TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

LukeArtanis Archive

View 7 posts and 47 comments by LukeArtanis on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

I'm an intactivist.
/r/MensRights13/05/20 11:43 PM
4

I do not believe that the penis is any different in that regard to any other external body part Doctors don't treat other body parts as disposable, why would the male genitalia be different? What will happen if you walk into a doctor's office, with cash, and demand your hands be cut off? Most likely you will be diagnosed as mentally ill (amputee identity disorder) for wanting to cut off a normal, healthy body part. If we treat all body parts the same, then the desire to amputate your testicles o…
/r/MensRights13/05/20 11:35 PM
2

Mutilation is already illegal.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 05:13 PM
3

If a patient comes in to a doctor and says they want to cut off their ear, is it ethical for the doctor to destroy a healthy body part? Or wouldn't it be correct for the doctor to suspect a psychological illness which should be treated with therapy and not surgery? Why should the genitals be treated any differently than an ear? Any competent doctor knows that in a culture which mutilates the genitals of children, that there is enormous sexual harassment and social pressure on adults to submit to…
/r/MensRights13/12/19 05:10 PM
1

I can't say it doesn't have medical benefits I can. Raping a baby with a knife doesn't have medical benefits.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 04:59 PM
3

Do you want to understand?
/r/MensRights13/12/19 04:57 PM
0

Yikes!
/r/MensRights09/09/18 08:18 PM
1

I think you got a little hot under the collar and flew off the handle Yeah, a bit. Thanks for making this post and sharing your ideas. I am an actual victim of genital mutilation. Surprise! ??? For the record I thought you were Malchuk who isn't, and it grates on me when he does that. I don't know where you're getting the idea that I'm "shitting on" anyone. You opened by portraying yourself as a (mostly) non-participant outsider and you referred to intactivists as "they" rather than "we". It see…
/r/MensRights09/09/18 06:12 AM
1

There are lots of intactivists who buy the Russia collusion narrative hook line and sinker. It's a diverse group of people.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 03:46 AM
2

PETA fucked this up a decade ago with a campaign that tried to argue animal abuse was like slavery, pissing off a lot of the African American community. Animal agriculture isn't "like* slavery it is literally is slavery, a worse form of it. And genital mutilation is a kind of slavery too. Just because something is true doesn't mean it's persuasive or wise to say politically. At the same time, if you want to have an intellectual comprehension of the issue, you have to be willing to offend the per…
/r/MensRights09/09/18 03:25 AM
2

I've been watching the Intactivist movement for the last 4 years ...OK? At best, they're barely moving the needle on this issue, You've been "watching the movement". How much has that moved the needle, bro? and some, such as Brother K and Jonathan Friedman, have supposedly even chuckled at the idea of a mass movement on this issue, meaning that the Bloodstained Men organization is content to let this issue slowly peter out. How about you show some respect for the pioneering work of Brother K who…
/r/MensRights09/09/18 03:12 AM
6

It's obvious you've put a lot of time in your research, just as I have. The thing is, I put the research in before I made my decision about circumcising my son. You seem to have put your research in afterwards. Am I right? You sound like a man who mindlessly mimicked the abusive parenting style of his father. Which means your father's cut, you're cut, and your son is cut. How is your family different from mine, if at all?
/r/MensRights08/04/18 01:38 AM
6

Let's suppose for the sake of argument that you're right and "circumcision" is healthy and safe. parents should be able to decide with patients doctors to circumcise newborns. What does that mean? The newborn is the patient. When the child grows up and learns that part of his penis has been removed without being allowed to have any participation in the decision, what should he do? What should a child do who grows up with permanent kidney damage because he had a UTI that would have been much less…
/r/MensRights08/04/18 01:02 AM
6

One of the common arguments by intactivists is talking about the history of cirucmcision talking about that Kellog guy as well as religion and such. It is one of the most common arguments against circumcision and they mention that only few countries do it besides America and Muslim ones. This is textbook genetic fallacy. In fact you do it when you mention this. Facts are not the same thing as arguments. It is a fact that "circumcision" was popularized in the US to punish boys for masturbating. J…
/r/MensRights07/04/18 10:02 PM
8

What argument is based on the genetic fallacy? I challenge you to give me your best example of a logically-valid, evidence-based, scientific argument for injuring healthy children by removing functional genital tissue. Modern "circumcision" in the USA has no basis in evidence-based science or rational logic. After the practice became entrenched in American culture, we realized that masturbation doesn't cause epilepsy or blindness. So doctors who had been injuring children searched for new excuse…
/r/MensRights07/04/18 06:05 PM
3

As a devout MRA and a devout Jew pedophile cultist FTFY
/r/MensRights15/02/18 07:48 AM
1

Start or join a local intactivist group, or foreskin restoration group.
/r/MensRights26/11/17 06:22 AM
3

Do parents own their children? If you believe this, then parents have rights over their children. Parents may decide which religion to force onto their child's mind and body. An alternative view is that every person has a fundamental right to ownership of their own body and mind. In this view, parents have responsibilities to the child. One of these responsibilities is to protect their children from genital mutilation. So when you say you have the right to kill your child in the womb and the rig…
/r/MensRights18/11/17 08:41 AM
2

Thank you for sharing your story.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 09:32 PM
8

The reason people do not listen to survivors of genital mutilation is because they have been brainwashed to be incapable of empathizing with us. Even people who conduct themselves in the most polite and professional way are simply ignored. But... sometimes people do listen, even to people who are angry and shouting. We all loathe the torture, sexual mutilation, and sadistic rape of children. We all hate it and are angry about it. The rage exists and it needs to come out of the closet. We shouldn…
/r/MensRights26/09/17 09:29 PM
9

It is sad that your points were ignored in your debates. It is so easy for the brainwashed to simply assert utterly false statements or change the subject or distract. It's so horrific, people want to look away. It sounds to me like you have a lot to contribute to the movement, which is awesome. Are you comfortable recording yourself on video/audio? Stubborn people need to see a man shout and be unabashedly outraged about having part of his penis cut off. For some people this is exactly what the…
/r/MensRights26/09/17 09:25 PM
1

No doubt, the angry approach is not persuasive. It persuades circumfetishists and sadists least of all. It actually gives them great pleasure to entice someone into anger. They are the dicks in this story. To come to a group of survivors of genital mutilation and carry signs that mock them. That's just evil. They are the fanatics. Why would you get confused about that? Why would you think a survivor of genital mutilation is wrong to express exactly what he feels? No. It's not wrong to do that. I…
/r/MensRights26/09/17 08:51 PM
4

Why should anyone give a shit about your opinion if you didn't even watch the video or attend the protest? I met Steve and have protested with him. He is a great guy and I believe it was therapeutic for him to express his feelings in Chicago. I share his feelings of rage and fury at these sadistic child rapists and their enablers. I am inspired by Steve's courage to be vulnerable for this video interview. He discusses very intimate pain and details that he would probably rather not even want to …
/r/MensRights26/09/17 08:41 PM
1

Do you think it's OK for someone to perform penis reduction surgery on someone who doesn't want their penis made smaller?
/r/MensRights25/09/17 05:26 PM
1

Circumcision makes the penis smaller, not bigger. If something is divided into parts, each part is smaller than the whole.
/r/MensRights24/09/17 06:31 AM
1

You said your penis scar is only a nanometer. There must not have been much to cut off.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 08:52 PM
2

Wow! That is a pretty small penis.
/r/MensRights22/09/17 09:33 PM
1

Kudos to your Mom for protecting your brother from unnecessary harm by letting him keep all of his penis. If a man doesn't have a problem with the fact that someone cut off part of his dick without his consent and against his will, is he truly okay? In my opinion, a man who won't/can't stand up for his rights is NOT okay. Maybe learning about foreskin restoration will help your boyfriend realize he lost (not gained) something precious when he was "given" a circumcision.
/r/MensRights22/09/17 07:31 AM
2

You must have an ugly circumcision scar. Are you talking about me, if so why do you assume so? Because I've never seen a handsome circumcision scar. They are all ugly.
/r/MensRights22/09/17 03:41 AM
2

You must have an ugly circumcision scar.
/r/MensRights22/09/17 02:17 AM
1

Sorry no one is purposefully cutting off the penis. Wrong.
/r/MensRights22/09/17 02:10 AM
1

You rape your sons because you are the children of Satan.
/r/MensRights22/09/17 02:07 AM
2

Was it your choice to be circumcised?
/r/MensRights22/09/17 02:01 AM
4

I protested with the Bloodstained Men with an intactivist woman and her son. The boy's shitbag father mutilated his him and then returned him back with a bloody dick to the mother who had absolutely no knowledge. She's fucking horrified and devastated. Men have so little rights that if either parent wants to mutilate the boy, then the boy can be mutilated.
/r/MensRights22/09/17 01:57 AM
3

The man you are talking about is Ron Low who invented the TLC Tugger.
/r/MensRights22/09/17 01:50 AM
2

It doesn't take intelligence to realize genital mutilation is wrong. It just takes character.
/r/MensRights31/07/17 09:01 AM
1

What is the default state of man?
/r/MensRights31/07/17 08:13 AM
2

What extra meanings do people add to these words?
/r/MensRights31/07/17 07:32 AM
3

People who are extremely happy and grateful to have fully-functioning, whole genitalia are appealing to me. The deal-breaker for me is those with mutilated genitals who choose to remain in denial of it. Ain't got time for that applesauce.
/r/MensRights31/07/17 07:18 AM
4

Do you refer to women as uncircumcised? In Egypt over 90% of girls are circumcised. There is a great stigma against "uncircumcised" women. In Egypt, the American woman is called uncircumcised. She hasn't been circumcised yet. She has an uncircumcised clitoris. Yet in America, she's just a woman. Not an uncircumcised or even an "intact" woman. She's just female, and she is expected to have all of her genital parts intact. She's got a clitoris. A normal clitoris. Not an uncut clit. Well guess what…
/r/MensRights31/07/17 06:54 AM
1

Thank you for sharing your perspective.
/r/MensRights12/10/16 01:56 AM
1

All forms of forced genital cutting violate the individual person's bodily autonomy. Contrasting FGM with MGM is a cognitive error. Each individual's experience of forced genital cutting is unique and cannot be meaningfully lumped into a category based on gender. Some acts of FGC are more physically injurious than the typical form of MGC. Other forms of FGC are less physically injurious than the typical form of MGC. If all forms of FGC are mutilation, then so too is the typical form of MGC.
/r/MensRights07/10/16 07:58 PM
2

What Jesus said is important for a number of reasons. 1) He was Jewish. 2) He resented his bris and called it mutilation. 3) He created a religion without a violence. 4) You have the freedom to observe his religion or pursue the path you feel best that suits you. I hear it so often said by Christians that they have never heard of a man who resents being circumcised. This means that they do not know basic facts about the person they believe to be the savior and the person whom they wish to emulat…
/r/MensRights07/10/16 07:42 PM
1

Difference Between: Male & Female Circumcision
/r/MensRights05/10/16 06:13 AM
4

Circumcision is genital mutilation, just ask Jesus: I just wish that those troublemakers who want to mutilate you by circumcision would mutilate themselves. Galatians 5:12 Catholics agree: Together with Paul, he [St Barnabas] then went to the so-called Council of Jerusalem where after a profound examination of the question, the Apostles with the Elders decided to discontinue the practice of circumcision so that it was no longer a feature of the Christian identity (cf. Acts 15: 1-35). It was only…
/r/MensRights05/10/16 06:10 AM
3

If you can look at America, founded on the genocide of indigenous people, enslavement of Africans, perpetual war, overthrowing other countries democratically elected leaders, a completely dysfunctional government, with outrageous wealth inequality, a health care system that leaves many untreated or bankrupt, environmental devastation, etc etc and call it the greatest civilization in human history it is no wonder you cannot see anything wrong with sexually abusing babies. Perhaps you are what has…
/r/MensRights22/09/16 12:21 AM
5

The transcript is available here.
/r/MensRights01/07/16 04:26 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter