LowestKey Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	White man replaced by 2 women wins $10,000,000 discrimination suit. Employer insists they'd rather go broke than end woke. That probably says a lot about the circle of people you find yourself in. https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20200429-swedens-male-only-supper-clubsfor-feminists https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/amp/entry/feminist-men-mental-health_b_8484594/ https://www.womenshealth.gov/blog/mens-mental-health	/r/MensRights	28/10/21 10:58 PM
1	White man replaced by 2 women wins $10,000,000 discrimination suit. Employer insists they'd rather go broke than end woke. If you feel the reverse isn't true then I would suggest you refrain from getting your information about what feminists support from a community with an axe to grind against women in general. You will not get an accurate depiction in this sub and environments like it.	/r/MensRights	28/10/21 09:09 PM
0	White man replaced by 2 women wins $10,000,000 discrimination suit. Employer insists they'd rather go broke than end woke. If these are the things you believe because you've read them then you might consider where you get your information. It sounds like you're reading a lot of authors who don't like women and I would suggest maybe you should consider that they're not providing wholly objective opinions.	/r/MensRights	28/10/21 05:29 PM
-2	White man replaced by 2 women wins $10,000,000 discrimination suit. Employer insists they'd rather go broke than end woke. Why do you think women aren't willing to stand up for mens rights? Where do you see anything to support that? All the feminists I meet are very pro-mens rights, are very much in support of mens health, parental leave, and so on. It sounds a lot like you've been fed some misogynist propaganda that's being used to radicalize you and give you a pretend enemy to fight against.	/r/MensRights	27/10/21 10:19 PM
-1	White man replaced by 2 women wins $10,000,000 discrimination suit. Employer insists they'd rather go broke than end woke. I do understand that. I'm an egalitarian. Firing anyone for their gender or race is abhorrent and should not be tolerated. Men should be concerned when it happens to men but men should also be concerned when it happens to women, minorities, etc. An attack on any of us is an attack on all of us.	/r/MensRights	27/10/21 10:11 PM
-8	White man replaced by 2 women wins $10,000,000 discrimination suit. Employer insists they'd rather go broke than end woke. I know. That was more directed at the entirety of this thread that seems to think one instance of this happening means it's a huge, widespread issue.	/r/MensRights	27/10/21 09:07 PM
1	White man replaced by 2 women wins $10,000,000 discrimination suit. Employer insists they'd rather go broke than end woke. For profit hospitals in a capitalist system. How else will the higher ups earn such lavish salaries?	/r/MensRights	27/10/21 08:36 PM
-14	White man replaced by 2 women wins $10,000,000 discrimination suit. Employer insists they'd rather go broke than end woke. It was a white woman and a black woman. Reading this article on a non nazi-loving site it says the jury decided the hospital was unable to prove they didn't fire him due to his race. Nothing mentioned about his gender despite that being part of his lawsuit. I'm sure more will come out about this in the future but the reason this is even a story is because it's so rare for a white man to be discriminated against. You don't see the hundreds of stories of minorities and women being discriminated ag…	/r/MensRights	27/10/21 08:35 PM
1	Why are men being treated like they’re monsters??? Sartre seems relevant for this pointless debate: "Never believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The anti-Semites have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. …	/r/MensRights	18/09/21 10:53 PM
-1	Why are men being treated like they’re monsters??? So you can’t produce any evidence of masses of feminazis demanding the murder of all men? I’m so very surprised to learn of your hyperbole.	/r/MensRights	18/09/21 10:47 PM
-4	Why are men being treated like they’re monsters??? And where do these feminazis congregate, exactly? I’m curious to see who they are and where they spread their hatred of men. I’ve never seen an actual feminazi but you make it seem like they’re widespread so it should be very easy for you to document their United, outspoken hatred of men.	/r/MensRights	18/09/21 10:42 PM
-13	Why are men being treated like they’re monsters??? You're replying to someone who just called all feminists evil due to OP pretending all feminists hate men. I hate to be the one to tell you, but this sub appears to be exactly the same as the misogynist incel subs.	/r/MensRights	18/09/21 07:59 PM
1	A woman barges into a busy men's room at Disney World and uses the toilet because she did not want to wait in line to use the ladies room. If you're masturbating into a woman's body you're doing it wrong.	/r/MensRights	10/09/21 06:33 PM
1	A woman barges into a busy men's room at Disney World and uses the toilet because she did not want to wait in line to use the ladies room. If a fetus is another life, so is sperm. Ban masturbation.	/r/MensRights	10/09/21 03:58 PM
0	A woman barges into a busy men's room at Disney World and uses the toilet because she did not want to wait in line to use the ladies room. Thankfully women only get $10,000 bounties put on their heads for exercising their legal right to an abortion in Texas. Can you imagine if they had to deal with oppressive stuff like this?	/r/MensRights	09/09/21 12:50 AM
-6	Ignore the colors Only seeing three threads on the subject in the last 7 years and they're all ratioed to hell so I don't think there's a lot of support for the last panel in your OP. So yeah, really seems like a strawman.	/r/AntiFeminists	30/06/21 05:34 PM
0	Ignore the colors Do you have a link? I don't see this graphic atop the sub's Hot posts atm	/r/AntiFeminists	30/06/21 05:21 PM
0	Ignore the colors Who made the latter thing? It is not identifiable in any way whatsoever and could easily have been made by you as a strawman.	/r/AntiFeminists	30/06/21 05:07 PM
-1	So apparently (in the usa) only men have to register in the draft and somehow the initial (obviously correct) ruling got overturned. What the fuck is this shit I’m sorry I can’t reach through the internet and click your mouse for you. If only you could follow basic directions and manage on your own.	/r/MensRights	03/02/21 05:50 AM
-4	So apparently (in the usa) only men have to register in the draft and somehow the initial (obviously correct) ruling got overturned. What the fuck is this shit I see you prefer insults to knowledge so I'll speak your language: You insufferable moron, have you never once used Wikipedia in your entire twelve years on this planet? There are citations on the article in the OP, you smooth-brained, inbred ass. If you follow those citations you will see the actual goddamn amicus brief you are incessantly whining about not being able to find, you potato with eyes. In this case, you brine swilling jackass, the citation you are looking for is the twelfth one (12…	/r/MensRights	03/02/21 05:01 AM
-7	So apparently (in the usa) only men have to register in the draft and somehow the initial (obviously correct) ruling got overturned. What the fuck is this shit I can explain why some links don't go to pages that actually exist: not every business or organization in the world has a page on Wikipedia. Feel free to do the legwork and create pages for them if you'd like. That's how Wikipedia works. Users create the content.	/r/MensRights	03/02/21 02:26 AM
13	So apparently (in the usa) only men have to register in the draft and somehow the initial (obviously correct) ruling got overturned. What the fuck is this shit The hell are you talking about? Did you not actually read the wikipedia article? There's like a half dozen women's rights group included saying the law unconstitutionally affects men. OP is equally as uninformed as you are because it literally says why this ruling was overturned in the article they linked and didn't bother reading: only SCOTUS can overturn SCOTUS precedent.	/r/MensRights	02/02/21 11:46 PM