TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

METALLlCA Archive

View 1 posts and 30 comments by METALLlCA on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
26

Will any man love me? Yes! I (40M) met my wife (40F) at an out-of-state wedding. We were both promiscuous 25-years old at the time and hooked up for a one-night stand. My flight got delayed so that turned into a two-night stand. But, we stayed in contact and we flew to visit each other. We, of course, had those talks. I’m not going to say what our body counts were, but they were higher than yours and about proportional to each other (or hers was higher and she heard my number and lowered it to m…
/r/RedPillWomen08/06/22 05:04 PM
5

I can speak for only myself, but the only reason I got married and would ever again marry (should my wife pass) is for the family unit. Long story made short, I had two kids out of wedlock and when I broke up with her, I realized how much power single moms have over their babies’ daddy. I got married to gain an advantage and my wife not only helped me get custody, she legally adopted them years later. I don’t need a marriage certificate to enjoy being in the presence of a person. Anyone who can …
/r/RedPillWomen07/11/19 01:22 AM
2

Well, I gave you the short story, obviously. A bit more context is that my wife really did put my ex in her place, we spent thousands in private investigator fees, attorneys fees, and so on. What really happened is that my ex puts on a persona of this pious Christian woman when, in reality, she was slutting herself around town, lying to people for personal gain (as in filing false protective orders), and just being anything but Christlike. So, I have nothing against promiscuous women (what you d…
/r/PussyPassDenied21/09/19 05:51 PM
1

I guess I have my own pussypassdenied related story to share. My ex used our kids as a custodial volley ball filing three false protective orders when she got upset at me. Basically, she punished me for breaking up with her and her instrument of punishment was withholding the kids. Long story made short, all three protective orders were dismissed, I got married to a woman who took them in as her own and legally adopted them, and I got full custody and the bitch hasn’t seen them since June 30, 20…
/r/PussyPassDenied21/09/19 03:58 PM
1

When the whole thing hinged on things she claims were said, while bystanders admit they didn't hear it. I presume you're intentionally misunderstanding this. No. I just asked who you were quoting because those were not my words nor was that a position I ever advanced. Feel free to sift through our exchange again and reread my contributions with the self-same charity you would wish others to extend to you. Address my arguments — not strawmen.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/07/19 11:30 PM
1

Stop being a disingenuous fuck Stop telling people of color to “go back.” You see how easy it is to lob accusations in lieu of dealing with the chief issue? obviously if you don't hear the whole argument, saying you heard it is inaccurate. When you precede the aforementioned object pronoun, “it,” with “whole argument,” the object, sure; it’s inaccurate. [emphasis mine] But, I never qualified “argument” in any such way.; did I? Hence, you’ve again moved the goal posts and are merely putting fire …
/r/PussyPassDenied30/07/19 11:28 PM
1

If you hear an unknown percentage of an argument, no I wouldn't say you then "heard that argument." Who are you quoting here? I certainly never used that phrase and a cursory search does not reveal such a phrase ever being used. The issue is whether the witnessed heard the argument. You are drawing upon both an arbitrary line of demarcation and a distinction between two things for which there exists no operational difference. People can argue loudly or quietly, formally or informally, written or…
/r/PussyPassDenied30/07/19 10:54 PM
1

I didn't say they stopped arguing I said the entire thing wasn't heard, you disingenuous fuck. Quoting what can only be inferred as an authoritative source to you, you wrote: The police report cited two Publix employees who said they did not remember or witness the argument between Thomas and Sparkes... You then lamented that it: Sure is weird how these sites ignore the actual police report. Firstly, yes, it is weird how these sites ignore the actual police report since the police report cites w…
/r/PussyPassDenied30/07/19 10:41 PM
1

The picture has mislead intentionally with it. That's why that characterization was used. A headline which read something like "u/redsepulchre viewed the planet Pluto" would equally be a mischaracterization of Pluto itself, but not of the viewing. That the phrase is "racist" is the mischaracterization since she did not mean it in such a way, but they are adopting HER characterization! That she said "go back" would be no more or less true than had you viewed the first discovered Kuiper belt ice d…
/r/PussyPassDenied30/07/19 01:30 AM
1

I didn't see the part about live stream debate how pathetic can you get I suppose I am so pathetic that I am able and willing to defend my argument in real time with my identity on the line. Only one of us is willing and able to do that. One of us is either reluctant or incapable and it seems to be the same party low enough to poison the well behind the safety of a blue light and moniker. Would you rather meet up to spar in a sanctioned gym on my dime? That nobody but the two of them knows what …
/r/PussyPassDenied30/07/19 01:15 AM
1

If you would rather debate tomorrow or at a later time, I am fine with that. That’s why I messaged you for your consideration of the debate question, time, format, etc. If you want, propose a date that works for you. So long as the question regards any point of contention you and I have already addressed, I will defend it.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/07/19 12:37 AM
1

Again, even an ELEMENTARY level of reading comprehension would clear this up. That both witnesses clearly stated they missed the OPENING of the argument does not mean they did not REMEMBER THE ARGUMENT THEY HEARD. If I say I did not catch the opening to a movie, but I caught the rest and recall, in detail, the portion I watched, I am a witness to the portion I watched. Literally nothing in my response is invalid. Two or more things can be true at once. One can miss the OPENING to a movie and cor…
/r/PussyPassDenied29/07/19 04:55 PM
1

The phrase characterized as “racist” is “go back,” thus an elementary level of reading comprehension would serve you well here. To iterate, I do not agree with its characterization, but to pretend the pictorial is not referring to the phrase “go back” when ascribing it to her is just foolish.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/07/19 04:48 PM
1

What am I supposed to get from [the video] about their argument? The education you claim we need. The claim that Ms. Thomas told Mr. Sparkes to “ go back” is DEMONSTRABLY true. Forget the racial characterization, hype, and clickbait headlines. She at least said it. Just own it. I do not know you, but you do not come off as ignorant despite your comments’ implication. You instead come off as an intelligent and thoughtful person so it boggles my mind why you’re steadfastly maintaining this charade…
/r/PussyPassDenied29/07/19 12:50 AM
1

Both employees interviewed said they heard nothing of the argument until voices were raised. Read the police report. You are moving the goalposts. Your initial reply reads: "The police report cited two Publix employees who said they did not remember or witness the argument between Thomas and Sparkes." This is a marked difference from "Both employees interviewed said they heard nothing of the argument until voices were raised." I read the report. I will summarize the witness statements: “Upon arr…
/r/PussyPassDenied28/07/19 11:34 PM
3

The link is in my comment, her lawyer posted scans of the police report on Twitter. Forgive me for requesting a source which corroborates your claim. You previously wrote that the police report says the two witnesses “did not remember” what was said, but we have witness statements to the contrary on the last page. Maybe the police report doesn't include this headline because that statement specifically says she was telling him to leave the store. I don’t care about the headline — I care about th…
/r/PussyPassDenied27/07/19 07:50 PM
7

Y'all need to educate yourselves. She walked back her statement and admitted he just called her a bitch, nothing racial. To my knowledge, she never made such an admission; instead, she just backtracked and said "I don't know if he said 'go back,' or those types of words ... I don't know if he said 'go back to your country' or 'go back to where you came from,' but he was making those types of references is what I remember.". Please provide a link to the police report because, in responding to you…
/r/PussyPassDenied27/07/19 07:22 PM
4

Fair enough. I misattributed the “sexual harassing” statement to you when it belonged to spacehog. I’ll chock that up to the long thread and my laziness double checking. Sorry for that. So, with that out of the way. Here are some thoughts of mine: Let’s suppose Louis CK’s entire apology was completely void of any faith or merit — that he issued it only because he feared defending his actions would ruin his career. If we can see him doing this, then surely we can see these women giving consent co…
/r/PussyPassDenied12/07/19 10:29 PM
3

I smell what you’re stepping in, but hear me out. Generally speaking, sexual harassment is any behavior characterized by making unwanted sexual advances in, say, a social setting. His masturbation may have been consciously unwelcome, but verbally it was. By analogy, imagine a sleeze friend comes to my house. Maybe the guy is unemployed, doesn’t clean up after himself, and has a drug habit. He asks if he can stay there for a few nights. I’d rather him not...but because he was a groomsman in my we…
/r/PussyPassDenied12/07/19 09:25 PM
12

I’m not berating you or being hostile. I’m calling attention to the fact that you missed the point of contribution. That one should be legally entitled to something after a divorce based upon custom is absurd IS the point. But notice that it’s the argument itself that is absurd — not me. You attacked me in lieu of the argument (argumentum ad hominem) by calling ME absurd. Had you said “your argument is absurd,” I might have simply replied with a “whoosh.” So, context is important. I think there …
/r/PussyPassDenied19/01/19 11:04 AM
24

Apparently the point is lost on you that neither I nor Chris Rock believe any woman should be given resources simply because she is accustomed to living a particular way any more or less than a man should be given sex for the same reason. Chris Rock was exposing the absurdity of alimony by the way of reductio ad absurdum. You, on the other hand, appear to believe alimony is peachy keen. You’re absurd.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/01/19 10:09 AM
21

As Chris Rock pointed out, men are accustomed to getting pussy when married. Should a woman should be ordered by a court to give up her pussy to her ex because he’s used to getting it?
/r/PussyPassDenied19/01/19 09:45 AM
266

If you’re the kind of person who holds open doors for people (irrelevant of one’s sex) you’re just damned if you do and damned if you don’t. Think about it: suppose you hold open the door for a woman, some feminist somewhere will complain you’re a benevolent sexist (“What makes you think I can’t open a door myself?!”). Suppose you then (fearing being called sexist) hold open the door for only men, someone feminist somewhere will complain you’re a sexist (“He holds the door open for only men! He’…
/r/PussyPassDenied01/01/19 05:41 PM
9

In my understanding, a sexual context is everything. A compliment like “hey, gorgeous” is not a catcall, in my opinion, whereas “nice tits” or “hey, sugar tits” is. To support this idea, I’ll cite a few dictionaries: Oxford: “A loud whistle or comment of a sexual nature made by a man to a passing woman” * Merriam Webster: “a loud, *sexually *suggestive call or comment directed at someone publicly (as on the street)” Wiktionary: “A shout, whistle, or comment of a sexual nature, usually made towar…
/r/RedPillWomen30/12/18 08:07 PM
22

Remember that viral video where a woman walked through NYC for ten hours to compile a 1:56 video comprised mostly of greetings and compliments which were likened to catcalling? I think that’s how. Don’t get me wrong. If you watch the video, there were some legitimate catcalls (maybe 1%) that I’d say were over the line. But in today’s world, saying “hello” to a female passerby is considered catcalling.
/r/RedPillWomen30/12/18 06:15 PM
9

Hopefully, this will give him a swift kick in the ass for even his own sake. Best wishes.
/r/RedPillWomen15/11/18 08:45 PM
2

Worked for me.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/11/18 02:46 PM
1

Boudoir photo session. Let him pick out the attire. A plus if he goes with you while you try it on in the changing room. Every guy is different, but when my wife does that, it’s the bees knees. So, I’m talking from my perspective what made my season. Good luck!
/r/RedPillWomen16/08/18 12:29 AM
2

It depends what level of commitment we are talking here. If you both are looking towards marriage, boudoir photos are legit. For less of a committed relationship, whatever he is really into, I’d find a subreddit for it and ask those folks.
/r/RedPillWomen14/08/18 06:22 PM
65

Naked too. My wife and I will be celebrating 10 years of marriage in a couple of weeks and I still want to see her naked.* And I can’t be the only guy in here who thinks seeing his wife prepare a meal in the buff does not rank among the best things of marriage. I love cooking. It’s a hobby of mine. But it really is great when my wife goes all out on a meal. Having grown up watching *Married...With Children, I thought I would have lost interest in my wife. I don’t think that trope is correct. If …
/r/RedPillWomen11/08/18 04:44 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter