TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

M4hkn0 Archive

View 0 posts and 18 comments by M4hkn0 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Australia has no rules against marriages of convenience? The US has rules about people getting married just to get immigration papers. The US INS will revoke green cards if they think a marriage was of convenience. I am not accusing you of such but divorces can turn nasty. The state could act on its own too.
/r/Divorce_Men01/07/26 01:58 PM
2

Verify Australian and New Zealand’s immigration rules. If you divorce, will you even be allowed to stay in Australia or New Zealand? If you were in the US her immigration status could be endangered. You moved, now the tables are possibly reversed.
/r/Divorce_Men01/07/26 01:38 PM
1

At the time she filed for divorce, we had two children still at home and I was not working for pay. It was always the plan for me to go back into the paid workforce once they were on their own. The divorce accelerated that timeline by a couple years. Yes... I am back to doing work, similar to what I was doing before we had the additional children. It did reduce the maintenance amount that I was to receive.
/r/Divorce_Men19/06/26 10:59 AM
0

If you do not understand or accept the financial commitments that come with marriage, you probably should not get married.... I think there are a lot of people who do not fully understand all that before they tie the knot. They are all too flush with romance to think about the sober realities of marital finances. As I lurk on this forum..... I see a lot of posts that suggest exactly that scenario.... then they are all mad about something or someone.
/r/Divorce_Men18/06/26 07:35 PM
2

Alimony absolutely is a formula in my state. I literally dealt with it. Two sides can agree to forgo it. Two sides can agree to a different formula. The default is the formula. If one side is eligible to get it, they will. It can max out at 33% of net income; after taxes only. Child support can bring that up to 40% of net.
/r/Divorce_Men17/06/26 01:57 PM
3

Unless you are very high net worth and have a very complicated financial profile, maintenance and child support are very formulaic.
/r/Divorce_Men17/06/26 11:14 AM
2

Possibly... we can't rewrite the past. I could have had a long career, with promotions ... or not, who knows. The clock ticks.. time runs out. A road not taken. I have no regrets having children. They are a personal good, a family good, and a societal necessity. Even with people who are dual income for the entirety of their married lives, there can be significant discrepancies in income levels. I know of many such relationships, where most typically the man is making quite a bit more than the wo…
/r/Divorce_Men17/06/26 10:56 AM
3

The only condition was being married 20+ years. The income discrepancy determines the amount and who pays. If we were dual income making the same amount, no one would be paying anything.... except maybe child support. In my state maintenance is determined before child support... which can have the net effect of lowering child support. Maintenance is in no way dependent on there being children in the relationship.
/r/Divorce_Men17/06/26 01:30 AM
10

In my state you have to be married 20 years or more to qualify for lifetime maintenance. I am the recipient of it.... I gave up a career for 24 years as a SAHD raising our three children so the she could have a thriving career. It worked for her too. She thrived without all the barriers that typically hold women back. I stayed home with the sick kids. I got up in the wee hours to feed them, bathe them, change their diapers. I ran them all over town as they got older. For all the domestic tasks..…
/r/Divorce_Men17/06/26 12:29 AM
6

The other's past income level can be imputed against the present.
/r/Divorce_Men27/07/25 11:33 PM
1

Court expected me to find work after 22 years raising kids.
/r/Divorce_Men11/07/25 08:44 PM
6

Depends on the state you divorce in. Some states have permanent alimony if you are married 20+ years. How much that is, all depends on what income and assets both parties have.
/r/Divorce_Men24/04/25 03:18 AM
3

In practice, you dont have 50/50. You have 100% custody cause the kids are sleeping under your roof. She is visiting (visitation).
/r/Divorce_Men28/05/23 11:43 PM
4

He didn’t get fleeced. He got off lightly. She should have gotten 50%.
/r/Divorce_Men23/05/23 10:52 AM
2

*fist bump* *bro hug* SAHD's crushing it!
/r/Divorce_Men15/05/23 04:14 PM
1

Absolutely not. 31 years married, 22 as the trailing stay at home spouse, three kids. My being home with the kids enabled her to have a more successful career. Unlike a lot of men I DID 90% of the cleaning. I DID the cooking. I took care of the kids when they were sick. I changed the diapers and stayed up very late when they were babies, so she could sleep. I shuttled them here and there. I managed all of our finances, including investment portfolios. I maintained the house, the yard, and our au…
/r/Divorce_Men15/05/23 04:04 PM
16

If on some chance you are in Illinois…. Local Junior college offers a CDL licensing class. If you are in reasonably good physical health, this could be an option. There are WEI grants (federal money) available that will pay for the coursework and pay you a wage to attend class. Our local junior college made clear they can help with other ways too. A lot of their students are coming in broke with barely or no roof over their heads. Trucking companies are desperate for drivers and are paying solid…
/r/Divorce_Men28/04/23 11:21 AM
2

Viagra.
/r/Divorce_Men21/03/23 12:27 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter