TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Lucky-Raspberry-3821 Archive

View 0 posts and 139 comments by Lucky-Raspberry-3821 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

For someone who says: "stop blaming victims", you will go a long way to defend the cunning and supernatural intelligence of the one you face. It's almost as if you'd rather bring yourself up rather than bring down an actual abuser. And here I thought we had women's interests at heart instead of your ego! Silly me.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/23 02:41 AM
–

Yes, same way grabbing a snake you didn't know was venomous and try to convince everyone that he was a 16ft tall invisible lizard. Take the darwin award. edit: Not gonna argue anymore, I really hope you're trolling
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/23 02:22 AM
–

Oh yes reading hundred of pages? I'll take the life-long traumatic experience over that, thank you.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/23 02:14 AM
1

And no abuser is gonna invest energy in a non promising source of supply for their self-gratification. Abusers are terrible at living without any source of appraisal or self-aggrandizement, and are unlikely to stick with someone who's not showing some desire to please early on.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 05:43 AM
1

Why would you default to any extreme as a valid indicator of stability? As a matter of fact this is the most certain way to land on a covert abuser, the opposite being the overt one; comprehensive study of both. I mean looking for anything beside moderation is unlikely to positively select for more stable companions. Abusers in general are nor able, nor willing to invest energy in someone who's not a promising source of supply for their intense appetite for self-gratification. I also see a lot o…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 05:38 AM
23

I mean abusers are not 200iq puppeters who everyone is bound to be fooled by. I really don't understand the need to elevate those coward losers in ways i'm sure they secretly are pleased with. They not only have very identifiable personality traits, but displayed early on at that (100 pages analysis detailing how There is loads of studies out there listing idiosyncrasies displayed by abusers which, I have to remind you, will always take the path of least resistance to sasiate their self-gratific…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/23 04:02 AM
1

Jesus wasn't a virgin, he got nailed before he died
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/23 01:53 AM
8

getting slapped brutally or being made to drink urine Can't imagine how empowering that might be
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/23 01:22 AM
7

This sounds like a "if women are bothered by being raped they should fight back instead" argument. A completely asinine oversimplification of a multifaceted problem that can't be solved simply by "fighting back", or "not allowing it". I mean how do you even stop a mob from ostracizing an individual for his beliefs, when it's been shown time and time again that defending those beliefs would hurt their livelihood at best and ruin their life at worst. It's more about conditioning minds at this poin…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/23 01:06 AM
2

This hypothetical "super valuable man" seems to use the spray-and-pray tactic in that case, as it's probably only a bad case of blue balls. What's boggling me though is the amount of time the chubby old tatted woman gets "led on" despite it being evident.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/23 05:30 PM
1

As far as I'm concerned, single cat ladies are still spending two hours of every day painting their face in a way that simulates fecundity and triggers the male's gaze they so passionately abhor. One would think their independence wouldn't implies spending more time making yourself attractive to the other sex but what do I know.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/23 09:33 PM
–

Well once the babies aren't getting born and that demographic bubble is gonna burst, you'll be as liable as they are today. Independence is pretty much a temporary luxury, not an identity.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/23 09:05 PM
–

and she's totally entitled to reject anyone due to those feelings, people should also pair up on the basis of their compatible value of intimacy
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/23 09:00 PM
–

speaking from experience or?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/23 08:04 PM
–

Depending on what your options are. Scavengers don't get to choose what's for dinner.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/23 07:48 PM
0

Source: Trust me bro?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/23 07:17 PM
–

Okay so you think that men surreptitiously gathered one day, and decided upon feigning disgust for a character trait that otherwise supposedly bears no impact upon their civic arrangement? Just for the lolz? Because the fact that they could have naturally evolved a certain disgust for certain traits that markedly impact their paternity certainty is too much to take? The same way that women almost religiously listen to their instinct for any behavior that may denote some semblance of "creepiness"…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/23 07:15 PM
-1

Well you forgot to mention the extensive ways in which the family court system will reward you for initiating divorce proceedings, guaranteeing you also child custody if so you desire. On top of that you will be portrayed as an independent paragon of feminism for freeing yourself of an objectively bad man. What I'm saying is that no matter which choices you take in life you will inevitably be celebrated in some way for being a woman choosing it. There is literally no single expectation that is e…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/23 06:55 PM
3

I mean you could as well be married and stay-at-home mother without social repercussions, it all depends on what a course of life you undertake. The fact of the matter is that society doesn't punish you for the choices you make. An exemple of expectation would be the ubiquitous women-and-children first policy on the sinking boat, whereas a man who fails to sacrifice himself for the life of the former would be socially punished, harsh judgments, perhaps ostracization. There is no equivalent for w…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/23 06:31 PM
-2

I think you're are confusing expectations with incentives. Society incentivizes women to take the career path but does absolutely not expects you to take it either.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/23 06:23 PM
–

And why isn't body count one of the metrics by which one could assess the personality profile of an individual? After all, it tells us a lot about the level of impulse control, long-term reward, personal hygiene, sociosexuality, as well as the traits on the 5-personality spectrum (extraversion, openness, conscientiousness, agreeableness and neuroticism) explored here, discipline (resistance to temptation), early childhood trauma, assertiveness, dependency, etc. In fact, there is also a risk by c…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/23 06:16 PM
1

I love how you just responded to my first point, hastily dismissed it with some copium rather than anything logical enough to be called an argument, then called it a day, as if anything I said was disproven. So much for that education really, when you fall for basic logical fallacies.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/23 10:29 AM
2

Instead of saying "the right thing" say "what benefits me". It makes it seem like you care about people other than yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/23 07:42 AM
2

This type of attitude just shows that the current generation of father will never deal with sort of women they raise (or not). Sue me but being a father/mother should be a privilege, the demographic growth absolutists can go to hell.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/23 07:37 AM
1

Sex ratio studies suggest that women’s perception of there being few acceptable partners activates a polygynous mindset, which in prosperous, monogamous societies drives promiscuity to the detriment of pair-bonding. More than 6 million years of hominin evolution under promiscuous, polygynous, and monogamous regimes shaped mate preferences that evoke different cultural and behavioral responses as environments change. The Church’s imposition of lifelong monogamy contributed to the emergence of the…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/23 11:55 PM
1

Either men have to hold those top x percent of men who "get all the sex" responsible for their egoistic behavior If they were expecting sex out of me, I certainly would. Unfortunately, they aren't looking after something that I can offer, which make: my bargaining power void, inside the boundaries of legality. Did you forget to suggest that women also hold other women accountable, or sexual agency is the sacred cow we can't touch, and works only one way in.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/23 11:47 PM
1

apparently sexual jealousy just appeared alongside "weird tradcon" men on the internet, and not the result of evolutionary favorable conditions.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/23 04:21 AM
3

define insecure
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/23 08:37 PM
2

no, what i mean is that if you're equally enforcing gender roles. If so, then you're pretty coherent and nothing wrong with that, as long as you treat everyone equally, irrespective of what they can/can't provide you with.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/23 05:56 PM
3

seems non-masculine Do you enforce traditionally gendered norms on both side equally or?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/23 01:21 PM
5

This seems to be a corollary feature of the empathy gap, whereas you are still compartimentalizing empathy through the lense of gender roles. Plus, it is also known that men get penalized for straying from masculine norms, for example, not seing them as competitors. This reluctance to show empathy for men is a display of insecurity, since it would impair your biological incentive for sexual opportunism. Siding unconditionally with women is a way to ensure your reproductive success since it immed…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/23 06:03 AM
5

You're thinking from a neurotypical point of view. For you it may seem intuitive that something cannot be said (beyond egregious topics) in certain circumstances, or that implied factors make something obvious in regard to a situation. Now imagine that in any given interaction you basically toss a coin as to whether or not the next thing you say is gonna be considered inappropriate (not in a creepy way). The only way you get to learn how to socialize stems from either people volunteering away ex…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/23 12:37 AM
2

Don't talk too fast, maybe you'll need another decade. "Women who perceived themselves as more attractive than their mates more strongly resisted mate guarding; the strongest relationships were with the subscales of Covert Resistance Behaviors, Resisting Public Displays of Affection, and Avoiding Partner Contact. When women perceived themselves as more attractive than their mates, they also reported less commitment, more flirting with other men, more appealing dating alternatives, and more frequ…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/23 03:59 AM
1

then you're just stupid what can I say
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/23 11:50 PM
1

Red pill literally states that look/intelligence is irrelevant and what you need is "a season pass to my rizz academy"/"just hit the gym fat ass". Not sure there's a dissonance though, if they only want money and money is objectively attractive
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/23 11:49 PM
4

sure he does. Can't understand why you'd be so interested in the plight of modern dating if "your relationship" is so perfect but go on.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/23 11:38 PM
10

or the "let me tell you why you can't criticize me/her/them without being a woman hater" strategy
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/23 11:28 PM
7

That's why the NCL (National Chearleading League) is so popular
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/23 11:10 PM
31

Because women can't entertain the idea that their actions are not purely morally motivated, making criticisms easier to wave off as bad faith.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/23 11:06 PM
1

No you're right.. my pretty smart friends Elon, Bill and Jeff all told me not to believe stats about friends of people online
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/23 11:08 AM
1

Generally gen Z's tend to bully older ppl out of their spheres (rightfully so). Reddit is the new Facebook that old people just found about. A dying platform that doesn't represent anything but corporate ideals.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/23 03:45 AM
-3

"a women's value" Notice the tactical removal of conjugal before value. Single mom defense 101: Look for some way to turn him into a women hater.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/23 03:33 AM
4

Funnily enough tho, polygyny / polygamy results in elevated degrees of sexual dismorphism.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/23 03:25 AM
4

Ahh the ever so useful : "Source: trust me bro!"
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/23 03:21 AM
3

It hurts man. It's sad to say but if anything try not to get too enthusiastic at the prospect of a girl showing interest, as genuine it may sound. Always assume that you are not her first choice and NEVER withdraw what is in your immediate interest. She doesn't pick up when you told her you would be available? Block. Something horrible seems to happen to her each time you are due to meet up? Block. She has a constant habit of abruptly ending otherwise productive conversations after a brief peek …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/23 11:56 AM
13

And you think this is exclusive to men? Like no woman ever pretended to be what she thought the man wanted instead of being true to herself? Stop gendering what is common in both genders.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/23 11:43 AM
1

And what makes you knowledgeable of the salacious and intimate desires of a young woman's mind, beside the fact that you have been one yourself? Have you been in extensive (daily) contact with women my age to get to know them, or simply relied on the carefully crafted media pieces circurlated in antiquated social networks? I am pretty sure if you would invite yourself in a young woman's mind, you would be no less disturbed than that of a young man. You have absolutely no idea what sort of things…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/23 11:38 AM
1

the advice of married people would be of use. Absolutely, if I would have been single 10/15 years ago, your advice would have been more than welcomed. This generation (Z) is currently facing unique problems that older generations have no way to address based on their mentality. The fact that you could successfully court a 20yo woman 10 years ago doesn't mean you can court a 20yo woman now (not including daddy issues pathology). I have way more in common with a woman my age than a man yours, same…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/23 11:15 AM
1

If any skill young people have gotten master of, is spotting someone above 28 on the internet.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/23 05:19 AM
1

You might want to add "in the west" to your remark; since people gauge each other's sense of importance through acquisition of sex and money. I guarantee you that a poor society, say the Tuaregs of North-Africa, wouldn't encourage the pursuit of sexual and financial freedom to the same extent. You can't blame a fish for feeling useless in a world of monkey.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/23 05:16 AM
1

What universe are we in, where a gen Zer is explaining the virtues of responsibility to a soccer mom.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/23 05:05 AM
1

Our generation understands the importance of responsibility over one's own quest for hedonistic pursuits. Having been the victims of atrocious parenting we are perhaps reluctant to perpetuate the dysfunctional family model previous generations (after the Best) have introduced as the norm, not the exception. The wisdom you rejected from your parents/grandparents could have been of use in that case, but you collectively decided that pleasure was to be our life's most defining feature, not family. …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/23 04:52 AM
1

Alright, I won't address weither or not the promotion of lonely female spaces and the eradication of lonely male spaces is discriminatory or not. It warrants its own discussion. What i find quite reprehensible is the involvement (regardless of gender) of "happily-married xyz" in a matter they have no stakes in, and will not suffer/benefit from, nor in the way it is pursued (through social shaming or civil discourse) or the resulting effect of their participation. Quite honestly i see way more of…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/23 04:47 AM
1

but if I wanted to fight against incels ..don't worry i'm sure you're gonna get statues built to celebrate your selfless quest to save humanity.. that allows women How about it allows and is pertinent to SINGLE people first? How about I don't "WANT" nor (excuse the language) give a shit about married women and men opinion about what they think single women want. No more than I want a non-certified doctor to give me health advices, a paraplegic to give me rock-climbing lessons, a fat person for e…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/23 03:57 AM
-2

Another "happily married" woman.. There must be a concerted effort somewhere of chronically bored mid-aged women coordinating to "fight against the incels !!!1!" by posting on basically any social space with men that have a modicum of free speech. They won't stop until males are policed 24/7.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/23 07:14 PM
0

Well that settles it i guess edit: Shameless vote manipulation btw, might try not involving the same alts on promoting this account ..
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/23 10:01 PM
1

You have to be extraordinarily stupid not to see the heteroclitic ways in which sex group are policed as men are still not allowed a space without middle-aged women monitoring them. Do you know how many times, some women have called me "daddy" without having agreed upon this dynamic previously, in a somewhat platonic exchange? I am pretty certain it can somehow reflect the feeling a woman gets from cat-calling, yet I am supposed to enjoy it because women are to be excused. Now here's a certain e…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/23 09:25 PM
2

There is obviously the vestigial legacy that makes the goal, motivations and fears concerning dating somewhat timeless. But the method, norms and expectations are as far removed from each generations to a point of absurd incomprehension. Also, it has been widely acknowledged that destruction of family was the brilliant venture of boomers with their uncompromising rejection of authority. The advice of boomers/gen-x should be avoided like the plague. Dating paradigms are incredibly generation-spec…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/23 09:07 PM
6

it seems like an incredibly petty enterprise. The time and energy could certainly be better spent in maintaining their current arrangement instead of talking down young men from enjoying their legal right to pursue happiness. It doesn't surprise me though, since boomers and generation X's are the most sociopathic and sycophantic generations which prioritizes their own happiness at the expense of others.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/23 07:30 PM
-1

Wouldn't you acknowledge that internet being such an overwhelming presence of modern life, may also have impacted the way dating is performed? It seems also that you only consider what men benefits from internet at women's expense and not the other way around, which is dishonest from an empirical viewpoint. Perhaps some women are happy that they get to know a prospect from the safety of her house. Perhaps they also are happy with the blocking/ignoring function that internet offers without which …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/23 07:18 PM
2

Although I do agree that men socialization is lacking in many fields, I wouldn't rely on testosterone to be a remedy. First, is a strong heritability for serum testosterone, with genetic factors accounting for 40–70% of the variation in testosterone levels in men (National Library of Medicine). What is left to naturally increase may be governed by the multifaceted aspects of your life, such as physicality, diet, anxiety, sedimentary, age, etc. As for testosterone and health, It's rather the cont…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/23 06:52 PM
4

Question 1: Why would a married person be compelled to participate in a community addressing the current dating experience? Question 2: If you aren't actively dating, how would you be made aware of the governing norms/practices that young people are beholden to? Question 3: How do you relate to 16-28yo women and their fears/expectations and how can your opinions reflect theirs? Observation: Just like technology, dating is a constantly evolving matters and your knowledge is only relevant for the …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/23 06:07 PM
1

I don't think it, I know it to be true. Why do virgin girls never ghost after sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/23 12:49 PM
1

Okay, but you've just proven my point. its actually doesn't say you cant pair bond My argument isn't that you cannot pair bond but that you cannot pair bond through sex alone anymore. be other factors like trauma. Pair-bond disruption after sexual encounter is technically trauma (at least your brain interprets it as such) They can be virgin and not bond And if it would be evolutionarily advantageous there would be more of it. Bounding is more than oxytocin and sex. Well then you successfully tra…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/23 09:06 AM
4

It's the funniest thing to see how the same women who frivolously denounce married men cheating (rightfully so) will also rationalize telling everybody but the principal concerned party (i.e, wife). Which makes me arrive to the conclusion that the social sharing is not at all morally driven, in fact it might even be bullying and victim shaming. The poor wife being first a victim of actual infidelity, but will also have to deal with the social repercussions.I would as go as far as to say that dis…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/23 07:13 AM
2

Sorry for the late answer. Oxytocin plays an important role in the development of the capacity to form social bonds, the mediation of the positive aspects of early-life nurturing on adult bonding capacity, and the maintenance of social bonding. "Oxytocin (OT) facilitates mating-induced pair bonds in adults through interaction with the mesolimbic dopamine system. Variation in striatal OT receptor density predicts resilience and susceptibility to neonatal social neglect in female. Finally, in adul…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/23 05:42 AM
1

Yes, but I can retrieve more if it isn't sufficient
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/23 01:35 PM
3

I second that, this seems like outrage-porn to me, artificial reaction farming but mostly a young suburban white chick with no other problems worse than what infusion to put in her latte. There's certainly a critique to be made about the marketability of male-bashing for victimization status. Constant exposure to relatable "all men trash content" is equally damaging for impressionable young women as hostile inceldom is for young men. A real problem I see a lot more is sour older women taking the…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/23 10:49 AM
1

There's certainly no stigma attached to traditional gender roles, especially if you live in typical non-anglosaxon countries (france, italy, spain, portugal...)
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/23 10:33 AM
1

There is too much data confirming that experiences flavor your future judgment and makes unwelcomed comparisons a certainty. Also, I am by fact of nature not the only guy who uniquely possesses a certain ability to make you feel a sensation, and it's a statistical reality that exposure leads to more expectations. Of course, creativity can mitigate a person's predispositions but positive sexual discoveries can only go so far. There's a certain point where experience become jadedness: "I didn't en…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/23 07:02 AM
–

Coming from personal experiences so take it for what it's worth. The problem with this is that women insecurities are self-sabotaging as in it affect their idiosyncratic behavior, especially in regards to their "flaw". They tend to become extremely closed to subjective feedbacks, some generic examples: "you say that to every girl", "you're only saying that because ...", "I know what guys find attractive (implying preferences are an objective metrics)". It's really hard to empathize when an insec…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/23 06:30 AM
7

The problem with is the "I know what i want" effect, which is the tendency for older women to decrease in agreeableness and openness to experience as they age. here - making them less inclined to novelty and more selective. Also, the effect of neuropeptides such as oxytocin (pair-bounding hormone) fades off as a women age research which means that sex is less likely to be a pair-bounding experience for them. We can't deny the fact that having a wealth of experiences makes you more vulnerable to …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/23 06:02 AM
3

How is it that a country so dedicated to distance itself from it's european values/culture, is made of people who dream of moving to Europe? For people who praise themselves for loving/promoting non-European cultures, why don't you move there instead? I say that as a European who don't rejoice at the thought of mid-aged liberal american women bringing their ideology over here.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/23 04:02 AM
3

Men are motivated by the importance they have in someone/something livelihood. Women are often motivated by long-term security/stability.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/23 12:58 AM
2

Someone who defines everything through social lenses would almost entirely let society do the choosing for them. If you harvest happiness out of societal approval, chances are you're not the safest bet out there.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/23 12:52 AM
3

I mean that makes sense since a woman who prioritize work will invest their spare energy in career-building efforts rather than relationship-building efforts. No matter how balanced you think may be, there's always someone willing to pick the later. Depending on your man's loyalty, I can see how he would enjoy someone making him feel more important than money and work.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/23 12:31 AM
9

It's not at all inconsistent really. Bisexual women tends to have elevated sociosexual index scores - gov-sponsored research - which also coincides with dark-triad (DT) traits (here) and cluster-B personality disorders (here),( pages 659-672, in the DSM-5) Those traits, as you'll guess it, represents an accurate predictor of infidelity. If you think this line of thinking is discriminatory remember that humans are discriminatory in their mate-selection patterns to make survival easier. Under a br…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/23 12:18 AM
1

Got it, you're fine. it doesn't do much for my personal well being and happiness to engage too much for my personal wellbeing to engage in anti-women rhetoric. Which is commendable. At the same time, it perhaps is cathartic for some men to express their anger after perceived mistreatment, wether actual or not. As long as this anger doesn't materialize in actual violence, I think providing men with a space to confide, argue, and express their emotions without cattering to the expectations of the …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/23 03:28 PM
2

Just stop responding, we're not living on the same planet.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/23 04:40 AM
1

Don't send me a paper on evolutionary psychology Those are peer-reviewed academic publications which involve multiple departments of neuroscience (with the inputs of highly-regarded neuroscientists, such as John Allman, William H. Calvin, Terrence Deacon) I put psychology where it belongs - a soft science Well i guess that's it for evolution then! since you don't agree with it. Your feelings have certainly more scientific value than an internationally recognized academic field with more than 153…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/23 02:49 AM
1

Did you ever had sex without making out? By definition, making out an expression of romantic affection and sexual attraction (I.E., your brain interprets it as sex even if you don't) “A kiss is a mechanism for mate assessment,” said Helen Fisher of Rutgers University in New Jersey, who is presenting her findings on Saturday at the American Association for the Advancement of Science meeting in Chicago. She has conducted a number of brain imaging studies and believes kissing can access any one of …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/23 02:22 AM
39

I'm sorry but a couple of men expressing common emtional struggles (perhaps in a way that infringes on your moral sensitivities) doesn't amount to a "culture of blame women". There are literal podcasts, books and literature called "Kill all men", with corporate sponsorship mind you not. Now can you point to me where the "Kill all women" book, show, podcast is? This fake moral outrage at what amount to a couple of men-dominated spaces speaking candidly is just ridiculous. You should be rejoicing …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/23 09:21 PM
4

Well the way you describe sex as "putting your member", portrays it as a trivial act of self-indulgence rather than a powerful tool of human connection meant to deepen the bound between loving individuals. "Sex activates dopamine and neuropeptide (e.g., oxytocin, vasopressin) receptors in the brain’s reward circuitry that function to condition attachments to sexual partners (Young & Wang, 2004). In humans, these same neural pathways have been linked to sexual arousal and sexual satisfaction (Bar…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/23 08:44 PM
28

How is that different from a friendship? Where is the need to elevate this friendship (by definition) into a relationship?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/23 10:44 AM
1

I mean it worked for my ancestors so far
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/23 10:18 AM
0

Did you even read it or? My argument is that it is an evolutionary adaptive trait for men to be generally more distrustful in a relationship. "This is because romantic jealousy motivates individuals to enact behaviors that reduce the likelihood that their partners will commit a romantic infidelity or facilitate them in avoiding the reproductive costs associated with being the victim of an infidelity. Further, through a consideration of the sex difference in obligatory parental investment, evolut…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/23 03:25 AM
5

In studies that solely looked at couples who obtained paternity testing because paternity was being disputed, there are higher levels: an incidence of 17% to 33% (median of 26.9%) [1, 2, 3, 4]. Paternity certainty is not only a moral right that should be universally defended, but a very astute way to legally define fatherhood. It should be within your own discretion whether or not to appeal to it. Regardless, something tells me that people like you aren't likely to leave a genetic legacy strong …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/23 12:12 AM
6

Mothers are still very much the gatekeepers to paternity, because a woman is under no obligation to disclose that she suspects a man of being the genetic father of her child. If she does not, in the first place, disclose this information, then no DNA test would ever be needed. The reality is that a DNA test only really becomes the gatekeeper if the mother has decided to post it there. If a man suspects he is the genetic father of a child he might seek a court injunction to enforce a paternity te…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/23 11:42 PM
1

I’m going to go out on a limb and guess that most of the men who are so concerned about potentially supporting a child that isn’t theirs aren’t going to be quite as enthusiastic about a system that also ensures that they do support children that are theirs… Who cares? It's no longer about him or her now that another human life have been introduced. Both should be held accountable and bear the responsibilities (not society) regardless of enthusiasm.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/23 11:24 PM
5

Nobody is forcing anyone not to be independent, as a matter of fact I think pursuing your life the way you see fit, with who you see fit is none of my business. The problem here is the "you're too insecure and don't know how to handle a boss babe" undertone, as if men are somehow to feel ashamed of their naturally evolved sexual preferences. You need to know that "handling a boss babe" is just about as evolutionary sound as to scratch my balls with a cooked gun. Why should I invest an unrecovera…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/23 04:15 PM
6

Feminists have been goal-shifting for years, now easily conflating what used to be genuine discriminatory policies with the natural tendency for a society to self-regulate through checks and balances according to its need. An example of this is the public discourse surrounding shaming (a very effective social regulator ) whereas women interpret any negative social scrutiny as the result of legitimate oppression threatening their freedom. The fact that their freedom is guaranteed by the law and d…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/23 10:34 AM
4

okay Pew research center - 63% 6 out of 10 men are single Young sexless males 60% young males sexless More than 60% of men are sexless and single i can go on...
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/23 10:46 PM
1

And how many times have you made the first move to seek a relationship? Studies have shown that in more than 80% of relationships initiated by women end up being successful, confirmed here, here, etc... If you let yourself being approached (i.e, passive mate-selection strategy) you will be "used" by a man adopting a quantitative mating approach (hitting on every other women until one says yes)
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/23 10:40 PM
1

Also there is a selection bias, whereas when the women initiate a relationship, 80% of the times, it will result in a stable relationship. confirmed, here, and here. It you adopt a passive mating selection strategy (a.k.a not doing the first move), chances are you will get a "number-oriented" type of guy, pursuing short-term mating.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/23 10:33 PM
3

Across various domains, studies suggest that attractive persons are perceived more favorably than unattractive ones, leading early researchers to propose that there is a “beautiful is good” stereotype (Dion, Berscheid, & Walster, 1972, p. 285). Indeed, subsequent studies and meta-analyses have shown that attractive individuals are perceived as more socially skilled, mentally healthy, intelligent, and also accrue more dating experiences, satisfying social interactions, and occupational success, t…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/23 09:10 PM
2

A very "personal incident" that you voluntarily submitted in a very "public forum", hence, you are no longer immune to public scrutiny weither you like it or not. Plus, anecdotal evidences aren't the most pertinent contribution to a hollistic conversation. Maybe it satisfies your own reasoning, nothing wrong with that... but it fails to address the most common experience which, in our case statistical relevance. As for the tone policing..? I am not responsible for your feelings. Any public feedb…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/23 08:55 PM
0

I totally empathize with the undue victimization you have been subjected to, and this being a serious misdemeanor, I suppose you already reported the perpetrator (resources for the US) since you care about providing women with a safe environment and sexual offenders will be recedivist at 5% to 40% rate That being said, the aggression you have been subjected to is a statistical minority (less than 10%) of cases (does not diminish the need to address it). "slightly over 86% of victims of sex offen…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/23 06:53 PM
1

Am I disgusting for asking questions? And why are you so defensive, I'm only following the moral implications of your statements.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/23 11:45 PM
1

okay, would you also blame pedophilia on children at this point?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/23 06:55 PM
10

To make it perfectly clear: it is men who make it so fun to be slutty. It is men who give women the motivation to be slutty. By this logic, would you also blame the heroin addict for providing a motivation to sell drugs
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/23 10:58 PM
2

One aspect overlooked is the Operational Sex Ratio, which denotes the local ratio of fertilizable females to sexually active males at any given time. An OSR of 1.0 would correspond to a perfect balance of reproductively available males and females, whereas 1.99 would be a total males-biased imbalance. Paradoxically, as the OSR increases, so do the societal propensity towards a combination of two practices – polygyny and concubinage – and the increase in social inequality (explanation.) this stud…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/23 09:45 PM
2

Ah you should go through a possibly deadly process Meanwhile, 861 women actually died out of pregnancy complications (2020), giving us a staggering 0.02388216% mortality rate ( CDC. For reference, the mortality rate of bed falls is 0.0236721% (802). When it comes to pregnancy, I believe in the right to act within your own volition, but using the lethality to justify yourself is kind of a hard reach. Like.. will you stop going to work pointing out the mortality rates as your rationale?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/23 07:15 AM
8

There's even a name for it, Women-are-Wonderful effect The women-are-wonderful effect is the phenomenon found in psychological and sociological research which suggests that people associate more positive attributes with women when compared to men. This bias reflects an emotional bias toward women as a general case. Some research also indicates that women perceived men high in benevolent sexism to possess positive attitudes towards women, while by contrast men low in benevolent sexism were percei…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/23 04:38 AM
2

where did I say for me specifically?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/23 07:32 PM
7

The "I wear makeup for myself" argument
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/23 04:55 AM
1

I mean who goes on job interviews just for the fun of it?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/23 05:20 AM
3

is your goal is to establish a connection or determine wether or not you guys are compatible If the former, you're using a short-term mating strategy; the later, a long-term mating strategy.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/23 06:23 AM
4

not if your goal is to find a genuine connection based on compatibility alone ( and sociosexual discrepancies absolutely ranks in the compatibility factor )
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/23 01:29 AM
9

Robert I. Bowers,a Skyler S. Place, Peter M. Todd, Lars Penke, and Jens B. Asendorpfd University of Nebraska - Lincoln Texas State University - Human Mate Choice University of Chicago - Do Females Copy Each Others? Christopher D. Rodeheffer, Randi P. Proffitt Leyva, and Sarah E. Hill - The When and Why Behind Human Female Mate Choice Copying The neural basis of human female mate copying: An empathy-based social learning process Different cognitive processes underlie human mate choices and mate p…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/23 11:16 PM
1

It is still a sexual deviance, and deviant behaviors have an impact on the likelihood of marriage, one dimension of the marital trajectory ( study )
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/23 09:56 PM
8

While I do acknowledge the individual agency concerning mate-selection for women, there is a scientific consensus that "indicates that females tend to change the likelihood of choosing a potential mate based on the decisions of other females", source• ( mate-copying sexual selection )
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/23 09:32 PM
1

OP is a furry, take it with a grain a salt
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/23 09:20 PM
0

Isn't that what a gender-role deconstructed reality is all about, the ability for men to follow a passive-selection sexual strategy? Obvious solution: women are freed of their gender-role, so why don't they become the initiator? (61% success partneering rate). It's funny how the passive sexual selection strategy of women is never viewed as an obvious "gender-role", and that the limits of female emancipation sit wherever their comfort is threatened.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/23 11:53 AM
1

No, but wherever sociosexual restrictions are heavier, and prenuptial monogamy is inforced, you'll end up which a much more equalitarian family-orientated society (i.,e. Greeko-Roman, Anglo-Saxon societies). On the contrary, when they are leviated, it will exacerbate the mate-copying sexual selection strategy of women, to a point where already preselected men will eventually hold a monopoly on reproduction. So you'll end up with a more tribe/clan-orientated society based around small patriarchs …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/23 11:37 AM
1

Congrat now you know why a man with high n count is different then a woman with high n count.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/23 11:17 AM
3

Nothing more remarkable than self-sacrifice for the benefits of the whole.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/23 04:03 PM
1

Sure, because "these days" coincide with the possibility of interacting with 8 billions people with no limiting factor of scale (i.e., living in a village in 1886).
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/23 03:59 PM
1

Women are way more likely to prioritize positive social feedback over authenticity in any given social situation (shown here). Making them more likely to identify with a dating prospect's perceived views, and omit mentions of traits suggesting incongruity. Also, women are way more sensitive to social scrutiny and therefore, more likely to curate and conceal information that could be useful in the prospect's ability to vett. Numerous studies have shown that females do not always choose their own …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/23 03:44 PM
1

What's up with the dichotomization of everything in PPD? Like you're either this or that disregarding that behavior depends on the particular person and their personal values, beliefs, experiences, etc., along with the specific social environment the person finds themself in (B=f(P,E)). Like say I'm dating a blind woman, am I a simp since I'm voluntarily altering my independence to cater to her peculiar needs? I get the point of bringing awareness towards counterproductive and self-destructive b…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/23 08:08 PM
1

How is it built up for the benefits of men while simultaneously making the majority of men suffer from it? (not counting "but rapes" arguments, it's more a religious constraint as in pre-christian europe everyone was raped fairly and equally)
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/23 05:39 AM
1

No doubt about that. It begs to question validity of chivalresque dates and romantic expectations in the post-modernist landscape.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/23 07:05 PM
1

I think what OP meant was probably one-sided relationships where you get the benefits without the consequences. I wouldn't say it's a purely male problem since a portion of men including myself have been guilty of this before. Simply the archaic but still widely acknowledged expectations of financial courting from men, combined with the loosening definition of relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/23 11:21 AM
2

depending on which side you fall in
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/23 11:06 AM
4

Expectations increase in proportion to your ego. After x amount of people praise you, the default treatment you expect will heighten according all the wealth of (boner-induced) qualities, you purportedly exhibit. In other words, experiences, the quality and quantity of which, color your self-perception and what you feel deserving of, overall. Opposite of which inexperience or unfamiliarity is more likely to manifest through humility.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/23 03:25 AM
2

Totally second this, talked to asian girls when I went for a year in east asia, and i would say that, in general, although they are more direct, (less "moving my hair, if you don't get it, your loss"), the approach feels much more like a business interview.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/23 08:28 AM
0

if you want i can translate their answers for you; "I don't see any potential between us, but i still want you to be freaky enough so that the door is still half-open; therefore, I won't tell you to stop being easy, since there's still chances we end up in bed"
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/23 01:43 AM
1

Like can you at least ask guys you didn't sleep with?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/23 03:29 PM
7

I hear that alot but usually it ends up being that one guy in high school. I'm pretty sure more than 90% of men would be ecstatic at the idea of you approaching them.. I've never heard a guy tell me before ".. you know, i'd be into her wasn't it for the fact that she approached me. I hate to feel desired"
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/23 09:11 AM
1

it doesn't requires a Ph.D to know how to suck a dick. Beside even if she knows how to please Andre, Jonathan and mike doesn't mean she'll get it right for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/23 09:04 AM
6

not sure if you're tryna be a walking condom ad or a n count scoresheet, whatever it is buy a lottery ticket because condoms don't cover you for syphillis, HPV, HSV, monkeypox, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/23 11:45 AM
1

I mean nobody is a cheater if you ask them
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/23 08:42 AM
9

The problem is cheating as a concept is morally reprehensible in itself no matter which definition you use. A knee-jerk reaction implies a transgression of someone's ethical framework or at least put a sense of gravity behind the word.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/23 08:41 AM
1

You could stamp a pair of tits on a toaster and get a marathon worth of dicks lining up for a shot at that. Fact is: You really don't need to be remotely attractive to find a dick to dig your inside, even 400lbs have their harem of simps nowadays.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/23 01:53 AM
2

Are you trying to flex your ability to fake your orgasm or am I missing the point? If it's the case just say it, don't hit me with a 3 paragraphs-long "men dumb, women smart" diatribe without addressing my points
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/23 09:49 PM
1

The ten thousands cocks stare doesn't lie tho
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/23 09:01 PM
1

So women say and do things to men that would get them punched by other women? How does it go both way exactly?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/23 09:00 PM
7

Yea, because polygamy is such a better alternative, just look at how stable and conflict-free most polygamous nations are.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/23 08:57 PM
0

I mean from which pool of women are you basing those wild assumptions, cause usually it's fairly obvious for anyone who can last more than 15 minutes when she's faking it or not. If she sounds like a dying goat and can't utter a word for her life that's a good sign, if she's too rythmic and aesthetically pleasing it's fake. Matter of fact, you just sound terrible when you cum, not something a women would want to fake if anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/23 08:44 PM
22

As a human being : No. As a partner : absolutely.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/23 12:53 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter