TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

LordFoom Archive

View 0 posts and 51 comments by LordFoom on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Seems very relevant to me.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/10/19 11:24 AM
14

Your friend should try and get custody of his children from his ex-wife.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/09/19 01:32 PM
12

So this is the first study linked in the digital journal: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0011392115611192 In the abstract we read: "Results show that cases involving female victims attract more punitive court responses overall than cases with male victims. Second, intimate and familial femicides are treated more leniently at several stages than other femicides. " This shows that men receive harsher sentences than women for murdering the opposite gender. Killing known women had more…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/08/19 02:29 PM
9

The typical feminist argument to these points, as far as I have seen in my browsing of feminist subs, is that men have a reluctance to reach out or ask for help, that this reluctance is due to the 'patriarchal' socialisation of men which states that they must be strong and devoid of human feelings in order to be 'real men' and there is also a belief that this is enforced not only by men but also by women as part of a patriarchal society and that the figures mentioned here are a result of the pat…
/r/MensRights17/05/19 12:35 PM
3

They'll even go to refugee camps for that purpose. And poor African countries.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 09:19 AM
1

So, it's not 100%? Interesting. Gosh, you sure got them good. You know the 97% is bullshit too, right? On the contrary, I know it's accurate, and that the only bullshit here is your commentary. "The consensus that humans are causing recent global warming is shared by 90%–100% of publishing climate scientists according to six independent studies by co-authors of this paper. Those results are consistent with the 97% consensus reported by Cook et al (Environ. Res. Lett. 8 024024) based on 11 944 ab…
/r/MensRights10/09/18 11:02 AM
1

100% of scientists agree about climate change, do they? 100%? Just a mere 97%
/r/MensRights10/09/18 10:40 AM
9

Looks like now they're owned by a conglomerate, not just one group. But it looks like the conglomerate is a wholly owned subsidiary of the church.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/02/18 08:28 AM
12

but are there women there that have the same revenue generation as those three do? No?
/r/MensRights31/01/18 01:30 PM
8

Are those windmills I see?
/r/MensRights31/01/18 10:02 AM
27

Not only that but they excluded the highest earning men: The highest earning men in entertainment and sport, but not news, is how I read that qujote
/r/MensRights31/01/18 09:22 AM
86

Not quite, just the entertainment and sport top paid men: PwC focused primarily on news staff and the BBC’s best-paid stars in entertainment and sport, such as Graham Norton, Gary Lineker and Chris Evans, were excluded.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 09:21 AM
16

The reason this was ruled as non rape is because in German law, which is now due to this case being looked at, if you do not physically try to fight against a sexual act, then it is not considered rape. That seems to be a myth: https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/32202/did-germany-until-recently-require-rape-victims-to-physically-resist-their-attac
/r/PussyPassDenied06/07/16 11:40 AM
-8

Yes, I certainly did. If a ten year old with a machine gun has the physical requirements to be effective in "combat areas", then I'm pretty sure a well-trained female soldier from the "modern American military" can perform effectively in "combat areas". Something about "force multipliers".
/r/MensRights06/12/13 03:31 PM
-3

Tell that to child soldiers.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 03:04 PM
0

And it's back to that, as far as I can see. It's wikipedia, this shit happens.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 11:58 AM
1

You tell us, buddy.
/r/MensRights22/08/11 08:15 AM
3

If it were a 34 year old man having sex with a 15 year old girl, I guarantee that they would not have been depicted as consensual sexual encounters.
/r/MensRights01/08/11 02:09 PM
1

Hey, I agree with you, not having sex with your marriage partner is as bad as cheating on them. And I don't think anyone thinks having sex while not in the mood is rape. However: "But the fact that spousal rape wasn't considered a crime was that sex was an acknowledged part of the covenant of marriage." I cannot agree with this. I put it to you that the reason spousal rape was not considered a crime is because the woman was viewed in many ways to be the chattel of the man. Owned things don't get…
/r/MensRights02/06/11 07:46 AM
-2

And it's a good one to point at. Spousal rape is just "part of the deal"? Sheesh.
/r/MensRights01/06/11 02:18 PM
3

You have got to be fucking kidding me.
/r/MensRights11/05/11 02:18 PM
2

In my view, the author begins well, taking some genuine male concerns, and then devolves into some dribbling darwinian metaphor, effectively dismissing the earlier concerns.
/r/MensRights14/02/10 10:10 AM
3

More and more I tend towards Pieter Gelderloos' point that the worship of non-violence is in the interests of those in control. I just wanted to make the point that non-violence is NOT always the right thing to do.
/r/MensRights09/12/09 09:29 AM
1

An association with Rush Limbaugh is worse than an association with the Third Reich??
/r/MensRights17/11/09 03:46 PM
3

The comments are awesome: "So they don't get that when a people decide they want to fight a war against terrorists, and that's what men truly are, they are sexist woman hating terrorists" "Thank goddess I never had to live with these pigs as an adult! Wow, I can't imagine any woman who had intelligence and income ever wanting men in the house to begin with." "I view them as meaningless animals at best, or dangerous rapists at worst, but compared to women, men really are quite inferior in every s…
/r/MensRights06/11/09 08:22 AM
4

Indeed. The state is the prosecutor; the (potentially lying) accuser is a witness.
/r/MensRights28/10/09 02:20 PM
3

Dude dumps toxic waste illegally in Sicily. Can you say "Mafia"?
/r/MensRights23/10/09 03:09 PM
-4

There are crazy misandrists and there are crazy misogynists and cherry-picking quotes from a bunch of crazies doesn't mean it's representative of the entire school of thought. Just saying. Let the downvoting commence.
/r/MensRights01/10/09 02:52 PM
6

But he didn't, did he?
/r/MensRights23/09/09 01:04 PM
3

Makes some good points but then starts frothing at the mouth. Exhibit a, the final sentence: "Women want men – all of us – in chains."
/r/MensRights23/09/09 12:11 PM
1

LOL :D
/r/MensRights08/09/09 12:28 PM
1

Women should be the one's solely responsible for contraception? One can more easily argue that it's the male's genetic material, so if we don't want to support their children, we should keep it to ourselves. In my country, equal custody is the norm and I think that's how it should be. I support your feeling that custody should be equal. I reject your assertion that "women want their kids all for themselves!". Wholeheartedly reject. Some women, sure, but not all women. Again, in my country, child…
/r/MensRights08/09/09 12:00 PM
3

So you're saying we should be able to force women to give up their children? I don't want the state to have that kind of power. Better, for me, that the state have the power to compel you to pay alimony (which may and probably is excessive and unfair) than that the state have the power to compel you to give up your children based on one parties unwillingness. And that's if you're lucky enough to have a willing adoptive couple. Maybe you're lucky enough to not have orphanages in the USA, I don't …
/r/MensRights08/09/09 07:56 AM
2

Flip it around, then: not forcing men to pay for their children incentivizes them to ignore reproductive safety, since they can always just financially abort. Sure European countries have their own problems; they also have universal health-care and education, as well as social support, as provided by the state. As for their problems: that's what happens when people live together, we get up in each other's faces. But I digress, this isn't a discussion on the relative merits of socialism. I'm not …
/r/MensRights08/09/09 07:39 AM
4

I totally disagree with your premise that by forcing men to look after their offspring you encourage women to have more children without fathers. Second, well, most of Europe is socialist, and they seem to be doing alright. Third, the strong hormonal influences ensure that many women will choose to have children, consequences be damned. And let's bear in mind, women can't have children without men.../shameless safe-sex plug
/r/MensRights07/09/09 04:29 PM
3

I don't disagree with you: fathers are important to children. As a single dad, I embrace that. But requiring fathers to support their offspring is very different to encouraging bastard children. Are you proposing involuntary abortions? I can't see that happening. It sucks, but guys need to keep an eye out for the hook-in-the-pussy. But that's just common sense, I've discovered.
/r/MensRights07/09/09 03:29 PM
1

......nothing like some aggressively delivered unsubstantiated opinion....
/r/MensRights07/09/09 03:24 PM
2

Again, a separate issue, but we can check it out: As far as I understand (I'm not American), adoption in the USA means your child goes to another set of parents. Child abandonment is illegal, however - you can't just dump your child somewhere.
/r/MensRights07/09/09 03:22 PM
3

While it is a fetus, sure. But once it's born, there it is. Or are you proposing involuntary abortions? Again, please understand that I am in no way saying that it is right that men are so effectively excluded from fundamental decisions on whether or not to have a child. But, even so, there is no justice in punishing a child because the mother is, for want of a better word, a bitch.
/r/MensRights07/09/09 02:50 PM
5

While I agree with you that, yes, there need to be more concessions from women around marriage (particularly in the USA, if what I've read is correct), a child needs money. Purely from the point of view of being provided for - food, clothing, shelter - a child costs money. Especially for the poor/middle-class, the contribution of an extra person makes a massive difference. In other words, I think it's better for a kid to be clothed, fed and educated by both parents (in a poor/middle-class situat…
/r/MensRights07/09/09 12:18 PM
6

Not sure how that relates to what I'm saying. In the case where a child is born, and the father is known, the child deserves to be supported by that father. Because, even less than the father, it had no choice in being born. Supporting other men's children, false rape accusations and custody are all separate issues. In particular custody is pretty fucked up. But it's a separate issue.
/r/MensRights07/09/09 10:40 AM
2

Look, it's unfair, but you can't punish the eventual child (which is what financial support is about) because some chick you knocked up won't listen to reason. That, in the RSA anyway, is the legal position: the state must look after the rights of the child. The wants of the parent don't enter into it. And it's not like the kid had any choice, either.
/r/MensRights07/09/09 09:07 AM
-5

The problem with this idea is that the child suffers.
/r/MensRights27/02/09 10:47 AM
2

The sense of entitlement that the modern American has come to display is pathological. Fixed.
/r/MensRights05/01/09 10:15 AM
2

I'm sorry I gave you the impression that I have the impression that feminist thought devalues men. My problem is with a specific statement, not an entire school of thought.
/r/MensRights03/12/08 07:52 AM
3

While I think it's well written, I don't agree with the way she frames some things, and think she wholly misunderstands large parts of the "male" culture that she critiques. Still, it did make me think.
/r/MensRights21/11/08 09:09 AM
6

I'm a feminist and I find this distasteful. I also find it sad that "feminism" has become a "dirty word". *edit I mean I found Jane distasteful
/r/MensRights07/11/08 02:47 PM
1

Yeah, it's a general thing in southern africa. Called Lobola in the RSA.
/r/MensRights22/10/08 08:55 AM
1

I agree. Double-edged knife, though, the whole "pointing out of facts". Reconciliation isn't all about showing the other person is worthy of blame.
/r/MensRights02/10/08 08:29 AM
1

And even if men were mostly the victims of violence by other men, so what? If a man rapes another man, it's not as terrible as a man raping a woman, because it's the same gender? Don't seem logical to me.
/r/MensRights01/10/08 02:47 PM
13

What bollocks.
/r/MensRights26/09/08 01:08 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter