TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MJ50inMD Archive

View 0 posts and 19 comments by MJ50inMD on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Didn’t they recently give a Nobel Prize to someone for debunking it?
/r/MensRights22/11/24 09:22 PM
5

Your first sentence says this as consensual. How did you arrive at that conclusion? What was the evidence ?
/r/MensRights13/09/24 09:03 PM
2

Political people don’t understand circumstances which detract from their political preferences as reality. Instead they presume you are inventing any factual drawbacks to justify your concern about abortions because this is how they reach their own conclusions. They choose to believe assertions which support their positions and do not believe assertions which do not. The idea that facts exist outside of support for political agendas is completely foreign to them, so when you expressed that opini…
/r/MensRights07/07/24 12:31 AM
3

I think it’s a great question. It self-identifies people who are either not smart enough or too enraptured by political propaganda to understand reality. Do you want you kids raised by someone like this?
/r/MensRights07/05/24 12:51 PM
7

If you remember the Kavanaugh case the key tactic to prove falsehood is to get their story with all the specificity possible before you even try to prove yourself innocent. Divulging facts prematurely allows them to retrofit their accusations. In his case the accuser claimed the party was a specific date because it linked to a specific event. When it turned out he was provable away that week it proved to all reasonable people she was making it up. She still tried to retrofit her claims, but imag…
/r/MensRights22/12/23 08:51 PM
3

Yep. I was banned for commenting in a related sub even though my comment was critical and I had not joined either sub in question. Because leftists are used to their allies controlling the forum (academia, media) they believe this is normal and legitimate.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 04:02 PM
1

They are referring to The Brand, not the reality.
/r/AntiFeminists06/04/22 12:43 PM
3

Anyone who claims women and blacks don't have power is both an idiot and sexist / racist. Even if you accept their own self-serving definition they're still wrong.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/03/22 02:20 PM
3

I'm referring to the exact set of people you proposed paying. It's your definition. It's ridiculous you're pretending to not understand it [or] are trying to turn it into some sort of sexist comment on my part.
/r/AntiFeminists04/03/22 09:59 PM
5

You advocate "society" should pay people but you don't even know who? I'm not sure anything could more clearly demonstrate how unserious your assertions are.
/r/AntiFeminists04/03/22 07:44 PM
5

I'm sure if someone was paying them we'd all know. But now we know you don't think you should pay them, only other people should pay them. It's also revealing that you invent this justification solely for them. For example people who run utility lines don't get paid extra "by society" because families with heated homes are more stable.
/r/AntiFeminists04/03/22 06:44 PM
10

You're free to pay them then. Do you have a published pay scale showing what they can expect?
/r/AntiFeminists04/03/22 06:07 PM
10

That you need to resort to such a stupid and irrelevant comment shows you have no relevant comments. Of course it is work, but since it's for yourself and family why would someone else pay you a wage for it?
/r/AntiFeminists04/03/22 05:38 PM
7

It's revealing I explained the specific weakness in how the statistic is defined and yet you pretend I only object because of the result. It seems reality isn't a factor in your conclusions. The ability to ignore reality is the prime characteristic of ideologues.
/r/AntiFeminists04/03/22 04:51 PM
8

How bizarre to think that because a statistic is different between countries it cannot have been calculated as it was defined.
/r/AntiFeminists04/03/22 04:25 PM
107

This statistic is so wrong I'm stunned anyone is willing to ruin their credibility by continuing to assert it. Public feminists have even given it up. The statistic is total wages to women / total wages to men, meaning it doesn't even adjust for the fact that fewer women than men work at all. Apparently we're supposed to pay the women who do work more than men to make up for the women who don't work. It's absurd.
/r/AntiFeminists04/03/22 01:30 PM
1

Maybe it's projection on the policies part, It's their training. Once the radfems took control of our institutions they began mainstreaming their insanity through training and punitive reactions to any deviation from their protocol. Eventually only people who support or bow to their ideology are left. Everyone else is weeded out up front or leaves because they won't/can't deal with the insanity.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/01/22 05:31 PM
2

you'll find that it's the comparison between the average hourly wage of men and women, I don't think this is true either. The original 78% figure was the difference between the median wage earners for men and women which means it didn't even adjust for the fact that men work more hours than women.
/r/AntiFeminists02/09/21 09:58 PM
29

No need to ban it. It's a fine example of how everything they claim abut incels is supportable if only the sexes are switched.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/08/21 05:02 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter