TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

LowPressureUsername Archive

View 6 posts and 104 comments by LowPressureUsername on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
16

There’s nothing wrong with women’s liberty, and posts like these derail our movement. The issue is that feminism is no longer about gender parity and is now one of the forces of selfishness in the west.
/r/MensRights27/10/25 05:26 AM
0

If you want feminists to disagree with this policy just say “yeah you’re right it makes sense I guess. After all one man can breed five women but five men need to fight over one.” Just say some heinous shit like that.
/r/MensRights28/08/25 05:44 PM
2

When they move to the alt right: surprised pikachu face. I’m not opposed to this as long as Germany takes care of their veterans just like Israel and uses the military to teach them real skills that gives them an advantage in the workforce, build social networks and receive a good competitive paycheck.
/r/MensRights28/08/25 05:06 PM
7

I like how it says r/mensrights is misogynistic but doubles up and says r/feminism is misandrist.
/r/MensRights26/06/25 08:34 PM
1

“So it’s natural for men to have multiple partners but not women?”
/r/MensRights13/08/24 02:39 AM
1

“Glad to know you’d submit to a man with a big dick. 🐶🦮🦮”
/r/MensRights11/08/24 11:53 PM
18

Ones more aggressive than the other, it’s basically saying “hey that’s not very nice but did a man do something to make you feel that way?” Vs “stop being misogynistic.”
/r/MensRights05/08/24 12:12 AM
34

Learn how to actually hold a conversation about men’s rights. Too many men’s rights activists can’t articulate their opinion and it sucks because our adversaries, which there are many of, will always pick and single out the weakest articulation of our arguments. Contact your senators, representatives and leaders at every level. When senators are only told that their base is demanding men’s rights they cannot refuse forever. As we’ve seen, their policy can fold easily to outside pressure regardle…
/r/MensRights22/07/24 06:30 PM
5

“One complainant, Melissa Gold, even declined to testify, saying she could care less. “I have nothing to report. I don’t want to go over this any further. It’s done and I don’t go there (Saddleback College) anymore. This is irrelevant to my life now. I don’t care what happens officially at this point,”” Of course you don’t. Absolutely no empathy whatsoever. It’s only a guy’s education and life at stake. Someone should find out what she’s currently doing and remind her that black lives matter.
/r/MensRights19/07/24 11:44 AM
2

People don’t post reasonable mod messages
/r/MensRights15/07/24 09:54 PM
4

His hip touched my butt in a dark and crowded room in a party! It must be intentional.
/r/MensRights13/05/24 03:57 PM
2

“Not a justified response.”
/r/MensRights07/05/24 11:37 PM
1

Contact YouTubers and influencers if you really want it to break 10,000.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 09:59 PM
1

No, it’s completely real unfortunately.
/r/MensRights08/03/24 10:29 PM
1

Not sure, but it sounds like it’s useless given a sample size of 2.
/r/MensRights24/02/24 10:11 PM
10

“Isn’t that just sexist? Women aren’t at the complete mercy of literally any man.”
/r/MensRights11/01/24 05:20 AM
1

Innocent until proven guilty only applies in courts, although even they get it wrong for men unfortunately.
/r/MensRights06/01/24 02:40 AM
25

Plus it probably includes countries like Iran or Saudi Arabia, so it’s very much not representative of the west.
/r/MensRights01/01/24 12:04 AM
5

Oh, take my upvote. Unfortunately those types of laws seem to be the norm and not the exception.
/r/MensRights29/12/23 10:38 PM
1

Read my post, friend. I was arguing against America and not Brazil.
/r/MensRights29/12/23 10:34 PM
9

I would argue Iceland or Sweden is more feminist. Openly advocating for man taxes, etc. In the United States there’s some crazies but also a good amount of opposition.
/r/MensRights29/12/23 10:26 PM
42

5,000 likes…
/r/MensRights29/12/23 02:14 PM
1

When I was 5-6 I was told you shouldn’t judge women for wearing men’s clothing but I shouldn’t wear women’s clothing cuz it’s gay. I was also told that societal standards where worse for women. I kinda just shrugged it off and was like “whatever.” Little things like that piled up though, like this girl chased me around and was like slapping me in front of a teacher but when I pushed her away I got in trouble and she mocked me. We had explicit instruction dedicated to women’s accomplishments but …
/r/MensRights28/12/23 12:10 AM
1

If it was safe and trustworthy, why not?
/r/MensRights20/12/23 02:09 AM
1

That’s disingenuous. Why wouldn’t I ask someone else for future reading? There’s a billion studies and only a few the original poster was referencing. Like if I asked for a source on r/MachineLearning it’s not because I’m trying to disprove anyone but because searching “study that found in their results that (something happened)” will lead to biased results and I’d prefer to just ask someone else for their resources.
/r/MensRights29/11/23 04:21 PM
6

Thanks
/r/MensRights27/11/23 07:01 AM
1

A victim is a victim. A male victim of a male perpetrator is just as much a victim as an African American at the hands of another African American. Just because someone who shares a characteristic with the victim committed the crime doesn’t make them second rate victims. Is a white women any less of a victim because she was raped by someone who shares the same skin color? Then why is a male corpse any lesser than a female corpse at the hands of a perpetrator that shares the same sex? So what?
/r/MensRights27/11/23 06:15 AM
5

Study?
/r/MensRights27/11/23 06:06 AM
1

“Saying that is literally derailing the conversation away from men’s issues and only pretending to care about women’s issues. Stop projecting.”
/r/MensRights26/11/23 09:01 PM
1

I honestly don’t care about whatever identity is assigned to a movie I like or dislike. The category a subject falls within should be determined by its content, the content should not be judged by the category. I’m sure there’s at least one “woke” movie that’s great, weather it be because it’s artistically valuable or just really well executed.
/r/MensRights05/10/23 08:06 AM
3

I’m sorry, I do not understand what you are trying to say?
/r/MensRights07/07/23 12:59 PM
12

Western intellectualism is not dead either. Just cherry picked / stifled.
/r/MensRights09/06/23 03:32 PM
2

And China does not have ridiculous rhetoric like this either.
/r/MensRights05/06/23 04:37 AM
16

I wish I was born as a woman but wouldn’t transition.
/r/MensRights24/05/23 01:38 AM
6

What are all of the countries that do this? I genuinely am curious and want to cite them in the future if you have examples. I’m not talking about correlation, because almost every country is sexist against men. I’m talking about enshrined in law btw.
/r/MensRights19/05/23 09:24 PM
28

Can you find that? It sounds funny.
/r/MensRights15/05/23 05:59 PM
3

To be fair you represent your argument badly. A better approach might be: “Are you serious? You think it’s okay to be selfish? Do you think a society where people lie and abuse the legal system will go anywhere? Do you wonder why lawmakers removed exceptions? It is disgusting but their logic is probably similar to yours. You are harming more than the falsely accused, their family, their friends and their livelihood. You are negatively impacting your community. You are sucking the air out of the …
/r/MensRights12/05/23 08:26 AM
7

You could’ve provided statistics and legal reports strengthening the MRA position.
/r/MensRights11/05/23 04:51 AM
1

No shit but they’re stupid and it’s not precedent. They seem to prefer cherry-picking and exaggerating evidence as opposed to making it up.
/r/MensRights09/05/23 03:06 PM
1

Hello, I’d be interested. What’s your discord tag?
/r/MensRights09/05/23 10:32 AM
0

I’m saying you should use a little bit of critical thinking and cite an original study. Fox News is easier to attack because of its reputation and its off putting to newcomers to the community so see a widely hated source known for propaganda being used on the MensRights subreddit.
/r/MensRights09/05/23 02:43 AM
0

Fox News is worse than CNN because they’re component propagandists, CNN is just news entertainment aimed towards leftists.
/r/MensRights09/05/23 12:20 AM
2

They die earlier, so I’d assume it doesn’t need to be at one age. It could be there chance of dying at one, multiple or every age is higher.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 08:53 PM
5

Let’s train our own language model to be neutral or even feminist. If we get around 400$ in GPU hours and data we can use either LLaMA adapter or go the route of Stanford’s Alpaca.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 03:30 AM
1

Well, they can be. Segregation existed and was very successful. In our modern society it’s more tricky than that, with the advent of the internet and the fact it’s illegal for discrimination to take place on sex or race.
/r/MensRights19/04/23 11:51 PM
3

The only complaint is a lot of them are almost certainly hired because they’re a woman and not because of competency. Other than that the nearly 50/50 ratio is perfectly fine, in fact the fact there’s slightly more women makes it hilarious feminists even call Canada a patriarchy so I don’t mind at all.
/r/MensRights15/04/23 03:57 PM
2

All of the suggestions to go teach in Korea and Japan are valid. They really value hard work. It won’t be easy o learn their language or adopt their traditions but if you do it you’ll be so much happier.
/r/MensRights11/04/23 08:53 PM
5

It radicalizes people in their direction I agree
/r/MensRights05/04/23 12:31 AM
2

We can probably do that. Do you want to try and test some things with me later?
/r/MensRights04/04/23 10:10 PM
1

Make our own model based off of LLaMa for factual unbiased answering.
/r/MensRights01/04/23 07:55 PM
1

I think there political affiliations are irrelevant. ChatGPT is a proprietary model optimized for dialectical applications. It is not optimized for factual answering. It’s largest success is RLHF. ChatGPT is “politically correct.” Regardless of what the programmers think ChatGPT has been given extensive safety measures to make it less “offensive” or “controversial.” If you want to experiment with less censored models you can try using OpenAI’s API or open source alternatives such as LLaMa, GPT-J…
/r/MensRights30/03/23 03:20 PM
4

We’re here for you. We care.
/r/MensRights26/03/23 10:20 AM
3

I think this sub has a lot of power and can start actively advocating for men to become educated and get into universities and fulfilling careers. I think we’ve struck a chord with a global audience.
/r/MensRights04/03/23 10:21 PM
3

You can try to bring up statistics or say because women are more likely to self report, but if you’re in a bad mood you can say “I guess what you’re saying is that women are 9x more incompetent than men as men clearly are more capable of planning out and executing suicide.”
/r/MensRights04/03/23 10:07 AM
1

Think about it this way: if you don’t know them they still have to care about you enough to gossip about you.
/r/MensRights02/03/23 05:42 PM
1

How many times did you post this same comment?
/r/MensRights12/02/23 04:16 AM
-1

How many times did you post this same comment?
/r/MensRights12/02/23 04:16 AM
0

How many times did you post this same comment?
/r/MensRights12/02/23 04:15 AM
1

How many times did you post this same comment?
/r/MensRights12/02/23 04:15 AM
1

Boys call each other obese as jokes, to girls that can be taken as an insult just because society communicates differently with them.
/r/MensRights10/02/23 03:12 AM
1

I think as a society we might need to be willing to make some trade offs. Surveillance vs crime for instance. Are you willing to have a camera in your workplace, school and streets in exchange for lower crime rates?
/r/MensRights07/02/23 12:27 PM
1

Someone here should start a company that’s actually an equal opportunity employer.
/r/MensRights15/01/23 03:53 AM
1

We do have empathy for women? It’s just unlike the feminists we don’t completely loose empathy for men.
/r/MensRights11/01/23 04:49 AM
0

How am I a feminist?
/r/MensRights01/01/23 07:48 AM
1

It’s arguing it effected women more, going back to the previous example 50% of 100 is 50 and 100% of 20 is 20. Even if the percent of women who killed themselves increased at a higher rate, there was a large actual increase in the number of men lost their lives to suicide than women. It is more important to help 50% of 100 people then 100% of 20 people. Saying that “there’s a startling rise in suicide, particularly for women” ignores the fact, in our example, the amount of male suicides outgrew …
/r/MensRights01/01/23 07:46 AM
1

“If somebody disagrees with me, even if the disagreement is mild they are only trying to subvert me.”
/r/MensRights01/01/23 07:33 AM
6

Even if a majority of women are feminists, we shouldn’t generalize. Even a small amount of women that support men’s rights shows that it’s not an inevitability for women to be feminist and that our movement isn’t just a club for “incels and misogynists.” But rather a movement for anyone who supports true equality.
/r/MensRights31/12/22 07:43 PM
10

That’s not what he meant. If 100 men killed themselves last year and that figure increased by 50% this year, that means 150 men killed themselves this year. If 20 women killed themselves last year, and 40 killed themselves this year, that means that female suicide has increased by 100%. A large percentage on a small number is still a small number.
/r/MensRights31/12/22 04:48 PM
16

It’s the strategy feminists use, there are plenty of women who support Men’s rights.
/r/MensRights31/12/22 03:28 PM
1

It’s already been trained, it likely doesn’t adapt in the same way. I’m sure the people at OpenAI had that incident at the forefront of their minds.
/r/MensRights24/12/22 10:12 PM
3

Itll literally say it supports the taliban if you prompt it correctly, it’s not reliable.
/r/MensRights24/12/22 05:52 PM
2

Take it literally, as mentioned previously just file anonymous reports against (management) for instance.
/r/MensRights24/12/22 02:12 PM
1

The worst thing we can do is shit on that sub, it’ll only move it further away from us. We should try and have interconnected, collaborative and friendly communities. Regardless if we agree entirely or not we still have common goals we can strive towards.
/r/MensRights24/12/22 09:13 AM
1

no.
/r/MensRights02/12/22 10:03 AM
3

“A women main character” what are you talking about? We dislike it when they’re poorly written self inserts.
/r/MensRights02/12/22 03:35 AM
3

You haven’t actually read any posts here have you?
/r/MensRights02/12/22 03:33 AM
2

1) Ask which dictionary definition they’re using. And fact check it. “It’s the advancements of women’s place in society with the justification of being about equity. Not inherently about equality, there is a difference.” 2) Tell them it’s fallacious https://effectiviology.com/appeal-to-definition/ 3) Ask them if they understand that language changes. Movements change. Ideas grow and evolve. A definition that might’ve been valid 100, 50 or even 20 years ago may now be outdated. Tell them nations …
/r/MensRights01/12/22 06:07 AM
15

So basically seduce someone, don’t say you want to have sex with them directly but strip without a word instead, and then accuse them of rape?
/r/MensRights26/08/22 06:30 AM
16

The worst part is the effect on the kids
/r/MensRights16/04/22 01:41 AM
2

My highschool has the same dress requirement. I see where you’re coming from, we where once specifically told to where suits and ties to something and the girls where just told to “look nice.”
/r/MensRights14/03/22 08:23 AM
2

“Men were 2.6 times as likely as women (61.1 vs 23.2 per 100,000) to experience unintentional injury deaths.” “Males accounted for more than 95% of these deaths,” “Men accounted for 89.9% of the active duty military population;” https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/96-103/pdfs/96-103.pdf
/r/MensRights11/03/22 11:45 PM
1

I’m.. what the fuck? “She told CNBC’s Tania Bryer that women and girls are particularly vulnerable to sexual and gender-based violence during conflict, as well as loss of access to healthcare, education, food, water and sanitation. “But more importantly, we see also that women are not only victims in crisis, but they are also carrying their families, their communities and their nations, from fragility to stability, if we only give them the space to do so,” Bahous said. “So, this is why we seek t…
/r/MensRights11/03/22 11:39 PM
1

I’ll send you some things tomorrow
/r/MensRights11/03/22 07:20 AM
1

It might be misinformation, or it might just flat out be brainwashing, but I don’t think the majority of feminists can tell the two words apart. I think they think they’re doing what’s fair, even when it’s so obviously not.
/r/MensRights11/03/22 01:48 AM
1

Can you find the original study? It’s just linking me to articles by the same source.
/r/MensRights10/03/22 08:38 AM
1

Thanks, I’ll take a look at it in the morning!
/r/MensRights10/03/22 08:38 AM
2

Thanks for your input. I’m a guy in highschool, it seems a bit unfair to me so I really appreciate your input!
/r/MensRights10/03/22 07:08 AM
2

Can I have a source?
/r/MensRights10/03/22 07:07 AM
1

Pretty much
/r/MensRights10/03/22 04:34 AM
5

Too general + it’s Reddit. Typically I think the consensus is there are reasons you would want an abortion, but it shouldn’t be whenever they fuck you want. Personally I believe women should be able to have an abortion for a window of a few months or so months after the baby is conceived and an extra month or so if the father agrees.
/r/MensRights10/03/22 02:39 AM
11

People express themselves more freely online.
/r/MensRights08/03/22 08:55 AM
1

On paper it would be easier, until you told them what it would imply.
/r/MensRights08/03/22 08:55 AM
-11

Wouldn’t suppression of emotions fall into toxic masculinity?
/r/MensRights08/03/22 08:54 AM
13

1) Anecdotal evidence is no evidence at all, please stop saying “my personal experience…” By your logic “I’ve never personally met a nazi, thus I can logically conclude they don’t exist anymore!” Despite the fact people are their truest selves online. 2) I don’t think you read the sentence, or I might be misinterpreting this… but he was saying feminism was based off the traditional gender role where women having no agency. 3) You’re right women have had impacts on history, very significant ones …
/r/MensRights08/03/22 08:45 AM
26

I think you should read the response he sent you too, you just copy and pasted the same thing basically ignoring the fact they’re different comments. That being said if you’re not going to put in the effort to write comments, I won’t put in the effort to write criticisms of them. “I’m referring to traditional gender roles This is why there is a disconnect with feminism. Feminism heavily relies on traditional gender roles especially for men. Specifically, feminists see men as agents and women as …
/r/MensRights08/03/22 08:38 AM
5

Just because you don’t personally know an extremist doesn’t mean they don’t exist and they’re not a threat. Regardless, online is where people’s true colors show. Anecdotal evidence is frankly no evidence at all.
/r/MensRights08/03/22 08:34 AM
8

Why don’t we like the term “toxic masculinity”: It specifically targets traditionally “male” characteristics, which aren’t necessarily harmful. (Confidence, bravery etc etc.) Obviously, too much of anything is bad, but some characteristics that could traditionally be labeled as “feminine” are also not great in excess. It’s not about intent, I personally believe the vast majority of feminists have good motives at heart but they just don’t effect men and boys positively. Feminism in its modern for…
/r/MensRights08/03/22 08:30 AM
7

People, be a little nicer to them. They’re trying harder than most feminists, and we should try to engage civilly.
/r/MensRights08/03/22 08:22 AM
9

Men make up about 90% of trucking jobs too, men often do dirty and disgusting jobs. It’s wonderful your sister worked in that field at some point, we need more women willing to do that. I’m glad for her as an individual she’s moved onto something (hopefully) more lucrative.
/r/MensRights08/03/22 07:38 AM
22

I don’t quite understand what you’re trying to say. You’ve listed everyone from Eleanor Roosevelt to Joan of Arc? I can give you significant male figures with even more significant successes in a single decade. 1) Hermann Göring 2) Dwight D. Eisenhower 3) Carl Gustaf Emil Mannerheim Former President of Finland 4) Erwin Rommel 5) Heinz Guderian Obviously, these where picked from World War 2, which lasted less than a decade, but yours where picked from a span of almost 500 years, if not more. Men …
/r/MensRights08/03/22 07:33 AM
2

They’re not wrong, there should be more articles about women, absolutely! But for the love of god, not because they’re the first women to do x y or z. When you say “she’s the first women to do (something)” it implies it’s an exception, that men can do it but women struggle at it.
/r/MensRights06/03/22 09:36 AM
4

“Thanks to FDS I clocked him nearly immediately” yes, conformation bias and placebos tend to make you not think very hard.
/r/MensRights04/03/22 11:43 PM
1

TLDR? At a bus stop, sorry.
/r/MensRights02/03/22 12:59 AM
1

Ironically when you cast women as the victims you’re forfeiting them as the weaker sex. Feminists like to play the victim card, women are the victims of male aggression, which may be true occasionally but not always. Because of the way one way victim hood has to be established feminism has to debunk rebuke or otherwise attack instances of male victim hood otherwise women aren’t the victims of a patriarchal society.
/r/MensRights28/12/21 09:44 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter