TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

LoudmouthedBitch Archive

View 0 posts and 75 comments by LoudmouthedBitch on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

There is no cultural pressure to look perfect. Wow, your head is so far up your ass you're hitting corn. I guess you don't ever shave, don't use deodorant, don't comb your hair and wear a potato sack and orthopedic shoes when you go out in public. Otherwise, you'd be trying to snag the best mate, all for your own selfish interests. You aren't under pressure from women there. You are under pressure from other men. You are competing with them. So blame yourselves for that one. You're more than wil…
/r/MensRights07/12/10 01:03 AM
1

Wow. This has got to be the most idiotic arguments I've ever heard. Makeup must be because women like lying, and not because of the immense cultural pressure to always look as "perfect" as possible, not to mention the shaming that goes on if you don't conform to those standards (being called ugly, dog, dyke, etc.) I also assume that when men wear cologne, deodorant, or style their hair, it's because they're filthy lying harpies as well. Congratulations, you cracked me up. Either you're a very te…
/r/MensRights06/12/10 10:58 PM
3

You're either a troll or an idiot. It's hard to tell when parody so closely resembles reality.
/r/MensRights06/12/10 01:48 AM
3

And women are harpies who prefer lies to truth. Yep, that sure ain't a sexist generalization. Ah, how enlightened you are.
/r/MensRights06/12/10 01:02 AM
1

Ah so maybe it's because they're brainwashed in an extremist environment… not that they don't have enough sex. Ya think?
/r/MensRights01/12/10 04:42 AM
0

Yea, and I have the right to call you a bastard, but doesn't make it appropriate. I'm not allowed to feel uncomfortable when some guy yells out some lewd comment from the safety of his car, and then calls me a bitch when I don't acknowledge him? I'm not allowed to find this distasteful and rude, and somehow I'm the one who's misanthropic?
/r/MensRights01/12/10 04:40 AM
0

You would be surprised, it's the internet. Nothing is too absurd here.
/r/MensRights01/12/10 12:28 AM
0

Right, but the title of this thread an in the article it says "Men sexually harass women because they are not sexist." Also, I find it rather unlikely that masculine, open hostility is frowned upon in corporate America just because of women (if you haul off and punch someone taking too long at the fax machine, you're going to talk to HR, whether or not it's a lady). The difference between corporate American and a "coal mine" is socio-economic status, i.e, class. And the "higher class" one is, op…
/r/MensRights01/12/10 12:27 AM
1

I've had some rando guy yell "go fuck yourself!" and I don't really consider it sexual harassment (just, y'know, ordinary harassment).
/r/MensRights01/12/10 12:23 AM
1

Hmm forgive me if I don't take strangers shouting at me from their cars as a compliment. Not that I spend weeks and weeks holed up in my room crying about it, but it's irritating, and I have the right to be irritated by it. I've also known women who go out in sweatpants and still get harassed. In fact, women who are overweight seem to get harassed even more. It's really not about attractiveness, it's all about some asshole getting off on making a stranger feel uncomfortable.
/r/MensRights01/12/10 12:20 AM
0

I wouldn't say that, because street-harassment doesn't necessarily have to do with attractiveness. I don't take it as a compliment, all they want is to get a rise out of someone they think they can bully. But I see your point, when catcalls are only directed at "pretty" people it's demeaning for everyone.
/r/MensRights30/11/10 06:04 AM
1

Uh… no… it just makes me think you're lucky.
/r/MensRights30/11/10 03:51 AM
2

Right, that totally makes sense. Except that I'm not on a sports team. I'd be as grossed out as you if someone randomly slapped you on the butt. Girls in ballet will often touch eachother (push someone's butt in to help their posture, etc.), doesn't mean if I see someone out in public or even an acquaintance that it gives me the right to push their butt and correct their posture. Understanding equality. Ur doin' it wrong.
/r/MensRights30/11/10 03:47 AM
4

I know what the "fraternizing" stuff is, and most cases of sexual harassment I've heard people complain about isn't the "chummy teasing" kind at all (although everyone is allowed to set their boundaries, if they're not comfortable with the "fraternizing" kind, that's totally valid). So to make a blanket statement like "Guys who sexually harass women do it because they aren't sexist" is false. A less sensationalist, yet more accurate statement would be, "Some types of sexual harassment occur when…
/r/MensRights30/11/10 03:40 AM
2

Wouldn't that mean priests and nuns would also be likely to be suicide bombers?
/r/MensRights30/11/10 02:54 AM
5

Really? So men yell out to other men walking down the street, "Hey sweetie! Nice package!" And in the work place corner other men and invade their personal space and make comments about their butts?
/r/MensRights30/11/10 02:46 AM
2

I dunno, I've seen acceptance both of the vigilante justice type, and the blame-the-alleged victim type. As per the r-word, I've seen it abused by more than just gamers or fringe feminists, (i.e, 4chan, frat-types, immature kids, "It's not rape, it's surprise sex," shirts with "She can't say no if she's drunk," Yale frat guys chanting, "No means yes, yes means anal," etc.). But I don't think there's any overarching conspiracy aimed against men or against women, just a culture that's so entrenche…
/r/MensRights27/11/10 12:38 AM
1

Yea, uh, I never said that. I just said I haven't seen them, so I asked you where you've seen them.
/r/MensRights27/11/10 12:24 AM
-2

"Us?" I was talking about those who "think men in the U.S have it as bad as women have it under Shari'ah law. " Because it's so hyperbolic, I don't see a rational discussion following it. But y'know. I guess that means I hate everyone? Or something?
/r/MensRights26/11/10 05:28 AM
2

In my experience, "feminists" who throw the word around are few. There are probably some, but that doesn't mean most feminists are like that. The lynch mobs can be seen in the comment section on any story about someone accused of rape: people are off the leash and calling for the accused to be raped, mutilated, castrated, and then tortured to death, with no regard for "innocent until proven guilty". I've seen some of this, but I've also seen many comments about how the alleged victim was probabl…
/r/MensRights26/11/10 04:50 AM
1

Uh… I don't think current feminists have ever make any case for the lynch mobs that went after blacks. Just because disgusting racists used it as an excuse to be violent, doesn't mean we can never talk about rape again. Most of the feminists I've known don't use the "R-bomb" casually. In fact, they abhor it being used casually/out of context. I'm sure there are some self described feminists who throw it around, and I disagree with them.
/r/MensRights26/11/10 04:46 AM
1

Then why do people take offense at an add aimed at the potential perpetrator? They act as if the "advice" not to drink, wear anything "slutty," etc., hasn't been propagated for ages. I read your post, some things I agree with, some I disagree. I do agree that it's hypocritical to both be offended when women are "overly defensive" and "assume" men could be rapists, yet also cry that it's the woman's responsibility to not be raped. It can't be had both ways.
/r/MensRights26/11/10 04:36 AM
2

People here? People where? Because I haven't noticed anyone forming lynch-mobs the moment someone mentions rape.
/r/MensRights25/11/10 03:27 AM
3

Wait… are you implying that women are responsible for rape? I.e, if they got drunk, they were responsible if they were raped?
/r/MensRights25/11/10 03:07 AM
4

Yep, post you linked to was troll poop. And actually, I've noticed the exact opposite. People who throw "rape" around constantly are less likely to actually be a survivor/be educated about sexual assault. People (including feminists) I've talked to actually don't like using the word, and only approve of it being used per the definition. Otherwise, it devalues how serious it is.
/r/MensRights25/11/10 03:04 AM
1

Obvious troll is obvious. Has also used the "n" word in other comments in reference to Obama.
/r/MensRights25/11/10 03:00 AM
2

I'm not complaining. I'm pointing out the hypocrisy. I've seen dissenting posters being told to fuck off many, many times here. So to pretend to take the moral high ground is disingenuous.
/r/MensRights24/11/10 07:14 PM
0

Yea, because on r/mensrights, I never get called a cunt, bitch, or get told to fuck off. But one person saying the poster's disgusting? Oh, no, that's bullying.
/r/MensRights24/11/10 06:23 AM
2

I'm not sure you can really expect a rational discussion when someone thinks men in the U.S have it as bad as women have it under Shari'ah law. It's mind-bogglingly hyperbolic. It'd be like saying the new TSA regs are just like living in Nazi death camps. Sure, criticism of the TSA is warranted, but being hyperbolic about it and minimizing the seriousness of death camps isn't helping your argument and is not productive.
/r/MensRights24/11/10 12:16 AM
0

Wow, the education system really has gone to shit now that women are part of it. Aaaand the trollking lives up to his name. Don't expect any fair discussion with this one.
/r/MensRights24/11/10 12:11 AM
7

I think the ads make it pretty clear that the women in these contexts are too drunk to consent (woman is passed out on the bed, don't "help yourself," i.e, taking things without permission, etc.). If you have sex with someone who's passed out/ limp and unresponsive, that's sexual assault.
/r/MensRights21/11/10 08:33 AM
3

I once went in because I broke my arm. I went in with my mom, and they didn't want her to come in with me because they wanted to get me alone so they could find out if I was being abused. So, pretty sure this happens to men and women. It's probably procedure.
/r/MensRights20/11/10 05:52 PM
2

Odd, because the government's mostly run by men. However, I'd love to see some of this government money I'm supposedly getting.
/r/MensRights19/11/10 07:59 AM
2

I kind of feel sorry for you, that in your world most women are evil and out to get you. I would hate feeling that way about men, it would make me pretty miserable. I really doubt there's much I can say to convince you otherwise, just as I doubt there's much I could say to someone who's convinced most blacks are bad, or most Muslims are wicked.
/r/MensRights19/11/10 07:58 AM
0

It seems kind of sensationalist to paint all feminists as evil, especially since there's no singular, discernible "feminist" movement today. Would you argue that things were better before even the earliest forms of feminism (back when women couldn't vote, run for political office, or have careers)? Or do you object to particular sects of feminism? My opinion is that men and women are indeed equal in terms of value. I also think we are much more similar than we are different, and we shouldn't dis…
/r/MensRights19/11/10 01:05 AM
2

So you think women are inherently evil? That we should revert back to a time before feminism, and things would be better?
/r/MensRights19/11/10 12:05 AM
5

I suppose it has something to do with original sin as well eh? All women are inherently evil? And we have to keep them evil wimmenz "restrained" or else they'll destroy everything?
/r/MensRights18/11/10 07:48 PM
3

Most women are bad, most men are good. Everything's so clear now!
/r/MensRights18/11/10 06:44 PM
0

Well, I don't think most of reddit is like that, or even all of this subreddit, but it does seem that too many times rape/sexual assault victims are stereotyped as malicious liars (e.g that thread about the woman who blogged about being sexually assaulted, and all the hate directed towards her).
/r/MensRights14/11/10 12:53 AM
0

Though when you express this position, it's seen as thinking false-rape allegations are a-ok. I'm also surprised at the "easy treatment" people think that alleged rape victims have. One of my friends was raped, and so many people informed me that while it was rape, she was "kinda asking for it," and "she put herself in that position," etc.
/r/MensRights12/11/10 10:02 PM
-5

I have not found this to be true. Remember how publicized the Duke Lacrosse case was? Also, convicted-rapes are swept under the rug as well. Mike Tyson is currently enjoying popularity in acting, though he was convicted of rape.
/r/MensRights12/11/10 10:00 PM
-5

You appear not to have understood my point. I never asserted that because false rape accusations were rare, that they're any less reprehensible. I also notice that you jump to labeling me as a "feminist," much as the term "liberal" is often used as a derogatory label. False rape accusations are a problem. I never said they weren't. I even said it was fine to report on them. If you want to devote a blog to combating false rape accusations, you are, of course, free to do so. My complaint was that,…
/r/MensRights12/11/10 09:56 PM
-13

True, and I don't think anyone would argue that intentionally false rape allegations aren't horrible. But what bothers me is when reddit fixates on only the rare instances of false accusations (again, rarity doesn't make them any less reprehensible), you create an availability heuristic, making it seem as if all/most/significant portion of rape accusations are false, committed by crazy/spiteful/horrible women. I'm not saying not to report on false rape accusations, but when that's all that's eve…
/r/MensRights12/11/10 07:24 PM
1

I'm not sure I see your point here, because you're just citing a different type of gender norm. In the middle east, wearing robes is considered masculine. Wearing a burka or hijab is considered feminine. These are culture/gender norms, and they comprise what is considered masculine/feminine. In 18th century France, men (royalty) wore high-heels. It was still considered masculine. Now, high-heels are considered exclusively feminine.
/r/MensRights12/11/10 01:37 AM
5

Really? You're going to simply assume she was lying, even though there's testimony that she was in an abusive relationship? I'm all for "innocent until proven guilty," but shouldn't that apply to the alleged victim as well?
/r/MensRights11/11/10 11:21 PM
2

I'm not sure how we're in disagreement, because that's exactly what people pick on gays for, or straights for acting "queer." It doesn't necessarily have to fall under that dynamic, but that's definitely part of what you're talking about. I.e, people who act differently (especially if a guy is acting too feminine, in a non-hip way) will be labeled as the "other," which could be "gay" (or some epithet), "freak," "weirdo," etc. Cultural and gender norms are constantly evolving. What doesn't evolve…
/r/MensRights11/11/10 06:42 PM
1

You'll see that as a general trend. Feminine traits are often seen as "weaker" (okay for women, because they're the "weaker" sex), yet if men dare to be feminine, they must be punished. Masculinity, however, is held in high regard. Women can adopt some aspects of masculinity and it can even make them seem "cooler," but too much and they too must be punished for being too "butch." What's hilarious is we think somehow that there are these rigid gender categories, yet we see throughout history that…
/r/MensRights11/11/10 06:54 AM
1

You might wanna be careful using terms like "harpies" and "screech," because those have the historic connotations of smacking down "uppity women." (e.g, all the times Hillary Clinton was described as a "shrill harpy.") Otherwise, yea. It's sad to see generalizations thrown around so much. I feel like people should be able to have discussions about gender issues without resorting to making hateful comments at roughly half of the world's population.
/r/MensRights11/11/10 06:40 AM
2

Actually you're right, that was my mistake. But she's still the one paying more, so the poster who wrote "lol typical woman…" implying she wants to get out of paying half, is still wrong.
/r/MensRights09/11/10 05:18 PM
0

After seeing all the name-calling you've thrown my way and dismissive, condescending attitude, I find it difficult to care about your opinion of me. Good day, sir. I. Said. Good. Day
/r/MensRights09/11/10 03:05 AM
0

You wrote "Women aren't crazy… well not all of them." How is this not supposed to be taken as saying the majority of them are? If you had written "Women aren't crazy… well not most of them…" THEN you would have a point. Again, you're the one throwing insults around. I've only ever criticized you on the content of your posts. I've never called you an asshole, never called you a troll, never said you were intellectually dishonest, or told you to get over yourself. No, my worst offense was replying…
/r/MensRights09/11/10 02:49 AM
1

You're so totally right! Calling out a poster who wrote "lol wow typical woman... you don't get to not pay anything like you want, you pay half" to a woman who posted about how she was paying more for child support than her ex, makes me so totally obnoxious. And then defending myself after being made fun of for it? Even MORE obnoxious! Obviously, the only proper response is to go, "Oh, I'm so sorry for speaking up against the poster who wrote "lol typical woman!" (eleven upvotes! Quite the charm…
/r/MensRights09/11/10 02:30 AM
0

Maybe the reason I come off as more polite is that I'm only reflecting back what people are throwing at me. If someone's being a jerk in comments, I'm not going to treat them with kid-gloves. If they treat me respectfully, I'll treat them respectfully as well. You claim you'd like a discussion, but you continue to demean me as being a "troll" or "intentionally obtuse." I've never thrown such accusations at you, yet I'm the one being inappropriate here? Of course somehow I'm implying that all men…
/r/MensRights09/11/10 02:20 AM
1

I know! I'm SUCH A bitch for expressing a dissenting opinion! I should just SHUT THE FUCK UP and be quiet and always go "lol yea ur rite most women are whores" so that I can be loved by jerky guys! Oh wait… no… I much prefer being loved by non-jerky guys who actually like me for using my lady-brain.
/r/MensRights09/11/10 02:06 AM
0

women are just as capable of that as men… Honestly, you'd need to be in great denial of actual statistics to believe that female-on-male DV and rape is as bad and as prevalent as male-on-female DV and rape. On the other hand, I think it's true that society has a problem with acknowledging male victims, which I think relates to the idea that a male has to always embody a "hyper masculine" persona, which means never being "feminine" in any way. Being a victim, unfortunately, is regarded as "femini…
/r/MensRights09/11/10 01:25 AM
3

It's easy just to dismiss me as a feminazi. But do you have any proof for your points? by teaching them that their masculinity is disgusting and offensives to women Any proof? If anything, kids are being bullied for not being masculine enough. Young men in schools who "act gay" or "too feminine" are bullied relentlessly. All wives are bitches that will divorce/fuck over their husbands. Right. what your actually going to deny this? wheres your evidence? your a joke You're actually asserting that …
/r/MensRights09/11/10 01:13 AM
-3

Women are still paid less than men for the same work. And now since women are starting to get top positions that used to be exclusively the domain of men, it's somehow some feminazi plot to oppress men? "feminists brainwash our kids so that boys are failing in schools. " Are you kidding me? How are they brainwashing kids so that "boys fail in schools?" "the few successful men that do somehow slip through the cracks end up getting ruined anyway." Right, I'll tell the rich, majority male CEOs, ban…
/r/MensRights08/11/10 06:04 PM
-9

Thank you :) Speaking my mind makes me a loud mouthed bitch cunt who should shut the fuck up, amirite? :D
/r/MensRights08/11/10 05:59 PM
-4

This is what I was responding to: lol wow typical woman...you don't get to not pay anything like you want, you pay half She and her new husband are paying for most of their son's expenses. The ex only pays 250 a month (that's a tiny amount of money). And this guy comes along and says "lol wow typical woman... you don't get to not pay anything like you want, you pay half…" SHE'S PAYING MORE THAN HALF OF THE EXPENSES. But no, don't listen to logic. Just kneejerk about "typical woman." And of cours…
/r/MensRights08/11/10 05:57 PM
1

A troll? Really? That's the best argument you can put forth? Women aren't crazy, well not all of them, but they have the ability to ruin a man's life quite easily. So, basically you're saying that it's okay to be biased against women because they can "easily ruin a man's life," in your example, by having a baby. And hey guess what? A man can ruin a woman's life by raping them and beating them. However, I don't use this as an excuse to generalize all men. So call me a troll if that makes you feel…
/r/MensRights08/11/10 05:53 PM
-7

And men can rape and brutalize women. Ohhey, I guess I should avoid all men because they're just AWFUL!
/r/MensRights08/11/10 04:49 PM
4

Are you being sarcastic? Please, please tell me you're being sarcastic.
/r/MensRights08/11/10 04:47 PM
-9

"The whole system is rigged against them." Poor, white, straight males. They're so oppressed in modern society!
/r/MensRights08/11/10 04:46 PM
-22

Uh… she DOES pay. It the ex who DOESN'T pay. Get your head out of your ass and try not to kneejerk "OMG STUPID WOMENS!"
/r/MensRights08/11/10 04:43 PM
-4

We eat their hearts and use the calories to go stomp on babies' heads.
/r/MensRights08/11/10 04:42 PM
2

Also, "sportfucking barely legal teens" is totally cool and fine, but if you're a woman and dare "fool around," you bitch.
/r/MensRights08/11/10 04:51 AM
2

Did you write the original blog post? That's the vibe I'm getting from your posts, correct me if I'm wrong. This is from the blog post: What the woman really wants is to spend the next four years riding the Alpha carousel, then to come back to her current boyfriend, who will of course have spent that time loyally pining away after her and will happily marry her when she is no longer sufficiently attractive to command the level of Alpha interest to which she has become accustomed. Here, he(you?) …
/r/MensRights08/11/10 03:38 AM
3

I think, if they have issues with women, they feel wronged by the lot of them. And want them to have their "comeuppance." I suck at flirting and I've had some terrible experience with guys, but I never wish horrible things upon them. And it's disgusting to see all these comments gleefully predicting horrible futures for women. I've even seen comments along the lines of "Oh those bitches want equality? I'll show them "equality" if you know what I mean >:)"
/r/MensRights08/11/10 02:55 AM
3

It doesn't. They aren't whores. My point was that the blog post, talking about "Riding the carousel," is implying that she's a "whore" for wanting to take a break. Obviously, men who sleep around are just reacting to their genetic dispositions, of course.
/r/MensRights08/11/10 02:51 AM
2

No no, you don't get it sweetie. You see, when a woman is feeling indecisive about a relationship, it's because she's a fucking whore. What, you think she's trying to use her weak little ladybrain to actually take a break to think about her relationship? No, hun, she's a fucking whore. Because all women are.
/r/MensRights08/11/10 02:26 AM
3

Because "feeling antsy" means she wants to hop on another dick. Because, you see, all women are secretly whores.
/r/MensRights08/11/10 02:24 AM
2

No, but, you see, these are women we're talking about. It's because they're women, not because they're young! And feeling "antsy" means she wants to whore around! Because these are women we're talking about, and they're all just selfish whores, amirite?
/r/MensRights08/11/10 02:22 AM
2

Yet I think the OP's observation is much more hurtful than power tools being marketed toward men. Actually, I see them as both symptoms of the same overall disease, that is, that we have strict gender binaries that are rarely questioned (Parent = mom = woman = GIRLY PINK FLOWERS YAY! Powertools = man = MANLY BUFF RAWR TESTOSTEROOONE!) instead of marketing different activities based on their inherent characteristics ("these baby carriers are great for the parent who wants a comfortable blah blah …
/r/MensRights08/11/10 02:15 AM
5

Let's see. She's a cunt for blogging about how a guy sexually assaulted her. She's the cunt. Not the guy who sexually assaulted her. Fun times.
/r/MensRights07/11/10 06:21 AM
0

Unfortunately, this is pretty run-of-the-mill.
/r/MensRights07/11/10 06:19 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter