TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Majiir Archive

View 1 post and 57 comments by Majiir on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
23

Majiir/r/MensRights10/10/12 05:06 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
27

they believe it is because women work in lower paying industries when the fact is that the industries that women work in are often paid less ...those are the same thing.
/r/MensRights28/11/25 04:02 PM
7

How does that contradict me? You said: Polyamory is fringe outliers among women 4-5% is a small minority, but not exactly "fringe outlier". Polygamous sexual nature describes the majority of men 4-5% is certainly not a majority. Meanwhile, I said: many people in poly relationships are women. Like, what am I doing here, just copy-pasting what's already been written? Can you not read?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/19 12:08 AM
4

Have you actually looked at real numbers? The first Google result for "polyamory statistics" gives us: There are more women than men: Essentially half of the respondents (49.5 percent) identified as female, while only 35.4 percent identified as male. The remaining 15.1 percent either declined to choose between male and female or wrote in “third” genders such as two-spirit and genderqueer. Your imagined world view contradicts reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/19 11:56 PM
3

Polygamy and polyamory aren't the same thing. Polyamory is the more applicable concept here, and yeah, many people in poly relationships are women.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/19 11:04 PM
1

CPI-adjusted, so yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/18 03:51 PM
1

What part of CPI-adjusted do you not understand?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/18 03:51 PM
1

Yes, median income is around $31K - which is as high as it's ever been. And yes, that's adjusted for inflation.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/18 12:59 PM
1

The economy? You mean the one with high wages and low unemployment? It's not 2009 anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/18 02:14 AM
1

Eh, I see a lot of meta discussion here. There are no TRP "how to" guides. Maybe this sub is just inherently critical of everything that's posted here, which is great. My point is that there is TRP content that I wouldn't want to spend my time reading, and because of how Reddit works, that content never even gets put in front of me.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/18 03:32 PM
4

I don't understand this. It's Reddit. You go to the subs you want. Were TRP posts making it to the front page all the time? Or are people offended that they seek out content and then it exists? Or do people just not have a clue how to use the site, and instead of fixing that, Reddit goes and bans subs? Like, I use Reddit all the time, and I'm subbed here, and I still never saw any TRP content because I never went seeking it out. I don't at all understand who was bothered by its presence.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/18 03:14 PM
7

They do masquerade as being about equality.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 05:03 PM
52

For activities that only smart people do, most people will be men. For activities that only dumb people do, most people will be men. For activities that only average-intelligence people do, most people will be women. That's what the higher-variance-among-men claim would indicate, anyway. Your intuition doesn't contradict the math.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 06:41 PM
486

shut the fuck up and let us build our thing I like this.
/r/MensRights23/01/17 01:00 PM
3

In the U.S., state and federal combined can easily end up over 30%.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/17 11:05 PM
1

People are free to have whatever preferences they want, and we're free to ridicule them for it. I doubt that our hypothetical corporate wife is going to have a matrix of requirements like "six feet tall, muscular, and makes $100K". Hopefully, she'll be a bit more diplomatic about finding the kind of person she wants, rather than going by numbers alone. (There are plenty of people making six figures who would make horrible partners in our hypothetical.) Maybe there's a distinction to be made betw…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 11:49 AM
6

I feel free to mandate a certain income -- because the minimum is lower than my own income. I think the same is fair for women. You make $120K? Fine, I get it if you want a partner making at least $100K. It's the (dramatically) opposite situation that I'm not cool with. You get to be picky about areas where you're strong, not where you're weak.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/16 12:49 AM
0

Okay... how? How does a high earner meet such a woman (who's single)? They're likely to be in high demand, and surrounded by an army of wealthy suitors. Is there a magical place where you can flash your W-2 and meet women in your same tax bracket?!?!
/r/MensRights13/08/16 08:57 PM
16

Well, it's hard to get riled up about this gap when you use phrases like "infinitely more". I'm interested to see some real numbers, though.
/r/MensRights04/01/16 06:05 AM
2

/r/couplesfuckingdragonsfuckingcars
/r/MensRights13/12/15 09:15 PM
5

You're conflating the categories with individuals. The chart says women should be all over me, but they're not. It's entirely possible for individuals to defy the general trend. The chart doesn't present reasons. It may have just been based on picture results, or maybe full profiles, or something else—I don't know. You could probably search on that. Or you could ask people here for their thoughts, but stop making it about you, because it's not about you. Nobody here knows you.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/15 08:00 PM
1

The chart doesn't have a bubble for /u/rudeawakening4444. It's not personal. But you asked: What does this mean? The chart indicates that, for some reason, men just don't like most black women. (Again, this isn't personal; we're talking about aggregates here.) When someone says you're attractive "for a black woman", they're alluding to the general disposition against black women, but still saying you're well above average in that category. Someone who phrases it that way is sort of an asshole, b…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/15 07:53 PM
2

It's a diagram using data from some dating site, showing the rates at which people in different gender and race categories responded to messages from people in other categories. The chart shows that men, regardless of their race, responded the least to black women.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/15 07:47 PM
6

You're pretty much SOL.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/15 07:43 PM
1

A higher percentage of what, though? Most people see "a higher percentage of women are being murdered" and think, oh, a higher percentage of women in the workforce are being murdered. But that's not true. It's more that if you die at work, it's more likely to be because of murder if you're a woman... but that's an entirely insignificant fact. The number of women dying at work pales in significance to even a small portion of men dying at work. There is no disadvantage women can claim here. None w…
/r/MensRights29/08/15 04:22 AM
3

Well, yes.... because we practically define men and women to have an equal average IQ. Any test that shows a discrepancy is considered flawed and is revised.
/r/MensRights19/07/15 04:09 AM
5

Most women who experience #FartRape are too intimidated to report the sexual violence. RIP SIDES
/r/MensRights11/11/14 11:54 PM
2

There's a limit to that. You might find that doubling salaries only gets you another 40% more programmers; doubling again, maybe only 20%. In the long run things do shift, but like I said, the issue is finding good programmers.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 12:25 AM
6

We also have labor shortages in some sectors. For example, in computing, there's simultaneously high unemployment and a labor shortage: talented labor is difficult to come by. Guess which gender comprises most computer programmers? Spoiler: it's not women.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 11:18 PM
1

So, you have $50K in the bank? Some of us actually save money. A $50K nest egg is completely reasonable.
/r/MensRights06/03/14 09:08 PM
2

No, that's not what he's claiming. He said there is evidence that "the most violent domestic partner arrangements are female-female lesbian relationships." So let's break this down. Say we've got 100 relationships in the world. Some are more violent than others. Take the top 5 most violent relationships. The claim is that those relationships are more likely to be female-female. It's entirely possible that the very least violent relationships are also female-female. This claim makes no statement …
/r/MensRights25/05/13 11:43 AM
1

The number of couples is irrelevant to his claim that the most violent arrangements are female-female. Those arrangements may be in the minority and yet still be the most violent. It's not my claim so I haven't dug up a source, but it's a stat I've heard a lot that's gone fairly uncontested. In any event, BTB's link shows she's not likely to get a much better deal than whatever she thinks she's running from.
/r/MensRights25/05/13 11:17 AM
11

No; the point of the OP is that body types are fair game for deciding whether you're attracted to someone. There's no all-looks-are-equally-attractive sort of political correctness here.
/r/MensRights11/05/13 02:26 AM
14

It's a speech...
/r/MensRights29/04/13 02:19 PM
1

The possibility is remote at best.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 12:11 AM
5

I don't doubt your claim, but do you have a source? Many would claim men are the more desperate for sex.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 10:39 AM
1

She may well not be—but I can't know that for sure, and that ship has sailed.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 07:51 PM
2

I'm not sure you understood my post. The point is that I'm trying to reject exactly that philosophy.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 07:44 PM
3

Interesting. I'm tall and make good money for my age, so maybe I need to decorate my clothes with Benjamins? All jokes aside, that's too bad, but I wonder how universal that is. Would I be crazy to say I wouldn't like that kind of person anyway?
/r/MensRights10/10/12 07:43 PM
3

I wasn't trying to fuck her, I was smiling. It's this shit that I'm talking about in the first place. [EDIT] I understand your warning, and I agree. My objection is that you brought it up in the context of this post.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 07:36 PM
1

Yep, and maybe I just need to practice this more. I like to be cheerful.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 05:24 PM
4

It's not conscious, which is why I'm so irritated. I need to very consciously train myself out of it.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 05:23 PM
12

I only had four months in the public school system, and I don't think I've had such explicit "training". It's more unspoken and insidious than that.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 05:22 PM
8

My firstborn. Take it.
/r/MensRights15/09/12 12:16 AM
4

Well, at least you're both potentially liable in the crash scenario. But point taken. :-)
/r/MensRights10/09/12 01:05 PM
6

If the accusation alone is damaging in a way you can quantify, then you can sue for that. (This isn't unique to rape cases.)
/r/MensRights28/08/12 11:29 PM
15

This is where "innocent until proven guilty" comes in. Sure, you could argue that such a system helps the guilty, but it also protects the innocent—and you never know when it could protect you.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 10:48 PM
6

No idea how long you've been playing EVE, but I'll mention my best times weren't with mega-conglomerates, but instead with smaller alliances that have a strong sense of personality and purpose. (Okay, maybe my first wasn't really that small... but it was definitely different and offered a gameplay experience that I don't think could ever be replicated again.)
/r/MensRights24/08/12 06:18 AM
15

TEST are jackasses anyway. Now that I know they're a "feminist safe space" I know where to train my lasers...
/r/MensRights24/08/12 06:06 AM
0

Don't fall into the same trap as feminists. It would surprise me if the majority of the homeless were women just as it would surprise me if the majority of CEOs were women. This isn't about socioeconomic pressures, either; it's biological. (Higher rate of mutation in men, which manifests in some interesting ways.) If we make the leap that homeless men = oppression, then we're doing the exact same thing as feminists who say CEO men = oppression. Now, homeless men may well be mistreated, and there…
/r/MensRights17/08/12 06:50 PM
1

This is reflected in IQ score distributions. You can also see it (albeit more anecdotally) in the gender distributions of CEOs and prison inmates.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 06:36 PM
13

Didn't you know that would make her boyfriend (in the open relationship) a horrible misogynist?
/r/MensRights12/07/12 09:55 PM
1

That's fine. You aren't the problem. The people who would treat this very differently were the genders reversed are the problem.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 05:54 PM
1

This is absolutely correct. However, consider what the reaction would be if the genders were swapped. A twenty-four-year-old gym coach flirts with a fifteen-year-old girl, convinces her to join him in a tanning booth, locks the door, takes off his pants and kisses her. This happens despite the girl's parent asking for her to be watched out for. Am I crazy to think that the article would have been written differently?
/r/MensRights28/06/12 10:02 PM
2

I wonder about the tortoise analogy. Is that just inflating the word count, or is it there to soften the blow of an "offensive" fact?
/r/MensRights25/06/12 04:21 PM
2

Sure, but it strengthens any movement to have a solid ideological basis.
/r/MensRights22/06/12 11:50 PM
1

I like GirlWritesWhat. I saw some of her videos a while back. I didn't know she was known by/representative of /r/mensrights.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 07:10 PM
1

In my case, I've been focusing on my career and hobbies at the "expense" of dating. I wouldn't say my ex-girlfriend was abusive, but she was certainly difficult in a lot of ways that are relevant to MR. She constantly suspected me of cheating—something I never came even close to. At the time, I never considered that this was a sexist stereotype; I just thought I was a nice guy by trusting that she wasn't cheating. When she (periodically) got into a break-up mood, she'd get really frustrated that…
/r/MensRights20/06/12 06:31 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter