TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Lumarin Archive

View 0 posts and 29 comments by Lumarin on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

“We're not saying all guys are bad. We're not trying to misrepresent any one individual. What we're saying is, as a collective group let's have a little less bad behavior and more good. That's the big message behind it” Honestly, this comment from Gillette's a load of horse shit. This is the same sentiment that Trump spouts out his ass. "When Mexico sends its people, they're not sending their best. They're not sending you. They're not sending you. They're sending people that have lots of problem…
/r/MensRights22/01/19 08:15 PM
1

Sorry that that post is so very long, I tried to put a lot of content and background into it so you can see the point of view of those that read this sub. If you want any kind of clarification on anything, I can give an answer...I don't really want to dig through any studies right now when they're right there on /r/MensRightsLinks or /r/MRRef though.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 09:19 PM
1

Alright, this post is going to be a little really long, so please bear with me. I'm coming to this forum from a feminist background, and honestly, I've never seen triggers used to shut people up, or attack others. Many of the members of this sub have seen this happen though, it's generally used by SRS members(And some other random posters) invading posts about men's rights(in this and other subs), to attempt to garner support and shut the opposition up. This is especially prevalent with regards …
/r/MensRights30/03/13 08:53 PM
1

You may have mis-read that, or perhaps I was simply not clear enough, sorry. :P I mean to say that people shouldn't have to proactively self-censor via trigger warning in forums and locations where they reasonably wouldn't know that they would trigger somebody. Like starting up a military shooter video game tournament at a LAN party after finishing a previous tournament of say, league of legends or super smash brothers, without knowing that there's a veteran in the room who could suffer from the…
/r/MensRights30/03/13 08:18 PM
2

I have to agree with everything except the last two sentences. However, you were spewing insults at people quite a bit all over these threads when you were commenting before. Most of the complaints in here are about how morality crusaders attempt to use trigger warnings as a method of censorship and to express distaste at things that they deem unsavory; You ignore this. In fact, I even agree with most of your statements in these threads. However, you came in here and commented on a one-line post…
/r/MensRights30/03/13 07:18 PM
1

Censorship of others via "OMG put a trigger warning on that you [insult]" is what those here are complaining about. Trigger warnings are fine for those who wish to self-censor; However, they should not be forced upon others by self appointed morality crusaders, and thus the criticism. Also, it seems you're conflating internet "they're talking about something traumatic that I experienced, their very discourse is triggering me"(To which most of this discussion is about, IMO,) with PTSD and being t…
/r/MensRights30/03/13 04:32 PM
4

See the Sidebar FAQ(http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/wiki/faq). Also, on this sub there have been studies posted that has a gap in favor of single childless women of up to 15%. It's when the data shows all people from all walks of life that the wage gap appears, almost entirely directly attributable to women's choices to have children and take a large amount of time off of work not gaining work experience. Rather than the 77 cents to the dollar number that's been debunked, it's somewhere betwe…
/r/MensRights01/02/13 07:01 PM
44

ShitRedditSays It's like /r/NoContext combined with /r/Circlejerk with a massive downvote brigade. Effectively, they like to take things waaaaay out of context wherever possible and then go downvote those posts; In addition, they go to subs and spam the FUCK out of stuff stating that something is beyond offensive/hateful when it's obviously sarcasm/humor and attempt to get people banned from either a sub or the site itself.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 07:08 AM
2

How can you expect anyone to have sympathy for your cause when you are so fucking evil. Yes, certainly, completely evil. Now I'm going to go beat some women and rape some 6 year olds. /s What the fuck is wrong with you. He said that you shouldn't tell your partner that you have a vasectomy so that you can protect yourself from women who cheat. He did NOT say that you shouldn't be open with the fact that you do not want children. If you have a vasectomy and say that you don't want kids, but you d…
/r/MensRights26/02/12 08:55 PM
1

Yea, I definitely know how this subreddit, and the online MRM in general can be a bit much. I tend to assume it is all just people who have had bad experiences and are upset, but still it is unfortunate. This is likely true. For example, I haven't had any bad experiences with women myself. However, my father has been paying 'child support' to his ex-wife for almost 30 years now. Far beyond the age of majority for his other kids, my half brothers. I stumbled upon some places where 'feminists' act…
/r/MensRights30/12/11 06:42 PM
2

Honestly I think this troll's hilarious, though if he keeps it up for long enough it might get annoying.
/r/MensRights07/12/11 03:49 PM
2

I think we should specifically make the point that Men's Rights is an America/Western World(possibly some other places?) movement, as some of the trolls could be under the mistaken assumption that we're here to attack feminism in the parts of the world where it's actually a good thing, and women actually have problems facing them. This is evident down at the bottom of the page in the conversation between francomaistre and tehEnd3r. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/kgmsu/are_the_mra_an…
/r/MensRights15/09/11 07:49 PM
1

I would really love to know more, because I don't know that much about places outside of the US and the problems you face, since I don't know many websites that are centered around other places, nor do I know the laws applicable in those regions and how they're being used/misused/not used. Edit: There's a lot of information about what we're talking about in the sidebar with references, perhaps you could read up on it some so you could see why we have this subreddit? It appears that we've(some of…
/r/MensRights15/09/11 07:36 PM
1

I think it's a good point to make that the MRM is mostly a united states/western world thing. Women do have it very very bad in many places in the world, yet in the U.S., they actually have many severe advantages given to them, whilst indirectly harming men. Nearly two thirds of college students are women, and yet women STILL receive massive amounts of scholarships that they receive because women are 'disadvantaged'. In education alone, women hold every advantage possible, from high school drop …
/r/MensRights15/09/11 07:29 PM
6

You're completely fucking up your analogies in what appears to be an attempt to troll. Benefits versus costs. Let's roll with your analogy. A computer will let you communicate, calculate, and even allow you to work from home, whilst being a nearly endless source of entertainment. The (exceedingly small) chance of it setting on fire and burning your house down is outweighed by how much it improves your life. Now, lets apply this to sperm donation. Benefits: Nothing, you have no rights to the chil…
/r/MensRights07/08/11 05:00 PM
7

In 2010 they tried again with a modest provision granting anonymity only between arrest and charge but it was abandoned because of vigorous objection from feminists, who worry that women are less likely to accuse if the suspect is not named. What. The. Fuck. Who in their right mind would avoid reporting a crime due to the fact that the person accused wouldn't be named until charged? It'd be even better if they were anonymous until found guilty though. Good article. There needs to be more like th…
/r/MensRights27/07/11 05:34 PM
2

Exactly, while I am personally uncircumcised, I would have never forgiven my parents had they done it to me. It's like giving your child a tattoo or tearing their ear lobes off upon birth, completely unnecessary unless there's a real valid medical emergency reason to do it(say, said ear lobes are infected and aren't responding to anti-biotics and the infection is spreading towards the brain, etc).
/r/MensRights06/04/11 02:09 AM
2

I agree that it's extremely sick, the only reason I didn't go into detail upon that is because I prefer to speak upon the health factors, since that's essentially a more relevant and valid reasoning behind choosing to have your child circumcised than religious or 'moral' reasons. Such reasons are secondary due to the fact that health issues can be rationally disputed whilst such religious and moral issues generally have little basis in rationality. Also, health issues for circumcision can be hea…
/r/MensRights06/04/11 01:39 AM
5

Here is the FAQ on circ. I would like to note that it is possible to cherry-pick studies based upon the nation that they were performed in to substantiate claims that health issues are better or worse for circumcision. This, of course, is completely dependent upon where in the world you live. If you live in Africa or in less-developed nations around the world, circumcision appears to be somewhat useful except for the fact that it's FAR less cost effective than condoms. If you live anywhere else …
/r/MensRights05/04/11 01:59 PM
8

There's this little thing called freedom and liberty. I make the decisions that I feel are the best for my family. I do not force you to circumcise your child, nor should you force me not to. Seriously? That's akin to a dictator saying that he has the freedom and liberty to rape and murder small children. This is obviously exaggerating a bit, but the analogy holds due to the fact that you have 100% control over your children's lives and could circumcise them, just like a dictator could do whatev…
/r/MensRights02/04/11 08:26 PM
4

This, by the gods this, if you really don't want a child, double or even triple up on your protection methods. Pulling out is very effective if done properly(I did it for a year before we got a regular supply of condoms+pills). If you really don't want a kid, condom(spermicide lube)+pill+pull out means you're waaay far beyond the possibility of having a kid. And if you really want to be sure, get your ass a vasectomy.
/r/MensRights07/02/11 11:25 PM
2

where to draw the line? Yeah, this is a very important thing. I believe that you should use your judgment in this though. If they make very good points and then insult someone, simply make a note that although they put forth good sense, it's unnecessary and detracts from their arguments to insult a person. Yet if they only insult the person and don't even attempt to address that person's points, it should be deleted and then if they continue to exhibit such behavior, banned. Edit: While actively…
/r/MensRights02/12/10 12:53 AM
14

Personally I believe that the manhood101 shit should be banned, as often as possible, it's simply spam. Being over the top has it's place, but outright insulting people is going too far, people should make reasoned arguments or GTFO. Throwaway accounts have their places, but trolling people and being a general ass deserves banning if it's a throwaway. If it's someone (non-throwaway) who's just a dick in general and has an opposing view, I believe it'd be far better trying to convince them with f…
/r/MensRights02/12/10 12:29 AM
6

I'll gladly accept any statistics that show that a huge number of men are not reporting their rapes when women are the rapist ... Rape victims are irrelevant to this discussion I call troll.
/r/MensRights13/10/10 10:53 PM
1

Essentially, it means that said a man is less likely "to believe that something that they have done deserves an apology, remorse or guilt(contrition)." It just means that men are less likely to feel guilty(and thus apologize) for doing something than women are for doing the same thing.
/r/MensRights25/09/10 06:12 PM
11

Every time I see a feminist in here trying to make peace, they try to frame the discussion in feminist terms. Which just coincidentally neglects most of the issues we talk about here. This here is the most important part, which you appear to not have taken into account. While women and feminist views are greatly appreciated, most of the time they come across as condescending rather than constructive, as they tend to ignore the issues from a realistic "it is" standpoint and instead take an ideali…
/r/MensRights31/05/10 04:32 AM
11

Try it, I'd love to see that one.
/r/MensRights26/04/10 12:11 PM
9

That is such a hilarious thing - are you seriously comparing something harmless like cutting someone's eyelids off with a permanent disability? Can't say I'm surprised, the sightsrights subreddit is full of the same hysterical weirdos as in the womens subreddit. .....Yeah, you might see where you stop being anywhere near intelligent and start to come across as an uninformed asshole. Anywaayyss, other people have already linked information on this, so you're either stupid, or a troll.
/r/MensRights26/07/09 05:44 AM
6

You, quit trolling.
/r/MensRights27/05/09 07:48 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter