TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Mahhrat Archive

View 0 posts and 93 comments by Mahhrat on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I agree. Having standards is not patriarchy but self esteem. You model the behaviors you expect from others.
/r/MensRights29/06/16 10:19 PM
-21

So the fact that she raised him without financial support from the father is irrelevant to you?
/r/MensRights12/06/16 03:33 AM
-25

So he is still responsible for the kid. I'm not going to declare whats happened is fair, but that responsibility remains.
/r/MensRights12/06/16 01:49 AM
7

This is the basis for whatever patriarchy is though, I wonder? Men had the physical strength and thus made the rules. We are capable of more nuanced society now and that should be explored, but that has to include revisiting the role of everyone, and realising most of us arent to blame for the situation we find ourselves in.
/r/MensRights05/02/16 08:07 PM
36

He was a scared young man, inexperienced in asserting himself, who has come in here seeking support and advice. Pull your fucking head in.
/r/MensRights20/12/15 07:06 PM
24

Because it makes you no better rhan them?
/r/MensRights19/11/15 07:08 PM
5

I did too for a long time mate. I'd stopped looking for love. Started thinking about just loving myself. Suddenly I'm 8 years deep in a relationship, married again, looking for improvements in other aspects of my life. You worry about you. Love yourself because you can bring you happiness. Somehow, that works for everyone else, apparently.
/r/MensRights03/10/15 08:42 PM
2

The easiest way around is just to ask the parents if it's cool. I've stopped men and women both from giving food to my daughter in years past. If someone asks first though, that's totally cool.
/r/MensRights18/09/15 11:15 AM
1

Which is why I also said there's a big difference between two young people exploring their sexuality and this sort of thing. Selective quoting is poor form. Have a nice day.
/r/MensRights05/09/15 10:18 PM
1

I work with youth social workers, people who deal with troubled kids. I don't think they're even sure about consent in young people. In lieu of that, they suggest there's a big difference between two young people exploring their sexuality, and this kind of predatory behaviour. However, the law as it stands is explicit. This is rape. I would also point out that I'm not this sub. My rule of thumb is to ask what would happen to an adult teacher who used his daughter to seduce a young girl in the sa…
/r/MensRights05/09/15 09:54 PM
4

Here's the info you need: The kid is 15. That isn't old enough to consent. Thus, rape.
/r/MensRights05/09/15 08:50 AM
18

Doesn't matter. You can work in a role where you are sexually objectified and still have the right not to be sexually assaulted. That's how most strip clubs work. Spitballing here, but in a litigious society, there could be great money in recording your performance, stating clearly there's to be no hands on action, then suing if it occurs.
/r/MensRights09/08/15 07:58 PM
9

I'd probably prefer something between those two actually. Physical and sexual health are practical life skills that should be taught more than they are.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 09:30 PM
2

As someone with the opposite viewpoint, my perspective is that I do quite a lot of stuff for others through the rest of the year. Work, supporting my wife, raising my daughter, other social and community commitments. My birthday, however, is MY day. The one day when I can celebrate my life, enjoy myself and be a bit more selfish than usual. It also gives those I love the opportunity to celebrate me. While that sounds a bit obnoxious, we all love doing wonderful things for the people we care for.…
/r/MensRights16/05/15 10:03 PM
3

Has it occurred to you that perhaps I don't want a culture where I'm expected to treat women as objects? Or that I don't want my children raised in that culture?
/r/MensRights27/02/15 07:55 PM
1

This sounds like the crap gender double standard. Pretty simple stuff.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 10:06 AM
2

As an Australian, no it won't.
/r/MensRights25/09/14 07:26 PM
1

Just as well that this isn't a simple "Yes or No" question then.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 02:47 AM
2

Yes, and the OP is arguing that that is not his style. That doesn't mean he has nothing of value to contribute to a "Men's Rights" discussion. I tend to lean towards egalitarianism as well. MRAs exist in the fight for where males suffer disadvantage in the community. Feminism (in my mind, anyway), exists to promote the cause of women where they have traditionally had disadvantage. To be quite honest, I'm not interested in the pissing match that often develops between who has the bigger claim to …
/r/MensRights14/06/14 10:52 AM
2

A bit? :)
/r/MensRights14/06/14 01:38 AM
25

The words are all we have mate. They're how we communicate ideas. Our egalitarian friend is right on the money. Ideally, everyone should be fighting for the same rights for everyone.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 01:37 AM
1

You are really working hard to take everything I'm saying and putting it into different frames of conversation. I don't understand why, and I don't care enough to continue trying to find out. I've twice stated my thoughts; informed or otherwise as they may be. They are not gender specific principles, with the exception of biological differences (for example, abortion rights). You figure it out.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 02:28 AM
1

Sorry for the delay in replying; I think we're in different timezones, and I had a birthday party :) In principle, I'm against the anonymous abandonment of babies. Remaining anonymous from the BABY I think needs to occur, because nobody should be forced to be a parent, but this does not absolve you from the responsibility you hold from having that baby. Now, that principle requires that abortion be a legal and socially acceptable choice, so that it is a reasonable alternative. If abortion is not…
/r/MensRights05/05/14 11:07 PM
1

This is where I'm walking on unsure ground and why I answer in principles than with absolutes. In principle, I agree with you - nobody should be forced to be a parent. However, I see a difference between not wanting to interact with your child and still remaining responsible - if only financially - for bringing that life into the world. My 'fear', if that's the right word, is a slippery slope of people simply dumping unwanted babies, much as currently happens with puppies just after each Christm…
/r/MensRights05/05/14 10:53 PM
1

Why are you against them?
/r/MensRights05/05/14 08:03 PM
0

If you're going to continue to be deliberately offensive, I'm not going to continue this discussion. Final warning. Directly answering your questions is too simplistic in what is a complicated situation. Let's try again: In principle, and all else being equal, a parent should be responsible - to the state if nothing else - for baby's upkeep, at least financially (which I see as a very bad outcome). I do not know much about why a mother (or a father) would choose to anonymously surrender their ch…
/r/MensRights05/05/14 03:38 AM
2

You are asking a series of 'yes or no' and 'if not, you're a hypocrite' questions. These are 'closed' questions; in limiting the frame of discussion this way, you are attempting to force my responses down paths you define. In expecting me to answer within that frame; you’re putting words in my mouth mate, any day of the year. I am answering your questions in my own frame, which is within a principles-based approach, since there is no one approach that works in all situations. There is no 'fair' …
/r/MensRights05/05/14 01:04 AM
1

Why are you being so offensive, and why are - as you are - still trying to put words into my mouth? What's best for the child should always take precedence. This includes financial responsibility for both parties. If the mother chooses to have the baby, she is responsible for its upkeep, even if she cannot (or will not) raise it herself. I'm not against the right of any parent to surrender their child - if that is what is best for the child. No questions asked. This does not negate their respons…
/r/MensRights04/05/14 09:22 PM
1

Nowhere did I say the legal system or any other system was perfect or even complete as is. I said OP's comments ignores the baby. You're widening the discussion and conflating views I don't hold.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 04:59 PM
-2

Don't try to put words in my mouth, bub. Surrendering an infant you can't care for should be an option if that's what's best for the baby. This would not reduce your responsibility to the child however. Parents who are not involved in directly caring for their child should retain financial responsibility for its needs at least.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 04:56 PM
-2

All of this ignores the actual baby. You also can't conflate abortion rights with reproductive rights, nor bodily autonomy with financial responsibility. If a baby is born, the people responsible for its creation are responsible for its care. The decision to have a baby or abort must remain the woman's, because to do otherwise takes away her bodily autonomy. This seems unfair to some, but until we have a means of creating babies without gestation in a womb, that's how it is. The Science isn't as…
/r/MensRights04/05/14 09:22 AM
-5

Yes, but that's isn't the point.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 02:55 AM
2

False equivalent. Genital mutilation of a baby is not related to the place of your birth. Besides that, you can choose to learn a new language as an adult. You cannot choose to uncircumcise your penis.
/r/MensRights06/01/14 02:26 AM
7

I guess the length of a human life isn't a long lasting consequence then? I'd have thought 70 years or more to be long lasting.
/r/MensRights05/01/14 07:45 PM
7

So if God told someone to fly a plane into a building, you'd be okay with that?
/r/MensRights05/01/14 07:06 PM
7

You were not given a choice. Repeat until you understand that. There is no issue with circumcision as a procedure. There is every issue with it being done against the will of the person it's being done to.
/r/MensRights05/01/14 07:05 PM
1

Black Widows?
/r/MensRights05/11/13 07:01 AM
1

That's cool! Also, interesting how it kinda proves the OP's point. Who'd have thought that women and men (and, indeed different people in general) would be attracted to different things?
/r/MensRights17/10/13 08:00 PM
5

So you're seriously going to suggest that there is a massive, untapped market for video pornography marketed towards women but that in the entirety of the last fifty years, no enterprising woman has gone and made any?
/r/MensRights17/10/13 02:46 PM
2

Yes, but we're not talking YOUR property or family, but a workplace. Mate, if my house was on fire and my wife was trapped inside I'd kick the shit out of anything stopping me helping her. I'm talking about work and the risk work takes.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 11:49 PM
1

Can you guarantee your safety though? See, here's the thing: there is plenty of insurance to replace all the "stuff" that could get burned. A small office fire might cost...what, a million in damage? How much would a month in hospital treating burns cost the insurer, given worker's compensation payouts?
/r/MensRights14/10/13 11:38 PM
4

Your safety (and even the safety of the perp) is considered more valuable than the land you're currently on, even if they're on there illegally. It's an interesting concept and, I suspect, one many US citizens would struggle with. We see it now when at work. Say there's a fire. We're instructed to leave. Forget saving the place, you get yourself and your work mates to safety first. The business should have insurance. We still have fire extinguishers, but they're only there (and place accordingly…
/r/MensRights14/10/13 09:33 PM
1

No, it will be demanding equal media exposure and prize money.
/r/MensRights06/10/13 11:12 AM
12

Mate, I'm a 140 kg honky dude, and I turned down three I can easily remember (long since married now). It happens all the fucking time.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 04:33 AM
8

I call them out on this shit. Happened a couple weeks ago. Couple of the office people were talking Hugh Jackman. I just pointed out that were I to enter a similar discussion about...oh, Scarlett Johannsen, it would be incredibly inappropriate.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 09:17 PM
15

I think you hit it on the head with"informed consent". You are making a legal decision based on a falsehood, deliberate or not? That isn't informed anything.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 09:40 PM
1

It's six months in Australia...
/r/MensRights28/03/13 08:38 PM
0

Male secretary here. Well, Personal Assistant, but you get the idea. Hate to rain on your parade, but yeah.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 08:11 AM
2

Congratulations for that. I had dry spells lasting years, since I'm a socially awkward fat nerd. I never paid for it though; never visited a prostitute, because I wanted my sexuality to mean more than just money. It meant that I've now found a girl who I love to bits for her, and not just her body, which is what fucked up my first marriage.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 01:24 AM
5

This is exactly a problem though. If men could learn to be more sexually discerning on the whole - to just keep it in our fucking pants and waiting for (thus demanding) a truly desirable partner, and refuse to lie to women for what casual sex we do want - I seriously think we would overcome the issues we discuss very quickly. A lot of people talk about how men "step up". I disagree...we should learn to "step away".
/r/MensRights19/01/13 07:54 PM
-1

Yeah I'm going to draw a line for myself here. This is victim blaming. I should be safe to be alone with a woman without getting accused of sexual assault, the same as a woman should be safe alone with a man.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 10:12 AM
1

Again, you come at it from the perspective of restriction. Why is there a restriction based on dress socially? A uniform for the purpose of safety, professionalism or a standard of service (say in hospitality) is one thing; how you are judged by society as a whole should have nothing to do with how you choose to dress yourself. Feminism has successfully argued this point for many years; this is why women can wear a much more varied selection of clothing without comment. Men are far more restrict…
/r/MensRights05/01/13 01:10 AM
1

Dude, I'm arguing not to restrict women, but to enhance men. I work in an office as a PA. My manager requires me to wear business clothes. Suit and tie. That's it. Every day. Yesterday it was 41 degrees. All the girls wore thin, sleeveless blouses BECAUSE THEY COULD. I couldn't even roll up my sleeves. Men should be as free to choose their dress options as women. Easy.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 09:20 PM
1

Except soccer reference. Dat phone.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 08:59 PM
1

Yes, but you don't not correct the kid's maths homework because you're too busy fighting for the rights of the oppressed.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 08:58 PM
6

To me, this is the goalie would strive for. I worry about radical feminism and it's search for power; I worry more about extending the social freedom of men who are not natural alpha by design.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 08:51 PM
3

Not if it's wrong. Wrong is still wrong. Why should I deserve any kind of social vilification for my attire? Is the point of all this equality? That would suggest treating a person on their merit, not their fashion sense.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 08:48 PM
2

I think it's important to separate parental leave, which should be equally available, with the leave a woman needs for the medical reasons around giving birth, which would include complications and so on. Apart from that, you should be entitled to leave without pay for at least six months, if not 12.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 05:24 AM
1

Well if it helps, I'm a male PA. Just got a new job working for the GM of a large, reasonably prestigious company. I love it, being so organised. Having so much trust placed in me, etc. I'm not a natural leader, so I'd rather be the boss' right hand man than the boss himself.
/r/MensRights25/12/12 08:46 PM
3

I'd like to see this broken down by kids who have a dropkick for a father, versus a dropkick for a mother, versus a Dad who passed away, before we pass judgement.
/r/MensRights24/12/12 06:03 PM
2

I'm reading all the changes to the OP's sentence, but I still think I like his the best. The words " ... notion that men can be hurt" is non-combative, yet forces the listener to consider the words. On reading it, I feel almost compelled to ask questions to clarify. While some of the other replies are more direct, they're closed comments. My first thought is, "Well, of COURSE they're people, but...". It's too easy. The biggest problem men face is the very notion that we are stronger than women a…
/r/MensRights10/09/12 04:37 AM
7

Australian here. All taxis are required to have cameras in them. There are stickers on all passenger doors saying if you enter a cab you are agreeing to being filmed. The camera sits just over the rear vision mirror and is wide angle to get all of the seats. Pro cabbie tip: if your fare sits with his hoodie up and sunnies on or looks down all the time, he is hiding his face from Mr Evidence. Pretend to nearly have an accident - swerve and yell out SHIT! Everybody looks up. Everybody. Gotchya :-)
/r/MensRights30/08/12 08:26 PM
1

So the ends justify the means? By that logic, no child should fly, thus eliminating the risk. Sound stupid? That's your argument though, harm minimisation without consideration of the rights of others. The fact that you don't even understand the concept I'm trying to explain to you confirms the logical fallacy and is not my fault, but yours. If you're going to argue these things you need to arm yourself better. All the best, I'm done.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 11:57 AM
1

No, I mean formulating a policy based on the totality of information discoverable and not simply taking action based on assumptions.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 09:01 AM
1

Procedures that enable adequate decisions to be made. For example, checking that I'm not the child's father, which has happened in the UK.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 03:58 AM
2

I hate to be the one to tell you this, but policy is exactly made on a case by case basis, particularly with regard to harm minimisation. What you do instead is have what's known as a principles-based approach. In this case, that principle SHOULD be that airlines can move you if they have significant concern over a child's welfare. See? Now you have provided a means to protect a child without making it about gender.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 08:08 PM
1

All right, let me ask it the other way round. why should a single woman who may hate children be forced to sit next to one because they have a vagina?
/r/MensRights14/08/12 11:57 AM
1

Aye, but those are done for the health of the child. I don't think anyone has an issue with it for the medical benefit of the child. They have problems with it being for religious or cosmetic purposes.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 08:53 PM
5

It'll be a wonderful day when we are human before we are boy, girl, man or woman or whichever other applies.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 11:40 AM
1

Oh yes, in that we are in agreement, and certainly also with regards emotional abuse as el as physical and better definitions of all forms of abuse, rape and assault.
/r/MensRights26/05/12 06:19 AM
1

I'm not suggesting the situation is at all "fair", but until we invent an artificial womb, women have a monopoly on it. What gets me is conflating that with post-birth rights n responsibilities. The rights of the child take precedence, the major one being the provision of sufficient resources to have an equitable chance at life's opportunities. The biological parents should contribute to that at least financially if nothing else. In so far as that goes, enforcing child support is a reasonable re…
/r/MensRights25/05/12 03:23 PM
1

Apologies, I'm having trouble following your argument. Let me try a different way of saying it. My argument is that women must have the right to abort; she must retain control of her body. Saying that, if she has a baby then no matter she keeps it, adopts it or otherwise, she should remain responsible for its upbringing. Currently, women have a birth control technique called the pill. Men and women have one called abstinence. That we don't have a pill is not an excuse to demand control over a wo…
/r/MensRights24/05/12 07:15 AM
-3

This looks at the situation wrong. Let me make two statements: first, women and men must have control over their bodies, else we are but slaves. Therefore, women must retain veto over rights to abortion. Second, we don't have effective male contraceptives. This whole "financial abortion" argument is only because we don't have male birth control. Except we do, it's called abstinence. I agree that the current situation is unfair, though were the laws applied properly - that is, the rights of the c…
/r/MensRights23/05/12 07:50 PM
4

Just an epic autocorrect.
/r/MensRights28/04/12 11:53 PM
0

Apologies; I wasn't clear enough. A "dominant man" is often perceived as a chauvinist (feminist language mate, not mine), which is not stated as a desirable trait amongst men right now (in spite of the fact that many women do indeed find such social confidence alluring). His "confident humour or unconcerned indifference" are often perceived as chauvinism.
/r/MensRights28/04/12 09:48 PM
19

Quite correct, but I'm leaving it because Tibet.
/r/MensRights28/04/12 09:44 PM
12

That number is growing too, as smart girls find the happiness in knowing they're in love with an equal. There is great satisfaction in knowing where you fit, even if that is just on the "average Joe" tier.
/r/MensRights28/04/12 08:52 PM
21

Maybe try, "I know, right? All genital mutilation should just be banned everywhere". You'll get agreement but curiosity because they'll wonder themselves what juicy Tibet of outrage fuel they missed. Then you discuss forced circumcision.
/r/MensRights28/04/12 08:48 PM
2

Even were this true, it would require a level of chauvanism to respond as you suggest, which is not socially valued right now.
/r/MensRights28/04/12 08:07 PM
4

Actually, teasing is fun and fine, but do it when it is just you two alone, then he knows your motives are pure, and if he is still sensitive to it he is able to express it in ways he probably feels uncomfortable doing in front of his mates. As to showing respect, pre-empt him. That could be surprise brekky in bed, or considering how a decision you need to make will affect him.
/r/MensRights28/04/12 11:57 AM
8

Why do you want to act different in front of the other boys? Why the urge to fit in? I would be concerned that you're coming across as requiring the approval of those men - and you're doing it in front of him and doing it as his expense. No wonder he is sensitive to it; he must wonder what he is doing wrong when you're out putting him down to impress his friends.
/r/MensRights28/04/12 11:36 AM
1

Probably when personal insults start.
/r/MensRights27/04/12 10:08 PM
4

I've got this one. If your relationship is crap, deal with it. Counseling, divorce, hell even open communication works from time to time. Cheating on your partner is never, ever okay. Ever. No reason, no justification. No excuse. Whatever wrong your partner may be involved in does not justify infidelity. Any questions?
/r/MensRights27/04/12 01:45 PM
3

Agreed. This is not a men's rights issue, it is an homelessness issue.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 07:13 PM
3

Because while I get what you're saying, the result of this event will affect a large amount of perceptions on gender-reversed situations. The fact that society sees a difference in male vs female underage sexual assault is a problem for society to deal with, not the law. Basing justice on society's perception of male mental/emotional damage is why we have issues with feminism in the first place.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 08:25 PM
3

Is it safe for work?
/r/MensRights16/03/12 04:21 AM
1

Looks like five of us have decided that's enough. It's a shame, because I enjoyed my morning read of it, and its frequency of updates. Guess I'll need a new muse. What about www.mahhrat.com? My dad does web hosting; trouble is, I'm better in responding to articles, not creating my own.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 04:14 AM
1

Doin' my best, Skep.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 03:12 AM
1

In more fun news, Tory Shepherd herself has returned from leave to counter the arguments put forward by diverse souls. I would have been interested to see if that's a result of one Tory calling in the other Tory for "support".
/r/MensRights16/03/12 01:31 AM
2

Of course not, I always knew that. There are always idiots who post abusive crap on the internet. I try to have more integrity. I'll go back there after I run a couple errands, see what's what.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 12:03 AM
1

You're welcome. They have, Tory even responded. I have re-replied as well. I have no time for people who seek to silence based on the fact that they don't like what you have to say. They gave their opinions, you gave your opinions. I would have been satisfied even if they'd got into the practice of banning individual comments if they deemed them "off topic", but this is censorship.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 11:44 PM
1

For your record and the others here, I'm about to post this on the Open Thread. I feel it's appropriate: To the Punch Team: I am incredibly upset that an Australian publication has seen fit to ban the poster, Erick, from this site for the apparent crime of "derailing". Quoting Tory McGuire above: ""... Erick has been banned because his repetition on a single issue saw many interesting discussions go off track and it was putting off a lot of readers and commenters. "" Given each and every one of …
/r/MensRights15/03/12 11:16 PM
2

Erick, heard about this this morning and am somewhat cranky, to put it mildly. Has anyone deigned to provide a reason for the banning? If you're ever in Tassie, hit me up, owe you at least a local beverage (I hear Moo Brew's a good beer, I'm a JD man myself) for the entertainment you've provided there. Haven't always agreed with you; have always respected your opinion. Rock on. Forgot to mention, also haven't seen Tory Shepherd for a week either. I wonder if there is a link we're not told about …
/r/MensRights15/03/12 10:16 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter