TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MajorWookie Archive

View 4 posts and 191 comments by MajorWookie on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
11

This has been my major struggle over the past year or so. I have 3 to 5 plates. The ones that drop are the ones that want me to get serious with them or I’ve gotten soft. Though I want to leave people better than I met them and try hard to Rolo makes it clear that, at least for women sexually, that’s just not possible to do. So I accept. I try to treat all my plates with respect and say a quiet “if you haven’ girl problems I feel bad for you son. I got 99 problems and a bitch ain’t one” to mysel…
/r/TheRedPill14/04/25 05:47 AM
1

Same person. The other post said it was removed and not to DM the mods. Will removed this post.
/r/TheRedPill22/09/24 12:35 AM
27

I must admit. I am often caught flat footed when I hear this bc it seems so obvious why a man would would want a younger woman. I think “didn’t you date men older than you when you were younger?” And “tell me how easier dating was when you were younger.” And “did you feel immature and manipulable or happy and excited to have new experiences when you were younger?” Men and women come into their primes about 10 years apart. The later seem to bitch and moan louder than the former when they’re out o…
/r/TheRedPill06/09/24 04:40 PM
3

Interesting take on the first part. Personally I avoided contemporary RedPill content (e.g. Fresh&Fit, @whatever podcast, Andrew Tate etc no hate towards these guys) because I felt their content wasn’t helpful to me and more shock and awe. Once I found Rollo and the RedPill theory stuff from the 2000s - 2010s I really started to unplug (and of course having my heart broken a few times). I think the difference between then and now is then the emphasis was on explaining how things really work vs n…
/r/TheRedPill03/09/24 09:23 AM
2

Understand and Rodger that. Very reasonable ask and standard to have.
/r/TheRedPill25/08/24 11:02 PM
0

Understood I’ll just delete my comment. It’s not worth the effort to explain.
/r/TheRedPill25/08/24 11:00 PM
2

Some of you guys really think you know what you’re talking about and our professional bloggers.
/r/TheRedPill25/08/24 05:46 PM
8

From what I gather girls breaking rules for the guys they like and making rules for the guys they don’t has been a principal in the redpill since the late 90s. Not sure what redpill guys you listen to (sounds like the YouTube, podcast, Instagram young men) but the redpill contant I consume does not have a Meliz victimization and coping doctrine
/r/TheRedPill24/08/24 05:12 AM
-2

They definitely do. Believe it whatever you want. I don’t care.
/r/TheRedPill22/08/24 10:11 AM
1

Shit test can be both conscious and unconscious
/r/TheRedPill22/08/24 10:09 AM
9

Women shit test like we check them out
/r/TheRedPill22/08/24 03:29 AM
85

Don’t women also shit test as it means of flirting?
/r/TheRedPill22/08/24 02:10 AM
8

So many things to name if you read both, it should be self-explanatory in my opinion. Explaining hypergamy, alpha vs beta, etc. Glover doesn’t do that.
/r/TheRedPill17/08/24 02:34 PM
9

I don’t think it’s unsafe. I think no more Mr. nice guy is safer than the rational male. Maybe be “safe” as a bad word. Read “ less taboo,” “more socially acceptable,” “less jarring,” etc
/r/TheRedPill17/08/24 02:23 PM
21

Should’ve clarified I don’t think that guy is a grifter. Like I said it’s a good book. But it is safe compared to something like the rational male
/r/TheRedPill17/08/24 11:58 AM
12

“Don’t check me, check yo bitch”
/r/seduction02/11/22 11:10 AM
-3

In fact I am trying to be helpful. Why do you expect people to do the work for you; to just give your the answers? This question has been asked dozens if not hundreds of time but you probably think your situation is special or unique. Did you even try searching this sub? I'm guessing not. And instead of considering this stranger (me) might be belong you fish (instead of giving you fish) you complain about it. That is a sign of needy behavior which by the way women find unattractive.
/r/seduction31/10/22 04:13 PM
-1

You could have just searched this sub for your answer...
/r/seduction31/10/22 03:59 PM
4

Get off dating apps completely. Approach women irl.
/r/seduction31/10/22 01:30 AM
1

Pretend?
/r/seduction28/10/22 09:05 PM
2

Lol. I ghost for lesser reasons.
/r/seduction26/10/22 08:03 PM
1

No.
/r/seduction22/10/22 06:54 PM
0

“Fuck that bitch”
/r/seduction22/10/22 03:21 PM
1

Texting is primarily for making plans not conversation. Don’t get too text heavy with chitchat, pictures, memes and emoji‘s
/r/seduction22/10/22 01:17 PM
2

Learn the “Fuck Yes or No” principal.
/r/seduction21/10/22 02:21 PM
7

Between 30 and 31
/r/seduction18/10/22 10:16 PM
6

Don't use dating Apps. Approach women in real life
/r/seduction16/10/22 01:26 PM
12

💰💰💰💰💰💰
/r/seduction13/10/22 02:36 AM
1

Don't use OLD
/r/seduction07/10/22 03:02 PM
3

I mute girls I’m dating.
/r/seduction03/10/22 11:27 PM
3

Read the book Models
/r/seduction02/10/22 09:47 PM
1

Eye contact.
/r/seduction16/09/22 03:23 PM
1

Been there done that. Not worth it.
/r/seduction12/09/22 08:31 PM
9

We can’t give you a credit card because you have no credit.
/r/seduction07/09/22 02:32 AM
1

I never understood why people get so hurt with being ghosted. Just move on.
/r/seduction11/08/22 01:01 PM
5

Thanks for posting. Wish I knew you in person to ask you questions.
/r/seduction14/07/22 12:51 AM
2

Atta boy
/r/seduction04/04/21 02:18 AM
18

Not PPD
/r/PussyPassDenied28/12/19 01:43 PM
4

Lol I might know this girl
/r/PussyPassDenied27/12/19 11:59 AM
45

Nice zinger but not PPD
/r/PussyPassDenied21/12/19 07:37 AM
1

Meh. I’ll flirt with the server for more beer, bud or food
/r/PussyPassDenied03/12/19 02:43 PM
4

Y’all don’t use Twitter uh? That was a fake profile.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/10/19 10:26 PM
2

Call her a cunt
/r/PussyPassDenied12/10/19 12:01 AM
-2

This is old i think.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/10/19 12:34 AM
1

Not commitment but resources. Men can earn more resources and longer than women can.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/09/19 05:43 AM
3

Ah you’re 14. You don’t know shit yet. I don’t know your situation kid. But I’m not inclined to side with this ignorance because you say you’re a victim and have been suicidal since 10. Imo you’re far too young to be trusted be with these claims. If what you say is true. You need to speak to your parents or trusted adults and GET HELP instead of shit posting on Reddit.
/r/MensRights17/09/19 01:00 PM
47

This is why I have to leave this sub. More posts by ignorant people.
/r/MensRights17/09/19 05:21 AM
95

It actually IS true.
/r/MensRights17/09/19 05:20 AM
-4

Meh. As it grows more bullshit gets in here.
/r/MensRights15/09/19 10:22 AM
4

People are calling OP the asshole because 1) she is trying to be fair and enforce the company’s code and 2) the code is too strict. NOT because anyone believes women should have to dress formal
/r/MensRights15/09/19 08:11 AM
3

Low hanging fruit
/r/MensRights15/09/19 07:56 AM
-7

Word
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/19 12:02 AM
1

Can we have a link? Why screenshot the article but not post the link too?
/r/PussyPassDenied31/08/19 09:07 PM
1

I’m black...
/r/MensRights29/08/19 02:08 PM
2

Relax dude.
/r/MensRights26/08/19 04:55 AM
1

And you have to travel. Women are also less likely to changes jobs as often, relocate for a job or take jobs that require travel.
/r/MensRights26/08/19 04:07 AM
2

Ya know how there’s a lot of meat that the market but no have ever seen an animal killed? Kinda like that
/r/MensRights18/08/19 04:11 PM
1

My HR department is like that too. They have “Love Wins” stickers everywhere.
/r/MensRights18/08/19 04:09 PM
3

What is this organization? What is their cause?
/r/MensRights02/06/19 01:54 AM
3

Lets keep an eye on this.
/r/MensRights02/06/19 01:53 AM
1

Thanks! Will will repost correctly
/r/MensRights02/06/19 01:31 AM
1

Dude. You could have keep all that to yourself . He’ll still likely make more
/r/MensRights25/05/19 01:35 AM
3

Good move. You’re gonna go far kid
/r/MensRights23/05/19 02:33 PM
7

This is very bad advice.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 01:43 PM
35

Meh. Sucks but that’s parr for the course buddy. Is it justified? I don’t think so. You’ll get teachers like that through college too. I had a professor tell me a girl should be able to get drunk and pass out naked in a house party and not be touched but when asked about men being robbed or assaulted under the same conditions she said men should be more responsible. Take comfort in knowing that you’ll earn more money than her mate
/r/MensRights23/05/19 01:41 PM
23

How old are you?
/r/MensRights23/05/19 01:10 PM
3

Very fair criticism. Thank you. Still there is a MGTOW sub that I do not subscribe to because I do not want to see this content. If MGTOW and MRA are different responses I am being consistent in saying “keep this shit out of here” Meaning. This is not the MGTOW sub where to post and share MGTOW content. This is a MRA sub where MRA related content is posted and shared. MGTOW and MRA are different (I’d argue separate too) “clubs.” Therefore keep the shit over there. BUT I’m not a mod. I just think…
/r/MensRights20/05/19 05:47 PM
1

*diet incel.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 04:23 PM
-8

MGTOW is diet Incel. Keep this shit out of here
/r/MensRights20/05/19 02:20 PM
1

🙄🙄🙄
/r/MensRights14/05/19 02:30 PM
1

Joe Rogan is not an intellectual; I wouldn’t assume many fans of his to be either. MR isn’t an intellectual movement (nor do you have to be an intellectual to participate) but there is a level of critical thinking and social observation one must have to see the problems we advocate against. I haven’t heard what Joe thinks about MR but if his (or his fans) general argument is something like “you’re a man in the western world” they haven’t seriously engaged in the discussion with good will. Edit: …
/r/MensRights14/05/19 02:18 PM
1

Meh. I think MRA are far more consistent. Probably because there’s fewer of us. That said it is not true that all feminists only care about just their people. But I dont care to defend them. I was trying to figure out how this is unique to men and boys beyond it being a general (young) human rights compromise.
/r/MensRights14/05/19 06:04 AM
0

They say the same thing....
/r/MensRights14/05/19 05:20 AM
1

Lol. I know what I did. I did it on purpose. You’re welcome
/r/MensRights14/05/19 12:53 AM
-1

I reserve the right to say what I want. I’ve edited my comment above towards your liking since you were nice.
/r/MensRights14/05/19 12:03 AM
-2

Lol. And who gave you the gavel and called you judge? [EDIT] With all do respect... Suck my dick.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 11:50 PM
-3

Lol. Whatever. I’m not here to hold anyone’s hand. This information is easily available.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 11:41 PM
1

Yes. EDIT: I don’t like giving advice to minors. If you are under legal age speak to your parents or an adult you trust. If you are of legal age seek help from a mental health professional. Even if you aren’t harming yourself sever depression is not something to deal with on your own.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 10:49 PM
17

Men will typically engage in reckless behavior such as “hard” drugs and behaviors like: Street racing, gambling, fighting etc) I’m of the opinion that these are also self harm
/r/MensRights13/05/19 10:24 PM
-4

How old are you? If you can use Reddit you can use google.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 10:21 PM
7

I’m pretty sure women attempt suicide more AND fail at suicide more than men while men are more (~3x) successful in their attempt. Short - women definitely lead in the gross suicide (attempts and completions combined) total; men lead in the net total (completions) I see what you’re saying and your facts are right but you’re wrong. You’re missing her point, being insensitive and talking past her just so you can get your point across. This has little if anything to do with Men’s Rights. This troll…
/r/MensRights13/05/19 10:06 PM
-2

Which again. I ask. What does this have to do with men right as opposed to human rights?
/r/MensRights13/05/19 07:53 PM
-2

Does this concern boys yes, but not exclusively. This is a bad idea for a number of reasons. Most of which are not exclusive to boys.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 03:56 PM
2

What does this have to do with Men’s Right?
/r/MensRights13/05/19 02:56 PM
2

I’m in Las Vegas...
/r/MensRights10/05/19 01:54 AM
18

Lol buy it. Say you’re trans. Whose gonna question your sex?
/r/MensRights10/05/19 01:37 AM
8

Do you use duck duck go regularly?
/r/MensRights09/05/19 01:58 AM
0

It’s Twitter...
/r/MensRights08/05/19 04:01 PM
1

Lol. What does your “gotcha” moment have to do with Men’s Rights?
/r/MensRights07/05/19 07:53 PM
1

Rest easy kid
/r/MensRights07/05/19 07:11 PM
11

Yeah. I’m a black man too. A lot of the men’s rights point are important to me and “my people.” I try to be active on this sub. Sometimes I see alt right/incel BS here and I’ll address it
/r/MensRights07/05/19 05:24 PM
1

I would love to takes CHS’s spot. Gay isn’t even making good points
/r/MensRights07/05/19 12:42 AM
10

Oh. God. Scared to read these comments. Edit: it was good browse.
/r/MensRights29/04/19 11:29 PM
3

So not news.
/r/MensRights28/04/19 01:40 PM
-4

I didn’t say that last part.
/r/MensRights28/04/19 01:07 PM
-6

Giving? You already have it.
/r/MensRights28/04/19 12:35 PM
0

Feminists are not remotely like Nazis. That is an absurd thought.
/r/MensRights28/04/19 03:24 AM
-1

I guess so. im not worries about something some feminazi said 2 years ago. She’s not the reason men are accused. This is a waste of energy.
/r/MensRights28/04/19 01:03 AM
23

Revoking consent during sex is fine. It’s when you put legal consequences behind it. There have been plenty of times I’ve been having sex with a woman and wanted to stop and she didn’t. I don’t want to her to go to jail.
/r/MensRights28/04/19 12:59 AM
-7

2 years ago...
/r/MensRights27/04/19 07:17 PM
1

I don’t equate feminists to nazis.
/r/MensRights27/04/19 12:13 AM
6

Not all of them.
/r/MensRights26/04/19 10:06 PM
10

A significant, unreasonable, portion of if yes. The complete phenomenon no.
/r/MensRights26/04/19 10:04 PM
1

Not s pay wall. Just need an account.
/r/MensRights26/04/19 02:34 AM
1

Unless the victim is a man/boy. Then he’s “lucky he got laid” <eye roll x9000>
/r/MensRights25/04/19 11:47 PM
3

Wtf?
/r/MensRights25/04/19 11:36 PM
2

Lol. He is the definition of white knight
/r/MensRights25/04/19 01:19 PM
6

This could easily go too far and/or give women even more legal leverage. But it could also protect men from women tricking them into having sex. I don’t know. Not sure how I completely feel
/r/MensRights25/04/19 01:00 AM
1

What does this have to do with men’s right?
/r/MensRights23/04/19 08:06 PM
2

With the one obviously exception, you both make a d damn good point.
/r/MensRights23/04/19 08:05 PM
4

Do what you want.
/r/MensRights23/04/19 04:16 AM
1

I... don’t understand you.
/r/MensRights23/04/19 02:30 AM
0

But... that’s not what I’m responding to... look at the thread hierarchy.
/r/MensRights20/04/19 03:38 AM
0

I don’t think so. Im defending my comment.
/r/MensRights20/04/19 03:21 AM
1

But.... what if.... a woman is the most qualified and competent...
/r/MensRights20/04/19 03:15 AM
0

No one said the man shouldn’t take responsibility for the child if it exist.
/r/MensRights20/04/19 02:58 AM
1

You’re either being contradictory or sexist. Either we need qualified and competent people in STEM. Or We need qualified and competent men. Which is it?
/r/MensRights20/04/19 12:01 AM
14

There would be absolutely no way to prove this without reasonable doubt. Men shouldn’t have to pay child support unless negotiated in divorce fillings.
/r/MensRights19/04/19 10:15 PM
1

Great. Fuck you. You technical piece of shit.
/r/MensRights19/04/19 02:33 AM
1

No. You are not. This is Reddit. Not a technical peer review or an academic journal where language is strict. You’re taking my words far too literally. All you’ve done is interpret code; not comprehend it. ALL statements have exceptions; in casual language generally overwhelmingly true statements are acceptable. Is it generally overwhelmingly true that no one admits to rape? Yes. Your rebuttal does not make my statement more false than it is true given how people admitting to rape very very very…
/r/MensRights19/04/19 02:22 AM
1

But not reading, or in other words not comprehending.
/r/MensRights19/04/19 02:07 AM
1

I didn’t say “you’re not quoting what I’m writing are you” Since we’re being technical here
/r/MensRights19/04/19 02:04 AM
1

You’re not reading what I’m writing are you?
/r/MensRights19/04/19 01:40 AM
1

No. That is a completely different statement. I’m not asking for evidence. I’m making a very safe assumption based on a socially observed and systemically documented phenomenon.
/r/MensRights19/04/19 12:29 AM
2

Wow... I stand corrected. Thank you.
/r/MensRights19/04/19 12:26 AM
1

Well, legally she can't rape a man. And even if she forced him to have sex at machete point, she would not be charged with such. What? this is illegal. what do you mean?
/r/MensRights18/04/19 10:58 PM
1

“With great power comes great responsibility?”
/r/MensRights18/04/19 10:53 PM
1

okay - this was funny lol
/r/MensRights18/04/19 10:43 PM
1

an accuser is not needed to charge someone of any crime. Lack thereof does not exonerate a person of guilt
/r/MensRights18/04/19 10:42 PM
0

Duh...... MY point is these TYPE of men should be ignored because they have little-to-no interest in reason. Their behavior is self-evident; there is no need to carefully evaluate every user node on the internet - that is an unreasonable standard to expect. Ignoring a very small fraction of men who are typically driven by hurt and anger and not logic and reason does not create or encourage an echo chamber at all. This is not to say we or they cannot engage but when people evidently abandon reaso…
/r/MensRights18/04/19 10:41 PM
1

I hate when, on the internet, type text, and assume people know if it’s a joke or not. Add an “lol” or someone. Do better
/r/MensRights18/04/19 10:30 PM
1

I hate when, on the internet, a person saying something that is overwhelmingly generally true and then some know-it-all brings up the an anomaly as if to say “wait no. That overwhelmingly generally true thing you said is wrong because I found an anomaly.” This is insufficient, distracting, lazy and point less. Do better.
/r/MensRights18/04/19 10:19 PM
1

One does not constitute an epidemic.
/r/MensRights18/04/19 10:07 PM
4

My advice is to ignore the incels and mgtow's read.
/r/MensRights18/04/19 10:06 PM
3

okay - I think you're preaching to the choir. Men are falsely accused not women - I'm sure you know that. ​ From what I've seen people have been saying "if she were a man..." and not flat out saying she is a rapist. My advice is to ignore the incels and mgtow's
/r/MensRights18/04/19 10:00 PM
-2

she never admitted to raping anyone No one admits to raping anyone. and this has nothing to do with "factual statistics." whatever that means.
/r/MensRights18/04/19 09:53 PM
1

because what people really mean when they say "toxic masculinity" is unreasonable (and/or unacceptable) masculine behavior
/r/MensRights18/04/19 03:52 PM
1

Tbh. I do over all agree with you. I’m just trying to see if I can sharpen your argument
/r/MensRights18/04/19 03:01 PM
2

Lol yes
/r/MensRights18/04/19 12:20 AM
3

Yeah... which is still corny. “You can only engage in this discussion if you agree with me”??
/r/MensRights17/04/19 11:55 PM
2

Okay - lets spar Let's agree, for the sake of argument, that masculinity has both good and bad aspects, in the way that nature always finds balance. We'll refer to the bad of masculinity as "toxic" and the good as, well, what? We can't exactly say "positive," because that isn't really a proper antonym to "toxic," is it? Perhaps "healthy?" No, still not good enough. If the bad of masculinity is toxic, then the good must be the antidote. I'll go with "sanative." I find "reasonable" and "unreasonab…
/r/MensRights17/04/19 09:55 PM
15

What a cool dad
/r/MensRights17/04/19 09:08 PM
1

So why say we don’t need more women in STEM?
/r/MensRights15/04/19 02:27 AM
1

How precisely am I doing that? [Edit] I thought so.
/r/MensRights15/04/19 02:25 AM
1

I haven’t defended anything other than “much”=/=“most.” you have yet to rebuttal incel.
/r/MensRights15/04/19 01:42 AM
1

Lol. Your avi is MGTOW and you’re active in r/Braincels. You don’t care about men’s rights. You’re a hurt man. Listen to some Jordan Peterson and get your life together or keep that bullshit in those subs
/r/MensRights15/04/19 01:39 AM
1

“Much of the work” =/= “most of the work” That is wrong. You are wrong. All the angst because you can’t get no pussy. I support men. I don’t support ignorance.
/r/MensRights15/04/19 01:33 AM
1

I don’t need to reach to reinterpret someone’s tweet be an MRA. Supporting men’s right has nothing to do with disparaging women. You’re just an incel. And WRONG.
/r/MensRights15/04/19 01:27 AM
2

Lol. Citing urban dictionary is worse than citing Wikipedia. And using this sub to support your argument is like citing the Bible to prove its true. But I guess because you are an incel everyone in your circles would. Point remains. “Much” =/= “most.” You’re wrong
/r/MensRights15/04/19 01:21 AM
1

Only incels use cuck as a none sexual term...
/r/MensRights15/04/19 01:11 AM
0

The only thing we need in STEM is qualified and competent people. We most definitely don’t need ignorance and discrimination
/r/MensRights15/04/19 12:37 AM
1

Smells like incel.
/r/MensRights15/04/19 12:32 AM
7

How the fuck do you interpret “much of the work” as “most of the work?”
/r/MensRights15/04/19 12:10 AM
1

Semantics. I said what I said.
/r/MensRights12/04/19 05:52 PM
1

I hate when women attempt to compare their “struggle” to that of minorities.
/r/MensRights12/04/19 05:42 PM
-1

The 850,000 lines are predominantly inputted data and output from that, he didn't actually write all 850k. Githup count grossly She did have the original idea and has done TED talks about it around before the image over the last couple years. From what I've understood she is the person who made it happen. It obviously needed a team to achieve though, yet she is the only one that's getting credit BUT if it's only one person getting credit, she deserves it. "Three years ago, Bouman led the creatio…
/r/MensRights11/04/19 08:15 PM
1

what is your point? that drone strikes happen? THAT is unrelated crap.
/r/MensRights11/04/19 05:30 PM
2

Yeah. I think we should give credit where credit is due
/r/MensRights11/04/19 03:53 PM
1

My point still stands. You should take your own advice. Soldiers are in armed combat in Africa There are troops all over the world aiding with allying conflict source Additionally the USA militarily caries virtually all its allies. NATO self imposed 2% GDP spending. 5 of the 28 countries meet this with American leading by ~1% source Most of conflict is not drown strike. I ready said “people who study war have long known that sexual assault against men, especially enemy combatants, isn’t uncommon…
/r/MensRights11/04/19 03:16 PM
1

I didn’t say war. I said armed conflict and the US has been in arm conflict for most of it existence source I didn’t know about the US policy. I would like to see some proof of that. Still my point stands because able bodied men in conflict zones are typically combatants.
/r/MensRights11/04/19 02:27 PM
2

I miss read. I’m not a data scientist. I’m an Oracle Developer
/r/MensRights11/04/19 08:09 AM
58

Comment from OP “She came up with the idea for the algorithm that their subteam used. Essentially this means that without her, he wouldn’t have had anything to code and their subteam wouldn’t have existed. It’s a really cool algorithm idea too. I already posted this quote once, but I’ll share again here since it answers your questions a bit: Vincent Fish, a research scientist at MIT’s Haystack Observatory, told CNN, “(Bouman) was a major part of one of the imaging subteams. One of the insights K…
/r/MensRights11/04/19 08:04 AM
1

Lol I have. Most people do especially if they’re in a full time gig.
/r/MensRights11/04/19 07:47 AM
8

Men and women have different values, particular sensitivities and garner self pride from different things about themselves (or lack there of). It seems to me for women it’s their body and for men their utility. Ex: rape a women everyone cares. Rape a man hardly anyone cares A women that cannot generate resources (typically money) is still “good for something” if she is pretty (not only talking about sex here). A man who cannot generate resources (typically money) is good for nothing. As “patriar…
/r/MensRights11/04/19 07:37 AM
0

First of all yes. The US has been in armed conflict somewhere since WW1 And two sexual violence against men is primarily targeted to combatants not civilians. The same is not true for women.
/r/MensRights11/04/19 02:18 AM
0

OP what is your argument or point? That it’s under reported? ALL war crimes are under reported even sexual assault against women. And people who study war have long known that sexual assault against men, especially enemy combatants, isn’t uncommon even in modern war. That men in war have no resources for sexual PTSD? That’s not true the VA has provisions these men. Help me understand.
/r/MensRights11/04/19 12:33 AM
-3

Men get overwhelming help for PTSD. Which Can cover sexual assault. proof
/r/MensRights11/04/19 12:26 AM
0

Because its a historically and statistically safe assumption. And dude It’s Fox News not a peer review or scholarly article. They’re not witting to be precise This seems to be talking about war crimes not rape in everyday society. The stigma of men taking about their sexual assault will still exist but in this case I’d argue men are unlikely to speak on their trama because the assault, though sexual, it’s primarily violent. That would be more congruent with PTSD than societal shame.
/r/MensRights10/04/19 10:21 PM
1

Okay. Just asking.
/r/MensRights09/04/19 02:03 PM
3

You think women breast feed to get the attention of men?
/r/MensRights09/04/19 01:49 PM
1

Oh so you’re just a blind at the people you hate.
/r/MGTOW08/04/19 05:54 AM
-18

Meh. That’s kind of a reach what whatever Edit. Y’all mad
/r/MensRights07/04/19 03:03 AM
5

People wish the worst of people they hate. What is “worse” is dependent of the the target is and what the given context is. There is nothing unique about sodomy and prison.
/r/MensRights04/04/19 06:21 AM
7

No. You didn’t. Lots of words; little said.
/r/MensRights02/04/19 08:31 PM
8

Lol. “Rocket surgery.”
/r/MensRights02/04/19 08:11 PM
7

All you did was say 1) who made the ad 2)who ordered it 3)how many people are employed by Gillette And use that as justification against a reaction. Do better than that.
/r/MensRights02/04/19 08:09 PM
10

No. None of your points are good. You just state things anyone can look up.
/r/MensRights02/04/19 07:30 PM
3

Interesting I haven’t see. Any
/r/MensRights30/03/19 02:00 AM
-10

the guy said this was a lie - still this was a great social experiment to show how inconstant people are.
/r/MGTOW28/03/19 04:59 PM
1

Lol. Take the L and move along.
/r/MensRights20/03/19 08:23 PM
1

You should be aware of your ideology and biases because its clear you have an ax to grind but I'm not the one. Let this be a lesson on 'pop sociology' - that is using academic sociological principles to justify liberal agenda - for example words like "privilege" and "toxic" being used as a pejorative. "Toxic masculinity" and "male privilege" are not constructs of sociology; they're phenomenon that exist and have been observed by the field. You can think of "toxic" and "privilege" as two poles in…
/r/MensRights20/03/19 08:02 PM
1

They're similar in that they study people. But that can be said about any social science including economics.
/r/MensRights20/03/19 06:27 PM
1

not true modern sociology also reinforces the inherit differences between men and women
/r/MensRights20/03/19 06:27 PM
1

Because it's "feminist and female dominated?" I would suggest you not follow your ideology and biases blindly. The APA guidelines are a proposed solution to a problem that as has typically always been true according so sociologist and anthropologist. I didn't study psychology but it looks as if these guidelines are meant to completely erase these male phenomenon or at least make then approximate women's. Sociologist I dont believe would do this. First because research has show us that men will c…
/r/MensRights20/03/19 06:26 PM
1

I’m not sure what you’re trying to correlate. Is there a point you’d like to make?
/r/MensRights20/03/19 06:00 PM
1

That is not what sociology is.
/r/MensRights20/03/19 05:51 PM
1

I have but that’s psychology. The ASA would study and address the issue much differently
/r/MensRights20/03/19 05:50 PM
1

Lol. I wanted to get out of school fast and I thought it was interesting
/r/MensRights20/03/19 12:52 AM
7

Yes and no. First of all HS social science classes are nothing like they are at the college level and not to be taken seriously. In actual study, there's way more actual reading research and theory from "founders" of the field to get to non sense like what in the OP. That said there is still a good bunch of 'pop sociology' which is what I would consider the OP - that is using academic sociological principles to justify liberal agenda for example words like "privilege" and "toxic" being used as a…
/r/MensRights19/03/19 10:48 PM
7

I can’t believe I have a sociology degree
/r/MensRights19/03/19 08:59 PM
1

Lol
/r/MensRights15/03/19 04:32 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter