TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Mackowatosc Archive

View 0 posts and 3,658 comments by Mackowatosc on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 3,658 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I dont exactly treat that as an achievement. You on the other hand, seem to put some crazy value to it...
/r/MensRights22/05/20 10:42 PM
1

If she's insane when it suits her, she should have no right of access to a child. She might get another bout of "insane" and try to murder her child AGAIN. PP Depression is common, and can be very severe if she's so depressed that se murders her children, she should be in a closed mental facility. For life. Society cannot be risked for just one insane fem.
/r/MensRights22/05/20 02:08 PM
1

SCUM manifesto. Works of one Dvorkin. Treating Asata Shakur, feminist ideological murderer of a police officer in a line of duty - as a hero, up to naming an all-girl organisation after her. This is your real feminism. Nice words might sound nice, but they are empty and worthless.
/r/MensRights22/05/20 01:41 PM
1

if and when you meet a woman who does want to give back, she'll say the same thing about you: "why should I be expected to provide anything when he doesn't?" Cool. I'll manage either way, especially being bi ;) Put her back in the sea. with current relationships-related laws, this is often...problematic. And expensive. The good women are out there, but it will be impossible to find one if you aren't willing to take risk of giving to begin with. Again...I'll manage. Im a man, and managing is what…
/r/MensRights22/05/20 01:27 PM
1

lol, i have wayyy to much sex to be one ;) not that getting to have sex is in any way difficult these days. You should stop thinking that someone's standards being different or higher than your, means that he's in the wrong.
/r/MensRights22/05/20 12:48 PM
1

All relationships are based on providing things for each other. Providing companionship, positive feelings, emotional support, entertainment, sex, etc. Shame that, more often than not, women dont really provide their part these days, and they cant be held responsible for it too - especially in long term relationships / marriages (especially legally/financially during divorce etc). Why should we provide, or be expected to provide, anything, then?
/r/MensRights22/05/20 12:31 PM
1

some are fun in other words, providing her with laughs. have a good character in genera depending on what it exactly was, might as well be self-serving for those girls, instead of loving him for who he is. Not good enough.
/r/MensRights22/05/20 12:00 PM
1

sure, they love...what they are provided with, usually. In one way or another, its always "i love him because he gives me X, Y, Z" type of talking, and nearly never "i love him because he is X, Y, Z person".
/r/MensRights22/05/20 11:30 AM
1

there's literally no female in the world that is not abusing a man in one way or another, if only indirectly.
/r/MensRights22/05/20 10:55 AM
1

In other words, men pressuring / coercing a woman for sex, likewise, is not a problem for you? Its a serious felony for a reason, you know...
/r/MensRights18/05/20 01:06 PM
1

yep, she can divorce you for that. Of course the other side around, its "toxic relationship and forcing her to sex". Welcome to feminism.
/r/MensRights18/05/20 10:24 AM
1

But nobody can force you to have sex with someonw if you dont want to Oh my sweet summer child. You really underestimate what emotional pressure can make you do, totally against your will. And women love using it when it suits them, especially in long term relationships.
/r/MensRights18/05/20 10:22 AM
1

But a lot of people in this sub seem to want a war on feminism. geee, I wonder why. The fringe “kill all men” crowd are just that. yeeeeeah, go read feminist classics, persons that are VENERATED by feminists almost universally. Dvorkin, Valerie Solanas, Asata Shakur, et consortes. Go over their deeds. Then tell me, why should I ever trust a person that subscribes to their ideology? Why should I risk? For their good? How about NO ?
/r/MensRights15/05/20 03:29 PM
1

Sure. But I think you get a lot of empathy back if you give it. unless you give to a woman, especially long term. It obviously doesn’t always work Its not good enough then. . And if you’re nice to everyone (or at least most people), you’ll seem really cool to everyone, so your life is a net positive overall. with men, yes, I experienced that. But just with men. We all have trauma female trauma is not our problem. They are big, strong, powerfull, independent ones by their own doing and will - the…
/r/MensRights15/05/20 03:09 PM
1

Talk to me. I'm a fem and a men's rights advocate then you have no right to opinion on the matter. Not your body, not your choice, not your right to have opinion other that a man tells you to. It's possible to be both. LOL, in your dreams. You either support us, and only us, in everything, without question or fail, or you are an obstacle that supports the opponent. Choice is yours but you can only play for one side.
/r/MensRights15/05/20 03:01 PM
1

No, neither is good Welcome to politics and diplomacy 101: If its beneficial to US, then it IS good. we should probably not just fight assholes with more assholery. we should fight with tools and weapons that are swift and effective, not ethical and good for the enemy. If you dont want that, how about not being an enemy? OR course, if it suits us, you will still be perceived as enemy, but thats, again, politics and diplomacy 101: No such thing as friends, just tools at best. Nothing personal, an…
/r/MensRights15/05/20 02:52 PM
1

tbh, their life is not our problem. Our problem is how they treat us, and thats it. Our needs should be our sole concern here, she can handle her own psychiatric needs - alone.
/r/MensRights15/05/20 02:48 PM
1

meh. Naming and shaming should always be done in such cases, with no leniency. Especially if we as a societal group (men) could benefit from it.
/r/MensRights15/05/20 02:42 PM
1

-why should parents of a woman be more responsible why should the guy take any risk for only a woman? her parents problem is not my problem. -just don't marry women who can't work for themselves her working or not can easily change for the worse, and she will not be pulling her weight. We must have a legal, efficient, and effective way to curb and punish behaviors that result in being forced to stay in a relationship with a parasite.
/r/MensRights15/05/20 02:15 PM
1

not much of a problem, just find a female / feminist judge :>
/r/MensRights15/05/20 01:20 PM
3

We will never coexist peacefully because of history of feminism. Only an idiot forgives amd absolves an ideology or organisation.
/r/MensRights14/05/20 12:24 AM
1

Most mainstream feminists think that, not radfems.
/r/MensRights12/05/20 02:31 PM
1

Yeah, I know. Im married, good sir. This will change soon tho, and on my terms too.
/r/MensRights12/05/20 12:29 AM
1

She might need a man, but does a man need her? Doubtfull.
/r/MensRights11/05/20 11:08 AM
1

Men are not offended because you are allowed in. Men are worried because it will mean picking up slack after women in yet another area. And risking life and limb in the meantime. Can you pull a wounded guy from under fire? Can you carry as much? Are you as intimidating if need be?
/r/MensRights08/05/20 01:57 PM
1

and this is why men must be taught to always take side of men, including male children - instead of appeasing yet another female. At the same time, women must not have any right to argue about man's body, money, assets, goals, etc, not can they have any right to have any control over our matters - under criminal penalties if they try to achieve such control or try to argue / push us towards not having our goals and needs 100% met. Its a toxic behavior, really, to limit men like that.
/r/MensRights07/05/20 02:42 PM
1

One thing is missing - greater criminal punishment if its a woman trying to decide about a male child - due to larger societal impact.
/r/MensRights07/05/20 12:55 PM
1

well, thank your parents (most probably, mommy dear) for removing ~30% of your nerve endings, not to mention other problems stemming from the procedure. You not knowing otherwise is not an excuse, nor is it "nothing happened" situation.
/r/MensRights04/05/20 01:53 PM
1

Did you consent to it? No? Then consequences must be dished out for lack of chance to not consent.
/r/MensRights04/05/20 12:24 PM
1

Or just a median modern female. Where morals are what it suits her, when it suits her. And where society enables it.
/r/MensRights04/05/20 12:22 PM
1

Then extend that care into a permanent closed mental ward care. She is not safe to walk free in public.
/r/MensRights03/05/20 09:07 PM
1

Right call should be death during proper self defence. Barring that, few years of mandatory prison sentence without parole.
/r/MensRights03/05/20 09:06 PM
1

Any evidence that could be verified on that, maybe?
/r/MensRights03/05/20 01:33 AM
2

Because they themselves.dont have a brain and thought process of their own, apparently. But, what to expect?
/r/MensRights01/05/20 03:42 AM
1

Their involvement is questionable at best, when it comes to motive, tho.
/r/MensRights30/04/20 12:26 PM
1

Its not acting out of need for security. Its being malicious by genetics.
/r/MensRights30/04/20 12:23 PM
1

For a week of hormones, you will not notice much if anything. For few yers, yeah...if you also start on testosterone suppresion. Hormones are not magic pills of sex change ffs... Source: majored in biology
/r/MensRights28/04/20 10:11 AM
1

Hate is always healthy, provided you stay in control.of it. It enables you to destroy enemies better and in more efficient way.
/r/MensRights26/04/20 01:14 AM
1

yep
/r/MensRights24/04/20 07:40 AM
1

That is because unconditional morality is not something women have, most of the time. Usually its "until it suits me otherwise" condition on everything.
/r/MensRights24/04/20 01:34 AM
1

Not enough. Euthanise the child, then the scammer mom for good measure. First is a punishment for her. Second is ensuring she will not so it again.
/r/MensRights24/04/20 01:22 AM
4

Man doing it to a woma already is literally classed as rape. But not the other way around. Welcome to equal law written by feminists. LOL.
/r/MensRights24/04/20 01:21 AM
1

Forced marriages in Europe ended when Christianity was introduced. ....yeeeeah, that is so incorrect, it hurts to look at. Not true at all, if anything, christianity made the problem worse by far, at least in my region.
/r/MensRights23/04/20 08:31 AM
1

I'd disagree about 'we dont care' part. We should care about what benefits us primarily, and put everything else second - just like feminism. The rest is just us needing to get some good diplomacy. Not "ethics", mind you, but diplomacy - real ethics is not really effective when interacting with someone that is not ethical in the same way.
/r/MensRights22/04/20 01:55 PM
1

they do? What exactly, apart from spending money? Even most of raising kids, really, is done by fathers - they are the ones that give positive encouragement or consequences- rather than, mostly worthless, words of "emotional support" of mothers - which men give too, btw.
/r/MensRights22/04/20 10:41 AM
1

Conscription and combat service has nothing to do with abortion rights. They are two entirely different topics.
/r/MensRights22/04/20 10:34 AM
1

no spousal support should ever exist after relationship ends. If she does not work and earn money, its her problem now. Men are not society's ATMs, and OUR Money and Assets must be under OUR absolute, unquestionable control at all times.
/r/MensRights22/04/20 10:28 AM
1

“Women make an important contribution to society by becoming pregnant, giving birth and breast-feeding.” LOL. They contribute only to themselves here, not to "society". Then again - feminists only deem themselves as society, so...fitting, maybe?
/r/MensRights22/04/20 10:05 AM
1

motive: feels.
/r/MensRights21/04/20 02:22 PM
1

Good. Burn her finances to the ground.
/r/MensRights20/04/20 01:10 AM
1

by your own standard you should be treated as malicious we are all malicious in eyes of feminism anyway, so what's the difference, exactly? I see zero reason not to use diplomatic rule of equal response. I'll manage without. Im used to this.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 03:26 PM
1

Being misguided or wrong doesn’t make a person malicious. maybe, maybe not. Why take a risk with giving a benefit of a doubt? :)
/r/MensRights19/04/20 02:12 PM
1

Like hawks, women behave mostly like an animal does - feelings and instinct over and above thought, discipline, and logic.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 11:16 AM
1

If the intentions are seemingly good, nut outcome is not, its still malicious. And we should name and treat it as such, no exceptions.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 11:10 AM
2

you can move on yet keep said mom removed from your life as consequence - for good measure. Keeps her from fucking you over a second time. Life experience is, if someone gets another chance, they will fuck you over due to not feeling consequences. Why bother? Plenty of fish out there.
/r/MensRights14/04/20 02:21 PM
0

BLM crowd, lol. They are targeted at young, black females. Go figure...
/r/MensRights14/04/20 12:55 PM
2

Well, they dont exactly advertise that part of her ...activism, lol.
/r/MensRights14/04/20 12:46 PM
0

tbh, not forgiving does not mean harboring anger. Its more about perpetuating the consequences.
/r/MensRights14/04/20 12:38 PM
3

I recommend forgiving her utter debilism.
/r/MensRights14/04/20 10:04 AM
2

If the mommy is toxic, removing her is in child's best interest. And most are toxic, especially during divorce.
/r/MensRights14/04/20 10:03 AM
3

yep, she wrote her manifesto about that.
/r/MensRights14/04/20 09:50 AM
0

and he's still recognized for his many other deeds and words, that is saying something dont you think ?
/r/MensRights14/04/20 09:39 AM
13

Valerie Solanas attempted to murder Andy Warhol and one another guy. Asata Shakur murdered a police officer by shooting him in the back of his head. Both are feminist icons. The latter has an all-girls organisation named after her, promoting "her activism". So, yeah... This is real feminism for me.
/r/MensRights14/04/20 09:37 AM
3

give'm a vibrator to buzz with, maybe they will stop that bs, then.
/r/MensRights14/04/20 09:34 AM
1

Its just an example of what should be checked and datamined about any woman nowadays, before building any meaningfull relationship with her. Its just a safe thing to do. Perhaps someone will learn from that instead of doing a mistake of trusting :)
/r/MensRights12/04/20 01:45 AM
1

she had 6 cases with her oldest kids before i ever knew her we have 3 kids together Mistake A, right here - not researching the partner before commiting.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 12:58 AM
1

you do you. i stopped consorting with any damaged goods long time ago, and my life got way better. Im not daddy therapist to fix her. I EXPECT her to not be a psychiatric case.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 12:00 AM
1

She will fuck up your life, most of the time. Not worth the hassle tbh - its just a woman, and just a relationship. Have high standards, they will serve you way better.
/r/MensRights11/04/20 11:00 PM
1

Protip: if any woman calls herself broken in any way, you should a) belive her, and b) run. Fast, and far.
/r/MensRights11/04/20 10:58 PM
1

Yeah, funny how that works. They will not think and learn tho, that part is beyond their capability and will.
/r/MensRights08/04/20 10:57 AM
1

So typical of her ilk.
/r/MensRights08/04/20 10:46 AM
1

World might have changed for the better, but not for men. More like on their expense, lol.
/r/MensRights07/04/20 08:39 AM
1

We dont exist to help women. She can resolve her problems herself, like a big girl she is.
/r/MensRights07/04/20 08:36 AM
1

At least where I live, she gets 2 years paid by the company+government. she provides nothing to the company and taxpayer in return. her position is locked down, with company jabing to keep it open for her, if she wants to maaaybe return. You can hire part time/temporary which is often impossible in high profile jobs, or positions that require expensive training (on that matter, will she pay for said training?). Alternative is forcing her work load on other employees. Nothing of above results in …
/r/MensRights02/04/20 09:59 AM
1

Work, experience, expertise...you forget lesser availability, added risks and losses for the company stemming from maternal leave, and a ton of other factors.
/r/MensRights02/04/20 09:45 AM
1

Empathy for them is not in our best interest, judging by their own words.
/r/MensRights31/03/20 11:53 AM
1

Not our problem. Leniency and forgivness is something we should never ever give.
/r/MensRights31/03/20 09:56 AM
1

Why should a man stand for a woman? Adult girl that you are, stand for yourself. We dont exist for you tbh. Unless ot suits us at the moment, and on solely our terms, that is.
/r/MensRights21/03/20 12:54 AM
1

She will not pull any shit...until it suits her otherwise. Women have a filter in their ethics, that says "...unless its good for me" on any "this is wrong".
/r/MensRights21/03/20 12:46 AM
2

Not feminists. Women. Women do that.
/r/MensRights18/03/20 10:33 PM
1

Am a programmer..if you are good enough, there's always a spot to fit in.
/r/MensRights18/03/20 09:20 PM
1

"we" as in who?
/r/MensRights17/03/20 11:54 AM
1

being taught to hate someone is not equivalent to being abused by that someone, tho.
/r/MensRights17/03/20 08:44 AM
1

therefore you did nothing. Nothing to count as "pro you" as opposed to "contra". Trying is not enough.
/r/MensRights16/03/20 09:30 AM
1

What would you do? Let me guess, we should "accept our guilt and make amends"? If you want war, war is what you will get from men. Often, more effective one than you can handle.
/r/MensRights16/03/20 09:30 AM
1

By that logic, men are said - by feminists, no less - to be guilty of literally everything since beginnning of history. So...yeah, you might want to start with your movement. Its feminism that started that talk.
/r/MensRights16/03/20 09:08 AM
1

you might hate it - but did you DO something about it?
/r/MensRights16/03/20 09:06 AM
1

We should stop? Im not doing anything to you. Go bark up the right tree. You hurt your bf? He should leave an abusive woman then.
/r/MensRights16/03/20 04:00 AM
1

Yeah, we are hostile to trolls like you.
/r/MensRights16/03/20 03:57 AM
1

You call masculinity "toxic". It is enough to be deemed an attack.
/r/MensRights16/03/20 03:54 AM
1

You could not possibly understand what and how we internalize. You are not a man.
/r/MensRights16/03/20 03:54 AM
1

Then you are a hater. Masculinity is positive by sheer definition. Unlike feminity. Lies, talking behind one another's back, backstabbing...list could go on. Real feminity. Go change that.
/r/MensRights16/03/20 03:53 AM
1

You are guilty by association. You expect us to take a risk for you, like you think we are on a same team. We are not. Feminism declared us as enemy. Cool with me. I'll manage.
/r/MensRights16/03/20 03:51 AM
1

Masculinity is always good for us. If it hurts women, too bad.
/r/MensRights16/03/20 03:45 AM
1

You say you hate it, but did you do anything to change that? Let me guess...you didnt.
/r/MensRights16/03/20 03:44 AM
1

Thats your standard. Our is different, and better to us.
/r/MensRights16/03/20 03:36 AM
1

If she cant or willingly will notraise above what hate she was taught towards Men, she is as guilty. Its "hard"? Being an adult is hard. Deal with it. "Its hard" is looking for an excuse where you should be looking for a way to acomplish despite any problem. MAN up, little child.
/r/MensRights16/03/20 03:33 AM
1

Nope. It is very not okay to associate those doctors with rapists like she did. Why she did that, its not N issue. She did, and it is derogatory. She is neither sane, nor safe to be around if you are male.
/r/MensRights16/03/20 03:30 AM
1

Shame that she did not invite a MAN to talk about this issue. Raw knowledge is not everything in that topic.
/r/MensRights12/03/20 03:03 PM
1

What they like is not our problem. If she is an offending pedo, she should die.
/r/MensRights12/03/20 03:01 PM
1

Good. Men invented it, it should work for them. She can invent and build her own medium if she has a problem with whwt we built.
/r/MensRights12/03/20 02:57 PM
1

Me. If she has a problem with me, she knows where doors out are located. Im a man. I can be just as happy without a woman in my life, and Im not defined by being in a relationship with one.
/r/MensRights11/03/20 06:46 PM
1

Well, tbh... you literally asked them to ban you, and said that you would not care. They complied with your wish, then ;)
/r/MensRights11/03/20 01:01 PM
1

Hey, f off. Sincerelly, bi guy.
/r/MensRights10/03/20 11:33 AM
3

Feminism, what to expect, really?
/r/MensRights05/03/20 11:20 PM
1

She is pushing him to have kid nr 4 against his expressed wishes. Thats enough to consider her toxic in my book. He said "no" already. She can go deal with it. No means no, right?
/r/MensRights05/03/20 11:14 AM
1

Its not a lie. Its not providing information to a potentially toxic partner, becquse that might prove deterimental to him. She is not entitled to his medical records.
/r/MensRights05/03/20 11:07 AM
1

Working hard is a hit different thing from how that work is used by society. Current state is not exactly acceptable from our point of view.
/r/MensRights04/03/20 12:02 PM
1

Thx, works wonders actually :)
/r/MensRights04/03/20 12:28 AM
0

Nope. I just have realistic standards. Trusting makes little sense nowadays, do I just dont bother.
/r/MensRights04/03/20 12:26 AM
0

Lol. We are not ATMs for females.
/r/MensRights04/03/20 12:24 AM
-1

And your gf will still fuck you over if its profitable enough for her to do so.
/r/MensRights04/03/20 12:21 AM
1

"she was there" does not mean that her work directly earned that amount. If it did not, its called "scamming" and "extortion", really.
/r/MensRights03/03/20 04:07 PM
1

Between the misspellings of words sorry for being on mobile. She received $38 billion in shares. did she earn that much, tho? or even close to that? The richest man on earth? That’s a different ball game No. If its HIS money and assets, its HIS money and assets. Not "theirs". If she didnt directly work for even a cent, she must not have access to it, nor any decision power over it. Does not matter who she is, or was. Does not matter who he is, and how much money he has. If he worked for it - its…
/r/MensRights03/03/20 03:59 PM
1

But...you do realise that phimosis is only rarely a case for circumcision, right? Many cases are resolvable w/o surgical intervention.
/r/MensRights03/03/20 09:58 AM
1

creadit is a very different thing to taking half the company's worth after many years just because "you were there at the start", lol. She's entitled to what the company was worth while she was activelly working there. Thats it.
/r/MensRights03/03/20 09:15 AM
1

If that is what women say to men broken by other women, we can say the same unto them. Really - she should not generalize, right? Or is it yet another double standard that we should just let go?
/r/MensRights02/03/20 06:29 PM
1

Her experience means nothing..she has no more right to generalise than any of us.
/r/MensRights02/03/20 01:14 PM
1

She is not a key figure by any margin. She worked just a little time there. She got her wage. She didnt acomplish much of company real value.
/r/MensRights02/03/20 10:02 AM
1

A bill is a bill. If she is using legislation as a political plaything, she should be on death row, not in the office.
/r/MensRights02/03/20 09:59 AM
1

If you employ a firearm, you are intending to kill. Its what guns do to people if you use them.
/r/MensRights28/02/20 01:14 PM
1

Nope. Child support should not exist in the first place, not how we know it anyway. If she cant upkeep it, she cant keep it.
/r/MensRights27/02/20 03:43 PM
1

People do sports for millions considering how damaging to health is to do sports at proffessional level, esp long-term, its no wonder they earn a LOT.
/r/MensRights27/02/20 02:17 PM
1

Yet more reason not to employ a woman, then.
/r/MensRights27/02/20 02:16 PM
0

even that is not acceptable, especially that it is men that pay most of the taxes. Oru money should not be spent on free stuff for nothing in return.
/r/MensRights27/02/20 01:58 PM
0

Sure. You are paying, I understand? Because, well, I want my money to go to me, my kids, and my partner, not to some random mommy because entitlement.
/r/MensRights27/02/20 01:57 PM
1

If you cannot upkeep a child, you should never strive to have one in the first place. No matter what times these are. Upkeep of the child rests on parents ALONE, not government or society.
/r/MensRights27/02/20 01:56 PM
1

Quick reminder if you are alive it's because a woman got pregnant and maybe she wasn't working during a period of time because it is both physically and mentally really hard. LOL, so what? Why would your employer pay you for YOUR child, that provides him with nothing, when you provide him with nothing, in return? Company does not exist for your baaaaby. It exists for owner's profit, ONLY. Denying women the right to have a paid break while in last month of pregnancy because you don't want to lose…
/r/MensRights27/02/20 01:54 PM
0

Because that employee has made the company plenty of money and they can afford it. LOL, so what? You are not entitled to money just because you have feelings of social JUSTICE. Money of the company is a property of company owner. You are not one? Too bad. Not for you. You have your pay, as per contract signed.
/r/MensRights27/02/20 01:52 PM
1

why do you want to be paid for work you didnt perform?
/r/MensRights27/02/20 01:50 PM
1

bc pills affect women's mood, libido, and even attraction to men. none of that is a problem of an employer, tbh.
/r/MensRights27/02/20 01:49 PM
1

he's gotta duck out all the time to put out fires might be valiant, but her employer gets zero financial gain from that. And they might very well be at a loss at one point. Expecting them to continuing her employment is just criminal.
/r/MensRights27/02/20 01:14 PM
1

Its not just about "being the best" in theory. Its about making an effort, in which men are statistically more likely to excel/perform, right now. And Im yet to see any verifiable scientific proof that "diversity" will boost my measurable income enough to offset any potential loss/problem steming from "diverse employment". I dont run company for social justice. I run it for my long-term profit.
/r/MensRights27/02/20 01:05 PM
1

Agreed, however, someone who thinks that an all woman work force would get nothing done, is, in fact, misogynist. Meh. IDGAF that they can get MUCH done. If I employ someone, I want 100% PEAK efficiency and effort. If men are better in that regard by 1%, I want an all-men employment capability. For profit. Mine.
/r/MensRights27/02/20 01:04 PM
1

at my company, most women spend their time on a coffee breaks, instead of doing any measurable work. So...I'd not disagree, lol. We cannot unfortunatelly, just kick them off, because vagina and babies.
/r/MensRights27/02/20 12:52 PM
1

You really think that women will choose to be held accountable? Someone has little experience, I see...
/r/MensRights27/02/20 12:48 PM
1

constructive interaction, with women - pick one. Usually. or have a history of failed relationships or traumatic experiences that have left them crippled by bitterness. and that is our fault? If so many women are unable to not be toxic, maybe its time to actually do something about that, instead of expecting us to be Elsa and 'let it go'. Forgivness breeds repetition of problem, nothing else. ITs not efficient, either. And one does not need to have the traumatic experiences themselves. We also T…
/r/MensRights27/02/20 12:47 PM
5

We will focus on what we want and when we want, not on what women want us to focus. She has no penis so she has no right to opinion nor right to spin our tale.
/r/MensRights26/02/20 12:45 AM
4

How many women? Not our team, not our problem.
/r/MensRights26/02/20 12:42 AM
2

So? We should only allow men to shape narration of men's issues and rights. They can listen, and do what they are told. In other words, we should say and do like feminists say and do. Equally.
/r/MensRights26/02/20 12:41 AM
1

Woman will promote what suits her best, most of the cases/time. Double so for feminist. Read feminist classic works, you get so nice ideas...like male genocide, lol.
/r/MensRights26/02/20 12:22 AM
2

99% of the cases, no. Intersex are usually not fertile.
/r/MensRights26/02/20 12:20 AM
1

Not our job to help them, and no profit for us there. Our job is to safeguard our goals, assets, and our group. We are not on the same team.
/r/MensRights26/02/20 12:19 AM
3

Women can take care of their problem, by themselves. Its not our problem, really. If they cant do that...well too bad. Again...not our problem, and not our issue. Our problem is MEN not treated like we should be. Thats it.
/r/MensRights26/02/20 12:16 AM
2

Yep. Equal treatment, lol. With no mercy.
/r/MensRights25/02/20 11:28 PM
3

Doesnt matter. It happens, so must be taken into account. Group-wide consequences just work.
/r/MensRights25/02/20 08:39 PM
2

Having a say isnt even remotely enough. Our goal should always be full control and decisive power, unchallengable legally by any woman, no matter what. Our way or the highway.
/r/MensRights25/02/20 08:38 PM
2

Meh. They do not see us as people, that much is certain.
/r/MensRights25/02/20 08:33 PM
5

If she didnt want to have kid, she should not have sex. No abortion for you, and no safe haven rights then. This is an only acceptable answer.
/r/MensRights25/02/20 08:30 PM
4

Hee risk is not our problem. She has a way out, we must have said way out too. Equality.
/r/MensRights25/02/20 08:28 PM
3

Now, check who exactly pushed certain laws into place, and you know who is abput equality, and who is about manipulation and using men as commodity animals.
/r/MensRights25/02/20 08:27 PM
4

Honest adults...where woman is quite often only honest when and if it suits her at the moment - especially nowadays. Worthless approach. Go on google, do some searches. Look on how many women advice other women to lie about birth control. Up to and including whole read pieces on major female-oriented portals. Lie, subterfuge, and manipulation of male sexuality to suit woman's goals is treated, nowadays, as a normal, perfectly acceptable thing to do. Obviously, this must change.
/r/MensRights25/02/20 08:26 PM
6

Its also consequence for women yet they have a LEGAL way out. Such double stamdards are not exsctly acceptable, nor equal.
/r/MensRights25/02/20 08:22 PM
3

It does not block us if we do the law the feminist way, and write it aproprietly. Evil, but effective. And in diplomacy, outcome always justifies the means.
/r/MensRights25/02/20 08:21 PM
6

Ive had experience with work and with newborns. Had waaay less work with a newborn even when being left alone with one, than with my work. Might be just my experience to, but...it might also be a result of men mostly trying to find a way to achieve despite odds, while women almost universally mostly look for reason/way not to do it if they can have someone else do it for them. But that also mught just be my experience. Anyway Child rearing is not as extremally utterly impossible as women want me…
/r/MensRights25/02/20 04:13 PM
1

There really ought to be a male pill. I wonder why there isn't that is being worked on, albeit feminists do take a piss. There were some issues with psychological problems in clinical testing, so it was halted for a time. So, in due time, I do hope that paternity scamming will cease to be possible. since us women have been told it's OUR place to submit to drugs and devices .... so that men can fuck us whenever and however! you dont HAVE to. Noone is FORCING you. Of course, guys might choose anot…
/r/MensRights25/02/20 03:47 PM
1

Nope. We must be about our needs first, not female needs before our own. If she has a problem with us achieving our needs and goals, well too bad. Why should we always sacrifice?
/r/MensRights25/02/20 01:49 PM
1

Rights can only be based on truth. Religion is not truth by sheer definition, and thus should have no rights whatsoever. Instead, being religious should carry either forced reeducation or criminal punishment. Only science-based society can be named free and normal.
/r/MensRights25/02/20 01:20 PM
1

Block her. If she persists, call the lawyer and ban her from getting close to you, in court, due to stalking.
/r/MensRights25/02/20 01:16 PM
1

Not our problem. If we didnt consent to the child, its not our child and she is using our sexuality in a way that we didnt consent to. Your accident is your problem. You can go and abort. Legal way out must be provided for us, bo matter the cost to women or their society. Way that 100% safeguards our emotions, money, assets, and legal standing.
/r/MensRights25/02/20 01:05 PM
4

Worthless religions should not have a right to interfere in Man's body, and..thats the end of it. God was never independently verified as an entity that positivelly exists, therefore there is no reason for such stupidity and cruelty.
/r/MensRights25/02/20 12:59 PM
1

Reason enough should be: company owner said so. He who has the money, sets the rules. If she does not like the arrangement, she can consider herself free to go somewhere else.
/r/MensRights25/02/20 12:52 PM
1

Meh. Two words feminists reeeee most about: "artificial uterus", lol
/r/MensRights25/02/20 12:37 PM
2

Meanwhile, boredpanda's facebook post on this topic has women hoping that...those guys are single. Dick hunting extraordinare. Alternativelly, women LOLing about men having issues. To be expected. Alternativelly, women trying to push the idea about making this all about shelter doggos instead, because they neeeeeed. Lol. Women. What to expect?
/r/MensRights23/02/20 04:08 PM
1

Your disagreement has no value, really. Feminists do not fight for any equality. They fight for female privileges. I never heard about feminists fighting for any issue that was solely male issue.
/r/MensRights21/02/20 11:35 AM
2

No such good feminists exist.
/r/MensRights21/02/20 11:34 AM
1

Writer is probably a pedo female. Lots of those around.
/r/MensRights21/02/20 11:25 AM
3

this is why you never go to a female therapists. Most women are inherently unable to fully understand us.
/r/MensRights20/02/20 02:12 PM
3

"no act of violence or abuse is minor" ...unless accused is female, lol. Then its a "misunderstanding", lol
/r/MensRights20/02/20 02:11 PM
1

primary purpose must always be what suits us at the moment. it might spur her on to retaliate you dont need to be vindictive for that, simply deny her, lol. It’s all about winning the war, not the battle. Winning a war is even better if nothing remains of your opponent.
/r/MensRights20/02/20 02:10 PM
2

so typical, lol.
/r/MensRights20/02/20 02:07 PM
1

Being vindictive is actually good. It teaches an enemy not to fuck with you. Its a matter HOW you use that, not IF you do.
/r/MensRights20/02/20 01:40 PM
1

This is why you never cover a criminal. Destroy her.
/r/MensRights20/02/20 01:40 PM
1

we say that it does, and dont really care what you think. Our expectations are not negotiable.
/r/MensRights20/02/20 01:36 PM
2

there is always some kind of payment, wheter is money exchange, or supporting a spouse in relationship. So...not much changes.
/r/MensRights20/02/20 01:29 PM
1

She would not speak before she was sure she was on the proper winning side. She is not about helping. She is jumping on social status profit bandwagon.
/r/MensRights20/02/20 01:27 PM
2

For that ilk, only women are "people". We men are just animals to use or cull. Oh well. Feminism, what to expect? Same BS since miss Dvorkin and Sally Gearhart's works, really.
/r/MensRights20/02/20 01:25 PM
4

If they dont do anything about it, they are guilty of being an enabler. At least that's what women do about men not reacting to DV. But I guess "its different" lol
/r/MensRights20/02/20 01:20 PM
6

6 year jail...suspended for 2. In other words, none whatsoever.
/r/MensRights20/02/20 12:32 PM
2

Just make two thin vertical slits in the wall of the box, and ask away...then guess which answer is correct lol
/r/MensRights20/02/20 11:23 AM
3

At least here in europe, a 17y old is legal age (in my country its 15+, even). Less than that if both partners are underage. Simple reason - teens were fucking since the world was turning, are fucking now, and will continue to do so, no matter what laws you pass.
/r/MensRights20/02/20 11:14 AM
2

"My gf sucked 37 dicks!" "...IN A ROW?" XD both movies are GOLD.
/r/MensRights20/02/20 11:11 AM
1

Meh. We had a case in poland where ...mommy kept to be primary caregiver to a child, after attempting (premeditated) murder of said child. By dumping that toddler in boiling water. Because mommies are best...apparently.
/r/MensRights20/02/20 11:08 AM
10

Bonus points if superintendent is a she. Triple points for feminists involved.
/r/MensRights20/02/20 11:03 AM
2

That is because men talk reality and facts, and women talk worthless feelings.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 03:18 PM
29

6 months? This society wouldnt last 48 hours.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 03:16 PM
7

Most women have zero understanding, because they dont bother with trying to understand. They expect to be provided with what they want, and thats it. A small part has SOME understanding on ehat they want/need. Other than that, its nothing.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 12:48 PM
1

Then you should act in favour of men, and only men.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 12:44 PM
5

That is correct. Correct term is being condescending.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 12:41 PM
1

She shared a prejudiced thought. Thats reason enough to condemn her if it suits our goals/profit.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 12:40 PM
1

Not our problem. Our problem is that her mindset is not good for MEN if she was prejudiced even for a moment. Her kid? Its her problem not to infringe on others while raising it. Not ours to be understanding - this is not free.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 12:38 PM
7

Some "mistakes" are quite deadly, too.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 12:31 PM
1

She voiced her unsaid thoughts later, tho. If she is prejudiced, then she is prejudiced. Does not matter if shw acted on it at the time. Its. Not. Acceptable. Acting on instinct? Are we talking about an animal? She is a human being, she should know, and be better than that. At least that is what MEN are told. Right?
/r/MensRights19/02/20 11:50 AM
1

We dont want a credit. We want you to stop expecting anything, because you have no right to expect anything from us, really. Especially not for free.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 11:45 AM
0

What she wants is not our problem. If she infringes our rights, she should be ..corrected. Unfortunately we cant really use a proper court sentencing but this will maybe change in the future, someday. She should not be allowed to be a parent if she is so prejudiced against half the society.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 11:43 AM
2

Mom didnt break out of anything. Shes still expecting that to be norm rather than an exception.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 11:41 AM
2

So much this.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 11:34 AM
0

Only stupid ones forgive. Never tends to end well, lol
/r/MensRights19/02/20 11:32 AM
1

Bingo. And she appears to not be able to discern that.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 11:29 AM
1

She said, herself, that she was prejudiced. That is reason enough to condemn her.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 09:58 AM
1

Nope. Its her duty to be able to discern real dangers from her prejudice and perceived problems that dont exist in reality. Apparently, she is unable to do that. She is also prejudiced. And she shapes her child in her own kmage - that of an inept, prejudiced womanchild that fears her own shadow.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 09:57 AM
7

Does not matter, really. She is so full of stereotypes, it spills out her ears. Yet she would expect us not to stereotype, surely.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 09:50 AM
3

All The Gear, All The Time - as we motorcycle riders say. No exceptions.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 09:44 AM
3

So, most heterosexual relationships nowadays. In one way or another.
/r/MensRights18/02/20 11:57 AM
1

Female equality, where men do all work, and women solely profit. LOL.
/r/MensRights18/02/20 11:56 AM
1

Its not needee for them to understand, its enough if they comply tbh...
/r/MensRights18/02/20 11:48 AM
1

Tbh one precludes another. If you support women, you will bring some men down, which is not acceptable. Our good must always end up on top.
/r/MensRights18/02/20 11:45 AM
2

They can leave the child at the hospital. Also, google safe haven laws. Women do get options. Men get none.
/r/MensRights16/02/20 08:59 AM
1

No. His consemt was retracted, therefore she is guilty of paternity fraud - just like her retracting consent to have sex, retroactivelly, is nowadays called "rape".
/r/MensRights16/02/20 08:58 AM
1

If we get legal obligation, she can get the same level.of being forced. Equality.
/r/MensRights16/02/20 08:55 AM
1

...unless tampered with by the female.
/r/MensRights16/02/20 08:51 AM
3

Stem cells, not just bine marrow. Any sex will do. Not "incubator", too. Either a surrogate mom to carry full pregnancy, or an artificial uterus. The latter does not exist yet, but is being worked on.
/r/MensRights14/02/20 08:45 PM
2

Yep. Of course downside of that is the fact that you will still need either a female for carrying the pregnancy to term, or alternativelly, an artificial uterus. The latter one is in the works and testing on cattle was being done in last few years. So...one day, women might happen to be out of luck. And they will RAGE.
/r/MensRights14/02/20 08:26 PM
0

I should do what is most profitable to my group. That being men, not mythical "everyone".
/r/MensRights14/02/20 08:24 PM
1

Nope. You neee a fully fledged CELL for that. Sperm is not a cell, its equivalent to a virus at best, and quite a simple one too. Ita not even technically alive, it works untill seminal fluid is there to provide sugar gradient for its movement. Its a not exactly smart guided missile, with genetic payload and a chemotaxy instead of its guidance. radar. What men CAN use, is our stem cells, because they also can be reverted to an egg.
/r/MensRights14/02/20 08:22 PM
8

Bingo. If we are told that we have no right to opinion - im cool with that but I expect exactly the same in return - her having no right to opinion on our matters. Now lets see if she is OK with that....equality.
/r/MensRights14/02/20 08:20 PM
1

easy. If you deem youself a man, then you ARE a man.
/r/MensRights14/02/20 03:18 PM
1

Being violent Id beg to differ. Without controlled violence you'd not have soldiers that protect us. self-centered without this, you'd have no achievement. Its a matter of HOW you use those, not IF you use them.
/r/MensRights14/02/20 03:17 PM
2

insisted this being the keyword, lol
/r/MensRights14/02/20 03:12 PM
2

There’s proper ways to acknowledge women’s issues this is not our business nor problem, tho. We should put rights of men first, and foremost.
/r/MensRights14/02/20 03:11 PM
1

Might make sense, but is it profitable to OUR goals for it to exist, or is it better for us if it does not exist?
/r/MensRights14/02/20 03:10 PM
1

anti-MRA why would you invite trolls into our midst? assume good faith sure, when and if it suits us at the moment, why not? We dont need to "discuss" our rights. We need to have them respected 100%, solely on our terms.
/r/MensRights14/02/20 03:08 PM
6

Found guilty beyond reasonable doubt by a jury of his peers. based on? GPS records and police compter database searches. this does not verify what took place, really. Do you consider african americans to be normal people? are they feminists? If so, I will not exactly trust their words. Feminists usually have their own agenda other than "verified truth" - so taking their word into account is risking supporting a false accusation.
/r/MensRights14/02/20 03:06 PM
1

same stuff, really. emotional or sexual, its still prostitututing temporary favour for money/assets.
/r/MensRights14/02/20 02:24 PM
1

is it profitable for us to "clean our room", tho?
/r/MensRights14/02/20 02:21 PM
2

apparently or verified? are their words 100% verified with evidence? Are they feminists or normal people?
/r/MensRights14/02/20 02:17 PM
7

I get the point. It is pretty hard to get justice for rape survivors if you require evidence. Not our problem. Men must not be sentenced guilty if there is no evidence of that being verified fact. If you sentence without evidence, its not justice system, but system of wishfull thinking.
/r/MensRights14/02/20 02:15 PM
1

Some do. And you should not discriminate agains them instead of working on yourself. But you do you.
/r/MensRights14/02/20 02:04 PM
1

Females have no right to pov on our body. Its our sexuality, and it is only for us, not for them.
/r/MensRights14/02/20 01:00 PM
-1

Stem cells, in essence. On the other hand, its proven that you can evolve stem cells into eggs, so...;)
/r/MensRights14/02/20 12:57 PM
-18

On other words, you are about your private agenda, not about our rights. Shame.
/r/MensRights14/02/20 12:52 PM
1

Yep. And that bitching os abput him not spending money on her shoes instead. Or on her oh-so-cute-doggy.
/r/MensRights14/02/20 12:43 PM
2

Me. We dont have to do that in poland, really, lol. Its safe.
/r/MensRights14/02/20 12:40 PM
5

Equality cant stand competition, lol
/r/MensRights14/02/20 12:36 PM
1

No, no, no. The date must "just happen". She cant really show agency and do actual work and risk. And if he does, its rape. /s
/r/MensRights14/02/20 12:34 PM
2

Employers should invest in what is profitable, not equal. Doing otherwise is tantamount to working against their own company.
/r/MensRights14/02/20 12:31 PM
5

I wonder how many such girls work for boening, lol Would explain a lot.
/r/MensRights14/02/20 12:30 PM
3

Easy. Counterinteligence. XD
/r/MensRights14/02/20 12:24 PM
4

A homo sapiens sapiens female, exhibit 1.
/r/MensRights14/02/20 12:19 PM
9

Yep. People gotta pee. Men got to pee as well, and we should nt be made to wait because girls need to hog our toilet so they can fix makeup for half hour, while potentially perving at us. They have their own toilet, they can go there. We are as much entitled to less crowd and more privacy.
/r/MensRights13/02/20 03:56 PM
3

Profit is not always monetary gain. Social standing in a group of friends works just as well as a motivation to lie.
/r/MensRights13/02/20 01:46 PM
1

Happiness is not related to narriage, unless she starts to be toxic because the guy does not want to marry her.
/r/MensRights13/02/20 01:38 PM
1

Women's problems are not our problem, we should not be sacrificed because of that. If they want shorter wait time, maybe they have to learn to do their business faster?
/r/MensRights13/02/20 01:36 PM
3

Its called active self defence. If someone assaults you, you have a right to protect yourself. Its just a matter of allowing lethal means and outcomes, and many jurisdixtions already allow them in many cases anyway.
/r/MensRights12/02/20 03:15 PM
0

We need male legal professionals. She will still see things through a female eye. This means that there is a risk of her sacrificing our needs for "society". And our needs and expectations must be ensured above all else, tbh.
/r/MensRights12/02/20 03:07 PM
2

They cant? As long as women paint us men like that, we will do that too. If they get hurt because of this, its not really our problem. If you want women to be treated fairly by us, then work for, and achieve results, in the area of priperly removing feminist extremism from existence. That would remove large percentage of issues men face. With emphasis on "achieving results", because empty words are worthless.
/r/MensRights12/02/20 03:03 PM
2

Meh. We dont need "protection". We just need proper right to physical self defence against a woman., with no result being forbidden. Its just efficient and effective, and situation will resolve itself very soon.
/r/MensRights12/02/20 02:59 PM
3

This is exactly no truet must be given unless there is independently verifiable proof.
/r/MensRights12/02/20 12:07 PM
1

Tbh im yet to see an example of a male false rape accuser ;)
/r/MensRights12/02/20 11:55 AM
1

Being effective is more important than good.
/r/MensRights12/02/20 11:55 AM
2

Use an egg bank, problem solved, no custody for bio mom.
/r/MensRights11/02/20 12:13 PM
2

Thats more for scientists and engineers to decide right now. Limited testing is already being done for cattle, but its far away from zero-to-term-pregnancy-in-vitro.
/r/MensRights11/02/20 12:12 PM
1

Artificial womb is already being tested on cattle, just saying. Decade or two, and we might have it perfected for humans.
/r/MensRights11/02/20 12:06 PM
10

This is why you abort trisomy fetuses ;)
/r/MensRights11/02/20 10:40 AM
1

I do realise that. Im not reality tho. If you dont have evidence, there is literally nothing to investigate, period - unless you have witness (most will not have one), or a recording (same). You get another word against word case of statistical unknown, where you'd have a conviction. And you would only have to go to police, and say "i got assaulted, i need evidence taken". Thats it. Literally. Feminists could do wonders just by running a damned hotline/volunteer service that supports that move. …
/r/MensRights10/02/20 10:37 PM
1

Either a) not doing rape kit testing / obduction at all, or taking one or several showers before it, sometimes over the course of days or weeks. Any forensic bio evidence that was on her body is gone by that point, any light damage healed. THE very firt she thing she should do is obduction/rape kit to get that evidence. Usually its not the case. One of my friends was assaulted. She waited a f..ng month!!! before considering obduction, or anything. Because feelings. Too bad reality does not wait …
/r/MensRights10/02/20 10:20 PM
1

Lol, Musk's a villian? Why exactly? And marriage, yes, its about money and assets as well. Thats what law literally says. Its stupidity not to consider risk vs reward.
/r/MensRights10/02/20 02:47 PM
1

If its marriage, legalese and economy must always be analysed first. Grimes is miss noone compared to Musk.
/r/MensRights10/02/20 02:38 PM
2

that thing got to breed? sad.
/r/MensRights10/02/20 01:00 PM
2

poly funny way to say "cuckold" :>
/r/MensRights10/02/20 12:48 PM
1

what's the point in a house without a family you can always adopt, or pay a surrogate.
/r/MensRights10/02/20 12:46 PM
0

MGTOW is nothing but a huge group of sexists who want nothing more than the world to do whatever they want. basically male version of feminism then XD
/r/MensRights10/02/20 12:44 PM
2

We're here to prop ourselves up, not knock other people down. If tearing women down is profitable to men, its an acceptable collateral damage.
/r/MensRights10/02/20 12:40 PM
3

What does think she men are like - soulless automatons who just drink beer, fart, eat junkfood, and pollute the environment? you obviously forgot "rape" /s XD
/r/MensRights10/02/20 12:30 PM
0

its the victim's job to provide such evidence, if he/she has it in their posession. Women tend to knowingly remove and destroy evidence from their body in rape cases.
/r/MensRights10/02/20 12:21 PM
1

but the "victims" are still called victim. and this is exactly what should be changed. It directly implies guilt.
/r/MensRights10/02/20 12:20 PM
1

Elon's still stupid to risk all his work for her vagina, tho. Especially that economically and status-wise she is nowhere near him.
/r/MensRights10/02/20 12:17 PM
3

Being promiscous has nothing to do with sexually assaulting people, tbh.
/r/MensRights10/02/20 08:02 AM
1

Lol. Theft is not "human rights issue". She is not entitled to products for free. And, sorry, nothing is free.
/r/MensRights10/02/20 02:53 AM
3

Herpes is for life, unfortunately.
/r/MensRights10/02/20 12:35 AM
24

Amber Heard, real face of metoo, lol
/r/MensRights10/02/20 12:32 AM
1

Both sides are right? Since when theft is "right"?
/r/MensRights10/02/20 12:20 AM
14

Yeah, thats a type of women who think sex is something that just someone else works for her benefit, and its something that happens to them, not something that they do. Her partner is her robotic sex toy.
/r/MensRights07/02/20 10:38 AM
2

protip: self-defence legalese also encompasses attacks against one health, and assets/property.
/r/MensRights06/02/20 03:40 PM
3

Well, if only some women didnt false accuse, things could end up different, dont you think?
/r/MensRights06/02/20 03:39 PM
-1

So, you prefer being friends with someone that is against rights for half society. You are reeealy helping that part of society, well damn me... Protip: you are not helping. You are an enabler at this point, thus just as guilty of hate. Why? You know it is wrong, and do nothing. Talking to her is worthless in our eyes. Action would be removing her from your life, citimg that hate as reason. Ostracism just works, sorry. Hate is not "different point of view". Hate is hate. You are perpetuating and…
/r/MensRights06/02/20 02:58 PM
3

Im not loqthe at all, provided an independently verifiable evidence is there in every case. Evidence, not word of accusation. Those two are not one and the same.
/r/MensRights06/02/20 02:49 PM
2

Nope, keyword is "consequences". They dont come around without a reason.
/r/MensRights06/02/20 02:45 PM
1

Proper male therapist is a great help, indeed. Just avoid feminist ones, they will fuck you over big time.
/r/MensRights06/02/20 02:29 PM
1

She's diagnosed BPD ...yeah, that's when you always, ALWAYS remove a woman from your life. No matter how much "love" you feel for her. She's a liability to have around.
/r/MensRights06/02/20 02:28 PM
2

The fact that you need to ask this question is proof enough that you were.
/r/MensRights06/02/20 02:27 PM
2

its not about stewing in bitterness, lol. We are not women. Its about always forcing consequences, for our benefit. Outcome always justifies the means.
/r/MensRights06/02/20 02:25 PM
3

Adult. Did not do any time. Did have to perform active self defence (also, was forced to perform active defence of 3rd party against assailant), tho. Including with a firearm. Yes, one has a right to use lethal means of self defence, if its an only way to end the threat. Dont want that kind of response? Dont be an assailant, its very easy not to assault people.
/r/MensRights06/02/20 02:25 PM
1

Where I live its not legal to record someone w/o their explicit permission to do so. Recording any evidence in this manner would land me 2-6 years worth of mandatory prison sentence.
/r/MensRights06/02/20 02:21 PM
1

this is PETA. The same PETA that barked at plastic fucking figurines of soldiers, specyfically because they had sculpted plastic fucking fur on them. What exactly would you expect? :>
/r/MensRights06/02/20 02:20 PM
2

nah, its women that are mostly unable to do so.
/r/MensRights06/02/20 02:18 PM
1

didnt read it yet (at work), but let me guess...author is either female, or feminist? :>
/r/MensRights06/02/20 02:11 PM
2

your opinion has no value, sorry. We work based on OUR opinions, not yours.
/r/MensRights06/02/20 02:08 PM
3

You are over-complicating my point. no, you are whitewashing female criminals. that it's wrong for a man to hit a woman. So, I guess I should just enable her to beat me with inpunity because she has vagina? Well fuck off. Try to hit me, and I'll take your life. Because he is (generally) bigger and stronger and more likely to cause her injury. good. Injuring her will cause her to stop attacking him. Apart from the fact that female assailants usually wield a weapon, very often a deadly weapon too.…
/r/MensRights06/02/20 02:06 PM
2

There's no bloody lack of abusive men, MATE nor there is lack of abusive women. No, we are not "mates". Please don't insult my experience, nor the experiences of the many women I've met over the last six months, their issues are not our problem. because "just because he hit the mother doesn't mean he'll hit his kids" this is correct - you cant just pull one from another. Its not magicians hat. And men's rights rhetoric is largely to blame of course, feminist rhetoric is glorious, right? For wome…
/r/MensRights06/02/20 02:00 PM
3

forget how about no? Never forgive, never forget. Works wonders.
/r/MensRights06/02/20 01:54 PM
2

Oh yes we would. In Alabama, abortion is illegal at any stage not our problem.
/r/MensRights06/02/20 01:44 PM
1

In many countries women only officially have been allowed to vote not our problem, lol. And many women still risk physical abuse not our problem either. Women can go solve their own problem by themselves. After all, they dont need no man, lol. Or so they said.
/r/MensRights06/02/20 01:43 PM
1

yet you spread their word...
/r/MensRights06/02/20 01:42 PM
2

whole organ, part of it - no difference, really. If we didnt consent, then you are not to do it.
/r/MensRights06/02/20 01:41 PM
1

what is shocking is the fact that women see no problem with damaging their sons sexuality, but would burn the world if same was forced on daughters. Female double standards should be a criminal felony.
/r/MensRights06/02/20 01:40 PM
1

Female circumcision is objectively worse in terms of health effects not our problem. We expect our bodies not to be mutilated without our consent. Your body? I dont give a damn what someone does to you. I care for my group - called "men", not "women" :)
/r/MensRights06/02/20 01:39 PM
1

So for me i don’t agree men can walk away from the baby they helped create with 100% responsibilities. LOL, of course a woman will not agree to have her right to extort men for money taken away from her. Its only our child and our responsibility if we activelly, enthusiastically consented first, and did not retract our consent later down the line. Check your privilege. Maybe we should do the same treatment to rape-specyfic legislation? I.e. no retracting consent 30 years down the line, as metoo …
/r/MensRights06/02/20 01:36 PM
1

Agree suicide / depression is a huge issue, plus female abuse, but its not a legal right issue per se of course it is a legal issue, when female abuser will get away free because of being female. Which is often the case - many types of abuse that females excel at, are not even classed as abuse. Rape is complicated. it is not. If I didnt consent to what you did, its rape. Its not about being able to sue. Its about the fact that we have to activelly sue for our rights to even be taken into conside…
/r/MensRights06/02/20 01:28 PM
1

I never really thought about it that way The fact that you didnt consider helping men to speak for themselves is telling. Looks like you dont want to advocate for us - you want to advocate for us in a way that pushes your goals forward, especially that below that, you say: my friend who is against men's rights ostracize her, stop all contact. That is what you should do about friends that cant have half of society having rights. The fact that she is your friend still, is quite damning for me alre…
/r/MensRights06/02/20 01:02 PM
2

you should enable other men to advocate for men, instead of advocating yourself. Women have already spoken about us enough with feminism.
/r/MensRights06/02/20 12:51 PM
1

Lack of any reproduction related RIGHTS whatsoever - we only have OBLIGATIONS. This includes men (well, male children, to be exact, even) being forced to pay child support to their rapist. Lack of right to vote. Men in US get privilege of voting IF they consent to being drafted and put their life on the line. Unlike women. It can be in a positive way or negative way. lol, what "positive way", really? I want to say that I am a woman and I am passionate about men's rights then speak and think abou…
/r/MensRights06/02/20 12:37 PM
2

that Amber apparently thinks that men are her free bodyguards, lol
/r/MensRights06/02/20 12:31 PM
2

the problem with this above being, if men do the same, they get arrested. In fact, they get arrested even if they dont defend themselves. I did slap my ex's face, tip drinks on him etc, in the earlier stages of our relationship - because I resented so, just standard DV. Physical abuse because feelings. You are just as guilty as he is. It was retaliation, it was spiteful, and it was stupid. Nope. It was a felony.
/r/MensRights06/02/20 12:20 PM
1

But is that something what we want, exactly? Or is that something you think will be best for "society" / "us as a team" ?
/r/MensRights05/02/20 02:27 PM
1

You say....so, when they wanted same right to vote, did they took on same burden of forced war conscription? Oh wait...
/r/MensRights05/02/20 02:25 PM
3

female superiority movement. nothing else.
/r/MensRights05/02/20 01:41 PM
1

Man's right, no exceptions. We are not supposed to generalise, right? Well dont so it then.
/r/MensRights05/02/20 12:12 PM
1

Feminism = sexism by definition.
/r/MensRights05/02/20 12:10 PM
2

Just adopt a boy, then. Girls will end up with shorter end of the stick, but oh well...
/r/MensRights05/02/20 12:09 PM
0

Tbh, you shpuld only get right to vote if you put more into the budget than you pull from it.
/r/MensRights05/02/20 12:07 PM
1

Most likely, the woman was all nice right up to the marriage, then took off that mask.
/r/MensRights05/02/20 11:28 AM
1

Feminism was never about any sort of equality, apart from empty words.
/r/MensRights05/02/20 11:17 AM
1

If you only speak words, you are not doing anything. If you cant see anything you can actually do, what use there is of you, then?
/r/MensRights05/02/20 11:13 AM
1

Bringing men up to never hit women has never worked well. Women always manipulated and schemed with impunity precisely because of lack of proper response from men. And it seldom ended up good for those men, too.
/r/MensRights05/02/20 11:11 AM
1

Bringing women up should depend on wheter or not it is profitable for us at the moment. We should be what feminism is, if we are to defend ourselves efficiently.
/r/MensRights05/02/20 11:09 AM
-2

Well, frankly..I can indeed hansle her abuse. But im not allowed to, since "handling" that sort of stuff is best achieved with a 9x19mm round to the face. Best self defence is always a lethal one.
/r/MensRights05/02/20 11:07 AM
1

Some animals are more equal than others, in their book.
/r/MensRights05/02/20 11:04 AM
2

Some animals are more equal...or something ;))
/r/MensRights04/02/20 01:53 AM
1

Why, its profitable.
/r/MensRights04/02/20 01:47 AM
1

You can go work somewhere else.
/r/MensRights04/02/20 01:46 AM
1

So, why does your username not the same in both places? This makes sense and is often used in practice too, by various official accounts. Sorry, but we got to check. Way too many spammers/crazies/derailers not to filter, these days. Im sure you understand not being trusted just because ;)
/r/MensRights04/02/20 01:26 AM
0

If they are women, its good that they are not leading us.
/r/MensRights03/02/20 10:43 PM
0

1) women should be given no right to decide about anything related to our rights. No exceptions. 2) none unless it suits us at the moment, on our terms and our sole benefit. Men's rights? Only men get to have a say/decision power.
/r/MensRights03/02/20 10:41 PM
1

...until its profitable for them to do so.
/r/MensRights03/02/20 10:37 PM
2

Such mutilation should result in criminal sentences, especially for women (ir higher sentences) because of possibility of female on male abuse.
/r/MensRights03/02/20 10:34 PM
3

And female too. No surprise.
/r/MensRights03/02/20 10:32 PM
9

If you are a guy, you have basically all obligations, and no rights. Sorry. Welcome to feminism.
/r/MensRights03/02/20 10:25 PM
1

No. We must only look at our needs. This means that sometimes it will be needed to tear women down. Supporting feminist metoo will be too deterimental to us.
/r/MensRights03/02/20 10:22 PM
5

Being an enabler is basically same as abuser, really.
/r/MensRights03/02/20 10:19 PM
1

How does one verify that identity ina 3 year old child? Any research paper on this, pubmed maybe?
/r/MensRights03/02/20 10:08 PM
1

Physically weak means nothing if a woman takes a knife up. And you being prego is not any excuse. If you attack your partner, he should use lethal defence. Dont want to die? Dont attack him, its easy.
/r/MensRights03/02/20 11:56 AM
2

So, they guy was being arrested.for defence, really? After all, he was responding to an attack on himself..in that case, best response is lethal response, really.
/r/MensRights03/02/20 11:51 AM
2

Well she has a vagina, so...
/r/MensRights03/02/20 11:44 AM
2

If she is an out of control animal, she should be put down for society's safety.
/r/MensRights03/02/20 11:40 AM
1

"Women can (...) be violent" No, they can not. If they are anyway, punishment must be due. This is excusing abuse.
/r/MensRights03/02/20 11:32 AM
2

Speaking is worthless. Doing somethign successfully against Amber would be something that matters.
/r/MensRights03/02/20 11:30 AM
5

Yes. We are not their hired bodyguards.
/r/MensRights03/02/20 11:28 AM
1

Time to force women to work more, then. So men can build a bond with THEIR child.
/r/MensRights30/01/20 11:53 AM
4

Crushes aka emotional masturbation using man's persona without his consent.
/r/MensRights29/01/20 01:04 PM
3

That is exactly what lawyer is for. Protecting his client. End of story. We should always defend someones good name if that person cannot defend himself anymore.
/r/MensRights29/01/20 12:55 PM
7

Oh, they do acknowledge it. When it suits them, lol
/r/MensRights29/01/20 12:53 PM
5

Charges dropped = no conviction If she had problems, she should get evidence and present it. She choose not to.
/r/MensRights29/01/20 12:51 PM
3

They are allowed to xome with accusations to the police for due process. They are NOT allowed to go to facebook for a smear campaign.
/r/MensRights29/01/20 12:49 PM
1

Laddish behavior - whatever does not suit her whaaaaants at any given moment.
/r/MensRights28/01/20 12:33 PM
17

Ignoring hate is what normalises it, really.
/r/MensRights28/01/20 12:20 PM
1

Don't allow yourself to be blinded by the damage that Feminism has caused to the female. tbh, thats not exactly our problem. Big adult girls can handle their own problems after all, right?
/r/MensRights27/01/20 12:16 PM
1

Patriarchy will be blamed, what else? XD
/r/MensRights27/01/20 11:44 AM
1

Amd those tribes ended up at tribal level preciselly because they were matriarchies.
/r/MensRights27/01/20 11:43 AM
4

Some of most cruel, bloody, and rabid rulers were female. Elizabeth Bathory, anyone?
/r/MensRights23/01/20 10:31 AM
2

Greta never had any practical sense. She is a little kid with psychiatric grade problem, given voice that she should not be given. Nothing else.
/r/MensRights22/01/20 02:12 PM
2

You mistake them being malicious as being just stupid.
/r/MensRights22/01/20 01:19 PM
1

She has vagina, so she's a feminist equivalent of an ubermensch.
/r/MensRights22/01/20 11:57 AM
0

She is not entitled to him not fucking someone else. Whatever he did earlier does not mean she gets to play vigilante. There is only one proper court sentence for her, that being death sentence.
/r/MensRights22/01/20 11:51 AM
1

Of she cannot upkeep the child, she should not be choosen as a guardian tbh. She should never decide to parent in such instance tbh.
/r/MensRights21/01/20 03:30 PM
1

Enjoy while it last, hopefully it will end soon.
/r/MensRights21/01/20 12:01 PM
1

And why do you expect a guy that did not consent to being a father, be forced to pay? Because someone wants?
/r/MensRights21/01/20 11:07 AM
1

Everything has consequences forever.
/r/MensRights20/01/20 01:22 PM
1

Law is what statistics are based upon.
/r/MensRights20/01/20 01:18 PM
1

Welcome to feminism, enjoy your stay. Unless you are male.
/r/MensRights20/01/20 01:16 PM
1

Idgaf. Stated a crime, should do the time. Next time, she will think before the posting.
/r/MensRights20/01/20 01:14 PM
2

Our dicks can get up even without much rubbing, especially for a hormonal teenager. Its anough to have a good dream, for that. Or daydream. Or seeing something remotely similar to a vagina... Still does not mean that teenager wants sex. More likely, he will not be happy due to having a mssive, hard to hide hardon tent in a public setting.
/r/MensRights20/01/20 01:13 PM
1

Its a woman. Do not expect anything to be seen by her in other way than what she thinks is good for her.
/r/MensRights20/01/20 01:08 PM
1

If women support such laws, they are guilty enough to not be worth any hassle.
/r/MensRights16/01/20 10:39 AM
1

Meh. Its a woman. She will never think that her words are as worthless as they are in reality.
/r/MensRights16/01/20 10:32 AM
1

If she's a bitch and abusive, I will leave her, cancer or not.
/r/MensRights16/01/20 10:26 AM
1

Well its a woman, what to expect but double standard?
/r/MensRights16/01/20 10:24 AM
11

He is an idiot. He should care for himself first, not for her. Because she will not care for him when the time comes.
/r/MensRights16/01/20 09:53 AM
1

Women - led aka "worthless, avoid" sign for me :)
/r/MensRights16/01/20 09:46 AM
9

Should be attempted murder charges, and jail. But she has a vagina so...
/r/MensRights16/01/20 09:44 AM
1

And again, he is a man because of what he provided to a woman, not because who he is as a person. Sad.
/r/MensRights15/01/20 10:15 AM
1

Ensuring is as easy as enabling video evidence and sexual history of alleged victim in court for defence purposes. What is enough for you/women is totally irrelevant. Its not about you, or women, here and now. We dont exist or live for you. Deal with the fact that we men, will put our safety first and foremost.
/r/MensRights14/01/20 12:58 PM
1

Not incessantly is not enough. What you fail to realise is that we men dont just expect an off-chance that things go right. We expect nothing less than 100% certainty, written in law - not in a worthless, unverifiable later, female word.
/r/MensRights14/01/20 12:40 PM
2

Nope. Most of the human history it was not like how it is now.
/r/MensRights14/01/20 12:33 PM
1

Yeah. Gender quotas for miners, when?
/r/MensRights14/01/20 12:30 PM
2

Meh. Im saying that person we married could have been right then, but still can fuck us over in regards to topic of the discussion in this thread. Relationship is not safety anymore. Neither is trust. Laws that are passed are safety.
/r/MensRights14/01/20 12:21 PM
2

Women change drastically and often. They also chqnge after getting married to men. Now what?
/r/MensRights14/01/20 12:07 PM
4

More like, its time to end giving women anything just because they want.
/r/MensRights14/01/20 11:52 AM
5

Because vagina is worth potential criminal charges, LOL. Yeah, its not. And neither is any relationship. Want to change that? Give us laws that give us certainty, not possibility, of safety.
/r/MensRights14/01/20 11:46 AM
2

This works untill we get divorced because we were not spontaneus in bed :)
/r/MensRights14/01/20 11:43 AM
4

Waivers are not legally recognized, like, anywhere.
/r/MensRights14/01/20 11:36 AM
2

And then she can claim that she no longer consented at some point, thus it is indeed rape. Why do you want us to take such risk? We can just pay a proffesional for sex, less risky, lol.
/r/MensRights14/01/20 11:31 AM
1

Same thing, really
/r/MensRights13/01/20 10:35 AM
0

Submitting a false claim is obstructing the duty, i.e. making a law enforcement make fundamentally faulty decisions.
/r/MensRights13/01/20 10:34 AM
2

Yeah, I dont think you really know what "emotional distress" is...
/r/MensRights10/01/20 03:08 PM
2

Nope. Emotional distress can still be verified, at least sometimes. Its way better than nothing.
/r/MensRights10/01/20 03:05 PM
3

Not "measure". Its mostly dna evidence gathering, i.e any body fluids that might be on/in her body and belong to the assailant, hair, skin cells residue etc. Also, MDs testimony to any damage, tearing, sings of struggle or fight, emotional state of the victim, etc. With photos if applicable, i.e. bruises might get photographed. All that is passed to police for processing, which could be notified by the hospital personnel, too. With a word against word, assailant could easily defend itself. Again…
/r/MensRights10/01/20 02:56 PM
2

Thats exactly why, where I live, you are taught that if you get sexually assaulted, first thing you do is go to a hospital to get a rape kit testing done and evidence gathered from your body. BEFORE any shower etc. On the other side of the spectrum - going with just a word of accusation, years down the line = knowing that no verifiable evidence exists anymore.
/r/MensRights10/01/20 02:49 PM
2

tbh, child's gender is not really a health related information.
/r/MensRights10/01/20 02:41 PM
1

dismissed means she brought in an accusation while knowing she has no verifiable evidence. That alone is wrong on many levels and should be punished.
/r/MensRights10/01/20 02:35 PM
3

baseless is as good as false, in my book. One does not bring in baseless accusation that can destroy someone's life just by being thrown.
/r/MensRights10/01/20 02:33 PM
1

She has no right to tell us what to do.
/r/MensRights10/01/20 02:30 PM
1

Do you honestly think this girl had consensual sex with 12 men in one night? protip: women sometimes do like group sex, too. Might not be in this exact event, but yeah - happens. So I dont find it impossible. You really cannot tell what she is into based on anything like looks.
/r/MensRights10/01/20 02:24 PM
1

Not just semen, but any body fluids (like salivia for example) microscopic skin cells residue as well. Or hair, or anything else you could leave on the victim.
/r/MensRights10/01/20 02:22 PM
0

she signed? well, she shouldnt have.
/r/MensRights10/01/20 02:20 PM
3

if parents want so, they should really be able to? after all, its ok if the child is male...;>
/r/MensRights10/01/20 02:17 PM
3

Trans or cis, its still a man. Why shouldnt he be allowed to speak here?
/r/MensRights09/01/20 12:24 PM
-5

Unless he is on top of you, with mass and higher bosy strength ;) its not THAT easy as you might think. And if he's acting with intent, a drunk can be as dangerous/deadly as any combatant. He might nit be fully aware of his actions, yes. He might have less controll, yes. But that person can still have combative capability. Same with drugs. Even worse, as some of that shit will actually boost you, by i.e. shutting down your body's shock reflex. Which leads to druggie being combat-able and bleedin…
/r/MensRights08/01/20 01:57 PM
-1

Shame. She should be executed.
/r/MensRights08/01/20 01:50 PM
0

That is not even remotelly correct. Source: am biology major.
/r/MensRights08/01/20 01:48 PM
8

Most probably, nothing exactly happened, apart from her having feels.
/r/MensRights08/01/20 01:44 PM
2

Being drunk does not exactly turn your strength down. Yeah, I can imagine that above being possible, easily.
/r/MensRights08/01/20 01:43 PM
3

Lol, religion. Such a worthless thing.
/r/MensRights08/01/20 01:40 PM
0

They are feminists. They dont consider us to be "people".
/r/MensRights08/01/20 01:24 PM
2

Its not inability. Its a lack of good will. If you have an ability to influence criminal law with mass demonstrations, you have an ability to self-police.
/r/MensRights08/01/20 01:22 PM
-1

It was never about equal rights. It was always about same rights without taking on same expectations, risks, or burden. Not nearly the same.
/r/MensRights08/01/20 01:15 PM
1

Of course it depends, but no singular female is worth any risk, or too much of work. Men can be as happy in a relationship, as they can be while single tbh, and we dont have to be needy either. Tldr: feelings are only rarely worth any hassle, and vagina is never worth any hassle.
/r/MensRights08/01/20 01:12 PM
0

If women behave in a way that makes them hated by someones standards, hate is what they will get. we need ...to reach our goals and needs in a way that is good to us, by our standards. Anything else is secondary or a non-concern.
/r/MensRights08/01/20 01:07 PM
1

Tbh, they dont consider men as people.
/r/MensRights08/01/20 12:24 PM
1

You can think you know her, but she will still do a 180 and fuck you over if it starts being profitable for her to do so. Protip: women change over time. Women also have no problem with using someone's intimate confession to her, against them - female morality is always through a looking glass of her profit, and you will always hear a hundred reasons as to "why". So, why bother? :)
/r/MensRights08/01/20 12:08 PM
11

If a female user shits on him, yes its woman's fault. You know why men think that talking about how they feel makes them weak? Because women, that they talk to, put them down and stop respecting them, and show that both in word, and in acting. Men dont imagine and "feel" things, we react to reality of.women beha ing as they do. And negative female reactions are almost universal, in one way or another. If you want men to universally open up, then be, by yourself, good enough for that to happen - …
/r/MensRights08/01/20 11:53 AM
1

War is never without a reason.
/r/MensRights08/01/20 11:10 AM
1

nope, this is realpolitik and diplomacy 101 - where only my country is supposed to profit. There are no friends in diplomacy, just tools to be used. Welcome to reality. edit: want a proof of that IRL? Just read NATO's pact article 5. Where support for the attacked NATO member is said to be on the scale deemed apropriate by those that are going to help (and NOT apropriate to what is actually needed!). Which can be...not much, really. Technically, one could lendlease a box of 9mm and ask if thats …
/r/MensRights07/01/20 10:19 AM
1

So still a rude overreaction, but not assault or battery this changes things ;)
/r/MensRights07/01/20 10:17 AM
0

I'm here to support men's rights and also be involved in getting people to join the cause, not be a subordinate to someone so, you want to lead, then? And fix our problems the way you think they should be fixed? Same thing as feminism does to us, really. You are making two mistakes - one is expecting that everyone will be on the same team, second one is thinking that you will be belived and trusted just because. Those two are not free. In the end, division of sexes doesn't benefit society. Socie…
/r/MensRights07/01/20 10:16 AM
0

Of its profitable to us, we should. If not, they can burn.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 03:19 AM
1

So, science and knowledge are patriarchy? Lol
/r/MensRights07/01/20 03:16 AM
1

Of course. Same as business, mostly :) in one way or another.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 03:08 AM
1

For selfdefence? Not really.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 03:03 AM
2

Some jurisdistions would argue that an act of physical intimidation is legal grounds for self-defensive measures already.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 03:02 AM
1

You being an ass does not mean she has a right to assault you. Thats called felony where I live, and hopefully, would end up with her dead for assault.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 02:59 AM
0

Women dont "need to support" us. They have to listen with understanding when it xomes to our issues, and then do as told. Nothing more, nothing less. We dont need their resolutions of our issues, we need our resolutions to our issues. And we do not exactly need equality, we need reality and OUR eeds being met. World is not equal, and after feminism we are not exactly on the same team anymore.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 02:56 AM
1

Yep. Draft military is worthless on the today's battlefield anyway.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 02:49 AM
1

We are indeed not on the same team. In that, they are correct.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 02:44 AM
1

Why bring someone to our side if we can just tear them down, long-term, for example? We must be effective, not good and nice, if we are to actually win anything for ourselves here.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 02:43 AM
-9

So? Its not our problem if you cannot fulfill expectations tbh :)
/r/MensRights07/01/20 02:28 AM
-1

Is it profitable for us men to have you not destroyed, tho? Now, or in the future? Sorry, this is about the same as feminism does to us. I dont see why I should not respond with a diplomatic rule of equal response, or even general diplomacy (aka you can be either a tool or an enemy, not an ally) ?
/r/MensRights07/01/20 02:27 AM
1

Alternative is: work to change the system, with other men, to one that will make sure we get what we want.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 02:23 AM
–

Its useful to destroy others, as feminism shows. We should do the same.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 02:22 AM
-8

If you dont speak up, you are part of the problem. We men will just have expectations against you. Its your movement that fucks things up, so its on you to do the work for proper change.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 02:21 AM
1

War is profit. If its profitable to us, it is good. Diplomacy 101.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 02:11 AM
5

Included is not enough. It must be forced, and ewualised against history of male only military of thousands of years. Once same amount of women dies in wars, we can talk.:)
/r/MensRights07/01/20 02:10 AM
8

Women do most at the office? You mean most coffee breaks? Lol
/r/MensRights07/01/20 02:07 AM
–

So, did you actually DID something about that? Because, well, words are worthless. If you did nothing, you are an enabler.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 02:03 AM
–

Its not being in denial. Its called "lying and manipulating". Female in a nutshell lol
/r/MensRights07/01/20 02:01 AM
1

a proper penalty for the people involved is always possible, if only to damage them in return. Being vengefull works wonders.
/r/MensRights05/01/20 02:52 PM
1

It might not be mine, but Im the one to decide its use. And supporting exes is not one of those uses, unless I get something I want, in return. That should be the norm. Want money? Go earn them.
/r/MensRights05/01/20 02:15 AM
3

Red flag. Dont marry a dependopotamus. Ever.
/r/MensRights05/01/20 02:01 AM
1

Go pay for it yourself, then, and leave my money alone. They are mine, not "society's".
/r/MensRights05/01/20 02:00 AM
1

Its bad and immoral by definitionn. Nothing is free.
/r/MensRights05/01/20 01:56 AM
1

How cute. Now she feels wrong?
/r/MensRights05/01/20 01:52 AM
7

Nope. We should encourage men to a) find a way to be whole again and b) find a way to legally destroy the lives of the people responsible.
/r/MensRights05/01/20 01:46 AM
2

Being empathetic is one prerewuisite. Second one is having an ability to be malicious.
/r/MensRights05/01/20 01:42 AM
3

If you are never really punished, everything seems ok to do/say ;)
/r/MensRights05/01/20 01:39 AM
5

Real feminist feminity in a nutshell, lol. Thy name is double standards...
/r/MensRights05/01/20 01:37 AM
1

If its profitable to us, its good. Politics 101.
/r/MensRights05/01/20 01:36 AM
1

Anger is good and useful. Its a matter of how and when to let go, really.
/r/MensRights05/01/20 01:35 AM
-2

Tbh, sometimes its an acceptable and good thing to do. If only to spare future potential partner from getting fucked over by a toxic female.
/r/MensRights05/01/20 01:33 AM
6

Frankly? Ladies dont have right to an opinion re: male body. They have a right to think as they are told to on the matter. Told by men, and noone else.
/r/MensRights05/01/20 01:32 AM
1

What you are saying is, basically, telling a rape victim not to dress provocativelly like that. Fuck off.
/r/MensRights04/01/20 03:13 PM
1

That. Also, deliberate sabotage of birth control in many ways is considered stealthing...if a man does it.
/r/MensRights04/01/20 03:10 PM
3

You still had options, either by aborting, or by adopting out. Men dont have any legal options or rights in this area, whatsoever.
/r/MensRights04/01/20 03:09 PM
9

Yep. My country has had a recent case where an older teenager literally murdered a 9 year old brother. Over PC access.
/r/MensRights03/01/20 12:16 PM
9

Feminist is shitty by definition. Even if there might be some that are not, its just not worth the risk and hassle to differentiate and give a benefit of a doubt, really.
/r/MensRights02/01/20 04:31 PM
1

More likely, they want us not to depend on them so they dont have to put in even that kind of effort, lol
/r/MensRights31/12/19 12:56 AM
1

If it suits us :)
/r/MensRights31/12/19 12:54 AM
2

Nope. If that guy has a certain standard regarding sex in his relationship, and she fails to deliver, he should not stay with her. Same with any other standards.
/r/MensRights31/12/19 12:52 AM
1

Science wise, this is not correct.
/r/MensRights31/12/19 12:47 AM
1

"Should"? Noone answers to you.
/r/MensRights31/12/19 12:46 AM
1

Empathy isnt free. Neither is support. Why should men support women instead of, well, other men?
/r/MensRights31/12/19 12:44 AM
1

Marriage? Sure, but not with legal and financial sharing. After all, she is not in it for money, right?
/r/MensRights31/12/19 12:31 AM
1

If she is unable to tell fact from lie, why did she put up a police case? She should have her facts in order first, then throw a case.
/r/MensRights31/12/19 12:21 AM
1

what goes around, comes around, I guess?
/r/MensRights30/12/19 02:28 PM
5

Fum fact, you can actually do that through any.mucous membranes :) works for water, alcohol, other liquids, gases depending on pressure...
/r/MensRights30/12/19 12:02 PM
4

Its a woman. Its a feminist. Not much there to add, really.
/r/MensRights30/12/19 11:51 AM
1

Womqn does not need feminism to be self-servomg like that. Its nature.
/r/MensRights30/12/19 11:49 AM
5

Hopefully he will read, and then remove her from his life after a court case to take her money and assets away from her.
/r/MensRights30/12/19 11:47 AM
1

Daughters are not our problem, really. We must focus on boys and men, first and foremost. Girls having problems? If our goals are furthered, nothing else matters.
/r/MensRights30/12/19 11:45 AM
1

Because outrage sells just as well as naked vagina. If not better. And only morality in business is profit.
/r/MensRights30/12/19 11:40 AM
1

How would we even prove a woman tricked someone into getting her pregnant? It’s hard to prove rape let alone being forced to impregnate someone. so, "belive the victim" does not apply here? I don’t know what would be comparable honestly because women can’t leave ejaculate inside of a man like he can her. because taking his money and assets for 18-26 years has no effect. Because pushing the guy into poverty sometimes is nothing, after all its just another male, living atm for glorious female race…
/r/MensRights30/12/19 10:08 AM
1

Unfortunately, men and women are supposed to have equal rights. If you expect men to just sacrifice, you are mistaken. How to deal with a lying woman? Jail should be in order. Condoms are not an answer, because she will just shame him into not using one - especially in long term relstionship. The only real solution is judicial action and legal consequences, because, unfortunately, pain is no longer acceptable.
/r/MensRights29/12/19 04:41 PM
1

Oh, she can have it all she wants. Our consent would be just for use of our time, money, and assets for support. If we didnt consent to be a parent, we should not be penalised for that. Women have options not to be a parent, after all, and we just want the same choice, as in - equality.
/r/MensRights29/12/19 11:30 AM
1

Settle? Lol. Please....if we didnt consent to the kid, or retracted the consent, then its not our kid. Hands off off our money, or die.
/r/MensRights29/12/19 12:13 AM
1

What about spouses lying about BC to trap their partner? You seem not to see that nowadays its almost a norm. Should be classed as rape. End. Of. Story. Destroy her life in return by a proper judicial action. Maybe forced sterilisation? Sounds so fitting to take from her an ability that she misuses so heavily. Man's money and assets must be considered just as castle as your uterus is yours.
/r/MensRights29/12/19 12:11 AM
1

Yep, trust is dumb if there is a woman in the equation.
/r/MensRights29/12/19 12:06 AM
1

Yes. It should also be deemed financial and legal fraud due to high, long-term societal, legal, and financial impact on a Man. I.e. two/three crimes at once, instead of just one.
/r/MensRights29/12/19 12:04 AM
1

Meh. Women can go fight themselves, lol.
/r/MensRights28/12/19 11:59 PM
2

The brutality of the punishment doesn't deter from doing the crime. The high chance of getting caught does. thats why both must be present in law enforcement. Brutal punishment is to ensure that any singular criminal will certainly not do crime again.
/r/MensRights26/12/19 06:50 PM
1

Should be death sentence, for proper fear factor. But we will get there, hopefully.
/r/MensRights25/12/19 10:50 AM
1

Meh. Never say someone is stupid if you might attribute being malicious to them.
/r/MensRights25/12/19 10:44 AM
1

It makes all the sense if you think about who is saying stuff like that: women that covet exactly that position of power.
/r/MensRights25/12/19 10:43 AM
2

/s I thought that would be a bit of a giveaway ;>
/r/MensRights20/12/19 02:05 PM
1

Tbh, he is correct on one thing: your baby and its needs are your private issue, its not company's business nor profit to intervene and change itself for just you. Welcome to being as expendable as all men.
/r/MensRights19/12/19 01:13 PM
1

Welcome to your glorious feminism. Enjoy your stay, I guess, lol. Or actively work to change it.
/r/MensRights19/12/19 01:10 PM
2

Nope. We will do what is good for us, not what women want us to.
/r/MensRights19/12/19 12:47 PM
3

Butbutbutttt she has feeeeelings that she must give voooice tooo...how dare you to stop her /s
/r/MensRights19/12/19 12:46 PM
2

Then be a change we want to see. On our terms. Then we might trust women again, if enough of women do so. If it suits us.
/r/MensRights19/12/19 12:29 PM
1

please have faith No :)
/r/MensRights19/12/19 12:24 PM
2

Why should they cater to you, instead? Whats in it for them, apart from nothing? XD Our work is not free.
/r/MensRights18/12/19 11:45 AM
3

We are not threatened by that movement. We just find its lies and hate for men - abhorrent. Women made great strides not to be included, but to be not trusted.
/r/MensRights18/12/19 11:44 AM
3

She is copping it for good reason.
/r/MensRights18/12/19 11:40 AM
1

No infant clits, for equality? What a shame.../s
/r/MensRights18/12/19 11:24 AM
3

Yep. Men definetly have to rely on themselves and other men first, instead on just some female. She might be ok, but why risk some bs, if we have i.e. a good male friend to talk to? Even as a wife, she is not entitled to our emotional side if we deem it deterimental to us in sone way.
/r/MensRights18/12/19 11:20 AM
2

Had Real Officer not shown up to perform the arrest, Diversity Hire Officer Dipshit would've never managed to arrest the guy yep, that part is correct. HOWEVER do not consider a person without a weapon, as "not dangerous". Quite many officers are dead just because that "unarmed poor guy" took a firearm from them. For example. Or just grabbed something off the shelf and used as an improvised blunt weapon.
/r/MensRights18/12/19 08:58 AM
2

proclaiming enemies instead of trying to be receptive of other people’s struggles and realities is the reason why nobody understands each other. why do you need to attack Feminism outright stated, time and again, that ALL men are rapists and enemies, and yet I am the one that is attacking? And I am the one that has "warped perception of reality" ? Seriously? You should realise that words have consequences. One of such consequences is not being trusted,, if you consider yourself a member of a hat…
/r/MensRights18/12/19 08:56 AM
1

It doesn’t have to be an issue of fairness to men because you said so? :> Ideally, it’ll only be awarded to people who need it World is not ideal. We cant really count of it being generous to men, if its anything but generous now. Stop typing. Now, what they have done is make alimony awarded less often, and awarded to men more often. Not good enoough. Alimony isn’t an issue of feminism, it’s the opposite. yep. Women BENEFIT from it, 99,9999% of the time. Of course its not a feminism's problem. w…
/r/MensRights17/12/19 03:52 PM
1

Yep. Any and all the time that someone actually helped me, it was a MAN. Women? Meh. All talk, all worthless. No actions "because reasons". But what to expect, really? :) Now, same women are surprised that I dont open up anymore. Oh baby, I do, - I tell them - just not to worthless you, lol.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 02:49 PM
2

you seem to be obsessed with the mom in this situation Its her workings that started the problem. Are they not? She is to get away freely? Well aint that cute... but ok, you win. Lets just fuck the guy over, he's just an acceptable collateral damage to you after all.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 02:43 PM
3

Moms actions and lies are a problem. Kid is her responsibility, and a collateral damage - but the responsibility is not that guys to carry. He didnt sign up to her LIES, he didnt CONSENT to this situation being forced on him. He must be able to leave it behind, without penalties of any kind.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 02:39 PM
2

They haven’t ended it. so they have done nothing, after all? Well too bad. You agree that women being more financially independent is beneficial to reducing alimony, yeah? its not. They will always WANT and EXPECT. A LEGAL way must be forced in order for them to be able to obtain nothing, ever, after relationship ends. Without fail.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 02:38 PM
2

empathy yeah, what about you having any empathy to the real victim, the father that was not really a father, it turns out? Oh, right. Mommy and HER baby must get what they want, and fuck the daddy/ATM/tool, right? and IM the one lacking empathy here, you say? i feel bad for the kid and i feel bad for the dad as well, hence why i said the situation is a difficult its not "difficult" or "personal". Mom fucked up, she must pay. Man was a victim and he must be relived of ANY and ALL obligations resu…
/r/MensRights17/12/19 02:37 PM
1

Female empowerment is ending* alimony, because it’s allowing women to be more financially independent, and therefore not need alimony. LOL. This is not ending anything. Removing any law that causes alimony is ending it. What you are saying is just worthless propaganda. Again - show me the laws that were rewriten to actually, TOTALLY REMOVE alimony from LAW, no matter the circumstances. Anything else is not enugh.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 02:32 PM
2

lol. First come, first serve, girlies.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 02:28 PM
2

doesn't change the part where the not bio kid did see him as a father and looked up to him not HIS child, not HIS problem, not HIS liability. place yourself in his shoes. Stop attempting to play on our emotions, and stop victim blaming the man. You dont get to decide for us. Want us to be engaged? Dont take the decision from us. Of course decision is possible to change in the future, without notice. Just like your decision that you have consented to sex can, apparently, change 30 years down the …
/r/MensRights17/12/19 02:26 PM
2

Its 2019, its not "back in the day" anymore. IDGAF what was "back then", really. Our money is our castle, and women must have no right to decide on money that they didnt directly earn. and how female empowerment is ending it LOL. Show me the legal papers that remove it from law, then we might talk.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 02:21 PM
3

If you want to force someone to raise and provide for a child that is not his, YES, that is a problem to me.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 02:20 PM
3

I think if she says “no,” that’s clear enough. then you get men loosing a partner because she goes all "I wanted you to do it, you should have known its a "yes" no, not "no" no". Been there, heard that. You cant please such persons, and in the era of marriage often defined as just someone living at your place for some time, men are vulnerable to an asset/money loss if women do it. How do you propose to solve this so that men NEVER are on the loosing side of female "wants" if they guess wrong?
/r/MensRights17/12/19 02:17 PM
1

the problem starts when she shows interest and is engaged first, then says it was rape 30 years down the line, lol. And gets you into prison.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 02:14 PM
1

So I believe consent education would have stopped their behavior. If you didnt communicate properly to them, how exactly you want them to make their decision on? We dont decide on "I feel"'s bullshit. We decide based on proper information, communication, and data. Proper communication is on you, not on them. You want them to behave in a certain way.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 02:13 PM
2

if you dont say a clear "no", how is someone to decide wheter or not there is consent? Guesswork? Sorry, in the era of men getting convicted or otherwise penalised (either by judicial system, or by partner leaving because he didnt do what she wanted in bed...) for guessing incorrectly, guesswork is not enough BY FAR.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 02:09 PM
1

If she does not give any information that there is no consent, its not really a valid communication. No, having emotions in her head is not communication. Neither is expectation of someone guessing a riddle correctly. If women want men to be held responsible for their decisions/actions, they must provide valid point of entry to men making a decision, instead of having us have to guess.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 02:03 PM
4

You don’t understand the difference between legal autonomy of your own body, and paying child support if he didnt consent to having a child, it is rape - a woman literally used his sexuality in a way he didnt consent to. And you expect him to pay her for it too?! I guess Shane Seyer is a bad guy, then, for you, then? Protip: he was forced to pay child support to a female that raped him when he was a child. I want you to think about why men can’t opt out of children, yet women can. IDGAF. If you …
/r/MensRights17/12/19 02:00 PM
4

, particularly feminism not being able to have a symbiotic relationship with men’s rights. first, feminism brands us as enemies. Now, it wants a relationship? LOL. They can fuck right off with that kind of "relationship". We are on the same team anymore. You might say that it can be changed. Yeah, but why forgive a (self-proclaimed) enemy if you can destroy them in the longer run? i simply just want to have an open conversation what would we gain off of it, that we cannot get anywhere else, chea…
/r/MensRights17/12/19 01:42 PM
15

Woman, "I love what can you do for me" fixed it for you
/r/MensRights17/12/19 01:37 PM
24

naaah, its goal for glorious vagina owners. Filthy males are to remember their proper place and work for her needs. /s
/r/MensRights17/12/19 01:36 PM
5

As an example, restriction of abortion Like, for men that still cant have a legal way out of unwanted fatherhood, because women have a problem with them having equal rights to the ones granted to women? :> Go fix that first, in a way that it suits men, then we could talk about feminism wanting equality instead of superiority. Do you disagree with the feminist movements that pushed for equality in the early 1900s and 1970s? equality? they pushed for more rights for women, not for equality. They d…
/r/MensRights17/12/19 01:33 PM
6

What you list is already achieved. And no, its not feminism that worked for that. Its that bog bad "patriarchy" aka men.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 12:54 PM
2

Nope. The kid never knew his father, mommy precluded that from happening. Her actions, her responsibility. And you are just victim blaming the man.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 12:42 PM
2

Not his kid, not his obligation, not his problem. Mom can go handle shit situation she created, on her own.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 12:40 PM
3

If he only wanted to raise his bio child, he is just protecting himself. She is at fault for making that happen.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 12:39 PM
0

If he forced her, its a felony. End of story.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 12:37 PM
-2

Nope. Attack a LEO, and die. Just dont do it, its easy. Everything you name is a) less than lethal, not non-lethal, and b) often will fail to stol the assailant. For a single officer, in close combat, that might end up deadly. 2v1 fight, of course the guy was stopped asap. That tends to happen if someone stomps you like that out od nowhere. Still, second LEO should just take his life.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 12:34 PM
1

Nope. Negligent discharge of a firearm. You must make sure no non-combatants are in the target area that might get hurt, before you fire.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 12:32 PM
2

That guy was being arrested for theft. What exactly do you expect? Her sucking him off? He should be dead the second he turned on her. Edit: also, iirc, she is getting charged.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 12:31 PM
1

Lol, social equality. You mean communism? That was already done. And is worthless. Want something? Be good enough in the eyes of its owner. You are not entitled to anything.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 12:23 PM
2

by her standard, he is only allowed to be a believer, not a questioning one.
/r/MensRights16/12/19 04:03 PM
2

I bet you totally not hate women. no hate here. Much indifference, tho. But one is not the other. If you don't like that, act like a real man. you are less than a man because you have no values Oh, but I do act like a real man: how it suits ME, not some "society" or women. Im a master of my life, not a woman. And my worth and value is not connected to wheter or not a woman likes my choices or not, or if she profits off of them. My values? You dont really know me to any extent to judge on that, l…
/r/MensRights16/12/19 03:44 PM
1

Men's rights kind of annoy me. then why are you even here ? because we are connected. We are?
/r/MensRights16/12/19 03:41 PM
3

Have you considered your wife left you and doesnt want your children near you because you are a mysoginistic asshole? Nothing like that happened yet to me, so... pick your targets better, lol. Because men never do that Its not about what we do. Its about what women do here. And what they do must bring on consequences. If they dont like that - too bad.
/r/MensRights16/12/19 02:53 PM
1

thats what happens if you do not do a proper death sentence scenes for the public. Fear of public execution just works.
/r/MensRights16/12/19 02:47 PM
3

The problem with your idea is, women wear masks when it suits them. Sometimes for years.
/r/MensRights16/12/19 02:44 PM
6

sounds like stockholm syndrome
/r/MensRights16/12/19 02:37 PM
0

Its really mostly a term of convenience no such thing. Terms have meanings and connections. And those, in turn, always have consequences. Its really mostly a term of convenience therefore you are an enabler of hate.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 03:27 PM
5

Its good that faith is eroded. Its a lie.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 12:23 PM
1

Dont marry, do not live in a state that enables this bs for non-married couples.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 12:23 PM
15

Bezos's wife was not instrumental to anything. She worked for a short time there. She was paid. That is it.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 12:20 PM
1

Men already do most of unpaid work in the house.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 12:17 PM
1

throwing tantrums is never right. Except for a three year old.
/r/MensRights12/12/19 02:07 PM
1

And her anger acomplishes exactly...what? Nothing. She is worthless, no matter what she might think of herself. You know who is not worthless? Scientist and engineers. They do make a difference, and are usually men.
/r/MensRights12/12/19 12:45 PM
2

She is not doing anything apart from throwing tantrums. If she wants to make a difference, she should be at school, then in science. But she will not be there. She does not want to make a difference. She wants to be in a spotlight. Nothing more.
/r/MensRights12/12/19 12:36 PM
2

any credible source on that...?
/r/MensRights11/12/19 12:09 PM
2

If all men get the right to just tap out, I worry about the fucked up people in the world who do shit like that on purpose you mean like women do, since forever? 2 in 10 children are unknowingly raised by a man that is not their parent. And thats a conservative number. So then in my mind, there should be exceptions, but how do you go on to prove those exceptions? If women get rights without exceptions, we must get them too - equality. I really have no clue what the best solution to this issue wo…
/r/MensRights10/12/19 03:32 PM
2

A guy must be free to walk away, without question or being forced to pay, if he did not consent to child being born or if he retracted his consent post-factum. No other way is acceptable or good for men, due to the fact that forced paternity happens, even if its rare.
/r/MensRights10/12/19 01:30 PM
4

Yep. Like "teach women not to murder their kids out of spite"
/r/MensRights10/12/19 11:18 AM
3

Nah, she had FEELINGS that made her do it...she is not guilty lol /s
/r/MensRights10/12/19 11:17 AM
4

Not on society's expense. We are not her wallets. If she cannot afford it, its not our problem.
/r/MensRights10/12/19 11:16 AM
1

That bigot is a feminist - its an explanation enough tbh.
/r/MensRights10/12/19 11:13 AM
3

Real feminism at work
/r/MensRights10/12/19 11:12 AM
1

at least its not a thai trap...iykwim :>
/r/MensRights10/12/19 09:07 AM
2

she's pro men when and how it suits her at the moment.
/r/MensRights09/12/19 04:00 PM
2

she's still not an ally.
/r/MensRights09/12/19 03:58 PM
4

If we say its a grievance, then it is. After all, they should belive the victim, right ? :>
/r/MensRights09/12/19 03:56 PM
2

Men should grow a pair, and totally withold any help, business, or service if woman wants it. Maybe then we'd show how much we actually do.
/r/MensRights09/12/19 03:55 PM
2

still, that is medically incorrect. And legally, too. The proper term for post-pubescent situation is efebophillia, not pedophilia. We should really strive to name things correctly.
/r/MensRights09/12/19 03:52 PM
1

Still, high punishments (up to death) should be available should a parent (and mother especially) coerce of force a child to make a decision. Women must have no legal way of forcing their hand on Men.
/r/MensRights09/12/19 03:45 PM
1

men are just better at anything we do, even at that.
/r/MensRights09/12/19 03:39 PM
1

But women do express their emotions in the socially acceptable way does not mean that its good or healthy, for women or society...
/r/MensRights09/12/19 03:37 PM
2

more like feminity.
/r/MensRights09/12/19 03:30 PM
1

Its safe for us men to generalize women. If they are allowed to do it for safety, so can we.
/r/MensRights09/12/19 03:15 PM
1

There is no medical benefit to circumcision that cannot be obtained without removal of body parts. Love? Its just brain chemistry. Art and philosophy is useless 99,999% of the time, especially modern. Ethics and law are important, provided that ethics are strictly atheist. Nothing that is religion-based should even be allowed to exist - its just building someone's world on lies.
/r/MensRights09/12/19 02:23 PM
2

Now if they offer a lot emotionally that certainly makes up for what they physically lack LOL, nope. She must provide everything a potential partner expects. All the time, every time. If she cannot...well too bad. She is not entitled to having someone interested in her without meeting their expectations.
/r/MensRights09/12/19 02:18 PM
0

Or, whe should just do what we want, when we want, and still have high standards. I she cant make the grade, or fails later in the relationship, kick her to the curb without any sentiment, just as soon as you find a better one.
/r/MensRights09/12/19 02:16 PM
-2

Why would one NOT ban such lies as religion, tho? There is no truth there. Unless of course you can provide an independently verifiable scientific proof to each and every word of bible being true? Including evidence of god existence, of course? If you cant, you are a liar to me :)
/r/MensRights09/12/19 02:12 PM
2

These rabbis need to decide whether they're running a religion or a cult. religion is just a cult that was not culled properly, and was allowed to thrive instead.
/r/MensRights09/12/19 02:03 PM
-1

any religion should be banned anyway.
/r/MensRights09/12/19 02:02 PM
1

sorry rabbis, your 'god' does not exist. Suck it up, and I dont mean child's dick.
/r/MensRights09/12/19 02:01 PM
3

what’s the point of removing it?? usually its "because god said so" - thus, FGM should be forced to become legal. After all, its tradition and religion to many people. And you dont exactly need your clit /s
/r/MensRights09/12/19 01:52 PM
2

The only reason it ever was looked at as one was because people assumed women were too incapable of doing anything else. This line of thinking should’ve been left in the ‘50s. TBH, seeing how women fare in many lines of work, one might argue its true. Most of the time they either only make it on lessened expectations / lessened entry bar, or they are piggybacking on other's work. Then, when it comes to do something for real, they fail in a spectacular manner.
/r/MensRights09/12/19 01:45 PM
-7

the problem with those you mentioned is, they have their own opinion on something that does not really apply to them. They have no right to such opinion.
/r/MensRights09/12/19 01:31 PM
-11

Nope. We dont need "allies". We need them to listen, and do as they are told. That is enough to have OUR needs and goals fulfilled.
/r/MensRights09/12/19 01:27 PM
1

why would she be entitled to it, tho? She did not work for that money, she should have no right to benefit from having them.
/r/MensRights09/12/19 01:25 PM
5

yep. She has no right to opinion about body that is not her gender. If she tries to have an opinion, a proper legal pain should be applied in order to prevent having an opinion other than what men expect of her.
/r/MensRights09/12/19 01:16 PM
1

the deal is lack of consent of the male child when you remove a needed body part. If we allow male mutilation, we must mutilate girls as well, for equality. You dont need sexual pleasure to procreate after all. Right? So if we cannot have full pleasure, you must not have it as well.
/r/MensRights09/12/19 01:15 PM
2

LOL, yeah, go tell that to yourself more. Meanwhile, I'll go be happy despite lack of your care :)
/r/MensRights07/12/19 01:19 PM
1

Diplomacy 101: rule of equal response.
/r/MensRights06/12/19 02:33 PM
1

again, impossible to judge without being presented with an independently verifiable proof of action. Words have no value. They can be twisted and turned very easily. she believe in what feminism stands for so she belived wrong. Consequences came (that being lack of trust). Its not a recoverable situation. And about the nazi Gestapo is that I would say that most of them expressed some form of hatred to Jews. but they were not criminally condemned after the war for their belief, but for specyfic c…
/r/MensRights06/12/19 02:25 PM
-1

You still used the name of hate-based ideology. Its not a recoverable situation, sorry. There is only one chance to gain real trust. You fucked it up with someine, and consequences came :) welcome to life? Only an idiot trusts a woman twice. Even greater idiot is one who gives a second chance to one.
/r/MensRights06/12/19 02:16 PM
1

So, I guess we should excuse like half of the nazi Gestapo then, because they were persecuting also criminal matters, not just political ones. Nope. Bad idea to disregard association. She might say that she wants ewuality but can she provide an independently verifiable proof of action that had proper result?
/r/MensRights06/12/19 02:14 PM
3

Feminism is just fighting for women’s rights to gain equality blatant lie. Its female superiority, hate-based movement and ideology. It only ever pushes an agenda if its profitable for women. Anything equal that is not pushing a woman up is instantly attacked.
/r/MensRights06/12/19 02:11 PM
1

Open discussion is not naive. But it only works if both parties have no ulterior motive suspected of them. OP's a feminist - so trusting that is...diffiicult, given that movement's history, words, actions, and goals.
/r/MensRights06/12/19 02:05 PM
1

Open discussion would require trust. And thats not exactly good for us to just trust nowadays:)
/r/MensRights06/12/19 01:56 PM
2

Fortunatelly, USA is not entire world, lol
/r/MensRights06/12/19 01:52 PM
1

Tbh, we have a bad name no matter what we say or do. Feminists made sure of it. So whats the difference? :) if we are good guys, nothing will change and we will still be considered bad.
/r/MensRights06/12/19 01:52 PM
2

Nothing prevents something 100% of the time. Not in medicine anyway. Especially where/when your own CNS is being a fucktard against you.
/r/MensRights06/12/19 01:46 PM
2

Morality is subjective? Not really. Unless you want to legalise murder.
/r/MensRights06/12/19 01:36 PM
2

Feminism is just fighting for women’s rights to gain equality, blatant lie.
/r/MensRights06/12/19 01:35 PM
1

If you do not activelly and successfully clean your movement of those "some feminists", then you are an enabler, and as much guilty, if only by association. Its reason enough for me to totally and irrevocably condemn you, sorry - but its just safer for men to act that way.
/r/MensRights06/12/19 01:34 PM
3

"verified data and facts dont align with my subjective reality, therefore verified data and facts are incorrect". LOL.
/r/MensRights06/12/19 01:33 PM
3

she has already proven that she is acting through the eye of her self-serving subjective opinion / "feeling of being correct", so its not a good faith by my book tbh.
/r/MensRights06/12/19 01:32 PM
1

True, but that would require men to take a risk. And no specyfic woman is exactly worth risking anything. If we are to go into relationship, outcome in such markers must be guaranteed to be positive for us, on our terms.
/r/MensRights06/12/19 01:30 PM
1

Also, a stalker. Typical female.
/r/MensRights06/12/19 01:22 PM
1

I am not "anti-men" nor the stereotypical "angry feminazi" that you guys (understandably) hate or you say so :) words, words, words...and when we look at your posts...each and every one of them is you saying you dont really know anything on the subject, then going either all "I dont belive you" or "but women". Again - with your mindset, id be banned on any of your feminist subs. You feel like women are the enemy Guess what, if said women say that im the enemy (literally thats what feminism says,…
/r/MensRights06/12/19 01:19 PM
3

Its not psychological disorder. Its NEUROLOGICAL mismatch, genital structure vs body map hardwiring in the brain, in very short. Psychology means its something you have conscious control over in one way or another. You do not have control over physical brain structure, unless you use a scalpel. They need help And that is what surgery is for, because noone is - as yet - able to rewire your brain connections - physical ones - to change your brain's construction of the part where body map is. Your …
/r/MensRights06/12/19 12:52 PM
2

yep. But wanted to show sort-of where does that come from, and why. Its not about conscious 'imagination'. I can easily guarantee you that trans persons would LOVE for it to be fucking voluntary...
/r/MensRights06/12/19 12:48 PM
5

Its not about imagination. Its about neurological body map vs the physical body, which can be mismatched and fuckig you over.
/r/MensRights06/12/19 12:43 PM
2

Only an idiot trusts a woman twice.
/r/MensRights06/12/19 12:31 PM
2

Cheating is not the end of a relationship Its not? Guess again, lol, after I leave your ass out to dry if you cheat on me. Want to fuck around? Dont get into relationship with me, especially of a kind where you will expect me not to fuck around. Cant control your cunt? Are you an animal?
/r/MensRights06/12/19 12:30 PM
2

right? :> its incredible how she has no understanding of what morality even is. It looks like everything is conditional to her.
/r/MensRights06/12/19 12:29 PM
1

she had FEEEELINGS that she just HAAAAD to do it, lol. Asking her husband to just let it go so the relationship can "survive" - so what's in it for him? Her fucking him over again in the future, because, well, she already faced no consequences first time? XD Worthless.
/r/MensRights06/12/19 12:28 PM
-3

You stated yourself to be feminist. You are an enemy by that fact alone, and its feminism that defined that relation. You say you want to talk. I read your classics and see talk about performing male genocide. What would you expect based on that, exactly? Trust? You cant possibly be serious, right? You go to any feminist outlet, and all you have there is hate and expectations. What do you want to talk about, exactly? Once your feminism cleans your act, we might talk again, if its profitable to u…
/r/MensRights06/12/19 12:10 PM
1

And I agree. I think there is a disparity and an unfairness caused to men there. I can’t imagine being a man with a pregnant partner, who wants to abort the child while you don’t What about if he did not consent to be a father? In that case you are using his sexuality in a way he did not consent to. Its literally rape, by criminal law standards. I hope we figure out more effective solutions to the issues. If he does not consent, if that consent is retracted, there must either be abortion or he m…
/r/MensRights06/12/19 11:00 AM
0

What it feels to you is a non-issue. Its not our problem. Men must be given same right not to be a parent AND not be forced to financially support your kid if we did not consent, or if we retracted the consent later. If that destroys your life, too bad, but you have no right to money that men worked for. You might be given, IF they unilaterally decide so.
/r/MensRights06/12/19 10:57 AM
1

If you have problem acting because of scary thoughts, you should really consider psychiatric treatment, tbh.
/r/MensRights06/12/19 10:54 AM
1

And scholarships are becoming more and more focused on incentivizing STEM You mean, forcing men not to be able to attend, so females can get in, even if they are too stupid to get enough entry grade? Thats not "incentive". Thats debilism. It only leads to your title later being not worth anything, because I, as an employer, cant exactly trust that its merit based instead of gender based.
/r/MensRights06/12/19 10:53 AM
2

I do not want to diminish or invalidate your views, but I’m a bit skeptical on some of your claims. you have no right to scepticism. Belive the victim, isnt it? I am a survivor of domestic abuse Not our problem, really. However, there are actual statistics and studies that show that it does not affect both sexes at the same rate, Feminist statistics are biased and not worthy of any science-derived name. 1 in 4 women falls prey to domestic violence, while 1 in 9 men fall prey. Blatant lie. The li…
/r/MensRights06/12/19 10:51 AM
1

My knowledge here is limited, but isn’t circumcision normally a religious decision or a decision made by parents mutually while the baby is young? Females should also be circumcised then. You dont really need clit to have sex or procreate. And many religions perform clitoral resections. Both parents? Since when women should have a right decide about male body and sexuality? No matter mother or no - you dont even have right to opinion on that, sorry. Alternativelly, fuck off of male body. Male ge…
/r/MensRights06/12/19 10:46 AM
0

And I agree, I consider myself a feminist in the original sense intended by it: working towards true equality between men and women. original sense has nothing to do with any sort of equality. Its female dominance, empowerment, and nothing else. You should really educate yourself better. so should “masculinity” Masculinity, and men, "should" nothing. We do what we want to, not what we "should". I truly hope we manage to get away from the woman vs man mentality LOL. Its your feminism that started…
/r/MensRights06/12/19 10:31 AM
1

And remember, unless you’re a doctor or something a lot of jobs aren’t super difficult that depends on what level you are at. Some can be quite easy on the starting level, and insanely difficult at masters.
/r/MensRights06/12/19 10:23 AM
4

...yeah, you should go learn biology and medicine "a bit"...its not as easy as you think it is.
/r/MensRights06/12/19 09:35 AM
7

His mom should have got her cunt cut off as justice, tbh.
/r/MensRights06/12/19 09:30 AM
2

Its not gay to read a book, unless you take a dick up your ass while you are at it.
/r/MensRights06/12/19 09:28 AM
2

Shouldnt I? Its men who were the greatest in history, from leaders to scientists. Its men who defended societies for the whole history, with their own lives. Its men who run the backbone of society, like 99% of the time.
/r/MensRights06/12/19 09:13 AM
3

It doesnt? Well thats interesting, because our - male - experience says something very different, very often. You might want try not to invalidate someone's experiences and opinions, if you want someone to continue talking to you...
/r/MensRights05/12/19 07:32 PM
2

Im a man. If its about anything male related - it matters. About your female matters - feminism says ive got no right to opinion. Its just equal response, really, that you should no right to your opinion on any of our matters then. Diplomacy 101.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 07:12 PM
3

Your "perspective" has no value.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 07:07 PM
2

Throat works better.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 07:07 PM
1

They say that everything is a dildo if you are brave enough, so...
/r/MensRights05/12/19 07:06 PM
1

Meh. Fem rapist? Take that animal's life, and be done with it.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 07:05 PM
1

No such thing these days
/r/MensRights05/12/19 07:03 PM
1

Since when promiscuity is bad? It brings pleasure to us...oh right. Females will not get their prince charming, lol
/r/MensRights05/12/19 07:02 PM
1

Aka "men are good when society gains on their sacrifice and expense" worthless idiocy.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 07:00 PM
1

LOL. All I could say to that.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 06:55 PM
1

Maybe. But strong are always strongest alone. I'll manage :)
/r/MensRights05/12/19 06:51 PM
0

Any masculinity is good.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 06:50 PM
1

Why should I expect help? Im a man. I KNOW that no help will come anyway, especially from a woman. I learned to be self-sufficient years ago, lol.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 06:48 PM
1

Nope. If she is asaaulting someone, her life should be ended.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 06:46 PM
18

Hopefully her hubby finds out, and properly fucks her life over when leaving.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 05:33 PM
1

Of course standards must be kept in check - they must be what is profitable and good for us.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 05:17 PM
1

Not our problem tbh.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 05:00 PM
1

There would be more if women were good enough for the task.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 04:59 PM
1

Sorry, just experience. Its safer to presume that :P if women want to be seen in a better light, they might want to work for it. Women presume the worst about men all the time, so I see no reason to do it as well - fair's fair.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 03:52 PM
2

everyone's alone in death.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 02:57 PM
0

the benefit of a future potential family unit maybe not everyone wants that "future potential family unit", nor WITH just any female, tbh.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 02:10 PM
1

Women dont value you as a person. They value you by what you provide for her, emotionally or otherwise.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 11:09 AM
1

We need to do whats best for us, and thats about it.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 11:08 AM
1

The problem with your post is: she might be a good person now, but people change over time. Assuming she will not turn bad on you is utter stupidity and unnecessary risk to one's money and assets.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 11:02 AM
1

Too bad. Its good for us to have high standards, sorry. Why shouldnt we, exactly? So poor women have it easy? Lol, so much NOPE.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 10:58 AM
1

That accountability is the very leverage you are looking for.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 10:57 AM
1

Meeting in the middle is not good enough for us, sorry.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 10:49 AM
1

Employee? More like IRS, lol
/r/MensRights05/12/19 10:49 AM
1

More like about you not having a wank that easily.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 10:47 AM
2

Why they are hell bent on making boys weak and women empowered? selfishness, what did you exactly expect? :)
/r/MensRights03/12/19 12:27 PM
1

Less of a man for stoically enduring a woman child's fits of rage? No, not at all. But she is less of a woman for doing it. Less of a woman and more of a poorly socialized child. Its more like a Human vs Animal comparison, tbh. Even poorly socialized children are often better than a female throwing an emotional period/pregnancy tantrum.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 12:16 PM
15

Better yet - just dont get into a type of relationship where she can feel entitled to information or access to your money and assets, in any way.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 12:13 PM
2

mommy in question. Most probably.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 12:11 PM
1

just feminity. Aka entitlement.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 12:08 PM
2

Law is not gender neutral to any extent.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 12:02 PM
2

Female problems are not the topic here and now.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 12:02 PM
1

Their legal guardians do
/r/MensRights03/12/19 12:00 PM
17

meh. Molestation, nope. But where I live we did have a case of an accident victim accusing paramedics of bodily harm. Why? They broke his ribs due to the hour of CPR they had to perform. And he fucking won the fucking case.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 11:59 AM
1

Its a woman, so not understanding is a given
/r/MensRights03/12/19 11:55 AM
28

Not nearly enough. First 2 minutes of CPR is literally you saving/supporting a life until proper help qrrives. If you dont CPr and just wait for medical team, 99% of the time there will be noone to save, or there will be so much hypoxia induxed TBI that you cant really speak of any quality of life (if you can even speak about consciousness at all, anymore).
/r/MensRights03/12/19 11:40 AM
24

If you are a recognized guardian of the group, you are still legally bound to render help. At least where I live, not assisting would end you up with criminal negligence charges, if not "not rendering help leadi ng to loss of life" charge.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 11:37 AM
1

i didnt realise the goal of mens rights was just to attack women. nope. Our goal is what is currently profitable to us. protip: does not matter what he did earlier on. Now he did a good thing, and thus was justly praised for it.
/r/MensRights02/12/19 03:44 PM
1

even male criminals were more valiant than any of women present on site.
/r/MensRights02/12/19 03:33 PM
1

She is his partner. OF COURSE she is supposed to also care about THE child. NO, she is not entitled to being a parent LEGALLY-wise if she is not good enough by his standards - otherwise his relationship with HIS child could potentially suffer.
/r/MensRights02/12/19 03:22 PM
0

Whatever the reason is, if she is found not good enough by his standards, its his right to deny her.
/r/MensRights02/12/19 03:18 PM
1

Where I live its just a CFO. Aka its a fancy name for chief finances dept.
/r/MensRights02/12/19 03:17 PM
1

tbh, what women think and say about masculinity is worthless. Its not something for them to decide or to have opinion on.
/r/MensRights02/12/19 03:11 PM
1

well, its a feminist, what to expect other than hate?
/r/MensRights02/12/19 03:10 PM
1

middle ground is not good enough.
/r/MensRights02/12/19 03:07 PM
2

And btw in my country (not sure where you are, I'm in the US) both men and women have to be worried, logical and take precautions on the streets because gun violence is killing lots of innocent people sadly. thats not the problem of "gun violence". Thats the problem of fucked up society you have. Look at switzerland - they have even more firearms per capita than you do. Yet...noone is murdering anyone, lol. Guns do not kill people. People kill people. And a criminal will always have a firearm if…
/r/MensRights02/12/19 01:30 PM
2

Unfortunate? Meh. Its just logical to be aware, take precautions, and not trust. Alike to you worrying while out there on a dark street.
/r/MensRights02/12/19 01:13 PM
2

Well, if you don do anything about that radical sect, you are an enabler anyway. Sorry, not sorry :) Its not worth it to trust twice.
/r/MensRights02/12/19 01:03 PM
6

That's ridiculous. So you have no right to an opinion on female bodies and sexuality? I have? Last time I checked, everyone in your feminism tells men that they dont have such right. So... :P
/r/MensRights02/12/19 12:45 PM
4

As a woman you have no right to opinion on male bodies and male sexuality, tbh. They are not yours.
/r/MensRights02/12/19 11:20 AM
2

Its a short road from a perv to a pedo. She's a sexual predator, and should be deatl with accordingly.
/r/MensRights02/12/19 11:01 AM
2

Feelings matter if its profitable to us.
/r/MensRights02/12/19 10:59 AM
5

"Perv female wanted to look at dicks" type logic
/r/MensRights02/12/19 10:57 AM
3

For women, relationship is about what she gets. Its about her feelgoods, and your money and assets spent on her. The rest is nice but empty words.
/r/MensRights29/11/19 11:46 AM
1

Women, self-control - pick one, lol.
/r/MensRights29/11/19 11:36 AM
2

There are non invasive procedures for that nowadays. You dont have to cut anything off.
/r/MensRights29/11/19 11:35 AM
15

Women only have sympathy to men when and if its profitable in some way.
/r/MensRights29/11/19 11:22 AM
11

Metoo has long been stated to be female only club. What to expect tbh?
/r/MensRights29/11/19 11:21 AM
8

By feminist standards, vagina owners are queens of the universe, and entitled to everything by default.
/r/MensRights28/11/19 11:20 AM
1

Its a day for men. She has no right to opinion on the topic, really.
/r/MensRights27/11/19 03:01 PM
3

Effectiveness and efficiency > morality works wonders tbh.
/r/MensRights27/11/19 02:51 PM
3

It happens and therefore must be taken into account. Men must be safe. If women get their ego.and feelings hurt because of our safety, its just acceptable collateral damage.
/r/MensRights25/11/19 01:35 PM
3

Or a chick with breeding fetish
/r/MensRights25/11/19 01:31 PM
1

Sorry, from our perspective they are one and the same.
/r/MensRights25/11/19 01:26 PM
1

So, a feminist.
/r/MensRights25/11/19 01:26 PM
59

Looks like equality is a bitch indeed. Good. XD
/r/MensRights25/11/19 01:22 PM
5

Also women: whaaaaaa noone is complimenting us anymore..men are so evil.
/r/MensRights25/11/19 01:15 PM
1

She has no right to it in a way she did.
/r/MensRights22/11/19 03:57 PM
1

Nope. They MIGHT have it if they continue to work for it, IF said respect is beneficial enough for us. Thats how it should work.
/r/MensRights22/11/19 03:47 PM
1

Respect must be earned. It is not to be given freely, lest it loses all value.
/r/MensRights22/11/19 03:46 PM
0

There is no medically valid psychological treatment for dysmorphia.
/r/MensRights22/11/19 03:43 PM
1

Her attempt is a virtue signalling, not an attempt to be positive to us.
/r/MensRights22/11/19 03:42 PM
2

Rven her statement above shows it. Its all about what we do for women, not about who we are.
/r/MensRights22/11/19 03:41 PM
1

Perhaps, but its not exactly worth the hassle to separate one from the other, for most cases.
/r/MensRights22/11/19 03:37 PM
1

Meh. She still says its because what we do for her, not because of who we are. Entitlement and toxicity but what to expect?
/r/MensRights22/11/19 03:36 PM
2

Abusive women should get a headshot, not treatment.
/r/MensRights22/11/19 03:34 PM
3

Also, societal status. And nowadays, "survivor" is a quite coveted status for some.
/r/MensRights22/11/19 03:32 PM
27

Cheating to save marriage is like fucking for virginity.
/r/MensRights22/11/19 01:08 PM
0

why did she marry one and have 4 children with him? money, and societal status.
/r/MensRights21/11/19 03:38 PM
1

Competence is one thing, but women tend to go on extended maternity leaves. This is not directly profitable for the employer, therefore risk must be taken into account, and your pay lowered accordingly. Alternativelly, you should be fired.
/r/MensRights21/11/19 01:01 PM
0

Our subjective feeling is that you are lying, therefore you are lying. Sorry.
/r/MensRights21/11/19 12:59 PM
1

Outcome always justifies the means. Welcome to politics 101.
/r/MensRights21/11/19 12:58 PM
1

You will. Because you named yourself one of them, a feminist. Your definitions have zero value.
/r/MensRights21/11/19 12:58 PM
2

We will do what we deem profitable and good for us, not what you tell us to.
/r/MensRights21/11/19 12:56 PM
3

Feminism outright states that men are enemies. What exactly do you expect? most of us dont Most of you are guilty of being enablers. And we are not on the same team.
/r/MensRights21/11/19 12:55 PM
1

Future is female until its time to actually achieve anything except nothing.
/r/MensRights21/11/19 12:51 PM
1

Yep. Thats just what happens to you if you are a traitor.
/r/MensRights21/11/19 12:49 PM
6

Antireligious is good. Religion was always just purest form of hate, and really should be eradicated.
/r/MensRights21/11/19 11:39 AM
1

You mean religious troglodytes?
/r/MensRights21/11/19 11:25 AM
8

Yep. This parasitism should really be admined out of here.
/r/MensRights21/11/19 10:28 AM
1

Real feminism :)
/r/MensRights21/11/19 10:22 AM
1

Yep. Damage done will be maximalised so that the attack is stopped ASAP. If she's a woman, too bad..for her.
/r/MensRights21/11/19 10:20 AM
1

If you want us to be hated by others tbh, we already are, so...yeah.
/r/MensRights20/11/19 06:02 PM
2

if you are a feminist, why should we even trust you with our issues? Your movement has already shown what is capable of, after all.
/r/MensRights20/11/19 03:04 PM
2

not exactly our problem, tbh. This place is to be primarily good and usefull resource for MEN.
/r/MensRights20/11/19 03:03 PM
0

If its going to be effective and good for us, we should not be different.
/r/MensRights20/11/19 03:01 PM
0

Nope. Its their problem. Not ours. Shaming men into providing free money and assets is borderline criminal.
/r/MensRights20/11/19 02:41 PM
2

Lol, females can pay for their own physiology and feels, tyvm.
/r/MensRights20/11/19 02:40 PM
1

Me, me, me Lol. Typical.
/r/MensRights20/11/19 12:33 PM
1

Not our problem, really.
/r/MensRights20/11/19 11:40 AM
2

Feminism, bigotry, same thing really.
/r/MensRights20/11/19 11:39 AM
3

Then why are you even here? You have your r/feminism after all.
/r/MensRights20/11/19 11:38 AM
1

If you are a feminist, you have no right to discussion, or opinion on our issues. You can listen and do as you are told to. Why? Because we are not on the same team anymore.
/r/MensRights20/11/19 11:34 AM
-1

What would it achieve? Can you prove your answer in a verifiable way? Is that something profitable to men enough?
/r/MensRights20/11/19 11:33 AM
2

Go read the works of miss dvorkin, then tell us. Feminism is a hate movement by sheer definition.
/r/MensRights20/11/19 11:32 AM
6

You dont feel it fine. You just dont have proper comparison.
/r/MensRights20/11/19 11:20 AM
-43

Meh. She is not doing it for us, most probably, but seeking attention.
/r/MensRights20/11/19 11:20 AM
1

Its not "being open minded". Its "being easily manipulated". Therapy could help, I guess.
/r/MensRights19/11/19 01:59 PM
1

I know that, and I know that we'll, but I even hear stuff from them such as "logic is overrated" or "we shouldn't be using logic because emotions are more genuine" ...and you cant just use what YOU want to use ?
/r/MensRights19/11/19 01:00 PM
2

That is what happen if you feel think too much, and use cold logic and reason too little.
/r/MensRights19/11/19 12:18 PM
2

So, women can "get over it" if they want to. Dont expect men to sacrifice or compromise - neither women nor current society are worth the hassle currently. We dont exist for them. We only exist for ourselves.
/r/MensRights19/11/19 12:10 PM
1

So? You still didnt resolve everything. Unless you execute pre-birth if she is pregnant as result of her crime.
/r/MensRights19/11/19 12:08 PM
2

And if she rapes him (and not peoviding true information re: birth control is literally classed as rape in several countries already...but only if women are on the receiving end. How convenient, lol) - then He's forced to both pay for the kid and endure emotional distress of unwanted fatherhood. But looks like you are good with that part. Let me guess, you are a woman?
/r/MensRights19/11/19 12:01 PM
1

and you are literally conflating men that didnt consent to having a child with rapists. anyway: men's sexuality is not for women - its solely for men and women are just part of it if it suits men, when it suits men. They have literally no right to opinion or say in it unless we directly consent to it, provided consent was not retracted later. No matter what cost and destruction it brings to women, right to consent must be 100% universal, encompassing everything that men would want re: their sexu…
/r/MensRights19/11/19 11:52 AM
2

So, are you saing that women literally never lie about birth control, and it never fails them? :>
/r/MensRights19/11/19 11:48 AM
2

It is analogous. Its using someone's sexuality in a way that that person did not consent to, or retroactivelly removed consent to. At least where I live, thats literally what rape is. Or would you disagree about consent part?
/r/MensRights19/11/19 11:43 AM
2

Im not the one calling names ;) just an observation. There is no "middle ground". Our (men) rights, needs, and expectations must be always considered absolute.
/r/MensRights19/11/19 11:38 AM
2

And forcing a man to give you a child is exactly THE same. Im not "suggesting". Im trying to show you analogies and inequalities that your pathetic ideas bring to Men. Which are not acceptable even if they are only a slight inconvenience to us.
/r/MensRights19/11/19 11:36 AM
2

It would not. The child still exists. Unless you will force women to give birth to children conceived from rape, its not equal in spirit.
/r/MensRights19/11/19 11:31 AM
2

Its not enough. Men must not be forced to endure emotional labor and turmoil because vagina owner wanted a baby from them. Sorry, if feminists say that women are entitled to this, then we are entitled to it as well. Equality, after all, right ? Right? Or is it only when it suits one side?
/r/MensRights19/11/19 11:13 AM
1

And you cant just force someone to have a child against his will. Its literally RAPE if man does it to a woman. Fuck off, maybe, from men, then? Equality.
/r/MensRights19/11/19 11:09 AM
1

If the alternative is our wages being taken from us without our consent, what is your proposition? Our money is our castle just like her vagina is her castle.
/r/MensRights19/11/19 11:08 AM
2

you cannot force the female to undergo a medical procedure against her will... then she should not have any right to any child support - also, if her partner did not consent to that type of use of his sexuality (or if he withdrew his consent retroactivelly, no matter what time passed), its rape by legal definition.
/r/MensRights19/11/19 11:07 AM
2

cool. If I cant have a say in her body, she cant have a say in my wallet.
/r/MensRights19/11/19 11:05 AM
-1

she has changed my perspective on some things. this already is abuse. She has no right to change you, or even to suggest change.
/r/MensRights19/11/19 11:04 AM
1

if you like the risk...thankfully im bi, lol
/r/MensRights19/11/19 11:02 AM
2

I always lean towards feminism then why are you here, even?
/r/MensRights19/11/19 11:00 AM
2

There is a new type of feminism out there no such thing. There was only one feminsm, and still is.
/r/MensRights19/11/19 10:55 AM
3

a feminist woman too tbh thats nothing to be proud of.
/r/MensRights19/11/19 10:55 AM
0

unfortunately, you are right. The problem being that you cant really trust that they are doing it for us, instead of their own perceived female profit that could come from doing it for us.
/r/MensRights19/11/19 10:48 AM
2

women actually listening from our perspective, instead from perspective of "what is profitable to me and other women?"
/r/MensRights19/11/19 10:47 AM
4

“Passively mysoginistic”? I’m sorry what? existing and not doing as female master says to do. LOL
/r/MensRights19/11/19 10:43 AM
2

typical. If she cant fuck him post-mortem, noone will.
/r/MensRights19/11/19 10:39 AM
1

Tell me in all honesty what 17 yer old young man wouldn't want to have sex with his hot teacher One in a commited relationship, for example? And I could find several other reasons, the main one being: "because he does not fucking want it and its not her business to know why, or argue". Women dont have right to decision or opinion re: male sexuality. That includes unilaterally choosing to have sex with them.
/r/MensRights19/11/19 10:07 AM
1

well, what to expect, really?
/r/MensRights19/11/19 10:04 AM
1

I hope there comes a time when this becomes law in many countries this is law already, where and when it suits women of course.
/r/MensRights19/11/19 09:11 AM
0

Again, functionally these are civil matters. at least where I live, perjury is a serious criminal case. Im not from USA, fortunately. Okay, but what the law should be doesn't matter. Prosecutors cannot create new crimes to charge a person with Prosecutors can not. Thats why you dont vote for them, but for legislators that will do that. nor can a court convict somebody for morally outrageous conduct which doesn't rise to the level of a crime depends on law written. And that can be changed if you …
/r/MensRights19/11/19 09:10 AM
3

Gender excluded from service? Then said gender will not provide any service back.
/r/MensRights18/11/19 04:58 PM
0

Easy solution, firemen should only help men. Feminists can firefight themselves lol
/r/MensRights18/11/19 04:54 PM
0

Future of crime is female, lol
/r/MensRights18/11/19 04:52 PM
1

perjury? defamation? slander? trying to destroy his life, for a stupid reason? take your pick. Law? Law can and should be changed to suit us. Feminists have shown more than once that its acceptable and good.
/r/MensRights18/11/19 02:53 PM
1

Even if there is medical reason, in most cases you dont need to circumcise anymore. There are other ways for most issues.
/r/MensRights18/11/19 02:19 PM
3

Because its not explicitly needed in 99,9999% of thr cases. And when there is a medical reason, there are non-destructive ways to fix it nowadays, in most cases.
/r/MensRights18/11/19 02:08 PM
2

good honest women yeeeah, that is a problematic bit nowadays.
/r/MensRights18/11/19 01:55 PM
2

its a woman and most probably a feminist, judging by her words. What exactly would one expect from that combination?
/r/MensRights18/11/19 01:48 PM
1

I am a man. Its just logical to advocate for our rights and needs above and before anything and anyone's else.
/r/MensRights18/11/19 01:20 PM
1

Lesbians are ok under current dogma. Its just male sexuality thats eeeeeviiil XD
/r/MensRights18/11/19 01:01 PM
0

It’s called personal growth. main question being, is her personal growth good and profitable to us?
/r/MensRights18/11/19 01:00 PM
1

tbh, discussion is badmouthing enough. She made her own bed, its not someone else's problem. She will be seen by that someone, as that someone sees fit.
/r/MensRights18/11/19 12:58 PM
2

its your employer decision how much he wants to pay you, or anyone. If you dont like it, you can renegotiate, or leave. Its not exactly your company to force any decisions.
/r/MensRights18/11/19 12:49 PM
1

yeeeeah, if she does not trust me, she can continue using her own pill, lol.
/r/MensRights18/11/19 11:47 AM
1

not exactly. If it lowers the libido then it works to our disadvantage (less sex).
/r/MensRights18/11/19 11:47 AM
1

ED and decreased libido mean that there is no point using it. I want my libido intact. What's the point of male BC pill if you dont have any want to have sex?
/r/MensRights18/11/19 11:45 AM
1

Traditionally and in evolution, it was a man's role to protect women and children. Times of gender roles are over. She can defend herself just as well.
/r/MensRights18/11/19 11:38 AM
1

nothing short of her death is adequate punishment. She tried to do something that would destroy his life, thus she should lose her life.
/r/MensRights18/11/19 11:36 AM
3

nope. Equality will come when men stop sacrificing and compromising literally anything in the name of "love" and only do what suits them, and them alone.
/r/MensRights18/11/19 11:34 AM
1

We are whores fixed it for you.
/r/MensRights18/11/19 11:33 AM
1

Yep. She must fuck around, because feelings. Women. Nuff said.
/r/MensRights18/11/19 11:31 AM
4

So true. Never let a sub-par female to be in your life, in any way. Its not worth the hassle.
/r/MensRights18/11/19 10:48 AM
4

meh. who cares what she wants? If she perpetuates hate, she must pay for it. Destroy her life, and be done with it - that should be society's response.
/r/MensRights18/11/19 10:45 AM
2

By toxic masculinity I meant the ideology that men are expected to bottle up their emotions. use a proper name then - "society toxic to men". There is no such thing as toxic masculinity.
/r/MensRights18/11/19 10:43 AM
1

its not a stupid complain. Its a matter of equality. NOTHING is to remain unequal when women are concerned, why should we compromise then?
/r/MensRights18/11/19 10:42 AM
1

they oftentimes don't get well recognized or even liked by men. most probably not due to their height.
/r/MensRights18/11/19 10:32 AM
10

What will it take to overturn this propaganda? you cant overturn dogma. You can only eradicate it.
/r/MensRights18/11/19 10:24 AM
7

unquestionable feminism, that's what is wrong.
/r/MensRights18/11/19 10:18 AM
2

what someone's earn is not my business. I earn more than enough. What my business is, is that no nosy feminists play with my money related information.
/r/MensRights17/11/19 09:42 PM
2

Used to have a female friend that was actually proud of veggie use. Also was proud of returing said veggie to the refrigerator afterwards. Did not come to her place for another visit ever again. Just in fucking case.
/r/MensRights15/11/19 12:27 PM
2

Weeell, they DO shake something in their pants, its a fetish after all ;)
/r/MensRights15/11/19 12:24 PM
3

Tbh, findom does exist. Its fetishism.
/r/MensRights15/11/19 12:24 PM
3

Well, its an extreme fetish, its bound to be fucked up, lol
/r/MensRights15/11/19 12:23 PM
5

Bachelor tax, childfree tax...there are ways.
/r/MensRights15/11/19 12:22 PM
2

To provide value, you need to have one first. Most do not.
/r/MensRights15/11/19 12:22 PM
2

What I earn is not some rando's business.
/r/MensRights15/11/19 12:21 PM
2

Lol, nope.
/r/MensRights15/11/19 12:19 PM
1

330kmh...hayabusa by any chance? :)
/r/MensRights15/11/19 12:07 PM
3

Leaving a woman is not a crime. She just was not up to his expectations and standards. Are you suggesting that he should not have standards so that woman has it nice and easy?
/r/MensRights15/11/19 12:01 PM
2

More like, finally he starts carimg for himself.
/r/MensRights15/11/19 11:59 AM
0

That would happen pre natally, wouldn't it Nope. event of birth itself is not considered prenatal. And yeah, circumcision does not help in any way. Just clarification of "cannot transmit" BS. source: majored in biology.
/r/MensRights15/11/19 09:47 AM
2

well, bacteria do fine without cellular nuclei, so. in other words, wtf?
/r/MensRights14/11/19 03:48 PM
1

Nope. Just wait a bit if her home is burning down, lol
/r/MensRights14/11/19 01:05 PM
1

Women are not like that...until they are.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 01:04 PM
0

They easily do. Mother can easily pass many STDs to the child in several ways. Unfortunately.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 01:01 PM
1

Whooa...they believe...but do they actually DO something about it? XD Women.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 12:49 PM
1

Its not privilege. Its called not being clinically insane.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 12:47 PM
3

WHO is not correct on the matter.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 11:44 AM
2

You seem to be correct
/r/MensRights14/11/19 11:42 AM
2

With that level of paranoia, she should never be allowed to even hold a firearm, much less own it.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 11:40 AM
1

Yep, that is a psychiatric case.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 11:35 AM
1

Not unless there is substantial tearing involved which is not repaired afterwards. Which it is, 99% of the time.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 11:32 AM
2

Yeah, ducks are literally evolved rapist species oO
/r/MensRights14/11/19 11:31 AM
1

Thats why, evolutionary, males often wipe out babies from precious males ;) just saying. Society is not pure biology, fortunately.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 11:30 AM
1

Yep. That just shows how little people know about basic biology.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 11:28 AM
5

Cant blame those men, if she starts fucking around on them because she just met a guy that makes even more than she does. Why risk that bs in our lives? :)
/r/MensRights14/11/19 11:26 AM
2

they will have those negative opinion anyway, so what's exactly the difference?
/r/MensRights13/11/19 03:03 PM
1

no war needed. Female part would just fail at civilisation, collapse, and run to us for help. Which we could nicely deny, then.
/r/MensRights13/11/19 02:45 PM
3

well, scandinavia is really great, provided you have a vagina.
/r/MensRights13/11/19 02:37 PM
3

No masculinity is ever toxic. It might be bad for women sometimes, but thats not our problem if only its profitable and good to men, like it should.
/r/MensRights13/11/19 02:22 PM
6

Toxic Feminity in a nutshell: opportunism, manipulation, and crazy ass propaganda.
/r/MensRights13/11/19 02:19 PM
15

nah, will probably be named positive discrimination or something, lol /s
/r/MensRights13/11/19 02:04 PM
1

At least she did the right thing eventually. I was refering to this, not her original BS. Apologies are worthless.
/r/MensRights13/11/19 12:04 PM
2

woman will never be happy if there's another woman nearby doing better than her, subjectivly, in any way
/r/MensRights12/11/19 02:33 PM
6

"real masculinity" aka what suits women at the moment? LOL.
/r/MensRights12/11/19 02:28 PM
8

Now the family... the 14yr old twat came from that tribe, also, wifey came from that same tribe, so yeah, about that marriage...she already made a choice - against her husband. Why would he stay with a partner that is not loyal to him to that extent, is beyond me.
/r/MensRights12/11/19 02:27 PM
1

You may have to forgive the stupid teenager for what she did, because because she cant be forced to learn that words and actions have consequences. Fuck her. Destroying her life is more usefull to society than forgivness.
/r/MensRights12/11/19 02:03 PM
20

Still should have divorced. Wifey was not loyal once, so she will be again if shit hits the fan. That alone is worth leaving her over.
/r/MensRights12/11/19 11:51 AM
1

There should never be any baby related additional leave. For any gender. Its not profitable, and its discriminating those that are not parents.
/r/MensRights11/11/19 11:29 PM
2

In my company, not a single female programmer contributes even remotely same quantity and quality, sorry. Not to mention time spent metrics vs coffe time. Yet they are paid same money, because, well, equality.
/r/MensRights11/11/19 11:24 PM
2

its on you to have your hygiene up to standards. You can buy one less pair of shoes. Society is not for sponsoring your basics.
/r/MensRights11/11/19 11:00 PM
1

nope. we exist because of feminist words of miss dvorkin, just to name one of many. You should realise that backslash usually comes if you start talking about limiting half of society's numbers to 10%. Or name half the society as public enemy because of their genitals. Well, guess what - cool, we can actually be enemies if you want to. Men didnt start this BS. Feminists did.
/r/MensRights11/11/19 10:58 PM
1

Still, taxation is removed for one gender related product.
/r/MensRights10/11/19 12:50 AM
0

Fair means everyone pays same tax, no exception. If she is too poor, too bad.
/r/MensRights10/11/19 12:49 AM
0

Then women should not get privileged treatment. Inequality is bad, right?
/r/MensRights10/11/19 12:48 AM
1

Preferential treatment based on sex is not good. Sorry. If she cant pay, she should man up and make more money.
/r/MensRights10/11/19 12:47 AM
1

Nothing is free.
/r/MensRights10/11/19 12:46 AM
1

Men love. Women calculate first.
/r/MensRights10/11/19 12:45 AM
2

Instagram model aka prostitute / sugar baby XD
/r/MensRights10/11/19 12:38 AM
3

We are better than women even at achieving death.
/r/MensRights10/11/19 12:28 AM
1

Its all about a cunt.
/r/MensRights10/11/19 12:25 AM
1

She did nothing. Speaking words is nothing.
/r/MensRights10/11/19 12:23 AM
1

Supportice for her victim, you mean? Her, I cant imagine supporting and validating that kind of creature
/r/MensRights10/11/19 12:23 AM
2

Hopefully she does not suicide, because feminists will turn the tables on that guy. I just can see the feminist titles in the news.
/r/MensRights10/11/19 12:18 AM
1

Lol, so typical female. Did bad, but forgive me, I had feeels. Lol. She tried to destroy his life. She should be happy theres no right to vendetta in the current society...unfortunately.
/r/MensRights10/11/19 12:16 AM
0

Yep. Jails are not the answer to crime. Death is. Life is a privilege, not a right.
/r/MensRights10/11/19 12:10 AM
2

And even that is impossible fo her without a man to help her, lol
/r/MensRights09/11/19 11:45 PM
2

You dont really have time for that kind of targeting in CQB situation. Centre of mass shots are good enough if your opponent does not wear body armor.
/r/MensRights09/11/19 11:40 PM
2

But, just how do you want answers without working for being trusted first? :) Men dont just always share emotions and perspectives, just like you dont just always share your body. Its intimate, to an extent.
/r/MensRights08/11/19 02:08 PM
1

you mean, women should not have access to abortion / voluntary parental abandonment that they have now, then? For equality, of course.
/r/MensRights08/11/19 12:24 PM
1

tbh, all of political shit in our country is all the same thing, lol
/r/MensRights08/11/19 12:23 PM
1

and yet, forced spousal support post-divorce is a thing.
/r/MensRights08/11/19 12:22 PM
9

Lol, what a worthless femcell
/r/MensRights08/11/19 12:08 PM
1

By roots i meant the basic notion of women having the same human rights as men you only have same rights if you provide same thing. Want a privilege of voting? Go die in the war for it, like us, while being legally forced to do it. Then we might talk, lol.
/r/MensRights08/11/19 10:47 AM
1

well, you do sound like he's correct, at times. Words you use are as important as whats between the lines, if not more.
/r/MensRights08/11/19 10:44 AM
1

Well, you did. Why did you word it like that? Because, well, that has consequences too.
/r/MensRights08/11/19 10:38 AM
2

Question/comment about circumscision- is it fully comparable to FGM? Correct me if I’m wrong yes. It removes 30% of your nerve endings, thats one. Its made without your consent, thats two. Three, if there is a medical need, there are therapies that do not end up with tissue removal. Four, foreskin is a cover just like your clitoral hood. Protip: it feels the same for us as for you if you dry touch/rub your clit. Its. Not. Pleasant. (FGM related stuff) That is not exactly our problem. Its your pr…
/r/MensRights08/11/19 10:36 AM
2

tbh, he has a point. You come to someone's place, and then tell them how to be, what to think, and you expect exactly...what? If you want to be belived, you have to work for it. If you want to be trusted, you need to work even more. Its not FREE. Its a very special thing to get, not something that you have a right to just expect. In other words - work for it, and you might get it...if it suits us at the moment of course.
/r/MensRights08/11/19 10:31 AM
2

I want to know the effects it had on men from a personal standpoint. in other words, its still about you, not us, and not about men in your life. How valiant... Im happy to say, many people i know have jumped off the train once they realize how insane it is, including myself. you can sign off, but from my perspective you can never leave. You still lack empaty, and you dont ever know it.
/r/MensRights08/11/19 10:29 AM
2

but i used too and that is enough not to trust you :)
/r/MensRights08/11/19 10:27 AM
2

You can be wiped out, and thats about it. Anything else would require forgivness and second chances, and no woman, literally, is worth that hassle. There was a one, singular chance. Feminism fucked it up. Now you have a bed to lay in, that you have made. Enjoy :)
/r/MensRights08/11/19 10:26 AM
2

Has feminism done anything on that level? You mean like historical records of using arson to further your goals? :>
/r/MensRights08/11/19 10:24 AM
2

the problem also being, that you dont understand our FINANCIAL and LEGAL autonomy, and right to not consent, i.e. regarding female pregnancy having an adverse, unwanted effect on our lives. We expect right of choice, including post-factum after any time we want, to remove ourselves from supporting you and your child (not ours, because consent was revoked. Just like with current sex-related consent. Yes, its deterimental to women. No, its not our problem that its deterimental to you. We expect sa…
/r/MensRights08/11/19 10:22 AM
1

Do you think it would ever be possible to have a rebirth of the movement You mean after current and past feminism making us villians extraordinaire? Why would we ever give your worthless, toxic movement a second chance? :) Forgivness is THE worst form of debilism.
/r/MensRights08/11/19 10:15 AM
1

Failed? Yes. Why? Double standards. But what to expect from women, really? How can the movement be improved to be an ally to men? Is that possible? It cant be improved, unless you mean obliteration. I agree with many of the feminist ideals in other words, you are part of the problem.
/r/MensRights08/11/19 10:07 AM
1

Not all guys leave their girlfriend when she cheated which is utter debilism.
/r/MensRights07/11/19 03:51 PM
1

This, I would argue, is his choice. more likely, he was pressured into the situation.
/r/MensRights07/11/19 03:51 PM
1

The emotional toll is different because the hormonal changes in a woman’s body can cause extreme mood swings, depression, etc. we men have hormones too. If you cant control yourself, its on you. If the mother wants to terminate and the father does not, how would you settle that? Does the father’s will override the mother’s? so, its not his child then, but If she wants him to pay for the kid he does not want, its his child, magically? Decide what you want, girls. Because you dont get to have both…
/r/MensRights07/11/19 03:36 PM
0

Also money is everyone’s castle LOL, nope. My money is not "ours". Its "mine". You dont get any say in the matter, no matter what relationship we would have. You didnt put the required work to earn those specyfic money. Who the fuck thinks their uterus is a castle?? basically any woman I know? And I know plenty of them, being 40 years old.
/r/MensRights07/11/19 03:32 PM
-1

If she has control over his finances for 18 to 26 years, its a fair exchange.
/r/MensRights07/11/19 03:14 PM
1

because the physical/emotional toll of pregnancy does not affect the father. physical toll does affect the father, if only indirectly - more workload is on him in that period of time. Emotional toll is exactly the same. We must be given exactly SAME rights, or noone should get any rights. Equality must be full, else its not equality.
/r/MensRights07/11/19 03:14 PM
1

lol, sure. But dont expect him to PAY money for something he didnt consent to, or to something he retracted his consent. Our money is our castle just like her vag is her castle. Its money that runs the world, not womb.
/r/MensRights07/11/19 03:12 PM
1

Us being superior is not our problem. If they cant cut it, they should not get same privilege.
/r/MensRights07/11/19 03:09 PM
0

women. what to expect than exactly that?
/r/MensRights07/11/19 03:04 PM
1

He was part of them and supported them. The fact that he moved away for now, changes nothing for me.
/r/MensRights07/11/19 10:26 AM
2

Once she is an ex-partner, its an one-way economical relationship you create, because usually she provides nothing. Its not acceptable, especially if its her that initiated the split.
/r/MensRights07/11/19 09:19 AM
1

Its not about negating the problem. Its about us not getting conflated with neonazi supporter, if we do support him in turn.
/r/MensRights07/11/19 09:18 AM
1

for one, they basically aligned themselves with neonazi/supremacist movements and legitimised them at one point into the parliament. Thats enough? Or should I go about making justice ministry (political position) THE same person as general prosecutor office, making the whole justice system politically-dependent? Including purinng high court / state court judges, and not going after several serious crimes that happened (up to and including one of opposition getting arrested and quite misteriously…
/r/MensRights07/11/19 09:11 AM
1

its a parental obligation if its your kid, not your job tho. Noone owes you money for it.
/r/MensRights06/11/19 11:52 AM
0

Its a woman. Her projecting everything as our fault is pretty much a given, from our perspective its not if, but when such thing happens.
/r/MensRights06/11/19 11:14 AM
3

With enough criminal law response everything can be controlled and curbed.
/r/MensRights06/11/19 11:11 AM
4

What she went through is not our problem. Her deeds and words against us are our sole interest and problem.
/r/MensRights06/11/19 11:11 AM
1

Intention is irrelevant. Written criminal law is what is important.
/r/MensRights06/11/19 11:08 AM
1

What she wants has zero value.
/r/MensRights06/11/19 11:07 AM
7

Belive the victim, something something...
/r/MensRights06/11/19 11:04 AM
5

Still no consent, so he should fuck her over for good measure. And she should have known better than that.
/r/MensRights06/11/19 11:03 AM
6

any spousal support post-marriage is unfair, true.
/r/MensRights06/11/19 10:54 AM
1

as a polish guy: neither that man, nor his political friends are someone that MRAs want to be identified with in any way. Current political leading party in poland is borderline-autcratic / nazism. This guy promoted and was part of it. We REALLY dont want to be ID as them.
/r/MensRights06/11/19 10:16 AM
2

yeah, that organisation should really stop talking, because they do more harm than good currently, everywhere they are.
/r/MensRights06/11/19 10:10 AM
20

and if they do, they still expect us to pay
/r/MensRights06/11/19 10:06 AM
9

Women. Who else you'd expect?
/r/MensRights06/11/19 10:04 AM
2

A small amount of crazy doesn't account for everyone's opinions. Not all men are rapists right? and yet all men are branded by feminism as such. So, do something about your extremists first. Then you might talk about rebuilding someone's trust, because women are not exactly entitled to it.
/r/MensRights05/11/19 06:51 PM
1

but this 'internet war' is tiring. you mean "feminist war" surely? Because it was feminism that started this BS. Some of us just said "cool, we can be enemies if you want. We can find profit even in that, so bring it on.". And forgivness is utter stupidity as far as im concerned - we should never forget, and never forgive. And feminists should have thought better and more than once before making half of society a public enemy in the past :)
/r/MensRights05/11/19 06:41 PM
1

Condoms are best option guys have atm In lab test setting, yes. In practice, not exactly. So you want to place 100% of the responsibility to prevent pregnancy on the woman, not do the bare minimum to assist, make her use contraceptives that carry huge risks for her and STILL have a say if she ends up getting pregnant? you mean like women doing this all already to men (because, well, they do, if only by sex denial, but still. We have no real say in the matter), while totally denying them any say …
/r/MensRights05/11/19 06:37 PM
2

We can? You mean after feminist classics going all about "reducing male population"? LOL. Too late.
/r/MensRights05/11/19 06:34 PM
1

He is assuming intentions based on something, tho. There is always a reason if men have an opinion. If you want to change that opinion, change the reason behind it instead of telling someone to change. If it suits that someone, you might even acomplish something then.
/r/MensRights05/11/19 11:55 AM
1

Seriously? You should stop invalidating other peoples experiences just because you think you know better.
/r/MensRights05/11/19 11:50 AM
1

Yet if you turm that joke on a woman, it will not be deemed acceptable. Why the double standard?
/r/MensRights05/11/19 11:34 AM
1

Dude, the act of using alternate forms of birth control IS literally compromising her standards thus, unconsolable differences and a good reason to leave. I’m just saying your love life is really going to suck its only a woman. And I can very well live single. Im not hell bent on love.
/r/MensRights05/11/19 08:40 AM
1

Then maybe they should get a better job, if they cant keep up with spending? Anyway, I'd really like my money going to my family, not to someone outside it thru massive taxation. ESPECIALLY not to someone that will just take it for granted, and not put in any effort to get their own income, and thats most of social funding crowd in my country.
/r/MensRights04/11/19 10:15 PM
1

If that is his standard, he should stick by it. Would you expect woman to compromise her standards? Let me guess, you would not. He has a right not to compromise. Of course that can mean having to find another partner (because, frankly, many women today will have a problem with that fact), but NEITHER of them are entitled to each other. And none of them are judges, really.
/r/MensRights04/11/19 10:13 PM
1

Im not from the US
/r/MensRights04/11/19 04:04 PM
1

Why? Because its more profitable to deny you / act against you. Why are women always the enemy? Should have not behave like an enemy, perhaps, statistically? Actions and words have consequences. Those consequences are not negotiable, are forever (because, tbh, forgivness is utter stupidity if you can just kick someone out of your life, or destroy them), and can spill to other women very easily if you fuck up enough. Sorry, just like you want to be safe walking home at night, we want to be safe i…
/r/MensRights04/11/19 03:53 PM
1

TOGETHER Nope. We are not on the same team. You wish it to be so, but its not solely yours decision, fortunately for us.
/r/MensRights04/11/19 03:47 PM
1

We are not on the same side.
/r/MensRights04/11/19 03:37 PM
6

Nope. Upholding the society and country is the taxpayer problem. Upkeeping single mom that provides nothing of value (apart from using her vagina a few times) is not there on the list.
/r/MensRights04/11/19 03:34 PM
7

Its still her life, and not taxpayer's to care about. We are not on the same team.
/r/MensRights04/11/19 03:19 PM
0

Why, because we have standards? Well sorry :P Feminism? You mean miss dvorkin and other extremists, that were taking their politics over even their marriage wovs (because, well, their partners are just an add-on for them, so lets deny them sex and closeness untill they do as we tell them to - just one of protests that feminism did early on...or should I consider arson as activism as well ? )? You mean THAT feminism? But you do realise that if women throw blanket statements on men, men will do th…
/r/MensRights04/11/19 02:52 PM
1

yep, medical tech is expensive. But thats not the point. The point is - the options are coming, and women will no longer have the power of gatekeeping having children.
/r/MensRights04/11/19 02:38 PM
0

You are a woman, so that's kinda a given :) But you should, really, because that opinion gives you insight about what you women as a whole should change in yourselves in order to achieve what you say you want ;) Wheter you do, or not - we will manage. Might take longer, but men always do win in the end.
/r/MensRights04/11/19 02:31 PM
1

An artificial, external uterus is in the works (currently at the stage of animal testing, namely cattle), sorry to inform you. This and stem-cell-to-ovum (which was achieved already in vitro), and we will have no problem having a child all by ourselves.
/r/MensRights04/11/19 02:27 PM
0

You mean, standard female/feminist talk? IDGAF, to be honest.
/r/MensRights04/11/19 02:26 PM
0

Maybe, but why risk it, if we can just not trust you? And what we will get for trusting you again? :) If she is out of the line, YOU women should do something about it. If you dont have a will or are unable to, its not exactly our problem, its your problem.
/r/MensRights04/11/19 02:18 PM
0

We can always adopt as single dads. Or pay a surrogate.
/r/MensRights04/11/19 01:09 PM
1

If the sane part of their movement does not weed out extremism, it is as guilty - if only by association.
/r/MensRights04/11/19 01:08 PM
1

She is stupid and reckless. Dont fuck her without solid birth control in place that she cant tamper with. Really, dont.
/r/MensRights04/11/19 01:03 PM
-1

We dont HAVE TO anything. We should only do what is good for us, and us, alone. Want something from us? Be prepared to pay the price first as requested, because we dont exist for you.
/r/MensRights04/11/19 01:01 PM
3

In theory. In practice, companies set rules because its bad for business in the court of public opinion. He knew the rules, otherwise he would not make the CEO.
/r/MensRights04/11/19 12:54 PM
3

a keeper!
/r/MensRights04/11/19 11:42 AM
5

True. Both parties should have the same opportunity here. Especially if we men are expected to pay spousal support WHILE having our own separate life. Which can very often be impossible due to costs involved.
/r/MensRights04/11/19 11:37 AM
3

Its a given that she will spend money on herself, if she is not cross-checked. This is exactly why women should never get primary custody if they are unable to provide for 100% of child's needs. 50% of the child's need can always be repaid by the father AFTER verified shopping bill is shown.
/r/MensRights04/11/19 11:33 AM
14

Then they should know better than that, seeing as most single-female-raised kids have emotional issues in way larger extent than when raised by men.
/r/MensRights04/11/19 10:01 AM
0

in many cases it could easily take as long. Want to become a medical proffessional? Where I live, you can say hello to 10-15 years of academy + training (if you want to be a specialist in a field,like cardio or neuro)
/r/MensRights04/11/19 09:37 AM
3

People make plans. Sometimes shit doesn't work out. Does not matter. Once they are divorced, she is not part of his life, and must be forced to keep her part of the deal, without fail. If she cant deliver, she must pay the consequences of failure. you got to agree it is kind of fucked that he can just change his mind any day after she hasn't worked for a decade and say I divorce you find work tomorrow Maybe if she didnt fuck up enough for him to push for divorce, things would be different? Welco…
/r/MensRights04/11/19 09:35 AM
3

just give me right to the same safe haven laws, and to abandon paternity should I choose to, no questions asked.
/r/MensRights04/11/19 09:17 AM
1

Vasectomy is sexual mutilation. Hardly anything is "mutilation" if done under one's own choice. If you are certain that you dont EVER want the kids, then sterilisation/vasctomy is a good choice. Its not birth control tho, because its mostly not reversible.
/r/MensRights04/11/19 09:15 AM
1

let's all put in effort to prevent it First - dont TELL us what to do, as we are not telling that to you. Second - your problems with female birth control are, well, not exactly your partner's problem. If he has standards re: sex quality, you can either say OK and work to provide said quality, or say NOT OK, and leave (or, more likely, he will - or should, really - leave). You have a choice, we want it too. Wheter you like it or not, our sexuality is for us, not for you.
/r/MensRights04/11/19 08:59 AM
3

tbh they also complained that the male BC pill WAS under development, too. But if they are women, they will complain about everything, literally.
/r/MensRights04/11/19 08:54 AM
2

even abstinence has a failure rate, if you belive in the bible :P and any science-based method can fail. But comparing 70% chance of a condom working to 99,9999% of a pill working...you get the picture.
/r/MensRights04/11/19 08:52 AM
2

he's not. At least where I live, it would be reckless child endangerment / abandonment, and criminal charges. Because, well, you dont have a vagina. If you do, its all good and nice.
/r/MensRights04/11/19 08:50 AM
3

except a) you will not get the custody, most likely, or b) if you do, you will not get alimony or c) if you do get alimony, she will just not pay it, and the court will give a fuck about that fact.
/r/MensRights04/11/19 08:44 AM
4

also, some western jurisdictions deny father the right to paternity testing if the mother does not consent. Yay, equality. Also, some of them will hook you up as a daddy if you are not together anymore, but less than a year passed from the divorce. Because fuck you, thats why. Even more equality.
/r/MensRights04/11/19 08:39 AM
6

they say that action causes reaction, and they are right ;) reaction from men should be quite a thing.
/r/MensRights31/10/19 01:47 PM
5

Not exactly our problem. Our problem is females performing false accusations, which must be stomped out. If that inconvieniences other women, maybe they should talk to their false accusing friends about that?
/r/MensRights31/10/19 01:37 PM
5

If she has no verifiable evidence, its a false accusation and she must pay. Word is worthless these days.
/r/MensRights31/10/19 01:17 PM
5

Was there any verifiable evidence to those claims, tho?
/r/MensRights31/10/19 01:14 PM
6

until it suits them otherwise
/r/MensRights31/10/19 10:28 AM
5

Sweet sweet income and assets that just turned inaccessible.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 11:20 PM
2

Not that she usually respects you, lol.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 11:15 PM
1

Yeah, we have reproductive organs but they dont govern our lives, really. We are not apes.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 11:13 PM
1

Meh. We do understand. And women must understand that their problems are not our problem to solve. They are more than able to do it on their own. If they cant, too bad, acceptable collateral damage.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 11:09 PM
1

No. It's against the Soviet materialistic ideology that says science and religion are opposed. of course they are opposed. Science is verified truth. Religion is well, worthless. Persecution of Christians by atheist regimes is ongoing. See: China, North Korea, etc. For good reason. Arguing against the Crusades is like arguing against the allies in WW2. You're just another atheist bringing up a war from 1000 years ago (that you don't understand) to justify murdering Christians now. Thats because …
/r/MensRights28/10/19 09:19 PM
-6

Woman cant ever be a true MRA. Shes not a man, and she cannot fully understand our perspective. She can be an usefull tool, and thats about it.
/r/MensRights28/10/19 11:30 AM
1

Tbh, proper healtht body fat percentage is rather important if you want to avoid life threatning cardiac issues :P
/r/MensRights28/10/19 11:24 AM
1

well, OP, did you ever see a woman admitting that she is wrong? XD
/r/MensRights28/10/19 09:27 AM
2

Then she should step up her game and get a better job, instead of being not good enough. His money is not hers to decide about, or whine about for that matter.
/r/MensRights27/10/19 08:19 AM
2

This is why men should never marry down, and why our money and assets must have the same status as your vaginas - a castle, that only we can make choices about.
/r/MensRights27/10/19 08:15 AM
2

most of today's society is toxic as fuck.
/r/MensRights25/10/19 03:04 PM
1

technically, you are considered / classed as "cured" if you are over 5 years in remission. It can always come back anyway, but the chance is low.
/r/MensRights25/10/19 03:02 PM
6

Hitler had "noble intentions" for his people too.
/r/MensRights25/10/19 10:38 AM
0

No such thing as allies. There are tools, or enemies.
/r/MensRights25/10/19 10:35 AM
1

Well one does need to be carefull, true.
/r/MensRights24/10/19 10:22 AM
1

effects, no. Possibly the medicine could be changed to a different one, tho.
/r/MensRights24/10/19 10:11 AM
3

This, here, is why you never just take psychiatric medication without proper medical guidance.
/r/MensRights24/10/19 09:21 AM
2

Thats because ots a very rare occurence when a woman does not wear a mask over who she really is.
/r/MensRights24/10/19 09:18 AM
2

Im bi. Never once was I judged by another man, yet, in my 40 years of life. Now, women....;)
/r/MensRights24/10/19 09:17 AM
3

Yep. Women must be taught that they have no right to expect men to provide for them (or anything else, really), for free.
/r/MensRights24/10/19 09:16 AM
2

Technically, its the same medical mechanism. It is a drug addiction, i this case, a prescription drug. Its a lesser evil type of a choice, one for which you pay dearly, later dow the line.
/r/MensRights24/10/19 09:14 AM
2

True, but you have no right to just expect someone to take a risk. Its their choice to make, not yours.
/r/MensRights24/10/19 09:12 AM
1

Nope. Its only worth the effort if the outcome is predicable / certain. Women dont exactly offer that much for certain, yet they have more and more expectations, and present a verifiable risk - quite often. Im bi, so...yeah. I've got options lol
/r/MensRights23/10/19 12:15 PM
2

Their life, their experience, and their choice.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 11:54 AM
1

I can be a single guy just as well, lol.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 11:51 AM
1

Oh, sure, there may be such women. Does not mean that they are entitled to our attention, or anything really, in return, lol.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 11:49 AM
0

Hate is a good thing. It allows one to efficiently fuck over his enemies. Its a matter of how you use and direct it, not it being inherently wrong.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 11:44 AM
1

Maybe, but just a woman is not exactly worth current level of risk and hassle.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 11:43 AM
1

Male friends are genuine by design. Female friends are genuine conditionally.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 11:41 AM
2

Can confirm, being bi is awesome. And we get to experience both sides of sexuality too. Win/win.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 11:38 AM
3

Prevention is not the problem. Medical issues that can arise instead of viable pregnancy are THE problem - several of those are promptly lethal for the mother if abortion is not performed.
/r/MensRights21/10/19 11:32 AM
2

Wwomen have no right to opinion on this matter.
/r/MensRights20/10/19 09:45 AM
8

So, her proffesional title is now theRapist?
/r/MensRights18/10/19 07:05 PM
0

Not our problem. She is an acceptable collateral damage.
/r/MensRights18/10/19 07:02 PM
1

Tbh, vendettas work quite well, if you are willing and able to be evil enough.
/r/MensRights18/10/19 06:53 PM
-1

Better yet, visit mr. Electric chair. We dont need those to live.
/r/MensRights18/10/19 06:47 PM
1

why not a capital punishment? After all, she took a life. Its indeed proper to take her life in return.
/r/MensRights17/10/19 02:06 PM
3

meh. just give it an in-built vagina dentata. gnawing sounds
/r/MensRights17/10/19 02:02 PM
14

that would require a) being critical toward themselves, and b) being able to introspect.
/r/MensRights17/10/19 02:00 PM
8

because all vibrators and dildos consented to being used as basically full time sex slaves by women :> LOL
/r/MensRights17/10/19 01:56 PM
1

women dont grow up, they just get older usually.
/r/MensRights17/10/19 01:49 PM
2

Don't be afraid to show it to people who care about you. i.e. usually not women.
/r/MensRights17/10/19 08:25 AM
7

action always breeds reaction of some sort. If only a reaction of mistrust.
/r/MensRights16/10/19 09:45 PM
8

Same thing as feminist theory in the academic setting really. Just concentrated on men. You see a problem with that?
/r/MensRights16/10/19 05:24 PM
2

Women are the gatekeepers of sex. Not anymore, not since tinder. Its EASIER than ever, literally, for men to have sex with a VERY LIMITED effort nowadays. Also, men are gatekeepers of EFFORT, MONEY, and RESOURCES - therefore all that should never be sacrificed and avalilable for any woman that he's courting or in relationship with (with apropriate laws in place to prevent stuff like alimony/spousal support from ever happening). thus women DO have a say on what masculinity is then they must be fo…
/r/MensRights16/10/19 04:15 PM
35

I'm talking of books like Liz Plank's For The Love Of Men or Rachel Giese's What It Means to Become a Man discussing how to build a new masculinity etc. so, in essence, women femsplaining men what men should be? LOL. How about fuck off, girls. They dont really have a right to an opinion on men, nor masculinity. They can leave if they dont like it.
/r/MensRights16/10/19 02:55 PM
1

matriarchy never really evolved out of tribal stage.
/r/MensRights16/10/19 02:53 PM
1

LOL
/r/MensRights16/10/19 02:51 PM
3

its a feminist author so...what to expect?
/r/MensRights16/10/19 02:49 PM
1

if its profitable for us enoough, on our terms - maybe. Then again, why bother checking? Its not efficient.
/r/MensRights16/10/19 02:37 PM
3

in other words, its a worthless system.
/r/MensRights16/10/19 02:35 PM
3

Thats because that cancer also affect male mammary gland tissue, not just female one.
/r/MensRights16/10/19 10:15 AM
0

Meh. The question stands - is it profitable for men to do that in that specyfic event?
/r/MensRights16/10/19 10:08 AM
2

What they dont realise is, this goes both ways lol
/r/MensRights16/10/19 09:44 AM
0

what makes us is logic, thought, and knowledge. What makes animals is feelings and basic reactions.
/r/MensRights15/10/19 07:43 AM
2

Nothing that is relevant to today. We live in the present, time to start acting accordingly. How it suits us, and us alone.
/r/MensRights15/10/19 12:16 AM
1

Our place is not to be a provider. We are not ATMs and our assets are ours and only ours. Our kids, yes - they should be provided for. Not women tho. She can, and should, have her own career.
/r/MensRights15/10/19 12:04 AM
1

Why do men do this? because we inherently want to achieve, despite hardship and odds on the way. Unlike women.
/r/MensRights14/10/19 02:57 PM
1

no prostitution on record, tho. Would be interesting to see.
/r/MensRights14/10/19 02:55 PM
15

male sacrifice: real, measurable work and effort. female sacrifice: "FEEEEELINGS". worthless, and not measurable in any way, just in case someone bothers to verify her. LOL.
/r/MensRights14/10/19 08:33 AM
5

At least where I live, those laws say outright thwt only women are allowed to use that way out. Tha ks, feminists, for pushing this exact law wording.
/r/MensRights13/10/19 12:38 PM
15

Better not to fuck her, actually. Like ever.
/r/MensRights13/10/19 12:35 PM
1

Meh. Most grest men were self made. If anything, women piggyback them to money and power.
/r/MensRights11/10/19 02:18 PM
1

Never said I was "different" or "better" ? :P
/r/MensRights11/10/19 08:46 AM
3

And we should trust you exactly, why? XD
/r/MensRights10/10/19 09:51 AM
3

We work for rights and needs of men. Feminism stands in our way, and activelly works against our goals. The rest does not exactly matter.
/r/MensRights10/10/19 09:50 AM
2

Its not exactly you who will decide who my enemy is, lol. Its me. You sided with my enemy, therefore you are an enemy, if only by association. Your side can solve your problems by yourselves. My sole concern is ensuring that your resolutions are not deterimental to me in any form. If they are, I'll try to negate them.
/r/MensRights10/10/19 09:49 AM
4

If you are a feminist, then you are part of the problem by definition.
/r/MensRights10/10/19 09:45 AM
1

Not that feminism works for equality, lol. Actions speak louder than words.
/r/MensRights10/10/19 09:45 AM
2

And women will care ..if it suits them at the moment. Sorry, not good enough, lol. I just expect the same certainty that im expected to provide. If they cant cut it, well, too bad I guess.
/r/MensRights10/10/19 09:43 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter