~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Male Feminist banned from /r/Feminism for saying women are hot. Women objectivism?If a women said, "male firemen are so friggin' hawt", would that be objectionable? I think for an accurate comparison one would have to find a female dominated field. "Male nurses are so friggin hawt". As (I assume) a man, do you find this phrase objectionable? I say it depends on the context, which is most of what I have been saying about the issue. To me society encourages women to be overly valued based on looks and men overly valued based on profession. Are there any studies you can link me … | /r/MensRights | 08/03/14 01:20 PM |
| 0 | Male Feminist banned from /r/Feminism for saying women are hot. Women objectivism?I'm offering to help you understand why you got banned. This is the reason. I find it fitting that you call me a whining child when as soon as you get banned you come running to /r/MensRights and throw a tantrum. I am gonna tell you like one told the one singular feminist who complains about this on my Facebook, I REFUSE to be regulated by your insecurities. This is a matter of politeness and empathy for your fellow people. I can't really argue against it except to point out that it is highly ru… | /r/MensRights | 06/03/14 03:43 PM |
| 3 | Male Feminist banned from /r/Feminism for saying women are hot. Women objectivism?Try again. First: 1.coming before all others in time or order; earliest; 1st. 2. foremost in position, rank, or importance As I said, he is talking about female computer scientist sexually before he treats them as people. Hawtness (are hawt) is the object of this passive sentence, making it the most important part. Granted, I could have probably used a phrase that was more highly specific. Then again, I didn't think I would be teaching a basic grammar lesson. The only logical case that you could… | /r/MensRights | 06/03/14 03:33 PM |
| 2 | Male Feminist banned from /r/Feminism for saying women are hot. Women objectivism?This isn't about the order of the sentence, it is about what he chose to say. Instead of saying "I respect female computer scientists", he chose to highlight the fact that they were female and that he found their accomplishments "hawt". Therefore he treats her as a sexual object first, as in, before he treats her like a person. On that note, being a sexual object is different from being a literal object. You seem to be intentionally reading malice into a simple statement without evidence from th… | /r/MensRights | 06/03/14 05:47 AM |
| 5 | Male Feminist banned from /r/Feminism for saying women are hot. Women objectivism?The problem isn't who or how you find people attractive, it is the context and method by which you verbalized it. I read your post "Female computer scientist are so friggin hawt." If you can't understand why a group of people would not want this contribution to their sub, I suggest that you reflect on yourself and your actions as well as educate yourself. If you still don't understand I can help. If you are a troll, I suggest doing something more meaningful with your time. | /r/MensRights | 06/03/14 04:54 AM |
| 4 | Male Feminist banned from /r/Feminism for saying women are hot. Women objectivism?Here is why: by saying a female programmer is hot you are referring to her as a sexual object first. If "hot" means "I am sexually attracted to that", you are basically saying "good job on all that hard work becoming a programmer, you make my dick hard." It's just rude. | /r/MensRights | 06/03/14 03:42 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter