TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Mac4491 Archive

View 2 posts and 479 comments by Mac4491 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
126

DiscriminationMac4491/r/MensRights08/04/17 10:44 PM
5

Mac4491/r/MensRights17/03/17 09:34 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

She’s probably like 14. So unless you’re also 14….that’s fucked up.
/r/AntiFeminists27/02/22 01:28 PM
2

Terrible application of fake tan.
/r/AntiFeminists27/02/22 01:26 PM
1

This has nothing to do with misandrist or feminism. It’s just a little chav (not sure on the Irish term for them) girl being a racist cunt.
/r/AntiFeminists27/02/22 01:25 PM
4

Pretty sure that’s a screenshot from an episode of Supernatural which has flashbacks and the boy is playing a younger version of Sam Winchester. I have no idea why that image was used for this.
/r/AntiFeminists20/12/21 04:06 PM
20

If the woman wants to abort then the woman gets to abort. It sucks for the man who wants the child but pregnancy can permanently affect a woman’s body and even in extreme circumstances kill her. Nobody, man or woman(except the pregnant one), should have a say on whether or not to keep the child.
/r/MensRights17/08/20 09:55 AM
-1

Go for it then. Prove your point. It’s a skit. Chill.
/r/MensRights13/04/20 06:31 PM
1

she probably wouldn't have been groped by a radio host Male stars get groped all the damn time in full view in public and nobody gives a shit.
/r/MensRights03/03/20 10:12 AM
0

Oh come off it. It’s Robbie fucking Williams. He was into it.
/r/MensRights09/12/19 12:23 PM
-3

No he wouldn’t. His friends would see him as some kind of legend for a while. Everyone will have forgotten it even happened within a week or two. Stop being so ridiculous.
/r/MensRights09/12/19 12:16 PM
2

Then why does he go back for more? If he was truly uncomfortable then he’d sing while keeping his distance. It’s all part of his act.
/r/MensRights09/12/19 12:12 PM
-2

Would they though? Really? If anything it’ll be talked about for a day or two in the media and then nothing would come of it. Be realistic.
/r/MensRights09/12/19 11:54 AM
-2

Nobody was saying that he was, that's not the point. The tweet in OP's post literally says he was sexually assaulted by this woman. He very clearly was not.
/r/MensRights09/12/19 11:22 AM
-3

would it be okay if he gropped her on stage during a performance? You're right, he'd get labelled a perv for being so into it. However, lets not pretend any female celeb doing what Robbie Williams did wouldn't be slut shamed in the media. The both of them would be condemned for making a soft porno.
/r/MensRights09/12/19 11:21 AM
1

Did you actually watch it? He invites her on stage. He invites her to do whatever she wants. When she starts getting a little bit handsy he just spurs her on and even mounts her at one point. It's all part of his act. If he was truly uncomfortable he would've kept his distance but he went back for more. The only double standard would be in how this would be viewed in the media if the genders were reversed. The female celeb would be slut shamed for being inappropriate and the male guest would be …
/r/MensRights09/12/19 07:54 AM
25

It would certainly be looked at differently if that was a man doing all that to a woman. However, with context it's quite clear that Robbie Williams was not only in to it he actually tells her to do whatever she wants. It's all part of his "act". Lets not pretend though that a woman celeb would get away with allowing a guy to do this to them. She would be criticised for being highly inappropriate and the guy would be labelled a perv. Both would be condemned for basically making a "porno".
/r/MensRights09/12/19 07:50 AM
-2

As much as I disagree with the practice it doesn’t mean they can't earn the degree. This just makes it easier for them to get on to the course in the first place. EDIT: Why the downvotes? I'm not defending this move at all.
/r/MensRights30/08/19 12:18 PM
-3

It's amazing that some people here don't understand that when it's a woman who's accused.
/r/MensRights29/08/19 08:54 AM
16

Guy gets accused of rape - name is blasted everywhere while the accuser remains anonymous. Turns out she was lying the whole time - Guy's reputation is still ruined no matter what and she still gets to remain anonymous. It makes no sense. Why are they protecting her identity?
/r/MensRights02/08/19 10:58 AM
1

Taika Waititi didn't write this article or express these opinions. Having a female Thor has nothing to do with casting out the male leads. It's a very popular comic book arc from 5 years ago so why not adapt it for the big screen? Focus on the article and the tweet. That's the real issue. Having a female Thor is not a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights29/07/19 01:53 PM
3

Yes, it did. I remember once distinctly telling someone on this sub prior to the film's release that regardless of quality it would make $1b easily. I was mocked and downvoted. Just because it wasn't rated hugely by critics or audiences doesn't mean much. Grossing over a billion and being in the top 25 highest grossing films of all time is "doing well".
/r/MensRights29/07/19 01:50 PM
1

I wish people here would at least know a little bit of what they're complaining about. Female Thor was a very popular and well received story line in the comic books starting in 2014. This isn't anything new. As with most superhero films they are using a loose adaptation of a popular comic book story line. I haven't seen many people express negativity towards this news in the various comic book and film subreddits, only places like this where people don't know what they're talking about.
/r/AntiFeminists25/07/19 08:47 AM
3

She takes up the mantle of Thor in the comics too. This isn’t new.
/r/AntiFeminists24/07/19 04:53 PM
7

The guy isn't wrong and a lot of the comments are pretty shameful. I can only assume that an employee made a comment to him or laughed about his height and he just lost it. I don't think it's a coincidence that the bagel place, and every single article I've seen, fail to mention why he went off on a "misogynistic" rant and what he actually said before the video starts to prompt the "...degrading to women" comment the video begins with. Are we to believe he just wandered into the store and starte…
/r/MensRights11/07/19 09:22 AM
0

No thanks. I'm looking forward to them so I'll do what I want.
/r/MensRights09/07/19 02:21 PM
3

More people watch female tennis Do they? I find women's tennis pretty boring.
/r/MensRights09/07/19 08:56 AM
0

Doesn't mean I'm wrong. I can't be arsed counting all the comments but there's quite a lot of people in this thread disagreeing with you.
/r/MensRights26/06/19 10:24 AM
0

It implies nothing of the sort. You're looking for a reason to be angry.
/r/MensRights26/06/19 10:15 AM
-1

There is no such implication. Anyone who sees that is reading way too much into it.
/r/MensRights26/06/19 09:53 AM
0

Oh my god, it's not blaming anyone! It's highlighting the fact that just because your mother's side of the family doesn't have anyone with a medical history of breast cancer doesn't automatically mean you're any more safe.
/r/MensRights26/06/19 09:39 AM
0

I swear people on this sub see a something about women and automatically think it's an attack on men and play the "But what about men...waaaaaah." card too often. Sometimes it's valid, but not in this case.
/r/MensRights26/06/19 09:37 AM
1

Not relevant to my point at all.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 09:45 AM
3

A line needs to be drawn somewhere. How do you determine that line? Say a woman is 100% certain that person A raped her. She accuses person A. Not enough evidence but during the investigation person B becomes a suspect and it turns out that person B actually did it. They find undeniable proof. The woman was wrong even though in her mind she was 100% certain it was person A. Should she then be punished for being wrong?! Surely if anything, person A should be compensated for being accused in the f…
/r/MensRights07/06/19 08:48 AM
2

Why "but it’s only if there is real proof that they knowingly made it up?" Because a Not Guilty verdict doesn't necessarily mean they didn't do it. It means it can't be proven beyond any reasonable doubt.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 08:40 AM
3

Ideally that's what it should read. However by UK law women cannot rape so UK news outlets cannot call it that or they could be accused of libel.
/r/MensRights06/06/19 09:12 AM
1

I agree that she should have to wait, but people here are trying to turn it into a gender issue and how they're favouring women when it's simply not the case. He might be able to beat her 10 times out of 10 but she's far more important to the sport than he is.
/r/MensRights03/06/19 01:03 PM
1

Doesn't matter. Every ranked male in the top 200 could beat her. Doesn't make her any less famous. It's fame that kicked this guy out of the room, not gender.
/r/MensRights03/06/19 12:58 PM
1

Not the point. She is far more famous than this Thiem guy. It's not a gender issue. It's all to do with fame.
/r/MensRights03/06/19 12:56 PM
1

Not that famous? Her and her sister are probably two of the most famous tennis players ever.
/r/MensRights03/06/19 12:55 PM
2

I have never found this to just be men at my local constituency It's always women at mine. I literally couldn't care less. Up until this moment I'd never even thought of it.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 02:03 PM
2

It's a crime to stream it to. I thought it would come with a fine, not jail time.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 02:02 PM
1

Everything. Zero redeeming qualities.
/r/MensRights26/05/19 08:44 PM
-6

He's an absolute cunt.
/r/MensRights26/05/19 02:54 PM
2

No, it's a jokey picture. You're overreacting.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 08:58 AM
3

Agree. I've been to a couple of places with unisex bathrooms and there's never anything untoward going on. women are disgusting in public toilets, Having worked in pubs, yes they absolutely are. Women's bathrooms are disgusting compared to men's. If anything, I've found that unisex bathrooms are cleaner than both. Neither sex wants to show off how gross they are in front of the other.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 08:57 AM
1

No.
/r/MensRights09/05/19 09:18 AM
1

Same could be said for the woman in this article.
/r/MensRights02/05/19 08:33 AM
-7

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/mar/17/man-who-pleaded-guilty-of-raping-12-year-old-freed-by-glasgow-high-court This one did.
/r/MensRights01/05/19 12:45 PM
1

What the fuck are you trying to imply? That women should do the cooking and washing for their husbands? I'm no feminist but that is a ridiculously archaic and sexist view to have.
/r/MensRights16/04/19 09:48 AM
2

You realise you can pay to go private if you want to and you'll get much better care than the NHS can provide? That option still exists for everyone who can afford it. Be thankful for the NHS. It may not be the most efficient but it means you won't be paying a debt for the rest of your life after receiving life saving surgery after getting hit by a bus AND being billed for the ambulance ride you so desperately needed. I haven't yet had to use it for anything major but if I ever do I'll be so dam…
/r/MensRights15/03/19 10:46 AM
5

I really enjoyed it. Not an amazing film but not bad. I didn't get a feminist agenda from it whatsoever. That all seems to have came from Brie Larson herself, not the content of the movie. I think you'll be pleasantly surprised so long as you go in with an open mind.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 09:30 AM
0

for no medical reason is Except I, and many more like me, did have it done for medical reasons. So using the word "mutilated" as a catch all for circumcision in general isn't really correct. I'm not language policing. I'm all for calling it that when it's about infants or young boys when there is no medical reason for it. I agree that the harsh wording might reinforce the idea with some people that it's not okay. I'm just saying that there is people out there for who the word "mutilated" doesn't…
/r/MensRights11/03/19 05:25 PM
3

Coming from someone who had it done as an adult for medical reasons, the word mutilated seems awfully harsh when used by people here to describe all circumcision.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 05:11 PM
1

After the DVD release everyone will have forgotten all about it.
/r/MensRights10/03/19 09:01 AM
2

I'd stop engaging if I were you. This guy is mentally unhinged as far as I can tell. You can't win against someone so stubborn and arrogant.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 02:54 PM
14

Please keep us updated.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 02:24 PM
22

Fairly certain that's illegal in the UK. It's blatant discrimination in favour of women.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 02:24 PM
1

I know nothing about the MCU Then with all respect you have no idea what you're talking about by saying the film will tank. It simply won't. but most people seem to think No they don't. Most people do not think of it like that at all. You're talking about a very small minority who think like that. Another very small minority are against the film because of the lead actress saying racist and sexist comments about white men. The amended 28% reduction in estimated opening weekend box office earning…
/r/MensRights08/03/19 08:56 AM
0

The difference there is that the all female ghostbusters looked and was pure shit. To me, and many others, this looks pretty good. The feminist marketing on this one has been incredibly minimal in comparison to ghostbusters. And it’s a highly anticipated film in the MCU. It’s like Star Wars where they don’t even have to market it to sell tickets. It’ll sell regardless.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 07:15 AM
-2

I didn't downvote you but I did read the article. I stand by what I said. This movie will be a huge success. That whole Alita campaign sounds ridiculous. Plus, I've not heard great things about that movie and it's been out a while already. Apart from the negative nancy's here, I've heard nothing but good things from those who have seen Captain Marvel.
/r/MensRights07/03/19 11:43 AM
0

All 3 Avengers films, Black Panther, Incredibles 2, Iron Man 3, Captain America: Civil War, Aquaman, Dark Knight Rises, The Dark Knight
/r/MensRights07/03/19 11:34 AM
-2

Not one snootch was shown Didn't the prostitute Roz flash her vagina in either season 1 or 2? Then there was Cersei's walk of shame. While not actually Lena Headley's body there was definitely full frontal nudity there. That's 2 off the top of my head without actually researching. Both from season 1-6. So you must not have done very thorough research. EDIT: I see now that you've declared that a flash of a vagina would count as pubic hair only. Well, yes, you'll certainly find what you need to va…
/r/MensRights07/03/19 10:50 AM
0

Don't go see it if you really want but if you're an MCU fan there's absolutely no point in boycotting this film. It's going to make $1billion. Easy. Brie Larson could've been a convicted murderer and it'd make $1billion. The incredibly small minority of people boycotting this film will make a very negligible impact on the ticket sales. If you're already an MCU fan then the only person you're impacting by not seeing it is yourself as you won't be 100% in the loop for Endgame.
/r/MensRights07/03/19 09:53 AM
0

It's going to make at least $1billion. You think the incredibly small amount of people claiming they won't see it will actually make a difference to the pockets of the filmmakers?
/r/MensRights07/03/19 09:49 AM
1

That says nothing about the quality of the film, which to be honest is all I care about with this one. It's going to make billions anyway, boycotting only serves to disadvantage me by not getting to see it.
/r/MensRights07/03/19 09:45 AM
1

Saving this comment for when you get proved wrong.
/r/MensRights07/03/19 09:45 AM
4

I'm a big MCU fan too and I will be watching it because I don't really care what the main actor has said. I'm not in it for her, I'm in it for the characters. Also, them not getting my ticket won't make a difference so why bother with a boycott. I've seen overwhelming support for this movie everywhere except this particular sub. I'm sure the movie won't care about the thousands of potential $$$ they lost out on when they inevitably make over a billion anyway. I might as well go and watch a movie…
/r/MensRights07/03/19 09:44 AM
1

First off, your link is shit. Include just the relevant picture next time. Second, people getting kicked in the nuts is pretty damn funny sometimes.
/r/MensRights04/03/19 11:55 AM
8

Exactly the response that makes men not want to come forward about their experience with domestic abuse.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 10:50 AM
34

Can confirm. I had it done at 23. Everything to do with sex was better with a foreskin.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 10:49 AM
1

you go see it if supporting feminism is that important to you. Well you've pulled that out of your ass for sure. It's okay to disagree on whether or not the film looks good but there's no need to try and invalidate everything I've said by claiming that I'm going to see it in order to support feminism, when I'm clearly not as evidenced by my previously stated opinions on the trailers.
/r/MensRights22/02/19 12:58 PM
-8

I disagree. The reason nobody went to see the all female Ghostbusters is because it just looked pretty terrible. While I've seen some people who think Captain Marvel doesn't look that good, I saw so many more voicing varying concerns for Ghostbusters, whereas the overall expectations for Captain Marvel lean more positively especially I think after Wonder Woman being a success. For those reasons I think Captain Marvel will do well whereas Ghostbusters just looked terrible to begin with. The probl…
/r/MensRights22/02/19 12:18 PM
-9

My ticket isn't going to make a damn difference. They would need a hell of a lot of people to boycott it to make a dent and quite frankly most people don't give a shit who's in the movie so it's pointless to even attempt. So I might as well go and watch a movie that I think is going to be pretty good and is part of a cinematic universe I thoroughly enjoy. Not going to see it out of principle is just...sad.
/r/MensRights22/02/19 12:00 PM
0

I'm going to watch it because I enjoy the MCU and think the film looks quite good. I'll avoid judging it before I see it unlike you.
/r/MensRights22/02/19 11:38 AM
3

It will do well.
/r/MensRights22/02/19 11:37 AM
1

It's all quite accurate for the time period. Turns to the drink to cope with PTSD in a time where PTSD isn't as well understood as it is today. Nowhere in the film is he ridiculed for it but he's consistently encouraged and supported by the people around him. I don't know much about Native Americans around this time but from an outside perspective he seemed accurate enough. If you want to go deeper into lore he's actually a Native American Demi-God named Napi, which is revealed in dialogue only …
/r/MensRights18/02/19 12:59 PM
2

Agreed. He's just unattractive. The same shit would be said if this was an overweight female.
/r/MensRights01/02/19 02:04 PM
5

I got a similar message from /r/feminism when I was banned. "There's no need to message us any further." It shows cowardice and an unwillingness to debate one's viewpoint because they know they are wrong.
/r/MensRights01/02/19 09:08 AM
53

OP would probably get called out for not being a team player. Maybe even as a sexist for refusing to help women.
/r/MensRights30/01/19 09:11 AM
2

As far as I know the sentencing for sexual assault and rape isn't all that different.
/r/MensRights29/01/19 02:29 PM
2

Under UK law women cannot rape. If they published the same article but claimed she raped someone they could get sued for libel, because under UK law she did not rape anyone. Why they didn't just call it sexual assault, which fits the legal definition, is beyond me though.
/r/MensRights29/01/19 12:12 PM
2

It's a UK publication and under UK law women cannot rape so they cannot report it as such. They should however at least call it sexual assault because it is and fits the legal definition.
/r/MensRights29/01/19 12:07 PM
6

I agree somewhat with the no commenting part of it but being told not to vote is ridiculous.
/r/MensRights28/01/19 09:10 AM
18

This is /r/niceguys material.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 12:50 PM
9

I have to agree. She sexually assaults him and admits it and he does nothing because he's, in his own words, "not complaining". Why not? Why didn't he go right up the police officer behind him and say "This woman just sexually assaulted me and admitted it on camera. I have video evidence. I'd like to press charges." Use that bitch as an example and plaster a picture/video of her being arrested everywhere. This video would hold so much more weight if he did. I'm sorry but you cannot stand behind …
/r/MensRights22/01/19 09:21 AM
0

Right, but why ruin his life because he’s a coward? Break up and move on. We would never support this behaviour from a man if the coward was a woman.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 09:50 AM
1

Do I ruin his life in rhe breakup process? She literally is asking if she should ruin his life.
/r/MensRights11/01/19 10:07 AM
1

The difference here is that while this might just be a story and even if it's fake, nobody got hurt. A rape accusation actually has an affect on another human being. So yes, we can demand proof for rape accusations and yes we can choose to make what we want out of a plausible story that literally affects nobody.
/r/MensRights11/01/19 10:02 AM
3

Fuck all those people. I like to think that if I found myself as an onlooker in that situation, not knowing the actual truth, I'd try my best to prevent the woman from leaving until the police show up just in case I was about to watch a bunch of people with mob mentality help with a kidnapping. Also, they should absolutely have pressed charges on the guy that kicked him in the ribs. Even if he was a suspected kidnapper, he's on the ground and restrained. There's no excuse for that. At the very l…
/r/MensRights10/01/19 10:49 AM
-10

I'd be careful of that one. Being found Not Guilty doesn't automatically mean she was lying. I'll give OP the benefit of the doubt and believe him because I have no reason not to but unless it can be proven that she was lying this line of enquiry is futile.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 10:06 AM
18

The “no further communication is wanted” is exactly what I got too. It’s the go to response when you know what you’re doing can’t be reasonably justified. The mods on that sub are truly terrible people.
/r/MensRights09/01/19 09:29 PM
1

I meant Jeremy Clarkson. In the article he says the BBC won't hire him either.
/r/MensRights08/01/19 12:37 PM
0

Jeremy Clarkson. It's got nothing to do with the fact he's a man. In the article he expressed how they won't give him jobs either.
/r/MensRights08/01/19 12:04 PM
-5

They won't hire him because he physically attacked a colleague. EDIT: I meant Jeremy Clarkson. The article, if you'd bother reading it, has Jeremy Clarkson state he won't get jobs from the BBC either.
/r/MensRights08/01/19 11:49 AM
-3

Maybe the bartender picked up on the fact that you were drinking with the intention of driving home and didn't want to risk her friends getting in your car for you to crash it.
/r/MensRights08/01/19 09:10 AM
28

You and your wife should find a couple of sane individuals to play with. DnD is a great game and I've found that people just need someone to ask them if they want to play. People are often very surprised as to just how much fun it is. A year ago my girlfriend was a skeptic, now she plays in two campaigns.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 10:46 AM
6

One's clearly sexual and the other isn't. I don't really have a problem with this. And I don't believe there would be outrage if a performer like Michael Buble gave a 12 year old girl fan a peck on the lips if she was in the exact same scenario as this kid. This isn't the Justin Bieber post on the top of the sub at the moment, or the time when Katy Perry stole a Pop Idol contestant's first kiss from him. This is as innocent as it comes.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 09:31 AM
1

Genuine question. Who is saying this? I've seen articles like this a few times but there's never actually anyone saying these things. It's just clickbait with no substance.
/r/MensRights20/12/18 10:14 AM
0

So you're saying that women should require a man's permission to have an abortion? And if he refuses? She should be forced to undergo a potentially permanent body change? A potentially life threatening birth? Forced to carry a child for 9 months that she doesn't want? What an absolutely ridiculous notion.
/r/MensRights18/12/18 12:29 PM
1

You're in school right? If it bothers you that much then tell a teacher.
/r/MensRights14/12/18 09:04 AM
5

Being banned from there is a right of passage. I got banned probably years ago now but I questioned the mods about it trying to get a reasonable explanation and all I got was "We no longer require you to contact us."
/r/MensRights03/12/18 12:20 PM
1

I would definitely not resist Hugh Jackman. No homo.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 12:40 PM
10

And unfortunately they have a pretty big voice which means we need people like Cliff Richard to go on these shows and set them straight.
/r/MensRights28/11/18 02:20 PM
16

Maybe so that he could air this “controversial” opinion to an audience that needs a reality check.
/r/MensRights28/11/18 01:14 PM
9

It's not specified anywhere in her post that the tumbling and gymnastics classes were for girls only, just that they were more appropriate. So what discrimination to boys in that specific post is there? By saying there's no outcry over the discrimination of boys in that specific thread it basically sounds like another "Look at me! Boys are discriminated all the time and nobody cares! Waaaah! Look at me!" post. Flipping the conversation to be about male discrimination simply isn't relevant for th…
/r/MensRights21/11/18 03:02 PM
-8

I highly doubt that. Stop being so dramatic.
/r/MensRights17/11/18 11:02 PM
10

I've seen a similar situation happen near where I live. Guy was working in a pub and dating a girl. Guy beat the shit out of girl. Girl gets restraining order. Girl then moves into the flat above the pub and guy is arrested at his place of work for violating the restraining order. Now the guy was a lowlife scumbag but still, I believe restraining orders should work both ways. If you feel threatened by someone enough to get a court to say they can't come near you or contact you then why the fuck …
/r/MensRights16/11/18 11:58 AM
-15

All I went on was what is in the linked video. I didn't read up on the specifics of the case.
/r/MensRights15/11/18 03:09 PM
-22

Because of the footage he couldn't be found guilty beyond any reasonable doubt, but how do we know what actually happened when they got upstairs? They could have had consensual sex. She could've blacked out and he had sex with her anyway. They could've played with a doll's house for all we know. People on this sub are very quick to assume that someone being found Not Guilty means that the accuser was lying. There's no evidence of that here.
/r/MensRights15/11/18 12:15 PM
17

The OP is the one who called the police, not the woman. Even as a man I'd feel somewhat fearful if a man passed me on the street then turned to follow me, especially when at that time of evening it's starting to get dark this time of year. I don't actually believe this post but still, this isn't what you're making it out to be.
/r/MensRights15/11/18 12:00 PM
79

Unless medically necessary. Rare but it happens. Even rarer for babies.
/r/MensRights13/11/18 11:40 AM
75

It was his choice at least. His fault.
/r/MensRights13/11/18 11:39 AM
6

Looks to me like anybody could walk around that without issue.
/r/MensRights12/11/18 02:33 PM
0

No no. Stop being so sensible.
/r/MensRights12/11/18 09:17 AM
-5

I don't see gender mentioned.
/r/MensRights02/11/18 12:34 PM
2

Someone you slept with accuses you of rape and you know with 100% certainty that it was consensual. Do you think it would be justifiable for all your friends, family, co-workers, to start alienating you and treating you differently because you are an alleged rapist? Even though the only thing anybody has to go on is somebody else's word that you raped them, and the people closest to you should know you well enough to know you didn't do it, would it be fair to treat you differently? Even when the…
/r/MensRights11/10/18 08:06 AM
4

Just paranoid.
/r/MensRights09/10/18 07:53 AM
2

It's people making jokes like that which is why this sub isn't taken seriously elsewhere. Also, due to the context of the protest it's not a very appropriate time for a joke of that nature.
/r/MensRights05/10/18 01:11 PM
5

In the context of this video, the guy would probably go to jail if he did that for an excessive use of force. By the time he has recovered enough to do something, the attack is over. There's no reason to hit her. Hopefully she'd be going to jail too, but she's a woman so unlikely.
/r/MensRights05/10/18 08:54 AM
1

By the time the guy in the video had time to react, the attack was over. It was done. Anything he does in retaliation would just end with two people committing violent crimes against each other. I sincerely hope he left the situation and called the police and submitted this video as evidence.
/r/MensRights05/10/18 08:43 AM
9

That's not how self defence works though. I'm completely 100% not on her side but retaliation is not self defence. You need to think that you are actually in danger to justify a self defence reaction. She hit him. Once. By the time he'd recovered from the hit it was over. She was no longer a danger to him. You also only use self defence if you can't leave without endangering yourself. You could just leave the situation. If you're in this situation ever and your response is to hit the person, reg…
/r/MensRights05/10/18 08:39 AM
6

So you're advocating sexual assault?
/r/MensRights05/10/18 08:26 AM
1

Yeah.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 11:53 AM
1

Couple of points, I get what you're saying but there's a few issues here with your argument. In the video you've linked they aren't raising the kid to choose his own gender, they're just not raising him with gender specific clothing, hobbies, toys etc. They have gendered him. He is a boy. They refer to him as such. They're not waiting until he's old enough to decide what he wants to be they're just raising him to like what he likes and not feel that he shouldn't like pink just because he's a boy…
/r/MensRights24/07/18 10:16 PM
6

Well she's British so she likely doesn't have an opinion on it since it's very rarely practiced here. It's simply not something we think of when a boy is born.
/r/MensRights21/07/18 10:59 AM
1

What's the relevance to Men's Rights?
/r/MensRights14/07/18 12:27 AM
11

I think that they're smart enough to not take it as truth. I know shit about the American Revolution but I've played AC3 and am smart enough to not take it as truth.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 03:18 PM
27

I think you're not giving young people enough credit. They'd have to be complete fools to think video games are an appropriate place to learn history lessons.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 03:05 PM
1

well they are doing it anyways Underage sex. You can't stop it. Might as well teach them to protect themselves if they do.
/r/MensRights02/07/18 01:05 PM
0

He clearly meant his first day as a full time stay at home dad. Yes, they should've specified but I think the intention was pretty clear and I'm sure you knew what he meant so there's absolutely no reason to be so insulting.
/r/MensRights23/06/18 06:08 PM
-2

Too true. This sub is drastically going down hill. I'm actually seeing more and more genuine sexist and woman hating comments every day too. The mods don't do anything about it either because they hate to censor stuff because of "free speech". Also, this is starting to look like a male version of a feminist forum. A bunch of moaning and whining about things that don't actually matter.
/r/MensRights23/06/18 05:44 PM
7

So you're sentencing it to be feminist propaganda without actually viewing it in its entirety and taking in all the facts first? Huh...¯\_ (ツ) _/¯
/r/MensRights23/06/18 04:21 PM
3

Go see the film before claiming such bullshit.
/r/MensRights23/06/18 04:17 PM
4

You mean the super powered baby that can't control his powers? Get a grip. You've probably not even seen the film to see how he deals with it and gets better.
/r/MensRights23/06/18 04:12 PM
11

This has to be satire. If you're in an elevator and a woman gets in, don't rape her. If you pull over to help a woman whose car has broken down, remember not to rape her. I'm sorry but I refuse to believe that whoever made this (Wendy French going by the tag) was in any way serious.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 07:39 PM
0

I think it's really sad that people like you think that every time a male is portrayed badly on screen that it's men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 11:38 AM
2

These shows are also full of horrible mothers and women too. But you go right ahead and pick and choose which parts support only your side.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 10:07 AM
13

Have you actually seen the film? I've seen another post that basically contradicted everything you just said only they actually gave a lot more detail about the film in order to prove that it isn't a "Men are useless and can't look after their kids" film. Also, it's fine that you have religious beliefs you stand by but please don't spout that stuff here and tell other men that they should be raising their children to believe such things. but have been given different roles in marriage. Seriously…
/r/MensRights18/06/18 02:35 PM
6

Don't complain to the store manager directly. It's very likely that this is a decision made by someone in upper management and out of the store manager's control. Don't go giving someone a hard time for something that isn't their fault. Also, while you're there get yourself a bacon cheese dog. They're amazing.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 09:43 AM
4

Yeah I don't think this is a men's rights issue. Women simply don't sign up and, if we're being completely honest, aren't as capable to serve in the military. It makes perfect sense for more men to die while serving. That's just the way it is and always will be.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 10:35 AM
3

I support self defense and that is what this man used. Sorry but you're wrong. This was in no way self defence. An argument could be made for the first punch, maybe, but in no way were any of the follow up attacks by the police officer justified. Absolutely no way.
/r/MensRights10/06/18 10:34 PM
1

Don't think of the woman in the video as a woman that thinks it's okay to hit men. Think of her instead as a drunk person who did an incredibly stupid drunk person thing. At that moment she wasn't thinking it's okay to hit men. She was just not thinking full stop. If you really think that the cop's behaviours was acceptable towards another person then there's something incredibly wrong with your world view.
/r/MensRights10/06/18 06:12 PM
2

Holy shit. This is actually a genuine sexist comment right here. And you wonder why people think this sub is full of women haters? You're giving everyone here a bad rep.
/r/MensRights10/06/18 05:45 PM
6

I don't think you're getting the point. Of course you need to use force. But the amount of force he was using, and it didn't seem like he was doing so to arrest her by the looks of things, was completely unjustified.
/r/MensRights10/06/18 03:32 PM
6

How should the officer have reacted? Professionally. She hit him. Excellent, arrest her. She was obviously drunk and of no real big threat to him. But she assaulted someone(him) so she should be restrained, which the police officer will have received training in, and arrested. He would've had very little problem defending himself from her and should've been able to restrain and arrest her with ease. Instead he chose excessive violence. As /u/Hyeruloak commented, "If you are a cop and someone pun…
/r/MensRights10/06/18 03:29 PM
13

This exactly. The cop showed nothing more than the thuggish kind of behaviour that if he witnessed someone else doing, he would arrest them. The woman hit him. Alright, arrest her. She's obviously drunk and isn't a huge threat to him. Choosing instead to turn to violence, and excessive violence at that, is frankly disgusting human behaviour.
/r/MensRights10/06/18 03:24 PM
35

Oh come on! Man or woman, the police man there behaved like nothing more than a complete thug. There was zero reason to retaliate with that much aggressiveness.
/r/MensRights10/06/18 02:36 PM
-10

If you want one then go and make one.
/r/MensRights10/06/18 01:23 AM
0

What point? We shouldn't ever make jokes that degrade men? Get a grip.
/r/MensRights08/06/18 10:55 PM
1

So fucking what? Probably because it was two guys talking. You're reading into this way too much. Take a step back.
/r/MensRights08/06/18 10:46 PM
2

It was a joke. What are we if we can't have a sense of humour? Domestic violence against anyone isn't funny. Jokes about domestic violence can certainly be funny though. Anything can be funny with context. Grow some thicker skin.
/r/MensRights08/06/18 10:28 PM
2

Jokes tend to be funny.
/r/MensRights08/06/18 06:43 PM
0

Did you bother reading my first comment? I did call out any potential women that were there and did nothing.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 05:32 PM
0

My post was more about people in general. We should all do what we can to help others in need. It was the woman in the article that called out only men. Not me.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 05:16 PM
0

Yours is very much an opinion based view. For me, Rogue One was the best Star Wars film to date and I really enjoyed TLJ. Although I really enjoyed Solo, I'm trying to make the point that it probably would've performed the same at the box office even if it was an amazing piece of film making and the same is true if it was absolute trash. Some of it probably has to do with TLJ being so divisive but I think most of its poor performance can be contributed to marketing and fan backlash at its concep…
/r/MensRights07/06/18 02:47 PM
2

I think Solo not being a box office hit has nothing to do with the quality of the movie. I loved it and it's getting a lot of praise on the Star Wars sub. There's no bias there because they're still divided on TLJ. I think it's lack of success is because it wasn't marketed very well at all and also the fact that it received an enormous amount of backlash when it was announced in the first place. There's a huge number of people who won't see it...just because. It's got nothing to do with the film…
/r/MensRights07/06/18 01:26 PM
2

Did you just assume my gender? Triggered. /s
/r/MensRights07/06/18 10:47 AM
0

I do appreciate the pun.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 10:42 AM
2

I didn't claim a side. I guess I just don't see the point of this post if OP didn't provide context behind why they've posted it. Were they hired on merit? Cool. Not a problem. But it doesn't belong here. Were they hired because they're women? Uh oh. Not good for all those men that missed out. Definitely belongs here. Just seems like someone is having a whine because they think having more women than men in important government roles is a sign of Feminism taking over.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 10:42 AM
2

I don't know. Not my job to know. The article actually tells you a little of what they've done previously though. Do you know they're not?
/r/MensRights07/06/18 10:35 AM
-9

At no point did I say that they should've gotten involved in a fight with the guy. I know I certainly wouldn't have. But simply moving away and doing literally nothing to help is pure cowardice.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 10:22 AM
7

Alright. Is that a bad thing? So long as he feels they're the best people for the job then it's not an issue.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 09:42 AM
3

I have to agree. Most of what I see here nowadays is people whining over really trivial things. Oh no, somebody made a meme with a joke that degrades men? So fucking what. It's a joke. Swap the sexes and you might as well call them whiny feminists because that's how they're behaving.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 09:37 AM
-6

I mean, I get that the controversy here is that she's calling out the men that didn't help and not any of the female passengers that also didn't help but at the same time...is she wrong? You see someone (man or woman) getting attacked and your response is to just move on and ignore it? Yeah you should be called out. I'm not saying get physically involved, no use endangering yourself, but do something other than just move away. Phone the police. Shout for help. Get involved, if you want to, and t…
/r/MensRights07/06/18 09:34 AM
7

It's to stop people going on a witch hunt. Besides, most of these are probably either huge exaggerations or completely made up fantasies that these women have had. In fact, the only one there I actually believe is the woman who said she was arrested afterwards.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 09:19 AM
45

Well the media rarely ever call it rape when a female teacher sleeps with a male student. As for an example of grown women lusting over developing male bodies? Taylor Lautner in the Twilight films. He was 16 when they filmed all his shirtless werewolfey scenes and a lot of grown women were perfectly fine commenting on how sexy he was.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 09:16 AM
1

Maybe you haven't read the story properly. If you can point me to a place in the article where it explicitly states that the boys are being forced to wear skirts and that there's no other options, then I'll concede. I agree the policy is stupid but lets be rational and stop pretending this is something it isn't.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 10:02 PM
28

Because the story they wanted to tell was about a female.
/r/MensRights05/06/18 05:35 PM
8

Internet points probably.
/r/MensRights05/06/18 02:13 PM
-2

To be fair, they did say "were". In a time where feminism was actually useful it was about raising women to be the same as men because they weren't equal back then.
/r/MensRights05/06/18 02:13 PM
1

Not the specific account you're using now but here's a response to a different account using the exact same argument with the exact same wording. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/8ofdz6/skirts_are_cool_boys_are_told_school_bans_shorts/e031uiy/?context=3 Downvoted to oblivion but there you go.
/r/MensRights05/06/18 02:07 PM
-1

I see you completely missed my point. Alrighty then. I'm out.
/r/MensRights05/06/18 01:42 PM
0

If anything it's a rights issue for both sexes. Girls that don't like wearing skirts but like wearing shorts are also affected. I don't see anybody here caring about them. Don't twist my words.
/r/MensRights05/06/18 01:31 PM
1

outside a gender norm Yeah, because they're being forced to wear skirts. /s i see you hopping allllll over the place regarding the topic in multiple threads apologizing for it. why? why is this your hill to die on? I could say the same to you as you've used the swimming trunks counter multiple times also, even though that would be completely different for a multitude of reasons. I would just prefer if the sub focused on actual discriminatory laws, rules and policies and what can be done about th…
/r/MensRights05/06/18 01:11 PM
-2

It's a stupid policy, but it's not a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights05/06/18 11:52 AM
2

It's the UK. Cargo shorts would not be a respectable part of any school uniform policy.
/r/MensRights05/06/18 08:16 AM
3

and feminization of boys Nobody is forcing them to wear skirts. It's just an acceptable option. They can still wear trousers. We need a REVOLUTION Calm down, V for Vendetta. Look, the policy is stupid. Banning shorts makes no sense. But it's not a discriminatory policy and everyone just needs to calm down a minute. If they had banned skirts I'm willing to bet that most people on this sub would be telling girls to just deal with it or wear shorts or trousers.
/r/MensRights05/06/18 08:12 AM
-46

sweat to death Well that's a huge exaggeration right there.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 11:13 AM
-9

I don't agree with the policy. It's stupid. But there's no discrimination here. I'm not sure why it's an issue suitable for this sub.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 10:31 AM
-51

There is a very obvious difference between a no shorts policy and a policy that tells young girls that they can't cover up their developing breasts. It would be forcing boys to comply with a policy outside a gender norm If they were being forced to wear skirts then yeah, but they're not. Nobody is forcing them to wear anything outside of gender norms. They're just being told that skirts are an acceptable option as well as trousers.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 09:54 AM
-10

You're right. If they had banned skirts and said that girls could wear shorts instead the people in this sub would be telling them to just deal with it and wear shorts.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 09:48 AM
1

Can I ask, why are you being so rude? you are suffering from Women are Wonderful emotional bias blue pills are much easier, I suggest you keep taking them I'm not delusional. I realise not all women are the perfect beings the media would have us believe. I know and accept that there are far more injustices towards men, especially in family courts etc, than there is towards women in the modern western world. I don't buy in to the false statistics over the wage gap. I came in here to counter what …
/r/MensRights29/05/18 09:27 AM
2

I'm just not a cynic.
/r/MensRights29/05/18 09:09 AM
3

If we're accepting anecdotal evidence to support generalisations I could argue that the opposite has been true for me.
/r/MensRights29/05/18 09:03 AM
4

People that voted for Trump embraced their inner full retard when they cast their vote.
/r/MensRights29/05/18 09:00 AM
3

I don't think it's that at all. It's comments like the one I originally replied to that give subs like this a bad name and being full of women haters. I know that to not be the case but I'd be lying if I said this sub wasn't beginning to lean that way more and more these days. In my experience, women don't really thank men, unless they want something else, usually something over the top. How is that not a generalisation? The exact kind of generalisation some people make about men that this sub m…
/r/MensRights29/05/18 08:55 AM
3

Wow. I can't believe this is actually an upvoted comment on this sub? And you wonder why it's often not taken seriously elsewhere on Reddit.
/r/MensRights29/05/18 08:49 AM
-5

and ignore the fact that endless men are violently dying. For equality there should be women dying violently as well But that's not even close to an accurate representation of these wars. Soldiers on the frontline were men, with the extremely rare woman every now and again. I get that it's a video game but I'd probably be less immersed if there was an even 50/50 split of men and women being killed in these games. Try focus on real issues. Not whatever bullshit this is that hurt your feelings.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 01:34 PM
23

Pretty sure you shouldn't take that as anything other than a joke. It was a Deadpool movie after all. My answer: In the context of the scene, no it's not sexist. It's never sexist to hit a woman. It's never sexist to hit a man. Generally it's simply considered a dick move to hit anyone except to prevent harm to yourself or another in self defence.
/r/MensRights23/05/18 01:19 PM
1

"If this happened to women..." Yeah, it literally happens all the time and nobody bats an eye.
/r/MensRights23/05/18 10:59 AM
6

So?
/r/MensRights22/05/18 01:03 PM
6

The point is that if someone posted a similar pair of pictures calling a woman's natural aging process a "tragedy," there would be cackles of outrage. No there wouldn't. Because it happens all the time already. Half of these tabloids aimed at middle aged women usually feature a section on some celeb's "horrible" beach bod because they've got a bit of a belly or they're showing some chub nowadays. Men and women included. Google image results for "Bad plastic surgery celebs" https://www.google.co.…
/r/MensRights22/05/18 10:42 AM
6

If she gets herself drunk and starts touching you, you slide your penis into her while she continues talking to you without her saying no, before during or after, showing that she is conscious, this is not rape. Unfortunately the law in the UK disagrees with you.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 01:27 PM
-1

If this is indeed real then both are in the wrong here. I'm all for defending yourself against an aggressor but he had clearly moved away from the threat. It was over. Walk away. But when he comes back to assault her back, not defend himself but assault her back, he crossed a line.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 09:06 AM
0

It's one commenter with 3 people who agree. Out of how many people on Reddit? It's as if people here go out of their way to be offended.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 09:57 PM
12

I don't really know what left or right means in politics. I don't take sides. I agree with policies from both. Why is there this label? And why does it matter?
/r/MensRights18/05/18 10:20 AM
9

It's a very common repost.
/r/MensRights17/05/18 01:28 PM
3

Aren't they both as sexist as the other?
/r/MensRights17/05/18 09:42 AM
3

The woman they interviewed didn't seem all that bothered. She seemed to understand the situation quite well. Good on her.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 02:31 PM
1

And if this was a guy and posted on another sub? Wouldn't you all be up in arms at people labeling him as a rapist before a verdict was even reached?
/r/MensRights15/05/18 10:23 AM
3

Can I ask, what is the point of this post?
/r/MensRights15/05/18 09:49 AM
1

Yes. Hence her joke, which was actually quite funny, about her leaving very successful TV shows.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 09:28 AM
9

That's not what the sign says or implies. You're seeing only what you want to see. Using your own logic you could also claim that only young boys experience child abuse because there's no mention of girls on it.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 01:54 PM
1

Age of consent wouldn't matter for a teacher and his/her pupil. She'd be getting the same treatment if he was still in school and 18.
/r/MensRights28/04/18 11:01 AM
31

Look at the top comment and a few of the others similar that are highly upvoted. Examples of why men need feminism too Am a guy. Ive heard this shit sooooo much. One of the many MANY reasons we need feminism to eradicate patriarchy.
/r/MensRights28/04/18 10:55 AM
4

If you have better ideas then find a way to pitch them. This comment is almost /r/iamverysmart worthy.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 01:06 PM
5

Ah the classic "no u" Alright. Good chat. I'm out.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 12:19 PM
3

Unless you can provide a credible source that isn't a picture of a bull's asshole then please leave.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 12:09 PM
7

These comments are why this sub is going downhill.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 11:48 AM
3

This is one thing I partly disagree with on this sub when it comes to reproductive rights. Of course the man should be held liable. More importantly, they both should. That latter part is what is wrong with the current system. When you have sex, pregnancy is an outcome you risk having to deal with. I don't usually like the "my body, my choice" argument but when it comes to reproductive rights I absolutely side with it. If she decides to keep it when you don't want to, that's just tough. Life isn…
/r/MensRights12/04/18 09:14 AM
1

Awful*
/r/MensRights01/03/18 10:04 AM
-6

It's a woman so obviously she's pushing a feminist agenda /s Seriously though, posts like these are why this sub is such a shit hole more often than not and why the rest of Reddit shits on it. "A woman said something I don't agree with. Bloody feminists! angrily shakes fist"
/r/MensRights01/03/18 10:03 AM
71

"Maybe he's just tired of being constantly hit on." "Pffff" "Whatever" Mmmhmm.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 04:15 PM
1

We don't need trolls here. People already speak shit about this sub, and sometimes rightly so, but this spreads the wrong message of what this sub should be about.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 02:48 PM
1

I'm curious as to why you have that in what looks like the equivalent of air quotes. Are you saying that it shouldn't be?
/r/MensRights20/02/18 03:10 PM
0

I seriously hope you're joking.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 02:09 PM
-1

I mean, it's fucking Deadpool. It's not like this was supposed to be a serious movie in which the male got distracted and taken down by a nut shot. It's a superhero movie that doesn't take itself seriously at all. Here we have a male hero being shown punching the shit out of a villainous woman in a movie for once yet you still find something to complain about.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 11:35 AM
-4

Why sue? This isn't the US where people sue for hurt feelings or if someone else caused them to have a papercut. He's no reason to sue. There's no lasting effects here. Everyone will have forgotten about it in a few days.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 08:21 AM
-2

I don't think I once said that what the receptionist did was "the right thing" and I actually really don't like the fact that she did it. If she had suspicions there was a much better way to handle it than going straight to the police. Ask some questions as small talk. Ask what plans they have for the day etc. But you really need to stop throwing around such crass insults about her and the police officer involved. I'm not going to entertain your levels of immaturity any longer I'm afraid.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 12:19 AM
-4

What was their basis to believe a crime was in progress? Suspected paedophile and a young girl checked into a hotel room. That's your basis to believe a crime may be in progress right there. You need to stop thinking like a cunt. You need to stop behaving like one. There's no need for insulting people who were literally doing their jobs.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 12:09 AM
1

This was in the UK. I'm not sure how ID works elsewhere but I could quite confidently assume that that daughter at 14 years of age doesn't have any form of photo identification except maybe a passport, which she wouldn't need unless travelling abroad so there'd be no reason to have it on her in this case.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 11:26 PM
-12

You're being very aggressive over this and I don't really understand why. There's no need to insult the receptionist or the police officer. You're behaving like a child. She had a gut feeling and she acted on it. She was wrong. It's not the end of the world and both father and daughter will probably have forgotten about the whole thing in a few days/weeks and nobody is worse off than they were before. The police officer however, literally doing their job. It would be incredibly irresponsible and…
/r/MensRights19/02/18 11:22 PM
1

Just because it favours women doesn't make the policy discriminatory against men. It's not like they made the policy to purposefully favour either gender.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 09:46 PM
1

That's not nearly the same issue but I'll entertain you the idea. Why not? Banning trousers would be ridiculous but they've every right to do it, so long as the reason behind it isn't "We don't want men here" or something similar. Does banning trousers mean less men would attend the event regardless of whether or not that was the organiser's intent? Sure. Most likely it would mean that less men attend. Is it discriminatory? No. It's absolutely not. Again, this is a non issue when it comes to men…
/r/MensRights19/02/18 09:43 PM
1

But they're not searching backpacks. They just don't allow them. Maybe they do search purses. How are we to know? This is really a non issue when it comes to men's rights. But everyone here just seems to love being a victim.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 09:34 PM
1

Women wear backpacks too. And men can carry purses. When a man gets turned away because he can't take his purse in but a woman can then you can start telling people it's discriminatory. You'll notice that OP didn't say there were women with backpacks that got let in. Fucking hell. You know this sub is going to shit when you're literally making yourself a victim.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 07:54 PM
2

Not really. They just have a no backpacks policy for whatever reason and they stuck to it. Sure, he said they could search it but maybe they'd rather not waste their time physically searching every single backpack that is brought in. Women with more traditional diaper bags were allowed in. A purse isn't a backpack. Had OP brought a diaper bag he would've been fine. But he brought a backpack, and they don't allow backpacks. This isn't discriminatory at all. OP is reaching with this post. As are y…
/r/MensRights19/02/18 02:14 PM
-1

Except this is the UK and we don't sue people for every little inconvenience. The only people that really lose out in the long run here is Travelodge when this guy and his daughter choose a different hotel in the future. Rightly so.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 11:59 AM
5

That's not a right men have. A woman can certainly give it a go if she pleases. It's probably not going to end well though.
/r/MensRights07/02/18 04:09 PM
8

As they already said, and it doesn't apply everywhere.
/r/MensRights07/02/18 04:07 PM
4

That's because they never happened.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 10:46 AM
6

Which to be fair is perfectly reasonable.
/r/MensRights21/01/18 11:21 PM
1

You were clearly downvoted for the irrelevance of your comment. There are plenty of threads where your response would be not only relevant but could also start some interesting discussions on the double standards men face in this subject. Unfortunately for you, that thread was just not it. Keep in mind that the downvote buttons isn't an "I disagree / I don't care about what they're saying" button but it's a "this comment is irrelevant and doesn't contribute to the discussion / this comment is ab…
/r/MensRights11/12/17 11:38 AM
3

Yeah once the applause starts up she gets cut off while saying "and teach them..."
/r/MensRights15/10/17 06:46 PM
3

Under the fucking law they are. I refer back to your previous comment. Just because they are found not guilty does not necessarily mean they were falsely accused. Your statement, in cases where someone got away with it, is in fact wrong. The mentality of Guilty till proven Innocent. I don't have that mentality at all. Just pointing out that your initial statement has the possibility to be completely incorrect. Plenty of people get found guilty of lots of crimes everyday. Doesn't mean they did do…
/r/MensRights11/10/17 02:52 PM
4

It just means it wasn't proven. Plenty of people get found not guilty of lots of crimes every day. Doesn't mean they didn't do it and it doesn't mean the accuser is a liar.
/r/MensRights11/10/17 01:14 PM
3

From what I remember he falsified medical tests and lied to his patients about them having breast cancer in order for them to consent to unnecessary surgery. I think as he was a private practice doctor and not exclusively working for the NHS he made a lot of money from these surgeries. To be honest, this and infant circumcision are two completely different things. This guy falsified records and lied and told these women that the surgery was life saving. For circumcision they don't outright lie a…
/r/MensRights29/09/17 09:16 AM
12

The student - who cannot be named - Why the fuck not? She was of legal age when this happened so I don't understand why her identity needs to be kept secret. Whereas this guy will always be labelled a rapist to some people he knows.
/r/MensRights27/09/17 11:54 AM
-1

I'm not even going to bother humouring you anymore. Night.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 09:14 PM
-1

I don't get your point. Are you trying to say circumcision is never the answer and I should've lived in pain and discomfort for a while longer on the off chance that one of the alternatives might've worked for me? Shut the fuck up. I can tell you right now it would not have.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 09:12 PM
1

Yes it was and I didn't get it done in the US so it didn't line anyone's pocket. Didn't even cost me a penny. The stage it was at required surgery for sure and was indeed a genuine reason for circumcision. Believe it or not. Putting it in quotes doesn't change that fact.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 09:06 PM
3

I get that you're an asshole, yes.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 02:25 PM
4

Wow. I really hope that was a joke, however distasteful it is.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 02:12 PM
0

Am I deformed because of the one I had a couple of years ago that was actually medically necessary? Infants are one thing but consenting adults are another. I don't think people on this sub realise that there are people out there who have had this procedure done for genuine medical reasons. I see nothing wrong with cut and uncut being the nomenclature we use. You can use whatever you want but don't shame those that choose to call it differently.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 01:57 PM
1

It certainly can do if the mods or a bot notices. I got banned for posting a joke in /r/imgoingtohellforthis because it's apparently a hate sub. It's not. It's just a place where people can share jokes and memes that would otherwise be offensive and trigger someone.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 02:30 PM
1

"Women do earn less in America because they choose to" Spot on. That's pretty much what the wage gap argument boils down to in the end. More women choosing lower paying jobs because of family etc. "Women should be at home with they kids. They're happier there." Really? What an asinine thing to say. Simply not true for a lot of women. "You're making a mistake. You'd be much happier at home with a husband and children." Is this the kind of guy people on this sub support? Seriously? He's a grade A …
/r/MensRights01/07/17 12:37 PM
17

As a circumcised man myself I don't mind it Do you know any different? As a circumcised man also, who had it done later in life for medical reasons, I miss my foreskin a lot.
/r/MensRights29/06/17 10:59 PM
1

From this image we can't tell how people responded to this question. In favour? Messages of support? The only way this would belong on this sub is if there was two similar posts, one by a man and one by a woman, where the man was criticised and shamed where the woman was encouraged and supported for similar views. All I get from this is that this woman is a shitty person and there's nothing /r/mensrights about it.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 11:00 AM
3

All these comments saying "Well Five Guys isn't getting my money any more." Fucking really? What an over reaction that is. I'm not saying this because I like the place, which I really do, but because this isn't anti-men at all. If anything it's a pro-feminism stance with a little bit of ignorance thrown in, which I do agree holds no place in modern western culture and having a separate bathroom just for women but not for men is wrong. The simple solution here is to send some emails to HO and inf…
/r/MensRights26/06/17 10:56 AM
1

I would refuse to go there if a) I cared enough, and b) I didn't really like their food.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 10:49 AM
3

Literally never.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 09:08 AM
4

Have to disagree. It's my favourite. I honestly think they have the best burgers around and they're fries are amazing.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 09:03 AM
1

I think you're the one that doesn't understand self defence. People like you seem to think that "self defence" is a phrase you can just throw out there to justify attacking another person in an overly aggressive manner. Grabbing someone by the throat, from which you can accidentally do a lot of serious damage, in this instance isn't self defence. For self defence you respond with reasonable force to get yourself out of the situation. It was an ass grab. It was a public place. There was no immine…
/r/MensRights25/06/17 12:37 AM
1

I think you're the one that doesn't understand self defence. People like you seem to think that "self defence" is a phrase you can just throw out there to justify attacking another person in an overly aggressive manner. Grabbing someone by the throat, from which you can accidentally do a lot of serious damage, in this instance isn't self defence. For self defence you respond with reasonable force to get yourself out of the situation. It was an ass grab. It was a public place. There was no immine…
/r/MensRights25/06/17 12:32 AM
3

Was what happened to him wrong? Yes. Absolutely. Does he come off as any less of a grade A douchebag? Nope.
/r/MensRights25/06/17 12:30 AM
0

Wow. Look out guys, we got a badass over here.
/r/MensRights25/06/17 12:17 AM
1

Assaulting someone in retaliation(which is what OP called it) isn't an appropriate response. There's no self defence in what happened here. If someone punches you in the gut and then runs away but you chase them down and punt them in the face it doesn't make what you did okay because they did it first.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 11:12 PM
2

Grabbing someone by the throat though? Come on. If a man grabbed a woman's ass and she reacted like this I would also say that was a major over reaction.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 11:03 PM
5

grabbed her by the throat Yup, you over reacted. You colossal tool.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 11:02 PM
20

No. It's more convenient for someone to have their shit right next to them where they can see it and it's safe rather than tucked away under their feet or whatever. This is a perfectly acceptable thing to do unless it becomes an inconvenience to someone else. Just grow some fucking balls and ask "Excuse me, do you mind popping your stuff on the floor so I can sit there?" If the person says anything other than something that doesn't mean "Yes, I'll do that for you." then they're an asshole. If yo…
/r/MensRights18/06/17 02:27 AM
1

I doubt that this is something you'd ever consider doing, but what would be the outcome if you took the kids away on mother's day on purpose so that they couldn't their mother on mother's day. Probably be a lot of people more willing to help her out.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 03:12 PM
7

Is there some form of kidnapping in there somewhere? My decree states Father's Day I get the children Is this legally binding? If so, how can she be... taking the kids out of town this weekend and isn't going coming back until Monday purposefully so I can't see them on fathers day. Seems like this decree should legally stop her from doing so. Police can't help Call them. Your children are being kidnapped as far as I'm concerned.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 08:17 AM
4

I think you have some anger issues you need to work out. I hope you get better.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 08:13 AM
0

How do we know the woman in the disabled seat doesn't have a disability? Not all disabilities are visible, especially not from a photograph. Or maybe it has nothing to do with her being a woman, maybe she's just a shitty person.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 08:12 AM
1

Money. More women = more fans = more money = more funds to make good content = more content = more fans = more money etc etc etc There's not much more they can do to hook in more male fans, even if there was they can probably hook in more female fans with good female characters and Wonder Woman is the perfect character to attract more women to the genre.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 11:45 AM
6

Why make this about feminism? She might just be an asshole. Or she might even be disabled.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 11:13 AM
1

You're the reason people don't take this place seriously. Idiot.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 09:24 AM
1

Jesus Christ, over sensitive much? If a particular women's only screening actually interferes with your life or just so happens to be the only time you, as a man, are able to attend then speak with the cinema and they'll let you in. This a PR stunt and advertising to women to get them interested in superhero genre films. They're not blatantly refusing service to men. Has anyone actually tried to get a ticket for this as a man? Probably not, you'd rather just moan about it online. It's a fucking …
/r/MensRights01/06/17 09:20 AM
3

More women being interested in superheroes is a good thing for the comic book and film industry. That's what this event will do. People who wouldn't otherwise bother going to see this film because "meh" will do now because they can celebrate feminism or whatever. I don't agree with a lot of modern day feminism but I don't see these screenings as being an issue. If it just so happens that's the only time you, as a man, are able to go then have a word with the cinema and they'll likely let you in.…
/r/MensRights01/06/17 09:16 AM
2

The gender specific movie showing I don't take an issue with but denying somebody work and pay because of their sex is blatantly wrong and illegal. As long as the company can show that their male employees will not be losing out on any potential earnings because of this event then that's fine. They should not be taking shifts away from people for such a reason.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 09:09 AM
5

I agree. It's not like they're saying "This film is only for women" or "Our midnight release will only be for women". There's one or two showings that they're hosting as being advertised for women only. It's a chance to celebrate the first massively anticipated female led superhero film. I can only see this being a problem if the times they were doing this showing just happened to be the only times you, as a man, were able to go that week. In that case, contact the cinema and explain your situat…
/r/MensRights01/06/17 09:02 AM
8

I still don't believe you but from various responses you've given in this thread and that one, and having a glance through your history...maybe it was for the best. You seem a tad unhinged.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 04:23 PM
7

Yeah, I don't believe you.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 03:19 PM
2

So a couple of months ago now I admitted that I used to watch porn to my wife. Hold up. Is this a big deal to some people. My girlfriend is very much aware I do. She does too sometimes. We both don't give a shit.
/r/MensRights04/05/17 09:12 AM
3

Not sure about NZ laws but most countries allow places to refuse service for any reason unless it's discrimination of a protected characteristic. Sex is one of those. Refusing service to a man is illegal. You're well within your right to refuse service because "they're ugly as fuck" however.
/r/MensRights28/04/17 08:59 AM
8

"I want him to have one that looks like everyone else's and that girls will like." What? Why? If he wants his penis to look the same as everyone else's he can get it done with his consent when he's old enough. Although by that age he'll probably realise that most girls, or guys, don't give a shit. A dick is a dick.
/r/MensRights28/04/17 08:50 AM
2

May be different in Scotland.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 12:40 PM
7

Same could be said for pretty much most men. The point is that women should be held to the same standards as men. I'm 100% confident there is female firefighters out there that could do a better job than me.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 10:25 AM
68

I applied to join the police in the UK and had to do the infamous bleep test as an initial fitness test. The women of course had different requirements they had to meet for the bleep test and didn't have to get to as high a level as the men, although they could keep running until they couldn't do it anymore. I didn't think much of it at the time but looking back on it now I realised that while most of the women there met their requirements to pass, none of them got anywhere close to the pass mar…
/r/MensRights26/04/17 09:01 AM
3

Grateful that you are not forced into marriage, getting your breast ironed, being called a slut for being a female, and not having unequal pay? These things don't happen in Western cultures. Both men and women in certain cultures are pushed into arranged marriages yet it's illegal to enforce it. They have a choice. getting your breast ironed How barbaric. Genital mutilation. Males in the US are so fortunate their genitals can't be mutilated.....Oh. unequal pay? Don't get me started. If you're go…
/r/MensRights22/04/17 11:43 PM
4

Yes, the relevance of those points goes over my head. White, black, female, Asian etc etc, every group of people has been persecuted and discriminated against at some point throughout human history. Even, you guessed it, males. How do feminists like this one defend Selective Service in the US only making Men sign up? Not only that, Grateful that you are not forced into marriage, getting your breast ironed, being called a slut for being a female, and not having unequal pay? None of these are appl…
/r/MensRights22/04/17 11:30 PM
1

So you're saying people shouldn't be able to plead not guilty? Do you even think we should have trials at all? Not what I said in the slightest. You've completely misinterpreted me. He was convicted for underage sex This is just incorrect unfortunately. Sexual activity =/= sex. He was convicted for sexual activity which is the grooming and kissing. There's no mention anywhere of him being accused of having sex with her. I just don't see the point in your post at all. It just looks like you're ju…
/r/MensRights21/04/17 11:53 AM
-1

The point us he pleaded not guilty, there was no evidence, and he maintains his innocence Murderers and rapists do this all the time. Doesn't mean we should believe them. Did he actually plead not guilty to these? A quick Google shows me that he plead guilty to "two charges against him, the other being one of child grooming". EDIT: It seems he plead not guilty to two more counts of sexual activity, one of which he was found guilty of and the other not guilty. I'm not seeing rape mentioned anywhe…
/r/MensRights21/04/17 08:34 AM
-1

“From the start of their contact, he knew full well that she had just turned 15 and yet this did not stop him. He no doubt thought that he would get away it.” I accepted her, got talking to her, I didn’t, I didn’t know, I just thought she was 17, 18. I'm curious to see which one of these is true. Are we just going to believe the footballer when he says this? Are we sure there isn't messages between him and the girl to state otherwise? After reading the whole article I'm unsure what to make of th…
/r/MensRights21/04/17 08:23 AM
3

They basically said masturbation can make you gay. It's a troll. Or they forgot that sarcasm does not translate well through text.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 01:09 PM
6

I was circumcised as an adult for medical purposes. Very rare. There is definitely a loss of sensitivity when having sex. I take longer to finish than I used to. As far as looks go, it looks fine. But it looks different to one that was circumcised at birth. There's barely any scarring and you wouldn't find any unless you were looking for it. I am fortunate enough to come from a country where infant circumcision is not the norm. I didn't understand why most pornstars dicks looked different to min…
/r/MensRights20/04/17 10:36 AM
24

I don't understand why this is relevant. We'd be jumping for joy if it were a guy. Hell when a guy is found not guilty this sub always jumps to the "wrongly accused" conclusion rather than "lack of evidence".
/r/MensRights19/04/17 02:54 PM
-3

What are you looking for with this thread ? Women suck, amitrite? Is pretty much what I take away from a lot of recent things I've seen on this sub.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 10:57 AM
1

I spoiled my ballot paper last election and wrote "Direct democracy or death" on it I tried to take you seriously. I really did. Pretty much gave up reading right about here.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 10:50 AM
9

The Force Awakens is two hours of women berating men. No. This is just incorrect. The bad guys in Logan are men because men are the most likely people to go into some sort of mercenary/private security work. They're also more likely to be chosen for that line of work because lets face it...men are more often than not better at it. I'd rather it stayed this way than they shoe horned in a female "because diversity" Maybe you missed the fact that one of the main villains of the X-Men trilogy is a f…
/r/MensRights19/04/17 09:43 AM
1

If she's been unemployed for 11 years then it would make sense to include this on a resume to explain any gaps in employment. I'd be grateful for the inclusion so that I wouldn't have to ask in an interview. If a guy put "full time stay at home Dad" on his resume I wouldn't think twice about it either. This is just petty. Can we focus on real issues please.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 05:31 PM
–

It's a shame both me and yourself are downvoted for stating this. It seems like people on this sub believe a not guilty verdict automatically means "OMG, dirty rotten liar of a girl. How dare she! What kind of sick perverted person does this?" I'm not saying he did it, but being found not guilty and actually not doing the crime in the first place are two different things. I thought this sub was for rational and logical discussion on issues men face but sometimes it borders on woman hating.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 01:05 PM
–

When asked if he can provide evidence of his innocence and he submits the case where he was found to be not guilty That's not evidence of his innocence. He wasn't found to be "Innocent". To claim a false accusation he would have to provide proof of said false allegation. The verdict of "Not Guilty" is nowhere near enough to prove anything. "Look, my client was found not guilty. Therefore, the girl lied." Maybe that's how things work elsewhere but that's just not going to fly with a UK jury. It's…
/r/MensRights17/04/17 10:46 AM
–

Being found "Not Guilty" doesn't neccesarily mean that the girl falsely accused him. For all we know he did it and the prosecution simply couldn't prove anything beyond a reasonable doubt. Maybe all they had to go on was her word. In my opinion going on someone's word is never enough no matter what the crime is. I'd rather see 10 rapists get away with it than have 1 innocent person locked up because it was his word against theirs. If he were to sue he'd then have to prove that the allegation was…
/r/MensRights17/04/17 09:47 AM
–

Being found "not guilty" doesn't mean the girl falsely accused him. It just means it couldn't be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. I choose to believe he didn't do it but for all we know, he very well could've.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 09:43 AM
6

Oh I see. You're an asshole.
/r/MensRights12/04/17 11:36 AM
5

To be quite honest, I don't think they were the ones being dickish. Your attitude stinks. I don't think we'd be at a loss if you chose not to contribute.
/r/MensRights09/04/17 09:56 AM
3

I'd have walked away too. Not because I have anything against hitting women in self defence but I believe the best way to avoid a physical confrontation is to just remove yourself from the situation. I'd use self defence if leaving wasn't an option. He should still take this to the authorities and press charges though. I think a criminal record teaches you more than a punch to the face.
/r/MensRights09/04/17 01:16 AM
7

The jury is your problem if she ever decided to press charges against him.
/r/MensRights08/04/17 08:13 PM
6

Not really. This video could be used against her and his restraint would go very much in his favour. If he punched her in the face and knocked her out then that could be viewed as "excessive force".
/r/MensRights08/04/17 06:04 PM
9

Not only that, isn't it far more likely that a victim of sexual child abuse is being abused by their parent? It's not usually someone they've run off with or been kidnapped by.
/r/MensRights08/04/17 05:10 PM
5

You're not required to give the names of all guests. They booked one room for two people. All they need is the name of whoever is booking it. Nor is it likely she, being only 13 and on holiday in her own country with her father, had any official identification on her.
/r/MensRights08/04/17 05:09 PM
0

she will accuse you of sexual assault on your child, Wow. You're an idiot. An actual real life moron. Have you ever had a healthy relationship with a woman in your life? I'm willing to bet not.
/r/MensRights08/04/17 04:46 PM
1

Please ignore everyone giving you relationship advice. Especially the guy that said to reconsider your marriage. I went through a similar situation with people on this sub when I mentioned how I was more than happy to pay for meals out with my girlfriend more often than she does because I simply have more money than her. Apparently when you do something nice for a woman you become a "cuck", whatever the fuck that is. I got people coming out and telling me she was basically a gold digger and if I…
/r/MensRights08/04/17 04:37 PM
11

That he felt that sense of helplessness AND no one noticed means someone wasn't doing their job. "The whole thing happened in about 40 minutes," Goss said. "He was fine and then I found him. I don't know what she said she did to herself." This was a heat of the moment thing. There were no signs. It just happened.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 08:03 PM
3

No.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 04:52 PM
7

My issue with this is what happens when you have a year where one gender completely outshines the other in almost every category. Then you're going to have people winning awards that might not actually deserve them...because diversity. Like that Oscars kerfuffle a couple of years back when there was little black representation and they kicked up a stink about it. Did they consider for one second that it just wasn't the best year for black cinema?
/r/MensRights07/04/17 01:25 PM
2

She needs serious professional help.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 07:57 AM
15

You go to shitty bars.
/r/MensRights07/04/17 12:21 AM
27

"In this example of domestic violence I'm about to show you, you will see an aggressor repeatedly attack their partner with several punches to the arm and torso. Their child can be heard in the background crying out for his mother as she's obviously in much distress. But the attack doesn't stop. This person continues to assault their partner while their child screams out, terrified and upset. He clearly wants to attack to stop." Oh my god. Disgusting. Lock him up. Make sure he never sees his kid…
/r/MensRights07/04/17 12:10 AM
2

How dare he touch her like that. I hope she presses sexual assault charges /s just in case
/r/MensRights07/04/17 12:07 AM
9

"You want to go to jail?" "For what?!" "Hehehehe" Brilliant.
/r/MensRights06/04/17 11:59 PM
5

This is quite a stupid comment.
/r/MensRights06/04/17 11:24 PM
8

The video has been flipped.
/r/MensRights06/04/17 04:40 PM
15

Because I actually really enjoy what I do. And if any allegations were ever made, there would obviously be no proof because I'm not a diddler, my union would support me through the whole thing.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 01:06 PM
26

This is enraging. I work in a school and am active in coaching one of the sports we have. I'm always anticipating the day something like this happens to me because some idiot thought it was worth reporting a 26 year old guy being seen with children.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 11:33 AM
31

It's very plausible that the 13 year old girl didn't have any ID. She wouldn't have a drivers licence, obviously, as she's 4 years too young. Unless they'd been abroad on holiday she would have no need for a passport either. There's also no reason to bring it with you if you're staying at a hotel in your own country with your dad anyway. Still, the manager is a tit. He was likely just stalling until the police arrived.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 11:26 AM
3

It's also my birthday today... ...Happy equal pay day :S
/r/MensRights04/04/17 09:30 AM
10

I think you might get some people coming here and saying you should definitely tell both your wife and the police. I'm going to somewhat agree with your stance on this. Might be a bit controversial but here we go. Lets say you go to the police. Is there witnesses to the assault? Is there any evidence of assault? If no to both of those then quite honestly what good is going to the police going to do? None I would imagine. It'd be a he said she said situation and I think we'd all be in agreement h…
/r/MensRights03/04/17 10:14 PM
2

Just a little bit gay?
/r/MensRights03/04/17 05:51 PM
24

is incompatible with the huge array of available gender identities That's a funny way of saying 2.
/r/MensRights03/04/17 05:21 PM
3

No. She was married to Ashton Kutcher who is very much involved in helping to find victims of child sex offences and help them in any way possible. OP is saying how "ironic" it is that his former wife, Demi Moore, once made out with a child on TV.
/r/MensRights03/04/17 02:11 PM
3

I know plenty of people that couldn't. And then what if the letter doesn't make them back down? You have to either suck it up or fork out even more legal fees to take it further. Just saying, I think the people of Reddit that can afford these things don't often take others financial situations into account.
/r/MensRights03/04/17 01:49 PM
-5

I work and I couldn't afford one. I think this advice is usually given by people who work high paying jobs where legal fees would only be a minor inconvenience. EDIT: Or did you mean that they work in the sense that attorneys work as a solution? Probably did. I think I misunderstood. Still, doesn't answer the question of where these people think others can get the money from.
/r/MensRights03/04/17 10:42 AM
3

have an attorney write a letter They're a high school student! Why is lawyering up so often a given answer here? By here I mean Reddit in general. Where are you expecting people to conjure up the legal fees?
/r/MensRights03/04/17 10:11 AM
1

This isn't relevant to this sub.
/r/MensRights02/04/17 10:50 PM
0

What?! No.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 11:15 PM
12

When I was managing a bar I had a woman get quite angry with me about the pricing of something, it was a while ago so I'm not 100% on the details. Basically, I had to explain her receipt to her because she couldn't understand the discounts and thought that -£15 meant she was being charged an extra £15. She was all like "Then WHY is it on the receipt?!" Wasn't having any of it. A female employee, someone I was in charge of, came up and said to the woman exactly what I had been saying. The woman t…
/r/MensRights01/04/17 06:45 PM
3

Good to know. Thanks.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 07:39 AM
49

"We never call men boys." Yes, we fucking do. Maybe it's a Scottish thing but we most definitely refer to men as boys quite a lot. "See that boy there?" He said about the fully grown and bearded man behind the counter. Isn't she an anti-vaxer too? For someone with a phd she aint all that.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 10:32 PM
31

Well duh, we earn more.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 01:17 PM
11

Why not? It's tradition. So was owning slaves, women not having the right to vote, imprisoning or chemically castrating homosexuals. Guess we'll revert back to those good old days shall we. There's no reason for you to pass judgment Oh yes there is. There's plenty reasons.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 11:33 AM
2

I don't know if you're being serious or not but they were clearly a troll. I simply took this opportunity to mock them.
/r/MensRights28/03/17 04:25 PM
2

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/61zjtd/why_women_had_few_legal_rights_before_the_1960s/ Ignore the troll.
/r/MensRights28/03/17 03:09 PM
3

Because they have the minds of children. We don't give children legal rights either. Children are stupid, mindless, infantile, given to temper tantrums, have no discipline, extremely flaky and cannot be relied upon ever and are overly emotional and irrational and can't be negotiated with because they're stupid. So which are you? A woman or a child?
/r/MensRights28/03/17 03:08 PM
6

I mean, that's not a tweet...but still. Horrible behaviour.
/r/MensRights28/03/17 09:41 AM
13

Ahhhh. I see. You're an idiot. Explains a lot. Nothing to see here people. You may go about your business. Move along.
/r/MensRights28/03/17 12:16 AM
12

No. What's right with them?
/r/MensRights27/03/17 10:24 PM
21

I can't even fathom how you could write something like this without once thinking, "Wait, isn't this what a lot of single fathers go through? More often than not less than a 50/50 split." faces the trauma of being without her children...every weekend But it's okay that Dad has to go without Monday-Friday? Gotcha.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 08:04 AM
1

I know, I truly hate this sentiment. I can't wait to get married.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 11:30 PM
10

I don't see what this has to do with anything.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 09:29 AM
10

Exactly. Just taking my previous job as an example that'd be about 15 women off for 3 days each every month. That's 45 days every month. Each requiring an extra person to work their shift of ~8 hours on average at just over minimum wage. As we were a national chain, multiply all that by about 850 different premises throughout the UK, all with varying numbers of female employees. Some would have 30+. And then there's all the Head Office staff and HR people etc. That's too much money for me to bot…
/r/MensRights25/03/17 11:23 PM
48

Three days off a month? Fully paid? Get a grip. This would actually cause an employer to consider hiring men over women which seems very counter productive for feminists.
/r/MensRights25/03/17 11:00 PM
10

This is where I believe the phrase "her body, her choice" actually has legs to stand on. There is many complications that can arise during pregnancy that can have a significant impact on the woman's body and mental state. In rare cases, she could even die. If she wants an abortion, then she should be allowed to have one. It's the duty of both parties to consider all their options and talk through it maturely but at the end of the day it will always be the woman's decision to make. If the man wan…
/r/MensRights25/03/17 10:56 PM
52

Her:"I promise I will have sex with you tonight." "Sorry, I've changed my mind. I don't want to have sex." Him: "But you promised so tough luck. We're having sex." Changing your mind is perfectly acceptable. Dumb bitch.
/r/MensRights25/03/17 04:26 PM
6

According to Virginia Code 18.2-422, "It shall be unlawful for any person over 16 years of age, with the intent to conceal his identity, wear any mask, hood, or other device, whereby a substantial portion of the face is hidden or covered, so as to conceal the identity of the wearer, to be or appear in any public place, or upon any private property in this Commonwealth, without first having obtained from the owner or tenant thereof consent to do so in writing. Apparently not to this extent, no. I…
/r/MensRights25/03/17 04:21 PM
20

I don't really have a problem with that one. As long as women wearing jeans don't get the discount then that's fine. Wearing skirts is not a protected characteristic.
/r/MensRights25/03/17 04:14 PM
3

Demand the same price as a female. What they're doing is illegal.
/r/MensRights25/03/17 11:00 AM
35

In the UK, yes. If a place is offering free entry or discounted drinks for women then they're breaking the law.
/r/MensRights25/03/17 10:58 AM
15

I don't think hats should be worn indoors and many bars will ask you to take them off. However, there were apparently women in that pub wearing hats and they weren't asked to remove them. Gotta be consistent with your policies.
/r/MensRights24/03/17 02:12 PM
6

That would be infuriating. How anyone could let her after seeing that video is beyond me.
/r/MensRights23/03/17 11:46 PM
1

That would depend on willingness to participate in sexual intercourse/activities. Wether they were willing or not, they can't legally consent. But leeway would be given for willingness to participate as it's not nearly as harmful to the victim as being forced into sex.
/r/MensRights23/03/17 06:05 PM
2

as it does not have near the same penalty level as laws about rape The reasons for that doesn't change its definition. Statutory rape Statutory rape is sexual activity in which one of the individuals is below the age required to legally consent Rape Rape is a type of sexual assault usually involving sexual intercourse or other forms of sexual penetration carried out against a person without that person's consent. The act may be carried out by physical force, coercion, abuse of authority or again…
/r/MensRights23/03/17 06:00 PM
2

There's a clear difference between rape that is forcing somebody to have sex against their will and without their consent and rape which is with somebody under the age of consent and therefore cannot legally consent but is still a willing participant. you're conflating stat rape with real rape, suggesting women and men drugged or threatened with their life into sex are on equal footing to a 17 year old in California having willing sex. That make you a sick, twisted cunt. Nobody here is comparing…
/r/MensRights23/03/17 05:47 PM
2

then Nevada people are getting away with rape when the age of consent there is 16 and its 18 in California, I don't think you understand how laws work. Is someone from the UK considered a rapist if they have sex with a 16 year old just because where you're from the age of consent is 18? are you suddenly a rapist because of the law Yes. Legally. Yes. You wouldn't go to somewhere where being gay is illegal and then complain you got arrested because it's not illegal where you're from. When it comes…
/r/MensRights23/03/17 03:55 PM
4

That's not needed to be a role model.
/r/MensRights23/03/17 02:27 PM
1

That's a decent point. Hadn't thought of it that way before. Maybe we should either all be getting changed in unisex rooms with cubicles for the more shy or get changed with people that share the same bits as you regardless of your gender identity.
/r/MensRights23/03/17 02:12 PM
5

You're entitled to your opinion on the matter and nobody is saying you have to like the idea, just be accepting of those who aren't in control of such things. I myself, while open and accepting of them, still find it strange. Why should we have to tolerate it? Would you say that of gay people? This is a similar situation. It's not like someone is telling you that you have to accept a racist into your group.
/r/MensRights23/03/17 11:25 AM
6

I would hope the same response would be issued to any girls complaining but it's unlikely that would be the case. I can understand why though, in a way. While still an extremely unlikely scenario, it's far more likely that a teenage boy as opposed to a teenage girl would be twisted enough to identify as a girl just to watch girls getting changed. Cases like this are a nightmare for schools. They're going to upset someone no matter which course of action they decide to take and I like to think th…
/r/MensRights23/03/17 09:20 AM
5

That's a ridiculous situation that would never happen.
/r/MensRights23/03/17 09:08 AM
6

Damned if they do, damned if they don't situation here. They either isolate the girl identifying as a boy and tell them to change elsewhere or to change with girls when they don't identify as one. This would open them up to a different lawsuit most likely. Or they tell the boys that they have to be accepting of this girl's gender identity and change with them as they would any other boy. What's their issue? That she'll eye them up? Nothing to stop a gay boy doing the same. Chances are there is o…
/r/MensRights23/03/17 09:07 AM
3

"Please don't wear revealing clothing if you don't want to be raped." It's in a similar vein to that really. Basically saying that it's your fault for being a victim. I'm not sure it's relevant to /r/mensrights but it's a decent observation on society.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 03:40 PM
5

There's no need to resort to insults. Please remain civil or just don't contribute. EDIT: I was simply trying to express that by being circumcised at birth those males are being robbed of the opportunity to experience having a foreskin. The benefits of which being that the penis is more sensitive, unscarred, protected and that the foreskin actually helps with sex by retracting and helping with natural lubrication. As far as scarring is concerned, even as someone who has undergone adult circumcis…
/r/MensRights22/03/17 12:27 AM
12

I can tell the difference. I had it done for medical reasons and I can quite confidently say I miss my foreskin. Is the medical reason I had it done also a justification to rob me of the choice had I been circumcised at birth? Absolutely not.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 12:22 AM
8

I've never seen it done before and I never want to again. Holy shit how is that not illegal? Barbaric.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 12:20 AM
9

Jesus, that child's screams are terrifying. What's going on here? Why are they taking the child away from him? The determination of that man to stay holding onto the car leads me to believe he wasn't doing anything wrong but without context we can't say for sure. I'm not sure any reason warrants the use of a taser on the man while he's holding the kid.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 12:04 AM
4

I don't get this at all with this game. I'm loving playing through it. I think that you yourself are allowing your own political views to ruin a fantastic game.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 03:31 PM
8

Clothing and vaccinations are in the child's best interests. They keep them warm and at less risk from illness. Circumcision is in the parent's best interest because for some stupid ass reason they want their kid's dick to look a certain way. Babies can't consent to food? Shall we just stop feeding them? That's where your argument is heading.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 09:48 AM
1

I got banned for pointing out the facts of a "rape" case when others were just reading the headline and assuming the worst.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 09:43 AM
5

You're in the wrong place.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 09:36 AM
2

Did you read the article at all?? The man, a taxi driver, THE POLICE WHO QUESTIONED HER EARLIER THAT NIGHT while they were out looking for underage drinkers and the judge all believed that this girl convincingly looked AT LEAST 16, the legal age of consent in the U.K. Are you telling me all those people are just really shitty at estimating people's ages or can you admit that there's a chance this stupid young girl could pass off being 16? If this happened to you you'd be singing a different tune…
/r/MensRights18/03/17 08:47 AM
3

You are completely missing the point. Everyone involved in this case believed the girl looked of a legal age and there was no reason to question her age. He rightly shouldn't be punished for her convincing deception.
/r/MensRights18/03/17 08:36 AM
1

I'll message them again in 72 hours.
/r/MensRights18/03/17 12:59 AM
2

Read the article then comment.
/r/MensRights18/03/17 12:39 AM
7

I think I got banned for this comment, https://www.reddit.com/r/Feminism/comments/5zxdy1/no_punishment_for_man_who_raped_girl_12/df1zrei/ I asked why and was told. "You're defending statutory rape. Goodbye". Now I'm muted and can't even message the mods again to even see if they bothered to read the bloody article. The case in the article was an exceptional circumstance that warranted being on the side of the man, the so called "rapist". Everyone involved in the case from the judge, to a taxi dr…
/r/MensRights18/03/17 12:24 AM
7

I'm all for tweaking the definition of consent in cases like this one. It's clear she knew exactly what she was doing.
/r/MensRights17/03/17 07:09 PM
13

He had sex with someone who didn't give consent. She did though. A 12 year old cannot give consent. But she did Them lying doesn't change that they didn't give consent. She did though Consent with a legal definition? Sure, she can't. Morally or ethically? I fully believe that she could and did give consent and that the man here did absolutely nothing wrong as he was convincingly lied to.
/r/MensRights17/03/17 06:47 PM
18

Teachers having sex with pupils is a different matter altogether. They are not only in a position of authority but they are most likely fully aware of the age of the pupil. This man was under the impression, as were many others, that she was of legal age.
/r/MensRights17/03/17 05:03 PM
14

What an absolute joke of a man. His first two points are just idiotic. On his third point, does he not realise there are English people living in Scotland who this will affect? They absolutely should get a say. Anyone legally living in Scotland should.
/r/MensRights17/03/17 04:27 PM
3

We don't know what the girl looked like that night or even currently. The judge and many others involved could obviously see what she she looked like and agreed that this warranted exceptional circumstances outside of the normal 13-15 defense.
/r/MensRights17/03/17 03:54 PM
12

I would also mention that this mistake is a lot easier to make with girls making themselves appear older. I don't think a 12 year old boy could pull it off.
/r/MensRights17/03/17 03:08 PM
7

It's really not. Some girls mature very quickly and could look 18 if they tried hard enough. This isn't a story about a guy picking up 12 year old girls outside their school where they don't put in the effort to look older. This was a girl who made herself up and dressed in such a way that she could claim to be 16 without much doubt.
/r/MensRights17/03/17 03:05 PM
75

Funny how they still call it "rape" when he hasn't really done anything wrong. Yeah he pled guilty to the rape charge because he felt awful when he learned the truth but still it's a bit out there to label him a rapist. The judge herself, I think it's important to note that she's a female judge, said that it was reasonable to think the girl was at least 16. EDIT: This is why I have an issue with consent laws being taken so seriously in some places or in different cases than this. Legally, you ca…
/r/MensRights17/03/17 02:47 PM
8

How are we still so backwards on things like this? It's shameful.
/r/MensRights16/03/17 08:50 AM
5

No.
/r/MensRights16/03/17 12:35 AM
2

What do you think would've happened if she had managed to catch up to them? She was going for physical confrontation, no doubt.
/r/MensRights16/03/17 12:35 AM
1

In the rare chance that you're seriously not trolling, You didn't specify in your original statement that you were talking solely about humans. That statement has been proven to be incorrect and so now you're adding this "human" clause. You took my comments out of context and they're not relevant to the "male hero punching a female hero in the face" debate. Can you really not cope with being wrong this much? It would've been so much simpler for you to just concede and everyone could get along an…
/r/MensRights14/03/17 09:55 PM
1

You will never see a female villain get punched in the face by a male hero. EVER. No exaggeration. Check it out. Its not an accident As for your first question, the clip I posted was just to show you that this is not always the case. Here you have a male hero going toe to toe with a female villain. Question 2. Kal-El is a male Kryptonian. In this fictional universe, they still have genders on alien planets. Not only that, you didn't specify in your comment or even imply in any way that the hero …
/r/MensRights13/03/17 10:16 PM
2

It's fine for companies to discriminate against white men, and only hire non whites and women Actually, that's illegal. At least it is in the UK and likely most other places. Fine as in socially acceptable? Perhaps. It shouldn't be though. However, still illegal.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 02:06 PM
9

I don't know what socialism is. I don't pretend to understand politics. I don't get the difference between left wing and right wing politics. Quite frankly, I don't care. I have my views, other people have theirs. I don't see the need to label everything. What I do know, without a shadow of a doubt however, is that you are a massive tool.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 10:38 AM
4

Right but if you're a racist white man then you're only going to hire white people. Many competent black/asian/latino etc people are going to go without that job. If you're a sexist female then you're only going to hire females. Many competent men will go without that job. By all means, have an office full of old white men if they're the best people for the job but that's rarely the case. I think you'd feel differently on this if you had actually been discriminated against in this fashion.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 09:59 AM
25

But it's religion so it's okay, duh. /s Just in case
/r/MensRights13/03/17 09:54 AM
2

Oh man, anaesthesia is awesome.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 02:39 AM
5

I do remember hearing that there's quite a difference between infant and adult circumcision, but I'm not educated on the subject well enough say what that is.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 02:29 AM
2

Tight enough to the point where I had slight tearing which became quite painful. A little. Not enough to make sex/masturbating any more difficult. UK.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 02:19 AM
5

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xqlaXylsMwQ
/r/MensRights12/03/17 01:44 AM
1

Had? As in as a baby? Can you "grow out of it" as you age and your body grows? I developed it as an adult and it caused me slight pain and discomfort so I opted for a circumcision. Not much changed really but I'm still thankful to have been born in a country where circumcision at birth is definitely not the norm and I had the choice as an adult.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 12:13 AM
0

I'm inclined to agree with you on this. The groping is a different issue entirely to be honest and he might have had a leg to stand on if that's as far as he let it go. But as far as I can tell he consented to having sex with her. He obviously regrets this decision but that doesn't change anything. It's not like he was physically held down or overpowered in any other way that she forced sex upon him.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 12:16 PM
3

One of the teachers at the school I work at the other day told me they've had their fair share of transgender pupils. No operations done but they identified as the opposite sex to which they were born. About 80% of them changed their minds before leaving school and went back to identifying as what they were born as. Sometimes it really is just a phase. They really shouldn't allow medical transitioning until they're at least 18.
/r/MensRights28/02/17 10:51 AM
-1

This sounds like absolute shite. The comments, not the game. It looks great and virtually nothing I have seen of it gives me this impression at all. I'm still buying it.
/r/MensRights28/02/17 10:37 AM
31

according to feminists sexual harassment can be as simple as telling a dirty joke Hugh Mungus.
/r/MensRights28/02/17 10:34 AM
28

K bye
/r/MensRights23/02/17 08:06 PM
1

Mirror?
/r/MensRights22/02/17 10:30 AM
2

Well aren't you a ray of sunshine. I hope the rest of your day is as pleasant as you are.
/r/MensRights21/02/17 09:20 AM
34

I've never gone to the pub and watched football in my life. I still have friends.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 12:38 PM
11

Obviously you should be able just restrain them both. You're a man after all. Just hold them both by the tops of their heads at an arms length each while they flail about trying to whirlwind punch each other.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 10:21 AM
12

However the assumption that when a woman is armed you can always restrain her is asinine. If a woman comes at me with a knife I'll probably panic first and then defend myself to the best of my ability. This person seems to think I should be able to just grab her arm and hold it behind her back while muttering "Silly woman. Thinking you can best me, a man, your biologically stronger superior."
/r/MensRights20/02/17 10:19 AM
2

That was pretty much expected.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 12:37 AM
1

The parents would most likely opt for surgery for whichever they want. Girl or boy. They'd raise it as such but then it might feel like it should've been the other and undergo gender reassignment surgery.
/r/MensRights17/02/17 09:42 PM
1

Yeah I didn't make that very clear.
/r/MensRights17/02/17 12:00 PM
2

If you're a couple in a long term relationship then it's probably going to be fine. Bang away. If you have a one nightstand and you both get blackout drunk then in the eyes of the law, unfortunately, he raped her. This is definitely not how it should be. You're right. We should be able to get drunk and bang whoever we want. Alcohol doesn't stop you from saying "No". My point is, to a certain extent you can get drunk and have sex but be careful or you'll face a rape accusation. In an ideal world …
/r/MensRights17/02/17 11:51 AM
1

To a certain extent.
/r/MensRights17/02/17 11:43 AM
3

If I can lift the seat up to pee they can put it down. Seeing as the majority of toilet use is with the seat down then really men are more often than not having to lift the seat more than women have to put it down.
/r/MensRights17/02/17 10:08 AM
1

The first paragraph is pretty much common sense. Don't force someone to have sex. Don't withhold it to manipulate. Probably shouldn't have sex during an argument. Drunk? Maybe. Depends on how drunk and the pre existing relationship. All good points. Lets read on. "Sex is the woman's right, not the man's," I'm done.
/r/MensRights17/02/17 10:04 AM
3

I have no idea who this guy is other than he's a Youtube celebrity I don't care about. But from any news I've heard about this all I get from it is that he made an anti-Semitic joke but he himself isn't anti-Semitic. Shall we go through every single one of Disney's films and point out all of the subtle racist and sexist jokes? Nobody cares because they're exactly that. Jokes.
/r/MensRights17/02/17 09:49 AM
5

Being born with both parts doesn't meant you're 1/2 male 1/2 female. A gender isn't the same as a sex.
/r/MensRights17/02/17 09:44 AM
7

My girlfriend's ex had a restraining order put out against him by a different ex girlfriend of his. She lived in the flat above his place of work and he was arrested on shift for being within a certain distance of her because he went to work. The guy's an absolute knob but come on, that was ridiculous. There has to be a "It goes both ways" kind of deal in these things. She shouldn't be allowed to just show up at a shop and if he's there he has to leave. That's just silly.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 03:34 PM
2

K
/r/MensRights16/02/17 03:16 PM
2

K
/r/MensRights16/02/17 03:04 PM
2

There's nothing wrong with finding the boat joke funny, is the point I think is trying to be made here. You seem to be dead against that to the point where you're insulting people for it. I personally don't think the joke being made by the text on the bag is particularly funny. Not because it might be offensive or sexist. I just don't think it's a great joke. My opinion. Personal preference. You think it is funny and that it's a good joke. That's fine. I'm not going to judge you for it. But for …
/r/MensRights16/02/17 02:24 PM
2

You don't need to be racist to find racist jokes funny. Racist jokes can be funny. Racism is not funny. Sexist jokes can be funny. Sexism is not funny. There's a clear difference.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 02:06 PM
2

Funny is subjective. Just because you personally don't find it funny doesn't make you right.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 10:07 AM
2

So you tell me, now, what do you think the bag joke and the slave ship joke say about the people who were making these jokes? They have a sense of humour.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 08:50 AM
3

No contraceptive is 100% effective.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 03:03 PM
3

I don't even know how someone could decide that this is okay.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 01:22 PM
3

there is a unique lifeform within her that is not her body. It is a separate body connected to her body. So you're against abortion completely then? That's a different argument altogether. If you're not against abortion then you have to realise that she's putting her body through a lot of changes that it may or may not be able to cope with. If you don't want a baby and are unwilling to go through those changes then it should be well within your right to abort. Or just not have sex. Obviosuly tha…
/r/MensRights15/02/17 01:16 PM
4

Unless she keeps the baby, then he is indebted to her for at least the next 18 years. Then we should be fighting to change that. Lets make it equally more fair to everyone than equally less fair to everyone.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 01:14 PM
6

People don't even consider how those exact comments would come across if it was a man instead of a woman. "how come when I was a teenager I never met men like this" "Imagine being that desperate. Let him go and council the boys." "28 and homeless is sad... he is handsome though. Hope he gathers himself and picks up his life" You could probably fabricate two exactly the same stories with one difference. The offender's gender. People would condemn the man and pity the woman.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 12:14 PM
10

It's 100% her body. I see what you're getting at but there's zero danger to a man's body, or even their life, with pregnancy. There is to a woman's. I'm all for fighting to strip yourself of all parental rights to a child conceived by accident that you don't want but your sexual partner/one night stand/whatever does want. We all know the risks when we have sex but if you don't want children then the answer cannot be "don't have sex.". I hate the argument "Her body, her choice" because it mostly …
/r/MensRights15/02/17 11:55 AM
17

Getting men the legal right to have no parental claim to a child they don't want is one thing, but forcing a woman to have the child because he wants her to is just plain wrong. I know that it'd be a really shitty feeling to have a sexual partner abort the child you so desperately want her to keep but until we have a way of growing a human being outside of a womb then this is a reality we have to live with. It's biology and really is her choice. It may be a right that men don't actually have but…
/r/MensRights15/02/17 11:41 AM
3

I worked in the US for a couple of summers and one of the guys I worked with was American whereas everyone else was British. We somehow got on to the topic of circumcision. He wasn't actually aware that it was a thing and just thought that's how penises looked. The night ended with him running around shouting "Will someone please show me their penis!!!"
/r/MensRights15/02/17 11:10 AM
7

I don't think all of this girl's problems come from simply not having her father in her life. I really don't think it'd make much of a difference for her to be honest. Some people are just lost causes.
/r/MensRights12/02/17 04:35 PM
2

They can't become King.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 02:20 PM
1

A university that will kick you out if you're caught drinking or have had sex? Where do they get off interfering in your private life like that? Sounds like it's ran by crazies.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 09:24 AM
34

609 likes for suggesting cutting off a man's penis. And where do they get the idea that men don't want women to feel sexual pleasure?
/r/MensRights02/02/17 09:12 AM
3

I'm sure I've seen them but they're not that common. I honestly don't see the need for either. Wherever you go you should expect to see male/female cleaners in female/male facilities. At my previous job there was a sign on the toilet check sheet that said "please be aware female members of staff may check the male toilets." but it said nothing about males checking the female toilets. I'd go in anyway. Some women would look at me strange but I only actually got challenged by one once. I just said…
/r/MensRights01/02/17 01:58 PM
2

I scored (-3.75, -2.41)
/r/MensRights31/01/17 11:34 AM
2

I don't think they're a majority of Hilary supporters. Just anti-Trump. I think you're grasping at straws here to be honest. Not a Trump fan but I think the comparison people are making between Obama and Trump are just ridiculous. So he didn't get her door for her. So what? It's purely just anti-Trump and people are looking for any excuse to badmouth him. Most of these people probably don't care about chivalry at all.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 10:52 AM
3

Any examples of a few things that left and right winged people tend to think is the right way to do things?
/r/MensRights31/01/17 10:48 AM
14

I don't know what being "left" or "right" means. Can someone ELI5 or TL;DR for me? Layman's terms. My views are my views. I believe that what is the right thing is whatever I believe to be the right thing. I probably share views from both the "left" and the "right" whatever they may be. EDIT: According to the political compass I'm ever so slightly left.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 10:30 AM
5

Well known? I have no idea who this is. I agree with him though. A male version of Loose Women would never be allowed to air.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 09:21 AM
11

Surely this is illegal?
/r/MensRights28/01/17 01:02 AM
83

It should be his choice. My view is, he's bonded with this child. Raised it for three years as his son and is probably devastated it's not his. I would want to still have a relationship with that child and would pay some child support if that were to happen.
/r/MensRights27/01/17 10:14 AM
3

That's interesting. Thanks. But I see a problem. Lets say you are in the running for a job and your main competition is someone of the opposite sex. You're both qualified for the job. You don't get it. The other person does. You later find out somehow, and lets assume you have documented proof, that the only reason you weren't hired was because the company needed to comply with this gender quota and avoid a fine. Therefore you have been illegally discriminated against because of your gender. You…
/r/MensRights26/01/17 02:35 PM
9

Marching for equal rights. Doesn't get special treatment because she's a woman. Has a moan about it. What?
/r/MensRights26/01/17 11:23 AM
2

Is this gender quota an actual thing in some companies? Is hiring a fair male:female ratio just for the sake of having a bit of diversity not sexist in itself? Many men/women will go without a job because they had to hire a woman/man to fill a quota. Ridiculous.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 08:59 AM
5

Legal definitions yeah. But used generally they're pretty interchangeable and everyone knows what you mean. 6 of one and half a dozen of the other.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 07:32 AM
1

So we wouldn't have even met. That makes sense but it's definitely not how you came across earlier. You made it sound like all women are only after one thing. Money.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 07:28 AM
17

Why? Because we're not showing support for these particular people in the protest? Did you even watch the video? It shows a female protester attack a man who defends himself. She then spits on him and he again defends himself. Then everyone calls for his arrest because it was "unprovoked" and the woman did nothing wrong.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 01:20 AM
28

At 00:45 does the woman say "That was assault" to the police. She's not wrong. Spitting on someone would count. 2:44 "She was punched in the face unprovoked" Are you fucking kidding me? She swung at him! 3:27 "Why isn't the guy who punched me in the face on the ground? What did I do?" Are these people serious? She attacked him. It's on film. Jesus Christ. These people are a god damn joke. If anyone should be arrested it should be the woman and then guy with the flag that was jabbing at the other…
/r/MensRights26/01/17 01:11 AM
2

Again, you know nothing of our circumstances apart from a slight financial difference between us. You don't know either of us as PEOPLE. We actually met through work if it's any of your business. She has dated people in the past who earned considerably less than she did at the time and has even gone as far as lending them money for shit they needed. This is absolutely ridiculous. You're really just assuming the worst in someone you've never met because some people are shallow enough to behave li…
/r/MensRights26/01/17 12:25 AM
3

You no nothing about my relationship. My girlfriend is amazing. I'm not rich. I'm not wealthy. Just better off than her as I'm in full time employment while she's in education and so I pay for a few more meals every now and again. Are you seriously telling me that some woman you know nothing about would dump me if I were in the same financial situation as her?! Fuck off. If the roles were reversed I am without a doubt certain that she'd do the same. Because I know her and you don't. I originally…
/r/MensRights25/01/17 10:47 PM
1

It sounds like a work of fiction to me.
/r/MensRights25/01/17 09:49 PM
14

Someone on my FB just shared this. I commented that this was already a thing. Men already can't back out of it.
/r/MensRights25/01/17 09:08 PM
-4

In that case I'd say it's the situation, not the money.
/r/MensRights25/01/17 07:04 PM
1

I'm pretty sure she would. But our living situation etc would be very different if I was poorer. Not every woman is after your wallet.
/r/MensRights25/01/17 06:28 PM
1

This isn't real. Is this real? Surely this is a satirical site? Yeah, it's not real.
/r/MensRights25/01/17 03:56 PM
8

My girlfriend and I try to take turn about paying for meals if we dine out. I usually end up paying most of the time and I really don't mind. I earn more than her as she's a student and sometimes can't afford it so I offer to pay because I want to. Never once has it been mentioned that I should pay because I'm a guy.
/r/MensRights25/01/17 02:39 PM
1

The scene in This is the End jumps to mind when they're all talking about how they're not going to rape Emma Watson. Or in It's Always Sunny. You know, because of the implication.
/r/MensRights25/01/17 11:46 AM
0

We're well acquainted.
/r/MensRights24/01/17 10:42 PM
2

I just think choosing to write like it's a college essay is a strange choice given the platform it's on. It's like he's trying to show off his extensive vocabulary and creative use of syntax.
/r/MensRights24/01/17 05:30 PM
0

Sounds like it. Also, you write weird. It was like an excerpt from a novel. Seems unnecessary.
/r/MensRights24/01/17 03:42 PM
1

You've left in the mobile number. Probably not a good idea. I see this post getting deleted. As it's a UK number, I'm fairly certain this would be very much illegal and is blatant discrimination. You should let them know. As a licenced premises they should be more than aware that this is wrong.
/r/MensRights19/01/17 02:28 PM
4

Because men can't be raped. He got hard so he enjoyed it. /s
/r/MensRights19/01/17 12:28 PM
5

Go above the principal. Keep going until you're heard.
/r/MensRights17/01/17 02:41 PM
5

Complain to your head teacher/principal. Get your parents to complain the the school board. Keep complaining and writing letters etc to people who have some sort of authority on the matter until something is done. If you're story is truthful then she has no place teaching kids and it needs to be brought to someone's attention.
/r/MensRights17/01/17 11:35 AM
2

So it'd be cool if a 13 year old girl went out to get laid and a 46 year old man happily agreed to have sex with her because she "had a nice body"? You'd be fine with that? Because it's not rape?
/r/MensRights16/01/17 03:19 PM
1

It is. You just have to prove you didn't cross that line between self defence and assault.
/r/MensRights16/01/17 02:32 PM
3

Which will probably backfire when 17 people saw him "assault" a woman.
/r/MensRights14/01/17 12:36 PM
2

As far as is necessary to stop an attack.
/r/MensRights14/01/17 12:30 PM
3

This is the right answer for any type of self defence regardless of who your defending yourself against. Use the appropriate amount of force necessary to stop the attack.
/r/MensRights14/01/17 12:30 PM
4

In the eyes of the law it is certainly acceptable. As a man you'd just have a harder time convincing a judge/jury that your use of force was necessary. Which is a problem if your jury consists of "never hit a woman" type people.
/r/MensRights14/01/17 12:28 PM
22

In the adopted case, both parents are perfectly aware that they are going to be raising a child that is not biologically theirs. They both agree to that and are perfectly happy doing so. If they split, that sucks but neither gets an out simply because the child isn't biologically theirs. In this post's case, they have both decided to raise a child that is biologically theirs. The mother knowingly allows this man to pay for a child she knows might not actually be his because she slept with someon…
/r/MensRights26/10/16 01:48 AM
0

How about we teach people to just not hit anyone.
/r/MensRights10/09/16 01:31 PM
0

While true I don't think the examples in that picture are very good at all. The only one that shows a situation where men are possibly treated unfairly is the custody battle one. More men in combat roles will obviously result in more male deaths. More men in industrial workplaces will obviously increase the number of males being injured/killed in a workplace accident. Where's the correlation between men killing themselves and that being an example of an argument against the existence of Male pri…
/r/MensRights18/07/16 03:09 AM
0

Isn't saying that more men die in combat or due to industrial workplace accidents along the same lines as saying women get paid less for the same job? We all know that this is false, there is simply just more men in higher paid jobs than there is women. Just like there are more men in combat roles and industrial workplaces than there is women. I just don't like that argument all that much.
/r/MensRights18/07/16 03:03 AM
1

When have I ever said all men are basement dwelling neck beards?
/r/MensRights17/07/16 12:26 PM
-6

Is this the standard response we give people that go against the hivemind?
/r/MensRights17/07/16 10:32 AM
-6

Fuck it, I'll get down voted to hell but here goes. I'm a guy, I saw this film a few days ago in the UK and I thought it was great. Better than X-Men Apocalypse, better than the steaming pile of crap that was Independence Day 2. The film itself doesn't attack or demean men whatsoever in my opinion. It had a lot of laugh out loud moments and I loved the cast together in it. However, Chris Hemsworth is probably the best thing about this film. Never knew he had such great comedy timing. Second best…
/r/MensRights17/07/16 10:01 AM
2

UK*
/r/MensRights28/10/14 07:51 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter