LucasSatie Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
6	19 year old woman has sex with 14 year old boy, and suddenly the sex offender registry is a problem. I go to "she's a hot piece of ass so there's no way a non-gay boy could be raped by her" and just kind of... wept.	/r/MensRights	20/09/17 01:00 PM
37	A guy was unconcious and a girl unzipped his pants and gave him a blowjob. She later decided to accuse him on sexual assault as she felt she was too inebriated to consent to giving him the blowjob It's reddit, it doesn't matter what you are.	/r/MensRights	03/05/17 12:11 PM
1	Divorcees don't need to afford lifestyle they were accustomed to in marriage, Court of Appeal judge says as he rules against ex-wife It doesn't refute anything because it's not addressing anything. The entire conversation here is about why alimony exists. Full stop. Talking about gender or gendered statistics means nothing to this conversation. That's why it's attaching the wrong type of statistic to the wrong type of problem. This entire comment chain was started because someone pointed out that "there is a fair rationale behind" alimony and all of a sudden we're discussing who gets more alimony, how it's not fair that women…	/r/MensRights	15/02/17 03:13 AM
1	Divorcees don't need to afford lifestyle they were accustomed to in marriage, Court of Appeal judge says as he rules against ex-wife What emotional things am I putting dollar values on? I've been pretty specifically staying away from trying to attach monetary figures to emotional value. The one issue I'm arguing now is financial support. But everyone seems to be glossing over the whole "it is a mutual decision made by both parties" and the "expectation of financial support".	/r/MensRights	14/02/17 03:22 PM
2	Divorcees don't need to afford lifestyle they were accustomed to in marriage, Court of Appeal judge says as he rules against ex-wife It's not gender bias when the phenomenon you are addressing is largely gendered. This is one of those instances where we are painting our own face on the boogey man. This isn't a gendered issue, it's an issue regarding marriage contracts and alimony. Yes, the overwhelming majority of alimony winners are female, but the overwhelming majority of house-spouses are also female. At this point you're attaching the wrong type of statistics to the wrong type of problem. Do you want to discuss if women g…	/r/MensRights	14/02/17 07:33 AM
1	Divorcees don't need to afford lifestyle they were accustomed to in marriage, Court of Appeal judge says as he rules against ex-wife Are you seriously nitpicking that he wasn't being gender neutral when talking about a phenomenon which is largely gendered? Seriously? It's all nonesense and the whole thing is just ANOTHER example of imperial women/feminists acting under the guise of "justice" His post was pointing out how women [emphasis his] forego opportunity while the man wastes money on her. The whole post reeks of gender bias. Something that this sub fights vehemently against. You completely missed the point of his post. …	/r/MensRights	14/02/17 05:09 AM
10	Divorcees don't need to afford lifestyle they were accustomed to in marriage, Court of Appeal judge says as he rules against ex-wife The entire point is that it doesn't matter what you or I believe should happen in a marriage, it's all about what actually was agreed upon. And in many cases it was a mutual decision for one spouse (usually the wife) to forego a career in lieu of child rearing. Both parties sacrifice, but it's not a zero-sum equation and it's nearly impossible to equate financials and emotions. The issue boils down to what the couple agreed to. And no matter how you want to phrase it, a majority of couples agree…	/r/MensRights	14/02/17 04:59 AM
-3	Divorcees don't need to afford lifestyle they were accustomed to in marriage, Court of Appeal judge says as he rules against ex-wife If she didn't contribute financially how else did she provide? That's entirely contextual. Every relationship is different. I know men who came to a mutual decision for the wife to stop working when they had children because child care is so expensive. The point of alimony is supposed to be for the purpose of giving back missed opportunities. E.g. schooling, promotions, etc... Maybe that's what the husband gained? I've seen so many marriages with so many dynamics it's not even funny, up to and i…	/r/MensRights	14/02/17 03:26 AM
2	Divorcees don't need to afford lifestyle they were accustomed to in marriage, Court of Appeal judge says as he rules against ex-wife What are you even talking about? I was pointing out the... insincerity of your emphasis on woman. My point was that the other spouse isn't throwing their money away. They made a decision to allow their spouse not to work. Whatever they gained from that spouse not working was their compensation. If they gained nothing, then they made a terrible decision - but a contractual decision nonetheless. I'm all for equitable divorce treatment, but I'm not for putting bread winners on a pedestal. he spent …	/r/MensRights	14/02/17 03:17 AM
3	Divorcees don't need to afford lifestyle they were accustomed to in marriage, Court of Appeal judge says as he rules against ex-wife Right, and if you have a problem with how the other party is conducting themselves then you "fire" (divorce) them. If they are "freeloading", as you put it, and you never correct it then you are as much at fault as they are. Just like any employer. And if it takes you twenty years to finally divorce that person, then just like an employer/employee relationship the severance package is probably going to be very sizable. And depending on the reason for "firing", could mean additional payouts.	/r/MensRights	14/02/17 03:06 AM
-2	Divorcees don't need to afford lifestyle they were accustomed to in marriage, Court of Appeal judge says as he rules against ex-wife You used to wash the dishes, clean the house, cook dinner, and fuck me. If that's all you were happy with her doing while you were married and never pressured her to do anything else, I can't say I feel much sympathy for you. Divorce exists for a reason, most people just use it poorly.	/r/MensRights	14/02/17 03:04 AM
10	Divorcees don't need to afford lifestyle they were accustomed to in marriage, Court of Appeal judge says as he rules against ex-wife That's nice, but it's also purely anecdotal. I know couples that have 8 kids spanning 22 years. It's not unfathomable that in some cases one spouse would genuinely not have had an opportunity like you did.	/r/MensRights	14/02/17 03:01 AM
30	Divorcees don't need to afford lifestyle they were accustomed to in marriage, Court of Appeal judge says as he rules against ex-wife I think that limited, reasonable alimony is definitely acceptable, but it needs to have requirements and restrictions such as requiring the spouse seek work or qualifications, and that it have a limit. I think that's what we're all aiming for. We're not saying that women are entitled to a payments for their entire lives. But she can still get a job. It's not like she was lobotomized by the marriage. No, but depending on the marriage length and when in their ages it happened it's entirely possibl…	/r/MensRights	14/02/17 02:56 AM
2	Divorcees don't need to afford lifestyle they were accustomed to in marriage, Court of Appeal judge says as he rules against ex-wife Except that you're just assuming the woman has to be the one to stay home. Yes, the cases of stay-at-home husbands are much more rare but that's not because of some regulation saying they can't. In a vast majority of cases it's mutually agreed upon that the wife will stay home. Now, if you go to divorce and there's proof that one spouse decided to stop working without the consent of the other spouse then your argument makes sense. The issue is already broken, let's not make it worse.	/r/MensRights	14/02/17 02:46 AM
-1	Divorcees don't need to afford lifestyle they were accustomed to in marriage, Court of Appeal judge says as he rules against ex-wife It's a privilege he can revoke at any time and say "get a job or no more money", or "start helping me with my work". I'm not sure I agree with this. Marriage is more of a contract than anything else and part of the contract is spousal support ("for richer or for poorer"). If you're unwilling to support a lazy spouse you either A) shouldn't have married that person or B) should divorce them. Yeah, there's a lot of gray here but I think your idea is swinging the pendulum too far to the other end o…	/r/MensRights	14/02/17 02:41 AM
2	Divorcees don't need to afford lifestyle they were accustomed to in marriage, Court of Appeal judge says as he rules against ex-wife I doubt it'll make much difference. Alimony isn't decided based on at-fault divorces as it is now. Yes, the accusations may increase but the amount of paid alimony will decrease. The only real defense is a prenuptial.	/r/MensRights	14/02/17 02:37 AM