| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | HPV vaccination for boys in the UK. Government announcement for or against due Wed 18th July.Does the vax help girls, too? It primarily helps women in that the major morbidity associated with HPV infection is cervical cancer, but it also helps men. That, and vaccinating men helps women, which helps men, which helps women, etc. because... sex. | /r/MensRights | 16/07/18 11:31 PM |
| 3 | HPV vaccination for boys in the UK. Government announcement for or against due Wed 18th July.Yes. | /r/MensRights | 16/07/18 11:29 PM |
| 2 | HPV vaccination for boys in the UK. Government announcement for or against due Wed 18th July.The vast majority of men and women will be exposed to HPV at some point in their lives. | /r/MensRights | 16/07/18 11:26 PM |
| 3 | HPV vaccination for boys in the UK. Government announcement for or against due Wed 18th July.Not as much as women, no, but HPV can cause oropharyngeal cancer in men. Either way, that the UK doesn't have boys/young men on the HPV vaccination schedule is egregious. | /r/MensRights | 16/07/18 11:25 PM |
| 0 | 'Love ALL of him': Billboard asks parents to rethink circumcisionWhy does someone have to be wrong? Can it not be more complex than a simple black and white scenario? When I say someone is wrong, I'm referring to whether or not there are medical benefits. Either there are or there are not. The degree to which there are benefits and whether or not those outweigh the harms is complex, but there shouldn't be a debate as to whether or not the benefits are real and their magnitude (once sufficient data is collected). To provide some clarity, the issue is not the d… | /r/MensRights | 07/07/18 10:46 PM |
| 0 | 'Love ALL of him': Billboard asks parents to rethink circumcisionso if there is no health reason to mutilate the child's penis... why are you saying there are health reasons for it? That's not what I'm saying. What I'm saying is that circumcision vs. not circumcising may not have much of an impact on the national numbers because of other causes of STIs and how that differs between the US and Europe. E.g., there are other factors at play. We can't simply chalk up the differences in STI incidence to "America cuts, Europe doesn't" and conclude that either 1) cir… | /r/MensRights | 07/07/18 10:03 PM |
| 0 | 'Love ALL of him': Billboard asks parents to rethink circumcisionThose are incidences of STDs, not UTIs. I'm aware that STDs are higher in the US, but the national incidence likely has little to do with circumcision vs. non-circumcision. If anything, rates of certain STDs seem to be rising while circumcision rates are falling. | /r/MensRights | 07/07/18 09:56 PM |
| -1 | 'Love ALL of him': Billboard asks parents to rethink circumcisionFor any number of other reasons both related or unrelated to circumcision? Also I've never seen any global comparison of rates of UTI by country but you're welcome to share. | /r/MensRights | 07/07/18 09:04 PM |
| 1 | 'Love ALL of him': Billboard asks parents to rethink circumcisionThe standard of modern medical ethics already states that if the data is inconclusive / incomplete, we should not be dice-rolling the outcome of an elective surgical procedure on a patient who cannot agree to it (because it’s unethical). And, There already is a wealth of knowledge and data about this topic, and the only nations that have a serious “debate” about the issue are those that have direct cultural, historical, or religious connection to the procedure. There is more than enough existing… | /r/MensRights | 07/07/18 09:01 PM |
| 1 | 'Love ALL of him': Billboard asks parents to rethink circumcisionAnd this position is sufficient for you to conclude that surgical intervention immediately at birth is desirable to natural evolution only in the USA, only for males? The international opinions seem to be focused much moreso around the ethics rather than the medical benefits. And there's certainly a conversation to be had about consent and treating those who can't consent, but that's not really what I'm presenting here. That said, "evolution" does a lot of things that modern medicine prevents (l… | /r/MensRights | 07/07/18 08:42 PM |
| 2 | 'Love ALL of him': Billboard asks parents to rethink circumcisionInteresting, I've never seen any of this data. I'll take a closer look at it. Thanks for sharing! | /r/MensRights | 07/07/18 07:57 PM |
| 3 | 'Love ALL of him': Billboard asks parents to rethink circumcisionI’ll take a look at some of the Dutch opinions, thanks for sharing. I should add though that, while AAP’s opinion expired late last year (unbeknownst to me), they are not the only medical organization in America who address the risks/benefits. I can’t speak to whether or not cultural impact factored into AAP’s recommendation. With respect to opinions being used for these statements rather than data, it’s worth noting that it’s not uncommon for professional organizations to make “opinion” based r… | /r/MensRights | 07/07/18 07:33 PM |
| 0 | 'Love ALL of him': Billboard asks parents to rethink circumcisionTrue, but shouldn't we really try to study the opposing position if we really want to be properly scientific? That is the problem I have with the AAP. They support only the science that confirms their interests. Sure, but is the AAP avoiding data that doesn't fit their narrative? Their task force publications seem to be pretty honest and up front about some of the data being cloudy. They don't even recommend the procedure as routine, they just say the benefits > the risks. And contradicts everyt… | /r/MensRights | 07/07/18 07:10 PM |
| -11 | 'Love ALL of him': Billboard asks parents to rethink circumcisionI saw this posted above and, while I appreciate the opinion of activists, I'm more inclined to side with data and the opinions of professionals. Further, I don't think comparing FGM to male neonatal circumcision is a reasonable comparison. I've never seen data to suggest that the various types of FGM provide medical benefit that outweigh the risks of the procedure. The procedures, so far as I understand them, are largely for ritualistic (rather than medical) purposes. | /r/MensRights | 07/07/18 07:07 PM |
| -2 | 'Love ALL of him': Billboard asks parents to rethink circumcisionYou might disagree with the AAP's findings, but just because you personally haven't had problems doesn't mean that we should dismiss studies consisting of literal thousands of subjects. That is the flawed idea of science. | /r/MensRights | 07/07/18 07:03 PM |
| -6 | 'Love ALL of him': Billboard asks parents to rethink circumcisionDid you read your own report? Yes, I did. You were questioning whether there was a source for circumcision creating a "cleaner environment" and discouraging bacterial growth and infections. The relevant parts of the linked publication from AAP are here: Circumcision reduces the bacteria that accumulate under the prepuce which can cause UTIs and, in the adult male, can be a reservoir for bacteria that cause STIs. In an internally controlled study with fair evidence, researchers cultured the periu… | /r/MensRights | 07/07/18 07:02 PM |
| -5 | 'Love ALL of him': Billboard asks parents to rethink circumcisionCircumcision creates a cleaner environment and discourages bacterial growth and infections. Complete myth. I have direct experience to the contrary. Luckily, science is not based on the experience of singular individuals and, rather, gathers data from the population at large. http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/130/3/e756.full | /r/MensRights | 07/07/18 06:21 PM |
| -5 | 'Love ALL of him': Billboard asks parents to rethink circumcisionYes. | /r/MensRights | 07/07/18 06:21 PM |
| -7 | 'Love ALL of him': Billboard asks parents to rethink circumcisionI love 99% of the material on this sub but the anti-circumcision rhetoric is a little radical. Is it an elective procedure? Yes. Is it comparable to FGM? No. There are legitimate medical benefits of circumcision, especially in certain ethnic communities. Pretty much every major medical society in America that deals with circumcisions (AAFP, AAP, ACOG) state that the benefits outweigh the risks. A lot of the arguments against circumcision that I see on here revolve around "well, if my son wants a… | /r/MensRights | 07/07/18 06:18 PM |
| 3 | A guy was unconcious and a girl unzipped his pants and gave him a blowjob. She later decided to accuse him on sexual assault as she felt she was too inebriated to consent to giving him the blowjobAs for debate? You got to be kidding. This is the Reddit comments section, not a debate. Then why are you bothering to refute OP? ...oh, because it's actually worth it, to some people, to clear up misinformation when they see it. And that's for OP doing his work, he didn't do any work at all. He posted misinformation. Nothing more He posted misinformation and you eventually shared a source to refute it, so good on you. But the point being made to you was that, without sharing your source, you're… | /r/MensRights | 03/05/17 07:22 PM |
| 5 | A guy was unconcious and a girl unzipped his pants and gave him a blowjob. She later decided to accuse him on sexual assault as she felt she was too inebriated to consent to giving him the blowjobThis isn't about what you "need" to do, it's about how common debate works: 1) OP made a statement, and provided a source for it. 2) /u/PIG_CUNT made a contrary statement, with no explicitly stated source as to his evidence. OP did his work. /u/PIG_CUNT made a statement to the contrary, thus the burden is on him to prove otherwise. It's fine if he wants to make a contrary statement, and it's fine if you want to accept it. But most people won't, and most people shouldn't, because you probably sho… | /r/MensRights | 03/05/17 07:03 PM |
| 7 | A guy was unconcious and a girl unzipped his pants and gave him a blowjob. She later decided to accuse him on sexual assault as she felt she was too inebriated to consent to giving him the blowjobDid you know that the "earth is flat"? I put it in quotations and I don't have the source handy but if you're too lazy to look up my source then you're just going to have to accept it as fact. :thinking: | /r/MensRights | 03/05/17 04:42 PM |
| 0 | Woman absolutely shits on the pussy pass during a focus group session.No the reason is that she is is facing federal charges... Idiot Except she's not...? She hasn't been charged with anything yet, and it is entirely possible that she never will be. So, you know... maybe I'm not the idiot here. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 16/05/16 09:41 PM |
| 1 | Woman absolutely shits on the pussy pass during a focus group session.Would you want one of your 2 potential choices to be under investigation for money laundering when they decided to run? No, of course not. I doubt the government would be spending the amount that they have investigating a member of what amounts to our generation's Kennedy family for so long if they felt there was nothing of merit. I wouldn't want them convicted. I'm not a big fan of her being under investigation and being in the race, but she's innocent until proven guilty. No matter how much th… | /r/PussyPassDenied | 16/05/16 04:02 AM |
| 0 | Woman absolutely shits on the pussy pass during a focus group session.You're right, my bad. That seems like a good enough reason to deny someone from participating in their democracy. Time is relative! No big. /s | /r/PussyPassDenied | 15/05/16 05:00 PM |
| 1 | Woman absolutely shits on the pussy pass during a focus group session.Actually, she was allowed to run last time, which makes that completely different from the scenario you've posed. She lost fair and square, which is totally fine. She wasn't arbitrarily assumed guilty and denied a chance to run just because she was under investigation. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 15/05/16 04:47 PM |
| -5 | Woman absolutely shits on the pussy pass during a focus group session.You should not be allowed to run for president while under investigation for federal crimes. I'm not a Hillary fan, but denying someone the ability to run for office while under investigation both 1) opens the door for serious corruption and abuse, and 2) prevents her from participating in a fundamental part of our democracy just because she is suspected of a crime. If she's denied the chance to run and the investigation comes up with nothing... is it just "sorry! See you in four years!"? No tha… | /r/PussyPassDenied | 15/05/16 07:22 AM |
| 2 | [FR] Most pathetic K-close ever. I give up and bitch about my lonliness, get kissed, then dropped for another dude.Absolutely agreed with the above. I'm new here, but having just gone through a bad breakup, I experienced all those things. No time for being depressed or lonely anymore--only time for self-improvement, and realizing that I am indeed awesome. | /r/seduction | 10/01/12 07:53 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter