TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MajesticFerret36 Archive

View 1 post and 89 comments by MajesticFerret36 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Outer Game MajesticFerret36/r/seduction19/06/24 06:31 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Imma be honest: most westerners can't tell Korean and Chinese apart, especially if you lean into Korean hair cuts and fashion. If you think it's an advantage being Korean, just larp as Korean and if girls ask, say you're Korean.
/r/seduction12/07/26 12:58 AM
2

The most comtraversial but most effective and most well known seduction technique that men have been using for thousands of yrs is literally just lying. Same is true of women, it's also the most effective technique they employ as well. Any other answer is just wrong.
/r/seduction03/07/26 10:53 PM
0

I mean, no shit. I don't see any advice ever advocating treating them as lesser than. Negging in general has largely disappeared from the space as it's winmoar try hard crap that mostly only works if the girl already likes you and is high risk, mid reward, which is sub optimal. Only point I slightly disagree on is leading, which if were being honest is mostly getting them to do what you want them to do / go where you want them to go but these doesn't imply inferiority. If my friend invites me ou…
/r/seduction15/06/26 03:42 PM
6

For women, it's more of a threshold thing. Most Instagram models, if you see the guys they date behind the scenes, are usually rich 6-7's. Definately above avg in looks and reasonably well put together, but they're usually not male model good looking. Most of the most attractive women on the planet would take a rich guy who is relatively good looking over a broke guy who is a 10. So yeah, for men, a rich 7 is prob closer to being a 10 for most women than a guy who is a Greek god but isn't rich. …
/r/seduction18/05/26 03:40 PM
1

Invite her to your place for some drinks/food and to watch a movie. If she doesn't bite, she's prob wasting your time.
/r/seduction11/05/26 10:42 PM
1

Yeah, this is something a lot of people don't want to talk about or can't talk about due to not dating young women of both generarions at separate time periods, but Gen Z Western women are particularly cooked. Millennial women, even when they were college age, never had the innate stigma towards men or dating and the pressure to get your shit together and settle down was at least somewhat there and the man hating normalization or unapologetic levels of girl boss (narcissism) brain rot wasn't nea…
/r/seduction11/05/26 08:37 PM
2

Not even close. Breast augmentation satisfaction is very high with little to no repercussions or complications when performed in this day and age. Limb lengthening basically compromises your legs for life. You won't be as fast or jump as high and can potentially limp the rest of your life, on top of just looking ridiculously disproportionate most of the time. If you need a few inch bump, use lifts. If you need more than a few inches, you're not a great candidate for limb lengthening anyways.
/r/seduction11/05/26 08:03 PM
1

It's possible, but you need thick skin and expect to get a lot of rejections and gas lighting, both from older and younger women. Or date abroad in locations where age gap shaming is less prevalent, which is pretty much everywhere other than the west.
/r/seduction21/03/26 11:43 PM
1

The correct pill to swallow is women are just as physically shallow as men and always have been. That being said, as a man, are looks 100% of the equation? Are you willing to compromise on looks for certain traits in your partner? Well, there's your answer. And don't get me wrong: there are some men who are so shallow they would date women who treat them like shit just because they're hot just like there are women who will date men who treat them like shit just because they're hot. And these peo…
/r/seduction19/03/26 11:57 PM
3

What are your advances? Verbal or physical? I find Chinese girls respond better to physical advances than verbal ones. Admitting to being sexual creatures is not part of their culture. But they respond well to touching and physical dominance just fine. Just move the date forward and try to end up at your place and expect it will take more than one date for plenty of them.
/r/seduction13/03/26 05:50 PM
8

There is no "statistic" that suggests Asian chicks sound like Japanese porn stars in bed, aka, like a dying pig. I think Japanese are the only race of Asian I haven't hooked up with, but the rest of them don't sound like this crap. I don't even think Japanese sound like this. They are bad actresses so the closest thing they can do to act like a guy with a barely 5" pecker is fucking their brains out is to make a bunch of sounds like they're dying or it hurts, but I'm pretty sure they don't insti…
/r/BlackPillScience24/07/25 06:05 PM
20

Shit, late 50s in the PUA space basically makes you a dinosaur. YOU tell US how to pull as an old man, senpai, we'll take notes for when we're there.
/r/seduction24/06/25 09:28 PM
1

Compression shirts don't work and literally make you look fatter imo. You're better off just wearing looser fit clothing if you're a bit chubby. It's too obvious you're out of shape if you try tight fits. Also, looser fit clothing is kinda a bit more in style now anyways tbh.
/r/seduction23/06/25 12:38 AM
1

There's nothing to be enlightened on, most people use all 3 apps simply to cast the widest net, but depending on your age and what city you are in, some of these apps suck and it's expected to be getting much better results from some than others. I'm based out of Houston and the general concensus over here is: Bumble has the best combination of hot to eager women, Hinge women are the most eager but are less hot than Bumble and Tinder girls and less likely to be looking for something casual, Tind…
/r/seduction12/06/25 02:23 PM
2

This style of game works poorly on the highest caliber of women and is winmoar for basic or ugly chicks, where if you're coasting by on hotness, could get them even easier and more consistently using more refined game than this. Even the receipts of the women responding to it don't exactly show what I'd call very attractive women if I'm being honest.
/r/seduction09/06/25 01:51 PM
4

This is terrible game, but anything will work if used enough and if you're enough out of the league of the girls you're using it in.
/r/seduction09/06/25 04:20 AM
2

I would for all intents and purposes assume this girl is a dead end lead and work on acquiring other leads through in person or online dating. However, if she's still willing to go out with you months from now, it wouldn't hurt to hit her up. You never know. But I definately wouldn't bet on it.
/r/seduction02/06/25 06:18 PM
35

I would for all intents and purposes assume this girl is a dead end lead and work on acquiring other leads through in person or online dating. However, if she's still willing to go out with months from now, it wouldn't hurt to hit her up. You never know. But I definately wouldn't bet on it.
/r/seduction02/06/25 06:18 PM
74

Correct. This is the problem with social circle that many don't talk about as many game to be players, not to settle down. Woman talk, and if you're a fuck boy, you burn up your social circle very quickly. You also better make sure you're on point in the bed room too: women talk about that, so one bad performance and every girl in the group will know.
/r/seduction30/05/25 10:42 PM
14

This is the most realistic answer. The girls who are chasing guys are usually beneath what you can get and both of you kinda know it, and the girls that run away are usually outside of the guys league, and both of them kinda know it. There's exceptions of course, and people's value perception is highly subjective. Like, there's girls that will legitimately turn down a doctor for a drug dealer. Doesn't mean he's a better deal, for a toxic chick who likes to party and wants an enabler for a bf, he…
/r/seduction29/05/25 09:05 PM
0

These studies are useless and someone from the seduction community should know better. They perceived short term partners as attractiveness being more important while they do the opposite for long term partners while I can confirm this is cope, women want the same men they want for short term partners as long term partners, they will just say otherwise out of insecurity. Also, this study isn't equaling for looks and age. Hot young, highly confident women want hot young highly confident men. Basi…
/r/seduction28/05/25 06:26 PM
1

All things equalized, I disagree with you. I have friends who are good with women who have come in and off of steroids and they admit they got better results and had better sec when enhanced. But they are smart and only take enough toook super fit and not enough to look like a body builder, but for most men, looking super fit is very difficult without some help from supplements.
/r/seduction28/05/25 05:55 PM
1

OK, let's not be ridiculous now. If you actually have low T, which is who TRT is for, TRT is a game changer. It can get rid of brain fog, increase energy and libido, on top of making you leaner and more muscular. Yeah, some guys can have all that and still suck with women, but a guy who can at least get his dick up that sucks with women is a big upgrade over one who doesn't.
/r/seduction28/05/25 05:53 PM
1

Yeah, I have no idea wtf this cliche comes from. One of the main reasons guys go on TRT is to fuck better. I know guys who couldn't give two shits about muscle that lost libido and couldn't fuck like they used too who went on it for that reason and that reason only. Even equalizing test levels, naturals lose test throughout the day, so your peak levels are only in the mornings while your lowest is at night... The time most women woman to fuck lol. Being on steroids or TRT is like having morning …
/r/seduction28/05/25 05:45 PM
3

Yeah, I have no idea wtf this cliche comes from. One of the main reasons guys go on TRT is to fuck better. I know guys who couldn't give two shits about muscle that lost libido and couldn't fuck like they used too who went on it for that reason and that reason only. Even equalizing test levels, naturals lose test throughout the day, so your peak levels are only in the mornings while your lowest is at night... The time most women woman to fuck lol. Being on steroids or TRT is like having morning …
/r/seduction28/05/25 05:45 PM
2

But test doesn't just impact muscle, it impacts metabolism and muscle retention. And women LOVE looking shredded. If you go in a diet and you have low T, you will lose fat slower and lose muscle with your dieting. If you diet with high T, you maintain your muscle, and your metabolism is faster and you burn fat easier. Also, high test gives you a lot of energy while starving yourself gives you super low energy, so taking test while you fast can make the process easier. It's very hard to look shre…
/r/seduction28/05/25 05:35 PM
1

Like you said, none of that is a problem if you have healthy test levels, it's when guys dope on it that it becomes a problem. TRT is a game changer for older dudes who want the natural test levels of younger men. Honestly, 800-900 ng/ml range or whatever metric unit they use for free test, is already quite high. Most guys in their 40s are going to be 350-450 natty unless they take very good care of themselves. Even boosting to 600-700 is going to make a world of difference for them. Also, one o…
/r/seduction28/05/25 05:31 PM
0

Bro, just say you're a peasant that lives on fast food without telling me. If restaurant food is "expensive" for you, that sounds like a personal finance problem. I eat out multiple times per day, every day and I can do so in a way that is financially comfortable for me. Most of the people I know do too. Alcohol is even more expensive and hell, even coffee can be pricy in this economy. And it doesn't make sense to do a walking date if you have a busy schedule or the weather isn't great. Sounds l…
/r/seduction26/05/25 03:31 PM
2

Was this in English? What I'm trying to say, is if you feel like eating and want to invite a woman, do it. Honestly, where I live, drinks are more expensive than taking a chick out to eat anyways and sometimes your schedule makes more sense to grab food VS do other things. Ive gotten laid and even gotten gfs from dinner dates. There's entire countries, typically the more conservative ones, where food dates are the norm and the standard. Don't let random low quality western women dictate thinking…
/r/seduction25/05/25 06:42 PM
3

Dinner on a first date is fine, but it should be under your frame and something you want to do and shouldn't be some hyper expensive restaurant.
/r/seduction24/05/25 07:10 PM
3

Agree on most of these, but job should not be getting 10/10. Very high risk and honestly, I don't think almost any woman is worth the risk if you value your job. However, it can be an absolute gold mine if your job is bullshit and you don't give af if you're fired (bar job, club job, mall job, etc.) I actually lost my v card to a coworker in a mall job fresh out of HS, so do admit it has potential, but once you're a bit older and your job is actually good, its no longer worth the risk.
/r/seduction06/05/25 09:32 PM
-1

Agree on most of these, but job should not be getting 10/10. Very high risk and honestly, I don't think almost any woman is worth the risk if you value your job. However, it can be an absolute gold mine if your job is bullshit and you don't give af if you're fired (bar job, club job, mall job, etc.) I actually lost my v card to a coworker in a mall job fresh out of HS, so do admit it has potential, but once you're a bit older and your job is actually good, cots noongwr worth the risk.
/r/seduction06/05/25 09:32 PM
4

I think you're overestimating yourself in multiple categories if I'm being totally honest. If you're truly good looking... women will let you know. Guys who are "self identified" good looking guys don't really have the right to call them this unless women are the ones calling them it. Women are giving you approaching signals or making it much easier to approach them and are receptive to you? Cool, you're prob good looking. Not? Prob not as good looking as you think, no offense. Also, you should …
/r/seduction05/05/25 06:28 PM
3

IG can help you pull women, but it's a lot of work and you need to have realistic expectations. If she has 300k+ followers and you're a nobody, you will be invisible to her. As long as it's normie girls, you stand more of a chance than you think as long as your profile is good and you're in the same city and have plausible cause to be messaging them.
/r/seduction05/05/25 05:54 PM
1

I'm not reading that novel. If your Instagram is great, it's better than a number because you can demonstrate value with a good Insta. If your Instagram is garbage, just get the number. Having a shitty Instagram will just work against you.
/r/seduction25/01/25 05:34 AM
2

Alex from PwF is pretty ugly these days, the Lyme disease has done a number on his health.
/r/seduction22/10/24 01:18 AM
1

Well, hit me up when you are
/r/seduction06/10/24 07:14 AM
1

You in Houston?
/r/seduction06/10/24 03:39 AM
0

Google search ways to get around dating app bans. It's not that hard to circumvent them from what I hear.
/r/seduction11/09/24 05:49 PM
1

Not putting out is the dumbest strategy imaginable as no guy who is worth two shits is going wait around for that crap in 2024. And im not talkimg about putting out on the first date as 2nd and 3rd is usually fine, but im talking the delulu chicks who think they can vet a guy for 5-6 dates without putting out and the good ones will stick around. No man appreciates women who make him wait, as the word has gotten out and every man is aware women don't make men wait for long if they're genuinely at…
/r/seduction20/08/24 01:31 AM
1

I've been doing this shit for over 10yrs and your critique of club game is by far the most based, spot-on analysis I've ever seen lol. Which is why no one commented to debunk anything you actually said. Clubs mostly only work if you're in the top percentile of good-looking men/height (height matters probably more in a club than anywhere else as women can only see a silhouette, they can't see your face very well), and the women overwhelmingly pick you, not vice versa (you still need to approach o…
/r/seduction09/08/24 06:15 AM
1

Yeah, from my experience, girls who are drawn to tables, unless it's for work or they're part of the group that bought the table, are low quality women. "Club rats" as what we call them. I have literally sniped women from paid for tables multiple times. It's not that hard at all or even hard to make a better offer. Girl: I like being at the table, free drinks! Guy: I can pay for all the drinks I want and get more drink variety to boot, and I prefer the dance floor to being huddled up at a table …
/r/seduction09/08/24 06:04 AM
7

The part that I found the most adorable is TC thinks most hookers DON'T look like middle aged Latinas from Venezuela/Ecuador. Bruh, these are like the prostitute capitals of the world, and yeah, most of them are thrashed middle-aged women. The young hot ones will feel you out and see if you're simpy, the older ones legitimately have had their parabonding so fried they don't give af about you and just want money.
/r/seduction07/08/24 11:01 PM
2

Absolutely a scam. No woman says shit like "would you like to get to know me?" That is pure scammer talk.
/r/seduction02/08/24 09:54 PM
3

Tendom is a bit of a weird concept. Are we applying to just looks or the whole package? It also depends on how high your criteria is for 10s even just talking looks, but if you're using the term scrutively, they are literal unicorns and many will never date one as they are simply too rare. If we are just applying to looks, I would honestly say they are not more difficult than 8's, they are just more scarce which lowers your probability of nabbing one. If you're a little bit more flexible on what…
/r/seduction24/07/24 11:08 PM
1

If you can't escalate, you can't get "any woman" so I would stop with the delusional arrogance as a first step. If you were truly confident enough to believe you could get any woman, you would have no problems escalating, as you would assume they all want you,and of they all want you, nine of them will say no to any of your advances. The fact that you can't do this shows an obvious inconguence between what you say and what you subconsiously actually believe.
/r/seduction17/07/24 06:13 PM
7

Then expect a lot of rejections. As already outlined, Japan is not a country with good day game logistics. Japanese women largely don't like being bothered during the day, speak bad English, and most of them are not interested in foreign men. Meanwhile, if you do night game and online game, your logistics sky rocket as a lot of party girls are very interested in foreign guys and Japanese women are far more open to being approached at bars and clubs. Japan doesn't do this American cope BS where g…
/r/seduction12/07/24 01:32 PM
1

How much alcohol we talking? A little bit can improve sex imo. A lot of it can cause tons of problems obviously. Porn is a pretty big sexual desensitizer so you can try laying off of that to fix the sensitivity issues.
/r/seduction11/07/24 08:00 PM
1

House parties are much easier, only thing that can make a house party worse is they are hit and miss in terms of people there. If the ratio is good, it's the easiest place on the planet to meet women. If the ratios are bad...well, it's worse than a bar or club lol
/r/seduction10/07/24 10:42 PM
2

It depends on a lot of factors. The one thing that online dating completely destroys cold approach in is countries where you can't speak the language. It's one of the main reason PPBing has become as huge as it has. Cold approaching in many countries where English is awful will net you a lot of rejections simply because of the language gap, but online dating can vet the girls who do speak English much faster. For example, Japan. English there is awful. Day game is largely a waste of time if you …
/r/seduction10/07/24 10:15 PM
3

Why wouldn't I expand my horizon and learn some new strategies? There are tons of situations where the hottest girl in the room is sitting down. So I limit myself to next hottest because sitting sets are harder? If you don't have advice than just say so. Maybe if you stick around you'll see some good advice and you won't limit yourself to mostly standing sets too.
/r/seduction19/06/24 06:55 PM
0

Technically you gave a transitioner, not an opener, unless you open with "I'm gonna sit here for a sec"
/r/seduction19/06/24 06:53 PM
1

I love how he openly admits he has bad game ("I tell girls im a farmer and my friend is a millionaire selling milk!") and has pulled with dog shit game and is then surprised when it takes him 20 approaches to get any semblance of success. In night game, I can get a number close (good ones where I can't guarantee a date for sure, but the girl will message and there will be some back and forth before logistics potentially get in the way) or pull probably 30% of the time and this is my number in Am…
/r/seduction18/06/24 03:22 PM
1

He's technically correct, but wrong to his conclusion of what the dating market would look like if everyone is high value. Yes, part of what gives you an advantage in dating is being better than others, but if everyone (men and women) were high valued, we would technically have a truly blue pilled market place where personality and game would be all that truly mattered. Also, women can only get away with being low value in personality when they are high value in looks in a looks deficit market. …
/r/seduction17/06/24 02:31 PM
10

This is 2024 and we're still selling guys on this "rejections are just a shittest bro" propaganda? Most harsh upfront rejections are the girl deciding upfront you aren't her type or her genuinely not being available and you acting needy by not moving on to the better and more compliant option often times just makes you look even lower value and more desperate. Shit tests are usually the girl letting you get your foot through the door and then asking you some questions or her maybe saying somethi…
/r/seduction10/06/24 06:03 PM
16

Wayyy too much psychoanalyzing and hyper situational and won't work all the time. Plenty of botchy people never get their come uppance and double down on being nice to them might piss them off even more. It all depends on how much pull you have in any situation. A social setting if someone is rude to me and I have pull, I'll put them in their place. If it's a group and I have no pull, just acting endlessly kind can make it look like I'm just retarded and am not getting the hint that the group wa…
/r/seduction10/06/24 05:49 PM
3

The reason dating coaching is dying is because most advanced guys will wing you for free as long as you're not a tool, just because game is fun and showing off is fun. If you can afford a plane ticket and hotel in Houston and agree to pay for my drinks any night we go out and aren't a jerk, I'll coach you for free. Just dm me and tell me in advance and I'll see if my schedule aligns.
/r/seduction08/06/24 02:58 AM
11

I have no idea where people think dance classes are good places to meet women. Nearly every hot chick who goes there is in a relationship with her significant other in the class, you have a lot of thirsty 4s and 5s, and if you will have maybe one hot single chick, that will be orders of magnitude more stuck up than any girl at a bar as she proceeds to absorb all the male attention in the room from all the weirdos who didn't have the balls to hit on girls at a bar and thought hitting on girls at …
/r/seduction27/05/24 12:58 AM
1

I can't imagine what I said that could warrant such an incelish response.
/r/seduction27/05/24 12:40 AM
2

What city you live in where this is the case? I live in Houston TX and with all due respect, this advice is terrible over here. The girl to guy ratio in our gay night life is atrocious, a lot of the women are actual lesbians, but women aren't being mass approached so are pretty open to being approached in straight bars and the ratios here aren't awful. But yeah, straight girls going to gay clubs to "escape creeps" isn't a thing here. You'll see the occasional straight girl in the gay clubs, but …
/r/seduction25/05/24 05:42 PM
2

Day game has always been easier, you just have shittier logistics during the day because there is no way to vet who is single and who isn't. At a club, if she has her titties out and and isn't glued to another man, she is single for the right guy. There's also hotter women in night life on avg, with maybe the exception of a college campus, but most guys outgrow hitting on sub 21 yr olds and women usually around 22+ become significantly less ageist. I would say the biggest lie I've ever heard in …
/r/seduction25/05/24 05:20 PM
1

*laid, I corrected it, holy fk Reddit has the most brain dead auto correct ever. Also, most girls go to bars and clubs looking for sex. Every hot guy knows this. If you dead ass think they're their to just "have fun, we all have bfs btw!" and not get hit on, than I hate to be the bearer of bad news but...you're not getting the hot guy treatment because this is a load of shit. Even the ones who have bfs/husband's want to get hit in. Hell, they want to get hit on arguably more than the single girl…
/r/seduction25/05/24 12:32 AM
0

I had one friend who got laid more consistently than any guy I knew and this is what he did. Sometimes he got 9s...other times I saw him leave with a 3... And he was good looking and rich too, I'm honestly surprised he could bring himself to fuck 3s, but...he did.
/r/seduction24/05/24 10:57 PM
7

This is definately not to how get laid every time you go out. This is how to get laid occasionally, if you're lucky. You need to definitely want to get laid if you are consistently getting laid every time you go out.
/r/seduction24/05/24 10:55 PM
4

A smile is more indicative of a girl wanting to be approached. Eye contact for a long time is usually a good sign too, but a lot of time shy girls break eye contact easily even if they're interested. Either way, IOIs are not remotely necessary for approaching and are used as an excuse to not approach, so I would kinda just tune them out. If you want to approach, you approach whether or not an IOI is given. Women that I'm not interested in also give plenty of IOIs. Essentially, IOIs shouldn't dic…
/r/seduction21/05/24 04:07 PM
2

I feel the whole "kick her to the curb and move on" guys are being a bit unrealistic and kinda dehumanizing. My philosophy is everyone gets one free pass. Sometimes shit happens, for whatever reason. People who get ass hurt and go full blown ghost mode over one reschedule or instance of cold feet are being a bit absurd and you could be missing out on great women, and their are plenty of complete shite women who have 99 problems but showing up for the date isn't one of them. Also, this girl gave …
/r/seduction19/05/24 05:41 PM
8

All of his dating advice is on his YouTube channel. There is nothing particularly proprietary about his program other than a "cheat sheet" for pulling scripts that maybe worked 15 yrs ago but will get you Me Too'd now (he pretty openly advocates lying to women to pull, which is the most dangerous part of the interaction to lie and can get you in legal trouble) and a texting flow script that is decent, but I'm sure you can find a solid venn diagram of texting girls if you just Google search one f…
/r/seduction19/05/24 12:42 AM
2

That's not really true though. Lots of girls like it when you put in effort for them. The whole "ultimate abundance" mentality is more a general rule of thumb, at the end of the day if another guy stays in set and you get pushed out, the guy who sticks around has a higher chance of getting the girl.
/r/seduction18/05/24 04:07 AM
3

There is no real cheat code to this. If you want the girl back, you have to man up and interject. Most guys will back off. Some won't. You have to calibrate accordingly based on that. Honestly, whether or not I interject would be based in various factors, like how much I actually like the girl, how well the set was going, and if the dude looks like he would be willing to throw down.
/r/seduction18/05/24 03:37 AM
1

What's there to lol about? Dude is spot on. How do I know? Because I'm the guy who did the same thing to women in the club for years: make out and then ditch them when things got serious because I had a girl at home. I had female friends who had bfs and they would do the same shit. Tons of girls and guys that go to clubs that make out with people have a bf or gf. The only people who aren't aware of this are youngsters who are new to nightlife and are naive.
/r/seduction10/05/24 11:25 PM
1

Gotten laid from many dinner dates and even went on to date top tier women from them and certain women don't drink (the good ones, if im being honest). Honestly, drinks are so expensive in most spots these days, food is cheaper unless you're simping and taking her to a 5 star restaurant or something. What I recommend: Don't be a simp and take her to some hyper fancy place. Take her to a "cool" spot that is walkable and close to lots of cool stuff, not an expensive spot. Dinner dates are great fo…
/r/seduction06/05/24 03:11 PM
5

A lot of guys have great skin but other weaknesses, so of course they dismiss makeup as part of the looks maxing equation, but if you're a guy with bad skin and you have otherwise good stats: make up is busted. Concealer for pimples or acne scars, toners to even out skin tone, and powder to make your face matte if you have super oily skin. And if done properly, not a single girl will figure out you're wearing it. Literally every guy on the big screen is wearing make up and you can't tell in most…
/r/BlackPillScience30/04/24 02:02 AM
1

Wtf you mean "it doesn't benefit you in any way"? You're the one on Reddit complaining your bad text game is hindering your results. And then you say stuff like implying it's a numbers game. It's not. No one is saying in person game doesn't matter, but if girls are talking to guys who have great in person game and great text game...they are the better option than you. And they will flake. On you. For the guy who is both cool in person and isn't a weirdo over text message. I've had women tell me …
/r/seduction30/04/24 12:27 AM
1

Lol, what is there to disagree about? Text game is so stupidly easy I could tell you word for word how you should be messaging women and as long as you have good interactions before number closing or aren't ugly in your profile pics if we're applying this online dating, they will work. Nothing is this tried and true or formulaic about actually hitting on women in person. There's tons of stuff to account for that has nothing with your actual verbals and may need to change on the fly. You have muc…
/r/seduction29/04/24 02:26 PM
1

It's objectively easier to master text game than it is to master any form of in-person game, so it's absolutely a skill issue and one that should be resolved far easier than any others. Also, great in person game is wasted if your text game is shit, so it is probably the thing you should master first unless you like getting ghosted by women who were clearly attracted to you when you were talking to them in person. Why is text game the easiest to master? Because you can literally use scripts and …
/r/seduction29/04/24 04:06 AM
1

As someone who has an almost zero flake rate: Do not message the girl "hi," please send something funnier and wittier than that. My name is Jake. When I message the girl, I say something like "This is Jake from Statefarm, have you thought about changing car insur...I mean, this is Jake from <insert name of where we met here> lol. How's your week going so far?" And then if she responds, I say something along the lines of, "nice, yeah my week has been pretty busy so far, but hopefully towards the …
/r/seduction29/04/24 12:23 AM
3

I have never verbalized to a woman a single time that I want to be in a long term relationship with her and I've been a player and been in plenty of long committed relationships. This advice is mostly nonsense. Most men don't like to communicate how we feel. We sure as hell dont like to communicate our desire for a long-term relationship when we risk looking clingy, especially when we're still having fun and having sex with the girl. It's high risk and low reward, which is textbook bad game. In …
/r/seduction26/04/24 09:40 PM
1

Second or 3rd date is the sweet spot. Every girl I've been with that lasted several yrs, including the one I'm currently with going in 6yrs now, put out in the first 3 dates. 2nd is prob best, but only if the chemistry is off the charts. Current girl I'm with we slept together on the 2nd date. If she puts out on the first date, that's usually a sign she is a bit too easy and I might judge a bit. If she makes me wait longer than 3, you risk things getting awkward and the chemistry stagnating. The…
/r/seduction26/04/24 09:30 PM
1

Asking her to a bar by herself is basically asking her out. Anything more than this and you're practically asking her "can we be bf and gf?" which is the most dorky shit ever and will be all but guaranteed to turn her vag into the Sahara desert. They don't work together directly and she has already been in situations where he was able to make out with her friend and even drove this guy home. She is by all accounts, pretty unprofessional. Also, him not being in a position of power and making a mo…
/r/seduction21/02/24 08:50 PM
5

The fact that she's 20yrs older than him and he gives nice guy vibes to the max tells me she is not "intimidated" by him as a stalker, or intimidated by him at all really. Based on his story, it is VERY clear to me she wanted him to make a move, but he simply pussed out. It might be too late for him, but he might still have a chance. He should definately try to meet other women in the mean time though for sure.
/r/seduction21/02/24 07:11 PM
1

The biggest problem is this guy doesn't know how to "flirt" period. He thinks confessions of love are flirting. This is like the type of shit I thought girls liked when I was in middle school. He doesn't need to say ANYTHING to advance with her. Just be a man and start being touchy with her, but it's obvious he's the type that needs a woman to practically grind on him before he knows he needs to move things forward.
/r/seduction21/02/24 07:05 PM
1

You might have already fucked it up, but every indication on the planet indicates she wanted to fuck you at one point. Hopefully there's still something there. First off, forgot all this cheesy bullshit about "telling her how you feel." Girls hate that shit. You're going to have to break the touch barrier as that's the fastest and most congruent way to show attraction in a confidant and masculine way. This is what you do/say, "Hey, we haven't got a drink in awhile, I found a new cool spot." If s…
/r/seduction21/02/24 07:03 PM
1

Here's what TC doesn't want to hear, but aside from really young people, above a certain age threshold, awkwardness is no longer acceptable in general.
/r/seduction05/09/23 08:48 PM
3

Bar game and club game is not the same. If you want to talk to women or practice verbals, you should go to bars. If you know which ones are popular on which days, just as hot if not hotter girls go to bars as clubs anyways. Girls at bars are usually pretty bored as there is nothing go do at them but talk and drink, but girls tend to be more receptive on avg to being talked too at bars as it's easier to talk and less stimuli. Club game is more about balls, looks/height, and kino. If you don't fee…
/r/seduction05/07/23 04:01 PM
10

Like men, it depends on how attractive the person is. It's why I see a lot of guys in the space who don't advocate for being direct. It's usually an indicator of their appearance. Being direct works fantastic if you're hot. If you're not conventionally attractive, complimenting people doesn't work as well.
/r/seduction14/06/23 03:15 PM
4

I know ugly gay dudes with triple digit lay count and older women are still generally far less picky than young women. If you ain't clapping young women's checks, you prob ain't that attractive.
/r/seduction24/05/23 06:59 AM
7

Lol, gay men and older women want to fuck everybody
/r/seduction24/05/23 01:40 AM
1

If you do well on dating apps. Tbf, part of it is being attractive + taking good pictures where you both look good and convey high value + having a decent bio and text game, but being good looking is unquestionably the single most important thing in dating apps.
/r/seduction24/05/23 12:47 AM
1

Talking to women is much easier than sleeping with them and building attraction, so I still feel like the "just be friendly to women" is shitty advice for beginners, especially for night game. I was at a bar the other night with a group and this guy (stranger, so its a cold approach situation) was talking to my friend: very friendly guy, was absolutely interested in her and what she had to say. It was still highly awkward and she was creeped out and I've seen guys hit on her before, but more dir…
/r/seduction25/04/23 09:40 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter