TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Madness20 Archive

View 1 posts and 610 comments by Madness20 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Madness20/r/askTRP30/07/15 03:17 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

There's like loads of ugly rich guys that do a lot better than poor attractive guys
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/19 08:24 PM
0

Most younger women do not prefer 45+ men. Let's not be delusional. You're distorting what i said. Women prefering older men, is a pattern accross all spectrum. We prefer richer men and by richer we don't mean Mr. $50k a year. You prefer people with financial stability, something younger men have a lot more difficulty with. Sugar daddys that can pay them a lifestyle the younger cannot afford yet, are in high demand. Men who are sexually attractive at 45+ are men who were always sexually attractiv…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/19 04:42 PM
2

Older men do have more options than older women, because of several factors: More women than men from around 45+ Older men are usually richer or at least financially stable compared to younger ones. Men have a lot less requirements to have sex or a romantic relationship Most older men prefer younger women Most younger women prefer older men By a man's 50's -60's, there is enough "imbalance" between these and more factors that the roles basically "switch", and men can afford to be the choosy ones…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/19 04:27 PM
3

I understand where you are coming from, but you're oversimplifying too many things to the point of being wrong. Forget humans as individuals. Humans are a collective and have always been. Think of tribal societies, what humans were for millions of years, they depend on having several different "professions" or "skills", every person is important and has to be included. For a big part of pre-history, humans were actually pretty much scathered around the world and "wars" and outside competition ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/19 12:25 PM
3

If i have sex with a junkie and i get a disease without worrying about future consequences, is it my fault, or is it the junkie? I can blame the junkie for being a junkie, but the fault is on me for knowingly ignoring the red flags that were obvious.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/19 08:54 PM
6

is not women's fault that you're punching above your league. Almost no men is really punching above their league, aside from young boys that are still in some fantasy land, that is. If your dating pool is of women ages 23 and under, sure. But this changes for most women like that while other women don't care at all No, it only gets worse. By 23 if you haven't at least one of those 3 requirements, your pretty much doomed to virginity. Any woman who cannot attract a guy like that learns to get mor…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/19 01:42 PM
3

It's only hard because the "real men" women want, are the top 20% of almost every field. If you ain't earning 100k, have less than 6 feet height and you're not ripped, you ain't a "real man" worthy of their compromise.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/19 01:29 PM
2

Let's say male twins: They look the almost exactly the same, but most likely one of them is a lot better with girls than the other, just because humans tend to establish hierachical "dominance", in which the others tend to accept with passivity. Even if you had just clones of the same 10/10 physically, little differences in sociability in experience would bring up diverging personalities and styles, which would obviously bring differences in romantic success.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/19 10:36 AM
1

Yes, without even thinking twice. Most of the problems i had in life would be a lot easier and even cathered to, maybe too easy for real adulthood, and i'd prefer to have a more innocent, inexperienced, naive view of the world, than i do.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/19 10:26 AM
1

Be clingy, jealous, cater to her all the time, make her feel like she's "superior" and that you're desperate to be with someone like her. Works with 100% guarantee.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/18 02:46 PM
2

Asexual, no, but it'd be cool that our sexuality wouldn't put so much influence into our lives. The way people in general are driven by hormones, and the social and environment consequences of that, are quite destructive in the long term.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/18 01:37 PM
2

"People should not have a job unless they're prepared to be bound to it for the rest of their life" For me, they are equivalent statements.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/18 07:48 PM
13

Grill : "Halp, society is unfair!" Society :" Omg poor grill, let's all shed a tear and help this poor grill. Sensibilization campaign tomorrow!" Male : "Halp, society is unfair!" Society : "Deal with it"
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/18 07:32 PM
1

ITT: Women: "If men don't want babies maybe they should abstain from having sex, teehee. Also i'm totally not pro-life, teheeehehe"
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/18 11:10 AM
3

Well if you are able to then can you explain how? How do you analyze pratically everything about a person? How do you analyze if a person is rich? Or if a person is a liar? Or crazy? Can't you make correct judgements from holistic evaluations of what you know for facts about a person? What? Doesn't this just support my point? No, it just supports that you're unable to distinguish between both, not that they are indistinguishable. Most people are about the same level as niceness. You can't separa…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/18 01:49 PM
5

I find it hard to believe people can't distinguish between genuinely good people, and people that are just situationally being good for them. And being nice does not necessarily have any correlation between other desirable traits like loyalty, accepting, and honesty. I clearly don't understand how you make this jump in definition. In my book, they're definitely correlated. For instance certain men will act VERY nice and beta when you first meet them. They will shower you with gifts, attention, a…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/18 12:56 PM
3

I find it curious how you coming from unwanted deadbedrooms relationships, have even the scrupulous of doing it yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/18 12:48 PM
1

Marijuana does that just fine, imo.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/18 04:00 PM
1

Sex is not their primary goal, and so they tolerate the sex to get what the well provided children that they actually want. No they aren't. These women are just settling for what they can get, not what they actually want. Every sexual being, by nature, desires to have sex. Women who aren't assexual, fall into that category, which is the majority. But then they inject immorality and try to shame women for doing the same shitty things and being selfish to achieve their own dating imperatives. Who'…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/18 12:56 AM
1

I said that women tolerate sex to get what they want, and then you replied by saying, “nope, they tolerate it to keep the man around to continue to provide for her kids”. The simple fact that they're "tolerating" something, means they are not getting what they want. They're just "tolerating" the lesser of two evils, the other being, alone. And what they want in trade of "tolerating" is simply a provider. How is that somehow more virtuous than having a relationship with someone you trully love, a…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/18 04:29 PM
1

Why is it a stupid example? It's entirely valid. Do you think the Beatles would be regarded as attractive these days? Yes / No?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/18 01:50 AM
2

women's standards have not skyrocketed. lol. Want a very simple example? Remember the Beatles? How sexy do you think people would rate them today? Do you think Beatles of today would have to cancel tours because they couldn't sing over the sound of all the girls screaming histerically for them?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/18 01:36 AM
3

Because men are made, they're not born. The negligence society has to this fact, is naturally the very cause of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/18 01:29 AM
3

It's really up to the individual, but the reason I would wait is that it's all about quality for me, not quantity. If she's not giving out to keep you around, she doesn't really think you're quality material.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/18 11:48 AM
1

Again, it’s not. It probably is for men, but not for women. Women tolerate sex because it gets them want they want. Lol. Nope. Women who are asexual shouldn't even be pretending to be sexual, and if they're sexual and not attracted, it's still under false pretends. The only reason women are drawn to "tolerate" sex from men, is evolutionary reasons to keep the men around provide to her kids. Are incels not obsessed with sex? Are spergs not obsessed with sex? No!!! They're desperate. They're obses…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/18 11:41 AM
4

I imagine there are a lot of people who would rather do a lot of things than have sex a lot of the time. One of my attractive/social female friends said to me once, "Sex is overrated." The millionaire telling the poor that money is overrated.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/18 03:25 AM
3

There's zillions of factors for why almost any "problem" in our society, never has enough people protesting for it. People are mostly always too busy on their own lifes, and many who have the time to protest are mostly angry youngsters, or people with less responsabilities or experience to even identify and fight the problems correctly. Men's rights is indeed a critical thing that if the same problems had a prefix of "Wo" before the men, it'd be an authentic worldwide scandal that people would e…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/18 12:33 AM
1

Lots of women do. And they are fine being so. That’s why more men cry about dead bedrooms than women. Yes, bad marriages. Stop playing around , beating bush that procreation and sex is the single biggest motivator for people to be in a relationship. Sex becomes a burden for a lot of women. Married people or people in relationships that aren’t having sex, are still in relationships/marriage. You don't stop being married, because it's a legal link. But from the moment an expression of love and car…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/18 09:15 PM
1

I'm always intrigued by this view that men must somehow be in a constant state of self-improvement forced by their wives for them to be loved, while the same standard doesn't go the other way.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/18 02:23 PM
2

Because women have lists of people waiting for a chance, and the husbands she choose must comply or she nexts them, while he might very well end up worse after divorce. Unfortunately, many men are either too compromised, invested or scared of ended up being alone that they often comply to this crap and eventually become passive and obedient.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/18 08:48 PM
1

Yes, leaving at any adversity, certainly seems like a wise choice, but doesn't check with my values unfortunately.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/18 08:42 PM
2

Not everyone thinks of cheating because they are mad at someone, in fact 'im mad at you so I'm going to have sex with someone else' sounds like something someone in highschool would say. That's not being mad enough to entertain sex with another person. Suppose bad streaks of luck that end up culminating with the absense of a spouse, or a sufficiently big dry spell for things that are really outside of your control or actually your partner's fault to some part, etc. There's plenty of reasons for …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/18 01:30 PM
12

In my opinion, male disposability is a natural consequence of human evolutionary biology. According to it, the only way to reverse male disposability, would be for eligible males to become too scarce, scarce enough that they can reverse gender roles.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/18 12:27 AM
1

Neither are people in relationships where the main goal is sex. Relationships without sex are simple friendships. No sexual being wants to be in an asexual relationship by choice. Women aren’t with you primarily for sex. Women are with me because i'm a tall man with good constitution and have at least average to good characteristics in most fields. I have no illusions that my gf wouldn't be with me if i didn't had those sexually attractive characteristics. think that it’s the spergs that are obs…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/18 12:14 AM
2

I think you are confusing putting on a pedestal with "benevolent sexism". They can intercept, but they aren't the same thing. "Benevolent sexism" is not pedestalizing, it's literally treating women as inferior and less capable. Putting women on a pedestal on the other hand is thinking that women are generally better , more moral or incapable of being as bad as men. That's something that's easily more seen in RadFems than anything else.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/18 06:06 PM
2

Chasing as a straight women only gets you pumped and dumped. It's funny that one would think it's exactly the opposite. Most men who pump and dump approach women. Most men who don't want to risk pumping and dumping, don't approach outright a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/18 05:55 PM
2

Thinking of women as property and slaves is not putting them on a pedestal.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/18 05:41 PM
2

Well, a man can hire a prostitute, also easy. The fact is, research shows that men and women are equally likely to cheat (with men being slightly more likely to cheat, but that could be the standard error margin). Men are less likely to even be married, at least 10%. That automatically skews data in one direction. This means that in raw absolute numbers , women do it more by virtue of being more often in relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/18 05:28 PM
6

Putting women on a pedestal doesn't mean there's no misogyny going on. Putting women on a pedestal is short for "women are wonderful" and a combination of self hatred and misandrist views. That's not misogyny in any book.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/18 05:24 PM
2

No, not quite. There is an inherent imbalance! If a man does the chasing, he selects the woman he finds most attractive, and gives it a shot. He might get shot down, but nothing ventured, nothing gained, right? That goes both ways really. It's flattering for a man to know a woman is interested in him if she's direct with it, and many actually find that sort of determination in women attractive. However, if he waits for an attractive woman to approach him, he might be waiting for a long time, unl…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/18 04:46 PM
3

Thinking about something and trying to do it are different things. I have thought about murdering someone, but if I'd try to do it, I would go to jail. I don't see how a person who tried to cheat and failed is any better than a cheater. I wouldn't judge a person who thought about cheating but refrained from doing so. I would say almost everyone in the world entertains the idea of cheating on someone when they're mad enough. Most people abstain from even trying for moral or pratical reason, but e…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/18 04:24 PM
1

I said that men and women cheat or try to cheat equally often, Then that's not what interpreted from it, it seemed to me you were implying cheating isn't a female behaviour as in that women don't cheat naturally. Easiness has nothing to do with it, in my book, if a man tries to cheat and fails he is as good as a cheater. I don't disagree, but thinking of cheating and doing it are very different things.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/18 04:03 PM
6

In both of these quotes you hold women accountable, but not men. I hold women accountable for their actions of choosing a wife beater knowingly, yes. I have the ridiculous notion that women have agency.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/18 03:57 PM
1

1.) Is it possible for a Red Pill Man to have a sexual or romantic relationship(fuckbuddy or ltr), with a Blue Pill Woman? Yes, of course it is. The mistery about the other person can actually also be a bonus on attraction. 2.) If so, did TRP tactics and strategies play a huge role in helping the Red Pill Man get the Blue Pill Woman? Yes. Of course. Water is wet, sky is blue, mostly. 3.) Are there any real life examples of such a relationship? I've seen some. Most cases it's the case of the woma…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/18 03:52 PM
0

There are plenty of women that cheat as well, possibly more, just because it is that easy, you wouldn't know that for a fact. How does it make it a male nature thing?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/18 03:35 PM
6

Frustrated men mostly pretend to be misogynous to mirror the behaviour of the peers they realize have more success than them. On real life actions, most frustrated men also have tendencies to put women on pedestals.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/18 03:31 PM
6

should I extrapolate my experiences and assume that all men are cheaters? Cheating is not a female behaviour, men cheat or try to cheat all the time. You somehow manage to contradict yourself in the very following sentence.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/18 03:28 PM
3

What women in the OP? Somehow, women are bad if they cheat and if they get cheated on. I don't get what exactly made you extrapolate such idea.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/18 03:26 PM
1

If Chad had relationship with like 5 girls, there's probably 4 guys out there who didn't have a relationship. Dating is a sum zero game and if some people have lots, it means there's other many people having few. It's like money to some point.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/18 03:23 PM
9

Yes, that's the irony of it. Most men i've known with most success with women, also tend to have a more red pilled view and actions on the world in correlation. They know what women are capable of, they know just how attractive they are and have the right mindset of self-improving and never sacrificing themselves for loved ones, and very few of them believe in love or companionship from them at all. The ones that are in relationships, mostly just do it to have kids, while they still bang other w…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/18 02:38 PM
1

Dating for the goal of sex is a man’s main purpose of dating. Not a woman’s. Again, because sex is not the goal of dating for women. Some women want money, others want romance and most want some kind of compensation in return, whether commitment, fame, money, providership, or even just free trips and travel. Women can get sex whenever they want, so sex is not as much of a big deal for them. lol. Yes, for women, dating is totally something so virtuous and virtuous. So much virtue. Lol not really.…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/18 10:43 AM
1

Who was talking about at the same time?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/18 10:24 AM
1

How can each woman have multiple possibilities unless the guys have multiple possibilities too? It doesn't work like that. Think about things like your class on high school. One or two guys there probably had relationships with a bunch of women, a few had a couple, some have one but many didn't had one. While for women, they mostly at least have had one boyfriend by the end of highschool.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/18 11:51 PM
1

Lol male solipsism at its finest. Dating doesn’t mainly exist for sex (and eventually reproduction). Lol. Denial without even making an argument for your point. Care to elucidate what dating is in your perspective then? Friendships? Neither is a dating relationship where the man isn’t giving the woman money or some kind of compensation. Dating doesn’t just exist for the pleasure of men. Why the hell would a woman need financial compensation for? That’s fine. And men that are focused mainly on se…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/18 11:45 PM
2

Dating someone mainly for sex is incredibly shallow. What the fuck? Dating exists so we find our sex partners and reproduce. If a partner doesn't want to have sex with the other, that's not a dating relationship. If men’s main desire for dating is for sex, then there’s absolutely nothing wrong with a woman dating men mainly for the free money. No there's nothing wrong at all. They just happen to be prostitutes and the kind of women men avoid to date.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/18 11:41 AM
1

their instincts are to demand commitment (think evo-psych; you don't want to carry a baby alone) This is where you're wrong. Extra-conjugal affairs are a thing, and Chad's are the ones they'd risk they're own marriage having sex with. Outside of marriage, most women wouldn't want to have regular casual sex with anything else than a Chad, so there's that.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 03:09 PM
0

I’m quite sure I know far more than you do. I'm quite sure you don't. Most lonely men aren't either Chad nor dark triad, and it's quasi paradoxal if they exist. Dark triad men and Chads have no problems manipulating people for their intents.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 02:55 PM
3

If a successful masculine guy was looking for a long term dating partner and a jobless woman contacted him couldn't he totally have the same reaction? How often have you seen a man rejecting a woman because she was jobless? So many men even prefer it, many men want a stay at home wife.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 11:28 AM
1

Ok. So if you think a woman should date a man who’s jobless, should a man date a woman who is sexless? Not a good comparison. Dating is for men precisely to have sex. It's like you're saying, dating for women is precisely to have free money.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 11:24 AM
0

Toxic masculinity is NOT being tall, having a job, being attractive, or being confident and assertive. The fact that you associate each of these with masculinity, and this masculinity as something that men must have in order to be seen as one ,makes it toxic by definition. Every man I know who is not a Chad, dark triad or sociopath seems to have zero problem finding women to date and fuck. You don't know many men do you?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 11:20 AM
1

There's literally no such thing as non-toxic masculinity according to it's own definition. The very definition of masculinity, and attributing qualities to it, makes it toxic for it's pressure on intending a gender to conform to the "roles" defined by the gender label.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/18 11:10 AM
1

Not directly, but i would say some wealth allows people to have healthier lifestyles, that allows them to become/stay more attractive or for longer. Obviously someone who can avoid an over stressful lifestyle, manage to have good nutrition and time to physical exercise, is always going to be more attractive than otherwise. Let's say, my mother is closing 60's and most people wouldn't giver her more than 40's. Her own mother, my grandmother, by her 40's already looked older than my mother looks n…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/18 02:35 PM
3

White knights are the kind of men that jump on defending women every single time because they think they virtue signal a lot by doing it, and that they can win them pussy. They mostly end up sooner or later becoming real frustrated and turn to TRP, incels, MGTOW and that kind of troops that are frustrated for feeling disappointed that their feminist education never got them laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/18 02:08 PM
2

Why do you think it is that women stop having sex with their men? Women stop having sex for a variety of reasons, but it can all be summed up to that at least one of them isn't that interested in it. I find that the pattern for the average couple is women overplay their own sexual desire by "giving" sex for men to attract a relationship, but stop giving it freely as soon as they feel they're "married" and that he won't leave. Don't get me wrong, but i bet that even guys like Brad Pitt most proba…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/18 01:35 PM
3

Men police each others about women all the time, specially what they think it's unfair treatment some other man is giving to a woman, or simply hoping to gain her respect, white knights are a prime example of this. Other than that, it is part of the "bro code" to really not making any observations or control of other's men behaviour, but will promptly ostracyze / cut relations with them if they break "acceptable" behaviour.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/18 12:50 PM
4

It's not bizarre at all. You're just interpreting it wrong. Society wise, there's absolutelly 0 concern about problems that affect mostly men.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/18 03:53 PM
1

This is because men are seen as stronger and more able to thrive in these positions, not because men are seen as disposable. Wrong! The less strong a man is the more disposable he is. Men are disposable because they're less important in the replacement and outnumbering competition. A society that sacrifices it's women has a disavantage against one that sacrifices it's men to protect it's women, which is the ability to reproduce more.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/18 03:33 PM
3

More women than men are now generally accross most fields with higher representation, yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/18 09:09 PM
2

Some men do become nurses. It's just that most just prefer to aspire to being something else, like a doctor or a surgeon.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/18 09:05 PM
2

What's the relevance and point of that question? Options and choices, naturally?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/18 08:49 PM
3

Because I can name similar level jobs where it would be the other way round - for example many would agree that being a hospital nurse is just as, if not more, stressful than being a construction foreman. Both jobs are honestly incomparable for being so different. But i can pinpoint that most construction workers never become foremen, and that construction workers have a lot less life expectancy than the average nurse. I personally know a lot of nurses, because it runs in family, and i can agree…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/18 07:38 PM
2

What makes you believe this? The 'more dangerous' part I'll allow, because for the most part the most dangerous jobs are jobs normally done by men The more dangerous, the more physically demanding, the more stressing jobs, and they also work for more hours, it's a statistical proven fact. Men who live in less demanding and stressful conditions tend to live a lifespan as long as women. There are lucky and lazy fucks on both genders that manage to function in society because of corruption and lack…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/18 06:55 PM
3

I would like to see some statistical proof of this being true today. How would that suddenly become invalid? Feminism didn't ease the access men have to become parents, quite the opposite. There's never been so many virgins. a man who divorces at 40 can easily get married again and have more kids but a woman who divorces at 40 very well may not be able to have any more children. "Easily"? How regular is it? What percentage of men are we talking about. At 40 there's already less men than women at…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/18 05:29 PM
23

Marriage creates opportunity cost for women becuase we have a much shorter window in which to reproduce than men do, and our energy expenditure toward parenting is MUCH higher. Technically incorrect. Men die, become infertile or impotent, develop diseases or simply have accidents that prevent them from being able to reproduce all the time. The fact is, no matter the "window", a lot more women manage to reproduce than men, across all epochs. This is to say, opportunity is rarer for men, and usual…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/18 04:01 PM
1

This is Nature's way. The mare doesn't approach the stallion. She may wink at him (I don't mean with her eyes, lol) but he has to work up the courage to mount her. No sense defying Nature. "Nature's way" is not what you think. The power dynamic is only conjectural, and simply shifts when someone simply has enough power to do so. I don't need to prove that some guys like hollywood actors , music or sport stars get flooded by approaches and loving letters every single day, and basically have more …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/18 02:32 PM
1

Works both ways, really.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/18 02:23 PM
1

The best men don't have to move their way to approach a girl. They'll throw themselves at him, silly.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/18 12:57 PM
1

Look, if a man is interested, and has balls, he'll approach. If a woman is interested, she'll approach. Apparently you self project your own rationalization of why you can't find the "testicular fortitude" to approach the men that would interest you.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/18 12:54 PM
1

If a man isn't enough attracted to a woman to approach her, he sure as heck isn't attracted enough to date her, make a lifetime commitment, make babies with her, etc. Oh god that is so wrong. It's actually the opposite. Most men i know would be terrified to approach someone they're really attracted to because they fear rejection or fucking up the opportunity. The same men on the other way, have little to no trouble approaching women they consider less desirable for a relatonship and just for sex…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/18 12:50 PM
1

It's because objectification is a shit test. It's perfectly ok for women to do it because hypocrisy.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/18 11:58 AM
13

No true scotsman feminist
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/18 10:04 PM
1

Assholes are attractive because subconsciously they're signaling they can get away with it and be cool. Women love these subconscious displays of prepotence.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/18 10:58 AM
1

You could say the same for the less attractive they are. People that suffer from some sort of discrimination, usually end up with social and emotional problems derived from the rejection and lack of socialization.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/18 03:26 PM
2

the 20% lower percent in that principle, would be the ones that the top 20% men wouldn't touch for some reason or other. Either being too ugly, fat/skinny, mental, or very unhealthy history overall.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/18 12:58 PM
6

A huge part of getting girls is just hanging out with them. Not really. Hanging out with girls, will get girl friends and you'll feel emasculated by the constant rejection. Most players i know strictly hang out with just their "bros", they like to be independent and go to a bar pick up a girl if they feel like. The only girls you'll see them hanging out with, involves his gf and his gf family.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/18 12:30 PM
1

As far as I gather, depression is a transient condition that can strike the misogynistic douche and the friendly guy, but humor me, I wanna some lolologic in action. lolologic in action? Do i have to point you out how TRP, incels, MGTOW and MRA's and several other groups are like 90% former male feminists? Women spend their youth having sex with so many assholes and ignoring so many genuinelly nice guys. Who do you think ends up feeling bad about themselves? The jock, or the nerd?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/18 06:37 PM
1

From what i can gather from most answers, if a man is depressed, he's fucked, because no one will want him. Just goes to show how being a misoginistic douchebag and exploit women for sexual advantage ends up better off than the friendly dude who just happens to respect women he has no romantic interest in. Guess which one ends up in incels.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/18 05:33 PM
8

Even historically we can see some cycles between "sexual" liberalism and the reactionary sexual repressive ideologies kicking back with traditional values sooner or later to prevent total collapse, religions are a testament of that. I'm sure this dynamic probably relates highly with evolutionary biology, and the shift of paradigms between prosper/growing societies pushing for liberalism and collapsing societies pushing for conservative values, is easily explained by the fact that in less than id…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/18 10:16 PM
2

I agree. Ultimatelly, we're survival and breeding machines, and that often has little to do with morality.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 11:34 PM
3

That's right, but the point is, niceness won't make she want you on her bed. Being an asshole on the other way, maybe.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 10:47 PM
2

I think you're closing the truth right there. But i wouln't generalize though. Some people are genuinely nice just because they are, not because they're not in positions where they could be rude. But aside from good people, i don't see why that wouldn't be truth for the majority of people out there.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 10:38 PM
1

In love with a character who's relevance can be resumed to being a barely mentioned cool guy that for all we know is just Percy Weasley hufflepuff's version, but just happens to die at the forth book.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 10:24 PM
12

“He was really nice and took me out to a fancy place so I made sure too look if he was husband material and not bang him for 1 month until i'm certain of that"
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 10:17 PM
1

Cedric Diggory was nice and he’s probably the biggest heartthrob of the entire series. And he was a Hufflepuff, for Christ’s sake! The most beta house. That was just after twilight. Before then he was close to a random guy that barely appeared on the movies, and no one crushed over his book character for sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 10:09 PM
1

Nah, it's more than that. Even before the movies were a thing draco was already prefered by miles. Even all the perfectly nice weasleys combined don't have the same form of admiration.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 10:01 PM
1

Are they really that mismatched looks wise? No matter the looks, harry is actually a really nice guy and draco is often a complete piece of ****.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 09:32 PM
13

"I banged him because he was really nice." "I banged him despites being an asshole, but he was hot". Which of these sentences are never seen.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 07:25 PM
3

Just look at any fandom with attractive villains. They often collect a lot more admirers than their good counterparts. Draco Malfoy is a lot more romantized by girls than Harry Potter.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 07:13 PM
7

Women often perceive niceness in men as an expression of their weakness instead of an expression of their kindness. They're often so used to be "dominated" and handled around, that niceness is like subconsciously signaling submission.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 05:46 PM
2

It is, it's a big trp myth that men don't commit to promiscuous women. Don't get me wrong, some men do commit to promiscuous women, but most of them are beta bux, and not the men women are looking for in hook up culture.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 05:31 PM
1

If a woman wants to compete with other women for a relationship with a particular man, she has to put out earlier and kinkier to beat out other girls. The kind of women they want to compete with, are not the kind of women that men gave commitment from the start isn't it? Either plain cognitive dissonance, or there's more to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 05:17 PM
1

Women love hook up culture because that's where they can find the top men of their lives that are the only ones who actually want and benefict from hook up culture. Everyone else is dragged by inherence of not wanting to be losing out.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 05:14 PM
2

Actually, statistically, self described lesbians are more likely to have slept with men than gay men are to have slept with women. It doesn't surprise me given how hard it is for one gender and how easy it can be for the other gender if it all boils down to casual sex. But most lesbians don't waste their 20's and even 30's to conclude they're gay at 40. Yes, dating and sex, (and hook up culture) are part of the game. Not denying that part. Like everything, and pareto distribution, only 20% of th…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 05:02 PM
2

Okaaay, and I've never seen a closest guy since like, HS. For the most part, people don't stay closeted anymore. You'd be surprised to know how many men "follow" an heterosexual relationship only to end up discovering they're gay, or even the ones who forced themselves into an heterosexual relationship despite being secretly gay. They are doing to meet men half way. Just like straight men come into relationships to meet women halfway. What??? We're all forced to play the game, please. As if all …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 04:50 PM
2

It's no less common than closeted men... I've seen countless teenage lesbian couples around. I have 3 lesbian women on my family, none of them ever closeted. I've never seen a teenager gay couple to be honest, like ever. What about all the gay men who are out and open and hooking in the gay club I love on top of?! "What about all the women who are out and open and hooking in the club I love on top of?!" Does that mean AWALT?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 04:44 PM
2

because men are a lot less romantic than women. Ok, full stop. At least we can agree where we completelly disagree upon. Lol that's just not true at all! Yes it is true. Is closet lesbian even a thing these days, outside of extreme conjectures? So? How does this change the relevant romanticism between the sexes. It changes that most of them grow up with big troubles about their own sexuality hardly develop romantism with the same sex. It changes that many of them have wives and kids that they're…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 04:35 PM
2

I said nothing about straight women per se, i just said that for homossexuals. My point specifically was the contrary, that in fact homossexual men are on average, a lot less romantic than lesbians and still less than the hetero men, but the reason is mostly society conditioning. Being a lesbian is empowering and almost praised for their independence of men, while gay is basically treated with a lot more negative connotation, and therefore societal repressed on their romantic expectations. A big…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 04:00 PM
3

So you think romantism and drive for it can't differ between genders, specially driven by cultural pressure/influence?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 01:37 PM
3

Could it be because homossexuality and homoromantism is very correlated in women, while not necessarily in men?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 01:26 PM
1

Oups, very sorry, didn't saw the tag somehow :x
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 11:56 AM
1

In theory the handsome ripped guy 6'3 always has a lot more capacity for triggering attraction on the opposite sex, men don't need to speak much to look attractive. 5'7 with a below average face and skinny fat, is usually what women would say that are their funny friend that jokes a lot, and that they'd love to find someone like him. It's just that someone should be ripped, handsome, 6'3 .
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/18 11:51 AM
1

No, thats what you are saying. Not me. YOU are saying "he has to be dominant to be an AF or AB". I'm saying, no. That people are AFs or ABs based on their characteristics (how many alpha traits they have first, then how many beta traits they have on top for AB). No, you're actually misunderstanding, sorry if my point wasn't clear. My point is that Alpha labels are contextual, and no one IS alpha or beta per se, but those are behaviour established by how you fit into the hierarchy. Or rather, if …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/18 09:28 PM
1

These are categories of men based on the qualities they have. They don't really change as he moves around groups, or if he has no group. Yes they do. There's always someone who's superior to the other within the context, and therefore more respected. As i said before, if you put some alpha males in an island, most of them will start being followers, and just a few will actually lead. Don't they change their behaviour to align and adapt to the new imposed hierarchy? It's a matter of survival real…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/18 08:43 PM
4

Can't exactly pinpoint the reason, but without ignoring face : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Namibia#/media/File:Himba_Woman_and_Family.JPG There's something for me just so mesmerizing about this woman, and it's not the face. When i showed this to my gf, she told me she looks like a "godess of fertility".
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/18 01:49 PM
1

For the longest time I thought it was just a chore for them This exactly. I was kind of brainwashed since young that sex was a chore most women were forced to by their husbands.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/18 12:06 PM
1

Yes
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/18 11:57 AM
4

I think RP point would be that those 10% you can change make a hell of a difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/18 11:56 AM
1

I think everyone knows alpha/beta are just rather vague classifications within an hierarchy. Doesn't mean it's wrong to identify how these dynamics are consistent is with groups of people with simillar traits, or entertain the idea of more classifications. TRP certainly takes the step onto non-scientific boundaries thou.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/18 11:41 AM
1

Why so butthurt over someone pointing that alpha/beta dynamics are insufficient to explain hierarchies.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/18 11:30 AM
1

Yes, thats how dominance heirarchies work... But you don;t have to be at the top of every dominance heirarchy in existence to be an Alpha Male. This isn't Highlander. It's not "There can be only one!". If you agree dominance is contextual, then within the context of their "group", they aren't dominant if they have a subservient function. No one "IS" an alpha male without context, and no one fits a permanent category. People on the army have to follow orders imperatively and never question them b…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/18 11:08 AM
1

I am a metalhead and into punk culture.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/18 10:28 AM
2

There are social people in each and every group, but some groups are primarily defined by having an anti-social attitude against "society" generally. Plenty of people within these groups do not exactly fit either beta or alpha profiles according to many redpill definitions.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/18 12:32 AM
2

Why are all kids "beta" in theif family nucleus ? Because their dad is in charge ? Why does that make you a Beta ? Because kid's aren't grown ups, and don't have any sort of moral or physical authority that allows them to be "dominant" over the father. As soon as authority is asserted, he's back into his place, no matter how irreverent. Guys are below other people in dominance heirarchies all the time. You think every single officer in the US army is a beta because they all have superiors ? Ever…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/18 09:52 PM
3

What exactly do you think is missing from AF or AB that sigma explains ? AFs commonly don't do well with other men too. The transition between them. All kids are "beta" in the own family nucleus, if they have a father. Angry teenagers/adults, basically, would often not fall into either of those catergories for instance. They're at a transitional middle ground where their mentality/psychology keeps floating, between being confidently anti-social.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/18 09:03 PM
4

The truth is, and speaking by experience, being a "romantic" these days will only result in pain for yourself. If you don't have "experience" with dating, you'll most likely fail getting the potential interests and even acting on them, and no one will really look after that and think that your shyness or anxiety, or any other social problems, are cool. So, there's a certain growth that men must make, that they only get through experience, trial and failure. Failure is also the best thing to know…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/18 08:55 PM
1

It's subjective. For many people sex is what matters the most, but there are plenty of people happy with just keeping a romantic relationship with low amounts of sex. I'd say the core of monogamy is in itself the interests of the child ,culturally and reproductivelly. In environments where a child "quality" is very important for it's reprodutive success, monogamy tend to be able to afford a better education and dedication to the children.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/18 08:40 PM
4

Sigma males absolutelly exist as in males that are basically anti-social / rejected but alpha enough to gather interest by his attributes. Bad boys, metalheads, punks and other "manly" cultures could very well fall within these categories.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/18 08:24 PM
1

You didn't just say genes matter and influence personality, you said Environment does matter but so do genetics, seemingly more so. seemingly more so. Basically that's exactly how arianism was justified.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/18 03:28 PM
1

Environment does matter but so do genetics, seemingly more so. Wow, nazism coming back now, in full force. Our genetics only go so far that if we're raised by wolves, we think we're wolves and behave like one.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/18 12:45 PM
1

Is there a distinction here. In this context is there a meaningful distinction between the two? Yes. That's part of the point of what's called toxic masculinity for example. Little to no woman like emotional or sensible men for example. Therefore you won't see many man engaging in this form of behaviour. In reality, a lot of men are sensible or emotional, but they just hide it well. When a women love him for being so stoic, she's not loving him for what he his, but for how's he behaving.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/18 12:41 PM
1

People are not "becoming" this or that. People are raised to be the way they are. I always find it funny the cognitive dissonace in believing that any lack or decrease in a woman's performance is due patriarchal reenforcement, but we completelly blame men for their own problems and performance. It's almost as if there's no societal pressure that could conditionate men's life.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/18 12:30 PM
2

LMAO. In a radical feminist society most men would be single but most women wouldn't want to be with them. And somehow a fantasy of a culture of segregation and suffering seems cool for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/18 12:30 AM
1

lol
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/18 01:07 PM
3

Adultery used to be a crime, divorces were not allowed, marrying after losing a partner was very hard. Inequivocally, nowadays there's plenty of men that are on their 2nd or 3rd marriage, lovers or even girlfriends with multiple kids involved. Casual dating also allows some "surprise" kids from time to time. Whoever can afford to have multiple wives or kids, is now allowed to do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/18 12:41 PM
5

Feminism increases privileges of being an high smv/rmv male. Powerful people can now be pseudo-polygamous and have kids with multiple wives without it being socially looked upon.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/18 12:27 PM
1

The women who cook vastly outnumber the men who cook. Does that mean men aren't capable of cooking?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/18 12:20 PM
1

Can you prove it? Uh, are you that ignorant that you don't know women leaders and scientists? Do i have to prove to you how there's fuckloads of important queen leaders through history? Were queen victoria, marie curie or even and judit polgar men?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/18 10:24 AM
1

The vast majority of achievers, be it leaders, scientists or almost anything else are men.´ There are excellent women leaders, scientistis, as capable as men. Being the vast majority of achiever doesn't mean everyone had equal access or desire for that achievement. Women are socialized to not care about being politicians, scientists or other "boring" professions for them. Women educated differently, end up as capable as men.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/18 09:43 AM
1

Today you learned women indeed are less capable of all that because of the lower testosterone. Care to prove your point somehow? Women can make great leaders as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/18 09:04 AM
2

You can't say "men are being objectified" simply because some men meet opportunistic women. You can't say "women are being objectified" simply because some women meet opportunistic men. See how that works? Semantics. Objectification, being social, status, financial, sexual or whatever other way people use and manipulate men for, exists. I am not talking about "some people" here. I am talking about society as whole. Women are a huge part of society. "Society as a whole" does not objectificate men…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/18 03:28 AM
2

Are people judging them for being rich? Because if they were being "objectified" for being rich, that's exactly what should be happening. Attractive women are objectified by their attractiveness Men are objectified by their fortune. Some men use women for their purposes, some women use men for their purposes. Men are objectified by how much money they can provide for some women and society. Men with low social status, mental problems, or poor are judged for their condition, and are completelly d…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/18 02:16 AM
2

Men are not treated by SOCIETY as a walking wallet. Yes, many literally are. Women make up more than 50% of the society. It's more than enough people to make for a generalization to society. Women for centuries have been treated by society as a cleaning machine with a vagina. Was that before or after cleopatra? much less often than women Is this oppression Olympics? Are men not judged by their "size"? much less often than women lol
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/18 01:52 AM
1

Yes, I want you to show me concrete proof that men are sexually objectified. Are men raped? Are men sexually harassed? Are men not judged by their "size"? Are men judged by their sexual status/ability? Are men body shamed? Are men judged by their appearence? Do men engage in self-objectification? Do men suffer from anxieties and disorders about their appearance? Are they being demeaned and treated like a second-category citizen for being rich or successful? I thought it was just the contrary. It…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/18 01:36 AM
1

How do you need examples? What kind of way are women objectified? Looks? Ability to provide sex? Sex Objects? Men are also objectified by their status and financial ability. Are you heterosexual? Do you have physical standards(requirements?) in men? Would you consider dating someone really outside of them?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/18 12:45 AM
1

Basically the same way women are.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/18 12:32 AM
1

I think you're looking for the sexy son hypothesis, handicap hypothesis, fisher's principle and some other themes in evolutionary biology that study and approach these dynamics.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/18 02:22 PM
1

I agree with almost everything but : When a woman's material needs are met, she values socioeconomic status less in a man. but she starts to value his physical attractiveness or his compatibility as a partner more. I doubt this. It's exceedingly rare for a women to marry below of her social class, and career women usually desire someone who's at least as successful as her.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/18 02:14 PM
4

Is this a bad trolling attempt or do you actually believe that? Can't tell.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/18 01:59 PM
5

No? There are women who make more money than the father of their baby so then you can't say the man is doing anything of value. What? Is a man investment only measured by how much money he brings to the table?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/18 11:45 AM
1

I think polyamorous relationships begin when there's a power unbalance and one of the partners is of too low value for the other, or the other simply has power to force it. I don't think that people would consentualy be drawn to share their partner if they'd had very high value for them. In primates this is clearly true and observable, being that only dominant leaders have harems, while low quality females have harems of submissive males.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/18 11:37 AM
13

Don't they also work and sacrifice health for the baby and mom at home?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/18 11:17 AM
17

Women sacrifice more. They sacrifice youth, their bodies, time, other suitors to get married and they have to bring in 50% for the bills? No. How is that different from what a man sacrifices?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/18 10:58 AM
1

I'm saying the disclosure of the information to a woman is more damaging to her opinion of him, than it'd actually affect a guy's personality to the point of "compromising" relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/18 10:28 AM
3

I think a women "opinion" on a man who she knows was cheated on is more damaged than the thrauma the man emotionally received by that.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/18 01:05 AM
5

The topic basically assumes that the woman has the information that the guy was cheated on, which would mostly assume the guy told him. The person would then make a judgement from it. Then you wonder why most men don't open themselves emotionally.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/18 12:57 AM
5

So a guy was hurt and rejected, revealed it to you, and you want to ostracize him more for it. Then you wonder why toxic masculinity exists.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/18 12:40 AM
1

Sexual dimorphism, mate choice, handicap principle, sexy son hypothesis, evolutionary arms race, and much more. Just open a biology book, really.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/18 12:30 AM
1

Asking for specific credible links is always difficult, but i'm sure you can find them within a few clicks. There has been plenty documentation of sexual dysmorphism leading to eventual extinction in many species. Many species collapse upon overpopulation, many species have so little genetic variation that they're erradicated by diseases or predators looking for specific traits.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/18 09:22 PM
1

Who even said anything like that? I'm high T myself, naturally. Doesn't mean i can't think high T in itself hasn't negative consequences. Or chauvinism is everything that computes for you?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/18 08:59 PM
2

Sucks when your family members are selfish bastards who throw their problems at you. Now i'd be the selfish bastard if i gave up on them.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/18 07:36 PM
4

"Maybe those poor Africans wouldn't be so hungry if they just stopped wanting food!" "Maybe, if they worked on their personalities, they'd stop being so poor and hungry"
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/18 07:32 PM
2

Where did I say that? Anyone can have these attributes, but they're more likely found in people with higher testosterone levels. You said High T is correlated with ambition and confidence as if it was a cause. I offered you a simple counterexample that women have low T are as capable of having the same traits. The reality is that the causality is reversed for men. Men that acquire confidence and are in leadership positions tend to have their T raised. Not the opposite.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/18 07:01 PM
1

High T is also correlated with ambition, confidence, and leadership abilities TIL women are incapable of these skills. The majority of high T men are NOT psychopaths, true psychopaths are rare. I'm not saying they are, i'm just giving you another example of how a trait can be an "advantage" reproductive wise and be negative socially and for everyone else. Psychopaths also make excellent CEOS by the way.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/18 06:55 PM
1

If the world falls apart after I am gone I don't really give a fuck. You're lucky you don't apparently have problems resulting from others not giving a fuck about it. My personal experience is that my life is constantly fucked up because of people like you. Nothing personal.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/18 06:52 PM
2

If having children with a high T man gives her offspring a genetic leg-up in the long run, then it is a RIGHT preference. Most instinctual preferences are there for a reason, and therefor RIGHT. Sure it used to give. Having testosterone is directly correlatable to having more muscle, and back in time, it was useful to be a warrior and kill the competition. The alphas were stronger, and they commanded by fear and violence often. Nowadays, preference for high T is but a residual of the times where…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/18 06:46 PM
2

Sure, if their children suffer I would say that is wrong but that doesn't matter. She is free to choose the worst possible parent for their children. Sucks to be them. If she crosses the line and does something illegal maybe society can do something about her. Many, if not all extinguished species of animals met their demise due too sexual selection going overboard with traits selected. I can't simply consent it's ok to not having anything to say about eventual behaviours that are at the very so…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/18 06:34 PM
4

Her preferences may seem idiotic to me if they guide her to that kind of situations but that doesn't make them "wrong". She suffers, her kids suffer, society suffers. Unless you think nothing is actually "wrong" objectivelly, there's certainly a limit of how much those preferences can affect society overall. Unhealthy preferences and expectations are inequivocally morally wrong when they affect more than the person in question.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/18 06:14 PM
3

Preferences are not wrong. Standards are not wrong. Sexual preferences are animalistically and instinctivelly based, they're not necessarily morally or ethically based. Not all preferences are morally wrong, but saying preferences are inherently right is kind of silly. Many preferences are unrealistic, unhealthy, or socially damaging for some reason or other. If women have a preference for high T men, and high T men manifest high agressiveness, competitiveness or violence against her, i'd say sh…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/18 05:48 PM
1

How would you know that your husband would go from muscular to overweight? Every man loses testosterone and muscle with aging, and avoiding becoming overweight by the changes in metabolism is a matter of awareness and some effort. Being muscular is hard to maintain, and is harder to maintain through aging, and most likely requires major sacrifices in other aspects of their lifestyle, just to keep in shape. Requiring men to keep muscular through life and maintain is almost as realistic as requiri…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/18 02:20 PM
1

I'm curious if you would you say the same thing with genders reversed?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/18 01:39 PM
1

Isn't that basically, the story of humanity?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/18 12:55 PM
2

Most recently, The Drug War. In general, 400+ years of systemic racism. That's like, less than 5% of the population in question nowadays. What about the other 95% of the men. Hypermasculinity which glorified violence and promotes the disrespect and devaluation of women. More than ever, there's a quite good ammount of men that aren't hypermasculine at all, and are even feminists. The ammount of orbiters and good providers available for women has never been so high. Women choose to be single. The …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/18 12:35 PM
8

White men don't have more variation from asian women than black men or most indigenous people of accross the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/18 07:11 PM
5

Choosing the "best" genes are more of a matching game than a contest. Women choose men that with the combination of genes will produce the strongest offspring. Oh, i see, that's why women even in asia have a bias towards tall white men, it's because tall white men are the genetically superior. Thanks Hitler.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/18 06:34 PM
3

scarcity of available good partners. How did that happen? The cause of this is rampant toxic masculinity How is toxic masculinity responsible for single motherhood?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/18 03:32 PM
7

Yes, but that's beyond the point. The point is that women's choice do not necessarily select the best genes. A man that spent his life on research and not exercising an obsession for sex isn't necessarily "weaker" or worse than a man that worked out physically and is deemed more attractive because of his lifestyle. A BB isn't objectivelly a worse man than an AF within a social context. Also, the chance a descendent to follow their parents steps is always a lot higher. By promoting certain people…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/18 03:22 PM
8

This is the exact opposite of what the females are supposed to do within their respective species, weed out the weak through natural selection. Sure, Newton, DaVinci, Tesla, all "weak" men that couldn't find a lover to have them. It's not like species wise those 3 dudes just happen to be some of the most important people of their times. But hey! They're weak af, who cares to breed their genius. Of course stronk brute caveman that grabs and harrasses his way to attraction is stronk men.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/18 10:45 AM
1

Depends on if they have an healthy life. Many men reach post-wall when they have an health condition that prevents them from having sex often. My grandfather is a natural born red piller, and since my grandmother died, he's certainly had more girlfriends and sex than he did when he was young. At his 80's now, he's still here and there, with a new woman almost every month, to find a good companion that he wants.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/18 10:23 AM
2

If a girl is a biochemist then your biochemistry-knowledge could be a huge turn-on. In what planet is this even true? Where are the erotic stories of chemistry engineers falling in love because he knows his thermodynamics? It even violates rule 34. If a girl is a leftist then left-wing political views could be a huge turn-on. Having a political divergences could be a turn-on as well. Someone challenging instead of consenting boring is always more interesting. And if a girl is a feminist then I d…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/18 09:35 PM
2

I don't think people's attitudes about female sexuality are unjustifiable, the same way as male's sexuality. Promoting promiscuity is half a factor that is likely to end up with lots unwanted pregnancies, DSTs,single motherhood, poverty, all those that have the consequences of involving a second human being in the equation, their offspring. I don't think that a social pressure against risky behaviours is irrational when you account those have consequences with real social implications to the lif…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/18 11:46 AM
1

When you give someone a score out of 10, isn't it implied that you're comparing them to others in their age-group? I don't think that'd be a fair comparison. When we classify someone's attractiveness, we classify it by comparison to their peers, and in comparison to how "attractive" a person is to the entire potential interested in them. If it's contextual, it's meaningless. You could go and classify a 50 or a 100 year old a 10/10, but that'd be meaningless in terms of objective attraction. Weal…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/18 10:02 PM
16

Many women inherently see sex as a reward they give to men for being/acting a certain way. Men usually see sex as a reward they want to work for.´ Women don't see sex as a reward because it's not something they feel it's an achievement. The dynamic is therefore inherently biased from the very source.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/18 03:04 PM
1

My gf is what you could describe as land whale physically, she didn't complete high school and was a loner for most of her life. I'm a slightly fat but tall muscular man that has a diploma , am into sports, worked hard to lose weight and many women look at us as couple and can't understand how we're matched. She was a virgin until 24 but she can't count the ammount of men that she took home from simply asking them when she discovered it was as simple as that. I was a virgin until 29 and was luck…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/18 02:53 PM
2

Models aren't necessarily prettier than non models, so many pretty women that aren't models and so many models that are just way too thin to be attractive. If she's a 6/10 than you're basically saying about 40% of the women are hotter than her, which also wouldn't make sense. Consider all the fat to obese, all the mentally ill, all the uglier women, all women too much older or younger than her, all women of lower classes, education or skills. Pretty sure that she would make it to the top 90% per…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/18 01:03 PM
6

-Checks a very specific site in which several factors account into a viewer rate. -This site is apparently for users to chat with pretty women -Users choose pretty women -Decides this is evidence all the users want is pretty women and that all non-users of the same gender are the same. I don't even ...
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/18 11:18 PM
4

Status is basically an analogy to social hierarchical position of a person in the metas defined by society. Positions of power, fame, money, beauty, and all other sorts of things that humans compete for, define hierarchies between competitors, and having "status" is basically being in a privileged position in the hierarchy of status within the context. Naturally, public opinion of someone, makes for a good part of his "status". The perception people have of your "status" is completelly determina…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/18 12:49 PM
2

Men don't "hate" promiscuous women, they just don't find them particularly preferable for a loving relationship, and some even for sex. They are the people men know they must be careful with to not contract an STD or simply having his life ruined in some form or other. Many of the factors that lead to "promiscuity" are often of mental and psychological background that also don't make for a good wife/mother material.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/18 12:31 PM
1

I think boys might be more prone to bully each others physically specially when they're at the "top" of an environment, the most powerful he feels, the more prepotent he is, but most will eventually be punished sooner or later for it because they'll end up either bullying the wrong guys or being bullied by even bigger jerks. Girls on the other way, i find are a lot less punished socially for bullying other girls or even weak men, these types actually usually are very "popular" and tend to be the…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/18 02:15 PM
1

In my opinion there are quite an ammount of ways feminism has affected men of today. Equality apart, much of "feminism" and gender studies is trully an ideology imposed by governments because of it's useful outcomes government wise, and the outcome is obviously divisive and segregational, profitable and an allienation of the people to the true problems behind. I'm pretty sure the ideological indoctrination of feminism in young people is part of what keeps the patriarchal and intersectional privi…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/18 01:54 PM
8

Uh, your arguments are paradoxical. For men to be able to date older women, then older women are able to date younger men as well. Yes?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/18 09:02 PM
4

For me, it doesn't even compute in my notion of relationship, not living together. I've personally seen and known cases of people dating for years, and then breaking up little after living together. Dating is cool and all, but it's all fake relationship made up of the "best" of your moments, keeping frame and other superficial stuff, it's only when you live with a person on a daily basis and have to share troubles, difficulties and duties, when the true personality and compatibility of the perso…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/18 01:41 PM
1

I don't think it's necessarily the lack of physical or emotional intimacy per se, some people voluntarily abstain from it are totally ok with it, specially older people.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/18 10:40 AM
1

I understand what you want to state, but your arguments aren't correct. There are always male incels by virtue ( or defect) of having one or several congenital disorders, or simply other health problems in life. These are true celibates. Other than that, the number of celibates on healthy men, would be only dependable on the ratio of men to women. There's certainly a ratio of men to women, in which the power of choice starts to turn around.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/18 07:37 PM
3

I was debating primarily your first generalization that incels defend putting women on camp with the analogy to radical feminism who do the same, which are not expressions of what the respective groups are actually about. Then i was refuting your statement that you can't empathize with female experience or women can't empathize with men experience. Several, and specially the hardest issues about their experience, you can empathize, and vice versa. Wanting to make a comment with this sort of gene…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/18 02:28 PM
1

I think your attributing a lot of human thought process onto animals. I'm not attributing any human thought processes into it, only what you think are human thought processes. Shocking information to you: animals think, interpret, observe, analyse and understand ther reality up to a point. I grew up in the country. That's how animals act. Do you think humans are not animals too? I think you have a very misinformed idea about animals if you don't understand they have their own racionality and qua…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/18 02:16 PM
6

I'm arguing that extremism staten by individuals on a group can't be generalized to your own psychopathic tendencies of wanting to eliminate them simply because they appear to hurt your feelings.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/18 02:08 PM
5

Oh, right, women and men are completelly different. Thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/18 02:02 PM
12

Some radical feminists have written around how to put men in concentration camps or exterminate them, does that mean you can't empathize with feminists?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/18 01:56 PM
1

Because we're fishes?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/18 01:49 PM
1

Yes. I am a sexist, my flare is red. Women could not have been warriors against men, for obvious reasons. They probably could have hunted, as man other large female mammals hunt and raise young, but evolution just didn't work out that way. They also could have cut a man's throat in his sleep, but since prehistoric humans were essentially animals, and killing interspecies in cold blood is almost never seen. You clearly don't understand what you're talking about, purely false statements from begin…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/18 01:46 PM
1

I'm not following, do you think the female monkey feels attraction to the blue balls and gives the male consent before he mounts her? I don't think, it's an obvious and proven fact that males are selected by their balls. Have you ever seen animals mate in the wild, it's loud and violent, and the female often snaps at or kicks males and males often over power females. Wow, way to go mate. "Have you ever seen animals in the wild", as in, let's put all animals in the same box and ignore that our ec…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/18 01:43 PM
0

Women couldn't not raise objection to this Wow, misoginy 101. Women are fragile beings and could had never been warriors, hunters, gatherers or simply being smart enough to cut a man's throat while he's sleeping. Completelly inocent as well. Behold the purity of the femme. Not gang rape exactly, not in the modern sense where we have something called consent. Men would fight each other and take the fallen competitors women. That's far from being even an acceptable approximation of human dynamics …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/18 01:24 PM
1

Wow, every mammal strictly reproduces through rape, cool story. It's not like theres even monkeys with glowing blue balls to display his fertility, no, that's just an irrelevant silly color and behaviour from his rapey balls, no evolution involved right!!! :D
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/18 11:35 AM
0

I don't understand what you are trying to say here. In tribal times it wouldn't matter if women noticed or not. If a guy was going to fuck her, he would just take her (if the men in her family didn't fight him off). The side of dick made no difference. Ok, so according to you, human's penis size is due to multiple gang rape, across millions of years, on the same women, and monogamous relationships were completelly out of the window until civilization? Why the same proccess doesn't hold to other …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/18 11:23 AM
3

You're going on a really bluepill discourse, besides seemingly identifying as red. Women don't know now, but i'm sure up until tribal times it wouldn't be something going unnoticed. Almost all primates have micropenises, and they compete as equally or more as humans (bonobo?). Humans having an oversized penis, women having a certain ideal penis size within certain parameters to give them pleasure, and like 90%+ of the men falling within those parameters is merelly a lucky coincidence?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/18 01:10 AM
1

Ok, just kidding, but to put it another way around, how'd you justify within the current context that women have choices, how do you think it'd affect a women's view of his attractiveness and his masculinity if she knew he had a small penis?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/18 12:48 AM
5

Not all, son, not all. Some are lesbians.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/18 12:39 AM
2

Given the inherent worship both men and women have for the big phallus, i'd say that's far from correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/18 12:28 AM
7

Women often have not had their choice of mate, or their choice of mate has been constrained (by their family for example) Women certainly had through human history a lot of control in choosing the desirable mates, and patriarchy as we know possibly makes up only like 1% of the entire human evolution through history. Sexual dysmorphism and competitivety for females is self evidential in itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/18 12:20 AM
4

Men in my life always told me actually the opposite. Interesting.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/18 01:47 PM
4

Lol! You'd have to grow in some cave if you weren't flood with all sorts of "propaganda" that women actually didn't care about sex and looks much, and were "romantically" driven, loving those assholes that manipulated them, "players" or "jokers" as they were called. Weak troll , 4/10 for the attempt.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/18 01:40 PM
1

Contrary to what you've staten, bad sex is a women's fear, not men. She'll be the one who'll most likely have to cope with it in case it's bad, men really are way easier to satisfy. I don't see anything wrong with wanting to enjoy a non-sexual romantic relationship. Nothing wrong in my opinion, but that's beyond the point. Marriage is not a normal relationship, and is a very risky way to find out if you're really compatible with the person sexually, and sexually incompatible marriages inevitably…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/18 11:40 AM
1

It absolutelly is a thing in my country, but you'd have to go to very specific places to find them. Most feminazis i know are mid high class, either ugly, fat, or lesbian, or a combination of those. To find them you'll have to frequent either a arts or social sciences universities, or frequent their safe spaces like gay bars, or simply going to any feminist meeting around. Other than that, they're mostly really at home and don't hang out much.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/18 10:23 AM
1

It's not about pleasure, it's about compatibility. If you wait until marriage to know the compatibility, it has a strong chance of not going to end up well.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/18 10:00 AM
1

Sex is often a decisive factor on relationships. Sexual incompatibility is very likely to end up in divorce. Many of these religious girls end up marrying as fast as they can so they experience sex, and then end up knowing her husband really sucks at it or is completelly disrespectful of her part.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/18 09:59 AM
6

Yes, men lie themselves in believing in women's words. It's like the advice "be respectful and treat a women like a person" when Chad then arrives and asks her to be her object for that night and she enthusiastically consents.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/18 09:55 AM
1

Height isn't a golden ticket, but it's part of it. The short counterpart of a tall man will most often be deemed less attractive. If we allow a tall guy to have 3/10, the same short guy will be 2/10
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/18 09:24 AM
5

ITT: People either too young or too forgetful to remember how the official widespread narrative just a few years ago was something like "women no care about lookz as much as menz that are all shallow pigs who only wanted pretty babes and don't like my landwhale physique".
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/18 10:55 PM
7

Impossible for a tall man to be 3/10 unless he has some extremelly ugly features, most likely personality. 3/10 are basically incels.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/18 10:42 PM
1

100% hot, coming from a person who was educated to be "nice". Also, it's easier to be a nice person and be seen as a nice person when you're attractive and happy. No matter how much you were educated to be "nice", unless you're the most passive and hopeless male in the world, you'll most likely become bitter at the lack of validation from it, and probably become unhappy. So in summary, happiness would be the priority i'd want for my son, and being attractive is a better than being nice by a long…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/18 10:36 PM
1

The "wall" is just symbolism for the age that women eventually reach, where they're no longer so desirable by a big portion of attractive men that have younger and more attractive options, so they have an harder time engaging in casual dating and start to have to lower their own standards. From 40+, there's a shift in demographics in which women start outnumbering men, because men die earlier, and the decrease in attractiveness, is also associated as well with the decrease of available potential…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/18 03:03 PM
0

I think you might want to rethink about your abstinence position as it's something that has a high possibility of not working right. Several reasons for it, i'll just for instance leave a link to a post that seems could give you some further insight. https://old.reddit.com/r/AskWomen/comments/8jpcwe/women_of_reddit_who_waited_until_marriage_to_have/
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/18 01:29 AM
1

I'm usually skeptic about "love" per se, as i don't really differentiate it from friendship, it's just like a stronger form/degree of friendship. With that said, i think "love", like friendship, is something that can grow from positive experiences and mutual growth in a relationship, but it's increase is correlated with the decrease in physical attraction. The only relationships i've seen that i really absolutelly have no doubts that it's mostly about love, involves one or both partners having s…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/18 11:46 PM
5

It's weird, isn't it? 7 Billion people on the planet, and most of us feel lonely. Something is just so fundamentally wrong about society. Maybe we shouldn't allow ourselves to be so different.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/18 06:57 PM
1

I don't think theres really a correlation outside of unhealthy levels. It's sort of proved that men who grow up with testosterone, tend to depend on some of it to maintain an healthy mind and performance. Men with either too low or too high testosterone, tend to have their performance decrease, possibly due to a number of inhibitors and stress hormones involved that affect our neurology.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/18 06:51 PM
1

True. Stressful environments to work are some of the worst killer of T. I don't really know many men that manage to handle having an office job and an healthy lifestyle that allows them to keep their confort. Most often than not, those people are actually really worn out from stress and unhealthy lifestyle.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/18 06:47 PM
1

I think it clearly is multifactorial, but the "mysterious" reasons, are clearly the consequences of the shifts in lifestyle and conditions to most men. Today's average teenager simply socializes and exercises a lot less than what people used to. Men specifically have a lot less activities that "reward" them with a T boost, and are often in stressful environments that actually works against T-levels. From exercising, to hang out, to being forced to walk to go to most places, from having overall a…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/18 01:39 PM
2

I don't believe in it in most situations, but i believe it happens in very specific situations, and the specific situations is that the men in question just is already dominant and attractive enough, but it just didn't "click" women's radar yet. I think it can be completelly proven that women are very attracted to men that assert their dominance over others. On an extreme experiment where you put two men in a fight against each other, i'm pretty sure you could conclude with evidence that women l…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/18 04:04 PM
1

ITT : We learn that women are apparently perfect and incapable of doing harm, and men are the reason for everything bad on this planet.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/18 03:46 PM
2

Feminism as in equal right for both genders don't have anything to do with each others. Anything else about promoting rupture with gender roles, is just pure hipocrisy that will unfortunatelly only hurt those who actually follow with this "rupture". Behind most redpiller or incel was once a guy who actually believed in most of what they were told, and that's part of the reason they ended up where they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/18 08:51 PM
1

I think males are indeed socialized to be stoic, but i don't think it's something society does consciously, like much of everything else to be honest. Surely i believe the loneliness of today's man could attempt to challenge and create these sort of anedoctal cases where people manage to be socially clever enough to engage in this sort of behaviour. Outside of that, i think this is something that is deeply ingrained in everyone's minds, and is actually biological. Through most of mammal kingdom …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/18 12:07 AM
1

I think it all boild down to the common morality of don't do to others what you wouldn't like to be done to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/18 11:55 PM
3

Humans are dangerous. True story.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/18 05:27 PM
1

I don't follow the train of logic and how exactly more feminism would prevent single motherhood. The solution is feminism - creating higher self esteem in women, better pay, equal opportunity, easier access to birth control and abortion- it all creates women who are less likely to have a baby out of wedlock and more likely to demand more egalitarian partnerships. Right. Totally realistical as well. They also unfortunatelly create "strong" independent women that don't really think they need men f…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/18 05:25 PM
6

So women should also disclose that stuff, that they just want him to be her provider?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/18 10:48 AM
1

This happened to me and to my friends in RL. What i can say is that when dogs are too horny, there's no BPD stopping you from wanting to get laid. Outside of horndogs, and in retrospective, that's like a really bad red flag. BPD overall consists basically in a person being all sorts of manipulative and impulsive and then blaming it on their own diagnosis. Promiscuity, impulsiveness, and overall mania, doesn't exactly make for a reliable partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/18 10:36 PM
2

Sex is a necessity that men have to compete for if they want to keep "sane" from his own urges and societal pressure. Men go through incredible lengths in order to compete for this sex. They're also forced to compete anyway, if they want to breed. Everyone therefore is a direct result of what kind of men were breed during our evolution. Controlling women, and specially promising them to men upon certain desirable feats or metas, have been a consistent way powerful men control other men with prom…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/18 11:45 AM
2

i think most people's definitions of "alpha" and "beta" , the simplistic reduction to 2 or 3 classes and their supposed behaviour are plain wrong. Nonetheless, it's easily verifiable that men as groups have a general tendency to establish some sort of hierarchic order. Usually that hierarchic order is either established by force or it can also just be a natural growth amongst their relationships dependency. A select members of pratically all groups of men are for some reason socially prefered, a…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/18 01:12 PM
2

Generally, for both sexes, social conditioning and pressures. We live in a relatively recent paradigm that people grow up with all sorts of "fantasy" ideas and ideal people, places and situations for things to roll out, but it turns out life is never as easy and as fruitful as our media tells us. Social people have a natural emergent behaviour of trying to adapt to whatever criteria society tells them they should follow, whatever means and lengths it takes. People are naturally stimulated to com…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/18 12:58 PM
1

I like how pretty much everyone automatically assumes that men die earlier as a biological staten fact, instead of something much more to do with consequences of living conditions and lack of access to the correct healthcare for them. I'd guess the same argument could be made that if africans live up to have 40 years life expetancy in some places, than it must be because they're biologically conditioned for that.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/18 09:16 PM
1

Well, given that most of my shortcomings and troubles i had in life would have had much less severe consequences if i was a woman, i would go for it for a change without even a second thought.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/17 03:50 PM
1

People should deal with their shit the best they can, but i don't understand how someone can assume a relationship in which you really can't afford to fail or show weaknesses/vulnerability, that's not only unhealthy, as it's impossible to have an healthy relationship where there's no mutual understanding, empathizing and support.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/17 12:11 AM
6

Women are the ones enforcing toxic masculinity by the very fact that they themselves don't empathize that a man can have the exact same plethora of feelings she does, but only that he was thought and forced to "overcome" them/repressed them through his education. It's for them that men keep the straight stoic image after all, you'll find that men "strong" curtains often fall off when he's among bros, and that most gay don't care shit about having a stoic image.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/17 12:53 PM
3

On the contrary, it's possibly the single worse and most demotivational advice ever done, and of course, by someone who completelly lacks the empathy to trully give an useful advice without looking like an hypocrite. This is the sort of advice you only give someone when you don't want to tell him the truth, and that's it. Somebne who finds himself alone and questioning himself why they aren't getting laid, has most probably , very successfully, been his very best self in terms of not trying to p…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/17 12:40 PM
1

Man lower expectations proportionally to their sexual despair, but above average dudes might have some standards because they got a girlfriend that "validated" their attractiveness at some point, when it comes to sex. When it comes to relationships, men tend to stabilize on someone they regard as more reliable as a mother and a faithful partner for his kids, so they tend to disregard physical expectations a lot more in trade of finding someone more fit to be his partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/17 11:56 PM
1

Women don't really date "down" when it comes to "leagues", that's half the point of TRP. Men date down a lot more than women, because there's always a lot more men available for every women, for a plethora of reasons. When a woman dates down, the man is still competing with all her "boy friends" of her league, meanwhile when a men dates down, he's simply resorting to the only thing available to him.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/17 11:16 AM
1

I think it's mostly wrong, and a bad reduction of the complexity of different aspects that a woman's N-count might be relevant to pick on red flags about why that woman might be an unreliable or potentially dangerous partner. Most men couldn't care less about a women's N-count when it comes to have a ONS with no strings attached, it mostly becomes relevant when it comes to men trying to evaluate if the woman in question is a eligible as his partner. Woman's high N-count when it comes to relation…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/17 01:16 PM
1

Hmm i'm unsure if this scenario would go anywhere for men, given the fact that with such advanced technology, probably most "uses" for men in a woman's life would be close to "none", specially given the feminist mindset that probably drove society to those goals. Fact is, on a society that women have no dependency of men, they would see us as redundant, inconvenient, aggressive and the source of most violence, i could totally see men becoming gradually extinct through policy. The only way i coul…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/17 12:57 PM
1

I believe you'll notice you'll only hear it from within a certain context, and that context usually consists on someone trying to find ways to approach some woman without falling into the "trap" of looking too interested. By TRP approach to psychologically induce attraction from a desirable woman, as means of a "game", it's important in their view to maintain at least the perception of having power and not immediatelly fall all over her and act like an horny dog around her trying to obey to her …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/17 12:40 PM
1

Welcome to the notion of how patriarchy was created in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/17 04:34 PM
1

Socialist utopia? There's no such thing. Socialism is a form of government in which it directly interferes on regulating markets and creating a state capitalism.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/17 09:13 AM
1

Well, to me it would certainly throw some "Big Red clone alert", "help, i'm dating immature", and possibly "I'm scared to death that she'll cut my penis" red flags. Real grounded feminists that are not tumblrainwahsed wouldn't even assume that i wasn't a feminist and need to point it out that to me. So i guess i would assume she'd be some kind of autistic?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/17 11:25 AM
5

Hi there, let's make this simple. Women are not to blame for their life choices and their consequences because they're somehow "oppressed" and conducted on their life choices to avoid pursuing things like "STEM" fields, on the other hand you find no logical reasoning as to why many men end up having such fucked up lifes where they completelly dominate crimality, suicides, homelessness, and most of other issues directly or indirectly connected to them. For you, there's obviously no acceptable exp…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/17 11:16 AM
1

Keep your beard and shave your hair completelly. Facial hair sort of "disguises" the "hairless babyface/cancer" appearance and a shaved hair will make wonders in making you look more "dominant"/"confident".
/r/askTRP18/01/17 01:39 PM
5

Dating is so difficult for many men that they don't really "understand" dating, because they never got the chance to. Many men don't really know they're being "creeps"/"stalkers" just because they're so out of touch with how women feel threatened by their behaviour. Dating is hard enough that /r/incels is downright cray. Women feel their dating is difficult because every once in a while they'll feel threatened by a crazy stalker. Men on the other hand, feel like dating is a walk through the dese…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/17 10:25 AM
1

I would make no distinction on gender on this case. Pretty much anyone should know there are lines for which crossing those means someone deserves a punch/slap in the face. When i was a 5th grader i had a (girl) classmate and bigger than me that out of nothing started wanting to bully me and push me around just because i had an higher grade than her. I got so fed up that i slapped her in the face and then had to face all repercursions from the white knight army that came to defend her, and obvio…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/17 04:15 PM
6

It's pretty obvious that high n count men have a very good game, and are addicted to it. I know a few Chads really closely, and for them it's not even a question whether they cheat on their wives every once in a while, or even have multiple affairs. They learnt to enjoy the game and are there for the thrill of a conquest and improving their self-esteem. On the other hand, it's pretty obvious that most of them either can't maintain a LTR or either marry with someone on the lower SMV so that they …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/17 04:05 PM
1

This is almost to the point, but it misses that "sexual" experience is just one very small possible incompatibility, compared to personality-wise compatibility. In my opinion, it's almost tautological that the sum of their experiences will deem them radically different people who have little in common even when ignoring sexual experience, and thus, mostly incompatible for LTR.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/17 12:01 PM
3

There's no single sentence i can find that would rather have a big impact on 18yr old stubborn me. At the best i would say something like "you're better than you think you are, just go for it, like a man."
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/16 03:23 PM
1

Hmmm. How is this even a question at all? No you're not obligated, but as any human with sense and empathy you should realize you should help another fellow human being that is being target of an aggression.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/16 03:15 PM
2

I agree. A woman's dick ideal is a 9 inches dick. The bigger and the more thick it is the better lol. Yeah, right, most women would totally run away from such a monster. By the way, i'm pretty certain that you'll find that most people falling in those "size", can't use it because they have ED. This is why I've always felt I was never able to give a woman an orgasm during intercourse. At 6 inches I don't really feel that big at all. Most men fall in this particular size and deal with it perfectly…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/16 03:11 PM
2

I agree with you that this issue is mostly irrelevant for many women, but How did we get to this point? Why wont they take women's word for it? Well, because many men fell they can't really trust a women's word when it comes to it. Most women wouldn't directly tell them they have a small penis either way, or that they would prefer it in any other form or shape, the same way many women wouldn't confess in much of other issues that they know would affect other people's image about her.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/16 09:34 AM
2

Average is average, because it's fine. Men and women are mostly made to be compatible, and the ammount of men falling into the "average" category and be successful, means that an average size is all that you need. Dick size matters on the issue where it's either a micro penis which the guy can't "compensate" enough with other skills, or either too big to have a confortable sex life. Besides that, pretty much everyone falling into the average category, is perfectly fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/16 09:19 AM
2

Of course there isn't something wrong with the fact that women like to make love. Overall, i'd say what's wrong is men being raised being bombarded by all the 30's women saying there is no longer good men, seeing their own personal friends and acquaintances demonizing men for their sexuality, and are basically indoctrinated that women are supposed to be some sort of assexual beings that just give sex in trade for commitment. Ends up to the point where the sexless/successless feels "betrayed" by …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/16 10:00 AM
1

It's all about how you define the blue and red pill concepts and how you accept it i guess. I personally think both blue and red have valuable informations and knowledge, which i accept as consistent with what i percieve and understand and know. In one side we have the red pill, which has hypothesis that try to explain some of more "primitive" and instinctive explanations to some behaviours, specially when it comes to the gender dynamics and "evolutionary psychology" when it comes to realizing c…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/16 01:45 AM
1

Don't get me wrong, just a simple question, are you an aspie? First, all you have to do is be you, and be natural and just be perceptive of the feedback, if she's receptive you'll know it, and just go with the flow. Second, make sure she has a good time around you and feels confortable to open herself. Third, get laid. It's as simple as that.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/16 01:18 AM
1

everyone lives in different places with different people and "cultures" amongst them, you should specify what place exactly do you mean. For instance in the country i live, dating is pretty hard, if i were to pinpoint ammounts i would say at least 10% of single guys between 20-30's are virgins, and from the single guys more than 50% would fall in the "undersexed" category. Then again, i live in a place where casual sex with strangers isn't really a "common" thing and most people rely on friends …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/16 01:02 AM
2

Women being choosers leads to the fact that most of them enjoy their confortable position of never having to deal with their social/emotional anxieties and can afford to just stay there in a corner waiting for eventual prince charming to approach her, "because she's that beautiful". And so, they tend to compete with each others to first get attention from the "chasers" they would want to know more from. That's also the reason why women are so "concerned" about what some other women are wearing b…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/16 01:05 PM
1

Communication is obviously the key in dating, no matter what anyone tells you, it's the single most important factor to how a conversation or a date turns out. Being muscular, fit, handsome, can all turn on women's lust for you or at least some sort of superficial attraction, but you can't just stay there and wait that some women jumps on you, no conversation included. in the end, she's waiting to be entertained and have a good conversation in which she can get to know you and feel confortable a…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/16 07:11 PM
2

Hmm, technically every sexually active man is a former incel. I understand that for the most, testimonials from 14 yrs old kid is of little importance, but doesn't mean that there aren't kids and young adults out there that did suffer their own loneliness for a period of time, which they were able to overcome and now are willing to counsel or help other people on the same situation. Heck, i'm a former incel (until 28yrs old), and trying to help people and other fellow men on the same situation, …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/16 03:07 PM
1

Every gender want relationships, but women have a lot more opportunities than men, and so, men are willing to invest more resources into meeting a woman than vice-versa. We don't have necessarily more romantic ambitions than women, but we're certainly more "needy" of satisfying intimate relationships than them, because of our socialization.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/16 03:00 PM
1

Any attractiveness factor is always important, but people here tend to think that any of those factors individually should earn you chicks, specially the kind of chicks you like. The truth is, if someone just likes you because you're built up, she ain't worth your time. If someone likes you just because you have a career, she's not worth the money you waste on her. Etc etc. In the end, all that matters is that you keep trying to find people you click, and that make each others feel better. And t…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/16 10:59 AM
1

I tried to list traits in order of importance: Height, Intelligence, Fitness, Good job, Handsome face, (or at least, not-ugly), Confident personality/Extroverted, Funny jokes, Interesting hobbies and personality.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/16 04:23 PM
1

Neither. Women's power isn't about dress code or artificial attributes. Women power over men is much more dependable on their "freedom" of choice and being able to set higher standards because society has deluded them that most of them deserve nothing less than mr. perfect, meanwhile men need women a lot more than the contrary, so they lower their own standards. Men in general are raised to lack significant intimacy and emotional expression, and have high societal and emotional pressure to find …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/16 04:16 PM
1

Well, just wanted to say that this is the truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/16 04:07 PM
1

I lik to think that most men actually care about sex quality when it comes to a more serious relatiinship, its just that lack of communication and bad exposure to porn that might misguide a man in terms of how to do it. Its funny that there literally no pressure on women on how to give his men pleasure. My first gf literally sucked at sex and refused to help me understand how to give her pleasure while doing oral for example, and even with a full dedication, sex quality went from bad to worse an…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/16 09:35 AM
8

Being unethical and abusive doesn't get a man laid more. Having charisma and a good attitude does.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/16 06:46 PM
1

Purple Not casual, but now a very frequent basis with a fwb/gf (i dont even know how to define my relationship, in a good way xD) Nope, it's meaningless for me. Sure, just to observe and have fun with friends. Often, most weekend Yep, a lot. 2 days. It was fantastic, met online, conversation after conversation, after 2 days she demanded a date (and moar):D Not at gym, i have weights at home, and i power walk almost every day, 10-20km
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/16 06:41 PM
1

It's not rape that they fantasize, since there's consent involved. Many women like being dominated, consumed and being eaten roughly as if you are really crazy about banging her, and that's just about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/16 06:46 AM
1

Yeah, thanks, the first one is always the hardest, since then, it's always a lot easier :P. Just got a new gf today lol. xD
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/16 06:33 AM
1

By getting back into my confident stance i had, stop caring, stop being needy , working out a bit, and finallly read interest signs and approach the person and treat her like a human being while learning the necessary steps of approaching.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/16 06:40 PM
1

Lololol, a beta telling an alpha.what's an alpha supposed to be. Clearly you dont have any idea what's like to be normal. The less you care about getting in anyones pants , the more atractive you generally are. A true alpha doesnt want to get into anyone's pants, the just want to get into a a single girl pants... at the time. He has the power, and he chooses, not the opposite
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/16 06:37 PM
1

Nah, being an alpha has nothing to do with how many women you bang. Ideological, religious or even just not giving that much caring about sex, can make plenty of chads a virgin. Not everyone is a crazy sex obsessed that is trying to get into someone's pants.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/16 09:21 AM
1

Dude, as a former incel myself i can tell you thar finding a fwb and have sex is nothing short of a miracle of how much the spiral of lower self-esteem and lack of confidence changes, and the mentality completely shifts toward realistic expectations and towards positivism.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/16 09:17 AM
2

Wow, excellent post, i agree with everything. but, the gender bias for me is that boys are more likely to be hiperactive and also rebel from not being able to adapt to being "obedient" workers during childhood. Let's say, even me in school, have always been a straight A grades, i'd often skip classes i deemed uninteresting subjects, and was often bored of having like 5 hours of classes with just like 10 mins of interval between each. I'd rather spend my time playing basket for example, even if i…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/16 10:55 PM
1

I don't think its a guy at all. It'd make perfect sense, a guy knows better, even blue pillers
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/16 07:16 PM
1

lol. 17?! That's really too young to dwell into thinking your an incel. You're really too young, it's not uncommon for women to lose their V-card in college or even after finishing. Just live your life, be happy, improve, seize the opportunity, things will eventually follow.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/16 04:27 PM
3

I'M shy so no thanks on game and whatever. Everyone has to make some efforts in order to learn and grow up. I can tell you that your stagnant attitude is rather unattractive, no offense.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/16 04:25 PM
5

... So you consider yourself an incel without ever trying to do anything about it?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/16 04:19 PM
3

Well, i'm afraid you can't tell that without asking. Pretty much every typical nerd is extremelly shy and wouldn't show it. Give it a try.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/16 04:18 PM
3

It is always positive. But not because it directly "rewards" them the validation they think they need, but because incels tend to overestimate the experience of having sex and feel they're losing out too much. Once they'd have sex, they'd realize how overrated it is by most society's feedback. It's cool, it feels good, but it isn't worth all the suffering to be honest. It's a fast way to change their ideas and gain confidence and abundance mentality.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/16 04:09 PM
3

Yeah, supply and demand is a start, but in reality there are a lot of other factors. For example, you're considering that top men will always pick top women, which isn't true. Men have lower standards and many might settle for someone who's deemed less attractive compared to average. On the other hand, a top women that doesn't pick a top man is most likely to prefer staying single than to lower their standards. A second factor is for example, adultery. There's a small subset, but significant eno…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/16 06:48 PM
2

Lololol, dude, you're way out of touch with reality. Im not a little kid nor thirsty and in fact my main problem with women was always putting them on a pedestal.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/16 03:57 PM
1

Obese doesn't make things difficult. Attitude does. Half of adult American women are "overweight" if we go by the government bmi ranges. 35% are "obese". Yet they have relationships, sex, marriage, kids. Damn, i should really move to America. I'm like "overweight" and i'm almost considered undatable because like 99% of guys around are at least slim. I'm thiner, taller and as handsome than, let's say, younger Jack Black and i can't find anyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/16 03:33 PM
2

Girls want to have sex. Not have some thirsty guy masturbate into their vaginal canal. It's really hard for women to find men who just don't wanna do that Which by itself makes it difficult for any bro to find a girl because she'll think that he just wants to use her as cum dumpster. Do you follow the train of thought? Good dudes don't have a label in their foreheads saying "i'll treat you like a princess".
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/16 03:29 PM
3

Where do you live? I'm in a mid-sized Canadian city and I frequent the "hip" bars fairly often. I live in Portugal. We're in the champion's league of the some of the most difficult women to date, according even to foreign PUA and stuff that come around to try their luck. Just by reference, we have princesses vs players, is the basic of our dating dynamics. In one way princesses are always too skeptical of a man's intentions and therefore almost never give away sex freely, in fact hookup culture …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/16 03:24 PM
2

Oh, cool troll bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/16 03:09 PM
2

It might be a little harder than you think. I'm pretty good-looking, and I can't remember the last time a person bought me a drink who wasn't already a friend. Different cultures probably. But where i live, women are basically used to be treated like a princess by her orbiters. . However, your depression would probably be worse as a woman. Women are about twice as likely to develop depression, for multiple biological reasons like hormones or predisposition towards migraines. I doubt i would be d…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/16 03:07 PM
3

I could find any bro a fat ugly girl to fuck in an instance. Nope, you can't. The fat ugly girl has 500 other candidates, possibly better candidates. What's the chance she's going to pick the fat ugly dude?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/16 02:51 PM
3

Women probably have it way harder. I can go on Tinder and find a fine lady in two seconds to slobber my rod, a girl can go on Tinder and just meet 500 thirsty guys who want to masturbate into her babyhole. ??? That is so wrong it's self refuting First you state: I can go on Tinder and find a fine lady in two seconds to slobber my rod Right after you state a girl can go on Tinder and just meet 500 thirsty guys who want to masturbate into her babyhole Do i have to explain to you how those two stat…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/16 02:43 PM
3

It's as difficult as job interviews. Only the best candidates get to be picked.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/16 02:41 PM
2

I wouldn't need to be hot. I'd just need to be as attractive as i am as a male. Problem solved.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/16 02:39 PM
2

That has nothing to do with how little sex is available to young men in comparison to their counterparts. Women have just as much sex as men do by logical necessity. They just tend to choose people of other demographics. When a young woman is dating someone 10 years older, there's someone with her age that is single.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/16 12:56 PM
2

Well, your post mostly answers itself, i'm not sure what you actually want to be explained. What I can't understand is exactly why this is the case. Why is it that an average looking woman on a dating site gets magnitudes more messages and 'likes' than her male equivalent? Why can a woman break up with her boyfriend and within a week have found a replacement, where as a male would struggle to do the same? Why can an average woman get sex at the drop of a hat, while an average man generally canno…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/16 12:46 PM
1

Oh i know i would. My life would be so much easier as a woman, specially given that most of my problems come from loneliness and depression, as a man all i can do is "man up" and being stoic, while being a woman half of my problems would have had an easy fix, since i'd have easy time on solving them, and on the other hand i'd have people worried about me. I'd have free drinks any time, lots of sex, and living the dream basically. I find literally no benefits in being a man. Being regarded as str…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/16 11:51 AM
13

No one ever stops maturing, aside from people without a functioning brain. We learn until we die. Humanity is so complex that we have to.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/16 10:52 AM
2

Well, i've seen it first hand, but i'm unsure of how prevalent it is, but given that about 75% of women do have babies, it is probably high. But in anedoctal evidence, i've seen women that were pushing mid 30's or even 40's that out of a sudden became a widow or single, and they basically grabbed the opportunity at the first available male and had kids within the first year of relationship. On a side note, it's actually scary how open they were and anyone could tell they were in "steal dna for m…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/16 05:31 PM
7

Hmm, you talk as if "trying hard" gets you somewhere? I'm pretty sure many of them probably try too hard, and emit a vibe of neediness and desperation that women can see through and run away like a plague. I've been there, working hard on attractiveness, exercising like mad, but the lack of abundance mentality and neediness literally completelly set me back no matter how attractive i looked. It was when i stopped caring that i actually got some luck with women. Other than that, even if we all we…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/16 11:07 AM
2

but also very little capacity for discipline and long term Quite the contrary. Many psychopaths end up being CEOs, politicians, and others, because they have little moral codes and are functionally some of the best "managers" a group can have in capitalistic terms. They don't hesitate being harsh to their workers, firing them, cutting their salaries or demand more productivity, etc. Also, they are the ones that are more likely to sabotage co-workers reputation in order to climb the social ladder…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/16 04:25 PM
1

Oh of course, because humans aren't social animals with social and emotional needs.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/16 03:53 PM
1

Of course it makes biological sense. Looks aren't everything when it comes to reproducing and granting success to their siblings, the same way looks aren't everything in a woman to grant reproductive success. Many prostitutes are actually very hot, but i'm afraid you won't find many men willing to marry one. Why? Because men most often than not, prefer reliable women that have good genes but that can also grant that his sons are really his. The same way, attractiveness isn't everything when it c…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/16 03:47 PM
1

I never said the contrary, i was simply stating that being privileged doesn't make anyone "superior" to anyone else in the sense op has staten. Note that the way he stated "superior" is not in terms of social position, but in terms of being "better" and more worthy of those privileges.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/16 12:15 AM
1

Why do people have to strawman everything
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/16 09:19 PM
6

Welcome to the 21st century liberal narrative. People who are superior to you are evil, privileged by definition. There is nothing more noble than the person so oppressed that they have accomplished nothing. Hold your horses. Don't go from 8 to 80. There are indeed "privileged" people who have a lot more "luck" in the condictions that were given to them without merit, and hard workers in both privileged and lesser privileged people. Being privileged isn't inherently being superior, but being sup…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/16 07:14 PM
1

I would basically second this, but i'm afraid it isn't "just" a cultural construct. I think it'd be quite evident that hormones do affect behaviour and sensibility to those hormones determine how these behaviours might appear "naturally". In many animals, we can see clear patterns of behaviour that separate both genders, and i'm afraid we can't really blame it to "cultural" influence, since they appear as a dynamic between genders even from a young age and without any sort of "interference" from…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/16 06:59 PM
9

Yes, of course. AMALT, for sure. We men, are pure evil and entitled sob's, we're not even humans and we can't suffer from emotional and mental problems. Obviously last time i felt rejected and angry i ended up mass murdering a few million people.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/16 11:17 AM
1

It's funny, because i'd replace "looks" with "status" and it makes a lot more sense to me. Pretty much anyone with sense knows "status" are pretty much the only factor that truly matters when it comes to dating. Most other things have very little impact on overall dating success (this isn't to say certain things won't matter to certain women, but that in terms of OVERALL success status is the main decider). Yet I rarely see it brought up by people who claim to know the truth. Most seem to ignore…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/16 07:46 PM
1

I think /u/monkeysinmypocket hit the spot. Humans are more complex than simply divided in two or three categories, most people wouldn't actually fit any of them in the way that most people paint it in TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/16 08:37 PM
1

I think /u/monkeysinmypocket hit the spot. Humans are more complex than simply divided in two or three categories, most people wouldn't actually fit any of them in the way that most people paint it in TRP. What there is though, and i think that's irrefutable, is the concept that relationships tend to have a "dominant vs passive" dynamic in which people tend to fall into one of the categories when socializing with someone else. Even within twins, there will always be a dominant and a passive twin…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/16 08:36 PM
1

I think you hit the spot. Humans are more complex than simply divided in two or three categories, most people wouldn't actually fit any of them in the way that most people paint it in TRP. What there is though, and i think that's irrefutable, is the concept that relationships tend to have a "dominant vs passive" dynamic in which people tend to fall into one of the categories when socializing with someone else. Even within twins, there will always be a dominant and a passive twin, in which one ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/16 08:35 PM
1

I think you hit the spot. Humans are more complex than simply divided in two or three categories, most people wouldn't actually fit any of them in the way that most people paint it in TRP. What there is though, and i think that's irrefutable, is the concept that relationships tend to have a "dominant vs passive" dynamic in which people tend to fall into one of the categories when socializing with someone else. Even within twins, there will always be a dominant and a passive twin, in which one ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/16 08:35 PM
1

I think you hit the spot. Humans are more complex than simply divided in two or three categories, most people wouldn't actually fit any of them in the way that most people paint it in TRP. What there is though, and i think that's irrefutable, is the concept that relationships tend to have a "dominant vs passive" dynamic in which people tend to fall into one of the categories when socializing with someone else. Even within twins, there will always be a dominant and a passive twin, in which one ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/16 08:35 PM
1

Of course "going beta" is a viable alternative for humans. It's in fact statistically way more viable for reproduction per se on modern societies, there's a reason for why beta males have been increasingly prevalent in the world, many betas are more willing to work hard enough to achieve higher statuses and being better providers for their partners, while alphas usually might actually be screwed up by other during their lifes simply because of people being jealous of them. It's something that i …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/16 08:21 PM
8

Not really, it's arguable that for example asian people have a lot more percentage of "beta" providers than the western world, the "patriarchy" has been much stronger in such countries and it's hard to really see an asian "Chad". White people are being fair game for "hateful identity politics", mostly because our women have way more freedom of speech and agency to bash the beta male here, and it's arguable that we're far too tolerant of hate speech and accepting of foreign people that later lobb…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/16 08:07 PM
7

Depends on the ammount of hair i would say. In humans, the ammount of hair is somewhat directly related to hormones, and it'd be natural that men would have preference for women with a better display of healthy features, including of course, hormonal balances. It's also a mix of aesthetics and hygiene obviously. Let's say, most people prefer "clean" partners. Naturally, for most of human history, our hygiene was pretty bad as well, but nonetheless it seems that even as little hygiene as one woul…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/16 02:20 PM
2

, I honestly think a traditional, patriarchal society would not suit me either. I can't be traditionally feminine even though I have tried in the past. Hey, i don't think most people around TRP would really contest the idea of women having the same rights and determination to decide their future, nor that "feminism" as in equal rights for women is the cause of destruction of society, aside from some angered individuals of course. I personally don't abuse my rights at all. I don't even vote becau…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/16 11:56 PM
1

Alpha and Beta male are just simplistic terms for "dominance" dynamics between people. When you put 2 people socializing, with time one of them will assert their dominance over the other person, through gestures, attitudes and leadership. That said, there aren't exactly "requirements" or thresholds for someone to be regarded as alpha or beta. It's just only a matter of how the person inserts in his own social hierarchy amongst others. A high status male might feel intimidated amongst a group of …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/16 05:18 PM
2

It'd be perfect for me. During my life i've suffered too much from cognitive dissonance between the belief systems i've been indoctrinated with and the reality that things are literally different than those so called believes, which mainly would revolve that my own beliefs for a long time was exactly the belief that men and women had simillar sexuality and sexual preferences, attraction and love for each others. Oh god, was i wrong. You wouldn't believe the shock i had when i realized that women…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/16 04:38 PM
1

There's nothing inherently wrong with TRP overview. But certainly, many people, either driven by anger or ignorance, exagerate and use hyperbolic terms and generalizations, but nonetheless, the basic phenomena is real, and there's nothing inherently wrong with the ideas that humans are products of socialization a selection, and that those factors determine a lot of the dating scene, hook up culture and the analysis of the dynamics between genders.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/16 04:26 PM
4

Well, it isn't surprising at all given the fact that men commit suicide 4x more often. If you have let's say, 10% depressed women and 10% depressed men, but then out of those 10% only 1% women commit suicide while 4% men commit it, you'll always be left with 9% female survivors and 6-5% of male survivors, so it's not surprising that in the end, there will be more "female" survivors than males which explain rates of 2:1 and the sorts.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/16 10:23 AM
1

Depression is an hormonal suppressor, specially for men, so it's not surprising that depressed men have lower ammounts of free testosterone available.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/16 10:19 AM
1

Hmm, when i mean "men", i mean the desirable and successful males that fill the social construct of the gender role and are successful in terms of reproduction and attractiveness that obtain female attention, obviously the ones that are "unwanted" are mostly the ones farther from the ideal of "men" that women desire and are willing to settle for. In our society like in animals, there's always variations and diversity, but there's also patterns on females choices that define the dynamics of what'…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/16 02:49 PM
2

Well, the true answer in my opinion is more complex than it would seem. Evolutionarily, men are exactly how women want them to be. For billions of years, animals have been reproducing sexually, selecting desirable traits that ensure then next generation survival and prosperity, and a common trait accross most of the spectrum is that "females" of a species gets usually to be the choosers and the responsible for selecting males and desirable traits to replicate, and as any other animal species, ou…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/16 01:39 PM
3

Actually, it'd probably suck for men. Don't forget that it works the other way around too. If women had Brad Pitt sex bots, less of a reason to interact with males, and they'd be able to go to sperm banks to reproduce. I think sex bots would actually give men an hard time.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/16 04:34 PM
1

As i said, we're all emotionally biased for most things. Being able to separate emotions from reality and analyse objectivelly even if the truth 'hurts' is a matter of education and discipline.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/16 11:52 AM
1

I agree. I believe it is more education based than anything else. There are women that are perfectly capable of analysing things rationally instead of emotionally biased, meanwhile that are men that are also the opposite, AWALT is just an example of it. We all have emotional bias when it comes to certain opinions, it's up to education to learn how to differenciate and separate it from logical conclusions.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/16 10:17 AM
1

Men like submissiveness and sensitivity. Submissive, not exactly, depends on the guy. There are plenty of men that like to be the submissive and are attracted over dominant women. I know plenty of relationships where "she" is basically the "man" and he's the submissive guy. Sensitivity, i'm quite uncertain, depends on the sensitivity type. Bitter women are never pleasant the same way a man isn't, so not all sorts of sensitivity. Also, i completelly despise women that pretend to be fragile or rat…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 08:27 PM
1

To put this simple, i frankly believe that a woman with all these traits combined, has more chance than a man with just a single one of those traits.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 05:16 PM
3

Creepy? Excuse me , but a woman to be regarded creepy, she must be like borderline crazy psychotic sadist killer. A shy woman or awkward woman won't be seen as creepy. For a man, sometimes even just a weird eye contact can be enough to be labeled creepy.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 05:14 PM
3

A. Shyness B. Awkwardness C. Submissiveness D. Quiet E. Lack of leadership capability F. Weakness G. Sensitivity H. Nerdy interests Let's take it another way, have you ever found an ugly girl engaged in which the guy said "oh, i love that she's insensitive" "oh she's extroverted, that's so cute"; "I'm attracted to the fact that she's a leader". Etc. Neither those traits nor the lack of them are really traits that are seen in negative or positive light to be honest. Actually more often than not, …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 05:11 PM
6

I'm a maths student and more than half of my female colleagues ressemble you're left example. They're all in happy relationships with a boyfriend. I really can't say the same for most male nerds in my classes.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 09:51 AM
1

Funnily enough i have a friend that was hooking up with a girl with exactly those traits and she didn't have a problem getting boyfriends, in fact she was in polyamorous relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/16 09:42 AM
1

Marx didn't advocate or invent social security or public schooling as we know them. He doesn't get credit for government programs that contribute to the stability of the current regime. Yes he did advocate. Not only Marx, as there are plenty of socialists involved in the theory, but socialism is based on a centralization of public(state) ownership of production and private property, and the state basically provides health and education and is responsible for creating a society that will abolish …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/16 10:06 PM
3

I think that 3rd wave feminism is wrong in terms of ideological approach and concrete reality. The world is much more complex than simply the approach of "white men = evil enemy" " women = oppressed class", there's evolutionary, psychological and sociological reasons for why this sort of society came to be that doesn't involve exactly a one-sided fault in it's construction. That said, I'm not against fighting "oppression" of women in terms of lack of rights or being abused in third world countri…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/16 05:24 PM
1

Specifically, almost everything Marx ever posited has been proven wrong. Hmm? Not really. Actually many of the things have been implemented with success pretty much in half world, like social security, poverty support, free healthcare and education and etc. Inequality isn't the result of oppression. It's the result of differences owed to status, wealth, and primarily ambition. Most millionaires are first generation millionaires. Most workers have the means to start their own businesses. They jus…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/16 05:15 PM
1

What do you mean superficial? Aesthetical? Aesthetically I would say an ugly face is a real turn off for me, specially when combined with bad hygiene. But when i mean ugly, i really mean it. Borderline disfigured or close to it. Non aesthetical, i would say weird voices. I just can't handle girls with voices that make me cringe. I really can't explain it though lol. I've seen hot women that the moment they opened their mouth i was instantly turned off.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/16 09:21 PM
2

I've had a bunch of unicorn friend in which i crushed, never got anywhere even before i knew about RP. They technically crushed every dellusion i had about "love".
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/16 09:13 PM
2

No. I actually like bisexual women and i'm romantic. For me, it'd tell that they want more than just a Chad.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/16 09:10 PM
2

Yes, most men in the world are defective. In one way or another the vast majority of the men are not sexually attractive and have no possibility to become attractive. Most women find most men to be below average, dude. When was the last time you ever saw an average woman approach an average man and offer him sex? You got it all wrong. Women just don't settle for the average men if they think they can get better, and men usually lower their standards for sex. By the way, not being Tom Cruise, doe…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/16 07:20 PM
0

Yep, my mother for instance is one of them. Determined strong women, doesn't give two shit about what others think about her, always assertive but she's basically a control freak that dictates everything in her household. Not sure i would marry one though, i'm sort of anti-submissive and rebellious, and don't like to be bossed around.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/16 06:45 PM
2

Defective, lol. You certainly can't be serious. You realize you're saying that more than 50% of males in the world are defective because they don't reach 6 feets. You're completelly delluded by some weird concept of "normality". Also, your kind of attitude is obviously characteristic of a person with a certain degree of anti-social disorder, so guess what, you're defective.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/16 06:18 PM
2

5'5'' is average on several countries in the world and certainly within parameters of like 90% of the world population.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/16 05:42 PM
1

I'd genuinely like to hear more about this. How might it work? For all RP likes to talk about SMP/SMV, sexual attraction and romantic interest actually isn't something that we can directly control and distribute like some commodity. Well, at the moment i'm with a massive hangover and it'll be hard to make some logic out of this, but i'll try to give my take. Sure, sexual attraction and romantic interest can't exactly be "controled" because they are partially biological imperatives, but i don't t…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/16 05:35 PM
3

You're confusing capitalism with a trade and monetary system, both are different things. By the way, communism isnt capitalist at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/16 02:38 PM
0

I feel the author is mostly right in a few things. Hook up culture is indeed a new paradigm that was envisioned by a few communists that wanted woman's liberation and independence from being "owned" by the system. But on the other hand, i believe she makes the point that besides being a "socialistic" paradigm, the "capitalistic" nature of hooking up and our education into being way too much self-centered, narcisistic and individualists, are the source of much of the pain/suffering involving the …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/16 01:05 PM
1

I don't think you got the authors attempt at connecting capitalism with hook up culture's selfish and narcisistic reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/16 12:58 PM
2

You wouldn't know if you were a virgin. That's my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/16 09:39 AM
3

Nah, the extensive criteria checklist usually ammounts to someone much better than themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/16 09:38 AM
5

I know what you mean in terms of sex quality, but i'm speaking about validation. A person that can get even a meaningless ONS feels validated. A prostitute might give you the best sex of your life in terms of "experience", but it still won't give you any sort of validation. It's hard to give a comparison, but that's what most male incels will look for when they are into sex. Self-esteem in guys is very much dependable on validation from opposite sex when it comes to being in that position. I cou…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 09:43 PM
4

Yeah i feel you bro. Sometimes there's nothing inherently wrong with us, and becomes a sort of a cyclical decay into introversion and insecurity due to negative feedback that perpetuates even more insecurity. Good thing is, changes can be made.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 09:29 PM
7

Same with men. Men who want sex but can't get it can go get a prostitute. Sure. But let's face it, it's still better to have a voluntary partner that tries his/her best than resorting to a professional with which sex is meaningless.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 09:25 PM
3

Well yeah. More than intimacy or sex, it'd be validation from the opposing sex that'd be more important for a male incel.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 09:19 PM
1

Now I sound like one of those gits writing about how women can get casual sex any minute of the day! Funny thing, they do xd.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 09:17 PM
5

Well, woman isn't an insult, but yeah, when someone is telling you that "you think like a woman" in a sort of dismissing your argument, it'd probably meant as a sort of insult for percieved lack of empathy or understanding about issues on men. It's not really different than being called misoginistic when someone comes with the argument "what about the menz?".
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 09:14 PM
3

A "good man" for most women is usually the same as saying "someone who's simillar or higher status and is willing to provide for my children and can fullfil my extensive criteria checklist of the personality he should have"
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 09:09 PM
2

But that's what i'm saying. There are guys who'll want to use a woman just for sex, but those are usually the ones that think they are of "higher value" or deserve more than her in terms of intimacy and aren't certainly incels. The incels that would desire intimacy with her, are either invisible, self-excluded or simply wouldn't approach women because of their insecurity and inexperience. When i was a virgin and wanting some intimacy, i used to find it odd how girls/women couldn't see through a …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 09:03 PM
2

Hmm, yeah i see what you mean, but technically a woman can usually find someone who wants some intimacy with her. The incels/fa guys are mostly a testimonial to that. With the desperation they have, they'd rather go for prostitutes if they only desired sex, than endure all sorts of pain and depression.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 08:53 PM
2

I feel you bro. xD. Way too many missed opportunities
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 08:50 PM
2

But on the other hand for some strange reasons even omega incels can empathise with women who only get used for sex when they want a relationship. Well, we all live in a feminist community, and are sort of grown to learn about those through life, and i would dare saying that many incel end up where they are by strictly opposing that view of "using" women and trying to engage into relationships. It's just when they realize that they're inexperienced and that women are shallow about those things, …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 08:30 PM
1

Several ones, mainly, that both women and men have different standards for hooking up, and how those standards get played in the dating scene, their consequences and why some people are successful and others are not. So TRP is in sum a sort of brainstorming community that tries to analyse dating scene and how to be successful by acknowledging tendencies.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 08:21 PM
2

How could they? For most of them, it was granted and easy, they never reached a point of desperation where they felt "lonely" in terms of intimacy. They also don't face the same ammount of social and hormonal pressure to lose it either way.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 08:15 PM
2

Hmm, it's not that women can't be socially awkward or lonely, i think the point is that those are really not going to determine if they do get laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 08:12 PM
1

You're definitely into something. Sure sex is important part of a relationship, but incels are mainly looking for emotional intimacy and validation with the opposite sex. And let's just say this, i've never been with hookers, but it probably sucks to lose your virginity with someone who's not even into you and is doing it strictly professionaly.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 07:59 PM
1

There's so much "broscience" in hormonal issues and interested hormone replacement corporation studies that you can't tell for sure, and even your linked study, only shows correlation, but not causation. I could show you plenty of studies that say there's a correlation between low-T and smoking cannabis, and other studies that wouldn't find any evidence. Be careful when you rely on studies in the internet.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 10:01 AM
1

LLol. Being fat has nothing in particular to do with low testosterone, its quite the opposite. Aromatase converts excess testosterone into estrogen and vice versa, thats why both fat genders have higher ammounts of testosterone or estrogen converted.. Body builders that dont take aromatase inhibitors also grow man boobs often. I'm fat but my test is often so high i feel like i'm in roid rage of sort.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/16 10:23 PM
1

Yeah, depends on the feminism. But guess what, gender studies and most informed feminists are far from the kind of bullcrap we see spread daily in the media.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/16 08:03 PM
1

TL;DR: Someone who was brainwashed into believing in radical feminism, that "patriarchy is a conspiracy from men" and "gender roles are imposed by patriarchy", blah blah blah. Next.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/16 07:38 PM
3

Yeah, it was a misuse of wording. Read what i stated above.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/16 05:19 PM
3

Nope. English is just not my primary language. I meant child support. Where i live, alimony and child support are the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/16 05:14 PM
2

Well, you'll see mostly feminists defending that the father should pay alimony for the child that isn't his, and combating the idea of obligatory DNA tests.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/16 04:52 PM
3

Lol, wanting to humiliate you? Really? What kind of women do you surround yourself with? And by the way, why would you even care? Now dude, fearing women, thats exactlly a "beta" trait as you'd like to call.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/16 11:21 PM
3

Why do you have to be a beta orbiter? You're only a beta orbiter if you're trying to jump to her pants through being nice and stuff. She's just a person. On the bonus side, it's possible that if she gets to see you hanging around flirting with other women, that she'll get jealous and you turn tables around. Double profit.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/16 10:21 PM
2

Not really. Female friendships are great to develop social skills with them, understanding them better, and on the bonus side, they might have other female friends that you get to meet and hook up with. And well, you know, they are also people that have interests, and can debate and discuss interesting topics and share some good time. Do you only hang out with guys you wanna fuck with?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/16 09:54 PM
1

I'm certain you can find articles about this within a few clicks. It's not something exactly new.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/16 07:56 AM
1

Well, there sort of is. Both high intelligence and low intelligence spectrum have positive correlations with increased mental illnesses/personality disorders. The virtue is in the middle xD.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/16 09:53 PM
2

Isn't it obvious that social and emotional intelligence is much more of a factor when it comes to relationships and getting laid? Also, in terms of romantic relationships, most intelligent people wouldn't find any fun in being with someone significantly less intelligent than them. For instance, it's hard to engage in many social conversations when you feel most themes and people are actually really dumb comparing to you and don't amuse or entertain you at all (yes i'm a narcisist too). So, it's …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/16 09:42 PM
2

You clearly have not read the study because you still do not understand what they actually did. They measured sexual pleasure during condom-protected penile–vaginal intercourse, and looked at associated variables. For example, men who were more sexually experienced were more likely to report higher sexual pleasure during complete condom use. Do you understand now? No, they didnt "measure". They read the report in men's personal "sex diaries" and came up to their own conclusions. Did you even rea…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/16 09:35 PM
2

Yep, and read much more before.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/16 09:19 PM
2

You clearly did not understand/read the study. Oh i clearly did. I understand completelly that their methodology is completelly ridiculous it's nothing like a real serious study. Let me quote Using the Internet, Indiana University researchers offered men over 18 a dozen free condoms plus instruction about proper use if they kept 30-day sex diaries. A diverse group of 1,875 men signed up and reported intercourse 8,876 times (an average of 4.7 times during the test month) with 5,249 sexual interlu…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/16 09:16 PM
2

The science that informs medicine – including the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of disease – routinely fails to consider the crucial impact of sex and gender. This happens in the earliest stages of research, when females are excluded from animal and human studies or the sex of the animals isn’t stated in the published results. Once clinical trials begin, researchers frequently do not enroll adequate numbers of women or, when they do, fail to analyze or report data separately by sex. This …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/16 09:02 PM
2

Funnily enough there's been a study on the topic recently. The majority of men didn't have an issue with condoms. However, "sexually unsophisticated men who experience sex problems may blame their difficulties on condoms". Wow, now having pleasure in intercourse is a matter of "sophistication". Funnily enough at the end conclusion "In other words, sexually unsophisticated men who experience sex problems may blame their difficulties on condoms. But older, more experienced lovers whose sex include…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/16 08:29 PM
3

My husband was unemployed when we met and unemployed when we got married. I wouldn't call hoping to marry someone rich a realistic career choice for anyone though, man or woman. Oh, i know so many women that desired and obtain that as a "career" choice. I've never seen a man do it because it's unrealistic. About your case, well, i guess your the 0,000...1% percentile that is contrary to the norm.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/16 08:04 PM
3

A) a vasectomy =/= castration. Ok, sterilization, do you like the word better? B) plenty of men do not find condoms makes sex insensitive. I'd go so far as to say the majority of men would vehemently disagree that condoms make sex not worth it. Nope. Why do you think so much campaign is made for "extra sensitive" condoms? Most condoms severelly affect the penis sensitivity, both sensibility to friction, to the warm and humidity. How exactly does that makes me anti-abortion? You said yourself, me…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/16 08:02 PM
1

All in all, getting taken more seriously doesn't seem like much of a benefit in the end. - health care is very much catered towards men Hmm? Not really, why would you say that? There's several campaigns mostly directed to women, and even medical specialities dedicated only to women, like obstectrician, gynecologists, and there's none for men's reproductive system other than urologists. And men aren't really encouraged to check for their health issues, and any visit to any hospital will mostly sh…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/16 07:51 PM
3

So no, they are not in any way comparable to the side effects of pregnancy/abortion. I don't know why are you throwing side effects of pregancy abortion around. But either way, male contraception is either to make sex insensitive, to castrate or abstinence. All in all, there's really no reward in making protected sex in a sense for men, if it boils down to either not even feeling it or having permanent damage from it. Yes. Then that makes you anti-abortion? I mean, people have all those alternat…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/16 07:35 PM
3

Do they? What's the incidence of someone unemployed marrying a successful woman, or even being able to attract her? Can someone realistically have that as a career choice?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/16 07:25 PM
3

What side effects do condoms have? Out of all those above cited, it's certainly the one with less side effects. But in personal experience, condoms ruin your sensitivity and can ruin your boner, and make it so that having sex with it is really no different than masturbation. not have sex with a fertile man. Would you seriously say that? Or recommend sterilization?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/16 03:11 PM
6

Yeah, FA women are not single because they are shy. There's other factors holding them back that don't exactly involve being shy, i'm pretty sure that they would and still are approached regularly. A guy on the other hand, being shy won't get them anywhere in the dating scene. The probability a woman approaches them are very very low, and the probability that a woman gives him a chance even when he approaches are still very low, because shy guys will inevitably be nervous, too condescendent and …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/16 02:52 PM
2

In today's world, if a woman's being raped or beaten on the street, the typical response is to just look and stare or ignore her. Many don't even call the police or 911, they don't pick up their damn phones. They just keep walking or staring. I can show you a number of news stories showing the same exact thing Ok, it must be an US thing. I live in Portugal, and i've never seen a women go unprotected in the streets. But then again, people aren't armed, so they don't fear other people having guns …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/16 02:46 PM
7

Vulnerable women aren't protected these days. Lol. What? Well, i don't live in the US so i can't say how it is there. But personally, i defend women everywhere when the opportunity comes and can count several different situations in which i always saw women protected. Personally, i have done it since i was a child, almost by instinct. Haven't seen anything changing about that. Women are protected by either other males or other females, i find that irrefutable in my experience. Unfortunately can'…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/16 02:12 PM
5

I said Men are more bullied in school Have you ever took an objective look on how males and females lack empathy for someone that shows vulnerability? How often have you seen a bullied guy being helped/defended, and how often have you seen a vulnerable woman being defended, by both genders?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/16 01:45 PM
2

Ah, lol, who told you i want to learn how to succeed with dudes here? Dude, or should i say, woman, you can't analyse what you don't even think about or are emotionally bias. This is why psychological diagnosis/treatments can't be made by yourself or someone close. I've had plenty of great girl friends over the years, even some "best friends" that were women, none of them could even say what exactly they'd like in a guy. Most people by norm are not that introspective to say the least.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/16 01:41 PM
2

Also, men may not have control of abortions but they can still use condoms, get a vasectomy, or abstain from sex with a fertile woman. Women are the ones who actually have to go through abortion/pregnancy. All with a lot of side effects and sometimes unrealistic. Abstain from having sex with a fertile woman, really? lol. Ok, i guess that'd be an argument for women too.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/16 01:37 PM
8

You'll still be successful in many things if you're a shy woman. Not a man. Shy women are cute, shy men are creepy. And that's how the generalizations mostly hold.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/16 01:33 PM
7

How about: Males: No real option than being a workaholic and work your ass off as a career, and never be able to prospect for any sort of provider for him otherwise Females: Having the choice of being stay at home mothers, easier time marrying someone richer than herself or with more qualifications to provide or her.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/16 01:32 PM
7

Women asks for help/support/compassion - millions of white knights/sjw's/random people helping. Men asks for help/support/compassion - "loser" " man up" "stop crying like a baby" "who cares" And well, then there's the social repercussions of showing vulnerability as well. Men are more bullied in school because of showing their vulnerability, and overall in society as well. Many men can't wait to jump on the wagon to humilliate some vulnerable dude, and women mostly lack respect for men that show…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/16 01:27 PM
1

Apparently the majority of RP believes that it is better to take advice on how to get laid from random dudes on the Internet as opposed to listening to and observing actual women. Most women are incapable of having an objective overview and advice that could help men. It takes a good dose of introspection and emotional unbias to take the right evaluation about much of everything, and so if someone is emotionally biased and lacks introspection, it's unlikely they can analyse their own "preference…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/16 09:52 AM
1

Yep, i agree with the op. On relationship advice, most women will say even stuff that won't really help you much or get anywhere near conquering them, it seems like most of them don't really take an objective look at what they really want, and say redundanct things like "be nice"/"be yourself"/"bring up your charm". Like, really? Wow, i couldn't figure that out at all if it wasn't for them. :/
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/16 09:23 PM
20

Damn, poor guy. Probably some hopeless soul being abused psychologically if not physically.
/r/MensRights11/04/16 02:08 PM
2

Uh, look what? You still haven't explained what exactly fascism and the red pill have in common in their ideas and have only pointed out a falaccious argument that there's some interception between their adepts.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/16 02:00 AM
1

I think you have most of the definitions of fascism right, but i simply don't see why you'd want to relate it to a theory of the sexual "market", when it fact it seems to me there's little relation between them. Sure, plenty of users around might be somewhere near being fascists, but i'm unsure that has really any connection to the red pill. For instance, i identify somewhere between a anarcho-communist/marxist, but i agree with most of the red pill "ideology", in terms of analysis of much of th…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/16 09:49 PM
3

The Nazis were considered fascist, but weren't they also National Socialists? I know socialists of today will say they weren't true socialists, but if I'm not mistaken they had socialized schooling, socialized medicine, and whole host of other social programs for the German people which we would today consider socialist. "Socialism" is mostly a economical and governmental system, not really an "ideology" per se. It's sort of saying that capitalism is an ideology, when it's merely an economical s…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/16 09:42 PM
1

I'm afraid it isn't going to be anywhere near as good as you think
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/16 02:26 PM
1

Being a young teenage through the end of 60's and start of 70's would be awesome, and getting the profit of most "revolutions" there were through those decades. Sexual revolution, hippies, great music, little to no fear of STD's, easy work, lots of drugs and alcohol, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/16 02:24 PM
1

I think you're having the wrong projection of viking's era. I'm quite certain it isn't anywhere near as awesome as you think it is. By the way, don't know if you know, but the vikings had one of the worse gender ratios ever, and part of the reason they started wars was to basically kidnap women, because they lack them.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/16 02:22 PM
2

Major depression and social anxiety, and highly neurotic overall. Both currently treated but could relapse any time if i down spiral again in my life.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/16 12:04 PM
1

Nah, theres more women than men in general. Boys die a lot more and start being in disadvantage in somewhere near their mid-20's/30's.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/16 11:55 AM
1

White knights are tipically the men indoctrinated with deep misoginy or deep radical feminism, that hold the view that women ought to be protected from the "villains" (all other men), and that seize the opportunity to always make his defence clear in the situation, but their defense is often hypocrital and expecting a payback in return in form of love or sex. The same way a PUA can pretend to be an asshole to get girls attracted, the white knight does the entirelly opposite, he feels that by pro…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/16 07:50 PM
0

I didn't mean rape per se. I mean women weren't choosing mates for sexual arousal. They were choosing for high probability of survival. Also depends on the epoch i would say. If i'm not wrong, some recent evidences suggest that in pre-agricultural ages, men and women lived on promiscuous societies were sex was often used as a "trade" and pleasurable activity. There's also some sexual dismorphism in men that would suggest that high rates of sexual competition happened at some points in human evol…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/16 01:10 PM
3

Men have always been judged by their looks in certain eras. I don't know why people assume that we "always" lived in a patriarchy, since most evidence states that patriarchal systems only started with the development of agriculture and economies.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/16 12:31 PM
5

Even if looks mattered to ancient woman, she would over powered by a man anyway. I doubt it. Even tribal civilizations that we know of, or even primates if we go that far, it isn't typical for a male to "abuse"/rape a female nor to forcefully marry it, in fact for both instances it's usually normal that the same happens as today as women are the choosers and men were mostly the askers. Rape within a community is always seen as despicable and unwelcomed.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/16 12:29 PM
1

Nah. Bad boys are just not bending over backwards to please them, but that's not being mean. To the girl they like they are very protective. You're confusing being a needy beta with being a nice guy. Nice guys also don't necessarily "bend over backwards to please them". Nice guys, are just that, nice guys, or the opposite of being douchebags, and doesn't have to be to please anyone. Not everyone is a sociopathic douche that pretends to be "nice" to persuade people dude. Most "nice guys" are just…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/16 10:10 AM
1

I feel this is a bunch of strawmans that you're trying to construct and refute. The opposition between "nice guys" vs bad boys, doesn't include any other inherent characteristic than the nice guys being nice guys, and the bad boys, being mean, specially when it comes to women. What follows by this is that women percieve that "nice" is seen as weak, and bad boys, are seen as egotistical douches, and a lot of women find the mean guys way more attractive than the nice ones, because it intrinsically…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/16 06:26 PM
2

Of course she doesn't care, they're male. If they were female getting rape in prison, there would be a scandal though
/r/MensRights04/04/16 10:02 PM
7

Uh, both women and men are? That's the point of the whole realization about the dating scene strategy, and how men and women analyse their potential partners. It's mostly inherently based upon reproductive conduct. The most desirable men and women, are the ones inherently that "offer" the most healthy "genes" to reproduce, and the most safety/success to their children. That's not even a TRP specific idea i would say.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/16 07:01 PM
1

damn xD
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/16 09:41 PM
2

TIL men should be put in jail for decades without proof. Thanks misandrists.
/r/MensRights02/04/16 07:41 PM
1

Lot's of my female friends are single... And waiting for mr. Prince Charming to come by.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/16 02:37 PM
2

I used to be an incel. Sort of. Not necessarily involuntary, since i've had load of opportunities back then, but i was always delluded with some sort of fantasy about wanting to lose my virginity to someone "special", and even when i had the chance, i didn't man up to tease her. I was also an extreme feminist myself, and always "feared" the whole objectification and hurting the "feels" of my friend for approaching her. Then i suffered from depression for like 8 years in a row, and had a hard tim…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 06:37 PM
1

Urr, ok, if you stand by insults, obviously you're the idiot here. GuitarAeGettingOld said: He can't grow muscle. It's legit. Some people are non-responders to heavy weight training. I said O.o Unless someone has some sort of condition that doesn't allow it, or unless they're in perfect shape, there's really nothing preventing from a few gains in terms of tone and strenght. He denied. So, i'm the idiot for pointing out the fact that unless you had some health condition, not being able to get som…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 06:30 PM
1

Although to be fair, my bench press did start out at 30 kilos and went up to 45 in about three months or so. It then remained at that point for the next 3,5 years. So you do have the ability to build up muscle and you wonder why i'm skeptical? You just reached your natural limit, that's really not much different than most people, you just happen to have a lower limit than average. Most people that want to push harder resort to artificial enhancers that screws up their body even more.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 04:40 PM
3

I'm very skeptical about this if he has no "condition". If he's able to move around, he doesn't have a problem with satellite cells, otherwise he wouldn't even be able to maintain muscles. Some one can be a "low responder", but no responder requires someone to not be able to build muscle at all. Not everyone can get a perfect shaped body, but anyone with an healthy body can build some muscle with proper diet and training, given no health condition like low-T, anabolic problems, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 01:30 PM
3

O.o Unless someone has some sort of condition that doesn't allow it, or unless they're in perfect shape, there's really nothing preventing from a few gains in terms of tone and strenght.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 12:55 PM
5

What do you mean completely ruined? Are you with some sort of disease that doesn't allow you to make exercise?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/16 11:55 AM
1

Stalin, maybe, but marx or engels not necessarily. Engels specifically stated that if women were to stay at home caring for children, they should be payed wages for "non-payed" hours working at home. Ends up being sort of the same either way.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/16 12:04 AM
3

Certainly it does. That's the whole point on why the owner class is so keen in consumerism and the whole propaganda of the "dream" as the carrot they put ahead so you can keep working hard for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/16 01:37 AM
4

What about forming a society where the work week is 20-30 hours a week? It could take advantage of the increased productivity. What about making the workplace a place where individuality is accepted and people aren't just cogs in a machine? A culture where creativity is allowed to flourish. That would be ideal and feasible, it's just not really compatible with this sort of capitalism that involves harsh competition, with cheap replaceable products that wastes workload and money for the sake of h…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 11:57 PM
2

28 yrs old, 1 LTR.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 11:50 PM
3

As i said, i'm nothing against a woman pursuing a career and having ambitions, whatever serves you, i'm just saying that it's a common narrative and propaganda that people are brainwashed into to be competitive workers working for the "carrot" in the end of the line, and in our capitalistic society, being explored and working like a slave to never get out of the same "social class" is the exact opposite of what happiness is supposed to be. But either way, whatever fits you best and good luck wit…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 11:46 PM
1

I say leftists because right wingers tend to be ok with traditional gender roles I get what you mean, but left ideologies come in many shapes and colors, and for the most, it doesn't really include liberals that accept capitalism and it's consequences, it's pratically just a US thing to claim left wing ideologies as capitalistics. Leftists are by common basis "egalitarians" or anti-elitists in terms of rights and opportunities, but not necessarily on the outcome. But it doesn't necessarily follo…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 11:41 PM
4

I agree with most of what you wrote but i don't understand why you say "leftists" hate things that are feminine. Is leftist some sort of new insult to whoever you don't like? Well, apparently for some reason now capitalists are considered leftists, that's something i can't simply comprehend. But on the topic, i think what's underlying on most "feminist" discourse is the dellusion that having financial success brings happiness and that only masculine traits are desirable in the capitalistic marke…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 11:28 PM
6

what exactly in TRP is blantantly misoginy? There might be users around that might be, but that doesn't necessarily say anything about the ideas and concepts of TRP. TRP in itself is just a collection of concepts and ideas about how the dating scene/hook up works for humans, and the realization that both genders have a different sexual strategy, different standards and different "powers" over the dating scene, and mostly is about pointing out evidence to these facts that there is a tangible diff…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 11:13 PM
2

Good luck with your celibacy then!
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/16 03:17 AM
4

A guy can walk into a club and have sex with a woman that has a N-count of 200 to a thousand and is known to being easy. There are a few of them, but they don't care about quality all that much and aren't representative for the average women. I suppose i clearly live in the wrong place then, since i don't simply see these sort of girls. Either way, every bar a guy might get in that is known to be some place to hook up, he'll find that there's like 10 PUA guys in line for each woman to approach t…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/16 04:02 PM
5

They can just walk into a club and approach women, but a woman that wants quality sex needs to put in effort to achieve that. Don't you see the contradiction within the same sentence? A guy can just walk into a club and approach women. Women want quality sex. Therefore a guy can't just walk into a club and approach women to give him sex, because she's looking for quality sex. y/y?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/16 01:40 PM
4

He's surrounded by his privilege. Whatever that means. I think i lost a bunch of IQ points after watching this video. Is she not making any sense or am i the one having difficulty on interpreting whatever she means?
/r/MensRights20/03/16 01:22 AM
14

Dude, what? Humans aren't "born" with social skills, they learn it. If you grow up in a group of wolves you learn wolves' social skills. And it's certainly something you can work on. People with charisma train it on a regular basis. No one for example was born to do speeches on convincing manner, people just train and learn it. "The 10% who don't (Incels, FAs etc.) are all somewhat on the spectrum or have a disorder like anxiety. That isn't treatable " Oh, it must be a miracle that i treated my …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/16 01:48 PM
13

"let's say you had a parachute that opens just 1/4 of the times, would you jump from a plane?" :P
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/16 10:52 PM
1

We do have, but it's sort of rare to be honest. Most men are independent, i wouldn't say that most men are alpha either, but they don't really fit the definition of a beta bucks. That's why in my experience, the dichotomy between the two is unrealistic, there are never just "two profiles" of men in the world, that'd be really oversimplistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/16 11:31 AM
1

Well, everyone wants a top model of course as an unrealistic quasi perfect standard, but most people realize it's unattainable and there aren't that much people around that meet those standards. Chad might have high SMV but it isn't the only man in the world that is seen as attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/16 11:29 AM
1

Social validation? I know what you mean but no one has a "i am a virgin" label on them. People don't really know you're a virgin, and it's self induced ideas that you need to prove yourself to... yourself. When i was incel, it was the experience itself that really matter, and the thought of being afraid to die/get to old to initiate sexual experiences, was what i feared the most. Social validation was never that important, i really just wanted to prove myself that i was capable of getting laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/16 11:23 AM
1

Oh crap, and he was rejected the 1000 times. Poor dude. XD
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/16 11:19 AM
2

wat?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/16 11:18 AM
1

I don't think i'm that wrong, in US there's still such things as social classes. Let's say, at least homeless, poor, middle class, high middle class, riches, millionaires?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/16 11:16 AM
2

There's always some people at the bottom of any hierarchy.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/16 11:08 AM
1

No, i'm from portugal, and college around here are barely the top 20% people, maybe less. About the rest, well, i'm not saying that having money is all that matters. But it can certainly trump a lot of the other factors. What i meant when i say money, is mainly, in which "social" class you insert in. It's just then between a certain social class that you'll see women then picking other factors. But one thing is almost guaranteed, it's extremelly rare to see a woman dating someone who's deemed a …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/16 12:49 AM
1

There'd be lots of factors, but i'm guessing primarily two factors. The poor guy is willing to settle for less, and the sillicon valley nerd might probably be extremelly boring and looking for the wrong girls. There's such a thing as guys with unrealistic standards as well. If the nerds are expecting a woman that has rich "chads" as an option, the nerds will have an hard time.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/16 12:42 AM
1

When a woman rejects someone, it doesn't mean that it's because she isn't attracted to you necessarily. It could be she simply thinks she has better options. Many women might be attracted to chad, but they're also attracted to their more average SO that they think it's more LTR material. Many women can see through Chad and know they'll be pump and dumped. Doesn't mean they don't find anything else attractive other than chad.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/16 12:38 AM
2

There are men with significant mental and physical handicaps who are happily married all across the world. Somehow they found a partner. And many that dont. Still they were lucky enough to obviosly have another handicapped women that was willing to marry them. The problem with incel "non-handicapped" women and men is that incel men are below incel woman standards, and the "incel" woman, has had opportunities which she rejected. If even the average guy is willing to lower their standards to very …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/16 12:35 AM
2

Still, doing a decent approach of 1000 women, is kinda... Hmm. Tiresome? Dude will be with the moral of an amoeba when it comes to the right girl.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/16 12:28 AM
2

At the end of a day, the supply is 0. If 50 men and 10 women are on a bar looking to get laid, it's only normal that 10 women get to chose 10 guys, and the rest of the 40 men has to wait for another day. But guess what, the 10 lucky guys are there again the next day again to compete with the 40 unlucky men again. Second day, 10 new woman, the same 50 men. 10 new woman pick a selection of the best 10 guys. Next day same thing. Etc. How do you even figure that one day by some miracle the incel guy…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/16 12:24 AM
1

Dude. No. It. Doesn't. Do you understand that men are willing to have sex more often than women? Is this hard to get? Hard to figure the consequences?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/16 12:10 AM
1

Well, yeah. There's obviously thresholds on wealth. But let's say you win the lottery. Do you have any idea how many of your friends would suddenly find you a catch? ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/16 12:03 AM
1

Not really. Money is always an advantage, even for chad. A poor chad isn't worth an average looking rich guy for most girls.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/16 12:00 AM
1

Well, isnt college students already in a high social class themselves? Being in college isn't properly cheap.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 11:59 PM
2

Holy mother of god, really. Do you need a drawing? You go to a bar, there's 50 dudes, 10 girls, how do you concieve that there's supply for everyone? This is just an example of how the proportions work on a daily basis. Men are always more willing to chase the opportunity of having sex on a daily basis, and most women are ok with much less than that.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 11:54 PM
1

You forgot money. It takes money to be able to buy a good lifestyle. You can be George Clooney, but you won't get far if you're poor.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 11:43 PM
2

No, it's just a natural dynamic in any animal kingdom. Demand, supply, competition. That's the whole story really.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 11:37 PM
1

As someone that used to be an incel, i can tell you something, take it as you want to: Virginity and sex are overrated. Nothing special about all that. I get that you face some social pressure to meet expectations, but just believe me, it's not all that is made up to be. It's a cool experience, definetly overrated. Don't be so hard on you dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 11:31 PM
1

Sort of. What do you think came first, the chicken or the egg? I'm afraid it is the egg. Same as people that could be seen as creepy.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 11:27 PM
5

Yep, now she knows what's like to be a man. xD.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 11:24 PM
1

Just within the same social class, of course. You wouldn't believe how rare it is for a women to settle for someone who is in a lower social classes. While men on the other hand are willing to do it. That's part of the reason for why every once in a while you see a bunch of high status women saying "where have all the good men gone?". The men are there, they just married someone on a lower class.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 11:20 PM
2

I guess you missed the entire point of the thread. It's technically impossible for some men to get laid. There are always a % of men that don't fit the standards of all other women no matter how low men standards are, due to the simple fact that every dude are willing to lower standards just to get laid, and also, there's always a % top men that hold a bigger portion of the dating "market". Women are less available to "give away" sex, and men are more available to buy it. When the demand far sur…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 11:16 PM
2

Who said anything like that? This is just the realization of the fact that incel men are actually involuntary, while incel/FA women are not. Since women voluntarily make that choice of not lowering their standards and rather be alone, it can't be called involuntary, y/y?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 10:19 PM
2

Oh, good point, let's see an FA asking 3.5 billion women, shall we? lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 10:15 PM
1

You shouldn't be telling me that but the incels. I'm not one of them, i just know the position because i've been there before. And well, even looks aren't really enough in dating sites. I'm actually a good looking guy and back when i used dating sites i had a hard time getting a response.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 10:09 PM
1

Women do get "thirsty", it's just rare because they can easily get sex if they so desire, but i've seen needy girls irl too.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 10:06 PM
1

I chalk this up to the nature of dating. Women don't have to approach men, so they don't. They can field their prospects and be comparatively pickier. But, what OP is claiming is that women could pick men they aren't attracted to. So could FA men, but they don't do that either. They sure do. Do you think the FA men in dating sites wouldn't? I've seen even average guys going for the lowest possible attractive women just to score something. You wouldn't believe how much low standards some dudes ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 08:39 PM
3

The point of the op is that the FA guy has low standards enough to accomodate the FA woman, but not vice-versa. I mean, even the ugliest women i've known, like completelly screwed up women, i've seen them getting laid. You wouldn't believe how much some guys are willing to lower standards to get their d's wet.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 08:36 PM
1

If you can not be lonely by changing your personality, getting a job and exercising, then you are not involuntarily lonely. True, but that doesn't change the fact that someone else will be an incel instead of the guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 08:31 PM
2

Urrr. The point is what the OP stated? That incel women are by choice, but incel men not really.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 08:29 PM
1

Nope. Dating sites would be testimonial to this. Even the less attractive females have more guys interested in them than an average men has of women interested in him. The male FA's stand no chance in the market.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 08:27 PM
3

Easy, a woman has always someone interested in her, no matter how ugly, fat or whatever. Out of a collection of dudes that are interested in her, given the choice, she won't pick the FA guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 08:25 PM
1

I'm not saying exclusively, i'm saying that it's certainly the most important factor, so that it often trumps all others. Even Chad can't afford to be poor or he won't get far but just getting getting laid once in a while, and relationships for him will mostly be amongst his social class. Women simply don't date down unless for a 1 night stand, and that's the whole point. So by perspective, women "out of your league" are indeed woman that think they can afford a man with a better social/financia…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 05:07 PM
1

Oh, i didn't seen the note. Yes, for 25 and under, class would be less important, but still mostly because many of either boys and girls aren't earning all that much, but i'd say it still matters quite a bit.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 01:23 PM
2

Knowing? I'd have a hard time, even so because i'd like to have kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 01:08 PM
1

For a relationship? Money always trumps everything else. I virtually never seen or heard of a loving relationship that the man earns much less than her which is the same as saying, women don't really date down in terms of social class. On the other hand, i see plenty of rich/famous guys in all world on loving relationships with hot women. And i know plenty of "marriages" broken up because either the man got unemployed or the woman decided to settle for someone "richer". The truth is that if geor…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 12:47 PM
1

but what? Do you doubt? I'm a sex machine that can last 6 hours straight without flinching ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/16 10:25 AM
1

Depends, but in general, i would say, the women that earn equal or less than you are always on your league.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 11:18 PM
2

I see we probably live in different cultures and ages though, in my place only like 1 man in 1000 has slept anywhere near those numbers, women's standards are way over the moon and slut shaming is somewhat prevalent. My own uncle is maybe the best "serial" dater i've met (he's a chad) and he probably has slept with about 60 top. Still, i think that being a virgin =/= skill or energy is kinda wrong, my girl for instance was in complete disbelief i was a virgin at the time because i gave her some …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 11:12 PM
2

Well, i guess it depends on the place, but in my country it's much more common than you think. Many would never admit it though. I've lost mine last year at 28, and i'm a totally cool dude that had more than plenty opportunities to lose it, but i was a hopeless romantic waiting for a certain girl to cross paths with me once again. The one girl. Of course, it didn't happen and i stop caring about being romantic.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 10:41 PM
2

I'm curious about: 5.) [scientifically unsupported 'biotroof'] if he can't find one woman to sleep with him by now, why should I risk potentially creating offspring with such an genetically unsuccessful man? So you'd rather that he'd try to sleep with some nasty women rather than he have some standards?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/16 10:35 PM
2

I used to be completelly oblivious to girls flirting with me when i was a teenager. I really thought they were just being friendly. That's just until i realized they stopped talking with me because i used to totally ignore them in that regards. Not that i wasn't attracted, i just couldn't tell when someone was being flirty or friendly, at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/16 11:54 PM
1

In personal experience, yes. When i went through the anger phase, i used to spend it exercising like mad, and made nothing short of a miracle in changes in my body.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/16 11:51 PM
3

Now, if you're talking about some drunk chick at a college party as OP seems to be, they might laugh in your face and be rude- but they're drunk lol, excuse me? Man, i can drink more alcohol than all girls at a party combined, i was never rude with anyone no matter how drunk, nor me, nor any of the people i hang out with. Drunk excuses are simply bad lies. No ammount of alcohol entitles you to mistreat other people. Sober people will most often try to be nice at first. Depends. Coming from girls…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/16 11:47 PM
-1

I know where you coming from, i just think you should stop seeing as a "meat market". I thought like you like years ago and it didn't make me any good. Just realize that everyone wants to have fun with sex and if you want it too, there's things you can work on to achieve it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/16 09:43 PM
0

No wanting to make sex with someone doesn't entitle you to mistreat others. I wonder how a woman would feel when the gender is reversed and a man is outright rude on his rejection.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/16 09:39 PM
8

Isn't this like sort of the basis for half of the redpill philosophy? Hookup culture is an orgy, but it's basically like just for the 20% top males.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/16 08:02 PM
1

wat?
/r/MensRights15/03/16 01:00 PM
2

I've been there, but i always had the balls to admit i was a virgin. To be honest, the girl i lost it with actually found that being a virgin was sort of cute but i didn't disclose it until we were going to the act, but she actually sort of needed me to persuade her that i really wanted to lose it to her. Either way, i realize she was an exception.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/16 12:24 PM
5

In other news, feminists fight for freedom of speech for woman. Logic.
/r/MensRights14/03/16 06:10 PM
7

Feminist logic: "Do you believe in god? Then you must be a christian"
/r/MensRights14/03/16 06:07 PM
1

Nah, i don't agree. Commenting about his size isn't much about the size really, he might actually be on the small side but he'd lie on it . The issue lies mainly in the attitude that he must maintain and not look like that issue actually hurt his confidence in the debate, any politician must pretend to be an "alpha" if he wants to stand a chance. That's also the reason he was targetted by an attack which looks like ridiculous but it's actually a good try at damaging his manhood or at least his c…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/16 12:13 AM
25

Welcome to 21st century's misandrism.
/r/MensRights12/03/16 12:07 AM
1

I'm not saying the most intelligent man is always an alpha, where did i state that? I specially gave emphasis to social intelligence. What i'm saying basically, is that intelligence is a defining trait of an alpha in most groups of humans, mainly intelligence around capacity to gain respect and lead the others, social intelligence per se. And your boxing example makes no sense. Actually it disproves you theory. Boxers are not known for being intelligent, yet it is clear that there are many alpha…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/16 04:07 PM
1

Can you just see and evaluate things in binary? Do you understand that there's no such thing as universal "alphas" and that their applied to the group their involved with? Let's say, group NFL players with a group of heavyweight boxers, do you think NFL players will feel like alphas? lol Let me ask you, amongst a group of NFL players, and amongst the google group of nerds, who's going to be the alpha in the group? It's certainly not the most physical potent per se, it's the one with social intel…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/16 03:08 PM
1

Or if you want another comparison, even twins, have a dominant one and a passive one. Sometimes, even very peculiar life experience differences make up for a hierarchy status.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 09:31 PM
1

I've already said before. Alpha is mainly about a dynamic in a group, and how someone is defined in the hierarchy of a certain population. All the rest is just dependable on the group. Let's just say, "in the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king"
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 09:20 PM
3

Of course it does, this is no mistery, is kind of statistically proven by many surveys even by media that follows "feminist" narratives. Women dates up as a standard. This is why "where are all the good menz?!"
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 08:57 PM
9

lol, it's just a matter of linguistics to be funny while pretending to be badass.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 08:52 PM
1

But that's my point, an alpha has power over the market but it's not having power over the market that defines an alpha. No matter how you paint it, emasculated men like Justin Bieber don't define any sort of "alpha" male. He's not respected, he's not a leader, he isn't particularly smart, or anything whatsoever that makes other men look upon him. He just has a bunch of teenage fangirls.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 08:48 PM
1

successful with lots of women doesn't make an alpha, an alpha male simple has power over the market but it doesn't mean it takes the most profit of it. Millionaires, famous artists and actors, etc, can have more success than most people in the world, even girlish men like Justin Bieber.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 08:17 PM
1

Yes, it does. And it's scientifically studied. Leadership attributes on humans come mainly from intelligence, be it logical, emotional and social.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 08:11 PM
2

lol, of course it does. Someone with higher intellect has charisma, confidence and overall capacity to lead and command the dumber followers.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 07:19 PM
6

alphas, betas, whatever, don't "look like". It's a hierarchy status in a certain population, and it's mainly a mindset about confidence and detachment from being submissive to other people. Let's say, you can have a fat, tall or muscular guy be a beta and a short skinny but with high intellect can be an alpha. It all depends on the "environment" a male is involved and it's mindset.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 06:32 PM
1

Who cares? Virginity is overrated.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/16 12:08 PM
1

Quite a rarity, yeah.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 06:41 PM
1

That just goes to show my point. If lower SMV aren't considering fat girls or older women as a real option, then they shouldn't complain they don't have options. They're just not taking what they could afford to.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/15 07:18 PM
1

Ok, all of a sudden greece seems like the perfect place to live.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/15 01:36 PM
3

Õ_õ Either you're too young, or live within religious groups, or your friends are liars. I've never met a woman, even the most romantic ones, who've had less than 10 partners before even settling for someone, and i doubt i know many women who didn't surpass the 50's figure at their 30's. "sexual liberation" they said.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/15 01:24 PM
1

lol, there are people with way bigger numbers than that. It's just that many of these people wouldn't even answer to such a study. It isn't even that hard to make up with 50 partners, specially for women of course. All it takes is 1 person per month for 4 years and there it is. If someone goes for ONS often, the number can easily get on the hundreds for some women. For men, it's much harder, but i've met some guys, including an uncle of mine, that had more than 600 girls in his bed. He'd have 2-…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/15 01:05 PM
2

There's no 'dating game'. There's just getting to know people outside of your social groups and getting to get them a chance to know you too. And women have just as many purposals as men, it's just that women can afford to be invited by multiple men for dating and date many at the same time, while men have to invite multiple women at the same time to get to have the chance on having a relationship with some of them, that's just how it works on a liberal society, that's how it's meant to be. Love…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/15 12:29 PM
0

Believe me, i ain't from US either, i'm from portugal and i could mostly say that portuguese women are some of the hardest to get. But what i know and can tell is that the majority of women here already rode the CC since 15 and for the most they have 100 times more experience than men, and they know about PUA stuff and can smell it from miles, so trying to pick and seduce is some of the worst things a man can do here, the only girls that fall into pickup trickery are either inexperienced or just…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/15 12:11 PM
1

Hmm, maybe you're betting in the wrong bars and environment for you. For example, i'm not going to a disco or many bars that don't have the sort of music and environment i like, and even on the bars that i like, i mostly will just have fun around with my friends having some beers and joking around, within the first weekends being there, just to get women to be attracted to the fact that i'm confident, a cool guy, and i'm not even tryin to get to know them, or clingy or desperate. It's much easie…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/15 10:54 AM
1

yeah, and dating sites are like 100 males for each female ratio, is just normal that this is the way it ends up to, specially when half the males there are potential sociopaths or just wanting to pump and dump and lie as much as they can. But on real life, many women aren't really on dating sites. Women on dating sites are mainly there to feed their own ego and they'll just usually select a few hot males to get laid with, that's if they do it at all, but on real life, many of these women get clo…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/15 10:27 AM
2

Not really. Every men have options, you just have to lower your standards to get them. If you're always looking for the unicorns and prettiest girls around, then you're fucked. But there's loads of options for almost any man, you just need to be willing to invest on who sounds interested in you and let the relation grow. Many lower SMV women are really tired of being used by all the players, and they know and usually desire to get to know the average guy that they know they won't "use" them.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/15 10:16 AM
2

I don't know why people even care about this, what you call "ghosting" is just normal and always has been, no one is entitled to commitment, and we're just meant to enjoy the good times and have no regrets, people get into dating with false pretenses all the time, and it's just natural that they're so confused that they just walk out of it when they're unsure of wanting any sort of commitment. Either way, plenty of fish in the sea, you know? We just have to keep fishing and have several options …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/15 10:11 AM
1

Yeah, she looks sensual and is pretty, but she's nothing special without makeup. There's loads of models and actresses way prettier and sexier than her. Personally, i have loads of friends way sexier than her.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/15 09:54 AM
1

Hmm hard to define. We're never that good at seeing from an outside prespective, i can't pinpoint why exactly many people were dragged towards me, it was more a plethora of reasons. But i am sort of an empathic and intelligent person with high charisma and confidence, no problems to be gentle, genuine and peaceful with anyone, but i'm also assertive, independent and couldn't care less about what people thought of whatever i did. So, in summary, i guess the main qualities was the ability bond eas…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/15 11:30 PM
2

I just tell them to learn some biology.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/15 06:57 PM
0

False, typically, testosterone production drops at a rate of around 1-2% a year after age 30. I didn't mean healthy men in their 30s when I said "older men." I meant men that are way over the hill who have had their T measured and find that it is low. Testosterone production is at it's highest around the ages of 18-20 in men. Bull. Testosterone keeps steadily rising until about the age of 30 with a range that is a little different from person to person, and "drops" after 30 are lies from badly d…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/15 06:25 PM
3

Nope, but when i wasn't worried about it, was the times i had higher statuses. From young age until like 3 years ago i wasn't aware of that, and to be honest, i was always respected and above much other people. I actually was so not aware of that, that i didn't really understand why people used to call me "the king" as a nickname. Being a natural leader is all about being natural and genuine, the moment you'll try to maximize it is the moment you'll start falling in status because you're obvious…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/15 06:00 PM
1

I would actually argue the opposite. TRP has an underlying understanding that your place in hierarchy depends much on the conditions you had, and that you can still shift to a higher place with self-improvement and working hard. It's a basis of TRP that all men are equal and genectics barelly matter when it comes to learn the needed behaviour, skills and assets to be as attractive as many other males, if not more. So it's arguable that TRP is actually inherently socialistic in the terms that all…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/15 02:17 PM
-1

Testosterone fuels sex drive. Young men are horniest during their peak years of testosterone production. Older men with low testosterone lose their sex drive. Sorry, both those two are entirelly myths. A man around his 30's has way more testosterone than a teenage. The reason a teenage might be hornier, has more to do with low tolerance to the hormones, and thus even a lower levels makes them hornier. The same happens to women in hormone therapy for sex change. When a certain level of tolerance …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/15 10:44 AM
3

Women more social than men? :O! That's completelly contrary to my reality. Men usually meet up for everything on a daily basis, play some games at home, meet up to do sports, meet up at night at bars or just talking with each others over a beer about politics, sports, or other modern issues, and we maintain several of these friendships through many years until we become basically "brothers". For some reason there is such a thing as a word for "bromance" and no real female counterpart that i'm aw…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/15 01:10 AM
1

lol. Mark those words because they're probably the most valuable piece of advice you'll hear in years.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/15 11:05 PM
4

Simple, if you separate a sperm and make in-vitro breeding, those are all future human lives. How dare you eliminate a future human life am i right? My point, is that embryos are just "future human lifes" as well, they just aren't really yet. There's nothing about the stages of development that makes it worth killing or not. Killing a sperm and killing an embryo is ultimatelly the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/15 05:53 PM
2

dude, if you read my post history you'll realize that i'm in favor of most of TRP overview. Fortunatelly, you don't need to be a crazy basement dweller to be a RP, but i'm not saying there aren't some. To be honest, if you took TRP to practice like i do, you'd have probably already met some good women like i did.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/15 05:47 PM
3

So i guess you'll never use contraception in your life? you're gonna kill billions of future humans. Good luck with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/15 05:46 PM
2

Yes, all you need to do is to fap one.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/15 05:43 PM
4

I guess you don't fap, i mean, each time you do you're killing millions of supposed future lifes, even when you don't fap, your body is killing them. Think about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/15 05:42 PM
6

I'm not sure why are you trying to generalize that all women are crazy psychopaths. There are women killers, the same way there are men who are killers as well. Or does your generalizations go both ways as well and you claim that everyone is a serial-killer? I don't know what sort of women you're surrounded with, but it'd probably make you good to go out of your basement and engage in meeting new women to your life. As much as there's bad people around, there's also good people around.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/15 05:34 PM
1

i haven't got much to add to grendalor response, so i make his words mine on the first point. I have seen feminists who think these issues are very important , so you're wrong. I would appreciate examples, would be quite refreshing to know someone who is generally accepted by feminists and is still worried about these issues. From what i've seen, the likes of Christina Hoff, are immediatly segregated from feminist community and called liars and anti-feminists from the moment they approach anythi…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/15 04:50 PM
5

Yeah, but that's like the small "serial killer" ammount overall. We've all met caring mothers and grandmothers.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/15 04:46 PM
5

I remember in high school we were talking about a case where a man got raped by a woman and the ones who were laughing the most were the young boys who said that "men can't be raped" and that "if he didn't enjoy it he must have been gay". Anecdotal example serves for nothing. You know men "like" to assert their own masculinity with those sort of affirmations and joking around. But on the other hand, it is feminists for the most that like to overlook the importance and underestimate domestic viol…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/15 02:16 PM
3

Who wouldn't love their own children? Of course they do.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/15 02:10 PM
5

Firstly, if the judiciary and political elite (almost off of which are men) actually belive that women shouldn't be help accountable for their crimes, then we need more feminism, not less, in order to convince them that women are just as human as men. lol. Feminism is the one ideology that tries to dissiminate that women are not accountable for their acts because "it's all patriarchal oppression" that makes women do what they do. The same goes for any "incovenient" equality that comes from regar…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/15 02:05 PM
1

Ok let's go piece by piece shall we? Women do not care about male weakness and neither does society, if you are weak, depressed, small, poor, uneducated, unconfident, not powerful then nobody cares. What this means is, the moment a man shows a "weak" emotion when associated to a male, it automatically makes him unattractive, and he's deemed a loser because of that. Let's say, being bitter, being highly emotional, depressed, unconfident, shy, passive, not assertive, defensive, complaining about d…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/15 01:41 AM
1

Simply saying "disagree" and not pointing out why, even if coming from anedoctal experience, doesn't help your point. It just looks as if you disagree because it's hard for you to accept.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/15 12:02 AM
2

I certainly wouldn't want my boy to be raised as a mangina. I'd teach him what girls are like, how he must work to be deemed attractive, how much of what society and specially feminist viewpoints are BS and that he should trust more his masculinity whatever man-hatred he most certainly will face and make him a hard worker, independent thinker and good person that will eventually bring him success.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/15 11:47 PM
1

Yeah, but it's still very important to find and point why there's so many single white guys, and so many single black women, and both of them are complaining about the dating scene.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/15 11:29 PM
1

Hmm, yes and no. If you realize the ammount of men that are letargical, self-excluded, depressed, waiting for a miracle and uninformed about the crude facts about attraction and how shallow women are, you should realize that there's a huge range of people that are simply complacent at the moment, and that most men that realizes he can improve and reach high above the complacent has very decent chances of finding an attractive partner. No hard work is unrewarded. About being bitter about women no…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/15 11:25 PM
0

I wouldn't say white women racially are biased against black guys, it's actually quite an epidemic in my place. To be honest even my next neighboor is such a couple. On the other hand i find black women very biased against white guys. Not sure why though.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/15 11:12 PM
1

Yep, i know, even close cases. My own brother is at least an 8, someone who get's stalked by hot chicks on a daily basis, he could have had a career as a model, had 2-3 girlfriends at the same time, had ONS and FWB with hot women like top models, strippers, actresses, etc, but he ended up married someone who's barely a 6 in terms of physical attractiveness and most of the LTR he had for longer times were with girls of about the same level, maybe even less, they just happened to be reliable and g…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/15 05:45 PM
1

Bruce willis average looking? Really? i don't think so, but i'm not a woman anyway. If you said Jason Staham, Ben Kingsley or even Patrick Stewart are average looking in a general population, i could agree with you, but Bruce Willis certainly beats them on some points. When i say average, i mean population wise average, not Hollywood star average.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/15 05:34 PM
2

Hmm, you know, there's such thing as shaved head, and a lot of women find that attractive. Personally, it fits me great, much better than most hairstyles i've had until today , i feel the only set back is that i look like a testosterone ridden skinhead but i'm pretty cool with it. I have a face that could easily make me an 8, and gorgeous eyes in most women opinion. I said 7 because on physical shape i'm still a tad overweight (about 5kg) that i could use to get a bit more muscle and a 6 pack, b…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/15 05:18 PM
2

Long distance relationships? :O That's quite hard to find a woman that 1- is interested in romantic relationships from long distance 2- is interested in guys that look for romantic relationships from long distance. 3- isn't only an attention seeking woman that just uses dating/chat sites for ego feeding while in reality they are in a relationship, this happens way too much online. 4- veracity of the interest, veracity of what she says she is 5- doesn't fall into the requirements of not being a s…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/15 01:40 PM
1

My anedoctal experience includes a range of thousands of people i've observed and met through my life, and that's without accounting what you can also access and percieve through media, internet, and whatever other source you can have to understand the world Then again, I imagine things change depending on the company you keep. I'm sure that women in the random pick-up scene have many more options than the women who want an intelligent conversation first. I don't actually go on any "pick up" sce…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/15 12:25 PM
2

Except the evidence suggests she's more likely to look for an equal. What evidence? lol. That's contradictory to most life experience i've had, it's contradictory to all dating sites you can search, it's contradictory to statistical numbers that there's around 20% men that will never marry or have kids against 10% women. I see guys dating way down, and women who are a 5 or 6 that won't date anything below a 8 or even 9.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/15 11:39 AM
-2

Do you think men and women would get closer to equality and relate better if they experience similar discrimination and shallow preferences? Nope. It's hard wired in women to be shallow, and it doesn't matter how much they suffer from being fat, ugly, or useless, that they still don't get that they must give opportunity for someone within the same class. It's funny that when i was fat, i used to find fat women more shallow with weight than the normal.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/15 10:47 AM
1

I think it would depend more on the mental "illness" we're talking about, and how deep and evident it is. To be honest, i've been personally attracted by some women with evident depression, but when the case is too extreme, it's quite a huge risk to advance into any sort of relationship with a person that could very well get suicidal and not only hurt you but also you'll feel bad for your inability to help, or you could even make it worse unintentionally. If we consider personality disorders as …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/15 11:48 PM
1

:O! I'm still skeptical anyway. :P
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/15 02:04 PM
5

Well it's interesting that last weekend i was chatting with some female friends about celebrities they liked, and for some reason they all agreed that Brad Pitt was deemed an alcoholic and took steroids, for which they found it quite undesirable. George Clooney on the other hand, seemed to fall into their consensus of a very attractive man.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/15 11:44 AM
2

hmm, a celebrity? Well i've never seen a woman that wouldn't fall for clooney somehow xD.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/15 11:37 AM
2

hur... I wasn't a depressed lonely virgin forever, you know? Quite in fact i was quite the popular guy in high school that everyone liked, highest grades, sports guy, political activist, known chess player, and several other areas of interest i was know for. I just happened to be slightly overweight, and fed up with romantic ideals of wanting a girlfriend to start with. For me, it was at 21 that things started to go downhill when i was seeing that college didn't make it any better and actually e…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/15 03:11 PM
1

Well, when i meant self-improvement, i didn't mean personal improvement, as that's very difficult since in a lot of ways, i'm a very old man in a young body, and i'm more mature than most elder people i've known, even my mother comes to me from time to time for some mature advice and overview at what she wants and she's quite a clever woman. The self-improvement i meant, came from having to get to perfect physical shape, to treat myself out of depression, loneliness, neediness, and all other sor…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/15 02:31 PM
1

lol, wealth and social status are extremelly important to keep attractiveness to females. Most of them will always prefer a man they regard of equal or higher status, with very few exceptions, like the ones considered the highest classes which have few choices but to date down, or they risk being single for the rest of their lives. Here's some personnal anedoctal evidence? Me and a friend of mine hang out often to clubs and discos. We're both about the same level of physical attractiveness, but …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/15 02:19 PM
2

I didn't said they didn't fight, i said that there's no killing/warfare involved. Fights end up as soon as one of the males surrender and withdraws from trying to fight for dominance. Either way, in the specific case of primates and other animals with big communities with established hierarchies, you won't see males fighting regularly over a female for most races, as hierarchies of power are mostly established. In big communities that depend on keeping male arounds to be stronger than nearby col…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/15 12:23 PM
2

Well, i don't speak for anyone but myself, but i think factual feminist makes very good points on how feminism derailed from equality into a man-hating ideology, in fact, i would say that she calls herself a "feminism" but she's actually an equalitarian in the very sense of the word. I would say she shouldn't be critized as she's one of the few women with credibility to criticize and help on many men's issues, like hate on masculinity, that she realizes are going to eventually be a major problem…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/15 06:01 AM
3

The people don't need feminism at the moment. As a society we're as feminist as it can gets, if not blatantly misandrist in some fields, like neglecting men's issues. Who needs feminism, is capitalism. Women are great consumers and there's a whole lot of profit generated by focusing on their narcisism and pretending there's inequalities in order to satisfy their underachieving self-esteem in order to give them an illusion that their very own choices to ride the CC instead of focusing in getting …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/15 05:53 AM
3

Do you realize that it's exactly the point the OP was making. When you think " guys who were getting laid treated the women like walking vaginas." you're falling into the category of males the OP was addressing
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/15 05:42 AM
2

I disagree. The very fact that this man appears to have risked his own future for a single instance of getting laid is as far from alpha as it can get. Murdering a man to rape a women is nothing but frustrated beta or omega underlying issues along with psychopathic behaviour. An alpha would never need to murder a male to get "laid". There's something you got wrong about dominance i believe. Dominance is not about "forcing" others to respect and achieve power through force, that's not congruent w…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/15 05:23 AM
3

Apes do engage in warfare, almost any animal engages in warfare, but it's fighting for resources/territory, not for silly purposes like getting pussy, and certainly not an alpha to do that, maybe, frustrated betas. Alphas by definitions are the respected leaders of colonies, and have most of the females they desire, they have no need to engage in psychopathic behaviour to get one single woman for one instance. Conflict within communities destroy the community healthy relations and thus it's stre…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/15 07:17 PM
3

Saying murdering and raping is the "sort of behaviour to our more primal instincts" is not only silly but obtuse. You must have been fed up with too much feminism. You don't see that behaviour in most sympathetic/social animals on a daily basis even less on primates. There's disputes between dominant males for sure, there's dispute between colonies for resources, but overall you can't even extrapolate that to "common behaviour" to primates, as most of them respect peaceful established hierarchie…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/15 06:21 PM
2

hmm by words the point is hard to explain, but let's see, in a trigonometric circle, you draw the tangent and cotangent lines to a circle. The secant of an angle is the distance it takes for an angle to intercept a tangent line. There's a easy way to calc the secant which is sec X = 1/cos X or in another way, by pythagoras theorem, (sec X)2 = 1 + (tan X)2 The same way a co-secant is the distance that the angle takes to intercept the cotangent line. The easy way to calc this distance is cosec X =…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/15 03:12 PM
1

Age: 28 Gender: M Occupation: Mathematician Country: Portugal Marital status: Forever alone (jk) Single. What pill are you: Every pill available A photo if you dare: Maybe another day xD
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/15 01:55 PM
-1

30, not exactly, but at 35 the dating scene certainly shifts towards men. Most women start becoming less attractive and their biological clock is forcing them to look for a partner to procriate, and also, it's sort of an age where they start to care less about what society thinks of them and start focusing more in how they enjoy having sex as well. There's a whole lot of factors that does make the power balance shift more towards men, it's also in this age that even most beta providers find a ho…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/15 11:36 AM
2

Oh god, 21 for sure, it'd spare me so much effort, pain and suffering for dealing with 5 more years alone, and i would had have time to focus on things like a career and politics instead of having to be more focused on self-improvement.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/15 11:27 AM
1

Well, uh, depends. On my place the ammount of dominant females looking for orbiting betas is so huge that being an alpha is actually a major issue, because everyone thinks you're a "player" no matter what you do. To be honest, my group of friends is mostly made of "alphas" but the few betas here get the best of girlfriends and some hot chicks. No wonder i grew up with a dissonance from being alpha and wanting to pretend to be beta. Didn't work either way xD. So feminism does work, but only if yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/15 09:36 PM
2

It would be exactly the same. Women would still just choose the 20% top males, and much of the others would be wasting their potential to be productive in other ways by being frustrated for all their hard work having no return.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/15 09:23 PM
1

I personally don't think sexual restriction would be a good thing for the society, i believe with the right education you could teach children to grow up into more empathic adults with lower standards that'd make them happy. The main problem i see with sexual revolution is that women grew up educated into thinking they're entitled to prince charming and won't LTR any lower than that until they're forced by biological means to consent the beta advances, and when it comes to ONS, women will tipica…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/15 10:19 PM
0

Wow. Is this guy fighting for a Mangina award or what? The reality is that women are treated differently by society for exactly the same reason that children and the mentally handicapped are treated differently. It’s just easier this way for everyone. You don’t argue with a four-year old about why he shouldn’t eat candy for dinner. You don’t punch a mentally handicapped guy even if he punches you first. And you don’t argue when a women tells you she’s only making 80 cents to your dollar. It’s th…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/15 12:47 PM
1

It's still manipulative obviously, but women who uses a man for pump and dump is unheard of, as it's mostly inherent that a man usually desires sex as primary reason for why it'd desire a relationship anyway. On the other hand, it's unheard of for a man to "give away" sex for a reward, because a man's sex is usually of no market value in the current dating scene, and it happens to usually be a man's reward by itself. Not saying it isn't manipulative, but i'd say that's barely a problem when it c…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/15 02:52 AM
2

Well, depends, let's not generalize, there's some things that TRP advocates that aren't manipulation, and then there's other ideas that are suggested that sound more like it. Let's say, self-improvement and working to be the dominant male some women like, is nothing about manipulation but simply improving. Now when it comes to do mind-games to try to force a girl to give sex and pump and dump, when she might actually desire you for a LTR of sorts, now that's where things might become manipulativ…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/15 02:41 AM
1

I think you're confusing being kind with being obedient. Most social animals will accept being obedient with a reward, but kindness is an inherent social skill to be social and increase probabilities that either of the people will get along fine which is better for an healthy community that requires mutual support as well. Families are kind to each others as a mechanism of support and survival mechanism, and generally, kindness is something that most child have without having any kind of reward,…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/15 02:20 AM
-2

Hmm, while some of TRP has manipulative dudes around and some manipulative ideas behind it, i don't think the intent and theory is necessarily driven towards being misogynistic nor manipulative, nor i think it actually helps on anything. I think the clear idea behind TRP is acceptance of an actual reality and dynamic between sexes and it's differences between how their attraction works, that we should all acknowledge as being natural and desirable. As much pain as one has faced through life, i t…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/15 05:11 PM
1

Around here, young girls have no probs approaching boys. And online dating? Sorry to tell you that women are contacting men all the time - I have lots of friends and can tell you this for a fact. Women are not prepared to wait for men to approach them any more. They pick a guy and contact him. Definetly i was born in the wrong country because i don't see that here at all. 99% of the women i've met, seen or known of, are passive and won't ever ever approach a guy, because they get approached them…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/15 12:21 PM
1

Sex doesn't make the man? It doesn't, but for a woman, a shy, inexperienced or insecure man that shows interest in a woman but doesn't know how to entertain her will most certainly be dumped. So, do you think man are born with confidence around girls they like? Do you think they don't get nervous, shy, or awkward due to inexperience? By the way, the biggest majority of women, outright dump a virgin if they get to know he's a virgin, guess what, they're expecting a sexually experienced man, and f…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/15 11:46 AM
1

It is you separating them, not me. I'm just saying that looking for sex, and looking for a marriage material woman, usually requires a bit more insight into a woman's. Obviously when you look for a LTR you'll look for someone attractive as well, but you'll also look for other aspects that are more relevant to be a reliable partner. From personal experience, i've seen all kinds of alphas hanging out with top models or other extremelly attractive women, and end up marrying someone about average, e…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/15 11:29 AM
2

Do you understand this is talking about when you get to know a girl, and not only by looks? Obviously you can't know a girl has a great personality or is great at cooking or at doing stuff at home for you, if you don't get to know her, but well, this is all to say that there's often the possibility that when you give it a chance, a woman that is not entirelly physically attractive, might make you build up attraction with her during a conversation, eye contact, etc. Am I the only guy around for w…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/15 11:24 AM
1

You misunderstood me, it isn't necessarily the ammount of sexual partners that give a man "status" but most dominant men will need a lot of experiences to reach a status where they can be considered marriage material, but for the most i'm considering we're talking about dominant males that try to pursue a woman for marriage, instead of beta orbiters providers that eventually might get luck out of opportunity. If you're a dominant woman then your case might be the latter. If a woman is passive an…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/15 11:34 PM
1

Yes and no. I'm saying that a woman that can pull the right strings on you to make you want to put her in a bed can go a long way beyond immediate physical attraction. On my personal case, my physical standards are usually too high for me to have immediate attraction simply by looks, so i give a lot of opportunities to people who don't exactly reach that immediatly, and for the most i learned i can be surprised, i can become insanelly attracted to someone that i found neutral physically. You sho…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/15 10:51 PM
1

Physical attractiveness is pretty much subjective either way, and most times there's plenty of women that you're neutral about them and then you eventually become attracted after you know and see more of her. Personally i find it hard not to be attracted to most women, in fact, it takes pretty much a really ugly face and attitude, or have a blatant physical/health issue for me to not be attracted physically. Has boobs, ass, looks healthy, pretty face? Check.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/15 10:39 PM
1

Oh common, there so much things into factor when it comes to attraction. Don't tell me you don't find some girls that don't use make-up attractive without being exactly the prettiest of woman. Has it never happened to you to be more attracted to someone the more you get to know her, by building up of attraction? Most times, confidence, sensuality, personality and intellect goes a long way, even if a woman is not that pretty.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/15 10:25 PM
4

i'm not applying my morals, i'm applying my knowledge from the world i know that surrounds me, and inevitably a man might find hundreds of attractive women a day, but he'll just want to approach a few of them, mostly because they look for something else than simply sex. Any man can go to a brothel if sex is all they want instead of spending so much time, resources and thought to get the same thing. I don't get you. On the OP you ask if a woman can make up for attractiveness with other attributes…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/15 09:53 PM
5

For sex? Probably, but those men ain't probably what a woman would be seeking anyway. Now for a relationship? fake boobs and other cosmetic issues might actually be a red flag of someone lacking other interesting marriage material attributes, that's the way i see it and many of the men i know. Any man dreams of having a woman that can at least make him a sandwish and not be a passive princess. ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/15 09:27 PM
6

Why not? Physical attractiveness isn't really that much of a thing, contrary to popular belief, specially when you know it can be faked by surgeries and cosmetics. For instance, i don't find anything attractive about fake "boobs" and "ass". To be honest, i find that most man will marry a woman which is less attractive than most of his previous girlfriends, but that has other attributes to make up for it, in fact it's more likely a less attractive woman spent more time and thought into being bett…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/15 09:19 PM
1

This isn't difficult to understand, most men are considered invisible to women in terms of dating material. When many of these "invisible" man try to have a friendly approach on her, women don't take it as if he was trying to hit on them, while in reality they most likely were, meanwhile, an attractive prospect having a friendly approach on her will most probably be considered a "hit" by the woman. It is the same way as woman "friendzones". Believe me that 90% of the man on a woman's friendzones…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/15 09:11 PM
0

I doubt most woman would consider marrying someone that has had less than that number of partners, if you consider the fact that "marriage" material man have to have a lot of experience to even reach that "status", self-confidence and ability to seduce someone he would consider marrying himself. The number might scare women, but in reality, for a man to reach that status of even being considered marriage material and wanting to marry a woman he got, has to have had a great ammount of experience …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/15 09:01 PM
1

I wasn't even talking about "markets", i was referring more to the great unbalance between what's required of a man and what's required to a woman to be able to even start dating, marriage is a whole different deal, and even so, it's obvious even the ugliest women can find decent men that hit them, while even average to good men not only don't get hit, but have to pursue themselves, and must get through so much growth and emotional pressure that a women can simply abstain from, if he doesn't wan…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/15 08:51 PM
1

There has been plenty of much healthier patriarchal societies then ISIS, that's an extreme case of barbaric societies, so it's barely even an acceptable example, not that i'm going to defend patriarchy here anyway, but it's just to say that you really didn't pick the best example for your case. On the other hand, i'd say, don't confuse the progressive achievements of freedom, with being a direct result of feminism, it's actually the other way around, the fact that societies became more demanding…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/15 05:38 PM
1

Hmm, i'm very skeptical that there are women saying they don't get hit, on the contrary, i've seen even the ugliest, most uninteresting women get hit often, so something is not consistent, unless those women that say they don't get hit, are socially isolated and live at an home miles away from civilization. If that's not the case, then, i'm pretty sure that when women say they don't get hit, they mean they don't get hit by the most gorgeous alpha guy at the club, while they completelly ignore be…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/15 05:09 PM
1

Not saying it's impossible for a shy guy to have a woman hitting on them, but at some point you'll have to throw away your shyness and hit them back, because even dominant women expect you to become extroverted or try your best when it comes to try to get her. So all in all, it's ok to be shy at first encounters, and some females might eventually be attracted to it, but they'll expect you to overcome that at some point, otherwise they won't keep around long enough for you to free yourself from y…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/15 04:55 PM
8

Funny, i also identified myself as a "true feminist" until some time ago, and took it by doctrine, but eventually i found out that not even feminists are feminist. Actually, the most "equalitarian" women that i've met, couldn't care less about labeling themselves as such feminists and most probably would argue against feminists because they'd consider themselves that there exists some differences, which is all cool and stuff. As for the woman and man that i've met that identified themselves as "…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/15 11:00 AM
2

In my opinion, it's hard to define exactly what an alpha male is in human society, but in several ways, the alpha male tends to be the one who gets to be more confident amongst a group, which is naturally a trait that is attractive on a subconscious level, but alpha male is more of a subjective term that has more to do with the conjecture or group of people around, than it's inherent skills. Other than psychological confidence and independence, there's really no other traits that might be univer…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/15 04:34 PM
1

"You're talking about building up your own attraction. Usually guys are sure they are interested in fucking. Hey it's a challenge. Do you ever do challenging things? You say you played sports and played chess, those are hard things where you tried to win. Well here's another." Obviously i want sex, i'm not saying the contrary, the question is, i don't simply want to bang a women simply because she has a pussy or looks hot. I need way more to get really "attracted" and reach the point where i rea…
/r/askTRP04/08/15 11:52 AM
1

"I still don't think you can distinguish it. If you were a 'natural', your penis would have found its way into some vag by now. Quite a few of them, in fact. That's what happens to 'naturals'." Well, that would be what probably would have happened if i wasn't completely busy with sports, partidary and student's activism, playing chess, and doing plenty of other things at the same time until i got tired and exhausted, and then i fell into heavy depression from about 16/17 years old for several is…
/r/askTRP30/07/15 10:24 AM
1

That's my issue. As i pointed out, i'm also sort of a demisexual/gray-a, or rather, i can't tell my attraction without getting to know a woman in a big majority of the time, unless she's some kind of "goddess"/unicorn that i become immediatly attracted. It's just when i know their availability, and when i get to have a mental picture of their personality that i actually feel sexual attraction to the person, it can actually become pretty intense after that and my attraction becomes as normal as a…
/r/askTRP30/07/15 09:40 AM
11

You should define better what you mean by depression, because in fact there's several levels of depression, which is a neurological and psychological disease with different phases and branches. Just feeling sad or down, isn't exactly considered depression, there's a whole plethora of amotivation, low self-esteem and other psychological traits that are "hard-wired" in the person's personality. Surely, eitherway, lifestyle changing is always welcomed to improve the patient's mood and health, and t…
/r/TheRedPill06/01/15 05:51 PM
4

Hey, this is my first post in TRP, don't be harsh on me, just wanted to bring my 2 cents. I think there's a lot more government beneficts than merely taxes with feminism. There's a whole plethora of sexual frenzy and frustration amongst the people that greatly allienates them from big matters like politics and demanding more from governments, and in the other side, it creates a lot of celibate "geeks" and stimulates men to work even harder to achieve a status that can attract the women he desire…
/r/TheRedPill05/01/15 10:49 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter