TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Malickcinemalover Archive

View 1 post and 43 comments by Malickcinemalover on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-2

and if that wasn't bad enough your actually getting defensive about it A bit of the pot calling the kettle black here, eh? comes across incredibly insecure more pot kettle black seeing your multitude of posts on "datingover30" it would appear I hit the nail squarely on the head ouch except for the intentional grammer mistakes in this comment good cover ETA: Look man, I just want you know that my intention truly was not to belittle you or make you feel bad for spelling something wrong. I know a l…
/r/MensRights14/11/23 12:00 PM
14

It was not a grammar correction; it was a spelling correction. I wouldn't say it's slight. You clearly didn't know how that word was spelled. This is fine, but many people like to know when they are spelling words incorrectly so that that they don't continue to make the same mistake. Whether you like or not, people will make inferences (consciously or not) about you and your intelligence if you don't have a good command of language. Would you like another? Grammer grammar Do you have anything mo…
/r/MensRights13/11/23 07:47 PM
15

persay * per se I agree with your reply.
/r/MensRights13/11/23 06:39 PM
1

OED was the first major authority to adopt it. However, generally accepted formal usage is not based on a singular authority. And also, dictionaries typically inform the generally accepted formal usage in terms of the style guides. It was only in the last decade that most other major authorities adopted it in the formal sense (and, still, not all of them have). People learning English as a second language (which is what spawned this side topic) are typically going to learn based on generally acc…
/r/MensRights19/10/23 12:17 PM
2

"He or she" was correct right up until about 10-12 years ago. Most major writing manuals have now opted for "they" as singular. "He or she" isn't wrong, but it is seen as clunky. Now that "they" is acceptable, it's more concise.
/r/MensRights19/10/23 10:51 AM
2

both formally and informally, done with they/them pronouns, and has been for decades. This is just factually incorrect. Formally, as I pointed out with references in my comment, it has not been done for decades. Prior to the last decade, the standard for an unknown person was to say "him or her". Wayyy back in the day, the standard at one point was masculine-dominant where unknown parties were referred to with "him". You're right that it has been done informally for decades, though.
/r/MensRights19/10/23 10:50 AM
-1

It's still a singular person. But yes, it's often used to apply to a non-specific person.
/r/MensRights19/10/23 01:38 AM
18

i understand it's hard for non native speakers that haven't had formal education on the english language (not american dialect) but it's not wrong grammatically Right up until about 10-12 years ago, it was wrong grammatically at least in the formal sense. And according to some noteworthy style guides, it is still grammatically incorrect. I took technical writing classes during my undergrad in early 2000s and "they/them" as a singular pronoun was strictly informal. Most writing guides loosened th…
/r/MensRights18/10/23 11:57 PM
-7

Sorry, the analogy makes no sense. The OP is about women giving other women dating advice. Women aren't trying to "catch" other women (the fish in your analogy) in most cases.
/r/MensRights12/06/23 11:38 PM
-1

You don't ask a fish how to catch a fish. You ask a fisherman. Who is the fish in this analogy? Men? So, don't ask a man how to get a man? I don't follow.
/r/MensRights12/06/23 11:08 PM
2

a passionate and artistic women *woman I am honestly not saying this to nitpick. I noticed you made the same error in the OP. Correct language usage is often a signal of intelligence and, thus, is attractive to women. So, it is on topic. It's a common mistake. It's easy to remember by thinking: singular: man, woman plural: men, women P.S. I agree with your general view from the OP. We certainly should be allowed to have preferences and each time I have dated someone who has slept with many men i…
/r/MensRights23/01/23 08:20 PM
3

Doesn’t change that neither of them should’ve been violent toward each other, 100% To me, this is less a man vs. woman thing and more a two-fucked-up people that have a toxic relationship and too much too drink, and one outweighs the other by 100+ lbs with a massive strength advantage. She was wrong. He was definitely wrong. I don't this is a situation men's right folks should focus on.
/r/MensRights04/01/23 06:21 PM
-14

I am a subscriber of this sub and a UFC fan. This ain’t the one man. Dana has been known to be making a fool of his wife having a mistress for years. Colby Covington famously filmed them together in a casino when he approached Dana for a title shot. Now that’s not an excuse for violence. But the long video shows him holding her wrist not letting her leave when she wanted to. She slapped him not very hard. He smacked her three times and pushed her to the ground. I doubt she’s a saint but he was o…
/r/MensRights04/01/23 01:13 AM
2

We are sexual creatures and we have needs. We all have our preferences, and for the most part, we didn't "choose" to have them. This actually doesn't align with basic evolutionary biology/psychology. When one person has a standard (e.g. 6 feet for height) which only 15% of the dating population possesses, then it's not an ingrained preference because humans have been successfully mating/pro-creating forever and if heigh were such a desirable trait intrinsically, the majority of us would be over …
/r/MensRights10/11/22 12:15 PM
2

Similar to a white knight I guess
/r/MensRights23/10/22 03:22 AM
0

A lot of missing context. Did she tell him how important a grand proposal was? How she envisioned it? If yes, then them's the breaks. He fucked up and gotta live with the consequences. If she wanted him to read her mind (which, if I had to bet, is the case given that she's the type of person to potentially throw away a life partner over a proposal), then he dodged a bullet and should cut ties. The real shitty part is her taking a month "break", which is essentially a punishment. Anyway, I don't …
/r/MensRights20/10/22 09:29 PM
1

in Canada it may be fair , but in alot of other places it isn't. We've come full circle. Glad you are now agreeing with me. That's literally the main point I made where you initially started disagreeing with me: She is right in that it depends on the country. All I said was it depends on the country. I gave an example to support that. Either you got your threads mixed up or you need to lay off whatever substances you're on.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 08:01 PM
0

Re-read my comments above. The actual amount is determined by these tables as is whether they get it. A judge can’t just decide to rule against the tables. Obviously not the same everywhere.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 07:17 PM
0

I know what they were saying. What I am saying is that family court judges in some places have less say in child support payment amounts as it's pre-established according to standard calculations.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 04:48 PM
5

She is right in that it depends on the country. I live in Canada and have seen first hand the mother paying child support. That was a case of 50/50 custody where the mother (she was my ex - kids were from previous relationship) out-earned the father. We have a set of tables that have a pretty straightforward calculation regardless of gender. The amounts are based on the income of each parent, the exceptional expenses of each parent, and the custody proportion.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 02:05 PM
11

The She Hulk series. Mark Ruffalo who was the Hulk said that its poor reviews were because of misogyny. https://www.outkick.com/mark-ruffalo-thinks-its-racist-and-sexist-to-not-like-she-hulk-series/
/r/MensRights20/09/22 11:20 PM
27

You are missing u/IceCorrect's point. Under the ACA, insurance companies are prohibited from charging women more than men Even for healthcare, under that definition, they can charge men more than women.
/r/MensRights14/09/22 11:59 AM
7

It's all dependent on the situation. If the woman forwent her education and/or career progression to stay home, then a divorce does legitimately put her back a few steps. I think temporary alimony (for maybe a few years - all dependent on the situation) makes sense in that case. I'd see it as no different if the man agreed to be a stay at home dad (which is obviously not as common).
/r/MensRights07/09/22 05:15 PM
18

I still think there are genuine issues faced by women that aren’t faced by men (and vice versa of course!). If everyone could just admit this, it would be a first step to open and honest communication. Women have issues societally that men do not face. Men have issues societally that women do not face. If both sides could understand that it's not an us vs. them, I think we could actually see progress on these issues.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 03:44 PM
1

This is something that's occurred to me with the whole "gender wage gap" debate and the steps that have been taken to get women into higher paying jobs. They don't want equality. They want only the good things. It's like I say I have a million dollars in the bank. And I owe $800k on my credit card. They say it's not fair that they don't have a million dollars, too. So they fight for equal bank balance and get it, but they don't want any part of that credit card debt. This is actually being refle…
/r/MensRights02/09/22 02:56 PM
8

That is sympathy/pity/treating someone like a child. I Yup! I had an ex that would constantly talk about her "mama bear" mentality and how much empathy she gained by having kids. Yet, I'd have to painstakingly walk her through what certain experiences would be like from a different vantage point (usually talking about mine). She totally confused sympathy with empathy. Now that's just one instance, totally anecdotal. I don't really have a firm opinion one way or the other.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 10:58 PM
1

This has been my experience. There's always a marked change in behaviour if you show any classically feminine emotions (e.g. sadness, worry) in an outward manner. I do wonder if it's a subconscious thing on their part. Like they mean it when they say it about wanting emotional vulnerability in a man. Then when they get it, it's like a switch is flipped and they realize they don't. They get the "ick".
/r/MensRights29/08/22 05:39 PM
1

I agree with most of your comment in terms of the overall message. However: where the alphas get all the women Don't slip into the red pill non-sense, man. "Alphas" aren't a real thing. There are men have that more desirable traits (good looks, height, career/status, confidence) but the "alpha" thing is pseudoscience. It was originally a term coined in the study of wolves which the original researched later rescinded. Within the chimp community, the ones that many might describe as "alpha" are s…
/r/MensRights27/08/22 05:17 PM
38

Why do young women think they can obtain those kind of men? I suspect part of it is because they do obtain highly desirable men in non-serious relationship/hookups. Studies show that in online dating, about 80% of the women are vying for about 10% of the men. Given the huge prevalence of hook up/non-serious dating culture, that means those top 10% of guys are churning through all those women. You end with a select few guys who have hundreds of sexual partners, spread out among those 80% of women…
/r/MensRights27/08/22 03:39 AM
1

constellation I noticed you used this word here and in another reply. I've never seen it used in such a context and have only known it to mean a pattern of stars. How are you using it here?
/r/MensRights22/08/22 03:20 PM
9

It depends on how you define "equally measuring work". When studies have controlled for actual job, hours worked, and education level, the gap is less than 1%. The problem with many "equal work" studies is that it considers amount of work but not the actual job. Not every hour of work is created equal.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 10:11 PM
67

Puck bunnies are for real. They throw themselves at the hockey players left and right here in Canada.
/r/MensRights02/08/22 11:32 PM
16

- Of college graduates, the percent is 35% male and 36.4% female Typo?
/r/MensRights25/07/22 01:58 AM
6

No, you are not following - it's a logical argument. If A then B. This, in no way, discusses the truth or validity or argument A. It only says "if we accept A as true then...". Everyone is emphatically saying A is not true in this case. I say this honestly and without judgment: you should consider an intro logic or intro critical thinking class (usually in Philosophy departments at universities). It will give you a good introduction to logical underpinnings of such statements and how argumentati…
/r/MensRights22/07/22 04:40 PM
16

It's so ingrained that some of us guys even buy it. My first sexual experience was, in retrospect, a situation where I was taken advantage of by a person in a position of relative power. I felt so weird and numb for the weeks after and was so confused because I was erect and I didn't say no so it didn't occur to me for years that it was not a consensual situation.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 04:26 PM
5

Dude I live in Canada. Almost every rec league and most youth leagues ban body checking. Most women’s leagues do as well. For the longest time, even the pro women couldn’t body check. It’s only typically allowed in high level hockey.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 01:05 PM
3

Yes, misogyny is defined only by the recipient of the hate or prejudice (i.e. that it's a woman). Women can act hateful toward other women on the basis of their gender. It's weird but can happen.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 05:38 PM
0

One tool such bad actors use is to purposefully write poorly defined "Rules" then apply them selectively, whenever they feel like censoring a valid idea. Who are you talking about here? The mods write the rules for the sub, not the reddit admins. You're all over the place.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 12:03 PM
0

The mods of this sub are bad actors who dislike men’s rights being discussed? How does that make sense?
/r/MensRights27/06/22 11:38 AM
1

I don't know why you're explaining it to me that my post might get removed. I don't care. Yet you keep telling me about this potential rule break about a potential interpretation.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 01:41 AM
3

There's nothing in my comment that encourages brigading. I will let the mods sort that out. If they don't agree, they can delete my comment.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 01:17 AM
12

Actually the reason I ended up back subscribed to this sub was a reply in the r/relationships subreddit (I always regret opening my mouth there). The post was about a woman who body shamed her man for being too skinny and then looked through his search history which was riddled with searches like "do women hate skinny bodies" and "do i need muscles for my girlfriend to love me" and she was surprised that he was emotionally affected by her badgering him about his body. One reply blamed men not fe…
/r/MensRights26/06/22 10:56 PM
1

"Common" is relative. Other characteristics that only 2% of the population have: - Being over 6'3" -Having a penis over 7" -Having a salary of $150k per year (Canada) The point is we all know people who are tall or who might have a pretty big dick or makes good money. 2% isn't extremely prevalent but it is common enough for everyone to know someone who is in that population subset. 2% is "common" enough for this discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/20 02:58 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter