TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MaMagooni Archive

View 6 posts and 401 comments by MaMagooni on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
408

False AccusationMaMagooni/r/MensRights14/08/18 01:30 AM
319

Edu./Occu.MaMagooni/r/MensRights08/09/18 02:48 PM
48

FeminismMaMagooni/r/MensRights30/11/18 05:47 PM
14

Social IssuesMaMagooni/r/MensRights23/10/18 05:42 PM
13

MaMagooni/r/MensRights25/01/19 09:52 PM
1

False AccusationMaMagooni/r/MensRights14/08/18 01:08 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Twitter and Facebook are poisonous. Was watching Cold Case Files and there was one case where the investigator figured people knew, but wouldn’t open up. So he creates a Facebook page titled “justice for Shannon Siders” and sure enough, pretty quickly someone shoots an investigator a message with some potentially useful information that was new to them. People will say stuff on social media they wouldn’t say in person. When woman say shit like this, I wish I could reach through their phone scree…
/r/MensRights24/10/19 05:57 AM
1

I never changed the topic, you did. You wanted to talk about rape. Not sexual assault. So don’t come here trying blame me for your own sins. That’s an incredibly pitiful thing to do. I’m muting this conversation so I don’t have to waste any more time on a child like you.
/r/MensRights22/10/19 04:24 AM
-1

You aren’t very self aware are you. Here, now it’s my time to ask a completely irrelevant question: are you tired of being sad and alone? Are you tired of your lack of education beyond 3rd grade? The fact that you can’t seem to tel the difference between rape and grinding is just absurd. Good day, I am truly done wasting my time. You are not a voice for change. You are not making any progress for men’s rights. In fact, you and your petty, childish bullshit is exactly why nobody take feminists se…
/r/MensRights21/10/19 09:14 PM
-1

You criticize me for ignoring something you said, and now what are you doing? Talk about a double standard Doesn’t apply to you though, does it?
/r/MensRights21/10/19 08:38 PM
-1

Comparing this to rape is like comparing someone getting punched in the face to someone getting murdered. Hell, tons of people joke about R Kelly and his child perversion. Were you sticking up for how those girls felt? Highly unlikely So no, I’m not answering that question because again, it is irrelevant to the situation at hand. It is a strawman argument you go there buddy.
/r/MensRights21/10/19 07:26 PM
0

The dude didn’t get raped. She grinned on him. Yes it’s sexual assault, but let’s not confuse the two as you continue to do.
/r/MensRights21/10/19 06:47 PM
0

I can deny it and I will. We are talking about making jokes online anonymously, and not about targeted harassment. Again, reaching
/r/MensRights21/10/19 05:30 PM
0

No, it does not. I am talking about a joke. I am not condoning her actions. Discounting rape is an entirely different discussion than making a crude joke. So yeah, it’s a moot point
/r/MensRights21/10/19 05:29 PM
1

Because I could see your comment history and know that you replied to another comment 20 minutes after that one - so it was definitely you. Nice try though
/r/MensRights21/10/19 03:45 PM
1

No one wrote off her actions as a joke - they made a joke about the situation. It’s not the same. You can call me immature, I don’t really care about your opinion. Fact is, this sub has turned into an echo chamber. A lot of you are no better than feminists. The fact that you still cannot understand that jokes are intended to make light of uncomfortable situations is a bit disappointing (although I will say not surprising based on this subs activity in the past 6 months or so). I do acknowledge t…
/r/MensRights21/10/19 03:43 PM
1

Yeah, downvote but don’t reply - says it all. You know you are wrong so you ran away.
/r/MensRights21/10/19 03:24 PM
0

You made two comments, the second being offhand. I responded to the first, but somehow I ignored the “meat of your statement”...... Also, your second comment was a fucking moot point and had nothing to do with the discussion at hand. Again, I’m not defending the actions said there, I’m simply saying you shouldn’t get so butthurt about a joke. Thin skin y’all have
/r/MensRights21/10/19 03:11 PM
0

Again, that’s not what I said or implied. I said the guy made a joke. People joke about sensitive topics. All. The. Time. And I know for a fact just about every person on this sub has made or laughed at inappropriate jokes. Because it’s a JOKE.
/r/MensRights21/10/19 02:47 PM
0

No one said all men enjoy being sexually assault? That is a reach and you know it
/r/MensRights21/10/19 02:15 PM
2

The above picture shows absolutely nothing with no context. Also, I don’t think there is anything wrong with making jokes like that. You are hyper-sensitive to these sort of things. What is acceptable to joke about? Nothing these days, due to people like you. Jokes are meant to be insensitive/inappropriate to some degree. Ever made a “that’s what she said” joke? Yep, by your logic that is a problem.
/r/MensRights21/10/19 02:13 PM
-2

You are having a hard time understanding. This picture has no context. All you can see in the picture is two people close. Upon watching the video, yes it is sexual assault. That doesn’t change the fact that the joke is harmless and you are getting up in arms about bullshit that doesn’t matter. And then you say “but if the roles were reversed people would be upset.” Yeah, feminists would be upset. Most people wouldn’t give a fuck. So you think it’s not ok to make these jokes, because people (fem…
/r/MensRights21/10/19 01:01 PM
-1

Dude all you can see on this picture is her ass is touching his crotch while she’s being arrested. Again, you are looking to be offended.
/r/MensRights21/10/19 12:42 PM
1

Dude just made a joke. This seems like a reach. I would say don’t look to be offended by stuff. That’s what feminists do and that is why they ridicule every little thing you say
/r/MensRights21/10/19 10:48 AM
1

If simply commenting on a sub was bad, Reddit wouldn’t have a popular tab. I agree, brigading should be avoiding, but simply “not commenting” just because you aren’t subscribed is the biggest, most made up sack of shit I have heard
/r/MensRights19/10/19 03:50 AM
8

That sub is awful. I remember seeing a post about some father who was trying to gain sole custody of a child (mother was a drug addict and emotionally abuse). Basically he won and the mother committed suicide. Whole sub called him an asshole for essentially causing her to kill herself. Yeah fucking right.
/r/MensRights18/10/19 11:02 AM
10

Why do I have to be subscribed to a sub to comment on it?
/r/MensRights18/10/19 11:00 AM
4

Right, but I guess the question is where do they draw the line in “defending yourself.” Here it’s pretty clear he just gives her a small slack, so I wouldn’t expect much. But if he punched her square in the jaw and knocked her out? I would be hesitant to believe the police would call that self defense. I mean if someone hits me I would love to hit them back as hard as I could, but I would definitely be scared to hit them at all if it’s a woman.
/r/MensRights10/10/19 06:40 PM
8

Protect the *female criminal. At all costs, we will triumph over the patriarchy!!
/r/MensRights10/10/19 05:59 PM
13

I would still say be careful guys. Dunno how it is in other countries, but in the US if a man hits a woman (even in self defense), YOU can still get charged if they deem the force you used unnecessary. So if you hit her too hard back, you get in trouble.
/r/MensRights10/10/19 05:00 PM
5

My point is that making some fuck You in the ass is a rough equivalent to a woman raping you. Since “women can’t force penetration” then a man can’t force another man to fuck him in the ass
/r/MensRights08/10/19 10:30 PM
6

So if I, a male, force another man to fuck my ass, that’s not rape?
/r/MensRights08/10/19 08:52 PM
1

Yes, a travesty. The guy is still a racist. Don’t let the injustices done to him distract from who he really is
/r/MensRights25/09/19 03:57 PM
12

Identify as a woman. Apply and wear a dress to the interview. Then resume normal activities once hired, and highlight how absolutely ridiculous this sort of shit.
/r/MensRights24/09/19 01:24 PM
3

My point is if they make the claim that they were raped under those exact circumstances, society and the justice system would be on their side. That’s what I was getting at. And as far as the regret part goes... yes I already basically said is was a bad decision I made. You aren’t bringing up anything new
/r/MensRights18/09/19 10:01 AM
23

Here’s a story: drunk me hooks up with roomies friend, who is actually cosplaying as Dracula (she was a biter). Very uncomfortable experience. She tells me when I’m driving her home that she “doesn’t do one night stands” and that she “will find [me] tonight.” I wanted nothing to do with that. Well I go out with friends again. I updated them about her and told them I want nothing to do with her. She finds us. We ditch. She finds us again, we ditch. This goes on for 4-5 bars. I think she was track…
/r/MensRights17/09/19 07:14 PM
1

Do you want to do the exact same thing you criticize feminists for. Got it
/r/MensRights17/09/19 02:09 PM
2

If that is your point, what have MRAs done for women?
/r/MensRights17/09/19 01:51 PM
1

Flood that sub. It’s the most toxic thing I’ve ever seen. It’s so small we could easily shut that bitch down
/r/MensRights17/09/19 01:44 PM
1

What is wrong in principle with the VAWA? And again, I reiterate, there are definitely issues with modern wave feminists. My initial claim was that most feminists aren’t these evil man hating misandrists that this sub often claims them to be.
/r/MensRights17/09/19 01:19 PM
1

That’s my point: the feminist subreddits represent a very small minority, so using them as a baseline for behavior is ridiculous. That was, however, the least significant thing I wrote in that comment. I find it odd that’s the one you single out.
/r/MensRights17/09/19 09:49 AM
1

I feel you man. This guy doesn’t understand the hypocrisy by claiming MRAs are faultless, but the Feminist movement is entirely terrible to the core. There are good women out their fighting for what they think needs to change. Whether we agree with that or not, that’s a different story and illustrates why we are entitled to our own opinions. But this whole “all women who believe in feminism are terrible misandrists” ideology needs to stop spreading through this sub. It’s becoming a damn echo cha…
/r/MensRights17/09/19 01:11 AM
1

Who says I don’t do anything? All because I correct people for placing blame on the wrong people and stereotyping? I am a very outspoken person. I have criticized my brother (who is so far left of center he thinks white makes are the devil incarnate). I’m banned on 3 accounts from multiple feminist subreddits for arguing with them. I’ve even sat my happy ass downtown in my city with a large sign that said “fathers deserve rights too.” And yet, you think you know me all because you heard one sing…
/r/MensRights17/09/19 12:20 AM
0

I’m not saying that because you guys aren’t adequately placing the blame on the correct people’s shoulders. You are labeling a group of people based on the actions of the few. It’s like how men account for the majority of violent crimes. When someone compares criminals to men, that’s where we say “this isn’t inherently a man problem.” Don’t judge all men by their actions. No one complains when folks on this sub says something like that.
/r/MensRights16/09/19 11:51 PM
3

Well I mean I’m a moderate, and I just want to ask you one question. How do you think feminists are portraying the men’s rights movement? They think we are all a bunch of incels who just want to complain because we don’t get laid. Well, that may be true for some. Not the majority, but some. I still stand by my assertion that the feminist movement as we see it is a bunch of dumb women who want to blame men for their own problems. This isn’t really true, but it’s the outspoken ones we see. There a…
/r/MensRights16/09/19 11:14 PM
1

Your ego prevents you from simply ceasing to reply. Every comment you make proves that
/r/MensRights16/09/19 09:55 PM
1

You are proving my point
/r/MensRights16/09/19 09:14 PM
1

You literally just respond to everything so you get the last word, don’t you?
/r/MensRights16/09/19 09:04 PM
1

You’re way behind the times if that’s your belief, which further solidified my belief that you are celibate. Nice try though bucko ;)
/r/MensRights16/09/19 06:46 PM
1

You wish she did, but she’s busy on top of me ;)
/r/MensRights16/09/19 05:36 PM
1

You wish she did, but she’s busy on top of me ;)
/r/MensRights16/09/19 05:36 PM
1

You wish she did, but she’s busy on top of me ;)
/r/MensRights16/09/19 05:36 PM
1

If that’s what you have to tell yourself to sleep at night ;)
/r/MensRights16/09/19 05:26 PM
1

Yeah, you’re definitely an incel. If I wasn’t convinced earlier, I am now
/r/MensRights16/09/19 09:50 AM
1

I’ll give you that, you’re a funny guy. I genuinely pity you
/r/MensRights15/09/19 04:32 PM
1

Your opinions prove you are sexist and have no right to be on this sub. You are just as bad as feminists And here you are, criticizing me for making my “clinical psychologists,” diagnosis, and then you do the exact same thing! So not only are you a sexist, you’re a hypocrite as well.
/r/MensRights15/09/19 04:31 PM
1

You started the accusations and psychological diagnosis with you’re “bet you’re a beta male” comment. By positing my photos, I was just proving you wrong. Remember, this all started with me calling out your sexist beliefs. I don’t need to be a psychologist to see you have some deep hatred for women. If you even spend a little time in a real relationship, you wouldn’t have those opinions about women. It’s so damn obvious you have mental issues.
/r/MensRights15/09/19 03:59 PM
1

I don’t care about that any more. This guy has made it abundantly clear he doesn’t want to have any reasonable discussion, and instead would rather just call me a beta and claim my girlfriend smacks me around. I have no desire to use the gift of speech kindly with him.
/r/MensRights14/09/19 02:38 PM
1

doesn’t address any legitimate points made and instead consistently resorts to calling others beta Yeah, you have an inferiority complex. I’m guessing it stems from years of rejection. Get a girlfriend, you celibate bitch
/r/MensRights14/09/19 02:29 PM
1

No, it’s not biased. Address what you said in regards to snacking around women, taking away their rights, and not respecting them. If you want to prove I’m somehow misinterpreted those remarks.. Convenient for you to immediately drop the whole “you’re a beta and your girlfriend snacks you around” claim
/r/MensRights13/09/19 12:55 PM
1

Very ironic you just brought up the dishes . And the are observations based on what I have seen you write, correct. “I don’t respect women.” “We should smack feminists around.” “We could take women’s rights away if we want to.” You’re sexist dude, and based on you vocalizing those beliefs I feel it’s been a VERY long time since any woman has shown you any compassion.
/r/MensRights13/09/19 12:32 PM
1

Here is me, just a beta male with his smoking hot girlfriend. No, I’m not making assumptions. I’m making observations. I’ve seen plenty of guys like you who talk about women like that. They all end up very alone in life. You can try and hide all you want, and pretend that it’s not true. But one day, you’re going to look back and wonder why you have nobody. You don’t respect HALF of the people on earth because they were born with vaginas. Yes, I have read some of your other comments and seen beli…
/r/MensRights13/09/19 12:14 PM
0

I’m not just labeling you a sexist, you are a sexist. You believe men can simply take away women’s rights, INHERENT rights, which implies that you believe we are better than them. THAT is sexist. I didn’t repeat my views from anyone else. That’s the typical accusation from someone who knows they lost the argument. Have fun with your virginity
/r/MensRights13/09/19 11:03 AM
2

Yeah people say that shit and I’m just sitting there with my girlfriend who I’ve been with for 6 months. Whatever helps them sleep at night
/r/MensRights12/09/19 05:35 PM
1

Link please!! I want to see it
/r/MensRights12/09/19 04:07 PM
1

This is the problem I have with this sub. There are so many people who confuse men’s rights with women hate. I mean a lot of the comments in this post are gross. When I try to draw the line and say “that’s sexist” or “you are wrong and that is a toxic way of thinking,” I just get called a male feminist and insulted a bunch. It’s really sad.
/r/MensRights12/09/19 04:04 PM
1

I mean she did have to register as a sex offender, right?
/r/MensRights12/09/19 03:59 PM
2

I’m calling out someone who says to “smack feminists around” and taking away “women’s rights.” This implies that we are better than women, and that we even have the right to decide if women have equal rights. I am not a male feminist, but you are a sexist. You really sound like someone with years of pent up sexual frustration who likes to take it out in women. I really don’t understand why you think a man calling out blatant sexist behavior is feminist. Again, I don’t think you understand this s…
/r/MensRights10/09/19 09:12 PM
1

They are linked but I don’t personally believe they are the same. Sexualization is to become aware of a man or woman’s sexuality. Objectification is to degrade someone to the status of a (usually sexual) object. I can appreciate and admire a woman’s sexuality without reducing her to the status of a sexual object, and that’s all I’m really getting at.
/r/MensRights10/09/19 07:08 PM
1

There is nothing wrong with sexualizing the sex you are attracted to. If you objectify then, that’s another thing. But sexualization is important to have a strong connection with your SO. And like you said, women do the same shit and I’ve witnessed it firsthand
/r/MensRights10/09/19 04:15 PM
4

Well that’s not true at all, my girlfriend is very happy and I haven’t objectified her at all. I treat her like another human being who is valuable to me, which she is.
/r/MensRights10/09/19 04:09 PM
0

I really don’t think you understand the point if this sub. You are no better than feminists. You should see yourself out and never comment again.
/r/MensRights10/09/19 04:08 PM
2

I would just say “sorry, I don’t value the opinions of trash.” He either A) accepts that he is trash and confirms that his opinions are invalid or B) tries to imply that not all men are trash and his opinion should be valued (therefore contradicting the argument that men are trash)
/r/MensRights10/09/19 04:07 PM
1

Obese women are beautiful obese men are disgusting duh
/r/MensRights01/09/19 05:25 PM
1

You still don’t understand that sexual acts do not require touching. If you force someone to masturbate for you, that’s a sexual act and that is sexual assault. To me it’s not different than Trump and his “grab them by the pussy” situation, because he very clearly stated that women let him do it - IE they consented. If you consider that sexual assault, then so is the Kesha thing. If you don’t, then you don’t for both. That’s where I think people who would defend Kesha for this will get cornered …
/r/MensRights29/08/19 01:58 AM
2

Well no shit they were at damage control then scrambling to salvage a sinking ship. They finally realized its time to abandon, not like they are getting most of those lost customers back soon
/r/MensRights24/08/19 01:11 AM
1

I never said you said that. I said on this post on the plethora of comments I have made, those are some things that people are saying. Implying others. I really don’t know how you didn’t pick that up, maybe revisit your basic reading comprehension skills. And again, hitting someone with a glass container is not the same as breaking a piece of glass, effectively turning it into a blade, and stabbing them with it. But the fact it was a cocktail/whiskey glass heavily implies that it was just a mome…
/r/MensRights21/08/19 08:48 PM
1

Assumptions made: look at his face, she stabbed him with a broken piece of glass - no, she had a drinking glass in her hand and hit him with it. It broke, and that’s where the cuts came from. It was a hate crime - again, no. She clearly has anger management issues, as evidenced by her history AND the sequence of events that lead to the man’s injury. I am blind to not see this as a double standard - I acknowledged it was a double standard many times in regards to her punishment. People bring that…
/r/MensRights21/08/19 04:52 PM
0

Again, and I don’t know why this is hard to comprehend, the whole purpose of my comments was to set the facts straight and show people that they can’t just make assumptions and treat them as facts.
/r/MensRights21/08/19 02:11 PM
0

My whole discussion was about getting the facts right, but everyone just kept bringing up moot points about double standards and other shit that wasn’t even relevant. I was trying to get people to understand the case by questioning their understanding of it. The whole aggravated vs regular assault was a rabbit hole. And I didn’t say you sound like an incel. I very specifically stated that’s how many other people view men’s rights activists and this sub in general. I have read plenty of comments …
/r/MensRights21/08/19 01:05 PM
0

You’re entirely missing the point. What I’m getting at is that on this sub in general, there is an abundance of misinformation spread. This is a key example. What she did was disgusting. Furthermore, by not following through with the deferred sentence, the justice system is fucked and absolutely a double standard. But what you don’t seem to understand is that by stretching facts you absolutely de-legitimize men’s rights issues. When people make claims and comments about issues like this and many…
/r/MensRights20/08/19 08:19 PM
1

They were at a bar and it was a glass she was drinking, and he was random. So it was spur of the moment rage. I mean even in court they identified that she has had anger management problems her whole life. She needs help because she’s a damn head case.
/r/MensRights20/08/19 04:58 PM
1

That’s what happens when you hit somebody with a bottle. I can promise you, if she were to break a glass bottle and stab him in the face it would look a whole lot worse. And it wasn’t even a bottle now that I did some more digging. She took a drinking glass and smashed it in his face. That’s completely different than making a bottle into a blade and bludgeoning someone. You’re really stretching.
/r/MensRights20/08/19 02:23 PM
0

homas smashed a drink glass into Lee's face at a Bournemouth nightclub in February. No, it’s not. How did you even come up with that? Did you make an assumption?
/r/MensRights20/08/19 12:32 PM
0

I think it’s pretty obvious. I highly doubt that she decided to stab him in the face with glass. The article makes it pretty clear she hit him out of nowhere because she was mad about something stupid and petty. I’m just saying it wasn’t a hate crime.
/r/MensRights20/08/19 09:56 AM
0

I read the whole article and it never says it was a random person or makes it abundantly clear what their relation is. You’re making assumptions, and it’s incredibly immature.
/r/MensRights20/08/19 09:50 AM
1

They wouldn’t because they can’t. The exceptions are the subjects attorneys, parents or guardians. It expands if they crimes become much more violent (like murder or attempted murder) but would not be granted to a judge for an adults first charge.
/r/MensRights20/08/19 02:59 AM
1

Juvenile records are almost always confidential. Few exceptions. They would not be considered for a case like this so you have to take it at face value.
/r/MensRights20/08/19 02:26 AM
0

It was just dumb rage she hit him with whatever she had in her hand. If she slapped him with a purse the act would be the same, the outcome would be different. It’s not like she broke the glass and stabbed him with it
/r/MensRights20/08/19 01:44 AM
1

And I think that is wrong, I don’t know why it’s hard to understand. I think that it should be the same case regardless of sex. I think a lot of you want women to get punished more just out of anger and frustration instead of thinking “oh, these would be equally fair if men weren’t punished as hard.” I never said men should be punished like you say, and women shouldn’t. In fact I said the opposite.
/r/MensRights20/08/19 01:16 AM
1

Wasn’t that his girlfriend or some girl he went to the bar with? I don’t really think that qualifies as hate crime
/r/MensRights20/08/19 01:14 AM
-2

The intent is ALWAYS considered in aggravated assault. Do you think her intent was to severely maim him, or do you think she just went into a dumb rage and hit him with whatever she had in her hand? I don’t think you understand in a court that upping these charges to aggravated assault is definitely pushing the envelope. Any prosecutor would be hard pressed to get a conviction for aggravated assault when assault would be a sure conviction.
/r/MensRights20/08/19 12:16 AM
-6

Right I understand that’s the norm. Also, aggravated assault is an assault committed with the intent to rob, rape, or murder. I don’t think she was trying to do any of those things. I think she was just angry (for no good reason). I think it’s just regular assault.
/r/MensRights19/08/19 10:49 PM
-4

You’re trying to bait me just as anyone else would. I stand by my belief that this, as the first criminal offense on the adults record, would warrant a deferred sentence. It seems she has since committed more crimes and the sentence has not been upheld. That is an issue, but I still think the sentence is fair regardless of genders. I also think men are punished too harshly. We shouldn’t look at these and say “women need to be punished more.” We should say “men are punished too harshly.”
/r/MensRights19/08/19 10:04 PM
-2

Well then that’s the justice systems fault for not enforcing their sentencing, not fault with the sentence itself
/r/MensRights19/08/19 07:30 PM
1

“You’re crazy if you can’t see the double standard” implying I didn’t think there was a double standard. But I did, and I stated so. So no. I’m not filling in some gaps. You’re creating some that eternity there
/r/MensRights19/08/19 06:30 PM
1

I didn’t argue against any of that.
/r/MensRights19/08/19 06:18 PM
2

I literally said in this comment and others that she got off easy and that men are treated fairly. Read
/r/MensRights19/08/19 05:21 PM
6

Hitting someone in the head with a bottle*
/r/MensRights19/08/19 04:35 PM
1

I have been very vocal about reform to criminal justice, so don’t come at me like that bud.
/r/MensRights19/08/19 04:35 PM
-3

And I acknowledged that a man should not get jail time immediately. That’s the problem with our justice system. We love to throw people in prison instead of trying to reform them.
/r/MensRights19/08/19 04:13 PM
-27

No its not. The other 17 convictions were from when she was a minor. It’s common that juvenile records/convictions are not considered for adults. Furthermore, it was a deferred sentence. She doesn’t actually get to walk away for free. If she fucks up at all within 2 years of the sentence, so much as a speeding ticket, she goes to jail. She also has to see a therapist regarding anger management. I actually think this sentence is fitting. It actually focuses on reforming the perpetrator instead of…
/r/MensRights19/08/19 02:33 PM
91

You can easily look up this case. You know nothing about the case other than what this little info graphic says. Don’t make hasty judgement in anger, that’s what feminists do.
/r/MensRights19/08/19 01:58 PM
6

FWIW: her 17 other convictions all came when she was younger than 18, and likely had a factor in the judges sentencing. On that note, it’s a deferred sentence. So within the 2 years of the ruling, if she so much as gets a speeding ticket she will go to jail for 12 months. I still think she only got off so easily because she’s a woman, but thought I would give some context to people wondering why she is still on the street after 18 convictions
/r/MensRights19/08/19 01:32 PM
165

Fwiw, the other 17 were when she was a juvenile. So that definitely played a part in the no-prison time. It’s a deferred sentence though. So if she fucks up for anything so much as a speeding ticket, she goes to jail for 12 months.
/r/MensRights19/08/19 01:30 PM
1

To be fair, it was much more video evidence of animal abuse then just “slapping” as this article implies. She pinned the dogs head against the ground and spit on him as well. I just wanted everyone to know what she actually did, because that article is beating around the bush.
/r/MensRights08/08/19 05:40 PM
1

If by “men” they mean “mankind” then yes, I agree. But they don’t. They mean guys with dicks and balls. Only CIS men are bad
/r/MensRights08/08/19 01:37 PM
6

I think the draft is unconstitutional. I also think government subsidized healthcare is not a right. Idea: must register for draft to to receive government healthcare: applies to men and women. Potentially sacrifice health (if war breaks out) to receive care for health. May not be practical but it was just a thought
/r/MensRights06/08/19 11:28 PM
1

I don’t know what point you’re trying to make but lay off the personal attacks.
/r/MensRights06/08/19 11:16 AM
1

No other demographic has shot more people - how about impoverished?? Medical malpractice kills more every day than mass shootings do in a year. I could easily name more
/r/MensRights06/08/19 02:07 AM
34

Yeah fucking right. She knows it’s an outright lie and that it didn’t happen. She’s just desperately trying to get out of the consequences.
/r/MensRights02/08/19 10:15 AM
7

This makes me so happy :)
/r/MensRights01/08/19 01:22 PM
1

That’s because it was made in jest. I’m just saying it’s unfair. Much like the “taxes are unconstitutional” is more of a meme at this point playing on how unfair they are
/r/MensRights27/07/19 03:10 AM
1

Alimony is unconstitutional.
/r/MensRights27/07/19 01:44 AM
2

Mmmm it’s in large the left.
/r/MensRights26/07/19 04:22 AM
4

It’s due to the lefts preconceived a prejudice notion that men are horny violent creatures that only think about sex. So a 13 year old boy chooses to have sexually with a younger woman. If the genders are reversed, it’s because the older one coerced, threatened, or forced himself on the girl. In reality, it’s the same in both situations. An adolescent unable to give there consent is taken advantage of.
/r/MensRights25/07/19 09:18 PM
1

What I’m saying is that if a woman said that to a woman, no one would care. If a man said it to a woman, then it’s inappropriate. It would also be appropriate if a woman said it to a man. But this was an interaction between two men of the same sex. You can’t say “if the genders were reversed” but only reverse the gender of one of the members involved. Furthermore, you should not adopt the “if we can’t do it then they can’t” mentality. It’s toxic. Two wrongs don’t make a right, didn’t your mom te…
/r/MensRights24/07/19 06:39 PM
1

Racism: prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one's own race is superior. There is no mention or implication of one race being superior to the other. Insensitive? Sure. Inappropriate? Absolutely. He makes very many inappropriate remarks. But racist? No. It is not racist. This societies rampant accusations of racism has lightened the gravity of the term.
/r/MensRights24/07/19 06:36 PM
1

You can’t run away that easy. I want you to admit you were wrong.
/r/MensRights24/07/19 12:02 PM
2

Ok, let me clear it up for you. Opinionated threads should always showcase a plethora of different viewpoints. How do you think facist countries ever came about? People blindly following what others say. Also, I’m not a trump fan but the dude isn’t racist. If you haven’t seen how the media super cuts clips of him, it’s pretty obvious that every thing he presented to support the claim that he is “racist” is extremely twisted.
/r/MensRights24/07/19 03:24 AM
1

I didn’t make any personal attacks? Just because I questioned the purpose of your comment you think I attacked you? This is EXACTLY what feminists do. Your point was unrealistic because it is an actual predator of the opposite sex telling a woman to take off her clothes. Point is, women wouldn’t make a deal out of it if it were another women saying that. I mean, Ellen degenres stares and makes comments about other women’s breasts and they don’t make a deal of it. And humor isn’t just “absurd.” D…
/r/MensRights24/07/19 03:15 AM
12

You’re wrong. If the genders were reversed it would be a woman telling a woman that and none of the feminists would care. And yes, there should always be different viewpoints. When everyone agrees that’s how subs become echo chambers, and this one is getting damn close.
/r/MensRights24/07/19 01:15 AM
6

There is a difference between humor and predatory behavior and if you can’t see it then there is something wrong with you. Oorrrrr more likely you are just using that as an unrealistic example to further your point. And it’s objectively funny. If it were a woman saying it to a woman (as this is man on man) it would be the same jest. Quit stopping to feminist level of triggered
/r/MensRights24/07/19 01:13 AM
6

No, and I didn’t say that it was. I’m saying we shouldn’t condemn jokes like these on either side. Instead of saying “well if we can’t make these sort of jokes about women you can’t make them about men” how about we say “I’m going to make these jokes and I do not care what feminists I make angry
/r/MensRights24/07/19 12:20 AM
10

Look at the comments. The vast majority are saying how disgusting it is, or how awful of a person Taiku is. I understand the real issue is the double standard. However, that is not what most people are complaining about.
/r/MensRights24/07/19 12:19 AM
7

The point of the post is the double standard. Taiku Waititi is a comedian, and Hemsworth is a sex symbol. Taiku is just laying it out. And it’s actually kind of funny. What isn’t funny is the way feminists would react if the roles were reversed.
/r/MensRights23/07/19 11:58 PM
12

Right but look at the comments. There are too many guys saying shit like “this is disgusting” etc etc. It’s not disgusting, it’s funny. The double standard is disgusting.
/r/MensRights23/07/19 11:57 PM
26

Right, the double standard is ridiculous. But the amount of guys on here saying “this is disgusting, blah blah blah” is just cringy. Very like the echo chambers of r/politics, where someone says something and everyone blindly agrees with it.
/r/MensRights23/07/19 11:56 PM
7

Thank you, finally someone else who sees it how it is.
/r/MensRights23/07/19 11:55 PM
24

Hold on just a second, Taiku is making a joke here. I do agree if it were the other way around feminists would flip shit, but let’s not scold him. That’s his humor
/r/MensRights23/07/19 11:54 PM
2

That’s not what I said. I said you couldn’t be a feminist and think men are disadvantaged.
/r/MensRights20/07/19 05:50 PM
1

I mean yeah I agree with most of what was said on that post, I just think that the person was clearly lying about their association with the left and feminism.
/r/MensRights20/07/19 04:41 PM
1

Yes, under the pretext that women are deprived. The person who posted that was either lying or that’s your alt account
/r/MensRights20/07/19 04:17 PM
2

You can’t be feminist and believe men are disadvantaged compared to women. Regardless of whether or not I agree with OPs point, the claim that she is a feminist and leftist is just bullshit
/r/MensRights20/07/19 03:59 PM
2

Yeah I completely mistyped that I meant that I didn’t have any issue with saying cunt. Don’t know why I said the other.
/r/MensRights16/07/19 05:37 PM
1

Repeatedly saying “you don’t get it” does not make your claim any more valid. I’m done debating this with a brick, it’s a waste of time. I urge you to get a girlfriend, you will cease being so lonely and bitter.
/r/MensRights11/07/19 04:25 PM
1

You said specifically that it was used in relation to domestic violence, which it was not. All you can say is “it’s used to dismiss a man’s opinions.” In certain circumstances, maybe. In other circumstances, not in the slightest. Considering that instance was the FIRST time the phrase was used in an official hearing, I would wager to say that it’s largely a non-issue.
/r/MensRights11/07/19 04:07 PM
1

And it is - women actually get paid a larger share of the money they bring in than the men do. It’s just that they bring in SO much less than men that they still make less despite the higher percentage.
/r/MensRights11/07/19 12:27 PM
1

No I’m in Georgia. Maybe it just had to do with my case in that he knew it would get dismissed but everywhere I shopped around was similar price
/r/MensRights10/07/19 09:25 PM
1

No, thread in reference to this string of comments. I did not say that was the theme of this post, but this thread. This thread that I started. This single chain of comments. And I was replying directly to your comments and responding to your critiques, so who is the one arguing fuck all? :thinking:
/r/MensRights10/07/19 06:30 PM
1

The very first comment on this thread was made by me. God damn
/r/MensRights10/07/19 06:19 PM
1

I started this thread in response to the fucking moose you halfwit
/r/MensRights10/07/19 06:16 PM
2

Well I mean that’s the case with pretty much all jokes. It’s making fun of a serious or semi-serious situation, but there is always a shred of “truth” to it
/r/MensRights10/07/19 05:47 PM
1

Eh, searching around it really isn’t low. I’ve found that there is this false perception of lawyers, probably due to Hollywood. Essentially, they are only working for their time. They don’t have operating costs, they don’t provide “products.” So let’s say my lawyer put 10 hours into my case - that’s still 75$ an hour. Pretty healthy. For a title IX hearing I wouldn’t wager it to be all that more expensive.
/r/MensRights10/07/19 05:25 PM
1

This whole thread is in response to that comment so get the fuck out. Also, you just said it was a feminist tool for belittling in all cases. You might want to rethink a few things.
/r/MensRights10/07/19 05:12 PM
1

Dude that article you provided was in reference to query made to an Australian minister about policy. It wasn’t in reference to any men’s rights movement and therefore was not dismissing any men’s rights. Do you have any fucking clue what you’re talking about?
/r/MensRights10/07/19 04:53 PM
1

If you think a cartoon of a moose mansplaining genders is an attempt to belittle men then you’ve fallen victim to this echo chamber.
/r/MensRights10/07/19 04:50 PM
1

In some instances sure, in most cases it’s just a jab.
/r/MensRights10/07/19 04:48 PM
-1

Mansplaining used to dismiss men’s issues? Yeah that didn’t happen. I don’t hide behind this app either. I would wager you’re one of those volcels who have sworn off women because of how the have “wronged” you. No different than feminists blind hatred of men. YOU are no better than they are. You can keep raging over this, I actually have to work. I’m done pandering to your ego.
/r/MensRights10/07/19 02:46 PM
0

Mansplaining: the explanation of something by a man, typically to a woman, in a manner regarded as patronizing or condescending. Domestic violence is not in the discussion of mansplaining. I never dismissed it as insignificant, I said it’s not relevant. Just as genocide isn’t relevant to this discussion. Should I get on a pedestal about the holocaust? No. It may have been a big issue, but it isn’t relevant to this discussion. And you have absolutely no clue who I am. You have no clue what I stan…
/r/MensRights10/07/19 02:23 PM
-5

Jesus here you go again. I’ve got a dick and balls, I am a vocal advocate for men’s rights. Getting offended by a mansplaining joke is not one of them. Everything you said about domestic violence is irrelevant to this discussion so I’m not going to address it further.
/r/MensRights10/07/19 02:04 PM
1

Maybe, I still don’t see anything wrong with joking about mansplaining.
/r/MensRights10/07/19 02:03 PM
-2

No, I’m a man. And I think you are being ridiculous. Jesting about mansplaining is not even remotely similar to calling someone a cunt or using the N word, though I really don’t have any qualms with cunt* The irony of this is rich though. You explaining something to me that I well know, and assuming I’m a woman because I disagreed with OP on the men’s rights sub. No subscriber should agree with every post. That’s how echo chambers are made. Hell, you didn’t even wait for me to answer whether I w…
/r/MensRights10/07/19 02:02 PM
3

No they didn’t? I just read the thread dude, the reply to his comment was just sarcasm, mocking OP for getting offended by it.
/r/MensRights10/07/19 01:09 PM
7

Oh geez, it’s a jest. Mansplaining is more of a meme than anything else. Even I make jokes about mansplaining. My favorite is to ask a woman if they know what mansplaining is, and they say yes, I tell them what it is anyways. But really, try not to get offended by everything. That’s what feminists do, they look for reasons to be offended. Don’t be like them.
/r/MensRights10/07/19 12:58 PM
1

I didn’t say per hour, it was 750 for the case.
/r/MensRights10/07/19 10:21 AM
46

Dude I had a stupid arrest based of the notion that I was a domestic abuser. In reality I just accidentally walked into a female neighbors apartment, and left immediately upon realizing it was not mine. Due to some stupid circumstance the cops were involved, even though my neighbor told them time and time again she did not want to press charges and wasn’t at all bothered by what happened. I too am in Georgia. I got a pretty good lawyer for 750$. I’m sure if you started a go fund me, there would …
/r/MensRights10/07/19 03:35 AM
12

Shit my cousin (bad side of the family) has had 4/6 children taken away because she was a shitty parent that did drugs and was on welfare. But here’s the difference: she’s poor and the father of all her children was black. Be white, don’t be poor, and most importantly: be a woman. Keys to law immunity
/r/MensRights09/07/19 03:04 AM
16

No it’s not. The most disappointing part is the bitch who wrote it published anonymously. If they truly believed what they were saying, there would be no reason to hide behind anonymity. But alas, it is just some twisted man-hatred demise bull shit.
/r/MensRights28/06/19 09:45 PM
2

No, I’m saying people are uninformed about these charges. They seem to think that they are in relation to her co fesses stuffing and robberies. They aren’t, they are about an entirely different issue. Saying “well other charges could come up” is not the same at all.
/r/MensRights25/06/19 06:16 PM
2

It very clearly states that her charges are in relation to the club incident in 2018. How can you say that it is otherwise??
/r/MensRights25/06/19 05:03 PM
2

Right but everyone thinks she’s seeing justice for all her drugging and robbing, but this is in relation to a much more recent incident involving two other women. This isn’t a men’s right issue Everything else she did is, but this assault was against two women
/r/MensRights25/06/19 04:43 PM
4

I’m not saying rule it out but everyone treats it as fact. That’s not how it started
/r/MensRights25/06/19 12:56 PM
6

No, she claimed she drugged and robbed men with the promise of sex, not that she raped them then robbed them
/r/MensRights25/06/19 12:55 PM
-2

Dude I’m with you. All I see is her saying she drugged and robbed men, and that she promised sex to lure them into their rooms from the club. Not that any of that is good, but I don’t see anywhere claiming she raped anyone. This sub is just a cuck nest sometimes
/r/MensRights25/06/19 11:47 AM
3

You are correct in saying you don’t know about this - you dont. Only charges she was indicted in was misdemeanor assault from a 2018 brawl at a club. This post isn’t real at all. All it took was a google search to figure that out.
/r/MensRights25/06/19 11:44 AM
31

I don’t think the claim that she had sex with them was ever made by any of the men she drugged
/r/MensRights25/06/19 11:42 AM
9

No, rapist has not gone bye bye. She never proclaimed to rape anyone, and the she was only indicted on charges from a 2018 brawl at a club, so misdemeanor assault. I hate her as much as anyone else, and she did some fucked up shit as a stripper. But, you are idiotic if you ever thought this was real.
/r/MensRights25/06/19 11:41 AM
3

“Men” doesn’t mean has a penis how fucking stupid are these feminist cunts
/r/MensRights13/06/19 04:57 PM
5

But is it good to be passionate about something if you are just always wrong?
/r/MensRights10/06/19 11:06 PM
2

Yes, I would agree with that. But AOC is probably projecting experiences of women in service industry to that of the professional industry (I mean she was a bartender)
/r/MensRights10/06/19 10:33 PM
-1

I mean it kinda is. AOC is just labeling male managers as creepy. That certainly is not the case. However, it’s not completely unfounded. There are many cases where it is true. There are some pretty inappropriate things being said at many workplace. However, it’s not the majority of cases, nor do I believe that it’s even an extremely notable percentage. It’s a gross exaggerating where the men who are doing inappropriate things are the minority.
/r/MensRights10/06/19 10:32 PM
10

Why are you a fan, she’s an ignorant babbling buffoon.
/r/MensRights10/06/19 07:21 PM
-2

I’ll just say - there are a lot of damn creepy dudes. My girlfriend’s manager will say things like “you look cute when you’re wet” to her when she has made it clear she only talks to him because he’s her boss (she’s in the service industry.” That being said, there are just as many well-meaning men who are just scared to be around women alone because women have a history of abusing the trust society puts in them. Edit: how is anything I said wrong? I swear, half of you think men can do no wrong. …
/r/MensRights10/06/19 07:20 PM
4

Shit on the toilet seat
/r/MensRights10/06/19 01:44 AM
1

I just want you to know I read 0 of that
/r/MensRights06/06/19 02:51 PM
1

I’ve had discussions with the guy before on this sub, and some of old arguments spilled over. Also, don’t really care about your two cents so you should probably save it.
/r/MensRights06/06/19 10:15 AM
1

Saying women look at men’s rights as a joke and just hate men on general is one I see here often. That’s not a precise statistic.
/r/MensRights06/06/19 10:09 AM
0

I have had conversations with him before on this sub. So no, not assumptions.
/r/MensRights06/06/19 12:30 AM
1

Hmmm I interpreted it differently. Regardless, he still acts as though men are completely different from women, and that only women act that way. Which simply is not true.
/r/MensRights06/06/19 12:13 AM
1

That was a direct quote and there is nothing you can say that will change the fact. You said feminists AND women in general are man-haters, to paraphrase. I agree with that about feminists, but not women in general. I mean you’re essentially saying your wife hates you.
/r/MensRights05/06/19 11:37 PM
0

“That’s feminism and women in general.” By definition, a generalization of women hating men. If I say “some women are awful people.” That is not a generalization. That is an observation. If I say “women are awful people.” THAT is a generalization. Hmm, everyone in Reddit seems to be married when it suits their argument. Truly fascinating. Holy shit, just realized I’ve had discussions with you before. I remember how truly idiotic you are.
/r/MensRights05/06/19 10:49 PM
0

I did not generalize guys. I don’t think you understand what a generalization is. I said there are a large number of guys who do something. That’s an observation. I didn’t say all guys, or guys generally do this. I more or less enumerated it. You on the other hand, said women hate men. THAT is a generalization. Tell me, do you have a girlfriend? Do you have healthy relationships with women? I’m guessing not, otherwise you would know that not alL women, I wouldn’t even say most, are against our m…
/r/MensRights05/06/19 10:01 PM
0

You’re too obsessed with your cries against feminism that you fail to realize you just generalized all women. Very many women are not these third wave feminists we oppose, yet you classify them as such for being a woman. Just try and see past your hypocrisy for one moment
/r/MensRights05/06/19 09:25 PM
1

This is exactly my point. Thanks for proving it
/r/MensRights05/06/19 09:14 PM
2

I don’t pay attention to them much anymore. In the past I would try to use logic In attempt to convince them what they are doing and thinking is wrong - never worked.
/r/MensRights05/06/19 08:32 PM
-2

Maybe I just see things you don’t, and you see things that I don’t. I’ve seen it way more than I’m comfortable with and contemplated leaving the sub because of it. But like you said, spurred incels. There are a LOT of them on Reddit. I think a lot are attracted to this sub as somehow to confirm their premonitions that women are shit and they are not to blame for their failures with women.
/r/MensRights05/06/19 07:48 PM
0

I don’t know man, I have been downvoted for defending women before. I will literally tell guys “you shouldn’t generalize the sex based in the actions of a few, it’s no better than what feminists do” and get in the one who gets downvoted to oblivion. I think the group that just hate women and think men can do no wrong are greater on this sub than many realize
/r/MensRights05/06/19 07:43 PM
2

There is absolutely a grey zone between harassment and seduction, it’s all perception. If I walk up to a girl and ask her if she wants to fuck, and she doesn’t - harassment. If she does - seduction. At least that’s how it currently is. That doesn’t quite make sense.
/r/MensRights05/06/19 06:41 PM
2

“I am willing to trust” no you are not. You said so yourself
/r/MensRights05/06/19 05:08 PM
2

You literally said you distrust all women, so which is it?
/r/MensRights05/06/19 04:03 PM
2

If you are naturally distrustful, you will lead a disappointing life. I’ve recently had a relationship ruined because of distrust, and not because I was untrustworthy. My ex’s previous boyfriend cheated on her, and she had problems trusting me simply because of his actions. I never gave her a reason to distrust me, yet she often did. So I broke up with her. That is what you have to look forward to. You are saying you will always distrust a woman, regardless of whether or not a particular one has…
/r/MensRights05/06/19 03:17 PM
4

You’re going to live a sad life if you go about thinking this way. You may not think so now, but it will wear you down.
/r/MensRights05/06/19 02:57 PM
3

For a lot of us that is the case. I also witness plenty of guys on here saying how evil and terrible women are. Like they just hate women for being women, very similar to feminist man hatred. It’s no better, and I think that’s what he’s getting at. There really are a lot of guys who mistake men’s rights for hating women, just as there are a lot of women who confuse women’s rights for hating men.
/r/MensRights05/06/19 02:54 PM
1

It does happened to men of all colors, and it happens to black men even more. Statistics support that men get convicted of crimes at a much higher rate than women, and black men get convicted at a higher rate than white men. Race is absolutely a factor here, as is sex. Learn some reading comprehension skills you Neanderthal.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 05:06 PM
1

The US doesn’t want slaves, but the effects of slavery are often felt today. Not in the sense that you would expect though. I believe it more has to do with the inescapable poverty. Slaves when freed did not generally have education, possessions, land, etc. It is easy to see how the quickly made a large part of the lower class. Then with lack of access to proper education to this day, it became very difficult for impoverished individuals to escape poverty. Poverty breeds crime. But that’s all be…
/r/MensRights31/05/19 05:04 PM
66

Race probably had a part to play too.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 02:34 PM
9

“Not all men are trash” is still by and large an insult to men. The proper wording would be “most men are not trash” or “men are often portrayed in an improper and incorrect way” or something of that nature. Saying “not all men are trash” is basically just saying “there are a few ones but mostly they suck”
/r/MensRights29/05/19 07:47 PM
36

Some women are just awful. My buddy drives for Uber. One time picking up a couple girls downtown they offered to give him a blowjob if he cancelled on them but drove them home for free. He’s married. He asked them to get out of his car and they started shouting at him and insulting him as he drove away. Sounds like a great deal to some people, but just imagine if you offered to eat out a female Uber driver. She would call the cops.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 03:10 PM
1

You can’t just swap dads at 5 years old, it doesn’t work that way. Despite that kid not being his, the guy is STILL the father to that child. Not biologically, but for all intents and purposes. And it’s not like you cannot have multiple children. What an outstandingly stupid suggestion. My dad had a daughter with another women before meeting my mom. Did having another child prevent him from having children with my mother? Am I fake? Do I exist?
/r/MensRights26/05/19 03:57 PM
1

Thank you for having a moral conscience. The majority of dudes on this thread don’t even have a shred of decency.
/r/MensRights26/05/19 02:28 PM
1

Mmmm no pretty sure I summed up my argument and all you could say was “you’re a slave” and the thoughts were of my own. You just don’t agree with them. Funny thing is, being a free thinker doesn’t mean agreeing with everything on this sub. I support men’s rights, and modern wave feminism terrifies me. That being said, this thread transcends men’s right and defaults to cruelty to an innocent child out of spite towards women. The majority of you rarely interact with women, as evidenced by your pur…
/r/MensRights26/05/19 02:27 PM
1

Dude at this point it doesn’t matter that the kid isn’t biologically his. And even if you say it’s punishing the wife, it’s moreso punishing the kid for the wife’s sins. In no world is that not punishing the kid, who now has no father. Parental fraud or not, that child will now have a broken childhood. I don’t know if you know what growing up without a father is like, but there is a reason that so many crimes today are committed by guys who grew up without a father. It would be morally wrong to …
/r/MensRights26/05/19 02:06 PM
16

6.0 but thick and I’ve never had a complaint. Women saying “anything less than 7” clearly don’t get laid.
/r/MensRights25/05/19 10:41 PM
2

no rebuttals, just insults - yeah, sucks to be me. Sucks to be spending the day with my beautiful girlfriend on the beach. I’m such a slave.
/r/MensRights25/05/19 05:17 PM
-1

You are so pitiful and it pains me that so many people on the sub are this petty. Who cares how it happened, but the dude was that kids father for 5 years. You want to punish that kid for something the mother did? Are you really that cold and callous? Cold you adopt a kid then just decide fuck it I don’t want to be the kids father anymore? You clearly have no grasp what parenthood is like, even remotely. Which also leads me to think you have never been intimate before. Hopefully for humanities s…
/r/MensRights25/05/19 01:37 PM
-4

Ok his wife sucks, and he has every right to leave her and I hope he doesn’t have to pay alimony. But to the kid, he is the father despite it not being biologically his. It would be the same as marrying a woman who had an infant from a pre-existing relationship, raising it for 5 years, then divorcing and saying “ah well it ain’t mine fuck this kid.” This is a terrible example of the message you are trying to convey
/r/MensRights25/05/19 12:23 AM
4

The thing that kills me is women can be “too drunk to consent” but men cannot be. Fucking baffling. I’ve had sex with women when I was hammered that I definitely wished I had not slept with. I’m not going around screaming rape because they didn’t rape me. We hooked up and I made a stupid decision when I was too drunk. Not like they were any less drunk. One specifically I had hooked up with the night before. She told me “I don’t do one night stands, I’m not done with you yet.” I’ll spare you the …
/r/MensRights25/05/19 12:10 AM
5

I’ve been staring my opinion on this for a while. This is what I think is happening. Rape statistics quoted by many people are often developed from polls. That’s is, let’s say 3000 women are asked if they have been raped/harassed. 25% of these or so say yes, they have. So not proven, not necessarily even reported. But those figures get applied to the whole population, and we hear how x% of women have been raped or sexually assaulted. Now we look at false rape statistics, which are only provided …
/r/MensRights24/05/19 10:30 PM
1

There is a fine line between courage and stupidity. Unless Menig a martyr gets you off or something..
/r/MensRights23/05/19 09:01 PM
-1

Right but this ain’t a high profile crime. If you hit the girl the court will undoubtedly see this as “defending the woman” so the guys who jump on you get nothing. I was at a bar about 6 months ago. Some girl slapped a guy (who was a regular that I saw weekly) and he punched her right back. Guess who got arrested? Guess who has battery on their record now?
/r/MensRights23/05/19 06:41 PM
0

Dude what the fuck you talking about “getting deals” let’s not pretend this is the crime of the century. What would happen here is the guy hits the girl back, the guy gets arrested. But if you want to be stupid, go ahead. Get arrested, get charged, ruin your life because you trust in the court system. Mine almost was, and I’m not making that mistake again. Not until things change.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 04:20 PM
20

I believe you have a right to defend yourself. But you are very cocky to assume you would just one hit knockout a bunch of people when they try to defend her. As if no one out there knows how to dodge a hook. I’m just saying the justice system doesn’t work when it comes to hitting a woman. Even in self defense most times.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 02:19 PM
4

Let’s see the fact then shall we? Since you are so confident in it
/r/MensRights23/05/19 02:13 PM
3

Let’s see the fact then shall we? Since you are so confident in it
/r/MensRights23/05/19 02:13 PM
7

Go back to grade school
/r/MensRights23/05/19 02:12 PM
3

Because it illustrates how biased the court system is against men and how much it favors women. Why do you think women seldom get convicted of domestic abuse?
/r/MensRights23/05/19 02:04 PM
21

So then explain how female child molesters repeatedly get community service or probation after having affairs with 13 year olds. Women have social treatment in court and statistic prove that.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 01:58 PM
2

I’ve lived in the south my whole life, albeit in larger cities and not small towns. And I wouldn’t be saying this if I didn’t see it so frequently.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 01:54 PM
14

I don’t think you understand what projecting is
/r/MensRights23/05/19 01:53 PM
2

?
/r/MensRights23/05/19 01:52 PM
33

It doesn’t matter dude. The court will find a way to justify the woman’s actions for slapping you and define your actions belligerent and aggressive.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 01:16 PM
73

I mean, who are the cops going to side with? In all likelihood you still end up in jail for assaulting a woman. The justice system is sexist towards men. Ain’t getting shit
/r/MensRights23/05/19 01:14 PM
8

Oh I probably would have hit her back but I’m just saying, at the end of the day I’m taking the raw end of that deal no matter what I do.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 01:12 PM
202

Yeah you’re really going to stick it to em while there are 8 people wailing on you
/r/MensRights23/05/19 12:01 PM
2

May not touch the bottom of a tuna can but it’ll blow out the sides
/r/MensRights10/05/19 04:01 PM
4

Yo on the real, 8 inches is bigger than most girl want anyways. Hell if my girlfriend likes my 3 inch warhammer surely long cock isn’t necessary
/r/MensRights10/05/19 02:46 PM
10

Sounds like we got a niceguy right here
/r/MensRights10/05/19 02:18 PM
1

I don’t need to, I’ll enjoy the company of my girlfriend tomorrow night while you sit in your cave masturbating, eating cheetohs, and wallow in your own self pity.
/r/MensRights10/05/19 01:24 AM
1

Considering there are multiple states where intent does matter in statutory rape cases, yes mens rea applies. So ya still wrong kiddo
/r/MensRights10/05/19 01:23 AM
1

There was never a possibility for a reasonable conversation, simply based on the fact that you are arguing to be right, and not to solve or discuss a matter. You do not understand the most basic definitions of common words. Pretty sure I’ve never seen feminists use these attacks. They are virgins just as much as you are
/r/MensRights10/05/19 01:20 AM
2

You should see the discussion I was having him earlier, trying to convince me I assumed a guy was a rapist when all I said was “do we know they didn’t have prior interactions? It’s possible he had sexually assaulted the girl at a prior date. We don’t know based off this article.” Dude is delusional
/r/MensRights10/05/19 01:18 AM
1

It still applies kiddo. It does not matter the degree of the crime in relation to men’s rea
/r/MensRights09/05/19 11:54 PM
1

Conveniently, you ignored every point I made again and focused on the thing that made you mad. If it weren’t true, you would have ignored it. Yet you did. Would you like me to tell you what a vagina feels like?
/r/MensRights09/05/19 11:53 PM
1

I quite literally said “we don’t know that it didn’t happen.” I didn’t imply that it did, I didn’t imply that it didn’t. I said we should hold off judgement until we know. You mentioned innocent until proven guilty - I fully support that, and the young girl deserves the exact same treatment. YOU are making the assumption that her claim was false. I was merely illustrating that we should jump to conclusions in assuming that her claim WAS false. Because we don’t know that. We also don’t know that …
/r/MensRights09/05/19 11:14 PM
1

He is absolutely right. Men’s rea is the intent or knowledge of a crime. If you mistake a girls age (EG girl had a fake and got into a bar even though she was 17), and you have sex with her, then you did not have mens rea of the crime. So while you are correct in the statement that doing something wrong knowing it was wrong is mens rea, you are wrong in your attempt to discredit his example. Again, you are arguing just because you want to argue.
/r/MensRights09/05/19 11:02 PM
2

Don’t waste your time with this guy. He argues just for the sake of arguing without truly understanding what he’s saying.
/r/MensRights09/05/19 10:53 PM
1

Like how you couldn’t respond to any of the points I presented that dismantled your argument. I honestly believe you realized you made a mistake halfway through the argument and knew you were wrong, but are too prideful to admit it.
/r/MensRights09/05/19 10:52 PM
1

I actually laughed at that. That isn’t an assertion. Assert: state a fact or belief confidently and forcefully. I didn’t state a fact, or an opinion. I didn’t say I believe he sexually assaulted her at a different time. I said he could have. That isn’t an assertion. I simply stated a possibility (he assaulted her) and another possibility (he didn’t and she lied). I laid out both possibilities, and I didn’t say I believed one more than another. I neither assumed nor asserted nothing. My stance is…
/r/MensRights09/05/19 09:56 PM
1

Yes, saying he may have committed a crime at a different time is not assuming that he did. I’m saying it’s a possibility. Let me help you. Definition of assume is: suppose to be the case, without proof. I did the opposite. My statement “he may have sexually assaulted her on another date” merely illustrates that her claim could have been referencing a time before the encounter on the bus. I also said it’s possible that she was lying in which case she should be punished. I proposed two possibiliti…
/r/MensRights09/05/19 09:13 PM
-2

No I did not? I said we don’t know. She claimed he sexually assaulted her. This article doesn’t say when she claimed it happened, but only days that the busses video footage doesn’t show anything happening. I did not draw a conclusion, I said based on this article we do not have the evidence to draw a conclusion. Please show me where there is conclusive evidence either way? There isn’t. Saying that she might have been referring to an earlier incident (that we don’t know about) is not making an a…
/r/MensRights09/05/19 08:47 PM
-1

I am literally not jumping to conclusions about this until. That’s exactly what I said. You must be misinterpreting something I said
/r/MensRights09/05/19 08:04 PM
-3

Alright alright alright. First, let’s take what we know. They didn’t see him sexually assault her, but that doesn’t mean it didn’t happen. This article includes no details other than they didn’t see it happen on the bus. Can we all think independently and maybe hold off judgement? If she made up the sexual assault claim, fuck her. She deserves to go to prison. But do we know that they haven’t had prior encounters and the sexual assault didn’t happen at an earlier date? This is what feminists do,…
/r/MensRights09/05/19 07:44 PM
1

Well the activity would be “filing false police report” which is too broad
/r/MensRights09/05/19 03:20 PM
1

That picture too just made me laugh so loud. I don’t know how some of these “facts” would be quantifiable either way
/r/MensRights07/05/19 09:29 PM
1

Chances are the cunt that wrote that is some fat ugly piece of shit that is just upset no guy wants to date her. I would stake my claim on it
/r/MensRights06/05/19 08:07 PM
3

I took it more of “I’m giving you a wet willie” After all the hawking at his ass of course
/r/MensRights29/04/19 09:24 PM
9

The source is this: false rape statistics are only counted on which ones are proven to be false accusations. The issue? They are never proven. Rape statistics is counted by claims, not by proven rapes. That’s the double standard they push
/r/MensRights28/04/19 11:11 PM
1

It’s like leaving my car unlocked: whose fault is it for stuff getting stolen? Not my fault. Someone committed a crime and stole my belongings. Could I have done something differently (like lock my car) that could have prevented it? Sure, I could have. That still doesn’t make it my fault. Same thing applies here. I noticed there are some folks on this sub that just blame women for everything because the think men’s rights means anti woman. That’s not true.
/r/MensRights28/04/19 04:13 PM
3

You couldn’t do a project on how teachers and professors have the tendency to project their personal beliefs on their students no matter how ignorant and ill-informed they are
/r/MensRights27/04/19 04:55 PM
0

Articles I haven’t even read? What are you even talking about? Convenient you had nothing relevant to say about this discussion
/r/MensRights26/04/19 10:17 PM
0

If it’s in South Africa I don’t give a fuck. But in the US that’s a completely different story. Everyone SHOULD care about the bakery because it was a civil rights issue. If it doesn’t affect you, you shouldn’t care? How about genocide? If you aren’t one of the victims, you shouldn’t care? You are honestly grasping at straws here kid, leave
/r/MensRights26/04/19 08:49 PM
1

It doesn’t affect me, but it’s still discrimination? What is your point? What about the national outcry when the bakery wouldn’t bake a wedding cake for the gay couple? Why were people who weren’t affected allowed to be upset about that, but I’m not allowed to be upset about this? Get out of here sexist
/r/MensRights26/04/19 06:46 PM
0

Cape Town South Africa? Or is there a Cape Town in the US? If this is in the US I would like to know the address and business name so I can report them.
/r/MensRights26/04/19 03:30 PM
2

The people downvoting you are incenels, my dude. More likely they are deranged basement dwelling virgins who couldn’t possibly fathom someone not wanting sex with a woman.
/r/MensRights24/04/19 11:14 PM
0

I mean essentially I was saying that it’s a functional world about wizards created by a nutjob so why should we care about it? It’s not worth getting upset over. It’s not worth calling out because JK does so many things that just make everyone scratch their heads. I don’t think this plot point shows any sort of discrimination against men, it’s just a dumb plot.
/r/MensRights24/04/19 06:32 AM
0

I essentially made the same point (that it doesn’t matter because it’s Harry Potter), yet I’m downvoted to hell because of the way I phrased it. This sub sometimes is swear...
/r/MensRights24/04/19 02:27 AM
-17

Dude it’s a fictional story about wizards and not about a man who was raped. Sure Voldemort’s father was justified to leave him but the story isn’t about his father, it’s not told through his perspective. Choose your battles, this is so incredibly insignificant we already know JK Rowling is a nut job Donvote but no one has a rebuttal. This sub is half legitimate and half dudes who just want to complain about everything because they don’t get laid
/r/MensRights23/04/19 08:32 PM
19

It was a 4 day marriage, and somehow she thinks she deserves spousal support. If this isn’t a scam by a money-grabbing whore I don’t know what is
/r/MensRights23/04/19 12:11 PM
0

Because women realized that they can claim they didn’t consent when they really just made a mistake in sleeping with someone that they now wouldn’t want to.
/r/MensRights19/04/19 02:29 PM
1

Digital rape - unwanted penetration with fingers. Also it was not confirmed his dick was never out of his pants, thats something you made up. Peace, trash
/r/MensRights12/04/19 10:38 PM
1

Answer me, why was her dress pulled up? You’re whole argument is based around there not being anything definitive that shows he raped her. That’s a fine opinion to have. However, you took it off the rocker and made the conclusive statement that he did not rape her. Even based on your own analysis, there is nothing that proves that. I really don’t want to discuss this any more. It’s clear you are not changing your mind. Just know that you are defending a convicted rapist.
/r/MensRights12/04/19 10:27 PM
1

Sorry, her dress was pulled up past her waist exposing her genitals. She wasn’t wearing pants. So let’s look at the facts: guy seen over a girl unconscious: he flees. Her dress is pulled up exposing her genitals. When he is pinned to the ground, he still has a boner. What exactly do you think he was doing to a girl who is unconscious? Asking if she’s ok? Gotta pull her dress up for that? You aware he also sent a picture of her bare breasts to his friends over group me? Purpose for that? Dude is …
/r/MensRights12/04/19 09:49 PM
1

Hey genius, read my comment again. HER pants were down.
/r/MensRights12/04/19 09:05 PM
1

Listen to yourself. Her pants were down. Her vagina was exposed. She was unconscious, and he had an erection. And he didn’t start immediately running. The guys came over and inquired why she was unconscious, at which point he started running. If he didn’t have his penis out, the intent was 100% there and he was caught mid act/just before. Stop trying to defend him. The dude fucking sick, and you trying to say he ain’t guilty of anything is just disgusting. If he isn’t a rapist, he’s an attempted…
/r/MensRights12/04/19 09:03 PM
8

Dude the chain of events literally has two witnesses who saw him having sex with her while she was unconscious. Brock Turner IS a rapist. This is not a battle you want to fight. All because you fight for men’s rights, as do I, does not mean you should believe man can do no wrong.
/r/MensRights12/04/19 03:59 PM
1

“Unless they want you to” and therein lies the issue many guys with good intentions have.
/r/MensRights10/04/19 01:18 PM
5

Outrageous that having to prove innocence can cost so much. Paying the fees shouldn’t be enough. She should have to pay his fees, pay the for the personal damages she caused the family, AND serve the time. She’s barely serving the time with that joke of a 3 year sentence.
/r/MensRights09/04/19 10:28 PM
2

This is equally a race issue. If he was a white man he probably would have gotten something less (though still undeserved).
/r/MensRights05/04/19 10:38 PM
1

Read the comment I replied to.
/r/MensRights30/03/19 11:54 PM
1

I agree. I think people like this are pretty much just projecting their own failures with women on the gender as a whole. I hate Uber feminists as much as the next guy. But there are so many women out there who aren’t like that.
/r/MensRights30/03/19 11:30 PM
5

Ehhh, a considerable number, sure. But most? I don’t find this to be true. I have a pretty liberal female friend (we lived together 6 months). She is very vocal about her views. She recently got pregnant (not married). She supports abortion, however, she decided that the only reason for her to get an abortion was out of convenience to her. So her and her boyfriend found a family looking and upon birth the child will go to them. I even got her to agree that divorce and child custody cases are ext…
/r/MensRights30/03/19 09:31 PM
3

At this point, if nothing comes legally (which is doubtful), I want to see her demonized by the public (which she deserves). Sadly, even that is doubtful.
/r/MensRights28/03/19 01:13 AM
17

I think my favorite quote (/s) was “But should we really be “uncancelling” Johnny after this? We can’t say for sure since his claims aren’t proven true in court yet.” So you want to believe Amber with no evidence because she’s a woman but to “uncancel” Johnny Depp it needs to be proven in court (as if the metric fuckload of evidence he has isn’t enough).
/r/MensRights26/03/19 02:10 PM
1

Lets call it what it is: false rape accusation victim exonerated 36 years later.
/r/MensRights26/03/19 01:37 AM
10

“I slapped him because I felt threatened” absolute bull shit. Classic feminist victim blaming bullshit. Attempt to claim victimhood at every possible moment.
/r/MensRights25/03/19 03:30 PM
0

I guess what I’m saying is I didn’t see a double standard from her side, unless she somewhere else mentioned that it was ok for women to express their masculine side. But like I said, I could just be misunderstanding that text. I don’t know
/r/MensRights19/03/19 06:57 PM
-2

Why is this on men’s rights though? This seems like a trans thing unless I’m misunderstanding the text
/r/MensRights19/03/19 06:50 PM
3

I don’t fucking get it. So people think that women and men must do the exact same things? We must have the exact same jobs, the exact same hobbies? Like fuck maybe more men just want to ride bikes how the fuck in their minds is that actually inequality
/r/MensRights14/03/19 12:51 AM
1

I think she’s being sarcastic trying to illustrate the ridiculousness of men trying to control women’s bodies. Only problem is, that is never what this is about. Abortion is not about controlling a woman’s body, it’s about not killing a premature human being.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 02:20 PM
2

Oh I see what you’re saying. I think at the very least you could make him rage a bit inside. Which he probably already is doing
/r/MensRights08/03/19 06:24 AM
0

How is approaching someone in a civil manner to have a discussion delusional?
/r/MensRights08/03/19 06:09 AM
5

That’s a method, but I would do kind of the opposite. I would approach him, after class and one on one. I would not do anything violent or abrasive. However, I would pretty much tell him that straight white men have personal struggles just as much as anyone else. I would tell him about my alcohol addition that almost caused me to lose my career, and my parents bankruptcy that nearly prevented me from getting a college education (I guess thanks army for blessing me with a scholarship). I would te…
/r/MensRights07/03/19 10:38 PM
5

No you’re absolutely right, don’t know who downvoted. While I think what she said was wrong, I don’t think replacing genders/color will do us any good in bringing awareness to the very real prejudice we often face. I think what needs to be conveyed (which is hard to do with the people making these claims) is that white men are not reviewing these movies at such a disproportionate percentage because of any sort of prejudice against the other sex and other races. It’s because white men are the one…
/r/MensRights07/03/19 08:35 PM
3

In other news, this same man makes more money than 16 female McDonald employees. Absolutely gross
/r/MensRights04/03/19 01:41 PM
0

Just for clarification, why did Rewind get so many dislikes? I just watched some of it, it was cringe and not good. But I didn’t see anything that would make me want to downvote it. Then again, I stopped watching around 5 minz
/r/MensRights16/01/19 04:15 AM
0

You’re back You can leave now. That’s an order young man don’t disrespect your elders
/r/MensRights05/01/19 05:33 PM
0

You said you were done, yet you’re replying. Are you really that desperate for the last word? I read nothing you just wrote, it’s been very clear you have no idea what you’re talking about
/r/MensRights05/01/19 04:21 PM
0

Yes they do mean the same thing. You don’t even know what the narrative I was referring to is, because you cared more about what I called it rather than what it actually was, even though I clarified it. And hey, congrats on losing your virginity (hopefully)! Whoopty doo, she said you have nice muscles! And the women I’ve been with said they love my large dick, though that doesn’t really matter as much either! Because keeping a women has much more to do with compatibility, emotions, and effort th…
/r/MensRights05/01/19 03:22 PM
0

THEY BOTH MEAN THE SAME THING BECAUSE IM TALKING ABOUT THE NARRATIVE I have clarified that already. And no, you go fuck yourself for trying to say you know what women’s desires are, when CLEARLY you do not. I’m not trying to be a dick, but you have no experience with women. What qualifies you to talk about their desires? Maybe part of the reason you’ve always been single is you don’t understand women well enough. Maybe that’s part of it. Have you thought about that before? You need help dude. Yo…
/r/MensRights05/01/19 03:01 PM
0

But I didn’t fuck up semantics. I said the narrative was mostly false. I made no blanket statements, but you did. If you didn’t know which narrative I was referring to, you should have asked. If this is how you normally are, I’m really not surprised you are alone on your birthday and have never had a girlfriend.
/r/MensRights05/01/19 02:50 PM
0

I NEVER said they didn’t desire them and I don’t know where you keep getting this notion. I have literally clarified multiple times now. My original comment was about the narrative being false. But you are too stubborn to differentiate. Like I think you don’t want to see how it’s different because you only care about being right. The narrative I am talking about is that if you are not 6+ feet tall with abs then you don’t get attractive women, because that’s all they want. That is what I am sayin…
/r/MensRights05/01/19 02:32 PM
0

Ok, at this point we are arguing semantics. When I said that girls only desire guys with abs is mostly false, and then said that it’s sometimes what they desire, etc.. I was trying to find different ways to say that physical composition is not the main thing women desired.
/r/MensRights04/01/19 10:16 PM
1

You completely have missed my points from the beginning. I have never said that it makes no difference. You can read every comment. Allow me to simply and briefly outline my thoughts for you, because this conversation is becoming cumbersome and I need to be more productive at work. 1) Being ripped with abs is not what all women desire. It can be a benefit, but it is by no means necessary. Confidence and personality > superb physical fitness 9 times out of 10. (note, this has nothing to do with l…
/r/MensRights03/01/19 09:27 PM
1

Ok 1 my point from the beginning was that girls don’t always prefer super ripped guys with 6 packs, so you highlighting me reiterating that was pretty pointless. 2 I’m not researching dominance stuff. That’s not how this works. YOU make a claim, YOU back it. I’m not doing that part for you. And I dont always see 6 foot chiseled hunks with super attractive chicks. The ones that I do see are usually with women who are equally fit. Those type of women aren’t at all intimidated. Also, most don’t lik…
/r/MensRights03/01/19 05:36 PM
0

What if I told you that taking the lead and being dominant is not at all related to your physique? Whatt?? I said that?? Whooaaa And I don’t think you understand what intimidating means. I’ll help. Intimidate: to frighten or overawe someone. And that’s exactly what being chiseled, 6 foot+, and abs is to the majority of women. Intimidating. You know why? Because it often brings out women’s own insecurities, and women hate being insecure. They can sit there and say “hey, that guy is really hot,” b…
/r/MensRights03/01/19 02:04 PM
0

Dude, have you interacted with ANY women? That’s not true for the majority of them
/r/MensRights03/01/19 01:00 PM
1

No, I’ve watched what they do as well. I’ve met my sisters boyfriends. I’ve seen the guys my close friends have dated. But unlike you, I am capable of having genuine platonic relationships with women that are not SOs of my friends. I have personally been and dated women that were far more attractive than myself. I have a feeling you don’t have similar experiences. I seen a lot of guys wanting to get in better shape, get ripped, etc so that they can be more attractive to women. Nothing wrong with…
/r/MensRights03/01/19 02:54 AM
-1

I don’t think I’ve ever heard that. I don’t think anyone likes being intimidated
/r/MensRights02/01/19 10:32 PM
5

I definitely believe a lot of rape claims are false. I also believe a lot of women ACTUALLY BELIEVE they were raped (when they weren’t) because of what society taught them. “If you’re under the effect of alcohol you can’t consent and you were raped.” “He tricked you into sleeping with him, he raped you.” “You didn’t want him to touch you but he did, he sexually assaulted you.” There are elements to truth with all of these statements. Guys that take advantage of very drunken women are rapists. Do…
/r/MensRights02/01/19 05:12 PM
1

I agree with pretty much everything you’ve said. I don’t think she was patronizing men because she’s probably saying those things because she had her own insecurities, and wants them to be masked my self appreciation. However, I was simply saying men don’t need to be chiseled with a 6 pack to be attractive to women. They really don’t. I peaked with women 2 years ago, I was in a FWB situation with one of the most beautiful women I know personally. She was honestly a 9.5/10. And she couldn’t stop …
/r/MensRights02/01/19 04:33 PM
5

I mean, I don’t think it’s patronizing. And I don’t think it’s untrue. I’ve dated now 3 very attractive women who I’ve considered out of my league. I’ve had a dad bod pretty much since high school, and I’m 24 now. I’ve had discussions with close female friends about this. The whole “women desire men with a 6 pack and chiseled biceps” narrative is mostly false. In fact, that can often intimidate women. This is directly from a close (and attractive) female friends mouth. Not to mention, a lot of g…
/r/MensRights02/01/19 02:43 PM
4

Well right off the bat I can tell you conservatives, as a whole (obviously there are exceptions), are more in line with the men’s rights movement than liberals. And I’m not talking politicians. I’m talking the people who self identify as one or the other. For example, my brother is extremely liberal. The only point he will concede to me is divorce laws and child custody battles. As far as prison, suicide rates, more dangerous jobs... this list goes on. He thinks they are all non-issues. And that…
/r/MensRights28/12/18 01:02 AM
7

I got banned from r/feminism. Remember that 16 year old who got 51 years in jail for murdering a guy? Well she was a prostitute. I suggested that she willingly entered herself into prostitution, and thus by shooting the guy who hired her she was murdering him and wasn’t acting in self defense. Their argument was that she could not consent and was therefore raped (legally, minors can’t consent, but she was willingly doing what she was doing). And so when I said she was willing, I got banned. Who …
/r/MensRights26/12/18 06:54 PM
5

Don’t know why someone downvoted you, but a lot of women definitely marry for money. No matter how much they deny it. There are more poor ugly guys with great personalities than there are rich ugly guys with “great personalities,” but for some reason the women are only attracted to one of those two subsets. Wonder why that is..
/r/MensRights21/12/18 01:31 PM
15

I got blasted the other day for saying a 16 year old who prostituted herself then murdered someone was willing because minors can’t consent. I agree that minors can’t consent to sex. But that was the feminists argument against the girl getting 51 years in prison. It was ‘self defense’ that she murdered the guy because she couldn’t really consent (even though she willingly prostituted herself). So that’s their argument. Since minors can’t legally consent, that means that they can’t willingly cons…
/r/MensRights21/12/18 12:30 AM
2

I also despise that they use stats of “unconvicted” and “unreported” rapes as fact. I have no doubt that a lot of them are telling the truth. But I don’t believe every single one. For instance, and not to sound callous, my sister claims to have been sexually assaulted. What actually happened was... not quite that in my opinion. When she came to me sobbing one day and began to tell me my fists were clinched ready to hunt this guy down. But as I got the details, I was barely able to prevent myself…
/r/MensRights06/12/18 08:51 PM
4

Maybe they think false accusations don’t happen because the only data on false accusations are ones that were proven to be false. That is, if someone (falsely) makes a rape claim, and the accused is convicted, then it will be etched in history as rape. If someone makes a false accusation but the the accused is proven innocent, or there is not enough evidence, AND the accuser is not PROVEN to have made a false allegation? Then nothing. I think there are plenty of false allegations. They just have…
/r/MensRights06/12/18 07:52 PM
1

I love when feminists and left wing drones tell me false accusations rarely ever happen and men rarely ever get unjustly imprisoned. Then they provide these BS stats that are just innacurate, because the majority of people wrongfully imprisoned are still in prison!!
/r/MensRights01/12/18 02:58 PM
15

I used to think the same thing but sadly, majority of feminists are not this way. Today, feminism is about hurting men. The outliers are the ones who are rational about equality. And that makes them the minority of feminists ergo NOT true feminists.
/r/MensRights01/12/18 01:32 PM
2

If you look in my post, you will see I called her representative elect. Genius. Ben Shapiro is not looking for publicity. He has plenty of that. He always wants to challenge people on issues he believes they are wrong on. Have you ever listened to her speak? She is definitely incompetent. She 100% got the job because of her sex. You haven’t been seeing all the “we need more women in office” comments and tweets?
/r/MensRights01/12/18 01:28 PM
5

An excellent rebuttal
/r/MensRights01/12/18 03:41 AM
4

She doesn’t take office until January 2019 and the request was back in August or somewhere around then. Debates are a well known platform for politicians running for office to show why they deserve office. She got elected simply because she is a woman. She is nigh incompetent. I think this pretty much proves you hadn’t the slightest clue what you were talking about and just wanted to defend the democrat.
/r/MensRights01/12/18 02:03 AM
5

What an idiot
/r/MensRights01/12/18 02:01 AM
26

You absolutely don’t have to. She could have just said no or ignored the request, but that would have made her look weak. So she spun this narrative to portray Shapiro as some sort of womanizer/Predator
/r/MensRights30/11/18 10:39 PM
11

It’s 100% just to preserve the victim narrative. She knows Shapiro wild embarrass her
/r/MensRights30/11/18 10:37 PM
23

That ‘fucking idiot’ just got elected to the House of Representatives. That’s the concerning part.
/r/MensRights30/11/18 07:03 PM
1

LOL you’re quite the trip. You know your brain probably needs a rest, it’s been working overtime trying to keep up
/r/MensRights11/11/18 03:26 PM
1

You Re: reeeeeee.exe
/r/MensRights11/11/18 01:49 PM
1

I asked you to answer two yes or no questions objectively and you went into an autistic rage. That sort of behavior is not conducive to having constructive discussions. I’ll leave, since you clearly can’t be civil. Goodbye, my child. My virgin child.
/r/MensRights11/11/18 01:36 PM
1

Do women carry purses? Do women go shopping more than men? Answer those two questions objectively
/r/MensRights11/11/18 01:14 PM
1

Because my anecdote is much more plausible. Women ALWAYS have an extra bag. Men do not. Women go shopping much more frequently than men. Because of these two commonly known facts, it is much more likely that women place shit on a seat next to them much more frequently than men do. You just conveniently “observed” the opposite because you wanted to disagree. I’m sure you haven’t actually observed the opposite, you just wanted to make that point so you made up some bullshit.
/r/MensRights11/11/18 01:08 PM
1

More men do... where’s your evidence? If that isn’t some made up anecdotal bullshit, I don’t know what is. And I don’t think you understand what a straw man argument is. I’m not distracting from anything, so look that one up. Guys go shopping much less that women do. That’s a pretty well known fact. Women are MUCH more likely to have extra bags on them. They all carry purses. Guys care wallets in their pockets. So I think you saying men doing it more is just absolute bullshit that you are making…
/r/MensRights09/11/18 01:40 PM
1

“The gayest men in the world are also the manliest.” Mmmm sounds like an opinion to me. I’m not trying to appear masculine, I could care less about what others feel about me. I just think you have a disgusting perversion. This isn’t about me, this is about you being a fucking freak. I’m not saying men have to be one certain way, but pretending to be a woman is just wrong. I will never accept that, and I don’t have to. I don’t have to be tolerant of those things. I’m tolerant of very many things.…
/r/MensRights09/11/18 01:37 PM
1

? I’m not wearing a thong. I’m not altering my natural body to tuck my junk. I’m going to be comfortable. You’re an unbearable twit. Enjoy cross dressing. Fucking weirdo.
/r/MensRights08/11/18 11:22 PM
1

It’s about the hypocrisy of feminists calling out men for “manspreading” but you won’t hear a single one of them call out a woman for something like this. Feminism is about man hating these days.
/r/MensRights08/11/18 10:46 PM
1

That’s not what I’m even arguing. If I spread my legs enough to be comfortable, and I’m touching someone else’s legs, then that’s not an issue. I’ve been on subs where it’s literally nut to Butt and you just have to accept it.
/r/MensRights08/11/18 09:58 PM
1

What in the fuck? YOU make the choice to wear uncomfortable panties. And you can make that choice. But it isn’t even slightly comparable to having dangling sacks of meat between your legs that cause you tremendous pain in certain circumstances. So don’t even try to compare them. And what does manspreading have to do with feminine expression? You’re grasping at straws here and really just reaffirming our beliefs that feminists are stupid cunts. How bout you express yourself out of this sub.
/r/MensRights08/11/18 09:29 PM
1

Men spreading their legs a little isn’t even inconsiderate. And because it shows a double standard. Because this isn’t “one inconsiderate person.” This is an example of what many do. I see this shit all the time. And I can guarantee you no feminist has ever called out another woman for doing this, but guys spreading legs a little for comfort of course they will
/r/MensRights08/11/18 04:51 PM
2

It won’t “crush” it but my point is that it is very uncomfortable. Especially if you have larger testicles and large thighs. I need to spread my legs open to not be uncomfortable.
/r/MensRights08/11/18 04:51 PM
1

We are also here to call out bullshit feminist claims and rhetoric.
/r/MensRights07/11/18 10:14 PM
24

I can’t understand how they don’t realize that 1) man spreading isn’t about “claiming space” for ourselves but instead not crushing our fucking testicles and 2) they are fucking hypocrites.
/r/MensRights07/11/18 10:13 PM
1

Well considering 119 people agreed with me and 0 agreed with you, I would say you’re the moron. Good day to you, buddy. I won’t be reading or replying to any more of your dim witted replies.
/r/MensRights02/11/18 01:16 AM
2

You’re still here? Isnt it your bed time?
/r/MensRights01/11/18 11:45 PM
3

You’re on a passive aggressive rage filled rant, and it’s not worth my time to respond to anything you’re saying, especially when you’re wrong.
/r/MensRights01/11/18 11:43 PM
3

This isn’t working out for you too well buddy.
/r/MensRights01/11/18 11:05 PM
5

Consent: give permission for something to happen. IE I am giving myself permission to get behind the wheel. Don’t think so linearly.
/r/MensRights01/11/18 10:02 PM
3

It’s disgusting
/r/MensRights01/11/18 09:32 PM
8

Well my point is that it’s a conscious decision you make to drive. So in that sense, it requires your “consent” to drive, no matter if you’re drunk or not. I think applying this sexually, if you make the decision to sleep with someone, drunk or not, that’s still a decision you made. Now, if you are inebriated past the point of making decisions (IE falling over, can’t keep eyes open piss drunk), then you are still making that decision. It may be a bad decision, but a decision nonetheless. I’ve sl…
/r/MensRights01/11/18 09:32 PM
3

That’s obviously different because the person gave absolutely no consent, because they were passed out.
/r/MensRights01/11/18 06:08 PM
159

Here’s something for SJWs and Feminists: you can consent to driving while drunk, and get your life ruined for it... but you can’t consent to sexual intercourse while drunk? This is where they lose me. You either CAN or you CANT consent to anything while drunk. The “I couldn’t truly consent because I was drunk” is just so unfair to anyone, because if a woman decides she made a mistake, and alcohol was involved, boom. Rape. I couldn’t consent because I was drinking hurrr durrr I know she’s standin…
/r/MensRights01/11/18 03:23 PM
2

It’s fucking infuriating that they, after having evidence of her saying she would lie about it, offered him a “deal” to drop rape charges if he plead guilty to misdemeanor assault. WTF?? He’s not guilty and they know it, but they still want to throw charges on him. This is absurd.
/r/MensRights24/10/18 02:31 PM
0

So you’re saying its a consent issue for people? IE not specifically a men’s rights issue? Got it. I think if you have never been tea bagged in high school, or had your ass slapped, you probably didn’t have any friends. The dude put his face in another guys crotch and laughed about it. I see this all the time. It’s a non issue.
/r/MensRights21/10/18 12:10 PM
0

No, it’s absolutely not. If a guy slapped another’s guys butt, you are not going to be throwing a fit saying it’s a men’s rights issues. Guys do that with each other. If it was a girl going out and grabbing guys butts I would see the point, but here no. It’s absolutely not a men’s right issue you ignoramus. Quit being like the feminists and crying sexism anytime there is something you don’t like.
/r/MensRights21/10/18 11:38 AM
-2

Ok but this is a man on one of his best male friends. Would you say the same about a woman on another woman’s crotch? No.
/r/MensRights20/10/18 09:05 PM
-3

No you’re trying to say this is a Men’s right issue when clearly it’s not. Don’t be like feminists who will take anything bad that happens to a woman and blame it on the patriarchy. That’s how you’re coming across.
/r/MensRights20/10/18 06:41 PM
-2

To make this post even MORE pitiful, it was OPs comments that was downvoted, and he’s trying to play it off as though he stumbled across someone else’s comment.
/r/MensRights20/10/18 06:15 PM
-6

The guy put his face in a friends crotch. If you aren’t T-bagged in high school then you had no friends.
/r/MensRights20/10/18 06:12 PM
-1

Don’t try reasoning with this guy. He’s jumping the gun on a non issue.
/r/MensRights20/10/18 06:05 PM
1

You can never have someone’s consent to a prank, otherwise it wouldn’t be a prank. If they cross the lines it’s one thing, but I really don’t think they crossed a line.
/r/MensRights20/10/18 06:04 PM
17

I would laugh if my friends did it to me. If it was someone I didn’t know, or didn’t like, then I would be pretty disturbed... but close friends? I don’t really see why it’s a big deal. You can downvote me all you want but it seems like it’s kinda grasping at straws
/r/MensRights20/10/18 03:32 PM
1

As a man who previously struggled with coming to terms with my emotions and being able to express them to significant people in my life... I recently had the most fulfilling relationship ever solely due to the fact that I allowed myself to be vulnerable and communicate my feelings. I wish I could say we were still together but an unfortunate circumstance separated us. I just wish I knew how to express my feelings sooner. I wish that I had never felt the need to “be a man” and mask my emotions. S…
/r/MensRights18/10/18 02:06 PM
1

I was just replying to the one comment about choosing to go Monday-Thursday, so he can miss be work week and slide into the weekend.
/r/MensRights17/10/18 01:04 AM
25

And then be broke because you’re in jail during the work week???
/r/MensRights17/10/18 12:44 AM
1

Can’t play video
/r/MensRights10/10/18 02:46 AM
4

What’s even more gross about this is the evidence, or lack there of. Semen found in the underwear of the woman was her boyfriends, but the boyfriend was never brought in for DNA test. Why? 2 months earlier he shot one of these men convicted and could not be found. Side bar, this woman was hiding a fugitive essentially, but no charges brought on her. Continuing on, the physician who examined her found no signs of assault, which she claimed happened. Hmmm. Also, she gave widely conflicting reports…
/r/MensRights10/10/18 02:41 AM
6

If you’re referencing yourself, then it is absolutely dropping. Cannot determine whether an accusation is is true without proving the event actually occurred. That’s the fucking point. Just making an accusation doesn’t make it true. For some reason many women think it does.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 03:52 AM
3

I saw someone claiming that rapes are 95% done by men. And that’s the issue, it’s actually around 60% men 40% women committing rape, but people just believe the bullshit and believe it’s mostly male on female when that’s only about half of all rapes, if that.
/r/MensRights24/09/18 01:19 PM
1

Ah, so all the other convicts can have rehabilitation? The murderers, the abusers, the 3 times DUIs? They can get rehabilitated for violent/life ending crimes, but someone who commits a sex crime cannot? Did you know, 1 of every 6 women has been the victim of attempted or completed rape, but only 6% of perpetrators end up in prison? You know what that means? 94% of people who attempted or completed rape are still out on the streets without society knowing. Read some more stats here And that’s di…
/r/MensRights11/09/18 12:17 AM
1

How is it not a mental illness? Can you explain that? Can you explain why the US has the highest percentage of repeat offenders of any 1st world country? Pretty convenient you completely ignored that.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 10:36 PM
1

No, it’s not stupid. Why does the US have the highest percentage of its population in prison? Why does the US have the highest percentage of repeat offenders? It’s because of stupid fucks like you. Stupid fucks that think any crime committed should define the rest of their life. Pedophilia is a mental illness. He needs help. The justice system hands out his punishment. If you think that it should remove him of every opportunity for life, you might as well just suggest killing criminals like him,…
/r/MensRights09/09/18 10:02 PM
2

You’re missing the point. Go read some of the comment threads on here. If you want to leave, good riddance.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 09:54 PM
0

What about the aftermath of someone who commits suicide? It’s a mental illness and those individuals need to be rehabbed lest they do it again. Not to mention what it does to society. It’s not secret our prison system is extremely flawed, and a large percentage of repeat offenders is part of it.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 07:17 PM
0

That’s my issue. People will complain about the prison system and how much money it costs tax payers, but not give a shit about convicts trying to re-establish their lives. They made grave mistakes, yes. But how can they be expected to not be burdens on society if they aren’t given the chance?
/r/MensRights09/09/18 05:56 AM
1

I actually have had this discussion with a friend and have laughed about it
/r/MensRights09/09/18 04:23 AM
2

That’s bullshit and you know it. Attraction to minors is a mental illness just as much as depression or suicidal tendencies is.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 03:11 AM
1

You’re asking me on a thread. I didn’t bring it up on this thread, but you can read through all the comments and find where I did.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 01:47 AM
3

He wasn’t featured, he was an extra. No one would know him from squat
/r/MensRights09/09/18 01:25 AM
1

Right, it’s laziness of American society. It’s too easy to cast them out instead of trying to help them.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 01:03 AM
2

“What other non sex offender felons have you brought attention to?” How is it so hard for you to understand? You did not ask me to bring attention to others. You asked me which ones I had brought attention to. As in past tense. And I answered that. You are not even understanding the question you asked.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 12:59 AM
3

That’s exactly what I’m saying. It’s not only torture for them but a literal burden on us. However, I do not think we should murder them we need to fix that And yeah, it’s just as much a mental illness as depression or suicidal thoughts
/r/MensRights09/09/18 12:57 AM
3

No, you asked me what others I have brought attention to. You didn’t ask me for others. Must be hard for you to live with sub 100 IQ
/r/MensRights08/09/18 11:55 PM
0

Me? No. Never been convicted of any crime.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 11:54 PM
3

This is one instance of it that I was bringing up. I didn’t exclude any others, this was an example. Which is why I have said “convicted felons” and not “convicted sex offenders”
/r/MensRights08/09/18 11:28 PM
7

Right, it is. However, men receive much stricter punishments from our “justice” system, so they kind of experience this most.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 11:27 PM
5

I’m not defending him for pedophilia. What’s the point of our justice system if we continue to punish after they complete their sentence? That’s like if you got a speeding ticket, you pay and and take the points, but then your employer says “oh you’re an unsafe driver so we are going to fire you because you shouldn’t drive to work”
/r/MensRights08/09/18 11:26 PM
7

This is a recurring problem with convicted felons and it’s a major issue. Regardless of what they did in the past, they can be rehabilitated to be a functional member of society, yet no one wants to let that happen and they end up being burdens on society. If y’all want it that way, should just execute them.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 11:24 PM
3

I’m supporting felons who have already been punished.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 10:33 PM
7

What about murderers? Attempted murders? DUIs? The list goes on and on kid.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 10:23 PM
1

Oh, are you confused? We aren’t discussing anything at this point. I’m telling you how stupid you are.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 10:22 PM
8

How come other 1st world countries can focus on rehabilitation with convicts and ensuring they aren’t repeat offenders, but we can’t? Are you that stupid? You realize if you don’t try and fix their issues, they are going to end up doing the same thing. It’s a cruel cycle, when you cast someone out from society. You should really do some research, you are coming off as very ignorant.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 10:14 PM
2

Was, but you’re dumb. Cons need work too, otherwise they end up costing you and I money. Plus, they are still humans kid
/r/MensRights08/09/18 10:05 PM
3

Not really. He served his time and took the punishment. Doesn’t matter what you as a coworker want. What you low IQ turds don’t understand is that with these felons need to be able to recover their lives. They need to be rehabilitated. If they don’t they end up back in jail and a burden on tax payers.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 10:04 PM
2

No. A consequence would be the way everyone looks at you. Fired because a co worker complained is just wrong. What can he do if a coworker complaining gets fired? He was an extra, not a lead role. Get the fuck over yourself. You decided before you even read anything that you wanted to argue about it. I’m done discussing this with you
/r/MensRights08/09/18 09:07 PM
6

Besides the point. He went through the justice system, served his punishment. Convicted felons don’t have an opportunity to reclaim their lives. They are shunned from society, and end up being a burden on the taxpayers
/r/MensRights08/09/18 08:35 PM
6

That’s just inherently wrong. Never said I thought he should be a teacher, but he shouldn’t be removed of every single possibility to work. How are you, and adult (presumably) male, at risk from a pedophile? Or an adult female? It’s double punishment outside of what was dictated by government.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 08:30 PM
6

So what you’re saying is he shouldn’t be allowed to work ever again?
/r/MensRights08/09/18 08:14 PM
5

It’s for public knowledge, not to fire him from jobs. You do realize Hollywood is full of pedophiles and rapists and sex traffickers?
/r/MensRights08/09/18 08:06 PM
6

And that’s the punishment is it not? You’re just adding onto how he should be punished. Outside of the justice system.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 07:53 PM
6

Don’t think he molested anyone, it was basically like sexting an adolescent. Anyways, I knew a guy in college who got convicted of the same thing, and it was sketchy as fuck. It wasn’t as black and white as it sounds upon reading the evidence. He was on some sort of online dating app. Not tinder, but among those lines. A bit more extensive. Well he matched with a girl he thought was at least 18. Heavy implications she was older. Like on a college campus with alcohol. Well in the profile somewher…
/r/MensRights08/09/18 07:15 PM
6

He was setting a 14 year old online. It’s gross and fucked up yes. But he served the punishment he was given. He spent time in jail, and he will have to register as a sex offender for life. Is that not enough? Treating ex convicts like this is a burden on the taxpayers, as many of these guys will often end up in jail again, because society would rather just shun them than try to rehab them. Sexual attraction to adolescents is just as much of a mental illness as suicidal thoughts and depression. …
/r/MensRights08/09/18 07:04 PM
16

He served his time. You think he should continue to be punished for life?
/r/MensRights08/09/18 05:52 PM
4

Yeah I understand the concern. I think the director should have made that known to cast members working with him. However, that is fault of the director. Not the convicted felon.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 04:34 PM
3

You’re in one state, and somehow think their aren’t 49 others? And now I’m even more confused...you’re saying felons have easier access to jobs no but you support this dude getting fired because of his past convictions? Pitiful.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 03:48 PM
15

You’re in one state, and somehow think their aren’t 49 others? And now I’m even more confused...you’re saying felons have easier access to jobs no but you support this dude getting fired because of his past convictions? Pitiful.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 03:29 PM
17

Provide your source for these claims. What help are you referring to? Because I’m pretty sure there is a section on almost all job applications asking if you’ve been convicted of a felony. It’s pretty much an automatic disqualification if you say yes (which you are required to do by law if you are a felon). There are millions of convicted felons who can’t get jobs. I think you should educate yourself instead of just making shit up
/r/MensRights08/09/18 03:17 PM
33

But he didn’t rape anyone? Read the article. Plus, my point is that convicted felons get absolutely no chance after prison. It should be about rehabilitation. The punishment was serving their time in prison. Men make up a vast majority of convicted felons, and people with opinions like yours are why they never get a chance after they served their time and 1) end up back in prison 2) end up homeless on the streets or 3) end up dead.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 03:08 PM
1

I don’t know. What I do know is that my girlfriend is the first one in her generation to not get pregnant in her teens, if that says anything
/r/MensRights14/08/18 05:10 PM
5

Well, I’ve made the joke too. But this is different. She pretty much”jokingly” said sure can fuck me over and potentially get put in jail
/r/MensRights14/08/18 02:45 PM
0

You’re a joke, I’m done with this conversation. Foreskin is useless, bottom line. Deuces
/r/MensRights14/08/18 12:05 PM
1

Lots of females do. I don’t attempt to understand.
/r/MensRights14/08/18 12:04 PM
2

You can ban bullshit but that came out of the blue last night, after I slept the whole day taking her around to doctor appointments.
/r/MensRights14/08/18 12:02 PM
1

You keep saying sensitivity, but that hasn’t been proven and is heavily contested. Protection from the elements is archaic. We aren’t running around naked like cavemen anymore. Visual indicator of arousal? Like an erection doesn’t do that? All the functions of the foreskin are insignificant. Much like nipples on men. Tattoos are reversible, sure. If you have the money, can stand the pain, and it can take up to a year. It’s an extremely deliberate process. And I did answer the question. You must …
/r/MensRights14/08/18 03:43 AM
0

Because it’s literally the perfect size now. Can’t get in without lube but once it is we are good. Make it girthier, as you say it would, and there’s more struggle (which it wouldn’t actually add girth). And it’s ok because it’s a very minor modification to get rid of an unnecessary piece of skin that truly serves no real purpose. How many people look back and say “omg I wish I wasn’t circumcised this SUCKS?” Probably no one. It’s like getting kids ears pierced. It’s very minor. It’s not like a …
/r/MensRights14/08/18 03:10 AM
70

Yeah she’s just joking and sent it to me. I don’t know what her grandma is trying to convey. That she can fuck me over if she wants to I guess
/r/MensRights14/08/18 02:46 AM
0

With tremendous effort and pain..
/r/MensRights14/08/18 02:27 AM
0

You know vaginas have different sizes much like penises do, right?
/r/MensRights14/08/18 02:24 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter