TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MLEMisafunnyword Archive

View 0 posts and 625 comments by MLEMisafunnyword on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Mon, Wed, Fri - Weighted pullups, barbell curls, lots of both, I don't count or do 'sets' anymore, I just go until I can't Tues, Thurs, (sometimes Sat) - pushups, overhead press, boxing For abs I do hanging leg raises and planks whenever I feel like it, but really I think the cardio from the boxing has developed my abs more than any "targeted" exercise I don't do legs cause I have naturally gigantic Slavic thighs and also don't rly care about legs. My diet is also fairly strict, which helps keep…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 04:10 AM
6

It absolutely is not, but if there's anything I've learned from having fat friends and being a former skinnyfat who got fit, it's that advice about working out doesn't really do anything. Out of shape people know they need to get in shape, they just haven't been granted the inciting factor yet. Sometimes it's a health scare, sometimes they're just sick of being gross, wahtever. There's always some catalyst and it's very rarely some person telling them what they already know. So it's not insensit…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 03:46 AM
1

21 year olds are LITERALLY BABIES
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/22 12:27 PM
1

We're the same height, but I'm considerably skinnier than you (175), probably the same BF amount I just have much less muscle, so overall I say you win there brother. Yeah, I brought it up 'cause it just fucking sucks and shows that U.S. chicks and some EU chicks (I'm from Czech Rep) are kinda just implicitly racist without realizing it. I have good Middle Eastern and black friends who are better than me in all categories, but the ease of use with women is on my side for no reason. Doesn't seem …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/22 07:26 PM
1

When did I say they were smart?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/22 06:51 PM
1

lmao looks like I'm dropping a benjamin on a steak this weekend. I've never had a tomahawk tbh, but I do like bone marrow... Also this place is incredibly pretentious, but it's also one of the highest rated places in my area, so c'est la vie and all that shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/22 06:41 PM
1

I eat chicken every day, I was going to exclude that one too :( And yeah I'm not in the best place for seafood lol, even if it sounds appetizing it probably isn't as good as it would be on a coastline
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/22 06:36 PM
1

Man sometimes it bugs me out how much hair/ethnicity have to do with dates. You and I have similar physical stats except I'm white and have a full head of hair, and I bet you're in marginally better shape, too. Every time I've approached a woman and had some kind of 'intuition' of it being a sure thing, it has been. Then again, I also haven't approached thousands of women, which sounds kind of crazy, but rejection rate is extremely low compared to yours, proportionally speaking. All of your bull…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/22 06:34 PM
2

Not a hard price limit, I like this girl, but I was gonna say 'excluding the tomahawk', but at the same time, it does sound really good.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/22 06:01 PM
1

Cookies are the most overrated dessert but a couple of these look like total chocolatey sluts, like that one to the left, so 8/10.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/22 06:00 PM
1

There's only one (severely) fat guy in my friend group. He's a great dude but he doesn't understand that being fat makes him undesirable and is mired in normie tropes about how women should 'just like him for him' At first, me and my other friends all got on him about fitness. He never listened, so we just don't bring it up anymore. He gets the picture, and knows what he has to do, and I doubt he will ever do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/22 05:58 PM
3

Date night Saturday, PPD choose my meal as I am indecisive and always take too long to order
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/22 05:56 PM
2

Both bison and duck when done well are incredible. I have tons of conflicting feelings about eating meat, but I can't deny all these cute fuckers taste really good. Try rabbit and wild boar sometime -- like the above two, they are ridiculously good when made properly.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/22 03:08 PM
8

Okay, well, the Professor Emeritus of statistics at Yale doesn't seem to agree with you, and neither do a lot of other physicists and statisticians, as my links point out, but nah, you'd rather just do a "but I'm an X therefore I'm right", which is a non-argument. Good goin'. Also earlier you said "it does not imply causation" and now you're saying "it only implies a relationship", which is kind of what I already said in my first post if you had bothered to read (i.e. does not specify the nature…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/22 01:20 PM
8

Nice job ignoring the legitimate studies, first off. You asked for a correlation and afaik there's lots of correlations between high partner count and infidelity, as noted in the examples above, and I'm sure there's plenty more. And second, correlation sometimes does imply (and or suggest) causation.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/22 01:04 PM
12

So I don't really particularly care about n-count, and I don't think there's "proof", but I do think that nearly all the studies done on the topic have noted an increase in extramarital affairs when higher partner count is taken into consideration (for both men and women). Also I would like to point out that while correlation does not always equal causation, this notion has been bastardized and used as a "counter argument" when people feel like refuting something without actually refuting it. Ed…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/22 12:54 PM
3

'Cause it doesn't match our lived experience, and I can speak on some authority as a dude who has been many bodytypes. When I have and maintain a six pack and arm muscles, the amount and quality of women skyrockets, and it's not even close. I've been skinny, skinnyfat, slim-fit and ripped, and the difference between the four is astronomical. Women always suddenly liked me more when I was ripped. I was suddenly "more interesting" to them, just by default. Who woulda thought?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 01:51 AM
2

According to every poll I can find, Evans outclasses literally every other cast member and it's not particularly close. Might agree on Bucky Barnes, but don't see how that helps your argument, as Sebastian Stan is still roided out and ridiculously jacked in those movies.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 01:48 AM
1

Right, my argument wasnt about body types, I even agreed slimfit bodytypes being preferable to most women over ultra jacked dudes, I was contesting the specific examples, which I think are untrue on their face.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 01:27 AM
1

I did google the stats. There weren't any lmao I already agreed that they were thinner overall in the 60's. No one in their right mind considers 15% bodyfat "fluffy" or "gross", and it is considered very in shape by the vast majority of humans. I say this as a European person, who has lived in Europe and America, in large population centers. 15% body fat is traditionally very in shape, everywhere in the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 01:15 AM
2

Face matters. Evans has traditional good looking American guy action star face. Benedict has weird British actor face. Also Evans is significantly more in shape than Benedict, it's not even a competition. Also stop with the redpill shit. I argue with redpillers here more than anyone else. I am not even close to rp.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 01:13 AM
3

That list is not genuine, and includes Tropic of Cancer (which is not erotica, it's literature), Lolita, which is not erotica, and The Unbearable Lightness of Being, which is literature, and not erotica. That list includes anything with slightly erotic/romantic overtones and considers it "erotica", which I do not find compelling. Search erotic covers on google. It's either naked women, or jacked dudes, and I see no dudes who look like lanklets.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 01:12 AM
1

Ok, and? Thousands do that to Thor and Captain America, too. When it comes to trends and analytics, Hemsworth and Evans absolutely demolish Benedict and Loki.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 01:07 AM
0

Right, and just by the engagement numbers alone, in which Evans and Hemsworth get orders of magnitude more, it would be very statistically unlikely that a) all of those searches or even a majority of those searches are men, and b) that the dudes who receive orders of magnitude fewer searches would be considered more attractive to a larger percentage of the female population. Just doesn't add up.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 01:06 AM
1

I mean, I've always been a slim-fit tall lanklet, I don't care about muscles and agree with some of your premise, just those specifics don't ring true to me, and there's a reason why multi billion dollar companies have jacked traditionally good looking dudes as their money-makers, and not Hiddleston and Cumberbatch.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 01:04 AM
3

After (sadly) doing a bit more research, there's been polls on some of this stuff before, "hottest marvel character" and whatnot, tens of thousands of participants and votes, which means far more than anecdotes, and Evans is like always in the lead. I think to compare the attractiveness you would have to get rid of talent. Benedict is probably a more talented actor, but if he was just some guy on the street, I don't think he would be considered insanely good looking. Evans/Hemsworth would.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 01:02 AM
2

How many awards someone has, has zero to do with how attractive they are to however many people. My argument is that Evans and Hemsworth would be considered more attractive to more people than Loki and Benedict. This shouldn't be controversial, as it's kind of true on its face. Besides, there's like major twitter polls about this shit with thousands of votes and Evans always comes out on top, even beats out Hemsworth, so at least with him there are some real numbers there. I doubt more people wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 12:59 AM
0

I don't think that data means any more than box office numbers and social media follows, it's a much smaller subgroup of people you're talking about. I mean shit, look at google trends if you want pure numbers. Hemsworth has many orders of magnitude more searches than Hiddleston. Just purely by the numbers, that seems like a lot more engagement, and I don't think the "those are all men!" argument really works. Like statistically speaking, it seems really unlikely that a dude who gets orders of m…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 12:54 AM
2

Tom doesn't put as many butts in seats as Evans or Hemsworth. Look up box office numbers. There will be a huge disparity. I can't think of a single good movie by any of these people, to be honest, I am not talking about the subjective goodness of the films, I am talking about who more people go out to see, and it's objectively, by all the numbers available, Hemsworth and Evans. I'm not sure how we're supposed to talk about the mass appeal of these people without talking about their mass appeal l…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 12:50 AM
1

Right, and I am wondering how you know this besides "I know women who like X more" and "I am a woman". That's not really an authoritative metric, imo, kind of just seems like an opinion. Also didn't say much about the erotica covers, which are mass marketed to women, and they mostly have dudes that look like Thor, not Loki. Seems like the female gaze has plenty of buying power. I really don't think erotica searches are a good measurement anyway. Not anymore than box office numbers are, in which …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 12:46 AM
2

Look man, if your argument is "I know soo many people who like X", and mine is the opposite of that, then we really have nowhere to go. I used one metric, which is social media popularity. But there's other metrics, too, like how Evans and Thor are genuine leads in the biggest movies ever, and Hollywoo is literally all about casting the most traditionally good looking people as leads. Benedict and Tom don't put nearly the same amount of butts in seats -- they are side characters. More people go …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 12:44 AM
3

Loki and Benedict are also playing far more le edgy dark-type characters, so it makes sense that their fanbase would be more rabid, I just don't think it's nearly the same amount of people.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 12:40 AM
3

Yet the cover of virtually every erotica is a dude who looks a lot more like Thor than he does Loki. Also I don't think followers is any better of a metric than erotica searches. They both seem to be based on popularity. In which case, Thor only loses out a little in terms of erotica searches, but wins big in terms of overall popularity/eyes on him. Edit: I'm not RP lol, stop seeing boogeyman in every person who mildly disagrees with you
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 12:37 AM
8

And Chris Evans doesn't? lol Benedict doesn't have social media so it's hard to compare, but considering how disparate the Loki/Thor numbers are, I'd reckon it's about the same. You're comparing a hyper jacked traditionally good looking dude to a niche taste skinny guy. Benedict seems to be doing just fine, which is why the "chicks only dig hyper jacked guys" argument is pretty stupid, but I sincerely doubt he beats out someone like Chris Evans in terms of pure numbers. Remove their fame, put Be…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 12:35 AM
8

Benedict Cumberbatch is not more popular than Chris Evans. I don't necessarily disagree than slim-fit is preferable to most women than ultra-jacked, but that one is untrue on its face. I don't think Tom Hiddleston is a bigger sex symbol than Chris Hemsworth either. Going by social media follows, Hiddleston has 11m, Hemsworth has 55mil... he is "more popular" by a factor of 5. I'm not sure how you went about equating their "sex symbolness", but by pure numbers, I don't think that part is true.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 12:24 AM
1

While people in the 60's were certainly much thinner overall, I think you're pulling that 40% number totally out of your ass, I'm pretty sure we don't have bodyfat statistics from the 1960's.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 12:20 AM
2

So your argument is that most people cannot maintain it, therefore it's realistic? When I said "realistic", I meant what most people could obtain without much fuss and or rigor. I also don't agree that "a lot of people maintain 10% bodyfat". No they don't. I have only lived in gigantic population centers with young populations and even most of them don't maintain 10% bf. That's ridiculous and untrue on its face, especially when you consider like 60-70% of people are fat, straight up. There's no …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 12:17 AM
8

I think you can bump up that bf percentage for men. A man with 19-20% bf can still be attractive and considered in shape. 10% is nearly unreasonable and almost no people maintain that. 15-20% is far more realistic and most people still look good at around 20%.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/22 09:57 PM
0

I'm a dude. I don't keep telling anyone to touch grass. Being an avid outdoors person doesn't make you any better with women. Actually having a sense of self and self worth helps, though, and it seems you lack that significantly if all the other men you see are boogeyman Chads. You're clearly too far down this particular rabbit hole to see what's actually going on, which has everything to do with you and your own mental patterns and not the habits of other people.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 04:53 PM
1

Adaptation has a ridiculously good cast all around, and I would argue Jonze's directing is more impressive than Kaufman's writing, so just not with you on this one.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 04:48 PM
1

Even if I did, I think most writing is narcissism-lite by default, but that doesn't make the actual content bad or poorly written.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 04:45 PM
1

I never said it was complicated. It being complicated =/= you not understanding
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 04:42 PM
1

Wow, three whole bars! Your weird direct comparisons to other people show that you severely lack self esteem, and for whatever reason lionize complete strangers. Getting women isn't some impossible task given to only the select few. This is the view of someone who hasn't had life experiences with women because of innate boo-hooness.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 04:41 PM
1

You're just regurgitating the plot development, not what the movie is about or its themes, those are different things. I don't think the themes are that difficult to understand either, but it doesn't seem like you've grasped them if this is your take.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 04:36 PM
1

No, Jonze had final cut on Adaptation, not Kaufman, it's a Spike Jonze movie, just like Eternal Sunshine is a Michel Gondry movie, not a Charlie Kaufman movie. I don't think you understand just how little sway even "powerful" writers have in Hollywoo, i.e. almost none. I think if you watch Adaptation and think it's only about 'look at meta I am', you're totally missing the larger themes of the movie and are willingly ignoring everything its about.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 04:28 PM
1

I'm with you on Woody but Adaptation isn't about 'look how meta I am', that's just a dishonest and base interpretation of that movie thematically speaking, and also Adaptation was directed by Spike Jonze, Kaufman didn't start directing until Synecdoche New York.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 04:16 PM
4

What you said makes too much sense, I doubt a guy like that would listen. He went to a single bar and concluded all bars everywhere must be Chad-vaganzas full of "shallow average women". Dudes like this have no interest in self improvement or making it better for themselves, they just want to rage against the machine, so to speak.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 04:13 PM
1

Your communication was so "effective" that the vast majority of the top comments are calling you a delusional narcissist. Wow its really working out for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/22 03:38 AM
1

You can care about what some people say without "catering" towards unreasonable communal half truths. Conversating while catering to bad ideas doesnt help anybody and isnt productive.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/22 02:29 AM
1

Caring about what dumbfucks say at you seems not advisable.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/22 01:11 AM
1

Yes, the community is very attached to a misinterpretation of OLD stats from 2008, so that means you ought to cater to retards? Whatever you say brother.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/22 12:42 AM
1

So? I didn't make that claim. The burden of proof is on the person making the claim. I never made the claim that most men are getting success. I said we don't know. And we don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/22 05:04 AM
2

Yeah, I could, and often do. Data like these are fickle and often meaningless, which is why an agnostic approach is more intellectually honest than an anecdotal one. The "picture" is probably an untangle-able mess that is different at different places and in different times. Figuring out the truths of sexual attraction and activity is an insane undertaking that relies on self reported user data and feelings. Unless replicable many times over, in order to chart a trend, really all we see is our i…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/22 03:03 AM
1

How do you know what data has been suppressed and what hasnt? How do you know this?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/22 02:58 AM
1

How is the guy who calls himself "top 20%" without extrapolation "normal" and not totally cringe inducing and insane? Like, seriously, what the fuck does that even mean, how does a human person describe themselves in percentages, and how do they unbiasedly measure their perceived "ranking"? Seriously sounds like baby shit to me. Also Men overrate themselves consistently.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/22 12:33 AM
3

Not enough data to make that exact claim imo, but if you told me "most people don't get anything off OLD", I wouldn't bat an eye, especially when you consider 70%+ of the apps are men.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/22 12:22 AM
1

The first set of okcupid data is from 2008. There's articles all over the place about it. TRP 80/20 misconceptions are based on the 2008 data. That's the only evidence you'll ever find. Go ahead and scour. All signs point to the 2008 study as being the starting point.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/22 12:09 AM
1

I turn 31 on sunday, so basically, yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 10:27 PM
1

There's surprisingly a lot of good ones, but I think the unquestionably best one is Some Like It Hot.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 10:10 PM
2

When did I say it was a recent fad? I literally said we've been talking about it forever and linked a thread from seven years ago. Weird way to start. It is not "almost universally" observed in ungoverned systems. You are thinking of generalized uneven distributions, most of which are not pareto distributions. If they were, we wouldn't have a nice clean spick and span wikipedia page that goes over pretty much all current examples of pareto applications. While there are many phenomena that can be…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 09:53 PM
1

Seeing The Northman tonight, fights with the boys tomorrow, birthday on Sunday, gonna hang with the lady and get a fancy dinner. :)
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 09:30 PM
7

The issue is that a pareto distribution, by definition, means that 80% of outcomes are due to 20% of causes. I don't think we have nearly enough data to make that claim about dating or casual sex. Your last paragraph does not necessarily point to a pareto distribution, just an uneven distribution.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 06:10 PM
4

The point is we don't know, not "I know". We don't know who is having the casual sex at what rates, full stop. The best analysis we have is from 2010 and could have changed a lot from there. I don't think introducing new meanings of 80/20 helps anyone understand sexual dynamics any better, it just muddies the waters with ever-varying interpretations of a false figure. That was really my main gripe with the post. > If you can get a woman to marry you, but she isn’t actually attracted to you, did …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 06:00 PM
11

Ever thought about "I don't know" as the honest, accurate answer? We don't know. There's lots of stuff we don't and can't know. We might be able to get some sort of "relation satisfaction" survey going eventually, in which case you don't need billions of participants (as 100's of thousands is generally good enough to perceive larger trends in big populations), and even then, it would have to be replicated numerous times before being any type of "truth". So right now, we don't know. You feel a ce…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 05:04 PM
8

Yes, "you seriously doubt" and "believe" things, and you do this based on your own personal feelings. Okee dokee, I feel you don't know what you're talking about and are just saying stuff for the sake of it. Using 80/20 even when it could potentially be 60/40 or any other number is really, really dumb.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 04:55 PM
6

AFAIK, the 80/20 meme became popular because of bad faith interpretations of dating app stats. I've been on these gender battle forums for a while, I don't remember anything about it until the OKC stats. Could be wrong, but I'm fairly certain that's where it came from as all evidence points that way...
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 04:53 PM
9

Whether or not it's a large or small minority is kind of a big point, though. There's a huge difference between 20% and 49%.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 04:49 PM
3

If you want to believe Susan Walsh's number, something like that, although there's still a whole 20% of casual sex not accounted for. Her application of pareto for casual sex participants was done in 2010, though, things could have changed since then, but afaik no one has actually conducted any thorough analysis on this since then.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 04:46 PM
20

The OP is still based off anecdotes and does not represent reality. We have absolutely no idea what percentage of men are having "interactions they want" with women. Whether it's 20% or 30% or 40% is a complete guess, based on nothing but "I feel this way" and "I think it's this way because of people I know in my insulated little bubble of the world".
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 04:41 PM
72

The 80/20 thing is one of the most misinterpreted concepts here and has been spoken about for literally years. The 80/20 rule as it is talked about on this sub absolutely comes from interpretations (usually bad ones) of OLD (okcupid and tinder) stats, in which it was determined the bottom 80% of men (in terms of attractiveness) are competing for the bottom 22% of women and the top 78% of women are competing for the top 20% of men. It had to do with match ("like") percentages, and had absolutely …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 04:33 PM
8

Depends on the individual. But being in a happy relationship has all sorts of immediate benefits. Loneliness is a killer, and we have tons of numbers that point toward perpetual long-term singledom not being particularly good for humans.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/22 06:42 PM
3

Not particularly good or bad, just a normal dude who likes other people and having human experiences.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/22 12:18 AM
7

This seems to be the prevailing opinion for both sides, and I just have never understood it. Even when it hasn't worked out, pretty much every person I've dated has been a lovely human with only a couple of exceptions. By and large though, all cool, good people. At a certain point you have to start wondering if its a curmudgeon-y woe-is-me mindset poisoning the waters, rather than "all the other people/options are bad". The dating world is just fine if you genuinely like other humans.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 11:48 PM
1

Everyone loves Zombie but he can't hang with the tippy top of the division anymore. He'll be a fine top 10 gatekeeper, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 04:44 PM
1

Oh yeah, the May 7th card is stupid stacked, one of the best PPV's in a while, but I always watch even Fight Nights with friends. It's really just an excuse to hang out.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 04:39 PM
2

Date night tonight with the gorl, watching the fights tomorrow with the boys, Sunday I'll be writing/reading/sleeping.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 04:29 PM
3

All of the women were bi, including my ex. I'd say it was all pretty even in terms of giving and receiving.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/22 01:44 AM
3

Maybe it's just 'cause I lived in LA, Prague and PHX, but I just don't see it. If a woman is hot at 25 and stays in shape, she's usually still hot at 35. At most she goes from an 8 to a 7, but even that I don't see much. 8's stay 8's well into their 30's if they don't let themselves go.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/22 08:48 PM
2

No, you cannot. There is no formula for attractiveness. Measuring facial symmetry does not give you some solid number of how many people would find those characteristics attractive, nor would it give you a certain number on a 1/10 scale. What the fuck are you talking about lmao You remind me of this dumbfuck here who thought he was superior because he only read non fiction books (also retarded). Kind of funny considering you don't even know what the word objective means.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/22 08:30 PM
2

How can attractiveness be objective? Lmao, maybe learn words. Objectivity requires it to be true outside of sentient observation. When rating looks, we are ipso facto observing someone. It is an opinion. subjective. I made no ridiculous claims, and you made no good arguments. That's PPD for ya.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/22 08:27 PM
3

I will definitely agree with you on the genericity, but a generic hot white girl is still hot, and I don't really think the wall approaches at 30 or anywhere near 30. 40 I can see. 30 makes no sense to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/22 08:24 PM
2

CZJ was never a 10. She was an 8.5/9. See how subjectivity works? 10's don't really exist. They are all just 9's with inexplicable personal preference thrown in. You can't actually realistically explain why she's a 10. You just happen to think so. I.e., at the upper echelons of hotness, it all comes down to interpersonal ratings. 7/9's are not a dime a dozen, and it literally makes you top tier attractive to be in that category. And still more than 1 in 100, 30 - 35 women are 7/9's.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/22 08:23 PM
3

10's don't really exist, 10's are just 9's that people prefer for inexplicable reasons, so it's really 7/9. I think Alison Brie is a 10, but most people probably think she's an 8/9, and I can't really explain why I think she's a 10. Same goes for every woman you'd put that high. I don't "gas up" anyone, 7/9's are attractive and nearly everyone but weirdos like you thinks so. Perennially embittered dudes like you are my favorite laughing stock of this sub, though, so please, keep it coming. You d…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/22 08:18 PM
2

I think 7-10 is appropriately hot, and you're just assuming what my standards are. I find all fat women repulsive, and even 'thicc' chicks almost always are complete no-go's for me. I've only ever lived in huge west coast U.S. cities, or in cities where women are internationally renowned for being hot (i.e. Prague). My standards are often considered too demanding to even my closest friends, so no, you're way off base. Just seems like you don't go outside and see women all that much. There's an a…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/22 08:13 PM
3

I disagree, don't know what to tell you. I see hot women in that age group every day, and it's far more than 1 in 100.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/22 08:06 PM
3

Same age as you pretty much, but this depends on where you live. In giant metropolitan relatively fit areas, the majority of 30-35 year old chicks are still hot. When I was still on the apps I saw dozens of them daily. Sure, looks drop off for some, but that's generally around 40-45, not 30.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/22 07:31 PM
16

IMO 'hoe' is a derogatory term. I've only ever heard men call women 'hoes' when they are judging her whole character and personage based on a single facet of her behavior, which seems silly and kind of fucked up to me. I prefer 'promiscuous'.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/22 06:37 PM
26

'She's a hoe' is a bit too judgmental for my taste. I don't judge people for enjoying sex or being sexually liberal, which is why I wrote it like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/22 05:41 PM
59

I've been in two threesomes - one was a heat of the moment thing with an ex and a German chick we met at a hostel in Japan, the other was a planned ordeal with two chicks I met at a concert. Both were fun in their own ways, but I don't really seek out threesomes or care about them, and that I think is the rub. If I met a chick who was "into threesomes", I would be a bit cautious, it likely means she's up for being sexually frivolous too often for my tastes. If I met a chick who has been in a few…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/22 05:26 PM
2

He's also intentionally misinterpreting what I wrote. I don't think playing video games is all that bad for you, cognitively speaking. I think wanting to play video games over interacting with other humans is a super clear mark of someone with some kind of avoidance disorder.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/22 08:00 PM
18

Honestly I agree with the title and a lot of what you said in this comment, but it still does not explain the millions of men who do exactly what OP describes and reap no reward. While I agree there are probably more Will and Jons out there, the op post ignores the millions of dudes who do shit and still get little to nothing. For my entire 20's I was entrenched in academia and met a lot of brilliant people in a lot of different fields as my MA required tons of multidisciplinary consultation. I …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 11:59 PM
1

There's a bunch of different types of truths. There's objective truths and axiomatic truths and normative truths and historical truths. We're talking about objective truth, i.e. the Earth orbits the sun and the other examples I already gave. The easiest ones to understand are cosmological, but there's tons of others. Also, in order to determine objective truths, it only has to be true outside of sentient observation, which we've already been over*.* It doesn't necessarily require a corresponding…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/22 09:02 PM
1

It is not. You did not describe once what quantification you used. You listed no measurements. You did not say why or how certain morals are "good" or "bad", or how you quantify certain moral rules. You listed an opinion based argument, which is called subjectivity. You listed one example which had very little to do with objectivity, and it did not include any sort of quantification. Math is not imprecise, and once again, is a discovery of phenomena, it is not made up out of the ether. I agree t…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/22 09:20 PM
1

You're changing the subject. This started with your claim that morality is both "subjective and objective". You have yet to explain how this can be the case, and you have yet to explain how morals themselves can be objective. You have to explain how "some morals can be objective, while others can't." Your answer so far is: "it's very complex", which, I'm sorry, is fallacious and a cop out and not an answer. And you apparently missed the point anyway. Triangles exist without the need for human mi…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/22 09:03 PM
1

Why don't you answer any questions? Asking me questions without any answers. Very curious. That would lead one to believe you cannot actually answer the questions posed (which you evidently cannot) Secondly, we're in the philosophy of math department now, and there's a ton of differing opinions here, and it's all a semantics game. If you don't believe math describes objective phenomena, then we have nowhere else to go, as it clearly does, and has forever now, and I find all the positions that th…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/22 08:39 PM
1

No. You do not need instruments to measure the orbital dynamics of the moon. You can do it solely with math, just like you can calculate the distance of the moon from Earth using only math. There is no imprecision in correct math. How is it a ubiquitous observation when there have been groups that have slaughtered each other, and gone down to zero members? And what does that say about the 'objective' morality of it? We were talking about the morality of the acts, as you said at the start (incomp…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/22 02:22 AM
1

What is imprecise about the orbital measurements of the moon? Either way, that wasn't my claim. My claim was that the moon orbits the Earth, which is true in every circumstance, not the exact velocity and orbital dynamics of the moon. Either way, they are not imprecise, and we can perfectly calculate how the moon orbits, so much so that we can predict exact positions of the moon. You cannot do this with morality, even a little. There are tons of examples of surplus killing, among even very intel…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/22 01:56 AM
1

What's the difference between a 'technical' definition and the actual definition? It's not esoteric if it's literally on the wikipedia and google. Esotericism requires some difficult to find or difficult to understand knowledge, which this isn't. It is the first (and only) definition you get when you search for objectivity. Maybe learn what esoteric means before using words you don't understand. What, again, is the "common" definition? You never gave me the "common" definition, despite me asking…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/22 01:26 AM
1

No. It is the way it is used in moral philosophy. The question was about moral philosophy. You not knowing the definition of the word does not make it esoteric. Even on google and the wikis, not academic sources, it says what I said. Type in 'define: objective' on google and it will tell you: not influenced by personal feelings or opinions in considering and representing facts, which is nearly exactly what I said. How is the first definition on google 'esoteric'? Pray tell: what is the "laymen" …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/22 10:40 PM
1

Encyclopedia of philosophy. Also on the wiki. Also I have an MA in philosophy, this is how it was always defined in every single class it was discussed. Also lmao @ how it suddenly doesn't matter now. Seems like you realized your argument makes zero sense. You: Make claim Me: Back up that claim with examples You: It doesn't matter now Very, very good.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/22 08:42 PM
1

I can subjectively find it wrong and distasteful and truly fucked up, but that does not mean it is objectively immoral. It requires sentient observation for a determination on either side to be made, therefore it cannot be objectively immoral. So I think slavery is immoral to me, but that does not make it objectively immoral. Also, there's tons of thought experiments on this. Lets say there's a truly malevolent leader who goes around genociding populations and killing children and just laying wa…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/22 08:01 PM
1

Considering how frequent suicide is, seems like plenty of people don't care about a long life. 'Happiness' is also subjective. You can have people being happy doing all sorts of different things. We cannot quantify it. These are all subjective states of being. "People suffer from different things". Yes, I agree. That is called subjectivity. Whether or not it's feasible isn't really the point. These are called thought experiments for a reason, and I just levied one at you that's a very popular ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/22 07:49 PM
1

What? Tell me which morals are "objective", then, and tell me how you "know" they're objective. Should be pretty simple, as you seem very sure of yourself. Game theory can effect our attitudes towards certain moral and ethical values, but that doesn't make those values objective. Once again, the very definition of the word is true without sentient observation. That's what it means for something to be objective.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/22 07:38 PM
2

"What they want usually" < --- How is this objectivity? "Usually" and "objective" are practically antonyms. If something is "usually" culturally satisfying or seen as "good" to the majority, how does that make it objective? That means in some cases, it's not. There are still sentient observers making those claims. They are outside the realm of objectivity. They are subjective. But I said every person dying in their sleep, not just some people. Everyone being dead means the amount of human suffer…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/22 07:26 PM
1

Who says that the goal of morality is to have the lowest net suffering? This is a Sam Harris argument, a form of utilitarianism. Technically the lowest net suffering is having every human on Earth dying peacefully in their sleep tonight. There, that amount of suffering is less than having a single person suffer, therefore it's better, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/22 07:16 PM
2

There are no fundamental moral codes, just cross cultural likeness, and something cannot be objective and subjective at the same time. This is easily the most misinterpreted word on this sub, and probably the whole of reddit. Objective means true independent of sentient observation. It is literally impossible for something to be both subjective and objective at the same time. Morals are created by humans, and are ipso facto subjective. They cannot exist without sentient observation. There is no …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/22 07:09 PM
4

Neither has anything on PTA. Dude has had eleven nominations, has never won once.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/22 03:08 PM
4

Never be the one to ask for exclusivity. If she likes you enough, she will ask. If she doesn't, she won't. Really that simple.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/22 03:46 PM
1

Creating your own characters and stories is far more special and impressive than literally pilfering the work and creativity of actual writers. Lots of people write for their whole lives and still suck. Means nothing. Can't wait for the link.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/22 03:33 PM
0

Why would anyone who genuinely enjoys reading be nice about fanfiction? It should be pretty telling that the only real fanfiction success is 50 Shades of Grey. I don't think anyone in their right mind would call that quality writing, regardless of its success. So even the hyper-successful ones are dogshit terrible.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/22 03:02 PM
1

No, there's other things to it, like how good your prose is, how well it flows, sentence structure and word usage. Something tells me your prose isn't anything to write home about. It shouldn't be a surprise to anyone that people too unimaginative to create their own characters and worlds almost always have shit prose. But originality and creating your own characters are 100% a part of being a good writer. Believable, deep characters are a cornerstone of all good fiction. Where's that link?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/22 02:32 PM
1

Rebuilding the world you didn't create, with characters you stole. Wow, what a "writer"
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/22 02:25 PM
1

There is no such thing as good fanfiction. Show me the Cormac McCarthy of fanfiction and I will show you a terrible writer. Rapper mixtapes can include original material, so not really the same thing. Fanfiction is always plagiarized, it is an intrinsic part of it. Go ahead and link me.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/22 02:20 PM
1

Anyone who writes fanfics isn't a "dope" writer. Fanfiction is the antithesis of good writing, which includes creating your own characters and worlds and themes, not copying them from other people's work. Fanfiction is basically admitting "I have no imagination" Moreover, every person I have ever met who claims to be good at writing and/or music, has been the exact opposite. So press X to doubt on this one, unless you have proof.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/22 02:15 PM
5

lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 04:22 PM
6

That's not "nerdy" shit. You like media designed for children. I have a ton of "nerdy" friends. They're deep learning researchers, computational physicists, forex traders, applied mathematicians. These dudes are nerds who have poured their lives into legitimately nerdy pursuits and actually got something out of it, careers, knowledge, self-fulfillment, money. I don't see how Pokemon and Marvel have gotten anyone any of those things because you don't learn anything by consuming them. You don't be…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 04:18 PM
12

The Star Wars comments having thousands of upvotes speaks volumes. A generation or two of infantilized men have trouble dating now... who would have ever guessed? Go to any one of those top commenters posts and see how frequently they post on video game and/or other "nerd" culture bullshit subreddits. I already did this, and almost all of them are constantly chatting about video games or memes. They fill their heads with bullshit all day and then complain about how hard dating is. Like, maybe it…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 03:52 PM
0

I didn't say anything about status, I said competency and skill, totally different things. You can be skillful and competent and have no status whatsoever. I even added "non famous" so you would get the picture, but clearly you missed it entirely. Either way, your original comment says attraction is only looks. Which isnt the case, as I find a skillful 6/10 more attractive than an unskilled 9/10, and so do many other people. Once again, skill=/=status. Moreover, I'd say a person's skill is more …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 06:11 PM
1

Not really. There's a reason why ugly (even non famous) rockstars get laid a lot -- it's 'cause attraction comes in a lot of other forms. Women can be attracted to talent and competence as well, not just purely looks. Hell, I can do the same and I have an overactive sex drive. If I see a 6/10 who is extremely skilled at xyz, she is more attractive to me than a 9/10 lookswise who sucks at everything. Initial attraction comes from looks, but overall attraction can take many forms, for both men and…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 05:46 PM
2

I'm a huge fan of PTA, Licorice Pizza is like his second worst movie (still good, though) and the only two people from it who deserved a nomination, Haim and Hoffman, didn't get one. Like, there were better written and directed movies in 2021, I dunno if PTA "deserved" either nod this year, but those two surely did. Ah well, Oscars are dumb af anyway. They never accurately represent the state of film. Power of the Dog is good by the way. Not my type of movie at all but I can't deny it's extremel…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/22 01:44 AM
2

We just disagree on what complaining is. I didn't complain, I criticized, I don't really care that you don't know the difference. Maybe work on your own reading comp before criticizing other people's. I already said multiple times that I think current OLD is just fine, thus needs no "solutions". The "problems" with OLD aren't problems for me cause it works just fine for me. I don't think there are "solutions" that are implementable. Seems like lots of people agree with me in this thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/22 11:42 PM
2

I never complained, though, and you couldn't point it out when I asked. The moment you find the stats, you'll realize they don't say what you think they do. Hinge is only marginally better at finding matches for people, and has all the same "problems" as all the other apps. Besides, hinge doesn't even employ the changes you want, so I don't see how it could work toward your point. They restrict match choice by only ten more people than bumble, it's hardly a big difference. Right now your only po…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/22 11:38 PM
2

You have no stats to back up your view despite posting nothing and every stat I looked up disagreeing with you. You had nothing to add in the first place, just wrong answers. Congratulations.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/22 11:31 PM
2

Except I didn't move the goalpost. I wrote exactly why you were wrong (multiple times). Your answer was "I know it works", which isn't an answer, it's a cop out. You don't know it works and the stats don't even agree with you, not to mention your "way" has not been implemented on "only hinge" since all the dating apps have match limits, so you cannot "know" it works. The best you have are anecdotes and stats that don't agree with you, that you're too terrified to post lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/22 11:25 PM
2

I disagree, it is perfectly acceptable to criticize a user's bad take. Don't care if you disagree. Once again, plenty of other users responded with "there is no solution", which is an appropriate response to OP's question. So is "there are not problems" or "there are not many problems". All acceptable answers that answer OP's question directly. Besides, this is a response to a particular paragraph in a comment, which, again, is perfectly acceptable and not off topic in the slightest. It's talkin…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/22 11:21 PM
1

I was responding to you though, and telling you that your solution wouldn't work, which is perfectly in the bounds of appropriate conversation concerning the topic. Someone offers a bad solution, you criticize it, pretty simple. Also lmao @ you not posting any stats, because you know they don't say what you think they do (and also because the stats online don't say anything about their success rate comparatively, I already checked) Also plenty of other users also responded that there is no solut…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/22 11:16 PM
1

Like I already said, I don't want a "solution" because OLD is fine for me. I don't need a better one because there is nothing wrong with the current system. My solution is don't change anything, it's fine. I am not "complaing" about your solution, it's called criticizing bad ideas. You don't seem to take criticism very well. I'd suggest working on that. Please show me stats that shows hinge "works" significantly better for the average man than other OLD sites. I looked up the stats available (an…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/22 11:10 PM
4

Please point to me complaining. Is it when I said I am okay with OLD multiple times? Is that complaining to you? You offered a solution, and it was a bad one that would never work in any real world scenario, and already doesn't work. You saying "just trust me" doesn't inspire a lot of confidence. So congrats on your shit zero applicability 'solution' I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/22 11:05 PM
2

I wasn't complaining, I was telling you your solution wasn't one. Those are different things. Read better plz.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/22 11:01 PM
2

I do have a better answer than you: your "solution" isn't a solution, it's a fantasy and has zero real world applicability. Think harder next time. I don't have a solution because there is no solution. Dating isn't socialist, and I don't think there has to be a solution. It's just how it is and I have no issues with that. That's why I'm not saying crazy shit like "restrict how many people women can match with" which all of the platforms already do to some degree, and thinking that's some kind of…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/22 10:59 PM
4

The stats for hinge are basically just as bad. They are better by tiny margins. That isn't a "solution". And once again, this isn't about our anecdotes. How well you've done has zero bearing on well most men do.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/22 10:55 PM
1

Weird, I've had tons of success on bumble, a bit on tinder and only a little on hinge. I reckon this is different for different people, and different for different populations. I'm not even talking about myself here, I am okay with OLD mostly, it's like a B- for me, but the vast majority of my friends (and it seems like most of the men here) struggle on any app. I haven't seen any comparative stat analysis on how hinge outcompetes other apps, and I doubt you have either. I've seen a ton of anecd…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/22 10:50 PM
8

Your "solution" to OLD would never work. Women would just keep unmatching the same way they do now. Even with strict limits, they would just move on to another app that forgoes any match limit. That kind of system is self defeating and opens itself up to smarter competitors who dont limit users. This isnt even mentioning that women wouldnt even use an app that specifically targets their freedom of choice like that. The moment you take away their agency and their near unlimited unfettered options…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/22 10:23 PM
5

I've brought up most of Patrice O Neal's takes and those are probably more misogynistic and crazy than contemporary RP takes. Even if they disagreed with some, they were still all friendly about it, and besides, if you articulate the ideas in the right way, I think most men here would be surprised with how intrinsically red pilled modern women are.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/22 12:18 AM
4

Maybe I've just met cool women, but I talk about gender dynamics a lot IRL and have never had too much pushback from women, not my own gfs or my friends gfs or much of anyone really. I have a few mixed gender friend groups and it has never been an issue, hell, if anything gender dynamics are almost always a good conversation starter and something everyone has opinions on. It's also a lot easier to say halfway controversial things congenially IRL, without people reading into your intonation and s…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/22 12:06 AM
1

Wow a study of 172 college students! OMG what a gotcha! Also this is about falling in love, not 'feeling sparks' on a first date, which is beyond statistical analysis, or has been so far. Completely different things.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/22 06:28 PM
1

You explained why it wasn't equal, and I disagree with that explanation. I see no evidence, anecdotal or otherwise, that says 'spark generation' is gendered. I agree that it's highly contextual, and if it's highly contextual, that means it's highly individualized and can not be garnered by statistical analysis. It is subjective, not gendered. In this case, I was using 'gendered' as a synonym for 'sex differences'. I don't think 'spark generation' has anything to do with sex differences, and it i…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/22 06:14 PM
1

Don't buy it. This is basic probability theory and Bayesian statistics. We can only go with what our priors are telling us. Our priors in this case tell us the more chances someone has at something (with all else being equal), the more the odds increase in favor of a beneficial outcome. Individuals have their own 'spark generation' criteria, and I don't think 'spark generation' is gendered. It is individually defined, not defined by gender. With this being the case, more dates has a higher benef…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/22 05:54 PM
1

Getting dates is easier for women, therefore they are probabilistically more likely to find a spark. The more dates a single person can procure, the more likely they are to find potential sparks. I never said it was easy for women to find a spark, I said it was easier for women than most men, and on a probability level, that is unequivocally true.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/22 05:03 AM
0

definitely the exact opposite for me. All of the instant sparks I've had with women were met with long relationships or at least long dating scenarios, yet never has an "awkward" first date ever amounted to anything. I think in a woman's case, she has no reason to keep trying after a bad or awkward first date. She likely has near unlimited options and can find sparks much easier than most men can. She ought to keep trying while she is still able and willing. No reason to settle for mediocre firs…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/22 02:27 AM
4

Interpersonal rapport. Like-mindedness. The chat just flows. It "feels" right. You don't have to force anything. There is a natural "spark". You can tell all of these things within a half hour, let alone multiple hours. When you vibe with someone, you just inexplicably do, and it "feels" right. When you don't, you don't. It's really that simple.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/22 02:18 AM
1

Why shouldn't she? On every good first date I've been on, I "felt something" within a half hour, probably less honestly. If she went on a whole ass multiple hour date and still felt nothing, that's more than enough time for romantic evaluation.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/22 02:11 AM
1

Or how about being a normal human who doesn't like pissing on other people, that works too.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/22 01:33 AM
2

Have never had an issue revealing kinks right away, first or second date. Not sure why you think its so stigmatized. Millennials and zoomers are pretty laissez-faire about sexuality in my experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/22 12:03 AM
1

You know, I just remembered that scene where Kendall goes into that interview with the "cool" sneakers and is all thrown off by whether or not he should wear them, and like takes them off mid interview, you might be onto something. There's a couple other scenes with him where you might have a good point there. Roman is the most outwardly normal, but definitely some delusions of grandeur/megalomania going on there -- there's that scene in the first season where he closes the blinds to the office …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 02:39 AM
1

I don't think Kendall's autistic, I think he's emotionally broken 'cause he can't get daddy's love in any meaningful fashion and this kills him, despite the tough guy act, that's all he wants. Also he's an addict, so really we're seeing a constantly-in-withdrawal Kendall pretty much at all times. If anyone is autistic, it's cousin Greg, but you know, loveably autistic and not full blown autistic. Everyone else has some version of narcissistic personality disorder, except for maybe Tom (even thou…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 02:18 AM
1

damn hers didn't have that sick nightcap/chef's hat. Maybe I can convince her to make one.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 01:37 AM
2

Honestly I think so too! It's pretty neat watching her turn a few strips of fabric into a full blown intricate dress, underwear and all. Doesn't make sense to my brain, but impressive nonetheless.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 12:52 AM
5

when you're dating a chick obsessed with 18th century costuming who has way too much time on her hands Life sure is weird sometimes
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 12:33 AM
0

Ok, and? I don't see your point.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/22 05:14 PM
–

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sturgeon%27s_law Sturgeon's law (or Sturgeon's revelation) is an adage stating "ninety percent of everything is crap. So 90% of everything you write is crap. Sorry. The law says so.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/22 04:37 PM
–

Depends on how high quality the girl is.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/22 04:17 PM
–

According to Sturgeon's Law, 90% of your comment that 'he's the 10%' is crap.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/22 03:38 PM
–

So is 90% of Sturgeon's Law crap, or is it somehow exempt from itself?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/22 03:28 PM
10

This study, which is paywalled, but this article is an analysis, seems to think that in more egalitarian societies, men are more likely to be interested in educated, intelligent women. That probably translates to "competence" in a lot of areas, but there's no research I can find that targets "competency" directly. Personally I like smart women who are good at shit. Some of the best advice I ever got was from my high school physics teacher, he said, "Only ever be with a woman who is smarter than …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/22 01:24 AM
1

There's plenty of femboys on dating apps, they are all just gay
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/22 10:57 PM
0

The fact is you have no stats to confirm your view. Your anecdote might be that you've "observed" enough in your life for this to be true to you, and my "observation" is there is no way it could be true, as it does not line up with my experiences. We could have an anecdote battle and that's it. The 80/20 rule as it is talked about on this sub absolutely comes from interpretations (usually bad ones) of OLD (okcupid and tinder) stats, in which it was determined the bottom 80% of men (in terms of a…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/22 10:45 PM
5

Niche tastes and criterias exist, so you're right, but what people here are generally speaking about are statistical probabilities. I.E. if you have feature X, there is a greater or lesser likelihood of that feature being considered attractive to X amount of people. What this kind of view tends to reject and overlook is that there are many millions of men (myself included) who fall into niche categories that do just fine with dating. To the incels and hardcore blackpillers on this sub, these men…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/22 07:04 PM
1

How is you saying "it's not much" out of context? You pushed back on that point a lot, it seems. You seem to think it's "not much" and called upper middle class incomes "mediocre". Median home price in LA, one of the most expensive cities on the planet, is 921,494. ..a $1-2M house is a rundown 50+ year old house by a major highway here Where? I guarantee you this isn't the case. If you think these places are "rundown", yup, pampered beyond belief.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/22 03:08 AM
1

Well I never really took contention with your reasoning about the OF, just your original phrasing of 300k being "not much", which is dumb as shit and crazy. How am I delusional? In a few years you have millions of dollars. Where in the world are houses going for multi millions of dollars on average? Even in LA, SF and NY, the average cost of a house is 1 - 2 mil. After saving, you could have that in a few years with a salary of 300k. It's not delusional, it's called math.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/22 02:48 AM
1

I am reading exactly what you're saying, words like "it's not that much" and "won't take you far". I was taking contention with that phrasing, which reads like the phrasing of trustfund kids I know. Calling upper middle class lifestyles mediocre = you're spoiled With 300k over a few years you can absolutely get an incredible house anywhere in the world. it's called saving.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/22 02:34 AM
0

There are no markets where 300k doesn't take you "that far" unless you absolutely suck shit with money. That doesn't exist. You could be in London or Zurich or Geneva or wherever and that would still be an upper class to upper middle class salary.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/22 02:22 AM
0

300k annually would provide you a good life anywhere in the world (and still put you in the top 10% of earners) and an insanely great life in most places outside of NY/SF. I don't think OP is right that 90% of people would take this deal, but it's certainly enough to make it enticing for pretty much anyone. Anesthesiologists make roughly this much in their first couple of years after eight years of med school and however much debt. Doing essentially nothing for an anesthesiologist salary seems l…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/22 02:13 AM
1

300k is top 10% of income pretty much anywhere in the US. It'd still be good money in Manhattan and SF. How is top 10% "not that much"? What the fuck are you smoking? If that doesn't "get you far", you're either a) spoiled, b) don't understand how to spend/save money
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/22 02:07 AM
2

Ok that's good then, I still see a lot of 'polygraphs are real' kinda stuff all over the place, so just making sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/22 01:10 AM
3

You do know lie detectors don't detect lies, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/22 01:07 AM
1

I'm pretty introverted myself, if I can make it work, anyone can. If the chick is into you, you can talk about anything and they won't care and will engage with whatever subject matter you choose. I talk about pretty wild/dumb shit on dates and it has always worked for me. It's about being shameless, which they will read as confident (even though I'm really not). Going on dates for me is just an exercise in turning off my filter for a few hours, letting it all loose. Every now and then this does…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/22 12:49 AM
5

All the top rated comments in that thread are essentially saying "it's all personal preference and neither of you are wrong", which seems reasonable. I've seen that sub flip out over dumb shit before, but this isn't one of those times.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/22 12:20 AM
2

Talking to people on OLD is just shitposting. You have to just type a bunch of increasingly bizarre, out of left field shit and a few chicks will find that "endearing" and "not like the other guys" and dumb shit like that. Focus more on trying to make yourself laugh than anything involving the girl and I'd bet your chances will improve. It's more about being different and standing out of the crowd than it is having a genuine conversation, which you should be leaving to the dates anyway. If that …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/22 12:11 AM
3

Because I don't agree with you and have seen with my own eyes average short dudes have cute girlfriends, which makes it not impossible, just difficult. I am like literally friends with these people lmao. Also No Incel/Black-Pill Content Incel Content will not be tolerated. Incels may be banned on sight at mod discretion. Incel Content is mainly determined by 3 factors; 1) Woe-is-me whining and fatalism 2) Lookism/Blackpill 3) Using Incel jargon or history on incel forums.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/22 06:12 PM
6

I am sure with your credentials you'll be able to find a cool job where you make a ton of cash, that will definitely help too. Until then, just talk to a lot of women, always, fuckin' constantly. Kind of uncomfortable and shitty, and the rejection sucks, but it's a methodology I reckon you haven't tried yet. Also just do the 'get muscles' thing, it will always be a net positive. This advice is the same advice I gave to all my shorter/uglier friends and like 8/10 of them now either have cute girl…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/22 06:06 PM
7

So instead of telling him the reality of the situation -- i.e. your ROI will suck dick and it will be extremely difficult, but not impossible -- your answer is "it's impossible, just give up?" Love and mutual intimacy are genuinely impossible for some people, like truly deformed people, for instance. This guy is slightly shorter than average height and has pretty good stats otherwise. That's not a "lost cause", that's a "unfortunately you'll have to work a fuck ton to make this work."
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/22 06:01 PM
3

I don't think you know what 'gaslighting' means Second, I know dudes with his exact stats pretty much and they mostly have cute GF's and can get laid more than once a year. But I guess they don't exist just 'cause you're shit with women huh. Hell, many of the married/couple women on this very forum have short husbands. Also I even told him it's an uphill battle, he will have a small ROI for a massive amount of effort, to stop using OLD, and that he needs to literally talk to women all the time, …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/22 05:54 PM
6

Your height doesn't help, but it can 100% be overcome, and it's more than all right you'll reject obese chicks if you're not obese yourself, that's a good thing, keep that filter. I don't recommend OLD for short dudes who don't have movie star faces and aren't jacked. Step one is always get jacked, and that's for a reason. If you don't have a movie star face, and aren't Tru-Jacked, I recommend going to more social events (yes, even if you dislike them, like I do). Concerts, bars, festivals, shit…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/22 05:47 PM
15

What steps did you take to improve yourself, what do you look like and what do the women you're trying to get look like?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/22 05:33 PM
8

yeah well I know a guy who says all rape statistics are a feminist psyop perpetuated by the gynocentric pussy worshipping government so I'm pretty sure you're wrong bro. listening to statistics is pure COPE and the best information comes from the insulated tribe of people I know who exist around me
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/22 04:59 PM
6

Way to insert your own personal feelings of "love" on the masses, as if "love" is some easily categorizable phenomena and not an invisible, highly individualized garble of neurochemical soup
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/22 01:58 PM
3

The book(s) I linked are all about how harem like systems turned into monogamy, I wasn't really arguing that (in fact, I said it in my post). You seemed to have some contention with the fact that paleolithic and early humans had harems, even though most of the evidence points that way. I don't see how your link says anything about how primates are not the "same", in fact it seems to confirm most of what I was saying in my post and even my linked material, which says pretty much the same thing, t…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 07:50 PM
1

She looks 100% better on the left.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 06:34 PM
3

Don't really watch it myself, but my cook friend has made a few recipes by Chef John and they have all been ridiculously good.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 05:16 PM
3

Don't really have a dog in this fight, but we do have some evidence and theories of paleolithic humans/early humans being polygynous harem builders living in multiharem structures, similar to baboons. The trend seems to go earliest humans, extremely promiscuous --- > slightly later humans, harems ---> modernish humans, pair bonding but still polygynous to some degree ---> even more modernish humans, some degree of monogamy + promiscuity As the Handbook of Evolution and Society says (analyzing Pr…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 05:10 PM
1

Yeah, just don't think your take here makes even a smidgen of sense, I'd urge you to think about it a little more.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 12:05 AM
3

This has got to be creative writing. If not, that's the most oblivious OP I've ever seen. Like that dude smokes premium copium in the copium den every second of his life in order to be this naïve.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 11:57 PM
1

I dont see how it matters if what I said is true concerning low N women. There is no "vetting better" if even the low N women are going for the tippy top of the tippy top, and they are, and that means even 5-8/10 men are likely not going to be the best or best looking sexual partner. I dont show my wallet or my stability since I make 50k a year and travel a lot ie not stable. Not sure why youre making random assumptions about how I do things based off cursory reddit comments.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 10:30 PM
1

Just because she's had casual sex a few times doesnt make her promiscuous imo. We have different opinions and life experiences. The chick I was talking about has fucked like 11 people total and she's 30. I dont consider that slutty even a little. She was just extremely picky about her casual sex partners. That's the rub.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 10:09 PM
1

Women having sex sometimes doesnt make them promiscuous. What I said would still be true even with low numbered chicks. Low numbered and ultra selective chicks probably have a higher likelihood of sleeping with some gigaChad than sluts do, given their pickiness. Also if the girl is hot enough and cool and does whatever I say in the bedroom, I really couldnt give a shit about her numbers if I find them arbitrarily reasonable. Like if she's fucked 50 dudes, yeah, I'm out. 10-20? Dont care in the s…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 09:59 PM
13

tl;dr extremists tend to be retards more at 11
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 09:35 PM
1

Yeah, pretty much, you're right on the money. Only caveat I'd add is even if you have some or all of those Chadly traits, it's not a good assumption to make. There is always someone Chadlier and better than you around the corner. If you're fucking hot young women, you can bet your ass they are choosing these traits in their partners and the likelihood of one or a few of them being better than you on these scales is pretty high (especially considering how easily these women can pick and choose). …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 07:03 PM
1

This is a legit tough one. On one hand, no dude should assume that he is their GF's/lovers/wife's best sexual experience in today's day and age, that's just silly, so he should have known this a priori. His bruised ego is coming from the fact that he assumes he's the best, when every sensible dude knows that in most circumstances that is not the case, especially if he is with an attractive woman who can fuck whoever she wants. On the other hand, she could have phrased it much better to soften th…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 06:47 PM
–

I second your concurrence. Good concurrence for a good post.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 01:23 AM
2

Relevant https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SpfUHOFT_Zc
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 12:57 AM
3

I have seen tons of people willingly change their views on the CMV subreddit. They have an award system for it and everything. There's lots of people with multiple hundreds of delta on CMV, so it kinda seems like lots of people on reddit are open to having their views changed just, like, objectively speaking.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/22 12:50 AM
-1

The only cool glasses are pure circles or pure rectangles. I mean you're hot enough, it doesn't matter, but no, they're weird as shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 11:55 PM
1

yes please
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 11:54 PM
0

Attractive/10, but what the fuck is up with those 1950's cat glasses
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 11:48 PM
1

I could have also said you look like Big Jay Oakerson on meth but I wanted to be nice
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 11:40 PM
1

You've got a good jaw and a symmetrical face, all the markers of objective attraction, it's weird you can't procure some amount of casual secks for yourself. Hair might be an issue, swipe that shit to the side like all the cool kids are doing now
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 11:31 PM
4

Here we have a rare exhibit, the elusive StrongMuscleFat pointing at the camera in his unkempt apartment. You can even see the dumbbell chained to his foot and his surgically attached fingerless gloves that were cool to scene kids in 2005.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 11:29 PM
4

Chadly in first picture, transgender in second, normal in last one. No idea what to do with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 11:22 PM
5

You look both normie and Chad. The proverbial Nhad, or Chormie, if you will.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 10:59 PM
7

You are precisely ten thousand times Chadlier than I expected you to be. Go out there and get some fuckin Scandinavian pussy man.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 10:58 PM
2

based on cursory undetailed glance, at least cute, maybe hot
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 10:27 PM
1

probably cause I'm not particularly attractive, crazy stuff
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 10:24 PM
0

Okee dokee dude, whatever you say, I am sure you had no part to play in that and are an entirely innocent victim
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 10:20 PM
1

well that's sad :(
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 10:16 PM
4

you have a movie star five o'clock shadow and I am jealous of it
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 10:12 PM
0

You would be hard pressed to find a comment of my mine where I'm just randomly name calling people without clear aggression from the other person beforehand
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 10:12 PM
1

you have kinda scary sunk in vampire eyes, but otherwise look like a happy normal couple i would smile at on the sidewalk
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 10:11 PM
1

jew skin, will always be bad, and i like being a 4 my dude, everything is aight anyway
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 10:10 PM
1

Nope, just tall and not fat my friend. Tallness and not fatness is good. Brings secks.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 10:06 PM
1

Tell that to pretty much every woman I have ever slept with dawg, maybe they will listen to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 10:05 PM
0

unironically highest rating of my life right hurr, one of the girls I'm sleeping with calls me 'ugly hot', it's pretty awesome.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 10:03 PM
1

He's got those cool eyes though, but at least I am much taller and my face doesn't matter as much.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 10:01 PM
1

hell yeah brother never stop speaking truth to power
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 10:00 PM
4

If you were my friend I would call you papa bear. You look like the kind of guy who is called papa bear a lot. And I bet people say cool stuff to you like 'hey big guy what's up'
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 09:59 PM
2

Thanks for the heads up anyway, it's just a fake name I use, I got it from this boy
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 09:55 PM
1

Even the women in my life I'm sleeping with beg to differ.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 09:52 PM
1

You think my name is Evelyn? Am I joke to you
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 09:52 PM
3

I was way late to the other one so I'll be early in this one, here's a little song as usual I rate myself a very cool 4/10 but not a gay 4/10
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 09:46 PM
1

6'2, lean, but truly ugly face, never had tinder, only bumble and hinge, would rate the apps C+ or maybe B-. I get about 15/20 attractive matches a week. In 2019, I was seriously dating six different girls throughout the year from bumble/hinge, most at one time was three, now I am dating two girls, one of which I met on bumble. In 2020 I only met up with like three chicks overall cause of the pandy. I slept with all these chicks and it wasn't difficult, it was fun and they were (and still are) a…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 09:22 PM
2

There was one near Halloween if I'm remembering correctly. Guess the mods just want chaos.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 06:21 PM
1

Oh yeah, totally, humans tend to associate with those that look like them, that's why the Germans killed a bunch of "other" white people, and why the Hapsburgs took over Czechland for 300 years, and why the Asian countries were at war with each other for thousands of years, why the Japanese were constantly trying to take over Korea and portions of China, and vice versa, it's why the Russians (other Slavs) decided to take over all the other Slavic majority countries, and it's why African slave st…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 04:27 PM
1

Why did "I" take on a portion of the blame because my grandparents fled Communism, when the Russians took over the Czech Republic? How did this happen? You keep saying this, but you're not explaining why or how I magically take on this blame. If it's because of my skin color, that means you're a racist who thinks all white people are a monolithic entity. Receiving social benefits through no choice of my own, because my grandparents decided to flee a country that was being militaristically taken …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 04:10 PM
1

The German government was to blame. I wouldn't say German resistance groups were to blame, because that's called delineation and means you have to separate the wheat from the chaff and actually look at the situation instead of saying blanket statement shit like "German people bad". I mean, my grandparents are Czech Jews and most of our family died in the Holocaust and even they don't think that way. I agree that whiteness has helped me anywhere in the west when it comes to social stratification,…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 03:48 PM
1

'My people'? Which countries did the Czech Republic colonize again? Oh, that's right, didn't happen. Stop assuming all white people are French, English, Spanish or Dutch. Colonization was the effort of only a few nations, and many billions of 'white people' are not from those nations. You are just a racist and completely lack the ability to delineate, because you're a racist who assumes "white people" are a monolithic "race" of humans, just like if I said all Africans are slavers from Dahomey 'W…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/21 03:32 PM
5

I read the study too, most people here have. The analysis of the study which is easily available online disagrees with your claims. Middle Eastern men are not the most desirable by white, Asian or black women, white men are. So how exactly are they the most desirable? I am pretty sure you have no idea what you're talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/21 08:45 PM
4

What? The studies don't show that Middle Eastern men are most desired by western/white women, they showed that all races preferred their own race to other races (oh, except everyone prefers white men). That study most definitely does not say that Middle Eastern men are "the most desired" "White women prefer white men to the exclusion of everyone else—and Asian and Hispanic women prefer them even more exclusively. These three types of women only respond well to white men. More significantly, thes…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/21 06:57 PM
3

It was kind of a genuine question honestly, but I think I figured it out now.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/21 06:03 PM
5

I think it's a biological male who identifies as a woman, who is sexually/romantically interested in women, aka a straight male who wants to be different and doesn't have any personality outside of their ultra cool unique gender identity
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/21 05:53 PM
13

A trans lesbian? So you're a straight dude?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/21 05:20 PM
1

LOL I joke with my friends that I went to school to "think about thinking" and how that just made me more confused about everything, and it did, so I really feel you, brother.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/21 11:22 PM
1

Well I agree with the second sentence, at least, it is certainly one of the most debated proofs in philosophy, and is still considered 'inconclusive' by pretty much every philosophy department in the world, so I guess he did his job there, although I still think all of the replies (especially Hofstadter's) have essentially smashed Searle to tiny bits. I don't think there's many cracks to a computational theory of mind. If anything, things like integrated information theory are making great strid…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/21 11:14 PM
1

Weird, I have a masters in philosophy, and these topics were pretty much at the forefront of thought when I graduated (not that long ago). I can't think of a single professor who liked Searle's big argument, let alone a single neuroscientist or computer scientist. Searle's big argument is called The Chinese Room and was constructed in the 1980's. Searle is not a cognitive scientist or a computer scientist. The Chinese Room is supposed to show that it is in principle not possible for digital comp…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/21 10:58 PM
2

Fucked up beyond all recognition
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/21 01:50 AM
5

When a guy uses Harry Potter and Nick Sparks as examples of fiction, it's a pretty sure bet that he's a literary troglodyte and knows next to zero about literature, and also that he has probably never been in a smart woman's bedroom before.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/21 12:26 AM
4

I am a pretty sexually charged dude and have never thought to do something like this. You don't sound horny, you sound deranged and autistic. Humans with normal brains don't even consider something like this, it is basically a social nuclear warhead with zero ROI.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/21 09:38 PM
3

He has been MeToo'd, he was taken off of both Bohemian Rhapsody and removed from the credits of Dark Phoenix. He will probably (rightfully) never direct a movie ever again, at least not in the states, hasn't in two years. He hasn't been in the spotlight like the others cause no one knows who he is, and he hasn't made a good movie since like 1995. If you're asking why he hasn't been arrested, it's probably because there's not enough evidence to convict or arrest him for anything, despite everyone…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/21 09:19 PM
2

You can get to know one another at a restaurant, though. Kinda completely different.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/21 11:01 AM
3

What about LoTR is anti-SJW? There's nothing SJW's would object to in those movies and they are beloved by pretty much everyone. You could easily make LoTR these days without issue. Conan isn't even good so who cares? Plenty of good movies are being made these days. People with talking points like this simply don't watch enough good movies. Maybe SJW's are ruining shit like Disney, but ... that shit isn't even good and it never was. Dare I say ... watch other movies not made by one of the bigges…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/21 02:02 AM
4

Ok, and? Fantasy is a genre known for being camp, low effort and shit. Like I said, there's like a few good ones per decade, whereas there's a ton of good movies in every other genre category per year.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/21 01:48 AM
2

So your hypothetical is "you get to fuck your celebrity crush but you dont cum" That isnt how I interpreted your post, really. Doesnt read like that. In any case, I would still quickly get unfulfilled and frustrated with it. So like I'd probably do it once just to say I fucked X Celeb, but then probably never again. Not a super appealing deal.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/21 01:38 AM
2

Emily Blunt in Sicario. Incredible female lead. Not scifi or fantasy, but a believable and great role nonetheless. And there's tons of great female leads in general these days. Natalie Portman in Annihilation, Amy Adams in Arrival, Charlize Theron in Mad Max (she is the protagonist regardless of what the title suggests) The real issue is that most scifi and fantasy are camp trash and only a few good ones come out in a decade. Most of the male leads are fucking terrible in scifi or fantasy movies…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/21 01:34 AM
2

Lol have you ever had sex? A chick getting you off feels about a million times better than masturbation. Not really the same thing at all. Memory doesn't cut it. As said, would much rather fuck a 7 that is enthusiastic about getting me off than a bombshell I can't cum with.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/21 01:26 AM
3

Would not take this deal. Cumming is cool and not cumming is not cool. Rather just fuck a 6/7/other attainable chick I can cum with. Fucking ScarJo would be cool and all but taking out the climax of sex would be, dare I say, anticlimactic, not to mention stupidly frustrating/unfulfilling.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/21 01:21 AM
2

Movies are shit first dates and only a dummy would suggest one. I say this as a person who worked in film for six years and loves movies. Honestly I think they're kinda a shit date in general, at least during the honeymoon period. You're supposed to be going out and getting to know one another and having fun, not sitting in a dark room.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/21 01:18 AM
5

Mega Chad 6'4 nuclear physicist but he has a micropenis and AIDs
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/21 09:57 PM
7

Ah, the mark of a person who doesn't know how to debate or make any good points at all. Ya' love to see it
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/21 02:38 PM
6

Every life experience I've ever had disagrees with your experience. It is directly contrary to it. I have only ever lived in giant metro areas in both the US and EU and have always had fairly large groups of acquaintances and friends. All the best looking fittest dudes I know get the most pussy and it's not even a competition. These are not necessarily the most interesting guys or funniest guys or richest guys or most social guys. The other things you think matter so much simply don't. As for yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/21 02:00 PM
2

He's the local fat girl chaser. Don't listen to him. 135 at your height is fine, right on the money.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/21 03:23 AM
2

No, not really, faces are more than just mouths.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/21 07:32 PM
4

Yes and also don't care. Asses of all sizes (excluding obese) are great, but if the girl's face is hot enough I don't really care about her ass or tits. Face beats out tits or ass.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/21 07:21 PM
4

One of the cruelest things God ever did is making these cute motherfuckers taste like hamburger. What a fucking cunt. They are both adorable and I love them.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/21 02:05 AM
3

Sounds to me like you just haven't met any smart women. Also I'm pretty sure an estimated 30% of people who bought 50 Shades are Men. So yeah, women do read some bad books. That does exclude them from reading good books too. What a wild leap of logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 01:24 PM
1

What? Neither of these is about blockchains lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 01:19 PM
1

I listed two below.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 01:17 PM
2

Great, go read Name of the Rose. I'll wait the decade it'll take your brain to process.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 03:41 AM
2

The take of a true no-reading loser. Ya love to see it.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 03:37 AM
5

Button downs are superior to polos. Polos are for queers and golfers.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 03:36 AM
2

You saying "they're not comparable" isn't an argument. You saying "they're not the same level" but not being extrapolate on that isn't an argument. It's the lack of an argument. Because you don't have an argument. You haven't read the fiction books with history in them, so how the fuck would you know? Your problem here is that I genuinely read both fiction and history. I am way more qualified to talk about this than you. There are a metric fuck ton of history books that can actively teach you hi…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 03:33 AM
2

'Cause if you read a single history book and go "all of this is true", then you're retarded. Reading a fictional book with a lot of history in it is the same thing as reading a history book with a lot of history in it. You still need to read more in order to verify the claims therein. They both lead you to seek out other sources. There's things in fiction books you would never know about, history and real shit, that you would never seek out otherwise. Bet you've never heard of Ubertino of Casale…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 03:26 AM
3

You clearly don't read. No one who reads consistently has this bad of logic, or knows this little about books. Not all books are Game of Thrones. That's a false equivalence. You wouldn't know this, because again, you don't read. You can't possibly say you know the contents of books you haven't read. So you don't actually know how much history or reality or fact is in them or not. I don't read or watch fantasy at all, so nice try, but also shit try.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 03:21 AM
2

Nah, it's about what you learn, that's what books are. And you can legitimately learn history from fiction. You wouldn't know this because you don't read.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 03:12 AM
4

So just ignore the point, huh? Name of the Rose has more history in the first fifteen pages than the fake books you're claiming to be reading. So does Lincoln in the Bardo. So do a thousand others. Mostly written by men. No one who actually reads has this bad of logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 03:08 AM
3

Once again, there are fictional books (thousands upon thousands of them) that contain actual history in them. This is reality, which you seem to love so much. You don't read tho, so how would you know? Also a pretty shitty argument considering that most of the great fiction writers are all men.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 03:04 AM
9

You've posted this exact same rant before and it's still retarded. There are some fiction books with more history in them than actual history books. You wouldn't know this because you don't actually read, you just like to gatekeep about reading (something you clearly don't do) Kinda sad tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 02:57 AM
1

"Further" than sex? No, sex is called shit like "homebase" and "consummation" for a reason. It is the ultimate form of intimacy and liking someone and there is nothing beyond it. No amount of "romantic gestures" will ever equal fucking someone. So pretty much, yes. If you're not getting sex out of the girl and you just do a bunch of shit for her cause you "like her", you're a simp. If she liked you back so much, she would fuck you, because women are humans, and humans like fucking other humans t…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 01:21 AM
7

It would not and this is one of Pussy's troll positions. Most of the time you cannot functionally tell the difference between a 22 year old and a 26 year old. He is placing an arbitrary number on it to infuriate people, not because his actual cut off is 22.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 01:15 AM
1

Okay, simps and cucks do one sided "romantic" things for women, and those "romantic" things aren't romantic unless it is mutual. If there is a couple of people and they are mutually attracted to one another, an outing is ipso facto romantic. You could go to a fuckin Burger King and that can be "romantic". The thing that makes something "romantic" is mutual attraction, aka wanting to fuck one another. The vast vast vast majority of humans like sex. So okay, if you want to squabble about outliers,…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 01:12 AM
1

Yes, welcome to humanity and most men everywhere. Taking a girl for a nice meal "because you like her for her" is naïve simp baby shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 01:09 AM
2

Romance? Romance and sex are interrelated. Romance leads to sex. No one does anything "romantic" unless it leads to sex. The difference between a romantic dinner and a dinner is the sex or lack thereof that you have afterwards. Cuddling is physical intimacy which you said wasnt allowed in your OP. Either way, its not nearly enough to consider cuddling someone "being in a relationship" with them. That's not "being with them". "Being with someone" means fucking them.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 12:54 AM
2

They arent a partner at that point. They are your friend.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 12:12 AM
1

So far its the first time for me! It was def spontaneous and fun and interesting but we're definitely going back to my dirty apartment next time :p
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/21 11:15 PM
1

Its not about the appeal, that's what you're missing. We fucked in the car cause it was a heat of the moment decision and we were both too tipsy to drive. That's really it. We wanted to fuck each other asap and that was the closest place to do it without either of us getting a DUI. Neither of us is into public stuff or car sex, it just happened. Not because of any innate appeal.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/21 11:09 PM
3

It was because I straight up admitted my apartment was not clean enough for a woman to go inside of it (and cause we were tipsy and she didn't want to drive yet)
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/21 08:51 PM
5

We were tipsy and liked each other! Leave us alone!
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/21 08:50 PM
1

LMAO no, it was an old Honda fit and incredibly difficult to fuck in because I am 6'2". Made it work but it was slightly uncomfortable.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/21 08:49 PM
1

Why would I eat mediocre food at a "normal" restaurant? My options were pay slightly more at the fancy place where every entrée is a fucking banger and one of the best things you've ever eaten, or get "normal" food. I'm not even rich or upper class, but I splurge on restaurants, and that's with friends or dates or anybody. She got the Coffee Rubbed Seared Ahi and said it was one of the best things she's ever put her in mouth. I imagine this won me a lot of points.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/21 08:47 PM
2

Yup. My logic was, worst case scenario, even if I had to pay for it all, I would still be getting a great meal out of it. Totally worked out in my favor in any case.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/21 08:36 PM
3

Well I technically have zero experience with Canadian women, so believe what ya gotta believe I guess. Still, I don't think it's fair to chicks to say they're all alike, and the types of women matter. If I know a guy who fucks 10 smokeshows, 10/10 perfect girls, and that's all he fucks, he's far more impressive to me than some dude who fucks 300 chainsmoking gutter Gremlins. Quality is more important than quantity.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/21 08:05 PM
12

Update on 30 year old man going on date with 37 year old woman: Date was one of the better ones of my life. Took her to the fanciest place in town, mainly just to see if she would offer to split it, and if she didn't, I would walk away. Turns out when she excused herself to the restroom she took care of the bill for us. This has never happened to me and I was/still am genuinely shocked. We got drinks afterwards (which I paid for). Talked/made out for like three hours before I walked her to her c…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/21 08:02 PM
4

Sure, and that's why I responded to him with "you're talking about shitter tier low class women, not 'women' in general'. So yes, I can agree with this, but not the original statement.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/21 07:55 PM
5

I'm a man. Who you know =/= the rest of the world. You're actually doing the very womanly thing here and mistaking your tiny focal point of life and extrapolating that to mean all of 'western women'. The dudes I know who get laid the most are all in shape, but not steroid shape, and none of them are criminals or have tattoos. They're well to do professionals with cool careers. So whose anecdote wins? Not even all 'western women' are like other demographics and populations of 'western women'. The…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/21 07:52 PM
2

They don't. You're thinking of low value shit tier women, not "women"
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/21 07:45 PM
2

Tell us you don't go outside without telling us you don't go outside.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/21 07:32 PM
–

Goin on a date with a woman seven years older than me in thirty minutes (she's 37). Wish me luck. Or misfortune. I got super drunk beforehand at a karaoke bar so feeling pretty fucking awesome. I wish all my comrades AND enemies here a fruitful Friday evening.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/21 02:18 AM
1

On this subject at least, I think you're almost certainly correct. Fuck, aging is gay.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/21 05:44 PM
1

I kind of have the same thinking as you, and I already am casually dating a 24 year old, so it seems dumb to also date a 37 year old. I might go on a date with her just to see how it is, but thinking anything long term might be difficult. Sucks cause she is genuinely cool and smart.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/21 05:29 PM
1

Yup, both childfree. I don't think I could get it up if I wasn't attracted to someone, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/21 03:55 PM
2

Nah, don't care about marriage or kids, either does she. Really the only issue is her potentially getting ugly, which now that I read it, sounds really bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/21 03:33 PM
3

True, I think there's lots of hot older women, the age difference just makes me think I could be wasting both of our time due to my own future shallowness. And I am looking for an LTR more than casual stuff. My last true LTR ended directly before the pandemic, the casual stuff since then has been nice and fun and stuff, but not exactly what I've been seeking.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/21 03:23 PM
4

I matched with a 37 year old woman on bumble a few days ago, I'm 30. She is hot and super cool. So far, I probably have more in common with her than any other person I've met on a dating site, including the current chick I'm casually dating. So PPD, should I go out with this chick? My only hesitation is that while she is still attractive now and could easily pass for 30, her looks will steeply drop off in the coming years.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/21 02:59 PM
1

Funny that you're going back to the Korean War and Vietnam to make your point. Neither of those wars has a big effect on today's economy and you know it. The two modern wars we've lived through were Republican brain children. Republicans at the highest level of office with veto power masterminded those wars and you know it and so does everyone else. They were also significantly more expensive and less economy building than early wars. I never said politicians were my friends, and I said I hated …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/21 01:34 PM
1

You can't really say what he would or wouldn't do. He was a staunch democratic socialist. Maybe he would hate modern day neoliberals, I know I do, but that doesn't make him less of a democratic socialist, and it doesn't mean he'd denounce socialism. You can be socialist and absolutely hate leftist idpol (like me, and lots of other leftists) Hell, there's a whole subreddit against exactly this with tens of thousands of members, just about as many as this sub. Lumping leftists together under a big…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/21 04:39 AM
1

It is not hyperbole about the conservatives. All the modern day wars were funded and started by conservatives. The neo-liberals that followed them, who I hate btw, did not start the costly wars (and should have stopped them sooner instead of drone programs and shit). But Conservatives cost us trillions we could have used on healthcare and education. It's not hyperbole -- it's reality. Also every system in Europe with universal healthcare is half socialist and half capitalist. Those are all capit…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/21 04:28 AM
2

When did I say it wasn't made by your brain? That wasn't what I was arguing at all lmao. Why is it more beautiful and how have you come to that conclusion? How is coming to faulty conclusions based on limited data "beautiful" or even have anything to do with "beauty"? Gibberish. Bullshit, agnosticism is how people gather more information later. Every great scientific project started with "I don't know", and then you gather more information. There are very few truly knowable things outside of mat…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/21 03:32 AM
1

What are you talking about? There are gradients of judgement. You can say "This person is beyond redemption because they're incompetent" or you can say "This person is incompetent, but I don't know why exactly" or you can say "This person might be incompetent, but I don't know the circumstances of their life, so I won't make any judgements". It's very easy to cool your own judgements about other humans by simply admitting that too much goes into making a person a certain way. Instead of saying "…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/21 02:38 AM
1

Why does it have to be anyone's "fault"? It is unfortunate human circumstance. We can either say "fuck you" or we can say "okay, how do we help people who were given a bad shake?" One of those options seems far more humane and a lot less edgy than the other. I never said people shouldn't take responsibility for their own actions. I said that incompetent people do not choose to be incompetent, and that incompetence is largely bred from genetic and environmental factors. Unsure anyone scientifical…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/21 02:29 AM
1

That's the quote I was just talking about. He admits in the book he is a socialist. Not sure what to tell you. And like I said, my quote from Orwell himself was him calling himself a democratic socialist. But I guess that doesn't count because you want him to be an anti-socialist, which he wasn't? LMAO
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/21 02:26 AM
3

No, what you do is that you accept that you cannot reliably judge because you are only one brain. You can judge all you want, but if you can't admit that you are entirely ignorant of the circumstances of most humans, then you have a God complex, and are tacily admitting you are the arbiter of good stuff, and everyone else is gay and retarded. The point is that you cannot actually know anything about the struggles of other humans, and you can only fling your own morals and attitudes onto them, wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/21 02:24 AM
1

I just re-read it last year, actually. What about it? Orwell was a democratic socialist for his entire life. He even says he supports socialism in Road to Wigan Pier lmao. Maybe you should re-read it. It's literally on the fuckin wiki page. Orwell blatantly states that adherents to socialism are often what make people turn against it, since they are all "juice drinkers" (great passage about shitty socialists), but he says multiple times that he supports it. BTW my quote was ten years after Road …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/21 02:18 AM
2

Because incompetence has nothing to do with whether or not humans deserve a dignified life, or whether or not they deserve universal care (shelter, clothes, food, water, medicine). Once again, if we left individuals up to this judgement, we would be doomed. Luckily, most sane societies do not. Incompetence is not the fault of the individual. Genetics has a giant role to play in whether or not someone is competent throughout their life. So does environment. All unchosen. So you are basically sayi…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/21 02:13 AM
1

I've read everything Orwell has ever written. You are hilariously wrong. Here's, oh, Orwell on the subject, who would be more akin to someone like Bernie Sanders, actually, just like him, because Orwell was a staunch democratic socialist. He literally wrote an essay called Why I Write. Do you want to know why he wrote? Here's why, from the man himself: "Every line of serious work that I have written since 1936 has been written, directly or indirectly, against totalitarianism and for democratic s…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/21 02:00 AM
2

Who is the arbiter of competency? You? Sure sounds like this is a "I don't like some people, therefore they ruin society" kind of argument. There's tons of societies all over the world with citizens high on educational and happiness indexes (aka NOT the US) because of the dignified life a centralized system largely provides for them. Who woulda thought that some amount of unity and collective effort would lead to statistically smarter, happier people? What a revelation! We only figured this out …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/21 01:57 AM
2

You said you completely agree with this: "It's hard to want to help someone who is so bad at helping themselves and so good at making excuses" This means that you think you are the arbiter of what competent is and what it isnt, and that people who dont meet your mysterious standard of competency dont deserve help for some reason, or are "hard" to help for some reason, even though that's kinda just basic human empathy. You also said you are starting to believe "pulling yourself up by your bootstr…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/21 01:52 AM
1

There's a ton of different types of libertarians and you definitely dont speak for all of them. Not all libertarians are right wing, and many support taxes. They are the price we pay for civilization Taxes help people when we are not spending them on cruise missiles and bombing brown children, i.e. all conservative political directives. Insane how every other civilized country on Earth has healthcare systems paid for by taxes and statistically happy and educated populations and yet dumb American…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/21 01:45 AM
2

Since when does anyone's competency mean they don't deserve a dignified life? Also who is judging competency? You? Why? How are you judging it? What metric are you using? Is it, "the people who disagree with me about stuff are bad and dumb, but the ones who agree are good and smart?" You people need to go back to the 1770's where you came from.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/21 01:41 AM
1

Confused who is right here, considering the last half is factually untrue. Conservatives are dumber on all studied metrics. Statistically, being a conservative means you are dumber than the average liberal/leftist. The quote doesn't say "libertarians", it says conservatives, and it doesn't even say that because the original quote is talking about 18th/19th century Republicanism, which is more akin to modern day classical liberalism (basically an anti-monarchy stance) which you're saying you kind…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/21 01:29 AM
1

Do you want to be paraphrasing Burke? Dude was a monarchist and staunchly against the kind of Republicanism that was vital to the American project. Doesnt seem like the kinda guy you would want to be quoting. He said some pretty insane shit about humans needing God given monarchs to govern them. Probably not the best guy for a "libertarian" to be quoting.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/21 01:22 AM
2

any man over 30 who is not a conservative has no brains." You "like" this quote, despite the fact that it directly contradicts the reality of many, many smart people over 30 in fact being leftists and having brains. Doesn't make much sense to me. But I guess people can like shit things that make no sense. No skin off my back. As a side note maybe if you were more prone to actually researching your own shitty quotes you would have known upfront that it wasn't Churchill. But I know conservatives a…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/21 01:06 AM
2

Makes little sense considering the amount of insanely smart people who were lifelong socialists and leftists, but okay. Guess George Orwell, Einstein and Bertrand Russel were all big fat no headed idiots, huh?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/21 01:00 AM
6

Churchill never said this. In fact the original quote is either by John Adams, who was a monarchist stooge pretty much (and was talking about 18th century democracy, which he was primarily against believe it or not, and if you don't believe me, you should go see for yourself what he thought of Tom Paine, arguably the most important American Founding Father), or by a fairly obscure French guy talking about French Republicanism in the 1870's, a much different kind of Republicanism than contemporar…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/21 12:56 AM
4

Generally the only thing that makes a woman unfuckably unattractive is her weight. Men overlook ugly faces for hot bodies all the time. It's called a butter face and has been common parlance for forever now. Butter faces can get men, as long as they're average/thin. If you're fat, that's your fault. Get skinny and there will be men everywhere for you, even with jank face. If you're like unspeakably deformed or something, that's another story. You're part of such a small minority that it doesnt e…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/21 08:44 PM
3

"Reddit users are sad retarded losers" says local reddit user
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/21 08:39 PM
3

Not really possible to know what other animals experience. What we can know is that it is like something to be that creature. We can axiomatically assume they have some variable of conscious experience. Whether or not its remotely similar to our own would be purely extrapolation on our part. Seminal paper on this is Tom Nagel's 'What Is It Like To Be a Bat?' Great read if you like this kind of stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/21 08:16 PM
1

No, I made a bunch of claims and you ignored all of them to focus on that one point. I even said the main point was that you cant know a creature that well until youre around it all the time. You didnt say shit to that and decided to attack one sentence out of many. You just sound like a dog apologist. There's a shit ton of bad dogs that are bad regardless of how well theyve been trained. Dogs are more malleable than cats with training, but within that malleability is still a broad spectrum of b…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/21 08:24 PM
1

Right, and Ive met many non pitbulls who were assholes to people who were not their owners. And you still ignore the other point.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/21 08:14 PM
1

Clearly you have never heard of pitbulls attacking people despite being good boys lol I have met a lot of "well behaved" dogs who were not well behaved around strangers. Some dogs are waaay untrainable and just have that crazy instinct brain thing. And this isnt about dogs vs cats. Love both. Its about the fact that knowing an animal comes with living with it, not just being around them seldom.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/21 08:10 PM
1

Different things tho. I've met shit dogs who were killers and could kill you. The worst cat I've met was a cold cunt but couldnt do shit to me. In the instance of which has the potential to be worse, its dogs all the way. Animals often warm up to owners and not strangers. Tru much of the time with dogs as well. Gotta be around an animal a bit to really know it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/21 07:55 PM
3

Not possible. I've told all of my good friends and every girl I've dated about this place and every single one was like "this sounds horrible" and/or "what a waste of time" It takes a true retard to enjoy this place as much as we do. We should all just accept it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/21 07:50 PM
1

You have too little experience with cats to have an educated opinion. You have one mediocre cat and extrapolate that to all cats. This is silly and I will defend their feline honor. I love dogs btw. Good dogs are equal to good cats.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/21 07:48 PM
1

Nah, I just lived with a guy who had four cats, and lived with an ex who had three, and moved into other places that had cats. Most of them have been cool. Met plenty of awesome female cats. The sweetest gentlest cat I ever met was a Russian blue girl. Not as cool as Waffles, but far gentler, less wild, and very sweet, a close second in personality. Most of the time when I have picked out cats at shelters, there is a checklist I've filled out, then they try to match you with the best cat. Affect…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/21 07:33 PM
4

Not all cats are like that, or NACALT. I have lived with dozens of cats over the years and they have all been different. Lived with a cat a few years back named Waffles. This little motherfucker was a puppy. He was the most affectionate amazing creature I have ever experienced and I grew up with dogs. Little dude followed me around all the time, so much so I would sometimes trip over him trying to get around the house. He just loved me. We fell asleep together every night. He never left my side …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/21 07:16 PM
1

"War movie" is a pretty expansive genre. Waltz with Bashir is one of my favorites. The Wind that Shakes the Barely is great and no one ever talks about it. Come and See is a masterpiece. Beasts of No Nation is another masterpiece. Ran, another masterpiece, although not set during a historical war like the others. Honestly war movies overall have a really good track record. Most of them I've seen, Full Metal Jacket, Saving Private Ryan, Thin Red Line, most WWII/Vietnam movies, all very good.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/21 02:29 AM
1

Sure, that works too, although I see almost no difference in your first two groups. If they attractive enough to LTR, in almost all circumstances you would consider this person 'very attractive'
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/21 06:10 PM
0

You're saying that now, but you certainly said a whole bunch of other stuff in your first post.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/21 02:48 PM
2

No, objective truths exist. The vast majority of professional philosophers accept realism about the world, meaning that there are things (facts about these things) that hold independent of our subjective attitudes. If there's a pile of 13 equally sized rocks, they cannot be placed into two rows of equal length. That's objectively true with or without sentience. Same as the Earth revolving around the sun -- true without humans. Same as the sun being the only star in our solar system. All objectiv…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/21 02:21 PM
1

Yes, I am aware of this, that's why I told him he didn't understand what the word objective means. 'Context independent' is just a different way of saying the exact same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/21 02:03 PM
1

How can someone's attractiveness be independent of context? Being able to judge someone's looks is necessarily dependent on context.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/21 01:59 PM
3

'More objective'? I'm pretty sure you don't know what that word means. Something is either objective or not -- it is a binary. Something cannot be 'more objective' lmao. > A proposition is considered to have objective truth when its truth conditions are met without bias caused by a sentient subject. That's all it means. Nothing more or less. 'More objective' is gobbledygook nonsense talk. The scores are useless because subjectivity exists. You can keep using words wrong and not understanding wha…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/21 01:41 PM
3

Your experience is not really a universal, though. I went through a similar thing of never getting laid to getting laid sometimes, and I already disagree with your first bullet point. Almost all of my FWBs have been really cool people and I liked being around them. You shouldn't conflate your shitty casual sex partners with all casual sex partners -- it is possible to find casual sex partners that you enjoy being around, and it's really not even all that difficult.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/21 01:32 PM
11

These lists are such shit. Brie Larson as a 5.5/10, but man-jaw Sui He as a 9/10? Absolutely fucking laughable. Anyone who takes that seriously has overinflated insane standards and has probably never dated anyone even remotely good looking. These lists are good proof as to why the 1-3 scale makes a lot more sense. 1, wouldn't fuck, 2, might fuck but wouldn't be in an LTR, 3, hot enough for LTR Also there is no such thing as 'objective awareness of looks'. That phrase is a non-sequitur. You cann…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/21 01:24 PM
1

Yeah, this isn't a rich man's dream or fun night out (they're doing way ritzier shit than this), it's just chili trying to flex to internet strangers. It's possible to go pretty much anywhere in the world cheaply, including Japan (source: went to Japan for like $700 roundtrip in 2019, whole month long trip cost about 3k) if you get lucky with tickets, and finding drugs isn't particularly difficult or expensive, although coke is probably the most expensive least worth it drug out there at the mom…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/21 09:31 PM
5

That's fair enough, especially the last part, but that post about how his inceldom and fomo was worse than losing his two brothers is a pretty giant psychological tell. That's not a healthy brain at work.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/21 02:33 AM
6

His post reads shittily narcissistic. His own inceldom was worse than losing two siblings? This sounds actually insane. His own sexlessness, loneliness and FOMO mean more to him than the lives of other humans, no less his literal family? Unless they were gigantic pieces of shit, these feelings are abnormal AF. It's selfish hyperfixated internet-brain manbaby gibberish. I would feel sorry for him but this post makes him seem like a terrible person who warrants no sympathy.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/21 02:25 AM
1

I just write like crazy on addy. It's helpful to start addy by doing something productive just as you take it. But yeah, I can see why you wouldnt love it if it does that to ya. And the no appetite thing is pretty brutal.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/21 12:56 AM
1

Addy is genuinely amazing and that is the main problem with it. Every time I've taken it I felt like a God and never wanted it to stop. As far as abuse potential goes, addy is right at the top. Unfortunately it tanks your liver and is way too easy to get addicted to, so pretty much a no go for anyone who doesnt want to be a drooling addict. As far as your other comments go, the best high for virtually anything is a low dose of LSD. Smaller doses make me hypersociable, peppy, generally euphoric a…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/21 12:44 AM
–

Nah man, 5 men can get laid. It is literally only the absolute dregs and super bottom tier men who can't. Like I said in another post, ALL of my short and minority friends get laid sometimes. They're not casanovas, they're not slaying pussy like there's no tomorrow, but they still get laid sometimes. And it all came down to gym and/or money. The incel rhetoric on this sub is not reality. Average men get laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/21 11:14 PM
1

Well it's all true, so your perspective means very little. Sucks to suck.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/21 11:09 PM
–

Your other life stats matter. And if youre not even remotely sociable or have other sociality issues, yeah, gym wont help. If youre insanely short, gym wont help. If youre like bottom 5-10% of facial attractiveness, gym wont help. Gym helps 90-95% of guys but there are no perfect systems. It is still easily the best suggestion to give for low value men in order to boost their chances.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/21 10:35 PM
1

No, like I said, those relationships were not with women who were attracted to me. They liked me because I was safe not because they actually were attracted to me, and both of them confirmed this when they broke up with me. I said this already. Not getting laid for years and wanting to fuck is not "normal". It is literally involuntary celibacy lmao. Nothing about my early LTRS was normal either. They were relationships of convenience, not love or lust. And the gym is the number one thing I recom…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/21 10:30 PM
1

Incels can be in prior relationships. Nothing about my definition prevents that. You are not the gatekeeper of definitions. Sorry, but youre still saying only your definition matters, but how you use the word isnt how I use it. I was an incel for years and became not one. Your gatekeeping doesnt change that. Getting in shape is all I did and all I said I did lol. And yes, that helps the majority of men. Why would you need the same starting point anyway? Everyone has different journeys, even ince…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/21 10:23 PM
1

Never said it was an insane tragedy. All I said is I was involuntarily celibate for two years. Pretty shit attempt at a strawman. Maybe attack the arguments I made instead of making up random shit I didnt say. And anyone who didnt get laid for years can understand other people who havent gotten laid for years. Pretty equivalent experiences for most men. I understand women not wanting me. I went through it for years. Not enough for you? There's that gatekeeping again. Also I never said I understo…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/21 10:11 PM
1

The definition is literally involuntarily celibate. Stop gatekeeping. Your definition is not the only definition. As it is defined everywhere else, it means involuntarily celibate. The individual decides what that means to them, not you. In my case, I think any young man with a normal sex drive who doesnt have sex for months/years even though he wants to, well that's an incel. Pretty simple.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/21 10:04 PM
–

I was involuntarily celibate from ages 22-24. That's what incel means. So yes, I certainly was. Incel does not mean virgin or virgin forever. It just means that I was celibate involuntarily.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/21 09:54 PM
–

Again, there were mitigating circumstances. Those chicks were with me because I was safe, not because they actually liked me. Also beside the point. I was still an incel for almost three years of my sexual prime. Please learn to read.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/21 09:48 PM
–

For two years I wasnt looked at by women. Then I improved myself and was looked at. How is this difficult to figure out? Two LTRs in very young adulthood means nothing, especially when almost everyone around me was doing much better with more attractive women. Incel does not equal forever virgin. I was in those LTRs due to luck and knowing those chicks from my hometown, not because women gave me the time of day, which they absolutely didnt back then.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/21 09:33 PM
–

2 year long relationships in my early 20's and couldnt get pussy outside of that. Not exactly stellar for a person in his early 20's going to one of the biggest unis on Earth. Why? Cause I was skinny fat and couldnt do the requisite work to not be that. When I did, getting women became easier. Not rocket science. Also I did mention that between 22-24 I did not get any women, aka was technically an incel those years. So maybe learn to read.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/21 09:27 PM
–

This is absolutely true and it's sad to see some younger guys here be completely devoid of hope. 18-21 I was in a couple (2) LTRs. One or two brief flings in four years of college after the LTRs ended. Very little casual stuff in my mid 20's. Nothing, zilch, zero around 22-24. By the time I was 25 I was sick of my pussy attitude, so I shaped up, worked out like crazy and by 27 I was having absolutely no problems fucking the women I wanted to be fucking. 30 now and I've been with more women than …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/21 09:14 PM
1

And that comparison to preestablished averages is not true in every circumstance independent of sentient observers. Therefore it is not objective. 'Typically agree' still isn't objective. The problem is you're using the word to mean exactly what it isn't. The only way something is objective is when it's always true, in every circumstance. "Near universally" is the opposite of 'objectively true'. "Typically agree" is the opposite of objectively true. If there are 13 rocks of equal size, it is obj…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/21 12:37 AM
1

Ok so you make a measurement of someone's jaw, what the hell does that tell you about how other people perceive it? Your point here is baffling. You taking a measurement of someone's jaw doesn't tell you how "attractive" that jaw is lmao. So yes, you can measure stuff. Those measurements tell you zero about the perception of other people. Your original statement was incomprehensible. Something is either objective or subjective, there is no in between middle area here. It cannot be 'mostly' objec…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/21 10:59 PM
1

All those things still require sentient observation. Attraction is like the polar opposite of objective. You can measure those things all you want. The measurements in no way say anything about "objective attractiveness". They only tell you what is considered attractive to some groups of people. Even if its 99% of people that find a certain trait attractive, that 1% who dont prevent it from being objective. All you people talking about objective attraction are really talking about probabilistic …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/21 09:58 PM
1

How can it be objective? Attraction requires a sentient observer. I seriously think like most people on the internet (and especially here) don't know what that word means. Objective means it's true outside of sentient observation -- the Earth revolves around the sun, is a good example. It is impossible for attraction or anything related to human attraction to be objective since they are all reliant on sentient observation. It's really not that hard. A proposition is considered to have objective …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/21 09:37 PM
1

Yes, it could be doing something like that, in which case it can be tricked by a potato or other vaguely oval vegetable with human features drawn on, aka silly, and probably tells you very little about your in person attractiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/21 06:11 PM
1

As I expected, this is super vague and doesn't actually tell you anything. The question is how does the algorithm they're using "study" and "test" this? Presumably there is a giant cache of preselected photos that the people who made the site are using and labeling "attractive", then the algorithm arbitrarily scores those based on the preselected photos. Unsure how that tells you how attractive you are, it is just basing this off other photos. If it's not doing this, it's probably something even…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/21 05:27 PM
1

How could it work at all unless you know what the testing parameters are? It just says it "analyzes your face", but it doesn't tell you what that analysis entails.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/21 05:15 PM
1

I am Czech, so really no need to tell me twice brother. I've met a lot of cool western EU chicks too tho.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/21 10:50 PM
1

No idea what you mean.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/21 07:56 PM
3

Then its the second one. In my experience European girls are just way more open to normal dudes. American women have media brainworms and are obsessed with superficial shit early. EU women are too, just to a much lesser extent. Admittedly, I dont have much experience in the UK, but French/German chicks are definitely more open in pretty much all categories.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/21 07:43 PM
9

Yes they were, thank you.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/21 07:40 PM
11

My team good, your team bad, impossible that both teams are gay and retarded
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/21 07:33 PM
5

Sure, 1) in most of mainland Europe, you're "exotic" and novel, competing with weird looking whities mostly 2) European women are not quite as picky as US women. Not everything is quite as hyper-focused on looks as it is in the US. Source: have lived in LA, Phoenix, Prague and Belgium. The European girls were always easier and easier going.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/21 07:21 PM
2

Nah, I am ugly. Posted here many times during purge picture threads. Consensus was ugly. Consensus in real life is ugly too. Sorry youre having no luck, but there are tons of factors that go into this.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/21 03:18 AM
1

Keep in mind I am in the fifth largest metro in America and live next to one of the largest college campuses in the world. Also I dress well and my pictures are mostly from Europe and Japan. These things surely help me just as much as the height does.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/21 03:00 AM
1

Why? Pretty much everyone I know with similar stats does as well or better than me. I'm 30. And I answered the pics question below. Mostly just super normal pics of me doing shit/were taken on trips.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/21 02:37 AM
3

Emma Stone and Zendaya are not attractive to me physically. I like some Emma Stone movies, though, so she has grown on me. Zendaya is repulsive to me and I see no appeal to her whatsoever.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/21 02:29 AM
1

Yes, it is actually ugly, and 175 6'2" is lean, but I wouldn't say 'skinny'. I don't like the bulky look. Carlos Condit was my target physique, he's my height and fought at 170. Don't really think anything bulkier than that looks good, and I don't think it'd be achievable for me without PEDs, which I refuse to take. There's a couple 155ers my height -- they look skinny.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/21 02:15 AM
1

170-175, altho why are you asking me this shit lol
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/21 01:37 AM
1

6'2
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/21 12:53 AM
1

Books are basically the only thing I genuinely like and only one out of however many of my past partners also genuinely enjoyed reading as much as I do. I'm dating someone right now and she hasn't read a book for pleasure in like five years. I'd love to find someone who likes books as much as me, but with all the other easier to consume media out there, it's pretty much impossible, and that's even while living in a gigantic metro area. Sucks to suck.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/21 09:24 PM
1

I never said face doesn't matter, I said it doesn't matter as much as height or musculature, and the literature agrees. All things being equal, those two things reign supreme. It's probably third or forth most important, although I think occupation/money probably beat it out. Also tall men don't look 'larger' by default if they are rail thin.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/21 09:19 PM
1

I didnt say that you have to be ripped to have an attractive face, I am saying being ripped makes anyone's face more attractive. Keanu and Johnny Depp were both skinny ripped for many portions of their careers. Also Tim, Depp and Keanu do not sell even remotely as much as the ones I listed, who are all in the top 20 most paid, aka more women go see their movies. Also Harry Styles has been ripped too, go look at pics of him with a six pack. Ok, you can think what you want -- unfortunately, every …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/21 08:33 PM
1

Their faces are more attractive because they're in shape. Leo has been ripped in many movies, and he started as a teen, not really a good example, and an outlier in any case. Every other one has been ripped to hell in movies, all of the big ones anyway. In any case, all the current highest paid actors (aka the ones who put butts in seats) are ripped. Daniel Craig, The Rock, Pitt, Jason Mamoa, Chris Evans, Chris Hemsworth, Ryan Reynolds, Markie Mark. All these dudes have been ripped, started ripp…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/21 07:59 PM
1

No, it's the other way around -- them being fit changes how their faces look. It's not that their faces are just soooo attractive. Jason Mamoa would be ugly if fat. So would Chris Hemsworth (fat Thor proves this). Hell, even look at someone like Daniel Craig. He is absolutely shredded in his 50's, and is one of the world's biggest sex symbols. He would not be if he was average, skinny or fat. He has to be shredded. You don't even get in the ballgame if you're not shredded at first, and every act…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/21 06:58 PM
1

Ok, I haven't observed that, and they will choose a dude with a good in between physique over either. Go look at the cover of any romance novel, or look at what actors are considered the most attractive by the largest number of people. They are all lean with huge arm muscles. That's not a skinny pretty boy or a body builder. And besides, every study ever done of this disagrees with you. Skinny dudes, like really skinny dudes, are chosen less than fat-strong dudes. It's actually less preferable o…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/21 06:20 PM
1

What are you talking about? The average man is in significantly worse shape today than he was 20 years ago, and this is true in both Europe and the US. In Europe, in almost every country, 1/2 of the men are overweight or obese. In the US it's like 70%. Getting in shape will always be the best advice, and there are only "more" in shape people now because there's more people in general, not because it's "nothing special". Being average = not being in shape. So your thinking here is really just bac…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/21 06:06 PM
1

They were mostly just normal pictures except I looked confident in them, no longer slouched my shoulders and my whole body was in frame. My pictures before that looked like I was hiding my physique, which I was. Also my cheek fat dropped significantly when I lost weight/gained muscle, and this definitely helped. I didn't post any shirtless pics and don't dress any differently, i.e. I wear flowery gay/colorful button ups and black jeans pretty much exclusively, and probably will forever, no tankt…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/21 05:56 PM
4

This question has been asked a lot, and the answer is obviously "yes, duh." I went from tall skinnyfat, to tall fairly fit, and the difference was night and day. In 2015-2017 I got maybe a good match a week. Maybe. And by good match I mean a 7/10 or higher. The only way I could get laid back then consistently was through friends of friends. In 2019 to now, I get 10-15+ good matches a week, and this is coming from a guy with an ugly face and no other remarkable features except height (not funny, …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/21 05:35 PM
1

Only ever met women on OLD, house parties, concerts and bars. Everything else seems weird. I do always want to hit on chicks in bookstores, though, but probably won't 'cause that also seems weird.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/21 05:19 PM
1

Wasn't worth it, already said it in other comments. But I don't think she would have gone for him anyway -- I dated this chick for a few months after and she made it clear she liked tall skinny dudes with dark hair and dark eyes, which is pretty much me, and the opposite of him. Not her type, doubt she would have went for it in any scenario. Also I did remove myself from the situation for hours at a time by saying nothing and staring at the floor and said as much in the OP. No engagement. Let th…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 08:37 PM
1

Definitely didn't cock block him. She wasn't interested. That's not cockblocking. That's her initiating shit with me (she initiated the making out, too) and everything else, and doing nothing with him despite all the opportunity. He can view it as a cockblock, but it was actually just her making a decision. Different things. Can't be trusted because one woman made a few decisions on one night? Yeah, that's kid shit and wreaks of insecurity.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 08:21 PM
1

No, you go on a date with a woman because she already wants to fuck you. Seriously, this reads like you've never picked up a woman or gone on a date. What you're describing is what dating is like for pathetic men, not normal ones. Also I've admitted to other users that they could be right about me being the asshole lol. They made good points. You didn't. That's the difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 08:13 PM
2

Pretty much 50/50 here, too. Kinda felt more people here would see the forest through the trees, or maybe I really am the asshole. Some of the YTA people do make good points, I won't discredit them entirely, I could have done a lot differently.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 08:12 PM
1

That's not what I said, and that's not what dating is. Dating isn't "convincing" someone else to like you, and it's not even the topic of conversation. Implicit attraction can happen during dating, and if they already like you, you don't need to convince them. Happens all the time. Doesn't happen to you? Never experienced it? Sucks to suck. I said, "Convincing women to like someone they don't like isn't a thing." Convincing women to like you =/= dating Maybe learn to read and stop making such sh…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 07:51 PM
1

Halfway reconciled. We still speak sometimes, but he refuses to go out in public with me, which is the crux of my issue here. I find that to be super childish and not how you treat someone after fifteen years of no issues. This is the only issue we've ever had. Like he said we could hang out at his place or my place, but that he wouldnt' be caught dead in a bar with me 'cause I'd always get "chosen" over him and would actively sabotage his chances (which is nonsense, and after this blow up, doub…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 07:35 PM
1

Dude, absolutely not. Implicit attraction is a thing that exists. Maybe you and your social group are hideous gremlins, but for normal average people, sometimes women like you and want to fuck you without caveats. You don't need to 'convince' them of anything, they just want to do it. If this seems like voodoo or magicks to you, that probably means you're extremely low tier and shitty. But I can assure you it happens all over the world, all the time. No 'convincing' necessary. Sometimes people j…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 07:32 PM
0

I didn't and still don't see why one girl at a bar would erase fifteen years of friendship. That seems waaaay immature on his end. Like, if I had done this a bunch before I would understand, but it was this one time and only this one time. Like I said in other comments, we've gone out a million times together and never had any problem. He has gotten laid on nights I haven't and vice versa. Never an issue. And I mean, he and I still talk, he just doesn't want to go out in public or to bars and st…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 07:24 PM
1

I did pull him aside at a gas station midway through the night and told him the skinny. I didn't "ask" anything because it was pretty obvious that she wasn't into him. Also I find "asking" to be diminutive to the woman, who had (and have, in most circumstances) all the choice in the world, and on that night, she didn't choose my friend. Seems simple to me, but by the looks of all the comments I've gotten, it's really not clear cut. People are all over the place on this one.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 07:22 PM
0

Yes, you are certainly guessing that. This was one of my best and oldest friends. His view of me was the same I had of him, which is that we both like one another in pretty much every category and are hugely like-minded in almost every respect.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 07:20 PM
1

Redhead was more attractive to me and cooler than the chick I was dating from bumble, it was kind of a jackpot situation for me, but I see what you're saying and I mostly agree with it. She was not worth alienating this good of a friend, although at the time I didn't think it would alienate him. 15 years of history told me that he wouldn't care and it would be fine, but clearly I was way the fuck off base, which sucks.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 07:17 PM
1

Convincing women to like someone they don't like isn't a thing. Grow up. Wingmanning only works when the chick is already into the guy. A wingman can make it happen quicker by building the dude up, or letting the dude shoot his shot, but he can't create lust or like when it's not there. It's not like you can 'wingman' enough to magically make a chick like a guy she isn't into.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 07:13 PM
0

I mean, I'm not hungup on good wingman, I even told the other guy I could very well be a pretty shit wingman, that's just fine with me. Not sure why one night and or one transgression makes me a "bad friend", though. Seems kinda dumb when there's fifteen years of history here. I didn't ditch him, I even went home with him at the end of the night when I could have easily stayed at her apartment and told him to fuck off lol
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 07:11 PM
1

Fair enough, this does seem to be pretty contentious, and the replies I've gotten have been really all over the place, both here and AITA. Seems like there's lots of conflicting views and I have no problem hearing the other side out. I could have definitely played this a lot better, although I think my friend could have as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 07:00 PM
2

Yes, normie is how I always act. That's not "acting charming" or whatever. I'm not going to completely change my behavior just so my friend can get laid. Also this was after he had already spoken to her for an hour alone after buying her a drink. I think if a girl likes a guy she'll go for that guy, and wingmanning has nothing to do with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 06:59 PM
-1

Why would I want to not fuck the hot girl that wanted to fuck me? Just because my friend also wanted to fuck her? I've been in LTR's where friends I've known wanted to fuck my GF. Should I have broken up with my GF's just 'cause my friends wanted to fuck her, for the sake of their feelings? Are you nuts?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 06:53 PM
2

I'd like to read that, too, although I've lived in two major US metros and two large European cities, and I haven't noticed too much of a difference tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 06:48 PM
0

Last point is technically fair enough. I could have veered off entirely, but she was pretty hot, and probably the only time a woman will speak to me first in a bar setting. Couldn't really let that opportunity slip by for the sake of his 30 year old feelings.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 06:46 PM
1

She spoke to me first. Should I have just told her to shut the fuck up? lol Also I don't know what "acting charming" is. She sat next to me on purpose, and I was acting like I always do, which is, you know, normie-ville. I think your comment presupposes that the girl has no choice in this matter if the guy "wingmans well enough", which I think is nonsense. I think she is a human and liked me better, and this is one night out of the year, it's not like every woman would choose me over him. That's…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 06:45 PM
2

It was more of a casual dating thing with redhead, not an exclusive relationship, and I did say this in another comment. The story was long enough without any addendums, just wanted to keep it brief as possible and it's still too long without the added stuff. I mean, what do you mean 'intentional'? Did I intentionally want to fuck this girl? Yes. Did I intentionally give my friend a bunch of space to shoot his shot? Also yes. Still unsure why her clearly being into me and not him is my fault. Li…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 06:42 PM
1

I said this in another comment, but historically there has been very little overlap in the women we're interested in. Like, we both like attractive women, obviously, but the women who are into us have always been very different Him and I spoke about this exact point, actually, and it's like ... we've been out a million times together before and this has never happened, especially when I've been in committed LTR's (most of my 20's) or he has been. We've been out when he's gotten laid and I haven'…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 06:36 PM
2

I dated this chick for a bit, actually, we just "broke up" last month. What gives you the indication I didn't give a fuck about her? Hell, I still give a fuck about her lol Also I explicitly said that chicks don't throw themselves at me. Learn to read.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 06:32 PM
2

How else am I supposed to say it? I stared at the floor for multiple hours that night listening to them talk, doing nothing. She told me she thought I was cute within ten minutes of sitting next to me and she initiated conversation about my hat when speaking to the creepy dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 06:28 PM
1

I mean, this is one of my best friends in the world, we (used to) talk all the time, he already knew I had a FWB because I told him about it weeks prior.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 06:24 PM
1

I did explicitly do this, at a gas station before going to her place. He decided to stick around anyway despite being fuming mad at me, which, yes, effected his behavior for the rest of the evening.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 05:58 PM
2

I let him get her a drink, I immediately dropped my convo with her when he came up to talk to her and I let them speak for an hour+ alone without me or creepy guy interfering. Maybe I am a bad wingman, but I'm not sure how anything I did that night proves it. I let him have his moment many times over and she just wasn't into it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 05:57 PM
1

Didn't hide it from him. Like I said in another comment, I pullled him aside after the bar before we went to her place. We went to get beers at a gas station and I was like "this chick is into me, not you, and she told me as much". He was pissed and decided to stick around anyway. He also knew she was into me at her apartment, 'cause she blatantly sat next to me every chance she got and we were like cuddling on her love seat while he sat adjacent from us. It was pretty obvious. I just didn't thi…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 05:53 PM
1

Yep, this is very close to my thinking and I told him as much. Also I wouldn't say better looking, just taller lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 05:50 PM
1

With ya, altho these comments are basically the same as the AITA ones. Pretty even split lol, so I really can't tell if I'm being too hard-edged or shitty here.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 05:49 PM
3

No history of this behavior, we are rarely if ever into the same kind of woman. Also I did pull him aside after the bar before we went to her place. We went to get beers at a gas station and I was like "this chick is into me, not you, and she told me as much". He was pissed and decided to stick around anyway. He also knew she was into me at her apartment, 'cause she blatantly sat next to me every chance she got and we were like cuddling on her love seat while he sat adjacent from us. It was pret…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 05:48 PM
3

I didn't keep it a secret, really, it was pretty obvious as she was always sitting next to me and we like cuddled on a loveseat while he sat on an adjacent chair. It was pretty obvious. He was pissed at me while we were hanging with her at her place, but decided to stick around, presumably to cockblock me fully.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 05:41 PM
2

It was an FWB situation. Also this was in June, no longer with bumble girl. We weren't exclusive, so none of her business.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 05:39 PM
2

I told him as much. He didn't care. She was his, somehow. I also thought this was ridiculous, and still do, regardless of how mad at me he is.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 05:35 PM
2

She wasn't interested in him, how is that me letting him down? It's not my job to make sure someone is interested in my friend, even if I did go with the intention of getting him laid. I don't see why I ought to have turned away free pussy just because I also wanted my friend to get pussy. Makes no sense to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 05:32 PM
2

I posted this story on AITA during summer (with a near 50/50 opinion split in the comments), but I would rather PPD's thoughts on this. In June I went out with my good friend of 15 years to this thing called First Friday. It's like a big art festival on the first Friday of every month. My friend had been down on his luck recently, and I was in a FWB situation with a girl I met from bumble, so decided to go out with him to see if I could wingman or pull anything for him. We go to bar, hang for a …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/21 05:25 PM
6

It's the other way around. People don't read because they are boring and tedious, not because books are. Books are the only way to actually learn stuff about the world in any meaningful fashion.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/21 07:45 PM
2

Yes, it is everyone else in the world who is boring and bad, but you are the "light in a dark room" lmao You have five dates and aren't excited about any of them. This is called "self fulfilling prophecy." How about only go on a date if it excites you upfront, and save yourself the disappointment you've already conjured before even going on the date?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/21 05:04 PM
4

Totally lost me, especially with the last bit. Astrology is just the Barnum effect. The sign descriptions themselves are too vague to have any meaning. I'm not sure how your personality can be "gently shaped toward" vague descriptors that can fit anyone. Also like half your paragraphs are about seasons -- so is it reversed if you're in Australia? How does that work? Does astrology only apply to countries in the Northern Hemisphere, or...? What?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/21 12:43 PM
1

Seems like you can't even explain what it means clearly, aka it's gibberish. It's not like there are entire fields dedicated to studying the use of habits to control behavior, or how sleep, exercise, and eating choices can control your neurology and are crucial for making life changes stick. This has nothing to do with having free will or not. It has nothing to do with "control". Changes can be made. It doesn't mean you are controlling anything. Which "fields of neurobiology" is this again? Lmao…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/21 12:22 PM
2

My ONS and FWBs have been all over the place, no real common thread. I like all types. But somehow 3/6 of my LTRs have been olive skinned Sicilian virgos (all Sicilian, too, like, family straight from Sicily), the other 3 were pale white artsy rail thin virgos. Astrology is plainly bullshit, but I still find it funny. Like, what are the fuckin odds? My preference is a different story. I think Middle Eastern chicks, when they're hot, are the hottest on the planet.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/21 03:43 AM
1

No, I edited for it to say 'directly or indirectly' ... either way, how do you indirectly "control' something? That's an incomprehensible statement. It makes no sense. If it's indirect, you're not doing it lmao. How do you indirectly control something? The word 'control' implies that it is direct. As a verb, it means determine the behavior or supervise the running of. How do you supervise your brain or thoughts indirectly? Like, dude, that is fucking psychobabble baby gibberish. Okay, tell me ab…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/21 01:47 AM
1

Nah, I am talking about the concept known in philosophy and cogsci circles as Libertarian Free Will. Basically no neuroscientist or cognitive scientist thinks we have it based on the reasons above. Oh and the myriad of brain scans that show our brains making decisions before WE know we have made them. How can you control your neurology directly or indirectly? What? So lets say you have a thought to work out. So the thought you had to change came from somewhere. Where? Electricity and neurochemis…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/21 12:23 AM
1

Said it a million times, but this isnt about me. My life is pretty cool thank you very much. The problem is that decisions are made for us, so you're not really answering honestly. You can gripe all you want, but youve said nothing substantial or anything at all really to the contrary. Just repeated yourself ad nauseum without any real rebuttal. People do change their lives. Never questioned that. Those changes are the result of neurobiology which they have zero control over. That does not sound…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/21 12:02 AM
1

How about you go read actual material on this instead of insults? You are your thoughts? How so? You have a physical body, which arent thoughts. That's a pretty huge difference. Thoughts are just information in your head. Brains are information processing systems. Those thoughts come from somewhere, unless you think we augur them in from nothingness, in which case you believe in magic. Thoughts (information in the heads of human brains) are caused. Dont agree? You believe in magic, then. We dont…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/21 09:36 PM
1

It's not a fact lmao. Humans don't choose their thoughts, so that's not really a choice, that's your thoughts controlling you. Once again, thoughts are caused by inputs you have no control over. Doesn't sound like 'choice' to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/21 07:43 PM
1

I didn't ask if they had problems socializing, I asked if they had different aspects to their socialization than Princeton kids. The answer is: yes. And there's tons of different American kids. Kids in 90's Compton didn't receive the same kind of socialization as Harvard kids. And when we look at how those kids turned out, well, it shouldn't be a shocker. Again, you saying "you can choose" isn't an argument. What you think feels like a "choice" to me is an illusion, based on prior states. I do n…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/21 07:38 PM
2

Right, so do you "choose" where you learn them from? Do you "choose" what school you go to, or who teaches you, or what kind of people are around you? Where is the "choice" and where is the "control"? 'Cause I don't see any choice or control there. The social skills come from someone and somewhere, are caused by things that are not your choice. And I do think those skills can be acquired in some circumstances, but that acquisition is still not really a choice in any meaningful sense of the word.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/21 07:18 PM
1

Why? Feral children have the same brain as normal humans. Inputs and causes create what happens with human brains. You don't "choose" those inputs or causes. If you think you do, you believe in physics breaking magic. There is no difference. So do children in Sub Saharan Africa 'choose' to be born in poverty? Do they get the same opportunities and environment as Princeton kids with rich parents? Don't you think those environments and opportunities influence them in huge ways? You clearly do not …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/21 07:17 PM
2

Wow, very convincing. I don't see where 'choice' is coming from here. You just saying "you choose stuff" is not convincing, nor an argument. Have you ever heard of feral children? There's a few cases of kids being locked in rooms for their entire lives with no input from the outside world. After they were rescued, there was no amount of therapy that could save their brains -- they were totally locked in permanent retardation, because their inputs from the outside world did not exist. Everything …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/21 06:38 PM
2

Except it really isn't. Whether or not youre adept at socializing is not up to you, and socialization tends to be a feedback loop. If you notice you suck at socializing, and/or socializing is constantly make you feel bad because of negative inputs from those around you, you tend to do less of it. If you're not prone to socializing, and you're naturally shy, you're going to do less of it, and being good is going to be an uphill battle. None of these factors you control. How much someone wants to …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/21 06:21 PM
2

Sure, you deal with the things that happen, that doesn't equate to "control", that equates to responsibility. Two completely different things. This conversation also wasn't necessarily about dating life, it was about pass saying that he wasn't in full control of his life because of wealthy elites, which is totally true, and wealthy elites dictate a huge amount of the life of lower classes. But I'm not too sure if you 'control' much about your dating life either. Genetics are not determined by yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/21 05:30 PM
3

100%? Really? Lets say my house burns down because of a gas leak I didn't cause, I'm in control of that? Or lets say I'm diagnosed with a brain tumor, did I choose that? I was in control of that somehow? There's no outside forces whatsoever that dictate how a life goes? Really? We didn't choose our genetics, we didn't choose our neurochemistry, we didn't choose where we got a primary education, we didn't choose the people or influences around us as adolescents and teenagers. Essentially everythi…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/21 04:36 PM
1

The final three books are for teenagers. It's a young adult novel. They are not for academics, or people who know how to read, or even people who genuinely like fiction with, you know, depth, you know, like I do. Compare the prose of something like Foucault's Pendulum to Harry Potter. Just go read the first couple of pages on amazon. You can't with a straight face tell me these are the same 'type' of thing. It's not the "dark content" that makes something 'adult', it is the complexity of the pro…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/21 09:34 PM
3

I'll give you a happy anecdote here to ease your mind. I was totally against dating mothers until like two years ago when I met one and she ticked all the boxes, hell, she created boxes I didn't even know I wanted (but that I totally wanted). This girl was a near genius classical pianist, a talented painter, worked in fuckin NetSec, made like 30k a year more than me and took care of her own shit proper. She was close to perfect, except she had a two year old daughter. We dated blissfully for a y…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/21 09:30 PM
1

You should be even more embarrassed if this is actually the case. Harry Potter is for children, and doesn't encapsulate good female characters in the slightest, let alone in fiction in general. Ever read a little book called A Tale for the Time Being? This is just some random book from the 2010's, and every single female character is better than anything JK Rowling has ever written. And this is just some book with some critical acclaim (Pulitzer finalist, Man Booker finalist, etc etc) but that n…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/21 09:14 PM
1

Do you really want an explanation from someone who thinks a young adult novel has some of the best female characters in ALL of fiction? That comment alone is a good way to tell that they dont read much.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/21 05:29 PM
3

I was under the impression that masks help transmit fewer particles. Particles still get in, but much fewer come out. It's why virtually every country with high mask adherence and strict lockdowns has fared much better in terms of death and serious illness.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/21 05:27 PM
1

Every Christian is a jack Christian, and plenty of Christian girls have premarital sex , actually the majority of contemporary Christians of all denominations say premarital and casual sex are aye-ok. His chance of finding a better church is about a coin's flip chance (less depending on denomination). Also only about a third of 15-19 year olds abstain from sex, regardless of religion. The thing with religion is that folks will cherry pick rules they like and ones they find unsavory. Most Christi…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/21 05:10 PM
1

Oh, like when you said you 'understood how algorithms work'? Lmao. What could I possibly misinterpret about that? You literally said it. Or when you misquoted a person for some 'gotcha' point that doesn't even make sense without his authority and credibility, said you would edit your comment, but then never did? I think you need a mirror and maybe a reality check before accusing others of arguing in bad faith.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/21 12:41 AM
0

I have lived in Los Angeles and Phoenix, the second and fifth largest cities in America. Unless you live in New York, no, that's not the case. LA especially has all the data points you could want. I am also a programmer, funnily enough, and have an MA in philosophy (and am only telling you this 'cause you pulled the 'I'm a programmer!' card first). This is my bread and butter. Also, listening to experts from google is my bread and butter, since they're the ones doing the boots on the ground work…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/21 12:35 AM
0

You tried to say a quote from a podcast host and CEO of a start up and tried to pass it off as the CEO of hinge to give some credibility to your point. I don't see how that makes your point credible. You have yet to explain the disparity of the people I see on OLD, or why hinge gives me half hot girls, half fat ones. Also I literally just said I'm facially ugly lmao. So algorithms have gotten more complex, therefore we understand them better, even though the complexity is what's making them diff…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/21 12:19 AM
1

Yeah, ratio thing makes a lot of sense. I'm all for bumble being the top dog, no skin off my back. And just fyi the tinder murder thing is obviously exaggerated. I am actually surprised at how few people get murdered when they online date, you'd think it would be a lot more with such an easy and unsafe platform to meet people.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/21 10:56 PM
0

I do great on bumble, ok on tinder, shit on hinge, but I'm tall, fit but also facially ugly, so there's obviously something that an algorithm can't do with some people. And I'd say I see about 50/50 disgusting girls on hinge, a lot of them are hot, so I'm not sure if I can personally abide by what you're saying. I do worse on hinge, but 50% of the girls on there are still hot. Also you don't know how algorithms work, because sometimes even people who write the algorithms don't know how they work…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/21 10:53 PM
2

He didn't say that, though. It was some other CEO with a company called Dating Ring (ever heard of it?) and some podcast that you probably also haven't heard of. In the article: But when we asked Justin McLeod, the CEO of the dating app Hinge, he said that they track attractiveness—but don’t use it as the metric for matching people up. The algorithm uses both filters to predict whether users are likely to like each other, and unlike with Tinder, attractiveness does not play a starring role. “Whi…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/21 09:37 PM
2

That's you and me both, brother. The moment I get their number I ask them out, because I just cannot text worth a damn. Some girls hate this, but overall the immediate 'lets just go on a date cause I am dreadfully shit at this' text has gone over well.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/21 09:30 PM
3

Could just be a region specific thing. The friend of mine who gets both the most and the hottest women uses exclusively hinge in Los Angeles. He tried all of them for a bit, and hinge was just a non-stop fuckfest for him, whereas he kind of struck out on the other two. And I lived with him when this was happening -- the girls were almost all gorgeous and there were a lot of them. I think hinge is all right, but I'm in Phoenix. There's a lot of fuckin heffers and ugly conservative chicks and meth…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/21 08:55 PM
2

I really want to know what bumble is doing/what their algorithm is doing that's different. It has worked out for me about a thousand times better than any other app, with very few changes on my part. Hinge may as well be a fuckin trough and tinder is only good when you make a new profile. Bumble has been steadily giving me women since like 2018. I think maybe the onus being put on women to actually do something upfront helps a lot.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/21 08:33 PM
3

I don't know why but the word 'sexy' cringes me the fuck out. Like just say attractive or hot like a normal person.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/21 07:34 PM
1

Seems like other users also didn't use your definition. Hm, weird. Almost like other people use the word tautology the same in every context except you. When it works for your argument it's ok, but when other people usually use the word to mean something entirely different it's bad, right? I certainly did. It's right there. Go read it. Second paragraph tells him why it's always unfair, and why that doesn't matter, and that second paragraph is true. There ya go. Very easy. Also: you still haven't…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/21 07:04 PM
1

> the saying of the same thing twice in different words, generally considered to be a fault of style I didn't do that, and I just posted the first definition of tautology on google. Good work, genius. Also I explained in my second paragraph, so even if your definition was the one usually used (it's not), it still wouldn't apply. Moreover, even if it were true, no one needs an in depth explanation about life being unfair except you I guess. If a person complains about the fairness of relationship…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/21 06:55 PM
2

How are you going to make it 'fairer' by calling it out? Oh, women are just going to start suddenly changing their standards because some rando on reddit said something? There's that naivety again. Like I said: The genie is out of the bottle. It will never change. Overinflated standards will exist as long as women get the pick of the litter, which they do. Like do you really think fat women are going to stop liking tall fit men because you pointed out the unfairness in the situation? What the fu…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/21 04:03 PM
1

My point is that your comment will never change anything, and it has never been fair, so you didnt' even need to make the comment. You said it's not a "fair expectation" as if you expect fairness in relationships, or think it can be fair one day. That's naivety. My suggestion is to stop being naïve. I never said men should date lazy fat chicks. Just that fat chicks are always going to have overinflated standards. You are the one that wants it to be "fair", even though that's impossible and stupi…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/21 03:50 PM
-1

What did I whine about? Lmao. What assumptions did I make? That life isn't fair, and never will be? That's not an assumption, that is fact. Are you sure you're responding to the right person? I didn't say any of this shit. I didn't project any of my situation onto anyone because I didn't talk about myself at all. Pretty sure you meant to respond to the fat girl. Thanks for all your stats that are totally irrelevant to the conversation, though. I wasn't talking about you in general, I was talking…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/21 03:41 PM
1

Pretty sure you don't know what that word means, and everything I said is still true (probably why you have no teneable argument whatsoever, and just said words you don't understand). Sucks to suck I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/21 02:53 PM
1

Nothing is "fair". The fact that you didn't learn this at like 5 years old is embarrassing. You can keep kicking and screaming about it and it will never change or do anyone any good. Men have an uphill battle when it comes to finding worthwhile partners. They will always have to invest more than women, and nothing will ever change about this. The genie is out of the bottle.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/21 02:30 PM
1

Peep Show is a way different feel from Succession, it's a straight British comedy with a lot of awkward humor, but you can tell it's a Jesse Armstrong show. Dude is just funny. Veep is different tonally from Succession, much more straight forward comedy, but the venom and acerbity is extremely similar. The insults and dark jokes on Veep are some of the best ever put on tv. Succession is the only other long running series I can think of that gets even close in terms of wit per minute. So yeah, Ve…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/21 02:06 AM
2

I was so skeptical of this show, but it is one of the best shows I've seen in years. I'm not a frequent or avid television watcher and generally only watch something if it's excellent in my view. This show is A+ shit. Watched the whole thing in like three days. Plus it's made by the guy who did Peep Show, who was also a writer on The Thick of It and Veep and other Chris Morris/Armando Iannuci shit (that's why there's so many good comebacks and amazing metaphors and just venom in general) . It's …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/21 11:33 PM
2

So all this sounds like to me is that the average amount of sex partners is going up in the US, if 20-30 year old women have significantly more than 10 partners. I dont think anyone who talks about this is really thinking about 60 year olds when they do. They want to know if the new generation of women, gen zs and millennials, are considerably sluttier than previous generations and if that sluttiness is going to increase in the future. Pretty much everything points to "yes" on that.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/21 08:03 PM
2

There's a selection bias for sluts? Why and how could you possibly know that?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/21 07:52 PM
7

Interesting how pretty much every comment is 15+ partners and yet stats show that the average US woman has fewer than 10 throughout her lifetime. I know reddit isnt indicative of reality but I'm sure there's tons of threads with hundreds of comments just like this, all with women who have had significantly more than 10 sexual partners. Hm... Wonder what that could mean...
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/21 06:48 PM
1

Alison Brie is a 9+, Elizabeth Olsen, Nathalie Emmanuel and Elizabeth Debicki are 8/9's. Celebrity 7's are a little harder to quantify. Anna Kendrick is the closest I can think of. Like, she's hot for a normal girl, and pretty, but not spectacularly hot for a celebrity and fairly plain looking.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/21 05:07 PM
1

No, but I do go to bars and concerts and social events knowing there will be almost exclusively younger women there. I mean, it's how I met the current girl. What's the difference?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/21 03:18 PM
0

I'm 30 and live in a college town, one of the biggest in the country. I don't 'trawl' the campus for anything, but every bar and social scene and street corner here is inundated with college aged people, so am I just not supposed to go out and have fun because some randos think it's creepy? I'm also dating a 24 year old master's student and no one gives a shit. The age disparity has never been mentioned once. I started dating her when she was 23. No one has ever cared or thought anything about i…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/21 03:00 PM
6

In my experience, it is not true about women's reading habits though. That's just some thing you made up because you haven't met nearly enough women, and I'd bet you haven't been around academic women even a little with a viewpoint like this. Most of my 20's were spent in academia and those bitches read everything good they could get their hands on. Go meet more women before saying stupid shit. People are replying to you because what you're saying is the sign of someone who just doesn't read hig…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/21 07:19 PM
6

Lots and lots of fiction books are "based on reality" -- what does this even mean? The best fiction books I've read take place on Earth and concern real world events. Not everything is Game of Thrones or whatever other shit you're dumping into this category. What you mean is "I can't read between the lines or try to understand thema, and it's easier for me to just get force fed information." Sounds extremely fuckin boring to only read non fiction. Non fiction is great for lots of stuff, and so i…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/21 07:10 PM
9

Fiction books can teach you about reality and reveals truths as well. Sorry that it's not all completely spelled out for you in the driest way possible (which, hey, I like sometimes, that's what non fiction is for). Also you're still implying that your brain isn't "developed" if you read fiction, which is clearly baby nonsense. Sounds like some authors just got a little too difficult for your little ol brain :(
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/21 07:05 PM
11

I don't get some people's thing with fiction being bad. I mean, dude, read some Pynchon, Eco, some Steinbeck, some Delilo, some Cormac McCarthy. This stuff teaches about the world in the same way any non fiction book does, and this is coming from someone who reads both a lot. Like, I don't watch TV at all, I read pretty much exclusively. Both fiction and non fiction are necessary to being or becoming a well rounded human being. Also there's tons of women who read good books. Maybe ... meet more …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/21 07:00 PM
3

It doesn't matter if it's hypocritical if a woman says it The main issue is that the guy in the OP photo blatantly lied about his age and then made up a creepy excuse. You can say just about anything against this guy and redditors will rally with you, as long as you hate X man for X reasons. The hypocrisy is a tertiary afterthought compared to vitriol and spite.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 06:29 PM
3

Don't wanna knock ya but that sounds like a pretty shit "best friend". I have political and philosophical disagreements with most of my good friends and it doesn't stop us from being friends or wanting to be around one another.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/21 06:43 PM
2

Do 'they' have no self determination, though? Generally when we look at populations of colonized peoples, there is a wide array of adherents to the new colonizers and rebels to the new colonizers. Within every population I can think of except the most severe cases (which, yes, were a net negative, aka Belgians in the Congo) there were always large native populations that sided with the colonizers, sometimes it was the local elites, sometimes it was the local rebellions that wanted to dispose of …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/21 10:35 PM
2

I would agree that both sides have merits, and my position isn't Pro-Colonial so much as it's that some colonialism in some places was certainly beneficial. The people I argued with throughout university did seem to hold that all colonialism everywhere was a net negative, and this was pervasive in both the universities I went to. They were almost exclusively hardcore cultural relativists who couldn't even admit that something like bringing the Japanese into the modern world (which was a combinat…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/21 09:43 PM
2

Colonization was not a monolithic experience and there are many notable examples of countries improving on every objective metric when they decided to adopt cultural practices similar to their colonizers. More to the point, that if you drop the arbitrary timescales, nearly every nation or subgroup population on Earth has been culturally infiltrated by another or several others, and that there are no real "true cultures", and most of what we call "cultures" today are assimilations of multiple old…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/21 08:10 PM
1

I've never hated it except in tiny vehicles. Airplanes kinda suck, too. Otherwise, it's awesome and I'm genuinely grateful for it every day.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/21 06:04 PM
2

Iliza is just outlandishly hot so you are perceiving her to be funnier than she actually is. She's not overtly terrible or obnoxious, but she shouldn't be anywhere near a best contemporary female comedians list when killers like Maria Bamford, Bonnie Macfarlane and Jessica Kirson exist. This is probably an East Coast/West Coast divide thing. The ladies on the East Coast who perform regularly are ridiculously good at comedy. The west coast ladies ... less so.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/21 04:06 PM
6

Wanda Sykes isn't funny imo. Maria Bamford is better than most male comedians. She'd take my top spot for female comedians. I agree on Lucille Ball, but I mean, Catherine O'Hara exists, and the ladies who worked with Chris Morris and Armando Iannuci are all funny (Doon Mackichan, Julia Davis, Rebecca Front). Meg Ganz was/is a writer for some of the best comedies out today (Bojack, Community). Chicks like Dina Hashem regularly eviscerate dudes and make them look like amateurs. Elaine May has writ…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/21 03:29 PM
3

While I would agree men are funnier on average, and that there's way more funny male comedians, this doesn't exclude women from being funny, and there's a shit ton of funny female comedians, comedic actresses and television writers. They're not all as terrible as Amy Schumer and Lisa Lampanelli. Christopher Hitchens got this right however long ago, the ones that tend to be genuinely funny are Jews or lesbians, but that doesn't mean they're nonexistent.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/21 03:21 PM
2

Ok, and? I'm bi. Androgynous weirdos like this are good shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/21 05:44 PM
5

I don't care what it is, it's hot.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/21 04:27 PM
1

this
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/21 12:11 PM
6

I'm really not sure where dudes here get their conception of women's looks. I am 30 and I see hot older women all the time, every day, in every city I've ever lived in.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/21 04:24 PM
2

You're gonna' be doin a lot more than texting relatively soon. ;) I am genuinely happy you went for it, we need more women willing to take the risk. Good job!
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/21 04:17 PM
3

Good for you, brother, I have also fucked girls on the first date, but that's not the topic, really, we are talking about the OP, which is about whether or not it makes you 'beta-zoned' to be making out only on the second date, which it decidedly does not. If you don't think there's many ways for individual women to show enthusiasm that don't include fucking right away, we're just not aligned on the issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/21 03:41 PM
4

I don't agree with that at all, though. If she's making out with me on the first date, that's enough to understand she's at least a little enthusiastic, especially when we consider how easily any of these girls could be doing it with anyone else. She doesn't have to fuck me even on the third or fourth date for me to have evidence of enthusiasm, especially if we're doing other stuff in the bedroom. Plus, every woman I've been with has had her own job and career and such, so it wasn't like they we…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/21 03:31 PM
3

I'll second this -- every good LTR or long term FWB situation I've been in has started with a makeout on the first date. It's a great litmus test, so I am fully in agreement with OP's claims.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/21 03:24 PM
1

listening to this super positive feminist jam on repeat all day, have a breezy day everyone
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/21 02:49 PM
1

I'd bet money on it, but the figures are impossible to ever quantify. People here (namely dudes) are super resistant to suggesting that significantly more lifetime partners makes more sense than >10. I'm with you, though. Most of my friends are average, and most have already slept with more than 10 people (late 20's, early 30's demo), and many have slept with far more than 10 people. In big cities this is totally the norm in pretty much every group I've ever been a part of.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/21 02:09 AM
–

Congrats, you're halfway to destroying your own relationship because of stuff you read on reddit. A long time ago I had similar thoughts until I realized I could never scry the past in any meaningful fashion. You don't genuinely know what she did for other people, these are just imaginary phantoms that live in your head because of reddit jargon. Some chick just made you food and your mind is on what she did for other people instead (which you dont actually know). Does that seem healthy or logica…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/21 01:49 AM
2

This kind of makes it different, tho, I assumed you were a man. If you're a woman, you should definitely go for it. Men do not get nearly the same amount of attention as women. If he's not outrageously good looking (like top 5%), he likely gets zero attention, even if he's cute or whatever. Ask him out. The worst he will say is 'no'
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/21 04:35 PM
5

From Steinbeck's The Short Reign of Pippin IV "In my profession, Marie, I have had contacts with many men. I think I am in a position to make generalities about them. First, they are like children, sometimes spoiled children." "Now there I agree with you." "The ones who really grow up are no good because men are either children or old--there is nothing in between. But in their childlike unreason and irresponsibility there is sometimes greatness. Please understand that I know most women are more …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/21 03:44 PM
3

In most cases I support hitting on whoever you want, but I would advise against hitting on food service workers of any kind. If this is a genuinely cute girl working the Chipotle bar, she is inundated with requests she wants nothing to do with, just like every other cute waitress or hostess is. Unless she's giving you overt signals she's not giving other people (that you've noticed), you're almost certainly setting yourself up for failure here.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/21 02:13 PM
7

In his post history, the dude says he's 6'2", makes 80k a year, is a kickboxer, but he has an ugly face so he can't do OLD. Apparently he's not getting any pussy ever, touched deprived for a year+, which I find suspicious, as I'm his height, make 30k a year less than he does, and also have an ugly face, and OLD really isn't a problem, and either is finding women IRL. This guy almost certainly has some hardcore socialization issues to work through. He is clearly going about this the entirely wron…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/21 02:09 PM
1

Not sure why you think there's an issue? Just saying, you've posted about it at least 5 times in the last few weeks, seems like you're overthinking and hyper-fixating on a relatively easy to go about procedure. Just do it. Stop leading this girl on.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/21 11:27 PM
1

Yeah, I know, it's not that hard man, not sure why you're making it out to be like you're writing a fucking dissertation. You're not an idiot, just use your words, or use other people's words, just do it. Dragging it out makes it worse, not better. Here's some other people's words -- "I'm not ready for exclusivity", "The distance makes it difficult for me to envision this as a long term prospect, "You're awesome but XYZ reasons make me think we ought not to do this", "It sucks we/I can't make th…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/21 10:15 PM
1

You're in a "situationship" or whatever dumb word you use for it, 'breaking up' just means 'breaking it off' in this instance, it's almost exactly the same kind of talk, almost exactly the same phrase, you just want to be pedantic about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/21 09:59 PM
2

Dude, just break up with this chick already. You've been hamstering around this for like weeks now. Just makes me think you're emotionally unprepared for things that aren't actually that difficult. You're blowing up this situation in your head to gigantic proportions when it's, in reality, just a single talk, a few sentences, and then it's over.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/21 09:53 PM
4

Come on, now. Very few people here think it's some 'huge social injustice'. They just don't like it, but what you wrote seems like an exaggeration. 2nd thing: Much of the sexual/relationship game is rigged in favor of genetically above average people in general, so I don't think anything about sexual selection is anyone's "fault". Alpha fucks are alpha fucks because, in general, they have genetic features that Beta Bucks don't. I also don't think personality is anyone's "fault", or intelligence,…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/21 09:50 PM
8

I honestly don't give a shit about this topic, or what anyone calls me, but it feels overbearing and weird to police what people can and or should get upset over. Also lots of men can't just 'change it' and that's why they're constantly talking about it and that's probably why we have this thread, don't ya think?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/21 09:31 PM
17

"How people feel internally about you doesn't matter unless they call you a ni&&er" - poppy, 2021
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/21 09:01 PM
1

Everyone who reads your comments know they're some combination factor of trolls and/or lies or just sheer misunderstanding of basic life stuff, brother. Don't need to tell me something we all already knew.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/21 08:58 PM
1

Sounds to me like you don't have any research, and don't understand how to even research stuff in a valuable way, and just like talking about stuff you don't understand. Congratulations on not understanding how things work, I guess. "other people say stuff, I experience some stuff, therefore what they say is right" < --- your comment, which makes sense to you. That's uhhhh a problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/21 08:49 PM
1

So do you just use lame insults on everyone if they don't exactly follow your shitty life plans? They've experienced the same thing you have? And what is that thing? What are the exact steps to smelling like you do, and how do you know these men have followed those steps? I bet it has fuck all to do with "hunter gatherers", even though you seem to like to harp on about that stuff (even though you clearly know nothing about it). They've also had women masturbate next to them in the cafe, and you …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/21 08:33 PM
1

So essentially everything you said in your original comment makes zero sense and is wrong on its face. Studies you personally conduct don't amount to anything. They leave out too many variables. Unless you're like closely taking into account every part of your own eccrine system somehow (you're not), then you don't actually know what's making you smell better, the best you have are total guesses. Some people just don't smell all that bad, and that still says fuck all about all the other total bu…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/21 08:19 PM
1

What the fuck does this have to do with our ancestors not smelling? You making lifestyle changes =/= hunter gatherers didn't smell. Two different claims. Individual humans sometimes don't smell that bad, it's about the eccrine glands and sweat production in your own body, you could just secrete less than other people, it doesn't mean hunter gatherers smelled good, or that "alcohol and coffee and weed make you smell bad". Like, you're all over the place here. Also how do you "live" like a hunter …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/21 08:07 PM
3

And why do you think hunter gatherers smelled good? Where is there any evidence to suggest this? Hunter gatherers had the exact same eccrine glands as modern humans and the same sweat mechanisms. So your theory is that sometime between hunter gatherers and small civilizations, humans just started smelling out of nowhere even though nothing about the biology of the human changed. Not sure how you're going to make any sense out of that, but ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/21 07:54 PM
3

This is such a weird comment. Our primate ancestors were using fermented rotting fruit as alcohol, and even besides that, we know humans have been drinking alcohol since like 7000bc. Coffee has been in use since like 800ad. Cannabis has been in use since like 2500 years ago and there were way weirder drugs like soma that were widely used. How far back do you want to go before humans start smelling good? When was this? People have always smelled like shit. Do you really think hunting mammoths mad…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/21 07:47 PM
4

The way this dude talks/moves his hands is my biggest pet peeve. It's like he thinks he's revealing the secrets of the universe to a congregation of sad groveling morlocks that could never possibly reach his level of enlightenment. What an impossible cunt.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/21 05:31 PM
1

There are thousands of people walking down this stupid street. I had no idea there was a game tonight. I just wanted to go to my usual shitty stupid dive bar and interact with my sad acquaintances who are mainly inoffensive and effete. A cute girl and a man who looked like a white Rastafarian with absolutely no musculature whatsoever both told me they liked my shirt and now I can't tell if my shirt is cool or if it's actually gay. The guy asked me where I got it and I had to sheepishly admit it …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/21 02:06 AM
1

They weren't telling "me" anything (I'm dating someone atm), I agree that people should be hitting on them, I was just pointing out that women don't hit on men like the OP was saying. This wasn't a complaint, it was a correction. Maybe read a little more carefully next time.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/21 09:23 PM
4

If gimp isnt a long-con LARP I would be extremely surprised.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/21 08:11 PM
1

"Signals" are not the same thing as upfront approaching random strangers. Men approach and start conversations with women far far far more than the inverse and virtually everyone knows this and agrees with this. We are talking about men approaching women they dont know, so your point about conversations makes no sense. Those convos are most of the time initiated by men. Yes, women give "signals". They do not approach on average, and they do not start conversations on average, and looking at peop…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/21 08:09 PM
1

Well exactly, 7 women are not en masse hitting on 7 men, 7 men are being hunted by less than ideal women, and I'd still say that's fairly rare. Ugly/average women have self esteem issues too which prevent them doing any approaching at all. And since they're not socialized to approach, and the risk they're taking is much greater than a man approaching a woman, I'd put this in the "rare" or "uncommon" category.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/21 06:09 PM
1

The ways women "hit on men" =/= approaching men. Totally different ballgames. And like I said, even this kind of indirect initiation happens like ten thousand times less than the inverse.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/21 06:04 PM
1

Sure, I'm ugly and a few women have thrown themselves at me, but you have to consider the amount of situations where you're not getting any women thrown at you - i.e., most situations. The few are an exception to the rule. And standardly attractive 7's and 8's are not getting hit on by women, not because of their attractiveness, but because women are not socialized to hit on random men, and it's a giant risk for them to hit on random men. That risk, for most women, is only mitigated enough if th…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/21 05:57 PM
3

Even good looking men are rarely approached. 7's and 8's (good looking on any metric) are not getting approached en masse, and even when they do, it's like ten thousand times less than any woman who is equivalently attractive. Only the toppest of the top are getting any upfront initiation from women whatsoever.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/21 05:48 PM
3

Social protection/feigning being a sweet little unpromiscuous angel is "women stuff 101"
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/21 04:35 PM
7

I think you know the answer to this question already.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/21 04:22 PM
1

Well I'm not in a relationship with her, so it feels weird of her to assume I'd be okay with a couple's costume. Also I only date one woman at a time, even if we haven't discussed exclusivity. I am not "trying you out like ice cream flavors" lol
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/21 03:57 PM
1

It's not within your rights to kibosh the meeting, she's allowed to do whatever she wants, and you "restricting" her wouldn't do you any good anyway, she'd just call you "controlling" and you'd lose the argument straight away. It is within your rights to kibosh the relationship, because no woman who was happy in her relationship would do this. Women who are happy with their current partners don't go to 1 on 1 meetings of any kind with other (presumably straight) men. She's essentially going on a…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/21 02:16 PM
0

And suddenly youre being hostile unprovoked. Okee dokee. Time to take your meds I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/21 12:34 AM
1

I am into her just fine, but I am also into other women. Also she knows I dont have any other plans.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/21 12:31 AM
2

I am tall and in the best shape of my life and live right next to the largest university in the world. Being in an LTR now would not benefit me. And yes I know I will probably eat those words shortly.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/21 11:54 PM
1

Yeah, kinda feel the same way. Sitting on a "maybe" right now as she lists costume ideas. I dont know if I want to be the sad 30 year old in a uni town alone on Halloween weekend or if I should just bite the bullet.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/21 11:39 PM
2

She wants to go as avocado toast, which makes me hate her. I want to go as Jeffrey Epstein and one of his sex slaves, which makes her hate me. I am sure we will settle on Ash and Pikachu or Wayne and Garth. Mainly I am just apprehensive because it seems weird to go to a party of her friends in a couples costume when we are not in a relationship. Feels like I am being tricked.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/21 11:25 PM
1

Girl I am casually seeing (about six dates in) just invited me to Halloween party and suggested a couple's costume. Is this kosher or am I being bamboozled?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/21 11:00 PM
1

In my experience judgement, if its truthful, helps 99 percent of the time. So imma do that thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/21 09:59 PM
1

Fuck him only once doesnt sound like hate huh
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/21 09:55 PM
1

Sucks that you wont ever get hot pussy dude. I mean, it makes me laugh, as a tall man with a full head of hair, but it sucks for you. So so sad. Enjoy your endless vidya and pornography of women who wouldnt even look at you irl.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/21 09:52 PM
1

Seems like you already made up your mind and didnt want an answer to your question. Sorry for giving you totally doable advice. Dont get a good job or try to raise your status. Dont work out. Youre right. All bald men everywhere are doomed forever. You are unloveable and all women hate you forever.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/21 09:43 PM
1

Hahahahahah god I can't tell if this is a serious reply or not. I don't think family deserves special recognition, or is free of judgement. If anything, families are more judgey towards each other's bad behavior on average. If my niece tells me she's sucking dick for crack, she doesn't deserve any more or less judgement than the average crackwhore.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/21 09:41 PM
1

You posted 2 guys? Your sample size is worse. Your second sample is only 3 guys. Lmao. You also used famous men to prove that they weren't somehow. I just did what you did. When your top picture was posted here during the purge, most of the thread said he was cute and would date him. You should get COPE tattooed on your big shiny forehead. Maybe that will make you more attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/21 09:39 PM
1

Cast judgement? Are you serious? People are going to be judged no matter what, mother, niece or nun. Can't stop what's comin'. No, as an uncle I want her to succeed and not become a crackwhore and be an upstanding member of society, with like, a job, and useful thoughts. Judging her is a good thing if she's on the path to becoming a crackwhore.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/21 09:29 PM
1

Well I can continue discussing whatever I like, darling, so I am going to keep doing just that, thank you very much.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/21 09:28 PM
1

And finally you are correct
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/21 09:28 PM
1

Why would I care about or want a legacy? How dare people want different stuff from you, right? What's hilarious is you're just saying totally tangential shit now because your random ass "points" from earlier were so vapidly shit, it's all ya' got. That's funny. Thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/21 09:24 PM
0

OP posts here all the time, if he doesn't know this stuff by now something is very very wrong. He was fishing for someone to tell him that women just love bald guys sooooo very much! Telling someone to get some of the other stuff doesn't make it wrong, it is literally the only advice.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/21 09:23 PM
2

Yeah, look at all these hideous fucking trolls You're using movie stars so I can too huh
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/21 09:21 PM
1

I got snipped in my 20's, so my niece is a better example. If my niece became a crackwhore, I would call her what she is: a crackwhore. Her being family doesn't remove her from judgement of what she actually is.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/21 09:15 PM
2

Fat men have to get in shape to get pussy. Poor men have to make more money. Socially inept dudes have to go to fuckin therapy sometimes. How long have you been on this sub? I've seen you around before. How do you not know this already? Yes, you have to do a lot in order to make yourself attractive to women if you're average, and that goes for any single "bad" feature. Also it doesn't mean they "hate" bald men. It's that they like those other features, and they like them enough to not care about…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/21 09:14 PM
2

No, he just has other features women like, and he's like 5'11, not even truly tall. If you have a shitty unfortunate feature like baldness, you work on other features that you can improve like fitness and status and money and suddenly women wont give a fuck if youre bald. Not rocket science dude. Baldness doesnt even rank in most of the conversations on this sub because its a nonissue. Being short is worse than bald. Being fat is worse than bald. Being impoverished is worse than bald. Being soci…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/21 09:07 PM
1

Maybe its a combination of features that makes someone attractive or unattractive and not a single feature like baldness? Or is that too sensible for you?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/21 09:04 PM
3

My best friend is bald (but also tallish, jacked and has a cool job) and he gets more genuinely attractive pussy than anyone I have ever known. Being bald isnt your problem if that is what youre getting at.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/21 09:00 PM
1

I never once told you what to think. I used words like "some" and "generally". I never said ALL conservatives or anything like that during this whole convo. So maybe just read a little more carefully before crying about something I didnt actually say.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/21 08:58 PM
1

I'll keep treating individuals like individuals. I don't treat crackwhores the same way I treat my female GP, or my female dentist. Most people don't, and shouldn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/21 08:46 PM
4

How about treating women like individuals instead of a monolith? Your comment presupposes that all women are darling angels who deserve nothing but sympathy and respect.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/21 08:33 PM
1

Everyone in my family but me is conservative (not even close to Dems, btw, all have voted conservative in every presidential election, including Trump), and I live in a red state lmao. I got this conclusion because of what they were saying and the conversations I was having with them and how easy it was to come to conclusions on virtually every topic. So yeah, already did all that stuff you just suggested, which is why I'm saying the stuff I am now. Maybe you need to talk to more socialists.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/21 08:18 PM
9

Just told a girl on campus that I loved her spectacularly fat tits. Thank you for inspiring me to do this /u/O-j-O
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/21 07:57 PM
1

This is PPD anyway, I don't come here to have political debates. If you want to talk politics, go elsewhere, this isn't the place. I don't think your solutions would be all that different. It's not like there's infinite solutions to stuff like homelessness. I would reckon they mimic at least some socialist's goals, and some conservative's, because, well, they are very similar. Climate change is a different issue altogether because those have tenable solutions, and pretty much every civilized cou…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/21 07:16 PM
1

They talk about economics more than anything else, and worker's rights -- if you're not a regular on the sub, I don't think it's fair for you to say that all they do is meme about the NYT, which is total nonsense. Agreeing or even somewhat agreeing with small differences on most things but one thing (aka your entire argument is "capitalism good, socialism bad) is not "fringe", nor is it irrelevant. You can feel that way, but bringing people together through some amount of mutual understanding is…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/21 06:49 PM
1

Once again, they've done survey polls of the sub's pop, many times. Most of the sub is dem-soc or just soc, and those are not a radical positions.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/21 06:13 PM
1

I've been on the sub for a while, it's definitely about politics imo. Every single thing with lots of comments and upvotes is pretty much strictly political. And it's like largely dem-soc's when you look at the surveys they've done ... I would not consider dem-soc's 'extremists'
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/21 06:07 PM
1

/r/stupidpol , you will have a ton in common with them, I can pretty much guarantee it. There's a bunch of rightoids on that sub anyway and I see a ton of overlap on virtually all issues without the users themselves realizing it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/21 05:21 PM
2

Yeah, probably. As a socialist, it's intellectually honest to say that there's definitely some socialists that are afraid of boogeymen words instead of having beliefs they can back up -- jack socialists, if you will. Happens to most people, really, political affiliation has very little to do with it. Now let's see you say the same instead of one word nothing responses.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/21 05:18 PM
2

Yes, sorry you don't like it and have nothing else to respond with.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/21 04:59 PM
13

I am tall and fit so don't really have typical guy problems, but on a probability level, their argument does make a bit of sense. It's not that they see a bunch of creepy messages as a boon, it's that within those messages there is some probability factor of them not being creepy messages. The choices here are binary. You can either be a woman and get a ton of messages on OLD, with most of those being disgusting losers, but some of them being okay picks. or you can be a man, and likely get almos…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/21 04:55 PM
3

I hate both, but holding up environmental accords with the rest of the developed world. Considering the environment is essentially the #1 global issue to anyone with a brain, this right here makes him a thousand times more preferable, even if it is all political jabbering at this stage.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/21 04:44 PM
9

I don't really have a dog in this fight, am pretty agnostic on the issue as we don't have enough relevant data, but this doesn't go both ways in this case -- her study was a cross sectional analysis of 150 countries and the study did not use weasel words like "it's entirely possible". It's also a study and not a proposal. If you want the actual number, there is a 13.4% higher probability of receiving higher inflows in a democratic country than otherwise. Harvard explains the findings here
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/21 04:28 PM
0

Kliban is significantly smarter than any PBF cartoon I've ever seen but to each their own
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/21 01:12 PM
1

Sounds like a personal problem and not a general indictment.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/21 12:53 PM
5

I'd also consider myself a socialist, and I think you'd be surprised how many conservatives actually believe in a lot of traditionally "socialist" ideals. They're generally more afraid of the word "socialist" than anything the socialist actually believes or wants to put into practice.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/21 12:52 PM
2

Just want to share some Kliban cartoons that are highly relevant to this subreddit. We all need to be more like Bernard. One Two Three Four Five
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/21 12:14 PM
1

Fully agree with this, don't know why, but bumble has easily been the best when it comes to dating and finding worthwhile matches. Probably because it puts some of the onus on women to legitimately be selective and do some of the legwork upfront.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/21 12:11 PM
10

Your assumption that hot girls on dating apps aren't dating other men is adorable and also almost always wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/21 12:00 AM
2

Jesus, what types of friends and relatives do you have? I have many friends significantly more successful than me and I couldnt be happier for them, and they are equivalently happy for any of my successes that come along. I couldnt imagine being around people like you described. It is completely contrary to my experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/21 11:57 PM
7

If your dick game is legitimately unprecedented you dont want her to be saying anything, you want her to be exasperated and neuronally gorked and barely able to think, like she just heard the true name of God for the first time.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/21 11:32 PM
1

Yes, people will always be tribal. Doesnt mean we cant or shouldnt try to erase the large differences that have obviously been causes of strife and division for essentially no reason. Even the things you listed are basically just humans being idiotic tribal lizard brains for no good reason. Bulworth's point was a little more optimistic than that.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/21 11:24 PM
10

3 is hot with or without makeup. The rest aren't even that hot with makeup. Most pornstars look like shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/21 05:05 AM
1

A good friend of mine lives in New Haven -- careful what you wish for Smurf!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/21 12:23 AM
1

I dont even know what a bellini is, I had to google it. Sounds fucking amazing. But I will probably be the lone 30 year old white man ordering a mimosa, that just sounds really good right now, thank you for inserting that thought into my head.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/21 12:11 AM
1

I lived in a large house with five friends in my last four years in college (I was in college for 8 years, dumb master's degree stuff), we just threw parties all the time. 90% of the girls I met through parties, friends-of-friends type of stuff. Since you don't have this, might make it a little harder, so at least try to make friends with some people who have a party house. Also I dont know how badly all this pandemic shit has effected colleges, might be a factor. But it was really conducive to …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/21 12:08 AM
1

Well I didn't have a brunch cocktail and it's 5PM now, but it would be unwise not to listen to you Smurf
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 11:55 PM
2

Yeah man, you'll be okay, we have similar stats and I did well during my college years and I am ugly facially haha. Enjoy your jestering, if you're efficient and gauge interest well I can virtually guarantee you will fuck a ton of chicks well within your looks threshold. Big piece of advice is try not to get into an LTR. I spent years 20 to 23 in an LTR and I regret it. I still had plenty of time to be a man slut after, but that LTR in my early 20's was not a good decision.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 11:51 PM
2

Don't know your stats but I do know all my "average" friends (aka most my friends) do a lot better in real life than they do on apps. I mean dude I'm tall and lean and still don't do super well on apps, they are annoying as shit. So my rec is, unfortunately, delete the apps, start the jestering. It's at least less disheartening on average because you're interacting with real life people.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 11:39 PM
2

I wish you better luck in the future, brother, this sounds hellish.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 11:26 PM
4

Honestly, your take is a fair take. I have not hooked up with a fat girl, but I have hooked up with average girls who were not rail thin and it was fine. A pretty face on an average girl (even if she has some "rolls", as you say, which average women can totally have) can take away a lot of the grossness. But no, I haven't hooked up with a true fat girl who has like a gut or something, and I don't think I could, so I do see your point.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 11:22 PM
2

Most of my GF's and dates have been rail thin 'cause that's just my type, but I have seen attractive "chubby" girls before. I have never seen an attractive fat girl, though, and I think there's a line in most dude's heads about where that is. There was a convo in the megathread the other day about how Christina Hendricks is kind of exactly on this line between chubby/actually-attractive-thick and fat. We can call this the Hendricks Line. Even Christina herself is sometimes above or below this li…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 11:12 PM
0

I went out last night and I'm all hungover and have felt like shit all day. Should I go out again tonight? I feel like I should and shouldn't simultaneously. I will let purge PPD decide.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 11:05 PM
1

Fair enough, no arguments here.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 10:43 PM
6

We're talking about losing weight. If you're fat or obese, CICO regimens are a good way to start it off. Then you start working on more difficult regimens. But if you're fuckin 300 pounds, then yeah, CICO works and the other shit you said doesn't matter. Skinnyfat is infinitely preferable to fat to pretty much everybody. Skinnyfat dudes have at least some place in the sexual marketplace, maybe not a good place, but they're still better off than true fat people by an order of magnitude. Notice in…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 10:41 PM
3

You are equating not eating food to making money and somehow don't see how those are not correlates whatsoever. Making money requires active forward effort. Losing weight requires the opposite of that, literally taking away stuff. Eat less. If you eat three hamburgers a day, eat two. It's not "difficult" in even remotely the same ways. Shit analogy. Also this isn't even mentioning that there are inborne qualifiers like intelligence that do correlate to how much money people make. Like, intellige…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 10:30 PM
3

People being lazy and stupid doesn't make the act itself any easier or harder. The act itself is burning more calories than you're intaking, which is not difficult. The act itself is eating healthy foods instead of shitty ones, which is not difficult.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 10:20 PM
1

Rami's a new one, and you are really way too nice for your own good mwk
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 10:19 PM
2

You said all this stuff much better than I did. Good take. Big ups.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 08:55 PM
3

I am Uzi Lover pilled
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 08:43 PM
2

Forcibly feeding fat people nutritious diets would legitimately make their lives better, even with all the kicking and screaming and jiggling that would come with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 08:30 PM
3

I already said it: instant gratification and people being prone to laziness. People's brains are all fucked up from this. Instead of taking not that much time at all to cook their own meals, or even just microwave frozen vegetables and cook chicken, it is slightly easier to get shitty takeout or shitty processed frozen food. These foods instill feedback loop mechanisms in their brain, and they become addicted. This is a mental health issue. Mental issues are solved by therapists. What don't you …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 08:26 PM
0

I have read some wicked crazy shit on this sub, and this is the first time it has felt like I have actively engaged with legitimately insane people. How they let themselves believe this shit is fucking wild.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 08:12 PM
2

I suppose we disagree about the gradient of "difficulties". I don't consider totally box standard human shit to be "difficult". People in sub-Saharan Africa and the Middle East and parts of Asia have difficult lives. Vast majority of Americans, even poor Americans, absolutely do not.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 08:06 PM
4

Not significantly overweight, but I was fat in high school. I got not fat very easily by eating vegetables and lean meats in college, when I had no money whatsoever. This was both in the 5th and 2nd largest cities in America, where I was carless and broker than almost everybody. I lived out of a closet in Los Angeles for almost three years, and my upgraded 'room' for the next three years wasn't much bigger or better. It was also not difficult to figure out an appropriate workout regimen that fit…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 08:01 PM
3

Right, I said major population centers, as in, where most people live when you look at populations. There's more people in New York than 40 other states. Which "inner city" "only has" corner grocery stores? Have you ever lived in a giant metropolitan area? I have only lived in them and they have never lacked a proper grocery store where you can buy frozen vegetables and chicken. This shit is everywhere in the US. Also do you know that public transportation exists? I've never even owned a car, in…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 07:55 PM
2

So there's psychological underpinnings, and my recommendation was intensive therapy for obese people. Seems like we're already pretty much in agreement and you just don't realize it. Also where in the western world besides almost nowhere (and definitely not major population centers) is it difficult to get vegetables and lean meat? Like, this is not difficult to figure out. Eat vegetables and lean meats, don't eat sugar and carbs. Eating healthily costs roughly $1.50 more than eating shittily, he…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 07:36 PM
3

In the immortal words of Bulworth, Everybody just gotta keep fuckin' everybody til they're all the same color
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 07:24 PM
5

Well you're either fat or a fat apologist who somehow thinks it's difficult to lose weight even when it isn't (unless you have very rare genetic things wrong with you). So either way you're retarded unfortunately.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 07:19 PM
1

Obese goopy cum brain strikes again with another witty riposte that definitely doesn't make him sound like he's 14 or something
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 07:12 PM
7

Seems like you're trying to dictate my own beliefs to me. But that's probably because you have fat brain and don't understand that people have views contrary to your very shitty ones. Being excessively fat is a mental illness. It should be treated with therapy. That's a belief I hold, and I don't give a fuck if you think it's "trolling". It's actually just true.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 06:47 PM
7

Yeah, I actually believe this, so not trolling. That's how this works you fat retard.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 06:44 PM
10

Not trolling. Being not fat isn't difficult unless you have genetic abnormalities, which very few people have.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 06:42 PM
11

It isn't difficult, fat people just have mental imbalances. All of which can likely be worked out with intensive therapy. Everyone knows sugar is addictive. I don't see how that's an excuse. You lack such willpower you let sugar control you? Why wouldn't I view that as anything but totally pathetic?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 06:30 PM
45

The fat people who legitimately complain about how hard it is to get lean/fit actually just can't stop shoving sugar into their mouths. Losing weight and looking halfway respectable is not difficult, and the people who think it is have been ruined by a culture of instant gratification. Their brains are legitimately fucked up. Obesity is the U.S.'s largest mental health crisis by a huge margin.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 05:21 PM
1

I haven't, literally have only replied to you. Also you can defend a point without being X thing but I know you have brain troubles and cant understand that.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 04:47 PM
1

Oh yeah, "protective" -- it's actually just called being "not retarded"
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 04:44 PM
1

Nope, I'm tall
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 04:31 PM
1

Your eyes suck shit at delineation and you are not the arbiter of quality
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 04:20 PM
0

You have no idea if that's true, you're just saying words. There is a huge gradient of quality in the dudes in the OP pic. Some of them look entirely normal/conventionally attractive and some are troglodytes.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 04:13 PM
6

unless we know how often the dudes in the photos get laid, the post is pretty useless. I'd reckon most of these dudes can pull fairly easily except for the really deformed ones, who are, of course, a small sampling of the general population, almost all of whom on average would benefit from getting in shape post is dumb
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 04:10 PM
2

I mean a lot of RP is bullshit but I don't see how this post accomplishes that
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 04:01 PM
3

No, not really, but I don't think we should say bluepillers are "successful" either. Both of these things can be true at once.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 03:42 PM
3

But they all know they can't do better up front, that's why they mostly cling to any relationship regardless of how shit it is. The point is the decisions most BP men are not the best outcome for their life in any true measurable sense, and they are entering relationships purely out of desperation and lack of affection/intimacy. It's not "successful" to be strung along by women for your whole life.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 03:34 PM
9

what is the point of this post
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 03:28 PM
3

I mean, that's totally fair, but I wouldn't call it "successful"
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 03:22 PM
3

They're in the relationship because they sorely lack sex and affection most of the time, and often don't realize how detrimental the compromises they're making actually are. They will basically let their "GF's" get away with murder all for the allure of mediocre pussy.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 03:17 PM
5

"BP" guys are generally in one sided relationships in my experience. 95% of my friend group(s) are normal "BP" guys and they get themselves into all sorts of shit and make compromises no man with self respect would make. They have next to zero power in terms of how the relationship progresses.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 03:06 PM
1

dae appreciate le underrated gem that was nominated for 10 Oscars?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 03:00 PM
3

love these threads but I got here late and have posted pics before, so that's all rite. as usual I rate myself a very cool 4/10
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 02:51 PM
–

Because you're gay
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/21 09:28 PM
7

This dude was basically the only consistently good poster on this sub. Sorely missed, unless he's hanging around somewhere and sucks now.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/21 09:07 PM
–

I'm gay and you are also gay
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/21 07:10 PM
1

No, you have said "because I think this" and "because I said so". That's not clarification, it's fallacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/21 05:26 PM
1

It's not a debate if you don't clarify your own points and give no explanations to anything you said. We're going in circles because you can't answer questions concisely, or like, at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/21 05:25 PM
1

I mean, I wasn't talking about getting into a relationship with them, I was asking why my hypothetical would be considered maladjustment and you have yet to answer this. You made the claim that high n count meant certain things (lack of control, hedonism), and you have not backed this up. You have also not yet connected the dots for me, because you don't answer questions. Sleeping with one dude a month, or ten a year, or fifteen a year, doesn't show any psychological signs of anything except a p…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/21 04:37 PM
1

There's a difference between not wanting to bond and unable to bond, but it doesn't make you maladjusted just because you don't want a relationship. There are tons of reasons why any individual woman/person wouldn't want a relationship. Plenty of people like being single. What about being single makes a person psychologically unwell in any way? Because you say so? What 'most' people do isn't really relevant, and is kind of just a bandwagon argument all over again. You were saying they were hedon…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/21 04:23 PM
2

What about it makes it a red flag? Why is it a red flag? You're saying it's a red flag because it makes them "hedonistic" and "unable to control themselves". What about being sexless for 29 days out of a month and having sex one day out of the month shows those things to you? Because that is not the behavior of a truly hedonistic person with no self control -- again, especially considering women can get fucked whenever they want. Nobody in the world? Do you really think that a psychologist would…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/21 04:12 PM
–

So a high n count, in your opinion, is necessarily a problem, which is the opposite of what you wrote. I mean, there is no psychological literature that would concur that sleeping with one new person a month is maladjustment. That's like not even close to actual sex addiction, or having problems with sex, and does not show any classical signs of hedonism as it is categorized. So what exactly are you talking about, except for your own feelings? If men could do this, they would. Are they psycholog…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/21 03:56 PM
–

You don't answer the question, so you turn it back on me? That's not how questions work, but okay, sure, I'll actually do the thing you didn't do. I think some women some of the time, depending on the individual, can fuck lots of people (just like men can) and be considered neurotypical and have 'normative' sexualities. I think if a girl fucks, lets say 5 - 10 dudes a year, is not a rampant slut, and is actually being hugely discerning when we take into account how many more she could be fucking…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/21 03:52 PM
–

I don't necessarily disagree with what you're saying, but you are tacitly admitting that high n count itself is the problem. If you're saying that high n count shows a lack of self control and a propensity toward hedonism, how would it be possible for a woman to rack up a high n count without those things? How could a woman healthily achieve a high n count, in your opinion?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/21 03:41 PM
–

I've never heard anyone say that men can't catch feelings after sex, I have literally only ever heard the opposite.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/21 03:35 PM
9

While this is mostly true, the men who lose their looks at 30 were never particularly good looking, and on average, in general, men increase their status in their 30's. They have more money and better jobs and thus their SMV raises. And no, I don't believe that women hit the wall at 30 or whatever other dumb shit. Most people still look pretty okay at 30 - 35. 40 is the real wall for most people.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/21 03:30 PM
3

We just had this thread yesterday, I thought. The consensus seemed to be that men don't really have this weird age range thing -- they'll fuck most anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/21 07:34 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter