TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Lord_Mahjong Archive

View 2 posts and 23 comments by Lord_Mahjong on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
24

I am often called a sociopath because I left my wife and child to have sex with transsexuals. I feel guilty about it sometimes, but I realize that I'm way more satisfied with a trannydick in my ass.
/r/TheRedPill29/04/13 03:31 PM
-29

One of my exes threatened to hit me with a hammer. I called the police, but the police did NOTHING. Another one of my exes threatened to kill me in writing in an email. I called the police and told them about the email, but the police did absolutely NOTHING. If the genders were reversed, and the perpetrators were male and the victims were female, I know the police would have done a lot more. OH MY GOD A WOMAN THREATENED ME WITH A HAMMER AND THEN ONE SENT A MEAN E-MAIL TO MEEEEEE If you're intere…
/r/MensRights28/04/13 07:49 PM
1

Yes, as with male circumcision. If male circumcision, however, FGM type 1a should be legal. You'd hear the feminists scream bloody murder about it, though.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 09:45 PM
1

I am a sexist cretin, but not in the way that you think. In fact, under liberal democracy, (limited) FGM should be legal, as is the unfortunate reality of liberal democracy. I don't really see your point, as I am not a supporter of liberal democracy. You don't know what "false equivalence" means. You are assuming that male circumcision and FGM are equivalent and then claiming that if one is legal, then the other must be, too. You are literally--literally, not in the imprecise sense of the Tumblr…
/r/MensRights27/04/13 09:43 PM
0

Yet you are certain that FGM and MGM are on opposite sides of a "hard and fast rule for legality". No, my opinion is that FGM and male circumcision are very different styles of modification, with FGM usually being far more harmful to the genitals. My suspicion is that it's the F and the M that are the determining factor in your separation of the two - not the severity of the act. Oh, fuck off. FGM usually involves the removal of the clitoris and clitoral hood, and it often involves excising part…
/r/MensRights27/04/13 07:48 PM
1

So, one more time, where is the line to be drawn and by what criteria? There isn't a hard and fast rule for legality because there are always externalities and changing social mores. I'm not going to try and write out an all-encompassing definition of what behavior should or should not be legal in society because that's a pointless exercise.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 07:09 PM
1

Obviously it's easy to decide between two extremes, but what when things get more borderline? Uh...then I make a judgment based on the particulars of the situation, which is exactly what I'm doing in this case.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 06:46 PM
-1

The problem is, so far you seem to decide arbitrarily or by gut feeling when it is and when it's not. It's not a "gut feeling" to make an ethical distinction between circumcision and murder.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 06:25 PM
-4

But they are absolutely comparable in the manner in which you attempted to justify practicing circumcision - which is exactly the same. That they are not comparable in severity invalidates the question. The justification of one behavior does not justify all behavior.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 04:31 PM
0

I know. But I've found that a lot of mothers want their boys circumcised and are proponents of the "it's cleaner" mindset.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 03:21 PM
0

I doubt that it will take a few hundred years, but let's say we put a circumcision ban on every ballot in America tomorrow. Would it pass? Unlikely. When San Francisco tried to put up a ban on it, they were defeated and smeared as anti-Semites. You want a circumcision ban, you kick out the Jews and Muslims and go from there. Then you have to deal with the women, who are some of the biggest proponents of circumcision mythology.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 03:14 PM
-5

They wouldn't, mostly because the people who live in cultures that practice FGM are uncivilized. The research indicating that circumcision is harmful is relatively new and it's slowly becoming mainstream. Americans will eventually stop circumcising their boys as younger generations become more aware of the consequences, and I expect we'll eventually see companies like Foregen develop a product to fully restore the foreskin.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 03:04 PM
-4

I agree in theory, but I just can't get that worked up over it.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 02:49 PM
-6

Yes, they do. Parents are in charge of their children and make decisions for them all the time. In this case, I disagree with it, and I would personally make circumcision illegal, but getting buttmad over it is pointless.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 02:43 PM
-2

I would say that's less bad than male circumcision.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 02:39 PM
-4

at least one of them is far less invasive or dangerous than MGM Which of them? FGM usually removes the clitoral hood and clitoris at the minimum.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 02:16 PM
-15

What kind of autistic manchild compares circumcision to murder.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 02:13 PM
-13

While I'm sure this is an unpopular viewpoint among MRAs, I consider FGM worse than male circumcision (or MGM, if you will). Circumcision leaves the penis relatively intact and capable of functioning, whereas FGM is far more destructive to the vagina.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 01:40 PM
1

It depends on the individual subreddit, I think.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 01:19 PM
2

/r/MensRights (and most of Reddit) doesn't like links to the Gawker network, so you'll have to investigate yourself.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 01:06 PM
-15

I sure don't, it's barbaric While I agree that circumcision has no place in white Christian culture, there are religious reasons for Muslims and Jews to circumcise their children. It's part of their culture, and I think that the majority of these people don't mind because it is part of their religious heritage. You might disagree with it (and I do) but the religious rites and cultural heritage of some groups mandate circumcision.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 12:19 PM
0

without being sexaully attractive and having to provide and protect in order to acquire sex and reproduce? Ah, there's the rub, isn't it? You want sex without the strings attached. Don't want to worry about social obligations or providing for another, just the free cooze. You could be so much more.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 02:25 PM
-1

So the old feminism instead of the new one, no thanks! Men are breaking away from gynocentric systems that are policed by shame and are going to create something new. All societies are policed through the enforcement of social standards, which includes shaming wrong behavior. Women will never be attracted to you because you are an invertebrate desperate for sex. Look at how pathetic you are. "We're going to create something new," you proudly proclaim, but you should only feel shame. Your "new" s…
/r/MensRights20/04/13 01:59 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter