated mind to …
/r/MensRights13/08/13 05:08 PM
1

Emotions can not be rational. They can be reasonable. And granted this is my own distinction. For example it is reasonable to be afraid of a venomous snake, it is unreasonable to be afraid of a rabbit. However even when dealing with venomous snakes, the fear will prohibit you from being rational. I hope that makes sense.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 05:01 PM
2

Atheism plus is supposedly atheism plus social justice. In practice it is essentially atheism plus the worse aspects of feminism. It's SRS plus atheism.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 04:56 PM
1

Does AronRa actively support atheism+, or is he rather indifferent to it? I haven't seen him mention it too much. Is he a member of atheism plus? I admit I would be disappointed if he were.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 04:54 PM
2

Until their standard of evidence is met. For Jen McCreight, hearing multiple independent claims that Krauss has harassed people was evidence enough to warn people about him, and eventually bring those claims to the attention of various officials within the groups in question. I see your point, but I still disagree. If she has evidence she should present it. Instead when pressed she seems to have backed off (if thundef00ts video is to be believed). If that's the case, then she should have kept qu…
/r/MensRights12/08/13 04:51 AM
2

Warning: Wall of text. People tend to get emotional when someone has done something bad to a member of their community. People tend to get mad when someone is accused of doing something bad to someone of their group. The lack of evidence is irrelevant to them, often evidence that contradicts them is irrelevant. And, that is the problem. People instantly defend who they consider is part of their group. Look at Zimmerman and Travon Martin. That is not conducive to finding the truth. Also keep in m…
/r/MensRights12/08/13 03:55 AM
3

Skeptics are people too. No one can completely divorce themselves from emotion. This is really why I think rational skepticism won't last in the long run, unfortunately. Emotions inherently destroy ones ability to reason, and someone who can reason without emotion has no real impetus to defend their beliefs. So, imagine a scenerio were someone is accused of some crime, like this one. Some very emotional people want the accused head on a platter. The rest say, I am indifferent until there is evid…
/r/MensRights12/08/13 02:30 AM
1

I am. Well, not "just", as there are other aspects to my personality. But you got the gist. And yes my penis is small.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 01:58 AM
1

Having a kid does change things, if I my wife abused my kids and I thought she was going to take them... Yeah. That said I plan to reserve judgement. I dislike when people automatically defend the wife when the situation is reversed, so I am not automatically defending this guy.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 12:59 AM
1

Thank you, much better.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 07:54 PM
30

This is atheism +, There is no room for critical thinking and doubt in this skeptics organization!
/r/MensRights11/08/13 03:03 PM
0

Well, I am not going to take this guys words for face value. She said she was leaving him, and left the room. He follows her, they argue and then she starts punching him. He leaves the room again to get the gun and then comes back. This is bizarre behavior. Now I am not saying an abused person couldn't react in such a manner, but I think there was more going on than "she abused him till he snapped." I am not about to defend this guy's behavior.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 03:36 PM
5

This comes from the very vague definition of the word "feminism". Because it's so ill defined, everyone thinks that their personal definition is the correct one. Their are actually a few concepts that are like this, but the best examples I can think of are "Art" and "God".
/r/MensRights05/08/13 04:05 PM
1

But then the issue isn't that it's sexist, but that its trite. That is definitely not the crux of Anita's arguement. A well done damsel story can be engaging. I haven't played "bioshock: infinite" or" the last of us", but those are essentially damsel stories with engaging stories, if the reviews are to be believed.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 12:09 AM
3

Never having been in that situation I find it hard to judge,however I agree that the state should not defend their behavior as readily as it does. When it comes to cops I think a presumption of culpability, if not guilt, should be used. For the reasons you stated, they are better armed and better trained. The video you linked is libertarian video against social programs, and I think easily refuted. I don't see how it is relevant to excessive force by police.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 06:00 PM
2

Let me get this straight, you are mad that rape survivors get angry when you equate pressuring businesses to accept legislation, with being raped by many strangers at once? How can writers not understand at this point that comparing something to rape or the holocaust or slavery is just stupid. There are probably hundreds of different metaphors he could have used that would have been more appropriate. Likely, he used the one he knew would be the most offensive, to get more attention. The real iss…
/r/MensRights02/08/13 04:18 PM
1

The reason this is so, is because force is often not necessary. I can't think of any case were they people criticized an officer for not using enough force. That said, I try not to be too hard on cops in general. They are often in high pressure situations, and anytime someone has authority and weaponry, there will be abuse. It's human nature. What bothers me is that there are too few consequences for those that do abuse their power.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 04:01 PM
20

That guy has more class than I would have in this situation, Good on him. That said I hope he presses charges. She falsely accused him of assault, she could have destroyed his life were it not for the phone.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 03:52 PM
0

Maybe, but to the individual it's harmful. But there is a double standard we should examine. Slutty behavior (from both sexes) will cease if and only if it is seen as undesirable. Now, male sluttyness is often beneficial to the male slut, because he has more experience with women, more confidence and therefor is seen as more desirable. Studies have backed this up, but anecdotal evidence should be enough to convince you. How many guys have long dry spells, but as soon as they get a girlfriend, wo…
/r/MensRights01/08/13 04:24 PM
4

I think its best in situations like this to remove gender from the equation. Say for example, a weak person hits a much stronger person. What is an appropriate reaction from the stronger person. If they are consistent then I wouldn't fault them as much. You can then switch it up, a male weakling hits a female body builder, can the body builder hit back? Maybe they do feel that the strong should not attack the weak, or it really is gender based for them.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 05:50 PM
1

Black people definitely get the short end of the stick when it comes to the justice system. Especially black men, as you know. But there are many factors in this case that tend to be missed. First is mandatory sentencing, which to me is absurd, but not racially motivated. Second is that she left the house, and then came back with a gun, that is not stand your ground. Secondly she fired in his general direction, so its not clear if it was a warning shot, or if she just missed. After this incident…
/r/MensRights28/07/13 06:41 PM
11

Maury Povich would beg to differ. Many women would likely say its the person they hope is the father. If I works out great, if not they are screwed. I wish it was a mandatory test. If I ever have kids (God forbid) I hope I have the balls to ask for the test.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 06:00 PM
16

To me this is one of the best argument against patriarchytm. If patriarchytm were true there would be mandatory paternity tests as it is definitely in the best interest of men, and against the best interest of woman. Since almost noone, And certainly noone in power, has ever seriously considered it, the notion of patriarchytm becomes difficult to defend. As to why it hasn't been made into law, I suspect it has to do with the expense, and the risk of violence against the women who are about to fo…
/r/MensRights28/07/13 05:28 PM
3

So did Weiner send photos to complete strangers? I get the feeling that if the texts/pictures were unwanted he'd be in jail, and in the sex offender registry. In truth I don't care enough to look up exactly what happened, but I don't think this is as big a deal as people are implying. Yeah, he was stupid and a jerk to his wife, but she is really the only one that should be offended by what he did.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 05:05 PM
2

Thanks for bringing it to my attention.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 04:47 PM
10

Can someone post the 14 things here, I don't want to give traffic to that rag. Anyway, articles like these prove to me that women (at least in this country) have a huge inferiority complex. People don't do make posts like this if they truly thought of themselves as equals. Imagine a magazine saying how much better Asians are than white people because they do better on I.Q. tests, or ten ways black people are better in sports than white people. It would be absurd. Like my dad would say"Tell me wh…
/r/MensRights25/07/13 04:06 AM
6

So, basically every rap video.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 05:42 PM
0

I hate that, shitty song + boobs = hit. But its not just men who fall for this shit. Yesterday at the gym I overheard a woman singing along to this crap song on the radio. How many guys actually like this song? However, I don't know if this is sexism or just marketing, how many girl bands have videos of themselves topless to promote their own music? If having guys rocking out with their cock out sold records we'd be drowning in wieners. Blurred lines video ,especially the uncensored version, is …
/r/MensRights24/07/13 05:41 PM
1

Is there a difference between a straight cis male and a pre-op trans woman who is a butch lesbian?
/r/MensRights23/07/13 03:39 AM
3

Actually, this study goes along with the notion of male disposability quite nicely, athough its conclusion is utter nonsense. Having a daughter or a sister, causes the male to empathize more, this makes perfect sense. Not because the females behavior " rubs off" as the article puts it, but because the male now focuses on the needs and wants of the female, as opposed to his own. Once you begin focusing on anothers desires, it makes sense that that behavior transfers to other people.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 05:22 PM
1

I agree. Its like in the Zimmerman case where people say "imagine if the races were reversed", it is an untestable hypothesis that only serves to highlight and strengthen your bias. "Imagine if Zimmerman was polynesian and Trayvon was a native american." Its nonsense.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 06:02 PM
12

I think there are a lot of men who would gladly accept those conditions, as bad as they are, just like there are a lot of women who have abortions when they are not ready to be mothers. She is trying to stick a knife into the men who would want to "paper abort", but that knife is nothing compared to the bullet they would dodge. Edit: I assume that she would agree that any man that is forced to retroactively pay child support should also automatically be granted partial custody. (Yeah right, like…
/r/MensRights18/07/13 04:52 AM
3

You can't be responsible for either her reaction, or your friend's. If you want to defend being an MRA advocate, you risk an unpredictable reaction from her. Even what (to us) may seem like the least offensive defense of the MRA, could ultimately blow up into a bad situation. If you don't think its worth the risk of losing a friend its perfectly okay to stay quiet. If ,however, you feel stating your opinion is worth the risk, then just start stomping on those damn egg shells. I don't think anyon…
/r/MensRights17/07/13 04:39 AM
0

In the article she implies that women who disagree with her assessment are like the women in the jury. She also implies that the women in the jury are like the women who cried raped to lynch a black man. I very much dislike this sort of manipulation tactic. I do agree that women are more likely to feel threatened in that situation, but not because of racism.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 04:03 AM
3

Likely, alimony laws will change as more women are forced to pay alimony to their ex-husbands for the rest of their lives.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 03:38 AM
7

Wouldn't there also be legal maternal surrender. I assume there would be a few women who would rather "give" the child to the father. If both parents surrender, then the child will essentially be left for adoption. Perhaps MRA should call it legal parental surrender, may get more traction.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 03:18 AM
19

What's crazy is that this man's life is still in grave danger. Whats stopping her from trying again? They effectively said "last time was okay to try to kill him, but don't do it again." I bet the guy ends up dead soon.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 02:52 AM
8

I don't think there is any other case were a statement like " teach men not to rape" wouldn't instantly be recognized as absurd. Examples. " Don't teach people to look both ways before crossing the street, teach drivers not to hit people." " Don't teach kids not to take candy from strangers, teach strangers not to abduct kids." " Don't teach people to lock their doors at night, teach burglars not to break and enter." " Don't teach kids to not to drugs, teach drug dealers to not sell drugs." " Do…
/r/MensRights10/07/13 03:41 AM
1

No, Lie detectors are utter bullshit. Just watch "Penn and Teller's: Bullshit!"on the topic. At best, and I am being generous, the lie detector is an anxiety detector. I can imagine that asking a rape victim to relive his/her experience while attached to a lie detector would be very anxiety producing, and lead to false positives. Meanwhile a good liar, might show no anxiety at all lying in front of device.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 10:27 PM
2

You are right of course. Its difficult to trust statistics on this topic for many reason, some of which you mentioned. However, I still think that female victims of DV are more likely to suffer severe injuries than male victims(in heterosexual relationships). That said, there needs to be a lot more awareness about male victims of DV, because there is essentially none. Of course, I am also speaking from a statistical point of view. I don't think that male victims of DV are any less emotionally tr…
/r/MensRights08/07/13 08:16 PM
7

I used to think that women were more opressed, but now I wonder if its just confirmation bias on my part. Girlwriteswhat?! Has a great video out now covering a similar topic. Essentially her view is that places where women are highly oppressed are places where everyone is highly oppressed. For example, in war torn countries while the women and girls are being raped, the men and boys are being killed or forced to conscript(or also raped). I do think that there are cultures where women are seen as…
/r/MensRights08/07/13 11:31 AM
4

I agree with you on principle, but I would like to offer an alternative hypothesis for the cringe response. When I see two people kiss, I subconsciously place myself in their situation. If one is a male, I place myself in his position. When I see two males kissing I unconsciously picture myself in that situation. Being a heterosexual, the notion of me kissing a man is repugnant. When two attractive women kiss I picture myself as one of the women, and therefore I don't have the sense of revulsion…
/r/MensRights30/06/13 08:47 PM
8

Yep, if men gave birth, abortions would be completely illegal. How many times have you heard "If you're man enough to have sex, you're man enough to be a father?" Now how many times have you heard that about women? I also think that if men gave birth, maternity tests would be mandatory. These are completely untestable hypotheses, of course, but they have as much evidence as the ridiculous claim they make.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 01:32 AM
3

It really makes no sense at all. The child wont care what his/ her genitals look like until much later in life, why can't you wait until then? By then, what gender they identify as will be more apparent, and a wiser decision can be made.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 04:59 PM
5

Seeing as that she is trying to kill him, isn't it now reasonable for him to kill her? According to the justice it should be. I think that would be a good defense for him.
/r/MensRights23/06/13 12:07 AM
1

I know this is /r/mensrights,and not /r/atheism, but I love what you said about certain atheist developing disbelief because of emotional reasons. I have long thought that emotional reasoning is the bain of humanity's existence, and I couldn't get how some atheists could still use emotional reasoning so unabashidly. I thought it was because humans were naturally inconsistant, and we are. But now I wonder, do these atheist have no faith in a god, or do they have faith in no god. I wonder if there…
/r/MensRights13/06/13 06:15 PM
1

I don't know. It's weird. I can understand why women would want more representation in politics, or in higher profile jobs, but stem isn't glamorous or prestigious. The only thing I can think of is that women are traditionally seen as not good, or not interested, in these feilds and it bugs people that they haven't proved the stereotype wrong yet. Which is foolish, it would be like white people wanting more representation in basketball to disprove the stereotype that white men can't jump.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 05:53 PM
10

It's not just this, because any field were women dominate would be just as offensive. I think many feminists have an inferiority complex about their sex. If i say women are better communicators or multitaskers, no one cares. If i say men are better at X everyone freaks out. I have always thought the easier you are to insult/offend, the less you think of yourself ,or at least about that particular aspect of yourself.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 05:38 PM
4

The video says her claims were later validated, though they did not say how. Lets say however, that her claims were bogus. The officer still acted inappropriately arresting someone who is alleging misconduct on his part. At the very least its conflict of interest and abuse of power. I think he should be fired even if he didn't assault her.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 05:10 PM
1

I agree with your statement, but I can understand why men would hesitate in taking a career whose name literally means breastfeeding. I wonder if more men would become nurses if they were called "Medical Technicians" instead. In veterinary medicine the nurses are called techs, made it a lot easier for me to become one.
/r/MensRights10/11/12 03:01 AM
3

There are way too many confounders for her to come up with this conclusion. There may be many more reasons for why single women may be more likely to vote democrat. For one, I would bet single women are more concerned about keeping their right to have an abortion than married women. Also, correlation does not equal causation. This is just horrible logic.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 05:41 PM
2

I agree with you. I was just playing devil's advocate. It may be an objection that op's professor raises.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 05:29 PM
4

Alternatively, Is is okay for businesses to discriminate customers based on sex? Is it okay for businesses to cater only to women?
/r/MensRights09/11/12 05:13 PM
3

People might think that women deserve leave because of the physical requirements of labor, and the need to recover from it. In that case, then the questions are asking two different things.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 05:03 PM
3

Should children have the right to body integrity? Should circumcision of boys be illegal? This is the same question framed differently. I bet they get two completely different answers. Edit: Changed wording do the answers correspond better.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 04:56 PM
1

I didn't think of that. I'm not sure how many states deny felons the right to vote, but I know mine does(Florida). No one has been convicted for failing to register since 1986, but doesn't mean it can't happen.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 10:40 PM
13

I don't get feminists. They'd complain that "the patriacrchy" values maleness and masculinity it's more than femininity, but they do shit like this that only reinforces that notion.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 01:42 PM
1

No biggie. I thought that too until very recently. I think it's a common misconception.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 02:16 AM
1

In the states adult men and women got universal suffrage at the same time. Edit: this statement is very much a technicality.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 02:07 AM
1

Are you sure about this? I tried looking this up a while back, and the only consequence of not registering for the draft (beside the really small risk of jail and fines ) was not being eligible for federal financial aid for college. Do you have any links concerning voting?
/r/MensRights08/11/12 02:01 AM
1

Well, for your shotgun scenario it depends on the state i think. If they are in your property it may very well be legal. But that's irrelevant I suppose. I see what you are saying and while i don't disagree per se. However, let's say it was one persons word against another, then I think the previous behavior may be used as evidence in favor of the defendant. but let's say there is a camera that showed what went on in the room, then what happened before doesn't matter. I am not suggesing that the…
/r/MensRights06/11/12 03:10 PM
1

I didn't say Terry was responsible for his rape. I said he acted foolishly, which he did. I'm not saying he deserved to be raped or anything of the sort. I guess I would like for you to tell me why this is "victim blaming". I am not saying he wasn't raped. Nor am I suggesting the rapist should not face trial or even go to jail. I am suggesting that Terry's behavior up to that point was foolish, and can and should be used as evidence,circumstantial though it may be, that he may not have been rape…
/r/MensRights06/11/12 04:04 AM
1

If a feminist heard you give that analogy they would say something like, " my body is not a bicycle". And then get offended that you compare them to an object. It's crap arguement, but that is exactly what I see in SRS when someone uses that analogy. This is my new analogy that I use so that people will hopefully realize that it's not misogyny that leads to "victim blaming" A straight cis guy, let's call him Terry, decides to go to a gay bar just for fun. Also for fun,he decides to wear assless …
/r/MensRights06/11/12 02:46 AM
6

I agree. It's just their target audience they are talking to. Any of these can apply to either sex, and for the most part it is good advice. I was expecting something like"he doesn't pay for the first date" and crap like that.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 02:18 AM
1

It seems like an exaggeration for sure. Obviously, I am no expert on the behavior of homosexual males, but I do remember this incident. I doubt this is the norm though. I wonder, however, how many women would have raised their hands if asked.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 10:06 PM
2

Yeesh, I now know not to buy Gillette.
/r/MensRights03/11/12 05:51 PM
5

If she likes reading, ask her to read "The myth of male power" by Warren Farrell.I have not read it, but I will when I find the time. The book is one of the first books on the role of men in society. This guy was (is?) a hard core feminist. He taught women studies, and was elected to NOWs new York chapter board of directors. It maybe a good an non-confrontational way to introduce her to some of the core concepts of MRA. There's also this interview of his, if she is not a big reader. If she is no…
/r/MensRights01/11/12 09:36 PM
16

Yeah, I urinate a lot too. I didn't mean to imply that something must be wrong with him, just that it should be investigated.
/r/MensRights01/11/12 07:39 PM
47

How old is your brother? There are many diseases that can cause increased urination, such as diabetes. Or he may have just drank a lot of coke. Still would ask him if he urinates frequently all the time.
/r/MensRights01/11/12 07:08 PM
4

How would you feel about tattooing babies, or cutting of an earlobe? I can't think of another example of making a permanent modification to a child's anatomy that is acceptable in the civilized world, unless it will save the life of the child of course. Maybe ear piercing, but those are easy enough to close, and even so I think it's also unethical to perform on a young child. Maybe you disagree, maybe you think it's just fine to alter a child's body however the parent sees fit, but I think child…
/r/MensRights01/11/12 12:48 PM
2

You are right, but most* of the time, the nonbiological father has to pay only if he was married to the mother or otherwise took a fatherly role. This is clearly not the case here. My point however, is that it's the other poor Schlub who is on the hook for child support. The courts will likely not want to destroy the fatherly relationship the guy has for the sake of finding the biological father. However if the boyfriend of the op does a DNA test and he is the DNA donor, then it's possible that …
/r/MensRights31/10/12 11:10 PM
21

He is not referring to women in that quote, he's referring to feminist therapists.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 08:49 PM
5

They are always 100% sure if not more. They're never like "I slept with two guys so I'm fifty-fifty". To be fair the guys are always 100% sure they are not the father. They always say something like "Yeah we had sex all the time, but shes a slut so there's no way I'm the father". Edit: This of course assumes these things weren't staged.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 01:55 AM
1

If you're interested girlwriteswhat!? did a good video on just this subject. I will make an edit towith the proper link I, like you, did not think it was a huge deal until I saw this video.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 12:49 AM
10

This argument only holds if one defines feminism as that which allows women to explore their sexuality. I would argue that is a result of birth control rather than anything else. Let's see how much feminism helps him out when he gets a girl pregnant, or gets a divorce and barely gets to see his kids. The term feminism is very ill defined. I think purposely so. I have found that if you think women and men should have the same rights you are called a feminist. If you think women and men should hav…
/r/MensRights31/10/12 12:32 AM
7

Yeah, there is no way she knows who the father really is. I don't get we're this idea that the women know who the father is comes from. If Maury taught me anything, he taught me that.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 08:56 PM
37

Unlike the other reditors here, I don't know if a paternity test is necessarily the right move. Unless demanded by the courts or advised by his lawyer it just shows that he admits the possibility that he could be the father, and if it comes back positive then he is screwed for sure. The father is the father, she can't just claim that your boyfriend is now the father. There is nothing that ties your boyfriend to the kid. He should continue to act like he is not the father, because he is not, rega…
/r/MensRights30/10/12 08:54 PM
4

He is saying men are generally more slovenly than women, that's not misandry anymore than saying men are generally funnier than women is mysogyny. Granted its a silly stereotype that may or may not be true, but that's a long ways away from misandry or mysogyny. I see many people on this forum complain that the word mysogyny is thrown around rather loosely by feminists, but then we use the word misandry in the exact same way. I understand that we are trying to show the double standard when it com…
/r/MensRights30/10/12 12:20 PM
9

With this statement, are you suggesting people should not be able to negotiate for better contracts? How can you judge performance and what do you mean by equality? For example, should all basketball players make the same amount? Should they be paid by points/game or rebounds/game or time played or how many people they draw to see the game? I agree that negotiation skills does not determine how good one is at ones job, but why would any employer pay you more unless you ask for it? Would you mand…
/r/MensRights29/10/12 04:39 PM
4

I don't get how anyone can justify this standard of proof. Literally half of all innocent people will be found guilty. Furthermore, anyone who doesn't understand statistics will assume that there is automatically a 50% of any accused person to be guilty, and if anyone thinks an accuser is less likely to lie than not lie (Like all feminists would) that's all you need to convict anyone (Don't know if convict is the right word). This is complete lunacy.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 04:06 PM
2

Yeah, If I remember correctly she said in an interview that what worsened her depression was that she had to live a lie and deceive everyone around her. I can imagine that would be hard on anyone. I have not read her book, so I won't make any comment on how being treated as a man may have affected her mental health.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 06:21 PM
2

Relevent username of OP?
/r/MensRights28/10/12 05:04 AM
2

Very astute observations by this guy. I see this sort of thing from SRS and similar minded people. To recruit feminists they say something like "feminism is just wanting equal rights for women and men". But if someone claims that they are feminists but don't believe in patriarchy theory, for example, then they aren't real feminists.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 08:25 PM
2

Edit : the following two paragraphs are wrong. Apperantly HIPPA does not provide a "private cause of action". Which I think means you can't use it as a basis for a law suit. This quote is from a law website that I lost the link to. The case is a good reminder that although HIPAA sets a standard for an individual’s privacy rights it does not provide a private right of action, says Nicholas K. Lagina, an attorney with Krieg DeVault, based in Indiana. When it comes to HIPAA violations, the patient …
/r/MensRights26/10/12 02:46 PM
3

I don't think SRS, or at least SRS prime, is allowed to link to us. They say it's because we are so full of shit, but I think it's because they don't want their readers seeing how generally reasonable we are.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 02:06 PM
3

HIPPA passed in 1996, the report you link to is from 1994. Every credible urologist source I have seen says that HIPPA says its illegal to require consent. For example this guy. I admit that this interpretation maybe up to the courts to decide.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 12:53 PM
3

That may be up to interpretation by the courts, but I assume you didn't see my link to the urology clinic that stated it's illegal to require consent due to HIPPA. So here is another one. again it's a FAQ, so you have to scroll down to find the question. Here is a urologist stating that it is illegal to require spousal consent. If you have a credible source stating the contrary please post it here. If clinics routinely require consent for vasectomies this would be an awesome cause for MRAs as yo…
/r/MensRights26/10/12 12:47 PM
6

I know it's legal in some states, but I'm 32 and I see 16, hell, even 18 year old's like annoying little kids. It seriously weirds me out that older people find people that young sexually attractive. I'm necessarily not saying its immoral, I guess I see it as bizarre. Even more so if I had a kid that age. I definitely question this person's mental health, and ,depending what state she lives in, she should go to prison.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 05:46 AM
2

"Dick" and "Pussy" and "Asshole" are insults that have pretty clear meanings. I don't think it implies anything inherently bad about the body part it's referring to. I mean, if you call a someone a "dog", I don't think you are implying that dogs are bad. Dogs are awesome and everyone thinks so. We should not look into hidden meanings behind words, because you will eventually find them. Soon you end up thinking that calling someone "manic" implies that men are bad because "man" is in the word. I …
/r/MensRights26/10/12 05:26 AM
1

I am highly skeptical of this claim. "Here is an article about it from the good men project, that throws some doubt onto this claim. Furthermore this violates HIPPA and you can sue their pants off. Hippa is a health privacy law in the states, I'd be surprised if other countries don't have similar laws. I would not be surprised if individual clinics tried to convince men to tell their wife etc.. But just say "HIPPA" and I bet they change their tune. That said, I would wager $100 bucks that if suc…
/r/MensRights26/10/12 04:52 AM
1

Or the wife's mistress. What a twist! I do think that the focus on the rings and then showing the bathtub's girls lack of a ring is intended to imply that she was the mistress, but I like my version better. By the way, I like your videos.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 01:23 AM
1

I think it's fair. I am male and i am more weary around around huge guys that can beat me up, than I am around people I think I can take.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 07:34 PM
1

Date rape is by definition not stranger rape. Even then there are ways to mitigate risks, like the examples I gave before. I seriously think it's foolish to not teach people to mitigate risk for fear they might limit themselves. I understand where you are coming from, we don't tell people not to swim because of shark attack, and that would "shark attack hysteria". But it is not wrong to teach people to beware of rip tides, and what to do if your caught in one, and not to swim if the risk of rip …
/r/MensRights25/10/12 05:43 PM
1

I guess one persons' caution is another persons' paranoia. I admit it's a fine line.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 04:52 PM
1

None that I can see. I am afraid I don't see the point you are trying to make. I think you may be seeing it as a slippery slope. Whereby if we tell women not to take relativly unknown men up to their room because it's risky, that may lead to us telling women not to take any an up to their room because it's risky too. Then that may lead to telling them to never be alone with any man ever. etc... Is that a fair assesment of your thoughts?
/r/MensRights25/10/12 04:49 PM
1

Out of curiousity do you have any idea how much of your pay check you were spending on your kids' support before? Either way, good luck to you.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 04:37 PM
2

I most assuredly advise men not to take strangers home with them. Furthermore, if the danger of female to male rape were as high , and the results as devistating, I would make an even bigger stink about personal safety for men. I guess I should say needlessly risky. Anything you do is risky, like driving, but you should try to mitigate that risk by , for example, wearing a seatbelt. It's not wrong to say people should try to reduce risky behavior when possible. Being alone with a stranger is oft…
/r/MensRights25/10/12 02:01 PM
1

Forgive my not quoting you, as I am on an iPad and copying and pasting is a pain. So your complaint about the speeding analogy is valid of course. However even if speeding, he is still the victim of an accident.( Let's assume he didn't hurt anyone else). No doubt this person may feel guilty and may suffer PTSD, but he was still not being safe. And I bet few would claim he deserved to be injured even though he was speeding. But you still victim blame. For the locked car, you are right. The cultur…
/r/MensRights25/10/12 12:30 PM
2

Do you actually care? If yes, then make a stink. If not, then don't. The notion that if the situation was revered someone would make a stink is a bit of a logical fallacy and irrelevant. Furthermore, your complaint will not be taken seriously if you are not seen as sincere or just doing it out of a sense of duty.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 02:40 AM
1

I think it's all in the gender roles. Women are generally not seen as agents, at least not as much as men. Girlwriteswhat?! has a great video about the concept, I think it has some truth to it. To give some examples if a man cheats he is a jerk, if a woman cheats then he must have neglected her. If a man hits a woman it's always wrong, if a woman hits a man then she must have a good reason. (I think it's funny that feminists only ask for context for abuse when its a woman hitting a man, never th…
/r/MensRights25/10/12 02:30 AM
1

I disagree with your first paragraph. I think "Victim blaming" exists with many other crimes, we just don't call it that. In the car accident example one may say " Why wasn't he wearing a seat belt?" or "Why was he driving over the speed limit." Hell, you can be the victim of murder and people may blame you, of course we call that justifiable homicide, or reduce the sentence to voluntary manslaughter. Or if you get an STD they may ask "why didn't you use a condom?" If your car was stolen "Why di…
/r/MensRights25/10/12 02:03 AM
1

That's weird, it should cost the state the same to collect one bill worth $100 or one worth $1000 right? So why should they get paid based on amount. I also don't like that the state is then incentivized to mandate unnecessarily high child support, but I'm preaching to the choir.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 08:11 PM
3

So it's in the states best interest to demand higher child support? That sucks!
/r/MensRights24/10/12 08:08 PM
3

What do you mean by "matching"?
/r/MensRights24/10/12 05:30 PM
11

Stop paying half of everything she puts in front of you, you may come out ahead. I know it's not that simple. Do courts take into account how much one supports their kids outside of the mandatory child support, or do they assume the father normally gives only what is mandated? If OP were to suddenly stop with other types of support would they increase his payment?
/r/MensRights24/10/12 04:59 PM
3

I guarantee it would cause a huge bruhaha if a male host flirted with a military guy.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 09:03 PM
11

I agree, everyone has their own experiences and perceptions, but calling that "privilege" gives it a connotation that their life is somehow easier, which may or may not be true. The whole notion of privilege seems to be used solely as a way to dismiss people's (typically white males) opinions outright.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 07:48 PM
17

Is there a rebuttal of these points somewhere? Twenty nine cracks me up, as feminists rarely if ever admit to any female privilege. I am surprised they don't mention our ability to use urinals as privilege.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 07:13 PM
3

I guess you could ask " If you were a woman would you accept feminist theory". I doubt it. I am way to skeptical of a person to buy into untestable hypothesis like patriarchy theory. Also their notion that the "Patriarchy " created and reenforces gender roles as opposed to the other way around is bizarre to me.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 01:14 PM
3

Satan in South Park: Bigger, longer, uncut
/r/MensRights20/10/12 05:05 PM
4

By "spanish" do you mean you mean she teaches Spanish or she is from Spain? If the latter I would not be as upset about it, their culture is very different when it comes to gender roles. It would be very likely a male Spanish teacher would do the same thing. Not saying it excuses it, but may mitigate the insult. If she is American, then yeah, she was being sexist.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 04:59 PM
1

I don't know why more people don't see femithiest as a satirist. I think she is hilarious.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 11:55 AM
1

I think a simple "Lol" would suffice. it's really all his response warrants. However, I think I would just reply,"Dude, it's just a picture.". He is obviously not capable of thinking rationally about this particular subject and therefore you should not even try to debate it with him. He is too emotionally invested in his view, for whatever reason. I dont think this is worth the very real risk of losing your brotherly relationship with him. He ,hopefully, will realize he overreacted and will prob…
/r/MensRights16/10/12 12:16 AM
2

I loved the "let alone a white male one." comment. Why is it more acceptable for a non-white male to talk about trans-vaginal ultrasound?
/r/MensRights04/10/12 11:07 PM
1

If I had I kids, I would try to teach my son , and daughters, to respect people. The usual stuff male children get taught. Enphesizing the importance of consent and not to assume consent is given just because she or he is not resisting. But I would focus most of my rape talks on any daughters I had (maybe sons too). I would make sure she understood that she should in no way be an innocent bystander in her own sexual assault. No guy should ever have to question if they raped her. I will teach her…
/r/MensRights28/09/12 09:29 PM
3

From a strictly anatomical standpoint she is correct. The glans penis is analogous to the clitoris, and the clitoral hood is analogous to the foreskin. As to how much removal of any of these structures affects sensation is anyone's guess.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 11:07 PM
0

Okay, makes sense. Thank you.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 03:00 AM
2

Enlighten me please, You have been falsely accused. How do you prove your innocence? How would the police? I agree with you that the burden of proof lies with the accuser, yet you agree with me that in this society that is not the case. if you are counting on the false accuser growing a conscience to avoid jail time ... I am counting on no such thing, but if an FA gets called on her bullshit it becomes her best interest to continue the lie when she can go to jail for telling the truth. When it's…
/r/MensRights18/09/12 11:04 PM
2

I agree with your sentiment, but you must agree it is very difficult to determine that a rape did not occur. Especially if there was consensual sex. I have no idea how I would prove I did not rape someone I slept with. I guess my point is that if I was being falsely accused, I would not want the accuser to think she would go to jail if she recanted. Her recanting is the only way to guarantee that I wouln't go to jail,and my reputation would remain intact. Maybe that's just me. Of course, ideally…
/r/MensRights18/09/12 10:14 PM
2

Meh, I am indifferent. Your mom's main concerns was ,and should be , you. Obviously the accusation that all men only want sex is wrong, but her point is for you to protect yourself. "Men will often be dishonest to get you to sleep with them." The term "often" is subjective, but this does happen. "Sometimes they will just force you". Also true unfortunately. I am not going to criticize someone for trying to protect their kid. The danger , as I am sure you know, is that girls internalize the messa…
/r/MensRights18/09/12 08:08 PM
3

I can read. Suspicion does not equal knowledge. Which is why i specifically stated "the only reason we know for a fact" The reason this matters is two-fold. First, If she did not confess would she have gotten jail time? I doubt it, but then again my suspicion does not equal knowledge. I wonder if there are any cases where an FA did not confess and received jail time. I would imagine there would need to be a shit-ton of evidence against her for that to be the case. If this girl knew she would get…
/r/MensRights18/09/12 06:04 PM
1

I agree she deserves the sentence, my concern is that in some future case the legal council for the FA will advise them not to come clean for fear of jail time.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 05:31 PM
9

I am glad she is in jail, however I don't know if jail time is a good idea in this case. Hear me out. The only reason we know for a fact she lied is because she admitted her guilt (after questioning of'course). As much as I despise people who lie in this way, this sentence will discourage other false accusers from admitting they lied. While ideally this would discourage people from making false accusations in the first place, I doubt it will work that way. Jail time should be reserved for people…
/r/MensRights18/09/12 05:06 PM
1

I'm not doubting you, I'm just curious where did you find that statistic of women in conservative clothing being more likely to be raped?
/r/MensRights08/09/12 04:42 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter