~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | MGTOW and non-dependent relationships | Lucius_Martius | /r/MGTOW | 01/02/15 09:43 AM |
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Don't do No Nut NovemberIf anything, I think it's female sexuality that has historically been demonized in western civilization. Historically female sexuality was more like a taboo (not acceptable to talk or think about), not demonized, or at least only rarely during witch crazes. But that's a more complex (offtopic) discussion. More recently however, female sexuality is empowerment and to be celebrated, while male sexuality is considered sick, depraved or creepy, unless it pleases a woman in some form. There is no cel… | /r/MensRights | 03/11/20 03:39 PM |
| 1 | Don't do No Nut NovemberAlso I'd argue that the whole nofap thing is not just a meme but boils down to the same old demonization of male sexuality we have seen in countless shapes over the decades and centuries. From religious zealotry to pseudo-scientific health-nuts around the turn of the century (like John Harvey Kellogg) over feminist misandrism to this current new breed of pseudo-scientific health nuts around the turn of the century. | /r/MensRights | 03/11/20 11:44 AM |
| -4 | Don't do No Nut NovemberI'd say that self-discipline is being able to force yourself to do what's rationally good for you. Which in my (and OP's) eyes nofap still needs to prove. So unless masturbation damages your quality of life in some way or another, yes, it's basically flagellation. And not without a precedence either. To me nofap is just the same old demonization of male sexuality, just from a different angle. | /r/MensRights | 03/11/20 11:03 AM |
| 1 | Scotland's new gender quota law directly discriminates against men. It requires at least 50% women, but not 50% men. Men have no protection.It's not men not sticking together that's the problem I agree. Men not blindly siding with their gender is actually a good thing. The problem is that women do exactly that. This creates a huge imbalance in social power, partially like you say also through expected male gender roles and stereotypes. But these stereotypes are still prevalent because the people reinforcing them have all the social power and control the narrative. And now they are amassing more and more institutional power as well. | /r/MensRights | 11/06/20 07:58 AM |
| 1 | Just a random redditor trying to denounce the severity of MGMI though it had been tolerated then ruled unconstitutional by a court It had been tolerated in the sense that it rarely went to court since it was mostly performed by private practitioners and there was no specific law explicitly allowing or disallowing it (like with FGM), so it was not investigated by the police on their own. In every case where it was brought to court however, judges always ruled against circumcision. There are two rulings against it under additional circumstances from 2004 an… | /r/MensRights | 10/06/20 09:43 PM |
| 5 | Just a random redditor trying to denounce the severity of MGMSure, most forms of FGM are worse, no question about that. But whatever form of FGM that is the equivalent of circumcision, there would still be no doubt in anyone's mind that it's mutilation. Not so with MGM. So let's not compare what's worse, but instead agree that cutting off parts of a child's genitals is mutilation regardless of gender and that all forms of genital mutilation are bad. | /r/MensRights | 06/06/20 12:44 AM |
| 2 | Just a random redditor trying to denounce the severity of MGMAs you have already realized, you misunderstood me. I live in Germany and this topic pisses me off quite a bit, because until 2012 Germany was one of the only places in the whole world where MGM was illegal, and counted as "Körperverletzung" (Assault with bodily harm). But then they explicitly legalized MGM for religious purposes (with FGM obviously remaining illegal). | /r/MensRights | 06/06/20 12:40 AM |
| 75 | Just a random redditor trying to denounce the severity of MGMIt's not just a piece of skin, that's not how the human body works. The foreskin is at least two layers of skin with tissue, lots of nerves and blood-vessels in between. It's as much a piece of skin as a woman's labia and clitoral hood, yet strangely nobody (in the western world) seems to have a problem with recognizing that removing those from a baby would be mutilation. | /r/MensRights | 05/06/20 02:28 PM |
| 1 | IF YOU ARE A MAN fighting for men's rights, this here is a prime example of doing it the wrong way!Is your point that MGTOW is better again? This is where they are right and PUAs are wrong. It's like not you're destroying your actual self, just tweaking it a bit. I think our disagreement comes down to this. That is the definition of compromise. It's that you think it's acceptable, and I don't. And also I'd clearly differentiate between what you describe and and self-improvement. The one is getting closer to the person you want to be, the other is getting closer to the person women want you to… | /r/MensRights | 11/03/20 02:18 AM |
| 2 | IF YOU ARE A MAN fighting for men's rights, this here is a prime example of doing it the wrong way!Correction, it's about being the best version of yourself. What if no version of myself includes being a "high-status man", much less emulating one? What if that would make me disgusted with myself, because that type of man/status disgusts me? Also, men get told to "just be yourself, man" all the time. Doesn't usually work. Does not work for what exactly? I'm going to guess "getting women". I think you just made my point. If "getting women" is not someone's priority in life, that whole house of … | /r/MensRights | 11/03/20 01:27 AM |
| 2 | IF YOU ARE A MAN fighting for men's rights, this here is a prime example of doing it the wrong way!I'm sure some of it does rely on psychological tricks and stuff, but a lot of it just comes down to behaving in an attractive way such as emulating "high-status man" behaviors. Which are... "psychological tricks and stuff". Note that the worst thing about this is not that you betray women by pretending to be someone you're not. The worst thing is you betray yourself by pretending to be someone you're not. Second, is it really "manipulation" if you're not really controlling her but just influenci… | /r/MensRights | 11/03/20 12:31 AM |
| 2 | IF YOU ARE A MAN fighting for men's rights, this here is a prime example of doing it the wrong way!I'd say MGTOW and PUA/redpill make similar observations, but draw different conclusions/solutions. One example. As a MGTOW you go to the gym to train for sports you like, to get healthy, etc. As a PUA/redpiller you go to the gym to get ripped to impress girls. The difference comes when you don't want to go to the gym. As MGTOW you just do something else that fullfills you and makes you feel accomplished. As a PUA you become a loser because you're not attractive to women, so you force yourself th… | /r/MensRights | 10/03/20 11:44 PM |
| 5 | IF YOU ARE A MAN fighting for men's rights, this here is a prime example of doing it the wrong way!MGTOW is not even necessarily against long-term relationships as long as you don't give the woman (or man) control of your life. What MGTOW is against however is focusing your entire life on the acquisition of more pussy. Which is basically what PUA and /r/TheRedPill do. | /r/MensRights | 10/03/20 10:16 PM |
| 30 | IF YOU ARE A MAN fighting for men's rights, this here is a prime example of doing it the wrong way!Especially since the first guy mentions MGTOW, which is inherently incompatible with PUA and /r/TheRedPill. | /r/MensRights | 10/03/20 07:59 AM |
| 8 | Mother stands strong on her decision to mutilate her sons peniswe need to have better quality procedures and protocols You'll never have procedures that catch 100% of complications. That is just medical reality. With most procedures that's fine, because they do more good than the potential for harm. But when your procedure is entirely unnecessary, even the lowest risk becomes too dangerous. Not sure if doctors list the pros, cons, and risks of circumcision, might ask my brother (pediatrician). Do that, but be aware that for US paediatricians it's a very pro… | /r/MensRights | 09/03/20 08:51 PM |
| 9 | Mother stands strong on her decision to mutilate her sons penisI'm sorry but I personally dont see how one could be haunted by their circumcision. That's an ignorant thing to say considering there have been enough men on this sub and other places who said they were unhappy with it. Are you not able to empathize with these men because your experience was different or do you deny they exist? If it was a botched surgery I can understand it, that's terrible and surgeries that involve cutting away at a person should be done precisely and in a good environment. T… | /r/MensRights | 09/03/20 08:10 PM |
| 4 | Mother stands strong on her decision to mutilate her sons penisAnd because you feel that way, everybody does? What about people actually regret it but had the decision taken away by their parents when they were an infant? Or do you deny that at least some people exist that do regret it? And all of that for no tangible benefits. It's just pointless suffering produced by the vanity of people having been mutilated themselves when they were an infant. You may argue it's a lot of suffering or not a lot of suffering, but you can't deny it's pointless suffering. | /r/MensRights | 09/03/20 07:55 PM |
| 6 | Mother stands strong on her decision to mutilate her sons penisI can tell you that 98% of circumcised people really dont give a shit Let's treat it like that number is fact for a second for the sake of argument... What about those remaining 2%? If 98% don't care and 2% are haunted by an irreversible decision their parents made for them, why should parents be allowed to make that decision? Seems like a net-negative to me. | /r/MensRights | 09/03/20 07:52 PM |
| 6 | Mother stands strong on her decision to mutilate her sons penisit's both the father and mother's choice Of course. Why should cutting off parts of their children not be a valid choice parents should be allowed to make? | /r/MensRights | 09/03/20 07:47 PM |
| 3 | Can a man with the same levels of internet clout as hers make the same tweet about international women's day today without being cancelled ?claiming that the radicals are the ones in power is simply untrue Which I never did. I'm talking about mainstream feminism not radicals (those are another story altogether). Your average Guardian, Buzzfeed, Times feminism. I'm talking about academia, gender-studies in particular. I'm talking about politics, with politicians calling themselves feminists and trying to gain voters by spouting misandry and pandering to women. You're basically saying that because feminists managed to con the broader … | /r/MensRights | 09/03/20 12:39 PM |
| 1 | Can a man with the same levels of internet clout as hers make the same tweet about international women's day today without being cancelled ?No true Scotsman fallacy. Look it up. Feminism is not what the dictionary says, but what people who call themselves feminists do. I'm not saying there aren't many well-meaning people who want equality and identify with feminism because that's what the dictionary says it stands for, but they're not the kind of feminists that making politics, control academia and media. They may be a minority, but they hold the majority of power among feminists. | /r/MensRights | 09/03/20 12:25 PM |
| 5 | Lost Boys. Over 100 boys die unnecessarily in US as a result of circumcision.The question you should ask is why is it not a common practice in any modern western country except the US. And the fact that circumcisions are a billion dollar industry while considering how the rest of the world does healthcare in comparison to the US should give you an idea. | /r/MensRights | 24/01/20 03:52 AM |
| 9 | Lost Boys. Over 100 boys die unnecessarily in US as a result of circumcision.I'm sure that they would have much rather had the operation happen as a newborn than during their adulthood. The problem is that as much as you can't unmake a cake you can't uncircumcise a penis. So which is the tougher situation to be in, being uncircumcised and wanting to be circumcised or being circumcised and wanting to be uncircumcised? | /r/MensRights | 24/01/20 03:42 AM |
| 1 | Holy fuck. This is a book about teaching women to ruin men, take fathers from their children, take children from their fathers, strengthen a hateful ideology and provoke suicideConvenient how you didn't quote the full sentence: Why did they go that far to recognize how women have gained social power... You're making it look like I implied the author was female, while I actually said, that they (as in neutral pronoun) recognized that women have gained social power. You don't use "almost self-aware" if you don't assume the writer is a woman. I meant self-aware as a feminist, not a woman aware about her own social power. If that had been my point, it would have not been a… | /r/MensRights | 22/12/19 04:44 PM |
| 1 | Holy fuck. This is a book about teaching women to ruin men, take fathers from their children, take children from their fathers, strengthen a hateful ideology and provoke suicideThat perspective would normally be from a woman, but the book is clearly written by a man. Yet it is what they wrote. Again, I don't care what gender the writer of a book is, I only care what's written in it. You downvote any feedback that doesn't re-enforce the narrative. No, I downvote stupid ideas about the gender of a writer being more important than what they write. | /r/MensRights | 22/12/19 07:36 AM |
| 1 | Holy fuck. This is a book about teaching women to ruin men, take fathers from their children, take children from their fathers, strengthen a hateful ideology and provoke suicideDid you read at all past the first sentence? It does not matter if it was written by a man or a woman. What I meant is that it recognizes all the advantages women have in society, yet still attributes them to women's oppression. I don't believe that it was "written by a woman in order to manipulate men", but it was certainly written out of a feminist perspective, failing to realize there is no such thing as patriarchy and oppression of women. | /r/MensRights | 21/12/19 01:38 AM |
| 11 | Holy fuck. This is a book about teaching women to ruin men, take fathers from their children, take children from their fathers, strengthen a hateful ideology and provoke suicideis a completely nonsense statement I agree. Yet that is what they are trying to say in the excerpt. Why did they go that far to recognize how women have gained social power and are beginning to wield that power to terrible consequences, but just ever so slightly miss the mark by repeating the feminist mantra that it's all the fault of patriarchy. That's what I meant with almost self-aware. | /r/MensRights | 04/12/19 12:37 AM |
| 19 | Holy fuck. This is a book about teaching women to ruin men, take fathers from their children, take children from their fathers, strengthen a hateful ideology and provoke suicideIf someone does that to you, then you have no reason not to absolutely destroy their business and personal reputation. It all depends on how much effort you are willing to put into doing it. If you are able to manipulate your social environment in that way, you wouldn't get in this type of situation in the first place. I am an introverted engineer myself, so I could empathize with this Eric character. However knowing what I know (that an apology is only a validation of their claims and starts a … | /r/MensRights | 03/12/19 10:56 PM |
| 43 | Holy fuck. This is a book about teaching women to ruin men, take fathers from their children, take children from their fathers, strengthen a hateful ideology and provoke suicideIt's astounding how almost self-aware this is. "By abusing patriarchie's tendencies to prioritize women, women hold all the power in this system where men hold all the power." It's almost like there isn't a system to oppress women in the first place. Which obviously is nonsense, this must be "patriarchy hurting men too" again. | /r/MensRights | 03/12/19 10:48 PM |
| 6 | He spent 29 years in jail for false rape accusation, nothing can bring back those 25 years he Lost.Are you suggesting that 51% of all individuals in prison are innocent? It stands to reason, as other countries that are comparably wealthy and free as the US have far less than half of the US's prisoners per capita. Sure, my definition of innocent in this case is "not deserving of prison", but I'm not so sure it would look that different otherwise. With 97 percent of felony convictions being reached by means of plea bargaining and never receiving a fair trial it wouldn't surprise me. | /r/MensRights | 17/11/19 09:31 PM |
| 5 | He spent 29 years in jail for false rape accusation, nothing can bring back those 25 years he Lost.The US judicial system has more people per capita in prison than any other country in the world, significantly more than any modern western country. Are you saying imprisoning all those people is justified? | /r/MensRights | 17/11/19 08:05 PM |
| 5 | Woman mocks men speaking out against infant circumcision.It actually was illegal on the grounds of "Körperverletzung"/battery before a new law exclusively legalized MGM in 2012 for reasons of religious freedom. It had been demanded by the Central Council of Jews for a while. | /r/MensRights | 25/10/19 01:08 PM |
| 2 | 3y kid has part of penis severed in genital mutilation procedure in Brazil. Doctor died days later.I'm not sad at all about the fucking doctor. I have no idea why when this happens in America the parents just say "whoops!" and forget about it. Maybe they'll even throw in some free traumatizing gender conversion in an attempt to prove a feminist talking-point, who knows. | /r/MensRights | 19/10/19 09:47 AM |
| 4 | Mother circumcises her child, and she regrets nothingincluding health decisions. Which this is not. It's a decision of cutting off a part of your child's body without medical necessity. There are a lot of things you aren't allowed to do as a parent. Basically everything that is or can be harmful to your child. And cutting off parts of them without medical reason definitely should be on that list. | /r/MensRights | 05/10/19 01:49 PM |
| 6 | Mother circumcises her child, and she regrets nothingYou just confirmed that you’re either unemployed, in a low level job, or a teenager. So after studying logic, instead of refuting my arguments, you resort to ad-hominems so you don't have to confront your cognitive dissonance about circumcision. And sure... go ahead and show this to your people... I mean, show it to everyone you meet on the way. If even one of them realizes what an ass you have made out of yourself in this exchange in order to defend this barbaric practice, at least something po… | /r/MensRights | 05/10/19 01:44 PM |
| 13 | Mother circumcises her child, and she regrets nothingThere are just other things to consider with adult circumcision, which is why what you’re saying is completely moronic. Adult circumcision can be tragic... How awesome, that you don't have to get it if no-one's forcing you. Unlike a child, you know. Also, how can you know how tragic circumcision is for an infant. You do realize that even things you don't remember can still cause severe trauma. Sometimes you can even forget things because of trauma. 'for an adult it is bad' so 'for a child it mus… | /r/MensRights | 05/10/19 12:04 PM |
| 11 | Mother circumcises her child, and she regrets nothingLmao it’s literally the same as saying because you weren’t, that other’s would regret being. Yes! You are almost there now. Just give your train of thought a little shove and broaden your horizon. Both statements are illogical, because you can't know how your child will feel about it, so have your child [ ] mutilated [ ] decide for himself when he is old enough Come on, you can do this! I'm counting on you! | /r/MensRights | 05/10/19 11:39 AM |
| 6 | Mother circumcises her child, and she regrets nothingI agree forcing your idea onto your children who can't consent, that seems to be wrong. I agree on that. Firstly, as others pointed out, that's the most important factor. And it's good that you're on board with that. Why do people dislike being circumsized? I am and don't see the issue about being circumsized or not. Secondly, nothing is wrong with circumcision if you are happy with it and/or you have made an informed decision to the get the procedure done. However, there is a lot of misinformat… | /r/MensRights | 05/10/19 11:26 AM |
| 7 | Mother circumcises her child, and she regrets nothingThe whole job of being a parent is asserting authority over a child who can't consent to most things. So tell me, why is FGM illegal? Or cutting of a baby girls mammory gland, because the risk of breast-cancer later in her life? Or hitting your child as a punishment for misbehavior? Right, you have the right to raise your child, but not to harm them, because they are protected by the same human rights as everyone. They are not property. They are not your property. They are human beings. | /r/MensRights | 05/10/19 11:15 AM |
| 10 | Mother circumcises her child, and she regrets nothing'I was ...' so 'everyone can only ever be ...' Find me the logic error. | /r/MensRights | 05/10/19 11:12 AM |
| 19 | Mother circumcises her child, and she regrets nothingI’m glad my parents did it That's great. I mean even if it had turned out you were unhappy with it you could always have gotten your foreskin back... oh wait. | /r/MensRights | 05/10/19 11:10 AM |
| 14 | Mother circumcises her child, and she regrets nothingTechnically pediatricians do recommend it US pediatricians that is. You know, the industry that earns all the money from circumcision. If you disregard muslim and jewish countries, most of the modern west does not recommend the procedure. as there are more medical benefits than detriments, but it’s not a lot more dangerous not to do it (mostly just increases risks of infection, cancer, and some STDs tho it’s a minor increase). The reason why most pediatricians around the world don't recommend it… | /r/MensRights | 05/10/19 10:58 AM |
| 2 | Men should be trained for marriage! A female colleagues' FB post.No thanks. Though your offer of reconditioning to accept a role of life-long servitude under a woman sounds compelling, I'd rather enjoy my life instead. But I'm sure you'll find a willing subject. Maybe try looking in /r/MensLib. | /r/MensRights | 01/10/19 09:37 PM |
| 0 | So I lurked r/FemaleDatingStrategy for like five minutes. The talk going on in there is evidence enough of female-on-male historic and systemic sexism.There are no "eyes of redpill" there is only you. Sure, I know that. But go to that place and try to tell them how you developed this new "game" that lets you focus on your passions by taking women out of the equation altogether. Let's see what they have to say to that. a goal to understand yourself and your relationships with women and your responsibility to those relationships. Yeah... I don't think we both get the same sub when we navigate to /r/TheRedPill don't go there Not planning to. At l… | /r/MensRights | 01/10/19 01:58 PM |
| -1 | So I lurked r/FemaleDatingStrategy for like five minutes. The talk going on in there is evidence enough of female-on-male historic and systemic sexism.Yup, all useful advice. Except for the reason that makes you do all of those things. You do them for pussy. All the progress in your life will be built on sand. It just forms you into a reflection of what women find attractive. Which is a shame because that isn't necessarily yourself. In the end, and this was said by many PUA types at some point, it turns you into an empty shell. You don't want to lift weights but play games in your free-time, and your idea of working hard is building stuff and … | /r/MensRights | 01/10/19 12:38 PM |
| 1 | I like Greta but this is sexist bullshit.The elitist source of the underlying malthusianism does not have a real scientific backing and has been shown to be incorrect again and again and again for decades as the predictions fail to come to fruition, and zero-growth is a fantasy that'd lead to significant harm if an attempt at implementation was made. You repeat all this jargon, and I would agree with you about the point about population growth that I can sense is somewhere in your incoherent ramblings. But it actually hasn't got anythi… | /r/MensRights | 29/09/19 04:54 PM |
| 1 | I like Greta but this is sexist bullshit.The child is having their immature and irrational apocalyptically stark view on the world Which happens to also be the consensus of an overwhelming majority scientists around the world. I could rephrase it like this: If children have to tell the adults to fucking take a second and listen to the smart people (scientists, no, not politicians), then it's not the adults place to blame the children for speaking up. I personally don't care about personality cults like with Greta Thunberg because it de… | /r/MensRights | 29/09/19 03:15 PM |
| 2 | More people in the mainstream get itYears ago, when I told my mother that I am suffering from depression, she told me that that's not so bad and that it could be worse, like for the neighbor's adult daughter who was diagnosed with cancer. Sure, cancer is objectively worse, I couldn't say anything against that. And I'm sure she meant well, in a glass-half-full kinda way. And usually she's an intelligent and ressourceful person I can always rely upon when I need advice and help on something. But what she said in this case left me fe… | /r/MensRights | 29/09/19 03:06 PM |
| 1 | This is the most popular post ever made on r/feminism. The ten thousand people who upvoted this before it was locked share the belief that every agenda and belief you may have that isn't theirs is wrong.At least it's not the usual bullshit about everyone advocating for equality being a feminist. I'd rather be labeled a sexist by a feminist than a feminist by a regular person. | /r/MensRights | 26/09/19 04:15 PM |
| 1 | The ‘Cancel Culture’ has destroyed one of the most profound technology leaders of our time from MITI'm not buying that anyone who went to Epstein's house and was approached by a young girl, in someone elses home, seemingly out of the blue, to fuck, didn't know that anything strange was going on. Since everything points to Minsky having rejected the girl, you are free to assume that he did realize exactly that. And even if something had happened it still wouldn't be sexual assault even then, since the coercion and force would have come from Epstein, not Minsky. I still don't know what the prob… | /r/MensRights | 21/09/19 02:45 PM |
| 1 | The ‘Cancel Culture’ has destroyed one of the most profound technology leaders of our time from MITSo, guilt by criticising guilt by association. This whole thing really seems like we truely have arrived at a new level of Kafka trials. He didn't "resign because of his comments" but because his comments were quoted out of context and given a spin to look like rape apology, despite all that RMS said in that post was either true or reasonable assumptions. | /r/MensRights | 19/09/19 08:14 PM |
| 2 | The ‘Cancel Culture’ has destroyed one of the most profound technology leaders of our time from MITIt has to get worse before it finally gets better. You should read about the Strauss-Howe generational theory. It defines generations moving through repeating cycles of four, High, Awakening, Unravelling and Crisis. The theory puts us currently in the Crisis cycle, with another ~6 years to go until the conflict peaks and fizzles out. Afterwards we will have a synthesis of progressive and conservative ideas and values and a resulting "golden age" for another ~20 years (like we last had in the ~50… | /r/MensRights | 17/09/19 10:41 PM |
| 1 | The ‘Cancel Culture’ has destroyed one of the most profound technology leaders of our time from MITPlease worry a bit more about getting facts straight than about how not immediately joining into the moral outrage makes the sub look to outsiders. | /r/MensRights | 17/09/19 10:33 PM |
| 1 | Zoe Quinn's allegations are falling apart - Alec Holowka committed suicided because of her lies and the cancel culture.Worst scene out of a really bad movie. I hope the new Dune movie avoids stupid crap like this. | /r/MensRights | 12/09/19 09:13 PM |
| 7 | Man gets falsely accused at work and has career threatened. Mod locks comments because people are defending men's rights in the comments. Shocking.but the reality is I do not hate women whatsoever. I think this is true for a lot of MGTOW as well. The only real rule to being a MGTOW is to not marry. That's it. As a MGTOW you can be friends with women, have a relationship, live together with a woman, possibly even have children or whatever. I myself am both an egalitarian Men's rights advocate and would consider myself a MGTOW if asked directly. I'm in an exclusive long term relationship with separate living arrangements (LAT) with a woman f… | /r/MensRights | 07/09/19 07:58 AM |
| 18 | Man gets falsely accused at work and has career threatened. Mod locks comments because people are defending men's rights in the comments. Shocking.The issue is not with MGTOW, but with MGTOW subs and communities. I came to the conclusion that MGTOW principles are inherently opposed to forming healthy communities. It's not a community to belong to or an activist group to join, but something you do for your own life to make your own life better or at least to mitigate further damage. Depending on the individual personal history, that may include more or less radical and even misogynistic thinking. This is usually given a pass, because some M… | /r/MensRights | 07/09/19 07:26 AM |
| 3 | Child support is sexist, outdated, and profit-driven-AVfMMy real question is, does that statistic exclude the fathers that bounced out, or are otherwise (actually) unfit (drugs, abuse, etc)? So you assume fathers/men are by nature more prone to be unfit or unwilling parents? Because if you'd assume that both genders are equally likely to be unfit/unwilling parents, it could be at most 15% of deadbeat dads among those 85%. But sure. You were just asking a (very suggestive) question. | /r/MensRights | 06/09/19 06:44 AM |
| 5 | User goes on a rantI have never, ever felt threatened by feminism. Or social justice, for that matter. Sure, so did Richard Dawkins, until he was persecuted relentlessly which gave him a stroke in the end (and probably still after that). Or sir Tim Hunt, a winner of the nobel prize, who lost his job over a joke that was quoted maliciously out of context and the feminist media outrage that followed. Or the poor guy(s) from shirtgate, elevatorgate, donglegate etc. (please excuse the "-gate" shorthand, but it's easy … | /r/MensRights | 30/08/19 10:46 PM |
| 4 | User goes on a rantWhat is your definition of feminism then? Because I always heard it was about equality between sexes. That's what I am telling you. The dictionary definition does not mean shit. There's a German saying "Papier ist geduldig" meaning paper is patient, or that you can write down a lot of stuff but what you do in the end is a completely different matter. That whole paragraph about feminism being a religious supremacy movement... can you link to anything supporting that because that is not how I've e… | /r/MensRights | 30/08/19 10:17 PM |
| 5 | User goes on a rantFeminism - Yes that's my understanding Feminism does not have a monopoly on gender equality. Realize what sub you are in. We are not feminists, yet I would argue we are more egalitarian than feminists ever were or will ever be. Feminism, in practice, is an unfalsifiable quasi-religious ideology and a supremacy movement. Just as with social justice, many well-meaning people call themselves feminists because they have not yet seen what the mainstream feminist actually does in practice. Look at the… | /r/MensRights | 30/08/19 09:51 PM |
| 13 | User goes on a rantPeople who are working to reform the justice system are SJW's Like everyone working for gender equality is automatically a feminist? What about those people doing the things he wrote about, which you surely wouldn't deny exist, do you? Sure, I agree it's not "all" of them, but "most" definitely fits. At least regarding the vocal group of SJWs. | /r/MensRights | 30/08/19 08:04 PM |
| 20 | User goes on a rantIt's not that his argument is a strawman, it's that yours is a no true Scotsman fallacy. What he is arguing against is what the "real" SJWs do. Ok, granted, it is a tiny bit of a strawman when you read it solely targeted at OP, of which I do get the impression that he's sincere and well-meaning but way too naive. Because that's how it always is, well meaning people naively defend the hateful bad people hiding behind a rhetoric of equality and love, because that what they have put in the dictiona… | /r/MensRights | 30/08/19 07:56 PM |
| 1 | I keep trying to convince “never hit a woman” is a sexist argument, but no one listens. They say I’m being sexist. Am I?Regardless of the gender of an attacker you are allowed to use enough force to 1) defend yourself or others, and 2) restrain the person that is attacking you if they don't stop. If that means hitting back, then that's what you should do. Nobody needs to "take it like a man", just because their attacker is a woman. | /r/MensRights | 27/08/19 12:09 PM |
| 8 | Men's Rights Movement: Legal ObjectivesSure, men have problems, too. But men have come first for centuries, so now it's time to fix the problems of women. Any and all problems of women. When every last woman on Earth is in perfect bliss, then we can get to some of men's issues. Remember, equality is not a zero sum game, feminism helps men too, you know. /s | /r/MensRights | 27/08/19 09:49 AM |
| 12 | Men's Rights Movement: Legal ObjectivesI don't want to argue against Ritalin helping you. Just to provide a contrasting anecdote... I was "diagnosed" with ADHD and was prescribed Ritalin as a child by my (female) pediatrician from when I was about 8 until 12 years old, initially, because I was "rocking on my chair too much" at school, and would not stop when the (female) teacher told me to, or start again soon after. It might just have been a phase or a bad habit or something. I was not a particular disobedient kid. And I had good gr… | /r/MensRights | 27/08/19 09:27 AM |
| 6 | Mike Buchanan asks why so few MRAs engage in practical (offline) activism?I am not a Men's Rights Activist. I don't even think activism works. Running around a street with sings and loud chants is ego masturbation at best. Politicians don't care, since the protesters don't vote for them anyway. Companies don't care, because these protesters don't buy their products in the first place. Activists are just a nuisance to them. I leave activism to people that prefer screaming polarizing one-liners over rational discussion. Like feminists. There are only a few people that b… | /r/MensRights | 26/08/19 03:06 PM |
| 7 | Circumcision is literally legal genital mutilation.Plus if there was evidence circumcision was bad we would have gotten rid of the practice long ago but there isn't. You mean like literally the entire world except the US, Israel and some third world countries? | /r/MensRights | 25/08/19 10:15 AM |
| 8 | Circumcision is literally legal genital mutilation.Cutting off your ears is harmless. People don't hunt anymore, so they don't need the extended hearing range. It looks better and you don't need to wash them anymore when showering. People live and die happily with any difference in their lives because of cutting their ears off. My dad cut my ears off and I'm just fine. In fact I'm happy he cut them off. Those disgusting skin flaps that they are... And tomorrow I'm going to have the ears of my two weeks old son cut off. Sure, He'll cry a bit, but… | /r/MensRights | 25/08/19 10:13 AM |
| 5 | Circumcision is literally legal genital mutilation.It's called phimosis and there are better treatments than circumcision for it. Go and ask your physician about a preputioplasty. Unless you live in the US, your doctors will probably know how to treat phimosis properly. | /r/MensRights | 25/08/19 10:07 AM |
| 3 | Circumcision is literally legal genital mutilation.Sure, there is no moral issue with choosing to get a circumcision for religious reason once you're 18 and able to consent. However religions shouldn't have a right to mutilate children, even if their skydaddy demands it. Edit: Changed the wording to not insinuate you are advocating for it, since you just asked a question. | /r/MensRights | 25/08/19 09:58 AM |
| 11 | Circumcision is literally legal genital mutilation.There is a far less invasive treatment for phimosis called preputioplasty. It is not performed as much in the US because their doctors just seem to like to cut peoples dicks up. But literally anywhere besides the US, preputioplasty is the standard treatment for phimosis. | /r/MensRights | 25/08/19 09:56 AM |
| 1 | Gillette Backs Out Of The SJW Game After Losing 8 Billion USDFrom piracy and over reaching countries Piracy? Are you living in the 18th century or something? Sure, there are the Somali, but that's a purely economical issue. If you'd dump the amount of resources needed to protect those coasts from pirates into restoring the fishing grounds of those coasts (or if they hadn't been destroyed by the western fishing industry in the first place) and stability to the country, you'd have a permanent solution instead of gunning down the dirt-poor Somalis. National … | /r/MensRights | 25/08/19 12:26 AM |
| 1 | Gillette Backs Out Of The SJW Game After Losing 8 Billion USDYou have yet to counter my biggest point in global trade we protect, Because it was neither an argument, nor a good point. Sure, you have a lot of ships out there protecting something from what exactly? Cthulhu rising and swallowing oil tankers perhaps? Can you protect from the real dangers to commerce, like freak waves or storms? As you said, the world is mostly at peace, the need for your war-fleet "protecting" trading is debatable at best. I'd argue the same as with nuclear deterrence, tradin… | /r/MensRights | 24/08/19 11:50 PM |
| 1 | Gillette Backs Out Of The SJW Game After Losing 8 Billion USDwe are the backbone of the UN and have sent troops where the world sees fit to end conflict for decades You mean you leverage the UN into permitting your incursions (or ignore their mandate if they don't or take to long). "Backbone" is especially funny, because in recent decades there have been many voices from US politicians demanding the US to leave the "restrictive" UN. But that has nothing to do with our discussion about your military (or military in general) anymore. You are completely igno… | /r/MensRights | 24/08/19 11:25 PM |
| 1 | Gillette Backs Out Of The SJW Game After Losing 8 Billion USDyou you are currently living in the most peaceful safe time inhuman history thanks to the MAD concept nuclear deterrence creates. Which is an unfalsifiable statement because how am I going to proof otherwise? Look up "cum hoc ergo propter hoc". Also I would argue we live in one of the most peaceful times (actually the most peaceful time) because living conditions are at an all-time high globally and religion is globally at an all-time low. At least I can back my reasoning up with localized stati… | /r/MensRights | 24/08/19 10:34 PM |
| 2 | Gillette Backs Out Of The SJW Game After Losing 8 Billion USDbut the idea it’s “all for not” because we have a handful of troops in the Middle East is a short sided fallacy. This must be the biggest understatement I have ever heard on the topic. Your military actions have been destabilizing the middle east for more than half a century, out of petty greed, the fear of economic recession and to divert attention from political issues within your own country. You don't get to wave this away as if your continuous presence in the middle-east is just a small out… | /r/MensRights | 24/08/19 08:59 PM |
| 2 | Gillette Backs Out Of The SJW Game After Losing 8 Billion USDBut an overwhelmingly majority of military are just doing a job and getting a step up in life. Your government could find better uses for the money you waste on the military that would actually benefit people and still create a ton of jobs. For example investing in your crumbling infrastructure or financing urban development to turn your ghettos and ghost towns into worthy places to live again. They DO protect the country on a daily basis. From what? Running out of cheap oil? Or the bankruptcy o… | /r/MensRights | 24/08/19 06:46 PM |
| 7 | Gillette Backs Out Of The SJW Game After Losing 8 Billion USDYou literally messed that sentence up on your last word. Don't get me wrong, I'm not going to shit on veterans, not even US veterans, who have rarely defended and mostly attacked and conquered. But being in the military does not make you a hero, it makes you a pawn of powerful people. And when pawns get sacrificed, they get my sympathy and compassion for the shit they've been through, but that does not make them heroes. They got conned into paying with their lives to make rich people even richer… | /r/MensRights | 24/08/19 11:11 AM |
| 2 | A Reminder of what 1st wave feminism was about. 2nd & 3rd waves are worse.Zeitgeist Just to add a bit, the literal translation is "spirit of the ages/times" (Zeit = Time, Geist = Spirit) which transports the meaning pretty well. | /r/MensRights | 14/06/19 11:26 PM |
| 5 | A great example of feminist misandryAdd the redpillers and PUA people to that list. And probably most regular (slightly insecure) men too, even though subconsciously. Because that's just what modern society and culture is bombarding you with. The only group/community explicitly trying to avoid caring about female validation are MGTOW. I, myself, even though I have a girlfriend and even though I am aware on a conscious level that female validation does not really matter, subconsciously, if a beautiful girl/women walked up to me and… | /r/MensRights | 04/05/19 08:41 PM |
| 24 | 'My son, Alex, killed himself after circumcision' Alex had come to believe that male circumcision should be regarded as "male genital mutilation".This is the only correct answer because it is the only one that mentions preputioplasty, the state-of-the-art treatment for phimosis with zero complications that works in 99.9% of cases and is practiced in all western/modern countries around the world except the US. | /r/MensRights | 17/04/19 10:03 PM |
| 1 | Why are attractive women honored and idolized for male achievements?I don't believe this is necessarily gendered. People like watching beautiful people. Media knows this and goes looking for pretty people to push when writing their articles making their thumbnails in order to get more clicks etc. At the company I work as a software developer, every few month they make a promotional videos of some sort, always with different production crews and companies. However, from my department they always pick out the same two men and two women for interviews. Not because … | /r/MensRights | 14/04/19 08:50 PM |
| 8 | Crazy pro-circumcision feminist destroyed by facts and logic!Not profitable? What? She means "less profitable than adult circumcision". And while that may be true on a case by case basis, she does not account for the fact that given the choice men tend to not get circumcisions, which means no profit for doctors at all. Add to that, that even if more expensive adult circumcisions and fewer adults willing to get the procedure would even out, a lower percentage of circumcised men in the population would lead to the aesthetic standard to change and thus the r… | /r/MensRights | 13/04/19 11:14 AM |
| 3 | Girl gets her justiceugly and unpopular On the other hand, isn't that just as dangerous as being beautiful and popular (without the perks though)? If a girl feels you're creepy she might just end up accusing you to get you out of her sight. The best way to be safe is just being invisible. | /r/MensRights | 12/04/19 06:38 PM |
| 6 | The young girl who (according to r/all) singlehandedly delivered the hyped black hole’s image.Can you link to the repository you were looking at, because from looking at this repository, I didn't get the same impression as you did. Sure, she did some major work and deserves credit, but definitely not more than the other three main contributors. So he moved thousand of line of code everyday, but he didn't write it himself. Code you merely move from branch to branch or by merging pull-requests in the form of merge-commits does not get counted towards a contributor's stats on github (and ne… | /r/MensRights | 11/04/19 11:51 AM |
| 7 | After browsing the r/feminism for around 10 minutes I have gone through more pain then when I broke my neckactual feminists (when I say that I mean girls who actually "fight" for equality but not just for girls) Those are two different things. Despite the dictionary telling you, actual feminists don't "fight for equality" for female supremacy. It's right there in the name. And by "actual" in this case I mean politicians, academics and activists, not just some well-meaning random person who has read feminism stands for equality and thinks that that's something they can get behind. | /r/MensRights | 06/04/19 11:33 AM |
| 5 | I dont understand why some people think being uncut is disgustingI'd not be so sure about the last part though. Girls will generally not care that you are uncircumcised at all, but I've gotten shit when advocating against the practice more than once, especially from women. The debate about circumcision here is less about aesthetics and more about religious freedom and the comparison to FGM. And just as in the US that is a fight you can only lose, despite it being complete bullshit. The reason is that Germany spends a lot of effort to cater to the central Jewi… | /r/MensRights | 06/04/19 03:38 AM |
| 4 | I dont understand why some people think being uncut is disgustingExactly. I am a straight male European and while I have never seen a circumcised penis I honestly find the dicks I see in US porn to look very weird. There are always visible scars, the color on one side of the scar is often totally different (brown below the scar, pink above). And when you go outside of commercial porn, where I assume the only take guys with perfect circumcisions, you'll see all kinds of deformations of the glans and/or frenulum and sometimes very ugly calluses on the glans (be… | /r/MensRights | 06/04/19 03:31 AM |
| 2 | I dont understand why some people think being uncut is disgustingI dont understand why some people think being uncut is disgusting Because they were born/raised in the US, the Middle East or Israel. | /r/MensRights | 06/04/19 03:22 AM |
| 3 | Anyone else think "for women" should be dropped from the description? It's not a fight for equality if its FOR one or the other.Feminists claim feminism to be about equality. The dictionaries state feminism is about equality. (Well meaning) regular people think feminism is about equality because that's what they are told. But if you look at the actions of feminist politicians, activists and academia, there is no equality to be seen. Feminism is a cult basing their beliefs around divine femininity, toxic masculinity and perpetual unfalsifiable oppression by an evil power (patriarchy). | /r/MensRights | 31/03/19 10:40 AM |
| 3 | Meant as a compliment, I think most feminists would be screaming about how toxic this is.It seems (to me, I doubt you’d agree) that this sub is more anti-feminism than it is pro-man Since feminism is opposing and slandering mens-rights advocates at whatever we do or say, at this stage these two things are one and the same to me. | /r/MensRights | 25/03/19 11:51 PM |
| 5 | Meant as a compliment, I think most feminists would be screaming about how toxic this is.I think he rather meant that if you leave on a single (granted, stupid) opinion you don't share, then it's doubtful you have anything to contribute to the discussion anyway. This is not a feminist sub, people don't get banned for wrongthink. If you can't live with that, you leaving is ok. | /r/MensRights | 25/03/19 11:28 PM |
| 1 | Social media is rapidly changing the public opinion of routine infant male circumcisioni just don't feel like it's that big a deal whether someone is circumcised or not that's all i'm saying Oh, don't get me wrong, I agree with that. People should be able to do what they want with their own body. If someone made that decision for himself and is happy with it, more power to them. Just don't amputate body parts of healthy young boys that can't consent, that's what I'm saying. | /r/MensRights | 19/02/19 02:20 AM |
| 3 | Social media is rapidly changing the public opinion of routine infant male circumcisionStudies rarely (never) query the whole population of a country. Yes, the sample size is low, since the study was performed in Denmark. The study does not try to conceal that. Possible error margins can be found in the tables. Also it only questioned people, since there is no other way to study this topic, which could introduce a whole other host of problems, people could be lying for one reason or another etc... But dismissing it because it did not question the whole population of the world is j… | /r/MensRights | 17/02/19 09:53 PM |
| 4 | Social media is rapidly changing the public opinion of routine infant male circumcisionNo, but I can post it here, so everyone can read them: https://academic.oup.com/ije/article/40/5/1367/658163 Some numbers from the study (circumcised vs. uncircumcised men): 11% vs. 8% of men reporting frequent difficulties achieving orgasms 38% vs. 28% of women reporting problems with sexual needs fullfillment 19% vs. 14% of women reporting difficulties achieving orgasms 12% vs. 3% of women reporting painful intercourse PS: In case you meant the stress vs hearing percentage, that was completely… | /r/MensRights | 17/02/19 09:36 PM |
| 4 | Social media is rapidly changing the public opinion of routine infant male circumcisionThe foreskin protects the glans and urethra from irritation and infection. Also studies have shown that circumcision can be linked to less satisfying or even painful sex for both partners. Slightly worse hearing on the other hand will not affect your daily life too much. We are not hunting or running from predators too much these days. And blocking auditory sensory overflow due to traffic noises etc. has been shown to reduce stress 1.8% and thereby benefit health. So cut the ugly things off your… | /r/MensRights | 17/02/19 09:09 PM |
| 2 | Social media is rapidly changing the public opinion of routine infant male circumcisionHe is saying it gets blown out of proportion, which is wrong and deserves all the downvotes it gets. People against circumcision are in the minority in the US. Nothing is blown out of proportion. Innocent children are harmed by a countries collective mass delusion. | /r/MensRights | 17/02/19 08:59 PM |
| 9 | Social media is rapidly changing the public opinion of routine infant male circumcisionStrangely European women, not raised in this collective US mass delusion have no such preference. And I myself find the American dicks I have seen in US porn, with the scars and deformations etc. to look weird. And I do believe that penises shown in porn are the more beautiful examples. I can't imagine what botched procedures (that happen regularly) do to the average American's dick. | /r/MensRights | 17/02/19 10:15 AM |
| 15 | Social media is rapidly changing the public opinion of routine infant male circumcisionPeople don't get mad "for you" but for all the infant boys that might not be ok with it when they grow up. It's just not ok to take this decision away from an infant. Especially with all the risks and with it being a completely unnecessary procedure. | /r/MensRights | 17/02/19 10:10 AM |
| 9 | Social media is rapidly changing the public opinion of routine infant male circumcisionI get why people get mad that it's not consensual or whatever ..."or whatever"... I just don't see it being a big problem honestly. Does not seem to me that you get it. Besides that doing completely unnecessary amputations on children that are unable to consent being horrible enough on it's own, the foreskin is not just a "tiny peace of skin". It's a fold of skin with a very high nerve density. It's less like cutting your toe-nails and more like cutting of your ears. After all, you don't need yo… | /r/MensRights | 17/02/19 10:06 AM |
| 8 | Social media is rapidly changing the public opinion of routine infant male circumcisionI had to get my son circumcised at 3 years old due to a phimosis. I had no strong feelings about it at birth, but since he didn't 'need' it, I didn't do it. I'm sad to be the one to tell you this, but he still probably didn't need it. American paediatricians have been collectively ignoring other less invasive treatments for phimosis for decades that are practised in the rest of the world. They also still recommend circumcising it at birth for several completely bullshit reasons despite all the v… | /r/MensRights | 17/02/19 10:00 AM |
| 3 | This is why it's so hard for men to share their feelingsBut imho this woman is innocent. Innocent in the sense of barely self-aware. I can't even put into words how unfit for any real relationship this woman is. Yes, she's only 20, but even that age you'd assume some basic level of self-reflection, conscious thought and seriousness to be put into a relationship... instead of just "he makes my hoo-hoo tingle", like you'd expect from a 16 year old girl. | /r/MensRights | 16/02/19 01:45 PM |
| 2 | Woman suppresses the anatomical significance of the natural intact penis.You say there's no reason to be happy about it, but I like the cleanliness, look, and feel of my circumcised cock, women seem to like it too. You like it, because that's what your culture has raised you to find attractive. It's entirely arbitrary, but it's good that you are happy with it. I don't feel I've been wronged, but you think it's because Stockholm Syndrome? Yes, probably not exactly Stockholm Syndrome, but some similar psychological effect, like I described. And you objectively have bee… | /r/MensRights | 10/02/19 11:46 PM |
| 11 | Woman suppresses the anatomical significance of the natural intact penis.Not to forget that it isn't usually done as a precise incision on an adult foreskin but more akin to just ripping off the foreskin entirely. It is very common that the frenulum is just ripped off together with the foreskin on infant circumcisions. It is certainly not comparable to the most severe kinds of FGM, but, as practised in the US it is definitely a lot more severe than a labiaplasty. Also there are more severe forms of MGM that are comparable to even the worst forms of FGM. | /r/MensRights | 10/02/19 11:34 PM |
| 7 | Woman suppresses the anatomical significance of the natural intact penis.Because him being happy with it having been done without his consent when he was an infant might mean that he will in turn pass it on to his children, which are sadly not legally protected from mutilation. | /r/MensRights | 10/02/19 11:28 PM |
| 2 | Woman suppresses the anatomical significance of the natural intact penis.but from all I've seen heard and read I'm quite happy that I was circumcised. Yeah, I've heard these things too. The foreskin can spontaneously combust and burn your whole house down. Better to get rid of it early. Also as far as I know it can poison women performing oral sex on an uncircumcised penis. I am so happy that I know these things so can make an informed decision and don't have to have a bad conscience when I amputate a part of my child's body without his consent. /s On a more serious … | /r/MensRights | 10/02/19 11:23 PM |
| 4 | The gender privilege mythI don't think when that argument is made, it is seriously demanding more women in that kind of jobs. Most people here are opposed to quotas either way. This argument is made to illustrate that the wage-gap myth is based on the fallacy of only looking about easy high-payed jobs. It's purely rhetorical. | /r/MensRights | 28/01/19 06:56 AM |
| 12 | Neil deGrasse Tyson's statement on his false accusations.That concession will be the first nail in his coffin. You do not apologize to these people. Never, ever. This is one constant throughout all #metoo cases. If you really did something wrong and feel sorry for it, go to the police and submit a statement, confessing what you have done. If you have done nothing wrong and just feel sorry about "them feeling bad", keep it to yourself and just stick to the facts in public! Apologizing on social media is one drop of blood in an ocean full of sharks that… | /r/MensRights | 02/12/18 01:16 PM |
| 3 | She cares so much about babies.Further up/down I linked a Wikipedia article about preputioplasty, which is the operation that is usually done from my experience and which is what was done in the case of my friend (and would have been in my case). From what I can tell, I agree that a dorsal slit procedure would probably be similarly painful and disruptive as a circumcision. Only benefit is that you get to keep your foreskin. | /r/MensRights | 26/11/18 02:33 PM |
| 16 | She cares so much about babies.Hey, no reason to get upset. I didn't downvote you or anything. I just wanted to share a view on phimosis (the term is correct) from across the Atlantic. And yes, sadly American paediatricians do seem to have a blind-spot regarding circumcisions. That's obviously not your fault. It's just that outside the US circumcision seems to almost never be medically necessary. Edit: I looked up the procedure that is used here, it is called Preputioplasty. Much less invasive than a complete circumcision and… | /r/MensRights | 26/11/18 06:51 AM |
| 5 | She cares so much about babies.enjoy a nice penis Please just don't if it's a baby penis. | /r/MensRights | 26/11/18 06:35 AM |
| 34 | She cares so much about babies.but turns out I wasn't able to pull the foreskin back at all and my pediatrician told my mom it had to get done, otherwise I could encounter some really bad issues along the way. That wouldn't justify a circumcision in any other country. Usually, outside of the US it would just be a little cut to widen the foreskin at the tip, not cut it off entirely. With local anaesthesia, there wouldn't even be much pain involved and it heals within a few days. A friend of mine had that done at that age and I… | /r/MensRights | 26/11/18 06:32 AM |
| 9 | Google snowflake writes book, "How to Be Successful Without Hurting Men's Feelings" -- is too stupid to realize that women ALSO hate loud assertive womenI have to say, I equally dislike having to deal with quiet submissive people as dealing with loud assertive people, no matter the gender. Quiet people don't speak up when they should and loud people keep talking when they should just shut up. Especially for leadership I prefer reasonable and competent people that stay quiet until there is something to say. The loud obnoxious boss trope is not a trope for nothing (just like the bossy woman trope). | /r/MensRights | 17/11/18 12:26 PM |
| 2 | Men are afraid to revive women because of the epidemic of false sexual assault accusationsI don't think the point here is whether there is a reasonable chance of a false accusation (there probably isn't). The point with this statistic is that the societal change of recent years (#Metoo) has made men, who are otherwise naturally confident, doubt themselves to a level that they are no longer confident enough to help someone in need. And even if this moment of doubt just lasts a moment, it could be a moment to long and someone might die. This should be a waking call. | /r/MensRights | 11/11/18 09:08 PM |
| 2 | Crazy feminist claims that male genital mutilation is a "medical procedure that is in no way comparable to the assaults of female genital mutilation"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4164514/ The penile injury from circumcision is diverse: from infections to disfigurement or partial to total amputation of the penis | /r/MensRights | 10/11/18 09:06 PM |
| 12 | Crazy feminist claims that male genital mutilation is a "medical procedure that is in no way comparable to the assaults of female genital mutilation"You look at MGM and only see western circumcision. And even there you sometimes have complications that leave the penis disfigured or amputated. It's just that because MGM is not yet studied and categorized as a mutilation, you don't usually hear about the different categories of severity, like you do with FGM. Look at this (NSFW) if you have the stomach for it. | /r/MensRights | 10/11/18 05:12 PM |
| 22 | Crazy feminist claims that male genital mutilation is a "medical procedure that is in no way comparable to the assaults of female genital mutilation"Meanwhile I've never met any woman who defends FGM. Oh, they exist... believe me. FGM among fundamentalist Muslims is to a large part advocated by women who were also mutilated as children. It's the same psychology behind it that makes morons like /u/BogdanCherkassky defend their own mutilation. | /r/MensRights | 10/11/18 05:06 PM |
| 9 | Crazy feminist claims that male genital mutilation is a "medical procedure that is in no way comparable to the assaults of female genital mutilation"I think you are the one who is grossly misinformed. Not about the clitoral hood and foreskin being related body parts, but about the foreskin not taking part in sexual pleasure. It is perfectly possible to achieve orgasm from stimulating the foreskin alone without ever touching the glans! And with many types of circumcision practised in the west (mostly USA), not only the foreskin is removed but also the frenulum, the small piece of skin connecting the glans and the foreskin, which is even more … | /r/MensRights | 10/11/18 04:57 PM |
| 24 | Crazy feminist claims that male genital mutilation is a "medical procedure that is in no way comparable to the assaults of female genital mutilation"I agree with you, that there is a reasonable distinction in severity. FGM comes in many types ranging from equalling circumcision to much, much more terrible practices. However, MGM is very easy to botch, and when there are complications it turns out just as horrible as the worst kinds of FGM. If you can stomach it, just look at this (NSFW) And complications like this are not unheard of in the USA either. Only that instead of letting it fester, after a botched circumcision western doctors will j… | /r/MensRights | 10/11/18 04:50 PM |
| 5 | r/MensRights currently has more subs than r/Feminism!I am a MGTOW, yet have a girlfriend. I am against marriage, yet don't care if others marry. MGTOW is about your own choices in your own life. There is no overlap between "our movements" because where the MRM is a movement for legal and social equality, MGTOW is a set of measures to live a happy life in our unequal world today. They complement, not overlap, each other. But I grant you that there are some MGTOW who don't get that either. Many have been horribly exploited by horrible women and have… | /r/MensRights | 06/11/18 06:20 PM |
| 5 | Imagine the outrage if men talked about women's sexuality the way these feminists casually talk about men's (and hurting/seriously injuring men for basically masturbating)I just backed this on indiegogo. Thank you, misandrist sub, for making me aware of this amazing piece of man-made technology. | /r/MensRights | 29/10/18 09:55 AM |
| 11 | /u/NINJADOG looking out for usI agree. But it's harmless nitpicking. As others have pointed out, the expectation that fathers care less for their kids than mothers is probably the reason why women are given full custody so often in family courts, sometimes even when the father is arguably more suitable as a parent. Harmless comments like this, made without attacking anyone or insinuating something make people think about having missed something important. Maybe the next time soberone23 will think in terms of 'parents' instea… | /r/MensRights | 28/10/18 07:37 AM |
| 17 | Feminists who demanded that girls be allowed to participate in Boy Scouts now starting “all girls” Cub Scout packs. Insanity!Spend an hour perusing the posts in r/atheism. They are fanatical SJWs. r/atheism is not atheism. The belief that there is no god is atheism. For all I care the sub could be flooded with evangelical creationists and fundamental muslims, it still wouldn't change the definition of what an atheist is. The funny thing is, many followers of "atheism+" (and what's connected to it) are not even real atheists. Many of them have claimed that they are only against religion and don't want to believe in god… | /r/MensRights | 11/10/18 05:30 PM |
| 18 | Feminists who demanded that girls be allowed to participate in Boy Scouts now starting “all girls” Cub Scout packs. Insanity!I think you misunderstood him. Not organized atheism, but atheism in the sense of the belief and/or reasoning that there is no god, is discriminated against in these organizations. And the reason given by those organizations is that atheists can't be moral because morality comes from the fear of hell. Which is absolutely insane of course. So you could never have visited any atheist conference, written/read a post in /r/atheism and never known about the controversy of atheism+ in the first place … | /r/MensRights | 11/10/18 05:10 PM |
| 4 | X-POST Circumcising males when they’re infants should be illegal. I’ve never met a person who agrees with me and it’s infuriating. • r/unpopularopinionI don't know how to get that across to a secular person. We secular people usually prefer rational arguments. But I realize that is not an option in this case. | /r/MensRights | 04/10/18 09:11 PM |
| 8 | X-POST Circumcising males when they’re infants should be illegal. I’ve never met a person who agrees with me and it’s infuriating. • r/unpopularopinionThat comment is the very definition of a thought terminating cliche. No, using god as part of any argument whatsoever is. | /r/MensRights | 04/10/18 05:07 PM |
| 7 | X-POST Circumcising males when they’re infants should be illegal. I’ve never met a person who agrees with me and it’s infuriating. • r/unpopularopinionBecause it was mandated by G-d at 8 days after birth. Not any other way. Ah, sure... magical sky-daddy... got it. | /r/MensRights | 04/10/18 04:50 PM |
| 7 | X-POST Circumcising males when they’re infants should be illegal. I’ve never met a person who agrees with me and it’s infuriating. • r/unpopularopinionOh, so then female genital mutilation is ok I guess? What about child marriage? What about that New Guinea tribe that makes their boys suck off the elders cocks as a rite of passage? Religious freedom only concerns decisions you make about yourself and your own body. Children are not the property of their parents and have a right to bodily integrity that needs to be protected by the law if necessary until they can consent on their own. Why is circumcision such a persistent exception to that? | /r/MensRights | 04/10/18 04:01 PM |
| 3 | What's the logic behind them wanting to ban this.I don't think he described his own opinion so you may have misunderstood him. He just reasoned that the protests against this kind of thing are more motivated by Christians (and traditional conservatives in general) than feminists, especially in Texas, a very conservative state. | /r/MensRights | 04/10/18 05:54 AM |
| 7 | What's the logic behind them wanting to ban this.fundamentalist think its weird and nasty I think it's important to emphasize this. Traditional conservatives will be against this kind of thing too, probably even more so than feminists! | /r/MensRights | 04/10/18 05:51 AM |
| 2 | I see stuff like this all the time on all social media platforms.Curfew for women is a twisted reality in places like saudi fucking arabia. Only that in this case, the curfew would be to protect women from men, while in saudi arabia, the curfew is in place to... protect women from men... yeah, it's the fucking same. | /r/MensRights | 02/10/18 06:53 AM |
| 3 | Norwegian hospitals refuse to assist in circumcisionsIn Germany it was illegal under general child protection laws until it was explicitly allowed by a law in 2012 after demands made by the Jewish Central Council of Germany. The law was protested by human right activists and paediatricians all over Germany. Sadly, politicians here don't dare to refuse the Jewish Central Council. It has been ruled however that individual hospitals and doctors can refuse the procedure on the basis that no meaningful consent was given from the patient. | /r/MensRights | 30/09/18 01:03 PM |
| 0 | Girl attacks boy and the surrounding kids only interfer once the boy fights back.Virtually every street fight has an aggressor and someone defending. That's all established later in court. They're still called fights I doubt that court would call it "a good fight" though. Which was my point. Fuck off kindly you moron You are a very angry, very sad individual. | /r/MensRights | 30/09/18 12:36 PM |
| 0 | Girl attacks boy and the surrounding kids only interfer once the boy fights back.Then nothing is a fight. WWII was not a war, just an act of self-defense. WWII didn't have a "ref" calling "TKO" and then everything was dandy. It was a war, in self-defense but not a fight in the 'fair contest' kind of way to see who is the better nation (or some nonsense like that). And neither was this. | /r/MensRights | 30/09/18 10:38 AM |
| 0 | Believe Women!I am not really a fan of any military, but if that's indeed something they say, good for them. It's a principle to live by. For example paternity tests. It's often taken as a sign of distrust by a partner but should rather be seen as routine thing to be dealt with after birth so you can have peace of mind and never have to worry about this thing ever again. One less thing that can ever get between you and your spouse. Trust but verify... very nice. Edit: It seems to come from the Russian saying … | /r/MensRights | 30/09/18 01:48 AM |
| 2 | Believe Women!You can believe them as victims without immediately believing them as accusers of a crime. I mean that you can give a potential victim psychological help and support while still maintaining due process. This of course wouldn't make feminists and social justice people happy. | /r/MensRights | 30/09/18 01:43 AM |
| 15 | Boy forskin for sale online for $480 - would a ban on the for-profit sale of human body parts reduce circumcision rates?Oh no, this procedure where we remove that highly sensitive body part for literally no benefit except (very subjective) aesthetics and lots of possible complications is a bit more complicated at a later age so let's force it on babies without their consent. /s On a more serious note: Studies have shown that the brain activity of a young baby is permanently altered after a circumcision, with the alteration being similar to trauma victims. Which in my opinion is hardly surprising since it's often … | /r/MensRights | 29/09/18 01:07 PM |
| 1 | Male politicians receive more online abuse than female politicians.I completely agree. It always makes me cringe when people use "autism" as a derogatory term for this kind of behavior. If anything, autism makes people less likely to behave like that because they can't handle social confrontation well and tend to avoid it, concentrating on things and facts rather than on people. A much more fitting label would be the cluster-B range of personality disorders, which are in a way effectively the opposite of autism. | /r/MensRights | 09/09/18 09:18 PM |
| 19 | Broke up with my fiancé because she insisted our children would be circumcised.Yes, and that is wrong. Nothing is wrong with being circumcised if you feel ok about it. But everything is wrong with circumcision and how it is done in the USA and third world. | /r/MensRights | 22/07/18 08:39 AM |
| 26 | Broke up with my fiancé because she insisted our children would be circumcised.Nothing is wrong with you if you don't feel it is. You are asking a valid question. But it very well could be wrong for someone else that has been circumcised as a baby. The procedure is dangerous and potentially harmful with no benefits and young boys have no chance to willfully consent to it. And even if it goes well, it can have lasting psychological damages. Don't listen to people saying you should feel bad about it but understand that just because you are ok with it having been done to you,… | /r/MensRights | 22/07/18 08:30 AM |
| 31 | Broke up with my fiancé because she insisted our children would be circumcised.they know what the part being cut off looks like, and they just think that if there's no blood and it's a "clean" procedure What they don't get that the part that is cut of is not just a piece of skin, it's a fold of skin (like your ear, minus the cartilage), with blood vessels and nerve endings in between. There would be a lot of blood when it is cut off it no precautions were taken by the doctors. Babies bleed out from it. People saying "it's just a piece of skin" never have seen or touched an… | /r/MensRights | 22/07/18 08:22 AM |
| 6 | Nice to see society waking up!It's not only about trust and distrust, it's about a fundamental respect for a persons privacy or lack thereof. If you violate someones personal space like that, you're not fit for a relationship with them or anyone really. For example, I could check my girlfriends browser history if I wanted, since i manage all of our computers and have full access even to her account. My reasons might not be because of distrust, but perhaps out of simple curiosity or some even more mundane reason (boredom etc.… | /r/MensRights | 21/07/18 02:13 AM |
| 3 | Appearently we are not welcomeEveryone always says that. It's the 'logic' bit where it falls apart, because it's not. When a "creepy man" is in a woman's bathroom, all ideals of "not assuming gender" will go right out of the window, I can pretty much guarantee you that. | /r/MensRights | 17/07/18 04:17 PM |
| 8 | Now colleges are teaching young girls that the difference between "flirting" and "sexual harassment" is totally based on how it makes a woman feel.No, but I will certainly do that now that I know the truth. People who make me uncomfortable should not be allowed to work in this society! | /r/MensRights | 17/07/18 12:33 AM |
| 2 | Woman Claims To Get Inseminated, At Sperm Bank, Behind Husbands BackThis. And learn for the future. Never marry. | /r/MensRights | 16/07/18 08:40 PM |
| 8 | Now colleges are teaching young girls that the difference between "flirting" and "sexual harassment" is totally based on how it makes a woman feel.I felt shitty flirting my whole life (checking multiple points on that list). I thought that's just what it is supposed to be like, but that just might be my social anxiety. Telling a person like me that flirting should feel good and be fun is telling me to not flirt at all. It's a necessary evil at best. If it is unwanted, then it is harassment. I agree with that and also with some other points on that flyer, but certainly not the part about the bad feelings. There are so many reasons to feel u… | /r/MensRights | 16/07/18 08:16 PM |
| 25 | Now colleges are teaching young girls that the difference between "flirting" and "sexual harassment" is totally based on how it makes a woman feel.Wow, I never felt "in control" for a single second of flirting ever. To me that pretty much seemed to be the deal about flirting. But now I know I must have been sexually harassed by all those girls. Then again, I am a man, so that-doesn't-count™. | /r/MensRights | 16/07/18 08:02 PM |
| -4 | Toxic Femininity: how Anthony Bourdain's suicide was manipulatively reframed by girlfriend Asia Argento to somehow be all about her "victimhood" and #metoo, when her cheating was probably what triggered itholy shit you fucking people I am not a people. I am a person. Maybe you should rethink your groupthink. you commies Most communist regimes didn't give a shit about worker rights either. The only difference to your beloved ultra-capitalism was that the party exploiting workers was the state instead of corporations. So think of a better insult next time. | /r/MensRights | 06/07/18 06:12 PM |
| -10 | Toxic Femininity: how Anthony Bourdain's suicide was manipulatively reframed by girlfriend Asia Argento to somehow be all about her "victimhood" and #metoo, when her cheating was probably what triggered itthe right to keep and bear arms Wow... I hadn't thought of that. That must make killing your opposing warlords much easier. What African country is that exactly? | /r/MensRights | 06/07/18 05:01 PM |
| -19 | Toxic Femininity: how Anthony Bourdain's suicide was manipulatively reframed by girlfriend Asia Argento to somehow be all about her "victimhood" and #metoo, when her cheating was probably what triggered itIf you access reddit from a totalitarian regime where your internet access is monitored, shouldn't you use Tor or something? | /r/MensRights | 06/07/18 03:51 PM |
| -11 | Toxic Femininity: how Anthony Bourdain's suicide was manipulatively reframed by girlfriend Asia Argento to somehow be all about her "victimhood" and #metoo, when her cheating was probably what triggered itWhat country do you live in? In a free country there are usually laws prohibiting your employer from monitoring your internet access, especially if private internet access is granted (during lunch brakes etc.). If you live in countries without worker rights, like the US or China, you might be out of luck. | /r/MensRights | 06/07/18 03:47 PM |
| 3 | This is absolutely unacceptable.rights You Americans keep using that word, but I don't think it means what you think it means. | /r/MensRights | 10/05/18 01:15 PM |
| 3 | Danish political party wants minimum age for male circumcisionAlso, just like there are worse types of female genital mutilation, there are worse kinds of male genital mutilation than circumcision in the third world Africa or the Australian natives. Tribes that remove the glans or split the penis of their children in half causing extreme disfigurements. And that is if there are no complications, which in the unsanitary environment where it is usually performed is often the case. In that case it can cause death or complete loss of the entire genitals. MGM i… | /r/MensRights | 21/04/18 11:33 AM |
| 5 | Danish political party wants minimum age for male circumcisionIsrael and Saudi And the US, how fitting to see it among these theocracies. It's the same denial. The same denial that we often see in this sub when the topic comes up. People arguing fiercely in favor of the decision of their parents to take the decision from them. | /r/MensRights | 21/04/18 11:13 AM |
| 0 | Husband protects wife and saves her life, wounds are so massive that he turns into a vegetable, wife dumps himA few things to set straight: Women's rights advocacy is important and necessary. Men's rights advocacy is important and necessary. This thread has nothing to do with men's rights. Feminism has nothing to do with women's rights. On the rest you say about this issue I mostly agree. I'd not expect my girlfriend to take care of me or stay in a romantic relationship with me. I'd hope she would stay in my life in some form. I'd even go as far as to say someone who demands his partner to stay with the… | /r/MensRights | 20/04/18 08:58 PM |
| 6 | These double standards are in most TV shows nowadaysIf you think they have no value, consider that Steve Jobs got apple, Steve Wozniak got retired. Yes, backstabbing and manipulation is a valuable skill for acquiring money but leads to a shitty life in the end. We could argue who of the two is (or was in case of the angry, bitter and choleric Steve) happier. | /r/MensRights | 14/04/18 04:51 PM |
| 3 | (Ignoring the Republican part) the original cartoon was from USA TODAY if memory servesOf course a little more workout wouldn't hurt me either, but if you look like that your daily life is just as fucked as a morbidly obese person. You'd literally be a living caricature. | /r/MensRights | 23/03/18 08:30 AM |
| 6 | We at MensRights would like to celebrate international womens day because in contrary to popular belief we're not anti women!If I agree with you (I do), do I finally get to bitch on 'International Men's Day' about not having a google doodle again this year and feminists saying "every day is Men's Day" or do I still have to listen to the "Equality is not a zero sum game" speech? Or, let me rephrase that: If I am happy today that women's issues do get all that well deserved attention, am I allowed to be angry on Men's Day that men's issues do not? | /r/MensRights | 08/03/18 07:08 PM |
| 3 | Iceland may outlaw circumcision; would be first for EuropeThat's about what happened in Germany after it had been outlawed for decades. Since 2012 it is legal again in Germany to mutilate your boys if your magic sky daddy demands it. | /r/MensRights | 20/02/18 05:15 PM |
| 5 | Iceland may outlaw circumcision; would be first for EuropeNot a first exactly. In Germany it had been outlawed for quite some time. Even if there wasn't a specific law, it would have been punished the same as battery (Körperverletzung). Until 2012 that is, when it was explicitly allowed again for religious purposes after demands made by the Central Council of Jews in Germany, even with such a law directly violating 7 separate articles of our Grundgesetz (Constitution). Sadly, German politicians still feel like they cannot refuse any demand made by the … | /r/MensRights | 20/02/18 05:02 PM |
| 1 | Apparently to Vice news talking about men’s rights is comparable to white supremacy and the Nazi’sJust because it's called "Everyday Feminism" doesn't mean it is made by everyday people or reflects the notion of feminism that everyday people hold. It's made by academics and journalists trying to pitch their gender studies ideology to everyday people. Most people out there will not know about this site, even if that's what it tries to accomplish, but many will know about the dictionary definition or at least that 'feminism is good because it fights for the oppressed women'. | /r/MensRights | 30/12/17 10:10 AM |
| 4 | Is Modern Masculinity Gynocentric?Back when sexual norms were more conservative, gynocentrism just was different. Then, it was not about how sexually attractive you were for women, but how well you were able to provide for them. I am not sure which one is better, or rather I am sure that both of them are a bad deal for men. And since we can't turn back time anyway and move back to more conservative gender roles, the question is moot anyway. We can still move forward however. But since we are trying to overcome a very basic human… | /r/MensRights | 28/12/17 05:40 PM |
| 2 | Apparently to Vice news talking about men’s rights is comparable to white supremacy and the Nazi’sWhile there certainly where good women's rights advocates over the decades, I can't see anything good feminism has ever done. All they did was take the successes of other women's rights activists as their own until feminism was practically synonymous with "women's rights" and use that to reach their own (less justified) political goals. Today they go even one step further and tell you that everyone and everything that is for equality or women's rights must by definition be feminist, present, fut… | /r/MensRights | 02/12/17 08:53 AM |
| 7 | Apparently to Vice news talking about men’s rights is comparable to white supremacy and the Nazi’sThe vast majority of self-proclaimed feminists are neither educated on these matters, nor are they activists in any sense of the word. When people say "the good feminists," this is who they mean. They erroneously believe that "feminism" means "believes in equality," and because they want to think of themselves as good people, they call themselves feminists. This cannot be upvoted enough. When people say "mainstream feminism" they don't mean everyday people, they mean feminist scholars and activi… | /r/MensRights | 02/12/17 08:43 AM |
| 3 | Why I'm Anti-Feminism | Former feminist explains why she now rejects the ideology: she's against professional victimhood and misandryThey aint perfect, but I want to be positive this time Unsurprisingly, now it's gone. | /r/MensRights | 19/11/17 05:04 PM |
| 7 | Our problems began when we attempted to publish our findingsNatural complications with foreskin like what you describe for yourself are very rare. Even in those cases often only a very small surgical procedure (a small cut at the mentioned specific point) is necessary, not a full amputation of a large part of your penis. This is about doing it to newborns, not adults. That being said, what you do as an adult or as an adolescent (with parental consent) is absolutely your own business and nobody should judge you for it. But doing it to newborns as indiscri… | /r/MensRights | 06/11/17 10:05 PM |
| 11 | 'Male privilege is...'neckbeard's Makes the argument that there are only very few people shaming men for their appearance by shaming men for their appearance. | /r/MensRights | 15/10/17 06:34 PM |
| 2 | British universities reach out to the new minority: poor white malesIt depends on ideology and specificy of the non-profit. If the agenda is a clear and well defined goal the organization will most certainly just cease to exist once the goal is accomplished. If the goal is fuzzy and the reasoning behind it is full of beliefs and ideology, it will just continue to shift its meaning and interpretation of its goals indefinitely. Or at least try. "Cure cancer" seems be the first category. Another metric that I use for donating money is transparency. I like to know w… | /r/MensRights | 01/10/17 08:58 AM |
| 6 | Women are the victims. Stop yourselves men!!!Thank you for pointing it out. It is important to set these things straight and important to see that there are balanced campaigns too that look at these problems from all sides. But while this poster has a context like that, we are used to seeing other cases, where the campaign/service/whatever is entirely one-sided. Like abuse hot-lines that give one number for helping women get out of the situation and one number for men if the feel they are about to commit domestic violence. This "woman vict… | /r/MensRights | 24/09/17 10:21 PM |
| 2 | Lesbian couple who beat their 5-year-old son with a hammer, duct-taped his eyes shut and kicked him in the groin in a brutal attack that caused him to suffer two strokes are jailed for 20 yearsFeminists are an ideological group, masculinity is an aspect of a whole gender. To compare apples with apples, I don't think there is such a thing as toxic feminity either. | /r/MensRights | 22/09/17 10:18 PM |
| 11 | Brave man talks about considering banning circumcision in us county.In Germany, circumcision was completely forbidden (there was no specific law about circumcision and therefore it was treated as battery/assault on a child) until 2012, when a law was passed to allow it for religious purposes, lobbied for by the Central Council of Jews in Germany (that is a real organization, not antisemitism). People here seem so afraid to deny Jews anything, even if it goes against the human rights of a person with no chance of defending himself. I myself have once been accused… | /r/MensRights | 22/09/17 12:01 PM |
| 3 | Lesbian couple who beat their 5-year-old son with a hammer, duct-taped his eyes shut and kicked him in the groin in a brutal attack that caused him to suffer two strokes are jailed for 20 yearswe need to end toxic masculinity/the idea that males must be dominant, strong risk-takers No, we need to stop calling it toxic masculinity if men tend to behave that way and stop saying "man up" or "grow some balls" when men are behaving differently. As it stands, men are fucked either way, by some part of society, no matter how they behave. There are many forms of masculinity, none of them are toxic. Actions can be toxic, and as we are told so often, women are just as capable of doing anything … | /r/MensRights | 22/09/17 11:08 AM |
| 2 | They're admitting to being illegally sexist and google won't do anything about itWomen have the option to buy the male product, which has been shown to be literally the same product with different packaging most times. A man in this case would not receive the same product if he signed up as a woman in this case. That is a fair point, which I can concede. Nice, gotta virtue signal to everyone else that you're above dating and hookup apps right? You're so brave. Not above, beyond, as in "been there, done that". And because I think prostituting myself for a faint chance of huma… | /r/MensRights | 10/09/17 08:37 AM |
| 4 | They're admitting to being illegally sexist and google won't do anything about itWhy is this something bad? To have a successful dating platform you need about a 50/50 userbase. Fewer women tend to come to these platforms, especially ones titled like "hookup xy" so they make incentives for females to join. It's purely economic decision because men are generally willing to pay more. Whining about it is the same as women whining about the "pink tax". Of course all of those platforms are utter shit to begin with and no man with any remaining self respect should join them, but t… | /r/MensRights | 09/09/17 08:04 AM |
| 1 | "Nerdy" girl goes on dates w/ 80 men, keeps spreadsheet rating them all. Says she's "picky", wants a man who is "tall with a rugby player's physique". Her colleagues support her and find it funny. IF A MAN DONE ANY OF THIS HE WOULD BE HAULED OVER THE COALS. • r/IncelsWhere I live the "women's issues" have been among the most important issues for decades. They tend to be on every party's political agenda. And they can and have become laws or other official rules and practices. And is that such a good thing that you wish it would happen for men's little personal problems too? What is your concrete suggestion on how to improve this "sexual power imbalance" then? | /r/MensRights | 01/09/17 01:14 PM |
| 0 | "Nerdy" girl goes on dates w/ 80 men, keeps spreadsheet rating them all. Says she's "picky", wants a man who is "tall with a rugby player's physique". Her colleagues support her and find it funny. IF A MAN DONE ANY OF THIS HE WOULD BE HAULED OVER THE COALS. • r/IncelsEverything you mention is due to the severe lacks of the legal system (especially the US one) supported by government and academia. If that is not institutional, I don't know what is. There is no right for us as a movement to get involved into peoples private lives, who they date and why. It would make us look like the same fascists feminists are and rightly so. Just use good arguments to (hopefully) change the system to be exactly fair, no more no less. People will follow, and if not, are bound… | /r/MensRights | 01/09/17 01:08 PM |
| 0 | "Nerdy" girl goes on dates w/ 80 men, keeps spreadsheet rating them all. Says she's "picky", wants a man who is "tall with a rugby player's physique". Her colleagues support her and find it funny. IF A MAN DONE ANY OF THIS HE WOULD BE HAULED OVER THE COALS. • r/IncelsBesides, we have to change dominant narratives As I agreed to further down, it is actually a problem if the media shows a double standard when reporting the same thing done by men in a completely different light. But then that is the problem and not a "sexual power imbalance". Many women become entitled, thinking that they have right to demand things from men and many men adapt to this to win favors. This then have an effect in every field of life, like politics. They can demand all day long if … | /r/MensRights | 01/09/17 10:02 AM |
| 3 | "Nerdy" girl goes on dates w/ 80 men, keeps spreadsheet rating them all. Says she's "picky", wants a man who is "tall with a rugby player's physique". Her colleagues support her and find it funny. IF A MAN DONE ANY OF THIS HE WOULD BE HAULED OVER THE COALS. • r/IncelsThis is the actual problem with this, not the "sexual power imbalance" the "incels" complain about, that certainly exists, but is not a men's rights topic. But when media shows a huge double standard like this, that is surely an aspect of the problem we should care about. | /r/MensRights | 01/09/17 08:25 AM |
| 4 | "Nerdy" girl goes on dates w/ 80 men, keeps spreadsheet rating them all. Says she's "picky", wants a man who is "tall with a rugby player's physique". Her colleagues support her and find it funny. IF A MAN DONE ANY OF THIS HE WOULD BE HAULED OVER THE COALS. • r/IncelsMen's rights should only care about actual institutional discrimination. But this is about your private life. Perhaps it's a symptom of some larger problem. But even then, it's one that we do not have any direct control over anyway. If you think the game is rigged, either re-rig it to your own benefit (PUA) or don't play the game (MGTOW). If you need some action to fix this symptom in your private life now, take on either one of those two (additionally to men's rights advocacy). In my opinion, t… | /r/MensRights | 01/09/17 08:18 AM |
| 1 | Los Angeles Is Now Fining Subway 'Manspreaders' $75 for 'Taking Up Excessive Space'I hope they tackle this horrible practice of 'men-breathing' next. Men taking in excessive amounts of air that could otherwise be used by women must be stopped. | /r/MensRights | 27/08/17 11:50 AM |
| 3 | Ladies And Gentlemen - Feminism, The Circus That Never Ends. P¬))Assuming ill-intent gives you moral high ground. Moral high-ground gives you political status. Political status gives you power over others. And if they can pull it off without the crowd going "...wait a minute, that doesn't seem right!", which in case of "Think of the wyminz!11!", it usually doesn't, then even better. | /r/MensRights | 27/08/17 11:46 AM |
| 2 | Ladies And Gentlemen - Feminism, The Circus That Never Ends. P¬))Listen up, meatbags! | /r/MensRights | 27/08/17 11:42 AM |
| 5 | Ladies And Gentlemen - Feminism, The Circus That Never Ends. P¬))Its cluster-B not autism. Autism would have been if she had started spouting unfiltered details of the period when usage of each sentence had started and what the linguistic or historical reason for the reversed order of genders in both sentences is. Autists are thing oriented. They don't understand people or social contexts. This one is people-oriented. She does not understand the logical implication of the reversed order of genders, only how she can spin it so it gives her status and moral sup… | /r/MensRights | 27/08/17 11:39 AM |
| 0 | CBC job ad for a new President comes right out and says in the ad you have a better chance of getting the job if you're not a white malePlebs and freedmen need not apply. | /r/MensRights | 26/08/17 10:39 AM |
| 3 | If you call circumcision what it is. Approximately 81% of males have been sexually assaulted.two consenting parents choose to do for their days old baby Is this sarcasm? If yes, then its a very bitter and cynical kind of sarcasm. If no, then... dear god... | /r/MensRights | 20/08/17 06:47 PM |
| 6 | Found this on a pole in my university. Seriously?The answer, like in any religion, is always god. Or in this case, patriarchy. | /r/MensRights | 02/08/17 06:56 PM |
| 4 | Honestly, fuck her. That's all I can say. People say this shit doesn't happen but here's the evidence on a silver platter.I agree that deceiving yourself about the preferences of women (i.e. the blue pill) doesn't help anyone. it's about the meme wars and gene wars; if you want to play the game and try to "win", it's best to be aware of the general rules and norms. And I also agree with the above statement in a way like it was about some extremely dangerous sport that almost certainly kills you at some point, like wing-suit gliding or free-climbing. It's better for your health and life if you avoid doing it altoget… | /r/MensRights | 23/07/17 04:55 PM |
| 4 | Honestly, fuck her. That's all I can say. People say this shit doesn't happen but here's the evidence on a silver platter.Do people think they're going to reprogram women's parameters/variables for sexual attraction? No, people just don't reorient their entire lives around fulfilling said parameters. Men are more than women-fantasy-fulfillment-devices. And women who think otherwise can literally just go fuck themselves (or any of the spineless and instinct driven PUA men in order to produce even more spineless and instinct driven offspring). | /r/MensRights | 23/07/17 02:59 PM |
| 51 | Honestly, fuck her. That's all I can say. People say this shit doesn't happen but here's the evidence on a silver platter.Let me turn that around and MGTOW it for you. If a ("your") woman is so instinct driven that she rejects you because you show weakness, it is not worth and outright dangerous being with her. Going for such women in a /r/theredpill or PUA way is not a sign of self-esteem which it tries to make it look like but simply pathetic. And it will sooner or later backfire in one way or another. Instead just get away from those people and lead a happy life, in a way that feels natural to you and not the wa… | /r/MensRights | 23/07/17 02:51 PM |
| 3 | Just a reminder that this is the top post of r/feminism...Instead of putting resources and effort on tackling the problem, the effort is put on feminists vs non feminists. Then you would say "Everyone who is against (gender) equality is a sexist", which is sort of a tautology, instead of "Everyone who isn't a feminist is a sexist". If you say something like that, you only say it because you want to redefine something in order to get away with exactly the hypocrisy feminism tries to get away with. Otherwise, yes, why not, just call yourself an egalitari… | /r/MensRights | 22/07/17 01:53 PM |
| 2 | Stop Mansplaning the Moon.It doesn't assume that in every situation, obviously there are times a woman might actually be "bossy". And with a campaign like ban-bossy, among other things (where the word might not have been justified), they try to normalize this behavior. Otherwise the campaign would be called "don't-call-women-bossy-when-it-is-unjustified" and be pointless to begin with. And I don't believe most feminists think it's ok to call a woman bossy or bitch, regardless of what the woman behaves like. That doesn't … | /r/MensRights | 08/07/17 09:42 AM |
| 6 | Stop Mansplaning the Moon.A woman is called "bossy" for doing things men do all the time. That is exactly the misguided assumption feminists often make (not saying that you necessarily are one or all feminists are necessarily bad) and that I am talking about. It assumes that when men say "bossy" it means "assertive and I feel threatened by it" instead it really actually means "behaves like a princess and commands around people like they are her personal servants." In my opinion this assumption is false. When I want to sa… | /r/MensRights | 07/07/17 07:48 PM |
| 13 | Stop Mansplaning the Moon.Do you seriously not realize how sexist this statement is? You think feminism normalizes "bitchy behavior" in women? Yes. Feminism actively supports women getting away with any social misbehavior. See campaigns like "ban-bossy" or "reclaim-bitch" or just read this sub regularly how women are allowed to behave even at universities or courts of law. The negative connotation is to be removed from the misbehavior and re-branded as positive and empowered while men are supposed and all but forced to b… | /r/MensRights | 07/07/17 07:04 PM |
| 12 | Stop Mansplaning the Moon.has legitimate roots When they are asked for a definition of the word, they basically give a gendered version of the definition of "condescension". Condescending people surely are annoying, but neither is it a gendered trait, nor is it used in the right context most of the time. As with feminism itself, there is no connection between the definition of the word and it's actual use in practice. And I'd even go so far as to say that today, women get away far easier with being condescending than men… | /r/MensRights | 07/07/17 04:28 PM |
| 1 | "First Alaska woman charged with possessing child pornography gets no jail time." Well, of course she doesn't...You're aware that most pedophile rings require new members to produce their own content in order for them to gain access to other material right? Partially to make sure they're legit, but also to make sure nobody goes to the police to report on others. You're aware that then it would just be abuse, which could be punished as abuse instead of punishing the possession as abuse because it might lead to abuse. Punishing a crime before it has been committed is a human rights violation. Jesus fucking … | /r/MensRights | 06/07/17 04:53 PM |
| 5 | "First Alaska woman charged with possessing child pornography gets no jail time." Well, of course she doesn't...The possession is what causes the cycle to create. If no one downloaded it, it wouldn't be as big an issue. I disagree. Even if the people who create these images are in some form cheered on by the downloaders (which in this case probably didn't happen, because the article said she used a filesharing application), these pedophiles would still abuse their children anyway. Perhaps they would simply stop making photos or perhaps they would just keep them to themselves. But they certainly wouldn't s… | /r/MensRights | 05/07/17 09:27 PM |
| 8 | "First Alaska woman charged with possessing child pornography gets no jail time." Well, of course she doesn't...In the article it said that she downloaded the pictures via a filesharing application. I do not think pay was involved. And as far as I know, child pornography that is produced for money is an urban legend. Don't get me wrong, I do not think it is ok to share these images at all. But I do not think that whether they are downloaded has any effect on whether they are made in the first place. | /r/MensRights | 05/07/17 09:09 PM |
| 91 | "First Alaska woman charged with possessing child pornography gets no jail time." Well, of course she doesn't...I would argue that possession of child pornography in itself (as opposed to its creation) does not constitute abuse but only possession of illegal material. The point (as so often) is the double standard between men and women. | /r/MensRights | 05/07/17 04:45 PM |
| 7 | Mom opens son’s diaper and finds surprise genital mutilation (circumcision)Unnecessary surgical procedures == mutilation. Consent is not event a factor, since there is a thing called self-mutilation. However there is nothing wrong with it, as long as the person it is performed on has given his/her informed consent. | /r/MensRights | 30/06/17 03:51 PM |
| 9 | Mom opens son’s diaper and finds surprise genital mutilation (circumcision)Circumcision is legal in the UK – but only if both parents agree. This is exactly where the root of the problem lies. It should only be legal if the person circumcised is able to give his (informed) consent to the procedure. Children are not the property of their parents to do with what they want! Why do poeple accept that when sexual contact, labor, violence is concerned, but not regarding chopping pieces off the genitalia (of boys)? | /r/MensRights | 30/06/17 03:45 PM |
| 3 | Rape? What? WTF? - American professor says student who died after being detained in North Korea ‘got what he deserved’ - "young, white, rich, clueless white males routinely get away with raping women. Not so much in North Korea."One would need to do some research in the CAP (Central Archive of the Patriarchy) to see if he has used up any of his two Get-out-of-jail-free-for-rape cards that every white male receives on a yearly basis. | /r/MensRights | 26/06/17 01:31 PM |
| 3 | Sexism on college campuses is unbelievable."9. Remember that date rape is a crime that has serious consequences." I thought we lived in a rape-culture where rape is not punished but encouraged? Could these people kindly make up their mind for once? | /r/MensRights | 22/06/17 04:34 PM |
| 0 | A bit of a lighthearted post for a changeJesus did away with the "old law". If Christians did actually understand/follow what Jesus (fictional or not) tried to teach, then the world would have a lot fewer problems with them. Also Jesus did not "away with the old law". He sad a few things like "how about being nice to each other for a change". And god promised to not be such an irrational and sadistic cunt that tortures his own people anymore. But they still hate on gays, because Jesus did not give any meaningful update on the subject, … | /r/MensRights | 06/06/17 06:39 PM |
| 11 | A bit of a lighthearted post for a changebut the worst we get is the Westborough Baptist Church Worst in fanaticism perhaps. Worst in reach and power are definitely Americas evangelical elites. And they believe the same shit, they are just not as loud but much more effective acting on their beliefs. And in some aspects, they are even more fanatic and fundamentalist than Muslims: https://reason.com/blog/2016/06/13/in-america-muslims-are-more-likely-to-su | /r/MensRights | 05/06/17 09:10 PM |
| 1 | Classic CosmopolitanAll in the gym, doing their own ironing, keeping busy and learning to dress well. I am a MGTOW. But I don't give a shit about going to the gym or about how I dress (as long as it's durable and practical). I rather enjoy my life than putting enormous effort into the same things people normally only do to impress women. Maybe you confuse MGTOW with PUA? | /r/MensRights | 04/06/17 07:29 PM |
| 15 | Feminists are actually applauding thisYou'd just be encouraging her to make your life as much of a living hell as possible until you file divorce first yourself. Just like when your employer wants to get rid of you despite having a protected contract (and there is no good worker representation in the firm). /u/sjwking was right: Why marry at all? | /r/MensRights | 27/05/17 10:05 PM |
| 1 | Female genital mutilation is a religious right claim lawyers in first US case on the practice. Will this help the fight against male circumcision?I don't think you actually mean to compare Islam to whatever it is we have stateside to use the term domestic brand of savagery. Yes I do. There are more examples than I can reasonably sum up. Including (but not limited to) circumcision, rampant poverty and death by both violence and lack of (health/elder-)care, large scale terrorism in the form of the drone-war (or wars for your profit/oil in general) that destabilzed and radicalized (and still does) entire regions, religious indoctrination by … | /r/MensRights | 23/05/17 06:38 PM |
| 3 | Female genital mutilation is a religious right claim lawyers in first US case on the practice. Will this help the fight against male circumcision?the new name for someone who speaks out against savage Islam No, that's called Islam-critic. I know, because I am one. What's called a bigot is someone who doesn't want Islamic savages to get into his country because he prefers the domestic brand of savagery. If Muslims try to get rights to (comparable) FGM in a country that prouds itself on cutting pieces off the dicks of infant boys, it's not the "Savage Muslims", it's just "Hey, here is finally a place that's ok with this stuff!". | /r/MensRights | 23/05/17 04:50 PM |
| 9 | Female genital mutilation is a religious right claim lawyers in first US case on the practice. Will this help the fight against male circumcision?You realize that the US is the only country in the west where circumcision is done as frequently as in this backwards religious countries. And for (debatable) aesthetics for all reasons. That's even worse than doing it for tradition/religion. Add to that, that there are more than enough religious nutjobs in the US that even rival the most zealos Muslim fundamentalists, your Country particularly has no right to complain about them bringing these savage practices into your country. Any American th… | /r/MensRights | 22/05/17 11:45 PM |
| 92 | A Professor Is Now Sharing Men's Personal Info Online To Harass ThemYou know, in most cases I would disagree with that "email her employer" shit, but in this case the person it's about is inciting harassment or even violence. This should not be appropriate behavior for someone teaching young adults. | /r/MensRights | 22/05/17 09:35 PM |
| 7 | Slave husbands of Hong Kong: the men who marry into servitude. Vulnerable men from India and Pakistan are being tricked into arranged marriages and trafficked to Hong Kong where they work as bonded labourers and indentured servants for their in-laws, too afraid or ashamed to speak out.However, none of those statistics ever ignored men. This is also my experience with the subject. However, in forced marriage cases like this one, common believe is that "only men buy women for marriage". This not only omits men as victims but also demonizes men and depicts them as the sole perpetrators and profiteers of this form of human traficking as if were a great conspiracy of the patriarchy (who else) against women instead of a scheme of ruthless people against naive or poor people. So it'… | /r/MensRights | 22/05/17 02:58 PM |
| 2 | What is the most important issue facing men right now?In other words: We are a group of human-rights advocates with a certain set of goals and instead should become a full-blown ideology with no discernible purpose (like feminism). No thanks. | /r/MensRights | 22/05/17 12:48 PM |
| 2 | The Young Turks point out female privilege when it comes to sentencing and jail time.He says that if it would have been a black man he would have gotten a bigger sentence. They said that if you are a poor white kid from Nebraska, you'd have gotten a bigger sentence. They said that if the judge can compare them to their own kids (implying rich parents) they would have gotten a milder sentence She said that if she were less beautiful, she'd have gotten a bigger sentence. Then goes on about Trump vote and Brexit, implying more that it's about wealth. Also I thought the general cons… | /r/MensRights | 20/05/17 06:17 PM |
| 1 | The Young Turks point out female privilege when it comes to sentencing and jail time.Where did they acknowledge female privilege or discrimination against men? At one time he said black male, then he said poor people. As far as we know in his opinion it still is "only" racism or rich-privilege. I personally still don't believe the young turks believe that sexism against men is real. | /r/MensRights | 20/05/17 04:08 PM |
| 14 | Anybody want to know where circumcised foreskins end up? Goddamn beauty products.The anti-circumcise movement is not against the procedure in the case of one of the very, very, very rare medical reasons. It's against doing it for the bullshit reasons for which it is done 99,99% of the time to unconsenting infants. Can you get behind that? | /r/MensRights | 20/05/17 11:39 AM |
| 20 | If a girl tells me to stop, should I? | Interesting answer to this question on QuoraYou better hope she didn't actually want you to go on, because you might face a false rape accusation nonetheless if she suddenly decides you are a "creep" because you "bailed on her" and regrets the encounter. Sometimes no does mean yes. Affirmative consent is a lie and not a working defense in any case. And there is no real way to defend against something like that, except building trust and getting a good judgement of her character before you spend time alone with her, much less have sex. | /r/MensRights | 19/05/17 08:28 PM |
| 2 | We wouldn't want to damage her career, now would we?I think that is simplifying things a bit much. There are always circumstances and differing severity that has to be considered. But certainly a career should not be a consideration for letting someone off easy, especially not if like in this case it would never happen with a man. | /r/MensRights | 18/05/17 10:13 PM |
| 1 | Oxford student who stabbed boyfriend could be spared jail 'because of her extraordinary talent'There has to be a petition to get her kicked out of Oxford at least. Isn't this the very thing we criticize feminists for doing? Overruling the decisions of a legal system by punishing people socially... It is no better than mob justice. If you do not like how this sentence turned out (I agree), then petition the judges or politicians instead to improve the situation in future cases. | /r/MensRights | 17/05/17 07:58 PM |
| 1 | If You Start To Humanise Your Enemy, You In Turn May Be Dehumanised By Your CommunityBeing a feminist is very human. No matter if male or female feminist, they are following their instincts and feelings more than reason and rationality. Sadly this also makes it very hard to get into civilized conversations with them. I've seen people here being open to the ideas and rationally argue with them, only to be berated, shouted down and silenced. I've never seen that a feminist was banned on this sub, yet try to get an MRA point across in a feminist subreddit and prepare to be deleted … | /r/MensRights | 16/05/17 05:30 PM |
| 1 | love how they still managed to make women being more successful into women being victims somehowNo, that wasn't what I was implying. I was implying, that it doesn't matter if feminism has a chilling effect on businesses if most jobs are replaced by machines anyway. | /r/MensRights | 14/05/17 08:24 PM |
| 1 | love how they still managed to make women being more successful into women being victims somehowThere are different metrics of course and surely rankings may differ. Though mostly Norway is always ranked very high or at number one: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-39325206 | /r/MensRights | 14/05/17 08:21 PM |
| 1 | love how they still managed to make women being more successful into women being victims somehowIt will definitely affect low-skilled jobs first but it most certainly will quickly catch up with repetitive office jobs. Yes, as a software developer I am well aware of that. Even more, some high-education jobs will go as well, for example medical doctors and at least partially lawyers. Basically anything that can be replaced by search-algorithms and a database. But it's still potentially a good thing. If something can be done by a machine/computer and doesn't make the person otherwise doing it… | /r/MensRights | 14/05/17 08:18 PM |
| 8 | You're a dude. You're literally a man.you'll see it's a call for equality What it wasn't, was a feminist thread in a feminist sub. But OPs post was a feminist comment trying to shout him down. Now you still need to show me where "real feminism" is fighting for real equality. Thing is, you don't want real equality. You want a patriarchal society to hand you your masculinity on a silver platter. Which is just bullshit. I am an egalitarian and a Men's rights advocate. Tell me where I have done these things? You don't even know me. Is t… | /r/MensRights | 13/05/17 10:30 PM |
| 2 | love how they still managed to make women being more successful into women being victims somehowYes, there are obviously a few possible dystopian outcomes as well. But in such a case, marriage, children and tradtionalism wouldn't help a man without work and a perspective much either. He would just be fucked even more. And frankly for some countries, like the US, where poverty is already rampant, and where people scream "communism" when the government tries to implement social policies like health care, a dystopian outcome like that is the most realistic. But the rest of the world may have … | /r/MensRights | 13/05/17 10:11 PM |
| 24 | You're a dude. You're literally a man.complaining about Tumblr feminism Didn't you see the link she posted? People here are complaining about "everyday feminism". Not about most women, not about a few radical feminists, but about everyday, mainstream feminism. They believe exactly these kind of things. And sexism like this has long seeped into academia and politics if you haven't noticed. | /r/MensRights | 13/05/17 09:42 PM |
| 4 | You're a dude. You're literally a man.For the people downvoting this: Remember sarcasm. | /r/MensRights | 13/05/17 09:35 PM |
| 3 | love how they still managed to make women being more successful into women being victims somehowI actually kind of hate it when I get a match on tinder, because you absolutely have to send the first message, and the high chance of an instant unmatch makes it perilous. Regular conversational starters like, 'Hi, how's your weekend so far?' will often get you kicked to the curb IME. Why would men even put up with this? I know I once was in such a place too, but it seems so stupid now. Why would anyone play this insane, merciless game (apart from insta-win type attractive guys)? | /r/MensRights | 13/05/17 04:06 PM |
| 0 | love how they still managed to make women being more successful into women being victims somehowthe end of the civilization as we know it Perhaps. But maybe that isn't so bad either. We are nearing a technological state where hard labor will not be needed anymore and more and more be replaced by machines. Instead there will be more of a place for individual fulfillment. For a certain percentage of the population (male or female) that will mean taking on interesting, fulfilling jobs. For the rest it will mean turning to art, games and entertainment. Maybe there does not need to be a reason … | /r/MensRights | 13/05/17 03:56 PM |
| 1 | Snapchat News This Morning: "If men wish to procreate with beautiful, fertile women they're gross.""Let's hate on male sexuality! Because nobody has ever done that before." | /r/MensRights | 13/05/17 03:29 PM |
| 7 | Feminism in a nutshellFocus on issues which negatively and/or disproportionately affect men. Like feminism then? They push for unjust laws on the one side, increasing the disadvantage men face, and try to "no-platform" MRAs on the other side, reducing the effect our voices have on society. In my eyes, that more than qualifies as "issues which negatively and/or disproportionately affect men". Look, I dislike silly "memes" (as per the 4chan definition of the word) like this one as much as the next guy. But it certainly… | /r/MensRights | 01/05/17 03:54 PM |
| 7 | Feminism’s Goal Today ‘Is Not Equality With Men, It’s Protection From Them’I think it fits perfectly. The image that instantly forms in the mind describes this particular breed of feminist perfectly. | /r/MensRights | 23/04/17 09:11 PM |
| 3 | Robots are racist and sexist...because they're created by (straight, white) men | Irritating marxist feminist Laurie Penny whines again...Also consider the US-centric language they try to force down the throat of the software world. The word "slave" is not such a huge political taboo outside of the USA. I am often bewildered by the outrage a single mention of this word (even if completely out of the historical context) induces in US people. But than again no country tries to socially police language as much as the free-speech loving USA. | /r/MensRights | 20/04/17 10:34 PM |
| 4 | Guardian thinks that parents can "choose" their child's gender by making their sons play with dolls (and vice versa). Leave those kids alone!This person was abused I wont disagree with that, yet the case is to this day still cited as a proud example of feminist science and as proof that gender is a social construct (because it "worked" for a time). abused, not "raised as a girl" The two are equivalent in my opinion. Raised as <gender> is abuse in itself. Children should be raised as children and develop their identity on their own, play with the toys they want, etc.. That then will most likely turn out to align with their biological … | /r/MensRights | 20/04/17 10:25 PM |
| 37 | Feminist propaganda Ads showing on Windows 10 lockscreenOh god, this is horrible Windows 10! If only someone could force women to study computer science against their will! Where is the patriarchy when you need it? | /r/MensRights | 20/04/17 10:01 PM |
| 14 | "Before the advent of #BringBackOurGirls movement for the rescue of Chibok girls, boys were burnt to death and slaughtered in various terrorists’ attacks in boarding schools.""Men did all the violence, so they basically did it to themselves so it's their own fault." -the general public on men dying | /r/MensRights | 20/04/17 09:38 PM |
| 4 | Robots are racist and sexist...because they're created by (straight, white) men | Irritating marxist feminist Laurie Penny whines again......gender neutral class and object names because output varies between three possibilities. With C++20... You mean C+=. On a more serious note, there actually are regressives constantly popping up on github projects demanding to remove master/slave terminology because of "racism". | /r/MensRights | 20/04/17 09:18 PM |
| 5 | Robots are racist and sexist...because they're created by (straight, white) men | Irritating marxist feminist Laurie Penny whines again...your gender studies degree didn't properly prepare you for the 21st century It's the other way around. It's purpose is to bend the 21st century to (still) be a suitable host for their form of parasitism. There's a "soviet russia"-joke in there somewhere I think... | /r/MensRights | 20/04/17 09:03 PM |
| 2 | The hard naked truth about marriageThere still needs to be a head of household. Someone with a clear head that can know and handle all that's happening in the home at one time. I disagree. I'd even go as far as to say that if that falls to only one person, the "household" is ultimately doomed, be that sooner or later, because of the unbalance it creates. Where information is not fractured and nothing falls through the cracks. Information is not fractured and does not fall through the cracks if you talk with each other. Bidirectio… | /r/MensRights | 18/04/17 12:35 PM |
| 6 | The hard naked truth about marriageThis is wrong. Or rather it depends on the legal situation in your country. Mostly though, if done right, an unmarried couple starts out with "shared custody", i.e. the best outcome of a custody battle after a divorce (where both partners are equally capable). If they separate, the custody situation should already be clear. In marriage you both take care of the kids as a single entity. And in a divorce, individual responsibilities need to be redefined. Without marriage in the first place, equal … | /r/MensRights | 18/04/17 06:03 AM |
| 5 | The hard naked truth about marriagethe purpose of marriage I think... marriage entails a curtailment of freedom and autonomy for both the man and the woman this says enough already. But... But I'm saying there's a reason the divorce rate is so high to begin with, and it's because in western society, we've lost a good understanding of the purpose of marriage, and how to cultivate a life-long union. Marriage stands in the way of exactly that. By trying to enforce a life-long union, you make as difficult as possible in our increasin… | /r/MensRights | 18/04/17 05:41 AM |
| 12 | The hard naked truth about marriageIf these behavioral pattens are innate within the human psyche, then we shouldn't be surprised to find ancient writers grappling with these issues many thousands of years ago - whether you believe in divine inspiration or not. Of course a solution that might have worked 3000 years ago does not necessarily have to work in today's society as well as it did back then. Today women are realizing (or long have realized) their autonomy and freedom. At the same time, believes in obscure religions that d… | /r/MensRights | 17/04/17 09:47 PM |
| 28 | The hard naked truth about marriageIn other words: don't be a cuck! Not everyone wants to live in a traditionalist male role and not everyone is a christian and believes that the magical skydaddy demands submission. And it isn't a solution in all cases anyway, as the state and legal system often have the power to force you back into the role of a "cuck" if the woman desires it. Just simply hoping that you can dominate her is not a good base for a stable relationship. Why enter that unbalanced codependent situation in the first pl… | /r/MensRights | 17/04/17 09:12 PM |
| 22 | The hard naked truth about marriageThe biochemical effects of infatuation (being in love) last for about four years in most cases. 6 months is not nearly enough. And even if you know your girlfriend very well and infatuation has already worn of, marriage can change a lot of things. It can completely skew an otherwise balanced relationship by adding unnecessary dependencies and pressures. A better suggestion would be to simply not marry at all, especially if the woman demands it. There just isn't any reason. The (often cited) mino… | /r/MensRights | 17/04/17 09:06 PM |
| 1 | Can't quite believe what I'm seeingYes, women are (physically) weaker then men. But not all women are weaker than all men in all situations. | /r/MensRights | 15/04/17 10:40 AM |
| 1 | US Military and I need your help!There could be two reasons for maternity leave. One reason is the regeneration after the physical stresses of childbirth. The other one is bonding time with the child. While the former one needs to only be given to the mother, the latter one should be absolutely gender equal. The question here is, which of the two is given as a reason for the increase in time. And to me it seams that the given reason is bonding time which a father should get exactly as much of. | /r/MensRights | 08/04/17 10:53 PM |
| 2 | This Quora user nails our feelingsSo, I want to ask again, are we really living in a patriarchy? Not by the that "feminst" definition of patriarchy as a conspiracy. But still men hold most positions of economic political power like described in the bare meaning of the word "patriarchy". The critical difference is that most of those men in power will use their power for the benefit/protection of women, even at the expense of men, sometimes to a degree that might seem insane for a non-traditionalist (red-pill) person. That is a pa… | /r/MensRights | 08/04/17 10:44 PM |
| 3 | This Quora user nails our feelingsrule by the fathers Yes, of course. But what does that mean? Is it a bad thing because it takes away all the freedom and responsibility from women? Or is it a good thing because it protects and provides for women? Is it a bad thing because it forces men to provide and sacrifice for their families or is it a good thing because it gives men the ability to raise their kids in a stable environment with a loyal wife? There are rational arguments both for and against gender-roles/patriarchy/gynocentri… | /r/MensRights | 08/04/17 03:46 PM |
| 4 | This Quora user nails our feelingsPatriarchy actually exists, just not in the way most feminists think it does (=men-bad-women-weak ideology). But this persons description comes quite close. We also call that definition of "patriarchy" traditionalism or gynocentrism: It's all the same thing, even if these other two descriptions manage without blaming it on men because it's actually mutual and hurts and benefits people from both sexes. | /r/MensRights | 08/04/17 07:51 AM |
| 3 | New male contraceptive is safe, effective and inexpensive â but no company has agreed to sell it; maybe we should crowdfund and start our own companyyou are an idiot, go to /r/placeDE and look at what's actually happening. The german and Belgian flags are supposed to fuse. | /r/MensRights | 02/04/17 03:40 PM |
| 5 | New male contraceptive is safe, effective and inexpensive â but no company has agreed to sell it; maybe we should crowdfund and start our own companyI don't get at all what you are saying. They were at an early stage of trials where some side-effects are to be expected. The "side-effects" were showing up localized only at some test-centers (which suggests environmental or cultural influences to the "mood swings" and "depression", or just plain sloppy testing). | /r/MensRights | 02/04/17 10:08 AM |
| 14 | New male contraceptive is safe, effective and inexpensive â but no company has agreed to sell it; maybe we should crowdfund and start our own companyIf I remember correctly these side-effects were not as certain to come from the contraceptive as feminist media made it seem (in order to call men weak). At the stage the trials were in the bad press it got was in no way justified. TL;DR on the subject | /r/MensRights | 02/04/17 08:54 AM |
| 1 | Men pay £75 billion more tax than women every yearWell, that's because, you see, women aren't allowed to earn more, and are forced to work fewer hours by stereotypes and stuff. We all suffer from the patriarchy, you see. Women just a bit more of course. | /r/MensRights | 29/03/17 08:28 PM |
| 34 | "My Body My Choice"First: I didn't downvote you. Second: It is mutilation because you are irreversibly removing a useful part of the genitals/body of a child that is unable to consent, causing possible neurological/psychological trauma in the process with a chance of severe maiming (the whole penis can get destroyed if the procedure is done badly) or risk of death by infection and/or bloodloss. | /r/MensRights | 11/03/17 06:04 PM |
| 13 | Anyone else getting really tired of this?I don't know what movie this is, I don't know what character this is, but I am willing to bet that she gets "redeemed" in the end and everyone has a good laugh about how she almost destroyed the world. | /r/MensRights | 11/03/17 05:58 PM |
| 56 | "My Body My Choice"Because you are implying that parents should mutilate their kids by saying that you are happy your parents did it to you as a child. | /r/MensRights | 11/03/17 05:53 PM |
| 3 | Male Violence Is The Worst Problem In The World: "What do all of these seemingly isolated incidents have in common? They are all examples of male violence." Men are inherently evil. Thanks, HuffPost UKI'd say violence (both physical, legal and societal) by proxy on behalf of women is the worst problem in the world. You say patriarchy, I say gynocentris. The problem is that you aren't going to stop it by bashing on "the bad men" in order to protect the oh-so fragile and weak women, because that just reinforces this problem. | /r/MensRights | 04/03/17 11:37 AM |
| 1 | Bill Maher Defended Pedophilia in the Past, but Now Says He’s Responsible for Milo’s DownfallI was not insinuating that, I was insinuating that he has a strong preference about the shape of baby genitals, which is provably so. And whatever the reason for his position on circumcision may be, passing on abuse to other children or advocating for it is still wrong. | /r/MensRights | 26/02/17 11:58 AM |
| 6 | Bill Maher Defended Pedophilia in the Past, but Now Says He’s Responsible for Milo’s DownfallAll of this hardly surprised me, considering that Milo has a strong preference about the shape his baby dicks come in (hint: he prefers it when parts of them are missing). | /r/MensRights | 22/02/17 09:16 PM |
| 1 | Bill Maher Defended Pedophilia in the Past, but Now Says He’s Responsible for Milo’s DownfallAll of this hardly surprised me, considering that Milo has a strong preference about the shape his baby dicks come in (hint: he prefers it when parts of them are missing). | /r/MensRights | 22/02/17 09:15 PM |
| 2 | Muslim schoolboys allowed to refuse women’s handshakes | Not a word of objection from feminists, Islamic misogyny is perfectly OK with themWith issues like this, just ask yourself, "Does the behavior I object to, however odd, really hurt anyone?". In this case the answer is no. And if you still want to tell people how to behave in that case, you are an authoritarian and no better than SJWs. | /r/MensRights | 20/02/17 06:26 PM |
| 2 | feminism is ruining my best friend's lifeOk, so I think I agree with you about the judgement that the situation is bad. I'd see different reasons tough: he shouldn't spend so much money and time on them if he wants to keep the promise he made to his wife about the kind of husband he intended to be She used to but has pretty much given them up for work and in the effort to be the 'strong' one in the family, so, no time for fun. This is basically the recipe for misery right there. How could you ever get happy in your life that way? Sadly… | /r/MensRights | 20/02/17 06:22 PM |
| 11 | feminism is ruining my best friend's lifeShe does not feel secure with him because he is too childish This is what I meant. Who are you to judge what hobbies of him are childish and what he should rather do with his free time. Why is it his responsibility to make her feel secure? Does she make him feel secure? If she talks anything like you, she probably makes him feel like shit. the role he agreed to fill when they got married. Even if you agree to get married this still doesn't (or rather shouldn't) make him her utility and forever f… | /r/MensRights | 20/02/17 12:20 AM |
| 24 | feminism is ruining my best friend's lifeI reject the traditionalist touch in this. Especially this: 2) She is really unhappy in her marriage because she married a "feminist" man who, while an extremely pleasant guy, is pretty much useless Men are not utilities. Their worth is not measured by how much use they are to their partner. If that guy does not do his part in the relationship that's a legitimate criticism. But just having hobbies that are of no utility to his wife and not being sexually aggressive enough to satisfy his wife is … | /r/MensRights | 19/02/17 11:23 PM |
| 2 | Does someone have that image of a feminist holding up a "my body my choice sign" next to a baby boy getting a circumcision?It's bad because it can have quite harmful consequences and is done for no reason at all to an infant who cannot consent. And it's sexism and stands in the way of equality because we allow it to be done to boys while we make it illegal to be done to girls. | /r/MensRights | 19/02/17 11:11 PM |
| 3 | I found this and I thought it was hilariousInteresting that it depicts a nazi as an example for the oppression of women. Aside from holding very traditionalist gender roles the Nazis where much harder on the men of their persecuted groups. Female homosexuals (lesbians) where not persecuted at all while gay men where all killed. Female "asocials" (retarded people, homeless, anyone non-productive) where helped while male "asocials" where all killed. I have no data on female jews though, they probably suffered just as much as their males. A… | /r/MensRights | 12/02/17 10:53 AM |
| 1 | I just had a discussion on whether men have the right to their unborn child. It didn't go well. TL;DR in commentsThe point I was making was that the "standard" claim that women bear all of the risks and stresses is just a canard that attempts to shut down discussion. Of course I was referring solely to the act of gestating a baby. And concerning that, of course women carry more, in fact all risks. I still went into men having no control over what happens after that and how that puts them in a, in the end, much larger risk. But as I wrote, If you took away the obligation to provide from men, women would car… | /r/MensRights | 07/02/17 06:25 PM |
| 3 | I just had a discussion on whether men have the right to their unborn child. It didn't go well. TL;DR in commentsWhy are you picking out this one sentence? Haven't I addressed this sufficiently in the whole comment? | /r/MensRights | 05/02/17 06:16 PM |
| 1 | Women praising foreskinit will cause resentment in cut men If it causes resentment in cut men it will inevitably cause less resentment in non-cut men. Which must have a lot of resentment as it stands currently in the US. If you will not agree that feelings should not matter I ask again: Which of the two feelings is more important? I find it repulsive to oppose MGM on the basis of how it affects women As I said, I agree with that. But that's not what this is about. It's on the basis of how it affects your sexuality. An… | /r/MensRights | 05/02/17 12:28 PM |
| 16 | I just had a discussion on whether men have the right to their unborn child. It didn't go well. TL;DR in commentsThis is a difficult and complex topic. You can basically reach equality here by going in one of two directions. Currently the woman has all rights to the child and the man has none. So to restore equality, either per default you both have full responsibility to raise the child, or none of you does. The first case is hard to argue for, because, and in this they were right, men don't share the risk and stresses of carrying a pregnancy to terms. And on the other side it is unfair to men because the… | /r/MensRights | 05/02/17 05:46 AM |
| 3 | Women praising foreskinWe don't need to disparage either group, is my point. That's not what I said. I asked about the opposite effect that an already disparaged group is made to feel better about themselves? How do you weigh negative feelings in one group against positive feelings in the other group. The answer is, we don't weigh them at all when we make an argument. Arguments are about facts not feelings. This is yet another example of gynocentrism and male disposability. I agree, people should not even consider cir… | /r/MensRights | 05/02/17 05:18 AM |
| 2 | Cornell branded student a sexual harasser for underwear theft with no evidenceSo dies the panty raiding tradition. Oh man... does this mean we have to return our women's dorm master keys to the central patriarchy committee? Stop killing our rape culture! | /r/MensRights | 05/02/17 01:14 AM |
| 3 | Women praising foreskinI guess even a broken clock is right twice a day. | /r/MensRights | 05/02/17 01:05 AM |
| 2 | Women praising foreskinI think it's quite vicious actually, to disparage men who have already suffered having their genitals mutilated. What keeps the opposite from happening? What about men with hurt egos due to everyone mocking the natural state of their penises seeing things like this video and feeling better about their sexuality? Is feeling hurt because of a fact more critical than feeling better because of a fact? Or are the resulting feelings just irrelevant altogether when pointing out a fact? The important th… | /r/MensRights | 05/02/17 12:58 AM |
| 2 | Women praising foreskinrational women to stand up for us Fun fact: Did you know Laci Green made a similar video on the merits of the foreskin and condemning circumcision? | /r/MensRights | 05/02/17 12:41 AM |
| 2 | Women praising foreskin200 baby boys die every year from MGM in the US alone. "Yes, but women prefer it." This is literally how most arguments with an american on this topic will go. And not only with the unwashed masses, but also on here, in a men's rights forum. I've had it countless times. It really is important to point out to them that it is only part of women who prefer circumcised penises and that they are strongly limited to the US, because that's what they care for and you won't win them over otherwise. Also … | /r/MensRights | 05/02/17 12:37 AM |
| 2 | Women praising foreskinThat women prefer mutilated penises is the most often mentioned argument for MGM in the US. People do this to their babies because of this very argument. How else are you going to counter that argument? | /r/MensRights | 05/02/17 12:15 AM |
| 42 | The American Heart Association Is Sexist with #GoRedForWomen. More Men Die From Heart Disease So Why Not #GoRedForALL?It's easier for a charity to gather funding for women's issues than for male or non-gendered issues. And charity organizations hold a lot of jobs that depend on the funding by the state or donations. By this point it really has turned into a form of industry, just trying to maximize their profits. That makes it even more disgusting. People will try to rationalize it by saying "less death = better" and gathering more funding by only helping women means less deaths, but this still makes it sexist … | /r/MensRights | 04/02/17 02:40 PM |
| 39 | Tory MP opposes domestic violence legislation because it 'relates only to female victims'"What? Some guy voted against this clearly good thing? Why?" "Because he's a misogynist male supremacist rape apologist scumbag" Fixed that for you. That's what that conversation will be IRL. The controversy is about some asshole daring to reject their overwhelming, yet still underdog and "oppressed", moral superiority. | /r/MensRights | 02/02/17 09:02 PM |
| 3 | Canadian Theatre cancels showing of men's rights documentary The Red Pill due to complaintsparties in reverse That would imply all women are feminists or all feminists being women. It is sexist to claim all men are this and that, it is not sexist to claim all feminists are this and that, because "feminist" is not a sex. | /r/MensRights | 03/12/16 12:04 PM |
| 9 | Men are ticketed women are not.LOL no. LOL yes. There is such a thing as objective sexism, it is just not the way it is currently used. Do you really want to have the feminist definition of sexism as a standard? Sexism should be objective. Is it sexist for women to not be conscripted? That's why I said that there is no "sexism for/towards" but only sexism. It is sexist that women are not conscripted while men are. If Amazons were real, no one would call them traditionalist. If they were real. Or perhaps if they were real it w… | /r/MensRights | 13/11/16 06:53 PM |
| 20 | Men are ticketed women are not.There is a problem with the basic principle of "sexism against xyz". Either something is sexism or it is not. And if it is sexism the answer can only be one of two things, either treat women equally to men or men equally to women. Just as the concept of patriarchy and gynocentrism are the same if you take away the question of who suffers most under them. If you remove that notion, in both cases you just end up with traditionalism, which you can take action against. And that action is not to make… | /r/MensRights | 13/11/16 11:46 AM |
| 1 | If both procedures remove about the same amount of excess skin for cleanliness and both deaden sexual sensation, why is it important to keep females in tact and males not? Is sexual sensation socially considered more important more women than men?It protects the glans from irritation by clothes, which otherwise would decrease sensitivity, dry up the glans and make it become wrinkled over time It increases sexual pleasure by being the most sensitive part of the male body. It performs a gliding action during sex or masturbation, no need for lube, no pain for the woman It is a part of the immune system. Just see here for a more complete list: http://www.noharmm.org/advantage.htm | /r/MensRights | 13/11/16 11:29 AM |
| 1 | If both procedures remove about the same amount of excess skin for cleanliness and both deaden sexual sensation, why is it important to keep females in tact and males not? Is sexual sensation socially considered more important more women than men?As we have been already through, it serves many purposes. This is getting ridiculous. | /r/MensRights | 12/11/16 08:26 PM |
| 0 | Milo discusses how Harvard cancelled entire season for men's soccer team because players were "caught" rating women on their appearance.Thus far I have not heard one argument from you as to why what I say is hyperbole. You only state over and over that it's hyperbole. That is why we don't have a real discussion. | /r/MensRights | 07/11/16 06:15 PM |
| 0 | Milo discusses how Harvard cancelled entire season for men's soccer team because players were "caught" rating women on their appearance.Actually they did point to the mistakes. The mistake is the use of hyperbole. It is not hyperbole. It is this simple. Don't mutilate children regardless of their gender. You can do with your own penis what you want when you are 18, but don't do it to children. End of the fucking story. This is what I have repeated now over and over again. And it is not hyperbole. And here's the problem with your usage of hyperbole as often as you use it. It is not hyperbole. It is a human rights violation. And I… | /r/MensRights | 06/11/16 09:12 PM |
| 1 | If both procedures remove about the same amount of excess skin for cleanliness and both deaden sexual sensation, why is it important to keep females in tact and males not? Is sexual sensation socially considered more important more women than men?It's also not common. Or at least not common enough to medically justify amputating it preemptively (before one gets cancer), and especially not on infants. How common is penile cancer with infants? Do we amputate women's breasts preemptively? Because breast cancer is much more common than penile cancer. Also I assume that you completely agree with my other arguments since you didn't answer them. | /r/MensRights | 06/11/16 04:21 PM |
| 4 | Milo discusses how Harvard cancelled entire season for men's soccer team because players were "caught" rating women on their appearance.Calling male circumcision can be construed as mutilation, or it can be construed as a medical procedure. It's about context here. You're purposely using the word mutilation to invoke and emotional response. I'm not going to get into FGM because that procedure is entirely for ensuring a woman either does not procreate or can't achieve maximum sexual pleasure. We can easily call that no sound medical science, and it never was. That is what MGM is as well though. It has, at least historically, been… | /r/MensRights | 06/11/16 01:56 PM |
| 5 | Milo discusses how Harvard cancelled entire season for men's soccer team because players were "caught" rating women on their appearance.Mischaracterized as what? We are speaking about cutting off a piece of skin from babies without their consent for no medical reason. How would you characterize that? | /r/MensRights | 06/11/16 11:53 AM |
| 3 | Milo discusses how Harvard cancelled entire season for men's soccer team because players were "caught" rating women on their appearance.He did not state it directly, but he did agree with the guy before him that circumcision is not mutilation. And the guy before him made that argument with regard to children and the circumcision of children. It is not a strawman but very reasonable to assume unless he did not read the post he was answering to correctly. I will show you how I got that impression: you opened up a can of worms with this one. Folks(on this sub in particular) are quick to lambast you if you dare try to contradict the… | /r/MensRights | 06/11/16 11:47 AM |
| -1 | Milo discusses how Harvard cancelled entire season for men's soccer team because players were "caught" rating women on their appearance.stemming from a personal sexual preference Why has he a personal sexual preference on the aesthetics of infant dicks? As I said, either he is a troll and should not be taken serously, or he is an self-absorbed asshole and should be considered dangerous. Decide for yourself which one is true. Either way he is not the 'saviour of us all' he is made out to be in some parts of the manosphere. | /r/MensRights | 06/11/16 02:12 AM |
| 3 | Milo discusses how Harvard cancelled entire season for men's soccer team because players were "caught" rating women on their appearance.I was answering to a comment about Milo being a troll or not while the question in my eyes is, is he a troll or worse? Do not mistake him for anyone that cares about Men's Rights in any way, shape or form. In his article that I linked he advocated for the mutilation of children without their consent. | /r/MensRights | 05/11/16 10:40 PM |
| 8 | Milo discusses how Harvard cancelled entire season for men's soccer team because players were "caught" rating women on their appearance.Where are they/we the fanatics? Everything he wrote is either beside the point or dancing around the fact that we are speaking about doing it to children without their consent. Why not just let people make their own choices at 18? | /r/MensRights | 05/11/16 09:50 PM |
| 8 | Milo discusses how Harvard cancelled entire season for men's soccer team because players were "caught" rating women on their appearance.You will be shamed for being circumcised or believing it's ok It's ok if it was your choice to get circumcised. It is not ok to do it to your children, no matter how much you believe in it and it is certainly not ok for a state to let you do it to your children. Why would you not just let everyone decide at 18 if they want to have a part of their dick cut off? I know why, because then nobody would want/do it. If you want people's dicks cut, you have to do it to them when they are children and ca… | /r/MensRights | 05/11/16 09:49 PM |
| 11 | Milo discusses how Harvard cancelled entire season for men's soccer team because players were "caught" rating women on their appearance.I hope you recognize that this is a belief many of us share with me. Mutilating children is wrong. | /r/MensRights | 05/11/16 07:51 PM |
| 14 | Milo discusses how Harvard cancelled entire season for men's soccer team because players were "caught" rating women on their appearance.Doing it to children is mutilation. They cannot consent to a piece of their body being cut off. That is the very definition of mutilation. If you are a person who had it done to your children I'd call you all sorts of other stuff as well no matter if you find it insulting or not. If he wants to suck circumcised dick, good for him, it his mouth and his choice Yes, great for him. But still no reason to mutilate children. Coincidentally, in every country that makes it illegal to mutilate children, … | /r/MensRights | 05/11/16 07:46 PM |
| 5 | Milo discusses how Harvard cancelled entire season for men's soccer team because players were "caught" rating women on their appearance.He is either a troll or a self-absorbed asshole who thinks male infants should be mutilated because that makes it more likely for him to suck their cocks. I'll let you decide. | /r/MensRights | 05/11/16 07:18 PM |
| 1 | If both procedures remove about the same amount of excess skin for cleanliness and both deaden sexual sensation, why is it important to keep females in tact and males not? Is sexual sensation socially considered more important more women than men?Looks better imo You are of course entitled to your opinion. But you should be aware that it's influenced by the culture of circumcision in your country a lot. The US are a lot like the Muslim world and Africa in that regard. Here in Europe an uncut dick looks normal/better to most people and women would instead be wondering about the weird scar on your shaft and wrinkled/dry glans. cancer You can't have a cancer if you have amputated the thing that gets affected by it... why not remove your pro… | /r/MensRights | 05/11/16 12:18 PM |
| 2 | How a feminist petition to stop a film became an own goal - an interview with Cassie JNothing. Because MRA's didn't demand a propaganda piece in return for their funding but just an honest portrayal and a voice. Unlike feminists, which would have agreed to fund the film only under the condition of having control over the content and tone of the movie. | /r/MensRights | 02/11/16 09:46 PM |
| 1 | If both procedures remove about the same amount of excess skin for cleanliness and both deaden sexual sensation, why is it important to keep females in tact and males not? Is sexual sensation socially considered more important more women than men?Oh, so you don't shower? Because that's all it takes to keep a foreskin clean. Maybe your wife would appreciate it if you'd shower once in a while, foreskin or not. Also the foreskin has many uses, both practical and recreational. It makes sex more pleasurable, protects the glans from irritation by clothes and (assuming normal hygiene) even protects the penis from infection (it produces antibodies, much like a mouth or vagina). | /r/MensRights | 02/11/16 08:59 PM |
| 1 | If both procedures remove about the same amount of excess skin for cleanliness and both deaden sexual sensation, why is it important to keep females in tact and males not? Is sexual sensation socially considered more important more women than men?Yes, that's great to know what parts of your body your wife prefers cut off, but how do you know you wouldn't enjoy it even more uncut? Would you have your legs cut off as well if she didn't like them? | /r/MensRights | 20/10/16 10:43 PM |
| 1 | If both procedures remove about the same amount of excess skin for cleanliness and both deaden sexual sensation, why is it important to keep females in tact and males not? Is sexual sensation socially considered more important more women than men?I enjoy it, so it turned out alright How do you know you wouldn't enjoy it even more uncut? | /r/MensRights | 14/10/16 05:28 PM |
| 6 | If both procedures remove about the same amount of excess skin for cleanliness and both deaden sexual sensation, why is it important to keep females in tact and males not? Is sexual sensation socially considered more important more women than men?This is entirely subjective. In Murrica where most people are mutilated, mutilation looks normal and a complete penis looks strange to women. In Europe women will wonder about a penis that has some parts of it missing. | /r/MensRights | 08/10/16 05:16 PM |
| 3 | If both procedures remove about the same amount of excess skin for cleanliness and both deaden sexual sensation, why is it important to keep females in tact and males not? Is sexual sensation socially considered more important more women than men?I'm glad I wasn't circumcised. Looks better. | /r/MensRights | 08/10/16 05:14 PM |
| 7 | If both procedures remove about the same amount of excess skin for cleanliness and both deaden sexual sensation, why is it important to keep females in tact and males not? Is sexual sensation socially considered more important more women than men?Thank you for finding this video and these links. I had a long discussion in this subreddit a few months ago with someone claiming that the male orgasm only comes from the glans exclusively and that the foreskin/frenulum is only stimulated in the way our fingertips are and incapable of inducing sexual pleasure. "Do you orgasm rubbing your fingers together?" When I claimed that I could achieve an orgasm purely from foreskin stimulation he completely dismissed that as silly. What an asshole... If … | /r/MensRights | 08/10/16 05:06 PM |
| 3 | Feminism Implodes Globally as Yet Another MAN is appointed UN Secretary General - Say Hello To Former Portuguese Prime Minister Antonio GuterresHow?! Is it not the current year already?! | /r/MensRights | 07/10/16 12:44 AM |
| 25 | Wow...just wowIt sounds a bit tinfoily, I know, but it is actually a thing, just google the term. Basically there are a ever growing number of groups that benefit from government and donation money without ever doing much. They mostly only lobby for harsher laws and try to further victim mentality which again increases their income. It's a bit like the prison industry in the US. And a more rational, gender egalitarian approach would only harm their business. | /r/MensRights | 05/10/16 11:55 AM |
| 3 | That time TV show "Desperate Housewives" showed a rape, but it was funny because it was a female on man rape.Exactly. In the moment where she picked up the telephone I thought "Wait, this is great, she's calling the police, good thinking!" but than she called "Andrew"... -.- | /r/MensRights | 17/09/16 10:22 AM |
| 1 | "Meet the Vagina Voters" "The women voting for Hillary because she's a woman are setting feminism back a hundred years."The simple consequence of more women voting for Clinton is less women voting for trump. It's simple math. And I have yet to see one person speaking out about voting for trump because he is a man. That being said, it's again a vote between an even bigger douche and an even bigger turd-sandwich. You Americans really outdid yourself this time. Have a fun eight years with whichever evil overlord you chose. | /r/MensRights | 10/09/16 08:44 AM |
| 1 | "Meet the Vagina Voters" "The women voting for Hillary because she's a woman are setting feminism back a hundred years."Thank you for posting the right answer. Feminists play the identity politics game. So even if Palin was a woman, and even if her views would have aligned (which they didn't), they wouldn't have voted for her, solely because she's a republican. Remember, "internal misogyny" is a feminist idea. It is not enough to have a vagina, it has to be a vagina that (at least publicly) agrees with feminism. | /r/MensRights | 10/09/16 08:41 AM |
| 1 | York U gender neutral toilet... except...I guess we need those barcodes and RFID chips in the neck after all. Then we can talk at each other using numbers, like any good collective does. | /r/MensRights | 04/09/16 04:52 PM |
| 1 | Despite 120% increase in men reporting sexual abuse, UK's biggest male rape charity gets funding slashed to 0. They released this video in response.What worm?! Did you mean your Hugh Mongus worm? Sexual Harassment! Kill that guy! | /r/MensRights | 31/08/16 06:15 PM |
| 10 | Despite 120% increase in men reporting sexual abuse, UK's biggest male rape charity gets funding slashed to 0. They released this video in response.Because only reverend mothers of feminism can change poison into the water of life. | /r/MensRights | 30/08/16 06:55 PM |
| 3 | shoe0nhead AMAPUA and MGTOW are both completely different answers to the same question. PUAs answer the question by using the corrupted system to get more pussy. What they don't realize however is that they are still reaffirming the system by taking an even more active part in it. They are cementing these gender roles. For them, this is ok (even if they will never say so), because all they want is pussy. MGTOW, among other things, just abandon this abusive "game" and system. They have realized that nothing go… | /r/MensRights | 13/08/16 08:00 AM |
| 3 | Movie: Bad Moms - "un-cut guys are always so nice to you cos they know their dicks are gross"Here you go: http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/05/28/no-one-wants-to-live-in-a-world-of-uncircumcised-penises/ The teaser says it all: Your penis is not a perfect, special snowflake. There are objective standards of beauty for men, just as there are for women. For the edification and enjoyment of your female partners, not to mention the quality of oral sex you’ll get throughout your life, you should get circumcised. And you should do it to your newborn sons, too, as early into their lives as … | /r/MensRights | 26/07/16 09:40 PM |
| 2 | Movie: Bad Moms - "un-cut guys are always so nice to you cos they know their dicks are gross"I'm sorry, I didn't look at the Wikipedia article at all, but only at the sources at the bottom you directly linked. I will accept the 33% but would still remark that that number is high enough to begin with. Also it stands to debate (without reading the studies themselves) what is defined as "cut". Certainly while still a piece of the frenulum remains in most of the shown pictures it looks rather... well, mutilated. Do you orgasm rubbing your fingers together? I might, if that was my "thing". B… | /r/MensRights | 26/07/16 09:37 PM |
| 3 | Movie: Bad Moms - "un-cut guys are always so nice to you cos they know their dicks are gross"whites Only in the US. In (mainland) Europe, almost no-one is circumcised. Germany even had it outlawed for quite some time, until a few years ago Jews pulled the antisemitism card and got some special exceptions for religious mutilation passed into law. | /r/MensRights | 26/07/16 09:15 PM |
| 2 | Movie: Bad Moms - "un-cut guys are always so nice to you cos they know their dicks are gross"It's not only chicks though. Milo Yiannopoulos has advocated in favor of circumcision of young boys because he likes his penis cut. That being said it is wholly subjective (even if Milo tries to claim his beauty standard as an "objective standard") and to many (mainland) European women a circumcised penis would be the weird looking one. There is nothing objectively gross about it, its only culture (and hygiene). | /r/MensRights | 26/07/16 09:11 PM |
| 3 | Movie: Bad Moms - "un-cut guys are always so nice to you cos they know their dicks are gross"Great. You linked to "a couple of surveys". Still your 30% figure is nowhere to be found. There is no way for me to even expect what's behind the paywall to even be related to our topic. It seems to be about some malformation of the frenulum and not about circumcision and its effect on healthy frenulums. I am mostly referencing this site. Granted, it's not scientific by any means, but it's more scientific (by linking proper sources) than what you have thus far provided. And while I'm now reading… | /r/MensRights | 26/07/16 08:55 PM |
| 1 | Man spends his entire life's savings for wedding with his beloved "the one". She ditches him after 3 days because he's brokeLearning by burning. | /r/MensRights | 26/07/16 08:26 PM |
| 1 | Movie: Bad Moms - "un-cut guys are always so nice to you cos they know their dicks are gross"Would you care to prove that 30% figure or link me to a post where you have linked proof? Also while I can see you respond to similar points like mine, I can not see you actually "address" them but mostly repeat your mantra about that it's the glans and the glans only that makes everyone orgasm. | /r/MensRights | 26/07/16 08:20 PM |
| 2 | Movie: Bad Moms - "un-cut guys are always so nice to you cos they know their dicks are gross"I agree with none of your points and you fail to prove any of your "causes an orgasm" rethoric. Anecdotal evidence is not enough to prove a theory, but it's enough to disprove one. I can orgasm without even once touching the glans only by rubbing the frenulum with my thumb or a small vibrator. There are also countless men who cum from prostate stimulation, which is basically as far from the glans as it gets concerning the male reproductive organ. I bet there are even people who can have an orgas… | /r/MensRights | 26/07/16 08:12 PM |
| 1 | Movie: Bad Moms - "un-cut guys are always so nice to you cos they know their dicks are gross"The most sensitive part of a penis is the frenulum, the short piece of skin that connects the foreskin and the glans. What you perhaps not realize is that the frenulum is often destroyed in the process of circumcision. There are only a few techniques that work only on adult patients that manage to preserve that part of the penis. I have never seen a circumcised penis in any porn movie that had an intact frenulum. When I masturbate, I hardly touch the tip of my penis. I pull the foreskin back and… | /r/MensRights | 26/07/16 07:00 PM |
| 2 | Schoolboys, 14, who were banned from wearing shorts to school on the hottest day of the year used a uniform loophole to wear SKIRTS insteadVery cool. I like how it is so configurable. I once watched a demonstration on a basic traditional Scottish kilt from the Jacobite war (which also was only a larte piece of cloth that was wrapped around the wearer in a special way). He showed a lot of useful configurations for wearing it in different situations as well. | /r/MensRights | 24/07/16 09:02 AM |
| 1 | Schoolboys, 14, who were banned from wearing shorts to school on the hottest day of the year used a uniform loophole to wear SKIRTS insteadYes of course. That's why they bought and wore skirts, because short trousers were available as an approved part of their uniform ensemble. | /r/MensRights | 23/07/16 10:43 AM |
| 0 | Schoolboys, 14, who were banned from wearing shorts to school on the hottest day of the year used a uniform loophole to wear SKIRTS insteadThe Romans had skirts and/or tunics, the Greeks had them, the Germans had them, the Japanese had them... basically in every pre-modern, pre-medieval culture you look men wore skirts in some way or another. It's just the simplest, most obvious type of clothing for your lower body. Pants were basically only invented to make riding on horses easier. And at the price of being more complicated to make and thus more expensive and less durable. And since women didn't need to ride on horses, they got to… | /r/MensRights | 23/07/16 10:39 AM |
| 1 | Schoolboys, 14, who were banned from wearing shorts to school on the hottest day of the year used a uniform loophole to wear SKIRTS insteadI have this one these guys here. Really small (smaller than my girlfriends usual handbag) when you look at it, but you can fit a lot of stuff in there. It's like a shrinked messenger bag that never gets in the way. Also it's made of retired fire hose, so it's durable as hell. I also usually wear german military cargo pants as well, but you can't fit a >=1L water bottle in those. | /r/MensRights | 23/07/16 10:10 AM |
| 1 | My wife is physically abusive, resents marrying me and is six months pregnant - I haven’t told anyone about the abuse and don’t know what to do. Should I leave her?That requires for the multiverse theory to be true. Of course it does. But the alternative is not that everything is deterministic, but the alternative is only that there are no alternate universes. Whether it is true or not has no consequence on our universe in any case. It was just a way to illustrate what I meant. This is all theory, and I would disagree with you. It is like all science "just" a theory, but a well established and proven one and most probably true. Our universe is non-determin… | /r/MensRights | 22/06/16 07:25 PM |
| 1 | My wife is physically abusive, resents marrying me and is six months pregnant - I haven’t told anyone about the abuse and don’t know what to do. Should I leave her?Sorry for the following wall of text, but this demands a more complex answer and is a topic I (as a trans-humanist) am very passionate about. At the base of it, we are all machines. Our brains are machines. The electrons firing in our brains are our thoughts, and they travel down predetermined paths. While I agree with the first sentence in the sense that there is nothing metaphysical or spiritual about our consciousness, the second sentence is objectively wrong. That's why it's a philosophical … | /r/MensRights | 22/06/16 05:36 PM |
| 1 | My wife is physically abusive, resents marrying me and is six months pregnant - I haven’t told anyone about the abuse and don’t know what to do. Should I leave her?You have some degree of control over how you change. And you have some degree of control on how you react on change you notice in your partner (I could give you tons of examples for both). And for slow, progressive change that is more than enough. Also, am I assuming right that you are also someone who doesn't (philosophically) believe in the existence of free will? I guess we're going to disagree on that as well. Anyway, I've enjoyed this discussion. | /r/MensRights | 21/06/16 04:36 PM |
| 1 | My wife is physically abusive, resents marrying me and is six months pregnant - I haven’t told anyone about the abuse and don’t know what to do. Should I leave her?You believe it's possible to control how you grow as a person so that it's the same as how another person grows? No, I believe that being observant towards your partner (I am rapidly running out of ways to rephrase this) will help you moving forward together. Change together in one direction. In a relationship (this might be shocking to you) you are not two completely separate entities but a team that is as close as can be. If you're good together you will inevitably change together more than in… | /r/MensRights | 20/06/16 09:19 PM |
| 1 | My wife is physically abusive, resents marrying me and is six months pregnant - I haven’t told anyone about the abuse and don’t know what to do. Should I leave her?I assume that it is possible to take care that it does. And that it's your own fault (and your partners) if it doesn't. (Not accounting for trauma, death and other severe catastrophes) | /r/MensRights | 20/06/16 06:26 PM |
| 1 | My wife is physically abusive, resents marrying me and is six months pregnant - I haven’t told anyone about the abuse and don’t know what to do. Should I leave her?And I have lost friends because they couldn't (or rather wouldn't) keep up and preferred stagnation. In my relationship (also true for good friendships) I am highly motivated to keep up with my partner and I expect the same from her. | /r/MensRights | 20/06/16 05:39 PM |
| 1 | My wife is physically abusive, resents marrying me and is six months pregnant - I haven’t told anyone about the abuse and don’t know what to do. Should I leave her?I've had enough epiphanies to know that they work more like an impulse than a momentum. They can inspire change but do not instantly cause you to become a different being. Experience is the same, there is no "level-bar" that accumulates over time until you suddenly level up and change. It all comes natural and when you're in a healthy relationship you will notice the change in your partner and it will affect you too. But we're arguing personal philosophies at this point. | /r/MensRights | 20/06/16 05:03 PM |
| 1 | My wife is physically abusive, resents marrying me and is six months pregnant - I haven’t told anyone about the abuse and don’t know what to do. Should I leave her?Of course people change. But they do not suddenly change on you. That just doesn't happen "just like that". People perhaps gradually change with you then suddenly noticing. But that's your own fault as well. And yes of course, traumatic experiences for example can instantly change someone. And I can fully understand that even a healthy relationship can end because of something like this. But it clearly is not what this is about. If something like that happens to you (or your partner) you know th… | /r/MensRights | 20/06/16 04:43 PM |
| 1 | My wife is physically abusive, resents marrying me and is six months pregnant - I haven’t told anyone about the abuse and don’t know what to do. Should I leave her?People don't just change instantly after years of being together. If you have the impression that happened, that is most likely because you at some point stopped being "in love" (which never lasts forever and should be avoided in the first place) and do no longer see the distorted view you had of your partner before. If you and your partner are aware at all times in a relationship you will see slow gradual changes in each other and yourselves which if the relationship is healthy will only bring … | /r/MensRights | 18/06/16 04:37 AM |
| 2 | Equality Conference Tries To Defend 'No Straight White Men' PolicyMen are people in the way soylent green is people. | /r/MensRights | 12/06/16 04:02 PM |
| 5 | LMFAO violent rape is so hilarious... (xpost /r/CringeAnarchy)I do not know about any school definition of a sociopath. Perhaps it's also the language/cultural barrier we're having an issue with here. I am using the colloquial definition that is used in my country. To me, empathy is the ability to recognize emotion in others. Not necessarily to experience them (or being capable to experience them) yourself. That would be compassion. In German we also have two words for that (in addition to empathy), "Einfühlungsvermögen" und "Mitgefühl". After a short rese… | /r/MensRights | 12/06/16 03:52 PM |
| 4 | LMFAO violent rape is so hilarious... (xpost /r/CringeAnarchy)No, it does not. The most ruthless sociopaths often have a very good ability of understanding the emotions of others. They just don't give a crap and ruthlessly use their insight to further their own interests. In this example that means that they very well know how horrible that must have been to the man, that's what makes it funny to them. | /r/MensRights | 12/06/16 01:22 PM |
| 3 | TIL that women dont hold political, economic, or institutional power. The mental gymnastics is real.Same is true in Germany. Richest and most powerful individuals in Germany, all female. From the top: Friede Springer and Liz Mohn both control (after the death of their respective husbands) each about half of Germany's print media. They are even more powerful (and use that power!) than chancellor Angela Merkel which comes in as (only) the third most powerful person in Germany. Following them are lots of rich industrialist women who all got their fortune from surviving their husbands. | /r/MensRights | 07/06/16 06:05 PM |
| 4 | Rape is bad?I thought this 'eye for an eye' mentality was pretty normal in the USA, just like in most other third world juntas that still implement the death penalty. "Hey, he murdered/raped someone, murder/rape is wrong so let's murder/rape him for the justice!" | /r/MensRights | 06/06/16 09:21 PM |
| 52 | Absolutely pathetic, even by NY Mag standards: "Who Said It: Donald Trump or an MRA?"The real manipulative trick they do here is not comparing us with Trump but casually equating/conflating us with PUAs and /r/TheRedPill by advertising their quotes as ours. The only two quotes that would have been made by an MRA are the ones /u/garglemesh42 pointed out. | /r/MensRights | 21/05/16 02:18 PM |
| 20 | Absolutely pathetic, even by NY Mag standards: "Who Said It: Donald Trump or an MRA?"Those where the only two MRA quotes in there though. The rest was something PUAs at best and /r/TheRedPill at worst would have said and that they are conflating us with them again annoys the shit out of me. | /r/MensRights | 21/05/16 02:16 PM |
| 6 | House panel strips language requiring women to register for draftYes, this is the last straw with this useless patriarchy. I'll get my membership revoked, go trans and get myself some of that fine feminist utopia. Finally a supremacy movement that does things right! | /r/MensRights | 17/05/16 09:14 PM |
| 1 | being a woman on youtube (THE TRUTH)I've not yet been shown any example whatsoever of an "extreme MRA". Is it not true that most of the people that are perceived by feminists and the mainstream as extreme MRA are shitting on the MRM as well? Like some MGTOW, hardcore traditionalists or PUAs/RedPillers. The people that are perceived as extreme MRAs don't even want to be called MRAs. The irony is complete when people tell you to give up your (fitting) label because of the actions of people that don't want to wear your label. | /r/MensRights | 16/05/16 03:38 PM |
| 3 | being a woman on youtube (THE TRUTH)She's an anti-feminist. That's a difference because apparently advocating for missing rights of men instead of just bashing feminism puts you on the other side of the horseshoe to them. This seems to be a continuing sickness in the manosphere. Sargon has also recently said something similar, that the label is poisonous and everyone should stop calling themselves MRAs and just call themselve's egalitarian or anti-feminist. If you ask me it's all the fear of being perceived as the bad guys by the … | /r/MensRights | 16/05/16 03:22 PM |
| 5 | being a woman on youtube (THE TRUTH)Isn't that that girl that pissed all over the MRM a few months ago in order to impress her boyfriend? | /r/MensRights | 16/05/16 02:23 AM |
| -1 | This crappy comic is circulating again, so I had to fix it.Anorexia and bulimia are different stories. Same holds true for inverse eating disorders too, though. There is a difference between just being a lazy and gluttonous person or someone with an (obsessive compulsive) eating disorder, just as there is a difference between some bitch starving herself to get onto that model show and someone suffering from anorexia. In any case, you have to recognize the problem and don't blame it on everyone but yourself. Only the resulting measures differ. | /r/MensRights | 16/05/16 02:19 AM |
| 1 | Am I traumatized? No. This is what abuse looks like.You are not responsible for protecting anyone, especially women, from their bad choices! Yes, but you're responsible for protecting the hypothetical family she might kill from her (and your bad choice in not stopping her). I am not sure but this might count as involuntary manslaughter in some countries. This is why bar tenders call cabs for drunken patrons all the time when they realize their intent to drive. Honestly, this is sociopathic thinking if I ever saw it. "No, it doesn't matter they're… | /r/MensRights | 27/04/16 05:25 PM |
| 11 | Jodie Foster tired of ‘the woman thing’: There’s no ‘big plot to keep women down’ - "It would be nice to be able to have a more complex conversation and to be able to look at it more than just a quota or numbers."For what it's worth I know three lesbians and two of them were utter female supremacists. The other one was more a boyish character herself and not interested at all in feminist issues but sadly didn't care much for men's rights issues either. My girlfriend also knew two lesbians, one of them the mother of a boy (from a previous marriage) whom her girlfriend constantly mentally abused because of her hatred for men, talking about "braking him" in order to make him human. All anecdotal anyway. | /r/MensRights | 23/04/16 08:49 AM |
| 9 | Feminist Are Launching A Database To Identify And Punish/Jail Men For Arguing On The InternetThat is what they have invented the concept of "internalized misogyny" for. They are egalitarian in how totalitarian they are against disagreeing opinions. | /r/MensRights | 17/04/16 03:48 PM |
| 6 | Men Are Harassed More Than Women Online - Data shows men get more hate, while women say they get it because they’re women.Well, yeah, turns out you opinion-raped them. Now you know where the 1 in 4 stats come from. | /r/MensRights | 15/04/16 06:43 PM |
| 38 | I am glad to see other people getting annoyed by changing men's restrooms to anyone's restroomsBut still... if you're going to make one gender's restroom unisex, why not do the same to the other? Or just have one for everyone. If you don't have a dedicated men's restroom, you don't see the reason in some concept of gender privacy anyway (or whatever reason toilets are separated for in the first place), so no matter how you spin it, it comes down to preferential treatment of one sex over the other and not efficiency. | /r/MensRights | 13/04/16 12:13 AM |
| 14 | Came across this when doing my uni work rights online course for engineering studentsOr floating point errors... float men = 1.0, women = 1.0, equality = -1000.0; while(equality != 0){ equality *= men/women; affirmativeAction(equality, &men, &women); } Chances are that loop is gonna run forever, no matter what affirmativeAction() does. The only chance to win is not to play that game at all. PS: Bonus shitlord points for me for declaring/initializing men before women. | /r/MensRights | 31/03/16 05:37 PM |
| 3 | Came across this when doing my uni work rights online course for engineering studentsRight is wrong, true is false... welcome to the age of Orwell. | /r/MensRights | 31/03/16 05:31 PM |
| 1 | Black student who attacked white student for his dreadlocks is under investigationAs I said the question is whether you want to stand on your principle (while they continue to stand on their idiocy) or if you want to convince someone. Both are completely valid motivations and I'd not be sure I'd make the effort of trying to convince someone in this case. But if you really do want to convince someone you first have to take their point seriously, no matter how silly (you know) it is. There is no way around that, as they will dismiss what you say at least as easily as you dismis… | /r/MensRights | 30/03/16 10:17 PM |
| 23 | Black student who attacked white student for his dreadlocks is under investigationI too disagree with the whole concept of cultural appropriation in general, but if you want to convince someone of your point you best do it on their own terrain, so they can follow you back out of it. By showing them the idiocy of their idea through these historical facts you have a better (if still low) chance of convincing them than by just rejecting the whole concept at a glance. If they are not convinced that cultural appropriation is bullshit, they at least might think twice before they at… | /r/MensRights | 30/03/16 04:21 PM |
| 96 | Explaining how burden of proof works is "mansplaining".Well, she said the law was broken for women. If you as a man told the police she raped you, she'd be thankful there is something like burden of proof and presumption of innocence. That is not an oversight or cognitive dissonance but deliberate and conscious measuring by two standards. | /r/MensRights | 28/03/16 10:34 AM |
| 1 | Poll: Women Support the Idea of Women in the Military, But Not if They’re DraftedI am interested to learn more about this contention You might want to research it for yourself. I am from a nation where the right to vote wasn't conditional on anything since the country was founded after WW2 (Germany). We had compulsory conscription (for men) in Germany though, which was also enforced (suitable men had to go to boot camp for 3 months and serve at least 6 months) until a few years ago. I was conscripted myself but chose to go into civil service for 9 month instead. Even that ca… | /r/MensRights | 27/03/16 04:14 PM |
| 3 | Poll: Women Support the Idea of Women in the Military, But Not if They’re DraftedYeah, in shitty times and places men and women had/have it (more or less) equally shitty. But we are talking about the modern west where a clear inequality has to be corrected one or the other way. Either no-one is eligible for the draft (or equal responsibilities) or everyone is. Either voting comes with a condition for everyone, or it comes with a condition for nobody. | /r/MensRights | 25/03/16 12:36 AM |
| 2 | I was instabanned from /r/feminism for suggesting that Men's Rights also wants equalityHe didn't get banned because he isn't a feminist, for all they know he is one, he got banned because he didn't demonize the men's rights movement like a good feminist would. It's the same as when moderates/neutrals come here, asking us "why we can't all get along?". Then someone suggest to them asking the same in a feminist subreddit, they get banned and have got their answer. | /r/MensRights | 23/03/16 06:14 PM |
| 1 | What an awesome idea!At everyone down-voting him, what's wrong with criticizing chivalry? Chivalry and gynocentrism are responsible for most of the legal and systemic inequalities men face today in the first place. | /r/MensRights | 09/03/16 06:05 PM |
| 160 | Whoopi Goldberg on The View: "Women have this idea that you can hit and punch on a man and you will get away with it, these days are gone"Could you see it on their faces? The outrage about the heresy? Thousands of years of chivalry and gynocentrism challenged. | /r/MensRights | 06/03/16 08:41 AM |
| 4 | My Yoga Center Has A Huge Bathroom With A Couch And Coat Rack For Women. All Of The Other Bathrooms Are UnisexWhy would you put doorknobs to your ear? Is that some sort of fetish? | /r/MensRights | 06/03/16 06:44 AM |
| 1 | My personal challenge to anyone on this subreddit, meninists and feminists alike. I will PayPal anyone $5 who can give me a valid answerOK, I'm really surprised it didn't get banned there. | /r/MensRights | 06/03/16 05:48 AM |
| 1 | My personal challenge to anyone on this subreddit, meninists and feminists alike. I will PayPal anyone $5 who can give me a valid answerMay I ask where you posted it other than here? | /r/MensRights | 05/03/16 10:55 AM |
| 1 | Imagine if Marco Rubio had made a joke about a female candidate having inadequate genitalia.I agree. It's just the same as when feminist run out of arguments and use the "you have a small penis" or "you are angry because you can't get women" line. Just calmly say "So you have run out of arguments?" and quit the discussion. Something infantile and pointless like that should not even bother you. | /r/MensRights | 05/03/16 10:42 AM |
| 1 | On Milo YiannopoulosYou've also got Paul Elam and a few others of the AVFM guys who's charisma is debatable as well. But they are never getting invited to anything anyway. The thing is that without being a woman, a gay man or a transwoman/-man they will not let you speak. And even if you get to speak somewhere it is way too easy to attack you as a rape-apologist and the likes and destroy you in the public eye. This is why most politicians that are aware of the issues avoid the topic. On a side note this alone makes… | /r/MensRights | 05/03/16 10:30 AM |
| 2 | Swedish group wants 'legal abortions' for men - The LocalIt could be easy: -If a woman gets pregnant without both parents wanting a child both parents have the right to still opt out at that point. The woman may still have the child but the man is not financially responsible if he does not want to be. If he or she decides to be responsible they have committed to it and can no longer opt-out. -If you decide to have a child before the woman becomes pregnant, nobody gets to opt-out, including women. The pregnancy has then be carried to term. -This can be… | /r/MensRights | 05/03/16 10:21 AM |
| 6 | Milo Quizzes White House Press Secretary On Free SpeechNo you're not. I personally don't like him at all at a human level. He sometimes makes good arguments, other times not so much. But that's it. I really don't get why he's that big of a deal. Perhaps because he is gay feminists are forced by their ideology to listen to him and then have to scream him down for heresy instead of just excluding him from debates like they do with straight cis-males. | /r/MensRights | 05/03/16 10:07 AM |
| 4 | That seems fair.people who want to have their cake and eat it, too. This should be the real dictionary definition of feminism. | /r/MensRights | 05/03/16 09:01 AM |
| 4 | That seems fair.That is however expecting reciprocation at some point. For example you can have a sort of poor friend that helps you out a lot at work in the garden etc. and as a thank you, you invite him out to a meal. Or whatever reciprocation is worth it to you (and if it's just to see someone smile), but to /u/Madlutian it's obviously not worth it or else he wouldn't complain about it. | /r/MensRights | 05/03/16 08:54 AM |
| 9 | That seems fair.In my opinion it doesn't matter where your illness comes from (even if it was, let's say, psychosomatic) but if you do not feel able to work you should not work. It's your responsibility to do everything to get better and it's the companies responsibility to give you the time to do that (within reason). But then I am only a German, as which I enjoy quasi-unlimited sick-leave which does not need to be justified to the employer (only to a doctor), so that's an easy opinion to hold for me. American… | /r/MensRights | 05/03/16 08:46 AM |
| 1 | That's rich... women decline to date men who earn less - however good lookingThat is just what I said. But what you describe is not Men's Rights Activism but a choice for your personal conduct of your private life. If it were to become activism you would demand others to behave the same or perhaps laws that will make the behavior of these women illegal. And that would make you an SJW. Legal change belongs in activism, social change in your private life. It's that easy. Don't try to change people, either change the laws if they are unequal (activism) or change yourself (p… | /r/MensRights | 29/02/16 06:23 PM |
| 1 | When is men's day and my free skiing?Can you please clarify what you mean by it being the same (as what)? I clearly see a ladies' day and a men's day. One might even argue that Friday (Men's day) is a better weekday than Monday,(Ladies' day) but that would be nitpicking. Is there an issue with that advert I am not aware off? | /r/MensRights | 28/02/16 09:08 PM |
| 0 | That's rich... women decline to date men who earn less - however good lookingAnd I completely agree with what you're saying, just not in this context of men's rights. I disagree on that it is a men's rights issue in the way that I disagree most "issues" feminism is attacking are women's rights issues. These are issues that men should be aware for their private lifes, but you can't force people to stop being assholes. You just can stop associating with assholes. The moment you make this a part of activism you are committing the same mistake most feminists do when they mak… | /r/MensRights | 28/02/16 05:11 PM |
| 1 | When is men's day and my free skiing?When I went skiing last week (Austrian Alps, Kitzbühel) they had a women's day as well as a men's day (only cheaper, not free) every week. Sadly it was the day I departed so I couldn't use it. So it's not that bad everywhere and as others have pointed out, it should be illegal already. | /r/MensRights | 28/02/16 03:16 PM |
| 12 | That's rich... women decline to date men who earn less - however good lookingHow is this about Men's Rights? Don't get me wrong, as a MGTOW I appreciate the awareness you are trying to spread but MGTOW (or PUA, /r/TheRedPill etc.) is a philosophy you decide for yourself and a choice for your private life. It's not something that should be part of activism. This sub is about bringing about necessary societal changes and legal issues men face in our society. If you try to make laws against "bad picky entitled women" you'll end up just like feminists or other SJWs. | /r/MensRights | 28/02/16 03:03 PM |
| 2 | Feminism Tell the TruthFeminism is absolutely recognizing the facts. Only it's still a problem that needs to be fixed in their eyes. They don't think that the reason is personal choice but that the patriarchy is forcing women to make these choices. This is reflected by their "solutions" to attract more women into high paying fields by lowering the requirements for women and to force employers to pay more to women in less paying fields. And no statistic in the world will get feminists to stop denying women the agency t… | /r/MensRights | 27/02/16 11:15 AM |
| 2 | "Women write better code, study suggests". - BBC report on UNPUBLISHED and NON-PEER REVIEWED study suggesting female inherent superiority...I would imagine that it pisses off a lot of women who got to where they are by their own accomplishment. I know it would piss me off when I'd work hard for something and someone came waltzing in, demanding it for themselves out of pure entitlement. In fact the study even seems to reflect that. It shows that women where harder on other women than on men while men where harder on other men than on women. The guys who made that study even where pretty open about that fact, mentioning it in the comm… | /r/MensRights | 15/02/16 08:29 PM |
| 1 | "Women write better code, study suggests". - BBC report on UNPUBLISHED and NON-PEER REVIEWED study suggesting female inherent superiority...It's a bit sad how thoroughly you have to cover your bases these days... | /r/MensRights | 15/02/16 06:21 PM |
| 2 | "Women write better code, study suggests". - BBC report on UNPUBLISHED and NON-PEER REVIEWED study suggesting female inherent superiority...You should cover your bases though and still give her constructive feedback no matter how much she flips out afterwards. In a discussion with management about it you can then pull out that fact and she'll be the one explaining her conduct. | /r/MensRights | 14/02/16 08:10 PM |
| 4 | Two great women trying to bring mens rights to Alabama.I don't know its such a tough issue to debate. It is, though. It is a huge infringement on personal and human rights where a middle-ground has to be found that is fair for everyone. There is no one obvious reason to be found by pure logic, but it has to be carefully weighed and balanced. I don't believe either that a father should have any right to force an abortion but that's not what the link suggests. It rather suggests that fathers should have the right to financial abortion (i.e. rejecting … | /r/MensRights | 07/02/16 06:46 PM |
| 3 | Found this on Huff. Post. 26 Lessons your son's future spouse will thank you for teaching him. #1. What the actual F?Naturally women really suck at engineering good men. All they can do is engineer subservient slaves whatever their intentions are in the first place. I cannot imagine how any woman that seriously tries something like make[ing] him the kind of man she'll love [her] for will end up with anything but at least one damaged husk of a human being. PS: Please also note the subtle difference between 'making him the kind of man she'll love' and 'making him the kind of man she'll love her (the mother) for'… | /r/MensRights | 07/02/16 03:46 PM |
| 1 | Straight from the horse's mouth: Feminism isn't about equality.I love how she evaded answering the questions here (Paraphrasing). "Why shouldn't the sexes be equal when it comes to the draft?" "Well, first of all feminism is about the equality of all genders not just the sexes, hun!" "Uh... so?" "What do you mean, so?" "So what about all genders being equal when it comes to the draft?" "Wait a minute, I'm getting the details about a new definition of feminism just now from feminist headquarters... it turns out it really is about equality of the sexes after … | /r/MensRights | 04/02/16 06:16 PM |
| 1 | Woman Who Recorded Herself Raping 1-Year-Old Son Will Not Go To JailOk, I give you that and I know where the assumption comes from. But equally for me it seems quite strange that such a short-sighted measure is expected as a given when it's actually the exception even in far less "free" countries. | /r/MensRights | 31/01/16 03:28 PM |
| -5 | Woman Who Recorded Herself Raping 1-Year-Old Son Will Not Go To JailIf I wanted to be cynical I would call UK or even Germany a colony of the US because of the immense political influence the USA wields over them. If the US asks to jump (into the iraq war for example) they usually just ask how high. Canada, Australia and New Sealand would probably count as well because of the cultural influence. The political culture in these countries moves slowly away in the same totalitarian direction as the US. Just look at the countries that have a sex offender registry and… | /r/MensRights | 31/01/16 03:25 PM |
| – | Woman Who Recorded Herself Raping 1-Year-Old Son Will Not Go To JailAFAIK New Zealand does not even have a sex offender registry. Welcome dear american to another episode of "what the rest of the world does different than you (and your colonies)". Last time we were talking about how people that are 17 years and 364 days old are not considered children basically everywere except the USA. Today we will go into the horrible thought of a "sex offender registry" some form of revival of the medieval custom of pillory where people get their lives destroyed for sleeping… | /r/MensRights | 31/01/16 10:56 AM |
| 6 | Adult woman who pretended to be 15 so she could groom boys as young as 10 is called a "sexual danger to children" but spared jailSo it's locking them away for men and (doubtful) reformation for women? Seems totally fair. (Aside from the other inequalities like what a women can do before she is seen a sexual predator, when all a male photographer has to do for someone to call the cops on him is be in a park while carrying a camera.) | /r/MensRights | 30/01/16 09:42 AM |
| 4 | The huge privileges of being born femaleWell, I'm not sure if he meant that, but there are studies that show that women have a greater in-group bias in almost all situation, meaning that women unlike men will automatically tend to side with other women. See this abstract of a study (I sadly cannot provide a link to the whole thing): https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15491274 In my opinion this is the explanation why women assume there is some great conspiracy of all men against them. It's projection because that's what they would do… | /r/MensRights | 12/01/16 08:05 PM |
| 18 | Sanders: Law enforcement should handle campus rapeIt should of course be illegal to suspend someone before the investigation is concluded and it comes to a trial. Better yet, they should wait for the trial to be over. If said person is a sociopath police should rather take them into custody instead of the school throwing them out. | /r/MensRights | 12/01/16 06:56 PM |
| 1 | WSJ claims a majority of men are simply born as "supressive violent monsters, with destructive delirium"... WTF ! can we boycott buying WSJ from now on ?I think that is not what he is trying to say. You mean genetic influence as in the percentage of genes inherited which is of course always 50% from each parent. But I think he means the genetic "pressure" as in being the one who does the selection of the genes that get passed on. I think he was claiming that because the female genepool we all come from is larger than the male genepool women had more influence in deciding whose genes get passed on and are therefore more than equally responsible i… | /r/MensRights | 06/01/16 04:07 PM |
| 3 | WSJ claims a majority of men are simply born as "supressive violent monsters, with destructive delirium"... WTF ! can we boycott buying WSJ from now on ?Shortly after this incident the headmaster was forced to step down by the school board, because a feminist hatemob rallied by Konner occupied the offices and demanded his dismissal. They accused him of being a misogynist, raping 20 Students per day and eating (female) babies without proof. Of course this was not taken to the police because they would have needed to see proof where his employer only needed the threat of bad publicity to fire him. After he apologized to all women in a press confer… | /r/MensRights | 06/01/16 03:42 PM |
| 1 | WSJ claims a majority of men are simply born as "supressive violent monsters, with destructive delirium"... WTF ! can we boycott buying WSJ from now on ?I'd agree with both of you though. 50% of every individual person's ancestors where female, but ~80% of all ancestors (=> People who passed on their genes) are female. | /r/MensRights | 06/01/16 03:07 PM |
| 2 | Feminism Appeals to Female Losers the Same Way that PUA Appeals to Male LosersI think I'm fine with hating the game, forgetting about it and living my life instead. | /r/MensRights | 06/01/16 02:53 PM |
| 1 | Divorce in the 21st centuryIsn't that what I tried to say? | /r/MensRights | 04/01/16 07:42 PM |
| 1 | Divorce in the 21st centuryOf course we had sympathy for each other and found each other attractive. But we weren't "in love" like everyone today expects as the pillar every relationship is built on. Actually I have only had that infatuation with women that were extremely destructive to me. It's a distraction from what really counts. | /r/MensRights | 04/01/16 06:57 PM |
| 1 | Divorce in the 21st centuryIt's not so much the lack of a spark that sucks, but the expectation that such a spark needs to be there. I just want to be comfortable around someone but in order to be successful I have to go out of my way to seem interesting and charming and whatnot. I'd have to play the game. A game I am no good at and a game that I despise. The next problem is that people who are dating, have been dating and probably have a lot of baggage. If you get used to have that spark (that you only have the ~4 first … | /r/MensRights | 04/01/16 06:34 PM |
| 1 | Divorce in the 21st centuryhe wouldn't put up with any bullshit Well, he's going to get married, so that's that. | /r/MensRights | 04/01/16 06:23 PM |
| -1 | Divorce in the 21st centuryIt's even worse than normal "dating". The "cool women" are probably just bots from the site provider. And the crazy women get spoiled by tons of desperate men to select from. If they even notice you, by that time they have such twisted expectations that you would have to bend backwards to fulfill them. In the end you put yourself in the same cruel game of gynocentrism/narcissism that you have just barely escaped from with nothing but your life (in the case of OPs comic). There are plenty great w… | /r/MensRights | 04/01/16 05:35 PM |
| -10 | Divorce in the 21st centuryI am very capable of releasing my emotions, thank you. On the other hand I see lots of people that have to use violence or need to scream their way through life often being quite miserable. Emotional diarrhea is just as bad as "bottling up" emotions. Learn to get to the bottom of things and solve issues rather than uncontrollably shitting your emotions on the rest of the world. | /r/MensRights | 04/01/16 05:12 PM |
| – | Divorce in the 21st centuryIf someone suggested online dating to me in that situation I'd punch him right in the face... and I am normally an absolute pacifist. | /r/MensRights | 04/01/16 02:57 PM |
| 176 | The Wage Gap is realOf course the wage gap is real. But even if/where it is 75%, it is most definitely not a problem. It is already illegal to pay a woman less than a man for the same work in every western country so the wage gap comes down to life choices and career drive. I can understand that very well, because even though I am a man I am not the career type and prefer to work less time for less money and enjoy my life instead. Statistics though show that these are choices more common in women than men. That alo… | /r/MensRights | 03/01/16 09:42 PM |
| 2 | Guess Who Wasn’t Raped Last Year?If it ends in a conviction and you live in the US, it most definitely is. You almost certainly will be raped in prison, be a social outcast for live, never get a good job again, lose several years of life, lose your job, your family, your apartment, etc. | /r/MensRights | 03/01/16 08:56 PM |
| 1 | An orgasm a day could keep prostate cancer away, scientists claim Study finds participants who ejaculated more than 21 times a month were at a 22 percent lower risk of getting the disease.People are different. It might help for some but for different reasons what is celebrated (or dare I say circle-jerked) in /r/NoFap. I know that I had a phase in life where I had a very troubled sexuality and masturbating made me very depressed afterwards. But the key was not stopping to masturbate but getting my sexuality sorted out. | /r/MensRights | 30/12/15 03:05 PM |
| 3 | How late can a man remain a virgin before you assume he has some sort of major defect?That to me isn't something wrong with him I had to scroll down a whole lot for someone to get it. The fault lies with gynocentrism even making this an issue. There is no objective reason this should matter to anyone. And if it wouldn't these people would not descend into depressions in the first place. But at that point a man basically still has three choices. Stop giving a fuck about female validation (MGTOW), make attaining female validation your raison d'etre (/r/TheRedPill) or becoming more … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 30/12/15 02:58 PM |
| 1 | Serious Crime Bill change will target men who 'emotionally bully' wivesHow would any man not leave a woman (or throw her out) at the first time she says something like that? There is no acceptable reason whatsoever to be together with a person like that. | /r/MensRights | 30/12/15 02:27 PM |
| 2 | An orgasm a day could keep prostate cancer away, scientists claim Study finds participants who ejaculated more than 21 times a month were at a 22 percent lower risk of getting the disease.I agree that that can be a problem. I'd suggest different methods of coping though, for example getting a job. There are only so much ejaculations/erections you can manage after a busy work day. | /r/MensRights | 30/12/15 11:56 AM |
| 11 | An orgasm a day could keep prostate cancer away, scientists claim Study finds participants who ejaculated more than 21 times a month were at a 22 percent lower risk of getting the disease.I guess it would be enough to destigmatize male masturbation in general for a start. It is still seen as something only losers (who can't get women) do in their basements or creepy guys (who can't get women) in trenchcoats do in public. Like female masturbation male masturbation should be recognized as healthy and normal. I have a girlfriend and a satisfying sexual life, but I still masturbate regularly because it satisfies very different needs and I feel that I need both to be happy. Somehow th… | /r/MensRights | 30/12/15 12:36 AM |
| 15 | An orgasm a day could keep prostate cancer away, scientists claim Study finds participants who ejaculated more than 21 times a month were at a 22 percent lower risk of getting the disease.Masturbation is good for stabilizing hormone levels, better sleep, better mood, better concentration and now also keeps away prostate cancer. Meanwhile /r/NoFap still believe in the mystical power of the male mojo that gets lost when a man ejaculates and thus keeps them from instantly becoming multi-billionaires. | /r/MensRights | 30/12/15 12:27 AM |
| 9 | A short entertaining story: a feminist gone campingMost (if not all) young men from back when it was necessary to survive in the wild would not be able to maintain today's civilization... skill-sets evolved with civilization, what are you trying to say? | /r/MensRights | 29/12/15 12:49 PM |
| 12 | A short entertaining story: a feminist gone campingI like the fact that my girlfriend isn't screwed when these things happen. She usually tries to fix things (in her apartment) by herself before asking me for assistance. And if she really needs my assistance she is as grateful to me as I am to her for when I need her assistance (like yesterday when she brought me medicine and food because I'm sick). It's nice to be able to help each other out, while not being completely dependent on each other. | /r/MensRights | 29/12/15 12:45 PM |
| 1 | #If I were a boy - I'd be able to make choices about my own bodyit looks like that 98% success rate doesn't take into consideration the spermicide lube a lot of condoms use? I believe it does because real products are compared and every condom has that. Also I don't believe the minuscule amount of spermicide on the surface of condoms is all that effective anyway (spermicide in general isn't that effective, even in far larger quantities). But of course you're right they are better than nothing and (when the male is on top) can be used additionally to pulling … | /r/MensRights | 27/12/15 07:57 PM |
| 1 | #If I were a boy - I'd be able to make choices about my own bodyDid you look at my link? Even in a best-use scenario they are only twice as good as pulling out. In a typical-use scenario they are as bad as pulling out. And in one way or another the numbers don't even come close (2 vs ~0.1 to the numbers of the pill or permanent contraceptives women have at their disposal. | /r/MensRights | 27/12/15 11:09 AM |
| 8 | #If I were a boy - I'd be able to make choices about my own bodyForcing every country in the world draft women would probably end war as the "patriarchy" will want to protect it's poor and weak women from that horrible fate of having to serve in a war. But then again I bet there are countries who would be willing to go to war about not having to draft women... | /r/MensRights | 27/12/15 12:16 AM |
| 8 | #If I were a boy - I'd be able to make choices about my own bodyActually they aren't good at all, at least as a contraceptive. Of course they are the best thing available against STDs. But as a contraceptive they just suck... Their pearl index is closer to "coitus interruptus" (i.e. the pull-out method) than to the female pill or most of the other secure contraceptives women have at their disposal. | /r/MensRights | 27/12/15 12:06 AM |
| 2 | I'm tired of this shit...That's a bit of bullshit, what, were they afraid they would get an F otherwise? Yes, exactly that's what it could have been. Or possibly the other way around, the student fails by himself and the teacher offers to generously pass him/her for certain favors. That's only a minor detail away from blackmail. And because something like this is often very in-transparent from an objective viewpoint such a relationship should not be allowed in any case. At the very least it is hugely unprofessional. And… | /r/MensRights | 20/12/15 11:08 PM |
| 7 | I'm tired of this shit...As with every post of this sort I see I will point out the three aspects to consider with cases like this: A teacher is in a position of power over his students. This alone should make sexual relationships illegal completely independent of age, just like with superior officers in the military or political office. If they want to be in (sexual) relationship either the student or the teacher should transfer Another issue is whether there is a double standard between different genders of perpetrato… | /r/MensRights | 20/12/15 06:50 PM |
| 2 | Teenage boy dies shielding girls from gunfire- I think it's interesting to note the unthanked role men have of dying for women.It's not only men risking their lives to save women, men also do it for other men. There are countless instances where men jumped on the subway tracks to save people who have fallen down, no matter their gender. It'd be interesting to see if there are instances where women died protecting other women (again, not their daughters but other women). Also there might very well be feminists who will say this all is just because female bravery is frowned upon and not reported because of patriarchy. | /r/MensRights | 19/12/15 10:56 AM |
| 149 | "He said he wasn't enjoying it but he was. He loves older girls and likes sex full stop." - 21 year old babysitter who walked free after raping 11 year old boy still doesn't think she's done anything wrong, blames victimYou can discuss all day about what a fair sentence for a certain crime should be. But when your perpetrator can confess everything and still go out of the trial thinking they did nothing wrong, you know that something is pretty wrong with your justice system. | /r/MensRights | 20/11/15 06:35 PM |
| 1 | my letter to the CBCThat is exactly the reason why there are two axis on a semi-accurate political compass. left<->right and liberal<->authoritarian. If you really want to be accurate there are a lot of further distinctions to make between left and right. progressivism<->traditionalism, globalism<->nationalism, economical liberalism<->socialism etc. All things can be mixed and you will find examples for any combination in history. Which combination is "good" or "sane" is very subjective. I personally could consider… | /r/MensRights | 14/11/15 11:27 AM |
| 3 | A rare victory for my friend Doug.Great! Let's wait for the neighbors to inform the police that a strange old pedophile man is living alone with young girls. | /r/MensRights | 07/11/15 11:53 AM |
| 4 | Feminists are Trying To Shut Down A Documentary on Mens RightsMost of them will probably only realize it exists once it's out and then attack it without even watching it responding to the actual content. If they cared about the issues and what's really happening in the manosphere they'd all realize the same thing Cassie Jaye realized without even needing this movie. Ignorance and blind dismissal of reality is the only thing keeping feminism alive. | /r/MensRights | 01/11/15 05:37 PM |
| 25 | Feminists are Trying To Shut Down A Documentary on Mens RightsThis has been answered several times. When she started the movie a few years ago the "red pill" metaphor was quite common in the Men's Rights movement before /r/theredpill co-opted the term. She will not change it as this metaphor accurately describes her journey. I hope this Movie will seperate the term from /r/theredpill again so we can use this excellent metaphor again. | /r/MensRights | 01/11/15 05:32 PM |
| 6 | Boy writes letter asking judge to keep mom in prison: "Dear Judge Peeler, I feel that my mom should stay in prison because I seen her stab my dad clean through the heart with my sister in his arms."It is still manslaughter if it is committed in "rage of the moment". If she waited a day and then out of the blue stabbed him it would be second degree murder. | /r/MensRights | 31/10/15 12:52 PM |
| 6 | Boy writes letter asking judge to keep mom in prison: "Dear Judge Peeler, I feel that my mom should stay in prison because I seen her stab my dad clean through the heart with my sister in his arms."Well, for the US justice system I hope that a man would have gotten manslaughter as well instead of murder. It seemed that it was done in rage and not in cold blood and planned. It wouldn't be ok if it were self defense, which a good defense lawyer could probably work out for a poor women... | /r/MensRights | 31/10/15 09:53 AM |
| 2 | Ronda Rousey shuts down feminist reporter on female superhero objectificationI think this sub can differentiate between harmful mainstream feminism and individual feminists that have the right ideals. There currently is a sticky thread linking to the efforts of a feminist-made documentary about the men's rights movement. That documentary has now been funded mostly by MRAs because feminist organizations only would have funded it if they had been allowed to make it a propaganda piece against us. I've always been a supporter of conventional feminism, the idea that we're all… | /r/MensRights | 29/10/15 04:22 PM |
| 3 | Ronda Rousey shuts down feminist reporter on female superhero objectificationYou probably answered because you felt "your feminism" under attack by what I wrote about most feminists or mainstream feminists or those feminists in power. That however was unnecessary if you are not one of them. There are many individual feminists that are also egalitarians, advocate for women's and men's rights and free speech. What these individuals do is not diminished just because a very large part of the movement runs amok. | /r/MensRights | 29/10/15 04:04 PM |
| 22 | Ronda Rousey shuts down feminist reporter on female superhero objectificationMuch like feminism isn't all about whatever those blue-haired monstrosities marauding around Universities right now represent, or that all men involved in men's rights are not all misogynists who can never be self-aware. If that's all we want to see then that's all we will see. Sadly this is the face that feminism presents most prominently. In education, academia, politics and media there are almost no sane feminists. I like your perspective as a feminist, but you and like-minded feminists are n… | /r/MensRights | 29/10/15 08:21 AM |
| 1 | Feminist speaker at Oxford Union debate, opposing freedom of speech and right to offend, regrets it and manages to get her video deleted off the official Oxford Union YouTube channel.Well she did also state that she believed in a lot of those things but also strongly in the right of people to express contrary opinions. It was after all not a debate about oppression or feminism but free speech. And regarding that she had to take the opposing point of argument. She compared her true opinions to the free-speech advocating feminist (forgot the name) that came after her. | /r/MensRights | 28/10/15 12:23 PM |
| 3 | I wish everyone knew this already...let's not lie about the horridness of history. I won't and I already agreed that these times where shit by today's standards. And the thing is, these injustices happened to men as well, but men could complain, men could kick up a fuss I'd like you to show me a poor farm laborer during feudalism that had the right to complain and "kick up a fuss". And then I'd like you to look at Marie Antoinette telling the poor to "just eat cake". But let's not lie to ourselves and say women weren't once treate… | /r/MensRights | 28/10/15 11:32 AM |
| 6 | I wish everyone knew this already...I'd argue that women ever were second class citizens or oppressed in the way that blacks were during the US slavery or apartheid in South Africa. In traditionalist systems (call it patriarchy if you want) women are protected and cared for by men. Yes, they didn't have the same rights as men, but they also didn't have the same responsibilities and several privilges. And of course it is a good thing that these survival based traditionalist systems die out when they are no longer needed for surviva… | /r/MensRights | 28/10/15 10:14 AM |
| 2 | Sex Positive feminist is angry that hookup sex is so often bad sex, MUST BE THE PATRIARCHY!Almost all guys get off on penetration sex. Which does not necessarily mean it's enjoyable. I seriously can pass on sex that just "gets me off". It has to be worth the time, effort and mess. I'd rather watch porn, that gets me off too and is way more efficient. I (as a man) never had casual sex that was worth the effort, that's why I don't do it. In a relationship I have the opportunity to get to know a partners sexuality which makes it more pleasurable for her as well as for me. | /r/MensRights | 28/10/15 10:05 AM |
| 1 | "Women make the decision in the purchases of 94% of home furnishings…92% of vacations…91% of homes… 60% of automobiles…51% of consumer electronics"; "feel vastly underserved".30x30 Spongebob? | /r/MensRights | 28/10/15 09:52 AM |
| 1 | Please Don't Threaten My Son For Dating Your DaughterAnd rationalizing that young men have overwhelming urges that cloud their judgement and force them to make poor decisions regarding young women is nothing more than excusing bad behavior. No, that assumption is part of "consent education" and mostly held by feminists (as well as the "Boys will be boys" idiom). | /r/MensRights | 28/10/15 09:48 AM |
| 3 | Cassie Jay's "The Red Pill" documentary is now funded.Milo advocates for circumcision for the silliest of all reasons (aesthetics). He is too self-absorbed to see past his own bias as a homosexual. I would be ok if men that prefer the aesthetics make this decision for themselves once they are old enough to consent, but he explicitly argues about why parents should make that decision for their children and it sickens me. He also holds some traditionalist views that I would disagree on in other cases but that is the only one that really bugs me about… | /r/MensRights | 28/10/15 09:30 AM |
| 3 | Feminist speaker at Oxford Union debate, opposing freedom of speech and right to offend, regrets it and manages to get her video deleted off the official Oxford Union YouTube channel.It's just debating... Hell, I was once "forced" to advocate in favor of FIFA in a debate, probably the most corrupt and outright evil organisation on the planet. And I made it just as convincing as she made her advocacy against free speech. | /r/MensRights | 28/10/15 09:17 AM |
| 3 | Feminist speaker at Oxford Union debate, opposing freedom of speech and right to offend, regrets it and manages to get her video deleted off the official Oxford Union YouTube channel.It is not as dubious as it sounds. These things happen a lot at Oxford union debating society or even any debating society. People have to (convincingly) argue points they are not or only partially in favor. She also had friendly contact with MRAs or skeptics who critiqued her videos in order to explain her reasoning. She didn't even demand that they take down their videos but only asked them to explain her real views to their audiences. If she had only retracted her statements because of the ba… | /r/MensRights | 28/10/15 09:15 AM |
| 7 | Cassie Jay's "The Red Pill" documentary is now funded.I am neither a fan of Breitbart, nor of Milo (for different reasons) but you have to acknowledge the reach they get. | /r/MensRights | 28/10/15 09:04 AM |
| 10 | I wish everyone knew this already...To be fair, there is a stream of feminism (choice feminism as advocated by for example Christina Hoff Summers) that is about fairness. But most of mainstream feminism is not about equality or fairness but (moral, political and economical) supremacy. This is absolutely obvious as these feminists are the ones that write articles in mainstream media, go to UN conferences, influence politics, while the aforementioned choice-feminists get harassed and threatened by self-proclaimed "real feminists". I… | /r/MensRights | 28/10/15 08:53 AM |
| 2 | "The Red Pill" director Cassie Jaye gives Kickstarter update, along with new stretch goal!project page claim that Kickstarter actually allows "self-pledging" after the original monetary goal is met. Does anyone know is that's true? I don't know if it is but it certainly makes sense. Self-pledging is forbidden so the project leaders can't "push a project over the edge" last second to get access to the money from the other backers (for example using short-term loans). The goal is the money you absolutely need. It is reasonable to kickstarter to assume that if you have reached your goal… | /r/MensRights | 28/10/15 08:33 AM |
| 2 | Feminist anti-rape activist whines about men frightened of dating herAnd he'd probably gladly go to jail thinking he deserved it. Whatever floats his boat... | /r/MensRights | 27/10/15 02:58 PM |
| 12 | Feminist anti-rape activist whines about men frightened of dating herWell, she can probably hook up with this guy. There should be enough masochism in him to make it work. | /r/MensRights | 27/10/15 11:27 AM |
| 4 | 16 Days Left in the KickStarter for "The Red Pill". Let's show we can take part in some actual activism and not just post stuff in here, which, while advocacy is important, so is taking action such as this.I understand this decision as well, I like the name and I got behind it by backing the kickstarter. However I think it will put off a lot of people and it will be the reason if it does not get funded, which would be quite sad. | /r/MensRights | 26/10/15 12:22 PM |
| 4 | Laughing Witch finally apologises to thunderf00tI do not agree with people lashing out at her in revenge, but I can certainly understand them. And I'd understand it if that silly and insincere apology will not stop anyone from ruining her business. | /r/MensRights | 26/10/15 12:17 PM |
| 29 | What the hell is this about? [OC]White knights just don't cut it anymore with all the misogyny, sexism and racism. What we needed was a gender-jesus. A straight white cis-gendered male that dies for all our sinful privilege and absolves us from all the rape-apology, manspreading and mansplaining. Join the church of the gender-jesus! He has apologized for all of us and died for our sins! | /r/MensRights | 26/10/15 12:04 PM |
| 1 | Father speaks out after college-athlete son cleared of rape: ‘How many young men have to have their lives destroyed?’As others pointed out this is not likely to happen. A better way to tackle this problem is to advocate for harsher punishments of women who make false accusations. I bet there are a few prosecutors in every country who do not take kindly to their time being wasted, even if it is by poor oppressed womyn they normally would protect. Maybe it would be a good idea to write to the local prosecutor's office whenever a case like that happens in the area? | /r/MensRights | 20/10/15 10:21 AM |
| 1 | Karen Straughan to deliver speech on "toxic femininity" at SJW hotbed Simon Fraser University in VancouverNot that they are above calling in a bomb threat or similar to disrupt a talk or conference. That's what they did on the SPJ Airplay event (which wasn't even about them, at all). | /r/MensRights | 18/10/15 11:18 AM |
| 4 | Where was my "male privilege" when...Where was my male privilege when my life planning was interrupted by being forced by the state to either do military or civil service for nine months while all my female colleagues went ahead with their lives. When that happened my application for university was voided and I had to reapply once I had finished. And while the draft law in my country is currently on hold it still is in place for when we need it and should a war break out as someone who chose civil service I can be commandeered to s… | /r/MensRights | 14/10/15 07:20 AM |
| 13 | Feminists: Men Need Consent to Say Hi to WomenEven in that game the female protagonist has internalized misogyny and can still kill women while in reality women are incapable of violence unless forced to by male oppression. The game and main characters are all written by misogynistic men in a patriarchal male dominated studio and reflect a distorted, racist and deeply misogynistic reality. So it is still problematic for you to play it, at least without proper feminist supervision. Are you advocating for violence against women or why are you… | /r/MensRights | 13/10/15 06:37 AM |
| 16 | Feminists: Men Need Consent to Say Hi to WomenIt's always nice to see men responding in such a reasonable way to these suggestions. There is always room for improvement with men and I am happy that you agree in that regard. I have to disagree about the problematic reference to the "assassin's creed" video game which you should know is deeply misogynistic as you can kill women in it. You might get the suggested non-violent and passive walking confused with the woman-killing as you, like other men, probably lack a sense for morality, so it mi… | /r/MensRights | 13/10/15 06:12 AM |
| 36 | Feminists: Men Need Consent to Say Hi to WomenDid you just advocate for perpetrating stare-rape you misogynistic scumbag? Don't you realize that you demanding attention from a woman, either by looking or speaking to her, is male entitlement? Check your privilege please. If you want to be a good ally or at least a decent human being you should always walk face down when outside, only looking slightly up at times to avoid walking against most obstacles. And most of all never speak to or look at women first! Consent is given, never demanded, s… | /r/MensRights | 13/10/15 05:47 AM |
| 8 | Schoolboy seduced by teaching assistant disgusted as she is spared jailAgain, as I have to point out with every case like this (no matter if the perpetrator was male or female) there are three separate things to consider here. Abuse of power. A teacher has power over his students and their future and should not be allowed to have any romantic or sexual relationships with them. This would not be a problem if either the teacher or the student changes schools. But on its own this is already enough to ban someone from teaching for life in my opinion (if it can be consi… | /r/MensRights | 02/10/15 08:33 PM |
| 1 | Man on /r/relationships accosted for breaking up with gold digging girlfriendI really want to believe that guy isn't an asshole. Why would you want to believe that? He is an asshole. She is one too. It's not on the guy to not get seduced by this girl. It's like we're ignoring the fact that she's hot and able to seduce him, and just blaming him for ever thinking of dating a woman "for her looks". I really don't know what you are going on about. Are you saying that it's not his responsibility because men can't control themselves when girls are hot? o.O This is nothing you … | /r/MensRights | 22/09/15 03:30 PM |
| 2 | Man on /r/relationships accosted for breaking up with gold digging girlfriendnovice_at_life said "far more interested in her appearance" not "hated her on an emotional level"... that these things are synonymous in your mind says a lot about your reasoning skills. And his conclusion was also spot on. The OP even stated that there was not much common ground between them apart from what his dick had to say about her... that in it self is the definition of a shallow person and enough for such a shallow person to be a "nice" guy as long as it takes. Furthermore hypocrisy fits… | /r/MensRights | 22/09/15 04:50 AM |
| 0 | Man on /r/relationships accosted for breaking up with gold digging girlfriendAs a MGTOW I will not often agree with things people in /r/relationships say, but in this instance most of them are right. He was shallow, she was shallow, fucking surprise how it turned out. | /r/MensRights | 22/09/15 04:35 AM |
| -20 | Good News. The guy who hooked up with a girl who lied about her age has been removed from the sex offenders registry.No, it implies he was a "sex offender that is registered", as opposed to one that is not registered. What you are describing would be spelled out "sex offender registree". Notice the different order of nouns. The part that counts comes last. | /r/MensRights | 20/09/15 01:33 PM |
| -14 | Good News. The guy who hooked up with a girl who lied about her age has been removed from the sex offenders registry.Which implies he was a sex offender, which he actually never was. One or the other way that sentence is wrong. A neutral way of saying what you mean would have been "XY, formerly registered as a sex offender", but that's just me, not even a native speaker. | /r/MensRights | 20/09/15 01:23 PM |
| 9 | True equality in mainstream.The problem is twofold in situations like this. One aspect is the abuse of power by a teacher (of any gender) and another is the double standards reducing punishment for female adults and rapists. Age is a different matter and not necessarily the problem here. There exist several different ideas of when a young person should be allowed to have sexual relations (age of consent). US America's idea of "by the age of 18 and not one second younger" is... let's just say on the more conservative end of… | /r/MensRights | 10/09/15 10:56 AM |
| 2 | Reddit: It's good that the #1 cause of death for men is suicideOk, I could accept that point. But only if these people also agree that there is even less danger for women as well. If UK is safe for men it is even safer for women. No ifs no buts. | /r/MensRights | 06/09/15 10:18 AM |
| 1 | Female TSA agents target attractive men for sexual assaultIt says a lot about TSA and body scanners though. They told everyone something like that could never be abused by their great personnel. Thanks america for that crap. USA: Making flying shit for the whole world since 2001. | /r/MensRights | 05/09/15 06:20 AM |
| 5 | Julie Bindel on men: 'I would actually put them all in some kind of camp'I don't see many people in this thread taking it as a serious threat. | /r/MensRights | 04/09/15 05:01 PM |
| 12 | Julie Bindel on men: 'I would actually put them all in some kind of camp'The logistics would probably be difficult. All those portable safe-spaces and play-doh and finger-painting equipment that army would have to carry around. | /r/MensRights | 04/09/15 04:59 PM |
| 8 | Julie Bindel on men: 'I would actually put them all in some kind of camp'Don't you know that sexual dimorphism is a social construct? Once we have weakened men by teaching them to express their emotions and have produced enough emotionally dead radfem weight lifters victory will surely be ours! | /r/MensRights | 04/09/15 04:48 PM |
| 20 | Male privilegesThat actually makes sense if you think about it. Men are more likely not to hit back after an aggression because they know "you don't hit women". Women will have less qualms about hitting back because they know society will accept it and even shame the man for being at the receiving end. | /r/MensRights | 04/09/15 04:37 PM |
| 1 | feminist says freedom of speech is censorship (video) Oxford university debateIt says half. The face of the girl behind him says the rest. | /r/MensRights | 04/09/15 12:00 PM |
| 1 | Another UK gym offering a genitalia discount. Full monthly price £38, Ladies price £29.But we are against that authoritarian approach, aren't we? Why would you want to retaliate in kind? They force me, so I force them. Seems like an unhealthy spiral to me. | /r/MensRights | 03/09/15 04:15 PM |
| -1 | Another UK gym offering a genitalia discount. Full monthly price £38, Ladies price £29.That is one aspect. And some barbershops will charge a women the same amount for the same short hair haircut that men want. But others wont. Because women want special care beyond the quantifiable service. they want a hair-dresser they trust and feel comfortable with, they can gossip with etc.. And they will pay extra for it, even if some other shop charges them the same low price as men. Most men wouldn't just pay that additional price. For men prices for haircuts must be competitive and they w… | /r/MensRights | 03/09/15 04:12 PM |
| -4 | Another UK gym offering a genitalia discount. Full monthly price £38, Ladies price £29.I don't think this is an issue. It would be, if it were a public gym at a college or something. But this is a private business and they have the freedom to set their own prices. It's like with dancing schools or haircuts being cheaper for men. It's basic supply and demand. And if you do not like this price policy, vote with your wallet and go somewhere else. | /r/MensRights | 03/09/15 02:41 PM |
| 1 | Feminist thinks we support child marriage, women being unable to drive, female circumcision, and child sex slaveryI have it from this girlwriteswhat video. It also goes into another "feminist issue", the ban on work for women under taliban rule which feminists similarly misinterpret. But I cannot seem to find further sources what the legal situation is like. | /r/MensRights | 02/09/15 06:26 AM |
| 2 | Feminist thinks we support child marriage, women being unable to drive, female circumcision, and child sex slaveryIt might be in some way patriarchal, but not "patriarchy!11!" as per the feminist definition. In a system like this (or basically any traditionalist system either in the west or the east) women are not infantilized but protected. They benefit hugely from this. They do not have less rights but actually more rights plus less duties. Mind that (at least in china) responsibility is not forbidden, it is optional for women but mandatory for men. They can work, they can have property, they can even car… | /r/MensRights | 02/09/15 05:55 AM |
| 23 | Feminist thinks we support child marriage, women being unable to drive, female circumcision, and child sex slaveryExactly, it's in the way they go about these problems and the assumptions they make about their reasons. One example of this is the abortion of female babies in china. Feminists (naturally) claim it's about patriarchy and a disrespect for female lives. That is completely wrong though and the situation is of a far more pragmatic nature. Females do not have any legal obligation to care for their parents in china. In fact, the opposite is true, parents have a responsibility for their daughters outc… | /r/MensRights | 01/09/15 11:50 AM |
| 3 | Students will be marked down if they write ‘mankind’ in North Carolina State women’s studies classA vague idea of an explanation comes when you look at what happened to the terms 'boy' and 'girl' around the same time. At that time both were ungendered as well, where 'girl' meant 'child' and 'boy' meant 'servant' (try garcon in french, where the same thing happened). Somehow they decided that female children were just general persons, while male children where closer to servants. Once a boy graduates to a man he seems to become the more general person while the 'girl' becomes the 'woman', a g… | /r/MensRights | 01/09/15 05:18 AM |
| 1 | Sorry, ladies, there really is a man shortage | New York PostThe desire to make the "best catch" in these superficial conditions will make you blind for the things that count for a healthy and long lasting companionship. Of course, by chance you can have it all in a partner, if you are very very lucky. But lucky is not where we are, realistically. Where we are is at an all time high of divorce rates and an all time high of unhappiness of couples. Beauty and handsomeness can disappear really quickly and wealth can hit rough patches. And if that's what held… | /r/MensRights | 01/09/15 04:58 AM |
| 2 | Amazing Atheist and Sargon of Akkad ; Is Drunk Sex Rape?But having to suffer consequences from your actions is against equality of outcome. | /r/MensRights | 31/08/15 03:55 PM |
| 1 | Sorry, ladies, there really is a man shortage | New York PostThe question is whether you want the women to secure (as in trap) a "catch", in which case i agree, the advice is sound. Or whether you want them to have healthy long-lasting relationships in which case the presented advice is not nearly enough and even largely counter-productive. In that latter case you would need to make them stop wanting catches/utilities instead of human beings, which is doubtful to happen in the current social and political climate. | /r/MensRights | 31/08/15 11:27 AM |
| 2 | Saw this gem today. News to me that men can "back out"Right. I hope. ;) | /r/MensRights | 29/08/15 06:17 AM |
| 3 | Saw this gem today. News to me that men can "back out"The squeaky wheel gets the grease. It is a consequence of limited resources that we care for where the situation seems to be worst first. Often we do not check correctly if that is where the situation really is worst or if it's only our instincts that tell us it is. And we're dealing with pretty strong instincts here. Some of the strongest we have, which makes them the hardest to give up. I don't know if it's a proverb in English, but what I've got for you is "The steady drop hollows the stone."… | /r/MensRights | 28/08/15 03:31 AM |
| 3 | Saw this gem today. News to me that men can "back out"All we can do is talk about it and hopefully more an more people will see reason. Lay out the arguments as rationally as possible. That will hopefully speak to a large portion of men and at least some part of women. Our advantage is that rationality, data and knowledge are on our side, not theirs. That has to count for something. But maybe I am too optimistic. | /r/MensRights | 28/08/15 03:03 AM |
| 8 | The single most humiliating moment in Jessica Valenti’s public lifeIve never understood once how Valenti - a professionally vacuous and mindless harpy - was ever taken seriously. Why do kids love cartoons... McElroy came across as a serious adult figure ...instead of documentaries? Valenti (like all the other "internet feminists") speaks to a crowd of immature midtwenties that never actually grew up. It's like the Peter Pan syndrome for women. She promises them that they never have to grow up ever, and they love her for it. | /r/MensRights | 28/08/15 02:58 AM |
| 29 | Saw this gem today. News to me that men can "back out"It should be the default, really. Like with many things consent to have a child should be an opt-in not an opt-out. No matter the gender, if you choose to have a child you should not be able to back out that easily (that includes abortion of a child a woman agreed to have with her partner). But on the other hand if you didn't choose to have one there should not be a default obligation to provide for it. All this could be comfortably dealt with together with all the other legal stuff at the birth… | /r/MensRights | 28/08/15 02:23 AM |
| 14 | Saw this gem today. News to me that men can "back out"Or a utility. "his body, her right." | /r/MensRights | 28/08/15 01:51 AM |
| 12 | This is how Mary P. Koss, one of the most prominent feminist researchers in the field of sexual violence in the United States, feels about male rape victims.I was wondering when I read these things... If someone forces a "boobjob" on a girl or generally rubs himself at her, possibly ejaculating on her, I am almost sure it'll be tried as rape, while no penetration was involved. But hell... as if double standards are new to these people. Does anyone know of such a case? | /r/MensRights | 23/08/15 08:33 PM |
| 15 | This is how Mary P. Koss, one of the most prominent feminist researchers in the field of sexual violence in the United States, feels about male rape victims.Anxiety often leads to the opposite... except if you have anxiety because you do not want to get aroused in an unsuitable moment (for example at the pool), then it will happen for sure. But seriously, all kinds of reasons. The most horrible example because the man is drugged. But not even that would constitute it rape for these people. Also I read that even some paralyzed people can get erections. They wouldn't even feel it but if the penis is touched in the right way it will do it completely by… | /r/MensRights | 23/08/15 08:29 PM |
| 5 | Two Female Teachers Busted On A Threesome With A 16-Year-Old Male Student: Prosecutors Still Cannot Make Up Their Minds Whether They Will Face ChargesThis is not about age. This is not about wether it was consensual or not. This is about two things: Abuse of power. When you have power over someones future like a teacher has over a student a sexual relationship is just not an option. Let the teacher resign or the student change schools and there wouldn't be any problem with it. Double standards. You either punish both genders equally hard or equally soft. If your judges cannot be trusted to not be whiteknights then get different judges or impl… | /r/MensRights | 23/08/15 11:30 AM |
| 3 | Sexism in a nutshell [2]I never understood that trend. The hipster men that are currently fashionable look like styled and dressed up spiders in those narrow trousers. I was always made fun of by girls anyway since puberty for my hairy and muscular legs and my darker skin, but now I realize that they are actually one of my best features. Just that they are not fashionable currently. My girlfriend does not give a crap about fashion and loves my legs, especially in shorts. I also don't give a fuck about what other women … | /r/MensRights | 20/08/15 03:58 AM |
| 3 | Girlfriend lights boyfriend's dick on fire while he sleeps to get revenge for alleged cheating. Horrifying act of domestic violence, but not a single website reports it as such.Either because you are insane, because you live in a place where people will celebrate you for it or both. | /r/MensRights | 18/08/15 04:45 PM |
| 11 | Gender gap widens as women graduates outpace the men (63%:37%)While probably true, you've got to appreciate the doublethink. Or the "triplethink" if you include the subsequent whining about having bad job prospects with their worthles gender studies and sociology degrees. | /r/MensRights | 17/08/15 05:15 PM |
| 20 | Sweden, where 60% of university students are women, abolished their affirmative action program because it helped men over women.Interesting in the way that you'll find yourself convicted of rape for looking at some entitled Swedish princess in the wrong way? | /r/MensRights | 17/08/15 01:15 AM |
| 1 | A mother who left her sick, three-month-old baby alone to die while she had a whiskey fuelled sex marathon with a man she met at a bus stop has avoided jail.Ah, thanks. Very interesting. | /r/MensRights | 16/08/15 05:01 PM |
| 2 | A mother who left her sick, three-month-old baby alone to die while she had a whiskey fuelled sex marathon with a man she met at a bus stop has avoided jail.And what you'd get would probably be feminist judges that would see through it, find her guilty and still let her off easy because vagina. (women have a much larger in-group bias than men, they actually tend to conspire together against men and by projecting this mechanism on men they expect their mystical patriarchy to work that way too) | /r/MensRights | 15/08/15 02:16 PM |
| 1 | Why I Resent the Term "Alimony" | But Love the MoneyIt is not men's responsibility to "just trust them" (i.e. all men/all women), it's a humans responsibility to find out which humans to trust and which not. Only in absolutes and generalizations you deal my friend, to the dark side this will lead you. | /r/MensRights | 09/08/15 06:25 AM |
| 7 | Marriage in the 21st century (cartoon)This is marriage in the beginning of the 21st century. Give it a decade and you'll only need one panel. | /r/MensRights | 09/08/15 06:20 AM |
| 3 | Why I Resent the Term "Alimony" | But Love the MoneyWell, if you get to that point of discussion with a woman there is either already mutual trust, or whoever brought it up is clingy and crazy. When I discussed it with my girlfriend for the first time I trusted her completely. If trust were the only issue I could have proposed then and there. But there just isn't any reason to hand her a weapon labeled "use this to destroy me". That would not be trust that would be insanely stupid. People change, influences on people change and there aren't even … | /r/MensRights | 08/08/15 01:21 PM |
| 2 | "Why Do So Many Of Canada’s Women Columnists Write Like They Hate Women?"and uncovering any and all reasons why it may not have been his fault Well, if they need uncovering, then clearly the cases need more attention than you, or the Canadian courts are giving them. Whatever happened to seeing all sides first and then deciding? | /r/MensRights | 07/08/15 11:09 PM |
| 9 | Why I Resent the Term "Alimony" | But Love the MoneyI find it funny how when you point to the political climate and refuse to marry because of it, many women will regard it as an issue of not trusting them. It has nothing to do with trust. It is about being rational and taking precautions, just like a prenup in the case of a marriage. And how much trust can there be to begin with if a woman cannot trust a man to stay with her without a marriage forcing him to do so ("cheaper to keep her")? I am so fucking happy to have a girlfriend who understand… | /r/MensRights | 07/08/15 10:56 PM |
| 5 | This actually happened to me last night. So I thought I would make a meme of my experience.Yeah... and this is a Men's Rights issue why exactly? Don't get me wrong, I am annoyed by gynocentrism as much as the next guy, but a post like this might be better suited for the MGTOW or redpill subreddit, depending on your personal philosophy (or unphilosophy in the case of redpill). Edit: Also look up the correct definition of "meme". People outside 4chan might not understand the definition you are using. Edit2: No hard feelings buddy, just my two cents. Carry on. | /r/MensRights | 05/08/15 10:59 PM |
| 8 | Obama calls for end to female genital mutilation in Africa while US has highest rates of male circumcisionSo basically just assertions without any backup studies from pediatricians from a culture that regards it as useful. Even the article itself largely mitigates the benefits if proper hygiene is present and protection against STDs are used. And what you can present (an article with pediatricians telling you something without presenting evidence to back it up) I can present as well for an opposing position: http://translate.google.com/translate?js=n&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http://www.bvkj.de/bvkj-news/pres… | /r/MensRights | 30/07/15 03:51 PM |
| 21 | Obama calls for end to female genital mutilation in Africa while US has highest rates of male circumcisionSo none? That's what I thought. | /r/MensRights | 30/07/15 02:59 PM |
| 13 | Obama calls for end to female genital mutilation in Africa while US has highest rates of male circumcisionName one and back up your claim. I dare you. | /r/MensRights | 30/07/15 02:36 PM |
| 13 | Obama calls for end to female genital mutilation in Africa while US has highest rates of male circumcisionThat is a lie. There are enough modern western countries that do not do it at all. If there were objective health benefits from performing MGM doctors for example here in germany would suggest it to parents, but they don't, at all. And it's really not like infections or irritations (or whatever those "health benefits" are) are more common here because of it. Why are there never any statistics for this claim? It should be fairly easy to do. What sort of filthy and unwashed person do you have to b… | /r/MensRights | 30/07/15 02:28 PM |
| 3 | 'Minions' Creator on why all Minions are male: “Seeing how dumb and stupid they often are, I just couldn’t imagine Minions being girls".Yes, of course. There are women who learn to take responsibility even as little girls. When you have good parents gender does not matter much for becoming a decent human being. | /r/MensRights | 19/07/15 06:20 AM |
| 78 | 'Minions' Creator on why all Minions are male: “Seeing how dumb and stupid they often are, I just couldn’t imagine Minions being girls".The female minions have wandered off and became feminists. Stupid caricatures of real people striving for world domination... it fits. | /r/MensRights | 18/07/15 08:07 PM |
| 21 | 'Minions' Creator on why all Minions are male: “Seeing how dumb and stupid they often are, I just couldn’t imagine Minions being girls".I think not. Boys will also ask for help, but society will teach girls to demand it! When boys learn that they can't always rely on others they will try to take responsibility and make it on their own. Girls will try to optimize their help gathering strategies to get more and better help faster. | /r/MensRights | 18/07/15 08:05 PM |
| 20 | Feminist says she would rape a man were crime legal; her boyfriend calls her out on her bullshitBasically what is stopping her from raping a man is that it's considered a crime and not at all that it is morally wrong? And that it's too much effort to actually bother... No wonder they believe all men have to be taught not to rape. As with anything about them this is pure projection. Of course they are afraid of rape all the time because they would do it without the blink of an eye if society would permit them. We don't need paternity tests, we need morality tests. Like what they have in Bla… | /r/MensRights | 18/07/15 07:32 PM |
| 3 | Feminist outrage over new phone app which allows users to video their date agreeing to sex to protect them against rape claims"You should want me despite my obvious craziness! That's ableism and psychopathy-shaming, shitlord!" | /r/MensRights | 14/07/15 09:05 AM |
| 5 | Feminist outrage over new phone app which allows users to video their date agreeing to sex to protect them against rape claimsAn app like this will never be enough for feminists, and I can even understand why. There are even rational reasons for 'revoking' consent during the act. A video or app like this just cannot cover the complexity that is human sexual relations. It would be more prudent to record a video after all sexual contact has ceased instead of before. But the true answer that will annoy feminists even more is to just not stick your dick in crazy. And to identify women as crazy you have to get to know them … | /r/MensRights | 14/07/15 01:49 AM |
| 1 | Paternity tests, women's reactionThis just shows the god complex that many women have. "Show blind faith in me to not abuse the ability to destroy your life forever." | /r/MensRights | 11/07/15 08:59 PM |
| 12 | Bar is hosting a night where woman receive a 77% discount, based on the debunked "77 cents" wage gap. "Let's level the playing field, even if it is just for one night. Women deserve better."Don't you go to the secret patriarchy meetings in the strip clubs? All the money we save by paying women these 23 cents less goes into a pot for free drinks and free objectification for every male. Clearly by some mistake you haven't got your invitation... just send me your address and I'll fix that for you. | /r/MensRights | 30/06/15 03:05 PM |
| 2 | Male = pervert. Female = empowered.The defining element is that the actors in said movies are often very attractive themselves so it does not apply to them. creepyness = sexuality + unattractiveness And as women can never be unattractive, they cannot be "Creepers". I love the recursive word-redefinitions feminism has taught us. | /r/MensRights | 20/05/15 11:04 PM |
| 1 | "I Am Voting With My Vagina: Hillary Clinton For President".... I don't think anyone has ever stated they would vote with their penis to elect a man for the sake of electing a man. But sure, let's make major decisions based appearances alone.What would a penis vote? The turd sandwich or the giant douche? | /r/MensRights | 05/05/15 05:53 AM |
| 3 | Wife seeks more alimony over ex's new lookalike girlfriendOf course you are right, NAWALT. Not all women will consciously abuse this relationship for their own gains. There are also enough scenarios where the man can be the abusive party in a marriage. But not marrying in general seems like a good precaution even for a healthy relationship and a reminder to keep things nice and balanced. Marriage can be a guarantee that whatever you do, your partner cannot leave you without trouble. Guarantees like that can bring out the worst even in good people and d… | /r/MensRights | 24/03/15 11:39 PM |
| 2 | Hey, Ladies: Nothing Is Accomplished By Nagging and Complaining About MenIts just what society tells them. And most women believe it because they see it confirmed by grovelling men every day (that they of course refuse as sexual partners). But this hierarchy fucks over women too and once fucked over they will get sick of it pretty quickly and start looking for something different. "Friends with benefits" (or similar) will be the most successful (and also solid) relationship model of the coming decades. Why would anyone want more commitment (especially marriage) if no… | /r/MensRights | 18/03/15 12:04 AM |
| 10 | Hey, Ladies: Nothing Is Accomplished By Nagging and Complaining About MenIt's because a larger and larger part of this generation of videogaming, porn watching men are zeta-males that do not want to be a part of the women controlled sexual hierarchy. Such hierarchically motivated females try to force men and women inside this hierarchy with all the power they have. And they have virtually none over zeta-males and it drives them nuts! Just look at Japanese women. They are getting very very desperate right now over the herbivore movement and Japanese men in general. No… | /r/MensRights | 17/03/15 11:55 PM |
| 9 | Hey, Ladies: Nothing Is Accomplished By Nagging and Complaining About Men...or at least this man, isn't interested in becoming the kind of man a woman might deem "suitable". This man neither. And my girlfriend is more than ok with it, because unlike these two girls she does not look for an efficient appliance but a companion and friend with whom to share her interests that coincide to have a lot of overlap with mine. I can't stand how entitled these women sound. But at least it's mutual. I have no interest whatsoever in women like this that think they are in the posi… | /r/MensRights | 17/03/15 11:43 PM |
| 11 | No more Left/Right, Red/Blue, Liberal/Conservative slants, please.The left is liberal. Men's Rights are a liberal cause. Like Egalitarianism or women's rights (would be). Feminism is an ideology. It's neither liberal, nor left, it's an ideology. Almost like a religion. Men's Rights Activism and Feminism can not be compared directly. | /r/MensRights | 08/03/15 11:20 PM |
| 6 | It's not slut shaming to be honest about how you lose attraction to a woman upon knowing she's had a lot of sexual partners.I think you meant that about self-reflection. That's just something I have observed over a long time. And I do not mean women in general are less capable of self-reflection than men, so I think that's not sexism at all. I just have observed that most women show less self-reflection concerning what they are attracted to. Many will claim to be attracted by a number of things and then completely ignore them all and date the exact opposite. Man in contrast most often know pretty well what their "typ… | /r/MensRights | 06/03/15 07:50 PM |
| 7 | It's not slut shaming to be honest about how you lose attraction to a woman upon knowing she's had a lot of sexual partners.I agree with everything you say about them having to be able to handle the answer if they are asking. But I still couldn't be bothered with all the trouble. | /r/MensRights | 06/03/15 06:58 PM |
| 65 | It's not slut shaming to be honest about how you lose attraction to a woman upon knowing she's had a lot of sexual partners."Why aren't you attracted to me?" I'd not answer that question at all anyway, it's a trick question and you can only lose by answering it. They will get angry at you if they want to get angry at you, no matter what you tell them. When I asked girls similar questions (not in any needy/creepy way, just out of curiosity after-the-fact) I never got any valuable information at all. Mostly just "I'm just not into you." or variations of that she "doesn't need to explain". That's because they often do n… | /r/MensRights | 06/03/15 01:40 PM |
| 3 | Men's Reproductive Rights (We Need Them Dammit!)This. Even if realized such rights would be really hard to judge fairly, just like women's rights in that case, rape or other things dependent on someones state of mind. For now and for the future, like everywhere else in life, choose carefully whom you associate with in that regard. | /r/MensRights | 02/03/15 10:15 AM |
| 18 | Feminist Wikipedia administrator trying to delete the "Violence Against Men" article on Wikipedia.While I am not a big fan of Wikipedia myself for reasons of my own you have to give them credit with this article. I count basically three advocates of deletion and the rest for keeping the article. This will not make feminists refrain from trying it again in the future once they can mobilize more of their SJWs, but it at least shows that there are enough sensible people to strongly advocate for keeping it. | /r/MensRights | 28/02/15 02:40 AM |
| 20 | Feminist Wikipedia administrator trying to delete the "Violence Against Men" article on Wikipedia.No, I think the "reasoning" basically is that "we don't care enough about violence against men like we do about violence against women so we do not have a field of study for that and thus it does not need it's own article." Which is of course BS, but hey, I was surprised not to read arguments shit like "because patriarchy" or "this violence against men is because of toxic masculinity and should be covered with violence in general". | /r/MensRights | 28/02/15 02:23 AM |
| 1 | Impossible to be sexism towards men?That's why you also redefine "having power" as "being male". And there you have it. | /r/MensRights | 21/02/15 06:03 AM |
| 1 | Man was drugged and raped by a woman, his fiance does not believe him and slut-shaming himSure there are, and they are more probable reasons too. As I wrote I was playing devils advocate in writing out the worst case scenario. | /r/MensRights | 19/02/15 08:01 PM |
| 1 | Man was drugged and raped by a woman, his fiance does not believe him and slut-shaming himWell, maybe. But thats even more reason do offer it, a small effort for several positive benefits. While a logical person might think of these things on his own, once panic and crisis hits logic often goes down the toilet first. A lesson like this could engage people into thinking about what they would do if they were in a situation like this. Once they are in such a situation they would only have to react, not first have to think about what to do. And not all people are that intelligent, some r… | /r/MensRights | 19/02/15 11:20 AM |
| 9 | Man was drugged and raped by a woman, his fiance does not believe him and slut-shaming himRape investigations should be blind about the gender, period. If the victim has no evidence, they should get all the help they need to cope, but legally nothing can and should be done. I'm going to play the (gender blind) devil's advocate here, he could really have had an affair with her and after his g/f found out he claimed it to have been rape and made the police report. He of course conveniently forgot to take evidence at the right time. This is exactly the type of story that would make us s… | /r/MensRights | 19/02/15 04:08 AM |
| 2 | Man was drugged and raped by a woman, his fiance does not believe him and slut-shaming himNot really. Many of them do not only not know how to gather evidence, feminists continually lobby that such a thing should not be necessary because we should believe a victim's accusation without evidence. I support Vandechoz's suggestion of such classes. | /r/MensRights | 19/02/15 03:59 AM |
| 1 | MGTOW Millionaire leaves message of the key to happiness on a bank receipt... showing a balance of $13 million.The first thing you want to spend time on might be figuring that out for yourself. Then pick up hobbies, sports, learn something, build something. Whatever suits your type. | /r/MGTOW | 17/02/15 07:34 AM |
| 1 | MGTOW Millionaire leaves message of the key to happiness on a bank receipt... showing a balance of $13 million.As I already suggested in one of my first posts in this thread, if doing businessy stuff and accumulating money/wealth is what makes a person happy then by all means that is what this person should do with all the ability and vigor he has. After all, navigating the grand material stream (as a Ferengi from Star Trek might say) is a form of art and if you exploit noone by doing so, there is also nothing inherently morally wrong with it. But for most people I just cannot see this to be true. Many p… | /r/MGTOW | 15/02/15 05:47 AM |
| 1 | MGTOW Millionaire leaves message of the key to happiness on a bank receipt... showing a balance of $13 million.Ok, I think I can see where you are coming from. And I agree with this last post to a great part, while I still think your chosen words are rather strange in that context. I agree that a goods-centered economy is necessary (at least until some not all-too distant future where robots do all our work) and the best of all currently available options. I would not go so far to describe it as paradise, though. It can fuck you over suddenly and mercilessly. And only very few people can really make a br… | /r/MGTOW | 15/02/15 05:15 AM |
| 1 | MGTOW Millionaire leaves message of the key to happiness on a bank receipt... showing a balance of $13 million.I think this is the common delusion of the american dream. I just didn't realize what an epidemic it is over there. This just does not work (and can not work, based on economic theory) for everyone but a few lucky bastards who are then taken as an example that it's achievable for everybody (so everyone continues to work their asses off). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LfgSEwjAeno | /r/MGTOW | 14/02/15 06:50 PM |
| 1 | MGTOW Millionaire leaves message of the key to happiness on a bank receipt... showing a balance of $13 million.And getting to this point is achieved in reasonable working hours and without exploitation of others before the age of 30, while retaining a certain quality of life during that time, if you just set your mind to it? No, I don't think so. Most of us would work our collective asses off in more than unpleasant jobs (for me, being some tie-wielding bullshitting business person) before we reach this goal. And then we are probably 50 with a chronic heart decease from all the stress, have no other abil… | /r/MGTOW | 14/02/15 06:27 PM |
| 0 | MGTOW Millionaire leaves message of the key to happiness on a bank receipt... showing a balance of $13 million.Financial Independence in this context is a silly buzzword to con people into the hamster wheel. No matter how much more "financial independence" you gain, you are still dependent on money. Real financial independence peaks at the point where you have everything you need and want. From there on you start working for nothing and start wasting a lot of your (much more valuable) lifetime for the sole purpose of numbers on an account somewhere. (Oh and before I forget the obligatory insult necessari… | /r/MGTOW | 14/02/15 05:35 PM |
| 3 | MGTOW Millionaire leaves message of the key to happiness on a bank receipt... showing a balance of $13 million.Life is such a lovely balancing act. That is true. And balancing stuff is hard. And that makes it so easy for people to go overboard on one simple single directive like "Just care about your business, everything else comes later." | /r/MGTOW | 14/02/15 04:54 PM |
| 1 | MGTOW Millionaire leaves message of the key to happiness on a bank receipt... showing a balance of $13 million.I'd rather go for (without thinking much about it): Happiness = Self_sufficiency * Social_recognition + Fulfillment(hobbies, creation, knowledge, wisdom, abilities, ...); Note, how you cant be very happy if you have no social life at all, or if you are extremely dependent on your social environment. A balance must be maintained here. how you can have happiness, but have a harder time getting it, if you have neither of the above but focus on the things you want to do. Driven artists or scientists… | /r/MGTOW | 14/02/15 04:43 PM |
| 0 | MGTOW Millionaire leaves message of the key to happiness on a bank receipt... showing a balance of $13 million.The fact that I claimed that I do not work solely for a number on a bank account should tell you that I have no money to give away but exactly as much as I need plus a little bit of safety to bridge most trouble. | /r/MGTOW | 14/02/15 04:25 PM |
| 2 | MGTOW Millionaire leaves message of the key to happiness on a bank receipt... showing a balance of $13 million.Silliest thing I ever heard. Yes, questioning dogma always seems that way to religious people. A man without money is either dead/starving or is gifted as the gods, able to produce energy, food, water of his own will without the material world. And just to remind you why we are here: What do they say about men that do not have women on their side? A moneycentric world is just no better than a gynocentric world. "Once you make more money than you need for stuff you need/want it does not serve any… | /r/MGTOW | 14/02/15 04:22 PM |
| -2 | MGTOW Millionaire leaves message of the key to happiness on a bank receipt... showing a balance of $13 million.No it is not. I am not comparing women to money, I am comparing slaving your live away to women to slaving your life away to money. It really is just the same as PUA ideology. Working hard and dedicating your life to aquire something you ultimately do not need. Think about it: You need money because you need/want stuff. Once you make more money than you need for stuff you need/want it does not serve any purpose other than a religious one (money for the sake of money) and getting it is ultimately… | /r/MGTOW | 14/02/15 12:17 AM |
| -10 | MGTOW Millionaire leaves message of the key to happiness on a bank receipt... showing a balance of $13 million.Just as having a lot of women is the freedom from women... wait what? The religion of money is just as worthless as the religion of women. This is PUA philosophy all over again. To be free from it you have to not care about it. THAT is true freedom. Figure out what you want and make enough money to get what you want. If you can make enough money for what you want with a job you like (instead of a job that sucks but pays more) even better. Otherwise you waste valuable time and ultimately your lif… | /r/MGTOW | 13/02/15 09:21 PM |
| 1 | I Wasn’t Treating My Husband Fairly, And It Wasn’t Nice (Powerful Story)But what you are writing is exactly saying that women are mindless automatons. I guess its a matter of philosophy if you believe in (really) free thought or not. At their very core of being all women have certain instincts which in their environments will then translate into thoughts and actions. But not our instincts translate into thoughts but our conscious mind is sort of slapped on on top of that and is able to override decisions made based on instinct and biochemistry. It is just how our br… | /r/MGTOW | 10/02/15 08:42 AM |
| 21 | Plus sized female model for Sports Illustrated Swimsuit, but male standards still remain the same in this ad.On the one hand I really find women attractive who are not the sporty type, like some of those in this ad. I am not a fan of the flat butts of skinny women or concave "nut-cracker" butts of sporty women. A little baby fat and a bubbly butt can be quite sexy. But what's going on here clearly is a double standard. These spoiled entitled princesses think that when they are untrained it's "male propaganda for an unrealistic beauty standard" but when men are untrained they "have standards and the rig… | /r/MensRights | 05/02/15 11:17 PM |
| 7 | Speaking of porn, looks like The World's Most Popular Lady Porn is falling flat..according to the actors in it.Worry about your cellulite hausfrau audience, not us. I didn't know that even was a word in the English speaking world. xD | /r/MGTOW | 05/02/15 11:46 AM |
| 1 | MGTOW and non-dependent relationshipsI agree that up/down votes are not an indicator. And I also wonder why the previous poster seems to be already deleted/gone. But you are really no credit to your age here in this discussion. If what I write is worth so little to you then why even bother? If you have no motivation to post real refuting arguments we could both profit from, then you should best post nothing at all. Sometimes (the wrong) experience can be poisonous too and close your mind to challenging thoughts that are then percei… | /r/MGTOW | 05/02/15 11:40 AM |
| 0 | MGTOW and non-dependent relationshipsSeriously, if you married her and at that point didn't even know about her ex and her kids, then you were probably blinded and she probably was like this the whole time and never a 'wonderful person'. If you had looked more rationally and closely you might have spotted these inconsistencies. Except for the bipolar disorder etc. but if she had been responsible she could have dealt with that. | /r/MGTOW | 05/02/15 11:30 AM |
| 3 | Cenk Uygur Butts Heads With Men's Rights Activist Karen StraughanIt's more like the leaning tower of pisa. Unless you try to brace against it it will continue to lean in one direction until it falls. I believe he is just not receptive to rationally presented arguments, like most people (especially women but also men) are. I bet she would have gotten more support out of him if she had just placed a load of emotional crap on him. "Boo-hoo. This is so sad, that is so horrible, we are suffering so much." His male protection instinct would have kicked in and he wo… | /r/MensRights | 04/02/15 04:48 PM |
| 0 | Columbia Student: I Didn’t Rape Her - Paul Nungesser was cleared of a rape charge but faced a harsh trial-by-media. Now, as new details come to light, he’s speaking out and fighting back.Even if art is meant to provoke it doesn't mean that everything that provokes is art. Trolling provokes but isn't art, it's a waste of time and space. Things like this are trolling society on a truely grand scale. | /r/MensRights | 04/02/15 03:50 PM |
| 2 | I Wasn’t Treating My Husband Fairly, And It Wasn’t Nice (Powerful Story)I think that is overly pessimistic. I agree that you always have to look very closely, put safeguards in place and can't ever take a woman's claim for being NAWALT. But they are not robots and some of them are actually capable of free conscious thought, just as some men are able to free themselves from their primal imperatives. | /r/MGTOW | 04/02/15 03:19 PM |
| 6 | I Wasn’t Treating My Husband Fairly, And It Wasn’t Nice (Powerful Story)I wonder if she talked to him about her revelation. And I wonder if that came out in the form of an apology. If it did, this would really be a smart one. It takes a lot of self-reflection to see those things from a privileged female viewpoint. If not, well, she just noticed a danger to her status quo (him potentially leaving her) and dealt with that with the minimal effort. Also shame on twoxchromosomes for deleting everything AGAIN. Don't they notice that this casts an extremely bad light on th… | /r/MGTOW | 04/02/15 11:39 AM |
| 2 | I don't think women are evil, but this feminism has turned a lot of women into bitches... I'm going my own way.That is pretty much the most important thing. If you can't be happy without a relationship you can't be happy with one. You would always put to much of yourself into it. | /r/MGTOW | 03/02/15 03:30 PM |
| 2 | MGTOW and non-dependent relationshipswe haven't even established factually that "she" exists We also haven't established that you are as old and wise as you claim or that you have had any experiences at all. Why does this not matter? Because arguments need arguments non ad hominem. You argue based on your ideology and not based on your experience and observations. You have it all figured out, conveniently simplified so you can sit back and stop experiencing and observing altogether. Well, you may of course think what you want, and … | /r/MGTOW | 03/02/15 01:57 PM |
| 0 | MGTOW and non-dependent relationshipsSo then tell me. Why would she be with me if there is nothing to gain from this in terms of financial or other advantages? BTW: About the gifts. That was purely academical and not about my relationship. I hate giving gifts... so I don't. | /r/MGTOW | 03/02/15 09:09 AM |
| 0 | MGTOW and non-dependent relationshipsOf course, you will take none of this advice. Why would I need to take condescending advice about precautions already taken and things already considered? | /r/MGTOW | 03/02/15 09:01 AM |
| 2 | MGTOW and non-dependent relationshipsYou really seem very very afraid. You are seeing inevitable mechanics where there are just tendencies you have to maneuver around. That is a dark and terrible view of human nature (male or female) that I am not willing to share. Ah... you are VERY young and naive. Hopefully you won't get burned too badly, and good luck with all of that. Spare me your condescension. You are the one in need of luck... I know what I am doing. | /r/MGTOW | 03/02/15 08:57 AM |
| 0 | MGTOW and non-dependent relationshipsWhy would it not work, you just described how it works. You do not have to make sure (who could), just have a good judge of character and make it unlikely. If shit hits the fan nonetheless just move on. PS: People do seldom change in relationships. Often it's your view of the person that changes. We are just blinded by biochemistry most of the time that fades sooner or later. Make sure you think straight when you meet people (not just women, also happens with "bromances") then they wont "change"… | /r/MGTOW | 02/02/15 11:44 AM |
| -1 | MGTOW and non-dependent relationshipsNo exceptions. | /r/MGTOW | 02/02/15 11:34 AM |
| 1 | MGTOW and non-dependent relationshipsJust because someone has a personality trait does not mean that he is a slave to it or a robot with fixed static programming. That is just the same as saying "All men are dominant and devoid of emotion". I suppose it could work if you have the looks or the body in the top 1%. Actually I think just the opposite. If you are that attractive (male or female) you are way more likely things just work for you and you never have to think about any difficulties that normal people might have in relationsh… | /r/MGTOW | 02/02/15 11:32 AM |
| 0 | MGTOW and non-dependent relationshipsyou're basically just deluding yourself with a fictional version of the actual relationship I do not think so. All the points you apply above could be said about male friends as well. If no care is taken to avoid the pitfalls exploitative relationships between males are very possible too. I agree that many of it will be a lot more common with women, but just like there are many negative exceptions with men there are also positive exceptions with women. If you have found such a women (and they ex… | /r/MGTOW | 02/02/15 11:16 AM |
| 0 | MGTOW and non-dependent relationshipsWomen aren't interested in being equal in a relationship. They want the transfer of wealth to happen from you to them. That's the beauty of it. You automatically weed out the frauds and fakes. The number of women who will find such an arrangement appealing is vanishingly small. That just means you have to look closer. Or from a different angle no beta would look. | /r/MGTOW | 01/02/15 04:22 PM |
| 3 | And now they're after our porn.No way I want lady fingers in my porn. Actually you already have lady fingers in your porn. There are many female camerawomen, directors and/or producers. And IMHO they are often doing a very good job. After all, many women very well know what we want to see, which is the foundation of their power over us. But then again they are not the radical feminist type. Some of them are even demonstrating for their right to do what they want with their body and against feminism's claim that women in the p… | /r/MGTOW | 01/02/15 09:04 AM |
| 1 | 'Punishing Us For Being Women': UVA Sorority Members Protest Frat Party BanThat's exactly the point. I am not a big fan of fraternities in america (our german counterpart is even worse though) but they are looking out for their members and their image. If we remember the Rolling Stone rape story incident and its aftermath where the whole fraternity house was trashed and fraternity itself disbanded this is just the logical step. This is very very positive. If even the most stupidly sex-addicted men can stand up for themselves a change in society is imminent. | /r/MGTOW | 30/01/15 01:45 PM |
| 8 | Why Don’t Men Hate Being Single As Much As Women Do?I call uncanny valley on this. This is a really strange article with some valid points mixed with lots of WTF moments like this: Self-definition. Men are more likely to define themselves by their careers – What do I do? How much do I earn? What kind of car do I drive? How big is my TV? Stereotypes anyone? Or this: As a result, most men can date lots of women. Women – at least my clients – can only date .0001% of men. I suspect him to be one of the few alphas for which "things just work". In such… | /r/MGTOW | 29/01/15 03:34 PM |
| 1 | A short rantok... lesson learnt. I was wondering why noone else responded. Not that it was a good troll attempt. It didn't even get me out of my calm. Feminist trolls manage to do that much better. | /r/MGTOW | 29/01/15 06:01 AM |
| -1 | A short rantYou think you do, but you don't. You will realize that in prison when you have no control over anything anymore. | /r/MGTOW | 29/01/15 05:58 AM |
| 1 | A short rantI actually happen to have a girlfriend. But that doesn't matter so I didn't mention it. Even if I was asexual or just wouldn't want a relationship with a woman (e.g. preferred masturbation) my point would still be as valid. What I said meant by no means "live in celibate". You can look at girls and find them attractive. You can still look for a girlfriend. But as soon as you NEED them (all of them or one in particular) to want you, you obviously depend on something you have no control over. And … | /r/MGTOW | 29/01/15 05:51 AM |
| 1 | A short rantAnd with this line of thought she still has her tentacles in your brain. You still judge yourself through her eyes and freely give her the power she has over you. Stop that. You do not need female confirmation. Direct your need for confirmation elsewhere, be it school, your job, activism or in the simplest cases just play sports, an online game or something else and be really good at it. This can substitute the need for female validation for many men. This is MGTOW. And for your rather disturbin… | /r/MGTOW | 29/01/15 05:41 AM |
| 1 | Sorry for the quality, I am mobile. Crazy radfem doesn't give a fuck about men. I'm the green.Not really. If you confront them with something like this they just pull a "no true Scotsman" and go on about how THEY are the "real" feminists who believe in all the good stuff of equality for everyone and will save the world. You have to reveal each and every single one individually for what they truely are. | /r/MensRights | 29/01/15 05:29 AM |
| 27 | Why there are "no good men anymore"This is really just the typical paradigm. In high-school he wasn't good enough. She probably barely even noticed him. Then she let herself get fucked by every alpha that is available during her twenties and at some point gets herself pregnant. And once the "get a secure, low risk environment for yourself and the children"-algorithm kicks she "reconnects" with one of the poor guys she knew without a spine who can be manipulated into providing for her. Of course he is just a low priority fallback.… | /r/MGTOW | 28/01/15 07:05 PM |
| 4 | Black privilege is being able to shut down feminists.Wow... that list is horrifying. o.O | /r/MensRights | 28/01/15 04:43 PM |
| 1 | MGTOW expectationsI am hoping for some great crash in economy, abandonment of the america-centric ultra-capitalism-worshiping anti-humanist regime that has infested germany and a complete redesign of the sociopolitical environment that's about to happen in the next ten to twenty years as far as my hope goes. But then again it all could descend into the same flaming trainwreck that is the american society. That's impossible to predict for now. But all that does not have anything to do with my manhood anyway. I am … | /r/MGTOW | 28/01/15 04:33 PM |
| 5 | Noli me tangere (Don't touch me)He probably just faked the whole die and resurrection deal just to get away from his psycho-ex-girlfriend Mary Magdalene. And when she recognized him on the streets he thought "Oh shit... this time I have to go for good." He then got some fake roman passport while his disciples orchestrated the whole holy spirit lock-in thing as a distraction. | /r/MGTOW | 28/01/15 04:21 PM |
| 3 | Why Men Should Never Pay For First Dates (MGTOW)That poor guy that she has tricked into becoming her boyfriend. | /r/MGTOW | 28/01/15 04:10 PM |
| 2 | A Brave New World for Japan? Japan's Solution To Lack Of Sex: A "Handsome" TaxThere have been many attempts at Eugenics, even with modern technology, and they all failed to produce significant results. The key for healthy progressive procreation seems to be and always has been as much diversity as possible. | /r/MGTOW | 26/01/15 10:30 PM |
| 1 | "MGTOW" What It Would Take For Me To Go BackI have found a relationship like this. The trick is to not play the "game" but deny it. And probably to look at women that are completely different from the stereotypes that several other approaches and our natural instinct would target. In this case this means women who are not used to the world revolving around them. Women with issues who got rejected, friendzoned and treated badly themselves perhaps. Such a woman just might cherish you for the unique person you are instead of falling chemical… | /r/MGTOW | 26/01/15 10:56 AM |
| 1 | Exposing How Women Manipulate MenI would have appreciated it if they at least told me why they don't agree with me. | /r/MensRights | 26/01/15 06:13 AM |
| 2 | #653: “Help, I’m dating a Men’s Rights Activist”I also thought it was satire at first as well. But than it just turned out to be sad... really sad. apart from that I am speechless. | /r/MensRights | 25/01/15 10:44 PM |
| -9 | Exposing How Women Manipulate MenNothing is redpill stuff. Redpill is not only misogynist it's also misandrist and in general misanthropic. Redpill is reverse feminism only more self-harming and extremely harming to our cause (Men's rights and equality). This is just "choose carefully who you associate yourself with" kind of stuff. | /r/MensRights | 25/01/15 06:55 PM |
| 1 | Feminism is morally reprehensibleThank you. | /r/MensRights | 25/01/15 12:01 AM |
| 2 | Being a gay man in egypt is terrifying. We need to stop this!I agree with EngageBrain. This should be our issue as well. Sadly I have no idea what to do about it. These hardline traditionalist countries need to grow up in a lot of ways. You cannot force it on them they have to learn it by themselves. On the other hand I would support refugee status for sexually/gender repressed people as well. That also may be hard, because in my country (germany) like in many others the laws for refuge are getting stricter by the day and in some not even hardcore politic… | /r/MensRights | 24/01/15 03:10 PM |
| 1 | Feminism is morally reprehensibleStudies indicate that men do not have an in group preference -- in fact men tend to side with other women at the expense of other men. The reverse is not true, which might help to explain why the early feminists assumed that men in power were acting on behalf of men as a whole. It was an act of projection. Very interesting point. This always baffled me. Does anyone have a source for such studies? I would very much like to read up on this topic. | /r/MensRights | 24/01/15 02:52 PM |
| 6 | Working class fathers of yesteryear were never the monsters of feminist mythIt's not about intelligence, it's about agenda. Feminists even manage to put spin on documented history, just to further their goals. | /r/MensRights | 24/01/15 02:50 PM |
| -1 | Man watched girlfriend rape 12-year-old boyI would not judge this so easily. Clearly they both had an equal share in this case of rape. And just because his particular fetish is not raping a boy but watching one getting raped doesn't make him less guilty. Also the woman pleaded guilty while he clearly did not take responsibility. So if he gets a bigger sentence I think it would be well justified. | /r/MensRights | 24/01/15 06:57 AM |
| 3 | Woman lied about sex assault claim against police, but faces no penalty."He called it a "learning lesson" for the woman." I can accuse any man I don't like of anything and as soon as the lie backfires (if at all) show some mild regret and get away with it. [X] Lesson learned. | /r/MensRights | 24/01/15 05:12 AM |
| 2 | I ‘Walked Like a Man’ and Three Times As Many Women Ran into Me as MenI live in Germany too (Bavaria) and notice this on a daily basis. Mostly inside the train station or in the central part of the city and in the most crowded streets at the most crowded times of day. But then with an audacity that borders on sociopathic apathy. Especially Mothers with buggys do not seem to care even the slightest and expect everyone to jump out of their way while plowing through overcrowded streets with their baby-armed ramshields in front of them. Although... it maybe mostly due… | /r/MensRights | 22/01/15 11:27 AM |
| 3 | I ‘Walked Like a Man’ and Three Times As Many Women Ran into Me as MenThey may not do this on purpose, but because they just don't give a shit. I was outright rammed from behind(!) by women with baby buggys cursing me when they passed while on the phone with someone else. Other women walking in small groups on a narrow sidewalk next to each other talking and looking right through you. I see this so often... everyone (male or female) has to jump to the side and stand close to the wall or parking spaces until they have passed. I do not see this with men at all unles… | /r/MensRights | 22/01/15 11:15 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter