TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MaliciousPsychopath Archive

View 6 posts and 97 comments by MaliciousPsychopath on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

TRP literally just upped cocaine_face to senior endorsed purely because cocaine_face defended JP_Whoregan's political spamming. I'm not even editorializing, scroll up in this thread and you'll see it. That's a very clear sign of some high level shilling. It's very off putting and does not bode well for where this sub is going. No offense to cocaine_face, but his post history is dwarfed by the other senior endorsed people. He barely has any content above 100 points and only one in the 300 range. …
/r/TheRedPill10/03/16 10:26 PM
2

It's not really a fact that anyone disputes. Usually it's seen as an example of internalized misogyny, but obviously that's not how I see it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/16 11:57 PM
2

"Feminists" is not a synonym for "women".
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/16 11:35 PM
3

Yes it is. Feminists decided they wanted the vote long before women did.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/16 11:28 PM
2

I said it only took a moment from the point where women decided they wanted the vote.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/16 11:28 PM
8

Imagine you're a woman. Some guy keeps on rambling how woman are incredible privileged, how they are dishonest, manipulative etc etc. They cannot love like a man, they cannot work like a man etc etc. Now you find out that there's a place full of guys like this. Of course you're gonna hate that place. I don't think it's necessary to imagine much. The earliest feminists essentially did this, with some minor changes, and men responded by making radical changes to policy, custom, education, and so f…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/16 12:37 AM
8

It's inevitable with 150,000 of us, but it's not especially common. Most of the time when we get mentioned, nobody shows up to defend.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/16 12:35 AM
7

Not sure what you mean. If you mean that they care what the world thinks of TRP then I'd say you're trivially wrong. TRPers don't even defend TRP outside of subs like this on reddit, let alone elsewhere. Maybe they'd like for it to be thought of better, but it's not exactly a want that's given more than a shrug. Or you could alternatively mean that they care what people IRL think of them. That's just too obvious to dispute. Social status, social proof, preselection, and a few of the laws of powe…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/16 12:14 AM
6

More of an accusation of a witch. I don't think TRP especially cares about TBP, other than a small number who try to get posted there for sport.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/16 12:06 AM
3

No, that's probably not the reason why. They probably just felt the need to remove any and all discussion of the argument that you started because it doesn't add value to the thread. Your discussion truly adds nothing though. You aren't discussing whether or not he was right or wrong, and he's denied (along with another EC) that he referenced Satanism. Had he said "super Hitler but with less justification than the real Hitler" instead of Devil then you would have been fine. You've offered no sub…
/r/TheRedPill21/01/16 07:31 PM
1

None of my posts were removed. He removed some of his own posts or mods removed his. That's how it looks to you because you're logged in as you. For the rest of us, you had your posts removed. . I chimed in that his metaphor was a bad one because it lacked a fundamental understanding of satanism and "devil worship" and I stand by this. Exactly. That's irrelevant to the discussion whether you stand by it or not. Information about Satanism, which he didn't even mention, does nothing to help me und…
/r/TheRedPill21/01/16 07:13 PM
2

I think Cis has made it pretty clear that he's not trying to argue with you. Not a single one of your comments on this entire thread has been anywhere close to productive and most of them got removed by mods. Logical fallacies aren't really applicable to people telling you to shut up. Fact is, Ciswhite wrote about rhetoric, power, and understanding. You chimed in to talk about Satanism. It's irrelevant and really comes off as you just trying to show everyone how much you know about shit that the…
/r/TheRedPill21/01/16 06:47 PM
-8

For those with the attention span of a goldfish Something tells me that you're the only one who voted or commented who read his post. People here are so fucking stupid.
/r/TheRedPill21/01/16 02:15 PM
0

Women LITERALLY have smaller brains than men.
/r/TheRedPill21/01/16 12:23 AM
1

The vast majority of people on here are RPers So? You're arguing about what red pill theory is. If you think red pill theory is wrong then power to you but if the question is what RP believes then you're just outgunned here. Blue pill opinions on what TRP theory is are not valuable; opinions on whether TRP is correct might be, but not opinions on what TRP thinks. Ironically, my comment actually has more of them than Cis'). To me it's showing four for Cis and three for you, but it fuzzes the vote…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/16 04:57 AM
1

So far, you've had four people contend otherwise and looking at your conversation with Cis, it really doesn't even look like you tried to understand what he was saying. I'm yet to hear anything but your unsubstantiated promise that what he's saying is at odds with TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/16 04:41 AM
1

You need to understand where I'm coming from though. You didn't just make the claim that your version of masculinity is best. You said that you know the theory better than at least one of the most respected ECs. That particular claim is astounding and gets a lot of attention. If you want to concede that point and instead focus on your argument than that's one thing, but if you're gonna try to keep it alive than shifting the focus is pretty bogus.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/16 04:28 AM
1

So far both /u/CisWhiteMaelstrom and /u/5hourenergyextra have asked you in this thread what you have other than your own arrogance to say that you are an expert on TRP. You've cowardly declined to respond. Not to mention, your argument about masculinity got rekt by both Cis and even /u/Coratoad. There is nothing upvoted in your entire post history. I've never heard anybody who red pillers respect claim that you're any kind of authority or expert. All you've given is a crappy analogy on Christian…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/16 03:44 AM
1

What are you talking about? CisWhiteMaelstrom is one of the most respected people on TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/16 03:28 AM
1

Yes but it's not out yet.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/16 04:49 AM
1

"My smartphone has a nice camera." "Yeah, all smartphones are like that." "No, I don't think you get it. My phone's an iPhone."
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 09:10 PM
2

I was clearly joking.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 09:08 PM
1

Yes to the first question. That's victim blaming.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 09:08 AM
2

Yesyes treat all guns as loaded. No, that's just advice. AWALT means that all women are accurately described by some approximation of red pill theories.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 09:00 AM
3

an AWALT I don't think you understand AWALT. There's no such thing as "an AWALT". ALL women are like that. That means ALL women are awalts, which makes it a vacuous term.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 08:18 AM
2

Is it like PPD?
/r/MensRights04/01/16 07:32 AM
2

What's that?
/r/MensRights04/01/16 07:30 AM
3

Nice post.
/r/MensRights04/01/16 07:28 AM
16

She's an extreme narcassist. I looked at her verified facebook and it's all about her. It's full of photos of her being a fucking whore, showing "before/after parenting photos" of her literally passed out in a ditch, shots of her tits, push up bras, and other attention grabbing materials. This woman is psychotic and a perfect demonstration of everything wrong with whorish mothers. She also gets a huge kick out of telling the public that she literally does not wear any clothes around the house an…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/16 08:08 PM
1

Dude had some decent game. He was funny and kinda ballsy with lines like "Can I have a bite of your chicken finger."
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/16 09:16 AM
1

We have some of our most well regarded members being shameless rape apologists. This isn't the shit we hide. Red pill just doesn't care a whole lot if women get raped. That's not to say we rape, but we don't take much issue with it.
/r/TheRedPill03/01/16 01:48 AM
2

Yes, because I've productively contributed to the sub and you've gotten banned. Plenty of people read this shit for a long time and never get an understanding of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/16 05:13 AM
3

Then you're nobody to give an answer for what red pillers believe.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/16 01:08 AM
2

You can't find one specific post on there that talks about how members say "I just hate men". Lot of AMR overlap which has a misandry banner on the right. There are no feminist articles uploaded. I've seen wehuntedthemammoth posted there plenty. I'm a bit worried that TRP also encourages "stoicism" and assumes that "alphas" wouldn't get abused by women. Then you don't pay close attention to the sub. You don't hear anti-female sentiment to that extent on TRP, MRP or any of its RP-related subs. Fe…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/16 11:04 PM
3

I've noticed that you have zero well upvoted /r/TheRedPill content in your post history.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/16 10:55 PM
3

"Here" is a shit sub for people who do not understand TRP. Give opinions from /r/TheRedPill and not from the scrubs at PPD, unless those people have some claim to fame on TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/16 10:40 PM
2

ely. It wasn't hard because I was actively pursuing women. Are you a lesbian?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/16 10:39 PM
2

Why do you think the numbers aren't equal?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/16 07:20 PM
3

Big if.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/16 07:19 PM
7

You always knew about them.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/16 07:17 PM
6

Why would you even make this comment? You're not red pill and probably haven't even read the sidebar. Do you think any red piller would agree that this is an accurate summation of their philosophy?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/16 07:16 PM
1

High value men who rape are by definition not high value men as they have to take what is not given to them. All men have to take what's not given to them because we do not have female privilege.
/r/TheRedPill01/01/16 01:43 AM
1

Raped by high value men? Sorry but that sounds like a oxymoron. No it isn't. Moralizing has no place on TRP.
/r/TheRedPill31/12/15 06:42 PM
-3

I clearly wrote that it was a post discussing a fantasy. The guy you're replying to is an illiterate white knight.
/r/TheRedPill31/12/15 02:39 AM
8

Somehow drawing the conclusion that this is what women want, from one woman (who might very possibly be a man or just an erotic fantasy) is very absurd. Good thing I didn't write this conclusion and instead wrote: "This is what a rape fantasy looks like" !! Working with rape victims I can pretty much assure you that 99,99999% of them did NOT wanna get raped! How many were raped by high value men? I deplore these kind of stupid posts here, there is not really anything to learn from this. And I de…
/r/TheRedPill31/12/15 02:38 AM
12

Because it severely underestimates how hard it is to get raped and reads like she had her fingers in her pants while writing it.
/r/TheRedPill30/12/15 09:34 PM
11

It did not too long ago. MRAs were pissed. Good to see it's back. Xemnas81 accurately predicted that it'd be written by femicucks though: The issue of what causes female perpetrated IPV is another controversial subject. Donald G. Dutton and Tonia L. Nicholls write that traditional feminist theory "views all social relations through the prism of gender relations and holds, in its neo-Marxist view, that men (the bourgeoisie) hold power advantages over women (the proletariat) in patriarchal societi…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/15 09:08 PM
11

Then read the sidebar and get a real idea.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/15 08:16 PM
13

Reductio ad absurdum is a logical tool where you show that your opponent's premises, if accepted, necessarily lead to contradiction, which means that they are mistaken. What you did is not reductio ad absurdum. What you did is come up with a bunch of bulllshit that shows nothing other than that you don't read the sidebar. "Here's some shit you guys don't believe. Here's why it's false."
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/15 08:00 PM
16

First we are going with the assumption that the Alpha is the ultimate, the Beta is the inferior. Then we're at a bad assumption. It's a spectrum and some beta traits are good. Next we are going with the assumption that an Alpha is the person who controls and imposes, and others obey. Another bad assumption. An alpha is one who provides enough value and is willing to walk away that others tend to bend to him. He also has good social skills with shit like confidence and frame. Now if any of what I…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/15 07:23 PM
6

Is there anything about him at all whatsoever other than his money that makes you think that?
/r/TheRedPill28/12/15 04:46 PM
4

Thank you for understanding that this is not a post advising people to get married or have a wife that will not get a job. With the rest of these comments, I was trying hard to figure out where exactly I wasn't clear about those.
/r/TheRedPill28/12/15 03:19 PM
3

Again, I didn't write this to give you financial advice. In fact, I wrote not to take financial advice from Donald Trump's situation. I wrote about a relationship dynamic of focusing on yourself.
/r/TheRedPill28/12/15 03:06 PM
3

Do you people just comment on shit without reading it? I said very clearly that this isn't a post advocating to marry.
/r/TheRedPill28/12/15 09:30 AM
5

Which is why I very clearly specified that I'm not suggesting marriage.
/r/TheRedPill28/12/15 09:30 AM
1

The man you settle for will love you. You just won't get the same sort of commitment from a man who other women would love and you will probably have trouble loving him.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 05:04 AM
0

You can lower your expectations and settle. The longer you wait to settle, the worse your bargaining position will be because your looks will be used up.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 05:01 AM
0

I would guess that's gonna be what you do throughout your 20s for various men who will not want to be your boyfriend.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 04:59 AM
1

Yes. I would immediately disqualify you from an LTR and I would not recommend that any other men commit. From your comments, you very much act like a 20 partner girl and are VERY unlikely to be an exception to the rule.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 04:56 AM
1

How many men have you been with?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 04:53 AM
1

Depends, is that your only sexual partner? If so, probably not. You knew that though. The only reason that you asked was to smuggle in the part of it being one boyfriend in order to win everyone's approval with your near-chastity. And for that, I declare you a generic low self esteem teenager who is probably not worth an LTR, though for reasons unrelated to n-count.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 04:48 AM
21

Is the whole premise here just "What if everyone on TRP lies about their history and their beliefs in a way that conveniently fits my preconceived worldviews that I formed, probably before even reading much TRP?" ?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 04:08 AM
1

Is there any actual science behind rape being about power rather than sex, or is it just feminist theory?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 04:03 AM
2

Not recognizing at least #6 is pretty shameful.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/15 09:55 AM
2

Red pill's the one who gets us doing those actions.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/15 08:43 AM
1

That doesn't change how talking like that makes you look. Only to those who interpret with an agenda. That's just a charismatic thing to say. Are you really not able to look one level deeper on that statement? No it's not. I don't randomly bring red pill shit to the table. If you get those guys drunk they'll say it themselves unprovoked and excitedly without ever even hearing of the subreddit. They just get their mind blown when someone puts it very well and very clearly for them. Red pill belie…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/15 08:43 AM
30

This form of slavery gets our dicks sucked.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/15 05:36 AM
1

Good job, man!
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/15 01:14 AM
3

Can you give something specific?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/15 01:14 AM
2

You said I'm disrespectful and thus what I write likely isn't of high quality. No I don't I just say that both things are true and that you should pay attention to the meaningful correlation between them.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/15 01:13 AM
1

You literally post in /r/deadbedrooms.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/15 01:13 AM
2

"Disrespectful"? I'm not really under the impression that ideas are supposed to be respected. AFAIK that's a SJW line of thought. It's part of charitable explanation. https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/genetic No I didn't. First I told you that I read your post and thought it was bad and then when you yelled about it, I gave you a reason why you should be skeptical of your own authority.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/15 10:42 PM
2

Which advice?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/15 10:41 PM
1

Huh?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/15 10:40 PM
5

From CisWhiteMaelstrom: Getting laid isn't that hard. You guys, the rule is 80/20; it's not 99/1. Let's forget being "alpha" for one second (and only one second). Alpha is a life pursuit of excellence and not something that's absolutely required for you to have right now this second in order to be worth something. You know what'll work for right now? The much less prestigious "able to talk to girls." For fuck's sake, you guys know what a shit test is, how to beat it, and you've lifted at least e…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/15 10:38 PM
2

The more extreme the rhetoric, the more unrealistic it is and the more it exposes some sort of troubled experiences in the writer. Nah, red pillers find it to be a lot of fun. I had a fitness consultation with /u/GayLubeOil once and got to edit a post with him. He'll literally laugh and say shit like "Is this reaally misogynistic enough? What if I change this line to suggest that she's trashy?" There's some misogyny, but it's also largely a joke that they all get. And then there are some things …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/15 04:50 PM
2

First you have to ask yourself: How do people find TRP? Most likely the same way people used to find PUA. They google stuff like "How to get laid" or "Why do women only like jerks". A lot of the guys who google stuff like this will be virgins or not very successfull. That's one way. TRP is pretty famous at this point, especially from shit talkers shit talking it. Most of us come by just from curiosity. If they are indeed successful, chances are they will not bother reading through the TRP articl…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/15 04:44 PM
1

The asian thing is one guy or a small group. It's just a loud fucking voice. It's not actually a significant part of TRP. https://www.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/3y48tu/race_whiners_understanding_guys_who_believe_they/cyanm6s
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/15 06:22 AM
1

A starting point for low betas and incels who aren't able to jump straight into r/seduction, because they haven't overcome the mental blocks needed to even see themselves as men in the first place. /r/Seduction is not advanced TRP. It's TRP lite if even that. It's TRP for BPers.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/15 05:11 AM
1

Because you said: As for the books; I reckon thy should bring them back, because we get so many stupid threads here about what Nice Guytm means and why it's a shit phrase feminists concocted etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/15 03:24 AM
1

Can you break this one down for me a bit?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/15 09:28 PM
1

I'm confused, are you saying that TRP's high value man is a STEM beta nerd?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/15 08:55 PM
1

I suppose. Did that have the advertised effect on your ability to act like a RPW and pair bond?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/15 08:02 PM
2

No.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/15 07:59 PM
1

Oh, I thought you were a man. Since when do RPWs sleep with men who's name they don't even know?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/15 07:59 PM
1

I've had ons with men whos last names I didn't know Are you a TRPAlt? I didn't even know that sub was active.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/15 07:56 PM
1

He is endorsed because of his content. Is that what you're saying, or what other people would say? Both. In this thread he has three mods, several ECS, and the avatar of brodin defending him. He's not an embarrassment to The Red Pill. He's exemplifies it and they laud him for it. I have absolutely no idea where you decided that TRP tries to be nice and politically correct, or at least look that way, but the notion is 100% false. The problem is, I don't believe that all red pillers are scums of t…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/15 07:54 PM
4

/r/Seduction is a place for white knights who aren't man enough for the red pill to go complain that they're afraid to approach women. Even they know that they're content blows which is why almost nothing they write gets more than ten upvotes. It's not manipulative at all because it's so unbelievably castrated that they're afraid to manipulate. TRP on the other hand, literally posts guides to manipulation.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/15 07:50 PM
5

Why do you think TRPs want women in their lives if they hate them so much?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/15 12:16 AM
4

Well, it's mostly a criticism on the concept of claiming someone as an "endorsed contributor" and what it truly means. Also, I don't claim it's horrible. If I claimed it was horrible, that leaves room for the possibility it wasn't. Why is this so hard for you to understand? CisWhiteMaelstrom isn't a nice guy and red pill isn't a nice place. He's not endorsed despite that sort of content. He's endorsed BECAUSE of that content. All you're really getting at is that you're not red pill and you disag…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/15 12:10 AM
2

Has he never looked on /r/MGTOW? Cis said some tame shit compared to them. Blue pill's pathetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 09:53 PM
4

CisWhiteMaelstrom's red pill knowledge is on point. He really gets the philosophy and that's what red pill optimizes for. We don't give a shit if he's not nice. People who were red pill were horrified by the thread and the idea behind it. The MGTOW guy? Fuck MGTOW. He was probably never actually red.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 09:43 PM
1

I think you misread it. Buffalos are the alphas here.
/r/TheRedPill17/12/15 02:19 AM
3

What a well formulated argument!
/r/TheRedPill06/12/15 03:05 AM
4

That's what all non-nuclear shit tests from women are.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/15 12:47 AM
18

More like a "Get out of jail for the price of a divorce-rape" card. I still hope he takes it.
/r/TheRedPill04/12/15 03:30 AM
15

No, I'm analyzing what he was probably thinking while writing to try and give a more full picture. I like the little angry paragraph and I think its mere existence says something deeply red pill about the whole thing. However, without acknowledging that it's not productive narration, you miss that message.
/r/TheRedPill04/12/15 02:07 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter