TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MachMR Archive

View 0 posts and 20 comments by MachMR on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

I've heard a theory that most feminists want to act out rape fantasies in the bedroom due to these subconscious tingles as well. Can't seem to find my source though...
/r/MensRights23/07/13 07:25 AM
10

Warning: Holding one's breath for the above event may cause severe injury from suffocation.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 07:20 AM
3

You are right there, mostly just picking out the one grain of truth amongst all the lies.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 04:55 AM
1

Naturally, as OP describes below, smaller people can outdrink bigger people due to tolerance. The problem is that its hard to quantify tolerance while it is very easy to quantify BAC. Its not an accurate description I admit but I don't have a better way to describe who would be 'more drunk' in this case
/r/MensRights22/07/13 04:53 AM
1

There is a difference about alcohol absorpsion rate but in the long run (couple hours) alcohol affects both genders equally, all else being equal of course.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 02:09 AM
8

The only thing remotely true was the comment about a man and woman were to drink the same amount the women would be more incapacitated. Of course this would assume the man is the bigger person in this example since BAC is a function of alcohol consumed and fluid content in the body (read as size/weight). All else is utterly false. And even assuming the man is bigger is on shakey ground given the size of some women I have seen.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 01:35 AM
24

Agreed, most femenists I see are all about whats in it for them. Women have rape and DV troubles in India? Laws giving them ability to multilate and kill without discrimination should be passed in the US to even things out.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 09:58 PM
4

So part of the article is about how the presence of women in rich men's lives causes more charity. Almost as if these men would (and in the author's mind should) go out of their way to provide for others with their excess resources. Nice to see how great of a job we are doing about pigeonholing people into roles based off external circumstances huh?
/r/MensRights21/07/13 09:42 PM
-2

Not to be rude, but at the time wages were so low, most families had to send their women and even children to the factories to earn a living. The modern concept of male provider and women homemaker wasn't well cemented until the 1920's when an acceptable minimum wage emerged to allow it to become widespread.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 02:58 PM
7

Perhaps it is because she is a woman that she was able to recognize the bridle for what is truely is. Not in a men and women are different way, but in a socialization way. I think that scene about the queen giving yhe bridle to the princess is more than just metaphorical, just dressed up in imagery.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 09:17 PM
10

I think it didn't work because the judge herself was a woman, and a highly rational one. Takes one to know one and all that.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 04:41 PM
3

When you think about it, it makes perfect sense. Compassion and empathy are very desirable traits in peacetime, and they help society function. But in war, compassion prevents you from being the killer you are supposed to be. So how do you get your citizens to be caring towards another yet willing to kill? Well, those guys over there, they aren't human so killing them is okay, as compared to killing your neighbors.
/r/MensRights13/04/13 06:31 AM
10

Just to ask the question, but what law in particular did she violate that could even result in jail time? Just because she should be imprisoned doesn't mean she actually commited a jailable offense. Playing devil's advocate here, of course.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 09:34 PM
25

Only if you are female...
/r/MensRights12/04/13 12:34 AM
3

As an Air Force brat, I've lived an about seven homes, including Memphis when my dad was a navy liason in Millington. Its perhaps the most racially divided city in the country, and I have lived in a few. Now I was never attacked, but I have been called everything under the sun. I feel for you and agree with your point.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 12:26 AM
2

It is barbaric. If ANYONE decides to leave someone they currently cohabitate with, knowing that the other person possesses at least some of the household's income, they should expect their quality of life to decrease. It has nothing to do with man vs woman.
/r/MensRights11/04/13 06:43 PM
1

Given the trend of increasing government intervention since the Great Depression, you bet.
/r/MensRights11/04/13 12:28 AM
1

I thought of this too when I read this. Business is all about making profit as large as possible and little else. You can count on private companies trying to maximize profit. Considering employee compensation is THE greatest expense, one can conclude that companies would jump all over a cheaper source of labor, even as one a few as 5 percent. Given the fact that unemployment percentanges by gender don't show an excessive spread, one has to conclude that, from an employer's standpoint, there is …
/r/MensRights10/04/13 10:49 PM
4

Can't argue with every person you come across. disregard and save ammo for better targets. Metaphorically, of course.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 12:50 AM
3

Here is my thoughts of this issue, in another's words http://www.smbc-comics.com/index.php?db=comics&id=2939#comic
/r/MensRights09/04/13 12:27 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter