TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Low_Philosophy_8 Archive

View 0 posts and 205 comments by Low_Philosophy_8 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

How you reckon with something isn't the same as morality or law. Coercion implies violence and when we talk about non-violent rape in the case of clear manipulation through something like blackmail then there is a lot more than "feeling" involved. The court LITERALLY states this in the post. Like I said I don't know much about this case, but that doesn't seem to be the case. The korean court DOES recognize rape it just doesn't do so with no evidence beyond " I felt like I was raped", which is lo…
/r/MensRights21/09/24 05:40 PM
1

Oh okay so essentially the court did present more rationality here than your position. I don't think "feeling like" you were raped is a grey area. And I would consider that to be litigious extortion. Something happening and something being illegal are two different things. If you you can't be raped legally it doesn't mean you weren't raped it just means it's legal for women to rape men in that scenario and you can't get justice through the legal system. That has nothing to do with a false accusa…
/r/MensRights20/09/24 06:09 PM
1

Do you know about this case? Or are you saying a false accusation shouldn't have so much time without extortion? Isn't the case itself sort of litigious extortion if her claim is false? And "lack of consent" isn't a reasonable standard given how often sex is initiated without overt verbal consent.
/r/MensRights20/09/24 03:37 PM
1

You're actually a moron and it's sad. The "statistically accurate approach" is just collecting data. It's a base rate statistic you smooth brained rtard. No one made predictions about what a 20 year old might do, but you hence you saying 80% of people are married by 40 and yet I made no such claims. Ironically your data is outdated and the number of people who are unmarried at 40 is 25% now proving my point. Being divorced and widowed means you are NOT MARRIED that isn't playing game it's a fact…
/r/MensRights14/08/24 12:50 AM
1

Your first sentence is linguistic malice. The quote being about "marriages" and someone speaking about preferences in choosing marriage partners isn't "a flip". Base rate statistics don't tell the future. Currently 80% of Americans who are 40 being married doesn't account for marriage rates steadily dropping and that's ACTUALLY A FLIP . Only taking into account around a quarter of the American population doesn't equate to MOST people being married. CURRENTLY only 45% of us adults are married and…
/r/MensRights13/08/24 01:50 AM
1

Lol
/r/MensRights11/08/24 02:58 AM
-1

This is crap. Strong masculine men have been slaves for most of society and family men were corporate slaves more than anyone. Stop boogey man rhetoric. The opposite is clearly more true. This is what people do when they have the freedom to.
/r/MensRights11/08/24 02:48 AM
10

That isnt what the quote was explaining. And looking at marriage rates "most" people aren't married at keast in the U.S.
/r/MensRights11/08/24 02:25 AM
4

Huh ? That IS the apex fallacy. Some men being in political positions and having wealth doesnt benefit ALL men. The opposite even.
/r/MensRights20/06/24 05:20 PM
5

We live in a democracy and women are the ones who vote the most.
/r/MensRights20/06/24 05:16 PM
6

No, patriarchy has never just meant gender roles. Gender roles exist everywhere in nature its called sex. Even in egalitarian countries men do somethings and women do others. And women mostly in the west have been freed from their gender roles men have not. Things in society takes root from thr society of the past...uh duh. But it has nothing to do with patriarchu.
/r/MensRights20/06/24 05:14 PM
1

That literally isn't true. Feminism has achieved everything through complaining to men. Also, help do what? You helping someone doesn't mean they join your cause to do x,y,z nor does it make them indebted to your or to the world. This is utopian Samaritan babble and nothing to do with the conversation.
/r/MensRights23/05/24 11:14 PM
1

No, they lack it especially against men this is well documented.
/r/MensRights23/05/24 11:12 PM
1

Then at least they would have to put in some work and they will have revealed what they truly think about so called freedom.
/r/MensRights23/05/24 11:10 PM
1

Exactly, it's a lost cause.
/r/MensRights23/05/24 11:09 PM
1

If this is about marxism why wasn't all of the soviet union headed by women??
/r/MensRights23/05/24 11:04 PM
1

To me thirsty can be interchangeable with those. Basically I don't see older men nearly as pressed for attention of any kind from the other sex as much as younger dudes.
/r/MensRights19/05/24 06:57 PM
1

Really? You see older men in there 30s, 40s, and 50s as thirsty as younger men?
/r/MensRights18/05/24 05:36 PM
1

So you agree then
/r/MensRights18/05/24 05:44 AM
1

I don't know if that's true. Irl most people don't seem to be pro Trans.
/r/MensRights18/05/24 04:02 AM
2

IT actually seems to be the opposite. Older men tend to actually like being alone more than younger men. The vast majority of younger men tend to be more like this dude who wanted a relationship for validation and older men seem more contempt in solitude.
/r/MensRights18/05/24 03:53 AM
1

None of the people you're talking about are men's rights activist. And none of the podcast humiliates women because they haven't gone to college or aren't educated
/r/MensRights18/05/24 03:37 AM
1

Getting a child as a single man I would guess is probably difficult.
/r/MensRights18/05/24 03:36 AM
5

That's all it is though. Memes on the internet. Go outside. It's the same. You can't out media the most dominant and prevalent media narrative of all time.
/r/MensRights18/05/24 03:33 AM
1

No. All you're seeing is people who already had those thoughts and people who give lip service collecting in a corner. Joey Swoll was popularized by the former and the ladder have difficulty (not impossibly) criticizing him due to his size and how safe he plays it so they "let you have one" so to say.
/r/MensRights18/05/24 03:32 AM
1

Who said that? And rest of what? You were the one saying you had horrible bodily harm done to you. I'd say getting beat up is far more serious than anything else. Am I suppose to throw in every situation you've ever felt uncomfortable and make assumptions.? Fine. I'm sorry every time you cross paths with a man in day to day life he whips his dick out and chases you down while screaming at you. Better?
/r/MensRights11/05/24 02:33 PM
1

I'm sorry to hear that. Getting getting beat up everytime you come across a man has to be hell
/r/MensRights08/05/24 10:47 AM
1

It really isn't obvious. Bears aren't any more predictable when meeting a human than Bvice versa. You both enter fight or flight because the situation is inherently dangerous. If we set up an experiment, women would choose the man 100 out of 100 times. Posing the question would be inherently racist because the point is just to perpetuate stereotypes, which in this care aren't even true. Lost in the woods at night, no one would honestly think a woman would rather come across a bear than a man. An…
/r/MensRights08/05/24 10:37 AM
1

This is what I think it's come down to.
/r/MensRights16/04/24 08:32 PM
1

Oh brother
/r/MensRights16/04/24 08:31 PM
0

The vast majority of men aren't bottling up their emotions, and then all of a sudden, they become violent, nor is that a reason men have higher crime rates. The overwhelming vast majority of people who have violent outbursts have them regularly, and the majority of violent crimes are perpetrated by a small group of people who have a history of anti social and or violent behavior. I don't know why we are taking feminist narratives with no actual evidence that flies in the face of what I would gue…
/r/MensRights05/04/24 10:02 PM
1

Goof thing Im not GA otherwise I would probably only end up with a gun in my mouth with your help. Also, apologize for you being a dumbass? That's something your parents should do. I realize that's beyond your control though. My life is my own which is why I don't waste my time looking through someone else's history to get a dig after I've lost an argument. I'll help you though once you let go or your fragile ego and admit I'm right.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 09:54 PM
1

Yes. Though it heavily depends on your definition. Judgement isn't the problem with venting or being vulnerable its potential negative response. Everyone judges.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 04:55 AM
-10

1 is wrong and we need to be honest about that
/r/MensRights04/04/24 12:16 AM
0

Did you think you made a point with that quote? The only thing that needs to be mocked is your ability to reply and say nothing of actual substance.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 12:15 AM
1

Think is a strong word here. More like they've just adopted narrative and don't care to engage with anything else.
/r/MensRights02/04/24 10:32 PM
2

Thank you
/r/MensRights02/04/24 10:29 PM
0

No one said anything about telling you what to do. There are many "therapies". We are speaking specifically about talking therapy for usually stress or depressive type issues. All personal problems do not stem from an inability to express emotions. And therapy is supposed to help with coping in reality yes thats not a solution to anything. That's saying we need an equation to solve this problem...well duh. You didn't refute anything I said. You just said this is what therapy is "supposed" to do.…
/r/MensRights02/04/24 09:52 PM
0

None of what you wrote relates to what I wrote. I didn't make any assumptions or create fictional narratives about your point. It was stupid at face value Be smarter
/r/MensRights02/04/24 09:49 PM
0

Great solution. Human problem solving at its best. No wonder we live in a utopia.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 08:29 PM
1

Is this true or are you actually misplacing your critique. If so this is almost just bad as simping.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 06:14 PM
1

How? And MGTOW is a solution. There is no answer.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 06:13 PM
1

They are basically advertising to children.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 06:12 PM
1

Society conditions men to be simps.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 06:11 PM
1

You can do that anywhere though.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 05:54 PM
2

The problem I have with this is there doesn't seem to be any logical way to diagnose the weak points of therapy or who or where it doesn't help. Just saying "well you just haven't been to an infinite amount" sounds unreasonable. I don't think most people's problem is even expression or personal change it's social environment.
/r/MensRights27/03/24 05:53 PM
1

Why are you asking me?
/r/MensRights26/03/24 04:25 AM
1

Are you just making conversation?
/r/MensRights26/03/24 04:06 AM
1

Its not what you're responsible for as an adult it's what responsibilities you're supposed to take up as an adult.
/r/MensRights26/03/24 02:16 AM
0

I hate seeing these convos on here because I haven't been convinced this has anything to do with men's rights. However, seeing as I'm here why do you think that? You may say the women in real life but the societal narrative for women online is they hate men and would LOVE to be alone.
/r/MensRights23/03/24 12:01 AM
1

That is the opposite of what everyone is talking about. Being an adult to you means freedom. For all of human history and what the woman is talking about is RESPONSIBILITY. That is what "an adult" means in this context. She's basically asking why are men doing whatever they want instead of what she expects of you.
/r/MensRights22/03/24 11:58 PM
1

At least take out the internet.
/r/MensRights22/03/24 11:46 PM
2

Or give it up for adoption
/r/MensRights22/03/24 11:45 PM
1

No nobody has. And its a start to getting in the gym. Thats about it.
/r/MensRights07/01/24 05:14 PM
0

No one is not going to the gym because of that and goingbl to the gym isnt some solution to life problems lol
/r/MensRights07/01/24 11:57 AM
1

I don't think it was completely her. It was the police and the district attorney that went after him. She started the whole thing though.
/r/MensRights24/12/23 08:30 PM
26

Nowhere can I find anything from the trial that says he broke her finger. Wtf are you talking about?
/r/MensRights19/12/23 02:37 PM
2

Call it a narrative to the men in Ukraine. Or the men a part of the rising suicide rates. Or the men getting shafted by family courts.
/r/MensRights28/11/23 05:28 PM
2

Call it a narrative to the men in Ukraine.
/r/MensRights28/11/23 05:26 PM
3

Its a troll
/r/MensRights28/11/23 05:25 PM
3

Trolling about what? A snap judgement about someone when you meet is mostly appearance. You cant frasp someone personaloty on 3 seconds. Am O supposed to lie now and act like youve said something thats correct? Are you trolling?
/r/BlackPillScience26/11/23 07:07 AM
0

I JUST said that. It doesn't help your point it helps mine. Its a looks based judgement of sexual appeal.It has nothing to woth anyones actual pwrspnality traits. Why are you repeating my arguments back at me? Are you admitting you're wrong? Dont reply to me if you're not going to make a coherent response that actually fits within the context of our previous posts.
/r/BlackPillScience26/11/23 02:11 AM
4

Youre inferring someones personality in 3 seconds based on there looks and no dark troad doesnt have qmy ohysical characteristics just stop
/r/BlackPillScience25/11/23 05:11 AM
4

The first 3 seconds thing is pure physical attraction idk where you are going with this.
/r/BlackPillScience25/11/23 12:06 AM
1

Only way that would be relevant is if women were specifically looking for men looking for relationships and that was who got the most interest. That doesn't seem to be the case.
/r/BlackPillScience24/11/23 04:09 AM
2

Not prince charming, but a decent simp isn't too far off.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/11/23 03:47 AM
2

I think is the point actually. If they don't care why do you?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/11/23 03:34 AM
1

Cope.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/11/23 03:32 AM
2

I just met a dude who was was recently married and having a kid with a chick who already had 6 other children. Men aren't waking up to a goddamn thing.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/11/23 03:32 AM
1

The one where he said she has more exposure to them?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 01:32 PM
1

Dude stop extreme disengenous arguments that have nothing of substance to them and dont engage with anything I said.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 04:53 AM
1

I tell you the reality of growing old and the difference in needs in relationships and you say "get some real friends". Cool great advice. Everyone gets into a relationship because they dont want to be alone its the number one reason stop talking absolute nonsense. I dont care what you mentioned. You replied to my conversation that was talkimg qbout physical preferences. Not being someones preferemce isnt not being attracted to someone and no ot isnt bad relationship. Stop making stuff up and ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 04:51 AM
1

Family and friends grow a part and move away and usually get harder to get in contact with as you get older and everyone lives their own lives. Not to mention different relationships fill different needs in people's lives. If I'm hungry getting a sip of water isn't going to make me less hungry. Also, it cures your loneliness if you don't want to be alone. Didn't I already say that? Also just because someone doesn't fit your original preference in physical appearance for a partner doesn't necessa…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 03:00 AM
2

I mean you're kind of right, but not in the realistic sense. Your scenario works if we live in some garden of Eden for men where they can just pick whichever woman they want out of a global registry and can correctly get their exact woman. We don't though. Men who have options marry women like that all the time knowingly or unkowingly. Fact is not all but a decent amount of men are starting to care less OR don't have the will to exercise those options. . Essentially it's not about "options" or "…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 02:10 AM
1

Well you kind of are if you don't want to be alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 02:02 AM
1

No study has defined the complete ins and outs of attractiveness. I didn't say I disagreed I said I don't fully agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 02:01 AM
4

In 2023 I just think a decent amount of men including HVM don't care as much as RedPillers wish they did.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 01:30 AM
0

I don't fully agree but I see your main point. Subjectivity and spectrums aren't dichotomous though.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 01:28 AM
2

Ah well then in I think I kinda disagree. Not wholly but a decent bit.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 01:18 AM
8

I agree but then it's basically just opinions and personal venting which is fine, but that clarification is necessary.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 01:17 AM
3

Did you mean not promiscuous, then?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 12:56 AM
9

That's exactly what anecdotal experiences are. Projecting and overgeneralizing.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 12:55 AM
4

Aren't a promiscuous woman and a woman who has a large amount of bodies pretty much the same thing?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 12:47 AM
5

I think anyone is capable of doing anything given the context or situation
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 12:46 AM
9

"I"
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 12:41 AM
4

I don't think anyone disagrees with that statement. Morals are subjective yet most people don't think killing innocent people with 0 cause is okay. Just because something is subjective doesn't mean every opinion on it has infinite possibilities determined by quantum physics and are completely arbitrary. Subjectivity simply means from your experience it can appear objective without that necessarily being the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 12:39 AM
1

Modern western people don't have the capacity to lead a society to do that though.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 12:13 AM

It doesn't have to. Don't complain when the house stinks when you haven't taken out the garbage though.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 12:12 AM
2

Attractive is subjective.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 12:11 AM
2

Can you point out the part where he admitted these men are more into her? And high status people especially women especially women seek out and date other high status people.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 12:10 AM
8

"I" "Spaces online"
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/23 12:08 AM
-2

Oh you were talking about mexico
/r/MensRights08/10/23 06:51 PM
1

Nope that's just a vocal minority online.
/r/MensRights08/10/23 05:49 PM
-5

Are you saying men are kidnapped and disappear more than women?
/r/MensRights08/10/23 05:04 PM
1

The "study" was a poll on social media btw lol
/r/MensRights08/10/23 04:53 PM
1

It is a counterargument unless her point is that kids killed during intrasex are less important or dont matter.
/r/MensRights03/10/23 05:05 PM
-6

Was it effective
/r/MensRights03/10/23 05:02 PM
1

Kanye asked a similar question.
/r/MensRights21/09/23 08:25 PM
1

I agree.
/r/MensRights18/09/23 08:37 PM
1

We commit suicide and we arent supposed to do that. You can socially condition people to do just abiut anythung tbh. Being social doesnt have to be about sex and you can pay for that.
/r/MensRights18/09/23 08:36 PM
1

I agree
/r/MensRights18/09/23 08:34 PM
-35

I mean you chose to get married.
/r/MensRights13/09/23 02:43 AM
1

I mean dont care what anyone does anymore tbh so Im technically neither. Im just saying current mgtows dont really effect womens prospects much.
/r/MensRights25/08/23 02:50 AM
1

I don't know what you mean
/r/MensRights25/08/23 02:39 AM
1

Women have NEAR absolute total power in the realm of marriage and dating. Any trend is 90% based on their choices and decisions. Whether they take accountability for it or not. Men aren't "going their own way", women are sending them there.
/r/MensRights25/08/23 02:32 AM
0

Its cope
/r/MensRights24/08/23 03:00 AM
1

Oh okay. Though thats a different can or worms imo.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/23 06:06 PM
1

How are you forced to be pregnant not through rape though?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/23 04:07 PM

Thats intentional.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/23 01:16 PM
1

Did they disqualify you for those traits and say these things unprompted or were they describing there ideal and it came up in conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/23 01:15 PM
1

Unwilling pregnancy? You mean in the case of rape?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/23 01:11 PM
1

Not really it was more about how corporatism and greed would influence it. Also, Ennis has a hate boner for certain things so he went over the top with a lot of it just for the sake of it. Even homelander in the book says he might have been a great superhero if it weren't for the powers that be. In fact a big plot is taking down Vought itself.
/r/MensRights13/08/23 02:15 AM
0

Whats that
/r/MensRights27/07/23 06:17 PM
1

Most divorces are no fault
/r/MensRights27/07/23 06:16 PM
1

Close enough. I'm done.
/r/AllPillDebate17/07/23 03:47 AM
1

The names are irrelevant they had white names. You're running from my question.
/r/AllPillDebate17/07/23 03:38 AM
1

No you brought up the appearance of West Africans. And also now youre bringing up a bunch of different qualifications thay didnt exist before lile length of servitude. Since weve arrived at my victory I'll ask you what you asked me earlier. What traits are they looking at that are specific to a certain nationality?
/r/AllPillDebate17/07/23 01:24 AM
1

Even you said they had europeam slaves that were considered white. Its over. I know its ok.
/r/AllPillDebate17/07/23 01:01 AM
1

"People who looked like they were a West African nationality were still stigmatized". My work here is done.
/r/AllPillDebate17/07/23 12:58 AM
1

So why didnt they accept mixed people who are partially black? And "probably"? Not going to cut it. What are the actual numbers.
/r/AllPillDebate17/07/23 12:31 AM
1

Even pivoting all the way to this it implies skin color was a determination for everyone else until them. Also, is a farmer high class in in 1925? What new status did they gain to elevate them to whiteness? This says that they were simply denominated out of a belief not any gain in anything.
/r/AllPillDebate17/07/23 12:08 AM
1

So cluster of nationalities are the categories? And you're saying Armernians became white because they gained some new clout or prestige in 1925? Weren't they getting genocided then? That doesn't follow your logic.
/r/AllPillDebate16/07/23 11:09 PM
1

Lebron James is white?
/r/AllPillDebate16/07/23 10:08 PM
1

So race is determined by resources and reputation?
/r/AllPillDebate16/07/23 08:20 PM
1

And thats determined by?
/r/AllPillDebate16/07/23 07:54 PM
1

A hierarchy of people? What are they ranked by?
/r/AllPillDebate16/07/23 07:38 PM
1

No racial hierarchy is the hierarchy. It assumes race. Youre just talking to talk.
/r/AllPillDebate16/07/23 07:35 PM
1

No, it doesn't. What happened in America isn't universal. Arabs had a slave trade as well that had racial hierarchy. Brazil has a racial hierarchy. However, none of that answers my question as I said identifying race would come before any hierarchy. What part of this 1+1 logic dont you understand? Actually just stop replying to me this is boring.
/r/AllPillDebate16/07/23 05:58 PM
1

That doesnt answer my question.
/r/AllPillDebate16/07/23 04:59 PM
1

I dont get your point. Whats moral precedes usefulness and race precedes racial hierarchy. Idk why logically the delineation of race has to immediately correlate with any type of hierarchy.
/r/AllPillDebate16/07/23 04:46 PM
1

Idk what that is. And I didnt say it was universal just that it didnt have any impact if it was forced. Also, morals are forced onto people so...
/r/AllPillDebate16/07/23 03:42 AM
1

It being forced has no baring on wether its universal or not. However, that has 0 to do with what Im saying. Also, "Drawing from Petrus Camper's theory of facial angle, Blumenbach and Cuvier classified races, through their skull collections based on their cranial features and anthropometric measurements." Caucasoid refers to skull my guy. Also, idk wtf youre talkibg about or whar it has to do with anything Ive said.
/r/AllPillDebate16/07/23 02:37 AM
1

I'm not talking about whiteness and it WAS skull shape. Thats what caucasoid, mongoloid, australoid, and negroid refer to.
/r/AllPillDebate16/07/23 02:19 AM
1

No, it was because of one subset trait of phenotype which is differences in average skull shape. Not that it's relevant because phenotype is "natural". And that wasnt a univeral predilection somebody made it up and it was a school of though not conventional fact.
/r/AllPillDebate15/07/23 11:54 PM
1

Phenotype is a large part of what we interpret as race. And I'm not naming every feature of every phenotype.
/r/AllPillDebate11/07/23 06:18 PM
2

I didnt say anything about blood
/r/AllPillDebate10/07/23 07:59 PM
1

I dont agree. Some people dont. However it isnt unusual if that is the case.
/r/AllPillDebate10/07/23 06:07 PM
2

Phenotype is real
/r/AllPillDebate10/07/23 06:06 PM
1

I dont think the cultural expectation to be providers is what fukks dudes up. Its the absolute lack of respect that responsibiliity carries. Being a provider is in one view predatory and abusive while at the same time necessary or proof youre a loser.
/r/MensRights05/07/23 07:59 PM
0

There is no such thing as "social marxism". Marxism is inherently class reductionist at best its almost incompatible with identity politics.
/r/MensRights05/07/23 07:55 PM
1

Women werent cut off financially thats why alimony exists. Men got the kids because they were making the bread now that both parents can it should be 50/50 but it isnt because of feminists. "Potentially abusive" is a buzz term. Now with all the power in the world women are still constant potential abusee's. It is a narrative. However thw reason he said its because of feminist isnt necessarily marriage and families idk why you jumped to that.
/r/MensRights05/07/23 07:53 PM
1

A white woman accused him they arent taking some "priveleged" mans side over hers. And the "exploit issues" thing doesnt exist. Its virtue signaling about a big media case. Thats it. George Floyd sure maybe. Anything beyond that its crickets. There is no such thing as leeway if youre black AT ALL. Its justbthe media making up random stuff for clicks and people going along with it. In the case of abuse against a woman thats never going to be in a mans favor and ESPECIALLY not if hes black. Its ju…
/r/MensRights03/07/23 07:10 AM
3

It doesnt contradict it. The article just says that other people have come forward and said he was a diva on set and "emotionally abusive" to some past exes.
/r/MensRights30/06/23 10:55 AM
14

Its worse because he's black. Feminists especially black feminists despise black men 1 million times worse than average and black men support each other less than other groups and you cant expect it from anyome else.I wonder where these myths come from?
/r/MensRights28/06/23 06:21 PM
2

They cherry picked random studies with 0 context. What difference does it make anyway. The ultimate victim narrative would stand with every evidence to the contrary.
/r/MensRights25/06/23 01:43 AM
1

"Being a Democrat doesn't make you have fewer kids. Living in an urban area makes it more expensive to have kids AND makes you more likely to be a Democrat." ?? Also, American exceptionalism ideology is why it's falling behind and needs immigrants in the first place.
/r/MensRights25/06/23 01:41 AM
14

Giving up isn't a dating strategy obviously. It's an admittance that maybe something isn't for you and doing something else with your time. Idk why you would type that and think it sounded like it made sense.
/r/MensRights25/06/23 01:38 AM
1

I agree partly but you could say the same about racists. Dylan Roof had a black friend that excuses his blatant white supremacy?
/r/MensRights02/06/23 04:28 PM
1

"It's a hell of a lot easier to go to college if you don't have kids at a young age, so having kids acts as a filter to keep people with families from getting education." You're making up scenarios with 0 point that has almost nothing to do with what we're saying and no real substance. It's not only not true and clearly cultural but it's stupid to even say given where our conversation has been headed. I don't how you can get "kids make you rich" from what I'm saying. I assume you're resorting to…
/r/MensRights07/05/23 11:07 PM
1

No, because it isn't true. Poor people are poor with or without kids. Usually people are poor because of lack of job opportunities and less education. Hence why more education correlates a lot with less kids in general.
/r/MensRights06/05/23 10:16 PM
1

Nah the poorest people have the most kids and the richest have the fewest. It's the same in every developed country, city, state etc. The money excuse is just that. An excuse. And one not borne out by any actual data representing human behavior.
/r/MensRights06/05/23 09:13 PM
3

Japan and Korea are not these hyper traditional eastern countries they are made out to be. Theyve been US backwash since WW2 and they do have feminism there.
/r/MensRights18/04/23 01:17 PM
1

Nah its cultutal. A growing number of high school graduates dont even want kids. Two people working is normal and you can get q house it just depends on where you live.
/r/MensRights18/04/23 01:15 PM
1

I'm really not interested in a single study on a topic like this. Replication crisis and all I need a meta analysis of multiple studies showing the same thing with proper methodologies.
/r/MensRights13/04/23 02:12 AM
4

Skill isnt the only thing that goes into an employment like waitressing and it relying on tips is a problem of the industry and it being that type of service job. Also, who cares how they feel? They dont have to do those jobs.
/r/MensRights12/04/23 01:20 PM
11

Funny part is theres a study that shows women tip more to attractive men than men to attractive women.
/r/MensRights12/04/23 01:13 PM
1

Well men are killing themselves off a lot so...
/r/MensRights11/04/23 04:17 PM
3

You expect too much out of people tbh
/r/MensRights11/04/23 01:16 PM
5

Proven by what? Show me the meta analysis.
/r/MensRights11/04/23 01:09 PM
3

That empathy crap is measured with a questionnaire and isnt replicated with every methodology. Its not proven whatsoever.
/r/MensRights11/04/23 01:07 PM
1

Wouldnt the vision simply be to rectify the injustices?
/r/MensRights10/04/23 12:28 AM
2

That isnt anything new and it hasn't gotten anywhere.
/r/MensRights10/04/23 12:13 AM
1

"Anecdotally, I know gay men who didn't report because they feared the police would mock them rather than help." Women say the same thing. Also, there is more than 1 study that shows lesbians have higher DV so I don't know about that 1 particular one where it says they were abused by a man I've hear about it but never seen it. The methodology and questions sound funky. Also, there are ways to uncover DV that doesn't have anything to do with police reports.
/r/MensRights24/03/23 01:07 AM
0

You said "their ancestors" like men and women don't have the same ancestors lol
/r/MensRights24/03/23 12:35 AM
1

Nah just look at methodology.
/r/MensRights01/03/23 07:11 PM
24

Wouldnt matter even if you were right. Name dropping 3 people as some sort of gotcha to a broad general statement is maliciously disengenous.
/r/MensRights01/03/23 07:08 PM
6

They fought and she lost
/r/MensRights01/03/23 07:06 PM
1

Huh? Im not making an argument I'm putting forth a factual statement. When men in general are dealing with something IT IS dealt with on an individual level. Thats a fact. I dont understand what any of what you said had anything to do with what was being talked about.
/r/MensRights01/03/23 07:06 PM
2

I dont think men are harmed by gender roles as long as the role is fruitful and respected.
/r/MensRights01/03/23 05:29 PM
1

Nothing you said can be substantiated and none of it refutes my post.
/r/MensRights28/02/23 07:13 PM
-1

Explain
/r/MensRights28/02/23 02:19 PM

Well no the factors that cause men in general to have a hard time dating more than likely effects individuals. Hence why it happens in general.
/r/MensRights28/02/23 02:17 PM
1

You just reiterated the same thing, especially in your second sentence. I don't think most men are killing themselves because they enjoy knitting, singing, and baking and they just desperately want to tell the world, but can't bear keeping it a secret. And who are they witnessing do it if it's taboo for men? Just women? Also, I don't think shame is really that cancerous it's basic negative reinforcement which is a natural part of all social reality with pros and cons.
/r/MensRights17/02/23 11:30 PM
1

Do you have a source for women being charged more? In the study it only says arrested.
/r/MensRights17/02/23 11:20 PM
2

This contradicts what you said earlier. That women weren't seen as being able to be violent in relationships. This says the police are simply taking more action. It also doesn't seem to have any actual research into that. It merely offers their best guess.
/r/MensRights17/02/23 11:18 PM
1

I doubt most men are killing themselves because of some deeply held secret they like to bake, knit, or sing.
/r/MensRights15/02/23 02:10 PM
15

This does logically follow from feminist ideology.
/r/MensRights10/02/23 05:17 PM
12

That makes broader assumptions about "mental health". There's a reason all men's mental health issues in their minds comes from "toxic masculinity" and nothing else.
/r/MensRights06/02/23 02:38 AM
4

Not necessarily. We need to stop the myth of therapy being a cure all especially given how costly it can be.
/r/MensRights05/02/23 01:57 AM
6

Gender roles is not the same as the patriarchy nor does it derive from some "patriarchal ideology". Biological determinism and bioloigcal essentialism are not the same thing. What we say and argue ARENT the same. Some mexicans are matrileneal and take the mothers last name are they a matriarchy? No ones going to quit stating facts beause they dont match up with you dogma and shallow talking points. Youre clearly attempting to imply the patriarchy necessitates some advantage men have over women b…
/r/MensRights24/01/23 06:41 AM
1

Last sentence is pretty useless. Men are already attending college less and dropping out of the work force.
/r/MensRights24/01/23 06:30 AM
1

Break that down.
/r/MensRights20/01/23 07:13 PM
2

I'll admit though he misspoke after in his later comment, but its clear in his repetition what he wanted from you.
/r/MensRights17/01/23 04:21 AM
2

You would be better off finding what “actually happened” in this story instead of dismissing the source and the story in its entirety. Find evidence to the contrary or leave.
/r/MensRights17/01/23 04:19 AM
2

Fighting for rights is kind of nebulous. Most men don't even care about those problems. Other issues get solved because enough people with the power to disrupt things eventually believed they are wrong. We aren't even in an era where the same is true of male discrimination. It's jus the status quo.
/r/MensRights17/01/23 04:12 AM
4

He didn't ask you to provide evidence the source was unreliable he asked you to provide evidence the story had false information. These are not the same thing I don't why you can't grasp that.
/r/MensRights17/01/23 04:06 AM
8

Dating topics dont belong here tbh
/r/MensRights10/01/23 08:21 PM
1

https://journals.lww.com/greenjournal/Abstract/2021/11000/Homicide_During_Pregnancy_and_the_Postpartum.10.aspx
/r/MensRights10/01/23 08:18 PM
1

MOST women are only on there to promote onlyfans and stroek their ego unless they find a ****. A one sentence joke though the most horrible thing on earth lol.
/r/MensRights10/01/23 08:14 PM
1

It was implied by your comment about rape being forced.
/r/MensRights09/01/23 04:06 AM
0

So taking advantage of drunk women is NOT rape? If so...
/r/MensRights08/01/23 05:19 AM
1

So all men who have small dicks have a negative personality?
/r/MensRights05/01/23 08:54 PM
2

Tashfeen Malik and Jennifer San Marco. Also most rapes are done by men because the definition of rape is forced penetration. If you onclude made to penetrate rape for men goes up and about half is done by women and thats with men being less likely to report.
/r/MensRights05/01/23 02:13 PM
2

What difference does condemning them do if they are just feral beast? The way you described it thats just the nature of men so...
/r/MensRights05/01/23 02:07 PM
2

I just dont like this disengenousness. Its men complaining about being incels, its women divorcing, its women choosing to be single. Men arent "going their own way" theyre being sent their own way.Misandry is far more pure than some modern social dating situatioms. Excuse my nerd but its basically some Eldian shyt. Atrcoities of men is inherited by every man and eveything you do is highly scrutinized. I acknowledge this isnt just a male issue though the porblem is the societal hypocrisy but it d…
/r/MensRights04/01/23 09:50 PM
3

I dont think ambivalent sexism can be used to create this environment entirely. Being deemed "oppressed" granting people power to no longer have to be moral themselves is another part and is a more recent form of extremism. The "you cant be racist to white people and you cant be sexist against men because white supremacy and patriarchy," type of thinking I mean. It justifies any and all forms of evil while shielding them from self critisicm. If you call them out they'll deflect or just say men d…
/r/MensRights04/01/23 09:42 PM
3

Identity politics, the opprrssion to moral power complex, and an intrinsic empathy gap.
/r/MensRights04/01/23 09:36 PM
-9

Ban him. You people are the only one who brings him up.
/r/MensRights04/01/23 03:30 AM
1

Thats what it seems like to me.
/r/MensRights03/01/23 03:20 AM
0

Its not a "take" its an impulse. Nothing wrong with that as long as he isnt hurting others.
/r/MensRights03/01/23 03:17 AM
1

His brother manages onlyfans and still does. I don't know what a self help con artist is. You can say someone has bad advice in which case you would have to provide evidence but a bunch vituprative remarks claiming someone is somehow fake and only ye enlightened can see through it without any actual evidence isn't really an argument. 9/10 of the things he's said is actually the same type of advice everyone else gives just most harshly. Loom up alive on how to help anhedonia its going to be go ou…
/r/MensRights16/12/22 07:12 PM
1

Who would assume that?
/r/MensRights16/12/22 05:18 PM
1

Onlyfans didn't exist back then and Im pretty sure most his money now comes from his businesses like casinos and such. Hustler University is fairly new. I don't think believing men should be better and putting that message out there is the same thing as having some sort of responsibility coddle all men. Nor do I think that has anything to do with the idea of men issues lacking proper representation.
/r/MensRights16/12/22 05:14 PM
1

No, you place him in that category because you're a bunch of things I'm not going to say so my account doesn't get suspended . The vast majority of what he says isn't caveated with "fuck bitches" it's "you should be doing this as a man". He rarely if ever talks about casual sex, dating advice, or gives "pick up" advice. Pick up is something completely different. If you want to say he's one of the rebranded men's lifestyle coaches I might agree, but the vast majority of what Tate says lands squar…
/r/MensRights16/12/22 02:16 AM
1

99.9999% of what tate has nothing to do with "pick up".
/r/MensRights15/12/22 10:36 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter