TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Lucy_Heartfilia_OO Archive

View 0 posts and 111 comments by Lucy_Heartfilia_OO on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Id just say "she isn't my daughter but I am her daddy" and then walk off
/r/MensRights11/10/25 02:42 PM
4

Haha this is what I'd do. I'd hit on them with my dick and balls out and try to make the experience as uncomfortable for her as possible.
/r/MensRights13/09/25 01:54 PM
6

Germany has left the chat.
/r/MensRights28/09/24 11:47 AM
7

Germany has entered the chat.
/r/MensRights28/09/24 11:46 AM
3

That's the neat part you don't have to carry, they'll literally put a gun in your hands. But if you're smart you'll wait for a frag grenade.
/r/MensRights14/07/24 07:46 AM
9

All humans lie sometimes. Every single person has told a lie before, except for George Washington. This is why I stopped believing in religion. The odds of someone lying are far greater than the odds of miracles happening.
/r/MensRights09/05/24 05:25 PM
9

Interesting take. When I was younger my family did a lot of hiking. One time we were hiking we came across other hikers going the opposite way looking kinda scared and they said don't go up ahead there's a bear up there. We turned around and went back out of safety. We also encountered a lot of men hiking as well but never felt our lives were in danger from them.
/r/MensRights29/04/24 01:06 PM
7

It happens all the time with non sexual crimes too. If you know someone stole something from you, without proof it comes down to each individual's credibility (except in court proof is needed). The problem is all men are starting to be viewed as sexual predators, as shown by that stupid man or bear question going around. So false accusations are becoming increasingly easier.
/r/MensRights29/04/24 11:07 AM
20

Whether it's overrated or not is an opinion so it will always depend on the person. For me sports cars are overrated, but to someone else they might be their number 1 hobby. I used to be religious and I remember how much I hated how society puts so much pressure on men to want and to have sex. People still use virgin or incel as a way to insult men. With all that fuss over sex you would think it'd be better than it actually is. Its good but it's not that good. And both sexes overhype sex. For wo…
/r/MensRights24/04/24 07:19 AM
1

I certainly agree with that
/r/MensRights21/04/24 08:19 PM
1

Pretty sure our forefathers weren't against a peaceful transfer of power. They wanted a system where we could chose a new leader without anyone dying over it. We had a pretty good run too until Trump came along. RIP Ashley Babbit, you traitorous bitch.
/r/MensRights21/04/24 08:58 AM
0

Bro it's not even close. Trump literally tweeted to stop counting votes when he started losing his lead. He tried countless legal battles to overturn the election with 0 proof. He tried calling state governors to get them to throw out their states votes. He asked Pence to not certify those votes. And when all that failed, he organized a mob outside the capital to interfere with the election process, which got people killed. It's just sad to see so many men support this tyrant. Voting rights are …
/r/MensRights20/04/24 04:44 PM
-15

Despite this, I still hope he wins. The other guy took actions to overturn our democracy. I wish Republicans would be sane again though.
/r/MensRights20/04/24 04:06 AM
2

Yes same with how women "can't" wear the same dress twice. I have never met a single man who would give a shit. Women are making it harder on themselves and blaming us for it.
/r/MensRights12/04/24 08:17 AM
7

It's a similar tactic used by the pro-choice side and the reverse tactic is used by the pro-life side. It's easier to say aborting a fetus than an unborn baby.
/r/MensRights12/04/24 12:24 AM
10

The loophole is that for some dumb reason it's a state issue. It's illegal in some states, so if you see it in one of those states you should sue. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ladies%27_night#:~:text=Ladies'%20nights%20have%20been%20found,stadium%20owned%20by%20a%20city.
/r/MensRights11/04/24 11:49 PM
0

Legally we have less rights, except we can be topless in public (although I think women are the ones keeping this alive). For societal norms there are many differences where men have certain privileges in some areas and women have privileges in others. In total the sex that "has it easier" has been debated since the dawn of man. Some of these male privileges are: lower personal upkeep exptations(we don't need to wear makeup or shave legs), faster bathroom lines with urinals, less shame for promi…
/r/MensRights11/04/24 11:00 PM
1

That's a good point. I was raised religious so maybe that has influenced my opinion now, but I'm not religious anymore. My main gripe is more humanitarian. I see a fetus as being technically a living human organism. It doesn't sit right that a human organism doesn't have the right to not be killed based on certain criteria it doesn't meet yet. I also sympathize with them because when I think about when my life began, I always imagine it was at conception. If you showed me a picture of my pregnan…
/r/MensRights10/04/24 11:10 AM
1

Very true. I think it is beyond dumb when pro life people are also anti-contraceptive and anti sex ed. I agree completely with your scenarios, but i was thinking of let's say there's a blizzard outside and you want to kick someone out of your house. You know he'll die outside, but kicking him out is much different than shooting him and throwing out his body.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 08:42 AM
0

I am not silent on the gun control debate, I am very vocal on it. This government can't even keep heroin off the streets, yet I'm supposed to rely on it to keep guns out? Not going to happen.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 07:09 AM
1

True but there a difference between letting someone die and killing them. If they could remove the fetus without killing them I would have less of a problem with it.
/r/MensRights10/04/24 07:05 AM
3

There's also a vasectomy. But those are the only ones I can think of that men can control. Are there more?
/r/MensRights10/04/24 06:59 AM
5

Lol you said you don't care what people do with their kids cocks. You are the disgusting one here. Stop projecting.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 12:41 AM
9

It's simple, when they put a gun in your hand, shoot the person that gave it to you. If every conscript did this, they'd stop conscription real quick.
/r/MensRights21/03/24 10:55 AM
4

It's not necessary if you pay enough, or if the country is so great it's worth fighting for, or if the enemy is so terrible it's worth fighting against. Either way it should be completely voluntary and it's stupid young men just go along with it so that rich citizens don't have to contribute more.
/r/MensRights20/03/24 09:20 AM
2

If you need young men to fight, then make it worth their while. Seize land and money from those unable/unwilling to fight to pay those that can. In time of war young men are invaluable, and they are dumb as hell to provide their services for free.
/r/MensRights20/03/24 08:58 AM
8

Soldiers are necessary, conscription isn't. The country could offer a high enough salary that recruits soldiers voluntarily, but they prefer slavery because it's cheaper.
/r/MensRights20/03/24 07:37 AM
6

Shame, her experience cutting people would have made her a great surgeon.
/r/MensRights18/03/24 09:27 AM
29

Instead of dating I just pay for sex instead. I find it's less degrading to myself.
/r/MensRights18/03/24 09:20 AM
3

Any woman dumb enough to sleep with me is probably too dumb to take birth control correctly. So I always use condom.
/r/MensRights16/03/24 06:35 AM
7

Don't worry, feminists still think they're the victims here. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/10/style/john-cena-naked-men-oscars.html
/r/MensRights12/03/24 09:59 AM
1

How do you feel about a male and female sharing the same cell in prison? Do you consider it discrimination that we keep them separate?
/r/MensRights07/10/23 08:54 AM
3

Yea there was likely irrational fear mixed in there as well. But my main point is that these women's only cabins aren't some sort of first class cabins that only women are allowed in because of some ideology that women are superior to men. It's out of a legitimate fear of being molested. I would be against it here in the states because public transit molestation doesn't happen here at such high rates as in japan. Over here I'd feel like it would be more of a supremacy thing.
/r/MensRights05/10/23 05:50 PM
7

Except I never made those arguments. How did whites only drinking fountains protect white people from black people? It didn't. Our racist history was about white supremacy, not fear of black people. Can you even read the words I am writing or do you just look at the letters and something else pops in your head instead?
/r/MensRights05/10/23 05:33 PM
11

No the racist discrimination was based on whites feeling superior to blacks, whereas this discrimination is based on fear for safety. They're both discrimination, but they don't have the same motivations behind them.
/r/MensRights05/10/23 05:12 PM
9

The reasoning behind these two situations are different. Nobody was afraid Rosa Parks was going to molest them.
/r/MensRights05/10/23 04:50 PM
21

I don't think it's to prevent violence, but to prevent groping. Either way solid crime statistics should show a need for the separation.
/r/MensRights05/10/23 04:47 PM
12

Marriage doesn't even guarantee those 2. Go to a feminist sub and say wives are expected to put out and do chores and see how well they take it.
/r/MensRights27/08/23 03:25 AM
10

The first 2 don't require a legal marriage. The last one isn't worth the risks of divorce.
/r/MensRights27/08/23 01:14 AM
3

Lol I had to look up Asia's last name again.
/r/MensRights03/08/23 07:10 PM
24

Mr. T pitties him as well
/r/MensRights11/06/23 09:08 AM
1

Lol I saw that post last night too. I was going to make a comment about how men are discriminated against too but I figured I'd just be banned from the sub
/r/MensRights25/12/22 09:15 PM
49

But are you really a father? Where's your proof?
/r/MensRights25/12/22 10:04 AM
3

So in your opinion the cells that make up your appendix are alive, but the appendix itself is not alive? I've heard of non-living things forming living things (like organelles forming a living cell), but I've never heard of living things working together to form something that isn't alive. Well with the exception of a person that recently died. He is considered no longer alive but still may have some cells still alive days after his death. But an appendix or fetus are not really comparable to so…
/r/MensRights21/12/22 12:29 PM
3

You said it's not alive, I was just pointing out that that is incorrect.
/r/MensRights21/12/22 11:46 AM
2

It might not be considered a person but it certainly is alive and made of living tissue and cells
/r/MensRights20/12/22 11:57 PM
1

Maybe when you find the person you love you can take a vacation to the Philippines, get married in a catholic church there, and mention none of it to Uncle Sam. Oh and don't live in a common law marriage state.
/r/MensRights16/12/22 09:24 AM
7

The pope says you need to be married if you want to fuck
/r/MensRights16/12/22 09:18 AM
4

Russia was never willing to release the marine since they suspect he is a spy. Griner was never considered a threat to Russia and was always just a bargaining chip. It was stupid of us to trade the arms dealer for her though. Russia really played us on this one.
/r/MensRights09/12/22 05:50 AM
4

When she gets back we'll hear what she has to say
/r/MensRights09/12/22 05:43 AM
2

That's a good point, which person do you think Russia sees as more of a threat?
/r/MensRights09/12/22 05:39 AM
11

This seems to be the case with cheating too. When one partner becomes overly suspicious for no reason, it's likely because they cheated themselves.
/r/MensRights08/12/22 05:46 AM
12

Seriously, without the soldiers dying for their country all the people in this photo wouldn't last a week.
/r/MensRights08/12/22 12:13 AM
4

It is if we ignore legitimate women's rights issues. Ideally everyone would advocate for everyone's rights. Unfortunately some human rights issues that only affect men have been ignored and need special awareness. Hopefully someday we won't need this sub anymore.
/r/MensRights07/12/22 12:14 PM
10

The masculinist one is correct. The feminist one is wrong and should read just like the masculinist one with just the genders swapped. Specifically advocating for the rights of just 1 sex is sexist.
/r/MensRights07/12/22 08:14 AM
2

Domestic violence
/r/MensRights05/12/22 06:18 AM
6

Also his gun control episode is number 4, this post says it's season 1 episode 3. This whole thing is full of misinformation.
/r/MensRights05/12/22 06:15 AM
2

Yes, but you'll love your kids most as well. Also there's the time before kids where you love each other most. With single moms you're never number 1 from the start.
/r/MensRights22/11/22 09:05 AM
14

You will never be the person she loves most in life, her kids will always come first.
/r/MensRights22/11/22 05:43 AM
13

The article didn't say anything about domestic abuse, you're just programmed to believe all men are abusive.
/r/MensRights19/11/22 01:27 AM
6

It's true I've seen enough videos to know BBC makes women afraid
/r/MensRights13/11/22 01:28 AM
7

Yes. You did your best to fight this injustice. You shouldn't feel bad for failing, you should feel proud for trying.
/r/MensRights10/11/22 09:37 AM
6

What if you did wear a condom and she still got pregnant?
/r/MensRights27/10/22 07:13 AM
28

I remember when Tracer's ass got nerfed. Sad day
/r/MensRights19/09/22 02:40 AM
1

I read it properly and said you have a case. Did you read my comment properly? I just don't understand why you're going after her medical license if her being a medical professional didn't hurt you in any way.
/r/MensRights18/09/22 09:08 PM
1

I read the section in the law, seems like you have a case since she's not your spouse. But did she coerce you or use her power as a health provider to force you into doing these acts? Or is she a psychiatrist taking advantage of a mentally vulnerable patient? Or are you just trying to get back at her anyway you can?
/r/MensRights18/09/22 08:57 PM
5

I'm confused about the start. Were her advances always unwanted, or were you flirting back and going on dates but decided to file a complaint after you found out you were just a rebound? If the first is true then I hope you fight this injustice to the end! If the second is true then it sounds like you two are perfect for each other.
/r/MensRights18/09/22 07:37 AM
4

This is true, imagine him pulling out the dildozer on her after the recording. A simple solution is a before and after consent video. Before she says on film: "I give consent", and after sex she's filmed saying "i gave consent and didn't withdraw it at any time during". If she refuses the 2nd video you're still at risk, but if she does the 2nd consent video this will protect you from her changing her mind later.
/r/MensRights26/08/22 04:24 AM
4

Yea seems like it, fooled most people here though. "Chapter 4: why these damn methods work" is a pretty dead giveaway
/r/MensRights11/07/22 08:43 PM
1

I agree with that too. And ultimately I would want government to provide for kids. (Side rant: I kinda want a system where all kids are raised equally whether their parents are rich or poor so that they all have equal opportunities to succeed, but idk how that would work with some dystopian dictatorship) But for now it still comes down to who is responsible for kids financially, and where we consider life begins is a key point. If life begins at conception then it's simple: half of it came from …
/r/MensRights27/06/22 05:46 PM
1

So in cases of rape abortion is legal? Can the woman simply claim to be the rapist?
/r/MensRights26/06/22 03:44 AM
1

Yea that first link was terrible and my sympathies to the mother, but at least she knew she had a child and had the option to even have her, unlike this minor https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/09/02/statutory-rape-victim-child-support/14953965/ Either way it's fucked up. The reason we even have age of consent laws is to protect kids from the responsibilities of parenthood, so it makes no sense to use the law to slap kids with those responsibilities afterwards. And I guess Roe V Wad…
/r/MensRights24/06/22 04:30 PM
12

Lol and for the Uvalde police it's apparently not their job either
/r/MensRights24/06/22 09:18 AM
1

Lol exactly that's another tactic. They get our youth focused on this multiple gender nonsense to distract them from crippling college debt and unaffordable housing.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 09:11 AM
2

If the two genders united together to take on corporate greed, then they would divide us even more on issues of race and political parties.
/r/MensRights23/06/22 08:08 PM
8

What about the right to choose whether or not you'll have to support a child after an unwanted pregnancy?
/r/MensRights23/06/22 08:00 PM
4

Lol what do you mean ITT? That's how all of reddit works
/r/MensRights23/06/22 07:58 PM
8

I could probably look it up myself but meh, do you know how it is with lesbians? Straight women tend to marry up, do lesbians marry more equally?
/r/MensRights01/05/22 10:01 AM
1

I mean he's not wrong and I agree with everything he's said except the part about balancing the injustices against women. Being oppressed doesn't give people the right to take advantage of others and steal from innocent families. A systematic change is needed, not some vigilante justice. A clever troll likes to hide an underlying fallacy amongst a bunch of true agreeable statements.
/r/MensRights22/04/22 12:24 AM
7

Name doesn't check out
/r/MensRights19/04/22 11:55 PM
1

Sounds like mental illness. It's not normal behavior even in the man hating world
/r/MensRights17/04/22 09:52 AM
6

Gowernment is the people. Lol how naive. I guess the men that don't want to fight have nothing to worry about since they are the government they can just pardon themselves right? Just Ukraine. Are you serious? Um yes. What's wrong with that statement?
/r/MensRights14/04/22 05:39 PM
4

There are other free countries they could live in. If this was a world war between all the free and non-free nations then yes I'd say we need to fight for our freedom, but this war is just over the sovereignty of Ukraine. The misunderstanding is on you. Governments think their people owe them their complete allegiance and their very lives for nothing. If all of Ukraine is at stake then the ones fighting for it deserve all of Ukraine if they win. Instead afterwards veterans will just get a thank …
/r/MensRights14/04/22 05:15 PM
2

Make it worth fighting for. They could use incentives instead of threats. How about anyone that fights in Ukraine gets complete tax exemption for life. Or they could offer land in exchange for fighting in the war. Or even yearly payments to all veterans after the war. It's absurd that you have to pay for everything else in this world but when it comes to men risking their lives for their country, somehow that is supposed to be free of charge.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 09:38 AM
11

Yea, no. I pay taxes so I don't have to fight a war. If a government still can't defend itself after all the taxes it steals from its people, that government is a failure and has no business staying in power.
/r/MensRights13/04/22 07:36 PM
1

This is true across all races, genders, nationalities, generations, etc. But just saying bad people are bad is kinda boring, and it's complicated finding out which individuals are asshole so humans seek generalizations to make things simpler for our simple brains.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 05:34 PM
1

Because they're celebrating their 10 year anniversary. So if he's 31 and she's 18 now, then he was 21 and she was 8 when they got married.
/r/MensRights03/02/22 04:37 PM
18

Lol I hope you're not in your 20's
/r/MensRights03/02/22 10:37 AM
0

r/antiwork has a top notch mod, he was even interviewed on the news recently!
/r/MensRights31/01/22 04:44 AM
3

It's kinda sad how women joining the workforce didn't really increase the purchasing power of the average family, it just created more work for everyone
/r/MensRights17/01/22 08:03 PM
17

Yea also if a woman cheats, its seen as its because her husband was an inadequate lover, and if the man cheats its because he's a horn dog. Either way it's the man's fault. But idk if this sentiment is more true today than in 2000
/r/MensRights11/01/22 10:53 AM
-10

I'd have no problem if it was incorrect punctuation, that's completely reasonable. But there's no punctuation at all. My last comment was really hard for me to write, I kept wanting to put periods after each sentence. I just can't relate to someone that can write paragraphs worth of text without a single period. Now if the other side didn't use any spaces between their words the lack of periods here wouldn't seem so bad in comparison.
/r/MensRights14/12/21 11:29 PM
-15

I was trying to sympathize with him but it just got too hard to understand the whole story I don't know why he couldn't have put in a period between sentences it seems like an easy enough thing to do the spaces between paragraphs was nice at least so it became somewhat reasonable the larger paragraphs were too much though I would have had to spend too much time and effort to know what had actually happened to him when he could have just spent a fraction of a second to add a period I hate to say …
/r/MensRights14/12/21 07:54 PM
5

For women it's more like a postpartum abortion than murder
/r/MensRights14/12/21 07:23 PM
-23

You're either a man or pregnant because there's no period in sight. Why is there no punctuation in this? I couldn't even finish reading it all.
/r/MensRights14/12/21 06:34 PM
2

Lol gender didn't seem to protect this girl too well
/r/MensRights14/12/21 01:17 PM
1

Just say you lost the private keys and no longer have access to it. Better to have Monero in this case so they can't see if you ever spend it in the future. With bitcoin they'd be able to see if anything moves in or out of your wallet.
/r/MensRights03/12/21 09:56 PM
0

It can be monitored, but without your private keys they can't touch it. Or you could go with Monero which can't even be monitored.
/r/MensRights02/12/21 10:56 PM
0

You could always move your money into crypto, then nobody could touch it. Unfortunately it won't stop wage garnishments though
/r/MensRights02/12/21 06:51 PM
0

Copyright your DNA so if a woman gets pregnant you can sue her for making illegal copies of it!
/r/MensRights02/12/21 06:47 PM
0

My experience too, yet we need monetary wealth to pay for food and shelter to survive. People just don't see the big picture
/r/MensRights02/12/21 06:45 PM
19

Women have the upper hand here. They're naturally better at manipulation and social engineering, which is much more powerful nowadays than physical strength. We need to adapt fast.
/r/MensRights28/10/21 12:17 PM
8

They'll wait till after men have terraformed it first though
/r/MensRights24/10/21 10:53 PM
6

My take is that if I'm in like a parking garage and happen to be going the same way as a woman, maybe not walk too close to her
/r/MensRights14/10/21 10:45 PM
1

Would you save a girl who is tired and pessimistic all the time? Is she cute and/or does she watch anime/hentai? Then yes. If no or is a dude, then no.
/r/MensRights16/09/21 04:55 PM
-2

Joining the Taliban women have it worse, opposing the Taliban men would have it worse. It's not suprising the male army surrendered, joining them isn't so bad whereas opposing them would get them killed. The US should have trained more women soldiers instead. Since they had a lot more rights to lose, maybe they would have actually fought for them. In the end, regardless of gender, you should never rely on someone else to defend your own rights.
/r/MensRights18/08/21 12:49 AM
-5

From what I understand it started as "believe women" and that the "all" was put in by it's opposition to make it an easier thing to attack. Like how a man made of straw is an easier opponent to fight.
/r/MensRights26/07/21 09:51 AM
8

I agree every situation and relationship is different and it could ruin an otherwise good relationship. If she's giving up her career to raise your kids then that's a completely different story. But if you both have no kids and will both keep your careers, then prenups aren't that unreasonable. It all depends.
/r/MensRights05/05/21 03:45 AM
17

Hesitance is understandable, but if it's a dealbreaker then it's for the best. If she stays with you then you got someone loyal and probably won't have to ever worry about separation. If she leaves you over this then there's a good chance she would have left you for some other reason later on, but this way it's less expensive.
/r/MensRights05/05/21 03:20 AM
18

That's kind of a red flag though. If she won't be with you unless you entitle her to half of your earnings it shows what she's really after. But like they say love is blind.
/r/MensRights05/05/21 02:04 AM
10

I don't come to this sub often so this is the first time I've heard of this myself
/r/MensRights06/03/21 09:15 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter