MRmandato Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	Justin Roiland Domestic Violence Charges Dropped (sufficient damage was already done) If I did that yes they would if you spoke up. What are we disagreeing about?	/r/MensRights	23/03/23 06:04 PM
1	Justin Roiland Domestic Violence Charges Dropped (sufficient damage was already done) I agree	/r/MensRights	23/03/23 02:30 PM
-4	Justin Roiland Domestic Violence Charges Dropped (sufficient damage was already done) Common sense and context.	/r/MensRights	23/03/23 05:05 AM
-3	Justin Roiland Domestic Violence Charges Dropped (sufficient damage was already done) Right. Insufficient evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt does not mean a fabrication. Ie, a simple he said she said with no evidence is “insufficient evidence”. Ie if i punch you in a room with no witness, no cameras, and if theres no bruises.	/r/MensRights	23/03/23 04:12 AM
-7	Justin Roiland Domestic Violence Charges Dropped (sufficient damage was already done) Thats not what “pussy worshiper” means and you know it. Lol. Comon bro.	/r/MensRights	23/03/23 04:10 AM
-44	Justin Roiland Domestic Violence Charges Dropped (sufficient damage was already done) pussy worshiper Im gay. How did you not learn that from my post history? Same way you thought the last few hours was “over the past few days”	/r/MensRights	23/03/23 01:20 AM
-51	Justin Roiland Domestic Violence Charges Dropped (sufficient damage was already done) K	/r/MensRights	23/03/23 01:03 AM
-52	Justin Roiland Domestic Violence Charges Dropped (sufficient damage was already done) A lack of evidence to successfully prove beyond a reasonable doubt is not a “false allegation”. You would need proof the alleged victim fabricated claims and evidence maliciously. Charges get dropped all the time for many reasons. It doesn’t necessarily mean it didn’t happen. Will Smith wasn’t charged with assault, that doesn’t mean he didn’t hit someone.	/r/MensRights	22/03/23 11:34 PM
1	As simple as that Thats still “in public”, unless its a high fenced backyard.	/r/PussyPassDenied	12/10/19 06:05 AM
0	As simple as that Do I really have to explain the obvious difference ?	/r/PussyPassDenied	09/10/19 03:58 AM
1	As simple as that Yep, def a bigot...against people who dont wear clothes in public	/r/PussyPassDenied	08/10/19 02:02 AM
-1	As simple as that Im a troll because i have a radical idea about wearing clothes when in public...yep you got me.	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/10/19 07:00 PM
-3	As simple as that This is America and this is my property Quite possibly the douchiest thing to say. That doesnt give you the right to do anything and you can still be an asshole. Dude dont be a gross old man, wear some clothes when in public. Its not hard. Go down to the goodwill get some shorts for 3 bucks, dont have 3 bucks? Find a drunk trade him for his. Stop acting like this is some undue burden. No one wants to see your dangles.	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/10/19 04:50 PM
-3	As simple as that Thats kinda weird. Dont do that. Not worth calling the cops over, but its pretty simple: underwear isnt clothing.	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/10/19 04:26 PM
1	As simple as that Is this supposed to be satire or a joke	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/10/19 03:58 PM
-17	As simple as that How is pussypassdenied? Also who wears boxers as shorts? Thats not even a thing. This is just digging for non existent issues	/r/PussyPassDenied	07/10/19 01:14 PM
-3	With all the new traffic I think people need to see this again Is suffering a competition?	/r/MGTOW	09/11/17 09:57 AM
1	BBC interviews experts, many feel it was wrong to fire James Damore for memo I attend training on social issues all the time. Thats doesn't make t appropriate to voice your opinions on it via email. I assume you dont work in a similar workplace; this stuff is standard. After the seminar i sat down with administrators and coworkers and discussed it, but only an idiot would post a whole manifesto about their beliefs on diversity an expect nothing to happen to them.	/r/MensRights	13/08/17 06:32 PM
2	BBC interviews experts, many feel it was wrong to fire James Damore for memo This was a (sound) business decision. Like it or not, Google and other tech companies are under intense pressure for diversity and woman issues right now. In the midst of tireless work and spending to sure up their inclusion bona fides, an engineer sends out ( on Company email) a manifesto in which he implies a biological reasons for why woman may not be interested in tech. This is a PR nightmare for any company but even worse for Google at this time. Google has every right and reason to can him…	/r/MensRights	13/08/17 12:26 PM
0	Judge Judy has spoken. Get it together, you Cucks. Kinda like Dr. Phil used to be a doctor, and Oprah used to be a reporter. When you are about 20-30 years removed but still call yourself a "judge" when u are not it kinda losses it basis. Edit: "most of her life"??? She was an actual judge from 1982-1996... 14 years? How old do you think she is?	/r/MensRights	24/04/17 03:02 PM
-2	Judge Judy has spoken. Get it together, you Cucks. You...you know shes not really a judge? Thats TV.	/r/MensRights	24/04/17 01:05 PM