| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | What's your opinion on /r/ BeatingWomen and reddits response to it?So, just humor about violence is distasteful? | /r/MensRights | 19/09/11 06:27 AM |
| 0 | What's your opinion on /r/ BeatingWomen and reddits response to it?Senseless violence against those who don't deserve it is wrong. If you are hurting someone for no good reason, that is bad. Agreed. So: any material on there displaying real (not faked) violence against women is distasteful. Disagreed. Do you also think racial, ethnic, stereoptypic, economic, sexual, political, etc. humor is distasteful as well? | /r/MensRights | 19/09/11 05:33 AM |
| 1 | a long thread of people criticizing seddit on redditOh fucking please. Comparing them to devout Christians is one of the dumbest things I have ever read. You're justifying your obnoxious attitude with bullshit. | /r/seduction | 18/07/11 02:58 PM |
| -4 | a long thread of people criticizing seddit on redditYour logic is flawed. Just because those are the top four comments does not mean they solely represent the community. The entirety of the comments with positive ratios represent the community. I find this type of criticism hilarious! Read through it for a good laugh! Usually it goes something like this: "OMG look at those 'sedditors' and their 'manipulation'" and then: *Posts to /r_a: "WHY DOES NO GIRL WANT ME?! I'M A VIRGIN, I CAN'T TALK TO PEOPLE, I'm BORING AND NERVOUS AROUND EVERYONE! FUCK F… | /r/seduction | 18/07/11 07:25 AM |
| 0 | a long thread of people criticizing seddit on redditI totally agree man. It's sad to see you being downvoted. It's apparent that a great many of the posters in that thread misconstrue what seddit is about. However, they do bring up some good points, such as how ridiculous peacocking is and how silly the acronyms are. | /r/seduction | 18/07/11 05:59 AM |
| 3 | a long thread of people criticizing seddit on redditI actually agree with some of it. Specifically, the poster who pointed out how ridiculous the acronyms are. You simply shouldn't have to read through a list of acronyms to be capable of deciphering a lot of advice that is given. I also agree with the a poster who pointed out how ridiculously stupid peacocking is. Lastly, the way many of seddit community has responded to that thread is just as childish as the thread itself. I was very disappointed reading the comments here. | /r/seduction | 18/07/11 05:50 AM |
| 3 | A slightly embarrassing facebook trick that has been surprisingly successful.I don't see how this is any different than other things guys do. Good work man. | /r/seduction | 05/07/11 05:14 AM |
| 26 | A slightly embarrassing facebook trick that has been surprisingly successful.Isn't social proof inherently fake? | /r/seduction | 05/07/11 05:13 AM |
| -7 | The BEST possible text you can send when she flakes (doesn't reply to you asking her out)That reeks of desperation and butt hurt. | /r/seduction | 28/05/11 01:27 AM |
| 35 | How many nice guys does it take to screw in a light bulb?I thought he was going to say: none, because nice guys don't screw anything. | /r/seduction | 01/05/11 08:26 PM |
| 1 | Cross Post from F7U12 - Don't by girls drinksThat relationship is totally Abed and Troy from Community. | /r/seduction | 29/04/11 07:29 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter