TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

LucasTrask Archive

View 9 posts and 286 comments by LucasTrask on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Unbiased article about the on Raw Story? A very pleasant surprise.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 10:11 AM
11

SPLC branding Mens Rights groups as "hate groups". Didn't happen. http://www.dailydot.com/news/reddit-mens-rights-hate-group-splc/
/r/MensRights26/03/14 07:14 PM
2

Decades of activists have left persuasive arguments in support of my campus group's private study lounge in the student union.
/r/MensRights09/02/14 01:02 AM
3

...one of those crimes that the court is very harsh on... as opposed to murder, apparently.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 02:48 PM
8

Corrupt cops and their football culture, yes I have. Friends of the rapists harassing the victim, yes. But you mentioned a societal "stigma" of some kind.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 12:06 AM
7

Can you give an example of "stigma" directed against a rape victim in a western country? Scarlet "A" type shaming, real life finger-pointing, protesters with signs saying "shame," something like that? I'm not saying it's never happened in the history of forever, but is this something you've actaully seen happen in the real world? Yourself?
/r/MensRights18/12/13 10:57 PM
6

BENNED! Oh wait, I forgot we're not assholes.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 10:32 PM
2

They are paid equally. Same job, same performace, same hours, same pay.
/r/MensRights26/11/13 12:10 PM
4

I'm not clicking on that link, but is she pushing that nonsense about the SPLC labeling MRAs as a "hate group?"
/r/MensRights24/10/13 08:01 PM
-1

Care to offer a link to where you "learned" it? I have seen "fedora wearing neckbeard" used to demean male hipsters in general without a specific radfem component. But it's more often used by SRSers and their many alt accounts.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 01:56 PM
2

Plenty of violence in early feminism. Carrie Nation wasn't shy about using her hatchet.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 08:53 PM
0

It all started with the WCTU, and not much has changed since, except the marketing.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 08:50 PM
1

You're
/r/MensRights07/10/13 06:57 PM
1

Is there a transcript?
/r/MensRights26/09/13 07:24 PM
1

Clear as mud.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 07:15 PM
5

tactful No. There's a rhetorical purpose behind the less "tactful" voices.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 07:10 PM
8

and they HAVE posted new rules recently about not identifying or doxxing people Where is this posted please? I'd love to learn what the "official" definition of "doxxing" is, becasue it seems like identifying people is a-okay unless it's a radfem.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 01:31 PM
1

Doxxing is drawing a connection/claim between a person's real life identity and an online persona. Apparently it's much more than that. I posting a link to a site that identified one of the U of T protesters. This person was caught spewing hate speech, in public, on camera. Nothing to do with Reddit or any "online persona." The person in question even proudly had their portrait taken and name published after their arrest at the G20 protest. Hardly some anonymous commenter. It was deleted for "do…
/r/MensRights09/09/13 01:23 PM
3

First-wave feminism was also important in... So you're taking credit for the Suffragettes, but not the WCTU. Intellectual dishonesty at it's best.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 07:09 PM
-1

Doesn't bother me at all, but reporting the title as "misleading" is at best, misleading.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 07:26 PM
3

Good info, but a bit over-complicated. Everyone supports "equal pay for equal work," and that's what we have now. Same job, same performance, and same hours = no wage gap.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 07:12 PM
1

If "patriarchy" is institutional sexism, then the title isn't misleading. This is a protest against Australian obscenity laws.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 06:54 PM
1

AADworkin is female.
/r/TheRedPill18/08/13 02:14 PM
1

Most of SRS and the radfem subscribers reddits are male. This is based on what? That one self-reported survey? I trust those results about as much as I believe in the Tooth Fairy Patriarchy.
/r/TheRedPill18/08/13 02:13 PM
4

Someone is paying a few of them to keep the operation going. I wouldn't be surprised. But more likely, it's unpaid, at the direction of some Gender Studies faculty member. So you're right either way really, public money is involved somehow.
/r/MensRights19/07/13 08:24 PM
1

Words have meanings. You and your ilk don't get to pick your own. For example, racism is racism. Trying to graft on your "power and privilege" nonsense doesn't change that. "Stop trying to make fetch happen! It's not going to happen!"
/r/MensRights15/07/13 08:23 PM
-5

Chaplin's second ex-wife said Chaplain bribed officials to falsify the blood test results. So who the heck knows?
/r/MensRights15/07/13 07:22 PM
-2

And if it falls off it's "rape by gremlins."
/r/MensRights12/07/13 03:01 PM
1

http://www.sparksummit.com/sparkteam/ Wow. With researchers of this caliber how can I possibly refute their claims?
/r/MensRights11/07/13 03:21 PM
3

That's fucking stupid... You're enjoying the privilege of posting in /r/mensrights, please show some decency and refrain from this type of attack.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 03:19 PM
1

successful rape prevention campaigns Citation needed.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 03:08 PM
2

I've been talking with mods of other subs... That always ends well.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/13 01:24 PM
2

reddit will go the way of digg SRS is Reddit's mirror-version of the Digg Patriots. People think the Digg redesign killed it, but the great migration started two weeks before that, when Kevin wouldn't do a damn thing about the Digg Patriots and their vote brigades.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/13 01:23 PM
7

not becoming a downvote brigade Hard to stop SRSers from using false flag alts to create a brigade history, then submitting that as "evidence" to Reddit admins.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/13 01:09 PM
1

poses a health risk... So, people who don't wash their hands or cover their mouths when they cough are rapists.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 05:33 PM
3

If we're offended it's "butt-hurt," but her bullshit is excusable because of a recent breakup. Right.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 04:52 PM
6

"Deniers," like "Holocaust Deniers." Subtle.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 04:05 PM
5

Concern troll is concerned.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 03:27 PM
3

Just because you can't understand the strategy doesn't make it "flailing and amateur."
/r/MensRights03/06/13 03:22 PM
2

Put some kneepads... Take your homophobic bullshit elsehwere.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 03:20 PM
5

Yes, look at all these "amateurs" at AVFM. Quite shocking really. Paul Elam, Founder and Publisher John Hembling, Editor-in-Chief Dean Esmay, Managing Editor Robert O’Hara, News Director James Huff, Director of AVFM Radio Greg Canning, Australian News Director Dan Perrins, Ontario News Director Asha James, Senior Editor Pierce Harlan, False Rape Editor Suzanne McCarley, Senior Editor Michael Sharron, Father’s Rights Editor Ian Williams, Director of Art, Mischief, and General Tomfoolery Lucian Vâ…
/r/MensRights03/06/13 03:16 PM
12

more vulnerable to attack They're going to attack regardless, Paul's intent is to be a lightning rod. If he suddenly vanished, they be after the next person down the list. Think about how the US conservatives spent 30-years moving the goalposts, it's been immensley succesful to the point where a president who's civil liberties policy is to the right of Richard Nixon can be elected as a Democrat. Paul's rhetoric shifts the entire discussion in the direction we want it to go. You can disagree with…
/r/MensRights03/06/13 03:04 PM
6

One person quit the London MHRA group.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 02:49 PM
7

terrorist manifesto You're referring to the Ball self-immolation case?
/r/MensRights03/06/13 02:30 PM
14

That's almost certainly not welcome here Plenty of people here agree with you. Personally, I think that while Paul Elam's rhetoric is intemperate, his points are completely valid. Sometimes taking the "high road" and making your arguments softer or more friendly is counterproductive.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 12:22 PM
6

The MRM pushed this man off the cliff Nice projection from a misandrist.
/r/MensRights02/06/13 06:21 PM
-6

Marxism.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 07:35 PM
4

Anarchist = Feminism apparently. Or so they say. That sub was SRS before there was an SRS.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 07:33 PM
6

The taxi driver had video evidence, which is apparently what it takes to defend yourself now. Such quaint customs as "innocent until proven guilty," "the right to face your accuser," and "beyond a reasonable doubt," have fallen by the wayside. Falsely accused? "Pics or it didn't happen."
/r/MensRights26/05/13 01:43 AM
35

It's a relatively narrow slice of social-science that buys into the "power + privilege" horseshit. Most of "academia" hasn't sampled the Kool-Aid.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 04:09 PM
12

I think we call it an "analogy."
/r/MensRights24/05/13 03:34 PM
7

Sure, just like if I ask my drunk friend for a ride home and then he gets arrested of DUI, totally my fault for getting his false/void consent to drive.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 02:54 PM
2

This could be sarcasm, or a reference to the "enthusiastic consent" nonsense some feminists are pushing. That's the idea that consent alone isn't enough, because there can be subtle coersion involved. Or something.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 01:43 PM
29

This was followed by a long list on what these men should be doing, rather than discussing feminism- such as cooking for women, so they have more time to discuss it themselves. Future mandatory undergraduate curriculum, "Male Studies 101 - How to cook for Women."
/r/MensRights21/05/13 02:33 PM
12

Using the same color-coding for the second bar graph is less than ideal.
/r/MensRights19/05/13 11:53 AM
3

GAO said that all but 7 cents of the 11-cent gap could be explained by factors such as occupation, experience and level of education. Fine. This is legitimate. We're not talking about that bogus $0.77 to $1.00 nonsense.
/r/MensRights11/05/13 11:27 AM
9

Next time this woman wants to murder somebody, she won't make the same mistake.
/r/MensRights10/05/13 05:18 PM
29

St. Albans woman pleads guilty to kidnap, sexual assault on boys Police were first called to 68 Nason Street Tuesday night to investigate a call about a missing child. Misty Smith told the officers the boy was not there. They returned later and found the boy and two other 11-year-old boys upstairs. Smith was arrested, after the boys told police they walked to Smith's home on Nason Street after school. It is less than a half mile. They allege they were held against their will and were given alcoh…
/r/MensRights09/05/13 04:53 PM
40

Elizabeth Báthory Her initial victims were the adolescent daughters of local peasants, many of whom were lured to Csejte by offers of well-paid work as maidservants in the castle. Later, she is said to have begun to kill daughters of the lesser gentry, who were sent to her gynaeceum by their parents to learn courtly etiquette. Abductions were said to have occurred as well. The atrocities described most consistently included severe beatings, burning or mutilation of hands, biting the flesh off th…
/r/MensRights09/05/13 04:15 PM
6

http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/beyond-bullying/201304/the-mobbing-alyce-laviolette Alyce LaViolette was well aware of the facts of the case when she agreed to defend Ms. Arias and justify her confessed killing of Travis Alexander. Ms. LaViolette alone is responsible for her theorizing and her thinking and her testimony, and should be prepared to face criticism for these views just like any other professional claiming expertise on a topic. But it should come as no surprise that she had to re…
/r/MensRights06/05/13 04:07 PM
5

True enough. Forgive me, I'm old and I use "meme" the old way.
/r/MensRights06/05/13 01:11 PM
3

moved from radfems to the mainstream media outlet fairly effortlessly. Exactly, the author of the Standard article, Maxine Frith, must have gotten it from RadFem, she sure didn't pick it up from any of the UK MHRA groups. Then she leads her article with it.
/r/MensRights06/05/13 01:07 PM
8

...ongoing investigation Nice appropriation of official-sounding police-speak. Sorry RadFems, your "investigation" isn't going to make anyone shut up and take it.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 07:21 PM
17

A row has erupted between transsexual activists, men’s rights extremists ... "Extremists." Lovely.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 07:19 PM
11

seems really aggressive and anti-women/feminists. Aggressively anti-feminist, yes. Not at all the same thing as "anti-women." If you've spent any time here I would have thought you'd have noticed the distinction.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 12:40 AM
4

We're for equality. How "wrong" can that be?
/r/MensRights01/05/13 03:03 PM
3

Not what was claimed. (3) our culture condones, encourages, engenders, and perpetuates such behavior in women.
/r/MensRights29/04/13 09:46 AM
4

Welcome to r/mensrights You don't speak for us.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 08:48 PM
6

Assuming this isn't a troll post, I'd suggest looking for another partner. Ask her if she's blaming your intact state for her infections. Sure sounds like it.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 12:26 PM
7

From what I've seen... You mean here on Reddit? I haven't seen anything "nasty" from men here against trans people.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 10:16 PM
7

They've been doxxing and harassing/threatening individual feminists No they haven't.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 08:56 PM
1

But Reddit amins hate "doxxing." A word which means whatever they decide it means at the time. A bigot spews her hate in public? She deserves anonymity. Totally makes sense.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 09:30 PM
4

I agree. No double standards.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 04:45 PM
3

Anyone* watching the videos would have no trouble spotting the "hate speech." *excluding the tiny minority indoctrinated with Patriarchy Theory.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 04:43 PM
3

I see no problem with an investigative journalist tracking down the name of a protester who, on camera, in public, is caught red handed screaming hate speech. If they're so ashamed of their actions, then they can wear a mask next time they pull that shit. Which is apparently what happened at the most recent Toronto protest. Let them hide behind their masks.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 02:59 PM
0

compiling a list of...women on a website The rest of the media is already publicizing the men, naming their names, regardless of any actual evidence. The actions of the women on Register-her are well documented, nothing there is an anonymous accusation. So really, the reporting is more fair and journalistic than a man can expect to get in most media.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 02:35 PM
3

So we'll just mollycoddle the bigots and come up with a nicer diplomatic way to describe them. That'll work. The people we're trying to reach are those who don't really know what feminism is other than, "equal rights for women." Showing the real face of feminism is a vital step in shifting opinion. The people who have a problem with this are mostly the feminists themselves and well meaning but naive concern trolls.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 01:20 PM
3

Sorry, your homophobic "shoe" doesn't quite fit.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 01:08 PM
4

I see. So we need a more friendly, nice, term for "bigot." How about "equality-challenged?" Modern feminism is bigotry. It's what's taught in university, as we saw in Toronto. Calling out their hate is part of the fight, not sure why you'd have us retreat when they're exposing themselves for what they are.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 01:00 PM
7

Backing off on publishing these facts helps no-one, and they'll just move on to the next "offensive" thing they don't approve of.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 12:50 PM
8

They see it as encouragement to rape them somehow... "They" see everything as rape, we're all particpants in "rape culture." We don't need to buy into their frame.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 12:43 PM
2

Not a big fan of using "circlejerk" in this context.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 12:42 PM
5

I'm not in favor of protecting the identity if bigots hoping that the media will like us more. Bringing attention to actual people who're doing actual horrible things is a better tool than an ineffective PR effort to make us seem "nice."
/r/MensRights17/04/13 12:40 PM
8

They're going to spin anything we do or say as "misogynist." If these people don't like being on Register-Her, then maybe they should stop the hate speech and perjury.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 12:26 PM
7

This is not the same environment True, the bigots are out in public spewing their message for all to see, and Paul is documenting their hate. He deserves gratitude, not concern trolling. If you think "taking it down" is going to earn him any points with anyone you're shockingly naive.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 12:15 PM
9

Perhaps providing the opposition with additional ammunition... Perhaps protecting the faux sensibilities of a bunch of feminists isn't anything we need concern ourselves with.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 12:11 PM
27

Be the bigger man. Yeah Paul, MAN UP and take it down. The bigots, the purjerers, the misandrists. Protect their anonymity for fucks sake!
/r/MensRights17/04/13 10:45 AM
1

What next for these biblical scholars? Perhaps it was actually that miscreant Adam who stole and ate from the Tree? While the virtuous Eve was working hard on her Gender Studies degree?
/r/MensRights11/04/13 03:21 PM
3

At the WF protest the Socialist Workers Party literally bussed people in. The "fucking scum" woman, for example, wasn't a student but a well known radical who'd been previously arrested at the G20 protest.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 11:06 AM
7

The children pulling this crap aren't coming up with it on their own. There are faculty at the U of T who're responsible for teaching bigotry and hate, shouldn't that be against university policy?
/r/MensRights08/03/13 11:02 AM
18

and the Foster parents enjoy the kid's childhood Or they kill the kid through neglect. Just another isolated flaw in the system to which nobody in CPS would be held accountable.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 11:04 AM
2

This sickening piece of biased bullshit was written by Leonora LaPeter Anton. Email: [email protected] Twitter: @WriterLeonora
/r/MensRights04/03/13 01:18 PM
4

toiling in the fields picking fruits and vegetables Roughly 20% of migrant farm workers are women. Not dismissing your point, just saying.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 03:02 PM
3

It happened on school property As did the false accusation. I'm sure the school will do the right thing and compensate the actual victim.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 08:04 PM
-2

Worst comparison ever.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 10:11 PM
2

Devils advocate, equality based on life expectancy is a reasonable argument.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 04:33 PM
2

More concern trolling. Anyone keeping track of this stuff?
/r/MensRights23/02/13 04:32 PM
8

Wouldn't it be better to screenshot this instead of linking to these ass-clowns?
/r/TheRedPill21/02/13 01:11 AM
2

There's a lot of misuse, possibly by trolls. Like this douche.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 12:20 AM
10

says a semen test will be done to prove if the woman was raped. A common red flag in false accusations is an alleged victim who waits days, weeks, or months before reporting. No physical evidence, and still the alleged perpetrator is assumed to be guilty.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 11:18 PM
13

In 1987, Dworkin published Intercourse, in which she extended her analysis from pornography to sexual intercourse itself, and argued that the sort of sexual subordination depicted in pornography was central to men's and women's experiences of heterosexual intercourse in a male supremacist society. In the book, she argues that all heterosexual sex in our patriarchal society is coercive and degrading to women, and sexual penetration may by its very nature doom women to inferiority and submission, …
/r/MensRights17/02/13 07:28 PM
20

Way back in the day, when I was campaining for Howard Dean, I was an early member of this site. Kept participating there up until Obama sold out the Public Option to "stakeholders." When that battle was lost Markos (Kos) started berating his readership to fall in line to support the President's "Affodable Care Act," even though it no longer had anything to do with making coverage affordable. Last straw for me, haven't been back since.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 06:44 PM
17

As two-time Pulitzer prize nominee Steven Pinker notes, the best data "shows that in thirty-five years the rape rate has fallen by an astonishing 80 percent, from 250 per 100,000 people over the age of twelve in 1973 to 50 per 100,000 in 2008 Inconvenient truths hurt their funding, better to just make shit up.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 12:49 PM
5

in some quarters... Like the Socialist Workers Party, for some reason.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 01:21 AM
2

Is this a thing? Software?
/r/MensRights16/02/13 11:30 PM
6

Before handing out any more guaranteed student loans, maybe it's time for banks to apply some underwrting standards? Seems like quite a challenge to pay off if you're majoring in any of these.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 04:45 PM
2

The only good thing about the rising cost of tuition, and overwhelming debt load; people aren't going to be able to afford to go to schools that push this shit.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 11:13 PM
11

Try emailing Fathers and Families, they've got the background to explain this. The non-father might have better luck suing the mother to divulge the name of the real father (or list of potential fathers), and then going after him (or them).
/r/MensRights15/02/13 05:55 PM
5

"I bet OP isn't ever getting married now." Good advice. Thanks ladies.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 02:38 PM
41

"Free thought," feminism, awesome? Or just really great? Discusss.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 01:31 PM
1

Does she get paid to do this? By the University?
/r/MensRights12/02/13 12:56 PM
3

Not remotely worth the risk. NSFW
/r/MensRights11/02/13 08:17 PM
-13

Hopefully they'll learn that feminism is bullshit. Edit: Hi SRS!
/r/MensRights10/02/13 03:04 PM
4

This mess has been a PR move from the get go, as if women are "descriminated against" by barring them from combat. Changes to Selective Service registration will only happen with an act of Congress, and there's just no PR benefit to passing a law that would "draft women."
/r/MensRights08/02/13 03:24 PM
3

while we increase female's rights... Yes, boy we really need to get on with that. Long overdue.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 11:53 AM
3

(they are a vocal minority) I'm sure the reasonable majority will be along any time now to denounce the "vocal minority." Crickets.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 11:51 AM
4

Symantec may think this is legit. The SPLC zombie lie is very popular.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 09:56 PM
6

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ifl95/strausskahn_its_rape_if_she_says_it_is_comment/ Blast from the past.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 05:02 PM
8

History is chock full of these "relatively rare exceptions."
/r/MensRights05/02/13 02:01 PM
5

Catherine the Great, Elizabeth the First, Eleanor of Aquitaine, Maria Theresa of Austria, Queen Victoria. And that's just off the top of my head. All of these women sent men off to die in war. So, "women" have been powerless throughout history? Or maybe it's just that the very wealthy of both sexes have always had enormous privilege, while all the rest of us haven't.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 12:07 PM
1

Or open a jar. Or kill a spider. Or take out the trash. Or just deal with anything difficult or disgusting.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 01:31 PM
11

Is fidelity not part of the "contract?"
/r/MensRights03/02/13 04:20 AM
15

For anyone who's shocked when there's little appreciation if you do an equal share of the domestic work and all the guy stuff, like yard work and home reparis? This is why.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 04:06 AM
7

I gave you an upvote, because you're right about taking the time to read challenging opinions. But he's still nuts.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 02:28 PM
3

Still nuts.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 01:01 PM
2

Feminists, the abuse industry and even some misguided MRAs sometimes claim that women can be rapists. Never heard of this guy. He's nuts.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 12:48 PM
12

The irony is painful. This is a University Professor, instructing a room full of students and she's claiming "women are powerless."
/r/MensRights01/02/13 02:19 PM
15

I'm afraid that maintaining a crisis situation, real or imagined, has become the most important thing to professional feminists. Why else would we see such a huge effort to fudge the numbers? After all, there's only so much money out there, and how else can they ensure it goes to the right place? This explains the violent push-back against funding abuse shelters for men, and even University Men's Centers.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 12:05 AM
2

Partially, but the problem from their point of view is more about men and masculinity, than race. I've listened to plenty of rants about sexism in the asian and black communities. There's some truth to complaints about problems created by a "bunch of old white guys," but what they mostly fail to see is the class issue vastly outweighing the race issue.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 11:21 PM
2

This seems to imply that if only one partner works, and the other keeps house, then there's less stress and lots of intimacy. Doesn't work that way.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 11:13 PM
6

Oh dear, the Snopes article includes the word "misandrist." Don't they know that's not even a real word? I guess Snopes don't real. Or some shit.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 06:24 PM
3

She replied to my "wage gap" question.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 08:09 PM
2

Dawkins got it wrong... Stopped reading.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 02:17 PM
2

Even if true, how in the world does this excuse her original behavior, or her escalation? She's managed to divide the skeptic community beyond reconciliation. With friends like these...
/r/MensRights25/01/13 01:46 PM
3

The link isn't to back up or refute the alleged threats. It's in response to the original comment, which gave mis-informed support to Ms. Watson, "it wasn't really her that escalated...". We'll never know if she did or didn't receive "rape threats." Ms. Watson is not a credible source. And throwing that in as somehow a defense of her treatment of Ms. McGraf is derailment, at best.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 10:49 AM
13

she said she started getting rape threats in the mail... FTFY Stef McGraf's story EDIT. The link to Ms. McGraf's story of her horrible treatment at the hands of Ms. Watson isn't intended to support or refute Ms. Watson's claims of "rape threats." It's in response to the top comment about how it "it wasn't really her that escalated" the situation, when it most certainly was Ms. Watson who escalated it and divided the skeptic community.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 10:49 PM
63

She got up on stage at a skeptic conference and bashed women in the audience who didn't agree with her.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 10:34 PM
1

Former "liberal Democrat" here, campaigned for Howard Dean. But ever since President Obama sold out the Public Option I'm an independent.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 04:44 PM
4

The Snap Brim Fedora (Indiana Jones) was and always will be the coolest of hats. But, that douchy little fedora worn by douches? Yeah, that thing sucks.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 08:33 PM
22

Try again in english please.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 04:45 PM
3

I can only recall seeing cis-gender used as an insult once. You've never come across Laurelai and her friends I guess.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 01:34 PM
5

Then, of course you're free to downvote.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 12:53 PM
50

This is a frequent complaint. In my opinion, highlighting evidence of double standards and common misconceptions is as valuable as many other kinds of "activism."
/r/MensRights20/01/13 12:02 PM
2

Yeah it's all about "manhood," and not about the survivalist mom who kept unsecured weapons in the same home as her mentally ill child.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 01:55 PM
14

Understanding the how and why of relationships is integral to understadning "men's rights." Men can go through life thinking what they see on TV is the way things work, or they can take a good hard look at what really happens and try to figure out why it happens.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 01:52 PM
28

...that the SPLC did not label MRAs as members of a hate movement..." SPLC source
/r/MensRights17/01/13 11:51 AM
3

This must be about denying the "right" of a mother to adopt out a child without the father's consent. Hence, "anti adoption."
/r/MensRights15/01/13 10:57 PM
6

Respectfully, I disagree. There will always be something a nutbag can use to kill people with. A gallon of gasoline and a match can kill a whole school as easily as an assault rifle. "Gun control" is a wedge issue to keep us apart, not a solution to violence.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 09:15 PM
73

Sorry for the confusion, its a reference to SRS. "Shitthatneverhappened" is one of their "humorous" stock responses to false accusations.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 04:48 PM
84

Funny how shitthatneverhappened.pdf just keeps happening. I lost count after twenty, halfway down the thread.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 04:32 PM
10

This is the result of the study. That's the problem of course. A responsible academic would be careful to craft the study so the results confirm the feminist narrative.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 01:17 PM
16

Why didn't the admins censor the VA doxx? Because Adrian Chen is an "investigative journalist." At least when he's not busy pretending to have cancer or publishing celebrity sex tapes.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 05:34 PM
20

These protesters are not anonymous internet commenters, they are out in public doing their thing. Unless they're now ashamed of what they've done, I fail to see why they wouldn't thank us for spreading their message. One of these people was arrested at another protest and proudly had their portrait taken and published under their real name. If that's not a making yourself "public figure" then I don't know what is.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 04:20 PM
14

You know this is wrong... What's wrong is expanding the definition of "doxxing" to include a public protest where cameras were present. No perceived or actual internet anonymity was involved. Reddit can make up any rules they'd like but it's not unreasonable of us to expect consistent enforcement and clear definitions.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 04:09 PM
2

Seems this has devolved into catchphrases and buzz-word accusations, rather than actual debate. then I lol'd. No kidding.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 02:16 PM
2

A comment worthy of a SRSer. Goes well with the concern trolling.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 02:05 PM
3

There's no way you can pretend that "take it on the chin" is anything other than "man up." threaten Keep digging. Nobody here is "threatened" by your tone arguments and veiled misandry. what does that make you? I don't know, but I do know an ad hominum when I see one.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 01:59 PM
4

Take it on the chin. Oh look, another dog whistle "man up."
/r/MensRights02/01/13 01:41 PM
1

those who downvote me to explain their reasoning Tone policing and smugness.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 01:37 PM
4

It's time to stop being fucking children... Right. "Man up." Got it.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 01:34 PM
65

A Reddit admin appaprently feels that identifying a person who spewed hate speech in public, is somehow "doxxing." Because screaming at people on camera, in public, is the same as an anonymous internet comment. Or something.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 12:49 PM
13

So says the woman who voted for Bush's Iraq war.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 06:00 PM
4

She claims to have fibromyalgia But fibromyalgia is real. My TV told me.
/r/MensRights26/12/12 01:26 AM
3

Do you understand that being overly emotional is a feminin trait? Is spelling also a "feminin trait?"
/r/MensRights18/12/12 05:54 PM
2

The photo was apparently taken after her arrest at the G20 protest.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 04:39 PM
4

Apparently the definition of "doxxing" is a moving target.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 03:09 PM
7

Co opt seems to be the current strategy. Not unlike what's happeing with the skeptic/atheist community. It works up to a point, by splitting the group. Generally the idea seems to be that "feminism" is the big tent. Everything else is subordinant.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 12:22 AM
23

Are you fucking kidding me? The "illuminati" didn't vote for the Iraq War. But former Senator Clinton did. Not some big mystery.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 08:41 PM
15

Says the woman who voted for Iraq War. Over 4000 American soldiers dead. Over 30,000 wounded.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 08:27 PM
18

I do know that almost all war has been STARTED by men... Some men. Rich men, powerful men, and not a few rich and powerful women, like the Secretary of State for example. The primary victims or war are all the rest of us, men and women. Trying to pin it all on "men," just divides us while the 1% laugh and keep sending the poor people off to die.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 08:14 PM
12

At least, assuming the "protest" isn't under their instructor's direction.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 06:58 PM
15

Not doxxing. This isn't some anonymous internet commenter, it's a person out in public.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 06:55 PM
2

"I see in fight club the strongest and smartest men who've ever lived. I see all this potential, and I see squandering. God damn it, an entire generation pumping gas, waiting tables; slaves with white collars. Advertising has us chasing cars and clothes, working jobs we hate so we can buy shit we don't need. We're the middle children of history, man. No purpose or place. We have no Great War. No Great Depression. Our Great War's a spiritual war... our Great Depression is our lives. We've all bee…
/r/MensRights12/12/12 02:07 PM
-2

The claim that inclusion of [redacted] Who "redacted" this. Reddit anonymity doesn't protect public acts of hate speech.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 11:52 AM
-4

'Doxxing' an individual though Doxxing? Really? Maybe you need to get out of the house a bit more. The woman has NO expectation of privacy for acts committed in PUBLIC.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 11:46 AM
1

You're missing the point. People who publically spew hate are not covered by magical Reddit anonymity. Her identity will become known and she deserves all the shame she gets.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 11:40 AM
2

Again, what kind of person thinks she deserves any?
/r/MensRights11/12/12 06:27 PM
6

This person engaged in public hate speech. Not sure why anyone thinks she's entitled to anonymity.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 04:05 PM
1

Anarchists too.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 12:20 PM
7

"But honey, we just can't afford it..." "Stop abusing me!"
/r/MensRights09/12/12 12:09 PM
-1

It's not "doxxing" to identify the woman from the video. I don't care if she's a redditor or not. Public hate speech isn't protected by some magical reddit anonymity.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 01:10 PM
4

She didn't spew her hate speech on the internet, she did it in public. On camera. There's no presumption of anonymity.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 06:48 PM
1

Most gay men I've talked with say the opposite. "Born that way."
/r/MensRights06/12/12 05:54 PM
3

Since Dawkins called out that crazy woman in the elevator, he'd probably get much the same reception at the U of T.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 04:15 PM
6

i'm not going to waste time debating semantics Then maybe you should post your thoughts elsewhere.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 08:12 PM
85

She laughed... Yeah, really funny. I'd file a formal complaint.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 03:43 PM
1

Did you even read what you're replying to?
/r/MensRights08/11/12 02:05 AM
30

If this sub was anything like SRS you'd be "benned," your comment deleted, and we'd follow you around Reddit downvoting everything you post.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 03:48 PM
5

iCarly. All male characters are creeps, buffoons, fall guys, or punching bags.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 11:43 PM
2

Still waiting for your reasoned argument that a gender-based "wage gap" exists. I fully support equal pay for equal work. Who doesn't? Same job, same performance, same hours, same pay. But that's not what your talking about is it?
/r/MensRights05/11/12 01:35 AM
12

If you'd like to argue that a "wage gap" exists, start a new topic. We'd be happy to discuss it with you.
/r/MensRights04/11/12 06:33 PM
11

You mean equal pay for unequal work?
/r/MensRights04/11/12 06:24 PM
15

because no one has told them not to do that. Worse, they're told it's impossible to be "sexist," to a male.
/r/MensRights04/11/12 11:34 AM
25

What is it about having a stroller that makes people into inbeciles? There's only so much room in a store aisle, move that thing to the side.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 11:08 PM
3

I'm fine with equitable child support in the "best interests of the child," as long as the payments are audited to ensure the money is spent supporting the child. Which will never happen.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 08:51 PM
1

abstinence from a future action There has to be a benefit (consideration) to both parties. Not extortion. What's needed here is some kind of release from liability, not a "contract."
/r/MensRights02/11/12 08:04 PM
1

with consideration What's the "consideration" in this case? That's the problem. There's nothing exchanged, other than bodily fluids.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 05:40 PM
1

It wouldn't be a legal "contract" at all. There has to be an exchange of goods or services, a quid pro quo.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 05:17 PM
8

...Why is there such a severe lack of academic publications... This supposes that "academic publications" within the social sciences have legitimacy. If your field chooses to appropriate terms like "theory," then redefines the term to make their theories unfalsifiable, then there's a real problem calling it a science. Science isn't about choosing your conclusion first, then coming up with a body of work to support the conclusion.
/r/MensRights01/11/12 03:13 PM
5

60,000. Funny. The active user base there is likely less than 100.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 02:56 PM
1

Not all feminists are angry dykes who hate men. You'll have to dig hard here to find anyone saying that. The current version of Feminism as taught in academia has grown so convoluted and absurd that your average person wouldn't recognise it. Most people equate Feminism with equal rights, but it's gone far, far, beyond that now. There's good reason for opposing what's become of Feminism. And mischaracterizing opposition as "bashing," is exactly the kind of language I'd expect to hear from a radic…
/r/MensRights25/10/12 04:55 PM
8

Common? It's just getting started. Either let it slide and it gets worse, or stand up, for fucks sake. I'm skeptical its ever happened once. Okay then.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 04:49 PM
10

These "petty" offenses paved the way for what's now become full-blown misandry. It started with the jokes. Now we've gotten to the point where a male is forced to switch seats on an airplane because an unaccompanied minor is sitting in the next seat. We're far past the point where it makes sense to turn the other cheek. If it ever did.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 04:20 PM
13

I'll translate: Shit matters. Lie down and take it, or stand up and fight. Your choice.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 03:18 PM
9

Ok big man. Whatever, bro. If "fair to the child" was the whole point, then child-support payments would be audited to be sure the money is spent supporting the child.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 03:13 PM
16

Exactly this. And the OP is saying "man up and get over it." No thanks.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 02:59 PM
11

I'm starting to think you're a troll. Classic concern trolling.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 02:47 PM
6

Which is dick-ish and deadbeat as fuck. Framing this with gendered insults and adopting their "deadbeat" terminology is less than helpful. The double standard here is simple, a woman can choose to have no responsibility for the child. A man does not have that choice.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 02:44 PM
7

Someone made a joke about men? I don't care. What may seem like trivial issues to you are the very basis of the skewed playing field we're facing. Calling out the double-standards is our way of raising awareness, instead of just lying there and taking the "joke."
/r/MensRights25/10/12 02:41 PM
-6

professionally offended people "Professionally" means getting paid, like the academic social "science" people who indoctrinate and nurture the nutbags in SRS. This is our problem, we're all amateurs, while they've got a deep bench of paid agitators.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 02:31 PM
328

Let's see: Are we contacting so-called "journalists," to get people doxxed? Nope. Are we pre-banning all Redditors who post in subs we don't like? Nope. Are we leaking mod-chat transcripts and crying when we get banned for it? Nope. Are we calling everyone who disagrees with us "pedophiles" and "rapists?" Nope. We "all" aren't turning into SRS.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 02:22 PM
180

Sorry dude, but recent female colleges grads are only making 113% of what you can expect, so there's a lot more work to be done before there's social "justice."
/r/MensRights23/10/12 07:02 PM
1

But Nancy Brinker needs a new Jaccuzi!
/r/MensRights18/10/12 06:49 PM
4

Exactly. She probably didn't know what she was doing, and immediately blamed the children and told the police that they hacked her phone.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 04:48 PM
7

needs to have a laugh about... Ha, my kid got suspended, and the police were called. A real knee slapper.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 04:45 PM
9

I don't know if this is so much a Men's Rights issue... When you reverse the genders and the outcome is the opposite, then it's absolutely a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 04:44 PM
210

Teacher is negligent, at best, so she calls the police on 13-year old boys, and the school won't release her name as if she's a victim. The male privilige here is striking.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 10:50 AM
1

"...above..." No.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 12:42 AM
13

any non-liberal political subs Exactly. Although they're about as "liberal" as Pol Pot.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 12:21 AM
11

Cowardly would be to do nothing. They're doxxing and getting away with it. It's foolish to think they'll just stop with the low-hanging fruit.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 12:17 AM
16

Whose ass are they pulling that 30-40% figure out of?
/r/MensRights10/10/12 07:49 PM
7

because the movement started with women's suffrage... Sort of. It would be more accurate to say it "started" with the Women's Christian Temperance movement which dates back to 1873.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 05:47 PM
26

You might want to talk with the Rabbi. He'll likely agree that you should be there, and he might be able to smooth the way a bit.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 12:30 PM
2

what does a job CHOICE have to do with men's rights? Many more men die on that job than women, and you ask that question?
/r/MensRights04/10/12 07:40 PM
16

Do I have to censor my words for these people? "Bitch" is considered a gendered insult when applied to a woman, so of course you're in the wrong. "Dick," of course, would have been a-okay. There's no double standard, because reasons.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 05:48 PM
28

Look no further for "why Occupy failed." When men who showed up to fight against the 1% are sent to the back of the line and lectured on such pertinent topics as "enthusiastic consent," I have to wonder if this brand of feminism isn't another Cointelpro. Divide and conquer, works every time.
/r/MensRights03/10/12 04:51 PM
4

At least they're not mis-labeling "Social Studies" as "Social Science."
/r/MensRights03/10/12 02:09 PM
2

Yeah, and returning a child to an abuser is no problem at all right?
/r/MensRights02/10/12 02:58 PM
1

You told him to go look up "ad hominem" then you berated him for being "anti-intellectual." Motes and beams come to mind.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 07:52 PM
1

Your failure to see your attack on a user as an ad hominem betrays the quality of your reasoning.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 01:31 PM
1

You can understand how we would get that impression? You write well, but your ideas are confused.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 10:32 AM
1

Don't put words in my mouth. My advice still stands, taking a class in logic might help clean up your sloppy thinking.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 10:30 AM
1

Wow. Take any hard science at all? If so, then you know why its necessary to put quotes around the word "theory" as used by many social "science" disciplines.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 02:49 PM
3

You're an undergrad? Next semester, in addition to your studies in the realm of social "theory," take an introductory class in symbolic logic. Solid reasoning skills will serve you for a lifetime, and give you a way to evaluate information consistently.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 02:10 PM
2

You attacked builtbro as "anti-intellectual." Someone should certainly look up "ad hominem," but not who you think.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 01:47 PM
2

Uh huh, by that reasoning I'm sure you'd agree that Mitt Romney's vision for America is a "successful product" by the amount of money people have donated to his campaign. Ideologues will throw money at anything that confirms their bias. $150,000 is chump change in that arena. Again, the point you can't seem to grasp is that creating a product that sells is not easy. Finding fault is easy, creating something is hard. When she can do the former, then she has a right to do the latter.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 01:37 PM
1

What's "challenging" is creating a successful product. I'm sorry you find that difficult to understand. Perhaps less time in a classroom studying "critical analysis" and more time working in the the real world would help to expand your horizons.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 01:07 PM
7

Strangely enough, a biased effort to find offensive tropes in popular games isn't being seen as "a constructive endeavour." A better use of her time, and her supporters money, would be to develop a successful game that has none of the so-called offensive content. That's creative. What she's doing isn't.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 12:53 PM
10

I'd respond, but I'm busy cutting coupons so I can enjoy the privilege of affording enough food for my kids.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 12:52 PM
3

Here's a better idea, I challenge you and the rest of your ilk to stay inside your SRS safe space so you don't get offended. Again.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 12:50 PM
3

acted like a dick. You know about the "Dear Dick" letter? I'm not a big fan of gender-based insults.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 10:31 AM
2

Yet so inconsequential... Says the person who's single barely popular submission is "How to eat watermelon."
/r/MensRights27/09/12 07:45 PM
24

Exactly this. I used to read his blog, but after he attacked Richard Dawkins over that crazy elevator thing, I haven't been back.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 07:32 PM
9

Uh huh. They think they can define the word and then claim that it doesn't exist. Sounds legit.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 07:16 PM
6

The poster sucks. Racist, pure and simple.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 12:42 PM
7

I'm shocked, shocked, to find SRS downvoting going on here.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 07:22 PM
10

No, no, no. It's not "anyone." It's men. Period. Men are never victims. Because patriarchy.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 01:19 PM
2

Troll. Probably from SRS.
/r/MensRights15/09/12 10:08 PM
2

Most of the funding for Prop 8 came from the LDS chruch (Mormons) and Catholics.
/r/MensRights12/09/12 11:44 AM
3

My question is how the word "check" is being used. Is it like "check your fly?" Or more like "check your coat?" Or maybe its "a hip-check into the boards?"
/r/MensRights11/09/12 07:44 PM
13

...with his herpes infected mouth...
/r/MensRights06/09/12 04:55 PM
0

Sure. Right after you stop peddling your pro-muliltation lies.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 01:58 PM
9

"...believed..." Faith-based science apparently. The AMA does not recommend routine circumcision of newborns, and no study in developed countries shows any significant reduced risk of STDs.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 02:44 PM
12

Ah, yeah, I may have seen it around somehwere. It's all about creating a safe bubble No. It's about perpetuating their victim complex by inciting contempt and hatred throughout reddit. BTW that downvote isn't from me. I don't bother with that for a minor diagreement.
/r/MensRights14/07/12 11:09 AM
8

to create a safe bubble. I don't see it this way. Authoritarians can't exist without an enemy, they'll just find someone else who's "oppressing" them.
/r/MensRights14/07/12 10:54 AM
3

A prominent US sufferagette, Frances Willard, was president of the Women's Christian Temperence Union, the nice folks who brought us alcohol prohibition.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 12:15 AM
6

This is from the local Berkshire Eagle. And this from Ken at Popehat.
/r/MensRights11/07/12 02:28 PM
1

Sure, why blame suffragettes? I just blame the particular suffragette who was president of the WCTU when they came up with the White Life for Two program.
/r/MensRights09/07/12 07:05 PM
0

...it is a meaningless argument to such feminists. There's no arguing with "feminists."
/r/MensRights09/07/12 09:52 AM
2

Shock.
/r/MensRights08/07/12 11:12 AM
0

Sex for procreation only, I guess.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 05:00 PM
1

Well, exactly. And the feminist "solution" was to take away the right to drink alcohol.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 04:04 PM
-3

Okay then, no arguing with you I guess. It's crystal clear from the article that the Women's Christian Temperence Movement was both religious and feminist. And "instrumental in organizing woman's suffrage leaders." I can certainly understand why modern feminists would rather sweep this embarrassment under the rug.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 04:01 PM
1

Guessing you haven't read the article. It's all the same movement. "Thus, the WCTU was very interested in a number of social reform issues, including labor, prostitution, public health, sanitation, and international peace. As the movement grew in numbers and strength, members of the WCTU also focused on suffrage. The WCTU was instrumental in organizing woman's suffrage leaders and in helping more women become involved in American politics."
/r/MensRights06/07/12 03:43 PM
1

What I take from this, is that from the very beginning organized feminism was authoritarian. And one of their earliest "successes" was a complete disaster.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 03:36 PM
0

Yikes. I'd never heard of that. I remembered learning about the WCTU in college, so I googled it. I was very surpised to find that it was run by a suffragette. Naive, I know. Funny how these facts aren't mentioned when feminists lecture us on our privilege.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 03:25 PM
23

Men, doing the jobs women don't want, since ... forever.
/r/MensRights04/07/12 10:31 AM
8

You're brave to be teaching there at all. Most men don't seem interested in the hassle of public school teaching. My kid's elementary school has exactly one male staff member; the janitor.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 09:30 PM
13

Abuse of "harassment prevention orders" is absolutely a Men's Rights issue.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 05:21 PM
7

"Harassment prevention orders" are the result of a relatively new law in Massachusetts. The bill was passed in 2010, intended to "...fill what we all recognized was a critical gap in the law by providing victims of criminal harassment, stalking and sexual assault, regardless of their relationship with the defendant..." Source
/r/MensRights02/07/12 02:49 PM
15

Miss Nilan claimed she thought she'd hit a dog or a deer. Most times when a guy's head comes through your windshield it's hard to mistake it for a "dog or deer."
/r/MensRights02/07/12 02:29 PM
10

Here's the Google cache of the blog posts removed by the author in compliance with the Judge's order.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 12:27 PM
17

Gawker Not a Legitmate Source of News, Says Everyone.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 02:27 PM
13

Very well done.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 08:48 PM
20

The easiest solution isn't always the best. As hard as it would be, the OP should engage with the mother and communicate this fact: I have seen her many times attack my father and scream at him to hit her back. The last time that this happened one of my friends was with me and he also witnessed the whole scene. In my opinion this is a good way to short-circut a false accusation.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 11:33 AM
2

Whoever is the primary caregiver for the children makes less money. The wage gap is gender neutral. I work from home, my wife works in an office outside the home. She has 50-plus uniterrupted hours to focus on her career. I have 27 hours, at best, unless there are half-days, or snow days or sick days, or doctor's appointments, etc. I am always on-call. If I were female, I suppose I could cite this as discriminatory. It's not. I'm making less than I was before I took on this role, it was my decis…
/r/MensRights12/06/12 10:36 AM
64

Maybe SRS is hiring?
/r/MensRights08/06/12 10:09 AM
2

Another way to put it is; when you compare apples to apples, the gap is 95 cents to the dollar. Math is bipartisan.
/r/MensRights07/06/12 09:23 PM
1

So is having "thinning, dull eyelashes" apparently.
/r/MensRights07/06/12 10:33 AM
12

But, fibromyalgia is real. My TV told me.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 08:40 PM
1

Seems to me that the article offers a chance to better understand the opposition. And an opportunity to see that some "feminists" might be allies and not enemies.
/r/MensRights01/06/12 06:11 PM
2

Respectfully disagree. It's a spotlight on how problems of race and class are ignored when rich people are in charge. The piece isn't "anti-feminist," it's anti-racist and anti-classist.
/r/MensRights01/06/12 04:41 PM
11

First time I've read about this kind of scenario. Either the woman was batshit crazy to try it at all, or she'd heard that it worked for someone else.
/r/MensRights31/05/12 03:33 PM
4

Still pretty sickening. In all of these Disney shows, parents and teachers in general are portrayed as jerks and idiots. And violence against males, both adults and children is a comedy staple. This show is pretty bad, iCarly is worse.
/r/MensRights31/05/12 09:59 AM
1

After reading the ruling from the NY Supreme Court, it seems likely that this person's complaints have a lot more to do with butthurt than with any alleged misconduct of their attorney.
/r/MensRights25/05/12 06:46 PM
2

Here's more. "...within weeks of her birth, the couple began experiencing marital difficulties, stemming from the father's growing concern about the mother's mental health. ...when the child was just five weeks old, the mother vacated the couple's marital residence in Ulster County and traveled to Nassau County with the child." "...she prevented the father from having contact with the child for five weeks after her move to Nassau County, misrepresented that she was exclusively breast feeding the…
/r/MensRights25/05/12 06:05 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter