TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MaggieNoodle Archive

View 0 posts and 153 comments by MaggieNoodle on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-4

There was also a trans kid (male to female) in class, and when the boys didn’t want to include him in their games, Now in 6th grade, my son tells me he’s tired of how opinions from minority groups are always taken seriously while his own views often get dismissed Purposefully misgenders the trans kid, claims that his 11 year said the words "opinions from minority groups". It's either fake, or his 11 year old child somehow has the attention span to listen to his manosphere podcasts with him and i…
/r/MensRights19/05/26 08:57 AM
-13

Still probably rife with misinformation and omission of relevant facts and studies Well go ahead and read it for yourself to decide, every single source is cited.
/r/MensRights21/01/26 04:29 PM
8

Yeah this sounds like your average college classroom. Don't worry about other peoples conversations OP, just focus on your studies and ask them to quiet down if they're too loud or physically move yourself to a different table where you won't be distracted.
/r/MensRights21/11/25 05:16 PM
-1

Hence, girls don't have less rights than boys here in the US They do, straight up, have less rights now than they did a few years ago.
/r/MensRights07/09/25 08:15 PM
-4

That's an outrageous lie. The US federal government is allowing states to systematically deny women certain medical operations. Hence, less medical rights. US women in 2021, objectively, had more medical rights than US women do today in 2025. There's no discussion to be had over that, it's a fact. Girls aren't the ones who are circumcised at birth. Except for the girls who are. This obviously isn't a US issue but female circumcision exists - you're gonna need to convince the hyper Christian nati…
/r/MensRights07/09/25 07:52 PM
1

??
/r/MensRights07/09/25 05:31 PM
-1

It's been since 2020 honestly. There are still a few holdout commentors in threads like these saying "Yo... wtf?" but 95% of the sub is red pill, podcast bro, right-wing propaganda regurgitation.
/r/MensRights07/09/25 04:20 PM
-8

I’m not understanding how women are oppressed even before the over turning of roe v Wade. ...how about after, which is the current situation? Women objectively have less medical rights than you do, is that fair? The safety issue is not related to the inherent danger of their workplace but just to their general safety and security in public. Ask your women friends, ask your sister, ask your mom why women struggle to feel safe and they will have some stories to tell you.
/r/MensRights07/09/25 03:17 PM
13

AI is just trained on text that exists on the internet which is predominantly progressive, especially if this particular model is only trained on Reddit content. As Musk is learning its incredibly difficult to put blinders on an AI so that it only regurgitates content from one side of the political spectrum.
/r/MensRights28/06/25 03:51 PM
20

The study says it comes from the Pushshift Reddit archive with data from 2018-2022. If you control f pushshift you'll find it.
/r/MensRights26/06/25 01:54 PM
-1

Tell me what should I do? Restrict your access to the internet, I mean this in the nicest way possible. These algorithms and content creators purposefully feed you ragebait to keep you engaged and keep you scrolling - its not representative of reality just because you see it all the time, it's what you see all the time because you're glued to your phone. So, delete the gram and get off of online sites where you're exposed to this stuff (like this subreddit). Stick to fun hobby groups, stick to c…
/r/MensRights16/04/25 01:15 AM
10

Slavery is a legitimate issue, please don't poison the well with this. 100% of heterosexual men are slaves. No, we're not. We chase after women, all of our lives. I believe this is known as a skill issue. If you think that's your sole purpose in life... that's on you. Don't bleed attention from legitimate causes to serve a fringe movement of hatred. Keep that garbage nonsense elsewhere, or better yet, keep it to yourself entirely.
/r/MensRights12/01/25 06:09 PM
6

Leave the rage bait for a different thread, there is 0 reason to bring negative vibes to this post.
/r/MensRights19/11/24 02:48 PM
-9

Did you read the article? The commentor is right. The older, more conservative population overwhelmingly voted to maintain the draft.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 01:53 PM
1

Doesn't all of that already happen? Maybe not giving up seats for women, but there are definitely cities with women only buses, women only train cars, etc etc. It doesn't infringe on the ability of men to access transport. Like again none of these services exist without men who are half the population, they just expand capacity to account for and to offer women only spaces. And 100% in the future with high enough populations airlines will definitely offer women only flights. Offering a man only …
/r/MensRights01/08/24 01:28 AM
-4

That option is not available to men , only available to women. Choice should be gender neutral, if women need to be allowed to men only spaces then men should also have equal laws, if not then it's sexist. I'd say thay until, culturally, there is 0 animosity, fear or prejudice between men and women on public transit (and this goes for the entire world) that letting women choose their seats beforehand is the best option in the meantime. Sure it's not equal, but it's the lesser of two evils. You c…
/r/MensRights31/07/24 08:08 PM
-2

So, all men should also have the same option to choose right. I think the biggest thing is that men don't care who they sit next to, women do. And if men do care and don't want to sit next to women they probably won't anyway because the women have already chose not to sit next to men. The solution is to add an option with a choice of no preference, or prefer to sit next to men. You must be a tourist I wish, haven't been back in years. women have their own seats in buses , trains use algorithms t…
/r/MensRights31/07/24 06:38 PM
-4

This is for an Indian airline specifically. Not sure how many of people in this sub have even visited India, but as someone who lived there for a few years this is not just a good change but honestly it's probably a necessity. Hard guarantee that if this goes through and it works then women will choose to use that airline whenever possible. Indian culture just doesn't really respect space. Combine that with leering, handsy men in forced proximity for hours on end... Just suck it up and let the w…
/r/MensRights31/07/24 02:53 PM
-2

Hmm your last paragraph to me is why it sounds like you're suggesting men swear off women. You call it dishonorable to pursue women and relationships, and men should focus their efforts elsewhere. I don't really see an exception made for the men who do both at once, and for the men who don't have chasing women as a fully life consuming task... which is most men. That's where I get MGTOW vibes. And secondly the simp thing is weird? From what I understand you say the imbalanced dating scene is cau…
/r/MensRights05/04/24 04:53 AM
-5

Just read the last two paragraphs. OP doesn't understand you can pursue a hobby, a career, a degree while at the same time pursuing a romantic relationship with a woman. Its not black and white, you can have your cake and eat it too. He's suggesting teaching young men to actively swear off women. And he blames the difficult dating scene on women's artificially inflated egos??
/r/MensRights05/04/24 03:20 AM
-5

All of this, or aspects of them (minus the weird MGTOW/incel undertones) are things people learn over time in life with healthy, normal socialization and relationships.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 12:40 AM
2

Lol I'm well aware of what an open relationship is, but why do you think it's so black and white? News flash: Men can have female friends who they hang out with and also don't have sex with. Women can have male friends they hang out with and also don't have sex with. It's not that difficult. These sound like made up phrases. What kind of argument are you landing at here? I'm saying get with it dude. People are friends with the opposite sex, people can handle themselves, people are adults, people…
/r/MensRights12/02/24 04:29 PM
1

?? My guy, normally adjusted women who don't live in ultra conservative religious bubbles do let their husbands have female friends. Vice versa with normally adjusted men. Welcome to reality. Not trusting your own wife to handle herself alone? That is entirely a skill issue. Do some emotional maturing, internalize the fact that women have equal rights and marriage is a two way street, and be comfortable trusting the person you've dedicated your life to.
/r/MensRights12/02/24 03:44 PM
1

Oh no, women having agency over themselves and being of equal status in a relationship! The horror!
/r/MensRights12/02/24 02:30 PM
2

This isn't 1953. Women are allowed to drink and go out with friends. And they rightfully are gonna ignore men who won't let them do that. I don't think you need to worry about divorce since you usually need to be married first, and that involves respecting women, touching grass, and not pretending we live 70 years in the past.
/r/MensRights12/02/24 01:47 PM
1

I don't think being mentally disabled is the same thing as being an incel. And I'm not a Dutch prostitute but I'm sure they can also tell the difference. How are they going to know they're an incel and why are you framing them as pariahs? Incels are social pariahs. There's a reason they have a mostly online presence. There is a vast difference between a 50yo married man who's middle aged wife has a lower libido than 20 years ago and a 20yo man who's never been in a relationship in his life and b…
/r/MensRights14/12/22 04:19 PM
-2

What do you think drives someone to identify as an incel? I'm not claiming to know the answer, I only have my personal opinion. And in my opinion people become incels through loneliness, bullying perhaps, repeatedly embarrassing or bad social interactions growing up which compound over time and make them less likely to want to interact with others. I also believe that those core issues would be addressed by having their basic human needs and basic human rights fulfilled throughout their life. Pr…
/r/MensRights13/12/22 07:07 PM
-2

My family is from a very poor part of Africa and I can promise you, you don't need shelter to survive. Okay? I'm not going to argue with you on the definitions of basic human needs, they're pretty well documented, shelter being one of them. You won't die without shelter or free college either but the left argues for things too. Let's distinguish between basic human needs and basic human rights. Shelter is a basic human need required for survival. Shelter also isn't necessarily 4 walls and a roof…
/r/MensRights13/12/22 06:34 PM
1

Well the left in the US is center right at best when compared to the rest of the world. But regardless, They change their mind on advocating for the less fortunate when its unattractive men. Do you have an example of this? Specifically in terms of sexual access like we've been discussing?
/r/MensRights13/12/22 06:02 PM
-1

The left in the US should be in support of things like that (at least legalized prostitution, I don't agree at all with 'vouchers' for sex?), but actual left governments and cultures around the world have already legalized prostitution, legitimized sex work and have culturally have removed sex as a taboo. Meanwhile the right in America is still trying to drag sex back into black and white lines outlined in a religion followed by a minority. That definitely doesn't help provide sex or relationshi…
/r/MensRights13/12/22 05:17 PM
-4

I don't think sex itself is recognized as a basic human need, in terms of survival. The underlying part of that is human interaction in general which is an actual, recognized, measurable part of psychological well-being but also still isn't really in that same realm of survival. Sex isn't a basic human need in the same way that shelter, food, water, security, health are required to continue living. The state can and should be able to provide those things to people. But the state 'distributing' s…
/r/MensRights13/12/22 05:11 PM
-3

She called him a harasser - he did harass her, but he wasn't inherently a harasser. That's how the law saw it.
/r/MensRights05/12/22 09:01 AM
-4

Well the dude admitted to it and apologized about it, then successfully sued her for defamation because her hashtag exploded. He didn't fight that he did it at all, he argued that he didn't deserve to be the scapegoat of the movement. She didn't know her hashtag would explode like that. He took home the technical W since it was found that he was not actually a serial harasser.
/r/MensRights05/12/22 08:42 AM
-2

Exact same stuff as in the US, why is this an issue in any way? This is a sub about men's rights, not whining about feminism. In France anti harassment is more prominent IMO, and their version of me too was balance ton porc but it's pretty much the same stuff. Source: went to uni in France
/r/MensRights05/12/22 06:35 AM
3

After reading the study as well as this guy's Twitter feed I think we're misinterpreting this. It's clearly been removed as something interpreted as offensive to trans people, not as something offensive to women. When examined in context the removal is irrelevant to mens rights.
/r/MensRights17/10/21 04:48 PM
1

You're right, sorry, and I hope you can read the earlier comment for context.
/r/MensRights18/08/21 03:14 PM
1

didn’t start the thread but obviously there’s better criteria as to whether the asylum applicant is a woman or not. Things like if they helped NATO forces, educational levels, whether they’re actually of any value to the society they’re attempting to join etc. I'm sure all of which will be taken into account by the UK - As they stated, women and girls have priority, not a monopoly. I disagree on the value portion however. It makes perfect sense for immigration but not for accepting refugees. We …
/r/MensRights17/08/21 10:39 PM
1

Okay, your usage of discerning earlier seemed very synonymous with discriminate, for example, which is why I used it.
/r/MensRights17/08/21 10:17 PM
-1

There's dozens of possible things you can do besides provide housing which is usually closely controlled by government or organizations which require certain standards from their hosts. This is irrelevant regardless.
/r/MensRights17/08/21 10:14 PM
0

Why are you so needy to put words in my mouth I didn't wrote? As I wrote, I don't want to put words in your mouth and have asked you multiple times for clarification - why so aggressive? But I see, all you want is me to say 'all refugees bad', isn't it? Because you really make it look like painting me in a certain light is way more important to you than the cultural whoring out of little boys. So... Whats that about putting words in each other's mouths? If you're not interested in clarifying you…
/r/MensRights17/08/21 07:49 PM
1

You're worried that refugees are going to import this practice? Is that it? I'm asking you to confirm this in your own words, I don't want to speak for you. My question is why does this make you wary of all refugees? When in all probability a refugee would probably be fleeing from that practice, among other things.
/r/MensRights17/08/21 07:14 PM
-4

But we should be very, very discerning Interestingly, the whole existence of this thread is complaining about the admission of refugees as being too discerning - only women and girls. I’m not quite sure that would wash with potential rape/terrorism victims families that it was for the greater good. Yeah of course, and I'm sure people who are enslaved/killed in their home countries understood that it was necessary so as to protect the cultural integrity of a foreign country. Nobody wins in this s…
/r/MensRights17/08/21 06:51 PM
-5

In a heartbeat if I had the space or money - not a difficult decision to help a human being.
/r/MensRights17/08/21 06:45 PM
0

I'm asking a simple question as to the reasoning behind your opinion - not my that fault that you're seemingly incapable of providing it.
/r/MensRights17/08/21 06:44 PM
-7

the world isn’t that black and white, Which is why I don't believe all refugees should be mistrusted. I'd much rather let a few evil people in and save thousands of innocents than help nobody. I'd be interested in any evidences of this practice limited to Afghanistan and Pakistan being replicated in Western countries by refugees.
/r/MensRights17/08/21 04:40 PM
-2

Can I ask for clarification? Obviously I am capable of reading. Why is the existence of this practice a reason you're not fond of refugees?
/r/MensRights17/08/21 04:36 PM
-49

May I ask why this would make you not fond of refugees? I would assume people would be refugees since they are fleeing from this very practice (as well as everything else that makes one flee their country).
/r/MensRights17/08/21 03:49 PM
-2

MGTOW has long deserved a ban. Basing an ideology on mistrust of an entire gender is an iffy place to start, but nobody here can argue that the MGTOW subreddit itself wasn't hateful to the extreme. It was a poisonous echo chamber, and we should be sad that it managed to radicalize so many young men. Distrust of women is not advocating for men's rights, this sub had no ideological connection (but definitely an overlap of users - unavoidable) and isn't concerned with the banning. It's done, good r…
/r/MensRights06/08/21 01:48 PM
-1

Yes, those are 100% fair comparisons - did you understand my previous comment?
/r/MensRights19/06/21 12:57 AM
-1

What's inaccurate, please elaborate. And regardless, my entire argument is that comparing asian men to black women or white men to black women is impossible. We can compare across gender, we can compare across race, we can compare across gender while controlling for race if we want to know purely the difference between for example white men and white women but we cannot compare across both demographics. Comparing asian men to black women proves nothing.
/r/MensRights18/06/21 11:40 PM
-5

I think you're missing my main point - men's rights and social justice for African Americans in general (of which BLM is only one organization) are completely separate issues. They do claim that race is the main factor in police violence and deadly force though, which is not true. Okay, I can't find this on any of their material to corroborate this but I'll take your word for it. But regardless, they are separate issues. Men are more likely to be killed, and on top of that black men are more lik…
/r/MensRights18/06/21 11:36 PM
-4

Yet that's exactly what BLM does by pretending that race is the dominant factor and hiding the fact that gender plays a much higher role in how police treat you and how likely they are to kill you BLM isn't pretending, it only focuses on race, that's what I'm trying to get at - I don't believe that that's a valid reason to criticize it. We can't turn a valid racial issue into a men's only issue since it isn't only a men's issue. BLM is inspired by police shootings but is also a general protest o…
/r/MensRights18/06/21 10:29 PM
-1

Statistically "Male Lives Matter" would make more sense, but if anyone dared to start such a movement they'd be branded "alt-right misogynists". I disagree, since black women are similarly much more likely to be killed by police than white women (even though for all races men are usually the victims). Racial discrimination and gender discrimination are different issues and one shouldn't be presented reductively to take attention away from the other. Yet the ratio of police killing victimization …
/r/MensRights18/06/21 08:04 PM
7

Ok you can pull out buzzwords all you want but do you have any actual concrete specific pieces of evidence to back them up? Like for example how, exactly, does Mozilla hate men?
/r/MensRights27/05/21 01:40 PM
5

Firefox is run by left wing radicals ....what? And why does that even matter?
/r/MensRights27/05/21 01:22 PM
1

Just as an aside, this is extremely common in India but usually with acid instead of boiling water and more often than not the perpetrators get away with no repercussions.
/r/MensRights26/05/21 07:40 AM
1

OP is replying to a comment about mgtow, saying "a year ago [he] would've agreed" that they are misguided. Implying that now he's bought into it, confirmed by him saying "I can't really see any other option than to not play the game at all". He's bought into mgtow, okay, whatever. Mgtow is inherently misogynistic and self defeatest which is not what mra is about. I think spreading that more extemist rhetoric into this sub is actively damaging the subs reputation as well as even worse, actively e…
/r/MensRights02/05/21 04:13 PM
0

This sub isn't about being celibate, nor is it explicitly full of hatred against women, both of which you'll find on mgtow. That nonsense is not part of men's rights activism, don't bring it over here.
/r/MensRights02/05/21 02:38 PM
-1

If you can't see any other option then go to that other sub with other like minded people, don't spread that poisonous rhetoric on a community that is actively working against it.
/r/MensRights02/05/21 07:54 AM
9

Bad advice, go to university if you're able/willing and better yourself.
/r/MensRights05/03/21 07:55 AM
1

I think there is an important distinction to make between subreddits banning dissenting opinion comments (which is allowed, it's their sub) vs moderators banning TOS breaking comments in an attempt to not get an admin ban. The moderators here do tend to leave every comment up and don't take a stance one way or the other while leaving it to the community more to moderate with votes. This is the ideal situation AND it is what is currently done here. But I'll be honest, I no longer think it's a goo…
/r/MensRights22/11/20 12:55 PM
0

We can't have a civil discussion focused on personal growth at a time when the right to civil discussion itself is in jeopardy. Civil discussion being the key term here, those other subs were not civil, hence the bans. Civil discussion continued here, but it has devolved as more and more users and extreme mindsets migrated from banned subs. If we reject the hate rhetoric and tell these refugee users to either cool it with the misogyny or leave then we both further the actual MRA movement as well…
/r/MensRights22/11/20 12:31 PM
3

Women have gained huge amounts of power in the last few years we hate women because they're abusive psychopaths who torture men Case in point, this is not a healthy take. subreddits like /r/Menslib that are dangerous. They only increase hatred and violence because they don't allow a place for men to vent their frustration and pain openly. Menslib isn't making you hateful, you are making yourself hateful. There is a marked difference between venting and just spouting hatred, which is what has bec…
/r/MensRights22/11/20 12:27 AM
1

This sub has kind of.... Gone downhill? There used to be a hard line drawn between here and more extreme subs like mgtow/trp. There wasn't a pure hatred/rejection of women here like on those subs, just pushback against the actual results of feminism and the language associated with it as well as general discussion/awareness efforts. Now though, following the bans of the more extreme subs, as well as bans of plenty of right wing subs, a decent portion of the radicalized have moved here. You see a…
/r/MensRights21/11/20 03:22 PM
-9

These comments are insane, I pop in every once in a while but it just gets worse and worse - there used to be a hard distinction between trp/mgtow and here, not so much anymore.
/r/MensRights21/11/20 04:55 AM
0

This sub has nothing currently to worry about IMO, BUT promoting the TRP site is a huge mistake - that's not what this movement is about. Toeing that line is dangerous and poisonous. Men's rights IS NOT blatant misogyny, however considering the way the users here are trending that will eventually get this place banned.
/r/MensRights01/07/20 01:01 AM
9

Only small contentious articles like this without much research are unreliable. Labeling the entire website as unreliable just because you disagree with a few political opinions is dangerous.
/r/MensRights28/06/20 05:36 PM
0

Yeah it's pretty discouraging.
/r/MensRights19/05/20 02:17 AM
-4

Okey dokey
/r/MensRights18/05/20 05:43 PM
-14

I don't think you read the article...
/r/MensRights18/05/20 03:35 PM
1

Now you're complaining about the responses Because you said: In your opinion this is race baiting? Read the responses as evidence, yes it is. Your argument is that - pedantically - this is a false accusation and thus belongs on the sub. My argument is that this really isn't a false accusation - no one was actually falsely accused of a crime, and thus this post has no place on this sub. Did her false accusation and the response to it hurt someone or not? No, nobody was hurt. Nobody was accused. W…
/r/MensRights18/05/20 04:34 AM
1

Read the comments, this is bringing out people from the woodwork. It's about a third people saying this is irrelevant, a third complaining about feminism, and a third talking about migrants.
/r/MensRights17/05/20 06:34 PM
1

I disagree, nobody innocent was hurt. This is in no way equitable to actual false accusations that deserve discussion and justice. IMO this post is the_donald level race bait, absolutely nothing more, and has no place on this subreddit.
/r/MensRights17/05/20 04:38 PM
1

I went and looked it up, she said it was people who 'spoke German', and she retracted it 12 hours later. False accusation? No. She was raped, she did say she too that she didn't want to stir stuff up with racists (and inevitably...) But retracted her statement since someone else had a similar story (which they then retracted...).
/r/MensRights17/05/20 05:18 AM
1

She named no names, just misidentified her attackers appearance. No specific persons were accused. There are no two different groups, just the fact (assuming this is in any way real and not just a right wing race bait piece) that she was raped.
/r/MensRights17/05/20 01:02 AM
1

This isn't a false allegation. Did anyone read the headline? This article should be taken with a huge grain of salt considering it's source, but it's not a false allegation. She was raped, she claims it was by 'mixed people' and not immigrants.
/r/MensRights17/05/20 12:22 AM
1

Because it violates the sub rules? It's unrelated to men's rights.
/r/MensRights16/05/20 11:06 PM
-1

This is completely irrelevant to men's rights and Daily Mail is a garbage source of information. Why is this allowed?
/r/MensRights16/05/20 10:32 PM
1

...... What? Is this like people claiming drinking soy milk somehow makes you less 'male' too? That isn't how biology works, all humans have estrogen and testosterone.
/r/MensRights14/05/20 05:10 AM
1

The bottom line is that you don't know what you're talking about, and have likely never played soccer or any other sport at a high level. Okay, it's clear I can't shove this past your skull, this is a friendly, and not even that it was like a pr stunt. It's not my fault you don't understand how this sport works, I've tried to explain this to you. The results don't matter, it's a training session. And in other sports? Completely irrelevant, rugby is a totally different skill set, much more relian…
/r/MensRights03/05/20 04:21 PM
2

It just keeps coming. The women generate more cash than the men. The women's jersey is Nikes best seller of all time for a single season. 22% more people in the US watched the women's final than the men's.
/r/MensRights03/05/20 04:42 AM
2

Then why are you commenting on the subject as if you know about it? The irony in this! This is FC Dallas's academy, one of the better MLS academies in the country, but this u-15 group is definitely not the best available, they are almost all from Texas and scouted from local schools. They also still go to school, so, like, literally high schoolers. The women's team had an international tournament coming up, so they played friendlies to prepare for it since that's what you do in soccer. It's a tr…
/r/MensRights02/05/20 10:53 PM
1

I'm not here to bash women ...maybe you want to read the comments you've already posted here? Only a misandrist c unit could possibly ask for the same pay as a man while literally doing zero of the work the men have done. They're far more successful than the men, they literally do more work than them. The women won the world cup, the men didn't even qualify. They then ask "why is our pay so much less when we are 100x better than the men" and the judge says "because a long time ago your represent…
/r/MensRights02/05/20 10:28 PM
2

I think you're on the wrong sub, that's not what we're about here.
/r/MensRights02/05/20 09:31 PM
-4

Professional women are going to beat the 15 and unders, some will be faster and taller but at that age not most of them and in soccer it's a bit more equalized. I'm not sure if you've ever watched the women's team play but they are incredibly good, the best in the world at their positions. They'd be against some players with a physical advantage but none comparable in skill. And "going easy on them", it's a friendly in soccer. By definition you go easy, you rotate players, built fitness and avoi…
/r/MensRights02/05/20 09:30 PM
-7

Lol why do I hate men so much.... I'm a man, bro. It's not my fault this sub doesn't understand this sport.
/r/MensRights02/05/20 09:00 PM
4

Well them choosing the money now instead of dividends later is actually the correct answer, but the US women's team is actually far more lucrative than the men's, they are way more successful.
/r/MensRights02/05/20 07:56 PM
4

For anyone who follows the sport they're well known as top in the world in their positions, besides Solo who is retired. She's a pretty shitty person, however she did completely change the women's goalkeeping game.
/r/MensRights02/05/20 07:54 PM
-37

It's important to note that friendlies are realllllyyy not indicative of a teams actual performance, especially in the run up to an actual competition. The women's team would for sure beat a u-15 men's academy team in an actual competitive, prepared match.
/r/MensRights02/05/20 07:51 PM
1

So this post mocking this video is actually promoting Trump hate? There's plenty of Trump hate on Reddit already and there has been for pretty much the entirety of his presidency, it's nothing new.
/r/MensRights14/04/20 04:47 PM
1

The video in question is four years old...
/r/MensRights14/04/20 04:24 PM
1

??? Are you going to continue to waste my time or are you going to man up and tell me what your mish mash mumble of words actually means? What's the point in replying? You don't have an argument, just anger towards a retired president and people who don't agree with your preferred political party. Tribalism indeed.
/r/MensRights13/04/20 02:47 AM
1

I never made the argument that the Democrats universally agreed he deserved it. Hold on, lemme go back a few comments... ...Obama's Nobel Peace Prize is all the proof we need to see the hypocrisy of the left. How many Democrats spoke out against him receiving that award? As I've told you, multiple times, quite a lot of Democrats spoke out against that award. Since you've obviously ignored the article I've referred to multiple times, I'll link it for you again. Since your argument seems to be as …
/r/MensRights13/04/20 02:28 AM
1

What? Friend did you read my article? My evidential rebuttal? Democrats did not universally say that he deserved the Novel Peace Prize. I'd say most were as shocked as he was. Thus no, democrats do not blindly follow the leader. Also see my original link: 48 sourced polls showing extreme disparity between Republican opinions between presidents compared to democrats. As to you claiming he is the worst President, in history, please present your evidence.
/r/MensRights13/04/20 01:40 AM
1

What is your argument? The left are more like lemmings than the right, evidence: Obama received a Nobel Prize? That's a terribly weak piece of evidence, did you read my link? Everyone thought it was strange and unmerited.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 10:58 PM
0

Point stands, if you to discuss unconditional partisan support, Obama's Nobel Peace Prize is all the proof we need to see the hypocrisy of the left. How many Democrats spoke out against him receiving that award? Quite a lot of people, Democrats included. Obama himself thought he didn't deserve it and he was extremely surprised to receive it. As said in the article, he hadn't actually done anything yet. But... Seriously? You complain about partisan politics and you decide that Obama winning the N…
/r/MensRights12/04/20 10:21 PM
0

Wowie I can't even find the goalposts you moved them so far! Were you aware that the reason we no longer hear about drone strikes is because as soon as he was elected Trump repealed an Obama mandate requiring the govt to publish all drone strikes?
/r/MensRights12/04/20 08:08 PM
1

I have to say, one seems a bit different from the other in terms of blindly following suit with their fellow tribe members.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 05:54 PM
1

In this case, the accusation came first, it's on them to provide the evidence for their claim. Until then the accused should be treated as innocent.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 05:40 PM
34

Absolutely nothing to do with men's rights, keep that on other subs if you have to say it.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 02:50 AM
-3

Fox News is.... Bad. At this point it's not even a subjective opinion, Fox is a very poor source for accurate news. Tucker has for years been saying the things that pop up on the teleprompter, things that are both true and things that are also blatantly, empirically, egregiously false. While most of what he says in this is true, there is a very large Fox spin thrown in. A few examples off the top: never mentions racial inequality between incarcerated men, cherry picks a single study to say that …
/r/MensRights27/02/20 07:46 PM
1

HOW do you support men's rights when your Liberalism is clearly antimale and pro metoo and feminism, just answer this. I can have liberal political views while also not being anti male, pro me-too and feminist, in the same way you can have conservative views without being racist or sexist. This isn't black or white, you're allowed to have multiple opinions and preferences. I disagree 100% with pretty much every conservative position on politics, I think the liberal or central ideas will actually…
/r/MensRights18/02/20 04:38 PM
2

The Donald doesn't call for violence, it was quarantined because of the liberal woke bias of reddit. This is not an evidence battle you're going to win. As to the rest.... Wow. Okay.
/r/MensRights18/02/20 12:44 PM
3

You're right that I should be more clear with that, it's all more of one large interconnected bubble of people on the extreme/radical sides of their particular movements or groups. Of course I don't mean to say that all right wingers are guilty of misogynism/racism/sexism, etc. However, "all that shit" tends to be associated with more extreme right wing politics, this is undeniable. Check out the user overlap for mgtow or check the one for t_d. Both sides tend correlate with each other and there…
/r/MensRights18/02/20 12:02 PM
2

This sub will never be treated fairly because it's too close to the right wing/red pill/mgtow/incel/misogynistic/sexist subculture bubbles that exist on Reddit and elsewhere online. There's too much bleedover, and critics fail to realize that the MRA movement is completely separate (either they don't bother to do research or they just disagree with what they've found, you can't change their opinion regardless). If you can't handle the hipocrisy it's much better to say nothing than to go on the o…
/r/MensRights18/02/20 10:18 AM
6

Who knows, but diverting blame and trying to justify your hatred gets nowhere and is the opposite of what true men's activism is, as opposed to mgtow or incels or the red pill.
/r/MensRights18/02/20 09:59 AM
9

Because we do contain occasionally hate speech and misogyny. Don't ignore the flaws, some threads on here are just flat out useless and hateful. Call them out on it, report it and move on. This sub needs to take a hard stance against that kind of attitude that tends to leak over from quarantined or banned subreddits.
/r/MensRights18/02/20 06:03 AM
1

Okay, nice anecdotes.
/r/MensRights15/02/20 02:37 PM
1

Okay, do you have a source to back up your claim?
/r/MensRights11/02/20 11:45 AM
1

....no? That's not even remotely true.
/r/MensRights11/02/20 06:30 AM
3

Yeah it seems to change quite a lot. Some days it's really bad, some days it's really good.
/r/MensRights31/01/20 10:44 PM
1

That sub is (was?) completely misogynistic, but Reddit only cared once it got a right wing terrorist linked to it on the news. This sub, however, should take a hard stance against letting that mindset and any refugees take root here as well.
/r/MensRights31/01/20 05:41 PM
0

If this is what defines an awful country for you, you could do much worse.
/r/MensRights11/01/20 12:26 AM
2

If you don't like the sub, then don't read and/or participate in it?
/r/MensRights07/10/19 06:49 AM
3

I'm a bit late, and while I agree with your title your examples feel a little too accusatory and presumptuous. Even in a 'girl who cries wolf' scenario it should always be taken seriously, but it is true to say that it is often just a cry for help rather than an actual attempt. There are people who do just do it for attention but I feel like those are few and far between. I'd be interested in seeing statistics on the ages of people who are counted as attempts, I'd feel that especially in adolesc…
/r/MensRights27/08/19 04:15 AM
1

all stem from cultural problems, not political I could agree with that, but I feel like politics are required to 'fix' or 'adjust' these cultures. Public education and availability of healthcare, for example, is definitely failing these people who eventually become culturally out of line. Poor areas have terrible schools and graduation rates and mentally ill people slip through the cracks all the time, as we can see. The only way to improve schooling or health availability is via politics and fo…
/r/MensRights05/08/19 10:46 PM
1

Gang related homicides don't really compare to these indiscriminate mass shooters though, so this is IMO a misleading argument.
/r/MensRights05/08/19 10:02 PM
0

Dowries are illegal, but it's a very innefectual law. There are hundreds of articles easily found with a Google search talking about how yes it is illegal but it is still very much in practice. I agree too that lots of parts of the law are clearly biased against men. For example a man can be charged with rape if the woman is intoxicated even if she gave consent. However, imo, these extreme laws are kind of necessary. For sure advocate to change the blatant loopholes and problematic laws but that…
/r/MensRights04/07/19 05:43 PM
3

...by showing how a neighboring country has a very high rate of acid attacks? I agree that of course most general assaults are not with acid, that doesn't downplay the fact that acid attacks have increased over the past decade and women are the victim majority.
/r/MensRights04/07/19 05:25 PM
-2

So for those who don't know Indian culture, the police firstly are pretty much useless. Misogyny runs deep in India, as well as the caste system. When you arrange a marriage with a family it's much better to be on the groom's side because you can gouge the bride's family hard for a huge dowry. For the majority of Indians a huge dowry would be something like a few thousand rupees and a motorbike or a bicycle or some cattle or something but to the average family in India these are worth everything…
/r/MensRights04/07/19 03:23 PM
1

MS Office ?
/r/MensRights24/06/19 05:00 AM
-2

I'm a bit late, but no it really isn't. It's just a veil so it doesn't get outright banned like the late frenworld. Hell, half the comments still use the same terminology. Do what you want and believe what you want, but don't drag that garbage into this sub. Edit: r/honkler has been quarantined. Edit 2: r/honkler has been banned.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 04:47 AM
-7

I mean r/honkler is pretty much white supremacy and racism hiding behind the whole clown thing, we should avoid dragging that into this sub.
/r/MensRights23/06/19 04:47 PM
4

That's stamina and leg strength, as well as core strength. When I ran cross country in high school I was one of the slower guys on the guys team but my pace perfectly matched the fastest varsity girls so I trained with them.
/r/MensRights23/06/19 04:44 PM
1

Economy is good though there is still lots of debate as to who takes credit for it. Trump undeniably inherited en economy on the rise. From what I've read the tax cuts are beneficial temporary but long term stability is missing, not to mention we have to trust companies to actually pay workers more with their smaller taxes. He's only an embarrassment because that's how the media portrays him. Strongly disagree, one needs only to look through his Twitter page or watch him give a speech.
/r/MensRights09/05/19 08:45 AM
1

Extremist political rhetoric... I think your definition of extremism is way way off. Regardless, every big university will offer courses in this category that maybe you don't agree with, or maybe you don't agree with the professors. It doesn't matter, students can completely ignore the school of social studies as they can completely ignore the law school or the medical school or the engineering schools.
/r/MensRights09/05/19 08:26 AM
0

Wow, I disagree with everything here. I think he's a terrible president, an even worse leader and an overall national embarrassment.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 10:50 PM
-2

So they can get a job 👍 UW is an excellent and beautiful university.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 04:17 PM
1

Trump's unpopular among feminists (and most people) for far more reasons than just him being a man, I don't agree with this article portraying feminism as the one thing tarnishing his reputation.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 04:09 PM
6

Or maybe it's just that soy milk is in no way demasculating?
/r/MensRights15/04/19 11:49 AM
7

God forbid we gain a miniscule amount more by having some soy milk. Just ignore the fact that beef and meat products contain estrogen as well.
/r/MensRights15/04/19 11:30 AM
9

Everyone has estrogen, but it's interesting to see the demonization of something so trivial as soy milk to the point of political party divisions.
/r/MensRights15/04/19 09:54 AM
33

What's with the crusade against soy milk?
/r/MensRights15/04/19 08:05 AM
4

To you and to him he is correct, not to the real world.
/r/MensRights15/02/19 11:53 AM
9

Empirically correct in his own mind, sure. What a manipulative, poisonous attitude. Women don't actually care about you, but being women they require their male counterpart to feel validated? Showing emotion in any way, shape or form in front of women invalidates you and is permanently emasculating? Modern psychology is a farce because it dares to be metaphysical? God forbid we study our minds. *Everyone* will discredit you if they hear that you were unable to defend yourself, no matter your sit…
/r/MensRights15/02/19 11:15 AM
7

Nope, keep your misogyny over there, we do not want it here. That's not what we do.
/r/MensRights15/02/19 09:27 AM
16

I disagree 100% with every single thing you said. Reinforcing black and white stereotypes and completely denying the possibility of change is not what this is about, take that hatred and self defeatist attitude somewhere else.
/r/MensRights15/02/19 09:23 AM
0

The right think they know better, and they absolutely cannot be convinced otherwise. They think so highly of themselves they will take humanity and choice away from other people they disagree with, because to them those people are subhuman. Those people aren't smart enough to have come to the same conclusions the right have, so they must be treated like children. The right doesn't think, but knows they're correct. All evidence to the contrary is fake news. It's because of these compunctions that…
/r/MensRights05/01/19 01:44 PM
1

Article never mentions any wage gaps or tendencies of young women to leave jobs over young men. Pushing a narrative that isn't there is what makes people dislike this sub, this content does nothing but sow discord.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 04:34 AM
4

How is this an issue? Battlefield has never marketed itself as a realistic warfare simulator, and most traditionally male focused game series have all been adding especially in the stories more central women characters, so what? These games have been 'modernizing' old settings for years now, and it's pathetic that people are upset about it. Don't like the game? Don't buy it. Go and play Red Orchestra instead.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 04:41 PM
9

TRP I pretty much vehemently disagree with. Guys congratulating each other on their sexual exploits and sharing their personal alpha/dom/etc philosophies is just kind of messed up IMO. T_D at best is disillusioned and at worse is what old Ben Kenobi would call a wretched hive of scum and villainy. Those are my personal opinions, but I am confident in saying most of Reddit shares my viewpoint. That kind of brings me to why I think the image of this movement is very important. In terms of just Red…
/r/MensRights16/03/18 07:14 PM
66

Most people already think men's rights is a kind of right wing almost extremist misogynistic power obsessed group thanks to the red pill subreddit and most media on the subject, bleeding over into T_D doesn't help that image at all. Not to mention that any subreddit that gets politicized by the far right leaning users tends to fall apart pretty quickly similar to r/conspiracy.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 03:34 PM
3

I don't know about assertive, I can agree with warm though.
/r/MensRights24/02/18 09:43 PM
29

Well not exactly. The study found that men had more positive reactions when breaking from social norms while women had more negative reactions when doing the same thing.
/r/MensRights24/02/18 05:49 PM
0

OP is 'astonished' to not see more support for Moore on this forum. Most people already do not take men's rights seriously, and championing against, for example, the 'injustice faced by Roy Moore' would seriously damage this movement. Controversial politicizing is the last thing that is needed.
/r/MensRights14/12/17 12:42 AM
6

I agree, innocent until proven guilty applies to everyone. Moore has not been formally penalized or criminally indicted for his alleged actions in the past, and he is not being legally treated like an offender. However the general public will always have an opinion, and in this case the general public is also responsible for voting him into office. This is a much different situation to, say, a college instantly expelling a student based on a single unfounded accusation of rape.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 06:58 PM
16

The sheer amount and variety of accusations should (and did) raise red flags. Single unfounded accusations that end careers are a bummer, but Moore quite clearly has a dirty past. Even ignoring all sexual misconduct allegations, his many other ignorant and dangerous comments and statements he has made alone should've guaranteed his loss. If the Republicans wanted to win, they chose the wrong candidate. Moreover, he is definitely a terrible person to attach any men's rights movement to.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 09:37 AM
3

Not trying to jump on the hate train, serious question: Do you have a source for any of that medical research? Because I have yet to see really any research done on the whole gender neutral thing.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 03:01 PM
2

I agree with almost everything in this comment. And of course men have emotional burden too. I meant in the context of the man leaving, it was then all on the woman. I don't want to comment on your personal situation though, and presume like I know any of the context. Women want to FEEL like it's a fair process, and want the emotional support for the decision they need to convince themselves they are being democratic, but there's no gussying up the fact that it's a dictatorial decision. I'm sure…
/r/MensRights10/03/16 07:43 PM
2

Women totally can put their child up for adoption. The difference is they have to physically bear a child for 9 months in order to do so, which isn't easy in any situation.
/r/MensRights10/03/16 07:32 PM
-4

But not young women. They, despite being equal partners in the act, can avoid any unwanted repercussions from the event. Women cannot avoid any unwanted repercussions from the event. If neither party wanted to be pregnant, and the man is gone, it is left solely to the woman to be physically (and perhaps financially if there is no public health system) responsible for the abortion or the pregnancy, whichever she chooses. I'm sure any woman who has been pregnant and/or has gotten an abortion will …
/r/MensRights10/03/16 06:41 PM
0

No I agree that this law should exist, the option to abandon responsibility should exist, this is a free world. However, as a male, I think abandoning responsibility is kind of a dick move. Just my two cents.
/r/MensRights10/03/16 06:28 PM
-27

While I agree that technically men should have the right to 'abort' responsibility, in my opinion it's also a pretty dick move. A law like this would be abused badly, young men need to be taught that they actually have to take responsibility for their actions. Yes, women can abort without telling the men, but if the man aborts responsibility then no matter what an unfair physical burden is on the woman. She's the one who has to go in and get an abortion and deal with that emotional stress, and i…
/r/MensRights10/03/16 06:14 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter