TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

LouisdeRouvroy Archive

View 2 posts and 3,603 comments by LouisdeRouvroy on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 3,603 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
13

It's funny that when it comes down to what women can bargain with, even them find nothing but their cooch.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 01:57 PM
8

And then women wonder why men don't give a shit about abortion... The issue is simple: if you want me to care about your reproductive rights as you call them, don't lead with "you men don't need any".
/r/MensRights08/11/24 12:09 PM
19

Women's rights are on the line in America. Which ones? The right to not be a parent if you don't want to? Is this not the CURRENT situation of men? It's basically giving both genders the same treatment: you had sex and you don't want the kid? Too bad, you should have thought of that earlier.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 07:39 AM
–

It's also pretty telling of what these women think women have to offer to society... They realize that them stopping working in their HR departments and other paper pushing jobs isn't going to have much effect. At least if nurses said they'd stop working this would have some kind a leverage but that's about it. So feminists tell us they won't do the only thing women do for society: have sex and babies... Since they already don't have babies, I guess it's about not having sex then... Oh no! Anywa…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 01:20 AM
17

It seems that feminists should read their own classics, Beauvoir Second sex: the women’s effort has never been anything more than a symbolic agitation. They have gained only what men have been willing to grant; they have taken nothing, they have only received. What man has given, man can take it away.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 01:16 AM
14

Man child is a description of certain men. Woman child is a pleonasm since women are allergic to accountability, like children. Hence women and children first.
/r/MensRights05/11/24 07:28 AM
3

That's why women usually say that "things should be done" and use other passive structure. It's implied, by men of course. You can tell that this quote is projection 100%.
/r/MensRights04/11/24 05:01 AM
7

That's because male to male interaction always has an implied possibility of it becoming physical, thus most people know there are lines that should not be crossed and thus keep it civil. Women are under the impression that they are immune to physical repercussions of what they say, hence they have no qualms crossing many lines that males do only cautiously. Tyson said that with social media people have grown accustomed to speaking without fearing getting a fist in the mouth, hence why people ar…
/r/MensRights04/11/24 04:48 AM
5

UK film-director seeking input for documentary. (...) We want to hear your candid stories. How much do you want to bet that all the stories told will be prefaced with a "Here are some example stories of men losing their privileges and lamenting the end of patriarchy. These weaklings do not want to man up and cry like babies."?
/r/MensRights04/11/24 04:34 AM
62

It has been called “the selection effect” by sociologists, where women tend to look for someone of the same social class or above when they choose a partner. No, it's called hypergamy. I like how they're trying to bury it under another label because it's not good optics for women.
/r/MensRights01/11/24 12:09 PM
10

Usually scene from hormonal instable people...
/r/MensRights01/11/24 11:50 AM
1

How can you be tired of a comparison that no one makes? Women always preface what they object to by "I'm tired of" or "I'm sick of". You can see that on the twox sub. They do that because they're so used to have their feelings pandered to so they equate stating their state of mind with having other people do something about it. What they fail to realize is that men pander to them only to either fuck them or get peace, which are neither possible reasons on the internet. As for other women since t…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/24 10:02 AM
4

"What is mine is mine, what is yours is ours."
/r/MensRights29/10/24 09:55 PM
21

How dare you slutshame!
/r/MensRights29/10/24 12:56 AM
4

At any age it's the same. They can stay on their own. The older the longer.
/r/MensRights28/10/24 05:55 AM
12

Oh yeah the typical questions that lob together different things to inflate responses: "Have you ever driven a Ford or Ferrari?" Feminists: 50% of people have driven Ferraris.
/r/MensRights27/10/24 10:51 PM
5

Imagine not being able to take your eyes off an unpredictable, energetic little being for more than (not kidding) five seconds, because that is more than enough time for them to injure themselves, once they get somewhat mobile. Sorry but you did something wrong. Kids don't injure themselves because they play on their own in their room, even at 2 or 3.
/r/MensRights27/10/24 10:38 PM
1

Be a good slave boy! As I said, words of a bourgeois woman indeed.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/24 10:01 AM
9

Power is everything, it is our potential to interact in the world and shape it. English doesn't help since the word power covers two different things that other languages, French for example, differentiate clearly: pouvoir and puissance. Force is what interact and shape the world (puissance). But what La Boétie called voluntary servitude is "pouvoir", something that isn't exercise by force but by accepting to follow someone else's will (maybe under threat). And anglophone feminists and sociologi…
/r/MensRights27/10/24 09:59 AM
0

Oh you mean that the upper class help their serfs settled down? Why are you surprised?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/24 09:50 AM
62

the gender dynamics of sex and power made them react differently. "power" has become such a meaningless word that is used as a trump card to get away from any proper analysis. "IT's BeCaUSe of POwEr!" Justice is subject to dispute; might is easily recognised and is not disputed. So we cannot give might to justice, because might has gainsaid justice, and has declared that it is she herself who is just. And thus being unable to make what is just strong, we have made what is strong just. Pascal
/r/MensRights27/10/24 02:53 AM
2

That's called survivor bias. Because the reality is, you start at the bottom, you stay at the bottom. Only people with vested interests with those at the top, e.g. hypergamous feminists bourgeois women, like to pretend that you can "pull yourself up by your bootstraps" and "make it to the top" when you start with an inability to even house yourself. Women are very apt at that rhetoric because it allows them to easily tag which men they can filter in: women wait men at the finish line to pick up …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/24 02:42 AM
2

Oh the life of the bourgeois women!...
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 11:22 PM
2

I think you look what dv stats say about domestic violence being mostly mutual. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/the-psychiatrist/article/domestic-violence-is-most-commonly-reciprocal/C5432B0C6F8F61B49A4E2B60B931FA07# Large epidemiological studies have demonstrated that domestic violence is most commonly reciprocal and that when only one partner is violent there is an excess of violent women. But keep spreading the institutional feminist lies... Also, when women get free passes by law or …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 11:14 PM
4

Where young folks can't afford to have a place on their own... Yeah sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 11:01 PM
4

generalizations observed in events without self-awareness are not the same as generalizations about complex human beings. It's exactly the same. It's all about the number of inputs and their behavior. Actually random behavior is more difficult to predict than rational one. If you think you can predict the weather in 6 weeks because there's no "self awareness" of the forces in action, then I have news for you. It's easier to predict what a group of self aware people will do next week than what th…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 08:09 AM
21

Sorry but this is a silly take full of false premises like: It is wrong to say that women behave in a way if not all do. This is trying to conflate a trend and data points. Sorry to tell you but summer is warmer than spring even though some summer days are colder than some spring days. Anyone rejecting generalizations out of principle is someone who wants to muddy the waters. Generalizations are precisely what brings understanding. Another false premise is to say that since hypergamy isn't biolo…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/24 06:36 AM
2

its life fully supported by a woman's body. Unless you have a self sustainable farm, your body is fully supported by society (society grows food for you, makes it available to you, etc.) Thus by this logic, society has then the power to euthanize you whenever it sees fit. No? I wonder why... Even if you consider a fetus is not the woman's body, she has sovereignty over the parts that provide life support and can choose what happens to them. But abortion is not just about women killing their fetu…
/r/MensRights25/10/24 06:18 AM
1

It doesn't matter if you don't like it. Basically you have two options: 1. plenty of possible sex, many you don't like or 2. few options for sex at all. That you don't care to have a lot or that you complain of quality shows how you take the options for granted and you can't fathom not having any. Again, you're complaining about not having the food you like. You still have food though so although it's a problem, you cannot call that starving.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 10:30 AM
27

which would cover not only a woman's rights to abortion, No it wouldn't. That is precisely the point: the embryo and fetus are NOT the woman's body. They have different DNA. The issue is that the supposed "body autonomy" promoted by pro abortion folks is not about women's body autonomy, but it's consequences on others. It's like saying that you have the right to shoot around because you exercise your "body autonomy", pulling the trigger of a gun with your own finger. How dare other people tell y…
/r/MensRights24/10/24 02:07 AM
1

Nah. When men say "attractive" it means they would tap. Even if they can it doesn't mean that they will, but "attractive woman" means a woman a man would have sex with. Women instinctively know that, otherwise they wouldn't be so focused on their appearance. Men's attraction to women is context free, unlike women's attraction to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 11:49 PM
1

I don't think most women are attractive either. I doubt you'd tell them though, so this means your judgement on appearance will definitely change depending on context. So are you a good judge then? A reliable one? Men have long learnt to ignore what women say, and to focus solely on what they do, because of the huge discrepancy between the two.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 04:44 AM
10

It's basically confusing "I'm hungry I can eat anything" and "I'm hungry for chocolate parfaits with strawberries and caramel syrup".
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 03:20 AM
1

How do you expect not to be put in the "for fun only" category? Well, if it is what you're looking for, then ok. Otherwise, good luck.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 02:51 PM
6

There is very few studies about it because they produce NON politically correct results. Hence tax authorities do not let their data be used for such things. However, one that did the work is INCOME AND FISCAL INCIDENCE BY AGE AND GENDER: SOME EVIDENCE FROM NEW ZEALAND, Omar Aziz, Review of Income and Wealth Series 62, Number 3, September 2016 DOI: 10.1111/roiw.12165 Available here: http://www.roiw.org/2016/n3/7.pdf If you look at Figure 10. Net Fiscal Impact Per Capita by Gender and Age Group, …
/r/MensRights22/10/24 12:20 PM
1

Every promiscuous woman I've seen slept with average and ugly men, as well. So with good-looking and average men. We know the ridiculous standards women have because they think highly of themselves so they are unable to rate men on a normal bell curve.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 12:04 PM
4

You can have high standards and sleep with lots of men, because it doesn't mean that they have high standards for the women they sleep with..
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 08:05 AM
6

Are you pretending that ALL of the food is poisoned? At this point, you have to ask yourself if it's an issue with you and not others. Considering how plenty of ugly women do pair and marry, I doubt all the food is poisoned. But the thing is, they pair up with men of similar features. Fat women wanting men with 6 packs should only blame themselves if they are only hidden side pieces for fun times. If I can't buy a Lambo, I'm not gonna cry how unfair the world is because I have to return my renta…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 01:40 AM
15

How many of those men just wanted to use them for sex because they were desperate and didn't actually like them? You're already moving the goal posts here. You cannot claim you're starving because you don't have food you like. If you have food of any kind, you're not starving. You can complain about the quality of food, but stop pretending you have no food.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 01:30 AM
7

Give some push back to show that this is not normal, but is the haircut the hill you want to die on? Finish your masters and ridicule this rule as much as you can during your time there. Making fun of things is a great way to show how stupid it is. Last time I check, Haile Selassie had his hair longer than one centimeter. Was the king dirty and not hygienic?
/r/MensRights21/10/24 12:25 PM
1

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244015613107 Most women here arent getting anything from their partners. As if...
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/24 12:32 AM
4

Another "woman's feel" disproved: Although most men (74%) and women (83%) report that both members of the couple contribute to dating expenses after dating for 6 months, most men (84%) and women (58%) reported that men still pay more expenses. And that's after SIX months. You can be sure that one the FIRST date it will definitely be on the man to foot the bill. We can also see how women OVER state their contribution and UNDER value that of me...
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/24 08:25 AM
0

on literally a personal belief gut feeling yes or no question. That's anything but a gut feeling yes no question. Get a grip child.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/24 08:09 AM
4

Are you pro life? I'm not American. "pro life" "pro choice" is a debate framed in US politics through American cultural lenses that is considered silly in most countries. Demanding that everyone in the world align on US categories and debates is typical of Americans extolling manifest destiny or colonized minds that gulped that Kool aid. I'm pro logic. Which neither pro life or pro choice in the US are.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/24 01:29 AM
1

How do you think any technical advance has been invented? Only a woman would demand 100% safety before first use! By that standards, ladders would not be sold yet!
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/24 12:14 AM
3

They would rather you just pay them and left them alone. I guess they have that in common with their customers...
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/24 11:59 PM
8

The majority of women don’t get a dime from the men they date They get free meals, free drinks and free entertainment.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/24 11:52 PM
5

Escorts aren't suitable for most men because the main "value" on this sub for escorts (for those who believe this) seems to be building confidence for undesirable men. I'm sure if you're stuck in dead bedroom, then escorts are cheaper than divorces. Escorts are fulfilling a business transaction, they're not attracted to you, and they've clearly debased themselves and their bodies to a point where they have accepted a price to no longer have standards in potential sex partners. What confidence do…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/24 11:48 PM
-1

Why first? It's like saying selling cars will increase accidents so they need to figure out this FIRST before selling cars. You can figure it out later too.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/24 11:39 PM
18

It's called reputation destruction. It's what women do when they're aggressive. It's funny because the same women who have sex for free cannot fathom that other women have it for a hundred bucks. So they must construe that as "of course" being under durress otherwise she realizes that she could be making money she doesn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/24 11:37 PM
6

Judge the content for itself. If you think the NYT is immune to crap, you should read it sometimes.
/r/MensRights18/10/24 11:25 PM
3

Amazingly the reverse (dis/proving you're the father with paternity testing) is against the law in France, Switzerland, and Germany. It's not against the law per se, it's against the law if not done by court order during a paternity suit. And that prevents women from saddling you with a paternity just because you had a one night stand and she did a DNA test.
/r/MensRights18/10/24 11:19 PM
98

If you want your society to produce transcendent excellence in a given field, the only way to do so is to attach a competitive male status hierarchy to it. Academics used to understand competition, mens sana in corpore sano. Now it's just performative theatrics. No wonder women strive in it.
/r/MensRights18/10/24 12:03 AM
105

Protected classes are inferior classes.
/r/MensRights17/10/24 11:47 PM
0

You are only equating sexual arousing with masturbation because this is true for most males. It's funny how when about sexual relations, women are yelling "foreplay" "mind space", etc. but SOMEHOW when it's about time to label media consumption, then "mind space" is no longer a means for sexual arousing. What happened with "sex for women is cerebral"? Nope, now somehow it is JUST masturbation. Because that definition now benefit a female worldview. So girl, if candlelit dinner and essential oils…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 12:27 PM
-2

Harlequin novels and Hallmark movies is for women what Youporn is for men. They are both aimed at exciting the consumers. But because you consider that male sexuality is in itself problematic, then you label porn as bad and dark romance as good. Sorry but they are both the same. They are just aiming different consumers. Porn is fiction made to sexually arouse. That's what Dark romance is too.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 12:02 PM
-3

Women are going to read Harlequin books and watch romantic movies to fulfill their fantasies. Why should women's fantasies be considered fair game but not men's? That's just sexism and the usual gynocentric double standard. If you would say these things to any person irl you will be laughed at. Who cares what idiots and women think?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 10:03 AM
-4

Indeed. Note that there's no argument put forth against it, except a woman saying "it's not the same" thinking that because she says it then it must be so...
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 09:46 AM
-1

Yes because they are totally different things lmao. You can try to pretend that it is not but that doesn't change things. It's exactly the same: fantasizing to get sexually aroused. If women do it it's ok but if men do it it's not. The usual self serving double standard for women...
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 09:43 AM
-7

Also it is quite logical that a lot of women don't want you to look at other naked and attractive women. But if their husbands were to tell them to stop reading novels or watch movies with a guys that has more resources than them, then it would rightly be considered controlling behavior. Women fantasizing about being pursued by top tiered men is ok but men fantasizing about fucking better looking women is a big no? The usual gynocentric double standards...
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 09:11 AM
1

There were actually laws passed that women’s wages for the same job couldn’t be more than half of men’s wages. And a fourth for kids. Please remind us which jobs? Oh yeah, mining. Do you really think men, women and children had the same productivity as miners? There were laws passed that in order to work in a certain profession one had to be a member of the guild. Then they passed a law that only men could be members of the guild. That's the real target of feminism there: organized labour.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/24 11:55 PM
1

But you don't wonder when regular men started having bank accounts? Married women couldn't have a bank account because any debt she made was due by the husband.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/24 11:33 PM
0

More that it's because men, historically, have worked to keep women out of the workforce so that they'd have no choice but to rely on their husbands to provide for them. That's the most braindead feminist mantra right there. Women have always worked at the farm. Even during industrialization, working class women also did work. You know who did not work and were just throwing balls and complaining about it? upper class women, which is where feminist women came from. The ONLY time when women were …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/24 04:26 PM
-1

Typical male irrationality Girl. Logical reasoning was invented and developed by males. All of it. So you're going to have to give up your usual SIGN language if you want to make sense. They are on a spectrum The new trump card of the airhead: iT's A sPecTRum. Being a spectrum doesn't negate the character of being necessary. Status is necessary for men to be considered by women. She can THEN consider anything else however she wants, if the guy doesn't have status he doesn't even reach the interv…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/24 02:41 AM
1

Typical female hypocrisy: a necessary condition means that it is indispensable. Thus men are indeed chosen for their money and status because without either, they're not even selected or even noticed. It's like saying you don't choose your car because of the price. Sure, other criteria are weighed, but price is what set the possibility of being chosen. Then pretending that it's only one of many criteria because subsequently other criteria are applied is pure hypocrisy. Most people wouldn't have …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/24 02:19 AM
0

Read the title. OP claims that women do NOT pick men based on their status and money while in reality it's the first thing women filter for. But to preserve their own self image, they word it as "having his shit together", "ambitious", etc. Only an exceptionally good looking man will make women forget that first and foremost filter they apply onto men: status. It's why women consider it inappropriate to be chatted up in the subway but hope for it at an art gallery: it's not the action that is bo…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/24 01:47 AM
16

EVERYTHING is enforced by men, including women's rights. So I fail to see how this supposedly prove anything.
/r/MensRights14/10/24 01:53 AM
349

Remember, according to feminists, men have body autonomy...
/r/MensRights13/10/24 03:33 PM
17

No. Happiness and legal rights are not directly linked. No. The different types of feminism still have the same core beliefs, like there are different types of communism. No. But women regress ideological discussions onto their personal experience. Hence they tend to make it personal (including when they have nothing to answer, it'll go "incel", etc.) The denial that there are differences in rights between men and women: female genital mutilation is rightly forbidden, male one is normalized; rep…
/r/MensRights13/10/24 04:35 AM
1

C'est comme vous préférez.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/24 03:11 AM
2

I thought they didn't need no men. What gives?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/24 03:10 AM
3

Mater semper certa est. Pater semper incertus est. Mothers risk their lives giving birth and thus women evolved selective attachment to children: they must be theirs for them to care about them. There's a reason for the evil step mother trope throughout civilisations. Men on the other hand were never able to be sure whose child they were taking care of. Men are the altruistic gender. The so-called of oppression of patriarchy to control women's sexuality is just a minimum to ensure men that at le…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/24 12:44 AM
6

It's like the Nordic model regarding prostitution: it's legal to sell but illegal to buy. It's just as bad as the other wayaround.
/r/MensRights08/10/24 02:28 AM
19

Precisely to hide that it is a plutocracy! And that's why you have upper class women crying about them being oppressed under the patriarchy, precisely to hide that those who are oppressed are not women, but men and women of the working class...
/r/MensRights08/10/24 02:19 AM
16

Next time someone talks about men's flu, answer jokingly that it's like women and their period. And see the meltdown.
/r/MensRights08/10/24 01:12 AM
–

Men are competitive. If you allow the mass to compete with the elite's progeny, it'll be harder to justify the reproduction of the elite. If you design your system to reward obedience and eliminate the most competitive, you're having the sheep you need for social reproduction of the different classes.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/24 12:17 AM
0

The vast majority of women do not like being jackhammered for 10 minutes Then stop circumcising boys so they would be more sensitive and would still need to be careful not to hurt their frenulum.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/24 12:06 AM
–

I’ve met lots of men who chose not to go to college because “school isn’t for them”. I haven’t heard that from women as much. Because education systems are designed to not be for them. On purpose.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/24 11:43 PM
1

No need to sprint through a grocery store to pick up the same ingredients in bigger quantity. I can tell that you're not too familiar with grocery shopping... It is more work, remembering everyone’s wants. Making sure you have a breakfast lunch and dinner everyone will like. Snacks for the kids etc.. Everyone can eat the same. You should try it, that would prevent obesity. Either way the initial argument wasn’t that it is more work, just that it is work. Which everyone does whether they're alone…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/24 04:28 PM
–

Just like for women who suffered from genital mutilation then...
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/24 04:22 PM
–

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23374102/ It is shown that the foreskin is more sensitive than the uncircumcised glans mucosa, which means that after circumcision genital sensitivity is lost. In the debate on clitoral surgery the proven loss of sensitivity has been the strongest argument to change medical practice. Funny how it's a scandal if it happens to women but not to men. The usual double standard of those who pretend to seek equality. If you lose sensitivity, you're going to have to incre…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/24 04:15 PM
2

idk most of the men i know work primarily with spreadsheets and are not incurring injuries. They'll still live less long, just like blue collars live shorter lives. It should cue you whose bodies get destroyed more throughout their lives.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/24 04:08 PM
–

Good for you. Now don't confuse a data point and a trend...
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/24 06:39 AM
–

Indeed. And then women are like "you should be fighting for your 50%!" Like bitch, why should I in the first place and then how to if the slightest hint of abuse by the woman (which their lawyers always tell them to use) will ruin you, limit your interaction with your kids (who are maybe not really yours) or maybe put you in jail. Yeah, why don't men fight then?...
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/24 06:31 AM
0

Are you sprinting through the grocery store picking up items like it’s a marathon A marathon isn't a sprint. But you admit that it’s still work, that’s good cause that’s all I’m arguing. No. You're arguing that it is MORE work to do it for 4 than for 1. It's not. Thus since you need to do it for yourself anyway, doing it for 4 doesn't change anything in time spent on chores. Only folding laundry is directly related to the number of people. Cooking is not. Cleaning is not. Shopping is not. argume…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/24 06:27 AM
–

He says women should stop kidnapping men's kids with the help of family court. Marriage or cohabitation is not required for men to parent their own fucking children. Marriage isn't but education is about spending time. When women and the institutions force men out of children's lives to make them financially support them without spending time with them, then the results is what we have nowadays: dysfunctional individuals who cope with consumerism. Which is exactly why this scam is there for.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/24 01:18 AM
–

It's not that they don't value being a caretaker, it's that they're aware of how precarious their position as such is when all women have to do is a slight false accusation to get their way. Since women can remove fathers at will with the help of institutions, they hold all the decision power in the education of children simply because of the implied blackmail they can and often do exercise. So why the fuck should the men really get involved? As long as that institutional bias exists, there's an…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/24 01:17 AM
–

Why do fathers have to ASK 50/50. The female entitlement in this field is off the chart. And single mothers are bad for society as shown the disproportionate number of prisoners who grew up such household. Traditionally, education of boys were removed from women at the age of 6 or 7, which is the best most women can do on their own.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/24 01:11 AM
0

As far as I know, circumcision is related to religion not masculinity or capitalism so I’m not sure what your point is. You don't know then. Try looking why the US or South Korea have such high share of circumcision despite no religious obligation about it. And yeah, mutilating baby boys does affect their psyche and attitudes later on. Try to wonder why jackhammering is a prevalent attitude in countries that have rendered the penises of their males numb with scar tissue.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/24 12:59 AM
2

Men are all over the place in education institutions? That's a funny one.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/24 12:54 AM
1

Women's disproportionate investment in reproduction is less than a year per kid. That's 2 years in their lifetime, way less than what men work more than women (with even later retirement age in some countries for them despite shorter lives). Women need less time to recover from childbirth than men need to recover from injuries sustained at work. The disproportionate investment of wokent never offsets that of men in work which supports women throughout their lives (because they either aren't work…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/24 12:51 AM
1

Have you vacuumed in your life? Arms span IS a factor that allows to make it faster. Have you cleaned a pot in your life? Placed back a pile of plates? Scrubbed a bathtub? Strength DOES allow to speed up these processes.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 11:22 PM
1

It doesn't take more time if you are strong enough to pickup the 4 times the goods. As I said, strength and agility make house chores faster, which is why women spend more time than men on them when both are living alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 11:19 PM
2

You forgot "systemic" to have the usual combo women use to avoid personal responsibility. Women took over every aspect of education, whether within families or at schools, and the result is bad. Calling it "societal" to cover the fact that it's women doing and wanting it is just a smokescreen. The fact that kids of single fathers aren't disadvantaged like kids of single mothers show that despite their moaning about having to do children care by themselves all alone and men don't know how it is b…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 11:16 PM
3

They still can give up their babies for adoption. Which is more than what men can do.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 11:06 PM
0

Men want meat at every single meal. American?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 11:05 PM
2

It's about time spent, not strength Women's logic: "I spent 4 hours doing the same job that you did in 2 hours, so I worked twice as much because I spent twice the time doing it..." Yeah no.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 05:51 PM
2

women miss work due to their reproductive capacity. Their CHOICE. Women in the West are only mothers by choice so let's stop pretend it is something forced onto them. It's not. They are the first to claim it so too, until it's no longer convenient. Typical feminism: equal until it's no longer convenient. asymmetric income generation reflects asymmetric ability to earn income based on reproductive capacity. It's not the year off at max taken per child that justifies the lifelong difference. It is…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 05:50 PM
0

you just believed what women are saying? Like Aries are incompatible with Libras? Yeah no, I judge on facts, not on fantasies. Have you seen how most young single men live? They do the bare minimum so of course it takes less time. That's just your sexism speaking here. Anyone who has had to clean ladies toilets know how much dirtier they are. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0049124119852395 "We find that men and women respondents do not differ in their perceptions of how messy a ro…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 05:46 PM
-2

Do you not consider grocery shopping work? What about the budgeting and meal planning that takes place before the grocery shopping? Is that not work either? It's no different than having to do it for one. I know that from experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 05:40 PM
1

One makes life Did you skip sex ed in primary school? Parthenogenesis does not exist in human. one just dispenses sperm. By that logic, you just dispense an egg and a womb. but you can't compare the two. Yes you can: they are both the removal of the foreskin protecting the glans. One is much much more dangerous and detrimental than the other. That does not prevent you from comparing men's work with women's work though.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 05:39 PM
0

And if women stopped working, men would immediately have elderly parents to take care of without functioning elderly homes, their children to take care of due to no daycare and no schools, no running hospitals and not even social services who could step in. With only half the elderly and children left, there would not be any needs.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 05:35 PM
-2

So it's not difficult work is it?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 05:33 PM
0

Ah, so they act entitled to society's critical infrastructure despite not maintaining it. They are not the ones who, like women, say "they don't need no men". Men are not delusional. They know they need other men to benefit from infrastructure.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 01:07 PM
-3

Women miss work when they are out of work because of pregnancy and child birth. Why should there be no consequence for them NOT being at work compared to people who are at work, The thing is, women who do not have children do not have an income penalty compared to men. This shows that it is not about being a woman, it is about being at work or not. If I work less than another dude, there is no reason why I should earn as much as him.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 01:06 PM
-13

Because women do the same chores in more time, hence they spend more time doing their equal share of unpaid work. It's not surprising once you understand that chores are physical activities and men are faster and better in physical activities. You can see this by comparing how many hours single men living alone and single women living alone spend on chores.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 01:04 PM
1

And supply chains are maintained by men. That a market collapse in economic terms does not mean a society collapses.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 11:46 AM
1

If half the population split any way instantly vanished the economic system would collapse You are confusing the economic system, which will collapse, and the infrastructure, which does not have to collapse.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 11:42 AM
1

Circumcision has deep religious roots, FGM doesn’t. Circumcision in the US and Korea has ZERO religious roots. These are cultural roots, exactly like FGM. There are some medical benefits circumcision - lower risk of HIV and some other STIs, and UTIs - there aren’t any benefits to FGM. Let's cut off every female's breasts after puberty, this will reduce the risk of breast cancer to zero. The "supposed" health argument (with studies in Africa with shitty methodology) is typical of the double stand…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 11:34 AM
-15

The distribution of paid vs. unpaid work stems from women's pairing preference, hypergamy. Since it is rational that in a couple the one person earning more does more paid work and the person earning less does more unpaid work, AND considering that women favor pairing with a man that earns more than them, then OF COURSE they end up to be in most cases the ones doing LESS paid work and MORE unpaid work. The difference stems from women's hypergamic preferences.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 11:21 AM
-4

"more shopping" = "more unpaid work" = "more burden"... Imagine the mental gymnastics necessary to have to come up with such nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 11:18 AM
-1

I'm not American. And you're referencing Ms magazine? Then that's even worse, you're spewing American BS despite not even be American, that's how colonized you are...
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 11:12 AM
-1

An entire generation of men would be wiped out overnight if women stopped caring for male infants and children. The men could not do it since they would be busy upkeeping infrastructure. Any current adult male can do that. Stop pretending that children with single fathers fare worse than those with single mothers. It's actually the contrary. Not every man is busy maintaining the infrastructure. Women who are working are contributing. Working as what? HR drones and paper pushers? Aside from nurse…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 11:10 AM
1

Like female genital mutilation. So why is one illegal but not the other?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 11:06 AM
0

Women would figure it out. Not by the time the electricity will turn off, then water pumps will turn off, then no more water, no more fridges, no more food in your store. Stop acting like women are "about" to do something that somehow they never do.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 11:05 AM
0

Women consider normal to mutilate the genitals of boys but not that of girls because women consider boys only as resources providers and thus the genitals of a male baby has no intrinsic value for them (unlike their hands and feet which will provide labour). Women are not interested in having children because they're under the impression that the males of their society owe them labour to build and maintain the infrastructure that sustain the supposedly independent lifestyle of women. In reality,…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 03:43 AM
2

You're typical of these denialists who pretend that all female genital mutilation is infibulation and want to ignore that the most common form of excision is the exact same thing as circumcision: the removal of the foreskin protecting the glans. Even your criterion is a shit excuse because according to your logic, we can't compare the male and female genitals because one is internal and the other external.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 03:37 AM
-5

Tell me you're American without telling me you're American... Feminists are the first to pretend that it's a scandal to even compare genital mutilation of boys and that of girls. Try again.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 12:51 AM
1

Like stop mutilation of newborn boys genitals? Or is that even too much to ask?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/24 12:15 AM
8

"muh systemic" "muh patriarchy"... These buzz words that mean nothing are their only arguments.
/r/MensRights01/10/24 12:44 AM
59

Who's gonna enforce the curfew?
/r/MensRights30/09/24 08:56 AM
1

It's not because there's no reliable test that it doesn't factually exists. By this logic, there wouldn't have been fathers prior the invention of DNA testing. It's a silly premise. Virginity exists even though there's no reliable test for it or whether it has value or not or advantages or disadvantages.It's totally separate issue.
/r/MensRights30/09/24 04:01 AM
5

It basically seems to have been a rebranding of "virgin", because society has placed a lot of socially constructed value on the entirely nonsense concept of virginity. Why do you say that virginity is a nonsensical concept while it's a strictly factual one? The term incel exists precisely because society now devalues virginity.
/r/MensRights30/09/24 01:43 AM
-4

So this whole list boils down to only two things you bring: I'm great at date-planning and gift-giving. I think this is typical of how women don't understand the question and confuse "what do you bring to the table?" with "What makes you attractive?"
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/24 01:30 AM
8

Just walk in there and identify as a woman...
/r/MensRights27/09/24 04:20 PM
-1

It doesn't. That's the whole point for men: they are not in the driver's seat when it comes to knowing where the sperm came from...
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/24 02:40 PM
9

Indeed asking for a paternity test just mean the woman doesn't deserve to be trusted to begin with, When you drive me somewhere and I put my seatbelt, does it mean you're not a trusted driver? Funny how women are always advocating for the most safety measures for themselves, but actively want to deprive the same for others. Bracelet and alarm on newborn to ensure noone swaps newborns at hospital? Sure. Paternity test? How dare you! Well, ask those who've taken these DNA ancestry tests and found …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/24 12:17 PM
3

Try sci hub to free paid papers!
/r/MensRights26/09/24 12:05 AM
0

Well they want to have sex with guys that they like to fuck. As in the sex is amazing. Sex cannot be amazing BEFORE you have sex. And fuckable is BEFORE you have sex. Thus sex being amazing or not has nothing to do with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/24 09:46 AM
2

They want to fuck them unless they are raped. Is that what you mean? Sorry but no. You don't seem to understand that many women are willing to fuck for resources, and that's a characteristic of being a fuckable man: having resources.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/24 06:20 AM
3

I think want to say she will let him have sex because on the money, not that he himself becomes more fuckable. Have sex = fuckable. The more money a man has, the more women are willing to fuck him, hence the more fuckable he is.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/24 06:14 AM
5

Definitely not, but a man? Definitely yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/24 06:10 AM
-1

Money makes any man fuckable.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/24 06:01 AM
5

paying for a chicken dinner doesn’t make a man an SD, that sounds like something a broke boy would say. I'll take that as a no. Funny how women downplay the costs because they never shoulder them. typical.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/24 06:00 AM
2

It's not rejection of scientists, it's rejection of lysenkoism.
/r/MensRights22/09/24 12:34 AM
2

Why would I need “attention + resources” in a (regular) relationship with a man? There are friends and social media and jobs for that. Or, sugar dating Your female friends need as much attention as they can give you so you're not coming out on top there. As for sugar dating, you mean regular dating? Ever paid for everything on a first date? How often?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/24 12:24 AM
2

Most men are unable to get frequent casual sex. and refuse to pay for it due to pride. Or because it's illegal. The most feminist model of hypocrisy being the Nordic model, where it's legal to sell but illegal to buy. The female double standard made law.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/24 12:21 AM
-2

Hey dude, you're kind of unfuckable," It's something that can be changed with the proper amount of money.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/24 12:19 AM
4

If a man wants to drink, I'll tell him how to get a drink. If a man wants to eat, I'll tell him how to get food. There, I fixed the analogy...
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/24 12:08 AM
7

So sex with women is mistreatment of women?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/24 12:05 AM
-5

It would be like a woman asking “why are men so annoyed that I just want actionable steps to use him as an ATM and think of him as “free dinner simp.” Well, many men aren't opposed to the idea of exchanging money for sex. What they don't like is the hypocrisy of not saying so. Because many if not most women don’t want to “just” fuck a guy they find attractive enough to want to be fucked by. Maybe so for "attractive enough", but every guy has witnessed women dropping the panties on command for at…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/24 12:03 AM
8

The problem is that people think this is a modern issue... Here, food for thought: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/229820 In some northeastern states, levels of childlessness approached 30% for women born in the mid-19th century. Other states in the South and West had levels of 6%-8%. Nationally, childlessness increased across cohorts born in the latter part of the 19th century Our modern perspective is skewed because the parents of the babyboomers are a generation that had the lea…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/24 12:10 PM
34

Well I guess that buttresses the advice to not open up to women, especially "therapists" and the like.
/r/MensRights18/09/24 07:02 AM
7

Remember that babies aren't safe from women because Lucy Letby... Another article that uses feminine logic... And they wonder why women aren't taken seriously...
/r/MensRights18/09/24 06:52 AM
57

The first thing women do with men's spaces is to invade them and change everything in them to fit them because men's only spaces is sexism and patriarchy.
/r/MensRights17/09/24 10:06 AM
2

If working was so easy and desirable, why is the first thing lottery winners do is stop working?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 10:00 AM
1

House chores used to be real work before men invented tools to make them a piece of cake: washers, driers, vacuum cleaners, fridges, dishwashers, etc. The easier house chores have become, the more women pretend they're difficult. And we let them do so just because we want to fuck them...
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 03:07 AM
13

if he’s interested, he will initiate the next conversation. That's a false premise that exists only to disculpate women from their blatant passivity. What's going on strong independent woman? Are you afraid of being rejected if you do more than a vague passive comment that can be used to mean "I politely told you to go away"?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 03:04 AM
27

The onus of performance is always on men. Whenever there's one on women, it's called misogyny or patriarchy. Women like to think that their value stands from the simple fact that they're breathing. They deserve things. Why? Just because they're worth it. Men on the other hand have to do things, otherwise they're good for nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 03:00 AM
-2

Did you pay for the whole first date though?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 02:51 AM
1

Women will pay on the first date. But they won't be any second date then. You have to take what women say about what they do with the grain of salt as a monkey paw. Sure you'll pay for the first date, but if that disqualifies you for a second, then you're not really willing to pay for a first date. You just virtue signal and then somehow you'll have a completely unrelated reason for not having a second date. "It's not you, it's me." really means it's you.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 02:51 AM
1

Because men have to seduce women to have sex. Women don't have anything to do besides acquiescing. That's why sexual experience isn't the same for both genders: it reflects the man's skills but not the woman's.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 12:09 AM
1

Kelly et al.’s (2005) prevalence rate estimate was based on the extreme assumption that none of the 2284 cases outside those labelled false under police counting rules were false. The calculations in this paper show that, even with reasonably modest assumptions about the actual level of false allegations in other categories, the prevalence rate for the study’s sample would easily exceed 10% and could approach 15% — that is, 4 to 6 times higher than the widely quoted figure for the study of 2.5%.…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 12:06 AM
2

If she's ugly, she's filtered out whatever her ncount.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 11:55 PM
1

Because the definition of rape included in many cases the word penetrate or penetration, as in sexual penetration under threat, force, etc. Except some people don't want the possibility of women raping men through PIV intercourse so they argue that only the perpetrator can penetrate and only the victim is penetrated. And so to include the case of women forcing themselves onto men, the clarified expression "made to penetrate " is used so it shows what happened and that the victim isn't the one be…
/r/MensRights16/09/24 02:52 AM
7

It shows how your comment about "lie by omission" is nonsensical.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 02:46 AM
2

Men can differentiate sex and love very easily. It's simple you're either for sex only or sex AND love. High ncount women put themselves into the sex only category because if they truly have sex and love everytime they have sex, then they're very fickle in love and thus they won't really love you long. Hence sex only by their own admission. Fine. There are different types of incels: those who can't have sex and those who can't have love (and thus sex too). You're confusing both by thinking that …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 02:42 AM
2

So like when women have "an ick"...
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 02:33 AM
4

I think men who care about it are insecure about their own ability to pleasure their partner I don't think you've thought this through from a man's perspective. Not wanting high ncount women has nothing to do with being able to pleasure them or not. That's the opposite actually: a high ncount woman is one for catch and release and about your own pleasure, and zero worries about her pleasure because she's not here to stay.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 02:31 AM
0

whose sexual experience is greater than theirs. The simple fact that you consider sexual experience as a positive for women the way consider it for men shows that you truly can't think of men's perspective in this case.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 02:27 AM
2

I was pointing out that these are not statements said generally by women as a whole. It's women's default position: "Ncount doesn't matter and a man asking it is an insecure asshole. No I won't say my mine." or she lies by saying a lower number because she "forgets " to count one night stands, blow jobs only, and anything that happened in Vegas.) And even if women do disclose their true ncount, they still argue how men should be thinking about it, because they can't fathom that men consider it a…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 02:25 AM
5

Ideally, what I want, is for more men to get that a promiscuous past is not gonna affect the relationship unless it leads to cheating and/or the woman is still currently promiscuous. The past inform the present though. I doubt that you'd stick to this logic when it's not self serving any longer: "He has raped many women, it doesn't mean he's going to rape me!" would be a stupid line of thinking. And studies have shown that the more partners you've had in the past, the likelier you're to divorce …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 02:18 AM
3

Do you also tell them your credit card pin number and your email password?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 02:09 AM
1

Taking a plea deal IS reaching trial. You don't seem to understand what you're talking about. No complaint to the police, then she's lying. That's my default. I haven't seen your name and the plea deal so the anonymous claim "I was raped" on Reddit is just that, a claim that noone has to believe.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 01:20 AM
1

But we know it’s 1% that are actually false and 99% are true. That's just what you want to believe. Studies have shown false accusations are way higher than that.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 01:13 AM
4

Personally I don’t care about putting a man’s comfort above my safety The opposite is true. Men should not put women's comfort above their own safety, and since there's too many false accusations, then men should by default not believe any accusations women make. And if women don't have concrete evidence to back up their claim, then men should prioritize their safety and consider that these women are lying.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/24 12:13 PM
1

How is those boys getting raped misandry. Because it's often legally not even rape (like in the UK). And in the US, if a child is fathered, the rape victim still owes his molester child support!
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/24 10:51 AM
5

Misandry doesn't ruin lives , it just hurts your ego Remember that men Tell that to Emmett Till and boys raped by female teachers. And I'm not mentioning the huge number of falsely accused. Women lie. Not all the time, but pretty often. And they know that these allegations have far reaching consequences, which is the reason why there are so many bogus ones. https://www.saveservices.org/2021/05/one-third-of-sexual-assault-allegations-are-unfounded/
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/24 10:17 AM
7

It’s a major red flag, the chances of him being falsely accused is like 0.1% Speaking of talking out of your ass... https://www.saveservices.org/2021/05/one-third-of-sexual-assault-allegations-are-unfounded/ In her feminist classic, Against Our Will: Men, Women, and Rape, Susan Brownmiller claimed that only 2% of sexual assault cases are false (1). This claim was refuted when it was revealed that her statistic was based on a casual comment made by a judge at a bar association meeting (2). Legal …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/24 10:13 AM
1

Then my ex shared her experiences at doctors offices, where she was constantly dismissed and disregarded But she went to the doctor. It is ridiculous to pretend that group A as it worse than group B when group A complains about HOW it is treated while group B issue is IF they are treated. It's like bitching about food quality to someone starving. Women go to the doctor way more than men do. Claiming that the issue they have when they go is because of men, while the issue men have is to actually …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/24 01:10 AM
-3

the years of medical research that dismissed women. On prostate cancer maybe. Do you think antibiotics don't work on women? What's next? Science disregard women because experiments are done on rats? What an idiotic take. And women are the first consumers of healthcare so what you're complaining about is that it's still not enough for you!
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/24 12:52 AM
2

the female species Females aren't a species. You seem to be using words whose meaning you don't understand...
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/24 12:48 AM
1

But the question you really should be asking Don't womansplain what men should be doing. Your penis is useless without a womb I take it you're not good in bed. And gay men would want to have a word. Theoretically, women are capable of providing the same thing males can. Theoretically, everyone can become a billionaire. Except they don't. what is it that can men provide, specific to their sex, that women can’t actually do for themselves? Show me one building or piece of infrastructure that has be…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/24 12:46 AM
2

Advantages i would like: doctors take me more seriously. Because you wouldn't go see them...
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/24 11:00 PM
2

Despite your homophobic rant, you still didn't answer the question...
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/24 10:54 PM
2

You thinking that all males operate on the same level of competency is laughable. No I don't. But the question remains and you avoided answering it: what do women provide aside their reproductive ability?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/24 10:50 PM
-2

What else do they bring besides that that men can't do better?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/24 11:17 AM
-5

If reproduction wasn't an instinct, do you think women would have wanted to reproduce for two hundred thousand years while they had a high chance of dying in the process? Do you think that somehow this instinct got erased in the 20th century when modern medicine reduced those odds of dying? People trying to argue that women don't have a biological urge to reproduce are ridiculous. It's like pretending that men don't have an instinct to stick their dick in anything that's moist and alive...
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/24 11:16 AM
12

This is a very old philosophical questioning: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ring_of_Gyges
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/24 12:58 AM
5

Anyways, I WISH I could police his speech because this is the shit I have to listen to every goddamn day while nodding and smiling like he didn't just say the most nastiest perverted thing imaginable Just do like men who have to listen to feminist nonsense from corporate all day: nod along. If men can do that with women's nonsense then women can return the favor.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/24 08:37 AM
5

He's also a manager, so he's not going to allow someone to potentially make others uncomfortable. Except if you're uncomfortable with obese people I guess. It's funny how it's always about the comfort of some people but not others.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/24 05:39 AM
7

Literally talked about how overweight women should be shot. Yeah, this isn't funny. Not funny for women and that's why he has the sensibility to not say that around them. Yet you want to police his speech even when you're not around. Typical Karen imposing her own petty ideas onto others...
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/24 05:38 AM
7

You're still unable to explain it yourself so you have to make a dubious analogy with killing. I can explain killing. Please enlighten us with what objectification means. And "emotional word vomit" is more SIGN™ language...
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/24 05:31 AM
5

Context for that is whatever women don't like. It's basically women throwing shit like when they call men "insecure" whenever guys don't do what women want them to do. It is Shame Insult Guilt and Need to be right: objectification is a shorthand to say: "How dare you say that! You pervert! Reflect on your actions! No, I don't need to explicit anything why this is wrong."
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/24 01:58 AM
5

In a very broad sense, I think feminists use these terms to refer to treating women without respecting their agency, autonomy, dignity, and complexity as human beings. Which is ridiculous because then it happens to everyone everywhere all the time. Corporate treat employees as a cost in their financial report and not as humans with agency? Objectification. Safety standards consider only the body mass and number of people? Objectification. Etc. Because as is widely known, objectification and degr…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/24 12:50 AM
17

The issue is that feminists have failed to explain what objectification and dehumanization are and how it's somehow bad. Elevators safety is based on a maximum number of passengers of a theoretical weight: that's objectification and dehumanization at its finest, reducing people to a purely physical characteristic. Is this bad? Nope. Objectifying and dehumanizing are just labels to say I don't like that without having to explain or justify yourself. That's exactly how this is used: show tits at a…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/24 12:16 AM
1

My reasoning is because sexual harassment is about power, not sexual interest. This feminist mantra needs to die. Power and sexual interest aren't mutually incompatible.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/24 12:37 AM
1

The prime factor of the dating culture in Anglo cultures is that it is based on cultures that have separate spheres for each genders, ie, where men and women don't normally mix socially unless they have to. Hence the concept of dating is what allows people from opposite sex to get to know each other because men and women mostly hang out in separate spheres, and it is explicitly for finding a partner (hence the betraying when women treat 1st dates as a dining opportunity). A lot of TRP tricks (no…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/24 08:20 AM
2

The funniest in this whole Medical school scandal in Japan is that there are women ONLY medical schools in Japan like https://www.twmu.ac.jp/english/ Noone complains about how THESE schools select on gender...
/r/MensRights05/09/24 03:12 AM
1

Oh so now we have to pretend that most men have careers too? Hello boomer!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/24 03:17 AM
9

You got the stat backwards. It's "most criminals are from single parent home". It's not "most kids from single parent home become criminals." Kids with single mothers have a higher likelihood to become criminal compared to those in two parent household. A higher likelihood can be 5% compared to 1%. It doesn't mean they have a 50%+ chance of becoming a criminal... You can start here https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1756061616300957
/r/MensRights03/09/24 08:55 PM
1

If sex is love why men insult women they had sex with. And say they won't date them seriously or marry them. Sex isn't love. Sex is Eros. Sex is part of romantic love, it is not it alone. Just like an engine is an indispensable part of car, it is not a car. So if you cannot offer a car, at least they'll enjoy tinkering with the engine. It's nice and fun for sure, but most guys prefer a whole car. Also if sex is love why men mind being loved by their bros. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greek_word…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 02:04 PM
2

I mean yeah if she worked instead of sucking your dick and birthing your kids Funny how it's "your kids" whenever convenient. And that's not even sure. It's her kids as well so what is she complaining about? I might not have a full blown career now, but after breaking up with a boyfriend I lived with, who I cooked and cleaned whole day for, Who was paying the bills then? From he's point of view you just got room and board for free. And don't come at me 'cooking for yourself is the same as cookin…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 10:49 AM
-6

The point is that it's disingenuous to pretend that women "sacrifice their career" by getting married. It's like me saying I sacrificed being in the NBA by playing soccer at school. We have an epidemic of men who want a housewife without even wanting to provide for said tradwife. We have an epidemic of women who think they're owed monetary compensation for divorcing because they claim to have sacrificed something by getting married. Sacrificing having a dead end job isn't a sacrifice. They escap…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 10:39 AM
-5

There's a difference between a job and a career.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 10:31 AM
-14

Bold of you to think you have a career to sacrifice. "Oh no, I really wanted to be an HR assistant manager all my life!" Can we please stop pretending that women have or could have careers? Most don't. They just have a job.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 08:10 AM
1

If something like this hasn't happened to you in years, if ever, why does this topic live rent-free in so many of your heads? When is the last time you've had an abortion? Been raped? Been murdered? Why talking about it then? I don't casually wake up and ponder what I'm going to do in specific highly unlikely situations. Everytime you put a seat belt on, you actually do.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/24 06:37 PM
0

Lying and treating a sex partner like a glory hole has an aspect of romantic love? I'm saying the opposite. It is NOT romantic love but definitely erotic love. So equating Eros and romantic love is wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/24 06:18 PM
1

It is for men. That's what many women fail to understand. That's what Eros is...
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/24 11:49 AM
2

Eros has no issue with smash and dash and current hook up culture. This is not romantic love.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/24 06:59 AM
0

What I'm doing is calling out the idea that genitals make one group of human beings incapable of the same range of humanity as another group of human beings for the bullshit it is. Nothing more, nothing less. I'm pretty sure giving birth and having an erection are important parts of human experience. Not being able to experience it does not dehumanize those unable to do so. Sure. I just don't recall the "cultural concept" of "only men are capable of romantic love." Which century and continent di…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/24 03:42 AM
1

Read the Symposium and tell me that you think Aristophanes' speech doesn't sound a lot like romantic love. It's not. Evidence is that according to Aristophanes, homosexual men are the best men because they are the most masculine. The search for "wholeness" in Aristophane's speech is not about romantic love, it is more akin to a yin/yang situation. That's basically the situation PRE Romantic love era, with families finding "the best match" ie, the best complement to youth needing to marry, which …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/24 03:35 AM
-1

the ancient Greeks and every other culture I’ve known has had a concept of romantic love. It may not be exactly the same as ours, We are not talking about "love" but "romantic love". If it is not the same, then it is a different kind of love. Your confusion of love and romantic love is precisely the issue here. You are projecting your own values onto others just because you consider these values valuable. But it's just pareidolia.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/24 03:10 AM
3

I'm sure y'all can crack open a history book or two to see how dehumanization has led to unconscionable actions against human beings. So now you're right there at dehumanizing? That's quite the logical leaps here. Basically you're presuming that romance is a necessary characteristic of humans and disagreeing with you on this point is dehumanizing people... If my partner doesn't trust the feelings I have for him then wtf are we doing together? Again, you're begging the question by assuming that p…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/24 02:53 AM
-3

They may not have used those words as such, but the concept absolutely was in there. You're projecting your own concept onto others here.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/24 02:42 AM
5

This is silly. Romantic love isn't even a concept across human cultures. Since when romantic love is a defining characteristic of humanity? Weren't the ancient Greeks human? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greek_words_for_love
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/24 02:18 AM
-4

Also - historically - thinking that actual human beings aren't capable of having the same depth and complexity of feelings as you do has had some pretty noteworthy consequence Which ones? That's OP's question. Also, how does trust factor in this situation?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/24 02:17 AM
17

I think the common problem is wives and girlfriends unable to communicate properly and who are often so self-centered that assume that other people, first of all their partner, is supposed to cater to every mood swing they have. Thus in the mind of these women, not noticing the state of mind of the woman is failing what they see as the basis of all relationship, that men are here to serve them. Thus an inattentive servant is a bad servant.
/r/MensRights29/08/24 08:18 AM
5

“The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command...” - George Orwell
/r/MensRights28/08/24 11:10 AM
6

Indeed. The fact that women needing toys is considered men's fault but that men needing porn isn't considered women's fault shows the usual double standard between genders when it comes to accountability.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/24 11:52 AM
3

Women are quick to label men porn sick while they themselves are obviously toy sick. You see women saying "if he can't make me come I'll whip out my toy" and then complain when the man does the exact same thing with porn.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/24 06:33 AM
3

Tell her the restaurant was actually pretty good.
/r/MensRights25/08/24 07:06 AM
119

'The perpetrator... seeks to exploit the law in a deceitful way.' Like lawyers do... The clown show is going to backfire hard: special privileges for women plus anyone able to become a woman at will, well, guess what'll happen?
/r/MensRights24/08/24 08:49 AM
50

It's like the Bill Burr skit about women getting hit where he mentioned that you're not even supposed to ask questions about how it happened despite the fact that not every beating fall off the blue sky...
/r/MensRights23/08/24 01:03 PM
17

Hold on! If you need to be protected then it means you're the inferior being...
/r/MensRights21/08/24 12:07 PM
–

NO men say "They don't need no men." That's the difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 08:15 AM
1

It's about financial independence and not relying on a PARTNER for that. It's not about society Having to rely on a partner IS a result of a certain social organisation so it IS about society... And OP mentioned: somehow he'll manage to survive "in the wild" but it is not the case for women" Which shows that men are indeed on their own but women never are. As I said: you're equating living with nothing as living without money because you cannot just fathom what needs to be done for money to have…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 09:54 PM
1

Start with the title: "Can't women live individual freedom and survive on their own? "
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 09:44 PM
1

Same thing goes for the men in the OP. Men aren't the ones who say they don't need no men. The question is literally about financial independence No it's not. You choose to narrow "surviving" and "providing" to only money because it's something you can get by yourself. But it's just an opportunistic understanding because without men, your money would get you nothing. Women cannot survive a month without men. Men can survive much longer than that without women. Men cannot survive more than a gene…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 09:37 PM
-1

The question is about financial security through a man. Surviving on your own isn't limited to finances. You do limit it to that just because it allows the answer you want, that you can survive on your own. But if the financial system crumbles, then of course, it's a different answer. Women like to pretend they don't need men by gerrymandering the definition of "need" and narrowing its meaning to what allows them to get the answer they want. So sorry to tell you but unlike what you said, you did…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 03:39 AM
-2

Women are targeted more often by violence in situations where they did not engage with or provoke the attacker No true Scotsman fallacy. Where's your evidence that male victims of violence provoke their attackers more than female victims? It's just sexist rationalization to fit the patriarchy conspiracy theory.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 06:47 AM
-2

I’m not exactly sure what part of your source backs up what you said. "The early years recorded lower counts, with males at 33,575 and females at 26,207 in 1991. By 2022, there was a peak with 495,079 male and 469,261 female victims" There are more male victims than female victims. It's funny how somehow people consider victims to be victims only when the perpetrator is of the opposite sex. Sorry but the figures show exactly what I said: males are more likely to be victims of violent crimes. Tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 05:56 AM
1

You also need them to build the house you live in. I guess you'll say that protecting you from the elements is a protection racket too...
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 05:09 AM
-1

The next question though is why women claim to be the biggest victims of insecurity when it's men who are more likely to be the victims of violent crime yet somehow it's supposedly a uniquely female issue. https://www.consumershield.com/articles/victims-of-violent-crime-by-gender
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 05:07 AM
-3

Well, you still needed people to build your house and maintain the infrastructure you rely on. So did you really "survive on your own"?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 05:01 AM
2

It's always telling of women's real independence when they basically admit that they can't solve their own issues and need men to do it in their stead. What happened to "we don't need no men"? Apparently, according to this graph, they do need men, and not any kind of men, but heroes.
/r/MensRights18/08/24 04:43 AM
–

For women in other countries, it also means a loss of or huge reduction of their pension, which will literally impact them from the time the retire until they die. What shows the stupidity of this thinking is that the lack of kids make pension system unsustainable and thus they'll lose their pension anyway. It's not going to take too long before pensions will be tied to the number of kids, ie, 2 kids will be necessary to have a full pension...
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 04:20 AM
7

Girl, I was approaching women when you were born. It's been a long time I no longer need to do that. And women who cannot approach shouldn't lecture people on how to approach...
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 05:46 AM
7

Why does society make men out to be fools obsessed with sex? Because sex is the only thing that modern women can offer modern men. So instead of taking a deep look at why women offer so little these days, it's easier to pretend that that's the only thing men want.
/r/MensRights04/08/24 03:06 AM
6

Maybe that has happened but I don't want to believe it happens more than super rarely. Title IX kangaroo courts in universities affect lots of people, and lots of people witness what's going on. When you effectively scare guys from approaching at the time they're most likely to do so, when they're students, they're not likely to do so later. Especially since later, they see how HR sororities treat men if they make the wrong move where people used to approach the most, at work. If you're going to…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 02:43 AM
–

Bagging women isn't worse if that's what is encouraged, which is shown by how the default insult of women to men is "incel", "virgin", etc. Women want experienced men, while men don't care or don't want experienced women because there's no symmetry in what each sex wants from the other. So both sexes are encouraged to behave immorally (it's the classic way of diluting responsibility) and have a high ncount but such a feat is very easy for women and very hard for men so the result is that most wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 06:30 AM
–

Sure. There are flying fishes, but flying isn't a main characteristic of fishes. So stop pretending that outliers are a trend.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 05:15 AM
–

If we believe that a high n-count is a sign of moral failure or a sign of being unfit for an LTR, it doesn't really matter how hard it was for you to achieve it. Of course it DOES matter how hard it is to achieve. Moreover, it was hard and you did it anyway, it just shows how unfit you are for an LTR. That's some non sequitur right there. We are not talking about whether having a high n-count makes you unfit for LTR, we are talking about how easy or difficult it is to have a high n-count and thu…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 05:13 AM
–

I can’t help but feel at though you’re announcing you have a hard time getting some. Ah women. They can't help it can they? What's next? "incel"? I do know plenty of people engaged in hookup culture who find people to fuck same day. Again, you're missing the point. I do know plenty of people who run the 100m dash under 11 seconds. Clearly men are getting action if there are women sleeping with men. Clearly they are plenty of people earning a million USD a year. By your own logic, this must mean …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 05:01 AM
–

I know slut men If you think any man can say that tonight he can find an average looking woman and sleep with her within the day, you're dreaming. Unless he pays. On the other hand, most women can just walk up to a guy and ask for sex, it'll be a coin toss. They did an experiment like that with guys asking for sex bluntly and directly, 0% positive answer. When a girl did it, she had like 60%. Again, you are confusing two things: that some guys can fuck a lot, and that that is an easy thing. It i…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 04:42 AM
–

Not everyone agrees with you that having sex makes one immoral or a bad person though Sure, but NOT doing something that is easy to do (getting fat, slapping kids, kicking dogs) is a sign of self-control. Women who cannot help but open their legs constantly shows an inability to restrain their own basic instincts. It's on par with slapping kids whenever you get upset: sure it is easy, but it is because it is easy to do that you should not do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 04:35 AM
–

Lol imagine thinking easy slut men don't exist Only a woman can think that it is EASY for men to bed women. It's basically projection of their own situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 04:32 AM
–

If you believe that an n-count shows a person's morals or how good of a long-term partner they're going to be, that shouldn't be gendered. Except a high n-count for a woman is easy to achieve, thus a low n-count for her is a sign of moral rectitude, while for a man, a high n-count is very difficult to achieve, and thus a low n-count for men is a sign of nothing in particular. Hence it IS a gendered criterion.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/24 04:17 AM
1

/r/MensRights02/08/24 02:04 AM
3

It's not fear. It's a rational decision based on the fact that women are hypergamous. They don't want a man lower on the social scale than themselves. When they do accept it, they often weaponize that fact. No man needs that in their life If women weren't so obviously hypergamous, men would give higher status women a chance at relationship. But men first and foremost want peace in their lives, so higher status women are just good to smash, as any poolboy knows.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/24 01:00 AM
92

As usual, most feminist discourse is barely disguised projection. We can see that their definition of incels describe feminist activism almost to a T providing you swap a few terms: ”Feminism is often characterized by deep resentment, hatred, hostility, objectification, misandry, misanthropy, self-pity and self-loathing, racism, a sense of entitlement to resources, blaming of men and the socially successful for their situation (which is often seen as predetermined due to social determinism, a de…
/r/MensRights31/07/24 04:19 AM
10

They SAY they would rather be with a bear than a man. We all know which way women would run in reality. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ICVpIUeD6gY This whole thing was an another piece of evidence of why what women say doesn't matter, but only what they do. And then women complain that men don't take them seriously and disregard what they have to say...
/r/MensRights31/07/24 03:26 AM
54

The gender gap report doesn't call a gender gap favoring women a gender gap but "exceeding gender parity"....
/r/MensRights30/07/24 01:14 PM
1

What women's sport team beat a men's team? Synchronized swimming.
/r/MensRights27/07/24 12:08 AM
–

What man gave, man can take back.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 11:36 PM
1

Unless you are someone who dies when elecricity stops running. How long do you think water systems and refrigeration systems would last without electricity? it is very normal to see women on construction sites Not doing construction though. I have served in army too, and there was not a single position we did not have women on. Oh yeah, PowerPoint... Look at what's going on in Ukraine now, when real shit hits the fan. Not when it's about parading in third world countries.
/r/MensRights24/07/24 06:33 AM
11

The evidence of how the 6' bar is a purely mental and cultural one is how in Europe, the guys height bar is 180cm, which is 5'11 despite many countries in Europe having a higher average height than in the US. Indeed when ranking is relative, raising the level for everyone means raising the level for noone. Women will go for the top 10% not matter if it's of the 10 guys from her village or her 10k Instagram followers. This means that "doing better for men" doesn't mean doing better in absolute te…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 05:59 AM
1

Then wear a pad. Or a diaper. The issue is that women have much dirtier underwear than men and yet they lecture about underwear cleanliness.
/r/MensRights24/07/24 04:59 AM
5

Logic isn't women's forte. You can see this on just the titles of the posts on the sun twoX: so many are titles starting with "I'm tired of", "I'm sick of". Women are first and foremost emotional beings who have a hard time putting logic first. That's why when they talk about their problems they don't want to hear solutions, they just want "to be listened to", to "feel validated". It's all about their feelings. Then any justification is acceptable, logic not needed, as long as their feelings are…
/r/MensRights24/07/24 01:11 AM
1

Most jobs men do are neither necessary for survival That's not the point. The point is that all jobs necessary for survival are done by men. Just because the workforce is divided does not mean that the other side isn't capable of doing something, it is about desire and willingness. And ability. Women don't want to and aren't able to either. And yet they claim everywhere that "they need no man" and "they can do anything" while they're unable to carry half of the necessary tools for just road infr…
/r/MensRights24/07/24 12:52 AM
–

The fathers are often still around. And often not.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 03:15 PM
–

So women don't die in childbirth, Much less often than they are single mother. men don't adopt? Not at 2 days old. It takes longer. People don't split or get their child mutilated a little later than a day or two old? Well, 8 days for Jews, and 8 years for some Muslims. So basically, aside from some Muslims, there is virtually no chance that circumcision is decided without a mother being around.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 02:35 PM
1

Because if you were actually able to BE Redpill, you would have never needed TRP in the first place. That's black pill discourse to the letter... Hello supreme gentleman...
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 02:30 PM
1

Before the Red Pill sub got quarantines you also used to see these grand narratives all the time "women are children and shouldn't vote blah blah blah. Well, this has always been explained as a way to improve your odds to get your dick wet.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 02:29 PM
–

Single father also curcumsize their kids so your point is moot. There is no single father when a child is one or two days old, unless the mother died giving birth, which is very rare.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 02:27 PM
–

Do you genuinely believe single mothers are doing it at a higher rate than couples? It does not matter what the rate is. If single mothers do it, they do it on their own without the involvement of the father HENCE, unlike what you say, fathers do not participate in this equally.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 02:17 PM
–

It's both parents doing that, so equally men are out there mutilating their sons genitals. You are underestimating the number of single mothers.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 01:54 PM
1

I think this is a very weird point, because people in general need very little to sustain life. Really? Even in the US, just take a look at what happened with hurricane Katrina. Women are always in denial about the amount of work necessary for modern society to function. That's because they don't take part in it and it is invisible to them, so they have no clue of it, until it fails. Then, "women and children first"... Only thing that really makes genders depend on eachother is procreation. Wome…
/r/MensRights23/07/24 01:52 PM
1

Literally just wipe your ass properly. Literally just use a tampon properly. Yet blood stains everywhere...
/r/MensRights23/07/24 01:46 PM
–

Where are their fathers in this?? Who knows. It's not like DNA testing is mandatory...
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 01:45 PM
-9

Mothers have their sons genitals mutilated every day in the US. And they consider this normal. And then the same women say "my body my choice"... Only for females I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/24 03:30 PM
14

They can exist but somehow they're never able to sustain their own existence without the help of men, hence them saying they need no man is just as laughable as a toddler saying he doesn't need his parents to eat because he can get himself an apple from the fruit basket...
/r/MensRights22/07/24 03:26 PM
94

But they're okay with using the fruit of men's labour though. So there's only so much they are not willing to do. But benefiting from infrastructure built by men, that, they have no issue with.
/r/MensRights22/07/24 01:11 AM
3

The issue isn't that women don't have spotless underwear. The issue is that women demand men to have spotless underwear when most women have a collection of all types of body fluids in their underwear. It's the usual female double standard that is the issue.
/r/MensRights22/07/24 01:09 AM
3

Hairy ass can be difficult to clean if you don't have a bidet. And women stain their underwear with lots of different things. So it's a bit rich for them to demand others to have pristine underwear when theirs are Jackson Pollock motif.
/r/MensRights22/07/24 01:06 AM
1

Where did I shift the blame? You said: "The things the mother is saying is based on patriarchal ideas which is why deconstructing the negative ideas women have about themselves requires deconstructing patriarchy or at the very least, de centering men." This is feminist nonsense that basically says, even when women do wrong, they only do wrong because they have these patriarchal ideas imposed onto them by men. I’m saying that the direct cause of the daughter’s issue is the mother but the rhetoric…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/24 05:37 AM
1

Before this second wave of feminism all women were expected to become a wife and have kids with very few exceptions back then (the odd spinster, the clinically insane, and the nuns). This is incorrect. There were more childless women at the end of the 19th century than in the middle of the 20th. Spinsters were a recognized and decently big share of women. It's after WW2 that we reached the highest numbers of maternity rate among women. These figures vary by country, but the narrative that women'…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/24 04:26 AM
2

Sorry but you've done exactly the usual blame shifting women are so keen to do: Women making other women have unrealistic expectations? Of course it's men's fault... "It's a system" is the go to justification of women wanting to avoid accountability, and your comment exemplified that: mother fucking up a daughter? Of course it's men's fault. What a joke...
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/24 04:18 AM
1

A job that requires us to sacrifice community is forcing us to sacrifice humanity. That's a ridiculous statement. Community is divisible in time and place. Humanity is not. Thus your statement is nonsensical. The whole point of OP is precisely about how much time do you allocate to which tasks, and since it's 2nd wave feminism that pushed women to get salaried work, to be the perfect reserve army of capitalists, then the issue of balancing one's time between family and work has been made more di…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/24 04:14 AM
2

But communal raising solves that paternity problem anyway- one, normalizing it causes men to see the group's kids as their kids, Sorry but no. Communal raising means that the maternal uncles are the ones involved in kids lives. The fact that women want to decide what men should do with their kids so women can live up their hypergamy fantasy is really something. If you want real communal raising, hide the new borns for a few days and randomly distribute them to the mothers. According to you, men …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/24 04:05 AM
0

People miss the point because they do not understand that money is strictly an equivalent for labour, and labour is the use of someone's body, ie objectification. Thus expecting financial rewards of any kind is by definition objectifying the person giving those financial rewards. What you're missing is that women rarely operate under logical parameters. Their default mode is double standards. Hence women have no qualms crying bloody murder if they are objectified and at the same time saying that…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/24 03:57 AM
160

It's like the supposed disgusting male underwear... Pure projection too. They can't keep their own underwear spotless so they're quick to accuse men to have such issue, and when confronted with their own inability to keep spotless underwear, it's justification after justification.... Don't throw stones around if you live in a glasshouse...
/r/MensRights21/07/24 12:43 AM
2

There's no way around it: heterosexual sex is penetration of one by the other. It's the filling of one by the other. No matter how you dice it, feminists have always had this problem: their practice in bed is very far from what they say they want outside. Women want to be taken in bed. Most of the time, not just that but always at least that. And thus the problem arises: how can you at once pretend that you don't want to be dominated yet every time you raise your ass or open your legs, you want …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/24 12:09 AM
2

Both sexes have their pros and cons. The idiotic thing is to not recognize that or pretend that only one has pros - or more pros - or that both could get the same pros while these mostly stem from biology.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 11:39 PM
4

Beauvoir herself noted the following in her book, the Second sex: But women do not say ‘We’, except at some congress of feminists or similar formal demonstration; men say ‘women’, and women use the same word in referring to themselves. They do not authentically assume a subjective attitude. The proletarians have accomplished the revolution in Russia, the Negroes in Haiti, the Indo-Chinese are battling for it in Indo-China; but the women’s effort has never been anything more than a symbolic agita…
/r/MensRights12/07/24 11:14 PM
10

Women and their "feelings"... Sheesh. And then they wonder why men don't consider them very apt to make rational decisions...
/r/MensRights12/07/24 11:19 AM
4

Waiting for a dude to consider bruises on a woman's face to be art... Anyway, she basically showed that the art world is full of shit... As if noone knew already. Duchamp did that a century ago. How groundbreaking!
/r/MensRights12/07/24 03:52 AM
–

Maslow's hierarchy of needs is a pretty standard take: The five levels of the hierarchy are physiological, safety, love/belonging, esteem, and self-actualization. However, what you put within each category and how you order them can change. Sex can be considered a physiological need or a love need. Within the physiological needs, if air, water and food and the first needs without a doubt, whether the next one is shelter or clothes is debatable. The ethical implication is different indeed but the…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 04:11 AM
103

What are you on about? A patriarchy is whatever a middle class feminist woman dislikes, so yes, we're living in a patriarchy! You and your silly tries at objective definitions trying to invalidate women's lived experience!... A masculinist without a doubt!
/r/MensRights05/07/24 12:05 AM
15

What ''women's intuition'' is, is just the immediate rejection of explicitly misogynistic or hostile guys who otherwise have no redeeming qualities or attractive traits. Nah. "The ick" and their guts cannot even work for that because they tend to reject beta guys for being too nice more than rude alpha dudes "who are an asshole but fun". The issue with women is that they just cannot be bored, because if they are, they are left with the abysmal void that is their existence, so they need to hide t…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 02:11 AM
5

It's like which is it? Are you expecting logic? How patriarchal of you!
/r/MensRights02/07/24 12:20 PM
39

Why do feminists say kill all men? Because they are unable to do so themselves so as for everything else, they have to have someone else do the work in their stead. It's actually the crux of the issue for feminists: any rule of any kind needs to be enforced. Who is going to enforce feminist rules? Women? Against men? How would that even possibly work? So in the end, it shows what feminism truly is: a red herring spewed by upperclass women that pretends that half of the working class is oppressin…
/r/MensRights02/07/24 12:45 AM
69

By mature they mean better financially.
/r/MensRights01/07/24 04:25 AM
–

About 3% that means one kid for every 30. This means that in every classroom, there is a kid whose father (and the kid) thinks he's the father but in reality he is not... and that's the LOW estimate... "Believe all women"...
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/24 11:08 AM
3

A man's wife and his children were considered his property and an extension of himself, and an attack or a disrespect against them is an attack against him personally. It really depended on the type of marriages, whether with manu or without. And the cum confareatio , considered as the highest type, had become so outdated by Augustus time that they had a hard time finding a Jupiter flamine who was supposed to have been born within such marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/24 12:09 PM
16

Well, in Roman times it was also considered as an exchange so that's long before capitalism...
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/24 08:53 AM
8

Then if you require someone to make more than you then you're the dependent... I guess it's okay one way but not the other...
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/24 03:46 AM
3

It should be noted that if the relationship DOES NOT include marriage, then the breakups are roughly evenly distributed between the woman and the male. So if you don't swear "until death do us apart" then it is the same? Well, then what's the point of marriage then if you consider it as good as boyfriend / girlfriend...
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/24 11:47 AM
-3

Not bad. Weak.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 02:17 AM
2

It's still not high. So your assumption is less likely than a coin toss.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 01:37 AM
2

And you're assuming that this corner has a higher prevalence of autism... based on how convenient it is for your argument...
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 01:32 AM
1

Women here are mainly left-wing feminists and they do not like rp so they use insults to undermine it. Ad hominem is the basic form of debating for women because that's what women do among themselves: reputation destruction. So that's their default mode. Men know from experience that ad hominem can end up as a knuckle sandwich pretty fast so they usually don't start with it as their default mode of argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 01:21 AM
2

What's the prevalence of autism in the population? 2%? 3%? Assuming someone here is autistic is like assuming they have cancer... It's a silly assumption just so you can disregard an argument without having to argue. Convenient.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 01:17 AM
1

Naturally attractive men don’t need self-help That's quite the false premise or you just begging the question by defining "attractive" as being confident on top of rich and goodlooking.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 01:14 AM
0

Women find only 10% of men attractive so when they read posts by men they'll assume that 90% of the time the guy writing is unattractive. Hence they tend to think that the writer is unattractive whenever they see content they dislike. On the other hand, men find 60 or 70% of women attractive enough so when they read posts from women, they picture the author as a decent looking woman although often you find out the poster is an overweight single mum in her 30s complaining about the "quality" of m…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 01:11 AM
16

Mgtow2 was banned without even a pretend reason. The "breaking the terms of service" is just a convenient cover for reddit to get rid of what they don't like. When you see the sexism in twoX and other feminist subs, you're going to have a hard time being credible that sexism breaks your terms of service. Unless you mean sexism towards women only and mgtow is sexist towards women only insofar that it tells men to stop being leeched by women. Which is of course offensive to many women since it's t…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 01:53 AM
9

It's called mgtow and the sub was banned by Reddit because women would not extract anything from these men...
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 11:56 PM
1

That's exactly the point of Otis Redding song, Respect. No wonder it was repackaged as a feminist anthem.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 11:05 PM
19

Peace and all your needs met.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 10:51 PM
2

Who would build and maintain this female only city? There. That's your answer. And that's why those don't exist. Because women move in, they don't build up.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/24 12:43 AM
3

You said: If you are an average guy, with an average lifestyle, who's as bland as white bread, you aren't going to get laid. Do you understand the meaning of the word "average" or are you using it like women do?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 04:44 AM
1

Always do a coffee date as a first date. "Let's grab coffee at this nice coffee shop." Talk for an hour and move to another place if you like what you see.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 02:48 AM
352

So men are more competent than women at everything, including suicide... The I want to kill myself but don't want to traumatize my family is really high grade copium...
/r/MensRights18/06/24 02:39 AM
–

Nobody said that. Quite the opposite: it's very easy for women to get dates. But women pretend they have a hard time dating because women confuse getting dates and getting dates with men they want to have dates with. It's like confusing wanting to eat and wanting to eat what you like. It can only happen to someone who's never starved.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/24 05:28 AM
–

Attractiveness is a result, not a cause as you pretend it is. People are attractive because of beauty, wealth, character. They're not "just attractive". When women say that they just want to hide the characteristic they find attractive. Because it makes them look lower than the lofty ideal they have of themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/24 04:59 AM
–

the status is meaningless or a non factor Everyone knows that a rich man doesn't attract more women than a poor man, all else being equal... Yeah it's not the velvet gloves you should remove, it's the mask on your eyes that prevents you from seeing...
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/24 04:27 AM
–

Status is attractive for women, that's the whole point.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/24 04:22 AM
7

The sexual past isn't about trust and insecurity. That's only how loose women portray it. It's about knowing that pattern behaviors yield specific outcomes. Refusing to date a woman with a high body count is the equivalent of refusing to date a mam with a past of domestic violence. As for "the proof is in the pudding" for paternity tests, well no, that's precisely the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/24 03:17 AM
72

Just cut in and introduce yourself: "Hi, I'm Peter, her secret lover." See if she corrects you.
/r/MensRights17/06/24 03:12 AM
–

Noone said it's only dates. But whatever women want, they'd have to get a date first.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/24 02:48 AM
–

That's a no true Scotsman fallacy. The point is to have dates with respectful men. From then on it's a different story. But it shows that what women want explicitly is there on OLD, but they're unable to find these guys because of their selectivity borne from their inflated sense of self...
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 11:20 PM
0

Usually the people unable to see that any organisation is by definition a hierarchy will talk about "structural issue" when they want a red herring because more often than not they're complaining about the fact that hierarchies exist, which is unavoidable. So instead of being honest and try to sell you an alternate hierarchy with its pluses and minuses, they'll pretend to be able to organize without a hierarchy. They do so to oh surprise! end up at the top of their wanted "hierarchy less" organi…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/24 03:24 AM
-2

There can't be an egalitarian society because any enforcement of any rule is going to be done by the people most competent at force, ie the males. Thus that's why matriarchy is a feminist pipe dream because they'll need men to enforce their rules. And if men are the enforcers, it won't take long before they decide to be the deciders too.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/24 03:07 AM
17

Poverty is real oppression - in fact it’s the most severe form of oppression in existence. It's precisely the point of standpoint theory: only poor people should be able to talk about poverty and only among poor people. So there, problem solved since poor people have other problems to talk about than the reasons of poverty (more like how to deal with the consequences). So then upperclass women can lecture about how real oppression is that of gender, all while enjoying their upperclass living. Wh…
/r/MensRights13/06/24 12:01 AM
0

Female socialization norms have always been enforced by other females. That feminists believe in the patriarchy bogeyman to avoid this uncomfortable fact to paint women as perpetual victims doesn't change this fact. Thus any attempt to stray from the cultural norms in place by females will be managed by other females. Males enter the scene only if some type of rule enforcement through force becomes necessary. So for tradwife, we're not at a point where force is needed thus the social norms are e…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 11:47 PM
2

Women actually don't want men who believe women's bullshit. Women actually want to be checked whenever they are spewing nonsense.
/r/MensRights12/06/24 11:34 PM
7

My cousin is AFAB. If sex was assigned at birth, there'd be no gender reveal. Sex is recognized at birth. Big difference. The man vs. bear is just showing how females are just full of shit and why their word isn't worth much (and then they cry why they're not believed). Any woman encountering a bear on a path would back away towards a man on the other side. They're lying. We know they're lying. They know we know they're lying. And still, they're lying. Never take at face value anything a woman s…
/r/MensRights12/06/24 11:12 AM
–

Generally when you love someone and plan to marry them, you help them if they need it. “I see my money as our money” is verbatim what he said, and I would have done the same for him if the situation was reversed and I was able to. He was 3 years older than me, hardly a “daddy” of any kind. Yet: You didn't marry him. He spent 10K on you and your mum. I'm sure HE was expecting it to turn it differently. Well done, beta buck just bucked back your mother into health.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/24 09:58 AM
1

“When I use a word,’ Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, ‘it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less.’
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/24 09:55 AM
–

So a German sugar daddy then...
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/24 05:43 AM
1

You called it blue pill (which lean left and feminist No it doesn't lean left or feminist. You have a serious problem understanding the concepts here. Blue pill isn't feminist or leftist. Leftists and feminists are blue pill. This is different because this doesn't mean only them are blue pill. Tradcon and Taliban are blue pill too. Do you think banging as many women whoring themselves is something that the Taliban are advocating for?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/24 11:09 PM
1

I did not say the Taliban were feminist, read again.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/24 10:26 PM
1

That's not what I said. I guess reading comprehension isn't your forte.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/24 09:26 PM
1

The grunt part is precisely the part that women cannot do. Hence that is why, none of them build houses, pave roads, clean sewers, pick up trashes, etc. And that's the one you take for granted precisely because you are unable to do it and so you have to pretend that you can lift 40kg bags of cement.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/24 10:24 AM
5

Hahaha positively collectizing men in a thread discussing how this never happens. The irony. Women, thinking outliers disprove a pattern... Girls maths. They always counter a generality by saying "it is NOT never so you cannot say it is common." Good Lord, women and logic don't go together well...
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/24 07:40 AM
2

Plenty of women work with AI. If you're confusing a robot and AI, I'm afraid you are proving my point. Try to have ChatGPT build you a house...
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/24 07:39 AM
2

The broader point was to jerk off men and act like women are incapable of doing a thing which is demonstrably false. Not really. Women have yet to build a building anywhere on their own. And yet they're still "I don't need no men". Female delusion to the max.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/24 07:38 AM
-7

Taliban is blue pill though, since it's basically men being responsible for women in everything, just like in the West. It's the same obsession about the safety of women first mentality than US feminism. The difference is that they're more consistent because since men have all the responsibilities then they also have all the power, while feminists in the West want none of the accountability but all the decision power. Red pill is about telling men how to not take responsibility for women's actio…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/24 02:47 AM
1

Show me one house built by women... Oh yeah, tents.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/24 02:35 AM
-1

Nah. It's because they cannot.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/24 01:31 AM
11

if i could be completely self sufficient hermit i would. unfortunate im not that rich. The fact that you think you need money shows you have no idea what self sufficiency is. By definition, money is for when you rely on other's labor. yeah men need to live in houses, built by other men too, They're not the ones saying "I don't need no man."
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 10:56 PM
9

if it were up to me i would build everything i need myself. Sure. You would... yet you don't. Only those who have never built anything can say you'd do it all yourself. women survive on their own all the time single and alone. By survive on their own you mean living in a house built by men, buying stuff made by men, powered by electricity produced by men... Yeah, "On their own"
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 10:41 PM
11

It's the women are wonderful effect... And if you do a negative genreralization about women then it's sexism. It's not according to this sub, it's observable everywhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 09:58 PM
6

i don't want your help and i don't want your protection. i would prefer robots to do the labor. Robots built by men of course. The fact that you say you don't want the help but you're more than happy to use it shows how ungrateful women are. Men bring nothing, not protection, not money, not even good sex for most women. Men built your shelter, grew your food, brought your food and everything you could have with "money".The fact that you can't see what money is for or that sexual pleasure is all …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 09:55 PM
19

It's called women are wonderful effect. It's a psychological trait that probably stems from the value of women in reproduction (better 10 women and 1 men than the other way around) and thus no matter what women do individually, they still hold some value as part of the female group. Hence also in-group bias by women and not by men. And women being neurotic, they called such preferential treatment "benevolent sexism". It's like why the Gender gap report calls women lagging a "gender gap" but men …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 09:37 PM
9

And what do most men help protect against ? Tell me you're a spoiled person enjoying the benefits of modern civilization made by men without telling me you're a spoiled person enjoying the benefits of modern civilization made by men. Who protects you from the elements by building you a house? Who protects you from hunger by growing food and bringing it to you? Who protects you from thirst by making a clean water system? Who protects you from diseases by building sewage and picking trash? Men. An…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 09:25 PM
21

OP's point is not about whether we can generalize or not, since we can always do so consciously about anything, but the fact that at first glance, generalizations are acceptable or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 09:12 PM
6

The very fact that AWALT needs to be said, taught and repeated shows exactly OP's point, that is, that the tendency is to NOT collectivize negative traits for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 09:08 PM
7

When women say they'll do something, they do it. Ahaha, that's a good one. Ever heard marriage vows before?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 11:06 PM
91

If women got a form of cancer by sucking dick, you can be sure all women organizations and ministries would advertise to not suck dick, for your health. Eating pussy should be advertised as a health hazard like smoking is. I bet all the health advocate that like to have throat cancer photos on cigarette packs will object to equating eating pussy with HPV induced throat and mouth cancer. And yet... I'm laughing in advance to the reply to women saying not going down on them is a deal breaker: this…
/r/MensRights07/06/24 04:04 AM
5

Anyone with a barely existing surviving instinct and two brain cells would do exactly what the woman did in this video, that is, get away from the bear... The women saying they'd rather encounter a bear than a man are full of shit and everybody knows it. And then women wonder why their word can't be taken at face value.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 01:05 AM
11

They do lie. Everybody knows that every single woman who says bear would run towards the man if she encounters a bear that noticed her. https://www.foxla.com/news/video-bear-sierra-madre-hiking-trail This bear vs man shows just how full of shit women are and how normalized the shitting on men is.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 11:13 PM
1

They feel more secure because they are more secure because they're treated way better. Pretty privilege also applies to men. Hence the meme about what is harassment. Yet men don't make up just because of it. It's incredible how women are so willing to pretend that they have low agency and are not accountable for anything because they're just poor things being manipulated... they will continue to look like that with makeup on. Unless you sleep with them, hence the deception.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 06:11 AM
0

The fashion industry is run by middle age women and gay men. Most staff is female. Pointing at the handful of owners is really a stupid way to see it since the owner will go along anything that brings in money. You can engage in makeup all you like, it's not going to change that it's like rentnig a sports car to cruise downtown to impress others with your (temporary) high status.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 12:36 AM
1

And this is because male dominated industries prefer a made up look on women. It's patently untrue. This the case in the fashion industry the most, which is an overwhelmingly female dominated industry, which shows that unlike the "never accountable for anything" narrative of women, it's women who push for such use. Noone bats an eye if a woman has no makeup on a construction site. And if women were so forced by men to makeup they wouldn't engage in it in their free time by their own will. Again,…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 11:53 PM
1

The makeup is visible, not what's underneath. It's like padded bras. The issue is how much. With makeup it's thus how much does she look like she presents. It's not because you know that prices include a profit for the seller that it's impossible to swindle you. Women are the first to complain ads show unrealistic women and they say it's hurting girls and women. And yet they engage in the exact same deception with makeup but they consider it ok because now it's benefiting women at the expense of…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 11:09 PM
0

They feel more secure because they feel less ugly. It's like men driving around rented Ferraris. They feel more assertive because they display more wealth. That make-up works isn't the issue. Deceptive practices work because they're deceptive so you can't pretend that make-up working is evidence of it not be deceptive! There are laws that limit what companies can say in their ads because deception works. Make-up is exactly like false advertisement and women are saying "well you should know it is…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 10:48 PM
1

Trying to say that if it works in the corporate world then it's what men prefer is silly: it works to be a workaholic at your job, it doesn't mean people prefer it. So what you think is evidence isn't really. Again, you don't seem to understand that beautiful and natural aren't the same thing and that it's not because beautiful trumps natural that natural isn't preferred.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 10:39 PM
1

Then why women cannot assess height properly then?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 10:36 PM
2

Just as you can tell if a man is going to be a violent asshole by going with him on a date..
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 02:58 PM
-1

As in more honest, less insecure...
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 02:57 PM
2

You don't know how worse it really is. It can be a bit worse or way worse. Hence it's deceptive.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 02:28 PM
-1

The argument is that natural is better, not that natural is more beautiful.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 02:27 PM
4

Of course it is deception. And you can see how all the women here reply with "It's not deception" or deflect the question by saying "if it is deception then so is a toupee" Well yeah, a toupee is as deceptive as make up. Make up is like masks during Covid: they made most women rather pretty by hiding most of their face.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 07:45 AM
-3

If men in general appreciated natural beauty of makeup they wouldn't give all their time and attention to women who wear makeup over those who go natural That's missing the point. You are assuming that people can always spot when make up is worn. Which is definitely NOT true for men. Furthermore, your argument makes sense only if you think that "natural" is more important than "beautiful". Men rewarding beauty over natural does not mean they don't prefer natural. It's just that beauty is more im…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 07:42 AM
65

You can't fix problems if you don't first expose them. The routine treatment of men based on the assumption they're more dangerous than a frickin bear is one these problems...
/r/MensRights04/06/24 09:51 AM
3

I gave you truth Lol. Well then if all women are liars stop getting on here and asking them questions You should not make the logical fallacy to go from "women are liars" to "women lie all the time". Clearly you stand to gain nothing from talking to people who you believe are inherently deceitful Are you in third grade or something to think that you stand to gain nothing by talking with deceitful people? Have you ever done business? Interacted with shady sellers or regular lawyers? What a naive …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 03:06 AM
1

Women aren't being intentionally malicious. They're intentionally deceitful. I'm going to try and tread lightly here but the truth is people don't want to be burdened with placating you about things you should already know. How are you supposed to know that if noone bothers telling them to you? Even more so if the people whose opinion matters here most, women, will 1. lie about it and 2. will accuse men of mansplaining women if men step and tell the truth which is height and dick size matter. At…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 02:52 AM
2

Often, when men express concern about these characteristics, the social response is immediate and predictable: "That doesn't matter; what matters is personality." This statement, although well-intentioned, does not address the underlying insecurity that these men may feel. You're misunderstanding the true meaning of the "it doesn't matter" statement by women. Since women do not want short guys or guys with micro penis, these things DO matter. But since women spend their time complaining about me…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 01:59 AM
2

Listened and said if you think that's a problem, let me help you, and my whole family started helping. Nice for you but I doubt this a common pattern in the US in 2024...
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/24 08:32 AM
2

I don't agree with this view. I live in America, and I've been on arranged dates by parents. Ok. What immigrants or religious community do you belong to to be a grown woman with dates arranged by parents? Indian? Korean?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/24 01:53 AM
41

For women, a higher probability of being involuntarily single was associated with factors including poor flirting ability, elevated choosiness, and a low level of agreeableness. A high level of choosiness was also associated with having been single for a greater number of years. Quelle surprise !
/r/MensRights02/06/24 01:09 AM
2

You don't seem to understand that this is a public forum where everyone can chime in whenever they want. Women are not awful, they're just hypocrite. That's why what they say is of little value because they can't even notice when they contradict themselves or when they openly do the opposite of what they say.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/24 01:06 AM
6

They call it "the ick" because they find them disgusting.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/24 01:01 AM
3

That would be excluding criterion number 256. It wouldn't make a difference. Women get rid of men who make the mistake of opening to them. Or they use it against them. So it'd be a plus.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/24 01:00 AM
3

So when women vet their potential mates with a laundry list of criteria, it's natural. When men do the same with a list half as long it's rotten. Women excluding short or poor men, fair enough. Men excluding women with trauma, that's rotten...
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 11:56 PM
2

It's called draining the swamp. It's not a pool.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 11:52 PM
4

It's the phase in gender segregated societies where they don't normally interact with each other, when a male and a female entertain the possibility of considering each other's as a potential mate by talking with each other. In arranged marriage societies it's usually right after an arranged meeting by the parents where the male and female check each other's personal compatibility. In the US, it's a label applied to a period of time when you can justify low efforts on the part of the female (hen…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 11:42 PM
112

Are we going to pretend an hour of folding laundry is as hard, stressful or productive as an hour of mining. And it's done while watching daytime TV and yet, they'll pretend that they spent 2 hours folding laundry and not 2 hours watching TV while folding laundry...
/r/MensRights01/06/24 11:00 AM
–

"which led to" Yep, as usual, women are really always taking shortcuts in their narratives to minimize others (read men's) work. It's why women always used expressions like "is needed" "must be done" "should be done" in order to hide the fact that they're won't be the ones doing the actual work.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 11:52 AM
1

However you don't see men blaming others for their spending habits.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 04:30 PM
1

It doesn't make someone having the "agency of children" if they struggle against peer pressure. Sorry but if it is an issue for women and children but not for men, then women have the agency of children.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 02:45 PM
1

I view sex as a sacrifice a woman makes for a man. She risks her life Well, that was true before but that's no longer the case so please...
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 11:48 AM
0

I presumed op wasn't a product of rape. Ever heard of arranged marriage. I'm sure you are going to call it rape though...
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 05:33 AM
0

Less attractive women were prostitutes, mistresses, and concubines throughout history. Girl girl. If you think that mistresses and concubines were the less attractive women, you need to wake up. Don’t pretend men were a bastion of traditional values. Well which is it then? Either men uphold patriarchal values that prevented women from doing what they want with their bodies, OR they did not. But you cannot at once accuse men from supporting patriarchy and praising women for their liberation AND d…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 05:32 AM
-2

Sure. And? That's what the sexual revolution allowed, and women pushed for that. Don't tell me now you are not happy of the result. Well if you indeed are unhappy about it, then don't blame it on men when it is women's lib that pushed all these social changes.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 04:31 AM
0

In most of these supposed "no make up" photos she actually does wear make up, except probably the first one https://cdn2.fabbon.com/uploads/image/file/46692/medium_Taylor-swift-no-makeup-.webp And yeah no, you'd have to do a triple take to actually consider it's the same woman if you just walk past her.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 02:40 AM
1

Who does the purchasing? Women. It's funny how it's never women's fault, even their own damn purchasing habit... Men will do what it takes to sell, but you cannot pretend that it is beauty products companies' fault that women purchase and use their products. This is the logic that we use to protect children from marketing campaign. Should we also use the same logic to protect women because they have the agency level of children?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 02:38 AM
4

The confusion between agreeable and submissive is a long tradition in US culture. Beauvoir in her seminal feminist book, the Second sex wrote in 1949!: I recall also a young Trotskyite standing on a platform at a boisterous meeting and getting ready to use her fists, in spite of her evident fragility. She was denying her feminine weakness; but it was for love of a militant male whose equal she wished to be. The attitude of defiance of many American women proves that they are haunted by a sense o…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 01:48 AM
1

"they're expected" By who? Certainly not men.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 01:29 AM
-2

Fuckable means nothing Until you're no longer it...
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 01:28 AM
0

Yeah no. https://fabbon.com/articles/makeup/taylor-swift-no-makeup
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 01:27 AM
-3

Sorry but "let" is a supposition of yours. Men don't need women to let them impregnate them, there's quite a lot of evidence of that. You seem to think that Christian marriage where the consent of spouses is required is some anthropological necessity.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 01:25 AM
0

Sorry but civilization? Only a woman could think that appearance is civilization rather than the infrastructure... As for looking good for self esteem, this harps on two flawed principles of yours: first you look too much in mirrors. It's actually telling that men don't usually have full size mirrors but almost all women do. Second, looking good for self esteem means your self esteem relies on others reaction. That's precisely what growing up from a boy to a man is: learning how to not care abou…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 01:21 AM
-2

It's funny how older women sabotage younger women by calling them naive. If young women are naive despite older women being in charge of their education for generations, then it shows how older women do not really worry about young women's naivity since otherwise they'd educate them properly. This shows that being naive isn't really an issue because women would have redressed that a long time ago since they are, as educators, in all the positions necessary to correct this "problem". This also sh…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 01:12 AM
1

They still have less things to change.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 01:03 AM
-1

It wasn't long ago men were wearing high heels, corsets, and powdered wigs. Best example of female hypergamy in a while: considering that men could only be in Versailles, and thus what was done in palaces was totally representative; the vast majority of men do not even registering as men. This is why feminists believe stuff like patriarchy: they can only speak of top tier men when they think and consider men. The vast majority is just ignored because it doesn't interest them because well, they'r…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 01:02 AM
1

I don't think the women wearing makeup every single day are the norm. This really depends on culture. Makeup as an occasional or very discreet touch up is something true in some countries but not in others.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 12:57 AM
1

Also normal people are not fooled by make up or bras because normal people know those are normal things that women wear Noone would recognize Taylor Swift without makeup. Knowing she has some and knowing what she'd look like without any are two different things. Pretending that because you know a girl has makeup then you know what she'd look like without is disingenuous and is something women pretend is true to forget that makeup is deception. As for bras, they have the same effect: they can tra…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 12:53 AM
2

Then you guys have to e audacity to say you find most women attractive. But you don’t! That's because attractive is often used as a polite way of saying fuckable. Most women are fuckable for most men.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 12:40 AM
12

Remember that we are supposed to "Believe all women"...
/r/MensRights25/05/24 06:56 AM
4

English speaking people have to stop assuming that a wife changing their husband's name is what happens everywhere. And even when they do, feminists are basically fighting to keep a man's name)the father's) over another (the husband's)... Same with kids.
/r/MensRights25/05/24 03:24 AM
66

The World Economic forums publishes the famed Global Gender Gap report every year. In it they explain that when women lag it's a "gender gap" but when men lag it's "exceeding parity benchmark"...
/r/MensRights23/05/24 12:47 AM
23

Lol. Who's going to mine the ore necessary to make the tools and machines needed to extract the bone marrow and run the power plant and electric grid to have those running? Women are just so pampered that they fail to see that what they consider a given is actually the results of lots of men's work.
/r/MensRights23/05/24 12:36 AM
127

Because women rely on social shaming and checking a lot. They are not used to being held accountable for their words.
/r/MensRights21/05/24 11:29 AM
5

But you're blaming women for...policy determined and dictated by men. Lol. Feminist organisations lobby against equality in that domain. I find it funny that suddenly it's men doing the policies, as if women don't vote or are not in politics. Remember boys, when an all men supreme court rules Roe v. Wade then it's women's power, but when a half female supreme court rules Dobbs then it's men ruling...
/r/MensRights20/05/24 11:57 PM
3

But thats a made up scenario. Ask Ukrainians if it's a made up scenario... Or at leats in Finland the army said they dont have money to conscript everyone and make army mandatory for women also. So of course they chose to conscript only men Oh yeah, how about we don't educate girls past highschool because "we don't have money to do so"? How would that be received? This is ridiculous and it shows how normalized the unfair treatment is unlike what feminists like to claim. If women are at a disadva…
/r/MensRights20/05/24 11:53 PM
7

That there are issues in the military doesn't change the fact that women do NOT want to be treated equally when it comes to the draft. The draft is the litmus test that shows the hypocrisy of those who claim to be for equality but only if it favors them, which isn't being for equality. The fact that you'd rather have men go die than women risk sexual assault shows that you're considering one group to be superior because men can die and risk sexual assault but don't dare put the other group in th…
/r/MensRights20/05/24 10:45 PM
6

The answer no draft isn't an answer to equality since it's there. And that you are a guy does not change anything: Wanting equality only sometimes is NOT wanting equality. So those who oppose drafting everyone aren't for equal treatment.
/r/MensRights20/05/24 10:38 PM
74

The issue isn't to have 50/50 for everyone. It's about making it a baseline that one has to justify oneself for wanting something different rather than having to justify oneself for wanting 50/50. It's about making it a presumption rather than a goal.
/r/MensRights20/05/24 10:34 PM
8

So you don't want equality, you just want equality when convenient. That's not equality, that's opportunism.
/r/MensRights20/05/24 10:20 PM
2

If they didn't care, women would match with any guy, like guys do with women. But women match with upper tier men and still they are unable to even come up with an opener, because in their mind they're the superior being that anyone, even top tier men, should be grateful to just interact with. Hence they don't see the need to have a half decent opener because they think so highly of themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 01:46 PM
32

Nobody is blaming women for men going to war. The point is to show the hypocrisy of women when they claim to want equality. They only want equality when it's convenient for them and are quick to forget it when it's not. Which means women don't really want equality.
/r/MensRights20/05/24 01:43 PM
4

Bumble proves that it's not that they were just unwilling to make the first move, but that they were unable to even when they had to. Sexual selection is done by the female in humans. My assumption is the correct one: men need to be selected and thus have a biological imperative to be proactive, unlike women. And that's the reason why women do not know how to lead, because they don't have to. If men cannot lead whatsoever, they don't reproduce.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 08:21 AM
375

The one field the women will enthusiastically NOT replace men in is the battle field. This shows how all the cries of equality are just opportunistic.
/r/MensRights20/05/24 06:16 AM
3

There's plenty of complaints that do not even become a case because it crumbles during the police investigation. And women want us to believe them? Well girl, if you're going to treat me like I'm dangerous because I can be, then I'll treat you as a liar because you can be...
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 05:51 AM
13

The skewed gender ratio does not change the fact that women were unable to practice what they preach, which is to dish out an interesting opener. Bumble was evidence that women were unable to say more than "hey" even to men way above their league. The skewed gender ratio has an effect on selection but this ratio did not affect how they actually contacted the men once they had selected them. And the only thing they would do was saying "hey" to let the man do the proper opener. It was merely a "he…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 05:49 AM
1

But women lecture about how there are so many more cases than the ones that end up in court.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 04:16 AM
7

They don't have to but they're also unable to, as Bumble has shown. They're the first to complain about lame openers from men but when they had to, they were unable to be any better than the lamest "hey". So it's a good thing they don't have to because women are unable to. So of course, men have to...
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 04:04 AM
4

If women were assumed to be liars, things like the Duluth model wouldn't exist. Women confuse believe women with believe all women and thus they truly think that they're not routinely believed at face value. If really women were assumed to be lying all or most of the time, you'd see the difference. So much so that women are shocked when they complain to the police and the police requests supporting evidence. How dare they question women! This shows the baseline women are accustomed to.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 03:40 AM
10

Noone says initiative is the only trait for leadership. But it's a necessary one. Some men are maybe struggling to do a first move but women are totally unable to do so. The struggling young men are on par with the boldest women as far as first move is concerned.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 03:35 AM
4

I'll help you with the middle terms: Men must make the first move. They have to because of biological reasons. Being able to make the first move is necessary to be a leader. Men are thus better positioned to be leaders because they have a skill backed by a biological incentive that women don't have.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 02:21 AM
8

There are flying fishes but most fishes can't fly...
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 02:17 AM
8

Well it's leading the conversation...
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 02:15 AM
7

Well in french, Alain Soral wrote Sociologie du dragueur in the 1990s and appeared on TV shows dishing out red pills about women long before the word even existed. He made a movie that came out in 2001: https://m.imdb.com/title/tt0269105/ This stuff has been around for a long time, but it's not been packaged and distributed as widely as it's been since social networks and YouTube. In the 90s it would take months or years of experience to attain a level of understanding of gender dynamics that yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 02:07 AM
12

That there are grifters doesn't affect the validity of the message. It's not because some people want to profit from selling you shoes that shoes aren't valuable.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 01:55 AM
2

It's not only about believing only with evidence... With the bear vs man logic, then one must assume that women are lying unless they prove themselves not to be. If we must assume that men are violent because they can be violent and sometimes are, then we must assume that women are lying because they can lie and sometimes are. And since women lie more often than men are violent, there's even more reason to assume that anything a woman says, especially regarding bad things that happened to her, i…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 01:49 AM
6

Conflating the issue of the level of violence with that of the existence of violence is the very issue at hand. Because of that, people don't realize that women are the most dangerous to newborns. They dismiss women's violence as non threatening until of course said violence happens on a child and an elderly and then they wonder how could such violence exists! Well it's always been there, you just dismissed it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 01:44 AM
5

men are incredibly dangerous. and can overpower women easily. it's a legitimate concern and why women should always carry some sort of item, for protection. Most women are hurt and worse by men that they know. By the logic "if they can then you must assume they will", then men should never believe what women say. Women lob false accusations that are seriously damaging for men. Thus men should always consider that women are indeed lying, just like women want to consider that men are always more d…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 01:03 AM
6

Women's justification for their own violence is their lower ability to inflict injury. This doesn't deny the existence of their violence.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 12:45 AM
1

“False accusations” are documented events Not for most. Reputation destruction is a game women like to play.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/24 09:31 AM
1

Don’t be dense, all the men beating and spitting on women who reject them. Don't be dense, all the women making false accusations on men who reject them. Your strawman arguments have no place here. Sorry to let you know, but you are not the one to decide that.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/24 09:18 AM
2

You are now "a survivor" and "a victim". Thus you are owed brownie points as such, so it does increase your social status.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/24 07:20 AM
1

"- Did you report it to the police?" Yes -> She probably says the truth about it so you'd have to prove me she is lying for me to change my mind about it. No -> She probably lies about it so you'd have to prove she says the truth for me to change my mind about it. Women do not deserve the benefit of the doubt on these matters since too many have lied, omitted, embellished or manipulated their stories about these things to be taken at face value.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/24 07:19 AM
1

a woman saying ‘no, I’m not interested’ is not disrespectful and does not warrant any form of abuse. Define "abuse" because women call "abuse" anything they don't like.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/24 07:11 AM
0

Yes we can compare. You did compare repairing a gutter with folding the laundry.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/24 07:10 AM
-1

It's not a fair division if you ask me, because you rarely have to fix something, but you have to cook and clean on a daily basis... By that count then women cannot bring up birthing kids in these debates on equality since it's something they do once or twice in a lifetime. Somehow I have the feeling that feminists will suddenly consider frequency irrelevant. As always, when something works in their favor, it's important, when it doesn't, then it's not. Feminism is basically heads I win tail you…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/24 05:27 AM
-4

It's not only women on Instagram who does this. It's every woman in a divorce court who suddenly applies this thinking since the advent of no fault divorce.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/24 10:20 PM
–

That makes no sense. If someone was offended then that person did something offensive to them. By that count, if I say you said something racist then it means you did say something racist... What a silly argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/24 07:59 AM
–

But they can be based on delusions.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/24 07:40 AM
1

I don’t mean that they literally think that it’s reality. I mean it’s the subjective reality of feelings that is most important to many women. That it's more important to women is entirely separate to the issue whether these feelings are warranted. If subjective reality is based on nothing objective, then it's completely made up and is thus not real. That's called delusions.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 11:36 PM
0

Your reality is based off of your perception, just like everyone else's is. Silly women logic. If reality is MY perception, EXPLAIN how everyone is subject to the same gravity then? Funny how those who say such nonsense do not somehow stop taking stairs to go down buildings and instead fly down. Well, if reality is YOUR perception, you just have to alter your perception to alter reality then. Well, please don't. If you step out a window, you'll splat on the sidewalk. Because reality is NOT your …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 01:27 PM
2

I'm trying to understand wtf you mean here. What does X mean, in this case? X means ANYTHING. "I feel like YOU are nasty does NOT make YOU nasty." We are not talking about what I feel. We are talking about whether what I feel about something makes that something what I feel. "I feel this man is dangerous, thus this man is dangerous." (women logic). They think that reality is performative, ie, things exist just because they say things exist. This is what nominalism (and post-modernism) is. It's a…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 01:24 PM
-1

Bro, like 99.9999% of people never get in a situation where someone feels threatened by them. What? Women claim to feel threatened CONSTANTLY. Do you think it is always by the same one odd guy? If someone is constantly behaving in such a way that other people feel threatened, that's totally that particular individual's fault lol. If someone feels threatened by half the population who has done nothing to them, then it is that particular individual's fault.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 01:16 PM
0

My kid was happy to see Santa. His feeling IS reality. That does NOT make Santa REAL. Same for women: they flaunt the "ick" their feeling of "being threatened" while walking around, so much so that they'd rather meet a bear than a man. This exactly of the same cloth as my kid sayin "Santa is real because I feel he is real". The WHOLE point of entertainment is to make you FEEL things about something that is NOT real. Can you give an example of something women do that makes them worse than men? Wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 01:10 PM
-3

Except if the law punishes bad movies then suddenly it becomes more important than just a feeling. "He threatened me" is the go-to comment women do to have police act on their behalf. They do that because they confuse "I felt it was a threat" with "It was a threat".
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 12:54 PM
3

I think it's pretty obvious that women aren't so confused by emotions that they don't know what "court is adjourned" means. You are missing the point. A performative statement is a statement that becomes real just by being uttered, as in "The court is adjourned." The court is effectively adjourned because the judge SAID so. But it is not because there exists SOME performative statements that all statements are performative. That is what OP is point at: "I feel threatened thus there is a threat" …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 12:52 PM
-7

OP clearly explained it: "The word that most accurately describes this is reification -- where they believe their emotions are more than just congruent with reality, but that it is actually external reality itself" Women reify their emotions by thinking that because they felt something then that something is real. "I felt threatened thus there was a threat". This is female 101 faulty logic. See the Bear vs Man thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 12:46 PM
4

But my point is that emotions are reality for many women, and therefore reality is subjective That's quite a faulty logical conclusion here: "Emotions are reality for many women therefore reality is subjective" Sorry but this makes no sense. "Santa Claus is reality for many children therefore reality is subjective"... The debate then becomes whose feelings are hurt more when laws and rules are created one way versus another way. No. The issue is that too many women take their emotions for realit…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 12:44 PM
0

The world would be in chaos if all women were completely emotional and insane. Nobody said that. OP said that women take their emotions for reality, ie, they reify their emotions. OP's point is NOT that women are completely emotional, you're just strawmanning here.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 12:26 PM
0

I think women are often aware “reality” is subjective. That's an incorrect statement. Reality is not subjective. You cannot say that because "some" subjective ideas can become real (for example, performative statement like "The court is adjourned") that therefore reality is subjective. I find it funny that those who push this (very old, nominalist) narrative suddenly forget their own argument if you ask them whether gravity is subjective. If gravity is in your head, I wonder why people use stair…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 12:23 PM
30

The report proudly announces that this project is funded by the department of Homeland security...
/r/MensRights12/05/24 09:17 PM
13

It's more like women being scandalized that men don't want to remain silent when women say nonsensical things. It's the "I'm a queen" mentality in full display: not only should men accept to be considered less than an animal, but that they dare make it an issue IS also an issue for them. How dare the peasants run their mouth at the queens!
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 10:43 PM
2

Beauvoir wrote in the 1940s: The attitude of defiance of many American women proves that they are haunted by a sense of their femininity. In truth, to go for a walk with one’s eyes open is enough to demonstrate that humanity is divided into two classes of individuals whose clothes, faces, bodies, smiles, gaits, interests, and occupations are manifestly different. Perhaps these differences are superficial, perhaps they are destined to disappear. What is certain is that they do most obviously exis…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 10:27 PM
-2

Be allowed by who? Other men?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 10:20 PM
-3

The same consequences as when you interact with strangers. The reason any other person's ego is also your responsibility is because if you disregard or disrespect other people, they'll react to that. It's also why men have to be careful to respect women's ego, because they can cry rape or anything if they feel scorned. You thinking you owe respect to noone because you're a woman shows that you're thinking a little too highly of yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 10:19 PM
-10

It's not damned if you don't and damned if you do. It's about accepting the consequences of your choices. Women are so used to having everything handed to them that they would rather kowtow than have a spine. Beauvoir already noted that every right women got was never obtained by women but just handed by men. They're so used to that that women are incredulous that they have to actually say what they want, be it a raise or no date. They want to be treated like royalty that doesn't have to even ex…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 10:36 AM
1

You're using words I don't think you know what they mean. You're incorrigible. And that's why based laws about rape do not mention consent but actual means that aren't just declarative.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 10:21 AM
5

Oh suddenly we have to believe everything women say. These studies have a loose definition of rape and then take what women say at face value. Lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 10:17 AM
3

Spoken like a man with no concept of the law. Which law? Again, "event without consent" is precisely the issue: it is not enough to CLAIM that to make it true. Any proper sociology studies does NOT take declarative statement at face value, except obviously whatever women claim that happened to them because "believe all women". Yeah no. If a religious person would declare "God spoke to me", you'd be silly to take their words for it. By that count, we should say "God exists because X% of people ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 07:46 AM
4

Dude; if you consider this dialogue as "attempted rape", you need to review your definition.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 07:23 AM
5

Yes they do: Rape was defined as an event that occurred without the victim’s consent, that involved the use or threat of force to penetrate the victim’s vagina or anus by penis, tongue, fingers, or object, or the victim’s mouth by penis. The definition included both attempted and completed rape. '' "- Yo Claire. Let me stick my tongue in your pussy. Or you'll see who's the strongest. Get away you creep." This is counted as being a victim of rape according the criteria you just mentioned.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 06:32 AM
1

That still doesn't answer the question: detected and banned by WHO?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 11:41 AM
3

Anyone who does not share that goal must be banned the instant they are detected detect them. Banned and detected by WHO? The red pill police? Again, you sound like women who opportunistically gloss over enforcement of rules but are more than happy to be in charge of dictating rules. It's funny that you at once say that TRP isn't what should be and that there's a "rule zero" coming out of your ass, without realizing that by definition a rule is what defines what should be... I think the rule of …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 07:30 AM
2

are to be banned and shunned This is such a female attitude: social policing by reputation destruction and ostracism. You claim that TRP is about what is and not what should be, then why are you advocating that people should be shunned and banned?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 06:18 AM
3

Because they selected just males for that service.
/r/MensRights10/05/24 12:49 AM
3

No bear has ever made fake accusations to HR. I would choose working with bears rather than women. Checkmate!
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 11:40 PM
11

100% of paternity frauds are committed by women. So would you rather fuck a woman or an alligator?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 04:19 PM
7

1 in 5 women experience sexual violence since the age of 15 in Australia alone. Let's see what that definition of sexual violence is. This statistic changes to 1 in 3 when taking into account the entire world. Same. 9 out of 10 rape victims are female. Nearly 99% of perpetrators are male, against both female and male victims. In many countries like the UK, females CANNOT commit rape because of how the laws are worded. Then you are wondering why 99% of perps are male? Sorry but you can only count…
/r/MensRights08/05/24 09:30 AM
1

The word abuse has become meaningless because of how women equate it with things they don't like.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 01:01 AM
5

The servants are no longer willing! Who will serve us if it becomes widespread?
/r/MensRights07/05/24 12:05 AM
87

It's okay. We're not asking you to kill, just to be killed.
/r/MensRights04/05/24 01:52 PM
2

Women must still wonder why traffic accident deaths in statistics are "per vehicle km." and not just simply comparing the total death tolls...
/r/MensRights02/05/24 11:22 PM
13

We live in a world where people would rather give a freaking apex predator the benefit of the doubt over the average guy. Clown world. It's because women are hypergamous. They understand the bear is higher on the predator list than an indivual guy hence they go for it. It's the exact same reason why they go for the bad boy rather than the nice guy; it's their innate sexual drive: they open their legs for the top dog so if you're not it then it's a pass. The bear wins just like the bad boy did. O…
/r/MensRights02/05/24 11:19 AM
59

Next in feminist lecture, why you should be more afraid of mosquitoes than of bears because of malaria. Also, why the feeling of danger and danger mean the same thing when it's felt by a woman.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 09:54 AM
20

And the robber will cost you much less.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 12:54 PM
9

Dude, if foreskin is an obstacle to cleanliness, I wonder what you ass crack looks like.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 12:06 PM
25

Dude, your dick is easy to clean in all circumstances. I don't why Americans insist on that silly argument. As for what women say about what a dick should look like, who cares, it's made to be inside her, not to look at. Do they think their labia are all aesthetically pleasing? People born blind also don't miss their eyes because they have no concept of vision. Should we blind everyone at birht then? They wouldn't miss it either so they would be no consent issue from your point of view since the…
/r/MensRights01/05/24 08:26 AM
17

It's about the idiocy of the hypothetical which is based on women often confusing fear and danger and thinking that because they fear something they are in danger.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 08:14 AM
14

Well, if you go browse twox, and look for "I shared the bear versus man dilemma with my boyfriend and didn't get the response I expected. Now I'm sad", and you will see it live how it unravels...
/r/MensRights01/05/24 08:01 AM
-1

This is relevant in the current ethnic cleansing happening in Palestine: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3594843 Of all noncombatants in the former Yugoslavia, adult civilian men were most likely to be massacred by enemy forces. Why, therefore, did international agencies mandated with the "protection of civilians" evacuate women and children, but not military-age men, from besieged areas? But who gives a fuck, they were just men and teenage boys. We must pity their wives and mothers, they are the p…
/r/MensRights01/05/24 06:54 AM
1

So when the homeless dude yells a crude come-on to me downtown, that's my level? Yes. When some boomer Uber driver makes passes at me, that's my level? Yes. Ivguess that means women who got fucked by Chad aren't delusional after all! He hit on them, so that's clearly their level. Right? Men limit themselves a little upward but can fuck downward to way below. That's what women fail to understand. Young men can stick their dick where you wouldn't stick the tip of your umbrella.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 06:13 AM
1

Achievement and the feeling of achievement are two different things. Do not mistake one for the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/24 01:16 AM
1

Nope, it's just straight disgust when men act out towards women who aren't remotely attracted to them. Why should men care to act only after women are attracted? No one wants to deal with the sexual desire of someone who repels them Well if you're going to assume that any interaction with you is the expression of sexual desire towards you, then no wonder. Think from the other perspective, men have to actually deal with you! That's quite a burden too.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 04:32 PM
1

Damn shame so many men are determined to sexually harass women who are disgusted by them. That's how you want to portray it in order to save your ego from realizing that the men you are disgusted by are actually at your level in the sexual dating market. Men hit on at their level, women aim higher because of their hypergamy. What disgusts you is that if disgusting men hit on you it just means it is a reality check of your real level, and not the level you wish to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 03:27 PM
0

Just getting a sex partner wasn't what felt like an achievement. That's because you are a woman. You don't get a sex partner. Your sex partner gets you. As for pleasing a man, or skills, or whatever, calling that an achievement makes it sound like you are making it more complicated than it needs to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 03:24 PM
0

I don’t care who enforces it or how, Of course you don't, because it is never a woman's job. Until the enforcers start enforcing whatever they want, then suddenly you'll come and cry about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 01:09 PM
1

What the fuck it shows I have a mortgage and insurance and utilities to pay and people who fuck around with my livelihood deserve to get chucked into the street. "chucked to the street", but not by you. That's the whole point. Women always revert to the passive voice when it comes to enforcement because all enforcement is done by men.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 01:00 PM
0

The word insecure and creepy are just defense mechanisms for women. Women lob them as a shit test and to justify their sorting of men into alpha and beta. The fact that you gloat about what you do AT WORK with men making an innuendo or a joke shows you know that you can do that because you have the backing of the whole HR institution and you know men know their job might be at stake. But in another environment, one on one, I bet you're just shutting your mouth because you know you're unable to s…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 02:14 AM
-2

Achievement is a word reserved for things difficult to do. There's nothing sexual that an 18 years old woman can consider an achievement, she only needs to want it and someone will oblige. That's not an achievement.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 02:06 AM
0

No added pejorative for men? Except it's a patriarchy where they need to check their privilege... No need to add pejorative since it's the default gaslighting. It's like the Global gender gap report: When men are ahead it's an unacceptable gender gap. When women are ahead it's "exceeding parity benchmark". "The ick" is the new pejorative of the year. Women absolutely use pejorative about men but they don't consider them pejorative, that's even worse. Men know they're using a pejorative when they…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 01:52 AM
0

So you're a Boss bitch to some but not to all. The interesting part will be the separating criteria for these two categories.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 01:46 AM
-8

There was a study of women's daily food intake based on what they declared eating of course, and one researcher pointed at that taking women's declaration about what they ate at face value would mean that American women were all starving or anorexic. Women are like the USSR: "They lie. We know they lie. They know we know they lie. But they keep lying." And that's why the red pill first lesson is: don't listen to what women say, look at what they do.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 01:45 AM
0

I've been accused of virtue-signaling when I've said height isn't the most important thing to me as a short woman. It's always telling how people reframe their interaction to fit their narrative. Noone would accuse you of virtue signaling if you said height isn't THE MOST important thing. People would do so if you said height is NOT important.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 01:38 AM
-1

It is OK to stop in the middle of sex if the sex isn't going anywhere. Isn't going anywhere for who?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 01:33 AM
81

Because women disengaging from men makes them even bigger consumers. Men disengaging from women not only turn them into worse consumers, but often removes a wage slave with an indispensable job.
/r/MensRights29/04/24 01:31 AM
1

That's not a reach at all, it is a logical conclusion to the statement that sexuality is socially constructed.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 10:18 AM
1

If women were socially made to deal with men sexually and lovingly, this means that women's heterosexuality and love are only a social construct, and thus are not natural but just socially made up. This means that conversion therapy is valid according to this logic since sexuality is the product of religion and cultural backdrop, which can be reversed. I think not.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 03:22 AM
3

women would close up shop and stop dealing with men sexually or lovingly. Do you think that women started dealing with men sexually and lovingly in the 1960s?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 02:56 AM
–

More like she wants to tie HIM up.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 02:46 AM
–

Repressed catholic girls are not into submissive stuff in bed, quite the contrary. The trope is that they are very willing and aggressive in bed contrary to how they are outside. They would be the mirror case of the boss babe who's into choking and being facefucked tied up. By this count, the spread of feminist women and boss babes would increase the number of women who are into violent submissive sex acts. Guys oblige because they think they have to and want to. Because your dick gets hard wank…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 02:06 AM
–

I don’t believe that your statement applies to a large enough group of people to hold any weight. It's funny how the people demanding sources to others for their claim are the first to forego providing sources for their own claims. You can’t just make a sweeping claim like “the more dominant/independent they are irl, the more submissive they are in bed and this proves that women like to be submissive to men” and not expect to be challenged Another of "So you're saying" straw man... If you want t…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 01:51 AM
–

If you're not submissive 95% of the time and really submissive 5%, are you really hiding that you are indeed submissive? Not that sure. I've seen a lot of boss babes who are really trying to get put in place and get some form of pushback from their antics. That's how they feel noticed and valued. They're insufferable unless you stand your ground and then they consider you like some kind of valuable person unlike all of the other people they walk on. Some freaky daddy issues in my opinion. I don'…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 01:41 AM
–

Oh my god. A woman saying "but not all" thinking it's an argument. Yes, when speaking about any group of people in a meaningful way, one has to generalize.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 01:32 AM
–

Then the question is why do you like to be dominated and why being dominated by being choked is sexy but not by being pissed on (I assume). Unlike what you say, what people find sexy and like can be analyzed. Also I would do sexual things that I don't necessarily like for a man, as long as he would do the same for me. Sex should be enjoyed by both parties If you're doing things you don't really like then it's not enjoyable by both parties. Thus if you think sex must be enjoyed by both and you're…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 01:26 AM
–

But it seems to be working on a compensation system: the more they claim to be boss girls and equal, the more they tend to be in degrading shit in bed. It's like their psyche cannot live without being dominated and they must compensate if they're not submissive in their every day life.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 01:11 AM
–

Shaving is a very American thing. And even then, I doubt any guy would pack up his dick and leave upon meeting a natural bush. It's funny how you frame choking as something that men should be ok with because it excites you. If men are into pissing on you would you consider it unfair to shame women who allow that? As for choking, the question is what is sexy about it...
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 01:04 AM
2

As usual, comparing hours spent allows to ignore efficiency differences. It's like claiming you ran more than me because you did a marathon in 4 hours while I did it in 3. Single men living alone and single women living alone do not spend the same time on house chores because as for any physical activity, men are more efficient at it.
/r/MensRights28/04/24 12:38 AM
1

I am not the one to speak of untermenschen.
/r/MensRights27/04/24 01:02 AM
1

You are stitching two different parts and removing IF clauses: Voluntary termination of a pregnancy may, at any time, be carried out IF two doctors who are members of a multidisciplinary team certify, after this team has rendered its advisory opinion, either that the continuation of the pregnancy seriously endangers health. of the woman, or that there is a high probability that the unborn child will be affected by a particularly serious condition recognized as incurable at the time of diagnosis.…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 12:58 AM
2

You mistook the law in the UK for that in France from your linked article. What you said is incorrect for France https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/article_lc/LEGIARTI000043896164 The only two reasons are 1. major risk for the mother's life or 2. The fetus has an incurable life threatening disease. The two doctors have to be an obgyn and a specialist of the mother's or child disease. The only time a psychiatrist is mentioned is whenever there's an abortion to reduce the number of embryos becau…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 11:17 PM
2

Abortion was never allowed until birth. When first made legal it was until the 12th week and it's been pushed to the 14th week to align it with many European countries. Most European countries have abortion laws that would be considered very restrictive in the US during roe v. wade.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 10:28 PM
2

Sorry but: Abortion has been added to our constitution as human right, it cannot change The French constitution can be changed very easily. It's done every other year. no prenup is the standard, everyone keeps what was made before and splits what was made during the mariage. That's incorrect. Prenup, contrat de mariage in french, is mandatory. There are 3 standard ones: separate assets, common assets, common marital assets, and then you can have anything a lawyer makes. By default everyone gets …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 10:20 PM
7

This is textbook concern trolling... It's another attempt at trying to save the idea of feminism by trying to label as misogynistic anyone who dares to point that feminism is just a front for the elites to subjugate the mass of men with the complicity of women who are too narcissistic to understand that they have less in common with females of the elite than with males of their social class. Pointing at this goal of feminism and at the complicity of women in it, to their own detriment, gets you …
/r/MensRights26/04/24 12:06 AM
42

What's revealing about this issue is that if a man has ED it means something is wrong with him and if the woman cannot get off it also means something is wrong with him. Women are so adverse to responsibility that they don't even want it for their own sexual pleasure.
/r/MensRights25/04/24 12:09 AM
11

More like for tax dodging.
/r/MensRights22/04/24 11:59 PM
1

Yes they are unfortunately...
/r/MensRights22/04/24 05:30 AM
1

The number of simps confirm that.
/r/MensRights21/04/24 02:55 PM
1

"Who set that system up"? "Women. By giving pussy to the winners of that system, those who make money, they create, incentivize and perpetuate the so-called patriarchy."
/r/MensRights21/04/24 01:16 AM
5

This is plain misunderstanding of statistics. The divorce rate is NOT the odds of a marriage ending in divorce. The divorce rate is the number of divorce per 1000 and the marriage rate is the same. The thing is in Europe people stopped marrying so the marriage rate is falling. However people keep divorcing from previous marriages. So the two rates are converging. You can even have MORE divorces than marriages in a given year. Would you then consider that you have 110% chance of divorcing if you …
/r/MensRights20/04/24 02:16 AM
–

By that count, US supreme court concurring opinions are circle jerking... Reaching the same conclusion with different arguments is not circle jerking for anyone vaguely familiar with debating.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/24 12:13 PM
0

Pointing a double standard isn't circle jerking.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/24 03:45 AM
1

It takes a while before it happens though.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 03:46 PM
3

That's what women tell themselves to cope with the ghosting. Unless she's nuts, men certainly won't ghost a better looking woman willing to have sex with them...
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 10:20 AM
4

Sex is not assigned at birth, it's recognized. That's very different. If sex was assigned at birth you couldn't have gender reveals.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 11:43 PM
22

https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GGGR_2023.pdf page 64: Truncating the data at the equality benchmarks for each assigns the same score to a country that has reached parity between women and men and one where women have surpassed men. The type of rating scale chosen determines whether the index is rewarding women’s empowerment or gender equality. To capture gender equality, two possible scales were considered. One was a negative-positive scale capturing the size and direction of the gender gap. …
/r/MensRights17/04/24 10:34 PM
108

As the Global Gender Gap report puts it when there's a gap favoring women: This is not a gender gap, this is exceeding parity benchmark. War is peace. Liberty is slavery. Feminism is equality.
/r/MensRights17/04/24 02:46 PM
0

When a man trusts a woman's mouth around his dick.. I think you are overvaluing the trust needed for putting your dick into something. There is a sub called "don't put your dick in it" for a reason...
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 12:05 PM
–

You still don't get that this grouping, egalitarian and primary, are hiding the couples realty. With this "egalitarian earners" women can still engage in hypergamy for 100% of them and still they'd be labeled as "egalitarian earners".
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 10:04 PM
–

The fact remains that 52% of wives with a Bachelor's are married to men who make as much or less than them. How many of these 52% make as much and how many make more? Another dubious grouping...
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 09:45 PM
–

Where did you get your figures from? Here: https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.1908630116 I doubt that if the overall figure is 39% of couples meeting online then somehow young women is 14%.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 09:22 PM
–

The issue is that we don't have the distribution and only the grouping Pew artificially created. Considering that 60% of income is "main breadwinner" seems like a dubious label. We don't know if there's a drop off in the distribution or of it's linearly distributed, which I doubt. Thus the cutoff point is very important. I doubt that a couple where one earns 3k a month and the other 2k would consider one to be the main breadwinner. They're both necessary and they both know that. Furthermore, the…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 09:15 PM
–

I mean we’re still coming off of a system where women’s only economic opportunity was choice of husband. Wasn’t it just the 70s that women got to have bank accounts and credit? Women have always worked. People trying to pretend that the fate of upperclass women of the 19th and 20th century was the fate of women throughout history are just ignorant because they heard too much feminist bullshit. Also women couldn't open account and credit card without their husband's permission because women could…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 09:02 PM
–

That's a ridiculous definition of breadwinner and I suspect it's there to produce that very statistics. And yet: Breadwinner wives are still in the minority. Relatively few marriages (6%) have a wife who is the sole breadwinner, and wives are the primary breadwinners in 10% of marriages today. The share of marriages where the wife is the sole or primary breadwinner has increased from 5% in 1972 to 16% today.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 08:47 PM
–

That's a ridiculous definition of breadwinner and I suspect it's there to produce that very statistics.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 08:47 PM
–

Women fail to understand that a potential is a potential. It's not because you play the lottery that you'll win. Women want it all and pretend they can have it all. Anyone with half a brain knows that that's not possible because everyone has only 24 hours a day so you'll have to choose at some point. But let's pretend women all have careers instead of jobs and that they can be boss girls and mums too. Girls, it's like the chips and ice cream: you cannot feed on that and not look it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 08:46 PM
–

How many women have you dated?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 08:41 PM
–

The majority of couples are now made online. Apps allowed women's hypergamy to run amok and then women are surprised of the result: hook-up culture. Well duh! Consequences, consequences!
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 08:40 PM
61

The elites at the NYT are starting to worry. Politically they see a conservative backlash lead by young men. If young men now are unusually conservative, wait until they get older. But more than the political backlash that can be ridden away (the makers of the NYT will do well with democrats or republicans in power), they start to fear the disengagement of young men. Because society rests on young men's work and more importantly, no society can survive with young men opposing it. It is the young…
/r/MensRights14/04/24 10:36 PM
19

Feminists, of course, worship authoritarian corporations controlling them. "It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers−out of unorthodoxy." - Orwell, 1984 That's why elites push women in all places: they're obedient and diligent.
/r/MensRights14/04/24 10:24 PM
2

As I explained, the Japanese parent, mother or father, gets sole parental authority because they're the only ones with a family registry. There is no favoring of the mother because she's the mother. There's a favoring of the Japanese parent because he or she is Japanese.
/r/MensRights14/04/24 02:16 AM
4

Women do NOT automatically get parental authority in Japan.
/r/MensRights13/04/24 10:23 PM
28

That's incorrect. Japan doesn't recognize shared parental authority so only one parent gets it because the kid must be registered in one family registry. Judges don't meddle in who gets it unless there's a conflict so it's basically what the future ex spouses decide regarding custody and who gets parental authority. See the case of former PM Koizumi as a good case. However, a foreign parent cannot really have such parental authority because they don't have a family registry to register the kid i…
/r/MensRights13/04/24 04:21 PM
39

You should link to this comment for better info: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1arw8fp/comment/kqmubxn/
/r/MensRights11/04/24 03:08 PM
15

Noone "allows" men to age... The reason why men aging isn't a big deal is because men can still do things expected of them as they age. If the only thing you have to do is look pretty and have a baby, then of course you will no longer be considered useful once you age because you won't be able to do either.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 03:50 AM
0

It's funny how women have to couch anything they dislike as "threatening", "insecure", "hate", etc. It shows how women are really rarely able to lift themselves beyond their own feelings. That's why every other post on twoX is titled "I'm tired of" "I'm scared of", etc. So no, no man is threatened by makeup. And pretending that OP pointing that make-up is deception means he's threatened by it is just a rhetorical trick to not argue the point. Which is a common trick women do in person to avoid t…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 08:37 AM
98

Many of them claim to want to help, really just want to criticize this sub for not “caring about women enough”. We should be very wary of an influx of women who claim to want to help. They're concern trolls: https://www.dictionary.com/e/slang/concern-troll/ Best way is to ignore them and not to engage.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 07:24 AM
19

If the government doesn't have the right to tell women to carry the baby to term then the government shouldn't have the right to tell men to go die in wars Body autonomy for all or for none.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 03:19 AM
51

Feminists rewriting history to fit their narrative? How surprising!
/r/MensRights09/04/24 11:40 AM
6

There are magnitude less sugar babies in their 40s than in their 20s.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/24 04:26 AM
1

Not really. That's a 1960s trope. It's been decades that people no longer have secretaries and that women initiate most divorces.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/24 04:25 AM
3

They have broad appeal but I doubt at 40 a lot can do sugaring when you can have a 25 years old. As for "being successful" being attractive, it was always a proxy for "having money".
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/24 03:08 AM
5

The main downside for men is likely that career success/financial status no longer has any significant appeal on their "SMV." You need the finances to be a sugar daddy, so it is still significant. Between sugaring, OF and the cock carousel, modern young American women have broken down into three different parts the core of what relations used to be: you were financially supporting her, she was getting pretty for you and sucking your cock. It'll take a generation for women to collectively realize…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/24 02:50 AM
7

Because if women couldn't express their feefees, they'd have nothing to say (note how posts starting with "I feel/ I'm tired/ I hate" are common in female spaces). But men are expected to express constructed and argued discourse, not their feelings. It's the low social expectation common for women (how women are praised for the simplest things) because they always have a safety net to fall back onto. Women are always catered to, so navel gazing is their default way of communicating: how they fee…
/r/MensRights05/04/24 10:31 PM
13

In theory, anyone can know a topic. The issue is that feminists reduce men to their supposed feelings (hate, insecurities, etc.), and therein lies the problem: noone really knows others feelings so it's very presumptuous to assume what these are. This issue would not exist if feminists would not stem their discourse on men's supposed feelings, but on actual facts and actions. But that would be patriarchy already!
/r/MensRights02/04/24 12:53 AM
15

You know how suddenly pro abortion people find abortion problematic? When you say that sex based abortion should be totally acceptable. Then somehow, it becomes an issue to want to abort because to the baby is female. The fetus also suddenly becomes a baby. It shows how bodily autonomy is a fake argument by the pro choice crowd since this body autonomy is never extended to males (see conscription or circumcision). So no, abortion right isn't men's rights. It's evidence of how little rights men h…
/r/MensRights02/04/24 12:48 AM
3

Women drawing social benefits is the sign of a progressive society, men drawing social benefits, problem. It's funny how they shot themselves in the foot and made life on the dole playing video games more worthy than working. Well, if the rules of the game is so rigged that one set of players cannot win, don't complain that they don't play.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 04:06 AM
45

Only if it's a good choice. Women choose well? Yass queen! Women don't choose well? Society!
/r/MensRights01/04/24 01:35 AM
4

Because feminism perfectly aligns with the interests of the elite. It's the perfect controlled opposition: "Hey morons, the reason you're fucked is because I'm a man in charge. Let's put my wife in charge instead, it will sure change your lot." Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 01:07 AM
0

Another postmodernist not knowing the difference between discourse on reality and reality itself...
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/24 12:06 AM
1

I don't think you understand what reconstruct mean.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/24 11:34 PM
1

"more necessary"? Do you even understand what necessary mean? Again, the fact that you're unable to understand the meaning of basic concepts and that you want to make it personal because you have no argument and that you can only parrot, shows the foolishness of your position.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/24 11:32 PM
19

No feminists do not care about equality, or only in the Global gender gap report way, that is, by only looking at when women are behind and demanding equality then but when men are behind labeling the situation as "exceeding parity benchmark". Feminism is just a grift from middle class women. They're like duchesses pretending they're oppressed by the peasants because they can't be kings.
/r/MensRights30/03/24 11:24 PM
1

If you can't understand the difference between a gender and a person, I suggest you start with a dictionary. It's funny to witness all the evasive maneuvers women go at length to to not recognize the simple fact that all the material perks of civilization they enjoy are made by men.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/24 11:17 PM
0

The argument isn't about which gender is superior, but about which builds everything and is thus necessary to the other for its material sustenance.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/24 11:08 PM
-2

Aside from an ad hominem, do you have any argument against the point? It's funny to see how women are so used to scoring social points in real life with ad hominem and white knights that they're unable to argue logically online when this technique doesn't work since there's no crowd to appeal to...
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/24 10:59 PM
3

Girl, the fact you pretend that "women were kept out of work until WW2" shows precisely the kind of delusions that your reconstructed history is.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/24 10:43 PM
-2

Who feeds the female organism again? Even the only female contribution isn't totally women's...
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/24 10:26 PM
4

So this means that women have only value so long they have kids... Ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/24 10:24 PM
4

Stop taking marvel comic books for history books...
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/24 10:21 PM
-4

Which shows that you have no argument against it. Laugh all you want but look around you: everything you see was built by men. And that shows precisely which gender is actually useful and needed in practice.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/24 10:17 PM
-4

You will have to explain your premise, that people who loathe other people cannot give proper advice to them. Look, I'm sure that Gordon Ramsay could not stand most of the folks he came across in those shitty restaurant. Only a woman would thus conclude that any advice Gordon Ramsay would give is simply invalid because Gordon Ramsay despises the person he gives advice to. This shows women confuse the message with the messenger, and how they are basically unable to be professional.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 12:41 PM
12

"Believe all women."
/r/MensRights25/03/24 04:59 AM
1

Remember, if SHE does not get excited, it is HIS fault, and if HE does not get excited, it is also HIS fault.
/r/MensRights25/03/24 04:16 AM
11

Almost all feminist concepts, patriarchy, toxic masculinity, the male gaze, etc. are just rhetorical tricks with no explanatory power since they can be used to explain everything and the opposite: It benefits men? Patriarchy. It doesn't benefit women? Patriarchy. It doesn't benefit men? Still patriarchy. It benefits women? Benevolent patriarchy! It's like saying heads I win, tail you lose. When you start reading the so-called scientific literature of feminists, it's just non sequitur political s…
/r/MensRights24/03/24 03:03 AM
10

Feminism has achieved many impressive advances for women and girls as well as men and boys (Gamble, 2004; Javaid, 2016). The source for this claim about "as well as men and boys" is a paper (Javaid 2016) that says: This paper argues that, although feminist explanations of rape are robust and comprehensive, male victims of rape have largely been excluded from this field of research. While feminism has enabled the victimisation of women to be recognised, further understanding of the victimisation …
/r/MensRights23/03/24 11:35 PM
2

Remember guys: if she cannot get you excited, it's your fault, and if you cannot get her excited, it's your fault too.
/r/MensRights23/03/24 01:02 AM
-1

I don't think you understand what a sperm is...
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/24 10:18 AM
1

Well it's something like 28 or something nowadays. Bringing it down to 24 would mean lasting 16 years of a gender imbalance of 1.25.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/24 01:24 AM
1

With a steep gender difference of 125 men for 100 women, the men's age would increase of 1 year every 4 years. This means that a whole century would be needed to increase the age difference by 25 years. Women's age can be lowered too for that. So it's not doable forever but it'll last longer than oil usage.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/24 01:06 AM
1

To give birth no, but to be fertilized yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/24 12:55 AM
1

I don't know about India but with sex selective abortion in China, there's a big misunderstanding: it doesn't reflect a preference for sons, but a necessity for them. The sex ratio at birth in China really depends on children rank: for first born, it's normal, showing no preference for kids of either gender. For second born, way more sons, and even more so for third born. The fact is that families need A son because he's responsible for supporting elderly parents. Also there's a very simple way …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/24 12:53 AM
1

Except it's not a terrible idea because they will have children who embrace an egoist and materialist mindset. This is actually telling of how people negate the role of the father in the children's upbringing to assume that because the mother is egoist and materialist, then the children will, "no doubt", be the same. It's a terrible idea because it implies an inflated ego, whether there will be children or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/24 11:39 PM
0

She claims that invisibility is good except when she's not invisible. The fact that women don't see any issue with such a claim proves exactly why they're not reliable narrator.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/24 10:06 PM
1

So it's good to be invisible except when you're not. Great take indeed.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/24 10:02 PM
1

The two are not incompatible.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/24 10:01 PM
0

If you say it's nice to not be chatted up on, you're bitching about being hit on... But of course, your gratefulness about invisibility doesn't extend to men noticing a pregnant woman and offering their seat and what not. You like invisibility only when you can profit from it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/24 11:46 AM
0

She said it was so nice to not be hit on, only to have men leave their seat for her as a pregnant woma. She doesn't understand what invisibility means.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/24 11:43 AM
51

Married off at 18 with single income families. Single income family is typical of the bourgeois class of the 19th century and of the general population just after WW2. That's it. Otherwise women have always worked. Yes, their work has always been secondary (which does not mean it was not important), but the idea that women were just laying around taking care of kids around the farm is really feminist ahistorical nonsense. They have this idea because feminists ARE bourgeois from the 19th century.…
/r/MensRights19/03/24 06:49 AM
42

"This is a man's world" as James Brown sang does not mean it is a world made for men. It means it is a world built by men. Women do not understand the difference because they actually don't build things, they just use them.
/r/MensRights19/03/24 06:45 AM
3

So any woman who has married a man after this hypothetical point, are not attracted to their partners? The wall is when women need to get with men of their level after having been upgraded for a decade because of their youth by men above their league, who were happy to just have sex with them because men can scoop very low for a fuck. And women misunderstand that as a sign of interest in them and a sign of how attractive they are. This made women feel like the men they are attracted to are someh…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/24 06:07 AM
0

I got what you meant. I pointed that for you you equated invisibility with invisibility for sex. It shows that women clearly know what they are noticed for, and bitch when they are not seen as potential sexual object because they can no longer leverage that over men.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/24 05:19 AM
1

But the one thing that really gets my goat, is when men tell women what the women think and feel. Because women are mostly unable to say truthfully what they think and feel. Best example is women saying they want nice guys and fucking with bad boys. Men acknowledge the discrepancy between what women say and what they do and since what they do is what really reflects what they think and feel, men can know what women truly think and feel. And when men point that out to women, exposing women's doub…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/24 02:43 AM
2

The wall is when she's no longer attractive for the men she finds attractive and thus she needs to settle if she wants a relationship or needs to come to terms that she'll most likely be a booty call.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/24 02:08 AM
-4

It's funny how you equate having men noticing you to offer help with being invisible. Here it is men, another example of women using words to mean something else, along with the classics like "I'm fine", "I'm not this kind of girl" and of course, "No"...
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/24 02:01 AM
-2

The best ED medicine is women, naked, young and willing.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/24 01:56 AM
-1

Quality of life is more valuable than quantity of life (years lived). People always say that when it is about other people's lives. How convenient.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/24 10:52 AM
-2

Women in rich countries have way more abortions, which shows that they are obviously unable to think about the consequences of their own actions, like opening their legs. At least poor people have the kids and own up their own actions and deal with the consequences. So no, your take is not realistic, it is just patronizing and blatantly ignorant: women in rich countries are more keen to NOT think about the consequences of their actions precisely because the societies they live in have enough res…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/24 07:51 AM
1

We women want men to actually care about our well-being, respect our views, communicate properly, and be worthy of our time plus trust. "Worthy of our time" is the reddest of the red flag. It shows a superiority complex that women never shed, and deep down they think they are worth more than men are. Like, girl, time is the same for everyone. What makes you are worthy of other people's time? It's interesting how women are always assuming that they themselves are worthy of any man's time by just …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/24 07:47 AM
-1

People in poor countries are usually forced or pressured into sex which results in kids or they don’t think about the consequences of their actions and the poor kid is forced to suffer poverty. Man, the level of delusional patronizing in this comment is off the chart.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/24 07:31 AM
64

"believe all women"
/r/MensRights18/03/24 02:03 AM
-1

If "no resources no babies" were true, you wouldn't find the highest birthrates in poor countries or poor people.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/24 01:02 AM
1

"modern western society" is often a misnomer because it's just used to mean "English speaking and Northern European"... it's pretty telling that you rightfully concluded about "the US in 2024", which is quite different from the title. Relations between genders are quite different within the West, Sweden vs. Portugal for example. It's actually an interesting thing to see, the effects of theories cooked up in one culture when imported in a different one. See for example how modern American gender …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 01:14 AM
2

This is the same argument as fundamental Christians that say, “Fine Darwinists, micro evolution is provably true since literally you can observe it, but macro evolution is unprovable so therefore gimme money. FYI, Darwin didn't come up with the idea of evolution. Lamarck had a theory of evolution long before Darwin. Darwin came up with the idea of natural selection... And the objection to natural selection driving speciation isn't something that initially comes from American Christian evangelist…
/r/MensRights15/03/24 12:39 AM
268

Women will get drafted but not in combat positions I bet. I too wouldn't mind being sent to war so much if it is to serve breakfast in the rear. If women get to decide policies by being able to vote, they should be sent to die to defend those policies like men are. If not, then don't come pretend that women and men are equal.
/r/MensRights14/03/24 08:40 AM
3

Women consider an apt description of their behavior to be hating them... that's only because they never truly consider their behavior unless confronted with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 04:03 AM
23

"There is no feminist in house fire." - Bill Burr And we should add: in any shitty situations. It's equality for the good stuff, never for the bad.
/r/MensRights13/03/24 05:54 PM
25

By many you mean 0.01% Impressive share for those who always demand equality. You don't hear any feminist bitching about THAT gender gap.
/r/MensRights13/03/24 11:22 AM
0

Women are the leading cause of deaths of newborns. It's time we address this issue and pretend that women are dangerous for newborns. Alternatively, we could educate women to understand statistics but that would be a tall order.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/24 11:18 AM
-2

The total inability to compare your own situation and that of others in order to assess proper danger. Women are far less likely victim of violent crime than men, yet they behave like they are way more at risk. It's like making a stink that airplanes are dangerous and preferring cars, just because you're can drive one and not the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/24 11:16 AM
12

Then to the group you oh so surprisingly belong to... 35 years old college educated white American woman having empathy for the plight of all 35 years old college educated white American women...
/r/MensRights13/03/24 11:12 AM
-11

Performative navel gazing. Their life is so devoid of dangers that they must invent some. It's a variation of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Princess_and_the_Pea
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/24 09:05 AM
-1

I say wasting my body not for a woman who has sex but sex with a man who’s not deeply emotionally invested in her. If you need to qualify sex so that it is not inherently damaging to women, then by default, sex is damaging to women. Don't worry, you can consider that an erection as emotional investment. Thus every time a man has a hard on, then he is emotionally invested, for a few minutes at least. Men saying it is considered sexist because of the men who pursue casual sex all the while looking…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/24 07:13 AM
1

You say "wasting" your body for a woman who has sex. No man thinks like that about his own body but most men agree that women racking up bodies doesn't do good to her. But when men say it, we're told it's sexist or in no position to speak for women... That doesn't prevent men from noticing they're right about it though.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/24 02:07 AM
76

Just look at Ukraine for anyone doubting this fact. Women voted equally yet they bounced out as soon as shit hit the fan. They have no issues with the men being sent to die in war while women go abroad and do what women do in time of hardship, latch on less unfortunate men to continue to extract resources. And no qualms if it means sleeping with them.
/r/MensRights13/03/24 01:38 AM
154

If the tables are turned, men invent painkillers. That's the difference between men and women. Men empathize and are solution driven.
/r/MensRights13/03/24 01:34 AM
106

To themselves. Empathy and concern about themselves. That's an important qualifier but they never mention it because by default, whatever women do or think about is themselves. Their navel gazing world view reduces everything to their own issues and thus have to ignore or deride anything that's not about themselves. And it's funny how this "man flu" thing is such an English speaking phenomenon. It is only a reflection of American women's discourse rather than observation of facts.
/r/MensRights13/03/24 01:32 AM
1

Good lord I don't fucking care about this talking point. Of course you don't because it invalidates the whole feminist discourse that there's a patriarchy built for men while in reality women extract more than they contribute from the current system. But since their greed is never ending, they always want more. No wonder the current elite, whose mentality aligns so well with that of women, greed and never ending consumption, promote women wherever they can. Women as a group is exactly like the 1…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/24 01:25 AM
21

If you want to keep the position of the person in charge of dishing out the social brownie points, you cannot be completely blind to the issues that you do not like. Think of this as the coins thrown at the peasants once in a while to try to calm them down. Feminists nodding to any form of men's issue, that they will blame on men anyway ("patriarchy"), is just them trying to keep their social relevance by not being excluded from the debates on these pressing issues, in order to inform them to th…
/r/MensRights12/03/24 05:32 PM
1

However, tons of men here seem okay with forcing women to date men we don't want. It's as if the hedging, sorry, the weasel words, women employ don't really work when not in person. We can clearly see the implication of the initial statement. Yeah, it forces women to do the same, and women also pay for the men in jail. Women are not net tax contributors throughout their lives. They extract more than they contribute, so don't complain about it. Men fund most of society, the least you could do is …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 05:12 PM
0

I don't care what men want. So why should men care about what women want? behaving how men want me to behave (within the confines of the law). Which is of course reflects how women want men to behave, how convenient. The same that now dare to bitch about "marital rape". Well girl, that was within the confines of the law then. How come when it is convenient, the confines of law is ok, but when it is not, then it is not... However, tons of men here seem okay with forcing women to date men we don't…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/24 10:21 AM
-2

You're confusing what men think for themselves and what society wants men to think for society. Men do not want a ran through 30 years old single mother as a mate, yet society pushes the narrative that she's perfectly qualified to be because if a sucker takes her on, that's one less liability society has to support. The very fact that you don't seem to be able to differentiate between individual interest for men and social interests shows that you are just used to women's situation, where their …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/24 03:30 PM
1

You're confusing two things: not respecting and condemning. Women having lots of casual sex is easy and thus not respected. After that, whether this is condemned or not is a different thing. Some do and some don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/24 11:00 AM
6

By men who start fight with you, you mean men you start fight with, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/24 01:48 AM
3

Go ahead and enlighten us about what evidence anthropology supposedly uses to describe social norms of humans from 15k years ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/24 02:36 AM
11

It's not male domination, it's competence domination.
/r/MensRights08/03/24 07:35 AM
3

But somehow women can decide whether men's worries are warranted or not. Are you larping as a red pill man?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 07:26 AM
19

Who kills new born babies? Women. Women kill babies. Thus new born babies should be removed from women and given to men because women kill babies. Great logic I see.
/r/MensRights08/03/24 04:30 AM
3

Please enlighten us at how you could possibly know the social standards of human nomads living 15 000 years ago. Please.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 02:38 AM
4

I'm not sure that random person on the internet discounting the whole field of evolutionary psychology because it goes against feminist axioms is very convincing though.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 02:13 AM
7

Not knowing something doesn't mean that that something doesn't exist. I don't know whether I'll have an accident yet I still put my seatbelt on. No one said that she's rejected a lot of men. The whole issue is about what she did in her past with other men, not what she didn't do. Men are very happy to be the chosen one after she rejected 20 other guys. But not after she accepted 20 other guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 02:11 AM
3

If you can't find the answer by googling it, you're an idiot. If you have a point to make, make it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 02:06 AM
3

Why should men have to fight for something that women automatically get? Funny how this newish feminist argument is a rehash of the ex pissed: "you didn't fight for me." It's like saying women get raped because they don't fight enough. Women get worse outcome from divorce because marriage is a subsidy to women by men, so once this stops, of course women fare worse, even if family court force men to keep subsidizing women in exchange of nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 02:05 AM
4

Source: trust me bro. I think you're confusing humans and chimpanzees.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 01:58 AM
5

It's interesting to see women womansplaining men to men...
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 01:57 AM
3

It's a fact that the past is indicative of the future. It's a fact that the more partners a woman has had the more likely she will leave a relationship. It's a fact that men get fucked by the family courts. Hence a woman with lots of past partners is not a good bet. It's a rational decision.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 01:55 AM
3

No. Because insecurities implied that it's a feeling borne of unwarranted worries. Which is not the case when you don't feel like being mister 35 in a woman's life.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 01:52 AM
5

It's called probability. It's like putting your seatbelt on: you're not insecure by doing so, you're rational to take some protection steps. Imagine if men kept calling women insecure for wanting to avoid walking alone in sketchy areas at night.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 01:50 AM
8

He does: hypergamy. She settles because she is no longer able to play in the upper league. It's like being offered a job after 20 people passed. The reason they passed is still existing, even if you don't know it first hand. So it's a big red flag. And when you are offered something after so many people, you know that you're not the optimum choice. Hence the higher chance of getting fired, ie divorce.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/24 01:42 AM
35

The constant disrespect directed at me by male students was one of the most degrading and dehumanizing aspects of my job. The problem with women in a position of authority is that they assume that because they have authority they should be respected. It's like those bullying cops with their "respect my authority" issue. When it's a man doing it, everyone can see the issue. But for women, it's their normal behavior because they run on social validation. Hence most don't understand that there are …
/r/MensRights06/03/24 02:18 PM
9

Why is it that the current cultural zeitgeist is so focused on women as if women were a specially-protected species? Because they are great at perpetuating the status quo. As Orwell noted in 1984: It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers−out of unorthodoxy. Perfect little soldiers to perpetuate a ruling class. Look at how it works out. You throw red herrings, like gender identi…
/r/MensRights06/03/24 05:31 AM
0

It's an American thing then. Don't try that in most of Europe though, you're in for a surprise.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/24 05:36 AM
0

In the US sure. Don't try that everywhere thinking it's as accepted as in the US.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/24 01:40 AM
5

He's been dead for a while now.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 09:15 AM
18

What enrages women about ncount is that it reverses their usual position of being the arbiters of social norms. Women love to yield the "ick", "creepy" and other Kevin Samuels SIGN language™ to lord over men to direct men's behavior. They like to be in that position, distributing good and bad points, wagging fingers and telling men what they should or shouldn't do. But the ncount completely reverses that: it's a purely male inner psychological aspect about women's behavior. Women who have been l…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 02:55 AM
69

And then women deny that indeed they all flock to the same small group of men...
/r/MensRights03/03/24 02:18 AM
1

No. Serfs were not owned. They were not slaves. They were tied to a land. And no a peasant wasn't a status.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/24 02:00 AM
1

Women consume more calories than they produce. They literally have free meals.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/24 09:35 AM
1

A peasant owned their own land and sold produce grown on it, while pledging a percentage to their local lord and to the church. You’re thinking serfs. Peasant is a job. Serf is a status. There were peasants who were tied to a land that belonged to a lord, serfs. There were free peasants that own their own land, and there were free peasants that rented the land they worked. They were all peasants. They were also serfs that were NOT peasants, but for example, managers of abbeys properties and such…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/24 09:32 AM
1

I don’t see where I claimed that women did provided all or most of the calories. You tried to equate tending a garden with tending a field. And you tried to pretend that providing "some" calories equals providing "all". People revolted when they did not have enough bread, NOT when they did not have enough carrots. Well yes, it’s indeed pretty hard to work the fields when you have been deliberately crippled with broken and bound feet to please men’s desire for a helpless immobile wife who cannot …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/24 03:16 AM
1

"widely". Lol. Please tell us when medieval peasants had bank accounts...
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/24 02:15 AM
1

Everyone paid to eat, one way or another. Women wanting a free meal is really showing their own delusions.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/24 02:03 AM
1

What do you think a dowry is? I'll let you think the most common situation. Nuns and old maids lived off their work. Ask a Franciscan for the first category and any 19th century governess for the second. Modern women thinking that their grandmothers were morons unable to live on their own is really something.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/24 02:01 AM
-1

Rape is a legal definition. If you're not smart enough to understand how it changed, there's nothing anyone can do for you. And as usual, women and their SIGN language. Kevin Samuels was spot on with this one.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/24 01:57 AM
–

Women don't fuck men. They get fucked by them. Men penetrate women, not the other way around. You get to choose who fucks you, not who you fuck. Because despite you having sex, you don't fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/24 01:49 AM
1

Because most of the calories from the neolithic to the industrial revolution have come from grains. Who do you think toil the field. Not the gardens. The fields. Even the Chinese character for man is 男, which means the force of the field. Don't try to pretend that supplementary intake is not supplementary.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/24 01:46 AM
1

Yep. Look at post WW1 french women. Despite the lack of men, almost 90% still did get married. If women in droves didn't want to pair up, they would have had the perfect conditions to not to. And yet they did. And before the 20th century, a smaller share of women got married and had children (and they had many more). So yeah, unlike what mindless feminist anhistoric narrative tells you, they were proportionally more women marrying and having kids in 1950 than in 1750. So those nuns and old maids…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/24 01:42 AM
1

Women spend more time doing house chores because: They're less efficient at them as shown by the discrepancy between single men living alone and single women living alone, where the latter spend 30% more time at doing the same things. Female hypergamy. Because couple have to arbitrate whose time is more valuable doing paid work outside. Because women choose most of the time men with more earnings potential than themselves, and openly so, then of course when the couple decide who should be in cha…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/24 01:32 AM
2

You can't even do a simple google search on marital duties? Try to see if refusal to have sex is ground for at fault divorce or not. Hell, even the Catholic church has no consummation as a reason to annul a marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 06:55 PM
-2

Old maids lived off their own work. And you didn't have to be a nun to be in a convent. Open to all.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 06:50 PM
1

Because you got married in the 21st century. No marital duties, nor fidelity duty...
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 06:47 PM
-4

No it doesn't. If you don't know the difference between a salary and other forms of income, it's ok. Just don't pretend that you do.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 06:46 PM
3

Let women have their own money. When do you think regular people started to have bank accounts? Silver and notes belonged to whoever carried them. So stop with the myth of women unable to have their own money. Another feminist fantasy... Women are paid less and were paid less because then and now, they're less productive.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 06:43 PM
1

And before supermarkets too. Who do you think worked the fields to grow food that women didn't pay to eat? The unpaid labor goes both ways...
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 06:40 PM
-2

You know what a nun or an old maid is? People did, for a reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 06:38 PM
-2

Consent to marriage is consent to marriage duties listed at the wedding. If you're not willing then don't go for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 06:37 PM
-1

You realize that bank accounts were not widespread before WW2 and credit cards before 1970? And the reason why wives couldn't get a credit card on their own is because the husband was responsible for any debt.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 06:34 PM
-2

So she was working to get a fraction of his salary, maybe, if he felt like it. Do you think that peasants earn and did earn a SALARY? Geez, 21st century women need some history books...
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 05:10 PM
-1

They had relatively much better opportunities to earn money than peasant women. By better opportunities you mean doing the heavy work.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 05:09 PM
-6

I suppose women have always been able to refuse their husbands Yes. That's why they can refuse their consent to marry and then, no husband. Simple.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 05:07 PM
-4

Then didn't have to get married. Plenty didn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 05:07 PM
-6

Once women were able to control when they got pregnant, everything else came with it. Women always have been able to control when they got pregnant. By deciding when to open their legs. Men invented means for them to do both at once.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 05:05 PM
–

it’s a difference in “love languages,” That's just a PC label. "My love language is to get $ and be the center of attention"... yeah right...
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 05:02 PM
2

In case you don't understand, "modern" is not something you are born with.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 03:04 AM
5

Why don't people just go and live their lives? Tell that to feminist institutions, the education system, the justice system, the government. That's quite the gang that prevents you from living your life. At least for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 01:40 AM
3

But not all western women refuse to acknowledge your humanity, dignity and value. In fact, i'd say barely any woman would refuse to acknowdlege that. What women say is most often virtue signaling. It's what they do that matters. And honestly, at this point, average western dudes have better pack up and meet women elsewhere. Just be with a modern, western, non-hateful woman who acknowledges your humanity, etc. and stop making a gender war. Feminists made it into a war and actively continue to do …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/24 01:35 AM
127

Remember, if it favors women, it's a natural factor or it's men's fault. If it favor's men, it's definitely not natural and it is also men's fault.
/r/MensRights29/02/24 12:14 PM
–

You're comparing watching porn to cheating? lol reaching.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/24 12:11 PM
–

Not all fishes are flying fishes indeed. But most fishes are not flying.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/24 10:02 AM
–

Touching yourself to acts of violence is much different than watching a movie lmao. Nope. That's basically women watching 50 shades of Grey.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/24 04:58 AM
2

It's not. It's the "Let people be free to sell their kidney if they want to" type of arguments. It makes no sense once you factor in the position people are in when they have to make such decision. If you allow paternity leave to be transferable, you're basically putting them in a position where they will have to transfer it.
/r/MensRights29/02/24 04:35 AM
4

Let people decide if they don't want to work 16 hours a day without a day off. We know where this kind of rhetoric leads to.
/r/MensRights29/02/24 04:26 AM
2

Again, you're missing the whole point: if you don't make it mandatory, then it won't happen. Like for most workers' rights. That's why paid holiday should be mandatory for example. France mandates that workers have 2 consecutive paid weeks off between March and October for the simple reason that if something is not mandatory, then the ever lowering pressure is sure going to prevent it from happening. And that's why French workers can take some time paid off without issue while American workers c…
/r/MensRights29/02/24 04:05 AM
3

Arguing the fringe is typical of feminist discourse. What has the situation of 0.1% of parents got to do with the issue at hand?
/r/MensRights29/02/24 03:52 AM
8

Parental leave is about workers, not parents. That's how any workers rights exists, because it's mandatory. If it weren't, you'd still be working in mines 16 hours a day. If you don't want it and be a pull up by my bootstrap dude, then be self-employed instead of whining about rights not to be a provider taken for granted.
/r/MensRights29/02/24 02:42 AM
3

No testes, no opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/24 02:07 AM
3

My body my choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/24 02:02 AM
–

If you think watching something means having the potential to do it, then you should be advocating for the interdiction of movies where killing is shown. It's like Tippy Gore's moral panic all over again.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/24 01:53 AM
83

Are they admitting that females everywhere, families and schools, isn't doing what they'd hoped it would for boys? Quelle surprise !
/r/MensRights27/02/24 06:50 AM
1

That's why you have to develop the robot as a housekeeper to help women. Once in every household, then you upgrade the sex functionality.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/24 02:32 AM
1

As usual, men are more efficient, even in suicide.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 02:57 AM
6

The anthem of Gen X: I'm a driver/I'm a winner/Things are gonna change, I can feel it. Soy un perdedor I'm a loser baby, so why don't you kill me? The get yourself up by the bootstrap to better yourself discourse is indeed too often for the benefit of others.
/r/MensRights24/02/24 01:30 AM
-1

The fact that 50 years old men want to knock up a 20 years old woman or a 35 is irrelevant to my point. The point is that if you need both hydrogen and oxygen to make water, you don't need to worry about hydrogen if you're running out of oxygen. Same here. Women's fertility decrease way before men's and thus men's fertility is almost never an issue because a 50 years old man married to a 20 years old woman is super rare. Women in their late thirties wanting a kid isn't rare.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 02:14 AM
0

You realize that "old age" for men talking about knocking up a woman means 45 or 50 and by then they are as fertile as a 34 years old woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 02:00 AM
0

We already have them for the kids born of geriatric pregnancy, so why not?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 01:47 AM
-1

Men who want to be parent. When they're at risk of fertility issues themselves, men usually don't want to be a parent. They're 60. Women's fertility is an issue because lots of women still want to be a parent when they reach the age where their fertility declines due to age.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 01:44 AM
-2

Because most men do not want to become a parent after they become old enough to have a significant decrease in fertility due to age. When men reach the same fertility as of a 35 year old woman, they are already grand parents. Hence it's a non issue. It's like no longer having an umbrella when there's no rain.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/24 01:40 AM
4

I'm not a damn charity. How often did you get a meal paid by your date? Were THEY a goddamn charity?
/r/MensRights22/02/24 06:30 AM
5

Sorry but that is silly. By this count, any prosecutor who fails to convince a jury would be jailed for falsely accusing someone who is not guilty (the prosecutor DID accuse the person of committing a crime). Outside of judicial procedures, accusations should be dealt with: If just done to the general public (typical metoo), then defamation if it is not proven true (and even in Japan, defamation law can apply on TRUE things, which seems weird at first but which isn't so when you think of it) If …
/r/MensRights22/02/24 06:28 AM
3

Nor have I had to give anything, except for two cases. If two is considered an exception, how big is the population considered? 50?
/r/MensRights22/02/24 04:30 AM
14

Where are they now? https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-20028797
/r/MensRights22/02/24 03:39 AM
89

Page managed to get a man’s number in Harrods and is going on a date with him later tonight. I can only bow down to such pick-up prowess. Who did she harass to get that number? Isn't it what women have been saying harassment is? You want to shop on your own quietly at Harrods and someone bothers you to get a number.] She should be metooed...
/r/MensRights21/02/24 10:02 AM
5

The "better yourself" narrative is just more of the be a better servant narrative.
/r/MensRights19/02/24 07:35 AM
34

Genital mutilation of new born babies: on females it's horrible, on males it's hygienic.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/24 06:53 AM
6

Prostate cancer is.
/r/MensRights19/02/24 02:40 AM
–

I can like people with high morals and still like people. You dropped the "only" in "only like". Most women aren't interested in disappointing sex, no matter how high their libido or desire. Precisely. They don't really like sex. Men do. With average girls starfishing too. Better than none. Because men like sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 06:49 PM
–

If you only like higher quality people, you don't really like people.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 06:38 PM
–

If you like sex only if it's with 2% of the population, then you don't like sex. If I don't want to eat hamburgers 98% of the time, then I don't like hamburgers. If I can only drink Vosne Romanée and no other red wine, then I don't like red wine...
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 02:54 PM
–

Because men can fuck women they don't find attractive. They're women. That's enough. The opposite isn't true.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/24 02:43 PM
27

Some reports say that 1 in 3 Japanese women become victims of groping at some point in their lives. Personally, I would say that the true number is more like 3 out of 3. Well no. Since many Japanese women report having NEVER been groped. Like you know, 2 out of 3.
/r/MensRights14/02/24 03:33 AM
0

Men’s is dirty or would be dirty due to lack of hygiene Just wash up your crotch lady. Stop the stains on your underwear and start having proper hygiene.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 12:47 PM
-9

Again, you don't need to explain why vaginal discharge is natural and normal more that I need to explain why excretion is natural and normal too. The issue at hand is dirty underwear, NOT, WHY the underwear is dirty. So I repeat it, women are the least well placed to lecture about stains in underwear.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 07:59 AM
-6

It's not about why your underwear is stained or dirty, it's about the fact that it is, and way more than any man's. So maybe women should ease on what they think is a shaming tactic with "ugh, man's nasty underwear" because if you want to discuss having clean underwear, I doubt that women are in a position of lecturing anyone about that.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 06:37 AM
-2

That's a projection issue: it's women who routinely have stained underwear, not men. Girl, clean your crouch for gods sake.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 01:59 AM
1

Yep because now they earn more and guys still think the household should also be on women’s shoulders. It's not the men who complain about household chores distribution.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/24 05:33 PM
-1

But obviously a lot of women don’t buy your shit reasoning anymore and young women outperform and outearn men…..so you are the one „bitching“ now. Funny how that works. And still they bitch about the gender gap... Funny indeed.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/24 05:08 PM
1

Men would also have to do it anyway without their wives or girlfriends…..so why they don’t do it? Because usually men earn more than women in a couple and thus the distribution of tasks among the two means it is more efficient for the couple to have the man spend 1 hour working overtime than spending it cleaning and have the woman spend an hour cleaning than working overtime. It is as simple as that. House chores discrepancy stems from: 1. the incorrect assumption that TIME SPENT equals equal wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/24 01:57 PM
3

Yeah, the men usually are paying for the first date because they want to. Not a single one of my guy friends complains about paying for first dates. And women do the cleaning because they want to. Not a single mother of my friends complained about doing the cleaning. I'll let you try to understand how valid such counter-argument is... ​ it seems like you’re exhibiting the same behavior you’re angry at women for doing: everything that’s good in a relationship is the bare minimum…so you actually c…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/24 01:38 PM
7

Men like women who earn less than them Nah. It's women who dislike that their husband earn less: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00031224211012442 our results provide robust evidence that male-breadwinner norms are a key driver of the association between men’s unemployment and the risk of separation. The magnitude of this mechanism is sizeable; an increase of one standard deviation in male-breadwinner norms increases the odds of separation associated with men’s unemployment by 32 percen…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/24 01:32 PM
4

Two income household does not mean that she pays anything for the house. She usually does not because she works less and earns less. Which she conveniently forgets when it comes to talk about equal house chores.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/24 01:26 PM
-1

Women don’t „bitch“ about cooking and cleaning, they „bitch“ about being the only one who cooks and cleans. Which they would have to do anyway. So why are they bitching? Do they forget who paid for the house?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/24 01:24 PM
0

Another stays up and makes sure she and her husband have dinner together every night because he works odd hours. That's just a given in some cultures where meals are important (literally what companion mean, with whom you have bread). Sure in the beginning a guy taking the time to plan a date would signal that he was interested, but once they got past date two for most of my friends it definitely became a shared task. At least you acknowledge that it is up to the man to pay upfront. And funnily …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/24 05:25 AM
0

You do realize in western society rape and abuse are crimes. A crime is about justice. Marital rape is now a crime but it didn't use to be. Mutilating the genitals of baby boys is not a crime but it is still mutilation. The qualification of what is a crime and what is not is irrelevant to whether that action can happen or not (hence me quoting Pascal's Justice is subject to dispute). Rape is a crime because OTHER MEN consider it a crime. So if a man rapes you, it shows that you do NOT have power…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/24 03:55 AM
1

Millions of people used to think the world was flat No. Millions of ignorant people NOW think that people used to think the world was flat. And I didn't even do that, since I answered neutrally about both partners. When one is talking, there is something called context. If you are going to ignore the terms of a question, you should explicitly do so, not implicitly so. If you don't, then don't come around saying people are morons because they didn't understand what you wrote. - What music do you …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/24 03:49 AM
0

Ugh…we want to be sexually dominated at times due to evolutionary biology. We DONT want to submit our will to a man’s simply because he has a penis outside bed. These are not mutually exclusive statement. The fact that you want to be dominated only by some men does not erase the fact that: You want to be dominated Any man really willing to can dominate you You actually complain about point 2 ​ I do have control as THE FIRST TIME HE VIOLATES MY SAFEWORD WOULD BE THE LAST. And it being the last (b…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/24 03:42 AM
1

They plan dates, buy gifts, do cute little things with their partners. Planing date and buying gifts is a given for men, but above and beyond for women I guess. What are those "cute things" you are talking about? ​ They make their partners feel wanted and validated in the relationship. Feeling wanted is evidenced by sex. I don't think sex is above and beyond in a relationship, it is a given. However it is true that women think that sex is something they magnaminously give to men and not a given.…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/24 03:23 AM
1

I'm not the one who pointed it to you first. If several people mention something about you, then maybe it's not because magically everyone is out to get you and are dishonest in their reading you know. Maybe, maybe, it's actually about what you write.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/24 03:14 AM
0

OP didn't ask for what men can do. He knows. He asked for what you think men should do. He even capitalized it... If you do not see the difference between can and should, that's a problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/24 03:08 AM
1

They do a lot? Like what? The bare minimum! i.e. what's been described as "adulting" and I guess sex. Anything else?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/24 03:06 AM
0

Cooking and cleaning seem to be the bare minimum or just adulting only for men. Because if not, why do women bitch about doing it? If you have to clean the house for yourself anyway, why pretend you're doing a favor for him (conveniently forgetting he's most likely paying the house while she's not)? And "conjugal duty" is no longer an obligation, hence sex isn't the bare minimum anymore. But date nights are? Talk about inflated female entitlement...
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/24 03:04 AM
39

It's inflated ego. Women like to think they're to die for. And it's also typical of how women argue in bad faith. Rejection leading to murder is a trope since we hear and see it in movies as if it's like a 20% chance of happening and not 0.00001%.
/r/MensRights11/02/24 02:55 AM
-2

I have a safe word if I want it to stop. Meaning control for him ( however hot) is an illusion. I can withdraw it at any time. Which makes it safe to explore. He decides whether or not to follow it. You want to think that you are somehow still in control with your safe word, but deep down you know you're not, because your safe word works only because HE decides so. That's what is really puzzling OP: he doesn't understand why women get turned on by being at the mercy of men. Because that's what i…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/24 02:35 AM
4

Shouldn't a bigger school have more competition then? It does. But because it's IN PERSON meeting, you are restricted by that factor, the Dunbar's number (unlike online dating). In person, you can remember about 100 people. That means, 50 of the opposite sex. In a small school, these 50 spots will be taken by people who are far above, or far below, which in effect restricts your dating pool to let's say only 10 or 12. In a big school, because you can actually fill these 50 spots with "people of …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 08:19 AM
1

Not just those women. Because the average girl, instead of having 5 average guys to choose from, suddenly had 2000, including some Chads ready for a quickie, suddenly thought they were 10s. That's where their inflated ego comes from.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 08:11 AM
5

Get a discrete nanny cam, and at some point, stage an argument in front of it. You'll see how she will portray said argument. Don't mention you have it on video. Just let her tell the world "her version" to expose what a lier she is... Go see all the good lawyers in town now to know how to proceed. She's out to get you and you must know that and plan your defense if you don't want to get rinsed through the court and have your kids taken away.
/r/MensRights09/02/24 03:08 AM
58

Note the slight difference: "Believe women" can be understood as "Believe all women" or "Believe an undetermined number of women". This disingenuous use of the zero determiner plural is constant in English political discourse. That's why debates in English is always a pain with bad faith debaters, because they will constantly shift between the two meanings pretending one means the other or retreating to the other if cornered. For info, the zero determiner plural can either mean "all", as in "Dog…
/r/MensRights09/02/24 02:57 AM
22

Women rank men in a relative order. That's what people have been consistently complaining about. With online dating, you're no longer judge against the men of your village, but of the whole country, and beyond.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 02:39 AM
11

The dude didn't change his behavior, only the place he behaved.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/24 02:37 AM
3

Identity politics is perpetuated in universities. And people in the US pay an ungodly amount to be there. Even for unrelated degrees, they force students to get the odd feminist class for "general education"...
/r/MensRights08/02/24 06:32 PM
33

That's the whole point though. You have to properly name issues if you want to solve them. Patriarchy and feminism is a smoke screen pushed by all the elites, world economic forum, governments, etc. to hide that problems stem from the system that the present elites benefit from. And women fell for that hook and sinker because like Orwell mentioned, women, particularly young ones, are the best swallowers of slogans. And thus you have all these idiotic women supporting a social system that give th…
/r/MensRights08/02/24 03:46 AM
23

And respect is like for everything in education for your kids, it is best to show than just to say. Pampered girls often put themselves in danger BECAUSE they were never taught to respect males, and thus they turn the disrespect and the contempt up to 11, especially since this is normalized by society. And since they were told that they were as good or even better than boys at everything, including ass kicking, and thus are convinced of that, lots of these girls often have a pretty painful disco…
/r/MensRights07/02/24 05:21 AM
6

I was told that misandry is a minor problem compared to misogyny and didn't deserve recognition until misogyny is handled. In this case, say that sexual harassment is a minor problem compared to murder and thus doesn't deserve recognition until murders are eradicated. Then ask if she's willing to suck your dick...
/r/MensRights06/02/24 06:26 PM
-7

They don't die for Ukraine. They die for NATO...
/r/MensRights06/02/24 11:27 AM
28

Because actually women don't believe they're equal to men. They are deeply convinced that men are superior and thus it's unfair to expect reciprocal exchanges. Just like if an 8 years old started insulting you or hitting you, it would be of poor taste for you as adult to retaliate like you'd do to an adult. Same with women. Despite all their claims of equality, women are aware that they're not. And thus if you take them at their word and treat them like equal, they will cry misogyny because they…
/r/MensRights03/02/24 12:17 PM
5

And you know what you don't do when you are uncircumcized because your glans is not desensitized and it might hurt your frenelum? Jackhammer like a rabid rabbit. ​ What do you think about the trauma circumcised men experience? It'd be worth wondering if the most fucked up sexual kinks and unhealthy treatment of women originate in communities that mutilate their boys, as a way for them to achieve sexual pleasure by overcoming the handicap of a weathered penis due to mutilation and scar tissue. If…
/r/MensRights03/02/24 05:47 AM
7

What are you seeing as “mature” behaviors that girls exhibit and boys lack? From a teacher's point of view? Orwell put it this way: It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers−out of unorthodoxy. Perfect students are they not?
/r/MensRights02/02/24 07:08 AM
1

Girls, for whatever reason, are much more mature than boys by 14 That's because at that age, girls are finishing puberty and boys are just starting it. Compare both at 10 and at 15 to avoid drawing conclusions from transition times.
/r/MensRights02/02/24 07:05 AM
1

You can call any variation due to outside factors a cycle if you want, but that's not the same as an internally regulated cycle like women have.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/24 03:38 AM
1

Sorry to tell you but the same hormones, testosterone for example, do not work the same whether you have or not the appropriate receptors, which is genetic. However you want to cut it, it is not men who have a cycle of hormones.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/24 02:59 AM
58

Mainstream media, thinking they had locked on the monopoly of Moral authority, is really having a hard time with reality. Lol.
/r/MensRights01/02/24 10:47 AM
1

Tbh it’s not your problem but a man made a post complaining about it. Because guys are on the receiving end of it too. And it is now considered not okay to tell a woman to stop being hysterical or bitchy. Honestly as much as half the men on here complain about their issues meeting women, it’s just abundantly clear that they just don’t like us. How are those two propositions related? In order to like women, you have to first meet them no? Then why do you pretend that complaining about "being unab…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/24 06:31 AM
1

How does this go together? If you cannot judge whether she is a good mother solely from my premises, why are you so certain that you would not want a child with such a woman? If she had children with multiple men, I don't want to be the last in the list. This says nothing whether she's a good mother to the children she already has. "Already a good mother" is not a criterion for men to have children with women. Seeing people as an object has nothing to do with love. That's the most fake opinion p…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/24 06:22 AM
1

I barely even got half way through it. Stop TikTok, it's bad for attention.
/r/MensRights01/02/24 06:09 AM
0

You're missing the point. The very fact that the reason stated could not be backed up by hard evidence as she demanded just showed that the reason stated was bullshit. The fact that neither her supervisor nor her trainers were aware shows that your justification does not apply. If you think that the trainer or her direct supervisor had a hand in her layoff, think again. She got laid off because she was a new employee and last arrived first to go. That's it. Salary mass compression, only sales fo…
/r/MensRights01/02/24 02:43 AM
1

So women's problems is also men's but men's problems is only theirs. It's the opposite of money I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/24 11:50 AM
5

Their method of firing her wasn't the best, but she had literally made zero sales in her entire tenure at that company (in a sales position). Including a 3 month training. Any idiot knows that you don't fire someone on performance after only 1 month (which includes end of the year holidays) after training.
/r/MensRights31/01/24 04:13 AM
1

Hell, a while ago there was a woman who recorded the Zoom call with HR in which she was laid off, and people rallied to her defense. She was in the bottom 3% of performers for that quarter, and yet people still took her side. That's not what happened. She had just started and thus it was obviously BS to be fired on performance results while you have not started producing anything, good or bad. Those doing the firing obviously had no clue and were just peddling fake corporate reasons. That's why …
/r/MensRights31/01/24 01:37 AM
0

Because it’s ok for men to become helpless babies when they’re sick Say the women, the biggest consumers of healthcare... I always find that one funny though. It is something I have heard only in English speaking countries. And the women who claim that will then claim that men are stupid because they don't consult the doctors enough and thus don't catch things early enough. Oh well, it's not like consistency is expected from women, so...
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 06:09 PM
1

you've never heard a guy blame testosterone for his actions? No. Only heard women say that guys say that. But never heard a guy says that. Just like women say that if your Libra you are not compatible with a Capricorn. Never heard a guy say that.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 06:07 PM
-1

“I was thinking with the little head” I don't think this is how children behave though. You must be confused. “Men have needs” Indeed. “But I was horny!” Sure, and?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 06:05 PM
-3

It’s really only “your problem” if you’re married or in a relationship with someone dealing with PMS. Nope. If that person is your boss or in charge of important decisions, then it is also "your problem". And the question is thus, why should it though?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 06:03 PM
3

It’s the same point It's not though.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 06:01 PM
3

facts can’t be right cause they don’t fit my opinion A fact is not right or wrong. I don't think you understand what a fact is. A fact exists or does not.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 06:00 PM
1

What would be your opinion of such a woman? Regarding what? Would you consider that woman an extraordinary loving and good woman? I fail to see how her being good relates to her being loved though. None of what you said allows to judge whether she is a good woman. Would you consider her a good mother? Maybe. How can one judge that solely from your premises? Would you feel loved by her wanting to have sex with you, just like she wants sex with almost all other men? If a woman is sexually attracte…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 05:47 PM
1

There are genuinely delusional simps who think they have a chance at love. This does not disprove that MOST men on Only fans KNOW they don't have a chance to meet in person yet they simp. Which disproves your statement. Maybe its not sex but the love will persist as long as the guys are getting some sort of emotional connection (with an extremely hot girl) out of it. Either way still not unconditional. You're just backpedaling from "sex is off the table" to "some sort of connection". What are yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 12:40 PM
0

You're changing your argument. Who simps simp for is irrelevant about what defines simping because simping isn't defined as such depending on the woman's attractiveness. Simps know they won't have sex with the women they simp for, whether those are attractive or not. This contradicts your initial claim that: The second a man realizes the woman won't sleep with him all that "love" goes away. If love did go away the moment men realized that they won't sleep with a woman, then OF girls would only m…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 08:20 AM
1

I'm with you on benevolent sexism and those outcomes (war, maternal rights, domestic violence perpetrated against men). It's telling that you call these actions "benevolent sexism". It shows that you consider that sexism can only be towards women, and thus if it is to their advantage, then it's "benevolent sexism". Why don't you call universal male suffrage "benevolent mysandry"? Right there it shows that your starting point is already skewed towards women: any female privilege is considered uni…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 08:13 AM
0

The number of simps proves that your premise is wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 07:20 AM
3

Because I'm a man. If needed I will be sent to die to protect women and children; if I'm out of luck I'll be left on the street unlike women and children. This shows that I have no inherent value except the one I make myself be. I'm not complaining, I'm just recognizing a fact. And women are just too hypocritical to even recognize it: men are the expendable, while women and children must be protected nomatter what, so they do have inherent value. So even removing the mere sexual attraction from …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 03:43 AM
0

So you are arguing that all the males with higher education degrees that you seem to frequent are somehow not filtered in by you because they all have social status evidenced by their education? Just a coincidence. Wanting to fuck somebody (being physically attracted) is NOT love. It's called "Eros". It's the most basic form of it. You reject that through a No True Scotsman fallacy: you have a very narrow definition of love to justify your position. But as I explained, men don't even get to reac…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 03:25 AM
–

It'snot a sufficienttrait but it is a necessary one.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 02:48 AM
0

Ok- but being attracted to any woman does not equal live. In Greek, "love" translates into different word. One of them is "Eros". It's only because your definition of love is restrictive when you're on the receiving end that you don't think that sexual attraction is love. You say that's not enough, but it doesn't even change the overall argument. Because men don't even get that. Women are sexually attracted to alpha males only while men can fuck 80% of women. This shows that even without higher …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 02:43 AM
1

I'm not loved unconditionally- never have been. How do you know that?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 02:35 AM
1

First- who exactly is providing this "love?" Only a woman would ask such question by prefacing it with "first"? What we're eating is the first question only for people who know they have something to eat. Those who may not have food to eat do not start by asking what they're gonna eat but IF they're gonna eat. Men: we get no love. Women: what kind of love don't you get? It's like: I have no food. what type of food don't you have? This actually illustrates OP's topic: women cannot fathom the abse…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 02:09 AM
1

This essentially means women are socially conditioned to find a good partner. No. It's not about relationships in a social meaning. It's about sex. And this something that happens in lots of species. This is why in many bird species, the males are in pretty colors and the females in a dull grey. It's not "socially conditioned". It's innately conditioned and socially expressed. The attraction of males towards females, at the expense of the males lives in many animal species, is a powerful instinc…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/24 01:36 AM
42

Well, here is the feminist thinking: Premise 1: Women are better than men (what? everybody knows it). Premise 2: Women are doing worse than men (Studies) Conclusion: There must be an invisible conspiracy called the patriarchy that hold women back, otherwise how would you explain that women are not doing better than men while they are better than them? huh? How? Checkmate!
/r/MensRights29/01/24 03:27 AM
4

It’s not that hard to go look at the PPD demographic results. Sorry to tell you, but declarative statements in sociological surveys need to be cross referenced to be a bit serious. You basing your statement on a survey where it is noted that "There are a significant number of people who are only 5 or 6 inches tall, as well as 160 inches tall." should tell you not to take these numbers seriously. Or you may as well take for granted the polls in Elle magazine or horoscopes...
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 02:37 AM
2

I'd like to know what study showed you that the majority of men here are virgin. It's just you imagining things to not have to address the points made so you just call them incel (which is what an unwilling virgin is). Just the classic attack the messenger.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 02:10 AM
17

Funny you call them incel because it's what social media told you because they make generalization based on social media trends... You can't make this up!
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/24 02:00 AM
–

That's because you don't seem to understand what TRP is about. First off, it's not prescriptivist so don't pretend that it advocates for this or that. It leaves whichever option you want to take open, but knowingly. So if you want to enjoy the decline or go mgtow, it's up to each person to decide.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 06:29 PM
–

Women choose who they sleep with. Getting on the CC is always a choice. Maybe they should have realized how bad they are at picking men and have their father screen them, like back in the days... Oh but no, their mother kicked out their father from their lives, so well, I guess that can't work...
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 06:25 PM
–

So these tradcon women are aiming at the same target as the other women but at least they say that they bring something to the table in exchange!
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 06:23 PM
–

Conflating red pill and tradcon is misunderstanding both. And subsaharan Africa has the highest birthrates so contrary to what you assert, universal high quality childcare isn't what raise birthrates. What's the point of your post though? You are cheering for women to be drones at work under the guise of a non-existent career? Most people don't work because they want to but because they have to. Red pill doesn't care which societal model you're pursuing: a feminist utopia or a tradcon heaven. In…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 06:21 PM
26

You need to keep your workforce around if you still want to exploit it...
/r/MensRights28/01/24 06:02 PM
10

The U.S. economy is literally doing fine by every metric lol. Which shows that maybe the metrics are not that good. When infant mortality is rising, this is not a sign of a society in a good condition.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 01:30 PM
0

1 et 2 contredisent la logique de 4 (garder sa partenaire vs. en changer), ce qui prouve qu'aucun n'est suffisant pour dire que les hommes doivent ("should") faire jouïr leur partenaire. 3 n'est absolument pas une vérité. 5 n'a rien à voir, la résolution des conflits par le sexe n'implique nullement une nécessité de jouïr pour madame, ni même c'est le seul moyen de résolution. ​ Voilà, pas besoin de genrer Ca tombe bien, on parle pas du sexe masculine et féminin.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 01:25 PM
6

Calm down! That's not what women mean by "equality"! It's equality in the rewards only. Not in the duties or punishment. You know, Equality™, not equality.
/r/MensRights28/01/24 03:11 AM
2

Then I guess cleaning and sucking are not your hobbies then.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 12:50 AM
1

You should only care if you want to continue to have sex with that person Lots of women continue to have sex while not orgasming. Your premise that women only continue to have sex with men with who they orgasm is just plain wrong. They're the first to complain about it. and you don’t want your sexual reputation possibly tarnished as a bad lover, Gossiping, women's favorite sport. If you don’t care about either of the the above points, it really doesn’t matter who you make orgasm. Your first poin…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 12:31 AM
2

Somehow I doubt it, otherwise you'd do it everywhere you could.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/24 12:20 AM
0

Because... I assume you want to do it more than once?? That's unrelated as shown by the number of women who don't orgasm yet are in a relationship. Or just get another skank by being at the right place at the right time. Who cares if those get off.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 05:37 PM
2

And no, I don't buy your quasi-Marxist fantasy that there were no powerful male leaders within human societies except in the last 4,000 years. Try to have such thing in a small group of hunter gatherers. It seems you have run out of significant rebuttals, so I'll leave it there. It's more because you're talking out of your ass and have nothing left to say.
/r/MensRights27/01/24 05:34 PM
1

Honestly.. break it down further for me Sorry, I don't speak that level of womanese.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 11:10 AM
7

You fail to understand there have always been powerful males throughout human evolutionary history; it didn't appear at just one point in our evolution. And each of those males had potential to sequester women for themselves in such a manner that they were off limits to less powerful males - this was not a result of female choosing for the most part. You fail to notice that study of DNA actually can point at WHEN these ratio happened (hence the dating of different bottlenecks in population and r…
/r/MensRights27/01/24 11:08 AM
1

Because they give at least one single crap about the women they're sleeping with? They see them as human at least? How are those two things related? Do you think that soldiers killing the enemy do not know the enemy is human? That does not ensues that they care. Again, more fallacies. It is not because I know you are human that I care. So yes, men know the women they sleep with are human. Whether they care about these women is completely unrelated. Men can stick their dick in many things they do…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 11:02 AM
1

You should smoke. It does not matter whether you smoke or not. You should not smoke These are THREE different propositions with different meanings. Unlike what you implied, the opposite of "You should do X" is NOT "You should not do X", but both "It doesn't matter whether you do X" or "You should not do X". You pretending that "Why should men care?" is the same question than "Why men shouldn't care?" shows you do not understand the meaning of the words you use. Do you get it or should I dumb it …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 10:59 AM
10

If you remove the Genghis Kahn effect, men and women appear similarly choosy and to engage equally in sexual gatekeeping. That's not the case though. The "Genghis Khan" effect can explain some very lopsided short period (like 17 to 1 at the beginning of the neolithic) https://psmag.com/environment/17-to-1-reproductive-success But a 2 to 1 ratio as an AVERAGE over the span of Homo Sapiens existence is an insane lopsided ratio for 10,000 generations. A recent study on sexual gatekeeping confirms L…
/r/MensRights27/01/24 08:30 AM
13

Well, for a man to behave like Ken, it takes acting skills. For a woman to behave like Barbie, it takes a hairdresser appointment. The nomination is for acting...
/r/MensRights27/01/24 08:19 AM
32

AI monitoring/filtering? Dunno, but glad the issue has been raised. Yes. Browsing on Android phone through Firefox, I saw some [removed] post that had a longer explanation saying something like "this post has been removed by admins because it was caught in Reddit filters" or something like that. On desktop, it only appears as [removed] due to spam filters. Definitely AI filtering to address discourse that does not conform to "THE MESSAGE"...
/r/MensRights27/01/24 08:02 AM
4

when i was a virgin woman in my 20s no men wanted to deal with that Are you sure it was the virginity itself they did not want to deal with, or the reasons you were a virgin in your 20s they did not want to deal with?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 07:53 AM
0

Though tbh it sounds like my 'foreplay' is better than whatever your poor partners end up getting. Again, that whether it is or it is not better for THEM is NOT the issue. When you say men SHOULD make women come, it means it is beneficial for MEN to do so. Whether it is for women or not is irrelevant to whether men SHOULD do it. You SHOULD eat animal protein is obviously NOT beneficial for the animal you're eating. Women here are so self-centered that they are unable to back up their claim that …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 07:12 AM
1

Needless to say this created huge storm of angry feminists screeching that they don't want to be at the mercy of a man being in control of the money That's exactly what a boss is. Feminist logic: I don't want to be at the mercy of a man who loves me or who is at least committed to me being in control of the money so I'd rather be at the mercy of a man who is my boss being control of the money. And feminists then claim they are not a capitalist compatible ideology. Lol.
/r/MensRights27/01/24 07:00 AM
2

And sorry but this actually a myth: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0049124119852395 We find that men and women respondents do not differ in their perceptions of how messy a room is or how urgent it is to clean it up. Furthermore, the cleaning is often assessed by time spent cleaning, which is missing a very important aspect of the physical action of cleaning: efficiency. Men are more efficient at cleaning, as evidence by the fact that single men living alone spend less time on hou…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 06:57 AM
0

And 99% of your effort went into securing that first encounter with a woman. Isn’t it more efficient to keep her around than to go find a new partner? That's precisely the question. Since partners and spouses don't owe you sex more than a stranger, the question is, is the effort to make a woman come worth the one to bed another woman? Exactly. You’ve done the work already. Exactly. I DID the effort. Why should I do some more to make her have GOOD sex. As long as I have mine, why should I labor m…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 06:31 AM
-1

Ptdr demander une démonstration de pourquoi c'est mieux si tu fais kiffer ta meuf Bizarrement, on attend toujours la réponse. C'est comique de voir tout ce petit monde dire que c'est évident, facile à répondre, etc. et pourtant pas un volontaire pour avancer une argumentation logique. Ou quand ça argumente, ça repose sur des prémisses qui comme par hasard, quand on inverse les sexes, ne sont soudainement plus valables.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 06:19 AM
1

Men are just more likely to put up with bad partners because they’re more desperate than women Explaining why men don't care as much still doesn't answer why men should care about giving women orgasm. Aside from the usual female load of ad hominem, no women here have put forth a logical argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 06:17 AM
2

I'm fascinated by your responses in this thread. How much sex have you had to come to these conclusions? I can confidently say that unlike you, I have had sex, not just foreplay...
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 06:14 AM
-1

Again, you're missing the point. That most people want to have sex with the same person more than once does not justify your point. The Coolidge effect shows that diversity is what men want. So you still haven't addressed the point of why the effort of making a woman come is somehow worth more for the man than bedding another skank. You're demanding good sex from men and justify by saying that this will give you more sex opportunity. How is that different from work from the man's point of view? …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 03:01 AM
-1

But it's funny how this logic is somehow abandoned when you flip the genders. Women claim and repeat that men are not owed sex bywomen. So why should women be owed good sex? Just for a repeat? But what difference does it make to the man? Men have to do 99% of the effort to get sex anyway. Why should men bother about an extra effort while he's done all the work already? Is the decreased effort to get a repeat customer worth the extra effort to make women come? Bitches really cannot do anything by…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 02:51 AM
0

So why don't you blow random guys to make them happy? That would make you happy too according to your logic. Somehow I doubt you give away random blow jobs. Which shows that your answer is just a front. It's the idea you have of yourself. But it's not the reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 02:37 AM
-5

No. That's because you conveniently left out the conjunction. Are you going to pretend that you're happy BECAUSE others are happy? If so, that's just you blowing your own trumpet. If you're going to say that you're happy WHEN others are happy, it's just you showing how much you depend on others to tell you how to feel. And finally, if women were really happy when men are, men would have noticed a long time ago. So cut the crap and give a honest answer...
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 02:30 AM
-3

Nobody said they shouldn't. The question is why should they? Do you understand the difference or do you want me to mansplain it?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 02:14 AM
-5

because a woman who got off is more likely to want you back. So women do view men as sex objects that give them pleasure then. So why do women complain when men see women as sex objects? And men are more generous than women, they are usually satisfied even with women who are bad at sex. And yet somehow men get bad rep for it while women think it normal to not only demand sex, but good sex! Rule for thee but not for me. The true characteristic of women's behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 02:12 AM
-13

That's what you need to demonstrate, not take as a premise. Plenty of men obviously really enjoyed sex that the women didn't. And very often. According to women. Why should the - according to you - slightly better sex for him worth any extra effort for him. The question is basically why men have to enjoy sex by doing things themselves, yet the reverse is not true for women: they want good sex but not by doing things themselves but by demanding that their partner do them. Entitled much? I thought…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 02:05 AM
-1

It's feminine to suck dick and clean the house. Qed. No? How strange...
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 01:58 AM
2

She had sex with him. He only humidified his cigar.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 01:57 AM
-7

Female orgasms correlate with women feeling more satisfied, communicating better, and encouraging their partners. Encouraging their partners to do what? Women are not entitled to orgasm. Funny how the same who claims everywhere that men are not entitled to sex with women somehow think that women are entitled to good sex from men! Like, in exchange for what? Starfishing and a lecture on the patriarchy? Women's orgasm isn't giving more orgasms to men, so what incentive do men have to even bother w…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 01:56 AM
-14

Why should men care if women come or not?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/24 01:44 AM
12

"Believe all women"
/r/MensRights26/01/24 04:39 AM
14

And the graph has other issues: the false accusations shouldn't be in the unreported, but in the reported category. The pretension that there's a difference between a false report and false accusation is moot. A false report implies a perpetrator, and whether the police finds him because the accuser falsely accused him by name or because police set their aim at him because of the false report is a moot difference. The writer of the article cunningly implies that false report do not lead to innoc…
/r/AntiFeminists26/01/24 12:34 AM
10

If haven't been circumcised, you don't even need lotion. The thing is, there's no rape culture, but there's a mutilate boys culture. If you consider it ok to mutilate boys' genitals, let's not find it surprising they need more than vanilla sex to feel sexual pleasure.
/r/MensRights26/01/24 12:16 AM
6

Well they seem like the atheism community on Reddit: full of kids ready to shock their father to prove they exist and to show how smart they are. The first link in their Faq pretending to debunk hypergamy by showing evidence of assortive mating shows they understand neither. First, any search of "hypergamy" in Google scholar will bring you more than enough evidence of it in scientific literature. Second, for assortive mating to debunk hypergamy, it would need to show that women reject richer men…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/24 12:02 AM
–

> because you've got turtleneck and crew neck, thats two Lol. Unbutton white shirt, business suit blazers, col bardot à volant, basically anything with a col à volant long enough, any col à jabot, etc. no, you will still see cleavage even w modest clothes As if: https://www.bellazon.com/main/uploads/monthly_2024_01/Monica_Dolce_Gabbana_FW_1992_20.jpg.c9f08f6c5cc68f95ea332c4faa72b259.jpg
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/24 05:25 AM
–

For a woman with big or even average size breasts, there is no way to hide that to the point that it looks like a flat chest You're going for a No true Scotsman fallacy. Noone ever said "to the point that it looks flat chest". There is plenty of way to conceal big chests, and plenty of ways to flaunt it too. It doesn't have to be only cleavage.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 12:29 PM
–

Then why you're doing it then? That she's a virgin is irrelevant to a logical argument. And how the fuck would you know that anyway...
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 08:07 AM
–

That's how it works though.The fabric absorbs moisture (sweat) and it evaporates on the outside. The evaporation cools the space between the skin and the fabric. Absorption and evaporation happen simultaneously.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 08:04 AM
–

If she doesn't need you to stand up for her, why are you white knighting then?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 07:59 AM
-1

In what world do you live to think that what women wear is irrelevant to whether men notice them or not?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 05:40 AM
1

Let me explain that to you: Not respecting someone's decision doesn't mean dictating them what to do. And context isn't part of grammar...
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 05:37 AM
1

Are you aware of what a layer is? It's separating under from above. Trapping under the layer of cloth and evaporating above.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 05:34 AM
-2

You know why a wet Tshirt feels cooler than a dry one? Same. Whether air is dry or humid won't change the fact that evaporation cools and thus evaporation from a light cotton layer will make you feel cooler than evaporation from your bare skin. In the first case, it creates a cool layer around the skin, which doesn't exist if your skin is exposed. Not even mentioning direct sun exposure...
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 05:31 AM
0

You seem to think that there's nothing between bare skin or sealed plastic. What part of trapping through a breathable fabric part did you miss? The fabric traps the cool layer that forms due to evaporation of moisture from the fabric. Showing your tits doesn't allow that so pretending you're showing them for comfort is just not true.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 05:20 AM
0

Which is i? "respect" or "dictate"? You know these words don't have the same meaning right?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 05:16 AM
2

Are you saying that what women wear has a direct impact on them being assaulted? And sorry to tell you, but even in the countryside where there's no train, they still don't show cleavage. Bad argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 05:14 AM
-2

Asking for what? Going to the gym? Or being criticized for walking around in sweatpants thinking it's fashionable? Well if she's walking around in it, she won't be wearing that at the gym, will she? So the contrast between the designer bag and sunglasses and the plastic surgery on the face with "I'm just wearing sweatpants like I'm a Slav squatting" screams look at me please everyone look at me. Yaeh. She's wearing that to attract attention all right. She's looks like the girl from Pulp's song, …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 05:04 AM
-1

No. That's not what self-centerism is.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 04:57 AM
1

Women. Like to dish it out, but unable to take it. If you had a point to address rather than a derailing question, then don't be shy and say so.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 04:56 AM
1

Do you know what fashion is?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 04:42 AM
-6

Girl, I live in Tokyo, where it's hot and humid like hell in summer You know what Japanese women don't do? Show cleavage. Somehow they figured it out but you didn't? You're basically not very familiar with how to combat heat, or more likely, you don't want to not show off your boobs because it gets you some perks. I understand.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 04:40 AM
-10

You're missing the point. Which is not surprising. So let me mansplain it to you: contrary to what you pretend, showing skin isn't the best way to cool skin. Quite the contrary. It's trapping evaporating sweat, which creates a cooler layer on your skin, by having a layer of cotton or other breathable material. So pretending that you have no option but to show skin because it's hot is just patently false and ignorant.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 04:27 AM
–

I think you're still in that teenage mindset of thinking that because people look in your direction, they're noticing you. It's not because look at your chest that they're seeing anything. Men don't pretend that women are oggling their penis if they happen to lower their gaze. Yet women, always self-important, think men of course stare at their boobs, even when there's nothing to stare at. Like for a bulge in the crotch, your boobs will only be stared at if they're noticeable. Just go braless in…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 04:23 AM
0

Whodo you thinkare the best women'sfashiondesigners? Ifmen weren't, then you wouldn'thavemuch high fashion for females. You equating showing your boobs with showing cleavage is showing your incompetence at what showing boobs mean. Any man can tell you what a tight T-shirt or sweater can reveal. If you think cleavage is necessary, think again.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 04:17 AM
-2

If you wear sweatpants outside doing sports, then they serve one purpose. If you are a grown up woman and you don't know what clothes to wear to cover your ass, you're advertising how much you show your booty around because you obviously do not know what else to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 04:13 AM
-1

Yes, she's dressed like one.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 04:11 AM
–

It's also hot in the Arabian desert. Somehow they manage not to show their tits. I'm sure you can too.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 02:43 AM
–

The fact that you don't know that it's a long top that conceals ass tells me you're just used to showing it around. And sweatpants? Dear Lord, I think you need to frequent fashion advice or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 02:39 AM
4

That's patently untrue to pretend that no clothing can conceal big breasts. Many cuts and frills do make them not noticeable at first glance. You can dislike the style, but don't pretend that you have no choice but to parade your chest around.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 02:37 AM
–

As Dave Chappelle put it, "If you're wearing a whore uniform, don't be surprised to be mistaken for one." Women pretending that clothing is not socially driven, while they're the biggest fashion victims, is one more example of their blind self-centerism.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 02:33 AM
1

The fact that you think the man prefers a PlayStation as a sign that you shouldn't do anything about it shows that you think you're owed attention and don't have to do anything to gain it. That's the whole point. You think you're owed it and it's beneath you to have to do anything to gain it. The same females that paint their face and show their tits though, which shows the discrepancy between what they say and what they do.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/24 12:04 AM
-5

Social media do play a part indeed. But "telling my daughter she's beautiful and don't let anyone tell you otherwise" is NOT healthy encouragement.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 04:40 AM
-7

All I'm basically saying is that don't let others tear you down. Constructive criticism and Destructive criticism are two different things. They're both criticism. Whether it is constructive or destructive is up to the person receiving it to decide. you wouldn't tell your daughter that she is beautiful and valued?? Those are two different things. Valued, yes she is. Beautiful? Well if she is, then I have no issue with saying so, but if she isn't, then she should not be entertained with false nar…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 04:30 AM
-2

Silenced isn’t necessary, ignored is sufficient. That's not what "don't let ANYONE tell you" means.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 04:26 AM
-12

I'd raise them to value themselves, tell them "you're beautiful, and don't let ANYONE tell you different" So you'd raise them to favor wishful thinking over reality and to try to control other people's speech if it contradicts your thinking. Here it is gentlemen, the source of the delusional women they're 10/10 and people who disagree should be silenced.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 03:28 AM
149

"believe all women"
/r/MensRights22/01/24 01:59 AM
5

Because you're not owed attention? Women really have an inflated opinion of themselves. The bar for women is so low, just be better than a game console, and yet, they don't even measure or even think they do. It shows how little women bring to the table in a relationship and they know it. What's next? They can't compete with a toaster?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 12:38 AM
1

Not unhappy. Observant.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 12:33 AM
5

which is exactly why women have high standards, they are trying to vet out men who think like this That's what they tell themselves. But it only shows that women actually think they don't have to contribute anything if they consider that they cannot even compete against a Playstation...
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 09:35 AM
3

Most men women run into are average and average. That’s who we date. That's who women date but that's not who you pine for and want to, and often get pinned by on. Average people don’t want each other. That’s the problem. Women select. That's on them. Average men get what they can, unless they go abroad. Only Chads get what they want domestically.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 09:31 AM
5

TRP doesn't advise anything. It explains the rules and how things work. You're free to play the game however you want, or even not play it (mgtow).
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 12:54 AM
3

The American way of life has many issues. Obesity is doing harm onto yourself at least, not on the rest of the planet.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 12:52 AM
5

How many men do you all know, of all adult ages, whose lives revolve around watching sports, playing videogames, and inhaling shitty food? It's like a margin call, a study of probabilities: How many women are going to be better than watching sports, playing videogames and inhaling shitty food? Very few. How many of these are going to go after rich chads? Most of them. Hence although in theory it's possible for an average guy to score a decent woman, the odds are not in his favor. And even if he …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/24 11:52 PM
5

TRP never said to wait your thirties to find a girl. It never said to marry either.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/24 11:30 PM
1

Often...
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/24 10:44 PM
1

Lots of take out junk food apparently.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/24 05:06 PM
-2

What do women want? Hmm let me ask MEN Ever asked a woman what she wanted to eat?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/24 06:25 AM
1

Because it's a fucking test... Don't they have anything better to do in their lives though? Like you know, grow up and pass the adolescence stage...
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/24 06:24 AM
0

As I said, one rule for you (using stats is ok) and one rule for thee (you cannot see past statistics), whatever is more convenient for you at the moment. Tell me you're a woman without telling me you're a woman...
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 09:53 AM
0

Comparing yourself to OTHERS means you averaged others... It's statistics...
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 09:46 AM
11

Female journalists who write about gender issues say they are having to deal with a toxic wave of threats against them in Argentina. By people on the receiving end of their toxic writing? Funny how that works!
/r/MensRights18/01/24 09:02 AM
1

If you complain about an action only when you're on the receiving end but not when you're dishing it out, then your complaining is much weaker...
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 08:59 AM
1

For you to say you're normal, you have to compare yourself with the average... So statistics are ok if YOU do it, but not when others do it. Usual female double standard: rule for me but not for thee.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 08:57 AM
0

And emn are free to not marry their girlfriend. And women cannot complain about men "leading them on" about marriage when women are the first ones to lead men on about "til death do us apart". Women complaining about their boyfriend of 8 years not proposing is like men complaining about their wife of 8 years asking for a divorce.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 07:08 AM
1

Don't confuse English law jurisdictions that recognize common law marriges with the whole world. I agree though, these places should be avoided like the plague.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 03:51 AM
0

Girl, stop thinking you're special. You're not. I'm not playing Russian roulette because all the survivors say it's ok!
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 03:49 AM
0

You have more chance of having your wife divorcing you that getting pregnant while engaging in unprotected sex. You're basically saying "Don't worry about condoms, the odds are in your favor!". Girls' maths...
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 03:44 AM
-2

Funny how men are supposed to trust a woman forever if he trusts her now, but women are free to remove their trust whenever they feel like it. It's not his current girlfriend that he doesn't trust. It's what she will be in ten years that he's not sure about. If 5% of marriages ended in divorce, then yeah your argument of him being a bit paranoid and distrustful would hold ground. But 50% of marriages end in divorce and in 80% of them, the woman asks for divorce. This means that statistically spe…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 03:25 AM
-1

It does trust the present you. It's the future you he's worrying about. And that's not a small possibility. That's literally a coin toss. Women are the first to assert their rights to change, yet when men recognize that possibility, it's considered bad?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 03:17 AM
1

That's irrelevant to the topic at hand. If you think that post nut clarity is a social construct, think again.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 04:15 AM
1

They can have interesting insight but they can't really experience both sides, let's not kid ourselves with that. Hormone receptors are encoded in your DNA. Nothing will change that. No matter how you play with hormones, testosterone and oestrogen, males and females do not have the same receptors and thus you cannot pretend that it's the same experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 01:28 AM
1

Except those so called high standards do take attraction as a given, which is precisely the contentious point. Women are as guilty of having their judgement impaired by sexual attraction. But unlike men, they never experience having it turned on and off in a short time to actually experience the realization of the potency of such attraction. That is why women resort to vague wording like "the ick" when talking about attraction and repulsion. They cannot link it to a precise and discrete moment l…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 01:22 AM
2

It's not because you agree that there's snow outside that you somehow must agree with what to do, stay in, shovel it, go skiing, etc. It's disingenuous to pretend that RP which is descriptive of the actual current society is also prescriptive of a new one. It's not.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/24 08:39 AM
1

Red pill is about "enjoy the decline". You're confusing with tradcons. It's not because you agree on the description of the current situation that you have to agree with what to do. Those who want to paint red pill as tradcons are just trying to discredit the description of the actual situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/24 08:37 AM
1

It leads to the objectification of women, to the normalisation of a lack of commitment, hindering the development of deep, meaningful connections. All of that is true, but you fail to explain why objectification, lack of commitment are bad and deep connection is good. I think bombing kids in Palestine is an objectification of them, hence their mistreatment as if they were mere objects. That does not bother lots of people who pretend that objectification of women is bad. Lack of commitment. The a…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 05:39 AM
2

You like heroin. Same question. "me liking it" is not a sufficient justification in itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 05:34 AM
-1

Perhaps you should stop telling other cultures what to do. Like stop slavery and human sacrifice?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 05:33 AM
-3

Because people are different and can value different things. Some people don't want to live. Why do we have suicide help line then?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/24 05:32 AM
147

Good. They need no men so let the women do everything. The future is female!
/r/MensRights11/01/24 06:48 AM
19

Whenever a woman says she deserves to be treated like a queen or a princess, I tell them about queen Marie-Antoinette and the princess of Lamballe...
/r/MensRights10/01/24 11:44 PM
33

Mental load means the stress of using your brain. When you're not skilled at using your brain, it makes you more stressed when you're using it. That's mental load.
/r/MensRights10/01/24 11:30 PM
22

And cleaning is somehow restricted to put the dust into trash. What happens after to the trash isn't considered. Yet any hoarders house, or garbage men strike or stuck sewer should tell you that cleaning isn't just what women pretend it is.
/r/MensRights10/01/24 11:27 PM
1

People watch it whether they're having sex or not, horny or not, into what's happening on screen or not. People with satisfying sex life do not watch porn. Porn is there as a replacement for something else. Nobody watches porn to NOT get horny. I'm saying that women have a better clue about how they personally can not suck in bed. Lol. I like how women admit that faking orgasm is common for them, thus admitting that men do not really have a clue about what pleases women (otherwise they would not…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 02:31 PM
–

All people are entitled to automatic rights over any child that comes out of their body. You're begging the question. It's as ridiculous a claim as "everyone has automatic rights to the being created by their sperm." and then pretend that women also have this right. That is the concept of legal equality. Everyone with a penis has a right to vote. Women would also, had they had a penis. How ridiculous!
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 02:26 PM
–

A paternity test does a complete sequencing of DNA and compares it to the complete sequencing of DNA of a parent. What special portion of the DNA do you think that they are testing in order to just determine paternity? A simple Google search would have shown you how wrong you are. Paternity tests only look at STRs (Short Tandem Repeats) in non-coding regions on 40 or so locations, and compare them between the two subjects tested to see the similarity or not. Did you really think these tests actu…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 02:24 PM
–

So would you be more comfortable with all children by default having no fathers? Sure, why not? Why should parenthood be forced onto men while it is not onto women? Should a man not be able to decide to claim a child that is not biologically theirs? You mean like kidnappers or adoption? People can still adopt. There is a reason that there is a difference between legal paternity and biological paternity because a variety of situations exist in which the legal father is knowingly not the biologica…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/24 02:14 PM
4

Justifying the absence of reproductive rights for men is acknowledging they don't have any. You fail to justify why giving birth justifies removing rights for men. Men reproduce and are parents. How women reproduce is irrelevant to why men should not also have reproductive rights. And you arguing why men should not have reproductive rights should incite men to remove reproductive rights for women. After all, you claim equality but then conveniently refuses it...
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 02:26 PM
2

Nope, that's not what I suggest. Any man, married or not, that is willing to declare himself the father must prove so by DNA test. Which can be done before birth with the mother's blood. Marriage used to be for that exact purpose. A paternity test isn't a complete DNA profiling.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 02:08 PM
6

Only a woman can say there's no issue... It's like genital mutilation of kids. A horror for girls, totally ok for boys. The double standard about reproductive rights is blatant and then women wonder why men don't give a shit if women lose their rights to abortion. Like girl, men don't even have reproductive rights and you say there's not even an issue, so don't come crying if they vote to terminate yours. That's equality.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 01:51 PM
3

That's YOUR suggested solution. One that doesn't work. Women want their cake and eat it. They want men to be responsible of kids men don't want, AND they don't want men to be able to have a say about the kids men DO want. Basically women want the ability to decide whatever serves them as they please. Hence they're against mandatory paternity testing.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 01:46 PM
4

What part of the difference between legal and biological fatherhood is lost on you?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 01:44 PM
4

You know what would solve the issue? Mandatory DNA testing. Problem solved. But somehow you don't want the solution. How strange.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 01:43 PM
5

"Non-marital fathers are not guaranteed notice of an adoption or any rights in contesting the decision by the mother, nor are they guaranteed the ability to adopt or gain custody of the child." Useful.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 01:41 PM
2

Porn replaces a deficiency: lack of satisfying sex. Your claim shows precisely why you shouldn't think that women know better than men what men want in bed. "I know better than you what pleases you, and you really want what I want!" That's the advice of stuck up women trying to justify why they consider normal that men should do what's necessary to please them in bed, but that the reverse is not true because in reality women know better than men what men want in bed...
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 01:37 PM
0

Only a woman would consider proving and disproving paternity just a semantic difference. Until you legally become a father by declaring yourself as such, you ARE a random man. Thus there's no way you can DNA test a child before you are the legal father. Once you are, you're on the hook even if you test negative afterwards. As for your claim that you can go through court to prove your paternity, this the most disingenuous argument of all. What about we force women to go through a lengthy legal pr…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 01:30 PM
1

There's a problem: proving paternity and disproving it is not the same thing. A married man can thus not prove paternity, only disprove it. And a random man cannot demand a DNA test I'm many jurisdictions, which means he would need to first recognize the kid and falls into the situation of the married man.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 01:17 PM
3

Women thinking they know better than a man what to do with a penis. And then wonder why their man still looks at porn...
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 01:11 PM
-2

Everyone who is interested in the dna of their children can get a test. You're not thinking this through. The DNA test is to find out whether they're your children. Saying you can test your children is missing the point because you can test your kids only if you have declared them as such. It's too late for the test.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 01:07 PM
1

WORTHLESS PIG. Tout est bon dans le cochon.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 08:24 AM
2

Women misunderstand what being good in bed for a man is. They project their own criteria on what a man good in bed is, and assume that men judge similarly, like it's a set of techniques. Because that's what master men who are good in bed with women: touch her like this, do this like that, etc. Good lay for men have two principles: The second one is a list of don't. This list varies with each man but most items of that list are common for all men, like no teeth for a blow job. It's thus a simple …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 08:19 AM
-5

But if they want a stable, committed relationship with a partner they can depend on to be there for them not just when it suits him, they're not getting anything particularly worthwhile from this arrangement. So when it suits HIM, it is not good, but when it suits HER, then that is ok... Talk about a double standard...
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/24 09:34 AM
1

They get to have the top tier partner they always want.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/24 06:21 AM
1

You cannot have individually defined norms. It's the very definition of what a norm is ...
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 10:37 AM
–

Women could totally work for money. Funny how somehow men who were widowed could work and make money and raise their kids, but somehow women couldn't. If that's not evidence of the inferiority of women, I don't know what is.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 04:04 AM
–

By couldn't afford you mean they didn't want to appear working class and work so they would complain how insufferable their husband was despite him paying for their servants? It's funny how women always equate women's situation with bourgeois women's situation. Pretty telling of their hypergamy instinct...
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 02:36 AM
–

Well, you just have to compare divorce rate now and 150 years ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 01:47 AM
1

As I said, this makes no sense if the guy has the means. It's like trying to prevent the rain to fall in your neighbor's garden to ensure yours is watered by the rain. Furthermore, it doesn't even square with what women say about themselves, that they perfectly able to support their children.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 01:33 AM
6

According to a Georgetown University study, college graduates earn $1 million more in earnings over their lifetime compared to those who didn't graduate. That's for people who just retired and went to college 40 years ago. There's no guarantee it'll continue to be the case. Not mentioning that some highly paid professions like doctors and lawyers require a college degree. How much do these skew the results?
/r/MensRights29/12/23 01:27 AM
1

So men wanting to retain social norms (women traditional behavior) is bad, but women wanting to retain social norms (monogamy for men) is good... Why the double standard?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 01:13 AM
1

Because again, there's a difference in outcome: men want to ensure paternity, this isn't greed. Women are sure of their offspring, so why do they behave like they're not if not because of greed?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 01:11 AM
0

Ultimately women feel jealousy, if we can figure out why that's the case through evolutionary pressures or not it doesn't change the fact they do. Greed then...
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 01:38 PM
-1

That still doesn't explain why women demand monogamy though. If there's no evolutionary pressure as for when males demand monogamy from the females to ensure paternity, then why do women want exclusivity?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 08:59 AM
-1

Mate guarding for women makes sense if the resources aren't enough for 2 families. But what if they are? For example, he's your perfect man and has 100 million USD. Well enough to support 3 or 4 families in a luxurious lifestyle. Why wouldn't you share? Men are ok to have ONS with models. They don't mind sharing if it doesn't impact them!
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 06:22 AM
-1

If the man can afford it, which is the type of men women go after, why wouldn't women share?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 06:19 AM
19

It's a finance scam for doctors. And since noone cares about the body integrity of boys, then they continue.
/r/MensRights28/12/23 05:34 AM
1

Interesting read. I would add that the original title of "Whatever" is "Extension du domaine de la lutte" (extension of the domain of struggle) which explicitly states that social class struggle has now (in the 90s) moved from the economic realm into the sexual realms. This is obviously drawing inspiration from the work of marxist thinkers like Michel Clouscard (Le capitalisme de la seduction) or Christopher Lasch. It's interesting to see that this was all well seen by a handful of thinkers and …
/r/MensRights28/12/23 05:32 AM
75

You can do the reverse Uno card by pointing at the all female working environment and demand that these "complaints" be treated as "unfair treatment based on gender" because it's basically complaining about you being male.
/r/MensRights28/12/23 04:56 AM
13

She's obviously digging at the usual female empowerment men-bashing rhetoric, I don't know how you'd not see that...
/r/MensRights28/12/23 04:46 AM
-3

Genderflip the question and you get your answer. Not really. Men can not be sure about paternity, so they mate guard. There is an evolutionary pressure to do that. Not the case for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 04:24 AM
-10

It's not a bus. He's a private jet: you get to use it when you want, and someone else use it when you are not. Why do you demand the jet be parked and not used?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/23 04:23 AM
7

You're misunderstanding evolution. You seem to think that any existing characteristics must have an evolutionary advantage if they exist. That's not the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/23 01:16 PM
14

Female orgasm isn't necessary to reproduction. Male orgasm is. Hence the gap...
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/23 01:02 PM
1

As opposed to feminists studies doing research on undergraduate US psychology students?
/r/MensRights26/12/23 12:36 PM
–

I ended up marrying a guy from our social circle who was both attractive and was on the path toward a decent career. Our point exactly.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/23 12:27 PM
3

There hasn't been an expectation of marriage in Europe for the last 50 years. No one there came up with the term or the situation "situationship". For all the more open-mindedness of Europe regarding sex compared to the US, the slutty behavior of sleeping around hasn't reached US levels. Except maybe in the UK. This is a really American social situation. It exists only because online dating set the conditions so that American women were able to go full retard. Funnily, feminist author Simone de …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/23 03:46 AM
10

In your twenties... Basically you just tested your peak sexual attraction power to know what caliber of men you could eventually land. Nothing new here.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/23 03:18 AM
2

Y’all need to start considering that we are also looking for “no strings attached” sex. Nah. Only with higher level men in the hope of getting something more. FWB is the equivalent of nice guy for women: they trade what they have in hope of getting what the other party can get them. It's sex and relationship. Nice guys do all the relationship work with no sex in return, girls in FWB or situationship or whatever, ie concubines, do all the sex work with no relationship benefits in return.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/23 03:17 AM
5

well, uncertain romantic experiences. There's no such thing unless you are in full denial. If you've opened your legs for him and he doesn't call you his girlfriend, you're a one night stand or a fuck body. The terms exist only for millennials and gen z because these are the generations where women could monkey branch the world thanks to online dating. So they all end up focusing on the same group of higher status men. There's a name for women in a situationship: a concubine.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/23 03:12 AM
2

Hypergamy describes a social reality and has been a word used in sociology since before you were born. That you think you're the arbiter of other people's vocabulary shows who's delusional here, or more likely, who's female. Controlling speech because you can't control the reality describing speech has been a noted tactics since at least Orwell...
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/23 02:50 AM
30

Cue their surprise when you'll start having a political movement restricted to white men. Because that will of course end well...
/r/MensRights24/12/23 02:19 AM
1

No it doesn't, you can't use so broad and ill defined Manospherian term and just say oh that wins the day? it doesn't. Do yourself a favor and use Google Scholar and search "hypergamy". You've got to be completely ignorant of sociology for thinking this is a term from the "manosphere".
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/23 02:13 AM
2

So how about the gender war started whenever Reddit opened since now the whole western world can talk with eachother anonymously in an online environment? Dude. Everybody could do that before either in newsgroups or on Digg.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/23 01:30 AM
-1

Reality and facts take precedence here. And women DO engage in hypergamous behavior. That you deny it does not erase the fact backed by much bresearch, for example https://jhr.uwpress.org/content/58/1/260.short we show that hypergamy is an important feature of today’s mating patterns in one of the most gender-equal societies in the world, namely Norway. As for the rest of your "no" without anything to back it up, it shows how much you rely on your own delusions to buttress your position.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/23 04:29 AM
-5

Most women don’t have a realistic option of a man bankrolling their entire life and any and all future offspring. If not, then most women would not engage in hypergamy, which they actually do. This shows that in general, women, whether they say it openly or not, DO expect to have men bankroll their life and their offspring, and manage to have it done. Most men these days aren’t strictly following this “provision and protection” fallacy you’re peddling. And rightfully so. They wake up to the scam…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/23 03:32 AM
3

Good breakdown. Simply put, women say they value conversation but by that they mean they value vapid exchanges about frivolities, like gossip.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 03:39 AM
1

Women are the majority of voters nowadays, don't try to escape your responsibility. And if men defended rape, they wouldn't have made it illegal.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 12:27 AM
1

It's not rape in many jurisdictions like the UK. It seems that enough women think that it is ok then.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 04:02 PM
1

But by babysitters. Except if they're female, then it's not rape anymore. Somehow.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 11:11 AM
0

Of course you don’t believe what women say, because you’ve never experienced it and it’s in your interest to do so Why should women be more believed than men? It's not like they never lie!
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 11:11 AM
1

If laws by definition restrict rape to be male on female, why do you think saying that victims are female and perps male has any weight?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 11:10 AM
-2

If men want to not be considered rapists and abusers until proven otherwise, they need to stop acting like criminals under police scrutiny And if women want to stop being told they asked for it, they have to stop behaving and dressing like whores looking for johns.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 11:03 AM
18

All this shows that the concept of patriarchy is just women projecting their own in-group bias and assume that men's competency must stems from in-group favors since that's how these feminists have been advancing themselves in life. They just cannot fathom that being competent is what can get you to the top.
/r/MensRights19/12/23 02:52 AM
11

It is begging the question, ie, it includes in the premise what needs to be demonstrated (that toxic masculinity is actually something that exists).
/r/MensRights19/12/23 02:46 AM
15

So a regular wife then...
/r/MensRights18/12/23 05:22 AM
16

Presenting yourself differently to get laid is also common among women, ie makeup... Is it shitty for women to makeup too?
/r/MensRights18/12/23 04:02 AM
36

Feminists never fought for anything... Even Simone de Beauvoir recognized that in her feminist book The Second Sex: The proletarians have accomplished the revolution in Russia, the Negroes in Haiti, the Indo-Chinese are battling for it in Indo-China; but the women’s effort has never been anything more than a symbolic agitation. They have gained only what men have been willing to grant; they have taken nothing, they have only received.
/r/MensRights17/12/23 08:05 AM
58

"But in "egalitarian marriages," wives are still spending more than double the amount of time on housework than their husbands Anyone who has done real work knows that it is not because Peter spends twice the time to do the same task as John, that Peter worked twice more. Only feminists think like that.
/r/MensRights17/12/23 07:57 AM
3

You can't revoke consent after the fact You can not revoke consent after the fact for a past action, that's right. But you can for a future action. So you were his girlfriend during sex. Then he changes his mind and you're no longer it. It's like women do all the time: they say they're your wife until death then they change their mind and divorce you. Same.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/23 11:41 PM
8

You can find such woman. Especially in cultures where women are supposed to be at home, those who do not want to are very happy to marry guys who agree to let them work to their fullest professional potential and who thus take a more laid-back approach to their own career. In any case, you'd still need a job to still be somewhat independent and also to support the kids right after the births of kids when even boss babes are so pumped with hormones that they wouldn't do anything but feed their ne…
/r/MensRights14/12/23 09:45 AM
1

If he’s doing a chore in 5 minutes, he’d just giving it a lick and a promise and expecting her to do it for real later. It's been shown that this is false. Here the reference of a study that puts to rest this poor excuse: https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/18hbu2h/comment/kd90ipu/ Something I haven’t witnessed or seen any evidence of. There’s sloppy singles of both sexes. There's no difference between perception of cleanliness and urgency of cleaning. Single men living alone are …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/23 12:02 AM
1

This is an important point though. People have different standards for cleanliness and women's tends to be higher. This is not true. It's the standard sexist excuse women use to virtue signal. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0049124119852395 We find that men and women respondents do not differ in their perceptions of how messy a room is or how urgent it is to clean it up.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 11:45 PM
2

There's no difference of standard in cleanliness between the sexes. That's just your sexist answer to a very measurable difference in efficiency. And the reason women don't want the toilet seat up is that they don't want to see how they dirty underneath the seat. Again, men are more efficient at doing chores, like any other physical tasks. And that's why women only want to measure the total time spent at doing the task, so they can claim that running a mile in ten minutes is twice the work as ru…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 11:41 PM
2

If you do the same thing as I did in twice the time, you didn't work twice as much.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 11:37 PM
1

But for chores and childcare, you won’t find out about his willingness to do housework until you’re living together and he’s gotten comfortable enough to become lazy. And in the same way, it's not before he lives with her that he can notice that she takes 2 hours to do a chore that takes five minutes to then claim that she worked for 2 hours so it's now his turn. Women are notably bad at doing chores efficiently and this is why single women living alone spend way more time doing the same chores …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 12:10 PM
5

Imagine comparing a 60 bucks meal to decades of household and child rearing…… You mean a decade of 60 bucks first date. Funny how you seem to think that men will have only one first date ever...
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 12:04 PM
0

It's the last bit women often leave relationships because they bring in half the income but perform more than half of the household chores They don't. They spend more time than men doing house chores but that doesn't mean they do more than 50%.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 12:00 PM
–

If women make mistakes, who cares? The issue is that society, hence men, still have to fund the solutions that deal with problems created by women. So we have to care because directly or indirectly, men have to deal with the consequences of women's actions because THEY are not held accountable.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 05:35 AM
–

The world will still spin if we eradicate the human species through nuclear bombs. That you think that "the world is still spinning" is somehow evidence that single mothers are not an issue is really telling how you basically have nothing else to say.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 05:32 AM
–

No surprise.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 03:08 AM
–

By that you mean scores of single mothers crying they don't have the support of a man? Where have you been in these past decades?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 03:05 AM
–

You're confusing a warning with a threat. And then, when the consequences are there, you'll be the first to complain. Noone would care if women weren't constantly complaining about the results of their own decisions. But since women complain about the consequences of their own decisions, we have to at least warn them. But even that is construed as a threat! The entitlement is out of this world...
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 02:55 AM
0

“Hoes” = women who won’t sleep with you. Na. Even the ones who sleep with me can be hoes. Men have to issue sleeping with hoes. If it weren't the case, prostitution wouldn't be a thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 01:11 AM
2

All he brought was wasting my time and annoyance. And you'd have done the same to him. Funny that even the mere consideration that women should bring something for men in relationships is an outrageous thought for the modern woman. And they wonder why they're only used for sex: the women themselves are unable to name a single thing they bring to a man. Not one. It's just me, myself and I...
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 12:41 AM
2

Still zero argument. Answer the question: what do women bring to the table? Women here are so dismissive of men bringing "just money", but they can't name a single thing they reciprocate with. Not one.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 12:36 AM
1

She points out she brings education and motivation to better her life and you say “men don’t care.” You just proved her point. The only thing she proved is that indeed, she's unable to name a single thing she would bring to a man. But she can name 40 that she can bring to herself or what a man can bring to her.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 12:33 AM
0

What..? No? It's two people getting to know each other better and subconsciously scanning to see if they are a good potential partner. No. It's not because YOU think you two had a connection that you should assume he thinks so too. And he'll tell you whatever is needed if he wants to get into your pants, so don't take that "connection" at face value. Because every reason will be considered invalid. By WHO? That's the whole point. Women don't think men should have any standard or requirement thus…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/23 12:45 PM
2

I wouldn't say funny as much as prudent, maybe even smart. That's the DEI argument: reflect your audience.
/r/MensRights11/12/23 12:37 PM
-1

If both parties are connecting This means nothing. It's the female version of I got a boner. A big reason why I struggle answering the question is because every woman is a different person. Women love to think they're special but they're not. In any cases, if there's a billon different reasons because there's a different one for each female, then why do you have a hard time answering the question? Because you know, just like everyone else, that women do not bring anything to the table on a first…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/23 08:10 AM
-4

As expected, you were not able to provide a single answer for what women bring to the table. You're dismissive about the cost of a first date precisely because you don't have to pay for it and so you pretend it's only 2 dollars. It's more than that and times many so it adds up. So yeah, men provide money. In case you missed it, you're spending a third of your life chasing it so it's not nothing. So what does a woman bring to the table on a first date? In a relationship? Something that the man do…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/23 04:14 AM
1

Winners can complain about a game they win...
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/23 03:59 AM
5

In other words, winners don't complain about the game, regardless of what game is played. Ever played Russian roulette?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/23 03:53 AM
13

There's an undue conclusion in your title though: those who don't participate in it aren't able to. You can totally be able to participate in it and not partake because you dislike it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/23 03:52 AM
-2

I don't think the question is restricted to the first date but even within this situation, the difference is stark:yes, men are expected to pay for the first date so they clearly bring something to the table, right from the start. What does the woman bring herself then? She'll be offended by the question or any other reason given like yours (to discover the other etc.) are equally existing for the man. So there's a clear imbalance right from the start: men provide resources from the very beginni…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/23 03:04 AM
-1

Because asking such question is questioning the premise onto which rests modern feminism and zeitgeist: Women are valuable to others by themselves. Their mere existence is what brings value. Thus asking what they bring to the table implies they don't bring anything by just being there, although it's what they want you to believe. Hence the pushback. If you don't ask the question, you're not going to question the premise that women are valuable by themselves but men have only the value of what th…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/23 01:50 AM
17

One of the funniest swaps was in the movie Master and Commander, where they turned the American antagonist into French... And another one is when you had the Poles who intercepted a German enigma machine during WW2 turn into Brits... Wonder why...
/r/MensRights10/12/23 10:33 PM
–

What if I'm just ugly? Meet ugly people.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/23 04:48 AM
2

You're wrongly considering males and females as a static group. It's not about the size of these groups, it's about the flow. You can pair up males and females one to one by expanding or contracting slightly the age range of each group. Which is already the case... Even in countries with massive gender ratio gap, like China, you can match one on one by lowering women's age and highten men's age.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/23 01:50 AM
–

The point made was that good women would never do that. Di Caprio proves that wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/23 05:54 AM
–

That's not what OP's message was about. She was doubting good women would be ok dating someone twenty years older knowing that they would be replaced at 25. Did Caprio shows that this isn't true.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/23 05:53 AM
45

They know on some level they want to uproot the order and peace you've established. They want you to center your life around them, hence their reaction. Don't be with a girl who wants to be the center of your life.
/r/MensRights09/12/23 12:05 AM
5

the “men prefer younger” narrative falls flat when you realizes that the redpill movement simply doesn’t know who to for go the good girl or the sluts. The "movement" tells you to enjoy the decline. Enjoy the sluts if you go for sex only, and watch all the red flags you ignore when you just want sex if by any chance you want a relationship. I’m sorry, but I highly doubt that good women want a man with some Travis bickle-esque Madonna/whore complex who will say what a rare fertile virginal unicor…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/23 11:29 PM
3

It's a fact and a descriptor for societies through the world and animal kingdom in evolutionary biology, anthropology and sociology. Patriarchy? No it isn't...
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/23 12:04 PM
7

No need to derail the point. "Patriarchy" is a conspiracy theory that exists just to placate women's ego and habit of never wanting to be accountable.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/23 07:05 AM
7

Rule 1 to explain women's behavior: it's never their fault.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/23 06:10 AM
3

Looking hotter isn't difficult if you start from low...
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/23 04:00 AM
6

it's accepting that you aren't worthless because you aren't as hot as you were at 20. For that, they should not have thought that they were worth the shit just because they looked good at 20. If their ass is the only thing they can bring to the table throughout their life, then panicking at 40 is unavoidable.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/23 03:59 AM
4

Men always spend money on women no matter what. They had better do so on young hookers rather than on old ones.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/23 03:55 AM
7

They're only terrified because they base their whole life on their appearance and thus are afraid of losing that. Cue the body positivity movement that is trying to peddle the same vapid lifestyle to women who objectively don't have an appearance to rely on..
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/23 03:54 AM
1

Leaders often take the back seat to allow others to take charge. And needing to get the last word is ego. Not leadership. Noone said "need" to have the last word. You're projecting. The fact that leaders don't do everything themselves is irrelevant. They ultimately decide if there's a difference of opinion. Hence they have the last word. And you're still unable to say what trumps force.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 10:37 PM
1

If it's not, what is? Funny how you keep claiming that force isn't the ultimate power but you're unable to say which one is. Any man knows force is the ultimate power. It's because women are most often spared the use of force that they can pretend it's not.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 10:32 PM
1

Still no argument. Just S.I.G.N. language...
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 10:21 PM
0

Women use force to overpower. They are not incapable of it. They can do it on children. The question is who is stronger, men or women? The answer is clear: men. Then since force is the last recourse form of power, then men always have a power onto women that women don't have onto men.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 08:02 PM
1

Actually, there are plenty of dual-leader homes. One perspective taking precedence does not negate the leadership of another A perspective isn't leadership. A leader is the person in charge, ie the one who has the last word. Only one can do that. You're redefining words to fit your narrative. A fist to a mouth was the best you could do for "force"? It's one easy to understand. Force is a physical characteristics easily measurable. Power comes in many forms far greater than physical. And still yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 07:59 PM
0

But I don't do hate and people drawing conclusions when they don't know shit about the other person, such as "that's your religious belief." Lol not only am I not religious, but I actually hold extremely controversial views about all religions. Funny that you think that a belief must be a religious belief. Let me guess, you think that you don't have beliefs and only stupid religious folks do, but you are above that. So in reality, you are a person with beliefs who doesn't think she has beliefs..…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 08:32 AM
0

You're not looking to talk about the issue at hand. You're looking to peddle in how men are superior to women. Which is related to the issue at hand. It's not because you do not want to see it that it is not so. Men can choose to make other people either collaborate or obey, because they can rely on force to impose their will. Women cannot make other people obey, only collaborate. That's why they peddle the argument that force is in itself bad. Until they of course need it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 08:26 AM
1

I'm not mistaken in contrasting obedience with collaboration. You are not just contrasting it. You pretend it is one OR the other: " The first - a man takes the lead and the woman must obey him as the sole leader of the family. The second - the man and woman both lead and collaborate on a shared vision for the family. " This is the wrong take and the thinking in absolute that women love to throw whenever they argue. ​ In a relationship dynamic, why wouldn't a man and woman have shared goals and …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 03:29 AM
-2

I rarely am at a loss for words So no argument. Typical woman!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 02:58 AM
-4

You're mistaken to oppose obedience and collaboration. Basically, you collaborate when you share the goals. You obey when you decide to do something despite disagreeing with it. Both situations can exist in a relationship. The question is thus, why, when there's a disagreement about what to do, should the man decide and the woman obey. First, let's not assume it's happening constantly. If so then there's a misalignment of values and the relationship is doomed. So why should the woman submit in t…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 02:04 AM
18

I’d guess because we’re constantly told that men would shag anything with a pulse, According to recent news, a pulse is not even necessary sometimes...
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/23 01:17 AM
-2

You're being generous by calling makeup a sign of insecurity and of course pretending that it has its source by some societal conditioning. Nah. Makeup is a way for women to fraudulently acquire more societal pretty privilege. They know it, and that's why they do it. Women pretending they make up for themselves is as believable as men saying they jerk off for their prostate.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/23 04:21 PM
8

which everyone here seems to want to negate. The list of qualifiers about yourself pretty much means that your data point isn't part of any representative sample of the general population, hence it is irrelevant for general debate. I'm sure you have plenty of me, myself and I spaces for that.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/23 03:52 PM
-1

One is protecting against unintentional harm, the other presumes intentional malice and a failure in your partner's character. Only women can characterize paternity fraud as "malice". It is basically theft of resources and an abuse of the child as well as the man on another level. But hey, it's just "malice"...
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/23 03:49 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter