TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Lovekraft Archive

View 3 posts and 88 comments by Lovekraft on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-22

Oh spare us your feminazi talking point, enter the real world instead of listening to your twisted professors, and learn about true fairness.
/r/MensRights21/09/11 10:37 PM
1

If you dig deeper into the origins of feminism, read the writings of Dworkin, Solanas, Frieden and Steinem, you will see the foundation of a hate-based movement, one that is in league with anti-Christian principles, one that is funded and supported by other Marxist organizations. Today, thirty or so years later, we have a virtual wall between the sexes. No room for compromise. Great track record, feminists!
/r/MensRights24/07/11 08:38 PM
1

Then again, Paul Elam's blogradio show over at A Voice for Men was unceremoniously pulled. No explanation, chance for appeal. Typical leftist tactic. But, as any MRA knows, this is expected and in fact shows us how void of content the feminist camp is. He will return in a better, more invigorated format.
/r/MensRights24/07/11 03:51 PM
0

Not a big deal, just fine tuning the terminology. Any movement will do this. It is necessary in order to counter the expected arguments against it; in this case, feminists portraying MRAs as basement-dwelling bitter men.
/r/MensRights24/07/11 03:48 PM
0

How about in the workplace where charges of sexual harassment are overwhelmingly against men? Follow me here: but there is no standard against female bitchiness, cattiness, backstabbing etc? Not a statistical response, but a general observation on the workplace double standard that restricts inappropriate male behavior while giving females a general free pass.
/r/MensRights24/07/11 03:42 PM
0

This Will Ferrell/Will Forte spoof is a good start: http://www.funnyordie.com/videos/55c51f0c23/dear-woman
/r/MensRights12/07/11 12:19 AM
8

Feminism is an enemy of free speech and academic inquiry. It is a racket designed to extort money from the public coffers and based on junk science and emotion. They do not belong in anything remotely resembling an institution of higher learning.
/r/MensRights31/05/11 06:14 PM
2

The chief will likely receive a generous buyout, without any thorough review of her performance.
/r/MensRights31/05/11 06:12 PM
-9

"Progressives" circumvent legitimate venues of recourse, and instead try to infiltrate various institutions surreptitiously. They also overtly impose their agenda on schools, the workplace etc.
/r/MensRights31/05/11 06:08 PM
1

couldn't get onto AVFM (or the Spearhead) today. Was the kaibosh put on them?
/r/MensRights23/05/11 08:20 PM
0

I recommend these youtubers: LVJ1112 who posts Tom Leykis radio shows. and Barbarossaaaa, who is a pull-no-punches MRA. ChristyoMisty is also an emerging female MRA/Equalist.
/r/MensRights20/05/11 12:24 PM
0

Bravo, sir. I hope to see your contribution to the next stage of the MRM. Academia is dying, and only we will be able to revert to some semblance of balance.
/r/MensRights20/05/11 12:22 PM
1

I am a lot less afraid than I was, say, five years ago and in fact I am sensing the momentum shift. In my workplace, feminists with their sexual harassment cloud of fear has dwindled to where men can now counter-charge, claim bias, and denounce bias. But whether MRAs will have state-funded and protected marches, equal male studies in academia, openly pro-male politicians are not here yet. But everyday we see evidence of the sham that is feminism converting more people to our side.
/r/MensRights20/05/11 12:18 PM
5

I would reply that psychology has become feminized, with blatant female craziness reduced to 'emotional problems'. Dr Phil basically advanced this idea: that when a man invokes domestic violence, the book should be thrown at him, but when a woman does it, it is her 'expressing herself'. Look it up. Occurred around 4 months ago.
/r/MensRights17/05/11 11:44 PM
3

This woman's name needs to be remembered as an example against the feminist argument that women are special, nurturing beings. Of course, the feminists are going to spin it that it was his actions that drove her to this. And to make this claim stick, they will now try to pass law (or 'education' programs, at the very least) that require men to never break up with a woman unless she is 100% in agreement. What is in fact needed is a strong deterrent to other psychotic stalker women: her image plas…
/r/MensRights17/05/11 07:58 PM
3

Welcome to the MRM. I suggest you start by reading the essay Marriage 2.0, listening to Tom Leykis (youtube channel LVJ112) and actively commenting at sites like AVoiceforMen.com and The Spearhead.com. We always welcome new recruits/perspectives. btw, the reason you feel alienated because of feminism is because that is what Third-Wave feminism is all about: making maleness taboo.
/r/MensRights17/05/11 10:58 AM
1

How about this: First you must attack the woman's unassailable assumption that her female quirks are unacceptable. If she thinks she has the right to be bitchy, negative, nagging, moody etc, then he should have the right to his 'maleness (in this case, demanding, controlling). Further, as men are expected, morally and legally, to renounce their extreme 'maleness' in the form of physical domination, then women are also to be expected to renounce extreme mood-swings, cattiness etc etc. And NO, kne…
/r/MensRights16/05/11 10:46 AM
0

I saw yet another nauseating commercial yesterday where the prissy wife was shilling her goods and at the end scolded her 'husband' who was looking in the fridge. He gave a look that was identical to that of a 10 year old boy. When will this end? I as a fully-formed adult male, am aware that this is leftist propaganda, but what effect does it have on the youth?
/r/MensRights16/05/11 10:42 AM
1

Feminist: one who takes credit for things she didn't do, and puts blame upon others for things she did do. Essentially, a bipolar, damaged individual.
/r/MensRights14/05/11 03:37 PM
15

to all feminist and mangina readers: we really didn't want this to go this far. If fairness, adherence to proper judicial tradition and basic human decency were applied, we wouldn't have this discussion. You can help stop what is coming. We don't really want to dismantle feminism entirely. But if you hold to your unbelievably absurd premises, and not acknowledge that past misdeeds need to be accounted for, you will be left in the dustbin of history. stop promoting third wave radical feminism. st…
/r/MensRights13/05/11 11:43 PM
0

The article states April is "Sexual Assault Awareness Month" What!?!? Don't these people have real jobs? How about May being "Check your Shoes for Spiders Month"?
/r/MensRights18/04/11 08:26 PM
1

You should head over to A Voice for Men.com and weigh in on the Kellett case which is a litmus test for over-aggressive feminist prosecution of DV cases.
/r/MensRights06/04/11 09:00 PM
0

There was an explosion in Rights Group rackets. Minorities, homosexuals and women all claimed victimhood of the Evil White Capitalist Patriarchy. Pathetic lot and quite deranged: they claim to be equal, but only after being given accommodation and free passes.
/r/MensRights06/04/11 08:58 PM
-4

It is COMMON SENSE. If a guy walks down a street at night waving twenty dollar bills around then gets jumped, who is to blame?
/r/MensRights06/04/11 08:55 PM
2

You should check out the website AShrink4Men to help you understand abusive women, and tools to cope and move on. Stay strong, and don't feel you are alone, for many men have been blindsided by what we thought were our loves.
/r/MensRights06/04/11 01:19 AM
4

The double standard in the workplace and academia where men are put under a microscope for any type of questioning the status quo, while women are treated like delicate little snowflakes, all the while engaging in pretty vulgar and devious behavior.
/r/MensRights06/04/11 01:18 AM
0

Curious. He has some amazing insight. Let's hope all is well. I suggest you follow the website A Voice for Men which has, at the end of it's Tuesday webradio show a short commentary by John. Perhaps this site and/or the radio show can shed some light on the matter.
/r/MensRights06/04/11 01:16 AM
5

This case MUST go to the Supreme Court of Canada, with the result being inquiries into judicial activism in family court matters. Of course, this won't happen in Feminist Canada. But one can still dream.
/r/MensRights04/03/11 09:26 PM
2

You could do a lot of good by putting your message out on Feminist blogs and websites. We MRAs are well aware of these people and appreciate your support. But still, your words would resonate in the femcamp.
/r/MensRights04/03/11 09:24 PM
0

Absolute crap!!! 25% caucasian???? WTF does that even mean? Nothing could be more insulting to the young white males who CLEARLY had nothing to do with any present or past discrimination.
/r/MensRights28/02/11 09:13 PM
0

Absolute crap!!! 25% caucasian???? WTF does that even mean? Nothing could be more insulting to the young white males who CLEARLY had nothing to do with any present or past discrimination.
/r/MensRights28/02/11 09:11 PM
14

One would be hard-pressed to call these skanks 'women'. Trashy, mouthy, lazy and superficial. Reality show at its best, but still reflective of what passes for youth social interaction these days.
/r/MensRights23/02/11 10:16 PM
2

The glaring omission in this woman's missive is how unappealing marriage to a modern empowered, entitled woman is to most men with a solid head on their shoulders.
/r/MensRights22/02/11 10:06 PM
2

MEN: this thread has turned into a giant feminized circle-jerk. Get to the freakin' point!!! Feminism is a failed philosophy and shouldn't be given nearly the attention is has here! Let feminists come up with coherent policies that are verifiable and, until then, stop feeding the femtrolls.
/r/MensRights15/01/11 05:08 PM
2

Equality is a socialist catchphrase that renders anyone questioning it "anti-equality". Feminism is a term that renders anyone questioning is "anti-woman" or "misogynist" Gay rights means that anyone questioning it is a homophobe. Islamophobe, racist, bigot. See how language has been co-opted by the evil to advance their agendas? So many pseudo-intellectuals, living in western society and having the highest standard of living imaginable compared to the other 7/10 of the world, sipping their latt…
/r/MensRights15/01/11 01:17 AM
1

I saw it and the mother was a nutcase. Dressed like a tramp with a brood of spawn. She pimped out her children for boxing matches.
/r/MensRights10/01/11 10:13 PM
-5

Wow, that has to be nominated for Mangina Statement of the Year. Loser.
/r/MensRights08/01/11 09:01 PM
5

One can only imagine their funding and what one would find if they peered behind the glossy webpage and standard statements. Extreme cultural Marxists with a destructive agenda.
/r/MensRights08/01/11 09:00 PM
0

$15 000 IS a lot of debt! The Canadian show "Till Debt do us Part" looks at how debt can build and ultimately ruin a family/relationship and drastic action is needed to shift the mentality of the couple (although most of us know it is the entitled, superficial woman and her whipped mangina who is the example). So, best to move on and for any men getting into a relationship: fully SCREEN your woman BEFORE getting in too deep, because once she lives with you or are married, getting rid of her afte…
/r/MensRights08/01/11 05:05 PM
-2

Typical thin-skinned delusional feminist. You have been waging a war against reason, traditional and capitalism in favour of a nanny-state for decades and, frankly, we are glad you are being exposed for the sham you are.
/r/MensRights02/01/11 09:46 PM
1

I downvote downvotes.
/r/MensRights02/01/11 09:44 PM
5

The NDP party is full of useless hacks, contributing nothing to our national fabric and instead use every method to undermine the economy and traditional institutions. Just watch them in Parliament - frumpy and clownish. File under 'irrelevant'.
/r/MensRights02/01/11 09:43 PM
3

ABT (Anyting But This) Syndrome that strikes most modern entitled women which posits that no matter how much their basic needs are met and are available to them, they still find a way to nag and whine.
/r/MensRights02/01/11 09:42 PM
1

What!!! That's the answer? Try harder. How about telling him to dig his heels in and confront this a-hole.
/r/MensRights02/01/11 09:31 PM
1

Find a way to confront this guy in person, look him in the eye and as a man, say that if he continues assassinating your character and refused to come clean, then he has left you with no choice than to take matters into your own hands. Let him conclude from that statement whatever he wants. In other words, he sounds like a spineless douche and you have to step up the game.
/r/MensRights02/01/11 09:30 PM
13

Yes, let's all just make the men wear a visible badge when going in public to identify our faulty gene. That'll solve all the problems.
/r/MensRights02/01/11 09:28 PM
-1

Wake up yourself, white knight. Perhaps you yourself haven't been affected by misandry, but it doesn't mean it doesn't exist. And to paint all Mens Rights Activists with the same shamebrush indicates you are using the same tactic you decry us for using.
/r/MensRights01/01/11 08:39 PM
1

Amber is scum. Pure evil and should be sent to prison and rendered sterile. Look at her eyes and tell me there isn't an evil spirit behind it.
/r/MensRights30/12/10 06:34 PM
2

I just wonder if feminists will concede ever the possibility that women are able to entrap men and scream false rape. Duke Rape scandal come to mind? And don't try and paint we MRAs as pro-rape. We are pro-rule of law, evidentiary procedure, anonymity for accused, and cross-examination of accusers etc.
/r/MensRights29/12/10 09:11 PM
1

You dad is what is known as a White Knight mangina who is ignorant of the reality of woman-on-man abuse, an ignored yet prevalent problem.
/r/MensRights29/12/10 09:05 PM
-1

NOW is a laughingstock, only used by politicians for votes and nothing more. Completely irrelevant to aiding in the ills of the day and if anything, they add to our problems. Just a bunch of bitter old feminazis.
/r/MensRights29/12/10 09:03 PM
1

SCREEN your woman! I can't make it any clearer. Let the lust subside, know yourself, and really determine whether she has the resilience and moral fortitude to stick with you through thick and thin. Society makes it way too easy for women to 'get bored' or 'need to find herself' for you to enter cohabitation assuming otherwise.
/r/MensRights29/12/10 09:00 PM
0

How can she slap!!!
/r/MensRights28/12/10 01:21 AM
1

She should be taken to a counselling centre immediately and given years of training on how to use birth control and stay sober.
/r/MensRights28/12/10 12:12 AM
2

A classic example of karma. If you lie and destroy, soon enough it will come back to bite you in the a$$. And good too that her DA got fired for jumping on the feminist bandwagon, going after the lacrosse players like it was the inquisition.
/r/MensRights28/12/10 12:09 AM
3

Better to err on the side of caution. Many men have been destroyed under false allegations, and should you ever get on her bad side, the lack of accountability that feminism instills in AWs means no tactic would be so low.
/r/MensRights23/12/10 10:24 PM
2

This article states that the golddigger is trying to get the courts to override a pre-nup, if I understand it correctly!?! What the h@ll can a man do anymore to counter the insidious reach of feminism?
/r/MensRights23/12/10 10:20 PM
3

And how about my generation of men in their late 30s early 40s who had to deal with the hangover of the 60s and 70s? Yes, second-wave feminism truly reaped what they sowed: relationship discord and competition from entitlement b-'es.
/r/MensRights23/12/10 10:18 PM
1

And let's not forget the local prosecuting attorney in the Duke Rape Case had to resign for massive breach of duties. The problem I have with cases like this is the complicity of the Lamestream/Legacy media which puts out the initial (false) story that does its damage, only to print retractions days or weeks later in the back pages.
/r/MensRights23/12/10 10:12 PM
-9

It is kind of like the expression "a conservative is a liberal who has been mugged": A Mens Rights Activist (MRA) is a mangina who has been nagged and belittled by feminists.
/r/MensRights23/12/10 10:11 PM
2

I recommend you check out the website ASHRINK4MEN which actually recently posted a few articles about how to deal with abusive women over the holidays. Jump in and seek strength from fellow strugglers. Besides, Christmas, at least its present incarnation, is overrated, where putting on airs and spending ourselves silly is the order of the day.
/r/MensRights22/12/10 10:04 PM
1

More navel gazing from academia, I suspect. While the standard of living decreases, and national debt strangles the middle class, we have these liberal feminists trying to cover their tracks, saying 'hey, don't blame us for the decades of social destruction, we've changed, please take us back.' For me at least, it is going to take a lot more convincing. A lot more. Female humility is an oxymoron.
/r/MensRights22/12/10 09:56 PM
7

why don't you try walking a mile in this guy's shoes and tell me whether you would take the high road, you sanctimonious a-hole.
/r/MensRights22/12/10 09:50 PM
3

Women like Rosin are one of the main reasons I am an ardent Men's Rights Activist. Probably many men can echo this thought. Urban, liberal, moral relativist who sees the enemy around every corner and have no hesitation to destroy, smear, and humiliate.
/r/MensRights19/12/10 09:26 PM
2

I strongly recommend you track down and watch last year's movie "Anti-Christ" starring Willem Dafoe. It is a chilling summary of what feminism sees as the enemy: man.
/r/MensRights19/12/10 09:25 PM
1

Just hearing about his opponents (white knights, and feminists, and entitlement princesses) is enough evidence for me to support him. On Youtube, many of his audio shows are found under the following channels (BlowmeupTomLeykis, Alexanderino, TomLeykisClips). So refreshing to hear a man defend us against the overwhelming forces, up to and including Obama and Biden.
/r/MensRights19/12/10 09:24 PM
6

Schopenhauer was a lifelong bachelor who spoke to power: that the Hegelian worldview of man-made historical interpretation is flawed and leads to tyranny. As for women, he correctly asserted that, biologically and ethically, they are suited for nurturing children as they themselves share their emotional and intellectual abilities; and that giving them power beyond that leads to societal discord. His main thesis "The World as Will and Representation" should be required reading for anyone wishing …
/r/MensRights19/12/10 09:22 PM
6

Ugh. Typical feminist bandstanding, ignoring the concept of false accuse allegations and the rule of evidentiary tradition. She knows which side her bread's buttered on and should be ignored accordingly by anyone with a sense of justice.
/r/MensRights14/12/10 09:21 PM
-2

Semantics. The point you are avoiding is that there is nary a woman today who isn't affected/poisoned by second-wave feminism (superiority over men).
/r/MensRights12/12/10 09:20 PM
-1

And let's not forget that men have a higher moral code when it comes to ratting out co-workers and acting a certain way. Until society brings back shaming of feminist thinking, it will get worse. The workplace star chambers of accusation without cross-examination, precedent etc infect every large corporation.
/r/MensRights12/12/10 09:19 PM
4

And what interests me, in the age of No-Fault divorce, is whether he should have had to pay a single cent, if the case was that his wife was a nagging, deceitful harridan. This point gets pushed aside constantly but is highly relevant IMO. Of course, lawyers and judicial activists would never shine a light on this, for it would bring the whole racket crashing down.
/r/MensRights12/12/10 03:28 PM
0

And let's not forget the subversive, eroding trend in Lamestream Media to paint husbands as dopes and the wife as the strong one. And on the topic, there really isn't any mention of the MGTOW. Usually when you see men together w/o the broads, they are drinking, overaged children.
/r/MensRights12/12/10 03:26 PM
7

What a vile creature. I only want to hear how she has sought forgiveness for her sin. Anything else is hamster rationalization. And the fact her thesis supervisors are women speak volumes. How low has academia sunk...
/r/MensRights12/12/10 03:25 PM
0

And a few seasons back, they exposed Mike's squeeze Jan as a nutjob. The best was the episode "Dinner Party" which exposed her as a controlling psycho.
/r/MensRights10/12/10 11:38 PM
2

Tom Leykis is the man!!! Check him out on Youtube under the following channels: Blowmeuptomleykis, alexanderino and TomLeykisclips. Hours and hours of education and entertainment on how to reassert your masculinity and to tear a strip off the feminist moonbats.
/r/MensRights10/12/10 11:35 PM
0

Could you summarize the article for us? I really prefer getting your summary instead of spending a half hour dissecting it.
/r/MensRights10/12/10 11:32 PM
4

More signs that Feminism's global reach is failing, and that the MRM is gaining momentum. No longer will shaming tactics divert from the fact that many valid young men are trampled under by hypergamous, entitled women with over-inflated senses of worth and gold-digging instincts. One day, our stories will be a steady drumbeat.
/r/MensRights05/12/10 09:05 PM
2

I don't want to disrespect you. It just had to be pointed out. But you are like many men who got fooled by women who use sex and affection as a stop loss item, turning around once marriage hands the man's testicles over to her. Keep strong and you will find support among various websites.
/r/MensRights01/12/10 01:25 AM
-2

What do you mean "she would not get off of me" when the last child was conceived? Either you are a wuss, or she is a brute. I mean, that is the first time I ever heard such an excuse.
/r/MensRights01/12/10 01:24 AM
1

I like the line that the husband wouldn't comment on the circumstances surrounding why the marriage ended. Pretty sure it had something to do with her being a brutal b#$ch.
/r/MensRights01/12/10 01:22 AM
0

Men are the artists, who will push the vision forward, without being beholden to others.
/r/MensRights01/12/10 01:12 AM
4

Geez, while they're at it, why don't they just add "air breather' to the lot? Who in this day and age doesn't have some emotional baggage? But if there was a true comparison between how men and women HANDLE these issues, the results should be notable: that men bear their burden with much greater resolve and resiliency, choosing the high ground more often and showing much more patience and mercy.
/r/MensRights01/12/10 12:49 AM
-4

There's this commentor on The Spearhead who was similarly fleeced for having smugitis. She justifiably was heaped scorn upon her and it seems that recently she has changed her tune. We don't censor. But we also don't hold the hands of widdle gurls.
/r/MensRights29/11/10 11:49 AM
-1

Let's not forget the big picture: the destruction of maleness - competition, aggressiveness, honor etc. Look at how public schools campaign to eliminate male-only activities, remove achievement in order to make everyone 'feel' good. Now, here's the homosexualist agenda in step with such revision. Who's side do you think they are on? Screw them.
/r/MensRights28/11/10 02:52 PM
-2

it was completely passed over at my workplace, although I have been subjected to the typical women's movement crap. All there know I am an MRA,so the next time the feminists toot their own horn, I will visibly walk away.
/r/MensRights20/11/10 03:23 PM
2

In a way, this poster implies that all women are feminists.
/r/MensRights19/11/10 10:22 PM
1

Amber was in a class of her own as far as psychos go. The stigma that will follow her for the rest of her life for the various selfish acts conducted on national television will end up in her receiving retribution of one form or another. Sadly, society seems to have disregarded all notions of accountability. Too many lawyers, meddlers and, again, sociopaths getting away with it.
/r/MensRights19/11/10 10:00 PM
1

here's the short answer to the two issues (1. abortion against the father's wishes. He wants to keep the baby, she doesn't, and 2. keeping the baby against the father's wishes. She wants to keep the baby, he doesn't). if sex was consensual and they are of legal age, this decision is between the man and woman only. If these two cannot figure out how to raise this child, and the father is incapable of raising the child on his own, the state takes over the decision. If the state chooses abortion, t…
/r/MensRights07/11/10 03:03 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter