TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MajesticFxxkingEagle Archive

View 0 posts and 28 comments by MajesticFxxkingEagle on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

But, I think it's universal that no one is satisfied by completely emotionless sex. I don’t think this is universal though? I think it might be true that, all else being equal, sex with emotional connection feels more satisfying/fulfilling. But that doesn’t mean that it’s true for everyone that if the sex is emotionless that there is zero satisfaction.
/r/MensRights04/10/25 12:09 AM
7

Also beyond that, it signals a different socioeconomic approach to the underlying problems (such as universal healthcare, affordable housing, paid paternity leave, etc.) rather than just giving everyone the same ole bootstraps argument.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/06/24 04:36 AM
4

Why is it so hard to just be neutral? Especially if you're an outside observer with no context rather than a close friend that someone is confiding in for emotional reassurance Like, don't immediately dismiss the accuser and treat them like a crazy liar from the beginning. And also don't immediately assume the accused is guilty and start punishing them and treating them as a pariah just from the accusation alone. It's even fine to form personal opinions one way or another before an official ruli…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/02/24 04:46 PM
11

And even after all of that, the problem is that in-court stat only tracks official convictions or successful appeals. There are plenty of men who are sitting in prison right now who are actually innocent yet have no realistic chance of appealing, so their statistics will still count on the side of not being a false accusation. Of course, the same can be said on the opposite side for actual rapists who go free due to insufficient evidence or the victims being pressured to drop charges. It's a lot…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/23 06:17 PM
3

The article is paywalled Edit: nvm, it let me read it on desktop
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/23 11:27 PM
6

On a slightly related note, one thing that could bring about more equality in the workforce is paid family leave (by law) for both genders. Fathers want to cherish those early bonding moments with their children as much as mothers do, but they often forgo that because they want to make sure the family is taken care of. Some of that may be due to evolutionary instinct, but it's also due to societal expectations and the fact that maternal leave is significantly longer than paternal leave. Making i…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/03/23 05:11 PM
8

yeah, I was gonna echo this. Who the Daily Wire considers "Leftist" and who actual Leftists consider "Leftist" are often two totally different groups
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/03/23 09:59 PM
2

The heart of the issue here is that Jordan believes he's fighting back against a tyrannical system that is forcing him to call this woman beautiful. There are several problems with this sentiment that have to be addressed... The magazine cover, in and of itself, is in no way compelling Jordan, nor anyone else in the audience, to personally nor objectively recognize her as beautiful. In fact, the headlines on the cover don't even call her beautiful themselves. And even if it did, it's certainly n…
/r/MensRights20/05/22 05:09 PM
1

Pro-choice can be defended entirely on the grounds of self-defense. Even if you grant (which not everyone does) that personhood is fully obtained legally and morally from the moment of conception, you are allowed to use lethal force to remove someone from inside your body. It doesn't matter that they didn't ask to be there. It doesn't matter that they are innocent and have no bad intentions. You have the final say over what happens inside of your own body, and pregnancy meets enough of the legal…
/r/MensRights04/05/22 01:30 PM
4

I agree, but to clarify, I’m not talking about just general sexual attention—I’m talking about the ability to hold down long term relationships from men that they want.
/r/MensRights19/04/22 02:15 PM
6

Ehh, I’d say that’s not entirely true. “Pick-me” is basically the female equivalent of “Simp” Some anti-feminist women only have their eyes opened to men’s struggles once they hit “the wall” and their pretty privilege starts to wear off. Sure, they can still get “laid”, but they don’t have the leverage that they once had for relationships and marriage. So since they can’t get by on purely their youth and looks anymore, they have to adapt and make an effort to understand what men want and empathi…
/r/MensRights19/04/22 01:26 PM
1

1) don’t. 2) If you have to argue, force them answer very clear yes or no questions. Make them purely focus on the logic without letting them get off topic in long winded emotional responses.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/21 01:20 PM
3

Looked up the tweet. Looks like she’s joking/being sarcastic and did not literally go and slap a random man.
/r/MensRights11/08/20 03:50 PM
1

I think that(‘s?) assuming a false accusation is not a problem. I don’t think anyone here disagrees that false accusations are a real problem. However, given the sub and this post, I didn’t harp on it because I figured that would just be preaching to the choir.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 08:00 PM
5

That’s also wrong, but I’m not talking about that.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 06:15 PM
16

May or may not be controversial for this sub, but I’ll say this: I don’t know many details about these cases, but as a general rule, It’s not a good idea to come right out the gate and immediately label them as “false allegations”. It’s one thing to point out that they are unproven have little to no evidence or to want due process and not want someone’s career ruined in the court of public opinion. It’s another to immediately label a claim as false or say that the accuser is outright lying. The …
/r/MensRights12/04/20 04:46 PM
5

He doesn’t describe himself as an atheist, and he asks not to be called one, but he certainly fits the definition of someone who lacks belief in god. A-theism simply means “not” or “without” theism. And before you ask, no it’s not mutually exclusive with agnosticism. There are subsets of atheism such as strong/gnostic atheism, the positive claim that you are certain there are no no gods, as well as anti-theism, the position that all god belief and religion is harmful and needs to go away. I can …
/r/MensRights12/04/20 04:32 PM
6

I never claimed that it didn’t effect men as well. Reread what I said.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 07:53 PM
15

??? I’m not making “women the victims”. I’m making the egalitarian (neither men’s rights nor feminist) observation that both genders have pros and cons, and that there are some double standards that affect women instead of men. I did not disagree with any of the double standards of the OP or even say which side has to deal with more double standards. All I did was give one example (slut shaming) that conventionally is something believed to affect women more than men on average.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 07:26 PM
18

Those are fair points.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 07:13 PM
109

These double standards, in particular, are ale male-focused to highlight the fact that they aren't focused on enough, but of course, there are some double standards that affect women more than men (slut shaming for example).
/r/MensRights07/06/19 05:48 PM
23

In the case of Chris Brown rape accusation though, it was just an accusation, that he vehemently denied and was later dismissed. Cardi gave a full blown admission on video and bragged about it.
/r/MensRights18/04/19 02:03 PM
11

Religions are just the cults that made it
/r/MensRights14/12/18 08:00 AM
3

Depends. If your lack of attraction is purely because of physical preferences, then you obviously can’t control that, so it’s not racist. However, if it’s completely based on perceived stereotypes (e.g. “I’ll never date black girls because they’re all too loud/aggressive/ratchet”) then it would arguably be racist.
/r/MensRights24/11/18 04:53 PM
63

It's not entirely unfair though. While not every feminist is the extremist SJW stereotype you hear about, there are a lot of underlying themes in mainstream feminist thought that are inherently biased against men.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 02:14 PM
2

Different workplaces have different dress codes. And construction workers wear more than banana g-strings
/r/MensRights17/06/18 02:29 PM
5

I’m actually all for the feee the nipple movement, but the issue here is that she’s at some sort of work/school environment where this type of dress shouldn’t be acceptable for anyone. I don’t think nipples should be treated as genitals, but at the same time, that doesn’t make it okay to show up to a professional event in nothing but my underwear.
/r/MensRights17/06/18 02:27 PM
16

nods r/trashy.
/r/MensRights17/06/18 02:13 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter