| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | If women want to be equal in all things, why are they not required to sign up for the selective service?This will be my last response to this discussion as we obviously have very little common ground and I feel like you are very very angry for some reason. Not sure what good stuff you think poor helpless little girls want to take as if whatever "good stuff" (whatever that is) they get means less for men in general. And you in particular. The pillar of my argument is not that "it's against the law." That is merely fact. My point is that signing up for selective service is associated with something … | /r/MensRights | 16/12/10 09:46 PM |
| 0 | If women want to be equal in all things, why are they not required to sign up for the selective service?'this is a law which, by and large, was not made by women but rather a lot of old guys'......so, why were those other 'inconvenient' laws, made by those same old guys get shelved... equality, or rather selective equality. So, if I'm understanding correctly, you would have feminists fight the good fight to sign up for something that, by law, they are not allowed to do so that they are not being "selective" about their equality? Frankly, that's exactly WHY there should be some selectivity to it. M… | /r/MensRights | 16/12/10 07:35 AM |
| 0 | If women want to be equal in all things, why are they not required to sign up for the selective service?I'm not 100 percent sure if you're making a generalization about feminists or you're inferring that I'm a selective equality feminist rushing to say "it's always been that way, chock it up, we aren't allowed..." or both. OP asked "If feminists want to be equal, why are they not required to sign up for Selective Service?" IMHO it's a flawed question...They are not required because it is not law and not only that, it is against the law for them to participate in the activity for which it exists (f… | /r/MensRights | 16/12/10 06:21 AM |
| 1 | If women want to be equal in all things, why are they not required to sign up for the selective service?OK OK Not trying to be glib. I know lots of women who would have been happy to go register if the laws had been there when they turned 18. You're right though, it is easy to blow off because I really don't think the draft will ever be invoked again without a huge political upheaval -- in which case, I think that registration will become irrelevant ...it will just probably be enforced retroactively for women, should it come to that. So frankly, as a woman I have more relevant things to worry abou… | /r/MensRights | 16/12/10 06:12 AM |
| 5 | If women want to be equal in all things, why are they not required to sign up for the selective service?Because we've never been asked. Because we are, by law, prohibited from doing the job for which the selective service exists. (Combat). Because the political will does not exist to change this law. Our government would bomb a country to smithereens before requiring anyone (men included) to be drafted to go to war in this day and age. That selective service even exists anymore, IMHO is because it just hasn't yet been abolished. At this point, it's just something that men can point to and say "bit… | /r/MensRights | 16/12/10 12:33 AM |
| 2 | "false [rape] reporting has reached an epidemic level" - Orlando PoliceCan someone explain to me what would happen if there WAS a rape but the rapist was found Not Guilty? For whatever reason (not enough evidence was found, a technicality, for example). Would the victim then be charged with falsely reporting? What if it was true but it can't be proved. I'm definitely not saying that there shouldn't be consequences if there FOR sure was a false report...I guess I just don't understand what happens in a case where the accused is found not guilty. It's a fine line, I … | /r/MensRights | 20/07/10 01:30 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter