TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Lutenbarque Archive

View 2 posts and 47 comments by Lutenbarque on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
14

for almost all of history, men start wars, men fight in wars, men kill in wars, men die in wars, men end wars, men write peace treaties, men signs peace treaties. that's just what happens when men are the only ones able to make political and military decisions. it's like weeding out all the red flowers in a patch of red and white flowers, then claiming bees only land on white flowers.
/r/MensRights19/05/20 09:26 PM
2

so, you DO consider the factors I listed (beards, deep voice, Adam's apple) "sexual by definition" since they are "secondary sexual characteristics" that were based on sexual selection over millions of years ? Good, that's consistent. But then, why are these factors not as sexualized by our societies? They are still attractive and sexy to women, but since their presence is normalized, they can be both sexy and acceptable. Boobs on the other hand, are sexy and unacceptable. Their unacceptable exp…
/r/MensRights29/04/20 08:45 PM
1

But what about my whole thing with breast size that you didn't acknowledge as a counterargument to your breeding argument? The breast itself isn't erogenous, it feels like any other skin on the chest area. Except since it isn't firm like chest muscles, it is vulnerable to being pushed in and hurt, making it more delicate. The nipple, where all the nerve ending are, is more sensitive. However, male nipples are also more sensitive than the rest of the chest. Additionally, sensitivity varies from i…
/r/MensRights29/04/20 08:34 PM
1

okay let's take a step back. You said: breasts are involved in breeding. This is the point I am disputing. My argument is that the fatty tissue that makes boobs attractive to men is not important for any part of "breeding". This can be seen through the fact that women with small breasts that are not traditionally attractive to men can still feed a baby. Therefore, the sexualization of breast is not due to primary reproductive fitness like you said in your first comment, but rather because they i…
/r/MensRights29/04/20 08:14 PM
1

when I said "flattest titties" I literally wrote "that still have glands" .. I don't mean surgically removed breasts if that's what you're implying. I dont really get your point. A-cups, the flattest breast size, can still get the job done. That's my point.
/r/MensRights29/04/20 07:54 PM
1

https://www.babycentre.co.uk/x1048230/is-it-true-that-small-breasted-mums-produce-less-breastmilk https://www.verywellfamily.com/breastfeeding-with-small-breasts-431770
/r/MensRights29/04/20 07:37 PM
1

it's not an indicator of fertility. Women with small breasts are equally as fertile as big breasted women. Additionally, I've never heard of this "mimic the ass" thing. It sounds like a hypothesis, not a fact. Also, men in Arabia where its hot have significant hair and Inuit men where it's cold don't. Facial hair doesnt have a clear cut purpose but it definitely appears only in one gender during puberty, just like breasts. Lastly, you only mentioned facial hair. What about deep voices and Adam's…
/r/MensRights29/04/20 07:36 PM
0

female breasts don't either. You can have a baby and feed that baby perfectly well with the flattest titties in the world, as long as the glands are functional. The round fatty tissue y'all love is aesthetic, not reproductive
/r/MensRights29/04/20 07:13 PM
6

Technically they are "secondary" sexual organs. They come in puberty and show sexual maturity but are not used in reproduction. If you consider boobs sexual, you must also consider Adam's apples, deep voices, and facial hair "sexual by definition."
/r/MensRights29/04/20 06:54 PM
5

huh, i remember the whole scandal when that was going down. Do you think it's had notable effects on your ability to access information?
/r/MensRights28/04/20 08:34 PM
6

nw! Why is it blocked? censoring or copy right laws or something else?
/r/MensRights28/04/20 08:29 PM
8

the title is referencing a quote by the police chief, which is in the article
/r/MensRights28/04/20 08:23 PM
8

Ehh dunno about that. All fat people are unhealthy but not all skinny people are healthy. If you are into health and body, it's best to go for built/athletic people, not skinny.
/r/MensRights16/04/20 01:04 AM
3

well, the we was meant to show that stereotyping by opposite parties is equally as harmful, since the author of that book was stereotyping (misandry) and the commenter was stereotyping (misogyny).
/r/MensRights13/04/20 02:18 AM
5

crazy idea, what if we stop stereotyping
/r/MensRights13/04/20 01:38 AM
1

true. I was known as his GF among his colleagues before we had formally discussed the topic
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/19 11:35 PM
14

in my opinion, time person of the year is for people like her. Activists making noise. When you are a scientist, you’re not doing what you do to get that kind of fame. I imagine the majority of scientists don’t even want to have their face plastered on a magazine that features mainly politics and that gets the wrath of the population’s eyes. Great scientists are certainly appreciated, just not in this way, not through means that reach you if you don’t go searching. It was a fine choice by Time. …
/r/MensRights12/12/19 08:58 PM
1

yea and i’d love to be a man. Both genders have pros and cons
/r/MensRights21/09/19 07:51 PM
0

I think it’s more the idea of diffused attention. When women dress up in a skimpy fashion, she wants to tell the world “look, this is how hot I can be.” It’s for everyone to know that when she wants to, she can be quite the catch. Why? For possible desirable partners to have her on their radar. For there to be an understanding that she is hot and thus high in the desirability hierarchy. For men to know: if you’re willing to put in the work that it takes to have me, these are the goods you’re gon…
/r/MensRights16/09/19 06:53 PM
6

i think the correct equality would be no one should be pressured to do sexual acts that they don’t feel comfortable with (which is different from withholding sex in order to get what you want). I don’t know what the groupthink on this sub is in regards to that but that’s my opinion at least. downvoting well written and reasonable opinions you disagree with is for losers, hope you don’t get downvoted.
/r/MensRights10/08/19 07:48 PM
23

but they’re somehow not bothered by a warthog-meerkat-lion friendship
/r/MensRights14/07/19 05:53 AM
1

is wolf whistling the same thing as cat whistling? i’ve never heard that term before
/r/MensRights10/05/19 06:28 PM
4

i think i remember something along the lines that Oscar winners were 20-something % black, which is more than the national percentage of 14
/r/MensRights08/05/19 08:36 PM
73

same here. I’ve always loved cars and legos and disliked barbies and pink. Doesn’t make me a boy. Hell, it doesn’t even make me a tomboy. Just a girl who likes cars and legos. Hopefully this boy will take his life back when he’s older
/r/MensRights20/04/19 03:43 AM
2

it would be cool to see the demographics of reddit users, but considering they collect no data, it’s unfortunately impossible. Women to men is an interesting one, so would liberal to conservative
/r/MensRights19/03/19 09:56 PM
1

if that’s all true, sounds great man
/r/MGTOW11/02/19 03:06 AM
1

society sets my behavior towards men? That makes no sense man. I choose my opinions, as do you. also, extreme feminism isn’t society. A very very small minority of Americans think that’s ok.
/r/MGTOW11/02/19 02:58 AM
1

that makes sense, 63 comments later I think I may finally understand this sub :p
/r/MGTOW11/02/19 02:52 AM
1

that’s actually wonderful man, all strength to you.
/r/MGTOW11/02/19 02:49 AM
1

I’m sympathetic to MGTOW. I think those articles are absolute bullshit and you’re right to be appalled. I’m not a feminist. I don’t watch CNN. They are bias. I try my damn hardest not to be (do you?). This means that if I see women hating on men, I’ll call them out. And If i see men hating on women, i’ll call them out. Today in this post, I did the latter. My post is hardly extreme or biased. I’m just saying that I am disappointed with this sub because it’s about hating women rather than going y…
/r/MGTOW11/02/19 02:47 AM
2

half an hour on reddit is a considerable amount of time. Look at best, hot, new, read comments, check out profiles. I’m forming an opinion on a subreddit, not some grand scientific theory.
/r/MGTOW11/02/19 02:38 AM
1

But I don’t support “kill all men” and “hate men” in any way shape or form. As I said, I’m sympathetic to MGTOW. I also don’t support the hate on here, even if you insist it’s “mild.” And if there were a feminist subreddit on here spewing “kill on men” (which I haven’t found, but feel free to provide evidence), then I’d tell them the exact shit I told y’all.
/r/MGTOW11/02/19 02:34 AM
-2

No, I don’t. That sub has feminist BS that gives me some good ol entertainment, but there is no pervasive hate like on here. It’s funny actually. I agree with MGTOW philosophy, but not the subs execution of it, and I disagree with feminist philosophy, but the execution actually fine. You won’t find “all men are horrible” type shit on there.
/r/MGTOW11/02/19 02:28 AM
1

and thanks for the detailed response
/r/MGTOW11/02/19 02:21 AM
1

Expressing your anger so that you can move beyond it sounds great, but I seriously wonder if that’s what’s going on. Anger also breeds anger and hate also breeds hate. Anyways, neither of us has any data on the effect that this sub has had on its users so I guess we’ll leave it at that. I do hope you’re right though. And I do hope that the feelings expressed on here don’t fully extend to real life.
/r/MGTOW11/02/19 02:21 AM
-2

how am I part of the problem? I don’t like feminists and I don’t like the raw hate I saw here. I like reasonable. I like the middle ground. How am I being hypocritical? What is my double standard?
/r/MGTOW11/02/19 02:14 AM
1

I’m not sure I understand what negative news has to do with hate
/r/MGTOW11/02/19 02:11 AM
1

A few other comments said this, and that would make sense based on what i’ve seen. Not what I was looking for, and the content here left me seriously disappointed after leaving the youtube philosophy.
/r/MGTOW11/02/19 02:08 AM
-1

1) I hope there’s more to it, but I didn’t see much 2) See I like the idea of laughing at women’s shit without thinking they’re garbage, but a lot of the posts and comments are disturbingly hateful. 3) If this sub is about the hate, then it’s clearly not what i’m looking for and ill be on my merry way. 4) I never said this is what y’all do 24/7 5) How isn’t it misogyny?
/r/MGTOW11/02/19 02:03 AM
-1

I guess I thought there was more to MGTOW than this...
/r/MGTOW11/02/19 01:59 AM
2

i plan to, just voicing my opinion before I do. free country
/r/MGTOW11/02/19 01:58 AM
1

that makes sense. do you know of a subreddit that captures this philosophical aspect? because that’s what i’m looking for. and no i’m not saying at all that this is what yall do constantly. I’m saying that this is what this subreddit is mostly about.
/r/MGTOW11/02/19 01:57 AM
2

I agree that MGTOW opens your eyes. But this subreddit seems to me to be more about hate than men’s wellbeing. But if this mess of a sub has helped you and other people, then great i guess.
/r/MGTOW11/02/19 01:55 AM
-1

thanks mate
/r/MGTOW11/02/19 01:50 AM
-1

you’re right, it’s not a movement. Replace that word with “community.” So you’re saying that the bashing around here is why MTGOW was created? I thought it was to offer a mindset to men free of feminism and PC bullshit, not of hating women. Perhaps I don’t have a grasp of it...
/r/MGTOW11/02/19 01:49 AM
-8

that sounds great. I hope that’s what it’s really like, although that’s not what I saw during my half hour immersion in the sub.
/r/MGTOW11/02/19 01:41 AM
-5

picking the bad ones? I came to this sub wanting to like it. I’m not trying to prove an agenda, I’m just disappointed that a movement with so much potential was reduced to this. Keep on bashing women, free country, I’ll just take no part in it. It happens to some subs, but hardly all. If y’all want to bash women then like another comment said go start a r/stupidwomen or some shit. Because this? This is turning the MGTOW movement into a joke for any reasonable person who comes to join the sub, wh…
/r/MGTOW11/02/19 01:37 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter