TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MagicGin Archive

View 0 posts and 39 comments by MagicGin on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

extremely hard It would be nice if this were the case, but just googling a few things about the hidden web has historically been enough to get access to places like silk road. I can't imagine child pornography is any harder to find. You could easily find this by seeing it mentioned in a crime drama and googling "dark/hidden web pedophile".
/r/PussyPassDenied18/09/19 08:25 PM
17

legitimate stuff I'd argue that treating conscription and countless death in WW2 is a pretty legitimate subject, much in the same way that recognizing the suffering of women in the same age is legitimate. People would justifiably complain if a work of fiction tried to cast the early 1900's (and earlier) as a pleasant, egalitarian time for women--so it's equally sensible that we recognize it as a shitty time for men. Countless young men were forced into the trenches to be tortured by gas and bomb…
/r/MensRights13/07/18 06:36 PM
17

I mean, you could correct him instead of being passive aggressive about it.
/r/MensRights19/08/17 05:50 PM
17

When a woman tells you she’s been assaulted, believe her You really shouldn't believe things without cause, Carol. Supporting an alleged victim is fine. Believing them until evidence and testimony comes out is fucking retarded.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/06/17 06:06 PM
43

That compensation is worth about 6 years of minimum wage. If you want to work this out in a fair way then you can't look at it as simple wage output, you would need to look at the amount of money he would have been able keep after living expenses. The money is meant to compensate him in part for the sum of lost potential assets; "food I ate", "rent I paid" and "internet bills" are not assets. It's also meant to compensate him in apology as well to give him the money he needs to try to rebuild hi…
/r/MensRights15/05/17 02:34 AM
153

To be a bit more objective about it; They are "anti fascism". They believe that the far right are fascists and that the rhetoric they used is responsible for violence within the nation. Since far right speech is supposedly violence (by means of creating violence), they believe that violent resistance is both a valid and justified response to "fascist speech". They genuinely feel that they're shutting down literal nazis. Often they feel that anyone doing less is complicit (through inaction) but t…
/r/PussyPassDenied18/04/17 05:32 AM
18

gains in wealth [shouldn't always be shared] I have to disagree with this not on an ethical basis but on a legislative basis. If you place it in grey territory then you're granting power to whichever partner in the divorce has superior assets (or access to those assets) in order to win in court. Good lawyers make a difference and money is already too powerful in the legal system as is. Often shared assets are handled in a particularly egregious manner that screws one party or the other but addin…
/r/MensRights26/03/17 08:39 PM
1

This makes the presumption that children aren't children; if little Timmy has a knack for science and a love of animals, he'll probably still never go towards vet science because he recognizes that it's a "girl thing". 50/50 full retard egaltarianism won't help anything but boys and girls both need role models to expose them to potential paths. People won't move in the direction of their interests and talents--where they want to go--if they don't know those options exist. I understand that the i…
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/17 03:54 AM
2

Occam's razor isn't the "simplest" explanation, it's the one that makes the least assumptions. Occam's applies equally to both possibilities here: either the previous post was honest (and the account traded hands) or the current post is honest (and the mods actually thought this would be funny). The razor works because the more assumptions you make, the more points of failure your argument has. Neither side makes more or less assumptions.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/17 08:14 AM
61

and a cop who sees its not a big threat yet tackling her to where a person can smash their head on the floor and get permanent brain damage Except it's his basic job, and duty, to handle threats in a manner that preserves his safety and the safety of those around him. He's not going to fuck around and gently pat her into submission because then she might actually manage to hurt him. No, she broke the law and attacked him and he is going to stop using the exact amount of force necessary to do so …
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/17 06:02 AM
1

Anyone can sue for anything and you'll still have to defend yourself in a court of law. Lawyers can be sanctioned for filing frivolous suits, but it has to be really bad for that to happen. Sad reality is that on a cost:benefit analysis level, it's almost never a good idea to help anyone even if the law is strictly and obviously on your side.
/r/MensRights22/12/16 08:22 AM
8

im not sure how long it even was about equality to be honest It was never about equality. Social movements aren't about equality. They never are and they never were. A social movement, whether it's men's rights, feminism, black liberty, whatever, is always defined by a drive for power and better circumstances. This has been inherently true since the dawn of time. What causes a movement to succeed is when it's an equalizing effort, since the collective power of a monolithic group is never as grea…
/r/MensRights04/12/16 04:20 AM
9

That was my thought on the matter as well. I'm not sure if this is line of reasoning is bound in sex discrimination, but possibly rather in sexuality discrimination.
/r/MensRights28/10/16 12:43 AM
11

The defense of her actions put out is the spurious claim that she was the "real victim" and that he was supposedly an abuser. This is a pretty classic men's rights issue; men are seen exclusively as the perpetrator and women are seen exclusively as the victim. We do have a right to be protected against those who would victimize us and we do have a right to have our stories heard, considered and weighed against the evidence in a neutral fashion. There's certainly a foundation for pointing out tha…
/r/MensRights27/10/16 12:28 AM
10

Timeline, physical events, etc. don't support anything other than the notion that he's a raging cunt. Which is an awful thing to be, but it's also perfectly legal. Given his personality and so on I wouldn't be surprised if he got shackled at some point for some kind of stupid domestic shit, but that doesn't mean he did anything this time.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/10/16 02:33 AM
43

Have a pastebin link.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/09/16 04:37 PM
-1

As other people have pointed out chances are the woman applied for aid and the state automatically billed him. It's unlikely that this is malicious, it's just an incredibly fucked up state system.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/09/16 11:01 PM
4

Is it possible that the lawsuit was over the state covering costs that should have been covered by child support? As others have pointed out, the law's basis is that the rights of the child trump that of the parent and that payment should be handed out accordingly. They might have been trying to acquire money that "should" have been paid out in child support, in the same way that your insurance company might sue the guy who hit your car.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/09/16 10:45 PM
32

Sorry, in English the general term for this is rape, i found google translate wasn't a lot of help lol. The actual general term for this is "statutory rape", which is really ironic because: adjective: statutory required, permitted, or enacted by statute. It's only "rape" because it's literally codified as such. It doesn't meet the definition of the word. This is why most legal definitions actually refer to it as "unlawful sex with a minor", "carnal knowledge of a minor", etc. Because the term "r…
/r/MensRights22/09/16 06:58 PM
28

The general argument is that an excessive punishment may deter reports but holding that view necessitates ignoring how hard it is to prove malicious accusations. Unfortunately for civil society, the only records of malice are the one that the machiavellian party leaves behind. Text messages, weak accusations (making the accusations in a way that can be physically disproven), etc. So the notion that excessive punishment would deter reports is a silly one.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/09/16 07:53 PM
12

rather rare It's actually the other way around. Per Differences in Frequency of Violence and Reported Injury Between Relationships With Reciprocal and Nonreciprocal Intimate Partner Violence (PMC1854883), about 70% of nonreciprocal violence was perpetrated by women; this is about 35% of total violence. The study of course had limitations, but most were slated towards things like potential sampling bias (which would generally be suppressive towards male respondents) and more extreme methods (surv…
/r/MensRights15/09/16 04:52 AM
14

You're completely right, but I think the original post was mostly trying to emphasize that life in general was a bit shit and that the value of liberty was, historically, a lot lower. Liberty is always important and necessary in a civil, just society. On the other hand, it's really only as valuable as your capacity to make choices--which historically was pretty bad. Liberty is always valuable, but how valuable it is is very much a product of the time. To stretch it back many, many years, grantin…
/r/MensRights29/08/16 02:43 AM
20

To be fair here it doesn't seem that the cat is actually being struck. Definitely harassed, but not struck. The camera holder doesn't seem to give a single, solitary shit either--so they probably expected the outcome. The kid might be a little shit but I think there's something to be said for the fact that, whether it's right or wrong to let it happen, the parents probably intended for this outcome. Ignorance, not malice.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/08/16 06:13 PM
6

No, by its very definition it was always a sexist movement. It was always concerned exclusively with the concerns of women. The difference between then and now is that in decades prior social concerns were often a much more one-sided affair, so a group that was similarly one-sided achieved good results. Feminism was bad methods achieving the right outcome, and now that we live in the age we do those methods have come to light.
/r/MensRights30/07/16 06:59 PM
6

Relative to the lower rung jobs that are male-dominated, yes. Construction work is hard, dangerous and it takes a toll on the body. That's why the pay grade is above minimum--it's a necessity to attract workers. Nobody would work construction if they could be a desk jockey instead for the same pay.
/r/MensRights30/07/16 06:51 PM
1

A victim's history is often completely inadmissible and there's good reason for that. It needs to be emphasized that this case is an extreme outlier. She worked in the porn industry, the "rape" was on film with her as at least a generally willing participant, she had previously had sex with one of the individuals, she claimed to have no memory of what had happened and didn't pursue it until the video surfaced, etc. Every single one of these points, individually, puts this case on the extreme out…
/r/PussyPassDenied07/07/16 03:32 AM
14

her doing porn It establishes two things: she has been taped before and that she has had this kind of sex before. Which is important, because when you're examining the plausibility of this kind of case you need to ask whether or not this kind of behaviour is outside of the range of the alleged viction's normal actions. This is crucial as the alleged rapists are claiming that the sexual assault lawsuit is an accusation driven by revenge. This argument presupposes that this kind of sexual activity…
/r/PussyPassDenied06/07/16 08:40 PM
5

there aren't very many "rapists." There's just people, This is false. 90% of rapes are committed by serial rapists with an average of 6 rapes each. The myth of there being a subset that's willing to go "too far" is vastly overblown. The closest it gets is campus rape statistics, which show that both perpetrators and victims are generally drunk when this kind of thing happens indicating that it's less an issue of "latent rapists" and more an issue of "alcohol makes people do dumb shit". The notio…
/r/PussyPassDenied04/07/16 01:09 AM
5

The lad was accused of assault (per the 2nd video) and the "extortion" very may well have been a fine depending on what the local laws are. Depending on the legal structure it's entirely possible that they were being charged with something that could be handled with a fine. This isn't uncommon; being hit with a fine and being jailed or similar if you don't pay it is present in many legal systems. This article is written from an overwhelmingly sympathetic standpoint, ignores information present i…
/r/PussyPassDenied02/06/16 10:51 PM
5

/v/ links only break age checks, not country ones.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/16 11:24 PM
2

The department of justice defines domestic violence as including emotional abuse, which it defines: Undermining an individual's sense of self-worth and/or self-esteem is abusive. This may include, but is not limited to constant criticism, diminishing one's abilities, name-calling, or damaging one's relationship with his or her children. Prosecution varies a lot and the exact law applied, punishment, etc. will depend a lot. You'll never(?) see a domestic abuse case go forward simply because your …
/r/MensRights26/04/16 08:40 PM
18

Correct. It was already nuked because even Kickstarter has some awareness.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 05:48 PM
2

IANAL, but iirc waiving liability doesn't actually have a valid legal precedent. A crime is still a crime, even if you sign a document that says "I won't sue you". Sky diving, for example, might have a waiver stating that you understand that accidents happen. The company would then argue that you were informed and aware of the risk and that if a bird crashed into your chute in a freak accident, you were the one who took that risk. On the other hand, that wouldn't save the company if you were to …
/r/MensRights31/01/16 11:44 PM
4

earned dividend from over two decades of solid investments. That's what the divorce payout was. If he worked and your effort enabled his work, then the divorce compensated you with a percentage of his earnings. No part of your work entitles him for his future earnings--you stepped out of a business relationship early and sold your "stock". Why would you get more after the fact?
/r/MensRights07/08/15 11:22 PM
3

This is actually one of the few things I'll argue against to an extent. First of all, keep in mind that these laws are made to apply to the general population and generally assume good-faith arrangements. They don't work in broken relationships with trophy wives because they were never meant to do so. In a more reasonable relationship (especially those that we've had for hundreds of years) a husband and wife enable each other. Historically, the guy who busts his ass all day is only capable of do…
/r/MensRights08/07/15 07:58 PM
38

I like the not-so-subtle implication that you either agree with her or you're a "fucking idiot". It's so generic yet still both funny and sad.
/r/MensRights03/07/15 04:19 AM
2

People question drugs like Ritalin fairly heavily because in spite of their commonality, they're quite unproven. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000271380960501X Results suggest that in many areas, e.g., school, work, and personality disorders, stimulant-treated hyperactives function significantly worse than matched normal controls but similar to untreated hyperactives. It's presently the dominant therapy by a massive margin. In spite of that, it's statistically inert; it doesn…
/r/MensRights26/02/15 08:13 PM
8

Social activism is social benefit. The majority of feminists join into the shrieking hordes because everyone else is doing it. If men's rights became trendy, they'd be all over it in a heartbeat. It's not socially beneficial to attack top 40 artists. Some of their friends like those. It is socially beneficial to attack subcultures. None of your friends (openly) like those. This is the basic and central issue with modern activism.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 01:08 AM
4

I'm also what a lot of people would call an egalitarian. I feel that many of the root concepts of Feminism are decent ones; there's a lot of pressure on women to be beautiful/fit certain images and there's a lot of pressure on women to act in certain ways. However, I generally feel that Feminism as a social movement is grossly dated and extremely narrow. Even at the most utterly, basic level, even ignoring the fact that there a lot of the issues that apply to women also apply to men, men have a …
/r/MensRights04/02/15 11:46 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter