TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Lyzzy Archive

View 1 post and 63 comments by Lyzzy on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

metaLyzzy/r/EverydayMisandry20/10/21 09:43 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Please show a single example of a historical tyranny that did not have strong masculinity as a core value
/r/AntiFeminists20/10/21 09:11 AM
1

Hm, even as a bullet point list it's still an off-topic rant full of bullshit sweeping generalisations, accussations and general hatred. As if using asterisks instead of spaces didn't change a thing. Funny that.
/r/MensRights06/02/14 11:41 PM
1

Feminists usually do.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 01:38 PM
1

Well, twitter. Apart from being hard to look into today it's on the edge of being a chat platform. Some people having an oppinion or expresing concern on a chat platform is hardly a controversy. Is the part about hair and appropriation something larger?
/r/MensRights05/02/14 12:26 PM
0

Yes, I do get the joke and maintain that it is a rape joke as it makes light of rape. You might want to use a different definition if you want to catalogize jokes or similar but that's splitting hairs and leading nowhere. My orgignal point was that you cannot really compare a slice-of-life webcomic that tries to portray different lifestyles in a positive light with the deliberate dark humor and snark of penny arcade, especially when they go overboard.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 11:25 AM
0

Uhm...being raped to sleep by whatever the hell dickwolves are, every night? Also, it's the setup for a three panel joke, so yeah, it's both a brutal image and a rape joke.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 09:53 AM
-1

I'm not going to dignify that with an answer.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 09:38 AM
1

When you have Web comics like questionable content that try to be politically correct and the backlash he's seen about his well done Trans and Queer characters, Can you link to those controversies? I've only seen praising voices so far. or the dick wolves incident with penny arcade, most artists know the consequences of having an opinion against the current. A brutal rapejoke the authors did not want to shut up about and kept topping until a whole while later. Totaly not the same.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 07:25 AM
1

Alright, thank you, this has been very helpfull. I guess people thought it wasn't difficult to communicate these ideas before, so they added an extra hurdle. It's more of a battle to have some non-insulting terms which precludes those by a lot of older medical profesionals, especially when taken out of context. I'll just wait for the first bigot who trows merriam webster and some ill-understood medical study at me in order to call me a man because "it's science".. Thank you all the same though.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 02:06 AM
1

I took that difference just based the definitions of the words, Ok, can you provide links, please? I've never seen transsexual defined in a way that it required surgery outside of really barebones dictionaries. (unless the culture is so extreme that they perform surgery to further distinguish the sexes). That is the sad truth about a lot of intersexual babies.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 06:52 PM
1

That awkward truth is that the behavior is both born and learned because the brain is a complex organ. That makes it harder to make the distinction between gender and sex, but is useful for the "social construct" argument since social pressure would only relate to learned behaviors. I agree with this. It can be hard do differentiate learned and inborn behaviour and I would suggest that the brain is a sex organg insofar as it relates heavily to breeding (esp. the case for homosexual and transgend…
/r/MensRights10/12/13 09:09 AM
1

Gender is a a longlasting identification with one of several possible ideals that is thought to have neurological causes *:as well as societal ones. Those ideals are typically about apearance, behavior and personality and normaly allow for some variaton. In some western societes there are only two complimentary options (man / woman) available. Now, it would be cheating if I didn't include that most people where mostly fine with their gender bein assigned at birth based on their physical sex (as …
/r/MensRights10/12/13 08:50 AM
1

Uhm, I'm quite sure masculine and feminine are gender roles and expectations. You'd use them to say -- " hey, that was girl is quite masculine-looking", or "hey that guy has a very feminine hobby"..., but not personality unless you where talking abut specific traits. sex: anatomy, as in capatibitlity to reproduce or appearance?
/r/MensRights10/12/13 08:35 AM
2

Do you mean transgender or transexual? As in changing the gender identity vs a physiological sex-change? I've seen this usage of the terms a lot recently. Could you please explain where you got it from? In my experience, transgender and transsexual are nearly synonyms but transsexual is used more in a medical context and lacks any umbrella meaning.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 04:06 AM
1

You are talking about sex, not gender.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 04:00 AM
1

Ah, yes, I tend to forget about it's umbrella meaning sometimes. Yes, it can also mean anyone who identifies outside of the binary (i.e blurred genders, multiple genders, fluid gender, agender or thirdgender). They really should've picked a better word than "queer" though, in my oppinion.....
/r/MensRights10/12/13 03:00 AM
1

Not that gender in of itself is a social construct. Like I said, it is partly in the way a binary is assumed. You can either be a man or a woman but not inbetween and not something else. This is called the gender binary. Also physical sex is regarded as always the same es gender identity. While both are true for the majority (or at least don't cause them enough trouble to complain), there are exceptions to the rule. Hopefully you are willing to answer another question. Sure am. What is the 3rd(o…
/r/MensRights10/12/13 02:44 AM
2

Isn't the entire idea behind it that if you tend to enjoy girly things and have a girly personality that that literally means you're a girl? Nope, that's just what the media has found to be the bestselling narrative. Quite a few trans women also like more masculine hobbies. But a trans girl whose parents "always knew" because "he" wasn't playing with lego and wanted to wear dresses makes for a much better story than a trans guy who basically played along till his twenties, became depressed, did …
/r/MensRights10/12/13 01:39 AM
3

To get some misconceptions out of the way: Social construct does not mean that something is entirely made up by society. It merely states that societal oppinion of it makes up a huge amount of individual oppinion. In general, something that isn't socially constructed is physics/chemistry/ etc. - the same principles have been shown to work whatever people think about it. gender means a lot of different things depending on context, because people lack precision (see below) but the whole idea of it…
/r/MensRights10/12/13 01:21 AM
6

That is a rather old psychological theroy and there is no evidence for it. In fact, lot's of trans folk have are homosexual in regard to the gender they identify with. Also, why would someone choose more ridicule / opression / hassle / internalized shame to escape one stigma?
/r/MensRights04/12/13 01:25 PM
1

It's not about the adrenaline it's about the feeling of specialness that we are so often promised in the media. It's classic addiction with bliss and horrible withdrawal. I would argue that it's not a very stable way of having a relationship and can be bad for ones mental health - but in the end who can really stop those that don't only want to love and be loved, but to submit to it fully? Maybe it can even be a learning experience for some like you sugested....Maybe there should more movies wit…
/r/MensRights28/11/13 05:06 PM
2

I am sure that some girls like being treated badly, for reasons that I will never be able to understand Apart from socialisation and infantilisation of girls and women, some people like to enhance the thrill of romance by having drama. By accepting that there are some crushing lows, the highs become all the more higher. A friend of mine rode that rollercoaster for a while before seeing it as ultimatively destructive and working on self-improvement before seeking new relationships.
/r/MensRights28/11/13 09:05 AM
1

You are right that one has no responsibility to read minds and I would add that body language can be tricky to read sometimes. This is why I suggest the concepts of a safe atmosphere, enthusiastic consent and multiple inquires to deal with potential problems. If you take these parts away, you invite rule lawering and entice people to find loopholes. but that doesn't necessarily make it rape, and it sure as shit doesn't make the other person a rapist. I agree that rape is a strong word and should…
/r/MensRights28/11/13 05:36 AM
1

Ugh, I don't understand the contradiction on the first paragraph, please elaborate. How can it be not technically consensual but clear for any reasonable person that it was? IIf the pressure to have sex is merely social without a power dynamic going on (i.e the person asked would loose the asker as a friend if they refused) t's not rape. In the cases you described I'm missing the whole backstory. As I assume that those people weren't meeting at a sex party where the time between saying yes and g…
/r/MensRights27/11/13 03:51 PM
2

yes. And you should probably avoid or elaborate words like "scared" when talking about consensual sex...
/r/MensRights27/11/13 02:46 PM
0

The problem is that, as stupid as you rightly describe this attitude (which by the way is not that of feminists but of rapists), it is very prevailing and will be used as a defense by rapists. Rape culture however means more than just a lot of people assuming that rape is natural. It also means that people will try to blame the victim for what happend, insisting that they somehow deserved it.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 01:15 PM
1

The teaching part is aimed at those either having a warped idea of sex vs rape or those enabling psychopaths by doing nothing to stop them. Remember Steubenville? I doubt all those people will be diagnosed with psychopathy.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 01:06 PM
1

Straw feminists and overdramatisations aside what about your third example isn't rape? Would you call it consent If someone throws themselves on another, physically restrains them and yells "I'm going to fuck you and you better not make a fuss, ok?" Is it consent, just because the other party might mutter "ok" to avoid more violence?
/r/MensRights27/11/13 01:04 PM
1

Just so we're on the same page. After the previous exchange, I doubt this condition can be met and have lost interest. Call that a victory if you want to.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 04:10 PM
1

Sorry, but this is pointless. If you can't be bothered to read the stuff I write and compulsively substitute it with your own accusations, please have fun arguing with yourself.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 10:07 AM
1

I never said that. Why are you trying so hard to put words in my mouth? You don't have to want to hurt someone (or make them feel uncomfortable to stay on topic) for the act to be immoal. Not considering their feelings or the general societal rule regarding the appropriateness (which is why I used the term moral) of the act is sufficient.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 03:49 PM
1

A faux pas means unintentionall malice (or rule breaking). I cannot find much of a gray area in the specific situation and already argued how I see it as unlikely that such behaviour is accidental.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 07:26 AM
-1

How's that relevant ?
/r/MensRights05/11/13 01:46 AM
-1

I did argue that expressing such interest can be problematic for the reasons above and find that it would be very unlikely for an adult person to never have considered this topic. Thus, in expressing sexual interest in the above mentioned circumstances they are not acting inocently. Of course merely having such feelings is entirely human and there must be thousands of ways to express them without being imoral.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 01:36 AM
-1

Please explain. My dictionary says that the term means (among other things) "free from guilt, sin, or immorality", which would not apply. I guess we could argue about the meaning of the term but I don't see too much point in that...
/r/MensRights05/11/13 01:22 AM
1

Indicating sexual interest can be inappropriate, yes.
/r/MensRights04/11/13 03:51 PM
2

Well, stereotypes and power dynamics, cultural notions of sex being something special that is only to be shared between heteronormative lovers in a monogamous relationship, the intimacy that's invoked when someone talks * about something so private and so on. As a result, not everyone is comfortable being lusted after, especially when it's unexpected, unrequited and unsolicited. *or gestures or mimics or in any other way intrudes into that sphere
/r/MensRights04/11/13 03:14 AM
-1

Your description of her does not sound like you just innocently wished her a good morning. Are you trying to shame her in retrospect or trying to justify your behaviour while missing what might be the key point in the whole encounter?
/r/MensRights04/11/13 01:30 AM
1

A prominent feminist in Germany If you're talking about Alice Schwarzer, she's a bit of an embarassment. Having been part of some radical and and important issues, she is now to much of a feminist icon to be challenged publically. Which, considering her views on intersectionalism (particiluar racism), internet, sex work, young feminists, and so on, is quite sad.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 01:55 PM
3

It does not really improve hygiene in a developed country with showers. The negative effects include less sensation and sometimes pain, as the glans is not protected any longer and desensibilizes from daily contact with underwear. If you read this subredit a while back you'll find multiple accusations of feminists doing nothing for the men in regards to "male genital mutilation" - so yeah, damned if they do, damned if they don't.
/r/MensRights25/08/13 04:49 PM
1

Hm? At around 20:35 he talks about how he used to be a cool dyke poet who could talk about women on the street and still be edgy and raw, which of course he cannot do anymore as man liking women are quite common. What part are you refering to?
/r/MensRights17/07/13 09:28 AM
1

What part of the brain is non-biological?
/r/MensRights17/07/13 09:20 AM
1

So, a trans man tries to live as a butch lesbian, finally transitions and behaves like a stereotype for a while bevor he overcomes his pubescent urges. Sounds pretty typical and makes it hard to differentiate the hormonal effects from the general transition ones. Also he still seems very attentive of both male agression towards him and his need for female friends.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 10:13 PM
1

Well, those towns might or might have not had changes in the population, changes in police budget, changes in how many parties they had in a year (one article about edmont cites those parties as a huge risk factor) and so on. Also one should account for an increase in reported cases. Overall I think the best measure of success or failure of this campaign would be a long term evaluation of this town or towns with similar programs.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 02:19 AM
1

Can't find that in the article.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 02:50 PM
1

So I pick up a girl and take her out, we have dinner and drinks, and then I should tell her to call a friend to come get her, or rather she should call a friend, because now that she's been drinking, I'm a potential rapist. Sounds like an awesome date to me. Actually she should make preparations like a cab, bus or whatever ahead of time if it is a first date. That way there is a bit more safety and less rumors. Of course, that is an individual decission. I didn't see the questions that were aske…
/r/MensRights15/07/13 02:43 PM
1

Nice, if a little stereotypical, story. I missed some valentine's day activity like walks in the park or something. But meh. According to the CDC's definition of rape, the above is rape. I found nothing in http://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/sv_surveillance_definitionsl-2009-a.pdf to support that statement. Are you refering to a different document? That includes the phone survey that imputed rape after the fact, used for the 1 in 4 figure. Can you link to one specific study? I find lots of…
/r/MensRights15/07/13 09:51 AM
1

You think women will be better off if their dates start ditching them when they are drinking because they've been told don't ever trust men? Yes, I do think that it would be safer to be driven home by a friend instead of a person you just met, especially when you are drunk. Also there is a lot less feeling of obligation this way. No one thinks that rape is a joke A huge part of those interviewed prior to the original poster campaign thought it was -- or at least it wasn't serious. Every time a w…
/r/MensRights15/07/13 09:17 AM
1

I should have defined a lot more precisely as "more than"... Because every time we try to deal with false rape accuations, people come out of the wood-work, and emote concern over how our efforts to end one crime, and a culture that victimizes people is going to theoretically create a culture that victimizes another group of people. Actually the concern is that you reinforce an already existing culture of rape apology and victim blaming the extend of which has been measured in the study that was…
/r/MensRights13/07/13 02:38 PM
1

The article stated it had been a raising trend in not only this city but serveral more
/r/MensRights13/07/13 01:23 AM
1

Yet we're still told that it's not yet the time to take on false accusations. Because rape is still a problem that outweighs that of false accusations for a lot of people and there seems no progress in making this appear as less of a zero-sum game. And every time, and every way we do, we're told it's not the right way Can you give me some link to some campaigns that where a little more thoughtfull than this one? About your switching words: That something you can do on just about any issue that h…
/r/MensRights13/07/13 01:19 AM
1

How about you present it in a larger context of how rape is no laughing matter and you should not joke about rape (because it makes it appear normal), including falsely reporting it (because it trivializes it and hurts the accused)? Or how about "take it seriously", being both about listening to the victims and being earnest about accusations? Also one could imagine posters about people actually having the courage to prevent potential abuse by defusing risky situations (like being driven home by…
/r/MensRights13/07/13 01:07 AM
1

Already doing that, and it isn't helping. Next idea? Sociale changes needs time... I did not state that being a MRA means being mysogonistic, merely that appearing mysogonistic as a MRA might be a bad idea. And yes, the bad apples have a tendency to make the headlines...
/r/MensRights13/07/13 12:46 AM
1

There are victim assistance funds that give cash payouts Mhm, I didn't know that. Still, I think there are easier ways to get money by fraud without the side effects. I unterstand your concerns about the cost of policework and ressources but honestly doubt that false rape claims take up that much. It just sounded shocking when you implied that because of false reporting there was no money to investigate cases. The numbers you cite sound a lot like the statistics on wikipedia that had case number…
/r/MensRights13/07/13 12:15 AM
2

Help the fight against rape and be public about it. The less actual rapes and sexual assaults happen, the more spectacular the cases will be, leading to more thourough investigations. That's way more effective than appearing as yet another mysogonistic MRA who throws rape victims under the bus to protect himself from a very distant possibilty and thus is seen as a rape apologist or worse. If that sounds to feminist go political and demand that police take the sexual assault more seriously and in…
/r/MensRights12/07/13 11:59 PM
1

Even if you would actually word it in such a way that it's clear that you are against actual malice instead of fuzzy memory and feelings of guilt for maybe having been flirty or having drunk etc, you still create the impression that such false reports are a very common and thus any report is less likely to be believed.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 11:48 PM
2

I should have been clearer on this: If you promote the idea that false accusations are a problem as widespread (or more widespread) than actual sexual assault or rape, than you create a culture in which victims are in fear of reporting and police are less likely to believe them. If police does not have enough ressources to investigate a crime as serious as rape, then they should hire more people. I do not really understand the part about charity: They don't give out money to the victims, do they…
/r/MensRights12/07/13 11:38 PM
2

I don't know, a 10% decrease against a raising trend seems to signifikant to just be noise to me... Also it would be interresting to see whether the campaign helped combat the dangerous views on rape that led to it... Sadly there seems to be no followup-study
/r/MensRights12/07/13 11:25 PM
2

See: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/british-columbia/dont-be-that-guy-ad-campaign-cuts-vancouver-sex-assaults-by-10-per-cent-in-2011/article1359241/ in which they claim there was the first 10% decrease in sexual assaults in years. Also a study that was part of the campaign found that the majority of the interviewed did not have a clear definition of rape. So yes, people are stupid.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 10:34 PM
2

On that list there is an interresting part about how police officers in the largest and most rigorous study in the UK reported 8% false accusations, but only about 3% where false accusations (or uncertain) under the Home Office counting rules? A possible reason for this can be found here: http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2013/06/why_cops_don_t_believe_rape_victims_and_how_brain_science_can_solve_the.html
/r/MensRights12/07/13 08:44 PM
2

I think it would actually be quite clever to challenge the opinion that only men can be rapists and only women can be victims of rape. However, I highly doubt that women have such a high level of acceptance for not-actually-rape (except it is) when the victim is a man. But then again, maybe such a campaign would stop people from seeing an effective campaign against rape as misandry...
/r/MensRights12/07/13 08:32 PM
5

Can you point to a study that shows just how many women believe that falsely reporting rape is just good fun?
/r/MensRights12/07/13 08:19 PM
4

No you don't. You reinforce the idea that false accusations are a huge problem which leads the rape victims to think that they won't be believed.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 08:09 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter