TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Lower_Revenue_9678 Archive

View 17 posts and 103 comments by Lower_Revenue_9678 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
301

discussionLower_Revenue_9678/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/06/25 06:56 AM
212

discussionLower_Revenue_9678/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/25 07:29 PM
200

misandryLower_Revenue_9678/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/08/25 05:26 PM
152

GeneralLower_Revenue_9678/r/MensRights18/08/25 07:29 PM
135

discussionLower_Revenue_9678/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/08/25 07:30 AM
126

GeneralLower_Revenue_9678/r/MensRights16/08/25 07:36 AM
107

discussionLower_Revenue_9678/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/25 08:36 PM
86

discussionLower_Revenue_9678/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/06/25 06:38 PM
83

Activism/SupportLower_Revenue_9678/r/MensRights20/08/25 05:29 PM
74

GeneralLower_Revenue_9678/r/MensRights22/06/25 07:52 AM
65

legalLower_Revenue_9678/r/EverydayMisandry20/08/25 05:31 PM
53

misandryLower_Revenue_9678/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/05/25 02:22 PM
49

discussionLower_Revenue_9678/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/06/25 08:05 AM
47

Social IssuesLower_Revenue_9678/r/MensRights01/06/25 08:34 PM
35

GeneralLower_Revenue_9678/r/MensRights30/05/25 03:02 PM
29

GeneralLower_Revenue_9678/r/MensRights17/06/25 06:40 PM
13

GeneralLower_Revenue_9678/r/MensRights20/06/25 06:59 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

The average male is a net positive to society. The average woman is a net deficit. Women are the parasites. But ofc these conscriptionist creatures won't verbalize that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/08/25 11:42 AM
-1

I have no sympathy for you then.
/r/MensRights24/08/25 08:31 AM
5

Damn this cliché.
/r/MensRights24/08/25 08:26 AM
19

Bruh. The tradcons are there. Tradcons are equally misandrist.
/r/MensRights24/08/25 08:23 AM
1

Abuse them in return.
/r/MensRights24/08/25 08:22 AM
12

Respect is earned. I don't respect anyone who has not earned my respect.
/r/MensRights24/08/25 08:18 AM
19

Why tf are u apologetic? Don't say "I don't hate women". Be unapologetic.
/r/MensRights24/08/25 08:17 AM
39

You think X is any better? It is filled with disgusting tradcons and feminists.
/r/MensRights24/08/25 08:16 AM
-8

I recently came to know that I use the same word to describe Obama as did Ted Nugent.
/r/MensRights22/08/25 09:33 PM
4

PLASE EMAIL AND SHARE IT WITH OTHERS. EDIT: Here is a Harvard email u can use: [email protected]
/r/EverydayMisandry21/08/25 09:09 AM
8

"It sounded more like a line of thinking in an intellectual discussion." What the hell does this even mean? He clearly supports it. He literally says it is "a very good idea".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/08/25 09:00 AM
7

Wtf? Just click on the link and he talks about it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/08/25 08:59 AM
12

I literally linked primary source so many times in the post. Have you even read the post?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/08/25 12:00 AM
6

Those quotes disgust me.
/r/EverydayMisandry20/08/25 11:34 PM
6

I know that the Right doesn't really care about men. But given Trump's hostility towards Harvard, this is a good strategic move to use him to pressure Harvard.
/r/EverydayMisandry20/08/25 11:24 PM
2

Please don't be defeatist. Voting Republican won't do anything except maybe using them to further certain goals strategically. Both the right and left are equally misandrist.
/r/MensRights20/08/25 11:20 PM
0

No. I think that your brain has been smoothened by your 10 year reddit usage.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/08/25 11:05 PM
8

What makes you so surprised when he jumps to this from talking about "humans had mostly killed off alphas"/"importance of less aggressive men"? The jump is not really that much as you make it out to be. It is quite obvious to me that such a guy would think this. Would you also think that he would have made "good points" if he talked about the deaths of a certain type of female and how the other type is good? It is a very typical behaviour that when someone talks about the deaths of a particular …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/08/25 11:02 PM
1

What being on reddit for 10 years does to the brain...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/08/25 08:39 PM
3

WTF
/r/MensRights20/08/25 06:50 PM
29

I have. The approval is pending.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/08/25 06:02 PM
6

Damn. You must be one of those "disinterested truth-seekers" who will "rationally" argue with people why you have a right to LIVE and then k!ll yourself if they convince you that you should delete yourself. RATIONALITY (TM)
/r/MensRights19/08/25 09:19 PM
6

Your ilk is so unoriginal that you need to invert Penis envy to even form an insult. Btw, you are writing all this on a MAN-made platform.
/r/MensRights19/08/25 07:31 PM
5

We will not miss your ilk (net deficit on society). Bye bye
/r/MensRights19/08/25 07:19 PM
5

"China is already producing robot mothers so men with money will be able to have sons without women." In case u missed it.
/r/MensRights19/08/25 07:15 PM
1

Could you elaborate your experiences?
/r/MensRights19/08/25 11:40 AM
1

He gave this BS speech in 1973. Feminism was already everywhere by then.
/r/MensRights18/08/25 10:24 PM
2

"You'll be treated the same as a refugee or 2nd class citizen under the new establishment." This is no where given. They can just make you their citizens. Even if not, I will decide what I wanna do in that scenario. "That includes your family, your job, your rights along with everything else you can do." I see. My rights? Well, justifying conscription means that I had no natural right to begin with. Job? Lol. It depends on my situation entirely. Family? Not everyone has a family and if they do, …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/25 10:19 PM
3

I am not going to use the word "homeland". "You pay your [nation] to defend your property." True. What else? I still don't see how does that lead to justifying conscription. Elaborate more.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/25 09:50 PM
3

My home is my home. The homeland isn't my property. "But nothing is stopping a hostile foreign military from leveling the place from a distance and building over the corpses and ruins." I know. So? Could you explain?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/25 09:40 PM
2

Which portion of your comment even begins to justify conscription? Elaborate. Also, don't bring up this home cliché. I own my home. I don't own the country. Second: HOW I will defend my property is up to me. I can even decide to give it up based on my discretion.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/25 09:31 PM
4

No sorry. It cannot and should not be suspended. Even if Ukraine conscripted men and women, overwhelmingly men would pay the price.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/25 09:16 PM
2

Nothing "absolutely necessary" can exist to justify conscription. That same logic is used by Ukraine to force its men to die. "Necessity" I see. For whom exactly? Certainly not for the men who are sent.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/25 09:13 PM
4

Maybe I am hyper-aspergerian. Please explain to me if you find any problem with the post.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/25 08:53 PM
8

Why dream of that day? And not make it happen?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/25 08:27 PM
20

I am 1000% WILLING to do it. But I need A LOT of others to do it too. Would you or anyone help in recruiting people to call for him being fired on men's rights forums over the internet by emailing or calling Harvard? I can't call them since I am a non-native but I will surely email them in detail. Some Americans can call them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/25 08:21 PM
21

Is this meant as a compliment/sarcasm/criticism? (PS: I am Aspergerian)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/25 07:56 PM
1

Traditional conservative who appeals to tradition to enforce gynocentric gender roles.
/r/MensRights17/08/25 11:27 AM
13

Of course. It is THE naturalistic fallacy. Didn't see these same people arguing for murder and rape for evolutionary viability. But still, I am not sure that "it IS the biological nature of humans for men to be disposable". Survival isn't just child birth. There are numerous factors at work and until one understands all those factors, one cannot make such a statement.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/08/25 07:01 PM
-2

Please enlighten me which part/figure/group of the manosphere is not tradcon.
/r/MensRights16/08/25 01:33 PM
8

The manosphere is full of tradcons. And yeah, feminism was fraud from the beginning. Just research about the Pankhursts.
/r/MensRights16/08/25 01:22 PM
16

He was not technically a philosopher. He was a sci fi writer. He did his studies from the same military academy. So it is expected. I find it always amusing that these people who claim to be "logical free-thinkers" have views so perfectly aligned with the institutions they were taught in. A LOT of FREE-thinking going on there.
/r/MensRights16/08/25 01:18 PM
9

Why are so many male rights sympathizers like this? Like you ONLY think it is wrong because you are resentful for current benefits given to women and you see NO problem with saying someone is "disposable" irrespective of whether women are "worth it"? Both tradconism and feminism are anti-male equally. Feminism gained power largely due to tradconism being gynocentric itself.
/r/MensRights16/08/25 10:36 AM
11

"we can of course make a case for male disposability". Just to clarify: we CAN make a case for it JUST as we CAN make a CASE for the holocaust. "that's why i don't respect any of these people, deep down they are just feminist losers who overestimate their intelligence and try to act like they are cold and rational." Yeah lol. Why do you think these men like Heinlein find pleasure in devaluing their lives? This is some masochistic shit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/08/25 10:04 AM
13

"Rebranding the whole thing as noble sacrifice sounds much better, though." I don't understand. Why does it "sounds much better"?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/08/25 10:01 AM
5

This post has nothing to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights03/07/25 10:28 AM
17

5th one is a new shock. I was actually asking how Human Rights orgs defend their silence on this? Doesn't conscription violate the Human Rights Charter?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/25 11:39 AM
1

Lol
/r/MensRights27/06/25 09:00 PM
24

I want to know what rhetorical tactic they are using. How does conscription not violate human rights?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/06/25 08:41 PM
47

How do human rights organizations try to defend this atrocity?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/06/25 07:27 PM
52

Pure Evil. When will we be able to do something?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/06/25 07:22 PM
1

"I would say that it is moral to sacrifice adults for children, I think that's probably virtuous." You think your life is not worth less than that of a child but also say stuff like this. If two lives are equal, then why would sacrificing one for the other be "moral or virtuous" according to you. Do you think it moral or virtuous to sacrifice a child for an adult too?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/06/25 07:52 AM
2

Why would it be moral to sacrifice adults for children? If you think your life is worth less than a child, go and donate your kidney, eyes, heart, liver to some dying child. This is the same kind of moral sentimentalism which makes most people empathize with women more than men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/06/25 07:23 AM
14

They also mandate that every male should keep a gun and undergo training to use it. Why don't females keep a gun?
/r/MensRights26/06/25 10:49 AM
11

The whole subreddit should do an AITA and the answer would YTA.
/r/MensRights25/06/25 08:33 PM
1

You literally said that outside medicine you accept strict egalitarianism. Then you referred to utilitarianism and said that you think equal draft is more "complicated". How is that strict egalitarianism now? Do you realize the contradiction here? "utilitarianism is just the easiest to work with in discussion if i don’t know what moral philosophy is common knowledge." what nonsense is this? I also don't subscribe to Kant or any other moral philosophy. When you use any one moral theory as a gener…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/06/25 09:27 AM
-1

It is clearly hyperbole. Apart from this I don't want to argue on this trivial thing so much. If you still have problem then that is not mine. And yes, they serve malicious western interests. I will not reply to this anymore.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/06/25 06:18 PM
-3

I don't understand why are you talking about this so much. I am not saying HROs are LITERALLY the "greatest violators of human rights". It is clearly hyperbole. I can't even use hyperbole now? I did not go make a chart ranking who is the "greatest violator" and then commented. But they are of course agenda-driven frauds. That is causing great harm. Do you think that is a small crime? When you said "How can you in a thread talking about bullshit make just as equally bullshit answers." did you thi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/06/25 04:49 PM
6

I Kant agree with utilitarianism. Human rights aren't utilitarian. Many utilitarians don't give a f*ck about human rights. If outside instances in medicine you do believe in strict egalitarianism then why are you using utilitarianism to subvert strict egalitarianism?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/06/25 04:22 PM
-1

I am not saying they have the power to stop them. I am saying they have the power to condemn them. But they are selective and it is all based on agenda. Frauds are criminals. Aren't HROs frauds?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/06/25 03:48 PM
-6

It is not bullshit. The dictators and regimes do it. These people actually allow them to do it depending on their agenda despite claiming to be "human rights" organisations. They would "condemn" some violations but that is selective and agenda-driven. When someone does it everyone can actually see it, but when an organization claims to be for "human rights" but actually operates as something malicious it is much more dangerous. Which one do you think is more dangerous for you a known criminal or…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/06/25 03:04 PM
5

Such a simple truth. I can't fathom why some people cannot understand this.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/06/25 02:57 PM
1

Yes. I know that. Are there other modern philosophers who have written about this/spoken about this? What about past philosophers? I know of Ernest Belfort Bax
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/06/25 11:07 AM
17

The females get to vote without equal responsibilities. Conscription is never justified. But if it cannot be abandoned then atleast they should make it equal. Only then the privileged half will understand the injustice of conscription and fight to abolish it. When you are so accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/06/25 10:45 AM
13

Natanyahu is a tradcon misandrist. You can clearly see it if you watch some of his interviews. It might be hard to see it first. But for a keen eye it is obvious.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/06/25 10:39 AM
7

They are supposed to be the best at extracting resources from others like a parasite without any guilt. The woman in the post is one of those "best" women evidently.
/r/MensRights23/06/25 10:11 AM
8

It is the "real man" manipulation trope.
/r/MensRights23/06/25 09:55 AM
6

"People don't like to hear the truth because they don't want their illusions destroyed." - Friedrich Nietzsche When someone does something morally wrong, do you think most people like to hear of it? Do you think these people who so nonchalantly engage in sexism and hatred would like a group of people whose whole point is showing a mirror to them about their misdeeds?
/r/MensRights23/06/25 09:39 AM
71

It is so ironic for these people to claim this generalization when doing essentially the same thing to males.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/06/25 09:19 AM
77

I saw an Indian guy on quora trying a similar logic. He said that females should be prioritised in rescue during terrorist attacks because they are more likely to be taken hostage and that would lead to complications. He said that this was nothing related to gender. He also claimed that experts know this and that he has worked in some rescue operations. I searched the statistics for gender of people taken hostage by terrorists and also in domestic cases across the world and it is OVERWHELMINGLY …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/06/25 09:17 AM
18

Human Rights organisations are a misnomer. They are responsible for the greatest violations of human rights. It was meant to cover up the shady activities of the western nations.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/06/25 09:11 AM
31

A man saying it doesn't justify it in the least. But a woman saying so makes it much more amusing by showing the entitlement and immorality in their demand for something that they only benefit from at the expense of others.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/06/25 09:08 AM
4

The news media always ask for sources from MRAs. In the case of feminists, their word is the truth for these media propagandists.
/r/MensRights22/06/25 10:11 PM
3

Why do you think it can change due to WW3?
/r/MensRights22/06/25 11:30 AM
9

Today on X I found males defending a female teacher who sent n*des to a 14 year old boy.
/r/MensRights22/06/25 11:04 AM
3

Did you itch so much that you created this completely new account simply to make this idiotic comment?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/06/25 09:20 AM
11

Disclaimer for the viewers: Don't mistake this person as a tradcon male. This is a FEMALE trying hard to justify male disposability. I just looked into the person's comment history.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/06/25 07:27 AM
4

Just because the OP hasn't seen the movie doesn't mean that he doesn't have an idea about the main point of the movie that he is referring to. He shows that he knows about certain events in the movie. This kind of banal trope about one has to watch something fully to understand it, is so idiotic.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/06/25 06:47 AM
3

Yes. I came across Bax yesterday.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/06/25 05:31 AM
3

Is there a way to eliminate this through awareness? Karen Straughan was pessimistic that it was some kind of an instinct and all we can do is fight to minimize it. But that completely eliminating was highly unlikely because it was embedded in our brains. I am still a bit optimistic and skeptical about this. I want to see actual studies to understand how much societal conditioning is dictating this. Is there any literature on this?
/r/MensRights20/06/25 07:35 PM
1

The "life-years ahead" "reasoning" is what I truly oppose. It is pure utilitarian nonsense (although the reverse argument can also be made with utilitarianism) and lends itself to extension into other such cases of justification of discrimination. I can still entertain something on the "not able to look after themselves" argument. Value of life doesn't decrease with age nor with any disease. Entertaining such reasoning would imply that the value of life of people with diseases or disabled people…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/06/25 08:34 AM
53

Hollywood is a great propaganda machine. Hope it DIES completely.
/r/MensRights20/06/25 08:26 AM
1

I understand. But my concern is about helping them might come at the expense of the life of someone outside that category. There should not be any discrimination. The argument given is that they are not able to help themselves. That might be true but that also assumes that able-bodied people are able to look after themselves in such situations which is hardly the case. When the disaster is a life and death situation, everybody is almost equally helpless. And saving someone first might likely pre…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/06/25 06:42 AM
5

Ok
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/06/25 06:31 AM
5

Yeah. I know that quote. He was kind of a libertarian. But you can specifically search for quotes relating to male disposability of his. I was talking about that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/06/25 06:31 AM
2

They don't care about justice. Just their own power.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/06/25 08:04 AM
6

The greatest enemies of men are the spineless men in power. Current flagrant examples include: Putin, Zelensky, Natanyahu and of course most others.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/25 04:12 PM
19

If the windmills here are people/current reality, then you are literally saying that a movement for change is just Don Quixote charging after windmills.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/25 03:39 PM
15

Where does moral relativism come up here? Someone valuing group survival is also a moral preference. You spoke about moral preference and so I pointed it out. What do you mean by "practical" here? Behind that term "practical" also lies a latent moral valuation. Nevertheless, our actions are guided by ethics. Ethics is literally "how one should live". The word "practical" really has no relevance here. Would you say if committing genocide on some group like the nazis would mean the survival of the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/25 03:35 PM
21

You giving value to group survival is also a moral preference. What is "reality"? Reality doesn't care about group survival. The group is not an organism which has to survive. If that is what you think, don't call yourself an MRA.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/25 03:21 PM
1

if you are so concerned about the vulnerable why don't say "the vulnerable first" instead of "children and caregivers"? It excludes childless people who might be vulnerable. Although preferential treatment in life-death situations for any group cannot be moral.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/06/25 06:19 PM
1

it might be about population but that doesn't exclude it from the category of blatant misandry.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/06/25 06:15 PM
1

I was looking through the "women and children first" posts on r/AskReddit and there was so many people justifying it. Some also deny that it doesn't exist any longer. They use the reproduction-survival "argument" to justify it. One person commented that "I believe it is the *moral* thing to do". In every such post I get people justifying or saying that they are fine with it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/25 08:20 AM
12

Damn. That is disgusting. Why do you think this happens? Why are people so comfortable in telling other people to sacrifice their interests or themselves?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/05/25 03:52 PM
3

where did he order people? He literally said 'be who you want to be', u dumbass.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/05/25 06:41 AM
1

I know but I could not resist pointing out the idiocy of this evil "reasoning". Nobody commented on it. But it would have faced outrage if it justified killing females or the disabled based on essentially same evolutionary fitness/survival grounds.
/r/MensRights12/05/25 06:33 AM
2

Do you even realize the contradiction in your statement, you moron? If you care, then you are free to do so. But if someone doesn't then you are no one to obligate them.
/r/MensRights10/05/25 02:16 PM
1

You mean your subhuman low IQ nomad who claimed to be a messiah?
/r/MensRights10/05/25 11:59 AM
1

He is good man. It is you who are evil. Just stop playing your manipulative games. You think you calling someone evil means anything?
/r/MensRights10/05/25 11:54 AM
1

Nope
/r/MensRights10/05/25 11:52 AM
3

it is not a moral obligation you scum. Speak for yourself.
/r/MensRights10/05/25 11:42 AM
2

It should be every person for himself. Just because you are disabled, elderly or a child/infant doesn't make your life more valuable than a man's. Also, it is not our job to take care of group one. Speak for yourself, you scum. You don't get to speak for everyone. Die if you want.
/r/MensRights10/05/25 11:33 AM
2

Doesn't matter. This is no reasoning at all as evolutionary survival is orthogonal to morality and rights. If people support this then we should also kill people based on eugenics. But they won't because they are inconsistent and hypocritical. Better for society? Why should someone's life's value depend on if it is better for society or not? I don't understand how you low IQ people cannot spot that this is idiotic besides being plain evil.
/r/MensRights10/05/25 11:26 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter