| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | "Men are boorish and lazy. Why won't they marry us?"Absolutely; I'm not saying that it's not a desirable goal, just that for women to say that the sole contributing cause is male laziness is far from true, and the causing factor falls more on feminists. | /r/MensRights | 06/02/12 06:33 PM |
| 5 | "Men are boorish and lazy. Why won't they marry us?"I think we're speaking of two different concepts of chivalry. The concept of chivalry during the middle ages is certainly long gone, but there has still been a modern concept of chivalry, which I believe the feminists have killed with their "benevolent sexism" concepts. If women are upset that the man won't hold the door open on command, feminists are as much to blame as anyone. | /r/MensRights | 06/02/12 06:14 PM |
| -2 | "Men are boorish and lazy. Why won't they marry us?"The concept essentially is that, when it comes to social issues, feminism tells women what they should want and forces legislation through the system speaking for all women instead of letting women fight for themselves (and therefore invalidating their individual agency). A male feminist is essentially forcing his wishes on women. | /r/MensRights | 06/02/12 06:09 PM |
| -2 | "Men are boorish and lazy. Why won't they marry us?"True. Male feminists are probably worse than female ones in my book, though, because in actuality they work to take away womens' agency. | /r/MensRights | 06/02/12 06:04 PM |
| -4 | "Men are boorish and lazy. Why won't they marry us?"Naw, I just enjoy trolling the feminists without them realizing it. And jeez you are a dedicated one. Every single post I make. | /r/MensRights | 06/02/12 05:07 PM |
| 0 | Marriage gets even more dangerous in India!Funny how such ideas migrate with feminism specifically. The world is easy to take when you play it like a game of dominoes, each falling one by one. I just find it amazing that there never seems to be a real outcry. | /r/MensRights | 06/02/12 04:53 PM |
| 12 | 'The Great Scam'.Some good points; although people generally resist such sweeping generalizations, when they are fair they are fair. I think they are the majority. What would be nice would be to see some better statistics, but I fear that with the feminist bent of most of these researchers not much will be done. | /r/MensRights | 06/02/12 04:47 PM |
| -2 | "Men are boorish and lazy. Why won't they marry us?"I use the term rhetorically, in the sense of "a few bad apples." It would be interesting to know how many actually actively supported feminist causes, however. | /r/MensRights | 06/02/12 04:42 PM |
| 11 | "Men are boorish and lazy. Why won't they marry us?"Chivalry is dead and feminists killed it. If women should be blaming anyone, it should be the few that have ruined it for all by forcing men into a corner, not men. | /r/MensRights | 06/02/12 04:32 PM |
| 8 | 'The Great Scam'.purposeful or accidental misuse of the contraceptive, and what fraction is due to actual failure of the contraceptive. You're leaving out another category IMO: negligence. While sometimes women may accidentally misuse, and some may do it purposefully, it also seems fair to say that at least some women will forget to take the pill, remember but think that it's still okay because they're only off by a bit, etc. Of course, fault doesn't really shift away from the women in these cases, however. | /r/MensRights | 06/02/12 03:54 PM |
| 1 | WSJ article - Sex Smears and the Rule of Law at YaleMy take: Times reported the existence of a confidential accusation of sexual assault despite not knowing the name of the accuser or the content of the complaint. It relied on a half-dozen anonymous sources, all of whom were violating institutional confidentiality policies. And it highlighted a couple of minor infractions by Mr. Witt earlier in his college years, slyly suggesting that he had a propensity for lawbreaking. This is the absolutely absurd part. Publications are so quick to jump the gu… | /r/MensRights | 05/02/12 04:35 PM |
| 5 | The Next Target for Feminists... LEGO.While true, there are some redeeming elements. You can still buy plain Legos and use those instead, and you can reuse pieces in sets even if they're meant to build something specific. I think the real sad thing here is not the non-issue of gender separation, but the very real one of the lack of imagination that these toys imply in the younger generations. | /r/MensRights | 05/02/12 04:23 PM |
| 2 | I tried to have a meaningful conversation with a liberal feminist, yet this sums up my experience.I think we need to take a principled stand. It's time we all start hitting the MRA blogs and forums and saying, "let's talk about this!" Our words will melt away the bigotry of feminism once and for all and expose the MRM for what it really is for the world to see. | /r/MensRights | 05/02/12 05:47 AM |
| 0 | Before feminism: Gender displacementActually, game theory is quite well respected. It can help you find womens' Nash equilibria. | /r/MensRights | 05/02/12 04:31 AM |
| 0 | Why do you hate feminism?Yeah, I get what you mean. With feminism being a non-egalitarian (female-supremecist) movement, it's no surprise that they won't let men call themselves feminists. Just makes it worse for the "allies" that support them, eh? | /r/MensRights | 05/02/12 02:12 AM |
| 0 | Why do you hate feminism?It isn't meant to suggest that I'm not an MRA (because I am) or have any special meaning really. It was simply an available username that combined MRA with another word. Plus it sounded better than MRAstroturf. | /r/MensRights | 05/02/12 01:54 AM |
| 0 | The real problem with affirmative action for women is that it is demeaning to WOMEN??Exactly. It's a damned if you do, damned if you don't situation that the feminists have put us in. Probably part of the plan all along. | /r/MensRights | 04/02/12 11:06 PM |
| 0 | Why do you hate feminism?I don't hate feminism. I would have to say I do. I mean, I don't hate feminists, but from spermjackings to child support, this movement is clearly not only dedicated to putting women on a higher plane of existence, but also shoving men down as far as possible. | /r/MensRights | 04/02/12 06:50 PM |
| 15 | I tried to have a meaningful conversation with a liberal feminist, yet this sums up my experience.It doesn't matter what kind of feminist she is. Liberal feminist, moderate feminist, white, green, or purple; at the end of the day, your concerns are invalid or not as important. Arguing with feminists is pointless. | /r/MensRights | 04/02/12 05:41 PM |
| 0 | Anyone think we're about to get an influx of new MRAs?We should bring kloos_female_puppet or whatever back :( | /r/MensRights | 03/02/12 11:15 PM |
| 1 | Anyone think we're about to get an influx of new MRAs?Yes, more allies to our cause! They will surely turn away from feminism and its false "equality." | /r/MensRights | 03/02/12 10:17 PM |
| 0 | Anyone find this disgusting? 17 year old accused of rape full name and photo published online.This is all thanks to feminists that think women would never lie about rape. Disgusting. | /r/MensRights | 03/02/12 09:06 PM |
| 7 | Why not just wear shoes that are comfortable to begin with? But no we're held to a standard to sacrifice for the dumb choices you make.Feminists just don't understand why such behavior is so disrespectful to men. | /r/MensRights | 03/02/12 08:56 PM |
| 1 | Children win access to fathers. Children are for the first time to be given the legal right to have a proper relationship with both their parents after a divorce, The Telegraph can disclose.Just another success in the rocky road to victory against feminist bigotry. | /r/MensRights | 03/02/12 05:49 AM |
| -3 | How I view my girlfriend's cosmoAs long as feminism continues supporting these stereotypes among women, these "writers" and "editors" will continue to make money. | /r/MensRights | 03/02/12 05:21 AM |
| -1 | Violence of the "Oppressed" by GirlWritesWhat: This philosophy--that the violence of the oppressed is not the same as the violence of the oppressor--is what led to feminist suppression and dismissal of the almost 300 studies on domestic violence published since the early 80sWell it does say "feminist suppression and dismissal of the almost 300 studies." But these feminists just want to make our lives hard producing them all for them on a silver platter. | /r/MensRights | 29/01/12 03:49 AM |
| 1 | Seriously? Are the comments just being inflated by SRS or....?I've tried searching for links. It's clear the feminists are linking to it somewhere. | /r/MensRights | 29/01/12 02:57 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter