TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MadameDufarge Archive

View 0 posts and 66 comments by MadameDufarge on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

If it's not common where you live, you will also need to make sure everyone who changes your son's diaper is educated about not needing to retract the foreskin. Babysitters, daycare workers, relatives coming over to help out.
/r/MensRights21/08/22 01:19 AM
3

In the US she does not have the right to lie. It is a criminal offense (perjury) to lie in your legal testimony. It is very hard to prove though. If someone perjures themselves during a legal case, they can be charged with perjury but that would become a new and separate case/trial I believe.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 12:13 PM
27

Not sure how similar criminal cases are between the US and Canada (where I think this article is from), but at least in the US, during a criminal trial only the accused is on trial, not the accuser. So, if the accused is found not guilty that's it. The accuser is not on trial and no punishment will be levied on them as part of that case. This has its pros and cons, which I won't get into, but the other poster is correct... We do need to try someone in order to find them guilty in our legal syste…
/r/MensRights27/05/22 02:14 AM
-10

Nothing happened yet. If she is going to be charged with perjury I think that would be dealt with in an entirely separate case.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 01:30 AM
3

This is a tough industry to scrutinize at a macro level (annual pay) for pay equality though, especially based soley on what this article reports. Everyone working as a model (male or female) has different hourly/daily rates based on how in-demand they are, plus some modeling gigs will pay more than others, they all work different agencies, and there's also the matter of how many gigs you work in a year factoring into your overall take-home pay. It's not reported how many hours each model mentio…
/r/MensRights13/11/21 08:03 PM
1

They also have co-ed and boy-only troops.
/r/MensRights19/10/21 03:38 AM
2

They are already trying to shame her for the Vogue photos.
/r/MensRights04/05/21 02:30 AM
4

This is an example of one woman's situation. It does not show that all women are unhappy no matter what. This article's author is guilty of making a terrible and sensationalist generalization about men from a set of a few selected anecdotes. We should absolutely call this out, but in doing so, I wish commenters in this sub would be more careful not to do the same about women.
/r/MensRights06/02/21 08:37 AM
1

"news" lol. NYP is a gossip rag. This article should be called out not just for being sexist but for being bad journalism, if you can call it that. The author uses a few anecdotal examples to support her sensational claims, then misleadingly pairs it with study findings to make them seem legit... But she used data from studies that have nothing to do with her arguments and, frankly, seem to support the contrary.
/r/MensRights06/02/21 08:25 AM
0

And also showing a dad giving his newborn skin to skin care (aka kangaroo care)!
/r/MensRights22/07/20 11:55 AM
2

Yeah and also makes this essential job seem less demeaning
/r/MensRights17/05/20 05:48 PM
1

Historic origins of the two words are different and they did not simply mean 'male spouse' and 'female spouse' if you examine their etymology. 'Husband' historically meant the head of the household, whereas 'wife' just meant woman. Those who take issue with these terms often do so because the historic meaning of 'husband' implied that the male was the sole or primary breadwinner in the marriage by default, whereas modern laws (in western culture) treat both spouses as equal parties to a marriage…
/r/MensRights17/05/20 05:45 PM
1

Landlord is used interchangeably in common speech/usage, but the 'lord' part of the word is related to the title/rank of 'Lord' which is a gender-specific title with 'Lady' being the feminine version. Landlady is not often used and seems antiquated, but it is a real term.
/r/MensRights17/05/20 04:29 PM
1

Landlady is not commonly used, so landlord is often applied regardless of sex. In common speech/usage, your right it seems neutral, but the origin of the two words come from the titles Lord and Lady which are gender-specific titles.
/r/MensRights17/05/20 04:16 PM
7

Should be something like "business professional"
/r/MensRights16/05/20 07:00 PM
9

Landlady is landlord's counterpart
/r/MensRights16/05/20 06:59 PM
3

OP made a case that someone experiencing pain due to age, disability, or the result working manual labor should receive priority seating over someone who is otherwise healthy. I was only trying to make the case that someone who is pregnant might be living with pain too, and that a fall while pregnant is extremely dangerous to the baby. For many women pregnancy comes with physical impairments, and my option is that it is also condition that warrants some consideration. I did not say that a pregna…
/r/MensRights10/05/20 02:27 AM
12

Why "never" for a pregnant woman? If she's far enough along to be noticibly pregnant, she's likely experiencing some pain while being on her feet. Pregnancy can also bring on balance issues. A fall while pregnant could seriously harm or even kill the baby. I'm not arguing this because I think she's somehow more "special" than a man because she's pregnant, but pregnancy is a special circumstance and it's a safety issue, plain and simple. Same goes for a person (of either sex) who is carrying a ba…
/r/MensRights09/05/20 07:32 PM
29

Alimony makes sense in rare circumstances; so I'm glad the concept exists for those cases, but it definitely should not be the norm. It is especially baffling to read about alimony payments made when one or both spouses are a celebrity and the poorer ex's net worth is already many times greater than the average person's net worth. I'd they have millions, how do they require thousands more per month to survive?
/r/MensRights04/05/20 01:41 AM
10

Article is from April 2018 on TMZ, linked here. If you read the full article, it actually sounds like they maybe settled everything to put them both roughly even financially but there aren't many details. This was only a one-time alimony payment and neither ex will be on the hook for child support because they opted for split custody of their daughter.
/r/MensRights04/05/20 01:30 AM
6

Interesting read about what happened in the EU when they mandated insurance companies couldn't use gender in determining rates: How an EU gender equality ruling widened inequality - The Guardian, Jan 2017 In summary, the average cost for men actually increased after the change. Some of the difference is due to men being more likely to have more expensive vehicles, but insurance companies are also assessing risk based on things like the insured's occupation... And the occupations with the worst D…
/r/MensRights11/04/20 08:35 AM
4

Sorry, I had a typo in my comment. She was originally charged with statutory rape but ended up being convicted of a lesser crime.
/r/MensRights30/03/20 04:20 AM
2

Sorry, I meant to say she was not convicted of statutory rape.
/r/MensRights30/03/20 04:16 AM
16

This is from 1993, and while I would normally argue that citing older articles can be misleading about the current state of mens rights, this case has subsequently been used as a precedent in later decisions affecting other men (although without further searching, not sure how recently and where in the US). If you can't view the paywalled article, here is the Wikipedia summary of the case. The baby's mother was not charged with statutory rape as OP's title indicates, since she was also a minor a…
/r/MensRights29/03/20 07:21 PM
22

Or he can just get a copy from this sub from every time it has been reposted
/r/MensRights19/03/20 05:51 PM
1

This may be the case at whatever venue this is but someone's dad missed the memo. Who knows? There's never full context with these posts.
/r/MensRights02/03/20 04:01 AM
1

The dictionary people did not 'dictate' how to use these words, they documented how they are/were commonly used at the time the dictionary entry was written. Sometimes the usage comes before the dictionary entry is even created, so the writers document how they observe the word being used, or the entry changes as usage and connotations change over time. In this case, wifey seems like it's just out of date. Pretty sure I've heard it used negatively in older films, but not in modern speech. Chance…
/r/MensRights25/02/20 03:18 AM
3

She was at least nice enough to admit to the abuse publicly and in writing.
/r/MensRights21/02/20 12:54 PM
8

Miles of unibrow shown at every lecture
/r/MensRights26/01/20 02:00 AM
4

OP's headline does not match up with the details in the post presented in the screen capture. The post in the image says that his stance on remaining child free was confirmed by his experience with a pregnancy scare. It also says that at the time he chose to have the vasectomy, she had already revealed that her experience with the same pregnancy scare had led to uncertainty about her original stance to remain child free. OP's title says she left him a few days after his procedure, but the post g…
/r/MensRights24/01/20 02:26 AM
1

My takeaway from the post was not that he regretted getting the vasectomy, he was disappointed that she changed her mind about wanting kids. People change and sometimes relationships have to come to an end as a result. He wanted to be child free, she did at first but then changed her mind. Total deal breaker at that point. Sucks for him but people should break up when they realize their goals and values no longer align.
/r/MensRights24/01/20 02:08 AM
7

Yeah, did no one in this thread actually read the post on the image? OP certainly didn't and totally sensationalized this post's title.
/r/MensRights24/01/20 02:02 AM
6

The post seems to indicate it was his decision to get the vasectomy and that at the time she had expressed that she had become unsure about her plan to stay child free.
/r/MensRights24/01/20 01:59 AM
11

True you should not, but if I'm reading the post correctly it sounded like his own stance on wanting to be child free was confirmed during the pregnancy scare and that experience was the main factor in his decision to have the vasectomy, even saying she was at the time already feeling unsure about having kids later.
/r/MensRights24/01/20 01:54 AM
3

Joan of Arc is a terrible example; she is an outlier and it was not normal for women of her time to lead men in battle. She wasn't followed/supported for her military experience and skill, it was partly due to belief in her claims that God was speaking to her and that He would not be on the side of France if she was not at their helm, along with the fact that France was losing when she came along and the monarchy was desperate enough to give crazy a try.
/r/MensRights23/01/20 05:51 PM
3

Having strict gender/sex-based roles is still oppressive, even if the reason for the division of roles is not for the purpose of oppressing one or both sexes. It's oppressive to individuals who are forced into a role that they do not wish to perform; men being conscripted to fight or hunt when they as individuals might not have chosen this duty, as you mentioned, but also women who do not want to be limited to domestic and maternal roles having limited access to other stations within their cultu…
/r/MensRights23/01/20 09:35 AM
1

The current law only requires males between ages 18-25 to be registered for selective service in the US. That's like 5-6%(?) of the total population. Not defending selective service, just trying to quantify how many people this would be (and estimating because googling population stats is a black hole of results that don't have a clean 18-25 bracket... Also, I'm not sure if anyone stays registered for selective service beyond the required age so I have no data for that group). Even accounting fo…
/r/MensRights08/01/20 04:35 AM
1

Wasn't very detailed in my comment, but that's where I was trying to go with this. That you can't limit decisions like going to was to such a small group because of the factors involved, including morality.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 02:05 PM
5

Fewer than >0.5% of our citizens are in the military. Too few to be making such an impactful decision. Even if you were to add draftees to that (and they wouldn't be drafted until after such a decision has already been made), it is still a very small percentage of the total American population. And say this was somehow a thing, now you're also cutting out politicians who were voted into office in order to make such decisions. Furthermore, you'd be putting this decision in the hands of a group th…
/r/MensRights07/01/20 05:40 AM
45

So are his parents are paying with the money from his college savings account? Like I get it, government, you don't wanna pay welfare to another kid... But welfare is intended for outlier cases like this!!
/r/MensRights31/12/19 01:52 AM
1

She blamed it on the fact that her husband wasn't home very often. Yes, and she also tried to assign some of the blame on her victim. She is a dispicable person for doing this. She should absolutely be called out for this, in addition to her crimes. So, why was he working so much? Why was he so stressed that he couldn't pay attention to her? Could it be that she was spending more money than what she wanted to earn herself, so her husband had to do it for her Maybe, but this article doesn't give …
/r/MensRights21/12/19 02:46 AM
56

Unless we know the back story we are just jumping to conclusions about this situation. Comments are already jumping to conclusions about this man and woman when we have no information.
/r/MensRights16/12/19 12:19 PM
6

Well, and maybe for new parents.
/r/MensRights11/12/19 03:50 AM
2

Dude, you are so angry. Take a deep breath and actually read my comment. I did not say that I think women should be the priority; I was just pointing out that they tend to get additional healthcare support because reproductive care for women has the greatest impact on birth outcomes. And I'm ok with evidence-based measures being taken to ensure that babies get the best start in life that they possibly can.
/r/MensRights01/12/19 03:58 AM
17

Let alone the fact that she uses two men as examples who are significantly more wealthy and well-connected than most people. The average man doesn't have those same resources to defend himself and to bounce back afterwards.
/r/MensRights30/11/19 06:06 PM
-3

Also to add, you're claiming there would be more outcry if they mentioned cuts to women's healthcare. But the authors of this article highlighted the prostate cancer test as their example—and pointed out this is the commonist cancer suffered by men. Is that not some outcry? This news is new. It's too soon to say that there isn't enough reaction. And rather than worry over whether it gets as much outcry as women's health issues (it's not a competition, afterall), if prostate cancer awareness is s…
/r/MensRights30/11/19 05:59 PM
0

This headline does not match the article's headline and seems to be extrapolating a lot that just isn't in this article. If you read the article carefully it mentions the testicular cancer antigen blood test should be administered less often, in special cases, as an example of one 34 procedures covered in the source document. It is not saying that other methods of prostate cancer screening are being cut. There are no examples mentioned by the article of tests specific to women's health concerns …
/r/MensRights30/11/19 05:52 PM
3

Yeah, something I always post on this sub is that a lot of this care going to women is intentionally disproportionate because it indirectly impacts babies, of either sex, for the better. Meaning pregnancies resulting in healthy babies. Meaning unwanted pregnancies prevented. These are important things to invest in because unhealthy and unwanted people cost much more.
/r/MensRights30/11/19 05:25 PM
1

I bet she serves no jail time considering she's in S. Korea just living her life
/r/MensRights29/10/19 03:17 AM
11

People should be responsible for their own actions. Yeah, she needs to be held responsible for the consequences of her actions. This was a man she knew was depressed and having suicidal thoughts. Encouraging him to kill himself hundreds of times was abusive. The first amendment does not give anyone the right to abuse someone via speech.
/r/MensRights29/10/19 03:01 AM
1

Probably switching doctors? If you get a new patient who is, or at least appears, already-sick it may be difficult to even suspect something like this until enough time with the patient has occurred
/r/MensRights13/10/19 10:39 AM
14

The article says all three of her children were taken from her. The boy who was medically abused is in his father's custody.
/r/MensRights13/10/19 10:36 AM
87

I'm cases like this, they often switch physicians, so the doctors involved often don't have a very reliable medical history. Generally, doctors have little reason to suspect this type of thing at first. This article does say that it was doctors who reported her after suspecting medical abuse.
/r/MensRights13/10/19 10:33 AM
6

I'm sure I have but I'm not hunting for a source just now. I wanted to respond to your use of the phrase "mindless screeching" though. Keep it civil. "I wish more prominent feminists would acknowledge the impact that women's career choices have on these numbers" is a much kinder way to phrase. Let the feminists use vitriol if they want. Don't bring it here.
/r/MensRights07/10/19 11:59 AM
7

Yes, you are right. I should have included "full-time" in my phrasing. That was an oversight and was not intentional.
/r/MensRights07/10/19 11:42 AM
94

Except this tweet is also a gross over-simplification. Closer to reality is probably this, granted still very over simplified: "for every 8.2* hours the average man works in a higher-paying career, the average woman works 7.8 hours in a lower-paying career" *According to the 2015 American Time Use Survey by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, among full-time employees, men worked 8.2 hours compared to women working 7.8 hours Edit: @thatusenameistaken correctly pointed out that I should have inc…
/r/MensRights07/10/19 02:32 AM
19

Would you mind linking the full article? The headline in the image does not actually say that the false accusers received no consequences. It would also be helpful to know how recently this happened and where.
/r/MensRights04/10/19 03:44 AM
2

Do you have a link to this poll? I'm interested in responding to it.
/r/MensRights20/06/19 12:50 PM
4

Reposted almost as often as this mom gets to see her kids.
/r/MensRights20/06/19 12:46 PM
3

Seriously, dude? A fall could end the pregnancy; resulting in no baby or one that has to cling to life in a NICU because it was born too early or with serious injuries. It's not worth the risk for a pregnant woman to be standing in a moving vehicle simply for the sake of exercise, which she probably got plenty of while walking to the bus/subway. Asking for consideration to be given to a pregnant woman in this particular circumstance is not an affront to men; however, this sign is way out of boun…
/r/MensRights03/06/19 11:35 PM
6

Brian: ...When I signed up, you know, for the course I mean. I thought I was playing it real smart, you know. 'Cause I thought, I'll take shop, it'll be such an easy way to maintain my grade point average. Bender: Why'd you think it'd be easy? Brian: Have you seen some of the dopes that take shop? Bender: I take shop. You must be a fuckin' idiot!
/r/MensRights12/11/17 07:55 PM
0

False. There are tons of male-only scholarships out there... for ballet.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 03:48 AM
1

I think you are correct in that these services are heavily weighted to focus on women's reproductive health more so than other health issues (although I agree as other commenters below have pointed out that this is not exclusively reproductive healthcare). BUT, I don't think the imbalance of these programs in favor of women is because women's healthcare is more complex or specialized than men's. I'm speculating, but I think these services are offered to women (and not men) in large part because …
/r/MensRights26/01/17 03:06 AM
16

Well, they didn't talk to HuffPo, it even says in the article: Actresses Melissa McCarthy, Kristen Wiig, Leslie Jones, Kate McKinnon and director Paul Feig sat down with The New York Times’ Dave Itzkoff recently... Head over to The New York Times to read the full interview.
/r/MensRights26/06/16 02:26 PM
6

By identifying the mother it could identify her children as the victims; however, this logic is definitely not always applied when genders are reversed and it must be humiliating for those victims.
/r/MensRights31/01/15 03:56 AM
4

I can see the benefit to spending a little more on women to promote better reproductive outcomes... This has tremendous benefits to members of both sexes to come from a healthy womb and to have been nursed by a healthy mother. Nutrition delivered in utero and during the first few months can have lasting impacts on the infant into adulthood (see studies on children of the Dutch famine during WW2 for evidence suggesting poor nutrition during fetal development relating to higher risks of adult obes…
/r/MensRights04/01/14 07:49 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter