TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Maelshevek Archive

View 6 posts and 138 comments by Maelshevek on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

This post is disgusting. Don’t care if I get banned. She lost something valuable to someone who was an asshole. She got that valve back. No person should be treated like she was and all people should be helped as she was. Bitterness doesn’t make this post good.
/r/MGTOW05/03/19 07:09 AM
3

Well... I think a ten to one ratio of investigated crimes resulting in appropriate punishment is a decent rate for humans (given our fallibility). But 9 people also in jail appropriately doesn’t justify (make okay) injustice against one person. So these statements are problematic because those who hear them may not understand. It actually sounds rather messed up at first glance. I was prepared to downvote and speak out. So this will be my takeaway (what he really meant) and ideal scenario: I wou…
/r/MensRights28/11/18 06:56 PM
8

It’s like how a kid gets upset and blames the parent for disciplining them when they do wrong. How dare you do something that makes me experience the consequences of my actions!
/r/MensRights27/11/18 05:20 PM
2

I really hate how much we have turned to self protection because of the rape/abuse hysteria...so you’re right :/.
/r/MensRights24/11/18 03:38 AM
1

Seriously...so called “white collar crime” is garbage. I am reminded of The Big Short where there were almost no consequences to people who nearly destroyed the world economy. If they stole that much in real money or goods, they would get life in prison. This really belongs on r/latestagecapitalism
/r/MensRights23/11/18 01:46 AM
2

How can she be evaluated for mental health issues, everything she did was meant to be vindictive and cruel. She took the time to prepare and serve a meal of his butchered corpse to people she believed were infidels. And her motive was also not irrational either.
/r/MensRights23/11/18 01:42 AM
1

Your rights are wrong, learn your place, prol!
/r/MensRights23/11/18 01:26 AM
4

Yes, it’s systematic exploitation. They know what they are doing is wrong, hence the anonymity, and that they are admittedly targeting men who will pay their way. They utilize intentional deception, and if the other party knew about the intent to deceive, they wouldn’t go along with it. So they know it’s wrong to use people for free food, and in order to bypass any consequences they deceive. So then this behavior matches all the features of a con: where the man is the patsy, dating is the ruse, …
/r/MensRights23/11/18 01:24 AM
4

Double standard is double. If a woman did this, it wouldn’t be news. Anyone who reported it would be labeled a misogynist.
/r/MensRights23/11/18 01:11 AM
1

Definitely.
/r/MensRights20/11/18 07:46 PM
24

Giving them alcohol shows that she was intentionally trying to get them into a state where they would agree to her desires. This is no different than the Cosby case.
/r/MensRights15/11/18 10:00 PM
1

Humans have been both good, decent, acceptable, not great, and terrible at everything since the dawn of time. The lack of logic is that we think goodness and quality are properties of gender. Or age, or wealth, or race, or even government. They aren’t. They are are the properties and responsibilities of each person (especially those who are followers, for no great deed is done without many hands) to follow or not. Yes, there are differences between the genders...but they are both human. Both are…
/r/MensRights15/11/18 02:04 AM
93

We all know that sexual harassment happens. That’s not in dispute, it’s whether it did happen in a given case and what actually constitutes harassment. Many times evidence is flimsy or based entirely on perception. The worst crime is that people get fired or jailed with little to go on except an accusation. Injustice is rife in the corporate arena because companies fear suits and fire people to avoid conflict. What society needs is true justice based facts and measurable standards. If we ever wa…
/r/MensRights12/11/18 04:49 AM
12

The psychiatrist admitted that there is no evidence right now, but that it may change in the future. Sorry, but this is my degree and here’s a few things we know (sauce: degree in Psychology, minors in forensic science, philosophy, and history, because knowledge with reason is power): Sex crime recidivism is incredibly high, period. Saying we don’t have evidence is the same as saying “we don’t know”. Logic suggests that when we lack information, we refer to what we know that is most reasonable. …
/r/MensRights28/10/18 04:23 AM
4

Fortunately, most people don’t subscribe fully to all the outrages that are posted on Men’s Rights. We really have to approach these issues like rational adults, because the level of thinking is simply childish. Trust me: people really want quality rational understanding and leadership. It’s when people feel like the world is out of control and the sky is falling that they subscribe to madness. In this case, feminism is roaring from the rooftops that “men are privileged”, “men are rapists”, and …
/r/MensRights25/10/18 11:24 PM
11

Exactly this. It’s a system that makes no sense and is actually treats women as being incapable of working. A truly just society would award people based on the actual amount of work they do. Raising kids is hard, but it’s also not preventing people from working (unless they have made the poor choice of having too many kids). So the argument that a man has to pay because his wife never tried to develop a career is bullshit. How can society praise single working moms, yet also claim that stay at …
/r/MensRights24/10/18 11:25 PM
35

Frankly, it’s ludicrous that a victim should face public pressure to give public forgiveness. It’s as disingenuous as a pressured apology (she only apologized after being shamed and hard evidence came out against her...). If apology/forgiveness is to be given, this isn’t the right way to do it. As a Christian, I believe in forgiving people, but forgiveness definitely doesn’t mean no consequences. Consequences are required or people won’t change their behavior. Even if he forgave her in public, t…
/r/MensRights18/10/18 06:30 PM
0

This was basically my position until I Googled “why is my wife so lazy?” There were practically no articles on the issue. I found TRP, and realized how current feminist theory has given women moral license to behave poorly. It also showed me that as a man, it’s my calling to lead, that equity only exists if people contribute equally. It also showed that it was past time for me to stand up for what I knew was right. I had to be an assertive and confident in what was true and good. It also points …
/r/MensRights12/10/18 07:17 PM
4

Because clearly the message of Christ is saying people should act like that. /s Maybe it was her who wasn’t right with God because she did exactly what He said not to do? Or did you know that Jesus insulted and mocked even the religious leaders at the time because they were hypocrites? He literally said: “don’t be like them”. Perhaps when it says in the Bible “you will know them by their fruit (the results of their choices)”, it would directly relate to the woman who put your uncle away....that …
/r/MensRights10/10/18 01:25 AM
2

I will never have kids also, because I fear there is something terrible in me. I went to a Christian school where they were uptight bastards, and I got “paddled” far too many times. It was little more than being whacked so hard your ass hurt for hours or was numb. They continuously preached about hellfire and damnation, making me constantly question if God was going light me up and roast me forever. And they were graphic about hell. To this day, I have anxiety when going to church. My dad was al…
/r/MensRights09/10/18 08:18 PM
8

Don’t ever dare say anything unpopular or challenge the common narrative! It’s amazing how news isn’t news if it reports something the mods don’t want. All the news articles today are about Kavanaugh. TBH Reddit is such a heavily moderated social media platform it’s basically become a fake news outlet. Since every sub has a solid agenda, it makes getting disparate views nearly impossible.
/r/MensRights07/10/18 02:25 AM
7

I would also sue the school district for obstruction, and also sue the state for ignoring due process by not investigating enough to get a recording that would have set him free. I hope they win the case and go to trial so these girls get exactly what they deserve. Conspiracy to ruin an innocent person’s life ought to have severe consequences.
/r/MensRights07/10/18 02:14 AM
4

Dogwomanites you sexist pig 🤣
/r/MensRights03/10/18 03:08 AM
4

Here here!
/r/MensRights03/10/18 03:07 AM
3

QFT. Literature is so important. One of my favorite quotes is: “there is no truth without verification”.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 05:09 AM
1

Anonymity please, thanks for doing this.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 06:33 PM
1

I’ve been married for 7 years to a wife who has struggled to work part time and often complains about doing any housework. We have never had kids and just live in a small apartment. The only things she has been asked to do around the house have been to pick up her messes and empty the dishwasher. That’s it...and I get grief—angry words and looks, being snubbed. She acts like she’s an angel that everyone loves, but when asked to work she gets upset. I spend money and get blamed for giving things …
/r/MensRights28/09/18 09:37 AM
4

Thank you, it’s good to have a female perspective (I sometimes worry that MRM is just men). Yes—the history of religion is largely the same. Splits and segmentation as more radical leaders take point and are either accepted as mainstream for the movement or branch off (true man hating being one sub-sect). As a whole, feminism has seemed rather religious, with each moral outrage giving rise to another march or surge of sympathy and changes. (Perhaps if we comically called them Crusades, there cou…
/r/MensRights28/09/18 09:24 AM
35

Yeah I went there the other day and it was just regurgitation of feminism. They pointedly hate us and just white knight for women (I thought women didn’t need men to defend them??).
/r/MensRights28/09/18 08:30 AM
9

Modern morality is based on cultural relativism, which is subject to the beliefs of those who are in power. Without submitting to any moral authority (or at least using “equitable common good” as a moral standard), this is what happens. Who has the loudest voice determines who is: good / positive / contributing to society. Right now, any woman who can hashtag a man has the power, not because women are driving everything, but because men agree and back up women. To your point—the desire of men to…
/r/MensRights28/09/18 08:26 AM
8

What is most disturbing is that they provide a link to what they believe is the “right” way of thinking. It’s either agree or get silenced. And yeah I don’t like TRP much because it’s all about getting laid, and is full of half baked philosophies... However...TRP also opened up my eyes to the reality that men are under siege and being mocked for being men. They also pointed out something that disturbed me, which was the “femeninization” of male identity and the requirement of modern feminism to …
/r/MensRights28/09/18 07:58 AM
2

Entirely correct. Being a victim means that you are protected. Anyone who talks against you is a villain. Any action against a villain is justified. This is the cycle of oppression and domination. People subscribe to victimhood or believe they are victims by a barrage of popular narrative that tells them they are victims. They see former victims as powerful, being able to use it as a tool or weapon. It’s a means to acquire power and wealth. As they get more power, they can shout even more loudly…
/r/MensRights26/09/18 05:51 AM
2

I love that site. I just want fairness in a world that seems to just see me as an angry ATM, ultimately disposable.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 05:44 AM
1

The pop term “toxic” doesn’t even define anything worthwhile. I abhor the term because it’s little more than a weasel word. It’s what people use to denounce each other in spite, a classic example of master suppression technique. The same could also be said of the word masculine. Being “masculine” isn’t even well defined enough to create some sort of philosophical understanding of what it means to be a man. If it’s somehow reviling for people to be “masculine”, then we should revile “feminine” ch…
/r/MensRights26/09/18 05:35 AM
2

I think alimony should be based on equity and effort. A low effort spouse, regardless of gender, shouldn’t get alimony. It also should have a strict maximum time limit. Sometimes people need help, but they aren’t automatically entitled to something they never helped earn. That’s highly inequitable. A burdensome spouse should have to pay the person they afflicted. I also like the idea of women advocating for their needs. I dislike the idea of people merely finger pointing. It keeps both sides fro…
/r/MensRights22/09/18 06:02 AM
3

I generally don’t like Trump, but he has a point. Accusations without evidence are the same as “there is no truth without verification”. I believe they call that the underpinnings of a Justice system.
/r/MensRights22/09/18 05:47 AM
1

Why was he suddenly accused 30 years later? Seems rather intentional.
/r/MensRights22/09/18 05:41 AM
2

Well said using the reductio ad absurdum. It’s the same crap as when people want to be “tough on crime” and just build more prisons rather than work to change social problems.
/r/MensRights22/09/18 05:39 AM
5

If he was a TRP guy, he’d be too busy improving his game and getting ladies to murder. If he was an MRM guy he’d be sitting in a wingback chair smoking a pipe while reading philosophy on the nature of social equity.
/r/MensRights22/09/18 05:36 AM
2

Noam is correct, each sub is a fief, and each mod is a dictator. Contradict the rulers’ narrative and you disappear. It’s organizational oppression in a nutshell.
/r/MensRights22/09/18 05:29 AM
6

No soldier goes to war unprepared and blames his enemy. Each person owns the responsibility for their actions. The victimization narrative shifts every problem to men, and holds them responsible for everything that happens to women and every choice they make. Fail in school? The patriarchy. Regret sex with someone because they looked way hotter while tripping? He probably raped you. Unrealistic goals? Male oppression.
/r/MensRights22/09/18 05:26 AM
3

Female to Male surgery should result in the person not being given a penis. They should instead receive therapy to make them feel better about being a man...without a penis. Hmm...🙄
/r/MensRights22/09/18 05:05 AM
3

She was mad that she didn’t get a free ride on you. She’s angry that she had to be responsible for her choice to buy something. She’s not adult enough to be in a relationship.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 07:10 PM
4

Pay gap myth is about exploiting a rhetorical concept known as “the pay gap” in order to justify getting that which was never earned. It’s entitlement, and there’s no logic to it. If we sum the wages of all men and women and average each, and then compare, it looks low they earn less. However this would be due to at least these few reasons: Women take lower paying careers. They go towards non-profit, nursing, customer service, hospitality, and non-leadership jobs more than men. Despite the progr…
/r/MensRights21/05/18 07:08 PM
8

It’s completely sexist and should be removed.
/r/MensRights14/05/18 08:58 PM
9

My asking her to work more and get a job is making her angry, better get support with my behavior. /s
/r/MensRights14/05/18 08:57 PM
2

Yep, in HS girls would brag about hooking up with college guys, like it made them cool. The behavior is universal, but for women it’s more shameful (they actually hate on each other more), so they don’t advertise it as much
/r/MensRights14/05/18 08:41 PM
1

Jokes can be funny...but if accepted as being normal or status quo, it makes other sorts of behavior acceptable. There is a pattern of thinking that allows beliefs to be justified based on social acceptability. The equivalent paradigm is making racist jokes and having it be normal or okay. It justifies that way of thinking because it’s not regarded as morally abhorrent. It’s not illegal, but does it help make anyone’s life better? Does it uplift society? How can it be okay to make insulting joke…
/r/MensRights14/05/18 07:28 PM
2

Every action has an equal and opposite reaction. The reality is that nobody can demonize half the human population and get away with it forever. There will be backlash, and hopefully equitable reforms. I despise the idea “us vs them” because we need each other. But, there’s just way too much passive acceptance by so many men, and not enough basic questioning like “is this justified?”, “does this make sense?”, “why is this happening?”. We really need more men to wake up and think about their plac…
/r/MensRights14/05/18 07:18 PM
3

Well, I’m going to offer a dissenting but more equitable solution, because positive discrimination isn’t helpful either: We need make universities more equal in their educational quality. I understand that some universities are considered better, and that’s fine, but we really should focus on improving education at all universities. Additionally, universities are competitive, which is not really helpful when you think about the idea of learning. The goal is to add layers of knowledge, and the ch…
/r/MensRights11/05/18 02:09 AM
6

Reading the article it appears that the social narrative is far worse—men are expected to be labor. It’s a consistent take on the expectation in society that men be “the provider”, and any man who doesn’t work is lazy or a deadbeat. To the extent that it’s more important for men to work than be educated.
/r/MensRights11/05/18 01:07 AM
8

That’s disturbing and distressing. A lie becomes law.
/r/MensRights11/05/18 01:02 AM
9

Ad hominem much?
/r/MensRights10/05/18 10:10 PM
46

It’s not petty, basic human functions are human rights. It’s degrading and often nerve wracking to have to go and wait and wonder if you’re taking too long or if a spot will even be available. Standing urinals are also a form of gender bias, they take away our privacy, which takes away our dignity—something women don’t have to endure. We are also robbed of a more useful and fully functional bathroom appliance.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 07:16 PM
51

He was expelled for “not showing enough remorse”, and the complaints against him were weak, with the “worst” being that he was turned down and gave up. In fact in the Sexual Harassment training trash they teach us in the corporate world—that’s basically what they say to do. “Office romance is okay and many people even meet their future spouses on the job, but if a person says no, then don’t pursue any further”. Okay, so that’s what he did. However, I was a victim of a false sexual harassment acc…
/r/MensRights08/05/18 05:56 PM
13

It’s been sliding that was for probably 25-30 years. Watching old TV shows with female characters—even early episodes of Cheers—show how men are dumb and women are smart. If I may make a statement though—making it popular and okay to stereotype an entire class of people in a highly unfavorable manner is the very definition of evil behavior. It’s literally the definition of racism, sexism, ageism, etc. However, it’s branded as good. People are readily calling good evil and evil good, and are maki…
/r/MensRights07/05/18 05:46 PM
1

Not your lack of thinking—society’s. Though I am confused as to how your post relates to men’s rights. My point was that men are often villianized automatically when a woman makes any claim against him. It’s automatic guilt and people in general simply don’t think about how their ideological bandwagons that condemn so many unjustly.
/r/MensRights07/05/18 05:37 PM
3

False accusations need to be taken more seriously and investigated more rigorously. The burden has to be to show that a crime was committed. It’s ridiculous that this anti-male movement has been pushing the line way past guilty until proven innocent. It’s now just automatic guilt.
/r/MensRights07/05/18 06:02 AM
2

So true, real victims suffer from PTSD, anxiety, and depression. Most don’t report rape because they are ashamed of themselves. No victim would suddenly tweet MeToo to the world without years of counseling time to deal with the issue. Crimes often go on for years because people don’t talk about what’s going on. People just don’t get that real problems are often hidden and silent, and people hate talking about what’s wrong openly. If we were to believe that even half of the MeToo or other social …
/r/MensRights07/05/18 06:00 AM
1

Rape culture is a myth, because it depends on a culture that denies rape. Total bullshit, given how our culture actually puts victims on the pedestal and empowers them, often without even thinking (like your case). It’s rhetoric and it’s being used to justify anti-male ideology.
/r/MensRights07/05/18 05:51 AM
19

Some people said that it was posted by “rape apologists”. It’s like the only allowed thing to say is that men are bad and all men are rapists or rapists in waiting. I love how they are allowed to hate us, and if we also try to address a real issue that we are...hating them?
/r/MensRights07/05/18 05:48 AM
7

That article is shit. Wow, because men don’t want to be falsely accused, they are apologists? Non sequitur much? Rape Culture? Really? Still promoting moral panic. How can professors or doctors promote such rhetorical ideas when they should know better than anyone that we actually have a victim-centered social ideology. It’s why these topics are getting so much attention, everyone cares about the victims. So much so that anyone who wants to address the overzealousness of the anti-rape (anti-male…
/r/MensRights07/05/18 05:42 AM
2

Same in the US
/r/MensRights04/05/18 07:06 PM
1

Even if you don’t get a lot of money, what she did was wrong, and if you get a judgment in your favor, you can send takedown notices to places that have the libelous content and get it removed.
/r/MensRights04/05/18 06:09 PM
15

I like this guy.
/r/MensRights04/05/18 05:35 PM
10

Sarcasm incoming... I’d rather take a quote, a bad psychologist, and a couple theories...then mash them together and use the public frenzy over MeToo to tell the world that the idea I believe without any consideration of logic is, in fact, true. (Which is exactly what the author did) It’s all about attention-grabbing bullshit to get people to read my crap because it’s the most popular topic. Why not raise the stakes, be a little more edgy? It’s what gets readers. I hate this kind of “news”, it’s…
/r/MensRights03/05/18 01:10 AM
3

During my degree program (psychology), we deconstructed Freud’s and Jung and others as part of the “history of psychology”, basically showing how unscientific and logically fallacious so many of their ideas were. It rapidly became apparent that they had no real evidence or structured process and that the prescientific versions of psychology were little more than seeing a palm reader. It’s also why psychology has gotten such a bad rap over the years, because far too often people didn’t apply rigo…
/r/MensRights03/05/18 01:01 AM
4

Nobody worth listening to readily speaks of the degradation of another, of death, with lies and misleading statements, total categorical rejection, or the minimization of another person's troubles. Note how she has been tagged as the next Me Too campaign leader in Australia. It's easy to know the character of a "movement" by those who speak about it most loudly, and by those who readily support it. Look at their words and what they like. MeToo has become the insidious edge of feminism, and peopl…
/r/MensRights01/05/18 09:24 PM
1

Yeah, that's crap, but that's also the culture we live in. If we show consistent good work, the second we fail, people forget about the responsibility we've shown so far. It's magnified with women/feminists, however. They say they want to be strong and independent, but if we aren't bringing in a paycheck we're really on thin ice. If we're a student, then we had better be a good one or "we're not worth it". Regardless, these things are not examples of loving behavior. Modern feminist ideology say…
/r/MensRights01/05/18 09:13 PM
2

No, it’s not enough because she is “helping spearhead the MeToo campaign in Australia against male sexual predators”. The Witch Hunt expands. It’s like the Red Scare except it’s men, which makes no sense at all.
/r/MensRights01/05/18 08:45 PM
2

Yeah I think the societal pressure is for men to always "be strong" and "just take it", whenever life throws trouble at us. It's why people laugh or mock men who are victims of domestic violence. The expectation is that men are just meat shields with no feeling that can take abuse and just deal with it, somehow. And it's stupid because when I open up to my male friends, they don't give me crap, and I don't see them as any less than they are. There's this dual standard from women that men need to…
/r/MensRights01/05/18 07:55 PM
15

Damn, that’s sad, I actually had a girl dump me after I started having panic attacks. She said “you have too many problems”. My wife, however, is pretty awesome so, bullet dodged.
/r/MensRights01/05/18 01:04 AM
1

Everyone is a potential rapist, including her. I think she’s abandoned all thought and consideration of reality and has gone off the ideological deep end.
/r/MensRights28/04/18 05:28 PM
1

This was very nice, and I appreciate the logical distinctions made. There’s a lot of fallacies thrown out by the modern movement and some nasty double standards that shame men for the very things they do! Modern feminism seems to also talk almost primarily about sex too, only “pay gap” gets tossed around as the other modern issue. And by sex I mean: men can’t flirt, women can’t consent (because all women are victims), sex predators are everywhere, and sexual attractiveness is bad. Rarely is ther…
/r/MensRights28/04/18 05:22 PM
9

I agree, a lot of behavioral adjustment comes because people want to become part of the "favored group". We see it all the time in cliques and whatnot in school. This is often done with two (and possibly more) goals in mind: 1. Avoid the consequences of being someone who is a non-conformist, gets in trouble, and shunned. 2. Appeal to others to earn rewards (this is often how women use beauty on men). The issues we should be concerned with are self-censorship and repressive behavioral adjustment.…
/r/MensRights26/04/18 12:42 AM
9

I remember back when dungeons and dragons first became known to the public. People thought that every player was a devil worshiper! There was a story in the 90s about the shooters at columbine, and how they were linked to video games. Supposedly. It’s the nature of our current so-called news climate, to feed on the fears of every person and magnify all our worries, why? Because more than anything else, fear of the “unknown other” sells. It gets attention, and justifies all vile acts. This is not…
/r/MensRights25/04/18 06:13 AM
17

This could actually be a valid case for a lawsuit because they didn’t follow the rules of their own event, and there was money at stake. I would like to see this actually go to a court.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 06:02 AM
5

People will do what they have to do to protect themselves, especially when they aren’t the favored class. Look back to African American history and how they intentionally avoided being around white women or white people in order to protect themselves.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 05:59 AM
24

I love how we’re lumped in with a 4chan group full of mad talk...when all we really want is a fair shake in life and help with problems that are particular to men.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 05:54 AM
7

I’ve discovered over time that when people don’t want to do something, it’s someone else’s problem. The women simply use the generic male stereotype of strong defender to attempt to offload the issue onto men. Forget logic and reason, “fix my problem for me!” Feminists and women are happy to hide behind men and praise their attributes when it suits them. It’s all about who controls the narrative, and they want to dominate.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 05:50 AM
1

Been feeling really depressed and anxious lately due to surgeries and health issues. I feel like I’m dying on the inside, but I’m afraid of telling people how I feel because of how they might think of me.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 05:44 AM
102

It’s like the whole “driving while black” thing, “you fit the profile”.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 05:41 AM
16

Her example of women getting paid less because of child care was: not on topic, irrelevant to career choice, irrelevant to the kinds of pay different jobs merit, plus being able to afford child care isn’t both the cause of and a result of a so called pay gap. It’s a circular argument. If I’m going to even go out on a limb and address the issue of the cost of childcare...it affects men more than women. We’re the ones working to be educated and get better paying careers, and because of that, we’re…
/r/MensRights15/04/18 09:09 PM
3

Sadly the sarcasm, if posted in a feminist forum quoting me, would be taken as a legitimate argument in their alternative reality.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 03:47 AM
4

My wife works a low paying job with a nonprofit. She looks the job and wants to stay there. I on the other hand, work in IT and make 85% of our income. She chose that career path, her Masters degree program, basically setting herself up for a life of low paying jobs. While it certainly seems wrong that she gets paid little for helping make a difference in people’s lives...the problem is the system of funding as a nonprofit. She made a choice and so did I, it’s not some patriarchy or whatever tha…
/r/MensRights08/04/18 08:07 PM
57

There was a comment I liked about how coming to the defense of a woman is sexist against them, because it automatically implies they are weaker or can’t defend themselves. Really though, people shouldn’t hit each other when angry, or...at all. There’s a nasty double standard that they picked up on too—the man is laughed at because he is getting beat by a woman, with the silent expectation that he could defend himself. However if he did so, he’d be swarmed by the folks in part one. It’s also twis…
/r/MensRights07/04/18 12:38 AM
1

The article seemed to imply that women were just “carried along”, or just “fell into drugs slowly”, even when they committed other crimes. It seems to make the point that what happened to the women in the article is only true for women, or that the rise in opioid problems only merits a new approach because an “alarming number of women” are using drugs. Was it not alarming when men first street going to prison? Apparently it wasn’t as much of a problem when men were addicted, and a rise in male a…
/r/MensRights05/04/18 07:37 PM
3

The number of women serving time in Ohio prisons is rising. Because now there's a problem. One of the main reasons: Crimes related to drug addiction are going up, and more women are getting swept up in it. Some of those crimes are explicitly addiction-related, like drug trafficking. Others, like burglary, may have been committed in support of a drug habit. Swept up in trafficking, burglary? Could a man use that defense? The program works on changing how women think about themselves and getting t…
/r/MensRights05/04/18 08:58 AM
1

It's farcical because the trait of men being stronger and more durable is the rationale for positing that all men are abusers. It's also the rationale for "take it like a man" or "a woman can't beat up/hurt a man". Other men don't even take a guy seriously most of the time if a woman hurts him physically. It takes a deadly intent for female aggression to be taken seriously, but even then people in the back of their minds think "well why couldn't that guy fight off a woman?" And a man knows he ca…
/r/MensRights05/04/18 08:40 AM
7

Men's rights looks at the status quo and considers the needs of all parties and advocates for what's best. Reasonably and logically. MRM allows you to challenge ideas with opposing arguments, and think critically. It advocates thinking about what's right, independent of culture. In fact, by thinking about your rights as a man, you are challenging what culture tells you to do! Herein lies the truth -- most forms of thinking about maleness nowadays have been subverted or subsumed by feminist ideol…
/r/MensRights05/04/18 08:29 AM
13

Feminists want men subservient, they want us to be feminine or gay. They want a man to not even be a possible threat (threat as in "any rival, challenger to my ego, or threat to assertion of moral superiority") to them by taking away all your strengths. Think about how these things or viewed or what ends up happening. Who gets the kids? Who gets the alimony? What if you want sex? What if you want to be physically strong? Like the outdoors? Enjoy sports? Shoot guns or participate in martial arts?…
/r/MensRights05/04/18 08:11 AM
1

Regarding The Crown article: “And don't try any of your mansplaining, you stupid men. Nobody wants to hear "She wasn't as famous, though" and "Her agent should've asked for more money, then" and other patriarchal sexist rapey excuses.” Retched talk, full of fallacies, hate, hypocrisy, and master suppression techniques. If MR members talked half as viciously as these feminists do, we’d be be shitcanned beyond belief. I’m glad we don’t sink to this level. Let the feminists dig themselves into a ho…
/r/MensRights04/04/18 06:23 PM
193

That their rationale for hiring her was “the massive underrepresentation of women” shows how the feminist movement has redefined what’s right in favor of what’s popular. This guy took a stand vs YouTube earlier this year for the exact same practice. Hope he wins too. https://www.wsj.com/articles/youtube-hiring-for-some-positions-excluded-white-and-asian-males-lawsuit-says-1519948013?tesla=y&mod=e2tw
/r/MensRights21/03/18 06:17 PM
18

Here's basically what's wrong with the show. On Sex: Excessive lesbian relationship screen time Continuous use of non-threatening gay male characters Jessica is the sex initiator and stopper, she has all the sexual power. One of the men had a relationship with one of leads when she was 16, and of course, he was a film director. Hmm. On moral behavior: Jessica repeatedly threatens violence and death to people Jessica's assistant has to put up with her abuse endlessly and treats her well even so. …
/r/MensRights20/03/18 11:16 PM
7

Been watching Jessica Jones Season 2. It’s literally this.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 06:17 PM
37

I think that what we see is the big, sensational stories get all the headlines, when the larger problems are never talked about—medical costs, student debt, mental health/suicides, minimum wage living, and corporate domination. The feminist movement is just another sensational story that is overly talked about, but with little real investigation about the issues being raised. But this is true in the broader sense too—online journalism, social media, and TV news are all seriously lacking in solic…
/r/MensRights20/03/18 03:33 PM
4

It’s a mix of straw man (distraction from the point of discussion), and an ad hominem, because it attacks the speaker. These kinds of responses are typical of those who don’t want to discuss or reason. A perfect example is something of something that happens all the time: Person 1: “I’m angry because you did something that you know is morally wrong”. Person 2: “Stop being mad at me, you make me feel bad about myself.”
/r/MensRights19/03/18 01:49 AM
5

They explained that DV is more likely when there's gender disparity. My guess is that the gender with more legal protections is more likely to perpetrate regardless of culture, because they know they can get away with it. I suspect this is the same principle that explains why racial mistreatment is greater when the favored race has stronger legal protection. The same is also seen in discrimination and mistreatment of the poor. My conclusion is that women have more legal sympathy than men and kno…
/r/MensRights03/03/18 03:23 AM
2

Mansplaining is a strawman often pulled out by those who are embarrassed by a mistake they made. The fallacy of male patriarchy and privilege has given rise to the fallacy that any man speaking with knowledge and authority about a subject is automatically condescending. Feminist ideology paints men as controlling, manipulative, and domineering, period. The idea of "mansplaining" is a distraction created by feminists to vilify men and deprive men of their right to assert knowledge and correct oth…
/r/MensRights02/03/18 04:23 AM
2

"Nobody is condescended to". Hmm
/r/MensRights02/03/18 03:34 AM
2

It's a tool created by the patriarchy to elicit sympathy from females, because evile man is trying to control females through the superior emotion she possessez. It's a manspiricy of man-ic proportions.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 08:33 PM
2

Exactly, the polarity and the requirement that people fall into line means we end up in groups that "represent one idea", as in all feminists are democrats or all gun rights are Republican. And all group members support the ideas of said group. Advocates for MR end up in a political camp and get painted in with the rest, and are associated with all the other ideals of the other group. And rather than think topically, others see disagreement with a policy as disagreement with the party as well. I…
/r/MensRights23/01/18 04:05 PM
3

Largely true, but there's so many groups lumped into these parties, it's hard to tell what the parties really stand for. Often it feels like the flavor of the month subgroup pulls the whole party or influences its dynamic (gay rights, teachers unions, and feminists). In other cases, groups like the alt-right appear in the headlines but aren't really representative of policies that the parties create. We really need more parties.
/r/MensRights22/01/18 06:59 PM
3

They don't believe they are sexist because they believe they are victims who can't accomplish anything because of men. This justifies a warlike mentality where any means can be taken to oppose the enemy in order to end "his" tyranny. Women believe that they can't do anything wrong because they have no responsibility for what has happened around them. No responsibility plus the ability to commit any act with full justification is the hallmark of oppressive tyranny. All disagreement is silenced or…
/r/MensRights21/01/18 10:24 PM
6

God this article is sick, it's little more than a call to battle against anyone who disagrees with the them. Literally saying "fight harder". There's no discussion about what happened or the facts, just invective.
/r/MensRights21/01/18 10:10 PM
5

I'll never talk about these issues at work, because I would sound like a misogynist. My wife can't know because she'll rage at me, and tell her friends and family. The only people I can discuss the consequences of feminism with are a small group. Where is my patriarchy? How can I discuss my concerns if no one will listen? It's clear that disagreement with feminism results in censorship, but the MeToo movement has escalated this past the point of reasonable discourse. How can we work to meet the …
/r/MensRights21/01/18 10:05 PM
13

This article is amazing, and points to the dissatisfaction I've felt with modern Democrats and why voting for Hillary felt like a mistake. It's because Democrats have become subverted by the feminist goal of ruining men, and the marriage rights mania. And being a Christian I can't vote for the Republican right because they are little more than puppets for the corporate oligarchy ( not to mention that they attempt to perversely make being a Christian a tool to get votes ). Political parties in th…
/r/MensRights21/01/18 09:44 PM
1

Some people are more equal than others, apparently.
/r/MensRights21/01/18 07:35 AM
0

It’s an ad hominem when used in an argument, and an example of how to redirect a conversation away from a topic by changing the discussion point or target.
/r/MensRights20/01/18 03:06 AM
3

Translation--men set the bar high and women had to work to meet it? Or is it--we wouldn't have to work so hard if men didn't push us. Perhaps--without men to get us moving and working, we'd be doing a crappy job? Glad to help.
/r/MensRights13/01/18 02:09 AM
2

If the others are full, use it anyway. It's a single unit. Boohoo if someone doesn't like it. Resist.
/r/MensRights12/01/18 09:12 PM
6

MeToo is a place where any person can just hashtag that "something" happened that they didn't want, no matter what that behavior was. It could be flirting with a girl who is genuinely liked, but is unwanted. The point is that all a woman has to do is state publicly that "he sexually harassed me", with no proof, confession, or pursuit of what actually happened, and the man is instantly guilty. I had this happen at a job, I sent a girl that I liked a picture from some forums about a grammatical mi…
/r/MensRights12/01/18 09:08 PM
4

Title is pretty bad, and the dailymail is cancer, but here's my 2c. It's poetic justice. She games him for an expensive meal and gets the bill. Analysis and advice: -Her game was bad, I'm sure there are far more instances where a woman will play a man better than this and get away with what is basically a con. Disgusting. -She picked the restaurant. My guess? It was a unilateral decision. Yellow Alert. -He took her to a fancy restaurant. Women need to earn this kind of treatment. -He didn't play…
/r/MensRights12/01/18 08:52 PM
2

Look up the top 15 cognitive distortions, this is a derivative of overgeneralization. It's also similar to how people will classify an entire group based on certain members. For example, all black people are gangsters because they produce the most gangster rap. These kinds of fallacies and group perception problems create all of the following automatically: racism, sexism, classism, agism...the list goes on. The problem in general is faulty reasoning where people come to conclusions based on lim…
/r/MensRights12/01/18 08:37 PM
1

I have adopted this with my wife for a while now--if she doesn't want to participate in life or says no and can't think of anything better to do, then it's no longer my problem. And she often gets tired early and easily and I've continuously set the expectation that if we go out, there won't be any bailing for some weak excuse. And no, it isn't easy, she complains and whines sometimes, but it's decreased over time. The biggest winner is communicating expectations early, repeatedly, and ensuring …
/r/TheRedPill30/11/17 10:41 PM
1

Or reduced to it's simplest element "how can I get what I want without growing up or taking any responsibility for my actions?". But again, it's a short term strategy that only works because of the alimony / child support system. Without those being in place, there's no excuse. It really makes sense for men to hold back from giving in to women until they start hitting The Wall. It robs them of their power and ability to use sex as an exploitation / manipulation tactic. I think that what drives y…
/r/TheRedPill14/09/17 10:32 PM
2

Hypocrisy is a human trait, and the problem with most women before they hit the wall, is that they don't try to learn how to function in society without living off their looks or pretending to be innocent girls. It's the lazy life tactic that owns nothing and looks for validation in all external forms. I am a Christian man, and while I don't agree with everything on TRP, one thing will always remain true--men were made to lead. Part of that is having a bullshit filter and knowledge of what's tru…
/r/TheRedPill14/09/17 08:42 PM
1

Illusion of consensus and groupthink do not a good relationship or situation make. It's okay to disagree with people and having differing views. It's not okay when people are wrong and try to push that on others. That's where boundaries come into play. We can't control others, and we certainly aren't obligated to stay around people when they willfully act wrongly. Walking away is often a good life choice. If we all agree, we'll never learn anything new. If we pretend we agree, we set ourselves u…
/r/TheRedPill14/09/17 06:55 PM
1

So true, it's easier to blame others than take responsibility for bad choices. They play a short term game by maximizing physical beauty and sociability at the expense of maturity and education. It gets them rewards without long term benefits. The greatest irony is that it's women, not men, who shit on each other so hard about beauty and female conformity. They communally emphasize gold digging and sugar daddies. There's continuous reinforcement to be hot instead of learned. Women don't go into …
/r/TheRedPill14/09/17 06:41 PM
2

Married, but not a kept man. Basically stay casual and watch for claws. Include her in your life, but keep space. It's going to make her want you more. It's also going to keep you sane. People weren't meant to be around the same person all the time. It's crazy. Space makes you want to be close again, but you always need room to breathe. I remember one couple that could only be together on weekends. Best of both worlds, imo.
/r/TheRedPill14/09/17 08:29 AM
1

Wow. That's some grade AAA prime foulness. I feel for you.
/r/TheRedPill14/09/17 08:23 AM
2

You were betrayed by someone who pretended to fully be your ally. Don't look back.
/r/TheRedPill14/09/17 08:17 AM
1

I would call feminism a female superiority movement/male demonization movement. They rarely argue based on anything other than "how bad men are to women", or "anything you can do I can do better". It's about power and rebellion, asserting dominance for the purposes of self defense, monetary gain, personal power, and egotistical narcissism. It's like racism but with gender, and it's socially acceptable. What a pile
/r/TheRedPill14/09/17 08:05 AM
1

This is so accurate, and it's what I've seen too from the lives of friends and family. Good Marriage and solid family foundations are what build quality youth. It's awful how many people have kids thinking that they should. They get divorced shortly after and the kids are totally getting screwed. Having children is such a major fucking responsibility, it's mind blowing how daft the population at large is when it comes to making the choice to bring a new human into the world. There's never enough…
/r/TheRedPill14/09/17 08:00 AM
3

The problem is also contributed to by men who will take any woman to bed or marriage, despite her character. We put up with or try to overcome their shit just long enough to get what we want. It's a decision that may work in the short term, but has terrible long term consequences. My belief is that we get back from others the kind of character we expect. We don't tolerate bad behavior. If they don't like it--man or woman--too bad. Our standards can build a better world, but only if we hold the l…
/r/TheRedPill14/09/17 07:49 AM
2

Red Alert! Bail out now, ship's going down. Run, don't look back. All people have agendas, but when it comes to kids and the rest of your life and hers, she could show, um, a little thought and responsibility before trying to get pregnant based on a highly emotional decision. It's crap like this that defines the kind of women we don't want to be saddled with. Questions about your worth (hypergamy), relationship based on her own desperation, not living on her own at 30... Her life is going to be …
/r/TheRedPill14/09/17 07:09 AM
1

I an proud because you let him fail, and stayed true to doing your job the right way. I'm glad you didn't fight him, because you can't fight charisma with logic. Foolishness has to expose itself. The company is totally complicit in hiring and listening to him over you. They needed him to fail to see who they need, in order to be successful as a company. At work we call these pain points, where the only way a company or culture will change for the better is to suffer enough to do something about …
/r/TheRedPill14/09/17 06:55 AM
2

You can deflect to protect, especially against information that people don't need to know. Often, not answering is just a better choice "no comment" and all that. I've worked with sensitive information and know what it means to be under no obligation to talk to someone about what they don't need to know. Deception is only powerful as long as people can't access the truth. It makes life hard to always be mindful of the lies and how to hide them. The simplest way is to avoid revealing important in…
/r/TheRedPill07/08/17 01:27 AM
3

It's always idealism until we compromise. We can change based on new information, logic and reason and whatnot. We can improve our perspective by learning, but when it comes to right and wrong...that's what I think the Red Pill is, being a man by leading through example and guiding people on a moral course... But we've had some wretched fights over her working. Six years married. For us, the kids thing was decided before we got married, she actually had her tubes tied 3 months after we got marri…
/r/TheRedPill06/08/17 08:44 AM
1

People who get upset all the time are their own enemies. If you do what's right and they get mad...It's their problem. It's their lack of emotional control and immaturity that's the point! Changing because they can't approach the world from a place of reason, or because they can't work out their problems isn't an option. The real answer is learning to not let aggressive people run you over or dictate your behavior. Be assertive, recognize that the weak use aggression to get what they want and th…
/r/TheRedPill06/08/17 01:30 AM
10

Marriage as a relationship is fine, but alimony and unfair estate splits are trash. A lazy spouse doesn't earn what he or she gets in a divorce. It's craptastically lame for society to enable bad spouses who want a divorce. I'm fine with prenups and taking kids off the table. Find a likeminded woman who respects that and be clear about expectations up front. Don't compromise your values and it will go well. But sometimes it's better to remain single and take women off the table. They really can …
/r/TheRedPill06/08/17 01:23 AM
48

There's lying and then there's withholding information. You don't tell people everything about yourself. It never works. That's why you don't talk to the cops, you withhold to protect yourself from a hostile entity that doesn't have your best interests at heart. But lying to deceive and mislead for the sake of ones own vanity or shame is weaksause beta crap. Ruins relationships and makes people into cowards. There are few cases where lying is okay, but there are very few cases when being fully t…
/r/TheRedPill06/08/17 01:10 AM
6

God gave us our bodies to take care of, it's fine to get your teeth whitened/fixed, fat sucked out, stomach tied, or whatever because you gotta take care of yourself to work and make a difference. People who can look better will do better. In fact you affirm your value as a person and your respect for others by looking good. It gives them something nice to look at and you something to be proud of. It's why I wish we all dressed up nicely all the time, because dressing up is sexy. It's a differen…
/r/TheRedPill06/08/17 12:57 AM
3

Social media has shown to reduce empathy levels. Who spends the most time on social media? Women. Social media is full of half formed feminist bandwagons shouting slogans about pride and other crap without understanding the arguments or issues. The equality crowd says that they are entitled to everything that men have even if they don't have the same experience or education. They are being told that laziness is okay and that men will take care of them (because who else will?). Equality isn't the…
/r/TheRedPill05/08/17 09:34 AM
3

Trump is toxic to masculinity because he behaves irrationally and is both reactive and childish. He's become the strawman everyone paints masculine men as being like. Trump is a bully who mocks openly and shuts down people he doesn't like. It's pathetic because of how reactive it is. His cabinet and closest advisers are all cronies or brought on by nepotism. And let's get down to brass tacks, he's not qualified for the job. A real man prepares himself for his job fully before going into the aren…
/r/TheRedPill05/08/17 08:54 AM
1

Most people don't really understand or try to understand others and just react emotionally / defensively. Taking other people's bad behavior personally is never an option. However, we have to be willing to watch what we do and say because it can have a real effect on people. This is why I prefer to observe and ask questions without shame or condemnation. I expect the same from others and will call them out if they don't give me same space I give them. And if someone is wrong and won't change the…
/r/TheRedPill05/08/17 08:41 AM
1

The winner is the person who sets expectations and follows through on consequences consistently. Or who knows what is expected and executes on it, to gain the advantage. Justice is the adherence to the standard even when it sucks or results in unexpected problems. True justice holds everyone accountable and makes no room for excuses. Falling short is a learning opportunity. This relates directly with responsibility, that is, knowing the standard and how one is responsible for following it, even …
/r/TheRedPill05/08/17 08:19 AM
3

Globally this situation is a boundary issue. The ideal case is to let "friends" (are they the kind of friend you really want?) who get drunk and drugged up know ahead of time that you won't tolerate that kind of stuff and they will either need to either get public transport home or take an ambulance to the ER. The OP states he knew Dee was a blackout alcoholic beforehand, which will always result in him being in an unstable situation when she's around. White knighting when you know what's going …
/r/TheRedPill05/08/17 08:01 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter