TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Magikarp_evolved Archive

View 1 posts and 94 comments by Magikarp_evolved on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
76

Edu./Occu.Magikarp_evolved/r/MensRights10/04/18 08:31 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

I thought all those incidents were considered sexual emergencies. Because they don't want to appear "racist" toward a religious group. /sigh
/r/PussyPassDenied01/06/18 11:00 PM
2

Allow me to clarify: Oddly enough, all ham is pork but not all pork is ham. In this instance, the PPD is applicable across all spectrums of the matters involving women using their "women-ness" as an excuse for their actions; this being the ham. They getting what they deserve is that ham also being pork. You are right in that the person is getting what they deserve, but its also a PPD as she attempted to use her gender as justification for the actions in question, so technically, they are both. A…
/r/PussyPassDenied01/06/18 04:51 PM
9

That's putting an immense amount of trust in an already corrupt system. I think the opposite should be the norm; if you accuse someone of a crime, then not only should their life be put on display, so should yours. The character and moral/ethical compass of the accuser is just as important as the accused (along with some prosecutors once you have a quick glance at the legal history of the U.S.). If a person is known for making false statements, that should be taken into account, especially if th…
/r/PussyPassDenied01/06/18 03:36 PM
6

Arguably; the ideas are one and the same. Anyone who uses an inborn trait as a defining reason why they should be granted accolade or absolved of responsibility and then denied when others recognize the truth behind those actions are getting what they deserve. In this case, it's focused purely on women.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/06/18 03:32 PM
96

"When I cheated, I didn't mean to hurt him, but when HE did it, it was clearly to ruin my life and destroy my family. I'm a worthless person and I need to say that so you'll see how I'm up here on my cross, crucifying myself to show I know I was bad person, but HE WAS SO MUCH WORSE!"
/r/PussyPassDenied26/05/18 01:32 AM
7

That's a foregone conclusion, but it certainly wouldn't stop them from arguing that somehow the girls would somehow succeed based on nothing more than good feelings and "being on the right side of history".
/r/PussyPassDenied14/04/18 09:09 PM
27

Let's see what feminists might choose as their go-to argument to posture themselves. The boys cheated. (How you'd go about proving that a team of 15 year old boys cheated against a team of seasoned trained players would be interesting to watch.) The boys are younger, more fit, and with better stamina. A team of girls the same age could and would do just as well against older players. (Again, this would be interesting to watch.) This is why women need representation in sports! They can't get bett…
/r/PussyPassDenied14/04/18 08:03 PM
1

Personally, the wage gap idea doesn't bother me. We get false ideas, factually wrong information thrown at us everyday by hundreds if not thousands of sources. What bothers me is the idea being pushed by a private organization on a public level. What I'm about to propose will likely get someone talking about how private companies should be allowed to silence opinions, but that's not what we're talking about here. Google, Twitter, Facebook; companies like these have distinct facets that separate …
/r/MensRights12/04/18 08:44 PM
11

I love how much weight people put into the idea of what they think a right is. A right is something you're born with. Rights don't exist just because; they do not predate humanity. A right exists because a power greater than you created them; that power ultimately rests within the ruling authority as to how those rights are designed to be exercised and more importantly, whether or not the value the right possesses is to be respected upon being exercised. People in the U.S. have equal rights, no …
/r/MensRights28/02/18 07:56 PM
15

It's always so baffling that in a time when the media is vehemently anti-white male, anti-men, and overwhelmingly supportive of women, to the point that factual information is suppressed to push the narrative, these kinds of allegations never surface when the person has the job. Where's all this supposed racism and sexism happening in a time when the media is practically frothing at the mouth to have some to shove at white people and men specifically?
/r/MensRights26/02/18 09:31 AM
3

With a fat face like that, she's certainly not homeless.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/02/18 05:41 PM
12

If in theory, your resume looks less impressive because of real past discrimination But how would you or your potential employer know that without some measure of verifiable proof? Furthermore, if you were to have evidence of legitimate discrimination against yourself that could be posed to said potential employer, shouldn't that proof alone be enough to be taken into consideration for employment? Affirmative action's function is to balance out 'supposed' discrimination, with a presumption towar…
/r/MensRights14/02/18 05:35 PM
0

To that professor, I think only one word applies: delusion | dəˈlo͞oZHən | noun an idiosyncratic belief or impression that is firmly maintained despite being contradicted by what is generally accepted as reality or rational argument, typically a symptom of mental disorder: the delusion of being watched. • the action of deluding or the state of being deluded: what a capacity television has for delusion. PHRASES delusions of grandeur a false impression of one's own importance. ORIGIN late Middle E…
/r/MensRights23/01/18 05:00 PM
2

When the law is incentivized to profit, personal gain, or any measure of benefit beyond that of the public good, the Rule of Law is no longer in effect.
/r/MensRights23/12/17 07:06 PM
20

Given her size, I would think the physical exertion necessary to even get her in a position to be raped would be exhausting, let alone raping her.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/12/17 01:11 AM
3

Narcissism is fueled by attention. Attention requires making a scene. Feminism makes the assumption that because they are right™, everyone will agree with them and the attention they receive will invariably be the kind that they want. It's always nice to see when their fragile existence is broken apart by the Real World.
/r/MensRights12/12/17 11:50 PM
2

What you're saying to me is that you have nothing to really add so you attack the one thing that I got wrong, which is the location of a particular phrase in the Declaration of Independence. Furthermore, the government can and does regularly create laws limiting free speech. Feel free to test this by going into a movie theater and shouting FIRE or mount a protest in a restricted area or outside a designated "protest zone". At no point did I state anything about free speech or its social/politica…
/r/PussyPassDenied12/12/17 11:46 PM
1

i believe they are infringing on the other persons right to peacefully exist. You have a right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness as outlined in the constitution Declaration of Independence. Nowhere does it state you are guaranteed a peaceful existence nor entitled to one. Nor does the constitution guarantee you this right. Furthermore, no matter how disgusting a person is being toward you, it does not justify violence as a reasonable and rational response. This doesn't excuse the pe…
/r/PussyPassDenied12/12/17 07:58 PM
3

Only men do bad things, remember?
/r/MensRights02/12/17 03:51 AM
37

And of course, the goto reply of the courts when the man questions this is, "Well, you should have thought of that before you had a kid." Because this situation, among the myriad of ones that can possibly happen, is exactly what men and women think about when they have kids.
/r/MensRights24/11/17 06:06 AM
1

I feel like this is a probably a fake facebook convo; hell, its been around for a while. but whether or not it's fake, it does bring a very valid point and I'd love for someone who legit thinks that misogyny keeps women out of STEM fields to answer that question; why didn't you pursue a STEM degree? You can't say its because the math is privileged toward men because 2+2 will always equal 4. The number of man versus women in math doesn't change that. You can't say engineering is privileged toward…
/r/PussyPassDenied07/11/17 07:30 PM
4

That haunting moment when science becomes heresy.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 05:37 PM
29

Because its the only way people like her feel relevant; otherwise they have to live mundane normal lives like the rest of us and they're just too good for that.
/r/MensRights05/11/17 08:30 PM
1

I disagree. The reason things like racism and harassment are successfully being redefined according to the fragile feelings of snowflakes is because we failed to attack this hard enough to shed the light on the hypocrisy and fallacy that hold it up. Furthermore, by giving in to those standards, we are complicit in how these standards change. If we cower every time someone says "Oh you'll get punished for speaking up because they'll cry harassment", we might as well be saying SJW's are right.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/10/17 08:12 PM
3

The concept of child support is not about providing for the child. It's just another facet of power the state knows it can abuse to exercise control over people.
/r/MensRights24/10/17 04:13 PM
4

That's why a lot of jobs have 'take home work', the kind of stuff you don't sit on the clock punch card doing so its not technically illegal, but that must be done for your job. Think: School teachers, lawyers, physicists. What they're doing is making the high workload/hour a gendered issue rather than a human issue. How is this a gendered issue if both sexes work in those fields, which are generally salaried positions and not hourly?
/r/MensRights22/10/17 02:30 AM
-3

...for incels. Unless you've got evidence that says otherwise. EDIT: And what is it shorthand for, exactly?
/r/MensRights20/10/17 04:12 PM
-4

chad's child. I'm not the one who used that phrase.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 04:03 PM
-7

r/incels is that way -> Edit: So, is this sub in favor of incels? or are they just supporting this nutsac's dramatic interpretation of the future where "untouchable" men can't find love?
/r/MensRights20/10/17 03:40 PM
4

Not so much trying to stir up shit as they are trying to remain relevant. Relevance gives attention which in turn gives them influence which in turn gives them power. As with all forms of power, once you have it, you are loathe to release it. That's why I have issues with most forms of social activism; its less about championing for the equal protections of others and more about maintaining a conflict in order to feel "a part of the conversation".
/r/MensRights20/10/17 01:51 AM
7

It isn't okay, but because we allowed feelings based education to become the standard, this kind of factless delusional curriculum is rapidly becoming the norm.
/r/MensRights04/10/17 03:16 PM
3

Again; another fine example of why the cancerous notion of feminism needs to be forcibly removed from society.
/r/MensRights04/10/17 04:23 AM
2

Instead of posting this to reddit, shouldn't you be reporting her over and over and over and over again to child protective services? These things shouldn't be parents and the children of these things need a better life. We should all step in and report her until her child is taken from her.
/r/MensRights03/10/17 04:02 PM
12

Maybe they should do an article posting the pictures of the ones falsely accusing men; the Scarlet Letter goes both ways.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 07:03 AM
4

It has nothing to do with actual expenses Which is why in my comment, the word "logic" is in quotes. I know its bullshit. Always has been, always will be.
/r/MensRights25/09/17 06:36 PM
6

The "logic" behind it is you're reimbursing the custodial parent for their expenses. Currently the state says that whoever pays support does so to provide the child the financial support they would have had if their parents were still together; similar to the same flawed logic used to framework the idea of alimony: Oh you sacrificed everything to be with this person and now you have no marketable skills? Let's not hold you accountable for your choice and instead make your former partner PAY for …
/r/MensRights25/09/17 04:32 PM
3

The rise of most social movements stems from a focal point of insecurity; a desire to feel "included". Tumblr is a great example of this. You can easily spot hundreds of thousands of posts and comments that highlight how they want to feel desired and objectified like "conventionally" attractive people while demonizing everyone who receives that kind of attention as shitlords and bigots. Modern feminism found that the playing field between men and women had no battles where they could feel morall…
/r/PussyPassDenied22/09/17 04:18 PM
1

Well, to be fair, the name alone should have been a clue as to how the attitude in the sub would be.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/09/17 04:12 PM
3

I like how you make an assumption instead of actually providing evidence to support your statement that lesbian couples are not among the most violent of relationships. I guess its more important to accuse a bisexual of being homophobic than to support your statements. Care to tell me anything else I'm doing wrong?
/r/PussyPassDenied21/09/17 06:30 PM
5

Then find us one that is that completely shows your standpoint is correct. If your response is "do it yourself" or any excuse otherwise, fuck off from this sub.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/09/17 06:24 PM
3

So if I'm reading this right, they are advocating in favor of being able to abuse children?
/r/MensRights16/09/17 08:05 AM
2

We need to put a stop to this. Why this unfounded speculative bulshit is allowed to even exist in academia is beyond me but we need to put a stop to it.
/r/MensRights16/09/17 06:19 AM
17

You do know men have been laughed at by police when trying to report they've been raped, right? Imagine being LAUGHED AT by the ones who are supposed to help you when you tell them what's happened? Nah, guess they should just man up, right? Stop bein' a little pussy about it, is that it?
/r/MensRights13/09/17 08:44 PM
1

I think this is something we should all take note of; yes, feminism is a toxic narcissism machine of the insecure, BUT it is the system that is to blame for our current state of affairs regarding the eroding rights of men. Feminism, like any other social movement, is nothing without legitimacy. That legitimacy comes in the form of support by authoritative systems like government departments, the courts, etc. This is the part we should be tackling if we want to find success in establishing securi…
/r/MensRights07/09/17 03:29 PM
2

I never got my ban message and I've been locked out from r/hurtfeefees for god knows how long....
/r/PussyPassDenied04/09/17 05:40 PM
9

"We need genderless bathrooms so women feel safe from men." Proceeds to merge into what is really just a unisex bathroom. Fails to explain how this keeps women "safe" from men.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 01:41 AM
43

That's the part that always gets me, all these loud, vocal "types" that act like they have some authority to speak on complicated subjects While acting as the gatekeepers for subjects they perceive as "exclusive" to themselves or those like them. Furthermore, it's not like a white girl can walk into CVS and find her exact skin color either Friend of mine is really big into makeup. Pale as a ghost. She knows this struggle better than most. Average flesh tone colors are easier to manage than the f…
/r/PussyPassDenied01/09/17 07:15 PM
19

Well, for the past decade the "average" white community has acquiesced to a lot this. Yes, sadly. People are afraid of being outed publicly as racists. They don't realize these wingnuts don't really need a reason to "out" someone. They just cast a net over the whole population and whoever doesn't fit in is clearly undesirable. I believe it even played a major roll in that dipshit Trump getting to presidency. Agreed. I've never quite understood how the PC community expects to gain support when it…
/r/PussyPassDenied01/09/17 07:02 PM
630

"Person of Color" - Check "Transgender" - Check "Overinflated sense of self-worth" - Check Not at all surprised they outed themselves as racist. Seems to be the "in" thing these days.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/09/17 02:51 PM
11

If you have to claim rape to get attention from the person who is supposed to be giving you attention, you're doing everything very wrong.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/08/17 07:15 AM
30

"intimidating" is a weird way of spelling "disgusting".
/r/PussyPassDenied22/08/17 07:56 PM
1

Wow. So, you completely misunderstood the analogy; let's try it again. My analogy wasn't referencing how many people she fucked, when she fucked them or "accidentally" fucked as you somehow got to. If she genuinely believed he was the only one who could be the father, this means she was telling the truth, FROM HER POINT OF VIEW. Just as from your point of view, you'd only purchased 3 tomatoes. Just to be clear; I'm not saying you'd be right, but you'd be telling the truth. Fact and truth are not…
/r/MensRights20/08/17 06:33 PM
2

Let's try it another way: Yesterday, you went to the grocery store and bought 3 tomatoes. During your trip, however, you picked up 4 tomatoes without realizing it; you simply were not paying attention. When someone asks you if you bought 3 tomatoes yesterday and you respond with "yes, I did", are you lying?
/r/MensRights20/08/17 03:42 PM
1

Well, look back at the comment before mine and you'll see why their statement is odd to say the least. Because if she genuinely believed it at the time there's no intent, so it's not a crime. Of course, it's extremely difficult to prove intent in any case like this, doubly so in one fifteen years old. That means that not only can you not, you also should not prosecute her. What's important here is that they are saying if there is a lack of intent, there is no crime. To some degree, I believe thi…
/r/MensRights20/08/17 03:39 PM
5

Ignorance is not an excuse in the eyes of the law. I don't that applies here. The rest of your statements are spot on, but I don't think she broke any specific law nor was she ignorant of any law. She didn't lie or intend to mislead. She genuinely thought she was telling the truth. That said, the issue is not the girl; its the system. The courts have become a for profit system and once the law has incentive to profit, it is no longer the Rule of Law that governs us.
/r/MensRights19/08/17 07:38 PM
1

Because if she genuinely believed it at the time there's no intent, so it's not a crime. We may not intend to have accidents, but then we have involuntary manslaughter; an accident no one intended, but nevertheless is treated as a criminal act and a felony.
/r/MensRights19/08/17 07:34 PM
5

The comments in the article are cancer. Apparently everyone is shocked she got charged with murder because apparently allegations of abuse are enough to claim anything.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/17 04:32 PM
2

It is, but I think we'll end up veering into more hypotheticals than the discussion is worth. I think it's simpler to say that it's possible, but not likely.
/r/MensRights05/08/17 08:39 PM
1

I think you might inadvertently sidestepped the major point of my comment; the issue is whether or not you could teach something that exists in direct opposition to your beliefs with impartiality. To be clear; I'm not saying you teach both sides, but rather that you do not allow your bias to affect your presentation of the information. This is currently the problem that exists in many schools and college institutions; established fact being substituted with debunked or deliberately misrepresente…
/r/MensRights05/08/17 04:22 PM
2

Holding views contrary to curriculum does not prevent you from teaching it. If you were a teacher asked to teach children that 2+2=4 and you held the extreme and ridiculous belief that 2+2 in fact equaled 5, could you teach with impartiality? The ability for one to teach in contrast to their personal views is extremely important. You needn't look further than the religious right still pushing to allowing creationism in schools because religious teachers won't teach evolutionary theory. The issue…
/r/MensRights05/08/17 02:52 PM
2

Thanks for the FYI on that. I'd always been curious about why they switched actors but in the end I think Don Cheadle clearly plays the part much better. I could also argue bias as he's been playing Rhodie a lot longer than Howard got to so we never got to see the full range of his character but seeing how Cheadle handled the role in IM2 and 3, its hard to imagine Howard doing those same scenes and sequences with the same immersion of character.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/07/17 04:45 AM
183

I noticed that too. Went from Jim Carrey to the guy who played Rhodie in the first iron Man.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/06/17 04:03 PM
-1

I feel like you completely missed EXACTLY the point of everything I've said so far. I'll repeat myself: OBJECTIVELY. WRONG. What this means is that through logical analysis, we are able to determine is something is indeed helpful to the ethical development of society. It also means dismissing absolutes, such as all white people are racist or all men are bad. We know these things to be factually erroneous so they have no place in society. I think these ideas should be disallowed from legitimacy a…
/r/MensRights16/05/17 07:26 PM
3

Tell that to the men who've been falsely imprisoned because bad ideas were allowed to flourish. Tell that to children of abusive mothers who were forced to stay with them because bad ideas were allowed to flourish.
/r/MensRights16/05/17 06:31 PM
0

Except at no point have I said that we should silence people. If you want to say that Hitler was right, go ahead. That's your prerogative. You have the right to say that. You do not, however, have the right to legitimacy of position. It is clear that you would be objectively wrong and thus your position deserves no place on the sociopolitical stage of influencing policy toward some neo-nazi ideal. That's what I knew a lot of people would misunderstand about what I originally said. They can't dif…
/r/MensRights16/05/17 06:21 PM
5

Finally, a rational reply. Yes, you are correct; it is a very strong possibility people like myself could be in the minority, but answer this: Is it better to allow to expression of inherently false ideas such as anti-climate change or modern feminist dogma that is currently influencing governments in an objectively wrong direction or suppressing them before they can a chance to do real damage? Th real argument here is should err on the side of freedom and allow those ideas to persist and accept…
/r/MensRights16/05/17 06:08 PM
9

All ideas? "Pedophiles should be able to have sex with your kids without your input." Still think all ideas should be allowed to spread? "All men are rapists." "All women are innocent." "There's no such thing as false rape accusations." "There are more than 2 genders." Pretty sure some ideas do not need to persist.
/r/MensRights16/05/17 05:56 PM
3

I feel like you're just saying this to feel right about something. It doesn't change the initial premise of my original comment; the perpetuation of objectively wrong ideas on a socially influential level. It may come as a shock to you but just because something happens in the UK and the UK law is applied to it doesn't make it objectively right. It simply means that things happened the way they are meant to happen under those circumstances. I'm perfectly aware of those factors, but I'm choosing …
/r/MensRights16/05/17 05:39 PM
1

Very true, but does that in any way invalidate the remaining portion of my comment? I can't speak for another country's perception of expression and I won't presume to either. I can only speak from my own and how the US handles it.
/r/MensRights16/05/17 04:26 PM
71

I see a lot of people are misconstruing the idea of censorship once again. A lot of you seem to be under the impression that by shutting down these pages, these reprehensible people are being denied their freedom of expression. However, if you take a moment, you'll see this isn't the case. They can still assemble in public and express their views. They can still express their views publicly on Facebook. They can still speak. What's being prevented here is establishing a group dedicated to spread…
/r/MensRights16/05/17 04:13 PM
3

I just met you, and this is crazy, but I'm faking cancer, so call me Maeby.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/04/17 11:21 PM
7

So what happens when they encounter a situation where they can't perform the action necessary to safely move someone? I always see where they lower the standards, but I never hear about the problems that result in the field because of it.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 11:24 PM
3

Pretty sure the feminists will get upset at this anyways because the show isn't portraying real feminists but conventionally attractive ones. Fatties will be triggered.
/r/MensRights10/12/16 08:07 PM
2

"It was a joke." Yeah, let's talk about that joke. If it were indeed a joke, who was it meant for? Who was meant to find you throwing your child out in the fucking street funny? Who in your circle of friends shares your perspective that this is in some way humorous?
/r/MensRights19/11/16 12:35 AM
2

Unsurprisingly, the cited source is part of the problem. Non partisan...yet left leaning....
/r/MensRights17/11/16 10:47 PM
7

Pretty safe bet we'll hear how the police are being racist for singling out this struggling single mother whose trying to fight back against systemic racism and oppression.
/r/MensRights17/11/16 09:38 AM
2

When I first read your reply, something hit me; suppose for a moment you and your partner recorded a sex video and willingly up it up on the net for all to see and then, six months later, you realize you don't feel comfortable with it. Should it be taken down even though you initially gave your consent? And then I realized how close that sounds to the retroactive consent shit 3rd wave fems try to say women should be able to do.
/r/MensRights17/11/16 06:26 AM
28

So...lemme see if I have this right: He is suing her because she has openly stated that if he doesn't pay her x, she will release a sex tape. She is not being charged with blackmail and extortion because...? Genitalia?
/r/MensRights16/11/16 08:33 PM
11

Not to mention the logic of it doesn't work. "Donate sperm so that a woman can have a child without the need of BF/husband/Craigslist. Beware: if she finds out who you are, you will pay." Unless you are beyond stupid, you wouldn't donate.
/r/MensRights06/11/16 04:18 PM
18

Permanent infertility? No chance of "this is your kid, pay for it!"? Where do I sign up?
/r/MensRights06/11/16 05:30 AM
5

Is it just me or are only fat chicks the ones getting it on with kids? It seems like an oddly high number of overweight women are involved in this.
/r/MensRights19/09/16 07:55 PM
1

It allows a more moral ethical solution.
/r/MensRights24/08/16 06:01 PM
3

I miss FPH too :(
/r/PussyPassDenied11/05/16 02:19 PM
9

barf I never realized how odd this word is until seeing it printed. Surely I've seen it printed before, but for some weird reason it just looks so...strange. As for as the sentiment goes, yeah, spot on.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/05/16 01:17 PM
20

a culling of these types is our only hope. On one hand, I completely agree with the idea of wiping them out. The kind of irrational bigotry and delusional thinking that is being perpetuated by people like this is only going to worsen. Eventually, talking, reasoning, being diplomatic, and taking the high road with them will only get us so far. It will come down to open fighting and as much as people want to say these groups are "a small vocal minority", take a good fucking look around and notice …
/r/PussyPassDenied25/04/16 09:12 PM
2

At that point, the argument would become "what properly serves the public good and what doesn't" with the counterpoint of "what if". Think of free speech. The beauty of free speech is that we have the freedom to publicly express our opinions. The downside is we have to accept that some people out there have really shitty ideas that get to have equal time (feminism). Do we learn to accept that freedom of speech comes at a price or do we filter and censor ideas to shield ourselves from things we d…
/r/PussyPassDenied21/02/16 02:54 PM
18

I would add to it anyone who has filed a false rape claim.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/02/16 07:30 AM
2

And yet, you have failed to provide those reasons and furthermore, failed to address the questions posed, thus proving your insecurity. You're terrified to answer the question of why you think your reasons should trump another's right to their own body because you don't want to be seen as a monster. For all you speak of rights, it's telling when someone like you comes along and says NO YOU CAN'T DO THAT. IT GOES AGAINST <fill in the blank>. Rights are not inherent. They are not pre-ordained. The…
/r/MensRights26/12/15 10:27 PM
2

I've read your responses to several comments and as usual, many people here are choosing to get baited into the wrong facet of the debate. Being pro-life or pro-choice is irrelevant. What matters is what a person can do with their body and you have yet to give sufficient reason as to why YOUR perceptions, interpretations, and logic should somehow override another person's will to act on their own personal choices. In essence, why do you care? Why do you care what another person does with their b…
/r/MensRights26/12/15 09:08 PM
3

I'm mildly intoxi I'm druk right now. When I sober, I will read this and be fascinated. I upvoted because
/r/PussyPassDenied24/09/15 06:16 AM
1

If I recall correctly, though, she couldn't receive too many amps. Her heart would kinda stop after a certain amount received. And wow...I made this comment 24 days ago. What brought you to this one?!
/r/PussyPassDenied24/09/15 03:17 AM
69

And immensely satisfying to watch. I feel that most instances of taser use get glossed over as overzealous police officers needing to get off on a power trip. Its very gratifying to see its use in a situation where the person getting tazed deserved every volt they received.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/08/15 05:20 PM
10

To most people like this, the only fate worse than being a victim is not being one.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/15 04:32 PM
32

what fucking world does she live in where male chess players are considered cool? The world where she was so bad at chess they laughed her out of the club. So rather than accepting that she was bad at chess and refusing to read chess theory, practice, play against players of her own skill level, she choose to claim victimhood as that absolves her any personal responsibility toward her own failings.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/15 04:14 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter