TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Malcolm1276 Archive

View 0 posts and 171 comments by Malcolm1276 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

At least give me my veteran's discount.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/05/24 09:08 PM
7

>Umm, no.. 2013 was not any different than now Uses a vague answer that clarifies nothing. > If you couldn't interpolate that from what I said, then ask someone with with a 7th Grade education to help you next time. ​ Gets mad when you don't read their mind. With with . . .
/r/PussyPassDenied17/10/19 09:44 PM
1

I sAiD tHe LaSt ThInG sO i WoN tHe ArGuMeNt!!1!!!11!1! You're pathetic. Reply, don't reply. I couldn't give two shits. You misread my position the entire time. If throwing childish insults make you feel better, keep this conversation open and say one thing a day. I hope it helps soothe your bruised ego about being wrong. Be best. Bye friend. I know you'll miss me.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/09/19 12:11 AM
1

Yeah, because the scenario on the video was slightly different, then a woman has definitely never tried this in an interview. Flawless logic there chief. Your sure are a master of the smarts. And you really got me there . . . bitter in my room. My feelings!!!! How every will they recover!?!?! I must take my own life now!!! Later twat.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/09/19 11:01 PM
1

Nice deflection. You still didn't understand what the fuck I was saying, and you're calling me dumb. That's rich. I assume you have nothing else. Have a shitty day.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/09/19 10:54 PM
1

Edit, I was wondering about that sub, I'll admit that. Your argument is that because you have one video of a woman showing her tits for a job(you referenced it earlier) that this meme belongs on the sub which states that women or girls utilize their tits to get jobs. Correct? The act of defending this post with one video is cherry picking right? Or are we in an alternate universe? Jesus you're this fucking dense huh? My argument is that the meme represents, and is making fun of, the video,which …
/r/PussyPassDenied22/09/19 10:49 PM
1

I’d like to see an example of a sub dedicated to hating on all men making dumb generalizations So go hang out in the feminism subs, there's plenty to choose from. Statistics show that men are much more likely to commit those atrocities... so let’s not cherry pick And higher chance does not equal mutually exclusive. Statistics also show that women are the ones more likely to murder their children, but you don't see me waving that flag around and saying it's a mutually exclusive thing to women, do…
/r/PussyPassDenied22/09/19 09:57 PM
1

guys like to rape and murder, assault, and steal... So do women, what's your point? imagine if there were subs on here saying shit like that about guys, y’all would freak. There are, but you don't see me running to those crying about it on those subs, do you? But the sad thing? The sad thing is that instead of going to subs you like, you come here to bemoan things you don't agree with, rather than checking out shit you enjoy. What a sad life that must be. More guys do those things than women sho…
/r/PussyPassDenied22/09/19 09:33 PM
1

My bad, I guess it should have said "Some girls" and then your delicate sensibilities wouldn't have been so butt hurt. And apparently the mods don't care that much, as the post is still up. So your point is moot there. Do you even have a point beyond whinging and being intentionally obtuse? Or are childish insults all you have to muster at this point?
/r/PussyPassDenied22/09/19 06:32 PM
1

I'm guessing you missed the video of the girl showing a guy her tits at a job interview, and failing to get the job. It's in here to if you bothered to look. So, to answer your question, yes, that's how some women are, and there's video evidence. If you're offended that we make fun of those types of women, that's on you. You don't have to come to this sub.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/09/19 05:35 PM
3

You don't get it because you have the point wrong. It's not about disliking women, it's about disliking the expectations of special treatment because they're women, or because they flash their lady parts thinking that will give them an advantage. What I don't get is how you've missed that point of this sub.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/09/19 03:45 PM
1

The moral of the story wasn't just gay sex--that's the simpleton version touted by atheists. No it's not. Don't try to saddle us with your silly ideal on what people, whom you apparently don't associate with, think the bible was and wasn't about.
/r/MensRights12/12/18 04:27 PM
1

Meh, this is one of the times I'd have given them a pass.
/r/MensRights07/12/18 10:09 PM
39

Fuckin spot on.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/09/18 08:57 PM
1

Shit, that slipped right by me too! Good eye.
/r/MensRights30/08/18 12:43 AM
11

Called it. What? No you didn't. Projecting is a technique, not an argument fallacy. If you'd like though, you can use it now, since I had to explain to you that this wasn't an argument fallacy.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 06:45 PM
14

It's interesting to see how modern young people try so hard to prove themselves And this, my friends, is called projection.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 06:36 PM
2

I'm not sure, but if you don't, do you want to?
/r/PussyPassDenied19/07/18 01:23 AM
7

Hello Salty, my old friend. I see you've come to bitch again. Because your rage is now seething. And your deep anger is teeming. Quickly typing words of hate onto this page. You're insane. With the sound of stupidity.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/07/18 01:13 AM
1

And you seem to want to state what I'm saying and argue against that, rather than what I said. My electrical engineer/contractor example was a perfect representation of my argument. They both work with a thing, and neither is qualified to do the other's job. They might be able to do the other's work, but it won't be as good as someone who's trained and had experience at that spot.
/r/MensRights11/07/18 06:12 PM
3

I'm saying if someone isn't (or doesn't even feel) qualified to do a job, they shouldn't be forced to do that job, especially if it isn't one they've signed up for. This man took barber training to cut men's hair. He did not take stylist training, and doesn't feel qualified to do the job, regardless of what "style" was requested. Take your Cathy Newman style questions elsewhere, too.
/r/MensRights11/07/18 06:01 PM
0

The confidence in his ability to do the job correctly. An electrical engineer and an electrician both work with electricity, yet neither are qualified to do the other's job.
/r/MensRights11/07/18 05:41 PM
0

I'm a fool for knowing that barbers get one months training while stylists get the years of training? Okay then. This guy was targeted for a law suit, end of story. Go be bitter with your bad arguments elsewhere.
/r/MensRights11/07/18 05:39 PM
11

which this sub has basically become. Downvoting anything that doesn't agree women have it too easy these days. What if I told you that just because someone doesn't agree with you, doesn't mean they automatically ascribe the the things you're attributing to them here. Maybe your opinions aren't that good, or you aren't expressing them adequately.
/r/MensRights11/07/18 05:01 PM
4

Edit: seriously guys? Seriously? Why are you downvoting me when you didn't even read the article? What part of, "not trained as a stylist," do you not understand?
/r/MensRights11/07/18 04:28 PM
7

As for contradictions, you'll find many in your own life. I'm sure, but that doesn't change her actions from indefensible to defensible, just because I may have contradictions in my life. What goes on with me has nothing to do with this conversation at all, and isn't a point.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/06/18 12:20 AM
17

That's easily defended Not really. If she's saying she can't take it off (no matter what the thing is called) because she can't have males see her face, then goes on to say how a male saw her face, but it's okay because it was only a short time period, that's a direct contradiction. Second, if she was going to wear it all the time, she should have interviewed with it or, or at least brought it up that she would be wearing a religious garb while teaching. You can try to defend her, but your defen…
/r/PussyPassDenied26/06/18 11:29 PM
8

Young Earth Creationism?
/r/MensRights15/06/18 11:44 PM
8

5/7? what the hell did /u/Bornsign do to deserve a perfect rating??!?! This is preposterous!
/r/MensRights17/05/18 10:48 PM
16

I can smell the pink hair dye already You misspelled blue.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/04/18 08:32 PM
2

It's so sad. Because I'm probably much much smarter than you. But never mind. I'm sure you are, sweetie cakes. I'm sure you are.
/r/MensRights27/03/18 12:13 AM
1

Ok. So somehow. I get the feeling not all dads are like yours. That maybe your Angelic Father isn't the norm. But I can't back up that up by evidence....oh wait I can... because mine wasn't. So. Now we've established not ALL dads are like yours. OK. Great, not everyone's parents are the same, and don't fit into the mold of your sweeping statements. This is progress we're making here. Somehow I think I'm fine with my sweeping generalisation that women do more work in child-rearing than men. On av…
/r/MensRights26/03/18 11:29 PM
1

Well, stats prove otherwise Yeah, no, sorry but you're mistaken, there are no stats to back up your sweeping generalizations. and someone on this thread, it was probably you, yourself that complained about women doing all the child rearing and corrupting the innocent boys minds. Whilst the girls were moulded into the evil they will grow up to be. Look, I'll bother to put in the same amount of effort that you do here. If you can't be bothered to read what I've said, in order to respond to it, tha…
/r/MensRights26/03/18 10:27 PM
3

What evidence is there that women DON'T face more challenges? Contestant: I'll take "Logic & Reasoning" for $200 Alex Alex Trebek: "This is the thing that becomes yours once you've made a positive claim about a subject." Contestant: What is Burden of Proof? Alex Trebek: That is correct. You've made a claim that women have more challenges than men in life. It is your responsibility to now prove that claim. This isn't a religion, we're not taking what you say on faith.
/r/MensRights26/03/18 08:02 PM
1

Men could also raise their children, but oh wait....they don't. Huh, I never knew. My dad, who stayed home to raise three boys and take care of our farm, while my mom worked 65 miles away for a law firm, must have been made up memories. I mean, I guess I just imagined that my father taught me how to cook, sew, do laundry and dishes, hunt, fish, sports, and really, just the whole gambit of skills that are useful for adult life. But yeah . . . men don't do that, because you and a shit web site, sa…
/r/MensRights26/03/18 07:41 PM
1

So then their spouse or significant other can pressure them, because they don't like uncut penises . . . You thought the pressure would end with the parents, huh. Nice try, but there's always going to be pressure from someone when circumcised penises are what is considered normal. I know, I'm not cut, and it does have an affect on your adult dating life. I'd like to see the practice done away with entirely, unless medically necessary, but that may be wishful thinking on my part. Anyhow, this pro…
/r/MensRights14/02/18 01:14 AM
0

And that would be their decision to make. What would you rather have, that they have no autonomy, and don't get to make any of their own decisions? Or, are you trying to create a system where no one ever makes a choice they might regret later? Good luck with that. What is it, exactly, that you would propose differently here, that would make you feel better about this? I mean, this isn't a perfect solution, but it's light years beyond what is currently happening. So, tell me kn33, how would you r…
/r/MensRights14/02/18 12:47 AM
1

Maintain your obtuseness if you like, but influence and force are not equals. The teen has every chance to tell the doctor no, and 15 is the age of consent there. If they're old enough to consent to sex, they're old enough to decide if they want part of their sexual organs cut off. As a side note, do you even hear yourself in that statement? "Maybe they're not old enough to decide if they want to cut parts of their body off at 15 years old," is what you're saying. Do you know anyone around 15? I…
/r/MensRights14/02/18 12:38 AM
2

I don't disagree. Fortunately, doctors aren't influenced by the strength of someone's parents convictions. Doctors still need a patient's consent before they can operate. Anyone who operates on someone against their will, puts their license at risk, at minimum. Do you think doctors are going to risk their practice to force circumcisions on unwilling teenagers?
/r/MensRights14/02/18 12:23 AM
2

kn33, buddy, we need to work on your definition of consent.
/r/MensRights13/02/18 11:54 PM
25

If I recall correctly, and it may vary by state, but flagging duty isn't assigned to whoever randomly, people here who do that have to take a training course for that job. The males and females here who do it, chose that job specifically.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 04:24 PM
48

I know right!?!? Why should we expect them to take their trash home with them and leave the place they came to, in as good or better condition, than they found it? What an insane line of thinking!!!
/r/MensRights22/01/18 08:17 PM
7

Ok, I'd like to ask a follow up to this. If it was a black person saying these things, would that then make the statements valid?
/r/PussyPassDenied19/12/17 08:27 PM
12

Care to flesh this out, and explain why you see him as having this trait?
/r/PussyPassDenied19/12/17 07:34 PM
1

She didn't make him. And she didn't help him, or call someone who would, either. So, now she's on the hook for being an accomplice to his death. Who knew responsibility is a trait of both action and inaction? (That was rhetorical, most of us knew) Hopefully you've learned something new today.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/12/17 08:37 PM
1

How do you know he wasn't going to do it anyway? You don't. In this case we actually do know. He wanted to chicken out, she convinced him to keep going. I don't know how well read you are on this case, so I'm going to assume you didn't take the time to read the exchange of messages while he was in the act of trying to commit suicide. She's a vile human who convinced this kid to continue with the suicide, and then immediately after, she went to Facebook for sympathy from all of her friends. The m…
/r/PussyPassDenied12/12/17 08:20 PM
1

There you go with the snippy quoting again God forbid I show what points I'm responding to in a clear fashion. I didn't just tell someone to fuck off. I voiced an opinion about people needing to fuck off with the constant references to feminist agenda because it makes you sound like an idiot Your lack of self awareness here is astounding. Why do you not take account of your own hostile tone? Is starting any reply with Fuck off anyway to have a conversation that isn't hostile? You set the tone in…
/r/MensRights03/12/17 05:15 PM
1

I've had no opportunity to connect with you. You've been snippy and offput from the start I started by being all snippy? I'm not the one who started their input into this telling people to fuck off. Did you forget this already? Fuck off with the feminist agenda. You're not a feminist and you don't know their "agenda". Stay on topic And what was my response to that? Did you forget that too? My first comment into this was pretty respectful, as I only posed questions to you you talk like there was …
/r/MensRights03/12/17 05:44 AM
1

So you don't want to talk unless I agree with your point of view? Very open minded of you. I've got better things to do than worry if you're going to back up your statements. You've been given ample opportunity before now to present something that would change my mind, and you've failed to present anything at all. So, sure, let's call an end to this conversation. Good day.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 10:18 PM
1

So, what you're saying is, you've got nothing. That's cool. Thanks for playing. Better luck next time I guess.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 01:33 PM
5

There will be hundreds of bad examples in every movement. Then you should have no problems showing me examples of the bad apples from the men's rights advocacy side, who are taking the same actions and tactics used by the feminist side to shut down and silence what they consider their opposition. I wasn't joking when I said I'd be more than happy to see that, and if I consider it bad, I'll most likely even condemn it. Surely you have one favorite example you like to parade around. Either way it …
/r/MensRights02/12/17 02:43 AM
10

Really? Can you show me groups of men's rights activists actively trying to shut down feminist rallies? I'd really be super interested to see those. Where is this tit you're claiming a tat for?
/r/MensRights01/12/17 09:51 PM
3

Okay darling.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 09:11 PM
19

You're not a feminist and you don't know their "agenda". I think we've seen enough examples of feminists protesting men's rights advocacy to plainly state that demonizing men's rights is part of the agenda of current day feminists. Do we really need to link example after example to solidify that point? Do we have to state that yes, the statement is sweeping, and doesn't cover every feminist?
/r/MensRights01/12/17 08:52 PM
3

Goodbye fried rice, hello fried chicken!
/r/MensRights22/11/17 09:49 PM
4

I think it's worse, but I don't know how to answer that level of stupidity.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/11/17 10:21 PM
3

Ah, well, umm yeah, I got nothing.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/11/17 10:04 PM
6

Size is not an indicator of the amount of damage someone is capable of.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/11/17 09:46 PM
1

I'm simply saying that not all unwanted touching is the same, and to treat it as such oversimplifies the issue. If someone randomly pets my head I would consider it unwanted touching, but it is not the same as someone randomly grabbing my junk. And I'm simply saying it is all unwanted touch, and on that level it is equal. Do you disagree with that? Because that's the sentiment I was expressing there. Second, you don't get to determine the level of offense others are allowed to take, just because…
/r/PussyPassDenied20/10/17 11:35 PM
2

I know there is, but that doesn't change the fact that you should never put your hands on a stranger, ever. Discussing the severity of the thing you shouldn't be doing in the first place to make one seem better than the other is is a deflection from the point that you shouldn't be touching strangers. Why is that hard for you to grasp. "Well their level of fuck up wasn't that bad". Is a cop out.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/10/17 10:17 PM
2

"Hey she tapped me on the shoulder! So I grabbed her boob. It's the same!!!!" This was the full comment I replied to. I'm glad you can come back and edit your comment within the first 3 minutes of posting it, to make it seem that you had more of an argument, after I replied to your original statement And my logic is simple, don't touch strangers you don't know. End of story.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/10/17 09:38 PM
10

"Hey she thought it was cool to touch me, a stranger, so I assumed she wanted to be treated exactly the same way!" If you think that touching people you don't know is okay if you just avoid their intimate areas, you're part of the problem.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/10/17 09:21 PM
41

Touching without consent versus touching without consent. That's as equal as it needs to be.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/10/17 07:11 PM
41

That's very homophobic of you to say. Hypocrite.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/10/17 06:19 AM
15

GR8 B8 M8!
/r/MensRights26/09/17 10:19 PM
4

I'm not sure under OK state law, but I was more referring to the idea that women get lighter sentences for the exact same crimes that men commit. https://www.law.umich.edu/newsandinfo/features/Pages/starr_gender_disparities.aspx
/r/MensRights22/09/17 12:52 AM
18

And how long do you think the sentencing would have been for the perpetrators if they had been male? 20 years is a slap on the wrist for something as horrific as this for anyone, but you're kidding yourself if you think men would have received a sentence this light when considering the nature of the crime.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 08:12 PM
4

/r/incels is leaking again! Someone call a plumber and get this shit outta here!
/r/PussyPassDenied03/09/17 03:35 PM
1

Actually, I am of the belief that men should be allowed to be more feminine in their characteristics. I've called for this in past conversations as well. The same sexism that hurts women hurts men too. Wait, didn't you say this? It just is a little weird to imagine guys being sensitive about a fucking haircut Seems you're part of that sexism, funny that. It's a part of why I hate this sub, where y'all seem to act like your problems aren't literally coming from the same exact place We know, men a…
/r/MensRights09/08/17 07:38 PM
1

I'm not going to rescind my opinions about it making more sense to me for women to want a safe space than men This is because you also hold a view that men should be manly and hide their feelings. If men need a spot where they feel safe they must be a too sensitive, right? They should probably man up and quit being a pussy. (/s) I can't stop you from holding hypocritical views though, that's on you. when it's been a men's world for a long time now and women tend not get to own any public spaces …
/r/MensRights09/08/17 01:32 PM
1

It just is a little weird to imagine guys being sensitive about a fucking haircut in a haircut place. Showing your bodies in tight exercise clothes makes more sense to desire privacy for to me. It doesn't have to appease your sensibilities at all. Some men are sensitive about their balding, or their ear or nose hair. In any case, you don't get to dictate the level of their comfort just because it doesn't affect you. Also the idea of being judged.. sorry do women normally stand outside men's hair…
/r/MensRights08/08/17 12:45 AM
1

Neither is allowed to do that in the United States Are you intentionally being dishonest?
/r/MensRights08/08/17 12:22 AM
2

Or if your boyfriend actually wants you to come with him for whatever reason This same argument could be used for women only gyms. "The girlfriend/wife just wants to work out with their partner/spouse who happens to be a male . . . what's the problem?" The problem is, men aren't allowed there, just as women aren't allowed here. There's nothing wrong with having these spaces set to one gender only.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 12:19 AM
2

I'm not sure of what the laws are in Sydney, where this shop is, but I do concur. If they're following the law, more power too them. Unfortunately not everyone agrees with that sentiment.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 12:15 AM
2

If the whole "bakeries have to make cakes for gay couples" thing is based on discrimination against sexual orientation, That's because that bakery had a public business license, not a private business license. If that bakery was a privately owned business with a license to match, then they can bake cakes for whoever they do or don't want to, at their discretion. Once they became a public business, with a license to match, they now have to abide by all city, county, state, and federal discriminat…
/r/MensRights07/08/17 11:29 PM
8

Baseball hat.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 08:29 PM
2

Yes, but the government hasn't bothered to convict people for not registering since 1986. Which has nothing to do with the law, or the future enforcement of it. Also, registering takes less than a minute, and that's it. The time it takes to do so is not the point. This is a discussion about equality, and if we're talking about equality, here is a point where equality hasn't been obtained. Despite how you feel about a law, you should still comply with it. I agree to a point, but I still believe t…
/r/MensRights18/05/17 10:14 PM
2

So, without mind reading capabilities, how are you to determine if your "just because" assessment is true? You may think someone did something just because of reason. So how do you determine if that was the case outside of assumption and assertion? Edited: Apparently I can't spell "and" correctly on the first go.
/r/MensRights08/05/17 06:51 PM
2

Most of the antifa demonstrations here have been at college campuses as well. The Berkeley free speech rally is a good example, and both groups like to shout the same slogans, and use violence to try and stifle speech they don't agree with. That's why I place them both in the same camp. Hell, I don't like Ann Coulter at all, I think she's a vile cunt, but if she gets invited to spew her useless drivel somewhere, fuck it, let her loony ass up on stage. I think it's more fun when their bat shit cr…
/r/PussyPassDenied03/05/17 11:56 PM
2

While I can't disagree, I don't see these two groups in separate camps.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/05/17 10:29 PM
2

I guess you've missed the news from Toronto? http://www.torontosun.com/2017/03/17/protesters-crash-controversial-u-of-t-profs-appearance
/r/PussyPassDenied03/05/17 10:06 PM
2

Looks like it is now.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/05/17 09:59 PM
1

Is he no longer a member because he's been arrested? Yup. I doubt he changed his point of view in the last 48 hours. Me either, but I'm pretty sure antifa isn't a gang of force in the prisons. I'm sure they'll make other friends of ill-repute on the inside.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/05/17 09:48 PM
-2

was
/r/PussyPassDenied03/05/17 03:55 PM
3

me neither but I'm sure some exist. can you prove they don't? You do understand that if you claim something exists, the burden of proof is on you to show that they do, right? It's not up to someone else to prove they don't exist. That's not how this works.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 08:33 PM
1

Who? And where's the PPD?
/r/PussyPassDenied12/04/17 11:27 PM
1

Ok then, how about another, or is a law firm too bias too? http://tomjameslaw.com/blog/what-judges-really-think-about-fathers-responses-to-court-commissioned-judicial-bias-surveys/ And please, back up the assertion that this is " something feminists fight against," as a norm. This isn't on the agenda for 3rd wave feminists as a main order, and one article does not make it so.
/r/MensRights28/03/17 08:37 PM
1

You talk about conservative bias, and then whip out the trash that is everydayfeminism on me? How about something a little more centered. https://nationalparentsorganization.org/blog/22457-studies-show-judicial-bias-against-dads
/r/MensRights28/03/17 08:17 PM
1

That was never my point or claim, and I blatantly spelled that out for you already. Next strawman please.
/r/MensRights28/03/17 07:53 PM
1

I don't have to prove a negative. Where the hell did I ever ask you to defend a null hypothesis? This shows you know nothing about logic and reason. No, it demonstrates you can't prove that the claims presented are built on bullshit, nor can you even comprehend the discussion you're trying to have. But hey, go ahead and knock down strawman #37, lets see if you can build strawman 38 now.
/r/MensRights28/03/17 07:15 PM
1

It does matter where the argument is coming from since the context is important. This shows explicitly that you know nothing of argumentation. Your arguments are built on bullshit and it's impossible to argue against the imagined feminist bad guy you've created. Demonstrate anything of this claim . . . don't just assert, demonstrate. If you know it, you can show it.
/r/MensRights28/03/17 05:11 PM
1

The source of the argument absolutely changes the validity of the argument since religious conservatives have an interest in maintaining their patriarchal structures. Wrong. An argument stands and falls on it's own merit. If the argument presented is logically sound, and the facts presented are correct, it doesn't matter if the words are spoken by Mickey Mouse, or Mother Teresa And none of those explain the weird connection made between feminists and circumcision. If you believe feminists are in…
/r/MensRights28/03/17 04:43 PM
2

http://thoughtcatalog.com/janet-bloomfield/2014/08/5-legal-rights-women-have-that-men-dont/ Debunk this, or any of the other points brought up here: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/34qhvx/7_more_legal_rights_women_have_that_men_dont/ since you keep referring to the wrong link. parroting conservative talking points What if I told you the source of the argument doesn't change the validity of the argument. You're acting awful smug for someone who presents no arguments at all.
/r/MensRights28/03/17 01:58 AM
3

Again, all the things listed in the link provided are sourced (did you even bother to look?), you can pretend those sources aren't real, but that doesn't change the fact that they are. Until you present arguments against those very real sources, we're done. You have nothing I want to hear until you can rebut any of those. Hell, just one of those . . . Take all the time you need, I know you won't bother.
/r/MensRights28/03/17 01:40 AM
3

All your argument relies on is the conspiracy theory that women are behind circumcision. No, it's that women literally argue for the continuation of male circumcision. I've not once hinted at any conspiracy. And if you are serious that religious followers have as much power as leaders you have to be ignorant of most of human history. You really are obtuse. I explicitly said those leaders would have no power without followers, thus he followers are just as complicit, I don't see why this is so ha…
/r/MensRights28/03/17 01:25 AM
3

It kinda matters a lot who is in power. Is that even serious? Yes, its serious. The people in power can't do anything if they don't have the backing of the followers. That's how power structures work. It's a tradition started by religious zealots in a time when women didn't have much say. And it's a tradition that women push for continuing today. A tradition doesn't carry on unless it is also supported and carried by people. It sounds like your main arguments are problems with gender norms than …
/r/MensRights28/03/17 12:53 AM
3

If there was no draft there would be equality though. Plus no draft. While your dance here may be correct, feminists didn't want that until they had a chance to be affected by it, which is again, the point of discussion here. And you didn't think I know there are women in the south? You're the one acting as if the religious right is made up of only men while ignoring that it has a shitload of female support and backing. The people in power are disproportionately male, which was my point. Doesn't…
/r/MensRights28/03/17 12:27 AM
3

The article you site for feminists not wanting women to be signed up for the draft says they wanted it done away with all together, so your argument there is a load of crap. Because they don't want to sign into the law as it sits. Do you think I didn't read that far? It's an article about the proposition of getting women into the draft, and instead of gaining equality that way, they'd rather not have the draft at all . . . meaning they were fine with the draft while men were the victims of it, b…
/r/MensRights28/03/17 12:00 AM
6

Men don't go to jail for not wanting a child. Where did I ever say or imply that? Men go to jail for not supporting an unwanted child, while women aren't held to that same obligation. Try to keep up here. And sorry you forgot about abortions for a sec. Yeah, men don't have those, nor can they force a woman to have one. Alternatively, a woman can force an unwanted child upon a man, or get an abortion even if he wants the child and would raise it as a single father. Again, not equal under the law.…
/r/MensRights27/03/17 11:40 PM
6

There's no whining there, parenthood is steeply favored in women's' favor. As a right, if a woman has a child she doesn't want, she can literally leave the child on the doorstep of a Police station, hospital, rescue squad, and fire station, and see no persecution under safe-haven laws. If a man doesn't pay for a child he doesn't want . . . jail. But yeah, that's equality and men are just whining, right? Edit: Also, how is not having to volunteer to die for your country, to be able to vote, a rid…
/r/MensRights27/03/17 10:54 PM
7

Since women have these rights, I'd guess they take them for granted. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/34qhvx/7_more_legal_rights_women_have_that_men_dont/
/r/MensRights27/03/17 09:58 PM
5

Can you name rights that women don't have that men do? I can give you rights that women have that men don't . . .
/r/MensRights27/03/17 09:30 PM
1

Guys want to go see this movie voluntarily?
/r/MensRights11/02/17 12:49 AM
3

as I've stated numerous times - has zero health benefits. And then you go on using the same logic to circumcise men, that FGM practicers use to continue FGM on women . . . The benefits you shared aren't for all men, those issues affect some men (HIV risks) and some pre-mature babies (UTI-infections). None of which is any reason to cut parts off people before they're old enough to make that decision for themselves. Please don't post garbage that means absolutely nothing and pawn it off as fact. T…
/r/MensRights31/01/17 09:35 PM
3

Circumcision DOES provide health benefits Rationales offered in cultures that promote female genital cutting – hygiene, disease prevention, improved appearance of the genitalia, and social acceptance – are similar to those offered in cultures that promote male circumcision. You're using the same logic that FGM practicing places use. Congrats. There is NO link between circumcision and better health. In fact, cutting a baby boy's genitals creates immediate health risks. The foreskin is actually an…
/r/MensRights31/01/17 07:50 PM
2

The only thing is circumcision can help avoid UTI's and other similar infections for the male You forgot the part about this being for premature infants, and also something that is uncommon, even among premature boys. There's also no reason for routine male circumcision either. In america it's mostly a "we want him to fit in" thing. As you so eloquently put it. http://www.intactamerica.org/resources/decision
/r/MensRights31/01/17 06:32 PM
5

enshrined to form the basis of this country superseded any statutory law you will make period regarding this....... How? The legal system tells you. During that time slavery was legal, does that mean it was right?
/r/MensRights31/01/17 06:23 PM
8

Glad I'm not the only one who caught that.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/01/17 07:43 PM
5

While you're right on on hand, you forgot that part of where someone has to pay to have these new signs made. The sign making company isn't giving them away for free.
/r/MensRights23/01/17 07:46 PM
10

We all are
/r/PussyPassDenied21/12/16 09:38 PM
1

I may have misinterpreted somewhere, and thought you were trying to discount the advantages of going to a expensive private school, versus a publicly funded school. And I've seen this clip a few times and don't really know much about the girl otherwise. I don't think she really doesn't have the capacity to learn, I think she's just had her head filled with misinformation that she takes as fact.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/12/16 03:32 AM
1

I get that, and I'm saying you can't discount that the better education is available at one school and not both. Thus, those with the same potential will not realize their full potential, if not given that opportunity. You seem to be making the statement in a fashion that discounts the opportunity she was given, regardless of her actual learning potential.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/12/16 11:24 PM
1

That still doesn't discount the availability of a better education at a private facility versus a state run facility.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/12/16 09:29 PM
9

So what if he does? It doesn't change any of his arguments one bit.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/12/16 09:25 PM
2

If there are certain men health issues, then we will know about them. If there are certain female health issues, then they will know about them! That must be why we're always "raising awareness" about X type of disease, or Y type of cancer, because everyone already knows about them . . . . /s
/r/MensRights20/11/16 04:25 PM
18

Oppressed? No. Expected to die, yes. In cases of war, and tragedy. Women and children first is a unwritten rule. We're disposable. Let's not forget custody rights, being jailed in cases of domestic violence even when the female is the abuser, having to register for the draft in order to use our right to vote, and women get much shorter prison sentencing for the same exact crime as a man. These aren't just, "little things," and blowing it off isn't helping to put things on an even playing field.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/11/16 06:07 PM
3

Poe's Law personified.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/11/16 08:39 PM
1

I'm not sure if what Bernie had done to him would really be considered justice. quite the opposite in fact.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/11/16 06:01 PM
20

I really feel you're in the wrong sub. This isn't the place for your sensibilities, which is fine, but you're not going to win anyone over with this crap. You can have preferences of annoyances, just as you have preferences for sex partners, food you like or don't, or even music. You're dragging this off in a direction that was most likely not intended.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/11/16 09:02 PM
1

Downvoting is censorship. How so? The person is allowed to have their say at all times, the votes don't change that. If the opinion/statement doesn't hold up to scrutiny, then the votes reflect that. This isn't censorship, it's showing them that their statement/opinion may need to be re-examined. Hope everyone here can band together Well, it's not really possible if people are going to rely on false narratives. If the person you're defending brought out an article that showed their claim, then t…
/r/MensRights04/10/16 12:09 PM
3

Your original point was that, a woman was charged with rape for having sex with a drunk, passed-out, guy. Which is patently false, and a misrepresentation of the article you linked. Also, you didn't answer the question, so I'll ask again. Do you think rape charges would have been initially brought up if the roles were reversed? The whole point here is the initial charges, no matter who consented before passing out. If a man was found doing this, the rape charges would have been instant, and "may…
/r/MensRights03/10/16 11:14 PM
3

They're getting massively downvoted when they are trying to contribute to the discussion. Even if they aren't doing so to your standards, it's clear effort is being made and we as a community would better serve ourselves and those we purport to stand for by having patience and engaging in open dialog When the contribution to the discussion is misinformation, or misrepresentation, then massive downvotes are deserved. There's nothing wrong, what-so-ever, with shutting down these types of comments.…
/r/MensRights03/10/16 11:09 PM
6

What? They whip out an article that goes totally against their narrative as proof (which is isn't), and you're claiming they're rational? Really?
/r/MensRights03/10/16 07:55 PM
11

Did you even read the article? "She was charged with public drunkenness and bonded out of jail early Wednesday" If this was a man, banging a drunk passed out lady, do you think he would have received the same treatment?
/r/MensRights03/10/16 07:53 PM
3

woosh
/r/MensRights08/09/16 09:17 PM
1

I don't know what she's going for, but I've seen archaeologists dig less.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/09/16 09:12 PM
2

Where was the denial?
/r/PussyPassDenied08/09/16 08:42 PM
6

Can you define"modern liberal"? Because I think I'm a pretty liberal person, but I don't ascribe to this way of thinking that you're espousing here. I'm surely not conservative either though. P.S. The hippies I know don't think like this either.
/r/MensRights10/08/16 02:56 AM
1

It seems we're on opposite sides of crap logic then. The problems men face though the issues you mentioned are because of how the laws are used, and are not written into the laws themselves. (outside of the draft) Education gap and work place death gap . . . "legal" . . . not the route I'd have went there, as those things bring nothing to the table for the discussion. There are no laws written to those things at all, so your point here is rather invalid on that spot, as it's been decided that re…
/r/MensRights20/06/16 07:43 PM
1

One is totally reasonable if they find it not okay to have somebody record them I don't disagree at all, but their offense at being recorded doesn't give them the right to stop said person from recording them. There's a distinction between the right to do something, and being offended at someone using their rights. Edit: And there's also a difference between people filming children in creepy-ish ways, and filming the general public.
/r/MensRights20/06/16 07:36 PM
3

That's great and all, so riddle me this. Why do you have the expectation of having privacy out in public?
/r/MensRights18/06/16 01:17 AM
2

Thanks I guess. I don't needlessly harass people, but as I've said elsewhere. you shouldn't expect privacy in public.
/r/MensRights18/06/16 01:14 AM
3

And it should be entirely socially acceptable to film in public. You don't have the right, nor should you have the expectation, of privacy in public.
/r/MensRights18/06/16 01:12 AM
1

Again, you have friends. I'm sure you have someone you like and are completely comfortable with, and yet one of your other friends thinks that your first friend is a douche bag. hmm, that subjectivity tho! Keep hanging on to your black and white world.
/r/MensRights18/06/16 01:09 AM
12

Being a jackass is a matter of subjective opinion, thus it's completely ok, as you'd only be doing so by judgement of someone's opinion.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 07:27 PM
17

If something is legal, then it's ok, as decided by the courts. Now, whether you take offense or not about it, is all upon you, but just because you don't like something, does not mean it's not ok. Another's rights don't end where your feels begin.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 07:15 PM
4

Needs to be a credit card advert. American Injustice The best money can buy . . . .
/r/MensRights04/06/16 03:45 AM
44

A comment from the article sums up my thoughts nicely on this. "Equality means cherry picking benefits and leaving the rest. This is why 90% of CEO's being men is a huge sexist problem while 98% coal miners being men is fine. Feminism is like that person that does nothing on the group project, but demands equal credit. "
/r/MensRights12/05/16 10:06 PM
1

Fuck, that hits right in the feels . . .
/r/PussyPassDenied11/05/16 05:26 PM
9

User name tries too hard . . . .
/r/PussyPassDenied11/05/16 01:16 AM
3

That depends entirely on your time period, and who you're asking. According to the old American W.A.S.P culture, they were most certainly not white at all, ever.
/r/MensRights18/04/16 07:51 PM
18

And their damn dog!
/r/PussyPassDenied27/01/16 05:04 PM
2

Here's her mug shot.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/01/16 11:10 PM
7

But that would be tries's.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/01/16 06:08 PM
5

I love the, "those girls are probably bullies," comments. Because kids who aren't bullies, throw shit at people on bikes all the time. Fuck that little douchenozzel. His actions could have led to serious injuries and lawsuits that would have cost his parents thousands. Makes me glad I didn't procreate.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/10/15 04:56 PM
3

You're just a wellspring of misinformation. From: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/human-urine-is-an-effective-fertilizer/ "Researchers say our liquid waste not only promotes plant growth as well as industrial mineral fertilizers, but also would save energy used on sewage treatment" And from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urine "Healthy urine is not toxic.[11] However, it contains compounds eliminated by the body as undesirable, and can be irritating to skin and eyes. After suitable pro…
/r/PussyPassDenied02/09/15 04:33 PM
3

Sorry folks, there's no PPD to be found here. Move along, nothin' to see.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/08/15 12:18 AM
1

So, do you feel that Charles Manson should be released from jail? He was convicted of 7 counts of first degree murder, yet he didn't physically participate in those. Do you feel that this set a bad precedent, in view of the case we're discussing?
/r/PussyPassDenied25/08/15 07:45 PM
1

So you're against Charles Manson being in jail then?
/r/PussyPassDenied25/08/15 02:27 PM
1

What we are talking about is degrees of closeness in relationship and how much the person was encouraged. How would you prosecute one case and not the other You're absolutely right, and there's a huge line between "random internet stranger who lives a shitty comment" and "personal friend." Edit: Another scenario. Let's say I have a close friend who is terminally ill and in excruciating pain. He's telling me he's thinking about killing himself. I think a person should have a right to die if they …
/r/PussyPassDenied25/08/15 02:26 PM
2

Yeah, still not the same as a personal friend pouring on days of encouragement for suicide. You have to look at this in the whole context of the situation. You're trying to simplify a complex situation here, and still falling short.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/08/15 02:22 PM
46

will someone who says "go kill yourself" on a youtube comment to a person who eventually kills themselves then be subject to persecution? You're not comparing apples to apples. The person talking to him was a personal real life friend, who encouraged him along his chosen path, for days. That's no where near a, "kill yourself," statement left by a random internet user. That's a very slippery slope you've presented that in no way reflects the situation at hand.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/08/15 05:30 PM
3

Dats sum gud bait rite dar boy.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/06/15 02:23 AM
97

I agree until you get to the point that the man in the video was placed in cuffs because of the story she gave police.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/06/15 04:34 PM
12

I want to know the end result!
/r/PussyPassDenied02/06/15 04:45 AM
-1

I did, and do understand that, but you're forgetting the times when she's out alone, spewing her ignorance to anyone who will listen, with no counter argument to be heard anywhere.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/05/15 08:04 PM
-4

Oh really? I guess until I hear any counter to the contrary. I'm just an asshole. If you'd like to point out where I'm wrong, I'm ready to hear it.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/05/15 02:18 AM
-1

I don't think change through bad information is what your really looking for though, is it?
/r/PussyPassDenied22/05/15 10:51 PM
-5

So, I'm not wrong, just an asshole? I'll take that.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/05/15 06:07 PM
-6

Alright let's do this then. Fine no statistics I'll just imply what I consider basic truths about every person on the planet. FTFY People don't like having their beliefs challenged People don't like being told their wrong Granted, but to imply that a person should be commended for not throwing a temper tantrum is silly. Implying that temper tantrums are the norm for behavior when brought in to discuss a sensitive topic is also absurd. I will agree that there are "some" individuals who become hea…
/r/PussyPassDenied22/05/15 04:30 PM
-5

Rational adults don't freak out when they're shown they're wrong. 0% of your assumption applies to 90% of anyone. I too like to make up statistics out of thin air.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/05/15 03:25 PM
-13

"You were wrong, but hey props for not freaking out while being wrong!" What?
/r/PussyPassDenied22/05/15 01:53 PM
14

"underage drinking . . . may as well do meth . . . " This made me cringe.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/03/15 05:00 PM
2

Did you become confused on the topic? The main discussion was about semis that pull out into oncoming traffic when they clearly do not have the room. Why the hell are you going off about a semi passing a semi? And you're seriously barking up the wrong tree about driving etiquette when it comes to zipper merging, or having the patience to wait on someone else to pass. I'm not saying I'm a saint when I drive, but I'm sure as fuck safe, and courteous when I can be. Maybe you missed the part where I…
/r/PussyPassDenied03/03/15 02:46 AM
4

What you seem to be advocating here is that you seem to think it's alright for someone to practice unsafe driving habits that could potentially kill someone, just because they're on the clock. Just because they're paid to drive does not mean they're all "professionals." My father was a long haul truck driver for many years, and I wish he was here to tell you you're an idiot. There is no reason for any driver to purposefully put other drivers in harms way, on the clock or not.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/02/15 03:36 PM
-1

So, moral of the story, if you're busy and in a hurry, fuck safety?
/r/PussyPassDenied27/02/15 03:19 PM
21

Who is this person and why should I care? This isn't a troll question, I really don't know who this is or why they matter.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/02/15 03:08 PM
1

Touche!
/r/PussyPassDenied13/01/15 02:53 PM
5

Yeah, not really seeing the abuse here.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/01/15 11:12 PM
2

french fries
/r/PussyPassDenied20/12/14 02:46 AM
22

inbeeb!
/r/PussyPassDenied20/12/14 02:46 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter