TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Long-Night-Of-Solace Archive

View 0 posts and 50 comments by Long-Night-Of-Solace on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-2

Wow, that's one triggered incel
/r/PussyPassDenied23/03/22 06:46 AM
2

You're shifting the goalposts to avoid accepting that you're wrong. If you get in the habit of bravely facing the possibility that you're wrong, you'll abandon all this nonsense in hours. First the hilarious failed example of hate speech was worse than anything on MGTOW. Then I provided actual examples of hate speech and you didn't have the substance to face the reality that you were wrong so now there's this bizarre BS about the sub being quarantined. It's hate speech regardless. Don't deflect.…
/r/MensRights04/08/21 01:06 AM
2

You're intentionally justifying black racism against whites and female violence against men. I'm explaining that it's logical and reasonable to hold different groups to different standards based on relevant factors, and that groups with different experiences and power levels are impacted differently by the same issues. That's reality. That's not the same as justifying black racism against whites, which I think is a bizarre interpretation of my comments but at least I can see how you drew the con…
/r/MensRights04/08/21 01:03 AM
2

Everything you mentioned isn't racism Sorry, let me clarify: Pervasive prejudice is not racism? Are you just trolling me or are you truly so afraid of facing the possibility that you're completely baffled by this and entirely wrong?
/r/MensRights04/08/21 12:23 AM
3

I genuinely don't understand what you mean here. I'm not ignoring anything - can you point to where I am? I won't hold my breath because I genuinely believe you're just telling yourself that to justify ignoring my points because they threaten to drag your understanding of this issue into line with reality.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 12:17 AM
1

Oh so it's only hate speech in private, and that means that it's not hate speech? This is a serious reasoning failure.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 12:15 AM
2

There's nothing about racism in one direction that hurts more than racism in the other. Except power dynamics, history, social disadvantage, pervasive prejudice, etc. Except all those obvious, easily demonstrated, clearly relevant factors, you're right. Nothing at all. If your worldview is based around saying "But if I pretend things are radically different than how they really are, I can keep telling myself that I'm right" you're wrong.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 12:14 AM
0

Wrong again! You're on a roll, and it started years ago. If it weren't so embarrassing it'd be impressive. https://wehuntedthemammoth.com/2020/06/30/reddits-halfassed-hate-speech-takedown-ignores-the-blatant-misogyny-of-the-mgtow-subreddit/ When you and everyone who agrees with you have to desperately try to pretend that reality fits the narrative that your emotions desire, it's time to accept that your worldview is out of touch with reality.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 12:07 AM
2

I'm asking for examples. I'm not ignoring anything: "X and Y are true!" Me: "Got any evidence?" "Here's a failed attempt to demonstrate X" Me: "That's not evidence if you think about it for a second or two. Got any evidence?" "Well you're ignoring Y!"
/r/MensRights04/08/21 12:04 AM
3

You'd be fired so fast for racial insensitivity your head would spin twice Lol I work for a union, that's ridiculous in 99% of workplaces, but it's no surprise that you live in a fantasy world. I think you're right that there's a double standard, but if you understood literally anything about the issue you'd see that the two standards reflect two different experiences and power levels so it's not an unjustified double standard. But you're a child, so your feelings get in the way of any actual un…
/r/MensRights04/08/21 12:02 AM
4

it's clearly hate speech if I swap "yt" for "black". Lol it's really really not. Maybe you should google "hate speech", followed by "can I redo my entire education if it didn't work the first time?" Are there any actual examples?
/r/MensRights03/08/21 11:51 PM
1

So not hate speech then. Even with the genders swapped. I think it's a little off colour with either gender, and I don't agree with it, but how do you make the leap that it's hate speech? Got any actual examples? I'll wait.
/r/MensRights03/08/21 11:50 PM
0

Other than FDS and FDSpros, I couldn't spot hate speech on those subs. Are you sure it's not just your emotions driving?
/r/MensRights03/08/21 11:42 PM
-12

"I acted like a fuckwit asshole and got treated like a fuckwit asshole!" Boo hoo kid
/r/MensRights31/07/21 01:25 AM
-37

You folks believe Channel 7? That's embarrassing.
/r/MensRights27/04/21 07:21 AM
-1

God you children could be offended about anything.
/r/MensRights06/02/21 09:03 PM
0

Another genius who thinks they know better than the experts. Just cherry-pick the scant bits of research that support your point, and ignore the majority. You're wrong. You live in a pathetic fantasy world.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/12/20 04:21 AM
19

The joke isn't what's misogynistic, but posting it here, saying the guy has absolutely nailed it, and upvoting it is absolutely misogyny. People pretend that this sub is about people getting what's coming to them, and sometimes that's what's posted, but this was always a place for pathetic misogynists to embarrass themselves. That's what it's for. I found the post in r/all, before you ask.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/12/20 09:57 AM
-6

I know that comprehension skills aren't really a thing on subs like this one, but you folks do understand that women can hold hateful views about women, right?
/r/PussyPassDenied23/07/20 09:23 AM
-29

While that's often true, it's also often a mistake because the situation is different for men and women. Pretending that there is equality in all matters is beyond stupid.
/r/MensRights15/07/20 02:17 AM
1

She's evil and there's a clear double-standard, but: Do we know it's the same women making both arguments? It may be one or two who lack the intellect or moral substance to see the inconsistency, but that does sound like a hyperbolic exaggeration.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/04/20 07:57 AM
1

Okay but how is mentioning that white males are overrepresented among fire-fighters an attack on white males? That's where the comprehension fail comes in. Pointing out that there is a lack of diversity and putting forward an argument for why it would be good for that to change is not at all the same as attacking anyone. The problem is that around here there is that toxic combo of hilariously poor comprehension skills plus sad snowflake victim complex. It's embarrassing.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/03/20 08:58 AM
-23

Isn't this just the standard r/pussypassdenied comprehension fail though? Because nobody was attacking white males, so the woman replying just has terrible comprehension skills, like the people who think it fits in this sub.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/03/20 08:01 AM
-1

That's not a person
/r/PussyPassDenied31/01/20 04:42 PM
1

So the experts are wrong, 100+ years of social science is wrong, and you're right because it makes you feel better? You're a joke, and deep down you know it.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/01/20 04:12 PM
-8

I never met Stalin but I'm pretty sure he's a bad dude.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/01/20 11:08 AM
-8

You are so, so ignorant of how trauma victims act that you're beyond "stupid" territory and well and truly into "evil" territory. If you actually gave a fuck about considering all the facts, you'd consider the facts relating to the behaviour of trauma victims. But you're the one pushing an agenda by playing pretend. You're a disgraceful, subhuman creature.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/01/20 11:06 AM
1

That's just the caricature of a feminist that develops in the mind of someone who doesn't care to pay attention and only focuses on a tiny minority of feminist nutbars.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/11/19 11:31 PM
-16

My god you're going to struggle through life with reasoning skills like that. "The old man told me the beans are magic! Told me directly! That's a primary source you dumb fuck." You're proud of believing absolutely anything?
/r/MensRights22/03/19 01:18 AM
1

As if that's going to make a difference. Unionise or stop complaining.
/r/MensRights13/03/19 10:59 AM
4

I was with you until the MAGA hat bit, for two reasons: Firstly it's not a gender thing so it's just a bizarre unrelated side point. Secondly it's basically "Show everyone that you're either dumb or vile or both, and people treat you like you're dumb or vile or something!"
/r/MensRights13/10/18 08:37 AM
1

Agreed, or when it turns into attacks on women or feminism.
/r/MensRights13/10/18 08:35 AM
1

Thank you for posting this. You only pay attention half the time though.
/r/MensRights13/10/18 08:32 AM
1

That's not the point. The point is whether she feels like you're interested in other girls.
/r/askTRP10/08/18 10:13 AM
-8

The pattern is that antifeminists are all dishonest otherwise the fantasy collapses. There are problems facing men in today's society. Those feminists that claim otherwise are demonstrably incorrect. Not all feminists do, though. And we fix those problems by talking about the truth, not inventing BS. You're part of the problem.
/r/MensRights19/07/18 12:19 PM
-1

Lol "Sure he had a gun in your face, but you had the option to not put the money in the bag."
/r/PussyPassDenied12/07/18 06:09 PM
-1

Christ. Because it's not their fucking job. Like I'm not taking their side, but it makes no sense to condemn them for not condemning certain people. If they do it, blame them for it. But if someone else does it, don't say, "You have to have a battle with that person or I blame you too!" Grow up.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 10:58 PM
-1

Ok but you know that Freud was wrong about basically everything right?
/r/MensRights15/05/18 10:56 PM
6

Yeah you really need to look those words up
/r/MensRights15/05/18 10:54 PM
2

That's neat as hell. Some English spot by the look of it. In Australia, it seems to me that blue collar unions are the ones doing this kind of stuff best. Mates in Construction is an example.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 12:48 AM
0

Shh we don't think about things here
/r/PussyPassDenied05/04/18 11:10 AM
-4

Feminism doesn't deny that at all. It's either dishonest or insane to suggest that it does. Some whackjob feminists do deny that, but they're whackjobs.
/r/MensRights28/03/18 01:43 PM
6

That's most of them, you know.
/r/MensRights28/03/18 12:21 PM
1

That's not a reason to reject data and disagree with experts. It's almost like you don't actually have one.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/16 01:25 AM
1

I'm happy to concede that the name is inflammatory and alarmist and inaccurate, but the underlying idea seems pretty accurate to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/16 01:44 AM
1

Forces that affect the different genders differently. I'll say to you what I say to your counterparts in the anti-vaccine, flat earth, and creationist movements: if you have a good reason to reject the data and disagree with the experts, I'll be glad to agree with you. I'll even applaud when you get your Nobel prize. I'm not holding my breath though.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/16 08:19 AM
1

No, it's based on the idea that there are social influences that ought to be countered, not at all that masculinity compels them to harm women. I'm genuinely baffled about how you reach that conclusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/16 01:01 AM
1

No, that isn't what feminism is. I'm reminded of Sam Harris talking about water being two hydrogens and an oxygen. If someone says that that isn't how they choose to think about water, the conversation is over.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/16 01:00 AM
1

The rape culture stuff isn't garbage. Next?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/16 12:58 AM
6

I think that the error that you make is that you conflate the views of a small minority of counterproductively anti-male "feminists" with the core principles of feminism and assume that they're all the same. Of course I anticipate a counter-argument about TRP, but if you're talking specifically about TRP rather than the mens' rights movement, you're specifically selecting the extremes of the mens' rights movement for your comparison. Some examples of this: The Red Pill shames men who are underac…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/16 05:48 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter